(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us) Upload
See other formats

Full text of "A body of divinity: wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's larger catechism"

.^"^ 



J 





U3h 



DivistcijT 
No. Case, 

No. Bool-, J, : 








V 



. 1 




tyu^f ' 




/fll 



- ^i 



A 

BODY OF DIVINITY 



WMERIiilf THE 



DOCTRINES 



OF THE 

CHRISTIAN RELIGION 

ARE EXPLAINED AND DEFENDED. 

B£IXQ THE 

SUBST.ijYCi; OF SEVERAL LECTURES 
ON 

THE ASSEMBLY'S LARGER CATECHISM. 
BY THOMAS RIDGLEY, D. D. 

WITH NOTES, ORIGINAL AND SELECTED, 
BY JAMES P. WILSON, D. D. 

IN FOUR yOLU:MES. 
VOL. L 



jrnsT AMmiCAV, fbom the third elroiean EaiTmx 



PHILADELPHIA : 

rUINTrB BT jSSl' FOR 'WirLTA?!. "W. WOODWAnn, COHXEH Cr CnESXVT AND SOUTH 
6J;C0XD STREETt.. 

1814. 



Piistrict of Pennsylvania^ to wit: 

BE IT REMEMBERED, That on the seventeenth day of May, iii 

^ , the thirty-eighth year of the Independence of the United States of 

America, A. D. 1813, WiUiam W. Woodward, of the said District, 

hath deposited in this office the title of a Book, the right whereof he 

claims as proprietor, in the words following, to wit : 

" A Body of Divinitj- : wherein the doctrines of the christian religion, are ex- 
'-'' plained and defended. Being the substance of several lectures on the Assem- 
" bly's larger catechism. By Thomas Ridglpy, D. D. With notes, original and 
"selected, by James P. Wilson, D. D. In four volumes. First American, from 
"" the thii-d European Edition." 

In conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States, intitled, " An 
Act for the encouragement of Learning, by securing the Copies of Maps, Charts 
and Books, to the ;nithors and proprietors of such Copies during the times there- 
in mentioned." — And also to the Act, entitled " An Act supplementary to An 
Act, entitled " An act for the encomagement of Learning, by securing the Co- 
pies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the authors and proprietors of such Copies 
durmg the times therein mentioned," and extending the benefits thereof to the 
♦rts of designing, engraving, and etching historical and other prints." 

D. CALDWELL, Clerk of the 
District of Pennsylvania. 



rO THE READER. 

In this Jirst American edition the original text remains un- 
altered^ the notes xoJiich Dr. Ridglerj had subjoined to his xvork 
are retained^ and for the sake of distinction^ printed in Italics^ 
The other notes have been added by Dr. Wilson ; and in every 
instance xuherein they have been selected by him from others^ 
they are accompanied by marks of quotation, and the name of 
the author or book from whence they zvere taken. 



THE 

PREFACE. 

ri^HE influence which the different sentiments of men, in 
JL matters of religion, have, for the most part, on their tem- 
per and behaviour towards one another, affords very little 
ground to expect that any attempt to explain or defend the 
most important doctrines of Christianity, should not be treat- 
ed with dislike and opposition by some, how much soever it 
may afford matter of conviction to others. This consideration 
' would have put a stop to my pen, and thereby saved me a great 
deal of fatigue, in preparing and publishing the following 
sheets, had it not been over-balanced by what I cannot, at pre- 
sent, think any other than a sense of dut)'^, in compliance with 
the call of providence. I heartily v/ish there were no occasion 
to vindicate some of the great doctrines of the gospel, which 
were more generall}^ received in the last age, than at present, 
from misrepresentation, as though the method in which they 
had been explained led to licentiousness, and the doctrines 
themselves, especially those of election, particular redemption, 
efficacious grace, and some others, that depend upon them, 
were inconsistent with the moral perfections of the divine na- 
ture : these are now traduced by many, as though they were 
new and strange doctrines, not founded on scripture, nor to 
be maintained by any just methods of reasoning deduced from 
it, or as if the duties of practical religion could not be inculca- 
ted consistently therewith. If this insinuation were true, our 
preaching would be vain, our hope also vain, and we should 
be found false witnesses for God, and have no solid ground 
whereon to set our feet, which would be a most tremendous 
thought. And, if this be not sufficient to justify my present 
undertaking, I have nothing to allege of equal weight. 

I must cpnfess, that when 1 took the first step, in order to 
the' setting this design on foot, by consenting that proposals 



IV llIE PREFACE. 

should be printed, about two years since, I reckoned it little 
other than an expedient to disengage myself from any farthei* 
thoughts, and my friends from any expectation of it, which I 
could noC well do, but by having a proof of the backwardness 
of persons to encourage, by subscription, a work which would 
be so very expensive to the undertakers ; but, the design be- 
ing countenanced, beyond what I could have imagined, and 
numbers subscribed for, with more expedition than is usual, I 
was laid under an obligation im.raediately to prepare my notes 
for the press, and set forward the work, which, through the 
divine goodness, has been thus far carried on ; and I cannot but 
I ^ke occasion to express my grateful acknowledgment of the 
respect that has been shewed me, by those who have encoura- 
ged this undertaking. If it may answer their expectation, and 
subserve their spiritual advantage, I shall count my labour well 
employed, and humbly offer the glory thereof, as a tribute due 
to God, whose interest is the only thing that demands all our 
time, strength, and utmost abilities. If I may but have a tes- 
timony from him that I have spoken nothing concerning him 
that is a dishonour to his name, unbecoming his perfections, or 
that has a tendency to lead his people out of the right way to 
tiie glorifying and enjoying of him, my end is fully answered. 
Whatever weakness I have discovered, arising from mine in- 
equality to the greatness of the subjects insisted on, I hope to 
obtain forgiveness thereof from God, whose cause I have en- 
deavoured to maintain ; and, to be excused by men, as I may 
truly say, I have not offered, either to him or them, what cost 
me nothing. I have, as far as I am able, adapted my method 
of reasoning to the capacities of those who are unacquainted 
with several abstruse and uncommon words and phrases, which 
have been often used by some who have treated on these sub- 
jects, which have a tendency rather to perplex, than improve 
the minds of men : terms of art, as they are sometimes (Called, 
or hard words, used by metaphysicians and schoolmen, have 
done little service to the cause of Christ^ 

If I have explained any doctrine, or given the sense of any 
scripture in a way somewhat different from what is commonly 
received, I ha\'e never done it out of the least affectation of 
singularity, nor taken pleasure in going out of the beaten path, 
having as great a regard to the footsteps of the fiock, as is con- 
sistent with that liberty of thinking and reasoning, v/hich we 
are allowed to use, who conclude nothing to be an infallible 
rule of faith, but the inspired writings. 

As to what I have advanced concerning the eternal genera- 
tion of the Son, and the procession of the Holy Ghost, I have 
thought myself obliged to recede from some common modes of 
explication, which have been used, both by ancient and modern 



THE PREFACE. v 

writers, in insisting on these mysterious doctrines, which, pro- 
bably, will appear, if duly weighed, not to have done any great 
service to the cause, which, with convincing evidence, thty 
have maintained; since it is obvious that this is the principal 
thing that has given occasion to some modern Arians to fill the 
inargins of their books with quotations, taken out of the wri- 
tings of others, whom they have either, M'itliout ground, pre- 
tended to have been on their side of the question, or charged 
with plucking down with one hand, what they have built up 
with the other. 

Whether my method of explaining these doctrines be reckon- 
ed just, or no, I cannot but persuade myself, that if what I have 
said, concerning the subordination of these divine persons, be 
considered in any other view, than as an explication of the Son- 
ship of Christ, and the procession of the Holy Ghost, it will 
not be reckoned a deviating from the common faith of those 
who have defended the doctrine of the ever-blessed Trinity ; 
and, if it be an error to maintain that these divine persons, as 
well as the Father, are independent, as to their personality, as 
v/cll as their essence, or to assert that the maimer of their hav- 
ing the divine essence, as some express it, is independent, as 
well as the essence itself, then what I have delivered, on that 
subject, is to no purpose, which, when I am convinced of, I 
shall readily acknowledge my mistake, and count it an happi- 
ness to be undeceived. 

As to what respects the decrees of God, and more particu- 
larly those that relate to angels and men, and his providence, 
as conversant about sinful actions, and the origin of moral evil, 
I have endeavoured to account for them in such a way, as, I 
trust, does not in the least, infer God to be the author of sin ; 
nor have I, in any instance, represented God as punishing sin, 
or determining to do it, out of his mere sovereignty, as though 
he designed to render his creatures miserable, without consi- 
dering them as contracting guilt, and thereby procuring this to 
themselves. And, when I have been led to insist on the free- 
ness of divine grace, and the covenant of grace, as made witli 
Christ, and, in him, with the elect, and maintained the abso- 
luteness and independency hereof on the will of man to render 
it effectual to salvation, I have, notwithstanding, said as much 
as is necessary concerning the conditionality of <^ur claim to the 
blessings thereof, and the inseparable connexion that there is 
between practical religion and salvation, which fences against 
the charge that is often brought against this doctrine, as though 
it led to licentiousness. This I could not omit to mention, that 
the reader might not entertain groundless prejudices against 
some of the doctrines insisted on, before he duly weighs the 
method in which they are handled, or considers whether my 



vi THE PREFACE. 

defence of them against the popular objections, of that or any 
other kind, be just or no. Some, it may be, will see reason to 
conclude that it is ; and others, who think that there are many 
unsurmountable difficulties on our side of the que^stion, may be 
convinced, tliat there are difficulties of another nature, as great, 
if not greater, attending the opposite scheme, which they them- 
selves maintain. But this I rather chuse to submit to the im- 
partial judgment of those who are not disposed to condemn a 
doctrine, without desiring to know what may be said in its de- 
fence. 

As to Avhat concerns the work in general, it may be obser- 
ved, that when I have occasion to illustrate an argument, by 
7naking use of any criticism that may be of advantage to it, or 
to give the sense of ancient writers, either for or against what 
I have laid down, I have inserted it in Italics in the notes, that 
it might not appear to be a digression, or break the thread of 
the discourse. 

Though the title of CA'ery page mentions only the general 
subject of the question, there is a table prefixed to each vol- 
lume, that comprises the contents thereof, laid down in such a 
form, as that the reader may easily see the heads of argument, 
under every question, in their proper method and connexion. 

And, at the end, there is an index of scriptures, in which 
only those are inserted that are either more largely or concise- 
ly explained. This, together with the table, was drawn up by a 
kind brother, which I thankfully acknowledge, as having afford- 
ed me more leisure to attend to the work itself.* 

As to what concerns the second edition,! it was undertaken at 
the request of some who did not expect that the former would 
be so soon out of print. That which gives me great satisfaction 
is, the acceptance it has met with from many judicious divines 
and others, in North- B ritain ; and I cannot but reckon the 
honour that the learned professors in the university of Aber- 
deen did me, in signifying their approbation of it, much more 
to be desired, than the highest titles that could have been con- 
ferred upon me without it. 

I have nothing farther to trouble the reader with in this pre- 
face; but would only request of him, that, what thoughts soever 
he may entertain concerning the way in which I have endea- 
voured to state and defend some great and important truths, he 
1 -ould search the scriptures, and explain them agreeably to the 
divine })crtections, and not think the worse of the gospel, v/hich 
stands upon a firmer basis, than the weak efforts of fallible men, 
vvho use their best endeavours to defend it. If we had not a 

* .9/1(1 besides the nbm^e-mentioned Indexes there arc no7v added to this edition an 
i^phabetical index to thf xvhole matter's contained in the vork. 

^ And the ^nmr reason mnv be assigned -why this third is now offered to the puhUc. 



THE PREFACE. vii 

surer rule of faith, than the methods of human reasoning, re- 
ligion would be a matter of great uncertainty, and we should 
be in danger of being tossed to andfro^ and carried about -with 
every wind of doctrine. But our best security against this, will 
be our having hearts established with grace, and rightly dis- 
posed to make a practical improvement of what we learn ; and, 
if we are enabled to follow on to know the Lord with minds 
free from prejudice, and, if under a due sense of our weakness^ 
we humbly present our supplications to him, who is able to 
make us wise to salvation, we may then hope to attain to that 
knowledge of the truth, as it is in Jesus, which shall be atten- 
ded with peace and comfort here, and crowned with blessed- 
ness and glory hereafter. 

May the great God, in whose hand is the life and usefulness 
of all men, succeed, with his blessing, \7hat is humbly offered 
to his service, s© far as it is adapted thereunto, and approved 
of by him, that hereby it may be conducive to the spiritual ad- 
vantage of professing families, and the rising generation. 



THE CONTENTS 



OF THE FIRST VOLUME. 



Quest. I. Of glorifying God, and the enjoyment of 
him. 

WITH what distinction the glorifying and enjoymeJit of God 
may both be said to be marDs chief and highest end. Page 13 

What it is to glorify God ibid 

Hoxv God glorifies himself ibid 

Hoxv creatures glorify hitn 14* 

What it^ is to enjoy God 1 7 

The connexion between glorifying God and the enjoyment of 

him 1 8 

Contentedness to perish^ that God may be glorified, unjustly 
made a mark of grace 19 

To be quickened to duty by a respect to the heavenly glory, no 
sign of a mercenary spirit 20 

Quest, II. Of the Being of a God. 

Reasons -why we should be able to prove this by arguments 21 
The Being of a God may be evinced. 

From the light of nature ibid 

What meant thereby ibid 

How it proves the Being of a God 22 

From the works of creation- 24 

from creatures beloiv man Z% 

from the structure ofmarCs body 33 

from the nature of his soul 34 

from the nature and office of conscience 3S 

from the boundless desires of the soul 37 

From the consent of all natiotis ibid 

Objection, That there have been some speculative Atheists, 

answered 38 

The belief of a God took not its rise from human policy 40 

It was not propagated merely by traditio7i ibid 

From the works of providence 41 

From the foretelling future events 42 

From the provision made for all 43 

ParttQularly for man^s safety 44 



4P THE CONTENTS. 

The Gbjeciions taken from the prosperity of the wicked, an^ 
suuered 45 

Nothing short of revelatiori sitfficient to give a saving discovery 
of God 47 

Quest. III. Of the Holy Scripture. 

The -names given to it 48 

Why called a Testament 50 

Hoxv the want of a written xvord was supplied to the church be- 
fore Moses 52 
Whether the churchy under the Old Testament, understood the 

spiritual meayiing of the laws contained in it 53 

Whether the prophets understood their own predictio7is 54> 

How far the Old Testament is still a rule 56 

How the scriptures are a complete revelation of the will of 

God 58 

The scripture a siifficient rule of faith and obedience 59 

Its properties xis a rule 61 

It is the only rule ' ibid 

Human traditions of no divine authority 62 

The Popish doctrine of them confuted ibid 

The Canon of scripture preserved entire 65 

Js not perverted 66 

Que s T. IV. Of the Divine Authority of the Scriptures. 

In zvhat respects called divine 69 
A divine revelation necessary 71 
Not contrary to God''s perfections ibid 
Inspiratio?i not impossible 72 
The scripture proved to be the word of God 
From the majesty of its style 73 
From the purity of its doctrines ■. 74 
Its holiness considered absolutely ibid 
And as compared zuith other writings 76 
From the harmony of all its parts 78 
Dr, Paley on the genuineness of the scriptures, in a note 79 
Its harmony shexvn in the accomplishment of many predic- 
tions 86 
It doth not contradict itself 87 
Various objections answered 88 
Rides for reconciling seeming contradictions in scripture 94 
Grotius on their authority, in a note 97 
From its scope and design 98 
From the character of the penmen 102 
These were faithful ibid 
They were not imposed on * 106 



THE CONTENTS. iii 

Hoxv they might know they -were under inspiration 108 

They mistook not the deviCs impressions for divitie revela- 
tion 109 
The words as ivell as matter of scripture were given by iyi- 
spiration 110 
From its aiitiquity and preservation 112 
From the testimony of God by miracles ibid 
Two objections answered 114, 115 
By the conviction and conversion of sinners 116 
IIo^o Christians come to a full persuasion of the divinity of 
scripture 118 
7 he inward testimony of the Spirit explained ibid 

Quest. V, VI. The principal matters contained in 

scripture 
Quest. VII. Of the nature and perfections of God. 

Hoxv rve may conceive aright of the divine perfections ibid 
Of the communicable aiid incommunicable perfections of God 122 
Nothing common between God and the creature ibid 

God is a Spirit ; what a Spirit is 123 

Difference between other spiritual substances and God 124 
Independent 124! Infnitely perfect 126 

All-siifficient 127. When this perfection is in effect denied 127 
Eternal 129. His eternal duration not successive 132. How 

the parts of time are attributed to God 133 

Immutable. IVhen immutability is a perfection. Hoxv peculiar 

to God 135. Arguments to prove him so 136 

Incomprehensible 138 

Omnipresent 139, arid Almighttj 140 

Wherein his poxver appears 141 

What things God ca7inot do 142 

The improvement of this subject 143 

Omniscient 145. He knows all future contingencies 147 

Properties of God'' s knoxvledge 149. Its improvement 150 

When it is practically denied^ ibid. 
Wisdom of God infinite 15^ 

Different from knoxvledge ibid 

Wherein it appears ibid 

In Creation 154. Providence IS 5. Redemption^ 156 

In the C07istant government of thq church ibid 

Inferences from God^s wisdom 158 

Holiness of God infnite 159 

What it is^ ibid. Instances of it 160 

His suffering the entrcmce ofsin^ was no refection on it 161 
' Tis the standard of doctrines 1 62 

Instances of doctrines whigh lead to licentimtsness 162, IQ? 



iv 



THE CONTENTS. 



When God's holiness is contemned 16o 

yustice of God infinite 1 64 

Hoxv distinguished from his holiness ibid 

Glory ^ how called a rexvard 167 

Affictions of believers not properly a punishment ibid 

Mercy and grace of God infinite 168 

Difference betiveen goodness^ mercy, grace, and patience 169 

Mercy is either comtno7i or special 1 71 

Grace free ajid sovereign 172 

Discriminating 173. Instances of it, ibid. Afflictions not 

inconsistent xvith it 174 

Leads not to licentiousjicss ibid 

Patience of God, what it is 176 

Whether devils are objects of it ibid 

Instances of God'' s patience 178 

Wherein manifested to the wicked 1 79 

Not inconsistent with justice 181 

How to be improved 183 

By xvhojn it is abused 1 84 

Truth., God is abundant therein 1 86 

Hoxv he is called a God of truth 187 

Faithfulness of God, ibid. No impeacluneni hereof that some 

threatenings have not been executed 188. Nor that some 

promises have not presently been performed 190 

IIoxv this perfection is to be improved 191 

Quest. VIII. Of the Unity of the Godhead. 

How God is styled the living God 194 

Unity of the Godhead proved ibid 

Abemethy 07i that subject, in a note 197 

Was not denied by the xviser Heathen 200 

Inferences from it 202 

Hoxv xve should conceive of it 203 

Different 7nodes used in speaking of the perfections of God 204 

Quest. IX, X, XI. Of the Doctrine of tlie Trinity, 

Calvin on the word Person, iri a note 207 

The doctrine of the highest importance 209 

Hoxv to determijie the importance of a doctrine 211 

What knowledge of it necessary to salvation 213 

It is a great mystery^ 214. What a 7nystery is, ibid. 

It is incomprehensible 216 

Dr. Bates on mysteries, in a note 217 

Objections on this account ansxvered 220 

Whether to receive it be to use zuords without ideas ibid 

Whether the revelation of it be unintelligible 221 



THE CONTENTS. v 

Whether that which is unintelligible be the object of faith 222 

How this doctrine promotes religion 223 

Li what sense revelation is an improvement of the light of 

nature 224 

j^ot contrary to reason^ though above it 226 

When a doctrine is coJitrary to reason ibid 

It is not chargeable with Tritheism 227 

The use of reason in proving doctrines of pure revelation 229 

It cannot be known by the light of nature 230 

How it was made known to Adam ibid 

Whether the heathen knew it 231 

Whitaker on the word Logos used by the jfews, in a 

note " 233 

Trinity, ?iot to be illustrated by similitudes 235 

Rules for interpreting scriptures relating to it 236 

The word Trinity explained 239 

Person, the word explained 239 

The difference between divine and human persons 242 

Sacred Three j iji what respect One 243 

Dr, famieson on the Trinity^ in a note 243 

How their glory equal^ how the same ibid 

Personality of the Son^ 248. Of the Spirit 250 

~ Not metaphorically ascribed to either 252 

Eternal generation of the Son, hoxv understood by many 259 

Another vxethod of accounting for it 261 

This account thereof proved 264 

Scriptures relating to Chrisfs sonship explained , 2T4> 

Christ's sonship as Mediator, considered 276 

Another view of the subject, m a note 279 

Procession of the Spirit, how understood by ma7iy, 260. What 

it is 261 

The scripture doctrine of it 280 

Oeconomy of the sacred Three explained 291 

How distinct works are ascribed to them 292 

The Deity of the Son proved 

From his divine names 295 

Jehovah God^s incommunicable name ' 296 

Never given to creatures 297 

It is not applied to angels ' 301 

Chrises Deity proved from it 302 

God an^ Lord, hoxv applied in scripture 304 

Christ's Deity proved thereby 306 

This argued from 1 Tim. iii. 16. 311 

And from Acts xx. 28. 313. Rom. ix. 5. ibid. 

From 1 John v. 20. 315. Isa. ix. 6. 317 

From Titus ii. 13. ibid, John xx. 2fi. 319 

When the word God is used absolutely 321 

Its mea?ung when so used 321 



vi THE CONTENTS. 

In xvltat sense Christ is styled God by the Socinians 322 

From the ascriptio?i of the divine nature to him in Col. ii. 9. 325 

In Philip, ii. 6. this explained and defended 326 

Gemmieness of 1 John v. 7. defended 329 

From his conference with the Jews 335 

Fro7n his Attributes 342 
Eternity^ 343. Immutability^ ibid. 

Omnipresence 345 

This proved from John iii. 13. 347 

Omniscience^ 349. Objections answered 350 

OmnipoteJicy 352 

From his glorious titles 353 

From his work of creation 357" 

The Socinian account thereof 359 

Christ no instrument in creation 361 

Hoxv the Father made the world by him 362 

3Ien onhj moral instruments in miracles 365 

From his works of providence 366 

Christ the Governor of all things 367 

From his acting- as Judge 368 

Subserviency of his kingdom to the Father 371 

Christ as Mediator beloxv^ yet equal with the Father 374 
Inferiority of Christy how to be understood in scripture 376 

From the rvorship paid him 377 

Christ the Object sf religious worship 379 

From Baptism 382 

From the doxologies applied to him 386 
Anti-Trinitarians differ about the worship due to Christ 388 

Right to divine worship is incommunicable 389 

Objections against the deity of Christ answered 391 

Dr. Priestley'' s disingenuity^ in a i\ote C97 

Of the divinity of the Holy Ghost 398 
His divinity proved 

From Acts v. 3, 4. 400 

From his divine Attributes 404 

From his divine works 405 

Such works performed by him 407 

From the xuorship given to him 408 

Objections answered 410 

Practical inferences from the doctrine of the Trinity 414 

Quest. XII, XIII. Of God's Decrees. 

Some things premised in general 4-17 

Dissuasives from prejudices 419 

The general method laid down 421 

J/i what sense God fore-ordained all tlwigs 422 

That he did so, proved 424 

Dr. Smalley on the origin of sin (vide p. 532) 425 



THE CONTENTS. vii 

Purpose of God free^ wise, holy 432 

J^oxv it re7idtrs salvation necessary 4{S'i 

It is unchangeable 481 

RepeJitance, how ascribed to God 483 

Predestination, the xvord explained 433 

Consequences of denying it 499 

Election, the word explained 434 

Hoiv used in the Old Testament 438 

Hoxv in the Nezu . 441 

Fathers, their sense about this doctrine 507 

Election to salvation asserted i?i scripture 442 

Churches, how styled elect 443 

Chosen, part of mankind -were so 447 

These styled a Remnant 449 

A Remnant chosen out of the Jews 450 

Men elected to sanctijication as well as salvation 461 

Acts xiii. 48. explained and defended 463 

Men chosen in Christ 467 

Supra-lapsarian and Sub-lapsarian schemes differ 446 

Proofs of the doctrine of Election 

from God''s fore-knowledge 452 

from his giving the means of grace 454 

Jacob loved, Esau hated, explained 456 

Objections answered 458 

"^he opposite doctririe, how defended 501 

Properties of Election 469 

Misrepresentations of it answered 465 

^Reprobation, ho-w to be explained 486 

Preterition a branch of it (vide the note, 529) 488 

Predamnation considered from Jude, ver. 4. 491 
Rom. ix. 22. and xi. 7 — 10. explained 492 
2 Thes. ii. 11, 12. Psal. Ixxxi. 12. John xii, 39, 40. ex- 
plained 494 

Wicked, how made for the day of evil . 495 

W ill of God secret and revealed 471 

Is free, sovereign, and unconditional 476 

Its absoluteness 477' 
That it is conditional, cannot be proved from scripture 480 

Conditional propositions, hoxv understood there 479 

How God xvill have all saved 501 

Expectation of God not disappointed bij the will of man 505 

God not really disappointed, grieved, or resisted 506 

Bounds of life fixed by h i?n 508 

Stoical fate, how it differs from God^s decrees 516 

Objections against Election answered 507 

Practical improvement of it 526 

JDr. Williams 9n election, in 9. note 529 



THE INTRODtCTlON. 



TiEFORE rue enter on our present undertakings xve shall pre^^ 
^ mise afeuo things leading- to the subject matter thereof; and 
that rue may begin "with xvhat is most obvious^ let it be considered^ 
I, That it is a dutij incumbent on all xvho profess the Chris- 
tian name^ to be -well acquainted zvith those great doctrines on 
zvhich our faith^ hope^ and -worship are founded ; for ^ -without 
the knowledge hereof xve ?nust necessarily be at a loss as to the 
rvay of salvation^ xuhich none has a right to prescribe^ but he 
who is the author thereof, (a) 



a " C«RisTiANiTT," it hath been said, *' is not founded m ai'gnment." If it were 
onlj' meaiit by these .words, that the relig-ion of Jesus could not, by the sing-le aid 
of reasoning, produce its full effect upon the heart ; eveiy true ChnstiiiU would 
cheerfully subscribe to them. No arg^lments unaccompanied by the iiifliiencesoi' 
the Holy Spirit ; can convert the toid from sin to God ; though even to such con- 
version, arguments are, by the agency of the Spirit, rendeied subservient. Again^ 
if we were to understand by this aphorism, that the principles of oiu- religion 
coidd never have been discovered, by the natural and unassisted faculties of man ; 
this position, I presume would be as little disputed as the former. But if, on tlie 
contrarj', under the cover of an ambiguous expression, it is intended to insinuate, 
that those principles, from then- very natm-e, can admit no rational evidence ot" 
titeir truth, (and this, by the way, is the only meiining which can avail oiu* an- 
tagonists) the gospel, as well as common sense, loudly reclaims against it. 

Tlie Lord Jesus Christ, the autlior of our religion, often tu-gued, both with his 
disciples and with his adversaries, as with reasonable men, on the principles ot 
reason, without this faculty, he well knew, they could not be susceptible either 
of religion or of law. He ai-gued from prophecy, and the conformity of the event 
to the prediction. Luke xxiv. 25, &c. John v. 39, & 46. He argued from the tes- 
timony of John the Baptist, who was generally acknowledged to be a prophet. John 
V. 32, & 33. He argued from the mu-acles which he himself performed, John v. 36. 
X. 25, 37, 38. xiv. 10, 11. as uncontrovertible evidences, that God Almiglity ope- 
rated by him, and had sent him. He espostulates with his enemies, that they did 
not use their reason on this subject. Why, says he, even of iiourselves judge ye nol 
■what is right ? Luke xii. 57. In like manner we are called upon by the apostles of 
our Lord, to act the part of wise men m\A. judge impartially of what they say. 1 Cor. 
X. 15. Tliose who do so, are highly commended, for the candour and prudence 
they discover, in an affair of so gi-eat consequence. Acts xvii. 11. We are even 
commanded, to be ahoays ready to give an ans-uvr to eveiy mtin that asketh us a rea- 
son of our hope ; 1 Pet. iii. 15. in meekness to instruct them that oppose themselves ; 
2 Tim. ii. 25. a7id earnestly to contend for thefuiih -which -was once delivered to the 
saints. Jude 3. God has neither in natural nor revealed religion, kfi himsef-oith' 
out a -tfitness ; but has in both given moral and external evidence, sufficient to 
convince the impartial, to silence tlie gainsayer, and to render inexcusable the 
atheist and the unbeliever. This evidence it is our duty to attend to, and candid- 
ly to examine. We must prove all things, as we are expressly enjoined in holy 
writ, if we would ever hope to holdfast that ishich is tjooii, 1 Thess. v. 21. 

Ci^rraiLL 

Vol. L B 



The INTRODUCTIOK 

II. This knowledge of divine truth must be derived from the 
holy scriptures^ ivhich are the only fountain of spiritual rvisdom^ 
whereby we are instructed in those things that could have been 
known no other way^ but by divine revelation, 

III. It will be of singular use for us not only to knoiv the 
doctrines that are contained in scripture ; but to observe their 
connexion and dependence on one another^ and to digest them hi" 
to such a method^ that subsequent truths may give light to them 
that zvent before ; or to lay them dotvn in such a zuay^ that the 
whole scheme of religion may be comprised in a narroxu com' 
pass^ and^ as it xuere^ beheld with one viexo^ which xvill be a very 
great help to memory : and this is what zue call a system of di- 
vine truths^ or a methodical collection of the chief articles of our 
religiofij adapted to the capacity of those who need to be taught 
the first principles of the oracles of God : and if they are de- 
signed to give the world a specimen of that form of sound words^ 
xvhich the church thinks itself obliged to holdfast^ and stedfast- 
ly to adhere to^ then xve call it a confession of faith ; or, if di' 
gested into questions and answers, xve call it a catechism. And 
though systems of divinity, confessiois of faith, and catechisniSy 
are treated xuith contempt, instead of better argutnents, by 771 any 
xvho are no friends to the doctrines xvhich they contain, and who 
appear to be partial in their resentment, in as viuch as they do 
not dislike those treatises xvhich are agreeable to their own- 
sentiments, by xvhatever ttame they are called ; yet xve are bound 
to conclude that the labours of those xvho liave been happy in the 
sense they have given of scripture, and the rnethod in xvhich they 
have explained the doctrines thereof, ifi xv hat form soever they 
have been, are a great blessing to us ; though we are far from 
concluding that they are of equal authority with scripture, or 
that every xvord xvhich they use is infallible ; nor do xve regard 
them cniy farther than as they are agreeable to, or suficiently 
proved from scripture. 

IV. Confessions of faith and catechisms are not to be reckoned 
a novel invention, or not consonant to the scripture rule, since 
they are nothing else but a peculiar xvay of preaching or instruct- 
ing us in divine truths. Therefore, since scripture lays down no 
certain invariable ride concerning this matter, the same covimand 
that xvarrants preaching the xvord in any method, includes the 
explaining of it, as occasion serves, in a catechetical 071c. 

V. As there are many excellent bodies of divinity printed in 
our oxvn and foreign languages, and collections of sermons o?i 
the principal heads thereof; so there are various catechisms, or 
methodicai summaries of divine truths jxvhich,xvhen consonant to 
scripture, are of great advantage to all Christians, whether el- 
der or younger. 

VL The catechisms composed by the Assembly of Divines at 



THE INTRODUCTION. 

JVestminster, are esteemed as not inferior to any that are extant,, 
either in our own or foreign langvcges^ the doctrines therein 
contained being of the highest importance^ and consonant to 
scripture; and the method in rvhich they are laid doxvn is so 
agreeable^ that it maij serve as a directory for the ranging our 
ideas of the commoti heads of divinity in such an order,, that 
ruhat occurs under each of them may be reduced to its proper 
place. It is the larger of them thatxve have attempted to explain 
and regulate our method by ; because it contabus several heads of 
divinity not touched on in the shorter. Aiid if in any particular 
instajice,, xue are obliged to recede from the common mode of speak- 
ings {though it is to be hoped not from the common faith,, 
once delivered to the saints J xue submit our reasoning to the 
judgment of those xuho are disposed to pardon less ttiistaies,, and 
improve xvhat comes xvith su^cient evidence to the best purposes. 
The xvork indeed,, is large,, but the vast variety of subjects 
zvill render it more tolerable ; the form in xvhich it appears is 
sometohat differing from that in xvhich it xvas first delivered^ in 
a public audience^ though that 7nay probably be no disadvantage 
to it,, especially since it is rather designed to be read in families 
than co?mnitted to 77ie?nory,, and repeated by different persons,, as 
it has been. The plainness of the .style may contribute to its 
usefulness ; audits being less cmbarassed with scholastic terms 
than some co7itroversial writings are,, 77iay re7ider it more i7itel- 
ligible to private Christians,, xvhose instructio7i a7id advantage is 
designed thereby. It xvoidd be too great a va7iity to expect that 
it should pass throxigh the xvorld xvithoiit that ce7isure which is 
co77imo7i to all atte^npts of the like nature^ si7ice me«V se)7ti77ients 
in divi7uty differ as much as their faces ; and S07ne are not dis- 
posed to xveigh those argU7nents that are brought to support any 
scheme of doctrine^ xvhich differs fro7n xvhat they have before re- 
ceived. Hoxvever^ the xvork C077ies forth xvith this adva7itage^ that 
it has already conflicted xvith some of the difficulties it is like to 
tneet xvith,, as xvell as bee7\ favoured xvith some success,, and there- 
fore the event hereof is left i}i his harid xvhose cause a7id truth 
is endeavoured to be inatntained. 



TIIE 

DOCTRINES 

OF THE 

CHRISTIAN RELIGION 

EXPLAINED AND DEFENDED. 



OF MAN'S CHIEF END. 

Quest. I. What is the chief and highest end of man P 

Answ. Man's chief and highest end is to glorify God, and 
fully to enjoy him for ever. 

1. TT is supposed, in this answer, that every intelligent crea- 
X ture, acting as such, designs some end, which excites en- 
deavours to attain it. 

2. The ends for which we act, if warrantable, may be consi- 
dered as to their degree of excellency, and, in proportion to it, 
are to be pursued by proper means conducing thereto. 

3. There is one that may be termed the chief and highest 
end, as having an excellency and tendency to make us blessed 
above all others : this consists, as it is obsen ed in this answer, 
in the glorifying and eternal enjoyment of God, the fountain of 
blessedness. 

If it be enquired with what propriety these may both be call- 
ed chief and highest, the answer is obvious and easy, viz. That 
the former is absolutely so, beyond which nothing more excel- 
lent or desirable can be conceived ; the latter is the highest or 
best in its kind, which, notwithstanding, is referred, as a means 
leading to the other ; and both these ends, which, with this dis- 
tinction, we call chief and highest, are to be particularly consi- 
dered by us, together with the connexion that there is between 
them, (fl'.) 

I. We are to consider what it is to glorify God. In order 
to our understanding of this, let it be premised, 



a He who glorifies God intentionally, tiicreby promotes liis ovra happiness. 
Ovvc t iijoying God is gloriiying him. i'lie two objects coalesce. Vide note ou 
page 19. ■' 



14 or MAN'S CHIEr END. 

1. That there is a great difference between God's glorifying 
himself .and our glorifying him ; he glorifies himself whcu he 
demonstrates or shews forth his glory ; we glorify him by as- 
cribing to him the glory tiiat is his due : even as the sun dis- 
covers its brightness by its rays, and the eye beholds it. God 
glorifies himself, by furnishing us with matter for praise ; we 
glorify him when we offer praise, or give unto him the glory due 
to his name. 

2. Creatures are said to glorify God various ways : some 
things do it only objectively, as by them, angels and men arc 
led i;o glorify him ; thus the heavens declare his glory ^ Psal. xix. 
1. The same might be said of all other inanimate creatures 
which glorify God, by answering the end of their creation, 
though they know it not : but intelligent creatures, and parti- 
cularly men, are said to glorify God actively ', and this they do 
by admiring and adoring his divine perfections : these, as in- 
comprehensible, are the object of admiration ; and accordingly 
the apostle admires the divine wisdom, Rom. xi. 2>o. the depth 
of the riches^ both of the xv'isdom and knoxoledge of God ; hoio 
unsearchable are his judgments^ and his xuays past fnding out! 
and as they are divine, so they are the object of adoration : God 
is to be admired in all the displays of his relative or manifesta- 
tive glory ; and his work ruhich men behold^ is to be magnified^ 
Job xxxvi. 24. But he is to be adored more especially for his 
essential perfections. 

We are to glorify God, by recommending, proclaiming, and 
setting forth his excellency to others. What we have the high- 
est value for, we desire that others may have the same regard to 
it vrith ourselves : thus it is observed by the CA'^angelist, that 
when the disciples received their first conviction that Jesus 
was the Messiah, they Imparted this to others ; as Andi'ew to 
Peter, and Philip to Nathanael, John i. 41, 45. so the woman 
of Samaria being convinced hereof, endeavoured to persuade 
all her neighbours to believe in him, as she did, John iv. 28, 29. 
Thus we glorify God by making mention of his name with re- 
verence, proclaiming his goodness with thankfulness, and in- 
yiting others, as the Psalmist does, Psal. xxxiv. 8. to taste and 
see that he is good. 

But since this is a very comprehensive duty including in it 
the whole of practical religion, it may be considered under the 
following particulars. 

1. We glorify God by confessing and taking shame to our- 
selves for all the sins we have committed, which is interpreta- 
tively to acknowledge the holiness of his nature, and of his law, 
which the apostle asserts to be holy^just^ and good^ Rom. vii. 
12, This Joshua advises Achivn to do; to give glory to God^ 
by making coifcssion to him, Jo§h. vii. 19. And thus the pcni- 



OF man's chief ENP. 15 

teftt thief, who was crucified with our Saviour, glorified God, 
by confessing that he received the due rexvard of his deeds^ Luke 
xxiii. 40, 41. So didthe Levites, in their prayer recordea by 
Nehemiah, when they said to God, Tho'i art just in all that i* 
brought upon us, for thou hast done rig-hty but xve have done 
•wickedly, Neh. ix. Q>Z, 

2. By loving and delighting in him above all things, which 
is to act as those who own the transcendent amiableness oi his 
perfections, as the object of their highest esteem. Thus the 
Psalmist says, Psal. Ixxiii. 25. Whom have I in heaven but thee ; 
and there is none, or nothing, upon earth, that I desire besides 
thee* 

3. By believing and trusting in him, committing all our con- 
cerns, both in life and death, for time and eternity, into his 
hands : thus Abraham is said to be strong in faith, giving- 
glory to God, Rom. iv. 20. And the apostle Paul, 2 Tim. i. 
12. to have C07n7nitted his all to him. 

4. By a fervent zeal for his honour ; and that either for the 
honour of his truth and gospel, when denied, disbelieved, or 
perverted ; or for the honour of his holiness, or any of his other 
perfections, when they are reflected on, or reproached, either 
by the tongues or actions of those who set themselves against 
him. 

5. By improving our talents, and bringing forth fruit in pro- 
portion to the means we enjoy ; herein, says our Saviour, is 
my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit, John xv. 8. 

6. By walking humbly, thankfully, and chearfully before 
God. Humility acknowledges that infinite distance which is 
between him and us ; retains a due sense of our own unworthi- 
ness of all we have or hope for ; and owns every thing we re- 
ceive to be the gift of grace ; By the grace of God, savs the 
apostle, / am what I am, 1 Cor. xv. 10. Thankfulness gives 
him the glory, as the author of every mercy ; and accordingly 
sets a due value on it, in that respect. And to walk chearfully 
before him, is to recommend his service as most agreeable, 
whereby we discover that we do not repent that we were en- 
gaged therein J which is what the Psalmist intends, when he 
says, Psal. c. 2. Serve the Lord with glad?iess. 

7. By heavenly-mindedness ; when we desire to be with him 
to behold his glory. To which we must add, that all this is to be 
done in the name of Christ, our great Mediator, and by strengtli 
derived from him. 

8. As Ave are to glorify God, by yielding obedience to his 
commanding will, as in the aforesaid instances, so we are to do 
it by an entire submission to his disposing will ; particularly, 
when under afflictive dispensations of providence, we must own 
Lis sovereignty and right to da what he zvll! zvith its as hi') o'r\, 



16 or man's tUlLI END. 

Matth. XX. 15. and that these afflictions are infinitely less than 
our iniquities deserve^ Ezra ix. 13. And we must adore his 
wisdom and goodness in trying our graces hereby, and dealing 
%Fith us in such a way as is needful, and that only for a season^ 
1 Pet. i. 6. And we are to own his goodness in suiting our 
strength to our burdens, and over-ruling all this for our spiri- 
tual advantage. It also consists in an easy, patient, and con- 
tented frame of spirit, without the least murmuring or repining 
thought ; concluding, that whatever he does is tvell done, Psal. 
cxix. 65. And, which is something more, in rejoicing that we 
are counted worthy to suffer the loss of all things, yea, even of 
life itself, if called to it, for his sake ; of which we have various 
instances in scripture. Acts v. 41. Heb. x. 34. Acts xx. 24. 

Moreover, we ought to glorify God in all the natural, civil, 
and religious actions of life, which are to be consecrated or de- 
voted to him. We enjoy the blessings of life to no purpose if 
we do not live to the Lord, and thankfully acknowledge that we 
receive them all from his hand ; and whatever the calling be, 
wherewith we are called, we must therein abide with him, and 
see that we have his warrant to engage in it, and expect success 
from his blessing attending it, or else it will be to no purpose. 
Thus says Moses, It is the Lord thy God that giveth thee pozver 
to get xvealth, Deut. viii. 18. And, in all our dealings with 
men, we are to consider ourselves as under the inspection of the 
all-seeing eye of God, to whom we are accountable for all we 
do, and should be induced hereby, to exercise ourselves always 
to keep consciences void of offence towards God and man. 

As for religious duties, wherein we have more immediately 
to do with God, we are to glorify him, by taking up a profession 
of religion in general, as being influenced by his authority, en- 
couraged by his promised assistance, and approving ourselves to 
him, as the searcher of hearts : and we must take heed that we 
do not rest in an outward form or shew of godliness, without 
the power thereof; or in having a name to live without a prin- 
cipal of spiritual life, by which we may be enabled to put forth 
living and spiritual actions agreeable thereunto : and all these 
religious duties must be performed by faith, whereby we de- 
pend on Christ, our great Mediator, both for assistance and 
acceptance J by which means we glorify him, as the^ fountain of 
all grace, in whom alone both our persons and services are ac- 
cepted in the sight of God, and redound to his glory. And 
this is to be done at all times ; so that when our thoughts are 
not directly conversant about any of the divine perfections, as it 
often happens, when we are engaged in some of the more mi- 
nute, or indifferent actions of life ; yet we are to glorify him 
habitually, as having our hearts right with him ; so that what- 
e\ or »ve do may refer ultimately to his glory. As every step 



()F man's chief ElfPe IT 

the traveller takes is toward his journey's end, though it may 
not be every moment in his thoughts ; so the less. importa|U 
actions ot life should be subservient to those that are of greater 
consequence, in which the honour of God and religion is nxore 
immediately concerned ; in which sense we may be said tp 
glorify him therein. 

Thus having considered, that it is our indispensible duty to 
rnalce the glory of God our highest end in all our actions, we 
might farther add, as a motive to enforce it, that God is th? 
first cause of ail things, and his own glory was the end he den 
signed in all his works, whether of creation or providence : andi 
it is certain, that this is the most excellent end we can propose 
to ourselves ; therefore the most valuable actions of life ought 
to be referred to it, and our hearts most set upon it ; otherwise 
we act below the dignity of our nature ; and, while other crea- 
tures, designed only to glorify him objectively, answer the end 
for which they weje made, we, by denying him that tribute of 
praise which is due from us, abuse our superior facilities, apd 
live in vain. 

II. The next thing to be considered is what it is to enjoy 
God. 

1. This supposes a propriety in, or claim to himj as our God. 
We cannot be said to enjoy that which we have no right or 
claim to, as one man cannot be said to enjoy an estate which 
belongs to another ; so God must be our God in covenant, or we 
cannot enjoy him ; and that he is so, with respect to all that 
fear him, is evident, inasmuch as he gives them leave to say, 
Psal. xlviii. 14. This God is our God; and, Psal, Ixyiu 6, Go'd^ 
even our God^ shall bless us. 

2» To enjoy God, is to have a special gracious communion 
with him, to converse or walk with him, and to delight in him; 
as vv^hen we can say, 1 John i. 3. Truly our fellozvship is xvith 
the Father-, and xvith his Son Jesus Christ, This enjo}'ment of 
God, or communion with him, is, 

(1.) That which we are blessed with in this world, which is 
but imperfect, as we know and love him but in part, and our 
communion with him is often intenaipted and weakened,, 
through the prevalency of indwelling sm : and that joy and 
delight which arises from thence is often clouded and sullied ; 
and, at best, we enjoy him here but in a mediate way, in and 
under his ordinances, as agreeable to this present state. 

(2.) Believers shall enjoy him perfectly and immediately in 
heaven, without intermission or abatement, and that for ever ; 
this is called. Seeing him as he is, 1 John iii. 2. and being xvith 
him where he zs, to behold his glory, John xvii. 24. And in 
order hereto, their souls shall be made capable or receptive 
hereof, by the rem<ival not only of all sinful bvt natural imper 

You I. C 



Id OF man"'s chief eno. 

fections, and shall be more enlarged, as well as have brighter 
discoveries of die divine glory : and this shall be attended with 
a perfect freedom from all the consequences of sin ; such as 
sorrow, divine desertion, and the many evils that attend us in 
this present life ; as well as from all temptations to it. So that 
their happiness shall be confirmed and secured to them, and 
that with this advantage, that it shall be impossible for them to 
be dispossessed of it. This is certainly the most desirable end, 
next to the glory of God, that can be intended or pursued by 
us.(^) 

III. This leads us to consider the connexion that there is 
between our glorifying God and enjoyment of him. God has 
joined these two together, so that one shall not be attained 
without the other. It is the highest presumption to expect to 
be made happy with him for ever, without living to his glory 
here. For in as much as heaven is a state of perfect blessed- 
ness, they, who shall hereafter be possessed of it, must be train- 
ed up, or made meet for it ; which is the grand design of all the 
means of grace. How preposterous would it be to suppose, 
that they, who have no regard to the honour of God here, shall 
be crowned with gloiy, honour, immortality, and eternal life, in 
his presence hereafter ! Therefore a life of holiness is abso- 
lutely necessary to the heavenly blessedness ; and since these 
two are so connected together, they who experience the one, 
shall not fail of the other ; for this is secured to them by the 
faithfulness of God, who has promised to give grace and glory, 
Psal. Ixxxiv. 11. Therefore, he 7vho begins a good rvork in 
them^ will perform it, Phil. i. 6. and give them the end of their 
faith, even the salvation of their souls, 1 Pet. i. 8. 

From the connexion that there is between our glorifying and 
enjoying God, we may infer, 

1 . That it is a very preposterous thing for any one to assign 
this aB a mark of grace, that persons must be content to perish 
eternally, that God may be glorified. It is true, it is alleged ift 
favour of this supposition, that Moses, and the apostle Paul, 
seem to give countenance to it ; one by saying, Exod. xxxii. 32. 
If thou xvilt fcrgii^e their sin; and, if 7iot, blot ?ue, I pray thee, 
cut of the book "which thou hast written ; the other, Rom. ix. 3, 
I could ivish that mijself rvcre accursed from Christ, for my 
brethren and kinsmen according to the flesh. 

But to this it may be answered,- that Moses, in desiring to be 
blotted out of the book which God had wriuen, must not be 
supposed to be willing to perish eternally for Israel's sake ; but he 
'i '■" ■ ■ ' ■ — 

(6) The ansv/cr connected wllJi this qiie^jtion makes tlic glorifying and enjoj'- 
mentbut one end; and thus the enjoyment is supposed to consist in the glorifying 

God/ 



OF man's chief enC. 19 

is content to be blotted out of the book of the living, or to have 
his name no more remembered on earth ; and seems to decline 
the honour which God had offered him, when he said, Exod. 
xxxii. 10. Let me alone^ that. I maij consume them ; and I will 
make of thee a great nation ; he desires not the advancement of 
his own family, if Israel must cease to be a people, to whom 
God had promised to be a God. 

As for the apostle Paul's wish, it is either, as some suppose, 
a rash and inconsiderate flight of zeal for God, and so not war- 
rantable, though in some respects proceeding from a good prin- 
ciple ; or rather, as I humbly conceive the meaning is, he could 
wish himself accursed from Christ, so far as is consistent with 
his love; or he is content* to be under the external marks of 
God's displeasure ; or deprived of the comfortable sensation of 
his love, or many of those fruits and effects thereof, which the 
believer enjoys in this life : for I cannot, in the least, think he 
desires to be deprived of a real interest in it, or to be eternally 
separated from Christ, on any condition whatsoever. (c) 

- ■^- ' - ■ >- r=; 

(c) It is not probable that the idea of a buok of life, whicli is not to be under- 
stood literally, was at all in use in tlie ila} s of Moses. The term mx'^f^nv used 

" by Paid is not In-pothetical, but affirmative, and in the past tense, / clid wish, or 
TSither I teas inshin^ to he separated from Clu-ist, The tmth of this assertion 
no one, who is acquainted with his history, can doubt ; for he had been a per- 
secutor. Sucli a wish, made after he was a subject of saving grace, would have 
been unnatui'al, irrelevant, impious and impossible. It has been iievertheless, 
zealously contended by some learned and pious modern divines that, " the be- 
nevolent person is disposed, and willing to give up, and relinquish his own inter- 
est and happiness, when inconsistent with the public good, or the greatest good- 
of the whole."* By benevolence they meui love to being in g-cneral, without re- 
gard to any excellency in that being, " unless mere existence"! be such. In this 
they place all virtue, and all religion. And that they may the more clearly dis- 

i tinguish this species of love from that of complace?icy and gratitude, in whicli the 
partv ever has his eye upon his own advantage, they usually adopt the phrase 
disinterested benevoleixe, yet not wholly discai-ding- the idea of tlie party's own 
interest, but viewing it only on the general scale with that of all otlier Iwings, 

True holiness consists in a disposition, and suitable expressions of it, in con- 
formity to the revealed will of God ; so far as this accords with the good of the 
whole, such benevolence wdl run parallel with holiness ; but eveiy attempt to 
substitute any other rule of action or gi-ound of obligation than the authoritatively 
expressed will of God, approaches the crime of idolatry. It is certainly a veiy 
high stand we assume, when we jirofess to pass by all the amiableness, and ex- 
cellency of the divine character ; and all his goodness, and mercy to us ; and to 
love his I'ting only togetlier with created existences, with the sMne independent, 
and dignified love of benevolence, whicli he exercises towards his helpless crea- 
tures. All the displays of his perfections and compassions seem designed rather 
to elicit the affections of complacency and gratitude. That the advjmtages of re- 
ligion m this world, and the next maybe sought from selfish, aiul mercenary 
views is a lamentable truth ; but because cjun^il minds may find their own des- 
truction in aiming at the blessings which the spiritual only can enjoy, this is no 
reason wherefoi-e the saints should not find tlK-ir ultimate interest to accompany 
their duty in every instance. Accordingly, for their encour.igcment, the bles- 
sings of peace, and spiritual consolations liere, and of eternal happiness, are citi. 

* Dr. Ho*Kj!»s. f President Edwaubs. 



$d tH*. BEtKG or tobt 

^. Since the eternal enjo}Tnent of God is one great end 
which we ought to have in view, it is no sign of a mercenary 
spirit to have an eye to the heavenly glory, to quicken us to 
duty; seeing this is promised by God to those who are faith* 
ful^ thus, Psal. Ixxxiii. 24. Thsu s halt guide vie -with thy couiv- 
ael\ and qfterxvard receive ine to glory. The like promises We 
have in many other scriptures, which are designed to excite 
our desire and hope of this blessedness ', therefore the exercise 
of these graces, from such motives, is far from being unlawful : 
yea, it is commended in the saints, who are said, Heb. xi. 16. 
to desire a better country^ that is^ an heavenly. And Moses is 
commended for having the recompence of reward in v'\tw^-w\\tn 
he preferred the reproach of Christ before the treasures of 
Eg-ypt^ ver. 26. 

Nevertheless, when this respect to future blessedness is war- 
rantable, it must be considered as an expedient for our glorify- 
ing God, while we behold his glory ; and when we consider it 
as a reward, we must not look upon it as what is merited by 
our sen'ice, or conferred in a way of debt, but as a reAvard of 
'^ace, given freely to us, though founded on the merits of 
Christ* 



^ueST. II. How doth it appear that there is a Godf 

Aksw. The very light of nature in man, and the works of 
God, declare that there is a God ; but his word and Spirit 
onl}', do sufficiently and effectually reveal him unto men for 
their salvation. 

BEFORE we enter on the proof of this important doctrine, 
let it be premised, that we ought to be able to prove by 
arguments, or give a reason of our belief that there is a God. 

' ' ' . ■ .. ■ ■ ■...■,. ' ■ I 

bited to their view in glowing colours. Bat tiiis would not liave been done- if it 
were essential to the character of theirjcve, that they shfuld be willing to be 
separated from Christ. That we have by nature a fe:u-ful propensity to earthly 
good, which is xam, illusory, disgusting and debasing, must be acknowledged ; 
and that we are therefore required to den^ our natural selves is known unto eveiy 
christian. But it by no means results, that because we m<;st turn away from the 
temptations of temporal things, we may not aspire to those blessings wh;ch are 
spiritual and eternal. God himself is eternally happy in his onim neJf complacency^ 
and" has encouraged us to expect everlasting happuiess from the sanic source. 
Jesus Chi'ist, whose benevolence towards us is an eternal appeal to ouxgratitvdey 
U'hich supposes a regard to our own interest ; in suffering' death hiid respect also 
lo the joy which was set before him, aiid shall see of the ti"avail of his soul and 
shall be satisfied. Love is essential tq duty, without which it is forced, and can- 
Cot be deemed obedience in the view of him who searches the heart. This has 
beep noticed by the Saviour, but he has omitted those distinctions, whlcli are 
accounted so important in modem times ; yet his doctrines are not k'ss spiritual, 
than ours after we have sublimated the gospel to tlie highest pitch of refinement. 



THt ISIKG OF GOD. ti^ 

1. Because it is the foundation of all natural and revealed 
religion ; and therefore it must not be received merely by tradi- 
tion, as though there were no other reason why we believe it, 
but because others do so, or because we have been instructed 
herein from our childhood ; for that is unbecoming the digi^iif,'' 
and importance of the subject, and would be an instance of 
great stupidity, especially seeing we have so full and demon- 
strative an evidence thereof, taken from the whole frame of 
nature ; in which there is nothing but what affords an argu- 
ment to confirm our belief that there is a God. 

2. There is a great de;il of atheism in our hearts, by reason 
whereof we are prone sometimes to call in question the being, 
perfections, and providence of God. To which we may also 
add, that the Devil frequently injects atheistical thoughts into 
our minds ; which is a great affliction to us, and renders it ne- 
cessary that we should use all possible means for our establish- 
ment in this great truth. 

3. The abounding of atheism in the world,, and the boldness 
of many in arguing against this trutii, renders it necessar}- that 
we should be able to defend it, that we may stop the mouths of 
blasphemers, and so plead the cause of God, and assert his 
being and perfections against those that deny them ; as Psal. xiv. 
1. Thefool^ xvho saith in his heart there is no God. 

4. This will greatiy tend to establish our faith in those com- 
fortable truths that arise from our interest in him, and give- us a 
more solid foundation for our hope, as excited by his promises, 
which receive all their force and virtue from those perfections 
which are implied in the idea of a God. 

5. This will make us set a due value on his works, by which 
We are led to conclude his eternal power and Godhead, and so 
to admire him in them. Job xxxvi. 24. Remcynber that thou 
magnify his work^ which men behold. 

We shall now consider those arguments mentioned in this 
.answer, by which the being of a God may be evinced ; as, 

I. From the light of nature in man, by which we understand 
that reason which he is endowed with, whereby he is distin- 
guished from, and rendered superior to, all other creatures in 
this lower world, whereby he is able to obsen^e the connexion 
of things, and their dependence on one another, and infer those 
consequences which may be deduced from thence. These rea- 
soning powers, indeed, are very much sullied, depraved, and 
weakened, by our apostacy from God, but not wholly oblitera- 
ted ; so that there are some remains thereof, which are com- 
mon to all nations, whereby, without the help of special reve- 
lation it may be known that there is a God. 

But this either respects the principle of reasoning, which we 
trere born with, upon the account whereof infants are called in- 



2^ THE BEING OF COD* 

telligent creatures ; or the exercise thereof in a discursive Htay, 
in the adult, who only are capable to discern this truth, which 
they do more or less, in proportion to their natural capacity, 
as they make advances in the knowledge of other things. Now 
for the proof of the being of a God from the light of nature, 
let the following propositions be considered in their respective 
order. 

1. There hath been, for many ages past, a succession of 
creatures in the world, (d) 

2. These creatures could not make themselves, for that 
which is nothing cannot act ; if it makes itself, it acts before it 



(rf) "As for our o-wn existence, we perceh'e it so plainly, and so ceit:xinly,tl»at 
it neither needs, nor is capable of any proof. For nothing can be more evident to 
us than our o^^ti existence; Ithinic, /reason, I feel pleasure and pain: can any of 
these be more evident to me, than my own existence ? If I doubt of all other 
things, that very doubt makes me perceive my own existence, and will not sutil-i* 
me to doubt of that. For if I know I feel pain, it is evident I have as certain per- 
ception of my own existence, as of the existence of the pain I feel : or, if I know 
Idoiibt, I have as certain perception of the existence of the thing doubting, as of 
that thought which I call doubt. Experience then convinces us, that ive have 
an intuitive hnoidedge of our oTini existence, and an internal infallible perception 
that we ai-e. la every act of sensation, reasoning or thinking, we are conscious to 
ourselves of our own being, and, in this matter, come not short of the highest de- 
gree 0? certainty." 

" In the next place, man knows by an intuitive certainty, that bare nothing can 
no more produce any real being, than it can be equal to two right angles. If a man 
knows not that non-entitv, or the absence of all being, cannot be equal to two 
right angles, it is impossible he should know any demonstration in Euclid. If, 
thf^refoi'e, we know there is some real being, and liiat non-entity cannot produce 
any real being, it is an evident demonstration, tliat from eternity there has been, 
something ; since what was not from eternity, had a beginning, and what had a 
beginning, must be produced by something else. 

Next, it is evident, that what had its being and beginning from another, must 
also have all tliat which is in, and belongs to its being from another too. All the 
powers it has must be owing to, and received from the same source. This eter- 
nal source, tlien, of all being, must also be the source and original of all power ; 
ajid so tlds eternal Being must be also the most poicerfid. 

Again, a man finds in \iims^\i perception and knowledge. We have then got one 
stpp farther ; and we are certain now, that there is not only some being, but some 
knowing intelligent being in the world. 

Tliere was a time, then, when there was no knowing being, and when know- 
ledge began to be ; or else tliere has been also a hnoiuing being from eternity. If it 
be said, there was a time when no being had any knowledge, when tliat eternal 
Being was void of all understanding : 1 reply, that then it was impossible there 
should ever have been afiy knowledge ; it being as impossible that things wholly 
void of knowledge, and operating blindly, and Avithout any perception, should 
produce a knowing bebig, as it is impossible that a triangle should make itself 
three angles bigger than two riglit ones. For it is as repugnant to the idea of 
senseless matter, that it should put into itself sense, perception and knowledge, 
as it is repugnant to the idea of a triimgle, that it should put into itself greater 
angles than two right ones. 

I'hus, from the consideration of ourselves, and what we infallibly find in our 
ov.n constitutions, our reason leads us to the knowledge of this certain and evi- 
dent truth, that there is an eternal, most poiuerful, and most knowing being ; which 
whether any one will please to -call God, it matters not. The thing is evident, and 



THE BEING OF GOD. 23 

exists ; it acts as a creator before it exists as a creature ; and 
it must be, in the same respect, both a cause ^id an effect, or 
it must be, and not be, at the same time, than which nothing 
can be more absurd ; therefore creatures were made by another, 
upon which account we call them creatures. 

3. These creatures could not make one another } for to cre- 
ate something out of nothing, or out of matter altogether unfit 
to be made what is produced out of it, is to act above the na- 
tural powers of the creature, and contrary to the fixed laws of 
nature ; and therefore is too great a work for a creature, who 
can do nothing but in a natural way, even as an artificer, 
though he can build an house with fit materials, yet he cannot 
produce the matter out of which he builds it ; nor can he build 
it of matter unfit for his purpose, as water, fire, air, &c. All 
creatures act within their own sphere, that is, in a natural way : 
but creation is a supernatural work, and too great for a crea- 
ture to perform ; therefore creatures cannot be supposed to have 
made one another. 

4. If it was supposed possible for one creature to make anor. 
ther, then superiors must have made inferiors ; and so man, or 
some other intelligent creature, must have made the world: 
but where is the creature that ever pretended to this power or 
wisdom, so as to be called the Creator of the ends of the earth. 

5. If any creature could make itself, or other creatures of the 
same species, why did he not preserve himself; for he that can 
give being to himself, can certainly continue himself in being ? 
or why did he not make himself more perfect ? Why did he 
make himself, and other creatures of the same species, in such 
a condition, that they are always indigent, or stand in need of 
support from other creatures. 



from this idea duly considered, will easily be deduced all those other attributes, 
which we ought to^ascribe to this eternal Being. If, nevertheless, :uiy one sliould 
l>e found so smselessly arrogant, as to suppose man alone knowing and wise, but 
yet ll\e product of mere ignorance and chance ; and that all the rest of the uni- 
verse acted only by that blind hap-hazard : I shall leave with him that very ra- 
tional and tmphatical rebuke of Tulli/, I. 2- de leg. to be considered at his leisure. 
" What c:ui be more sillily aiTOgant and misbecoming than for a man to think 
" tliat he has a mind and understanding in him, but yet in all the universe beside 
" there is no such thing ? Or tliat those things, which with the utmost stretch of 
*' his i-eason he can scarce comprehend, should be moved and managed w ithout 
*' any reason at all ?" Quid est eiiim verivs, quam iit^minem esse oportere tarn stuhp 
arrogimtern, ut in se mentem et ratiotiem putet inesse, in calo mundoque non putet ? 
JiiU eo, qu£ "Jix i-mnma ini^enii vutioiie comprelienduty nulla ratione moveri putet ? 

From what has been said, it is plain to me, we have a more certain knowledge 
of the existence of a God, than of any thing our senses have not immediately dis- 
covered to us. Nay, J presujne I may say, tl;at we more certainly know that thcic 
is a God than that there is any thing else without us. When I say we kno-M, I mean 
there is such a knowledge within our reach, which we cannot miss, if we will but 
jajiply pur minds to tliat, as \\c dy to several other incjuh'ics." 

'■« J.OCKF. 



94i THE BEING 01 G«». 

Or farther, supposing the creature made himself, and ail 
other things, how comes it to pass that no one knows much of 
himself compai'ativel}', or otlier things ? Does not he that makes 
things understand them ? therefore man <?ouid not make him- 
self, or other creatures. 

6. It follows therefore from hence, that there must be a God, 
who is the first cause of all things, necessarily existing, and not 
depending on the will of another, and by whose power all things 
exist ; Of hhn, and through him^ and to him are all things^ Rom. 
xi. 5Q>. In hv?i xve live^ and move^ and have our beings Acts 
xvii. 28. 

Thus much concerning the more general method of reason- 
ing, whereby the light of nature evinces the being of a God ; 
we proceed, 

II. To consider more particularly how the being of God 
may be evinced from his works. The cause is known by its 
effects ; since therefore, as was but now observed, creatures 
touid not produce themselves, they must be created by one 
who is not a creature. 

Now, if there be no medium between God and the creature, 
or between infinite and finite, between a self-existent or unde- 
rived, and a derived being ; and if all creatures exist, as has 
been shewn, by the will and power of their Creator, and so are 
^nite and dependent ; then it follows, that there is one from 
whom they derived their being, and on whom they depend for 
all things ; that is, God. This is usually illustrated by this si- 
militude. Suppose we were cast on an unknoM^n island, and 
tiiere saw houses built, but no men to inhabit them, should we 
not conclude there had beeia some there that built them ? Could 
the stones and timber put themselves into that form in which 
they are ? Or could the beasts of die field build them, that are 
without understanding ? Or when we see a curious piece of 
v/orkmanship, as a watch, or a clock, perform all its motions 
in a regular way, can we think the wheels came together by 
chance ? (e) should we not conclude that it was made by one 

(e) " In crossing' a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone, and were ask- 
ed how the stone came to be there, I raig-ht possibly answer, that, for any thing I 
knew to tlie contrary, it had lain there for ever ; nor would it, perhaps, be very 
easy to shew the absurdity of tliis answer. But suppose I had found a xvatch up- 
on the ground, and it should Ijc enquired how the watch happened to be in th:.1; 
place, I should hardly think of the answer which I had before given, that, for art^ 
thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet, why should not 
this answer sen'e for the watch, as well as for the stone? Why is it not as admis- 
sible in the second case, as m the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz. 
that, when we come to inspect the watch, we percei'\'e (what we couid not dis- 
cover in the stone) that its several parts are fi-amed, and put together for a pur- 
pose, e. g. that thcv are so ibrmed and adjusted as to produce motion, and that 
motion so regulated as to point out the hour of the day ; that, if the several parts 
iUd been (jiiferently shaped from wUat they are, of a different size from what they 



THE BEING OF GOD. 25 

of sufficient skill to frame and put them together in that order, 
and give motion to them ? Shall the clay say to him that fashion- 



are, or placed after any other maniKT, or in any other order, tluai tliat in whith 
thicy are placed, either no nioliou at ail would h<ive been c.uried on in the ma- 
chine, or none which wouIlI have answered the Ube, thai u now served b} Ai To 
reckon up a few of the plainest of tliese parts, and of their offices, all tendiVig' t* 
one result: V/e see a cylindrical box, containing- a coded elastic sprang-, winch, 
by its endeavour to relax itself, turnj round the box. \A'c next observe a flexible 
ch -an (artificiidiy wrought tbi' the sake of flexure) commurucating the action O'f 
the spring" from die box to the fusee. We then And a series of wheels, the teeth 
of which catch in, and apply to, each other, conducting the motion from llie fu- 
see to the balance, and from the balance to the pointer; and at the same tune, by 
the size and shape of those wheels, so regxilatmg' that motion, as to termijiate in 
causing' an index, by an equable and measured progression, to pass over a given 
space m a i^iven time. We tiJce notice that the wheels are made oi' brass, in or- 
der to keep them from rust; tlie springs of steel, no other metal being- so elastic; 
tliat over the face of the watch there is placed a glass, a material em.ployed in. no 
other part of the work, but, in the room of which, if there had been any other than 
a transp:u"ent substance, the horn- could not be seen without opening the case. 
This mechanism bemg observed (it requires indeed an examination of the instru- 
ment, and perhaps some previous knowledge of the subject, to perceive and un- 
derstand it; but being once, as we have said, observed and understood,) the in- 
ference, we think, is inevitable ; that the watch must have had a maker; that 
there must have existed, at some time, and at some place Or other, an artificer, 
or artificers who formed it for the purpose which we find it actually to answer ; 
who comprehended its construction, and designed its use. 

I. Nor would it, I apprehend, weaken the conclusion that we had never seen a 
watch made; that we had never known an artist capable of making one; that we 
were altogether incapable of executing such a piece of workmanship oui-selves, 
or of understanding in what manner it was performed : all this being no more 
than what is true of some exquisite remains of some ancient art, of some lost arts, 
and, to the generality of mankind, of the more curious productions of modem 
manufacture. Does one man in a million know how oval frames are turned ? Ig- 
norance of this kmd exalts our opinion of the miseen and imknoMoi artist's skifi, 
if he be unseen and unknown, but raises no doubts in our minds of the existence 
and agency of such an artist, at some former time, and in some place or othei-. 
Nor can I perceive that it varies at all, the inference, whether the question arise 
concerning a human agent, or concerning iui agent of a different species, or an agent 
possessing, in some respects, a diffiirent nature. 

n. Neither, secondly, would it invalidate our conclusion, that the M'atch some- 
times went wrong, or that it seldom went exactly right. The purpose of the m*- 
chiner}', the design, and the designer, might be evident, and in the case supposed 
would be evident, in whatever way we accounted for the iiTegidarity of the move- 
ment, or whether we could account for it or not. It is not necessary tliat a ma- 
chine be perfect, in order to shew with what design it was made: still less necet- 
sary, where the only question is, whether it were made with any design at all. 

in. Nor, thirdly, would it bring any uncertainty into the argument, if there 
were a few parts of the wu'ich, concerning which we could not discover, or had 
not yet discovered, in \\hat manner they conduced to the general efiect; or even 
some parts, concerning which wc could not ascertain, whether thev conduced to 
that effect in any maimer whatever. For, as to the first branch of the case; ii^ 
by tlie loss, or disorder, or decay of the parts in question, the movement of the 
watch were found in fact to be stopped, or disturbed or rct;u-ded, no doubt would 
i-emain in om- minds as to the utility or intention of Uiese parts, althoi;gh we 
should be unable to investigate the manner according to which, or the connection 
by winch, the ultimate effect depended upon their action or assistance : .a\d the 
more complex is the machine, the more likely is this obscurity to arise. Then, 
as to the second thing supposed, namelv, that there were parts which might 'i-^. 

Vol. I. D 



2Q TITE BEING OF GOD. 

ed it, What makest thou, or thy work. He hath no handa t' Isi. 
xlv. 9. 



spared without prejudice to the movement of the WJUch, and that we had proved 
this by experiment; thesn superfluous parts, even if we were completely assured 
that they were such, would not vacate the i-easoning which we had instituted con- 
cerning' other parts. The indication of contrivance remained, vi'ith respect to 
them, nearly as it was before. 

IV. Nor, foiu-thly, would any man in his senses think the existence of the watch, 
with its various machiner}', accounted for, by being told that it was one out of 
possible combinations of material forms ; that whatever he had found in tlie place 
v.hei'c lie found the watch, must have contamed some intenial coiifigiu'ation or 
otlier; and that this configuration might be tlie structiu'e now exhibited, viz. of 
the works of a watch, as well as of a different structure. 

V. Nor, fiftJiiy, would it yield his enquiry more satisfaction to be answered, 
that there existed in things a principle of order, which had disposed the parts of 
the -watch into llicir present form and situation. He never Icnew a watch made 
by the principle of order ; nor can he e-. en form to himself an idea of what is 
meant by a principle of oider, distinct from tlie intelligence oftlie watch-maker. 

VI. Sixthly, he would be surprised to he;u", that the mechanism of the watch 
was no proof of contrivance, only a motive to induce the mind to think so: 

VII. And not less surprised to lie intbnned, that tlie watch in his hand M'as 
nothing more than the result of the laws oi' metallic natiue. It is a perversion of 
language to assign any law, as the efHcient, operative, cause of any thing. A law 
presupposes an agent ; for it is only the mode, according to w hich an agent pro- 
ceeds: it implies a power; for it is the order, according- to which that power acts. 
Without thi:; agent, without this poAver, which are both^listinct from itself, the 
tow does notJnng; is nothing. The expression, "the law of metallic nature," 
may somid strange and harsh to a philosopliic e;ir ; but it seems quite as justifia- 
ble as some otliers which ai'e more familiar to him, sucli as " the law of vegetable 
nature," "the law of animal nature," or indeed as " tlie lawof nature", in general, 
when assigned as the cause of phjenomena, in exclusion of ag-ency and power ; or 
when it is subsituted hito the place of these. 

Vni. Neither, lastly, would our observer be driven out of his conclusion, or 
from his confidence in its truth, by being told that he knew nothing at all about 
the matter. He knows enough tor his argument. He knows the utilit}' of the 
end: he knows the subserviency and adaptation of the means to the end. These 
points being known, his ignorimce of other points, his doubts concerning other 
points, affect not tlie certainty oi his reasoning-. The consciousness of knowing 
little, need not beget a distrust of that vhich he does know." 

Supi^ose, in the next place, that the person who found the watch, should, after 
some time, discover, that, hi addition to all the properties which he had hitherto 
obser%'ed h\ it, it possessed the unexpected property of producing, in the course' 
of its movement, another watch like itself; (the thing is conctivable ;) that it 
contained witiiin it a mechanism,' a system of parts, a mould for instance, or a 
complex adjustment of hiths, files, and other tools, evidently wid separately cal- 
culated for tills purpose ; let us enquke, what effect ought such a discovery to 
liave upon his former conclusion ! 

I. The first effect \\ould be to increase his admiration of the contrivance, and 
his conviction of the consunnnate skill of the contriver. Whether he regar-dcd 
the oliject of the contrivance, the distinct apparatus, the inirlcate, yet in many 
parts intelligible, mechani:im by which it was carried on, he woidd perceive, in 
this new observation, nothing but an additional reason for dohig what he had al- 
ready done ; for referring the construction of the watch to design, laul to supren-e 
art. If'tiiat construction idthout this property, or, which is the same thing, be- 
fore tliis propert)- had been noticed, proved iniention and art to have been em- 
jiloved about it; sciU more strong would the proof appear, when he came to the 
knowledge of this further property, the crown and peri'ection of all the rest. 

XI He would reflect, tfiat though the watch before him were, in some se)ne. 



THE BEIKG OF GOD. 2?" 

This leads us to consider the wisdom of God in his works, 
which demonstrates his being-. This the Psahnist mentions 



the maker of the watch, which was fabricated in the course of its movements, yet 
it was in a very different sense from that, in whicli a ciupenter, for instance, is 
the m.iker of a chair ; the author of its contrivixncc, the cause of the relation of its 
* parts to their use. With respect to these, the first watch was no cause at all t/> 
the second : in no such sense as this was it the avithor of the constitution and or- 
der, eulier of the ptu'ts which the new watch contained, or of the parts by the aid 
and instrumentality of which it was produced. We might possibly say, but with 
great latitude of expression, tliat a stream of water gTound corn : but no latitude 
of expression would allow us to say, no stretch of conjecture could lead us to 
think, that the streimi of water built tlie mill, though it were too ancient for u.s 
to know who the builder was. What tlie stream of v/ater does in the affau-, is 
neither more nor less than this : by the application of an unintelligent impulse to 
a mech:uiism previously arranged, arnmged independently of it, and arranged by 
intelligence, an effect is produced, viz. the corn is ground. But the effect results 
-from the arrangement, i'he force of the stream cannot be said to be the cause or 
author oi'the effect, still less of the arrangement. Understanding and plan in the 
formation of the mill were not the less necessary, for any share which the water 
has in grinding the corn : yet is tJiis share the same, as tliat which the watch 
would have contributed to the production of the new watch, u^wn the supposition 
assumed iu the last section. Thei-efore, 

III. 'I'liougli it be now no longer probable, that the individual watch which 
our observer had found, was made immediately by the hand of an artificer, 
yet doth not this alteration in any wise affect the inference that an artificer 
had been originally emiiloyed and concerned in the production. The argu- 
ment from design remains as it was. Marks of design and contrivance are 
no more accounted for now, than they were before. In the same thing, we 
may ask for the cause of different properties. We may ask for the cause of the 
colour of a body, of its hai-dness, of it** heat ; and these causes may be all dif- 
ferent. We are now asking for the cause of that subserviency to an use, that re- 
lation to an end, whicli we have remarked in the watch before us. No answer is 
given to this question by telling us that a preceding watch produced it. There 
cannot be design without a designer ; contrivance without a contriver ; order 
without choice ; ai-rangement, without any thing capable of arranging ; subser- 
viency and relation to a purpose, without that which could intend a purpose ; 
means suitable to an end, and executing their olfice ui accom.plishing that end, 
without the end ever liaving been contemplated, or the means accommodated to 
it. Arrangement, disposition of pai-ts, subserviency of means to_an end, relation 
of instruments to an use, imply the presence of intelligence and mind. No one, 
tlierefore, can rationally believe, that the insensible, Inanimate watch, from which 
the watch before us issued, was the proper cause of the mechanism we so much 
admire in it ; could be truly said to have constructed the instrument, disposed 
its parts, assigned their office, determined thcii- order, action, and mutual depen- 
dency, combined their several motions into one result, and tliat also a result con- 
nected with the utilities of other beings. Ail these properties thereibie, are as 
much unaccounted for as they were before. 

IV. Nor is .any thing gained by running the difficulty further back, i. e. by 
supposing the watch before u.s to have been produced by another watch, that from 
a former, and so on indefinitelv. Our going back ever so far brings us no nearer 
to the least degree of satisfaction upon the subject. Contrivance is still imac- 
counted for. We still want a contriver. A designing mind is neither supplied 
by this supposition, nor dispensed with, if the difficulty wei'e diminished the 
iVirther we went back, b}' going back indefinitely v/e miglu exliaust it. And this 
is the only case to which this sort of reasoning applies. Where there is a temleii- 
cy, or, as we increase the number of terms, a continual approach towards a limit, 
there, by supposing the number of terms to be what is called infinite, we may con- 
ceive the limit to Le attained : but where there is no such tendency or approtcb, 



28 THE BEING OF GOD. 

with admiration, PsaJ. civ. 24. Lord^ how manifold are thij 
works ; in wisdom hast thou made them all! When we see let- 



notiiing is effec'ed b}' iengtbenin^ the series. There is no difference as to the 
point in question, (whatever there may be as to many points) beiween one series 
and another ; between a series which is iinile, and a series which is infinite. A 
Qhain composed of an infinite number of links, can no more support itself, than a 
cha^n comjjosf-d of a finite number of links. And of this we are assured, (chough, 
we never can iiave tried the experiment) because, bv increasing the number of 
links, from ..en for instance to a hundred, from a hundred to a thousand, &.c. we 
make not the smiilcst approach, we observe not the smallest tendenc}', towards 
§eli'-3Upport. Tiiere ;s no difTerence in this respect (yet there may be a great dif- 
ference in several respects) between a chain of a greater or less length, between 
one chain ajid another, between one that :s finite and one that is indefinite. This 
veiy much resembles the ease before us. The machine, which we are inspecting, 
demonstrates, by its constiiiction, contriA ance and design. Contrivaitce must have 
had ;i contriver ; design, a designer ; whether the machine immediately proceed- 
ed from another machine, or not. That circumstance alters not the case. That 
other machine mk\ , in l.ke manner, liave proceeded from a former machine : nor 
does diat alter tiie case : contrivance must have had a contriver. That former one 
from one preceding it: no alteration still : •<. contriver is still necessary. No ten- 
dency .s perceived, no approacir towards a diminut.on of this necessity. It is the 
same wilh any and every succession of these machines ; a succession of ten, of a 
Ijundred, of a thousand; with one series as with ^tnother ; a series which is finite, 
as wich a series which is infinite. In whatever other respects they may differ, in 
this they do not. Li ail equrJly, contrivance .nnd design are unaccounted for. 
The question is not simply. How came tJie first WL.tch into existence ? which 

Suestion, it may be pretended, is done away by supposing the series of watches 
lus produced from one another to have been infinite, and consequently to have 
had no suchA'rs?, for which it was necessary to provide a cause. This, perhaps, 
would have been neailj- the state of the question, if nothing had been before us 
but an unorgumzed unmechanised substance, without mark or indication of con- 
trivance. It might be difficult to shew that stich substance could not have existed 
from eternity, either in succession (if it were possible, which I think it is not, for 
tmorganized bodies to spi-ing from one another,) or by individual perpetuity. But 
that IS not the question now. To suppose it to be so, is to suppose that it made 
no difference whether we had found a watch or a stone. As it is, the meta- 
physics of that question have no place ; for, in the watch which we are ex- 
amining, are seen contrivimce, design ; an end, a purpose ; means for the end, 
s^daptation to the pui-pose. And the question, which irresistibly presses upon our 
thoughts, is, whence this contriv;uice and design ? The thing required is tlie in- 
tending mind, the adapting hand, the intelligence by which that hand Mas di- 
rected. This question, this dem..'md, is not shiiken offi by increasing a number or 
succession of substances, destitute of these properties; nor the more, by increas- 
ing that number to infinity. If it be said, that, upon the supposition of one watch 
being produced from another in tlie course of that other's movements, and by 
means of the mechanism witliin it, we have a cause for the watch in my Jiand, 
viz. the watch from which it proceeded, I deny, that for the design, tlie contri- 
vance, the suitableness of means to an end, the adaptation of instruments to an 
use (yll vihich we discover in the watch,) we have any cause whatever. It is in 
■«'ain, therefore to assign a series of such causes, or to allege that a series may 
be carried back to infinity ; for I do not admit that we have > et any cause at all 
of the pliafnomenr., still less any series of causes either finite or infinite. Here is 
contrivance, but ni. contriver ; proofs of design, but no designer. 

V. Our observe!" vvculd further also reflect, that the maker of the watch be- 
fore him, .'.•:!«, in truth and realit)-, the maker of ever}" watch produced from it ; 
there being no difference (except thai the latter manifests a more exquisite skill) 
between the m.iking of another watch with his own h.inds by the mediation of 
files, laths, chisels, &^.. and the disposing, fixing;, ;ind inserting, of these insU u- 



TflE BEING OF GOD. 29 

ters put together, which make words or sentences, and these a 
book, containing the greatest sense, and the ideas joined together 
in the most beautilul order, should we not conclude that some 
man, equal to this work, had put them together .'' Even so the 
wisdom that shines forth in all the parts ot the creation, proves 
that there is a God. This appears. 

In the exact hannony and subsei-viency of one part of the 
creation to another, Hos. ii. 21, 22. I 'will hear ^ saith the Lord; 
I T.i'7 II hear the heavens^ and they shall hear the earth. And the 
earth shall hear the corn^ and the rvine, a7id the oil, and they 
ahall hear Jezreel. One part of this frame of nature ministers 
to another. Thus the sun, and other heavenly bodies, give light 
to the world, which would be no better than a cave or dun^ 
geon without them ; and afford life and influence to plants and 
trees ; and maintain the life of all living creatures. The clouds 
send down rain that moistens the earth, and makes it fruitful; 
and this is not poured forth by whole oceans together, but by 
small drops, Job xxxvi. 27. He maketh srnall the drops of water ; 
they pour down rain according to the vapour thereof; and these 
are not perpetual, for that would tend to its destruction. The 
moist places of the earth, and the sea supply the clouds with 
water, that they may have a sufficient store to return again to 
it. The air fans and refreshes the earth, and is necessary for 
the growth of all things, and the maintaining the life and health 
of those that dwell therein. This subserviency of one thing to 
another is without their own design or contrivance ; for they 
are not endowed with understanding or will ; neither doth this 
depend on the will of the creature. The sun doth not enlighten 
or give warmth to the world, or the clouds or air refresh the 
earth at our pleasure ; and therefore all this is subject to the 
order and direction of one who is the God of nature, who com- 
mands the sun, and it shineth, and the clouds to give rain at his 

merits, or of others equivalent to them, in the body of the watch alread}' made, in 
such a manner, as to form a new watch in the course of the movements which he 
had given to the old one. It is only working by one set of tools, instead of another. 
The conclusion which the first examination of the watch, of its works, con- 
struction, and movement suggested, was, that it must have had, for the cause and 
author of that construction, an artificer, who understood its mechanism, and de- 
signed its use. This conclusion is invincible. A second examination presents us 
with a new discover)'. The watch is found in the course of its movement to pro- 
duce another watch similai" to itself: :ind not only so, but we perceive in it a sys- 
tem of organization, sep:u-ately calculated for that purpose. What eftect would 
this discovery have, or ought it to have, upon our former inference ? Wliat, as 
hath already been said, but to increase, beyond measuie, our admiration of the 
skill, wliich had been employed in the formation of such a machine ? Or sh;',U it, 
instead of this, all at once turn us round to an opposite conclusion, viz. tliat no 
art or skill wliatever has been cfincerned in the business, although all other evi- 
dences of art and skill remain as they were, and this last and supreme piece of 
art be now added to the rest? Can this be maintained without absurdity? Yet 
this is atheism." Palet. 



30 THE BEING Ot GOt>. 

pleasure. It is he that gave the rtjgular motion to the heavenly 
bodies, and, by his wisdom, fixed and continues the various sea- 
sons of the yeai", summer and winter, seed-time and harvest, day - 
and night, and every thing that tends to the beauty and har- 
mony of nature ; therefore these curious, and never-enough to 
be admired, works, plainly declare that there is a God. This is 
descnb d with unparalleled elegancy of style, Job xxxvii. 9, 
&c. Out of the south cometh the whirlwind; and cold out of the 
north. By the breath of God^ frost is given; and the breadth of 
the xvaters is straitened. Also by rvatering he xvearieth the 
thick cloud; he scatiereth his bright cloud. Dost thou knoiv the 
balancings of the clouds^ the "xvondrous works of him which is 
perfect in knowledge P Hoxo thy garments are ruarm xvhen he 
quieteth the earth by the south-wind P (^) 

{g') " The works of nature '.vant only to be contemplated. Vv lien contemplated, 
they ha\'e every tiling \\ them which can astonish by their greatness ; ft^r, of the 
vast scale of operation, through which our discoveries cany us, at one end we 
see an inielligent Power arranging planetai-y systems, fixing, for instance, the tra- 
jectory of Saturn, or confiti-uctmg :. : mg of a hundred thousand miles diameter, 
to surround liiS body, and be suspended like a magnificent arch over the heads of 
his inhabitants; and, at the other, bending a hooked tootii, concerting and pro- 
viding an tippropriate merhunisiT;, for the clasping and reclasping of the filaments 
of the fealher of a hurnm'tng-bird. We have proof, not only of both these works 
proceed iig from an intelligent agent, but of their proceeding from the same 
agent: for, in the first place, we can trace an identity of plan, a connexion of sys* 
tern, from Satm-n to om- own globe ; and when arrived upon our own giobe, we 
can, in the second place, pursue the connexion through all the organized, espe- 
cially the animated, iiodics, wliicli it supports. We can observe marks of a com- 
mon relation, as well to one another, as to the elements of which their habitation 
is composed. Therefore one mind hath planned, or at least hath prescribed a 
general plan for, all these productions. One being has been concerned in all. 

Under this stupendous Being we live. Our happiness, our existence, is in his 
hajids. All we expect must come from hhn. Nor ought we to feel our situation 
Insecure. In every nature, and in every portion of nature, which we can descry, 
we find attention bestowed upon even tlie minutest parts. The hinges in the 
'^'ing's of an earwjg', and the joints of its antennae, are as higlily wi-ought, as if the 
Creator had had nothing el.se to finish. We see no signs of diminution of care by 
multiplicity of ol>jects, or of distraction of thought by variety. We have no rea- 
son to fear therefore, our being forgotten, or overlooked, or neglected. 

The existence and character of the Deity, is, in every view, the most interest- 
ing of all human speculations. In none, however, is it moi'e so, thiui as it facili- 
t^ites the belief of the fundamental articles oi' Herekitio?!. It is a step to have it 
proved, tliat there must be something in the world more than what we see. It 
is a further step to know, that, amongst the invisible things of nature, there 
must be an intelligent mind, concerned in its production, order, and support. 
These points being assured to us by iSlitural Theologj', we may '.veil leave to Re- 
velation the disclosure of many pia-tjcnlars, which our i'ese:u'ches cannot reach, 
respecting either the nature of tjiis Uenig as the original cause of all things, or 
his character and designs as a moral governor ; and not only so, but the more full 
confirmation of oilier particulars, of which, though they do not Ue altogether be- 
yond our reasoning.; and our ])robabi]iti(:'s, the certainty is by no means equal to 
the importance. The true Theist will be llie first to listen to any credible com- 
munication of divine knowledge. Nothing which he has learnt from Natural 
Theology, will diminish liis desire of further instruction, or his disposition to re- 
ceive it with humility and thankfulness. He wishes for light : he rejoices in 



THE BEING OF GOD^ 31 

But that we may farther ev^ince this truth, we shall lay down 
the following arguments to prove the being of a God, which 
appeal's, 



light. His inward veneration of tlus gi-eat Being, will incline him to attend with 
the utmost seriousness, not only to all that can be discovered concerning him by 
researclies into nature, but to all that is taught by a revelati(;n, w Inch gives rea- 
sonable proof of having proceeded fi'om him. 

But, above eveiy other ailicle of revealed religion, does the anterior belief of a 
Deity, bear with the stixingest force, upon that grand jjomt, which gives indeed 
interest and importance to all the rest — the resurrectionof the human dead. The 
thing might appear hopeless, did we not see a power under the guidi.nce of an 
intelligent will, and a power penetratuig the inmost recesses oi all substance. I 
am fai- from justifying the opinion of those, who " thought it a thing- incredible 
that God should raise the dead ;" but I admit that it is first necessary to be per- 
suaded, that there is a God to do so. This being thoroughly settled, in our minils, 
there seems to be nothing in this process (concealed and mysterious as wtt con- 
fess it to be,) which need to shock our belief. They who have taken np the opi- 
nion, that the acts of the human mind depend upon organization, that lh(- mind 
itself indeed consists in organization, are supposed to find a greater difficulty 
than others do, in admitting a transition by death to a new state ol sentient exis- 
tence, because the old organization is appiuently dissolved. But I do not see 
that any impracticability need be apprehended even by these ; or that the change, 
even upon their hj-pothesis, is far removed from the analogy of some other opera- 
tions, which we know with certainty that tlie deity is can-jing on. In the ordi- 
nary derivation of plants and animals from one another, a particle, in many cases, 
minuter than all assignable, all conceivable dimension ; an aura, an efiiuvium, an 
infinitesimal ; determines the organization of a future body : does no less than 
fix, whether that wliich is about to be produced, shall be a vegetable, a merely 
sentient, or a rational being ; an oak, a frog, or a philosopher ; makes all these 
diflferences ; gives to the future body its qualities, and nature, and species. And 
this particle, from which springs, and by which is determined a whole future na- 
ture, itself proceeds from, and owes its constitution to, a prior body : neverthe- 
less, which is seen in plants most decisively, the incepted organization, though 
formed within, and through, and by a preceding organization, is not conuptcd 
by its corruption, or destroyed by its dissolution ; but, on the contraiy, is some- 
times extricated and developed by 'those very causes ; survives and comes into 
action, when the purpose, for which it was prepared, requires its use. — Now an 
ceconomy which nature has adopted, when the purpose was to transfer an organi- 
zation from one individual to another, may have something analogous to it, when 
the purpose is to transmit an organization from one state of being to another state : 
and the}' who found thought in organization, may see something in this analogy ap- 
plicable to tlieir difficulties ; for, whatever can transmit a similarity of organ! zation 
will answer their purpose, because, according .even to their own theory, it may be 
the vehicle of consciousness, and because consciousness, without doubt, carries 
identity and individuality along with it through all changes of form or of visible 
qualities. In the most general case, that, as we have said, of the derivation of plants 
and aniniuls from one another, the latent organization is either itself similar to the 
old organization, or has the power of communicating to new matter the old organic 
form. Bat it is not restricted to this rule. There ai-e other cases, especially in 
the progress of insect life, m which the dormiuit orgtinization does not much re- 
semble that which incloses it, and still less suits with the situation in which the 
inclosing body is ph ::ed, but suits with a different situation to which it is desti- 
ned. In the larva of the llbellula, which lives constantly, and has still long to live, 
under water, are descried the wings of a fly, which tw o \ears afterwards is to 
momit into the air. Is there nothing in this analogy ? It serves at least to shew, 
that, even in the obsei'vable course of nature, organizations are formed one be- 
j)C&ti» tini»ther ; and, an;ongst a tUuua^d other instances; it shews complete 1\, 



,S2 THE BEING or GOD. 

I. From those creatures that are endowed with a lower kind 
of life than man. 

1. No creature can produce a fly or the least insect, but ac- 
cording to the fixed laws of nature ; and that which we call life, 
or the principle of their respective motion and actions, none but 
a God can give ; so that his being is plainly proved, from alt 
living creatures below man, which are subservient, many of 
them, to one another, and all to man, and that not by our order- 
ing ; therefore this is done by the hand of him who is the God 
of nature. 

2. The natural instinct of living creatures, every one acting 
according to its kind ; and some of the smallest creatures pro- 
ducing things that no human art can imitate, plainly proves a 
God. Thus the bird in building its nest ; the spider in framing 
its web ; the bee in providing store-houses for its honey ; and 
the ant in those provisions which it lays up in summer against 



that tlie Deity can mould and fkshion the parts of material nature, so as to fulfil 
ajiy purpose wliatever which he is pleased to appoint. 

They who refer the operations of muid to a substance totally and essentially 
different from matter, as, most certainly, these operations, though affected by 
material causes, hold very little afRnity to any properties of matter with which 
we are acquainted, adopt, perliaps, a juster reasoning and a better philosophy; 
and by these the considerations above suggested are not wanted, at least in the 
same degree. But to such as find, which some persons do find, an insuperable 
difficulty in shaking off an adherence to those analogies, which the corporeal 
world is continually suggesting to their thoughts ; to such, I say, evei'y consider- 
ation w'dl be a relief, which manifests the extent of that intelligent power which 
is acting in nature, the fruitfulness of its resources, the variety, and aptness, and 
success of its means ; most especially every consideration, which tends to shew, 
that, in the translation of a conscious existence, there is not, even in their own 
way of regarding it, any tiling greatly beyoiid, or totally unlike, what takes place 
in such parts (pi-obably small parts) of the order of natui-e, as are accessible to 
our observation. 

Again ; if there be those who th'mk, that the contractedness and debility of 
the human faculties in our present state, seem ill to accord with tlie high desti- 
nies which the expectations of religion point out to us, I would only ask them, 
whether anj' one, who saw a child two hours after its birth, could suppose that 
it would ever came to understand Jluxiorjs i* or who then shall say, what further 
amplification of intellectual powers, what accession of knowledge, what advance 
and improvement, the rational facultj^, be its constitution what it will, may not 
admit of, when placed amidst new objects, and endowed with a sensorium, adapt- 
ed, as it undoubtedly will be, and as our present senses are, to the perception of 
those substances, and of those properties of things, witli which our concern may 
lie. 

Upon the whole ; in every thing which respects this awful, but, as we trust, 
glorious change, we have a wise and powerful Being, (the author, in nature, of 
infinitely various expedients for infinitely various ends,) upon whom to rely for 
the choice andappointmentof means, adequate to the execution of any plan which 
his goodness or his justice may have formed, for the moral and accoimtable part 
of his terrestrial creation. That great office rests with him : be it ours to hope 
and prepai-e ; under a firm and settled persuasion, that, living and dying, we are 
his ; that life is passed in his constant presence, that death resigns us to his mer- 
<:ifdl disposal." Faust. 

» Se« Searst's Light of Nature^ passim. 



TH£ BEING OF GOD. 33 

winter ; the silk-womi in providing cloathing for man, and in 
being transformed into various shapes, and many others of 
smaller sort of creatures, that act in a wonderful v/ay, without 
the exercise of reason or design, these all prove the being of 
God. 

3. The greater, fiercer, or more formidable sort of living 
creatures, as the lion, tiger, and other beasts of prey, are so or- 
dered, that they fly from man, whom they could easily devour, 
and avoid those cities and places where men inhabit, that so we 
may dwell safely. They are not chased into the woods by us ; 
but these are allotted, as the places of their residence by the 
God of nature. 

4. Those living creatures that are most useful to men, and 
so subject to them, viz. the horse, camel, and many others, 
these know not their ov/n strength, or power, to resist or rebel 
against them ; which is ordered b)' infinite wisdom : and there 
are many other instances of the like nature, all \vhich are very 
strong arguments to prove that there is a God, whose glory 
shines forth in all his works. 

II. From the structure of human bodies, in which respect 
we are said to be fearfully and wonderfully made ; this, if it 
be abstractedly considered without regard to the fixed course and 
laws of nature, exceeds the power and skill of all creatures, and 
can be no other than the workmanship of a God, and therefore 
is a demonstration of his being and perfections. No man ever 
pretended to give a specimen of his skill therein. The finest 
statuaries or limners, who have imitated or given a picture, or 
representation of human bodies, have not pretended to give life 
or motion to them ; herein their skill is baffled. The wisest 
men in the world have confessed their ignorance of the way 
and manner of the formation of human bodies ; hov/ they are 
framed in their first rudiments, preserved and grow to perfec- 
tion in the womb, and how the}^ are increased, nourished, and 
continued in their health, strength, and vigour for many years. 
This has made the inquiries of the most thoughtful men issue 
in admiration : herein we plainly see the power and wisdom of 
God, to which alone it is owing. 

Here it may be observed, that there are several things very 
wonderful in the structure of human bodies, which farther 
evince this truth. As, 

1. The organs of sense and speech. 

2. The circulation of the blood, and the natural heat which 
is preserved for many years together, of which there is no in- 
stance but in living creatures. Even fire will consume and 
waste itself by degrees, and fill things, which have onl acqui- 
red heat, will soon grow cold ; but the natural heat of the body 
of man is preserved in it as long as life is continued. 

Vol. I. E 



o4 TU£ 9£IKG 07 GQDU 

3. The continual supply of animal spirits, and their subser- 
viency to sense and motion. (A) 

4. The nerves, which, though small as threads, remain un- 
broken, though every one of these small fibres performs its of- 
fice, and tends to convey strength and motion to the body. 

5. The situation of the parts m their most proper place : the 
internal pai-ts, which would be rained and destroyed if expo- 
sed to the injuries that the external ones are : these are secured 
in proper inclosures, and so preserved, Job x. 11. T/iou hast 
cloathed me with skin and fiesh^ and hast fenced me ivith bones 
and sinews. 

6. All the parts of the body are so disposed, that they are 
fitted for their respective uses, as being situate in those places 
which render them most fit to perform their propef actions. 

7» The diffei-ing features of different bodies, so that we 
scarce see persons in all respects alike, is wonderful, and the 
result of divine wisdom : for even this is neccssar}" for society, 
and our performing the duties we ov/e to one another. 

8. The union of this body v/ith the soul, which is a spirit of 
a very different nature, can never be sufficiently admired or 
accounted for ; but gives us occasion herein to own a superior, 
infinitely wise being. Which leads us, 

III. To consider how the being of God may be evinced from 
the nature of the soul of man. He is said, Zech. xii. 1. To have 
farmed the spirit of man within hvju And hereby his power and 
wisdom, and consequently his being, is declared. For, 

\. The nature of a spiritual substance is much less known 
than that of bodies ; and therefore that which we cannot fully 
understand, we must admire. 

If the wisdom and power of God is visible in the structure 
of our bodies, it is much more so in the formation of our souls ; 
and since we cannot fully describe what they are, and know 
little of them but by their effects, certainly we could not form 
them; and therefore there is a God, who is the Father of spirits. 

2. The powers and capacities of the soul are various, and 
\'txy extensive. 

(1.) It can frame ideas of i^hings superior to its own nature, 
and can employ itself in contemplating and beholding the or- 
der, beauty, and connexion of all those things in the world, 
which are, as it were, a book, in which we may read the divine 
perfections, and improve them to the best purposes. 

(2.) It takes in the vast compass of things past, which it can 
reflect on and remember, with satisfaction, or regret : and it can 
look forward to things to come, which it can expect, and accord- 
ingly conceive pleasure or uneasiness in the forethoughts thereof. 



(A) The theory ©fa nervous fluid, or animal spirits, is generally abandoned. 



THE BEING OF GOD. 3J 

(3.) It can chuse or embrace what is good, or fly from and 
reject what is evil and hurtful to it. 

(4.) It is capable of moral government, of conducting itself 
according to the principles of reason, and certain rules enjoined 
it for the attaining the highest end. 

(5.) It is capable of religion, and so can argue that there is a 
God, and give him the glory that is due to his name, and be 
happy in the enjoyment of him. 

(6.) It is immortal, and therefore cannot be destroyed by any 
creature ; for none but God has an absolute sovereignty over the 
spirits of men; No tnan hath porver over the spirit to retaifi the 
spirit ; neither hath hep07ver in the day ofdeath^ Eccles. viii. 8. 

IV. From the nature and office of conscience, which is that 
whereby the soul takes a view of itself, and its own actions, as 
good or evil ; and considers itself as under a law to a superior 
being, from whom it expects rewards or punishments ; and this 
evidently proves a God. For, 

1. Conscience is oftentimes distressed or comforted by its 
reflection on those actions, which no man on earth can know : 
and therefore when it fears punishment for those crimes, which 
com.e not under the cognizance of human laws, the uneasiness 
that it finds in itself, and its dread of punishment, plainly dis- 
covers that it is apprehensive of a divine being, who has been 
offended, whose wrath and resentment it fears. All the en- 
deavours that men can use to bribe, blind, or stupify their con- 
sciences, will not prevent these fears ,• but the sad apprehensidn 
of deserved punishment, from one whom they conceive to know 
all things, even the most secret crimes committed, this makes 
persons uneasy, whether they will or no. Whithersoever they 
fly, or what amusement soever they betake themselves to, con- 
science will still follow them with its accusations and dread of 
divine wrath : The rvicked are like the troubled sea^ when it can- 
not rest^ Isa. Ivii. 20. A dreadful sound is in his ears ; in pros- 
perity the destroyer shall come vpon him^ Job xv. 21. Terrors 
take hold of him as rvaters., a tempest stealeth him away in the 
night. The east-wind carrieth him away^ and he departeth ; 
and as a storm hurleth him out of his place. For God shall cant 
upon him^ and not spare ; he -would fain fee out of his hand^ Job 
xxvii. 20, 21, 22, The wicked fee when no man pursuethy 
Prov. xxviii. 1. 

And this is universal, there are none but are, some time or 
other, liable to th^se fears, arising from self-reflection, and the 
dictates of conscience ; the most advanced circumstances in the 
world will not fortify against, or deliver from them, Acts xxiv. 
25. As Paul reasoned of righteousness^ temperance^ and judg- 
ment to come^ Felix trembled. Even Pharaoh himself, the most 
hard-hearted sinner in the world, who would fain have forced 



36 THE BEING OF GOD. 

a belief upon himself that there is no God, and boldly said, Who 
is the Lord^ that I should obey him P yet he could not ward off 
the conviction that there is a God, which his own consci-nce 
suggested. Therefore he was forced to say, Exod. ix, z7. I 
have sinned this time; the Lord is righteous^ and I and viy peo- 
ple are wicked. And indeed all +he pleasures that any can take 
in the world, who give themselves up to the most luxurious 
way of living, cannot prevent their trembling, when conscience 
suggests some things terrible to them for their sins. Thus Bel- 
shazzar, when in the midst of his jollity and drinking wine, 
having made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, when he 
saw the finger of a man's hand upon the wall, it is said, Dan. v. 
6. The king's countenance %vas changed^ and his thoughts trou- 
bled him ; 6-0 that the joints of his loins were loosed.^ and his 
knees smote one against another. 

Thus concerning those dictates of conscience, which make 
men very uneasy, whereby wicked men are forced to own that 
there is a God, whether they will or no ; we now proceed to 
consider good men, as having frequently such serenity ol mind 
and peace of conscience, as affords them farther matter of con- 
viction concerning this truth. It is, indeed, a privilege that 
tiiey enjoy, who have the light of scripture revelation, and so it 
might have been considered imder a following head ; but since 
it is opposed to what was but now brought, as a proof of the 
being of a God, we may here observe, that some have that 
composure of mind, in believing and walking closely v; ith God, 
as tends to confirm them yet more in this truth. For, 

(1.) This composure of mind abides under all the troubles 
and disappointments they meet with in the world : those things 
which tend to disturb the peace of other men, do not so much 
affect them ; He shall not be afraid of evil tidings ; his heart is 
jixed^ trusting in the Lord^ Psal. cxii. 7. And as this peace 
abides under all the troubles of life, so it does not leave them, 
but is sometimes more abundant, when they draw nigh to death. 

(2.) It is a regular and orderly peace that they have, accom- 
panied with grace, so that conscience is most quiet Mhen the 
soul is most holy ; which shews that there is a hand of God in 
working or speaking this peace, as designing thereby to encou- 
rage and own that grace which he has wrought in them ; Rom. 
X. 13. thus the God of hope is said to fill us xvith all joy and 
peace in believing. 

(3.) Let them labour never so much after it, they can never 
attain this peace, without a divine intimation, or God's speak- 
ing peace to their souls ; therefore when he is pleased, for v,ise 
ends, to v/ithdraw from them, they are destitute of it ; so that 
God is hereby known bv his works, or by those influences of 
his grace, v/hereby he gives peace to conscience. 



THE BEING OF GOD. 37 

V. The being of a God appears from those vast and bound- 
less desires, which are impiiuited in the soul ; so that it can take 
up its rest, and meet with full satisfaction, in nothhig short of a 
being ol lufinite perfection : therefore there is such an one, 
which is God. This will iarther appear if we consider, 

1. We find, by experience, that though the soul, at present, 
be entertained, and meets with some satisfaction in creature- 
enjoyments, yet it still craves and desires more, of what kind 
soever they be ; and the reason is, because they are not com- 
mensurate to its desires ; The eye is not satisfied with ^eeing-y 
nor the ear -with hearings Eccles. i. 8. That zvhich is ■wanting 
cannot be numbered^ ver. 15. 

2. We cannot rationally suppose that such boundless desires 
should be implanted in the soul, and yet that there should be 
nothing sufficient to satisfy them ; for then the most excellent 
creature in this lower world would be, in some respects, more 
miserable than other creatures of a lower order, which obtain 
their ultimate desire. Thus the Psalmist, speaking of the brute 
creatures, says, Psal. civ. 28. Theij are jilled -with good ; that is, 
they have all that they crave. Therefore, 

3. There must be one that is infinitely good, who can satisfy 
these desires, considered in their utmost extent; and that is 
God, the fountain of all blessedness. 

VI. The being of a God may be farther evinced, from the 
consent of all nations to this truth. Now that which all man- 
kind agrees in, must be founded in the nature of man, and that 
which is so, is evident from the light of nature. It is true, 
there are manv who have thus known God^ xvho have not xvor- 
shipped and glorijied him as God; but have been vain in their 
imaginations^ and have changed the truth of God into a lie^ and 
worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator^ as 
the apostle says, Rom. i. 21, 25. But it doth not follow from 
hence, that the heathen, Avho were guilty of idolatry, had no 
notion of a God in general, but rather the contrary ; that there 
is something in the nature of man, which suggests, that they 
ought to worship some divine being, whom they could not, by 
the light of nature, sufficiently know, and therefore they did 
service to those who were by nature no gods ; however, this 
proves that they were not wholly destitute of some ideas of a 
God, which therefore are common to all mankind. Now- that 
all nations have had some discerning that there is a God, ap- 
pears, 

1. From the credit that is to be given to all ancient history : 
which sufficiently discovers that men, in all ages, have owned 
and worshipped something that they called a God, though they 
knew not the true God. 

2. The heathen themselves, as may easily be understood 



58 THE BEING OF GOD. 

from their own M'ritings, reckoned atheism a detestable crimen 
lor this reason, because contrary to the light of nature ; and 
therefore some of them have asserted, that there is no nation in 
the world so barbarous, and void of reason, as to have no notion 
of a God. 

3. We may consider also, that no changes in the world, or in 
the circumstances of men, have wholly erased this principle: 
whatever changes there have been in the external modes of wor- 
ship, or in those things which have been received by tradition, 
still this principle has remained unalterable, that there is a God. 
Therefore the being of a God may be proved by the consent of 
all nations. 

Object. 1. But it is objected to this, that there have been 
some speculative atheists in the world. History gives us an 
account of this ; and we are infonmed, that there are some whole 
countries in Africa and America, where there is no Vrorship, 
and, as to what appears to us, no notion of a God. Therefore 
the being of a God cannot be proved by the consent of all na- 
tions. 

Answ. 1. As to the first branch of this objection, that there 
have been some speculative atheists in the world; it is true, 
history furnishes us with instances of persons who have been 
deemed so, yet their number has been very inconsiderable ; so 
that it will not follow from hence, that tlie idea of a God is not 
some way or other, impressed upon the heart of man. Might 
it not as well be said, that, because some few are bom idiots, 
therefore reason is not natural to man, or vmiversal ? And it 
may be farther observed, that they who are branded with the 
character of atheists in ancient history, or such as appear to be 
atheists in our day by their conversation, are rather practical 
atheists than speculative. We do not deny, that many in ail 
ages have, and now do, assert, and pretend to prove, that there 
is no God ; but it is plain that they discover, at some times, such 
fear and distress of conscience, as is sufficient to disprove what 
they pretend to defend by arg-uments. 

2. As to the second branch of the objection, that there are 
some parts of the world, where the people seem to be so stupid, 
as not to o\\Ti or worship a God ; this is hard to be proved ; 
neither have any, that have asserted it, had that familiarity- 
with them, as to be able to determine what their sentiments are 
about this matter. 

But suppose it were true in fact, that some nations have no 
notion of a God or religion, nothing could be argued from it, 
but that such nations are barbarous and brutish, and though 
they have the principle of reason, do not act like reasonable 
creatures ; and it is sufficient to our purpose to assert, that all 
men, acting like reasonable creatures, or who argue from those 



THE BEING OF. GOD. 39^ 

principles of reason, that they are born with, may from thence 
conclude that there is a God. 

Object. 2. It is farther objected by atheists against the being 
of God, and indeed against all religion, which is founded there- 
on, that both one and the other took i»s rise from human policy, 
that hereby the world, being amused with such-like specula- 
tions, might be restrained from those irregularities, which were 
inconsistent with the well-being of civil government j and that 
this Avas readily received, and propagated by tradition, and so 
by an implicit faith transmitted from one generation to another, 
among those who enquired not into the reason of what they 
believed; and that all this was supported by fear, which fixed 
their belief in this matter: so that human policy invented, tra- 
dition propagated, and fear rooted in the minds of men, what 
we call the natural ideas of God and religion. 

Ans-w. This is a vile insinuation, but much in the mouths of 
atheists, without any shadow of reason, or attempt to prove it j 
and indeed it may be easily disproved. Therefore, 

1. It appears that the notices we have of the being of a God, 
are not in the least founded in state policy, as a trick of men, to 
keep up some religion in the world, as necessary for the sup- 
port of civil government. For, 

If the notion of a God, and religion consequential hereon, 
were a contrivance of human policy, it would follow, 

(1.) That it must be either the invention of one single man, 
or else it was the result of the contrivance of many convened 
together in a joint assembly of men, in confederacy, to impose 
on the world. 

If it was the invention of one man, who was he ? when and 
where did he live I What history gives the least account of 
him ? or when was the world without all knowledge of a deity, 
and some religion, that we may know, at least, in what age thi^ 
notion first sprang up, or was contrived ? Or could the contri- 
vance of one man be so universally complied with, and yet none 
pretend to know who he was, or when he lived ? And if it was 
the contrivance of a number of men convened together, how 
was this possible, and yet the thing not be discovered ? or how 
could the princes of the earth, who were at the head of this 
contrivance, have mutual intelligence, or be convened together ? 
By whose authority did they meet ? or what was the occasion 
thereof ? 

(2.) It is morally impossible, that such a piece of state policy 
should be made use of to deceive the world, and universally 
take place, and yet none in any age ever discover the impos- 
ture. The world could never be so imposed on, and yet not 
know by whom ; the plot would certainly have been confessed 
h.y some who were in the secret. 



40 THE BEING OF GO©. 

(3.) If human policy hsd first invented this notion, certainly 
the princes and great ni n oi the worid, who had a hand in it, 
would have exempted themselves from any obligation to own a 
God,, or any form of M'orship, whereby they acknowledge him 
their superior ; for impostors generally design to beguile others, 
but to exempt themselves from what they bind them to. If any 
of the princes, or great men of the world, had invented this 
opinion, that there is a God, and that he is to be worshipped, 
their pride would have led them to persuade the world that they 
were gods themselves, and ought to be worshipped; they would 
never have included themselves in the obligation to own a sub- 
jection to God, if the notion of a God had, for political ends, 
been invented by them. 

(4.) If the belief of a God was invented by human policy, 
how came it to be universally received by the world ? It is 
ceriain, that it was not propagated by persecution ; for though 
thei'^ ha? been persecution to inforce particular modes of wor- 
shi".^; ','et there never was anv such method used to inforce the 
belief oi a God, for that took place without any need thereof, it 
being instamped on the nature of man. 

If therefore it v/as not propagated by force, neither was the 
belief of a God spread through the world by fraud, what are 
those arts which are pretended to have been used to propagate 
it ? It took its rise, say they, from human policy ; but the po- 
liticians not known, nor the arts they used to persuade the 
world that there is a God found out. How unreasonable there- 
fore is this objection, or rather cavil, against a deity, when the 
atheists pretend that it was the result of human policy ! 

2. It appears that the belief of a God was not propagated in 
the world merely by tradition, and so received bv implicit faith. 
For, ' • : / » 

(1.) Those notions that have been received with implicit 
faith by tradition, from generation to generation, are not pre- 
tended to be proved by reason ; but the belief of a God is 
founded on the highest reason ; so that if no one in the world 
believed it besides myself, I am bound to believe it, or else 
must no longer lay claim to that reason which is natural to 
mankind, and should rather shew myself a brute than a man. 

(2.) No schemes of religion, that were propagated merely by 
tradition, have been universally received ; for tradition respects 
particuhir nations, or a particular set of men, who have propa- 
gated them. But as has been before considered the belief of a 
God has universally prevailed. Moreover, if the belief of a' 
God was thus spread by tradition through the world, why was 
not the mode of worship settled, that so there might be but one 
religion in the world ? The reason is, because their respective 
modes of worship were received, by tiie heathen, by tradition : 



THE BEING OF GOD. 44. 

"tvhereas the belief of a God was not so, but is rooted in the na- 
ture of man. 

(3.) Whatever has been received only by tradition, has not 
continued in the world in all the turns, changes, and overthrow 
of particular nations, that received it ; but the belief of a God 
has continued in the world throughout all the ages and changes 
thereof : therefore it is not founded in tradition, but by the light 
of nature. 

3. It appears, moreover, that the belief of a God could not 
take its first rise merely from fear of punishment, which men 
expected would be inflicted by him, though that be a strong ar- 
gument to establish us in the belief thereof. For, 

(1.) A liableness to punishment for crimes committed, sup- 
poses that there is a God, who is offended by sin, and from 
whom punishment is expected. Therefore as the effect cannot 
give being to the cause, so fear could not be the first ground 
and reason of the belief of a God. But, 

(2.) The principal idea which mankind has of Gbd, and that 
which is most natural to us, is, that of an infinitely amiable 
object, and so we conceive of him, as a being of infinite good- 
ness, 1 John iv. 8. God is love. Thus we conceive of him, as the 
spring of all we enjoy and hope for ; and as for fear, that is 
only what arises in the breasts of wicked men, and is founded 
in the secondary ideas we have of him ; to wit, as taking ven- 
geance, supposing he is offended. But they who do not offend 
him are not afraid of his vengeance ; and the sentiments of the 
worst of men are not to be our rule in judging concerning the 
being of a God. If these believe that there is a God, only be- 
cause they fear him, others believe him to be the fountain of all 
blessedness, and as such they love him : therefore the ideas 
that men have of the being of a God, did not arise from fear. 

VII. The being of a God, may be proved from the works of 
providence, whereby the world is governed, as well as preserved 
from returning to its first nothing. It is that which supplies all 
creatures with those things that their respective natures or ne- 
cessities require : creatures could no more provide for them- 
selves than they could make themselves ,• therefore he that pro- 
vides all things for them is God. All finite beings have their 
respective wants, whether they are sensible thereof or no ; an4 
he must be all-sufficient that can fill or supply the necessities of 
all things, and such an one is God. 

Thus the Psalmist speaks of this God, as supplying the ne* 
cessities of beasts and creepbig thvigs ; who are said, to wait 
2tpqn him^ that he viaij give them their meat in due season, Psal^ 
civ. 25, 27. Psal. cxlv. 15, 16. 

In considering the providence of God, whereby his being is 
evinced, we may observe, 

V»L. I. F 



42 llJE BEING OF GOD. 

1. The extraordinaiy dispensations thereof, when things 
happen contrary to tlie common course, and fixed laws of na- 
ture, as when miracles have been wrouglit. These are undeni- 
able proofs of the being of a God ; for herein a check or stop 
is put to the course of nature, the fixed order or laws thereof 
controuled or inverted ; and this none can do but he who is the 
Ood and author thereof. To deny that miracles have been 
wrought, is little better than scepticism ; since it hath been 
]}roved, by the most unquestionable testimony, contained not 
only in scripture, but in other writings, and is confessed, even 
by those who deny the principal things designed to be confirm- 
ed thereby. It is true, they were never wrought with an imme- 
diate design to prove that there is a God, since that is sufficient- 
ly demonstrated without them ; but in as much as they have 
been wrought Avith other views, the being of a God, whose im- 
mediate power has been exerted therein, appears beyond all 
contradiction. 

2. This may be proved from the common dispensations of 
providence, which we daily behold and experience in the world. 

These we call common, because they contain nothing mi- 
raculous, or contrary to the laws of nature : they are indeed 
wonderful, and have in them the traces and footsteps of infinite 
wisdom and sovereignty, and therefore prove that there is a 
God. For, 

(1.) It cannot otherwise be accounted for, that so mr.ny 
things should befal us, or others in the world, that are altoge- 
ther unlooked for. Thus one is cast dovvnii, and a blast thrown 
on all his endeavours, and another raised beyond his expecta- 
tion, Psal. Ixxv. 6, 7. PromotioJi cometh neither from the east^ 
nor from the xvest^ nor from the south. But God is the judge ; 
he putteth doxvn one^ and setteth up another. 

(2.) The wisest and best concerted schemes of men are of- 
ten baffled, and brought to nought, by some unexpected occur- 
rence of providence, which argues a divine controul, as God 
says, 1 Cor. \. 19. / will destroy the -wisdom of the rvise^ and 
xvill bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. And 
Vt^ho is it that can turn the counsels of men into foolishness ; 
but an infinitely wise God ? 

VIII. The being of a God may be proved by the foretelling 
future events, which have come to pass accordingly. For, 

1. No creature can, by his own wisdom or stigacity, foretel 
future contingent events with a certain peremptory and inftUIi- 
-ble knowledge, and not by mere conjecture, Isa. xli. 24. She%o 
the things that are to come hereafter^ thatxve may knoxv that ye 
ore gods. And the reason is plain, because our knowledge 
reaches no farther than to see effects, and judge of them in and 
by tlieir causes. Thus we may easily foretel that necessary 



THE BEING OF GOD. 43 

causes will produce those effects that are agreeable to their na- 
ture : but when the effect is not necessary, but contingent, or 
purely arbitrary, then we have nothing to judge by, and there- 
fore cannot come to the knowledge of things future, without 
an intimation given us thereof, by him -who orders and disposes 
of all things, and that is God : and therefore to foretel things to 
come in this sense, is an evident proof of the being of God. 

2. That there have been such predictions, and that the things 
foretold have come to pass accordingly, is very obvious from 
scripture : and if it be highly reasonable to believe that which 
is so well attested, as scripture is, we are bound from hence to 
conclude that there is a God. 

But since we are" arguing, at present, with those who deny a 
God, and consequently all scripture-revelation, we will only 
suppose that they whom we contend with will allow that some 
contingent events have been foretold ,• and then it will follow, 
that this could be done no other w;n-, but by some intimation 
from one that is omniscient, and that is God. 

IX. The being of a God appears from his providing for the 
necessities of all living. Here let us consider, 

1 . That there is a natural instinct in all creatures, to take care 
of and provide for their young, before they are capable of pro- 
viding for themselves. This is not only observable in mankind, 
as the prophet says, Isa. xlix. 15. Can a xvoman forget her 
sucking child ? but also in the lower sort of creatures ,* and 
among them in those who are naturally most fierce and savage, 
even they provide for their young with extraordinary diligence, 
and sometimes neglect, and almost starve, themselves to pro- 
vide for them, and sometimes endanger their own lives to de- 
fend them. 

2. They bring forth their young at the most convenient sea- 
son of the year, when the grass begins to spring to supply them 
with food, and when the fowls of the air may get a livelihood 
by picking up the seed that is sown, and not covered by the 
earth, and when the trees begin to put foith their fruits to sup- 
ply and feed them. 

3. When they bring forth their young, there is a providence 
that provides the breast, the paps, the udder reijiexiished witli 
milk to feed them ; and there is a natural instinct in tlicir 
young, without instruction, to desire to receive their nourish- 
jnent that way. 

4. Providence has furnished many of the beasts of the fields 
with weapons for their defence, and has given others a natural 
swiftness to fly from danger, and has provided licles and ca* 
vems in the earth to secure them from those that pursue them. 
And this cannot be the effect of mere chance, bnt it is an evi- 
dent proof of the being of a God, 



4A THE BEING OF GOE. 

5. Providence is, in a peculiar manner, concerned for the 
supply of man, the noblest of all ci^eatures in the world ; He 
g'lvethfoodto alljiesh, Psal. cxxxvi. 25. Thou preserv est man 
and beast, Psal xxxvi. 6. The earth is stored with variety of 
food ; and whereas the poor, which is the greater part of man- 
kind, cannot purchase those far-fetched, or costly dainties, 
which are the support of luxury, these may, by their industr\^, 
provide that food which is most common, and with which the 
earth is plentifully stored, whereby their lives and health are as 
well maintained, as the rich, who fare deliciously every day ; 
a.nd if their families increase, and a greater number is to be pro- 
vided for, they generally have a supply in proportion to their 
increasing rmiTiber, 

6. Providence has stored the isarth with various medicines, 
arid given skill to men to use them as a relief against the ma- 
ny sicknesses that we are exposed to. All these things, and inr 
numerable other instances that might be given, argue the care 
and bounty, and consequently prove the being of God, vvliosc 
tender mercies are over all his works. 

Here let us consider how the providence of God provides for 
the safety of man against those things that threaten his ruin. 

The contrariety and opposition of things one to anothev 
would bring with them inevitable destruction, did not provi- 
dence prevent it. As, 

(4.) Those things, which are the greatest blessings of nar 
ture, v/ould be destructive, were there not a providence : as 
the sun that enlightens and cherishes the world by its heat and 
influence, would be of no advantage, were it situate at too great 
a distance, and would burn it yp if it were too near. So the sea 
would swallow up, and bring a deluge on the earth, if God har]. 
not, by his decree, fixed it within certain bpiinds, and made the 
shore an itxflosure. to it, and said hitherto shalt thou go a;id no 
farther. 

(2.) The elements are advantageous to us, by their due tem- 
perature and mixture ; but, Avere it otherwise, they would be 
destructive. So the various humours and jarring principles in 
our bodies would tend to destroy us, but that they are so mix- 
ed, as the God of nature, has tempered and disposed them, for 
the preservation of life and health. 

(J.) The wi}d beasts would destroy us, had not God put the 
fear and dread of man into them, or, at least, caused them not 
to desire to be where men live ; the forests and desart places, 
remote frorn cities, being allotted for them ; and some creatures 
vV'ould be destructive to men, by the increase of their number, 
did they not devour one another. And insects would destroy 
the fruits of the earth, did not one season of the year help for 
ward their destruction, as anqther tends to breed them. 



THE BEING OF G09. 45 

(4.) Men by reason of their contrary tempers and interest?, 
and that malice and envy, which is the consequence of our firyt 
apostacy, would destroy one another, if there were not a provi- 
dence that restrains them, and gives a check to that wicked- 
ness that is natural to them, whereby the world is kept in a 
gi-eater measure of peace than otherwise it wouid be ; hence» 
the Psalmist says, Psal. Ixxvi. 10. Surelij the xvrath of man shall 
praise thee ; the remainder of xvrath shalt thou restrain. 

Object. It is objected, by atheists, against the being of a God, 
that the wicked are observed to prosper in the world, and the 
righteous are oppressed. This temptation the Psalmist was al- 
most overcome by ; as he says, my feet xvcre almost gone ; my 
steps had xuell nigh slipt. For I xvas envious at the foolish^ xvhen 
J saw the prosperity of the xvicked^ Psal. Ixxiii. 2, 3. 

Ansxv. To this it may be answered, 

1. That the idea of infinite sovereignty is included in that of 
a God ; and this distribution of good and evil, if made at any 
time, v.dthout regard to the deserts of men, argues the sove- 
reignty of providence ; and therefore proves that there is a 
God, who gives no account of his matters, but has an absolute 
right to do what ho will with his own. 

2. There is a display of infinite wisdom in these dispensa- 
tions of providence, in that the good man is made better by at- 
fliction, as hereby the kindness and care of providence appears ; 
and the Avicked man is forced to vwn, by his daily experience, 
that all the outward blessings he enjoys in this world, cannot 
make him easy or happy, or be a sufficient portion for him. 

3. Outward prosperity doth not prevent or remove inward 
remorse, or terror ot conscience, which embitters the joys of 
the wicked; A dreadful sound is in his ears ; in prosperity the 
destroyer shall come upon him^ Job xv. 21. Even in laughttr 
the heart is sorroxvful ; and the end of that mirth is heavine>.s^ 
Prov. xiv. 13. And, on the other hand, outward trouble in the 
godly is not inconsistent witii spiritual joy and inward peace, 
which is more than a balance for all the distresses they labour 
under ; it is said, The heart knoxveth his orvn bitterness^ and a 
stranger doth not intermeddle xvith his Jot;, Prov. xr\'. 10. He 
shall be satisfied from Iwnsef ver. 14. 

4. We are not to judge of things according to their present 
appearance, when we determine a person happ'/ or n^iserablc, 
but are to consider the end thereof, since every ihing is well that 
ends well. Thus the Psalmist, who, as was before obserxcd, 
was staggered at the prosperity of the wicked, had his faith es- 
tablished, by considering the different events of things. Con- 
cerning the wicked he says Psal. Ixxiii. 18, 19, 20. Thou didst 
set them in slippery places ; thou castcdst them doxun to destruc- 
tion. Hqxo are they brought into desobtion^ as in a moment I 



46 THS BEING OF GOD. 

they are utterly consumed tvith terrors. As a dream when one 
uioaketh : so^ Lord^ rvhen thou aivakest^ thou shalt despise their 
image ; which is a very beautiful expression, representing all 
their happiness as imaginary, a vain dream, and such as is wor- 
thy to be contemned : but as for the righteous, he represents 
them as under the special protection and guidance of God here, 
and at last received to glory, and there enjoying him as their 
everlasting portion. 

Having considered how the light of nature, and the works of 
God prove his being, we shall proceed to shew how this appears 
from scripture, as it is observed in this answer, that the word 
and Spirit only do sufficiently and effectually reveal him unto 
men for their salvation. The arguments hitherto laid down are 
directed more especially to those who are not convinced that 
there is a God, and consequently deny the divine original of 
f-cripture : but this argument supposes a conviction of both ; but 
yet it must not be supposed unnecessary, in as much as we are 
oftentimes exposed to many temptations, which tend to stagger 
our faith ; so tl^at though we may not peremptorily deny that 
there is a God, yet we may desire some additional evidence of 
his being and perfections, beyond what the light of nature af- 
fords ; and this we have in scripture. Herein the gloiy of God 
shines forth with the greatest lustre, and we have an account of 
^viorks more glorious than those of nature, included in the way 
of salvation by a Mediator. The light of nature, indeed, proves 
that there is a God ; but the word of God discovers him to us 
as a reconciled God and Father to all who believe, and is also 
attended with- those internal convictions and evidences of this 
truth, which are the peculiar gifts and graces of the Holy Spi- 
rit ; and therefore it is well observed, that this knowledge only 
li sufficient and effectual to salvation ; which leads us to con- 
sider the insufficiency of the light of nature to answer this end. 
The knowledge of God, that may be attained thereby, is suffi- 
cient, indeed, in some measure, to restrain our corrvipt passions, 
and it is conducive to the peace and welfare of civil societies : 
it affords some conviction of sin, and, in some respects, leaves 
men without excuse, and renders their condemnation less ag- 
gravated than that of those who sin against gospel light ; but 
yet it is insufficient to salvation, since it is a truth of universal 
f^xtent, that there is salvation in no other., but in Christy Acts 
iv. 12. and that it is life eternal to knoxv not only the true God., 
but Jesus Christy whom he hath sent., John xvii. 3. and this can- 
not be known by the light of natvire, but by divine n-velation ? 
which leads us to consider in what respect the knowledge of 
God, as it is contained in and derived from scripture, is suffi- 
cient to salvation. 

Here we do not assert the sufficiency.'thereof, exclusive of tlie 



THE BEING OF GOD. 4? 

aids of divine gi-ace, so as to oppose the word to the Spirit : 
therefore it is said, in this answer, that the word and Spirit of 
God alone can reveal him to men sufficiently to their salvation. 
The word is a sufficient rule, so that we need no other to be a 
standard of our faith, and to direct us in the way to eternal life : 
but it is the Spirit that enables us to regard, understand, and 
apply this rule, and to walk according to it : these two are not 
to l)e separated; the Spirit doth not save any without the 
word, (a) and the word is not effectual to salvation, unless made 
so by the Spirit. 

That nothing short of scripture -revelation is sufficient to sal- 
vation, will appear, if we compare it with the natural knowledge 
we have of God. For, 

1. Though the light of nature shews us that there is a God, 
it doth not fully display liis perfections, so as they are mani- 
fested in scripture, wherein God is beheld in the face of Christ. 

2. Neither doth it discover any thing of the doctrine of a 
Trinity of persons in the divine essence, who are equally the 
object of faith : nor doth it give us any intimation of Christ, as 
the Lord our righteousness, in whom we obtain forgiveness of 
sins : this is known only by scripture-revelation ; therefore, 
since this is necessary to salvation, we are bound to conclude 
that the scripture alone is sufficient to lead to it. 

3. The light of nature suggests, it is true, that God is to he 
worshipped ; but there is an instituted way of worshipping him, 
which depends wholly on divine revelation ; and since this is 
necessary, it proves the necessity of scripture. 

4. There is no salvation without communion with God ; oi- 
he that does not enjoy him here, shall not enjoy hhu for ever 
hereafter. Now the enjoyment of God is what we attain by 
faith, which is founded on scripture. Thus the apostle says, 
1 John i. 3. That which zve have seefi and heard,, declare xue 
unto you^ that ye also may have felhxvship xvith us ; and truli/ 
our fellowship is with the Father^ andxvith his son Jesus Christ. 

But since it is one thing to say, that the knowledge of God, 
which is derived from scripture, is sufficient to salvation in an 
objective way; that is, that it is a sufficient rule to lead us to 
.salvation, and another thing to say, that it is made effectual 
thereunto : we are now to inquire when it is made so. In an- 
swer to which, let us consider, that the doctrines contained in 
scripture are made effectual to salvation ; not by all the skill or 
wisdom of men representing them in their truest light, nor by 
all the power of reasoning, which we are capable of, without 
the aids of divine grace, but they are made effectual by thr 
Spirit ; and this he does, 

(fl) See this doubtful dftctrine discussal ix)st Qvicst 60 



48 TH£ WORD or g6d. 

(1.) By the internal illumination of the mind, giving a spirit" 
ual discerning of divine truth, which the natural man receiveth 
not, as the apostle says, 1 Cor. ii. 14. and it is called, 2 Cor. 
IV. 6, a shining into our hearts^ to give the light of the knoxv- 
ledge of the glory of God ^ in the face of Jesus Christ i 

(2.) By subduing the obstinate will of man, and so enabling 
it to "^^ield to a ready, chcarful, and universal obedience to the 
divine commands contained in scripture ; and, in particular, in- 
clining it to own Christ's authority, as king of saints ; and to 
t,ay, as converted Paul did, Lord^ what wilt thou have me to 
do ? Acts ix. 6. 

(3.) He works upon our affections, exciting in us holy de- 
liires after God and Christ, and a very high esteem and value 
for divine truth, and remo^'es all those prejudices which 
are in our minds against it, opens and enlarges our hearts to re- 
ceive the word, and comply with all the commands thereof, 
thus. Acts xvi. 14. The Lord opened the heart of Lydia^ that 
she attended to the things that were spoken of Paul. So David 
prays, Psal. cxix. 18. compared with v. 5. Open thou viine 
eyes^ that I may behold rvondrous things out of thy laxv. that 
my -ways were directed to keep thy statutes ! 



Quest. III. What is the Word of God? 

Answ. The holy scriptures of the Old and New Testament 
are the word of God, the only rule of faith and obedience. 

IN speaking to this answer, we shall consider the several 
names by which the scripture is set forth with the import 
thereof, and more particularly that by which it is most known ; 
to wit, the Old and New Testament, and then speak of it as a 
rule of faith and obedience. 

I. There are se\'eral names given to the word of God, in 
Psalm cxix. one of which is found in almost every verse 
thereof. 

It is sometimes called his law, statutes, precepts, command- 
ments, or ordinances, (a) to signify his authority and power to 



(u) He who has created all things, with all their relations, and who is the uni- 
versal Sovereign, has a right to the allegiance of his rational creatures, and they 
are under obligation to obey his laws, because it is his will that tliey should do 
so. He has connected oui- interest with our duty, as a motive to obedience, and 
because he is good; but if we should substitute utility for his authority, and con- 
form to his laws, merely because they are advantageous, we rebel against our So- 
vereign, and renounce his authority, that we may pursue our o%vn advantage. Vir- 
tue is amiable for its intrinsic rectitude. If we choose to practice it merely be- 
cause beautiful, wc please om-selves ; and though the excellency of vh-tue is iu 
tended as a motive, and it is well tor the man who is chai-med by it, yet, if this b;' 
the cnW jiir.cemciit, he has lost sight cf tLe Divine wuthority, loid his \ irt-.-.o. i . 



THE WORD OF GOD. %9 

demand obedience of his creatures whicli he does therein, and 
shews us in wiiat particular instances, and how we are to yield 
obedience to it. 

It is also called his judgments, impl)'ing that he is the great 
Judge of the world, and that he will deal with men in a judi- 
cial way, according to their works, as agreeable or disagree- 
able to this law of his, contained in his word ; and, for this rea- 
son, it is also called his righteousness, because all that he com- 
inands in his word is holy and just, and his service highly rea- 
sonable. 

It is also called God's testimonies, as containing the witness, 
evidence, or record, that he has given to his own perfections, 
whereby he has demonstrated them to the world. Thus we are 
said, 2 Cor. iii. 18. To behold^ as in a glass, the glory of the 
Lord. 

It is also called his way, as containing a declaration of the 
glorious works that he has done, both of nature and grace ; the 
various methods of his dealing with men, or the way that they 
should walk in, which leads to eternal life. 

Moreover, it is called, Rom. iii. 2. The oracles of God^ to 
denote that many things contained in it could not have been 
known by us till he was pleased to reveal them therein. Agree- 
no obedience to the laws of God. If the obligation of vii-tue be founded solely on 
its utility ,or beai'.t}', we ai'e at libei-ty to forego our adv-antag-e, oi" pleasure with- 
out guilt, and remorse of conscience will be unaccounlyble. It is also y?; and pro- 
per, that we shoidd practice virtue, but this is no more to be substituted for the 
Divine authority, than tha other motives of advantage or pleasure. If it be ob- 
jected, that the fitness of moral good is eternal, and a rule even to Deity, and so 
may be deemed a foundation of the obligation of human virtue. It is conceded 
that the fitness of vii'lue is eternal, for God is eternal, and has been always holy, 
and just; in the same manner also the beauty of virtue is eternal ; but to suppose 
these to have existed anterior to tliought and action, and to be independent of i^n 
eternally and immut^ibly holy God is to indulge the mind m specidations, which, 
to say the least of them, are groimclless. We may as well assign a cause to eter- 
nal existence, as to eternal holiness. When the Creator formed the Universe of in- 
telligent creatures, he g'ave them, witli tlieir existence, the various relations and 
circumstimces which sprang up with them : and their obligations witii respect to 
him and his works oi'iginated at the same time, and frf)m the same source ; which 
could be no other than the Divine pleasui-e ; and the positive express apix);nt- 
ments, which iiave been since super-added, rest upon the same basis, the will of 
God. 

That we might discern his will and conform to it, he has set before us his owa 
character, which in all thhigs is good. He has given us reason, or active intellec- 
tual powers capable of pursuing the truth, and discovering his character, as a rule 
of our conduct. And because reason is matured by slow degrees, and the adA'an- 
lages for its improvement are unequal, he has given us a sense susceptible of the 
impressions of good and evil, by which we can distinguish between moral gocxi 
and evil almost as easily, as by our natural senses we cliscern the differences be- 
tween light and darkness, sweetness and bitterness ; and thus lias he rendered the 
judgment upon our own actions almost always un.ivoid:Jde. The light of nature 
has been confirmed by express revelation ; and because the law of nature identifies 
itself with the written law of God, the obligation of both rests tipon ihe Sitnte 
foundation, the SQ%-ereign will. 

Vol. I. G 



so iHK WORD or Cod. 

ably hereto, the apostle speaks of the gi-eat things contained in 
the gospel, as being hid in God ; hid from ages and generations 
past, but now made manifest to the saints, Eph. iii. 9, Col. 
i. 26. 

Again it is sometimes called the gospel, especially those 
parts of scripture which contain the glad tidings of salvation by 
Christ, or the method which God ordained for the taking away 
the guilt, and subduing the power of sin ; and particularly the 
apostle calls it, T/ie glorious gospel of the blessed God; 1 Tim. 
i. 11. and the gospel of our scdvat'ion. Eph. i. 13. 

And, in this answer, it is called the Old and New Testa- 
ment ; that part of it which was written before our Saviour's 
incarnation, which contains a relation of God's dealings with 
his church, from the beginning of the world to that time, or a 
prediction of what should be fulfdied in following ages, is called 
the Old Testament. The other which contains an account of 
(iod's dispensation of grace, from Christ's first to his second 
coming is called the New. 

A testament is the declared or '.v^ritten will of a person, in 
which some things are given to those who are concerned or de- 
scribed tiierein. Thus the scripture is God's written will or tes* 
tament, containing an account of what he has freely given in 
his covenant of grace to fallen man ', and this is the principal 
subject matter of scripture, as a testament > therefore it contains 
an account, 

1. Of many valuable legacies given to the heirs of salvation; 
the blessings of both worlds, all the privileges contained in 
those great and precious promises, with which the scripture so 
abounds. Thus it is said. Thou s halt guide mexutth thy counsel^ 
and afterward receive me to glory ; Psal. Ixiii. 24. and the Lord 
will give grace and glory ^ Psal. Ixxxiv. 11. 

2. It describes the testator Christ, Avho gives eternal life to 
his people, and confirms all the promises which are made in 
him ; as they are said, 2 Cor. i. 20. To be in him yea andamen^ 
to the glorij of God; and more especially he ratified this testa- 
ment by his death as the same apostle observes, which is a 
knoAvn iTiaxim of the civil law, that xvhere a testament is, there 
must of necessity be the death of the testator, {ci) tilth, ix. 16« 
17. upon which the force or validity thereof depends. And the 
word of God gives us a large account how all the blessings, 
vvrhich God bestowed upon his people, receive their validity from 
the death of Christ. 

3. It also discovers to us who ore the heirs, or legatees, to 
whom these blessings are given, who are described therein, as 



(fl) Where a covenant is, there should be the death of the devoted victim. 



THE WORD OF OOD. 51 

repenting, believing, returning sinners, who may lay claim tp 
the blessings of the covenant ot grace. 

4. It has several seals annexed to it, viz. the sacraments un- 
der the Old and New Testiunent, of which we have a particu- 
lar account in scripture. 

This leads us to consider how the scripture is otherwise di- 
V^ided or distinguished. 

(1.) As to the Old Testament, it is sometimes distinguished 
or divided into Moses o7id the prophets ; Luke xvi. 29. or 3Io- 
ses'y the prophets, and the psalms-, Luke xxiv. 44. And it may 
be considered also as containing historical and prophetic wri- 
tings, and others that are more especially doctrinal or poetical ; 
and the prophets may be considered as to the time when they 
wrote, some before and others after the captivity. They may 
iilso be distinguished as to tiie subject matter of them : some 
contain a very clear and particular account of the person and 
kingdom of Christ, e. g, Isaiah who is, for this reason, b_v some, 
called the evangelical prophet. Others contain reproofs, and 
denounce and lament approaching judgments, as the prophet 
Jeremiali. Others encourage the building of the temple, the 
setting up the Avorship of God, and the reformation of the peo- 
ple upon their return from captivity : thus Zechariah and Hag" 
gai. As for the historical parts of scripture, these either con- 
tain an account of Ciod's dealings with his people before the 
captivity j as Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, ^c, or after it, 
as Ezra and Nehemiah. 

(2.) The books of the New Testament may be thus divided. 
Some of them are historical, viz, such as contain the life and 
death of our SaA iour, as the four gospels, or tb^ ministry of the 
apostles, and the first planting and spreading cf the gospel, as 
the Acts of the Apostles. Others are more especially doctrinal, 
a!id are wrote in the form of an epistle by the apostle Paul, 
and some other of the apostles. 

One book is prophetical, as the Revelations, wherein is fore- 
told the different state and condition of the church, the perse- 
cutions it should meet Avith from its Anti-christian enemies, its 
final victory over them, and its triumphs, as reigning with 
Christ in his kingdom. 

This leads us to consider, when God first revealed his will 
to man in scripture, and how this revelation was gradually en- 
larged, and transmitted down to the church in succeeding ages. 
There was no written word, from the beginning of the world, 
till Moses's time, which Avas betAveen tAVo and three thousand 
years ; and it was almost a thousand years longer before the 
canon of the Old Testament Avas completed by Malachi the 
last prophet, and some hundred years after that before the 
canon of the New Testament Avas given ; so that God revealed 



52 THE WORD OF GOD. 

his will, as the apostle says, in the beginning of the epistle to 
the Hebrews, at aundry timcs^ as well as in divers mantiers, and 
by divers i aspired writej-s. 

ISIotwitlistandirxg the church, before it had a written word, 
was not destitute of a rule of faith and obedience, neither were 
they unacquainted with the v/ay of salvation ; for to suppose 
this, would be greatly to detract from the glory of the divine 
government, and reflect on God's goodness ; therefore he took 
other wa)'s to 'supply the want of a written Avord, and hereby 
shewed his sovereignty, in that he can make known his will 
what way he pleases, and his wisdom and goodness, in giving 
his written word at such a time when the necessities of men 
most required it. This will appear, if we consider, 

1. That when there was no written w^ord, the Son of God 
frequently condescended to appear himself, and converse with 
man, and so revealed his mind and will to him. 

2. Tiiere was the ministry of angels subservient to this end, 
in which respect the word %ras oiten spoken by angels, sent to 
instruct men in the mind ajid will of God. 

3. The church had among them all this while, more or less, 
the spirit of prophecy, whereby many were instructed in the 
mind of God ; and though they Avere not commanded to com- 
mit what they received by inspiration to writing, yet tiiey 
were hereby furnished to instruct others in the way of salva- 
tion. Thus Enoch is said to have prophesied in his day ; Jude 
ver. 14, 15. and Noah is called, a preacher of righteousness^ 
2 Pet. ii. 5. Heb. xi. 7. 

, 4. Great part of this time the lives of men were very long, 
(viz.^ eight or nine hundred years, and so the same persons 
might transmit the word of God by their own living testimony. 

5. Afterwards in the latter part of this interA ai oi time, when 
there was no Avritten word, the world apostatised from God, 
and almost all flesh corrupted their way ; not ior want of a sui- 
ficient rule of obedience, but through the perverseness and de- 
pravity of their nature ; and afterwards the world was almost 
wholly sunk into idolatry, and so were judicially excluded irom 
God's special care ; and since Abraham's family was the only 
church that remained in the world, God continued to commu- 
nicate to them the knowledge of his will in those extraordinary 
ways, as he had done to the faithful in former ages. 

6. When man'^s life was shortened, and reduced to the same 
standard, as now it is, of threescore and ten years, and the 
church was very numerous, increased to a great nation, and 
Cxod had promised that he wovdd increase them yet more, then 
they stood in greater need of a written word to prevent tlie in- 
conveniences that might have arisen from their continuing any 
longer without one, and God thouglu fit, as a great instance of 



THE WORD OF GOD. SS 

favour to man, to command Moses to write his law, as a stand- 
ing rule of faith and obedience to his church. 

This leads us to consider a very important question, viz. 
whether the church, under the Old Testament dispensation, 
understood this written word, or the spiritual meaning of those 
laws that are contained therein? Some, indeed, have thought 
that the state of the church, l^efore Christ came in the fiesh, 
was attended with so much darkness, that they did not know 
the way of salvation, though they had, in whole or in parr, the 
scriptures of the Old Testament. The Papists g-enerally assert, 
that they did not ; and therefore they fancy, that ail who lived 
before Christ's time, were shut up in a prison, where they re- 
mained till he went from the cross to reveal himself to them, 
and so, as their leader, to conduct them in triumph to heaven. 
And some Protestants think the state of all who lived in ihose 
times, to have been attended with so much darkness, that they 
knew but little of Christ and his gospel, though shadowed forth, 
or typified by the ceremonial law ; which they found on such- 
like places of scripture as that, where Moses is said to have 
put a vail over his face ^ that the children of hrael could not sted- 
fastlij look to the end of that xvhich is abolished; and that this 
vail is done aivay in Christy 2 Cor. iii. 13, 14. and those scrip- 
tures that speak of the Jewish dispensation, as a night of dark- 
ness^ compared with that of the gospel, Vv'hich is represented as 
2i perfect day^ or the rising of the sun, Isa. xxi. 11. Cant. ii. 
17. IVIalachi iv. 2. And as these extend the darkness of that 
dispensation farther than, as I humbly conceive, they ought to 
do, so they speak more of the wrath, bondage, and terror that 
attend it, than they have ground to do, especially when they 
make it universal ; since there are several reasons, xvhich may 
induce us to believe that the church, at that time, understood a 
great deal more of the gospel, shadowed forth in the ceremo- 
nial law, and had more communion with God, and less wrath, 
terror, or bondage, than these suppose they had ; for which I 
would offer the following reasons, 

1. Some of the Old Testament saints have expressed a great 
degree of faith in Christ, and love to him, whom they expect- 
ed to come in our nature ; and many of the prophets, in their 
inspired writings, have discovered that they were not strangers 
to the way of redemption and reconciliation to God by him, 
as the Lord our righteousness. A multitude of scriptures 
might be cited, that speak of Christ, and salvation by him in 
the Old Testament, Jer. xxiii. 5, 6. Zech. xiii. 7. Psal. xxxiii. 
1, 2. compared with Rom. iv. 6. Thus Abraham is described, 
as rejoicing to see his day^ John viii. 56. and the prophet Isaiah 
is so very particular and ex})re6s in the account he gives ot his 
person and offices, that I cannot see how any one can reasona- 



54 THE WORD or CO©. 

bly conclude him to have been wholly a stranger to the gospel 
himself, Isa. xxii. 25. eh. lii. 15^ 14, 15. Can any one think 
this, who r^^ads his 53d chapter, where he treats of his life, 
death, sufferings, and offices, and of the way of salvation by him ? 

Object. It is objected hereunto that the prophets who deli- 
vered these evangelical truths, understood but little of them 
themselves, because of the darkness of the dispensation they 
were under. Thus it is said, 1 Pet. i. 10, 11, 12. that the pro- 
phets^ indeed, searched into the meaning of their own predic- 
tions, but to no purpose ; for it xvcis revealed to them, that not 
unto themselves, but unto us, they ministered ; that is, the ac- 
count they gave of our Saviovu- was not designed to be under- 
stood by them, but us in this present gospel-dispensation. 

Ansxo. The answer that may be given to this objection is, 
that though the prophets are represented as enquiring into the 
meaning of their own prophecies, yet it doth not follow from 
thence that the}^ had but little or no understanding of them : 
all that can be gathered from it is, that they studied them, as 
their own salvation was concerned therein ; but we must not 
suppose that they did this to no pur^iose, as what they were not 
able to understand ; and -when it is farther said in this scrip- 
ture, that not unto themsehe::, but unto us, they did minister the 
things that are noxv reported; the meaning is, not that they did 
not understand those things, or had not much concern in them, 
but that the glory of the gospel state, that was foretold in their 
prophecies, ^\ as wJiat v/e should behold with our eyes, and not 
they themselves, in which sense they are said not to minister to 
themselves, but to us; so that this objection hath no force in it 
to overthrow the i.^ument we are maintaining; we therefore 
proceed to consider, 

2. That it is certain, that the whole ceremonial law had a 
spiritual meaning annex;.'d to it ; for it is said. That the larv 
xvas a shadow of good things to come, Heb. x. 1. and that all 
those things happened to them for ensamples, [or tj'pes] and they 
are written for our admo):kion, 1 Cor. x. 11. 

3. It is unreasonable to suppose that the spiritud meaning 
of the ceremonial law should not be known by those to whom 
it was principally given ; or that the gospel, wTapt up therein, 
should not he seen through tl is sliadow till the dispensation 
was abolished, the ceremonial lavvr abrogated, and the nation 
cast oif to whom it v.^as given. 

4. If the knowledge of the gospel, or faith in Christ, which 
is founded upon it, be necessnry for our salvation, it was ne- 
cessarv for the salvation of those who lived in former ages ; for 
it was as much a truth then as it is now, that there is salvation 
in no other ; therefore the church of old were obliged to believe 
in him to come, as much as we are to believe in him as already 



THE WORD OF GOD. 55 

come ; but it is inconsistent with the divine goodness to require 
this knowledge, and not to give them any expedient to iittain 
it ; therefore we must either suppose this knowledge attainable 
by them, and consequently that he was revealed to them, or 
elbc they must be excluded from a possibility of salvation, when, 
at the same time, thev^ v/ere obliged to believe in Christ, v/hich 
they could not do, because they did not understand the mean- 
ing of that law, which was the only means of revealing him to 
them ; or if Christ was revealed in the ceremonial law, and 
they had no way to understand it, it is all one as though he 
had not been revealed therein. 

5. They had sufficient helps for the understanding the spi- 
ritual meaning thereof, viz. not only some hints of explication, 
given in the Old Testament, but, besides these, there was, 

(l.) Extraordinary revelation and inspiration, with which the 
Jewish church more or less, was favoured, almost throughout 
all the ages thereof; and hereby it is move than probable that, 
together with the canon of the Old Testament, they received 
the spiritual sense and meaning of those things which were 
contained therein. 

(2.) There was one whole tribe, viz. that of Levi, that was 
almost wholly employed in studying and explaining the law of 
God ; therefore it is said. They shall teach Jacob thy judg- 
ments^ and Israel thy laru, Deut. xxxiii. 10. and that the priests 
lips shoidd keep knowledge^ and they should seek the knv at his 
mouth ; Mai. ii. 7. that is, the priests should, by all proper 
methods, understand the meaning of the law, that they might 
be able to teach the people, when coming to be instructed by them. 

(3.) There were among them several schools of the prophet?? 
(in some ages at least of the Jew ish church) in which some 
had extraordinary revelations ; and they that had them not, 
made the scriptures their study, tliat they might be able to in- 
struct others ; so that, from all this, it appears that they had a 
gi"eat deal of knowledge of divine truths, and the spiritual mean- 
ing of the Old Testament ; though yet we will not deny that the 
gospel dispensation hath a clearer light, and excels in glor)\ (^/.) 



(a) PROPHETS BEFOIIETIIE CAFflVITY. 

With the order and times of their Propliecies. 
Teen before 
Gbiift. 

612 AM/VZIAII klngof Judali "^ Jonah sent with a mesja,^e. 2 Kirtjs 



Jeroboam II. king of Israel 5 xiii. 20. xiv. 25. 

800 UzziiJikingof Judah > . i 

11,? > Joel 1. 11. lu. 

Jeroboam II. 5 

800 Jeroboam II. king of Israel "} , ■ • 

Uzziah kmg of Judah 3 Amos i. ix. 
800 Jeroboam II. Uzziah Ifosea i. ii. iii. 

772 Menuliem I. Hosea iv. 

77i) Mcnahem 11. Jonah i. ii. iji. iv. 



56 



THE WORD OF GOD. 



We shall now proceed to consider, how far the Old Testa- 
ment is a rule of faith and obedience to us, though that dis- 



759 Uzziah 52. Pek,.h 1. 
753 JoTham 5. P.;kah 7. 
742 Ahaz 1. Pek:ui 18. 

In llie same yeur 

Li the same year 
740 Ahuz 3. Pekali 20. 

In the same year 
739 Aohaz 4. 
726 Hezekiali2. 

Ill the same year 

725 Hezekiah 3. Hoshea 6. 

720 H(;zekuJi7. 

715 Hezekiah 13. 

714 Hezekiah 14. 

714 Hezekiali 14. , 

In tlie same year 
In the same year 

713 Hezekiah 15. 
In the same year 

710 Hezekiali 18. 

In the same year 
In the same year 

698 Manassehl. 

628 Josiah 13. 

623 Josiah 18. 



611 Josiah 31. 
610 Jehoiakim 1. 

In the same year 
606 Jehoiakim 4. 

In the same year 

Li the same year 

In the same year 

In the same year 

In the same year 
605 Jehoiakim 5. ~ 
603 Jeboi;ikim 7. 
599 Zedekiah 1. 

In the same year 

In the same year 
* In the same year 

In the same year 
598 Zedekiah 2. 

In the same year 

In the same year 
596 Zedekiah 4. 

In the same year 
595 Zedekiah 5. Jehoiachin's capt. 5. 
594 ZedekijJi 6. Jehoiachin's capt. 6. 
593 Zedekiali 7. Jclioiixhin's capt. 7. 

Li the same ye:u", fifth month 
591 Zedekiah 9. Jehoiaxiiin's capt. 9. 

In the same year 



Isauih vi. ii. iii, iv. v. 
INIicali i. ii. 
Isaiah vii. 
Isaiah viii. ix. x. 
Isaiah xvii. 
Isaiah i. 
Isaiali xxviii. 
Hosea v. vi. 
Isaiah siv. \'er. 28, &c. 
Isaiiih XV. xvi. 
C Hosea vii. — xiv. 
( Micah iii. iv. v. vi. vii. 
Nalmm i. ii. iii. 
Isaiah xxiii. — xxvii. 
Isaiah xxxviii. xxxix. 
Isaiah xxix. xxx. — xxxv. 
Isaiah xxii. ver. 1 — 15. 
Isaiah xxi. 
Isaiah xx. 
Isaiah xviii. six. 
Isaiah x. ver. 5, &c. xi. xii. xiii. xiv. ver. 

28, &c. 
Isaiah xxxvi. xxxvii. 
Isaiah xl. — xliii. &c. 
Isaiah xxii. ver. 15. 
Jeremiali i. ii. 
JeremiaJi xi. ver. 1 — 18. 
Jeremiah iii. — x. xii. — xxi. 
Jeremiah xi. ver. 18, &c. 
Habbakkuk i. ii. iii. Zephaniahi. ii. iii- 
Jeremiali xxii. ver. 1 — 24. 
Jeremiah xxvi. 
Jeremiiih xxv. 
Jeremiah xxxv. 
Jeremiah xlvi. 
Jeremiali xxxvi. ver. 1—9. 
Jeremiah xiv. 
Daniel i. 

Jeremiah xxxvi. ver. 9, &c. 
Daniel ii. 

Jeremiah xxii. ver. 24, &c. 
Jeremiah xxiii 
Jeremiah xiii. ver. 13, &c. 
Jeremiah xxiv. 
Jeremiah xlix. ver. 34, &c- 
Jeremiah xxix. 
Jeremiah xxx. xxxi. 
Jeremiah xxvii. 
Jeremiali xxviii. 
Jeremiah 1. li. 
Ezekiel i.— vii. 
Ezekiel viii. — xi. 
Ezekiel xii. — xix. 
Ezekiel xx. — xxiii. 
Jeremiah xxi. xxxiv. ver- 1 — 8 
Jeremiali xlvii. 



THE WORD OF GOD. 



57 



pensation be abolished ; for we are not to reckon It an useless 
part of scripture, or that it does not at all concern us. Since, 



In the same year 

In tlie same year 
590 Zedekiah 10. Jeholachin's capt. 
lU. 

In the same year 

In t]ie same }'eai' 

III the same year '• 

In the same yeiU* 

In tJie same year 

In the same year 

In the same year 

In the same ycai* 
589 Zedekiali 11. Jeholachin's capt. 

11. first month 

In the same year,tliird month 

In the same year, fourth month 

In tlie same yeai*, fifth or sixth 

month 
In the same year 



Jeremiah xlviii. xlix. ver. 1 — 34. 
Ezekiel xxiv. xxv. 
Jeremiah xxxvli. ver. 1 — 11. 

Jeremiah xxxiv. ver. 8, &c. 
JeremitJi xxxvii. ver. 11 — 16. 
Jeremiiih xxxii. xxiii. 
Ezekiel xxix. vea-. 1 — 17- xxx. 
Jeremiali xxxvii. ver. 17, &c. 
Jeremiah xxxviii. ver. 1 — 14. 
Jeremiah xxxix. ver. 15, &c. 
Jeremiah xxxviii. ver. 14, &c. 

Ezekiel xxxvf. xxxvii. xxxviii, 

Ezekiel xxxi. 

Jeremiah xxxix. ver. 1 — 11. lii. ver. 

1—30. 
Jeremiah xxxix. ver. 11 — 15. xl. ver, 

1-7. 
Jeremiah xl. ver. 7. xli. xlii. xliii. xliv. 

ver. 1—8. 



PROPHETS AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE, DURING 

THE CAPTI\TrY. 

588 JEHOIACHIN's captivity 12. 
tenth month 

In the same year, twelfth month 

Between the 12 and 25 capti- 
vity 

In the same year 

In the same year 

In this year Nebuchadnezzar set 
up his golden image 
574 Jehoiachin's captivity 25. 
569 Jehoiachm's captivity 30. 

In the same year 
562 Jehoiachin's captivity 37- 
555 Belshazzar 1. 
553 Belshazzar 3. 
539 Belshazzar 17. 
538 Darius the Mede 1. 

In the same year 
536 CjTus 1. 
535 Cyrus 2. 



Ej^ckiel xxxiii. 
Ezekiel xxxii." 
Ezekiel xxxiv. xxxvi. xxxvii. xxxviii. 

xxxix. 
Obadiah 
Ezekiel xxxv. 

Daniel iii. 

Ezekiel xl. xli. &c. 

Ezekiel xxxi. ver. 17, &c. 

Daniel iv. 

Jeremiah lii. ver. 31, ^c. 

Daniel vii. 

Daniel viii. 

Daniel v. 

Daniel vi. 

Daniel ix. 

Ezra i. ii. 

Ezra iii. 



l»ROPHETS AFTER THE CAPTIVITY UNDER THE SECOND TEMPLR. 



535 CYRUS 2. 

In the tliird year of Cmis, and 
tliii-d after the captivity 

520 Darius Hystaspis 2. sixth month 
In the same year and month 
In the same jear, seventh month 
In the same year, eighth month 
In the same \cm; ninth month 

Vol. I. 



Ezra iv. 

Daniel x. xi. xii. 
Haggai i. ver. 1 — 12. 
Haggai i. ver. 12, &c. Ezra v. 
Haggai ii. ver. 1 — 10. 
Zechariah i. ver. 1 — 7- 
Haggai ii. ver. 10, £sc. 

H 



SB IHE WORD OF GOD. 

(1.) file greatest part of the doctrines contained therein af6 
of perpetual obligation to the church, in all the dispensations 
or changes thereof. 

(2.) As for the ceremonial law, which is abolished, with some 
other forensick, or political laws, by which the Jews, in parti- 
cular, were governed, these, indeed, are not so far a rule of 
obedience to us, as that we should think ourselves obliged to 
observe them, as the Jews Avere of old : notwithstanding, 

(3.) Even these are of use to us, as herein we see what was 
then the rule of faith and obedience to the church, and how 
far it agrees as to the substance thereof, or things signified 
thereby, with the present dispensation ; so that it is of use to us, 
as herein we see the wisdom, sovereignty, and grace of God 
to his church in former ages, and how what was then typified 
or prophesied, is fulfilled to us. Thus it is said, that xvhatsc- 
rver thing's were written afore-time^ ruere zvrittenfor our learn- 
ings that we, through patience and comfort of the scriptures^ 
might have hope^ Rom. xv. 4. 

The scriptures of the Old and New Testament contain a re- 
velation of the whole mind and will of God, and therefore are 
very justly styled a perfect rule of faith and obedience. Never- 
theless, 

We do not hereby intend that they contain an account of 
everv thing that God' hath done, or will do, in his works oi 
providence and grace, from the beginning to the end of time ; 
for such a large knowledge of things is not necessary for us to 
attain. ITius it is said, John xx. 30. that Christ did many other 
signs^ that are not written in the gospel ; but those things that 
are contained therein, are written that xve 7night believe; there - 



"In the same yeia-, eleventh month Zechariah i. ver. 7, ^c. ii. — \\. 
516 Darius 3. Eara v. ver. 3, &c. 

518 Darius 4. Ezra vi. ver. 1 — 15. 

In the same year, ninth month Zech. vii. viii. 
Subsequent to the fourth year 

of DiU'ius Hystaspes Zechariah ix. — xiv. 

515 Darius 6; Ezra vi. ver. 15, &c. 

462 Ahasuerus 3. Esther i. 

461 Aliasuerus 4. Esther ii. ver. 1 — 16. 

458 Ahasuerus 7. Ezra vii. — x. 

In tlie same year Esther ii. ver. 16 — 21'. 

457 Ahasueriis 8. Esther ii. ver. 21, Cifc. 

453 Ahasuerus 12. Esther iii. iv. v. &c. 

445 Ahc-suerus 20. Nehemiali i. — m. &c. 

433 Ah.isuwus 32'. Nehemiah xiii. ver. 6. 

- 429 Ah-.isuei-us 36. Malaclvi i.— iv. 

428 Aliusuerus 37- Nehemiah xiii. ver. 6, fjc. 

*96 Ptolemy Soter 9 The Canon of the Old Testament cot. 

pletcd, by adding' two books of Cliro- 
nicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, E;ither, anfl 
Malachi; by Simos the Just." 

Dk. Tatlod. 



THE WORD OF OOD. ^9 

fore we have a sufficient account thereof to support our faith ; 
and that there -wei-e many other things xvhich Jesus did^ which, 
if they should be written every one, the world xvoidd not COJI'- 
tain the books that should be written, John xxi. 25. («) 

Nor do we understand hereby, that God has given us an 
account of all his secret counsels and purposes relating to the 
event of things, or the final estate of particular persons, ab- 
stracted from those marks on which our hope of salvation is 
founded, or their outward condition, or the good or bad sucr- 
cess that shall attend their undertakings in the world, or the 
time of their living therein : these, and many more events of 
the like nature, are secrets which we are not to enquire into, 
God having not thought fit to reveal them in his word, for 
wise ends best known to himself, which shews his sovereignty, 
with respect to the matter of revelation ; Secret things belong 
unto the Lord our God; but those things which are revealed be- 
long unto us, and to our children, Deut. xxix. 29. When Peter 
was over-curious in enquiring concerning the future estate or 
condition of John, our Saviour gives him this tacit reproof, 
What is that to thee ? John xxi. 21, 22. 

Nor are we to suppose that the divine perfections, which are 
infinite, are fully and adequately revealed to man, since it is 
impossible that they should, from the nature of the thing ; for 
that Avhich is in itself incomprehensible, cannot be so revealed 
that we should be able fully to comprehend it, though that 
which is possible, or at least necessary, to be known of God, is 
clearly revealed to us. 

Again, we do not suppose that every doctrine, that is to be 
assented to as an article of faith, is revealed in express words 
in scripture, since many truths are to be deduced from it by 
just and necessary consequences, which thereby become a rule 
of faith. 

Nor are we to suppose that every part of scripture fully and 
clearly discovers all those things which are contained in the 
whole of it, since there was farther light given to the church, 
by degrees, in succeeding ages, as it grew up, from its infant- 
state, to a state of perfect manhood; therefore there is a clear- 
er and fuller revelation of the glorious mysteries of the gospel, 
under the New Testament-dispensation, than there was before 
it. The apostle uses the same metaphorical way of speaking, 
when he compares the state of the church, under the ceremo- 
nial law, to that of an heir under age, or of children under the 
direction of tutors and governors, v.^hose instruction and ad^ 
vances in knowledge are proportioned to their age ; so Go4 

• . (o) MVfxd^ is the unregenerate -vorld, John viJ. 7. and yitfw*t, is to receive k'lnd- 
Itj, 2 Cor. vii. 2. 



60 THE WORD OF GOD. 

revealed his word at sundry times^ as well as in divers manners^ 
Gal. iv. 1, 3. Hfb. i. 1. ' 

The word of God, accompanied with those additional helps 
betorc mentioned, for the churches miderstanding the sense 
thereof, was always, indeed, sufficient to lead men into the 
knowledge of divine truth ; but the canon being compleated, 
it is so now in an eminent degree ; and it is agreeable to the di- 
vine perfections that such a rule should be given ; for since sal- 
vation could not be attained, nor God glorified, without a dis- 
cover)^ of those means, which are conducive thereto, it is not 
consistent with his wisdom and goodness that we should be left 
at the utmost uncertainty as to this matter, and, at the same 
time, rendered incapable of the highest privileges which attend 
instituted worship. Can we suppose that, when all other things 
necessary to salvation are adjusted,'-and many insuperable dif- 
ficulties surmounted, and an invitation given to come and par- 
take of it, that God should lay such a bar in our way, that it 
should be impossible for us to attain it, as being without a suf- 
ficient rule ? 

And since none but God can give us such an one, it is in- 
consistent with his sovereignty to leave it to men, to prescribe 
what is acceptable in his sight. They may, indeed, give laws, 
and thereby oblige their subjects to obedience ; but thtrse must 
be such as are within their own sphere ; their power does not 
extend itself to religious matters, so that our faith and duty to 
God should depend upon their will ; for this would be a bold 
presumption, and extending their authority and influence be- 
yond due bounds ; therefore since a rule of faith is necessarj-, 
we must conclude that God has given us such an one ; and it 
must certainly be worthy of himself, and therefore perfect, and 
every way sufficient to answer the end thereof. 

That it is so, farther appears from the event, or from the 
happy consequences of our obedience to it; from that peace, 
jov, and holiness, which believers are made partakers of, while 
steadfastly adhering to this rule : thus it is said, that tlirouffh 
comfort of the scriptures they have hope^ Rom. xv..4. and that 
hereby the man of God is made zvise to salvation^ and perfect^ 
thoroiighlif furnished vnto all good works^ 2 Tim. iii. 15, 17. 
The perfection of the law is demonstrated, by the Psalmist, by 
its effects, in that it converts the soul^ makes raise, the simple^ 
rejoices the hearty enlightens the eyes^ Psal. xix. f, 8. 

We might farther argue, that the scripture is a perfect rule 
,of faith, from those threatnings which are denounced against 
(hem, who pretend to add to, or take from it; this v/as strictly 
forbidden, even when there was but a. part of scripture com- 
mitted to writing. Thus says God ; Te shall not add to the 
coord ivhich J command you; neither shall ye diminish ought 



THE WORD OF COD. 61 

from it^ Deut. iv. 2. And the apostle denounces an anathema 
against any one who should pretend to preach any other gospel, 
than that which he had received from God, Gal. i. 8, 9. And, 
in the close of the scripture, our Saviour testifies, to every man, 
that if any should add to these things, God tvould add to him the 
plagues written in this book. And if any should take away 
from this book, Godxvould take awatj his part out of the book of 
life. Rev. xxii. 18, 19. 

Thus having considered the scripture as a rule of faith, we 
proceed to shew what are the properties which belong to it as 
such. 

1. A rule, when it is designed for genend use, must have 
the sanction of public authority : thus human laws, by which a 
nation is to be governed, which are a rule to determine the 
goodness or badness of men's actions, and their desert of re- 
wards or punishments accordingly, must be established by pub- 
lic authority. Even so the scripture is a rule of faith, as it 
contains the divine laws, bv which the actions of men are to 
be tried, together with the ground which some have to expect 
future blessedness, and others to fear punishments threatened to 
those who walk not according to this rule. 

2. A rule by which we are to judge of the nature, truth, ex- 
cellency, perfection, or imperfection of any thing, must be in- 
fallible, or else it is of no use ; and, as such, nothing must be 
added to, or taken from it, for then it would cease to be a per- 
fect rule : thus it must be a certain and impartial standard, by 
which things are to be tried : Such a rule as this is scripture, as 
was but now observed. And it is an impartial rule, to which, as 
a standard, all truth and goodness is to be reduced and measured 
by it ; To the knv, and to the testimony ; if theij speak not ac- 
cording to this xuord, it is because there is no light iw them, Isa. 
viii. 20. 

3 All appeals are to be made to ^ rule, and controversies to 
be tried and determined by it. Thus the scripture, as it is a 
rule of faith, is a judge of controversies ; so that whatever 
different sentiments men have about religion, all must be redu- 
ced to, and the warrantableness thereof tried hereby, and a 
stop put to growing errors bv an appeal to this rule, rather 
than to coercive power, or the carnal weapons of violence and 
persecution. 

Moreover, the judgment we pass on ourselves, as being sin- 
cere or hypocrites, accepted or rejected of God, is to be formed 
by comparing our conduct with scripture, as the rule by which 
we are to try the goodness or badness of our state, and of our 
actions. 

4. A rule must have nothing of a different nature set up in 
competition wdth, or opposition to it j for that would be to ren- 



62 THE WORD OF GOD. 

der it useless, and unGt to be the standard of tiuth : tlius scrip- 
ture is the only rule of faith, and therefore no human traditions 
are to be set up as standards of faith in competition with it, for 
that would be to suppose it not to be a perfect rule. This the 
Papists do, and therefore may be charged, as the Pharisees 
were of old by our Saviour, with transgressing and inaking the 
i-o?nmandment of none effect bij their tradition^ Mat. xv. 3, 6. 
concerning whom he also says, that in vain they -worship hiniy 
teaching for doctrines the commandments of men^ ver. 9. What 
is this but to reflect on the wisdom, and affront the authority 
and sovereignty of God, by casting this contempt on that rule 
of faith which he hath given ? 

Having considered scripture as a rule of faith and obedience, 
it is farther observed, that it is the only rule thereof, in opposi- 
tion to the Popish doctrine of human traditions, as pretended 
to be of equal authority with it; by which means the law of 
God is made void at this day, as it was by the Jews in our 
Saviour's time, and the scripture supposed to be an imperfect 
rule ; the defect whereof they take this method to supply ; and 
to give countenance thereto, 

1. Tliey refer to those Scriptures, in which, it is said, our 
Saviour did manif other signs in the presence of his disciples^ 
■which are not written^ Jo^^" xx. 30. and his own words, where- 
in he tells them, that he had 7nany things to say unto them^ 
ivhich they could not then bear^ John xvi. 12. as also to the 
words of the apostle Paul, Acts xx. Z5. in which he puts the 
church in mind of a saving of our Saviour, received by tradi- 
tion, because not contained in any of the evangels, viz, it is 
viore blessed to give than to receive. 

To which it may be replied, 

Ansxv, (1.) That though it is true there were many things 
done, and words spoken by our Saviour, which are not record- 
ed in Scripture, and therefore we must be content not to know 
them, being satisfied with this, that nothing is omitted therein 
which is necessary to salvation, yet to pretend to recover, or 
transmit them to us by tradition, is to assert and not to prove, 
what thev impose on us as matters ol faith. 

(2.) Those things which our Saviour had to say, which he 
did not then impart to his disciples, because they were not able 
to bear them, respected, as is more than probable, what he de- 
signed to discover to them after his resurrection, during his 
fortv days abode here on earth, or by his Spirit, after his as- 
cension into heaven, concerning the change of the Sabbath, from 
the seventh, to the first day of tlie week, the abolition of the 
ceremonial law, the Spirituality of his kingdom, which they 
were at that time less able to bear than they were afterwards, 
•at>d other things relating to the success of their ministry', the 



THE WORD OF G0I>4 G3 

gathering and governing of those churches, which should be 
planted by them ; these seem to be intended by that txpres- 
Kion, and not those doctrines which the Papists transmit by 
oral traditions ; such as the use of oil and spittle, together with 
water in baptism, and the sign of the cross therein ; the bap- 
tism of bells, the lighting up of candles in churches at noon- 
day : nor that of purgatory, or praying for the dead, or giving 
divine adoration to images or relics, which are altogether un- 
scriptural, and such as he would not have, at any time, com- 
municated unto them. 

(3.) Those words of our Saviour, It is more blessed to g-ive 
than to receive, though they are not contained in one distinct 
proposition, or in express words in the gospels, yet he therein 
exhorts his people to give to him that asketh ; and speaks of the 
blessing that attends this duty, that they might he, that is, ap- 
prove themselves to be the children of their Father, Mat. v. 42. 
compared with 45. and exhorts them to hospitality to the poor^ 
and adds a blessing to it, Luke xiv. 12, 13, 14. Or, suppose 
the apostle refers to a saying fi"equently used by our Saviour, 
which might then be remembered by some who had conversed 
with him ; this is no sufficient warrant for any one to advance 
doctrines contrary to those our Saviour delivered, under a pre- 
tence of having received them by unwritten tradition. 

2. This doctrine is farther defended from the words of the 
apostle, in 1 Tim. vi. 20. where he advises Timothy to keep 
that -which xvas committed to his trust, viz. those traditions 
which he was to remember and communicate to others : and 
also the advice which he gives to the church, To hold the tra~ 
ditions xvhich they had been taught, either by xvord or by his 
epistle, 2 Thess. ii. 15. the former respects, say they, unwrit- 
ten traditions, the latter is inspired writings. 

AnsTv. That which was committed to Timothy to keep, was 
either the form of sound words, or the gospel, which he was to 
hold fast, 2 Tim. i. 13. or the ministry which he had received 
of the Lord, or those gifts and graces which were communicated 
to him, to fit him for public service. And as for those tradi- 
tions which he speaks of in the other scripture, the meaning is 
only this : that they should remember not only the doctrines 
they had received from him, which were contained in his in- 
spired epistles, but those which w^ere agreeable to scripture, that 
he had imparted in the exercise of his public ministry ; the for- 
mer were to be depended upon as an infallible rule of failh, the 
latter to be retained and improved as agreeable thereunto, and 

3. They farther add, that it was by this means that God in- 
structed his church for above two thousand years before the 
scripture was committed to writing. 

Ansxv. To this it may be replied, that God communicated 



64< THE WORD OF GOb. 

his mind and will to them, during that interval, in an extraordi- 
nary manner, as has been before observed, page 52, 53. which 
cannot be said of any of those traditions which are pleaded for 
by them. 

4. It is farther argued, that the book of the law was former- 
ly lost in Josiah's time ; for it is said, that when it was found, 
and a part of it read to him, he rent his clothes, and was aston- 
ished, as though he had never read it before, 2 Kings xxii. 8. 
to 11. yet he being a good man, was well instructed in the doc- 
trines of religion ; therefore this must have been by tradition. 

Answ. To this it may be answered, that the book, which was^ 
then found, was doubtless, an original manuscript of Scripture, 
cither of all the books of Moses or Deuteronomy in particular, 
but it is not to be supposed that he had never read it before ; 
for a person may be affected at one time in reading that portion 
of scripture, which he has often read without its having the 
like effect upon him ; and doubtless, there were many copies 
of scripture transcribed, by which he was made acquainted 
with the doctrines of religion, without learning them from un- 
certain traditions. 

5. They farther allege, that some books of scripture are 
lost, and therefore it is necessary that they should be supplied 
this way; the instances they give of this are some books refer- 
red to in scripture, viz. the book of the wars of the Lord^ Numb. 
xxi. 14. and another going under the name of Jasher, 2 Sam. 
i. 18. compared with Josh. x. 13. and another called the hook 
of the acts of Solomon^ 1 Kings xi. 41. and also his Songs and 
Proverbs, and the account he gives of trees^ plants^ beasts^ 

fowlsy creeping- things, and fishes, 1 Kings, iv. 32. 33. There 
are also other books said to bt written by Samuel, Nathan, and 
Gad, 1 Chron. xxix. 29. the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, 
and the visions of Iddo the seer, 2 Chron. ix. 29. and Jeremiah's 
lamentation for Josiah, is said to be written in the books of the 
Lamentations, 2 Chron. xxxv. 25. whereas there is no mention 
of Josiah in the book of scripture, which goes under that name ; 
therefore they suppose that there was some other book so called, 
which was written by that prophet, but is now lost. 

Anszv. 1, As to the argument in general, that some books 
of scripture are lost, suppose we should take it for granted that 
they are so, must this loss be supplied by traditions, pretended 
to be divine, though without sufficient proof: however, I am 
not willing to make this concession, though, indeed, some Pro- 
testant divines have done it, as thinking it equally supposable, 
that some books, written by divine inspiration, might be lost, 
as well as many words spoke by the same inspiration : but even 
these constantly maintain that whatever inspired writings may 
have been lost, yet there is no doctrine necessary to the edifica- 



THE WORD or COD. G^ 

tiou of the church, in what immediately relates to salvation, but 
what is contained in those writings, vrhich are preserved, by 
the care and goodness of providence, to this da}-; but, wiihout 
giving into this concession, I would rather adhere to the 
more commonly received opinion, that no book designed to be 
a part of the canon of scripture is lost, though many uninspired 
writings have perished; and therefore as to those books but 
now mentioned, they refer to some books of scripture, in 
which we have no mention of the inspired writers thereof, 
which, as is more than probable, were wrote by some noted 
prophet that flourished in the church at that time, which their 
respective histories refer to ; therefore some suppose that the 
books of Nathan and Gad, or Iddo, refer to those of Kings or 
Chronicles, which are not lost. But since this is only a proba- 
ble conjecture, we pass it over, and add, that it is not unrea- 
sonable to suppose that the books said to be written by them, as 
also those of Solomon, that are npt contained in scripture, were 
not written by divine inspiration, which is not only a safe but 
suificient answer to the objection. As for Jeremiah's lamenta- 
tion for Josiah, it is probable that the book of scripture, which 
goes under that name, was written on the occasion of Josiah's 
death, in which, though he doth not mention the name of that 
good king, yet he laments the desolating judgments which were 
to follow soon after it. 

Moreover, the Papists pretend, that some part of the New 
Testament is lost; particularl}- the epistle from Laodicea, men- 
tioned in Col. iv. 16. and one writen to the Corinthians, 710 1 
to company -with fornicators^ 1 Cor. v. 9. and another mention- 
ed, 2 Cor. vii. 8. by xvhich he made them sorry. 

Ansxv. 1. As to the epistle from Laodicea that was probably 
one of his inspired epistles, written by him \s hen at Laodice;?, 
and not directed, as is pretended, to the Laodiceans. 

2. As to that epistle, which he is supposed to ha\e written to 
the Corinthians, it is not expressly said that it was another epis- 
tle he had \v'rote to them; but it is plainly intimated, ver. 12. 
that he refers to the epistle, which he Avas then writing to them ; 
a part of Avhlch related to that subject, as this chapter, in par- 
ticular does, , 

3. As to the letter, which he wrote to them, -tvhich made 
them sorry ^ it is not necessary to suppose that it was written by 
divine inspiration ; for as every thing he delivered by word of 
mouth, was not by the extraordinary afflatus of the Holy Ghost, 
why mav we not suppose that there were several epistles written 
by him to the churches, some to comfort, others to admonish, 
reprove, or make them sorr)-, besides those that he was inspired 
to write ?' 

Having considered the arguments brought to prove that some 

voi.. r. i 



6€r TtiE WORD OF GO0* 

books of scripture are lost, we shall now prove, on the othei- 
hand, that we have the canon thereof compleat and entire* 
Some think this is sufficiently evident from what our Saviour 
says. Till heaven and earth pass axvay^ one jot ^ or tittle shall not 
pass from the /aw. Mat. v. 18. and it is easier for heaven and 
earth to pass ^ than for one tittle of the lauo to fail^ Luke xvi. 17. 
If God will take care of eyery jot and tittle of scripture, will he 
not take care that no whole book, designed to be a part of the 
rule of faith, should be entirely lost f It is objected, indeed, to 
this, that our Saviour hereby intends principally the doctrines 
or precepts contained in the law ; but if the subject matter 
thereof shall not be lost, surely the scripture that contains it 
shall be preserved entire. 

But this will more evidently appear, if we consider that the 
books of the Old Testament were compleat in our Saviour's 
time ', for it is said, That beginning at Moses^ and all the pro- 
phetSy he expounded to them in all the scriptures^ the things con- 
cerning himself I^uke xxiv. 27. and this may also be proved 
from what the apostle says, Whatsoever things were rvritten 
aforetime^ zuere rvritten for our learnings Rom. xv. 4. now it is 
impossible that they should be written for our learning if they 
are lost. 

To this it niSy be added, that the goodness of God, and the 
care of his providence, with respect to this church, farther 
evinces this truth ; fcH- if he gave them ground to conclude that 
he xuould be with them ahvays^ even to the end of the worlds 
Matth. xxviii. 20. surely this argues, that he would preserve 
the rule he had given them to walk by, from all the injuries of 
time, so that it should not be lost to the end of the world. 

Again, the Jews were the keepers of the oracles of God,^ 
Rom. iii. 2. now they are not reproved by our Saviour, or the 
apostle Paul, for any unfaithfulness in not preserving them en- 
tire ; and certainly our Saviour, when he reproves them for 
making void the law by their traditions, and threatens those 
that should add to or take from it, if he had found them favilty, 
in not having faithfully preserved all the scriptures committed 
to them, he would have severely reproved them for this great 
breach of trust. 

Object. It is objected against the scriptures being a perfect 
rule of faith, that they are in several places corrupted, viz. that 
the Old Testament was so by the Jews, out of malice against 
our Saviour, and the Christian religion, that they might con- 
ceal, or pervert to another sense, some prophecies relating to 
the Messiah, and the gospel-state. And as for the New Tes- 
tament, they pretend that it was corrupted by some heretics, in 
defence of their perverse doctrines. 

Ansxv, 1 . As to the Old Testament, it is very improbable 



THE WORD OF GOD. 67 

^nd unreasonable to suppose that it was corrupted by the Jews. 
For, 

(1.) Before our Saviour's time, no vakiable end could be 
answered thereby ; for then they expected the Messiah to come, 
according to what was foretold by the prophets, and understood 
their predictions in a true sense. 

(2.) After he was come, and Christianity took place in the 
world, though malice might have prompted them to it, yet they 
would not do it, because they had always been trained up in 
this notion, that it was the vilest crime to add to, take from, or 
alter it: so that one of their own writers* says concerning 
them, that they would rather die an hundred deaths, than suf- 
fer the law to be changed in any instance ; yea, they have such 
a veneration for the law, that if, by any accident, part of it 
should fall to the ground, they would proclaim a fast as fearing 
lest, for this, God would destroy the whole world, and reduce 
it to its first chaos : and can any one think, that, under any 
pretence whatever, they would designedly corrupt the Old Tes- 
tament ? Yea, they were so far from doing it, that they took 
the greatest care, even to superstition, to prevent its being cor- 
rupted, through inadvertency, and accordingly numbered not 
only the books and sections, but even the words and letters, 
that not a single letter might be added to, or taken from it. 

(3.) If they had any inclination to do this, out of malice 
against Christianity, it would have been to no purpose, after 
our Saviour's time ; for it was then translated into Greek, and 
this translation was in the hands of almost all Christians ; so 
that the fallacy would soon have been detected. And if they 
had corrupted some copies of the Hebrew Bible, the}' could 
not have corrupted or altered them all ; therefore to attempt 
any thing of this kind, would have been to expose themselves 
to no purpose. 

(4.) It would not have been for their own advantage to per- 
vert it; for, in altering the texts that make for Christianity, 
they would (especially if the fraud should have been detected) 
have weakened their own cause so far, that the reputation of 
scripture being hereby lost, they could not have made use of it 
to that advantage, to prove their own religion from it. 

But, notwithstanding all this out-cry of the scriptures being 
perverted, they pretend to give no proof hereof, except in two 
or three words, which do not much affect the cause of Christi- 
anity ; whereas, if the Jews had designed to pervert it, why did 
they not alter the fift)'-third of Isaiah, and many other scrip- 



* Vid. Philo. Jud. de Vit. Mosis ; & eund. citat. ab Euseb. in Prxp. Evatiff. I. viii. 
6. & J«Hfph. contr. .1pp. I. ii. 



68 ' THE WORD OF GOD. 

tures, which so plainly speak of the person and offices of the 
Messiah r 

2. As to the other pai-t of the objection, that the New Tes- 
tament hath been corrupted b}" heretics since our Saviour's 
time, \yhatever charge hath been brought against the Arians, 
and some others, of leaving out some words, or verses, which 
tend to overthrow their scheme, they have not been able, even 
when the empire was most favourable to their cause, to alter 
all th^ copies ; so that their fallacy has been detected, and the 
corruption amended. 

As for those various readings that there are of the same 
text, these consist principally in literal alterations, which do 
not much tend to pervert the sense thereof. It was next to 
impossible for so many copies of scripture to be transcribed 
without some mistakes, since they who were employed in this 
work were not under the infallible direction of the Spirit of 
God, as the first penm.en were ; yet the providence of God hath 
Jiot suffered them to make notorious mistakes ; and whatever 
mistakes there may be in one copy, they may be corrected b}'" 
another ; so that the scripture is not, for this reason, chargea- 
ble with the reproach cast upon it, as though it were not a per- 
fect rule of faith. 



Quest. IV. How doth it appear that the scriptures are the 
word of God P 

Answ. The scriptures manifest themselves to be the word of 
God by their majesty and purity ; by the consent of all the 
parts, and the scope of the whole, which is to give all glory 
to God^ by their light and power to convince and convert 
sinners, to comfort and build up believers to salvation : but 
the Spirit of God bearing witness by and with the scriptures 
in the heart of man, is alone able fully to persuade it, that 
they are the word of God. 

EFORE we proceed to consider the arguments here 
brought to prove the scriptures to be the word of God, 
oome things may be premise.d.(a) 

((t) " Since God has been pleased to leave us the Records of the Je^oish Reli- 
_?;ion, which was of old the true religion, and affords no sn\all testimfmy to the 
Chnstii^n relig-ion, it is not foreign to our ptirpose, to see upon what foundation 
the credibility of these is built. That these books are theu-s, to whom ihey are 
ascribed, appears in the same manner as we have proved of our books. And tiiey, 
whose names tliev bear, were either Prc-phets, or men worthy to be credited ; 
such as Esdras, who is suppo.sed to have collected 1 hem into one volume,. at that 
time, when the Prophets Huggai, Mnlacki, and Zucharias, were 3et ahve. I wiU 
not here repeat what was said before, in commendation oi Moses. And not only 
tii^L (irst part, delivered by Mosess, as we have shewn in the first book, i-ut the 



THE WORD OF GOD. 69 

1. When we speak of the scriptures as divine, we do not 
only mean that they treat of God and divine things ; to wit, 

■■■■ ; ' ~ - 

latter history is confirmed by many Pagans. *Thus the Phaiiician annals men- 
tion the names of Davidand Solomon, and the league tliey made with the Tyrians. 
A ad Berosus, as well as tl\e Hebrew books, mention j\'abuchadonosur, and other 
L'hahUans. Vaphres, the king of Egypt in Jeremiah is the same with Jipries in 
Herodotus. And the Greek books are tilled with Cyrus and his successors down 
to Darius ; and Josephus in his book against .ippion, quotes many other things 
elating to the Jeivish nation : To which may be added, that we above took out 
of Strabo and Tragus. But there is no reason for us Cliristians to doubt of the 
credibility of these books, because there are testimonies in our books, out of al- 
most ever}' one of them, the same as they are found in the Hebrew. Nor did 
Clu-ist when he blamed many things in the teachers of the law, and in the Phari- 
sees of his time, ever accuse them of falsifying the books of J\Ioses and the Pro- 
phets, or of using supposititious or altered books. And it can never bef proved or 
made credible, that after Christ's time, the scripture should be corrupted in any 
thing of moment; if we do but consider how fai* and wide the Jewish nation, who 
every where kept those books, was dispersed over the whole world. For first, 
tiie ten tribes were can'ied into Media by tiie Assyrians, and afterwards the other 
two. And many of these fixed themselves in foreign countries, after they had a 
permission from Cyrus to return : the JMucedonians invited them into Me.vandria 
with gi-eat advantages ; the cruelty of Jintiochns, the civil war of the Asmornei, 
and the foi'eigii wars of Pompey Siwd Sossins, scattered a great m.any ; the country 
of Cyrene was filled with Jews; the cities of Jisia, J\[acedoida, Lycuorda, and tlie 
Isles of Cyprus, and Crete, and others, were fidl of them ; and that there was a 
vast number of them in Rome, we learn from Horace, Juvenal, and Martial. It 
is inlpossible that such distant bodies of men should be imposed upon by any art 
whatsoever, or that they should agree in a falsity. We may add further that al- 
most threohundi'ed years before Christ, by the care of the Egyptian kings, the 
Hebrew books were translated into Greek by those who are called the Seventy ,- 
that tlie Greeks might have them in another language, but tlie sense the same in 
the main ; upon which account they were the less liable to be altered : And the 
same books were translated into Chaldee, and into the Jerusalem language ; that 
is, half iS'^r/acy partly a little before, and partly a little afier Christ's time. After 
wliich followed other Greek versions, that of Aquila, Symmachus, and Theodo- 
/ion/ which Origen, aiid others after him, compared with the seventy Interpre- 
ters, and found no difference in the histoiT; or in any weighty matters. Philo 
flourished in Caligida's time, and Josephus lived till Vespasian's. Each of thi m 
quote out of the Hebrew books the same things that we find at this day. By this 
time the Christian religion began to be more and m.ore spread, and many of its 
professors were Hebrews : Many had studied the Hebrew learning, who could very 
easily have pei'ceived and discovered it, if the Jews had received any thing that 
was false, in any remarkable subject, I mean, by comparing it with more ancient 
books. But they not only do this, but they bring very many testimonies out of 
the Old Testament, plainly in that sense in which they are received amongst the 
Hebrews, which Hebrews may be convicted ot any crime, sooner than (I \\ill not 
say of falsity, but) of negligence, in relation to these books ; because they used to 
transcribe and compai-e them so very scrupulously, that they could tell how often 
every letter came over. "NVe may add, in the first place, an argument, and that 
no mean one, why the Jews did not alter the scripture designedly ; because the, 
Clu'istians prove, and as they think very strongly, that their Master Jesus wa^; 
that very Messiah who was of old promised to the f(;refathers of tlie Jews ; and 
vhis from those very books, which were read by the Jews. "V^'hich ilie Je\f5 

*Thus (/;« Phoenician Annuls, gtc] See what Joxephus cites out of thpni. BpoI; Vtll. rhap. 
?,. of his AncifPt History ; where he adds, " that if any one would see the Copies of those F.pis- 
'■ ties which Silomon and Hirom wrote to each other, they may be procured of the public Keep- 
" ers of the Records at Tytm." (We must I.e cautions how we lietievc tin" ; liowever, see 
what I have said upon 1 Kitirv v. .^.) There is a remarkable pl^^ce concerning David, (puitfd by 
Juitphua. Book VU, CIi. 6. of his Anciei c History, cut of the IVdi of Diimasanus's Histoiy. 



f^ THE WORD or GO©. 

his nature and works, as referring principally to the subject 
matter thereof; for this may be said of many human uninspired 
writings, which, in proportion to the wisdom of their authors, 
tend to set forth the divane perfections. And when, as the 
consequence hereof, we assert that every thing contained there- 
in is infalHbly true, we do not deny but that there are many 
things, which we receive from human testimony, of which it 
would be scepticism to entertain the least doubt of the truth ; 
notwithstanding, when we receive a truth from human tes- 
timony, we judge of the certainty thereof, by the credi- 
bility of the evidence, and, in proportion thereunto, there is a 
degree of certainty arising from it : but when we suppose a 
truth to be divine, we have the highest degree of certainty 
equally applicable to every thing that is so, and that for this 
reason, because it is the word of him that cannot lie. Thus we 
consider the holy scriptures, as being of a divine original, or 
given by the inspiration of God, or as his revealed will, de- 
signed to bind the consciences of men ; and that the penmen 
were not the inventers of them, but only the instruments made 
use of to convey these divine oracles to us, as the apostle says, 
2 Pet. i. 21. Prophecy came not in old time by the xvill of man ; 
hut holy men of God spake., as they were moved by the Holy 
Ghost: and the apostle Paul says, Gal. i. 11, 12. I certify unto 
you., that the gospel^ which was preached of me., is not after 
man; neither received I it of man ; neither was I taught it., but 
by the revelation of Jesus Christ : the former asserts this con- 
ceniing scripture in general, and the latter concerning that part 
thereof which Avas transmitted to us by him : this is what we 
mean when we say the scripture is the word of God. 

2. It is necessary for us to know and believe the scriptures 
to be the word of God, because they are to be received by us 
as a rule of faith and obedience, in whatever respects divine 
things, otherwise we are destitute of a rule, and consequently 
our religion would be a matter of the greatest uncertaint}^ ; and 
as this faith and obedience is divine, it is a branch of religious 
worship, and as such, contains an entire subjection to God, a 
firm and unshaken assent to whatever he reveals as true, and a 
readiness to obey whatev^er he commands, as being influenced 
by his authority; which is inconsistent with any hesitation or, 
doubt concerning this matter. Moreover, it is only therein 
that we have an account of the \^'ay in which sinners may have 
access to God ; the terms of their finding acceptance in his 
sight, and all the promises of eternal blessedness, on which 



would ha\-e taken the gi-eatest cure should never have been, after tlieie arose a 
controversy between them and the Cliristians ; if it had ever been in their power 
to have altered what they would." GnoTirs. 



THE WORD OF GOD. /I 

their hope is founded, are contained therein ; if therefore we 
are not certain that the scriptures are the word of God, our 
faith and hope are vain; it is herein that life and immortality 
is brought to light ^ and, by searching thein^ we think that xoe 
have eternal life. 

3. As divine revelation is necessary^ so it is not impossible, 
contrary to reason or the divine perfections, for God to impait 
his mind and will to men in such a way iis we call inspiration : 
these things must be made appear, otherwise it is a vain thing 
to attempt to give arguments to prove the scriptures to be the 
word of God j and, in order hereto, let it be considered, 

(1.) That divine revelation is necessary; this appears be- 
cause as religion is necessary, so there are some things con- 
tained in it which cannot be known by the light of nature, to 
wit, all those divine laws and institutions, which are the result 
of God's expressed will ; and these could not be known by the 
light of nature, or in a way of reasoning derived from it, there- 
fore they must be known by special revelation. Positive laws, 
as opposed to those that are moral, depend upon a different 
foundation ; the glory of God's sovereignty eminently appears 
in the one, as that of his holiness doth in the other : now his 
sovereign pleasure relating thereto could never have been 
known without divine revelation, and then all that revenue of 
glory, which is brought to him thereby, would have been en- 
tirely lost, and there would have been no instituted worship in 
the world ; and the gospel, which is called the U7isearchabh 
riches of Christy Eph. iii. 8. must have been for ever a hidden 
thing, and the condition of those who bear the Christian name 
would have been no better than that of the heathen, concerning 
whose devotion, the apostle Paul, though speaking of the wisest 
and best of them says. Acts xvii. 23. that they ignorantly wor- 
shipped an xinknoxon God: and elsewhere, 1 Cor. i. 24. that the 
■world by xvisdom knexv not God ; and the reason is, because they 
were destitute of divine revelation. 

(2.) It is not impossible, contrary to reason or the divine 
perfections, that God should reveal his mind and will to man, 
which may be argued from hence ; it contains no impossibility, 
for if it be possible for one creature to impart his mind and 
will to another, then certainly God can do this, for there is no 
excellency or perfection in the creature but what is eminently 
in him ; and if it be not unworthy of the divine majesty to be 
omnipresent, and uphold all things by the word of his power, it 
^ 'vs> not unbecoming his perfections to manifest himself to intelli- 
gent creatures, who, as such, are fit to receive the discoveries 
of his mind and will; and his endowing them with laculties 
capable of receiving these manifestations, argues, that he de- 
si<med that thev should be favoured with them ; orrl theiefore 



72 THE WORD OF GOD. 

whatever displays there may be of infinite condescension there- 
in, yet it is not unbecoming his perfections so to do. 

(3.) As God cannot be at a loss for an expedient how to 
discover his mind and will to man, and is not confined to one 
certain way, so he may, if he pleases, make it known by inspi- 
ration ; it IS not impossible, neither is there any thing in the 
subjects that should hinder him from impressing whatever 
ideas he designs to impart, on the minds of men. This a finite 
spirit may do ; and that there is such a thing as this, will hardly 
be denied by any, but those who, with the Sadducees, deny 
the nature and power of spirits : it hence follows, that God can 
much more impress the souls of men, or immediately commu- 
nicate his mind to them in such a way, as we call inspiration ; 
and to deny that there is such a thing as inspiration, is not only 
to deny the credibility of scripture histor}', as well as its divine 
authority, but it is to deny that which the heathen, by the light 
of nature, have universally believed to be consonant to reason, 
and therefore they often represent their gods as conversing 
with men ; and they appear, in many of their writings, not to 
have the least doubt whether there has been such a thing as in- 
t>piration in the Avorld. 

These things being premised, we are now more particularly 
to consider those arguments which are brought to prove the 
scriptures to be the word of God, or that they were given by 
divine inspiration : these are taken either from the internal evi- 
dence we have hereof, viz. the subject matter of scripture, from 
the majesty of the style, the purity of the doctrines, the har- 
mony or consent of all its parts, and the scope or tendency.of 
the whole to give all glory to God ; or else external, taken from 
the testimony which God himself gave to it, at first by mira- 
cles, whereby the mission of the prophets, and consequently 
what they were sent to deliver, was confirmed, and afterwards, 
in succeeding ages, by the use which he hath made of it in con- 
vincing and converting sinners, and building up believers to 
salvation. These are the arguments mentioned in this answer, 
which will be distinctly considered, and some others added, as 
a farther proof of this matter, to wit, those taken from the char- 
acter of the inspired writers, particularly as they were holy 
men, and so they would not impose on the world, or pretend 
themselves to have been inspired, if they were not ; and also, as 
they were plain and honest men, void of all craft and subtilty, 
and so could not impose on the world ; and, had they attempt- 
ed to do so, thev had a great many subtle and malicious ene- 
mies, who would soon have detected the fallacy. To this we 
shall also add an argument taken from the sublimity of the doc- 
trine, in which respect it is too great, and has too much wisdom 
in it for men to have invented ; and others taken from the anti- 



THE WORD OF GOD. TS 

qulty thereof, together with its wonderful preservation, notwith- 
standing all the endeavours of its enemies to root it out of the 
world ; and then we shall consider how far the testimony of the 
church is to be regarded, not as though it contained the princi- 
pal foundation of our faiih, as the Papists suppose ; but yet this 
may be, if duly considered, an additional evidence to those that 
have been before given ; and then we shall speak something 
concerning the witness oi the Spirit with the scripture in the 
heart of man, which inclines him to be persuaded by, and rest in 
the other arguments brought to support this truth : and if all 
these be taken together, they vv'ill, we hope, beget a full convic- 
tion in the minds of men, that the scriptures are the word of 
God ; which leads us to consider the arguments in particular. 

I. From the majesty of the stvie in which it is written. This 
argument does not equally hold good \vith respect to all the 
parts of scripture ; for there is, in many places thereof, a great 
plainness of speech and familiarity of expression adapted to the 
meanest capacity, and sometimes a bare relation of things, 
without that majesty of expression, which we find in other 
places : thus in the historical books we do not observe such a 
loftiness of style, as there is in Job, Psalms, Isaiah, and some 
other of the prophets ; so that there are arguments of anothei- 
nature to prove them to be of divine authority. However, we 
may observe such expressions interspersed throughout almost 
the whole scripture, which set forth the sovereignty and great- 
ness of God; as when he is represented speaking immediately 
himself in a majestic way, tending not only to bespeak atten- 
tion^ but to strike those that hear or read with a reverential 
fear of his divine perfections ; thus, when he gives a summons 
to the whole creation to give ear to his words, Ilear^ hea- 
vens; and give ear^ earthy for the Lord hath ^poken^ Isa. i. 2. 
or, swears by himself, that unto hhn every knee shall boxo^ and 
every tongue shall swear^ chap. xlv. 23. or when it is said, 
Thus saith the Lord^ the heaven is my throne^ and the earth is 
7ny footstool^ cha.p.lxvi, 1. and elsewhere. The Lord reigneth, 
let the earth rejoice; let the midtitude of the isles be glad there- 
of Clouds and darkness are round about him; righteousness 
and judgment are the habitation of his throne. Afregoeth be- 
fore him; his lightnings enlightened the world. The hills melt- 
ed like wax at the presence of the Lord; at the presence of the 
Lord of the rvhole earthy Psal. xcvii. 1— -5. And when he is 
represented as casting contempt on all the gi'eat men of this 
world, thus he is said to cut off the spirit of princes^ and to be 
terrible to the kings of the earthy Psal. Ixxvi. 12. and to charge 
even his angels with folly ^ Job iv. 18. or when the prophet 
speaks of him, as one who had measured the xvaters in the hol- 
low of his hand^ and meted the heavens with a stan, and com- 

Vol. I. K ' 



,"-i lllE. WORD Of GOD, 

prehentkd the dust of the earth in a vieasui'e^ and xve'igked the 
mountains in scales^ and the hilla in a balance ; and that the na- 
tions of the earth are as a drop of the bucket^ and are counted as 
the small dust of the balance; yea^ as nothing., less than no- 
thing and vanity .^vihitn compared with him, Isa. xl. 12, 15, 17. 
It would be ahuost endless to refer to the many places of 
r:,cripture, in which God speaks in such a style, as is inimitable 
by any creature ; of this we have several instances in the book 
of Job^ especially in those chapters where he is represented as 
answering Job out of the whirlwind, and speaking with such a 
loftiness of style, as, it may be, the like cannot be found in any 
human composure, Job, chap, xxxviii. to xli. where such ex- 
pressions are used, which argue the style to be divine, great 
and magnificent; so that if it was not immediately from God, 
it would be the most Wold presumption for any creature to speak 
in such a way: therefore this argument, taken from the ma- 
jestic style of scripture, is not without its proper weight; how- 
ever, it may serve to prepare us to receive those other argu- 
ments, which, together with this, evince its divine original. 

II. From the purity and holiness of its doctrines, and that 
either, if we consider it absolutely, or compare it with all other 
writings, whereby it will appeal* not only to have the prefer- 
ence to them, but to be truh' divine, and so is deservedly sty- 
led the holy scripture^ Rom. i. 2. and the words thereof pure 
as silver tried in a furnace^ purified seven times ^ Psal. xii. 6* 
and to speak of right things^ in xvhich there is nothing froward 
or perverse.) Prov. viii. 6, 7, 8. Thus every one that duly 
weighs the subject matter thereof, may behold therein the dis- 
plays of the gloiy of the holiness of God : here let us consider^ 
that the word of God appears to be divine from its pui'ity and 
holiness, 

I. As considered absolutely, or in itself. For, 
(i.) It lays open the vile and detestable nature of sin, to 
render it abhorred by us. Thus the apostle says, Rom. \n. 7. 
f had not known sin; that is, I had not so fully understood the 
abominable nature thereof as I do, but by the laxv: for I had 
not knoxvn hist^ except the laxv had said., thou shalt not covet; 
and hereupon he concludes, that the laxv is holy., and the com- 
jnandincnt holy., and just., and good. 

(2.) It presents to our view the various instances of the di- 
vine vengeance,, and shews us how th(5 wrath of God is reveal- 
ed against the unrighteousness of sinners to make them afraid 
of rebelling against him. Thus it gives us an account how the 
angels hereby fell iVcni and lost their first habitation, and are 
thrust down to hell, being reserved in chains under darknessy 
unto the fadgment oj the great dmj., Jude 6. And also how 
man hereby lost his primitive integrity and glory, and exposed 



THE WORD OF GOD. 75 

luimself to the wrath and curse of God due to sin, and all the 
miseries of this life consequent thereon; and how it has des- 
troyed flourishing nations, and rendered them desolate. Thus 
it gives us an account how the Jews were first carried into 
Babylon for their idolatry, and other abominations, and after- 
wards cast off and made the sad monument of the divine wrath, 
as at this day, for crucifying Christ, persecuting his followers, 
and opposing the Gospel. It also gives an account of the dis- 
tress and terror of conscience, which wilful and presumptuous 
sins have exposed particular persons to; such as Cain, Judas 
and others ; this is described in a very pathetic manner, when 
it is said of the wicked man, who has his portion of the good 
things of this life, that when he comes to die. Tenors takt 
hold of him as waters^ a tempest stealeth him atvayin the night. 
The east wind carrieth him axvaij^ and he departeth^ and a as 
storm hurleth him out of his place. For God shall cast upon him^ 
and not spare ; he xvoiild fain fee out of his hand^ Job xxvii. 20, 
21, 22. 

Moreover, the purity of the Scripture farther appears, in 
that it warns sinners of that eternal ruin, which they expose 
themselves to in the other world ; Who shall be punished xvith 
everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord^ and from 
the glory of his power^ 2 Thess. i. 9. All these things dis- 
cover the purity and holiness of the word of God. 

(3.) It never gives the least indulgence or dispensation to 
sin, nor in any of its doctrines, which are pure and holy, 
doth it lead to licentiousness; it not only reproves sin in the 
lives and outward conversations of men, but also discovers its 
secret recesses in the heart, where its chief seat is; obviates 
and guards against its first motions, tending thereby to regu- 
late the secret thoughts of men, and the principle of all their 
actions, which it requires to be pure and holy. In this the 
Scripture excels all other writing's with respect to its holiness. 

(4.) All the blessings and benefits which it holds forth, or 
puts us in mind of, as the peculiar instances of divine favour 
and love to man, are urged and insisted on as motives to ho- 
liness; thus it is said, The goodness of God leadeth thee to re- 
pentance^ Rom. ii. 4. and when Moses had been putting the 
Israelites in mind of God's increasing them, as the stars of 
heaven for midtitude^ Deut. x. 22. compared with chap. xi. 1. 
he adds, therefore thou shalt love the Lord thy God^ and keep 
his charge and statutes^ his judgments and comraandments ahvay. 
And when the loving kindness of God has been abused by 
men, it severely reproves them for their vile ingratitude ; as 
when it is said, Deut. xxxii. 6. Do ye thus requite the Lord^ oh 
foolish people and umvise P /? not he thy Father that bought 
thee ? Hath not he made ther^ and established thee ? 



rS THE WORD or GOD. 

(5.) All the examples proposed to our imitation therein, are 
such as savour of, and lead to, holiness; and when it recom- 
mends the actions or conversation of men, it is more especialr 
ly for that holiness which is discovered therein : and, on the 
other hand, when it gives us the character of wicked men, 
together with the dreadful consequences thereof, it is that we 
may avoid and be deterred from committing the same sins that 
will be their ruin in the end. 

(6.) The rules laid down relating to civil affairs in the Old 
Testament dispensation, and the behaviour of one man to- 
wards another, have a vein of holiness running through them 
all. Thus the government of the Jewish state, as described 
in the books of Moses, and elsewhere, discovers it to be an 
holy commonwealth : and they are often called an holy nation, 
as governed by those laws which God gave them j so the gov- 
ernment of the church in the Gospel-dispensation, is a holy 
government: visible holiness is a term of church-communion, 
and apostacy and revolt from God excludes from it. 

(T.) All the promises contained in Scripture, are, or will be 
certainly fulfilled, and the blessings it gives us ground to ex- 
pect, conferred ; and therefore it is a faithful word, and conse- 
quently pure and holy. 

2. If we compare the Scripture with other writings, which 
are of a human composure, it plainh- excels in holiness. For, 

(1.) If we compai-e it with the writings of heathen moral- 
ists, such as Plato, Seneca, and others, though they contain a 
great many good directions for the ordering the conversations 
of men agreeably to the dictates of nature and right reason, yet 
most of them allow of, or plead for some sins, which the Scrip- 
ture mentions with abhorrence, such as revenging injuries, and 
self-murder; several other instances of moral impurity, were 
not only practised by those who laid down the best rules to in- 
force moral virtue, but either counttnianced, or, at least, not 
sufficiently fenced against, by what is contained in their wri- 
tings ; and even their strongest motives to virtue or the govern- 
ment of the passions, or a generous contempt of the world, 
are taken principally from the tendency which such a course of 
life will have to free us from those things that tend to debase 
and afflict the mind, and fill it with uneasiness, when we con- 
sider ourselves as acting contrary to the dictates of nature, 
which we have as intelligent creatures; whereas, on the other 
hand, the Scriptvu'e leads us to the practice of Christian vir- 
tues from better motives, and considers us not barely as men, 
but Christians, under the highest obligations to the blessed 
Jesus, and constrained hereunto by his condescending love ex- 
pressed in all that he has done and suffered for our redemption 
and salvation ; and it puts us upon desiring and hoping for com- 



THE WORD OF GOD. T7 

munion with God, through him, in the performance of those 
evangelical duties, which the light of nature knows nothing of, 
and so discovers a solid foundation for our hope of forgiveness 
of sin, through his blood, together with peace of conscience 
and joy resulting froiii it ; it also directs us to look for that 
life and immortalit)', which is brought to light through the 
Gospel ; in which respects, it far exceeds the writings of the 
best heathen moralists, and so contains in it the visible marks 
and characters of its divine original. 

(2.) If we compare the scriptures with other writings among 
Christians, which pretend not to inspiration, we shall find in 
these writings a great number of impure and false doctrines, 
derogatory to the glory of God, in many of the pretended ex- 
positions of Scripture. If therefore men, who have the Scrip- 
ture in their hands, propagate unholy doctrines, they Avould do 
so much more were there no Scripture to guide them : thus the 
doctrine that grace is not necessary to what is spiritually good: the 
merit of good works, human satisfactions, penances, indulgen- 
ces, and dispensations for sin, are all impure doctrines, which 
are directly contrary to Scripture ; and, as contraries illustrate 
each other, so hereby the holiness and purity of Scripture, 
which maintains the contrary doctrines, will appear to those 
who impartially study it and understand the sense thereof. 

(3.) If we compare the Scriptures with the imposture of 
Mahomet, in the book called the Alcoran, which the Turks 
make use of as a rule of faith, and prefer it to Scripture, and 
reckon it truly divine, that contains a system not only of fabu- 
lous, but corrupt and impure notions, accommodated to men's 
sensual inclinations. Thus it allows of polygamy, and many 
impurities in this world, and promises to its votaries a sensual 
paradise in the next, all which is conti-ary to Scripture ; so 
that composures merely human, whether they pretend to di- 
vine inspiration or not, discover themselves not to be the word 
of God, by their unholiness ; as the Scripture manifests itself 
to be divine, by the purity of its doctrine ; and indeed, it can- 
not be otherwise, considering the corruption of man's nature, 
as well as the darkness and blindness of his mind, which, if it 
pretends to frame a rule of faith, it will be like himself, im- 
pure and unholy : but that which has such marks of holiness, 
as the Scripture has, appears to be inspired by a holy God. 

Having considered the holiness of Scripture doctrines, we 
proceed to shew the weight of this argument, or how far it 
may be insisted on to prove its divine authority. It is to be 
confessed, that a book's containing holy things or rules for a 
holy life, doth not of itself prove its divine original ; for then 
other books might be called the word of God besides the 
Scripture, which is so called, not only as containing some 



78 THE WOKD OF GOD. 

rules that promote holiness, but as being the fountain of all 
true religion ; and its being adapted above any book of human 
composure, to ansM^er this end, affords an argument of some 
weight to prove it to be of God. For, 

1. Man, who is prone to sin, naturally blinded and preju- 
diced against divine truth and holiness, could never compose a 
book that is so consonant to the divine perfections, and con- 
tains such a display of God's glory, and is so adapted to make 
us holy. 

2. If we suppose that man could invent a collection of doc- 
trines, that tended to promote holiness, could he invent doc- 
trines so glorious, and so much adapted to this end, as these 
are ? If he could, he that does this must either be a good or a 
bad man : if we suppose the former, he would never pretend 
the Scripture to be of divine authority, when it was his own 
composure ; and if the latter, it is contrary to his character, as 
such, to endeavour to promote holiness ; for then Satan's king- 
dom must be divided against itself: but of this, more in its 
proper place, when we come to consider the character of the 
penmen of Scripture, to give a further proof of its divine au- 
tliority. 

3. It it plain, that the world without Scripture could not ar- 
rive to holiness ; for the apostle says, 1 Cor. i. 21. That the 
ivorld by xuisdom knew not God; and certainly where there is 
no saving knowledge of God, there is no holiness ; and the 
same apostle, Rom. i. 29, 30, 31. gives an account of the great 
abominations that were committed by the heathen; being des- 
titute of Scripture light, they were^ Ji lied ivtth all unrighteous- 
ness^ fornication^ ivickedness^ covetousness^ maliciousness^ full 
of envy ^ murder^ debate^ deceit^ malignity^ &c. 

II therefore the doctrines contained in Scriptures are not 
only pui-e and holy themselves, but tend to promote holiness in 
us, this is not without its proper weight to prove their divine 
original. 

III. The scriptures farther manifest themselves to be the 
word of God from the consent or harmony of all the parts 
thereof. («.) This argument will appear more strong and con- 

(a.) " The enquiries of le^irned men, ai'.d, above all of the excellent Lardner, 
who never overstates a point of evidence, and whose fidelity in citing his au- 
thorities has in no one instance been impeached, have established, concerning 
these writings, the following propositions : 

I. That in the age immediately posterior to that in which St. Paul lived, his 
letters were publicly read and acknowledged. 

Some of them are quoted or alluded to by almojt evei*y Christian writer thr.t 
followed, by Clement of Rome, by Hermas, by Ignatius, by Polycarp, disciples 
or cotemporaries of the apostles ; by Justin Martyr, by the churches of Gaul, by 
Irenseus, by Athenagoras, by Theophllus, by Clement of Alexandria, by Ker- 
jnias, by Tertidlian, who occupied the succeeding ag'e. Now wljen M'c find a 



THE WORD OF SOD. 79 

elusive, if we compare them with other writings, in which there 
is but little harmony. Thus, if we consult the writings of 

book quoted or referred to by an ancient author, we are entitled to conclude, 
that it was read and received in the age and country in which that atithor lived. 
And this conclusion does not, in any degi-ee, rest upon the judgment or charac- 
ter of the author making such reference. Proceeding by this rule, we have, con- 
cerning the First Epistle to the Corinthians in pai-ticular, within forty yeiys af- 
ter the epistle was written, evidence, not only of its being extant at CoriuUi, but 
of its being known and read at liome. Clement, bishop of that city, writing to 
the church of Corhith, uses these words : " Take into joiu* hands the Epistle of 
" the blessed Paul the apostle. What did he at first write imto you in the be- 
" ginnmg of the gospel ? Verily he did by the Spiiit admonish you concerning 
'•' himself and Cephas, and Apoilos, because that even then you did form pai'ties* ." 
I'his was written at a time when probably some must have been living at Corinth, 
who remembered St. Paul's ministry thei'e and the receipt of Hie epistle. The 
testimony is still more valuable, as it shows that the espistles wcte preserved in 
•the churches to which they were sent, and that they were spread and propagated 
from them to the rest of the Christian community. AgTeebly to which natural 
mode and order of their publication, 'I'ertulliun, a century afterwards, for proof 
of the integrity and genuuieness of the apostolic writings, bids " aiij- one, who 
" is willing to exercise his curiosity profitably m the business of their salvation, 
" to visit tiie apostolical churches, in which their very authentic letters ai-e reci- 
" ted, ipsse authenticse literse eorum recitantur." Then he goes on : " Is Achaia 
" near you .'' You have Corinth. If you are not far from ^Macedonia, you have 
" Philippi, you have Thessalonica. Ifyoucango to Asia, you have Ephesus; 
" but if }0U are near to Italy, you have Kome-j-." I adduce this passage to show, 
that the distinct churches or Christian socitties, to which St. Paul's Epistles 
■were sent, subsisted for some ages aftei'wards ; that his several epistles were 
uU along respectively read in those chiu'ches ; that Christians at large recei^•cd 
them fi'om tiiose churches, and appealed to those churches for theii- originality 
and authenticity. 

Arguing m like manner from citations and allusions, we have, within the 
space ol'a hundred and fifty years from the time that the first of St. Paul's Epis- 
tles was written, proofs of almost all of them being read, in Palestine, Syria, the 
countries of Asia Minor, in Egypt, in that pai-t of Africa which used the Latin 
tongue, in Greece, Italy, and Gault. I do not mean simply to assert, that, with- 
in the space of a hundred and fifty years, St. Paul's Epistles were read in those 
coimtries, for I believe that they were read and ch-culated from the beginning ; 
but that proofs of their being so read occur within that period. And wlien it is 
considered how few of the primitive Christians wrote, and of ^vhat was written 
how much is lost^ we are to account it extraordinaiy, or rather as a sure proof 
cf the extensivencss of the reputation of these writings, and of the general re.->- 
pect in wliich tliey were held, that so many testimonies, :aid of sucli antiquitv, 
are still extant. " In the remaining works of Irenaeus, Clement of rMexandria, 
" and Tertiillian, there are perhaps more and larger quotations of the small \o- 
" lume of the New Testamciit, than of all the works of Cicero, in the writings 
" of all ciiaracters for several ages§." We must add, that the Epistles of Paul 
come in for their full share of this observation; and that all tlie thirteen epi.s- 
tles, except that to Philemon, which is not quoted by Irenaeus or Clement, and 
which probably escaped notice merely by its brevity, are .severally cited, and ex- 
pressl}- recognized as St. Paul's by each of these Christian writers. The Ebi- 
onitcs, an early, though inconsiderable Christian sect, rejected St. Paul and his 
espistlesll ; that is, they rejected these epistles, not because thry were not, but 
because they were St. Paul's; and because, adliei'ing to the obligation of the 
Jewish law, they chose to dispute his doctrine and authority. Their sufl'rage as 

• See Lardner, vol. xH. p. 38. t Lardner, vol. ii. p. 598. t ^tf Lardner's Reeapitula. 

lion, vol. xii. p. 1,3. V See Lardner's Recapuiilation, vol. xii. p. 53. |1 Laidiicr. vol. ii. 

». 308. 



80 THE WORD OF GOD. 

most men uninspired, we shall find that their sentiments con- 
tained therein often times very widely differ; and if, as his^ 

to the genuineness of the epistles does not contriidict that of other Chi'istians. 
Mai'c.on, ia\ lieretical waiter in the former part of the second century, is said by 
Tertuiii;.n to have rejected tlu-ee of the epistles which wa now receive, viz. the 
two Epistles to Timotliy and the Epistle to Titus. It appears to me not impro- 
bable, that Marciou might muke some such distinction as this, that no apostolic 
epistle was to be admitted which was not read or attested by the chui'ch to 
which it was sent ; for it is remarkable th:it, together with these epistles to pri- 
vate ]3ersons, he rejected also the catholic epistles. Now the catholic epistles 
and die epistles to private persons agi'ce m the cuxumstance of wanting tins par- 
ticul;.A. species of attestiition. Maixion, it seems, acknowledged the Epistle to 
Philemon, and is upbraided for his inconsistencj' in domg so by Teilullian*, who 
asks " why, when he received a letter written to a single person, he should re- 
♦' fuse two to Tin^.othy and one to Titus composed upon tJie jmairs of the church?" 
This pa.ss;ige so far favours our account of Marcion's objection, as it show s that 
the objection was supposed by Tertullian to have been founded in something, 
which belonged to tlie nature of a private letter. 

Nothing of the works of Marcion remains. Probably he was, after all, a rash, 
ai'bitrary, licentious critic (if he deserved indeed the name of critic,) and who 
offered no reason for his determination. What St. Jerome says of him intimates 
this, and is beside founded in good sense : speakmg of him and Basilides, " If 
" they had assigned any reasons," says he, " why they did not reckon these epis- 
" ties," viz. the first and second to T>mothy and the Epistle to Titus, " to be the 
•' apostle's, we would have endeavoured to have answered tliem, and perhaps 
" might have satisfied the reader : but when they take upon tliem, by their own 
" authority, to pronounce one epistle to be Paul's, and another not, tliey can 
" only be replied to in the same mamiei-f . Let it be remembered, however, that 
Marcion received ten of these epistles. His authority therefore, even if his credit 
had been better than it is, foniis a very small exception to the unifonnity of tlie 
evidence. Of Basilides we know still less than we do of Marcion. The same 
observation however belongs to him, viz. that his objection, as far as appears 
from this passage of St. Jerome, was confined to the thi-ee privs^te epistles. Yet 
is this the only opinion which can be said to disturb the consent of the two fii'st 
centuries of the Christian ?era; for as to Tatian, who is reported by Jerome alone 
to have rejected some of St. Paul's Epistles, the extravagant or rather delirious 
notions into which he fell, take away all weight and credit from his judgment. 
If, indeed, Jerome's account of this circumstance be correct ; for it appears fi-om 
much older writers than Jerome, tliat Tatian owned and used many of these 
epistles+. 

n. They, who in those ages disputed about so many other points, agreed in 
acknowledging the Scriptures novv' before us. Contending sects appealed tu 
them in their controversies with equal and unreserved submission. AVhen they 
were urged by one side, however they might be interpreted or misinterpreted bv 
the oiher, their authority was not questioned. " Reliqui omnes," says Irenxus, 
speaking of Marcion, " falso scientix nomine inflati, scriptui'as quidem confiten- 
" tiu", interpretationes vero convertunt^." 

111. When tlie genuineness of some other writings which were in circulation, 
and even of a few which are now received into tlie canon, was contested, these 
were never called into dispute. Whatever was the objection, or whether, in 
truth, there ever was any real objection to the authenticity of the Second Epistle 
of Peter, the Second and Tliird of John, die Epistle of James, or that of Jude, 
or to the book of the Revelations of St. John, tlie doubts that appear to have 
been entertained concerning them, exceedingly strengthen the force of the tes- 
timony as to those writings, about which there was no doubt ; because it shows, 
that the matter was a subject, amongst the early Clu'istians, oK examination and 
discussion; and that, whei-e there was any room to doubt, they did doubt. 

• Lardner, vol. xiv. p. 455. t Lardner, vol. xiv. p. 458. J Lardner, vol. i. p. 3iS. 

« Ircii. advci'5, Haer. ouoted by Lardner, vol. x\ . p. 425. 



THE WORD OF GOp. 81 

t 

torians, they pretend to report matters of fact, their evidence^ 
or report, does not, in all respects, agree together, which shews 

What Eusebius hath left upon the subject is directly to the purpose of this 
observation. Eusebius, it is well known, divided the ecclesiastical writings 
which were extant in his time into three classes ; the " atyetvTtffinat., uncontradict- 
" ed," as he calls them in one chapter; or " scriptures universally acknowledg- 
"ed," as he calls them in another; the "controverted, yet well known and 
" appi-oved by many ; and " the spurious." What were the shades of difference 
In the books of the second, or in those of the third class ; or what it was pre- 
cisely that he meant by the term spurious, it is not necessary in this place to en- 
quire. It is sufficient for us to find, that the th.rteen epistles of St. Paul are 
placed by him in the first class without any sort ox' hesitation or doubt. 

It is farther also to be collected from the chapter in which this distinction is 
laid down, that the method made use of by Eusebius, and by the Chi-istians of 
his time, viz. the close of the third century, in judging concerning the sacred 
autliority of any books, was to enquire after and consider the testimony of those 
who lived near the age of the apostles*. 

IV. That no ancient writing, which is attested as these epistles are, hath had 
its authenticity disproved, or is in fact questioned. The controversies which 
have been moved concerning suspected wTitings, as the epistles, for instance, of 
Phalaris, or the eighteen epistles of Cicero, begin by showing that this attesta- 
tion is wanting. That being proved, the question is thrown back upon internal 
marks of spuriousness or authenticity ; and in these the dispute is occupied. In 
which disputes it is to be observed, that the contested writings are common- 
ly attacked by arguments drawn from some opposition which they betray to 
*' authentic history," to " true epistles," to " the real sentiments or circum- 
*' stances of the author whom they personatef;" which authentic history, which 
true epistles, which real sentiments themselves, are no other than luicient docu- 
ments, whose early existence and reception can be proved, in the manner in 
which the writings before us are traced up to the age of theu* reputed author, or 
to ages near to his. A modern who sits down to compose the history of some 
ancient period, has no stronger evidence to appeal to for the most confident as- 
sertion, or the most undisputed fact, that he delivers, than writings, whose 
genuineness is proved by the same medium through which we evince the autlien- 
ticity of ours. Nor, whilst he can have recourse to such authorities as these, 
does he apprehend any uncertainty in his accounts, from the suspicion of spuri- 
ousness or imposture in his materials. 

V. It cannot be shown that any forgeries, properly so called +, that is, weU 
tings published under the name of the person who did not con^pose them, made 
their appearance in the first century of the Christian aera, in which century these 
epistles undoubtedly existed. I shall set down under this proposition the guard- 
ed words of Lardner himself: " There are no quotations of any books of them 
" (spm-ious and apocrj-phal books) in the apostolical fathers, by whom I mean 
"Barnabas, Clement of Rome, Hermas, Ignatius, and Polycaip, whose writings 
" reach from the year of our Lord 70 to the year 108. I say this confidetitlij, be- 
*' caiise I think it fuis been proved." Lardner, vol. xii. p. 158. 

Nor when they did appear were tliey much used by the primitive Christians. 
" Irenxus quotes not any of these books. He mentions some of them, but he 
*' never quotes them. The same may be said of Tertullian ; he has mentioned a 
•' book called * Acts of Paul and Thecla:' but it is only to condemn it. Clement 
" of Alexandria and Origen have mentioned and quoted several such books, but 
♦' never as authority, and sometimes with express marks of dislike. Eusebius 
" quotes no such books in any of his works. He has mentioned them indeed, 
•' but how ? Not by way of approbation, but to show that they were of little or 

• Lardner, vol. vili. p. 106. f See the tracts written in the controversy between ^^ln. 

stal and Middleton upon certain suspected epistles ascribed to Cicero. t 1 belirve that iheia 

is a great deal of truth in Dr. Laraner's oliservations, that comparatively lew of those hook'!, 
which we call apocryphal, were strictly and originally forgeries. See Lardiicr, vol. xii. p. 16T. 

Vol. I. L 



82 THE WORD or GOD. 

that they are fallible ; but the exact and harmonious agreement 
of scripture proves it divine. That other writings of human 

" no value ; and that they never were received by the sounder part of Chi-istians." 
Now, if with this, which is advanced after the most minute and diligent exami- 
nation, we compare what the same cautious writer had before said of our re- 
ceived scriptures, "that m die works of tliree only of the above-mentioned fa- 
" thers, tiiere are more and larger quotations of the small volume of the New 
" Testament, tlutn of all tlie works of Cicero in the writers of all characters for 
" several ages ;" and if, witli the marks of obscurity or condemnation, which ac- 
companied the mention of the several apocrj^phal Christian writings, when they 
happened to be mentioned at all, we contrast what Dr. Lardner's work com- 
pletely and in detail makes out concerning the writings wliich we defend, and 
what, having so m.ade out, he thought himself authorized in his conclusion to 
assert, that these books were not only received fi-om the beginning, but received 
with the greatest respect ; have been publicly and solemnly read in the assem- 
blies of Christuvns throughout the world, in every age from that time to this; 
early translated into tlie languages of divers countries and people ; commentaries 
WTil to expla'm and illustrate them ; quoted by way of proof in all ai-guments of 
a religious natuie; recommended to the perusal of unbelievers, as containing tlie 
authentic account of the Christian doctrine ; when we attend, 1 say, to this re- 
presentation, we perceive in it, not only fidl proof of the early notoriety of these 
books, but a clear and sensible line of discrimination, which separates these from 
the pretensions of any others. 

The Epistles of St. Paul stand particularly free of any doubt or confusion that 
might arise from this source. Until the conclusion of the fourtli centun^ no in- 
timation appears of any attempt whatever being made to counterfeit these wri- 
tings; and then it appears only of a single and obscure instance. Jerome, who 
flourished in the year 392, has this expression: " Legunt quidam et ad Laodi- 
** censes ; sed ab omnibus exploditvir ;" there is also an Epistle to the Laodiceans, 
but it is rejected by every bod>*. Thcodoret, who wrote in the year 423, speaks 
of this epistle in the same termsf . Beside these, I know not whether any an- 
cient writer mentions it. It was certainly unnoticed during the three first cen- 
turies of the Church ; and when it came aftei-wards to be mentioned, it was 
mentioned only to show, that, though such a writing did exist, it obtained no 
credit. It is probable that the forgery to which Jerome alludes, is the epistle 
which we now have under that title. If so, as hath been already observed, it is 
nothing more than a collection of sentences from the genuine Epistles ; and was 
perhaps, at first, rather the exercise of some idle pen, than any serious attempt 
to impose a forgery upon the public. Of an Epistle to the Corinthians under St. 
Paul's name, wnich was brought into Europe in the present century, antiquity 
is entirely silent. It was unheard of for sixteen centuries; and at this day, tliough 
it be extant, and was fii-st found in the Armenian language, it is not, by the 
Christians of that country, received into their scriptures. I hope, after this, 
that there is no reader who will think there is any competition of credit, or of 
external proof, between these and the received Epistles : or rather, who will 
not acknowledge the evidence of anthenticily to be confirmed by the want of 
success which attended imposture. 

When we take into our hands the letters which the suflTrage and consent of an- 
tiquity hath thus transmitted to us, the first thing that strikes our attention is 
the air of reality and business, as well as of seriousness and conviction, which 
pervades the whole. Let the sceptic read them. If he be not sensible of these 
qualities in them, the argument can have no weight with him. If he be; if he 
perceive in almost every page the languag-e of a mmd actuated by real occasions, 
and operating upon real circumstances, I would wish it to be observed, that 
the proof which arise."; from this perception is not to be deemed occult or imagi- 
nary, because it is incapable of being drawn out in words, or of being conve)ed 

• Lardner, vn). x. p. 103. t Lardner, vol. xi. p. 88. 



THE WORD OF GOD. 83 

composure agree not among themselves, is very evident ; and 
it ^ less to be wondered at if we consider, 



to the apprehension of the reader in any other way, than by sending; hun lo the 
books theaiseives." 

"If it be true that we are in possession of the very letters which St. Paul wrote, 
let us consider wliat con&'niation they aflbrd to the Cla-istian history. In my 
opinion they substantiate the whole transaction. The great object of modern 
reseai'cli is to come at the epistolary coiTespondence of the times. Amidst the 
obscurities, the silence, or the contradictions of history, if a letter can be found, 
we reg-ard it as the discovery of a land mai-k; as that by which we can correct, 
adjust, or supply the imperfections and uncertainties of other accounts. One 
cause of tlie superior credit which is attributed to letters is tliis, that the facts 
which they disclose generally come out incidentally^ and therefore without de- 
sign to mislead the public by false or exaggerated accounts. This reason may 
be applied to St. Paul's Epistles with as much justice as to any letters whatever. 
Nothing- could be fui-ther from the intention of the writer than to record any part 
of his history. That his history was in fact made public by these letters, and has 
by the same means been transmitted to future ages, is a secondary and untliought- 
of effect. The sincerity therelin-e of the apostle's declarations cannot reason'ibly 
be disputed ; at least we are sure that it was not vitiated by any desire of setting 
himself off to the public at large. But these letters form a pai-t of the muniments 
of Christianit}-, as much to be valued for their contents, as for their originality. 
A more inestimable treasure the care of antiquity could not have sent down to us. 
Beside the proof they afford of the general reality of St. Paul's history, of Ilia 
knowledge which the author of the Acts of the Apostles had obtained of that 
history, and the consequent probability that he was, what lie professes himself to 
have been, a companion of the apostle's; beside the support they lend to tliese 
impoi-tant inferences, they meet specifically some of tlie principal objections upon 
which tlie adversaiies of Cliristiaiiity have thought proper to rely. In particulai* 
they show, 

I. Tliat Christianity was not a stoiy set on foot amidst the confusions wlijch 
attended and immediately preceded the destruction of Jerusalem ; when maJiy 
extravagant reports were circulated, when men's minds were broken by terror 
and distress, when amidst the tumults that siuTounded them enquiry was im- 
practicable. These letters show incontestably that the religion had fixed and 
established itself before tliis state of things took place. 

n. Wliereas it hath been insinuated, that our gospels may have been made up 
of reports and stories, which were current at tifie time, we may observe that, 
with respect to the Epistles, this is impossible. A man cannot write the history 
of his own life from reports; nor, what is tlie same thing, be led by reports to 
refer to passages and transactions in which he states liimself to have been imme- 
diately present and active. I do not allow that this insinuation is applied to the 
historical part of the New Testament witli any colour of justice or probability; 
but I say, that to the Epistles it is not applicable at all. 

m. These letters prove that the converts to Christianity were not drawn fi-oni 
the barbarous, the mean, or the ignorant set of men, which the representations 
of infidelity would sometimes make them. We learn from letters the character 
liot only of the writer, but, in some measure, of the persons to whom thev are 
written. To suppose that these letters were addressed to a rude tribe, incj.pa- 
ble of thought or reflection, is just as reasonable as to suppose Locke's Essay on 
the Human Understanding to have been written for the instruction of savages. 
Wliatever may be thought of these letters in other respects, either of diction or 
argument, they are certainly removed as far as possible from tlie habits and com- 
prehension of a barbai'ous people. 

IV. St. Paul's history, I mean so muth of it as may be collected from liis 
letters, is so iVnjift'fufet/ with that of tlie other apostles, and will i the substance 
indeed of the Christian history itself, that 1 apprehend it will be found impossible 
to admit St. Paul's h(<iry (I do not speak uftlie; miraculous p:ut of it) to be true, 



84f tHE WORD OF GOD. 

(1.) That men are naturally blind and unacquainted with the 
things of God ; and therefore their writing's will hardly be con- 

- "" ■ ' • • ■ - 

and yet to reject the rest as fabulous. For instance, can any one believe that there 
was such a man as Paul, a preacher of Christianity in the age which we assign to 
him, and 7wt believe that there were also at the same time, such men as Peter and 
James, and other apostles, who had been companions of Christ during his life, and 
who after his death published and avowed the same things concerning him which 
Paul taught ? Judea, and especially Jerusalem, was the scene of Christ's minis- 
try. The witnesses of his miracles lived there. St. Paul, by his own account, aS 
well as that of Ins historian, appears to have frequently visited that city ; to have 
carried on a communication with the church there ; to have associated with the 
rulers and elders of that church, who were some of them apostles ; to have acted, 
as occasions offered, in coiTespondence, and sometimes in conjunction with them. 
Can it, after this, he doubted, but that the religion and the genei-al facts relating 
to it, which St. Paul appears by his letters to have delivered to the several church- 
es wliich he estabUshed at a distance, were at the same time taught and publish- 
ed at Jerusalem itself, the place where the business was transacted ; and taught 
and published by those who had attended the founder of the institution in his mi- 
raculous, or pretendedly miiaculous, mmlstry ? 

It is observable, for so it appeai-s both in the Epistles and from the Acts of the 
Apostles, that Jerusalem, and the society of believers in that city, long continued 
the centre from which the missionaries of the religion issued with which all other 
chmxhes maintained a correspondence and connexion, to ^vhich they referred 
their doubts, and to whose relietj in times of public distress, they remitted their 
charitable assistance. This observation I think material, because it proves that 
this was not the case of giving oui* accounts in one countrv of what is transacted 
in another, without affording the hearers an opportunity of knowing whether the 
things related were credited by any, or even published, in the place where they 
are reported to have passed. 

V. St. Paul's letters furnish evidence (and what better evidence than a man's 
own letters can be desired ?) of the sounthiess and sobriety of his judgment. His 
caution in distinguishing between the occasional suggestions of inspiration, and 
the ordinary exercise of his natural understanding, is witliout example in the his- 
tory of enthusiasm. His morality is every where calm, pure, and rational : adapt- 
ed to the condition, the activity, and the business of social life, and of its various 
relations ; free from the over-scrupulousness and austerities of superstition, and 
from, what was more perhaps to be apprehended, the abstractions of quietism, 
and the soarings and extravagancies of fanaticism. His judgment concerning a 
hesitating conscience ; his opinion of the moral indifferency of many actions, yetof 
the piudence and even the duty of compliance, where non-compliance would pro- 
duce ovll efiects upon the minds of the persons who observed it, is as correct and 
just as the most liberal and enlightened moralist could form at this day. The ac- 
curacy of modern ethics has found nothing to amend in these determinations." 



"Broad, obvious, and explicit agreements prove little ; because it may be sug- 
gested, that the insertion of such is the ordinary expedient of every forgery; and 
though they may occur, and probably will occur, in genuine writings, yet it can- 
not be proved that they are peculiar to these. Thus what St. Paul declares in 
chap. xi. of 1 Cor. concerning the institution of the eucharist, " For I have receiv- 
" ed of the Lord that which I also delivered unto you, that tlie Lord Jesus, the 
*' same night in which he was betrayed, took bread ; and when he had given 
" thanks, he brake it, and said, Talve, eat ; this is my body, which is broken for 
" you ; this do in remembjrnce of me," though it be in close and verbal conformi- 
ty with tlie account of the same transaction preserved by St. Luke, is yet a con- 
formity of which no use c:ui be made hi our argniment ; for if it should be object- 
ed that this was a mere recital from the Gospel, borrowed by the author of tiie e- 
pistle, for tlie purpose of f.ettir.^- off his composition by an appearance of agree- 
ment with the received account of the Loixi's supper, I should not know liow to 
repel tlie insinuation. In like majjner, the description which St. Paul gives of him- 



THE WORD OF GOD. 85 

sistent with themselves, much less with one another, as they 
are oftentimes inconsistent with the standard of truth, by which 
Ihey are to be tried ; nothing is more common than for men to 
betray their weakness, and cast a blemish on their composures, 
by contradicting themselves, especially if they are long, and con- 
sist of various subjects. 

(2.) Men are much more liable to contradict one another 
when any scheme of doctrine is pretended to be laid down by 
diiferent persons ; for when they attempt to represent matters of 
fact, they often do it in a very different light : this may be more 
especially obs^ved in those accounts that are given of doctrines 
that are new, or not well known by the world, or in historical 
accounts, not only of general occurrences, but of particular cir- 
cumstances attending them, where trusting to ^eir memorj*^ 
and judgment, they often impose on themselves and others. 

(3.) This disagreement of human writings will more evident- 
ly appear, when their authors were men of no great natural wis- 
dom, especially if they lived in different ages, or places remote 
from one another, and so could have no opportunity to consult 

' ' ' ' ' ■ *- — 

self in his epistle to the Philippians (iii. 5.) — " Circumcised the eighth clay, ot" 
" the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews ; as 
" touching the law, a Pharisee ; concerning zeal, persecuting the church ; touch- 
" ing the righteousness which is in the law, blameless" — is made up of particulars 
so plainly delivered concerning him, in the Acts of the Apostles, the Epistle to 
the Romans, and the Epistle to the Galatians, that I cannot deny but that it 
would be easy for an impostor, who was fabricating a letter in the name of St. 
Paul, to collect these articles into one view. This, therefore, is a conformity 
which we do not adduce. But when I read, in the Acts of the Apostles, that 
" when Paul came to Derbe and Lystra, behold a certain disciple was there, nam- 
" ed Timotheus, the son of a certain woman -which rvas a Je7vess ,•" and when, in 
an epistle addressed to Timothy, I find him reminded of his "having known the 
" Holy Scripturcs/roOT a child," which implies that he must, on one side or both, 
have been brought up by Jewish parents : I conceive that I remark a coincidence 
which shews, by its very obliquittj, that scheme was not employed in its forma- 
tion." ■ 

"An assertion in the Epistle to the Colossians, viz. that " Onesimus was one of 
*' them," is verified by the Epistle to Philemon ; and is verified, not by any men- 
tion of Colosse, any the most distant intimation concerning the place of Phile- 
mon's abode, but singly by stating Onesimus to be Philemon's servant, and by 
joining in the salutation Philemon with Archippus, ; for this Archippus, when we 
go back to the Epistle to the Colossians, appears to have been an inhabitant of 
that city, and, as it should seem, to have held an office of authority in that church. 
The case stands thus. Take the Epistle to the Colossians alone, and no ciixuin- 
stance is discoverable which makes out the assertion, tliat Onesimus w.\s " one of 
" them." Take the Epistle to Philemon alone, and nothing at all appears concern- 
ing the place to which Philemon or his servant Onesimus belonged. For any thing 
that is said in the epistle, Philemon might have been a Thessaloiiian, a Philip- 
pian, or an Ephesian, as well as a Colossian. Put the two epistles togetlitr and the 
matter is clear. The I'eader perceives n junction of cii-cumstanres, w hich ascer- 
tains the conclusion at once. Now, all tliat is necessary to be added in tiiis place 
is, that this coiTCspondency evinces the genuineness of one epistle, as well as of 
the other. It is like comparing the twopurtsof a cloven tallv. Coincidence proves 
tile authenticity of both." * P.u.et. 



86 THE WORD OF GOD. 

one another, or compare their writings together ; we shall scarce 
ever find a perfect harmony or agreement in such writings ; 
neither should we in scripture, were it not written by divine in- 
spiration. 

This will appear, if we consider that the penmen thereof 
were in themselves as liable to mistake as other men ; and had 
they been left to themselves herein, tliey would have betrayed 
as much weakness, confusion, and self-contradiction, as any 
other writers have done ; and it may be more, inasmuch as ma- 
ny of them had not the advantage of a liberal education, nor 
were conversant in human learning, but were taken from mean 
employments, and made use of by God in this work, that so we 
may herein see more of the divinity of the writings they were 
employed to transmit to us : besides, they lived in different 
ages and places, and so could not consult together what to im- 
part, and yet we find, as we shall endeavour to prove, that they 
all agree together : therefore the harmony of their writings is 
an evident proof that they were inspired by the same spirit, and 
consequently that they are the word of God. 

We might here consider the historical parts of -scripture, and 
the account which one inspired writer gives of matters of facts 
as agreeing with what is related by another; and also the har- 
mony of all the doctrines contained therein, as not only agree- 
ing in the general scope and design thereof, but in the way and 
manner in which they are laid down or explained : but we shall 
more pai'ticularly consider the harmony of scripture, as what is 
foretold in one part thereof, is related as accomplished in ano- 
ther. And, 

1. There are various predictions relating to the providential 
dealings of God with his people, which had their accomplish- 
ment in an age or two after. Thus the prophets Isaiah, Jeremi- 
ah, and others, foretold the captivity and the number of years 
they should be detained in Babylon, and their deliverance by 
Cyrus, who is expressly mentioned by name. These prophecies, 
and the accomplishment thereof are so obvious, that there is no 
one who reads the Old Testament but will see an harmony be- 
tween them ; so that what in one place is represented as foretold, 
in another place, is spoken of as accomplished in its proper 
time, Isa. xliv. 28. and Chap. xlv. 1,4. compared with Ezrai. 

And the revolt and apostacy of Israel, their turning aside 
from God, to idolatry, which was the occasion of their desola- 
tion, was foretold by Moses, Deut. xxxi. 29. and by Joshua, 
Chap, xxiii. 15, 16. and Chap. xxiv. 19. And every one that 
reads the booK of Judges, will see that this was accomplished ; 
for when Moses and Joshua were dead, and that generation 



THE WORD OF GOD. 87 

who lived with them, they revolted to idolatry and were punish- 
ed lor the same in various instances, Judg. ii. 8, 10, 11, 14. . 

And the prophecy of the great reiorraation which Josiah 
should make, and in particular, that he should burn the hones of 
the idolatrous priests on the altar at Bethel^ 1 Kings xiii. 2. was 
exactly accomplished above three hundred years after, 2 Kings 
xxii. 15, 16. 

2. There are various predictions under the Old Testament 
relating to our Saviour, and the New Testament church, many 
of which have had their accomplishment, and others are daih* 
accomplishing. It is said, Acts x. 43. To him gave all the pro- 
phets rvitness^ that through his name whosoever believeth in him^ 
shall receive remission of sins ; and we shall find, that what is 
foretold concerning him in the Old Testament, is related as ac- 
complished in the New ; particularly, 

(1.) That he should come in the flesh, was foretold in the 
Old Testament, Hag. ii. 7. Mai. iii. 1. Isa. ix. 6. and is men- 
tioned as accomplished in the New, John i. 14. Gal. iv. 4. 

(2.) That he should work miracles for the good of mankind, 
and to confirm his mission, was foretold, Isa. xxxv. 5, 6. and ac- 
complished, Matth. xi. 4, 5. 

(3.) That he should live in this world in a low and humbled 
state, was foretold, Isa. Iii. 14. and chap. liii. 3. and the whole 
account of his life in the gospels bears witness that those predic- 
tions were fully accomplished. 

(4.) That he should be cut off, and die a violent death, was 
typified by the brazen serpent in the wilderness, vi%. that he 
should be lifted up upon the cross. Numb. xxi. 9. compared 
with John iii. 14. and foretold in several other scriptures, Iso. 
liii. 7. and Dan. ix. 26. and this is largely insisted on, as fulfil- 
led in the New Testament. 

(5.) That after he had continued some time in a state of hu- 
miliation, he should be exalted, was foretold, Isa. Iii. 13. chap, 
liii. 11, 12. Psal. Ixviii. 18. and fulfilled. Acts i. 9. Phil. ii. 9. 
- (6.) That his glory should be proclaimed and published in 
the pi^eaching of the gospel, was foretold, Isa. xi. 10. Psal. ex. 
2. Isa. Ix. 1, 2, 3. and fulfilled, 1 Tim. iii. 16. Mark xvi. 15. 
as appears from many scriptures. 

(7.) That he should be the spring and fountain of all blessed- 
ness to his people, was foretold, Gen. xxii. 18. Psal. Ixxi'. 17. 
Isa. xlix. 8, 9. and fulfilled, 2 Cor. vi. 2. Acts iii. 26. In these, 
and many other instances, we may observe such a beautiful con- 
sent of all the parts of scripture, as proves it to be the very word 
of God. 

But since it will not be sufficient, to support the divine au- 
thority of scripture, to assert that there is such a harmony, as 
we have observed, unless we can prove that it doth not contra- 



88 THE weRB VF GOp. 

diet itself in any instances ; therefore the next thing we arc to 
consider, is the reproach cast upon it by those who would bring 
all divine revelation into contempt, as though it contradicted it- 
self in several instances, and contained various absurdities ; 
which, were they able to make appeal*, would enervate the force 
of the argument we are maintaining, to prove the scripture to 
be the word of God from the consent of the parts thereof: there- 
fore we shall consider some of those contradictions, which ma- 
ny, who pretend to criticise on the words of scripture, charge it 
with, as so many objections against the harmonious consent, 
and consequently the divine authority thereof, together with the 
answers, which may be given to each of them. 

Object. 1. If we compare our Saviour's genealogy, as related 
in the first of Matthew and the third of Luke, they allege that 
there is a very great inconsistency between them, for one men- 
tions different persons, as his progenitors, from what the other 
does ; as, for instance, in Matth. i. he is said to be the son of 
Joseph, and Joseph the son of Jacob, and he the son of Matthan ; 
but the other evangelist, viz. Luke, says that he was the son of 
Joseph, which was the son of Heli, which was the son of Mat- 
that : and so we find the names of each genealogy very differ 
ing, till we come to David ; therefore they suppose both those 
genealogies cannot be true, inasmuch as the one contradicts the 
other. 

Ansxv. It evidently appears, that there is no contradiction be- 
tween these two genealogies, since Matthew gives an account of 
Joseph's ancestors, and Luke of Mary's, and so, both together, 
prove that he was the son of David, by his reputed father's, as 
well as his mother's side. 

And if it be replied, that Luke, as well as Matthew, gives an 
account of Joseph's genealogy, and therefore this answer is not 
sufficient : we may observe, that it is said, Luke iii. 23, 24. that 
Jesus 7vas^ as it is supposed, the son of yoseph, which was the 
son of Heli, ^c. the meaning is, he was, indeed, the supposed 
son of Joseph, but he really descended from Heli, the father of 
the virgin Mary ; and nothing is more common in scripture 
than for grandsons to be called sons ; and if we observe the 
meaning of the Greek words, which we render, which was the 
son, ££?c. it may better be rendered, who descended from Heli, 
and then there is not the least absurdity in it, supposing Heli 
to be his grandfather ; and therefore there is no appearance of 
contradiction between these two scriptures. 

Object. 2. It is pretended, that there is a plain contradiction 
between these two places, 2 Sam. xxiv. 24. and 1 Chron. xxi. 
25. in the former whereof it is said, that David bought the 
threshing-floor of Araunah the Jebusite, to build an altar on, 
and the oxen for burnt-offerings, that the plague might be stay- 



THE WORD Of g6D» ' 8§( 

^^^for jijtif shekels nj silver ; but in the other, t>E2. in Chroni- 
cles, it is said, that he gave him for the place six hundred she- 
kels of gold; therelort- they pretend that one of thtse places 
must be wrong, inasmuch as they plainly contradict one another. 

Anstv, The answer that may be given to this objection, is, 
that David paid Araunah (who is otherwise called Oman) for 
his threshing-floor, where he built an altar, and for the oxen, 
which he bought lor sacrifice, fifty shekels of silver, as it is ex- 
pressed in Samuel. But, beside this threshing-floor, he bought 
the whole place, as it is said in Chronicles, i. e, the whole tract 
of ground, or mountain, on which it stood, whereon he design- 
ed that the temple should be built ; and therefore he saith con- 
cerning it, 1 Chron, xxii. 1. This is the house of the LordGodj 
i. e. this place, or tract of land, which I have bought round a- 
about the threshing-floor, is the place where the house of God 
shall stand ; and this is the altar of burnt-offering for Israel^ 
which was to be built in that particular place, where the thresh- 
ing-floor was : now, though he gave for the threshing-floor but 
fifty shekels of silver, (which probably was as much as it was 
worth) yet the whole place, containing ground enough for the 
temple, with all its courts, and the places leading to it, was 
worth a great deal more ; or, if there were any houses in th6 
place, these were also purchased to be pulled down, to make 
room for the building of the temple ; and, for all this, he gave 
six hundred shekels of gold, and we can hardly suppose it to 
be worth less ; so that there is no real contradiction between 
these two places. 

Object. 3. It is pretended, that there is a contradiction be- 
tween 2 Sam. xxiv. 13. and 1 Chron. xxi. 12. in the former 
of which Gad came to David, being sent to reprove him for his 
numbering the people, and said. Shall seven tjears of faming 
i:ome unto thee in thy land 7 But, in Chiouicles," he speaks of 
but three years of famine. 

Ansiv. To reconcile this seeming contradiction, t^. 

1. Some think, that in some ancient copies, it is fl&t seven, 
but three, («) years of famine, in Samuel, as it is in Cto-onicles ; 
the reason of this conjecture is, because the lxx, or Greek 
translation, have it so ; and they think that these translators 
would hardly have made so bold with scripture, as to put three 
for seven, if they had not found it so in the copies that they 
made use of, when they compiled this translation : but probably 
this answer will not give satisfaction to the objectors ', therefore, 

2. The best way to account for this seeming contradiction, 
is this : in Chronicles, Gad bids him chuse if he would have 
three years of famine, viz. from that time ; but in Samuel he 

(a) O" Jii' y-i^ "]"• HIT. vvaiitinp^ only in 85 ^id 112 of Konn:(.o«. 

M 



90 THE WORD OF GOD. 

saith, shall seven years of famine come unto thee, that is, as 
though he should say there hath been three years of famine al- 
ready, for Saul and his bloody house^ because he slew the Gibeon- 
itesy 2 Sam. xxi. 1, Now, that famine ceased but the year be- 
fore, and the ground being so chaped and hard for want of rain 
this year, which was the fourth, it was little better than a }'ear 
of famine. Now, said Gad, wilt thou have this famine continued 
three years more (which, in all, makes up seven years) unto- 
thee in the land ? And, if we take it in this sense, there is no 
contradiction between these two scriptures, though one speaks 
of three years, and the other of seven. 

Object. 4. They pretend to find an inconsistency, or absur- 
dity, little better than a contradiction, by comparing 1 Sam. 
xvi. 21, 22. and chap. xvii. 55. In the former it is said, David 
came to Saul, and stood before him, and he loved him greatly ; 
and he sent to Jesse, with die intent that he might give him 
leave to stand before him, inasmuch as he had found favour in 
his sight. No-w, say they, how can this be consistent with the 
other scripture ; where Saul seeing Davjd going forth against 
Goliah the Philistine, asked Abner, Whose son is this ijouth ? 
And Abner replied, He could not tell ; and, in the next verse, 
he is ordered to enquire xvho he was. Now how could this be, 
when he had been his armour-bearer, stood before him, and 
found favour in his sight ; and he had sent to Jesse, to desu-e 
that he might live with him ? 

Ansxv. I can see no appearance of absurdity, or defect of 
harmony, between these two scriptures ; for supposing Saul's 
memory had failed him, and he had forgot that David had 
stood before him as a servant, shall the scripture, that gives an 
account of this, be reflected on, as containing an inconsistency ? 
It is true, David had stood before Saul, as his armour-bearer ; 
Y<tX. he had, for some time, been sent home and dismissed from 
his service, during which time he kept his father's sheep ; and 
probably he lived not long in Saul's family ; therefore it is no 
wonder if Saul had now forgot him. There is no master of a 
family but may forget what servants have formerly lived with 
him, and much more a king, who hardly knows the names of 
the greatest part of the servants that are about him : besides, 
at this time, David appeared in the habit of a shepherd, and 
therefore Saul might well say, whose son is this youth P This 
sufficiently accounts for the difficulty, and vindicates this scrip- 
ture from the charge of inconsistency ; though some account for 
it thus, by supposing that Saul knew David, (as having been 
his armour-bearer) but did not know his father, and therefore 
asks, whose son is this P or who is he that hath so bold and dar- 
ing a son, as this youth appears to be ? If these things be con- 
sidered, there appears not the least absurdity in this scripture. 



THE WORD OF GOD. 91 

Object. 5. Another contradiction, which some charge the 
scripture with, is, that when Israel, pursuant to the advice of 
Balaam, committed idolatry, and went a-whoririg after the 
daughters of Moab, and God consumed them for \-: by the 
plague, it is said. Numb. xxv. 9. Those that died in the plague 
■were twenty-Jour thousand; but the apostle Paul, referring to 
the same tiling, says, 1 Cor. x. 8. Neither let us commit forni- 
cation., as some of them committed^ and fell in one day three and 
trventij thousand, 

AnsTv. 1. The answer that maybe given to this objection, 
that the apostle Paul, when he says, three and txventij thousand 
died^ or fell, in one day., speaks of those who died by the imme- 
diate hand of God, by the pestilential distemper that w.ts sent 
among them ; but, besides these, there were many more that 
died by the hand of public justice for this sin ; for in that chap- 
ter in Numbers, verse 4 and 5. we read of the heads of the peO' 
pie being hanged up before the Lord., and the jxidges behig or- 
dered to slay every every man his men that 7vere Joined unto 
Baal-pcor. These died by the sword of justice, and it is no 
great impropriety to say, that such died in a mediate way, by 
the plague, or sword of God ; the sword is one of his plagues, 
as well as pestilential diseases, and is frequently so styled in 
scripture : now we cannot suppose that fewer died of this latter 
plague, if that be the import of the M^ord, than a thousand ; so 
' iat Moses gives the number of all that died, whether by God's 
immediate hand, or by the sword of the magistrate, pursuant to 
his command : but if it be reckoned too great a strain upon the 
sense of the w ord plague, to admit of this solution, let it be far- 
ther observed, that, in the 9th verse, where Moses gives the suni 
total of those that died, it is not said that they were such who 
died o/'the plague, but in the plague ; that is, those that died in 
or soon after the time that the plague raged among them, whose 
death was occasioned by this sin, w^ere four and ttventy thou- 
sand ; so that these two places of scripture are so far from con- 
tradicting, that they rather illustrate one another. 

Object. 6. Another contradiction is pretended to be between 
Gal. i. 8. where the apostle says. Though rye, or an angel from. 
heaven^ preach any other gospel unto you., than that which xve 
have preached unto you., let him be accursed ; 2 Cor. xi. 4. If he 
that Cometh., preacheth another jfesus xvhom we have not preach- 
ed., or if ye. receive another spirit., which ye have not received., 
or another gospel., xvhich ye have not accepted., ye might xvell 
bear with him. In one place he speaks against those who preach 
another gospel ; in the other he says, they may be borne with ; 
which seems to be a contradiction. 

Ansxu. For the reconciling and accounting for the sense of 
tliese two scriptures, let us consider, that in the former of them 



92 THE WORD OF GOD. 

the apostle pronounces them that preached another gospel ac- 
cursed, and therefore, doubtless, they were not to be borne 
with, or allowed bf ; therefore it must be enquired what he 
Tneans v/hen he say:;, m the other scripture, that such may be 
well borne with ; row this scripture will, without the least strain 
or force upon the words, admit of one of these two senses. 

1. It may be considered as containing a sarcasm, by which 
the apostle reproves their being too much inclined to adhere to 
false teachers : if, says he, these bring vou tidings of a better 
Spirit, a better gospel, then bear with them ; but this they can- 
not do, therefore reject them ; or, 

2. The words may be rendered, instead of i/e might rvell bear 
xvith him^ ye might well bear xuith me, as is observed in the 
mai'ginal reference ; the word him being in an Italic character^ 
as will be elsewhere observed,* is not in the original, and 
therefore me may as well be supplied as hi?n, and so the mean* 
ing is this ; ye bear with false preachers, are very favourable to 
them, and seem a little cold to us the apostles ; so that I am, 
afraid, as is observed in the foregoing verse, lest your minds 
should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ ; you 
can bear with these false teachers, and will you not bear with 
me ? as he says, ver. I . Would to God you could bear with me a 
little in viy folly, and indeed bear with me. It is a sign religion 
is at a low ebb, when it is with some difficulty that professors 
are persuaded to bear with those that preach the pure gospel of 
Christ, who are too prone to turn aside to another gospel. Take 
the words in either of these senses, and they exactly harmonize 
with that text in G^alatians, and not, as the objectors pretend, 
contradict it. 

Object. 7. Another charge of contradiction, which is brought 
against scripture, is, that our Saviour saith, Matth. x. 34. 
Think not that I am come to send peace on the earth; I came 
not to send peace, but a sword : this is contrary to Christ^s ge- 
neral character, as ?i prince of peace, Isa. ix. 6. and to the advice 
he gives his di^jciples, not to use the sword, because such shall 
perish by it. Mat. xxvi. 62. and what he saith else, J/j/ kingdom 
is not of this xvorld, John xviii. 36. and therefore not to be pro- 
pagatea by might or power, by force or civil policy, or those ' 
other carnal methods, by which the kingdoms of this world are 
advanced and promoted. 

Answ. For the reconciling this seeming contradiction, let it 
be considered, that Christ did not come to put a sword into his 
followers hands, or to put them upon making war with the pow - 
ers among whom thev dwell, for the propagating the Christian 
religion ; his gospel was to be advanced by spiritual methods : 
in this sense, the design of his coming was not to send a sword, 

* See Q;tes. 154. 



THE WORD OF GOD. 93 

but to bring spiritual peace to his people ; but when he sailh, I 
came to send a sword, it implies that his coming, his kingdom 
and gospel, should occasion persecution and war, by reason of 
the corruption of men ; this the gospel may do, and yet not put 
men upon disturbing their neighbours, or making war with 
them ; and this is not contrary to Christ's general character of 
coming to be the author of spiritual peace to his people. 

Object. 8. Another contradiction is pretended to be between 
1 Kings viii. 9. and Heb. ix. 4. in the former it is said, There 
■was nothing in the ark but the tzvo tables^ ruhich Moses put 
there; in the latter, that there was the golden pot^ that had 
manna^ AarorCs rod that budded^ and the tables of the covenant. 

Anszv, This seeming contradiction may easily be reconciled : 
for we suppose it true that there was nothing in the ark but 
the two tables, as it is said in the former of these scriptures ; 
therefore to explain the latter agreeably to it, two senses may 
■be given of it. 

1. It is not necessary to suppose, that the apostle means, in 
the ark was the golden pot, ^c. but in the holiest of all, which 

,he mentioiis in the foregoing verse ; therefore the meaning is, as 
.in the holiest of all, there was the golden censer, and the ark of 
the covenant, so in it was the golden pot and Aaron's rod : but 
because there may be an objection against this sense, from its 
being said in the words immediately following, that over it were 
the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy-seat, where it re- 
fers to the ark, and not to the tabernacle, or holiest of all ; if 
therefore the cherubims were over the ark, then the other things 
must be supposed to be in it, which objection, indeed, is not 
without its force, unless we suppose that the words* may be 
rendered in the higher parts of it, to wit, of the holiest of all^ 
7vere the cherubims of glory above the mercy seat, and accord- 
ingly the meaning is this ; that within this second vail was not 
only the ark, the golden pot of manna, Aaron's rod, £s?c\ but also 
the cherubims of glory, which were above them all : but since 
the grammatical construction, seems rather to favour the objec- 
tion, there is another sense given of the words, which sufficientjv 
reconciles the seeming contradiction, viz. '^■ 

2. When it is said,f that therein, or in it, to wit, the ark, was 
the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded^ 
the meaning is, they were near it, or beside it, or some wav or 
other fastened, or adjoining to it, in some enclosure, in the out- 
side of the ark, whereas nothing was in it but the two tables ; 
so that there is no real contradiction between tiiese two scrip- 
tures. 

I [« »■] » uftt.itirnei *.j »> e^, Cuni, ad, prgpe,^uxta, at vsll hs In. 



S4. THE WORD OF GOD. 

Many more instances of the like nature might have been 
given, but, instead thereof, we shall rather chuse to lay down 
some general rules for the reconciling seeming contradictions in 
scripture, which may be applied by us in other cases, where we 
meet with the like difficulties. As, 

1. When two scriptures seem to contradict each other, we 
sometimes find that this arises from the inadvertency of some 
who have transcribed the copies of scripture, putting one word 
for another ; though it may -je observed, 

(l.) That this is not often found ; for as great care has been 
taken in transcribing the manuscripts of scripture, as in any 
manuscripts whatever, if not greater. 

(2.) If there have been mistakes in transcribing, it is only in 
a few instances, where there is a likeness between two words, so 
that one might easily be mistaken for the other; and this ought 
not to prejudice any against the scripture, for it only argues, 
that though the inspired penmen were infallible, the scribes 
that took copies of scripture for common use were not so. 

(3.) When there is any such mistake, it may generally be 
rectified by some other copy, that has the word as it really 
should be : it is so in our printed Bibles, in some editions of 
them we find mistakes, as to some words, that may be rectified 
by others, which are more correct ; and if so, why may not this 
be supposed to be in some written copies thereof, that were 
used before printing, which is but a late invention, was known 
in the world, from which ail our printed copies are taken ? 

2. When the same action in scripture seems to be ascribed to 
different persons, or the same thing said to be done in different 
places, there is no contradiction, for the same person, or place, 
is sometimes called bv various names : thus Moses's father-in- 
law, who met him in the wilderness, and advised him in the 
settling the government of the people, is called, in one place, 
Jethro, Exod. xviii. 1. and in another Hobab, Numb. x. 29. So 
the mountain, from which God gave the law to Israel, is some- 
times called mount Sinai, Exod. xix. 20. and at other times 
Horeb, Deut. i. 6. 

3. Chronological difficulties, or seeming contradictions, ari- 
sing from a differing number of years, in Avhich the same thing 
is said to be done, may be reconciled, by computing them 
from the different epocha's, or beginnings of computation : as it 
is said, Exod. xii. 40. The sojourning of the children of Israel^ 
-who dwelt in Egqpt^ ivas four hundred and thirty years; but, 
when God foretels this sojourning, it is said. Gen. xv. 13. Thy 
seed shall be strangers in a land that is not theirs, andsshall erve 
them, and they shall afflict them four hundred years : now the 
four hundred and thirty years takes its beginning of computa- 
tion from Abraham's being called to leave his country, and 



THE WORD OF GOD. 95 

sojourn in the land of promise, as in a strange land ; this was 
four hundred and thirty years before Israel went out of Egypt ; 
but the four hundred years mentioned in Genesis, during 
which time his seed should sojourn, takes its beginning ot com- 
putation from his having the promised seed, or irom the birth 
of Isaac, which was twenty-five years after his leaving his 
country ; from that time to the children of Israel's going out of 
Egypt was four hundred and five years ; and the five years 
above four hundred are left out, as being an inconsiderable 
number, which is very agreeable to our common wa} of com- 
puting time, when a large even number is mentio«ied, to leave 
out a small one of four or five years, more or less, as in the in- 
stance here mentioned, especially when, time is expressed by 
centuries, as it is here; for it is said, in ver. 16. in the fourth 
generation^ that is, after the fourth century of years, they shall 
come hither again. 

4. When, by comparing the years of the reign of several of 
the kings of Judahand Israel, mentioned in the books of Kings 
and Chronicles, we find that some are said, in one of them, to 
have reigned three or four years longer than the account of the 
years of their reign, mentioned by the other, the seeming con- 
tradiction may be reconciled, by considering him as begmning 
to reign before his father's death, as Solomon did before David 
died ; or from his being nominated as his father's successor, and 
owned as such by the people, which was sometimes done to 
prevent disputes that might arise about the matter afterwards ; 
and sometimes, when a king was engaged in foreign wars, in 
which he was obliged to be absent from his people, and the 
event hereof was uncertain, he appointed his son to reign in his 
absence, from which time he had the title of a king, though his 
father was living : or when a king was superannuated, or unfit to 
reign, as Uzziah was when smote with leprosy ; or when he 
was weary of the fatigue and burden of government, he would 
settle his son, as his viceroy, in his life-time, on which account 
the son is sometimes said to reign with his father : thus many 
account for that difficulty, in 2 Chron. xxxvi. 9. where it is said, 
Jehoiachin-was eight years old when he began to reign ; but in 2 
Kings xxiv. 8. he is said to have been eighteen years oldxvhen 
he began to reign : the meaning is, that when he was eight years 
old, he was nominated as his father's successor ; but when he 
was eighteen years old, he began to reign alone, his father being 
then dead. 

5. Scriptures that seem to contradict one another may not 
treat of the same, but different subjects, as to the general de- 
sign thereof: thus, that seeming contradiction between the apos- 
tles Paul and James is to be accounted for ; the former says. 
Gal. ii. 16. Knowing that a man is not justijied by the xvorh of 



d6 THE WdRD Of GODi 

the lati\ hilt hy the faith of Jesus Christ ; but the other says, 
Jam. ii. 24. That by works a man is justified^ and not hy faith 
only. The apostle Paul speaks of a sinner's justification, or 
freedom from the condemning sentence of the law in the sight 
of God, which gives him a right to eternal life, in which re- 
spect he looks for it out ox himself, and, by faith, depends alone 
on Christ's righteousness ; in this sense, works do not justify : 
wh'^reas che apostle James, when he asserts, that a man is jus- 
tified by works ^ and not by faith only^ intends that our profession 
and sincerity therein is justified ; that is evidenced, not by our 
having just notions of things, or an historical faith, such as the 
devils themselves have, but by those works of holiness, which 
are the fruits of it; this is the only justification he treats of, and 
therefore doth not in the least contradict the apostle Paul, who 
treats of another kind of justification, in which works are ex- 
cluded. 

6. When two scriptures seem to contradict one another, they 
tiiay sometimes be reconciled, by considering the same thing 
absolutely in one place, and comparatively in the other : thus, 
in many scriptures, we are commanded to extend that love to 
every one in their several relations, which is due ; and yet our 
Saviour says, Luke xiv. 26. If any man come to me^ and hate not 
his father and mother^ and -wife^ and children^ and brethren and 
sisters, he cannot be my disciple : this is to be understood com- 
paratively, that is, our love to the creature ought to bear no pro- 
portion to that which is due to God. 

7. Scriptures that seem to contradict one another, often speak 
of different persons, or persons of different characters : thus it 
Ss said, Luke vi. 36. Be ye merciful, as your Father also is 

merciful ; or. Judge not, that ye be not judged. Matt. vii. 2» 
This respects persons in a private capacity, and therefore doth 
not contradict those other scriptures that are applied to ma- 
gistrates in the execution of public justice ; to such it is said, 
Deut. xix. 21. Thine eye shall not pity, but life shall go for 
life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. 

8. Two contrary assertions may be both true in differing 
respects ; thug our Saviour says in one place, The poor ye have 
always xvith you, but me ye have not always. Matt. xxvi» 11. 
and in another, Lo, I am with you always, eveti to the end of 
the world, chap, xxviii. 20. these are both true, one respecting 
Christ's bodily presence, as man, in which respect he is not 
now with us \ the other his spiritu:d and powerful influences, 
v/herebv he is always present with his people as God. 

9. We must take notice of different times or dispensations, 
in which respect those laws or ordinances, which were to be 
received and observed as a rule of faith and duty at one time, 
may not be so at another; thus circumcision is recommended 



THE WORD OF GOD. 97 

as a duty, and a privilege to the Jews before Christ's time, in 
which respect the apostle reckons it among the advantages 
which they formerly had above all other nations, Rom. iii. 1, 
2. but v/heu the gospel dispensation was erected, and the Jew- 
ish ceconomy abolished, ir was so far from being an advantage, 
that the observance of it was deemed no less than a subver- 
sion of the gospel, as the a}X)stle says. Gal. v. 2. If ye be cir- 
ciimcised^ Christ shall pro jit you nothing ; and the same apostle 
gives a very diminutive character of those institutes of the cere- 
monial law, which he calls, in his time, iveak and beggarly ele- 
ments^ such as had a tendency to bring them again into bondage^ 
and blames them for observing the Jewish festivals, such as 
days, montlis, times, and years ; to wit, the new moons, feasts 
of weeks, or of years, such as the seventh year, or the jubilees, 
land tells them, on this occasion, I am afraid of you^ lest I have 
bestowed on yon labour in vain^ chap. iv. 9, 10, 11. so that what 
was ii dutv and a privilege in one age of the church, and en- 
joined with the greatest strictness, and severest punishments on 
those that neglected it, is forbid, as a sin in another age there* 
of, without the least shadow of contradiction between those 
scriptures, which either enjoin or forbid it >• thus, when our 
Saviour first sent his twelve disciples to preach the gospel, he 
commanded them, Not to go in the ivay of the Gentiles^ Matt. 
X. 5. to wit, so long as he was here upon earth, or till they had 
finished their ministry among the Jews, to whom the word 
was first to be preached ; but afterwards, when the gospel was 
to be spread throughout the world, he gave them a commission 
to preach the gospel to all nations^ chap, xxviii. 19. which, accor- 
dingly they did, as apprehending there was no contradiction be- 
tween the former prohibition and the present command, (a) 

(rt) " The most ancient tradition among all nations, is ex:vCtly agi-eeable to the re- 
lation of Aloses. For his description of the or.gmui of the world is almost the very 
same as in the ancient Phosnician histories, which are translated by Philo JiibUva 
from Sivnchoniathon^ s Collection ; and a good part of it is to be found among tlie 
Indians and J-lg-ypticms ; Vvhence it is that iji lAmm, Hesiod, and many other Greek 
writers, mention is made of a Chaos, (signified by some under the name of an Egg) 
and of the framing of imin^als, and iilso of man's fomiation after the divine image, 
and the dominion given him over all living creatui-es ; whicli are to be seen in ma- 
ny writers, particularly in Ch^id, who transcribed them iiom the Creel:. That alj 
things were made by the Word of God, is asserted by Kpichunnus, and the Pla- 
ionists ; and bef )re them, by the most ancient writer (I do not mean of those Hy mns 
which go under his name, but) ot those Verses which were of old called Orphe- 
us' s; not because Orpheus composed them, but because they contained his doc- 
trines. And Empedodes acknowledged, that the smi was not tlie original light, 
but tlie receptacle of light, (the storehouse and vehicle of fu-e, as tlie ancient 
Clu'istians express it.) Jiratus, and Catullus, thought tlie diAme residence was 
above the starry orb ; in wliich Horner says, there is a eontuiual light. 'JViules taught 
from tlie ancient schools, tliat God was the oldest of beings, Iiecaise not begot- 
ten ; that the world was most beautiful, because the woikrnansliln of God ; that 
darkness was before light, which latter we find in Orpfieun's ^'e^seJi, and Heti>jJ, 

Vol. I. N 



*J3 f HE WORD OF OOOi. 

IV. The divine authority of scripture may be further pro- 
ved from the scope and design of the whole, which is to give 
all glory to God. 

•I— ■■ ■ 

whence it was, that the nations, who were most tenacious of ancient customs, 
reckoned the lime by nights. Anaxagoras affirmed, that all things wei-e regula- 
ted by the supreme mind : Jlratm, thai the stars were made by God ; Virgil, I'lom 
the Greeks, that Life was infused into things by the Spirit of God ; Heaiod, Homer, 
and Callimuchns, that man \ras fonned of clay"; lasth", Maximris Ti/rivs asserts, 
tliat it was a constant tradition received by all nations,' tlial tliere was one supreme 
t^iod, the cause of all things. And we learn from Joevphus, PMlo, Tib'iUus, Cle- 
mens Ale.vandrinus, and Luciaji, (for I need not mention tlie Hebrexvs) that the 
memoi) of the seven days' work was preserved, not only among the Greeks and 
Italians, by honouring tiie seventh day ; bat also amongst the Celtcs and Indians, 
who all measured the time by weeks ; as we leai-n from PMhstratus, Dion Cas«7/», 
and Justin Martyr ,• and also "the most ancient names of tlie day. The Egyptians tell 
us, that at first men led theu- lives in great simplicity, their bodies being naked, 
whence arose the poet's fiction of tlic Golden Age, famous among the ImUans, M 
Strabo remarks. Maimmiides takes notice, that ihe history of Adam, of Eve, of 
the tree, :iiid of the serpent, was extant among the idolatrous Indians m his time: 
and there are many witnesses in our age, wlio testify that the same is »till to be 
fount! ..rnongst the lieathen dwelling m Pern, and the PhiSpfmie islands, people 
beioiig.ng to the same India; the name of Adam amongst ihe Prachmana ; and 
and that it was reckoned six thous;md years since the creation of the world, by 
those of Slam. Berosus in his history of Chaldea, Manethos in his of Egypt, Ilie' 
rom in his o^ Phoenicia, Histxus, Ilt'cat.cits, HiUanicv^ in theirs of Greece, iuid /fe- 
no</ among the Poets ; idl assert that the lives of those who descended from the 
first men, were almost a thousand yeai-s in length ; which is the less incredible, 
because the historians of many nations (particularly Pavsamas and Philostrattix 
amongst the Greeks, and Pliiiy amongst the Romans) relate, that men,'s bodies, 
upon opening their sepulchres, were found to be muclt larger in old time. And 
Catullus, after many of the Greeks, relates, that divine visions were made to men 
before their great and manifold crimes did, as it were, hinder God, and tliose Spi- 
rits that attend him, from holding any correspondence with men. We almost 
every where, in the Greek and Latin historians, meet with the savage life of the 
Giants, mentioned by Moses. And it is very remarkable concerning the deluge, 
that the memory of almost all nations ends in the history of it, even those nations 
which were unknown till our forefathers discovered thein : so that Var^-o calls all 
that the unknown time. And all those things which we read in the poets, wrap- 
ped up in fubles (a Liberty tliey allow themselves) are delivered by the ancient 
^vriters according to truth and realit\ ; that is, agreeable to Moses ; as you may 
sec in Berosus' s History of Chalcka,Abifdenus's of ..3*6j/n«, who mentions the dove 
that was sent out of tlie ark; and in Plutarch from the Greeks; and in Lucian, 
who says, that in Hlerapolis of Syria, there was remaining a most ancient history 
of the ark , and of the preserving a few not only of m:u:kind, but also of other liv- 
ing crcatui-es. The same bistort' was extiuit also in Mvlo and in JVicolavs Damas' 
csniis ; winch latter names the ark, which we also find in the histor>- of Deucalion 
in ApoUodjrvs . and many Spaniards affirm, that in several pai'ts of Amenca, as 
Cuba, Mcchouca7iU, J\'icaraga, is preserved the memoiy of the deluge, the saving 
•Ai\e of animals, es]3ecially the raven and dove ; and the deluge itself m that part 
called Golden Castile. That rem:u-k of Pliny's, that Joppa was built before the 
l""lo.)d, discovers what part of the earth men inhabited before the Flood. The 
jilacv where tlie ark rested after tlie deluge on tlie Gordycean mountains, is evi- 
dent from the constiuit tradition of the Armenians from ail past ages, do\",n to this 
very day. Juphet, the father of the Europeans, and from him Jon, or, as thej- for- 
merly pronounced it, Javon of the Greeks, iUid Ifammon of the Africans, are names 
to be seen in ^'Moses, and Josephns and others observe the like footsteps in the 
names of other places and nations. And whicli of the poets is it, in wliich we do 
not find mention made of the attempt t© climb the heavens.'' Biodorvs Siculm, 



"THE WORD OF GOD. ^9 

It may be observed, concerning the scripture, that the ad- 
vancing the divine perfections, and debasing the creature, is 
the great end designed by God in giving it ; and we find that 
whatever doctrine is laid down therein, this end is still pursued. 
Now scripture-doctrines are designed to advance the glory of 
God, either directly or by consequence. 

Strabo, Pacitua, Plimj, SolimiSy speak, of the burninjj of Sodom. Herodotus, Dio- 
dorus, Strabo, Philo Jiiblms, testify the ancient custom of Cn-curriC;.sion, which is 
confirmed by tliose nations descended from Mraham, not only Uebre-ws, but also 
Idmnxans, lamaelites, and others. The histoiy of ^ibraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jo' 
nfph, .'igreeable with J\Iosea, was extant of old in Pliilo lilbiius out of Sunchonia- 
thon, in Berosus, Hecatxus, Damascenus, Artapanue, JSupolemus, Demetnvs, and 
partly m the ancient writers of the Orphic ^'erses ; and something- of it is still 
extant in Justin, out of Tro^us Pompems. By almost all which, is related also the 
history of .Mbse*, and his principal acts. The Orphic Verses expressly mention 
his being taken out of the water, and the two tables that were g-iven him In' God. 
To these we mAy add. Polemon ; and several thing's about his coming out of JE^'z^pf, 
from the Egyptian writers, Alenetho, Lysiinachus, Cluerejnon. Neither can any pru- 
dent man tliink it at all credible, that Moses, who liad so many enemies, not only 
of the Ejiiptiatis, but also of many other nations, as the Iditmteans, Arabians, 
and Phwnicians, would venture to relate any thing coicerning the creation of the 
world, or the original of things, which could be confuted by more aiicient wri- 
tings, or was contradictoiy to the ancient and received opinions : or that he woidd 
relate any thing of matters in his own time, that could be confuted by tiae testi- 
mony of many persons then alive, Diodonts Siculus, Strabo, and Pliny, Tacitus, 
and after them Dionyaius Longinus (concerning loftiness of Speech) make men- 
tion of Moses. Besides the Talimtdists, Pliny and Aptdeitis, spe:ik of Jamnes and 
JMambrea, who resisted Moses in Egypt. Some things there are in other writings, 
and many things amongst the Pythagoreans, about the Law and Rites given by 
Moaes, Strabo and Justin, out of Tragus, i-emai'kably testify concerning the reli- 
gion and righteousness of the ancient Jews: so that there seems to be no need of 
mentioning what is found, or has fonnerly been found of Joshua and other.s, agree- 
able to the Hebrerv books ; seeing, that whoever gives credit to Jiloses (which it 
is a shame for any one to refuse) cannot but believe those fiimous miracles done 
by the hand of God ; which is the principal thing here- aimed at. Now that the 
miracles of late date, such as those of EHJa, Elisha, and others, should not be 
counterfeit, there is this further argument ; that in those times Judcea \\as become 
more known, and because of the clifference of religion was hated by the neigh- 
bours, who could very easily confute the first rise of a lie. The history ot Jonah's 
being three days in the wliale's belly is in Lycophron and ^Eneits Gazeus, only im- 
der the name oi' I/erailus ; to advance whose fame, eveiy thing that \\as gi-eat and 
noble used to be related of him, as Tacitus observes. Certainly nothing but the 
manifest evidence of the history could compel Julian (v\-ho was as great an ene- 
my to the Je-ivs as to the Christians) to confess that there were some men inspi- 
red by the divine Spirit amongst the Jeivs, and that fire descended from heaven, 
and consiimed the sacrifices m Moses and Elias. .And licre it is worthy of obser- 
vation, that there was not only veiy severe punishments threatened amongst the 
lltbre-MS, to any who should falsely assume the gift of prophecy, \mt very many 
kings, who by that means might have procured gi-eat authority to themselves, and 
many learncil men, such as Esdras and others, dared not to assume this lionour 
to themselves ; nay, .some ag-es before Christ's time, nobody dared to do it. Much 
less could so many thousand people be imposed upon, in avouching a constant and 
public miracle, I mean that of the oracle, which shined on the High Priest's 
breast, which is so firmly believed by all the Jews, to have remained till the de- 
struction of the first temple, that their ancestors must of necessity be well assu- 
r«"d of the truth of it." 

G ilOTIt^ 



too THE WORD OF GOD. 

1. As to tKe former of these, the scripture abounds with ir- 
stances, in which God is adored or set forth, as the object of 
adoration, that is, as having all divine perfections, and as do- 
ing every thing becoming himself as a God of gloiy : thus he 
is described herein, as the Lord mo-i't high and terrible^ a great 
King over all the earthy Psal. xlvii. 2. and glorious in holiness^ 

fearful in praises^ doing wonders^ Exod. xv. 11. and as the 
true God^ the living God^ and an everlasting King^ Jer. x. 10. 
and as the great and dreadful God^ keeping the covenant and 
mercy to them that love him., and to therii that keep his coramand- 
ments^ Dan. ix. 4. and it is also said, Thine^ Lord^ is the 
g'reatness, ajid the porter., and the glory., and the victory., and 
the majesty ; for all that is in the heaven., and in the earth is 
thine : thine is the kingdom^ Lord., and thou art exalted as 
Head over all., 1 Chron. xxix. 11. These, and such-iike adora- 
ble perfections, are not only occasionally ascribed to God in 
scripture, but ever\' part thereof displays his giory in a manner 
so illustrious, as gives ground to conclude, that the great design 
of it is to raise in us becoming apprehensions of him, and to 
put us upon adoring and worshipping him as God. 

2. It may, by a just consequence, be said to give all the glo- 
ry to him, as it represents the emptiness, and even nothing- 
ness of all creatures, when compared with him, and hereby 
recommends him, as all in all : when it speaks of the best of 
creatures, as veiling their faces before him, as acknowledging- 
themselves unworthy to behold his gloiy, and as deriving all 
their happiness from him ; and when it speaks of man as a 
sinful guilty creature, expecting all from him, and depending 
upon him for grace sufficient for him t" and when it speaks of 
God, as the author and finisher of faith, in whom alone there 
is hope of obtaining mercy and forgiveness, grace here, and 
glory hereafter, and lays down this as the sum of all religion ; 
we must certainly conclude that its design is to give all glory 
to God. 

Now let us consider the force of this argument, or how the 
general scope and design of scripture, to give all glory to God, 
proves its divine authority. Had it been the invention and con- 
trivance of men, or if the writers thereof had pretended they 
had received it by inspiration from God, and it had not been 
so, then the great design thereof would have been to advance 
themselves ; and they would certainlj' have laid down such a 
scheme of religion therein, as is agreeable to the corrupt ap- 
petites and inclinations of men, or would tend to indulge and 
dispense with sin, and not such an one as sets forth the holiness 
of God, and his infinite displeasure against it. 

And as for salvation, the penmen of scripture, had they not 
been inspired, would certainly have represented it as very easy 



THE WORD OF GOD. 101 

to be attained, and not as a work of such difficult)* as it really 
is ; and they would also have propagated such a rtligion, as 
supposes the creature not dependent on, or beholden to God 
for this salvation, and then the scripture would have deti-acted 
from his glory ; but since, on the other hand, its general de- 
ssigu is to give him the glory due to his name, this is a con- 
vincing evidence of its divine originaL 

From the general design of scripture, as being to give all 
glory to God, we may infer, 

(1.) That whenever we read the word of God, we ought to 
have this great design in view, and so not consider it barely a» 
an historical narrative of things done, but should observe how 
the glory of the divine perfections is set forth, that hereby we 
may be induced to ascribe greatness to God, and admire him 
for all the discoveries which he makes of himself therein. 

(2.) The scriptures' general design should be a rule to us iu 
the whole of our conversation, wherein we ought to give all 
glory to God : whatever we receive or expect from him, or 
whatever duty we engage in, let us act as those, that not only 
take the scripture for our rule, but its general scope and de- 
sign for our example. 

(3.) Whatsoever doctrines are pretended to be deduced from, 
or to contain the sense of scripture, Avhich, notwithstanding,- 
tend to depreciate the divine perfections, these are to be re- 
jected, as contrar)'^ to its general scope and design. 

V. Another argument may be taken from the character of 
the penmen of scripture ; and here let them be supposed to be 
either good men, or bad : if good men, then the)^ could not 
give themselves such a liberty to impose upon the M'orld, and 
pretend that they received that from God, which they did not; 
and if they were bad men, they neither could nor would have 
laid down such doctrines, as centre in, lead tiic soul to God, 
and tend to promote self-denial, and ad-\^ance his glory in all 
things ; since this is to suppose the worst of men to have the 
best ends, which we can never do ; for, as our Saviour says. 
Matt. vii. 16. Do men gather grapes of thorns^ or Jigs of this- 
ties ? He is speaking of false prophets, who were to be known 
by their fruits ; wicked men will have bad designs, or are like 
the corrupt tree, which bringeth foi-th evil fruit. But, on the 
other hand, if persons deliver that which carries in it such in- 
ternal evidence of divine truth, and have such a noble design 
in view, as the securing the honour of God, and promoting his 
interest in the world, these must certainly be approved of by 
him, and concluded to be good men ; and if so, then they 
would not impose a fallacy on the world, or say that the scrip- 
ture was given by divine inspiration, when they knew it to be 
Otherwise. 



Kte "rkx WORD or god. 

If the scriptures are not the word 6f God, then the penmen 
thereof have miserably deceived, not a small number of credu- 
lous people, but the whole Christian world, among whom we 
must allow that many were judicious, and such as would not 
easily suffer themselves to be imposed on ; to which we may 
add, that others to whom the gospel was preached, were exas- 
perateei enemies to those, that pr;.ached it, and particularly to 
these mspired penmen of scripture, and greatly prejudiced 
against their doctrine, and therefore would use all possible en- 
deavours to detect the fallacy, if there had been any ; so that 
it was morally impossible for them to deceive the world in this 
instance, or make them believe that the scriptures were the 
word of God, if there had not b.en the strongest evidence to 
convince them of it, which they could not withstand or gainsay. 

But, that we may enter a little further into the character of 
the penmen of scripture, let it be obsen^ed, 

1. That they could not be charged by their enemies with 
immoral practices, or notorious crimes, which might weaken 
the credit of the truths they delivered : they were, indeed, 
compassed about with like infirmities with other men ; for it is 
not to be supposed, that, because they were inspired, therefore 
they were perfecdy free from sin ; since that does not neces- 
sarily follow from their having this privilege conferred upon 
them ; yet their enemies themselves could find no great blem- 
ishes in their character, which might justly prejudice them 
against their writings, or that might render them unfit to be 
employed in this great work of transmitting the mind of God 
to the world. 

2. They appear to be men of great integrity, not declining 
to discover and aggravate their own faults, as well as the sins 
of others. Thus Moses, though a man of gi-eat meekness, as 
to his general character, discovers his own failing, in repming, 
and being uneasy, because of the untoward and turbulent spi- 
rit of the people, over whom he was appointed a governor, 
when he represents himself as complaining to God ; Wherefore 
hast thou afflicted thy servant? and ivheref ore have I not found 

favour in thy sights that thou layest the burden of all this peo- 
ple uponrne} Have I conceived all tins people ? Have I begot- 
ten them^ that thou shouldest saytinto ??zf. Carry them in thy bo- 
som f Whence should I have flesh to give unto all this people ? 
I am not able to bear this people alone^ because it is too heavy for 
vie. And if thou deal thus -with me^ kill me., I pray thee., out of 
hand., if I have found favour in thy sight ; and let vie not see 
mine own xvretchedness., Numb. xi. 11 — 15. This was certainly 
a very great blemish in the character of this excellent man ; but 
he does not attempt to conceal it ; nor does he omit to mention 
his backwardness to comply with the call of God, to deliver 



THE WORD OF GOD. 103 

his brethren cut of their bondage in Egypt, but tells us what 
poor trifling excuses he made ; as when he says, Exod. iv. 10, 
13, 19. Lord^ I am not eloquent; and when God answers 
him, by promising to supply this detect, he obstinately ptr&ists 
in dticlining this service, and says, my Lord^ send^ 1 pray 
thee^ by the hand of him whom thou xvilt send; that is, by any 
one but mvseif ; so that he who expressed such courage and 
resolution forty years before in defending the oppressed Israel- 
ites, and supposed that his brethren would have understood that 
God, by his hand, Avould deliver them, but they understood it 
not. Acts vii. 24, 25. when God really called him to deliver 
them, he obstinately refused to obey ; and, indeed, whatever 
excuses he might make, the main thing that lay at the bottom 
was fear, and therefore, as a further inducement to it, God 
tells him, The men rvere dead that sought his life. All this he 
says concerning himself; and elsewhere he tells us, Deut. 
xxxii. 51, 52. compared with Numb. xx. 10, 11, 12. and Deut. 
jii. 25 — 27. that he did not sanctify the name of God in the 
eyes of the people, but spake unadvisedly with his lips ; and 
that, for this, God would not let him go into the land of Ca- 
naan, though he earnestly desired it. 

And the prophet Jeremiah tells us, how he was ready to faint, 
and, in a murmuring way, curses the day of his birth, Jer. xx. 
7, 8, 14, 15, 16. and seems almost determined not to make men- 
tion of God^ nor speak any more in his naine^ because he had 
been put in the stocks by Pashur, and was derided and mocked 
by others, who were, indeed, below his notice. 

And David discovered his own sin, though it was a very 
scandalous one, in the matter of Uriah, Psal. li. the title, com- 
pared with ver. 14. and prays. Deliver me from blood guiltiness ; 
which is a confession of his being guilty of murder. 

The apostles also discover their infirmities. Thus Paul dis- 
covers his fm-ious temper, in persecuting the church, before his 
conversion, and ranks himself amongst the chief of sinners, 
1 Tim. i. 13, 15. And how willing is Matthew to let the world 
know, that, before his conversion, he was a publican : thus he 
characterises himself, Matt. x. 3. and says, chap. ix. 9. that 
when Christ called him, he sat at the receipt of custom^ though 
the publicans were reckoned among the vilest of men for extor- 
tion, and other crimes, and were universally hated by the Jews. 
Moreover as the penmen of scripture expose their own 
crimes, so they do those of their nearest and dearest friends 
and relatives, which carnal policy would have inclined them to 
conceal. Thus Moses tells us how Aaron his brother made the 
golden calf, and so was the encourager and promoter of the 
people's idolatry; that it was he that bid them break off th-; 
golden ear-ring^^ zi'hich he rccched at their hand^ vckereof hr 



104- Tiir. wojiD or gqd. 

made a molten calf-, and then biiill an altar before it^ Exod. 
xxxii. 2— '5^ Though the Jewish historian * was so politic, as 
to conceal this thing, for ihe honour of his own nation ; and 
therefore when he tciis us, that Moses went up into the mount to 
receive the laW, he s«iys nothing of the scandalous crime, which 
\h^ people were guilty of at the foot of the mountain at the 
aame time. 

Moreover, as they do not conceal their sins, so they some- 
times declare the meanness of their exta-action, which shewed that 
they did not design to have honour from men. Tlius Amos 
tells us, AiTios i. 1. He xvas among' the herdmen of Ttkoa : and 
that he was not bred up in the schools of the prophets, which he 
intends, \yhen he styles himself, no prophet^ neither a prophet^ a 
ifin, chap. vii. 14. 

• v'And the evangelists occasionally tell the world how they 
were fisher-men, when called to be Christ's disciples, and 
so not bred up in the schools of learning among the Jews, (a) 

* Vid. Joseph Aiitiq. 

(a) Reason will tiffirm tiwt every effect speaks a cause ; then we ask how it 
should happen that a dozen illiterate fishermen and mechanicks of Galilee, after 
ttie wisdom of the philosopiiers had left the world m dai-kness, should have uitro- 
duccd so much light of knowiedg-e, that our children and servants are wiser than 
the ancient philosophers ? Let no one say, tliat tliey only began, what the wisdom 
T>f after ages have carried on tov/ards perfection. The writings of tire apostles are 
thesameto this day ; as is proved by the earliest versions, quotations, and manu- 
scripts. So perfect was the system of morals they left, tliat no eri'or has been 
detected in it, and all attem]3ts to build upon or add to it, have only exposed the 
ignorance of the individuals v.-ho have essayed to do so. "* 

Mow has it happened that whilst learned men have ever been at discord about 
the nature, and true foundation of the obligation of virtue, these despised fisher- 
men, have shown tile true foundation andnatiu-e of duty, and have en-ed in no par- 
ticular ? Is it not strange that whilst the wisdom of the philosophers made their 
puivst virtue but a more refined pride, these poor men laid the ax to the I'oot of 
that pride, and taught tlie W'Orld that even their virtues brouglit them under ad- 
ditional obi:L';aiion^ to Divine grace .'' Is it not remarkable thav the system taught 
by these unlearned men should so perfectly coincide Avith what is discovered irt 
the works of God, that whilst it aims to eradicate sin, it represents it as in evei"y 
instance eventually productive of the glory of that God, who brhigs good out of 
the evil, and light out of the darkness i' 

How is it to be accounted for, that ^dien the most leai-ned rabbles per\erted the 
law, and knew not its meaning, that a few crude and uninstructed fishermen 
shovdd I'emove vheir fnlse constructions of that law, explain the t}-pes, shadows, 
promises and pi-ouheciesi, sliow how the truth and justice of God might be clear - 
in thepardon of sin,^ and set the laboiu-ing conscience at rest ? How came the fisher- 
menof Galilee todlscover to the wise andlearned v»hat tliey had never conjectured, 
^.nd ti-uths, which only attentive minds at the pi-esent time can acquiesce in, that 
all things are certjxin, becau.se foreknown, :uid foi-eknown becatise Divine know- 
ledge must be infinite and eteinal, and yet that ratiomd creatures may be capable 
of choosing iiid refusing, thongh ihey must be whoU} dependent r Is it not pass- 
ing strange that the wisdom of Pliilosophers, the leai'ning of Rabbles, the jiower 
of Kings and Emperors, the influence of tliousands of priests, tlie prejudices of 
the world, and the malice of the wicked should be o^ ercomeb)' twelve poor fisher- 
men ? How is it to be accounted for that these twelve poor illiterate men should 



THE WORD OF GOD. 105 

3. They were very far from being crafty or designing men ; 
neither did they appear to be men that were able to manage an 
imposture of this nature, or frame a new scheme of religion, 
and, at the same time, make the world believe that it was from 
God. For, 

(1.) None that read the scriptures can find any appearance 
of design in the penmen thereof, to advance themselves or fami- 
lies. IVIoses, indeed, had the burden of government, but he did 
not affect the pomp and splendor of a king ; neither did he 
make any provision for his family, so as to advance them to 
great honours in the world, which it was in his power to have 
done : the laws he gave, rendered those of his own tribe, to 
wit, that of Levi, incapable of, and not designed for kingly go- 
vernment ; and the highest honour of the priesthood, which 
was fixed in that tribe, was conferred on his brother's children, 
not his own. 

(2.) The prophets were very few of them great men in the 
world, not advanced to great places in the government ; the 
esteem and reputation they had among the people at any time, 
was only for their integrity, and the honour conferred on them 
by God ; and the apostles were plain men, who drove on no 
design to gain riches and honours from those to whom they 
preached the gospel ; but, on the other hand, they expected no- 
thing but poveity, reproach, imprisonment, and, at last, to die a 
violent death : therefore, how can it be supposed that they were 
subtle designing men, who had some worldly advantage in 
view ? It is plain that they had no design but to do what God 
commanded, and to communicate what they had received from 
him, and shunned not to declare the whole counsel of God, 
whatever it cost them. The apostle Paul was so far from en- 
deavouring to enrich himself by preaching the gospel, that he 
tells the church, I seek not your's^ hit ijou^ 2 Cor. xii. 14. and 
how he was fortified against the afflictions, which he foresaw 
would attend his ministry, when he says, Philip, iv. 11, 12. / 
have learned in whatsoever state I am^ therewith to be content. I 
know ho-w to be abased^ and I know how to abound^ to befull^ and 
to be hungry^ to abound and to suffer want : and he was not on- 
ly content to bear afflictions, but, when called to it, he profes- 



have effected such surprising changes, thut modern infidels are ashamed of tlie evi- 
dence oftlieir ancient predecessors, and are obliged to borrow from the fishermen ot 
Galilee aport ion of the knowledge they have introduced, Without which the opposeis 
of the Gospel must fail into contempt ? Is any man so credulous as to imagine men 
of no better education and opportimities, possessed of themselves all this know- 
ledge ? when or where lias the natural world produced such a ])l>a:uomenon ? 
they declared that it was not of themselves, but, that such feeble ir.stj-umentj* 
werecliosen, that tlie power might appear to be what it really was, from Go J. 
This testimony they confirmed bv miracles, and sealed with their blood. 

Voi . r. " o 



iO& THE WORD OF GOD. 

s€s himself to take pleasure in reproach^ in necessities^ in perse* 
cutionsy in distresses^ for Christ's sake^ 2 Cor. xii. 10. 

Hitherto we have proved, that the penmen of scripture were 
men of such a character, that they would not designedly impose 
on mankind. But some will say, might they not be imposed on 
themselves, and think they were divinely inspired^ when they 
were not .'' 

To this it may be answered, that if they were deceived or 
imposed on themselves, when they thought they received the 
scripture by divine inspiration, this must proceed from one of 
these two causes : either, 

1. They took what was the result of a heated fancy, a strong 
imaginaiion, or raised affections for inspiration, as some of our 
modern enthusiasts have done, who have prefaced their warn- 
ings, as they call them, with. Thus saith the Lord^ &c. when 
the Lord did not speak by them. And the deists have the same 
notioH of the prophets and inspired penmen of scripture, and 
esteem their writings no farther than as they contain the law 
of nature, or those doctrines that are self-evident, or mjght 
have been invented by the reason of man ', and as such they re- 
ceive them, without any regard to divine inspiration. Or, 

2. If the inspired penmen of scripture were otherwise im- 
posed on, it must be by a diabolic inspiration^ of which, in other 
cases, the world has had various instances, when Satan is said 
(to use the apostle's words) to transform himself into an angel 
of lights 2 Cor. xi. 14. or has been suffered to deceive his fol* 
lowers, not only by putting forth signs and lying wonders, but 
impressing their minds with strong aeiusions, v/hereby they 
have believed a lie, 2 Thess. ii. 9, 1 1. as supposing it to proceed 
from divine inspiration j and, to give countenance thereto, has 
produced such violent agitations, trems'blings, or distortions in 
their bodies, as have seemed preteniatural, not much unlike 
those with which the heathen oracles were delivered of old, 
which were called by some, a divine fuiy ; but this cannot, 
with any shadow of reason, be applied to the inspired Avriters, 
therefore they v/ere not iinposed on. 

1. They did not mistake their own faiM:ies for divine revelation.- 
To suppose that they did s<5, is not only to conclude that all 
revealed religion is a delusion ; but that the church in all agesy 
and amongst them the ■wisest and best of men, have been en- 
thusiasts, and all their hope, founded on this revelation, has 
been no bettei- than a vain dream. But it is one thing to assert^ 
and another thing to prove ; and because they v\^ho take this li- 
berty to reproach the scriptures, pretend not to support their 
charge by argument, it might seem less necessary to make a re- 
ply : however, that our faitli may be established, we shall brief- 
ly consider this objection. Therefore, 



THE WORD OF GOD. 107 

(1.) This charge is either brought against all that ever spake 
or wrote by divine inspiration, or only against some of them ; 
if only some of them have been thus deluded, we might de- 
mand particular instances of any of the inspired v/ritcrs, ■ who 
are liable to this charge, together with the reasons thereof. If 
it be said that some of them were men of less wisdom, or had 
not those advantages to improve their natural abilities, as others 
have had ; this will not be sufficient to support then- cause, since 
God can make use of what instruments he pleases, and endow 
them with wisdom in an extraordinary way, to quality them for 
the service he calls them to, whereby the glory ot his sovereign- 
ty more appears. If he pleases to chuse the foolish things of the 
ivorld^ to confound the zuise^ that no flesh shall glory in his pre- 
sence^ 1 Cor. i. 27, 29. shall he for this be called to an account 
by vain man ? And it is certain, that some who have had thi§ 
gift, have, as the consequence thereof, been endowed with such 
wisdom, as has tended to confound their most malicious ene- 
mies. But we will suppose that the}', who bring this charge a- 
gainst the inspired writers, will not pretend to single out any 
among them, but accuse them all in general of enthusiasm ; 
and if this charge be grounded on the vain pretensions of some 
to inspiration in this age, in which we have no ground to ex- 
pect this divine gift, will it follow, that, because some are delu- 
ded, therefore divine revelation, supported by incontestable evi- 
dence, was a delusion ? Or if it be said, that some of old, 
whom we conclude to have been inspired, were called enthusi- 
asts, as Jehu, and his fellow-soldiers concluded the prophet to 
be, who was sent to anoint him king, 2 Kings ix. 11. nothing 
can be inferred from thence, btit that there were, in all ages, 
some Deists, who have treated things sacred with I'eproac h and 
ridicule. 

(2.) But if this charge be pretended to be supported by any 
thing that has the least appearance of an argtmient, it v/ill be 
alleged, in defence thereof, that it is iuipossible for a person 
certainly to know himself to be inspired at any time ; if that 
could be proved indeed, it would be something to the ptirpose : 
and inasmuch as we are obliged to assert the contrary, it will 
be demanded, how it might be known that a person was under 
inspiration, or what are the certain marks by which we may 
conclude that the inspired writers were not mistaken in this 
matter ? I confess, it is somewhat difficult to determine this 
question, especially since inspiration has so long ceased in the 
world ; but we shall endeavour to answer it, by laying down 
the following propositions. 

1. If some powerful and impressive influences of the Spirit 
of God on the sotils of men, in the more common and ordlnar}'' 
jnethods of divine providence and grace, have been not oi\ly 



108 THE WORD or GOD. 

experienced, but their truth and reality discerned by them, who 
have been iavourcd therewith, so that without pretending to in- 
spiration, they had sufficient reason to conclude that they were 
divine ; certainly whtn God was pleased to converse with men 
in such a way, as that v/hich we call inspiration, it was not im- 
possible for them to conclude that they were inspired ; which 
is an argument taken from the less to the gi^eater. 

2. There were some particular instances, in which it seemed 
absolutely necessary, that they who received intimations from 
God in such a way, should have infallible evidence that they 
were not mistaken, especially when some great duty was to be 
performed by them, pursuant to a divine command, in which it 
would be a dangerous thing for them to be deceived ; as in the 
case of Abraham's offering up his son ; and Jacob's going with 
his family into Egypt, which was a forsaking the promised land, 
an exposing them to the loss of their religion, through the in- 
fluence or example of those with w horn they went to sojourn ; 
and it might be uncertain whether they should ever return or 
no ; therefore he needed a divine warrant, enquired of God 
with respect to this matter, and doubtless had some way to be 
infallibly assured concerning the divine will relating hereunto, 
Gen. xlvi. 2, 3, 4. Moreover, our Saviour's disciples, leaving 
their families, going into the most remote parts of the world to 
propagate the gospel, which they had received in this way, 
evinces the necessity of their knowing themselves to be under 
a divine inspiration : and if they had been deceived in this mat- 
ter, would they not have been reproved for it by him, whose 
intimations they are supposed to have followed in the simplici- 
ty of their hearts ? 

3. As to the way by which God might convince them, beyond 
all manner of doubt, that he spake to them who were under di- 
vine inspiration, there are various ways, that might have been 
taken, and probably were. As, 

(1.) Sometimes extraordinary impressions were made on the 
30ul of the prophet, arising from the immediate access of God 
to it : of this we have frequent instances in scripture ; as in 
that particular vision which Daniel saw, which occasioned his 
comeliness to be turned into corruption^ and his having- no 
strength^ Dan. x. 8. and the vision of our Saviour, which John 
saw, the effect whereof was his falling at his feet as dead. Rev. 
i. 17. and many other instances of the like nature might be de- 
ferred to, which were, at least, antecedent to inspiration, and the 
result of the access of God to the soul, which occasioned such a 
change in nature, as could not but be discerned after the per- 
son had a little recovered himself. But if it be said, that such 
an effect as this might be produced by an infernal spirit, the an- 
swer I would give to that is, that supposing this possible, yet 



THE WORD OF GOD. 109 

it must be proved that God would suffer it, especially in such an 
instance, in which his own cause w;is so much concerned ; and 
besides, it is not improbable that the soul of the prophet was 
sometimes brought into such a frame of spirit, as resembled i he 
heavenly state, as much as it is possible for any one to atttiin to 
in this world; such an intercourse as this made Jacob say. 
This is no other but the house ofGod^ and this the gate of heaven. 
Gen. xxviii. 17. 

(2.) As this converse with God contained in it something 
supernatural and very extraordinary in the effects thereof, so it 
is not improbable that God might woi-k miracles, of various 
kinds, to confirm the prophet's belief as to this matter, though 
they are not particularly recorded in all the instances in which 
we read of inspiration ; and this would be as full an evidence 
as could be desired. 

If it be objected, that it is not probable that miracles were al- 
ways wrought to give this conviction : I would not be too pe- 
remptory in pretending to determine this matter, it is suificient 
to say they were sometimes wrought ; but, however, there were, 
doubtless, some other concurring circumstances, which put the 
thing out of all dispute ; for not to suppose this, is to reflect on 
the wisdom and goodness of God, as well as to depreciate one 
of the greatest honours which he has been pleased to confer up- 
on men. Thus we have considered the unreasonableness of the 
charge brought against the inspired penmen of scripture, as 
though they were imposed on, by mistaking their enthusiastic 
fancies for divine revelation. We proceed to consider, 

2. That they were not imposed upon by the devil, as mistak- 
ing some impressions made by him on their minds, for divine 
revelation : this is evident ; for 

1. Divine inspiration was not only occasional, or confei-red in 
some particular instances, with a design to amuse the world, or 
confirm some doctrines v/hich were altogether new, impure, and 
subversive of the divine glory in some ages thereof, when men 
were universally degenerate, and had cast off God and religion ; 
but it was continued in the church- for many ages, when they 
evidently appeared to be the peculiar objects of the divine re- 
gard; and therefore, 

2. God would never have suffered the devil, in such circum- 
stances of time and things, to have deluded the world, and that 
in such a degree, as that he should be the author of that rule of 
faith, which he designed to make use of to propagate his interest 
therein ; so that his people should be beholden to their grand ene- 
my for those doctrines which were transmitted by insjnration. 

3. Satan woidd have acted against his own interest, should 
he have inspired men to propagate a religion, which has a di- 
rect tendency to overthrow his own kingdom ; in which instance, 



110 THE WORD OF GOB. 

as our Saviour observes, His kingdom would he divided against 
itself^ Matih. xii. 25, 26. As it is contrary to thv wisdom and 
holiness of God to sulfer it, so Satan could never hav , done it 
out of choice, ana he has too much subtilty to do it through mis- 
take ; therefore the inspired writers could not be imposed on by 
any infernal spirit. 

And to this we may add, that this could not be done by a good 
angel ; for if such a one had pretended herein to have imitated, 
or as it were, usurped the throne of God, he would not have de- 
served the character of a good angel ; therefore it follows, that 
they could not have been inspired by any but God himself. 

Having considered that the penmen of scripture have faith- 
fully transmitted to us what they received by divine inspiration, 
we must now take notice of some things which are alleged by 
those who endeavour not only to depreciate, but oveitlirow the 
divine authority of the sacred writings, when they allege that 
they were only inspired, as to the substance or general idea of 
what they committed to writing, and were left to express tlie 
things contained therein in their own words, which, as they sup- 
pose, hath occasioned some contradictions, which they pretend 
to be found therein, arising from the treachery of their memo- 
ries, or the unfitness of their style, to express w^hat had been 
communicated to them. This they found on the difference of 
style observed in the various books thereof; as some are writ- 
ten in an elegant and lofty style, others clouded with mystical 
and dark expressions ; some are more plain, others are laid 
down in an argumentative way ; all which differing ways of 
speaking they suppose agreeable to the character of the inspi- 
red writers thereof : so that, though the matter contains in it 
something divine, the words and phrases, in which it is deli- 
vered can hardly be reckoned so. 

And as for some books of scripture, especially those that are 
historical, they suppose that these might be written without in- 
spiration, and that some of them were taken from the histories 
which were then in being, or some occurrences which were ob- 
served in the davs in which the writers lived, and were gene- 
rally known and believed in those times, to which they more 
immediately relate. 

And as for those books of scripture, which aj-e more espe- 
cially doctrinal, they suppose that there are many mistakes in 
them, but that these respect only doctrines of less importance ; 
whereas the providence of God has prevented them from mak- 
ing anv gross or notorious blunders, subversive of natural reli- 
gion ; so that the scripture may be deemed sufficient to ansAver 
the general design thereof, in propagating religion in the world, 
though we are not obliged to conclude that it is altogether free 



THE WORD OF GOD. Ill 

from those Imperfections that will necessarily attend such a 
kind of inspiration. 

Amxu. If this account of scripture be true, it would hardly 
deserve to be called the word of God; therefore, that we may 
vindicate it from this aspersion, let it be considered, 

1. As to the different styles observed in the various books 
thereof, it does not follow from hence, that the penmen were 
left to deliver what they received, in their own words ; lor cer- 
tainly it was no difficult matter for the Spirit of God to furnish 
the writers thereof with words, as well as matter, and to inspire 
them to write in a style agreeable to what they used in other 
cases, whereby they might better understand and communicate 
the sense thereof to those to whom it was first given ; as if a 
person should send a message by a child, it is an easy matter 
to put such words into his mouth as are agreeable to his com- 
mon way of speaking, without leaving the matter to him to ex- 
press it in his own words : thus the inspired writers might be 
furnished with words by the Holy Ghost, adapted to that style 
which they commonly used, without supposing they were left to 
themselves to clothe the general ideas with their own words.(a) 

2. As to what is said concerning the historical parts of scrip- 
ture, that it is not necessary for them to have been transmitted 
to us by divine inspiration, it may be replied, that these, as well 
as other parts thereof, -wet-e xvrittenfor our learnings Rom. xv. 
4. so that what is excellent in the character of persons, is de- 
signed for our imitation ; their blemishes and defects, to hum- 
ble us under a sense of the universal corruption of human na- 
ture ,* and the evil consequences thereof, to awaken our fears, 
and dehort us from exposing ourselves to the same judgments 
which were inflicted as the punishment of sin : and the account 
we have of the providential dealing of God with his church, in 
the various ages thereof, is of use to put us upon admiring and 
adoring the divine perfections, as much as the doctrinal parts of 
scripture ; and therefore it is necessary that we have the greatest 
certainty that the inspired writers have given us a true narra- 
tion of things, and consequently that the words, as well as the 
matter, are truly divine. 

3. When, that they may a little palliate the matter, they al- 
low that the inspired writers, though left to the weakness of 
their memory, and the impropriet}'^ of their style, were, notwith- 
standing, preserved, by the interposure of divine providence, 
from committing mistakes in matters of the highest importtmce j 
it may be replied. That it will be very difficult for them to as- 
sign what doctrines are of greater, and what of less importance, 
in all the instances thereof, or wherein providence has inter- 
posed, to prevent their running into mistakes, and when it has 

(«; Vide Dodd Expos. 3 vol, app.— Di€k on Insp.-^Parry's Enq — ^^wker, &>:. 



112 THE WORD OF GOD. 

not ; so that we are still in an uncertainty what doctrines are de-' 
livered to us, as they were received by inspiration, and what 
are misrepresented by the penmen of scripture ; and we shall be 
ready to conclude, that in every section or paragraph thereof, 
some things may be true, and others false ; some doctrines di- 
vine and others human, while we are left without any certain 
rule to distinguish one from the other, and accordingly we can- 
not be sure that any part of it is the word of God ; so that such 
a revelation as this would be of no real service to the church, 
and our faith would be founded in the wisdom, or rather weak- 
ness of men, and our religion, depending on it, could not be 
truly divine ; so that this method of reasoning is, to use the 
word inspiration, but to destrov all the valuable ends thereof. 

VI. Another argument, to prove the scriptures to be the 
word of God, may be taken from their antiquity and wonderful 
preservation for so many ages ; this appears more remarkable, 
if we consider, 

1. That many other writings, of much later date, have been 
lost, and nothing more is known of them, but that there were 
once such books in the world; and books might more easily be 
lost, when there were no other but written copies of them, and 
these procured with much expense and difficulty, and conse- 
quently their number proportionably small. 

2. That the scripture should be preserved, notwithstanding 
all the malice of its avowed enemies, as prompted hereunto by 
Satan, whose kingdom is overthrown by it. Had it been in his 
power, he would certainly have utterly abolished and destroyed 
it ; but yet it has been preserved unto this day, which discovers 
a wonderful hand of providence ; and would God so remarkably 
have taken care of a book, that pretends to advance itself by 
bearing the character of a divinely inspired writing, if it had 
not been reallv so ? Which leads us to the next argument, con- 
taining an advice, which is more convincing than any other ; or, 
at least, if this be added to those arguments which have been 
already given, I hope it will more abundantly appear that the 
scriptures are the word of God ,* since, 

VII. The divine authority thereof is attested by God him- 
self; and if, in other cases, we receive the xvitness ofmen^ surely, 
as the apostle observes, the -witness of God is greater^ 1 John v. 9, 

Now the testimony of God to the authority of scripture is 
twofold ; First, Extraordinary ; Secondly, Ordinary ; the extra- 
ordinar)^ testimony of God is that of miracles ; the ordinary is 
taken from the use which he makes of it, in convincing and con- 
verting sinners, and building up in holiness and comfort, 
through faitli, unto salvation. 

1. As to the former of these, God has attested the truth 
hereof bv miracles. A miracle is an extraordinary divine 



THE WORD OF GOD. 113 

vi'ork, whereby something is produced, contrary to the common 
course and laws ot nature : thus the magicians confessed, ihat 
one of the miracles which iVIoses wrought was the finger of 
God^ Exod. viii. 19. Oi these there are many undeniable in- 
stances recorded in scripture, both in the Old and New Testa- 
ment ; and these being above the power of a creature, and m orks 
peculiar to God, they contain a diyine testimony to the truth 
that is conlirmed thereby, for the confirmaLion whereof an ap- 
peal was made to them. Now when we say that the divin,q 
authority of scripture was confirmed by miracles, we mean, 

(1.) That God has wrought miracles to testify his approba- 
tion of most of the prophets and apostles, who were the inspired 
writers thereof, whereby their mission was declared to be dir 
vine ; and we cannot think that God, who knows the hearts and 
secret designs of men, would employ or send any to perform so 
gi"eat imd important a work, if he knew them to be disposed to 
deceive and impose on the world; or that they would in any 
instance, call that his word which they did not receive from 
him. The reason why men sometijnes employ unfaithful ser- 
vants about their work is, because they do pot know them ; 
they never do it out of choice ; and therefore we cannot sup- 
pose that God, who perfectly knows the hearts of men, would 
do so ; therefore, having not only emplo) ed the penmen of 
scripture as his servants, but confirmed their mission, and tes- 
tified his approbation of them, by miracles, this is a ground of 
conviction to us that they would not have pretended the scrip- 
tures to be the word of God, if they were not so. 

Now that miracles have been wrought for this end, I think, 
needs no proof; for we are assured hereof, not barely by there- 
port of those prophets, whose mission is supposed to have been 
confirmed thereby, but it was universally known and received 
in the church, in those times, in which they were wrought, and 
it is not pretended to be denied, by its most inveterate enemies ; 
the truth hereof, viz. that Moses, and several other of the pro- 
phets, and our Saviour, and his apostles, wrought miracles, can 
hardly be reckoned a matter in controversy; for it is a kind of 
scepticism to deny it : and it is certain, that herein they appeal- 
ed to God for the confirmation of their mission ; as Elijali is 
said explicitly to have done, when he pra3^s to this effect; Lord 
God of Abraham^ hauc^ and of hrael^ let it be knoxun this day 
that thou art God in Israel^ and that Ian thy servant ; and that 
I have done all these thiiigs at thy ivord^ 1 Kings xviii. 36. and 
we read, that God answered him accordingly. By the f re from 
heaven consuming the burnt-sacrifice^ &c. ver. 38. 

(2.) Such appeals to Ciod, and answers from him, have at- 
tained their end, by giving conviction to those who were more 
immediately concerned; this is evident from what is said; in 

Vol . I. ' P 



Il4 XifE WORD or GOI>. 

that the same prbphet, having had his request granted hiiii; 
when God wrought a miracle, in raising the dead child to life., 
the woman of Zarephath confessed, that by this she knew that 
he xvas a man ofGod^ and that the word of the Lord^ in his 7nouth, 
ivas truths 1 Kings xvii. 21, — 24. And it is not denied by the 
Jews, the most irreconcileable enemies to Christianity, that 
what is related in the New Testament, concerning our Saviour's, 
and his apostles, working miracles, was true in iact ; but the 
only thing denied by them is, that this was a divine testimony, 
- or that they were wrought by the hand of God ) and therefore 
the common reproach which is cast on them js, that thej' were 
wrought by magic art^ as the Jews of old objected to our Sa- 
viour, that he cast out devils by Beelzebub^ the prince of the de- 
vils^ Matth. xii. 24. and his reply to them was unanswerable^ 
when he said, that this objection would argue Satan divided 
against hhnsef; intimating, tiiat he would never take such a 
method as this to overthrow the Christian religion, which he 
could not but know was more conducive to the establishment ol 
it, than any other that could be used. 

Object, \, But if it be objected, that though miracles were 
Avrought to confirm the mission of several of the prophets, yet 
none were wrought to confirm the divine authority of the sub- 
ject matter of the scriptures : 

Ansxv* To this it may be easily answered ;• that it is sufficient,^ 
if we can prove that God has given his testimony, that he made 
choice of those prophets to declare his mind and will to the 
world ; and that he has accordingly deemed them fit to be cre- 
dited, and that they were not men liable to any suspicion of 
carrying on a design to deceive the world; so that if God him- 
self not only styles them holy men, as he does all the inspired 
writers in general, when he says, 2 Pet. i.*21. Holy men of God 
■apake as they -were mvved by the Holy Ghost^ but also wrought 
miracles to prove that they were his servants and messengers,- 
employed in this v/orl: ; this is as convincmg a testimony, as- 
though every part of scripture wrote by them had been con- 
firmed by a miraele.' Besides, it is not uni'easonable to sup- 
pose, that the church lived in those ages, in which the various 
parts of scripture were written, had some eiitraordinary proofs 
of their divine authority ; since, in many of them, miracles were 
very common,.and, at the same time that the penmen of scrip- 
ture had the gift of inspiration, others had, what the apostle 
calls, a discerning of spirits^ 1 Cor. xii. 10. so that they were 
enabled,^ bv this means, to know whether the prophet, that pre- 
tended to inspiration, M^as really inspired : this, to me seems 
very probablv, the sense of the aposfle, when he says, 1 Cor. 
xiv. 32. The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets ;■ 
, for he is discoursing before of prophets speaking by divine re- 



THE WORD OF GOD. ~ iJ5 

V elation, and others judging thereof: now if there was this ex- 
traordinary gift of discerning of spirits in the ages, in which 
particular books of scripture were written, they who were fa- 
voured herewith, had a convincing testimony of the inspiration 
/pf the prophets and aposdes, from the same Spirit hy whom 
they were inspired, by which means the divine authority of 
scripture was infalhbly known to them, and so imparted to 
others for their farther confirmation as to this matter. 

Object. 2. We are not now to expect miracles to confirm our 
faith, as to the divine original of scripture ; therefore how can 
we be said to have a divine testimony. 

Ansxu. As miracles are now ceased, so such a method of con- 
firming divine revelation is not necessary in all succeedin^j' 
ages : God did not design to make that dispensation too com- 
mon, nor to continue the e\ddence it affords, when there was 
no necessity thereof. Thus when the scribes and Pharisees 
came to our Saviour, desiring to see a sign from him. Matt. 
xii. 38. he would not comply with their unreasonable demand ; 
and the apostle Paul takes notice of humour prevailing among 
the Jews in his time, who then required a sign, 1 Cor. i. 22. 
but, instead of complying with them herein, he refers them to 
the success of the gospel, which is t/ie power of God to salvar 
iion, as the only testimony to the truth thereof that was then 
needful ; and our Saviour, in the parable, intimates, that the 
truth of divine revelation has been so well attested, that thei/ 
tvho believe not Moses and the prophets, xvoidd not be persuaded, 
though one rose from the dead, Luke xvi. 31. Therefore, since 
we have such a convincing evidence hereof, it is an uni-eason- 
ble degi-ee of obstinacy to refuse to believe the divine authority 
of scripture, merel}^ because miracles are not now wrought ; 
since, to demand a farther proof of it, is no other than a tempt- 
ing God, or disowning that what he has done is sufficient iox 
our conviction ; and to say, that for want of this evidence, our 
faith is not founded on a divine testijnony, is nothing to the pur- 
pose, unless it could be proved that it is not founded on such a 
testimony formerly given, the contrary to which is undeniably 
evident, since v\^e have this truth confirmed by the confession of 
the church in all the ages thereof, and therefore we have as 
much ground to believe this matter, as though miracles were 
wrought every day for its confirmation. This will farther ap- 
pear, if We consider the abundant ground we have to conclude 
that . God has formerly given such a testimony to his word ; 
which leads us to enquire how far the testimony of the chuixh, 
in all the ages thereof, is to be regarded. 

The church has gi^ en its suffrage, throughout all the agt^s 
thereof, to the divine original of scripture, how much soever it 
has perverted the sense of it. That this argument may be ;s.et 



116 THE WOilD OF GOD. 

in a true light, let us consider what the Papists Say to this rhSjt'' 
ter, when they appeal to the church, to estahlish the divine 
authority of scripture j and wherein we diffi^r from them ; and 
how far its testunony is to be regarded, as a means for our far- 
ther conviction. We are far from asserting, with them, that 
the church's testimony alone is to be regarded, without the in- 
ternal evidence of the divine authority of scripture, as though 
that were the principal, if not the only foundation on which our 
faith is built. If, indeed, they could prove the infallibility of 
the church, we should more readily conclude the infallibility of 
its testimony J but all their attempts of this nature are vain and 
trifling. 

Moreover, we d6 not niean altogether the same thing by the 
thurch as they do, when they intend by it a council convened 
together, to decree and establish matters of faith, by him whom 
"they pretend to be the visible head thereof; and so a majority of 
votes of a body of men, every one of whom are liable to error, 
.must determine, and, according to them, give a divine sanction 
to our faith. Nor do we think that those, whom they call the 
fathers of the church, are to be any faither regarded, than as 
they prove what they assert, since there is scarce any error or 
absurdity, but what some or other of them have given into. We 
also distinguish between the churches testimony, that the scrip- 
ture was given by divine inspii-ation, and the sense they give of 
many of its doctrines ; as to the latter of these, it has given us 
ground enough to conclude, that its judgment is not much to be 
depended upon ; however, we find that, in all ages, it has given 
sufficient testimony to this truth, that the scriptures are the 
word of God, and that they have been proved to be so, by the 
seal which God has set thereunto, to wit, by the miracles that 
have been wrought to confirm it. If therefore God has had a 
church in the world, or a remnant whom he has preserved faith- 
ful; and if their faith, and all their religion, and hope of salva- 
tion, has been founded, without the least exception, on this truth, 
that the scriptures are the word of God, we cannot altogether 
set aside this argument. But there is yet another, which we 
lay more stress on, namely, the use which God has made of it, 
which is the second thing to be considered, viz. 

2. His ordinary method of attesting this truth ; it appears 
therefore, as is farther observed in this answer, that the scrip- 
tures are the word of God, from their light and pov/er to con- 
vince and convert sinners, and to comfort and build up believers 
to salvation. Here let us consider, 

1. That the woi'k of conviction and conversion is, and has 
been at all times, experienced by those who have had any right 
or claim to salvation ; oi which there havt; not only been vari- 
ous instances, in all ages, but the very being of the church. 



THl VTOUD OF GOD. IIT 

which isupposcs and depends thereon, is an undeniable proof of 
it. 

2. As this work is truly divine, so the scriptures have been 
the principal, if not the only direct means, by which it has been 
brought about ; so that we have never had any other rule, or 
standard of faith, or revealed religion ; nor has the work of 
grace been ever begun, or carried on, in the souls of any, with- 
out it ; from whence it evidently appears, that God makts use 
of it to propagate and advance his interest in the world, and 
has given his church ground to expect his presence with it, in 
all his ordinances, in which they are obliged to pay a due regard 
to scripture ; and, in so doing, they have found that their ex- 
pectation has not been in vain, since God has, by this means, 
manifested himself to them, and made them partakers of spiri- 
tual privileges, which have been the beginning of their salva- 
tion. 

3. It cannot be supposed that God would make this use of 
his word, and thereby put such an honour upon it, had it been 
an imposture, or borne the specious pretence of being instamped 
with his authority, if it had not been so ; for that v/ould be to 
give countenance to a lie^ which is contraiy to the holiness of 
his nature. 

Thus we have considered the several arguments, whereby 
the scripture appears to be the word of God ; but since multi- 
tudes ai-e not convinced hereby, we have, in the close of this 
answer, an account of the means whereby Christians come to a 
full persuasion as to this matter, and that is the testimony of 
the Spirit in the heart of man, which is the next thing to be con- 
sidered. By this we do not understand that extraordinary im- 
pression which some of old have been favoured with, who are 
said to have been moved by the Holy Ghost, or to have had an 
extraordinary unction from the Holy One, whereby they were 
led into the knowledge of divine truths, in a way of supernatu- 
ral illumination. This we pretend not to, since exti-aordinan- 
gifts are ceased ; yet it does not follow from hence, that the 
Spirit does not now influence the minds of believers in an ordi- 
nary way, whereby they are led into, and their faith confirmed 
in idl necessary truths, and this in particular, that the scriptures 
arc the word of God ; for we may observe, that no privilege re- 
ferring to salvation, was ever taken away, but some other, sub^ 
servient to the same end, has been substituted in the room 
thereof; especially, unless a notorious forfeiture has been made 
of it, and the church, by apostacy, has excluded itself from an 
interest in the divine regard ; but this cannot be said of the gos- 
pel-church in all the ages thereof, since extraordinary gifts have 
ceased ; therefore we must conclude, that being destitute of that 
way, by which this truth was once confirmed, believers have, 



118 THE WORD Or GOD. 

instead of it, an inward conviction wrought by the Spirit ol 
God, agreeable to his present method of acting; otherwise this 
present gospel-dispensation is, in a very material circumstance, 
much inferior to that in which God discovered his mind and 
will to man in an extraordinary^ way. 

But that we may explain what we mean by this inward test!' 
mony of the Spirit in the hearts of men, whereby they are fully 
persuaded that the scriptures are the word of God, let it be con- 
sidered, 

(1.) That it is something more than barely a power, or fa- 
culty^ of reasoning, to prove the scriptures to be divine, since 
that is common to all ; but this is a special privilege, given to 
those who are hereby fully persuaded of this truth. Moreover, 
there may be a power of reasoning, and yet we may be mista- 
ken in the exercise thereof; and therefore this is not sufficient, 
fully to persuade us that they are the word of God, and conse- 
quently something more than this is intended in this answer. 

(2.) It is something short of inspiration j therefore, though 
the scripture was known to be the Avord of God, by the Spirit 
of inspiration, so long as that dispensation continued in the 
church, yet that privilege being now ceased, the internal testi- 
mony of the Spirit contains a lower degree of illumination, 
which has nothing miraculous attending it, and therefore falls 
short of inspiration. 

(3.) It is not an enthusiastic impulse, or strong impression 
upon our minds, whereby we conclude a thing to be true, be- 
cause we think it is so ; this we by no means allow of, since our 
own fancies are not the standard of truth, how strong soever 
our ideas of things may be ; therefore, 

(4.) This inward testimony of the Spirit contains in it a 
satisfying and establishing persuasion, that the scriptures are 
the word of God, not altogether destitute of other evidences, 
or convincing arguments : and that which is more especially 
convincing to weak Christians, is taken from the use which 
God makes of the scripture, in beginning and carrying on the 
work of grace in their souls, who are thus convinced ; and this 
firm persuasion we find sometimes so deeply rooted in their 
hearts, that they would sooner die ten thousand deaths than part 
with scripture, or entertain the least slight thought of it, as 
though it were not divine ; and certainly there is a special hand 
of God in this persuasion, which we can call no other than the 
inward testimon}^ of the Spirit, whereby they are established in 
this important truth. (a) 



(<i) This description of the Spirit's witness resembles sensible assurance; that 
there may I)e such an immediate suggestion, or impression is possible ; but the 
Spirit's witness is tlie image of God, and is of adoption. — Vide Edwiu'ds's Vvoiks, 
vol. 4. p. 161. 



The scriptures i^e(^uire FAitH and practice, li^ 



Quest. V. IVhat do the scriptures principally teach ? 

Answ. The scriptures principally teach, what man is to be- 
lieve concerning God, and what duty God requires of man. (a) 

HAVING, in the foregoing answer, proved the scriptures 
to be the word of God, there is in this a general account 
of the contents thereof; there are man}- great doctrines con- 
tained therein, all which may be reduced to two heads, to wit, 
what we are to believe, and what we are to do. All religion 
is contained in these two things, and so we may apply the words 
of the apostle to this case, Noru of the things which we have 
spoken this is the siim^ Heb. viii. 1. and accordingl}^, as this 
Catechism is deduced from scripture, it contains two parts, viz> 
what we are to believe, and in what instances we are to yield 
obedience to the law of God. And that the scriptures princi- 
pallv teach these two things, appears from the apostle's advice 
lo Timothy, Holdfast the form of sound words^ which thou hast 
heardof me^ in faith and love ^ 2 Tim. i. 13. 

From the scriptures' principally teaching us matters of faith 
and practice, we infer, that faith without works is dead; or that 
he is not a true Christian M^ho yields an assent to divine reve- 
lation, without a practical subjection to God, in all ways of 
holy obedience, as the apostle observes, and gives a challenge, 
to this effect, to those who separate faith from works ; Shezu 7ne 
thy faith without thy works^ and I will shew thee viy faith by 
my works, James ii. 17, 18. and, on the other hand, works 
without faith are unacceptable. A blind obedience, or igno- 
rant performance of some of the external parts of religion, 
without the knowledge of divine truth, is no betfer than what 
the apostle calls bodily exercise which profteth little, 1 Tim. iv.- 
18. therefore we ought to examine ourselves, whether our faith 
be founded on, or truly deduced from scripture ? and whether 
it be a practical faith, or, as the apostle says, such as xvorketh by 
love ? Gal. v. 6. whether we grow in knowledge, as well as in 
zeal and diligence, in performing many duties of religion, if we 
would approve ourselves sincere Christians ? 

Quest. VI. What do the scriptures make known of God? 

Answ. The scriptures make known what God is, the persons 
in the Godhead, the decrees, and the execution of his decrees. 

IT is an amazing instance of condescension, and an inexpres- 
sible favour which God bestows on man, that he should 
manifest himself to him, and that not only in such a way as he 
does to all mankind, by the light of nature, which discovers 

((/) Wliat \vc ai-c to believe reaches to Qu. 91. the rest is of practice. 



120 • , THE PERFECTIONS OF GQD. 

that he is ; but that he should, in so glorious a way, declare 
what he is, as he does in his word : this is a distinguishing pri- 
vilege, as the Psalmist observes, when speaking of God's shexv- 
ing his xvord unto Jacob^ his statutes and his judgments unto 
Israel^ Psal. cxlvii. he mentions it, as an instance of discrimi- 
nating grace, in that he has not dealt so xvith any other Jiation. 
This raised the admiration of one of Christ's disciples, when he 
said, Lord how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself to usy and not 
unto the rvorld! John xiv. 22. And it is still more wonder- 
ful, that he should discover to man what he does, or rather 
what he has decreed or purposed to do, and so should impart 
his secrets to him ,* how familiarly does God herein deal v.dth 
man ! Thus he says concerning the holy patriaixh of old, Shall 
I, hide from Abraham the thing xvhich I do ? Gen. xvi. 17. 
However, it is one thing to know the secret pui-poses of God^ 
and another thing to know the various properties thereof,* the 
former of these, however knovvn of old, by extraordinary inti- 
mation, are now known to us only by the execution of them ; 
the latter is what we may attain to the knowledge of, by study- 
ing the scriptures. 

Now as the scriptures make known. Firsts What God is ; 
Secondly^ "^he. persons in the Godhead ; Thirdly^ His decrees ; 
And Fourthly^ The execution thereof; so we are directed 
hereby in the method to be observed in treating of the great 
doctrines of our religion ; and accordingly the first part of this 
Catechism,(a) which treats of doctrinal subjects, contains an en- 
largement on these four general heads j the first whereof we 
proceed to consider^ 

Quest. VII. What is God? 

Answ. God is a Spirit, in and of himself, infinite in being, 
glory, blessedness, and perfection, all-sufficient, eternal, un- 
changeable, incomprehensible, every where present, almighty, 
knowing all things, most wise, most holy, most just, most 
merciful, and gracious, longrsufFering, and abundant in good- 
ness and truth. 

BEFORE we proceed to consider the divine perfections, as 
contained in this answer, let it be premised, 
1. That it is impossible for any one to give a perfect de- 
scription of God, since he is incomprehensible, thei-efore no 
words can fully express, or set forth, his perfections ; when the 
wisest men on earth speak of him, they soon betray their own 
weakness, or discover, as Elihu says, that they cannot order 
their speech by reason of darkness^ Job xxxviii. 19. or, that 
they are but of yesterday^ and knoxv^ comparatively, nothings 

(a) Thut is unto the yist Quest. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 121 

chap. viii. 9. We are but like children, talking of matters 
above them, which their tender age can take in but little of, 
when we speak of the infinite perfections of the divine nature; 
This biowledge is too wonderful for ns ; it is high^ xve cannot 
attain to it^ Psal. cxxxix. G. Hocv little a portion is heard of 
him ? Job. xxvi. 14. 

2. Though God caimot be perfectly described ; yet there is 
something of him that we may know, and ought to make the 
matter of our study and diligent enquiries. When his glory is 
set forth in scripture, we are not to look upon the expressions 
there made use of, as words without any manner of ideas af- 
fixed to them ; for it is one thing to have adequate ideas of an 
infinitely perfect being, and another thing to have no ideas at 
all of him ; neither are our ideas of God to be reckoned, for 
this reason, altogether false, though they are imperfect; for it is 
one thing to think of him in an unbecoming way, not agreeable 
to his perfections, or to attribute the weakness and imperfection 
to him which do not belong to his nature, and another thing to 
think of him, with the highest and best conceptions we are able 
to entertain of his infinite perfections, while, at the same time, 
we have a due sense of our own weakness, and the shallowness 
of our capacities. When we thus order our thoughts concern- 
ing the great God, though we are far from comprehending his 
infinite perfections, yet our conceptions a^enotto be concluded 
erroneous, when directed by his word ; which leads us to con- 
sider how we may conceive aright of the divine perfections, 
that we may not think or speak of God, that which is not right, 
though at best we know but little of his glory ; and in order 
thereunto, 

(1.) We must first take an est!mate of finite perfections, 
which we have some ideas of, though not perfect ones in all re- 
spects ; such as power, wisdom, goodness, faithfulness, ^c. 

(2.) Then we must conceive that these are eminently, though 
not formally in God ; that is, there is no perfection in the crea- 
ture, but we must ascribe the same to God, though not in the 
same way ; or thus, whatever perfection is in the creature, the 
same is in God, and infinitely more ; or it is in God, but not in 
such a finite, limited, or imperfect wav, as it is in the creature ; 
He that planted the ear^ shall he not hear f He that formed the 
eye^ shall not he see P He that teadieth man knoxvled^-e^ shall he 
not know f Psal. xciv. 9, 10. Therefore, 

(3.) When the same words are used that import a perfec- 
tion in God, and in the creature, viz. wisdom, power, ^c. we 
must not suppose that these words import the same thing in 
their different application ; for when they are applied to the 
creature, though we call them perfections, yet the)- are, at best, 
but finite, and have manv imperfections attending them, all 

Vol. I. Q 



i^U- "illE PERFECTIONS Of GOD. 

■which we must separate or abstract in our thoughts, when th€ 
same words are used to set forth any divine perfection : thus 
knowledge is a perfection of the human nature, and the same 
word is used to denote a divine perfection ; yet we must con- 
sider, at the same time, that the Lord seet.h not as man seeth^ 
1 Sam. xvi. 7. The same may be said of all his other perfec- 
tions ; he worketh not as man worketh ; -whatever perfections 
are ascribed to the creature, they are to be considered as agree- 
able to the subject in which they are ; so when the same words' 
ure used to set forth any of the divine perfections, they are to 
be understood in a way becoming a God of infinite perfection. 
This has given occasion to divines to distinguish the per- 
fections of God, into those that are communicable, and incom- 
municable. 

1. The communicable perfections of God are such, where 
tif we find some faint resemblance in intelligent creatures, 
though, at the same time, there is an infinite disproportion ; as 
Avhen we speak of God as holy, wise, just, powerful, or faith- 
ful, we find something like these perfections in the creature, 
though we are not to suppose them, in all respects, the same as 
they are in God ; they are in him, in his own, that is, an infi- 
nite way ; they are in us, in our own, that is, a finite and limit- 
ed way. 

2. The incommunicable perfections of God are such, of 
which there is not the least shadow, or similitude in creatures, 
but they rather represent him as opposed to them. Thus when 
we speak of him as infinite, incomprehensible, unchangeable, 
without beginning, independent,^ <3'c. these perfections contain 
in them an account of the vast distance that there is between 
God and the creature^ or ^ow infinitely he exceeds all other 
beings, and is opposed to every thing that argues imperfection 
in them. 

From this general account we have given of the divine per- 
fections, v/e may infer, 

1. Tliat there is nothing common between God and the crea- 
ture ; that is, there is nothing which belongs to the divine na- 
ture that can be attributed to the creature ; and nothing pro- 
per to the creature is to be applied to God : yet there are some 
rays of the divine g^or}', which may be beheld as shining forth, 
or displayed in the creature, especially in the intelligent part of 
the creation, angels and men, who are, for that reason, repre- 
sented as made after the divine image. 

2. Let us never think or speak of the divine perfections but 
Avith the highest reverence, lest we take his name in vain, or 
debase him in our thoughts ; Shall nrA his excellency make yoii 
a^raid^ and his dread fall upon you? Job xiii. 11. And when- 
ever we compare God with the creatures, viz. angels and men, 
that bear somewhat of his image, let us, at the same time, ab- 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 123 

stract in our thoughts, all their imperfections, whether natural 
or moral, from him, and consider tlie infinite disproportion that 
J here is between him and them. We now come to consider the 
perfections of the divine nature, in the order in which they are 
laid down in this answer. 

I. God is a Spirit ; that is, an immaterial substance, with- 
out body or bodily parts ; this he is said to be in John iv. 24^ 
But if it be enquired what we mean by a Spirit, let it be pre- 
mised, that we cannot fuily understand what our own spirits, 
or souls are ; we know less of the nature of angels, a higher 
kind of spirits, and least of all of the spirituality of the divine 
natul-e ; however, our ideas first begin at what is finite, in con- 
sidering the nature and properties of spirits ; and Irom thence 
we are led to conceive of God as infinitely more perfect than 
any finite spirit. Here we shall consider the word spirit, as ap- 
plied more especially to angels, and the souls of men; and let 
it be observed, 

1. That a spirit is the most perfect and excellent being ; the 
soul is more excellent than the body, or indeed than any thing 
that is purelv material ; so angels are the most perfect and glo- 
rious part of the creation, as they are spiritual beings, in some 
things excelling the souls of men. 

2. A spirit is, in its own nature, immortal ; it has nothing in 
its frame and constitution that tends to corruption, as there is 
in material things, which consist of various parts, that may be 
dissolved or separated, and their form altered, which is what 
we call corruption ; but this belongs not to spirits, which are 
liable to no change in their nature, but by the immediate hand 
of God, who can, if he pleases, reduce them again to their first 
nothing. 

3. A spirit is capable of understanding, and willing, and put- 
ting forth actions agreeable thereunto, which no other being 
can do : thus, though the sun is a glorious and useful being ; 
yet, because it is material, it is not capable of thought, or any 
moral action, such as angels, and the souls of men, can put iorth. 

Now these conceptions of the nature and properties of finite 
spirits, lead us to conceive of God as a spirit. And, 

(1.) As spirits excel all other creatures, we must conclude 
God to be the most excellent and perfect of all beings, and also 
that he is incorruptible^ immortal^ and invisible^ as he is said to 
be in scripture, Rom. i. 23. and 1 Tim. i. 17. 

Moreover, it follows from hence, that he has an understand- 
ing and will, and so we may conceive of him as the Creator and 
governor of all things ; this he could not be, if he were not an 
intelligent and sovereign being, and particularly a spirit, {a) 

(2.) The difference between other spiritual substances and 



'■.?) His i<lea'( ai'enot the f fleets, but causes of things. Vide post \t. 1^4; 125. 



124 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

God, is, that all their excellency is only comparative, viz. as 
they excel the best of all material beings in their nature and 
properties ; but God, as a spirit, is infinitely more excellent, not 
only than all material beings, but than all created spirits. Their 
perfections arc derived from him, and therefore he is called, 
The Father of spirits^ Heb. xii. 9. and the God of the spirits 
of all Jiesh^ Numb. xvi. 22. and his perfections are underived: 
other spirits are, as we have observed, in their own nature, im- 
mortal, yet God can reduce them to nothing ; but God is in- 
dependently immortal, and therefore it is said of him, that he 
only hath immortality^ 1 Tim. vi. 16. 

Finite spirits, indeed, have understanding and will, but these 
powers are contained within certain limits Avhereas God is an 
infinite spirit, and therefore it can be said of none but him, that 
his understanding is infinite^ Psal. cxlvii. 5. 

From God's being a spirit, we may infer, 

1. That he is the most suitable good to the nature of our 
souls, which are spirits ; he can communicate himself, and ap- 
ply those things to them, which tend to make them happv, as 
the God and Father of spirits. 

2. He is to be worshipped in a spiritual manner, John iv. 
24. that is, with our whole souls, and in a way becoming his 
spiritual nature ; therefore, 

3. We are to frame no similitude or resemblance of him in 
our thoughts, as though he were a corporeal or material being; 
neither are we to make any pictures of him. This God forbids 
Israel to do, Deut. iv. 12, 15, 16. and tells them, that they ha^ 
not the least pretence for so doing, inasmuch as they saxv no 
similitude of him^ when he spake to them in Horeb ; and to make 
an image of him would be to corrupt \ them selves. 

II. God is said to be in, and of, himself, not as though he 
gave being to, or was the cause of himself, for that implies a 
contradiction ; therefore divines generally say, that God is in, 
and of himself, not positively, but negatively, that is, his being 
and perfections are underived, and not communicated to him, 
as all finite perfections are, by him, to the creature ; therefore 
he is self-existent, or independent, which is one of the highest 
glories of the divine nature, by which he is distinguished from 
all creatures, who live, move, and have their being in and from 
him. 

This attribute of independency belongs to all his perfections ; 
thus his Avisdom, power, goodness, holiness, 8?c. are all inde- 
pendent. And, 

1. With respect to his knowledge or wisdom, he doth not 
receive ideas from any object out of himself, as all intelligent 
creatures do, and, in that respect, are said to depend on the 
object; so that if there were not such objects, they could not 



THE PERTECTIONS OF GOD. 125 

have the knowledge or idea of them in their minds ; therefore 
the object known must first exist, before we can apprehend 
what it IS. But this must not be said of God's knowledge, for 
that would be to suppose the things that he knows antecedent 
to his knowing them. The independency of his knowledge is 
elegantly described in scripture ; Who hath directed the Spirit 
of the Lord^ or^ being his counsellor^ has taught him ? With 
whom took he counsel^ and tvho instructed him., and taught him 
in the path of judgment., and taught him knoxvledge^ and shewed 
to him the way oj understanding f Isa. xl. 13, 14. 

2. He is independent in power, therefore as he receives 
strength from no one, so he doth not act dependently on the 
will of the creature ; Who hath enjoined him his way ; Job 
xxxvi. 23. and accordingly, as he received the power of acting 
from no one, so none can hinder, turn aside, or controul his 
power, or put a stop to his methods of acting. 

3. He is independent as to his holiness, hating sin necessa- 
rily, and not barely depending on some reasons out of himself, 
which induce him thereunto ; for it is essential to the divine 
nature to be infinitely opposite to all sin, and therefore to be 
independently holy. 

4. He is independent as to his bounty and goodness, and so 
he communicates blessings not by constraint, but according to 
his sovereig-n will. Thus he gave being to the Avorld, and all 
things therein, which was the first instance of bounty and good- 
ness, and a very great one it was, not by constraint, but by his 
free will, y^r his pleasure they are and were created. In like 
manner, whatever instances of mercy he extends to miserable 
creatures, he still acts independently, in the display thereof ; 
nothing out of himself moves or lays a constraint upon him, 
but he shews mercy because it is his pleasure so to do. 

But, to evince the truth of this doctrine, that God is inde- 
pendent as to his being, and all his perfections, let it be farther 
considered, 

(1.) That all things depend on his power, which brought 
them into, and preserves them in being; therefore they exivSt 
by his will, as their creator and preserver, and consequently 
are not necessary, but dependent beings. If therefore all things 
depend on God, it is the greatest absurdity to say that God 
depends on any thing, for this would be to suppose the cause 
and the effect to be mutually dependent on, and derived from 
each otber, which infers a contradiction. 

(2.) It God be infinitely above the highest creatures, he can- 
not depend on any of them ; for dependence argues inferiority. 
Now that God is above all things is certain : this is represented 
in a very beautiful manner by the prophet, when he says, Isa, 
xl. 15, 17. Behold the nations arc as the drop of th" bucket^ 



126 THE PiRrECTIONS Of GOB. 

and are counted as the small dust of the balance ; all nations be- 
fore him are as nothings and they are counted to him less than 
nothing and vanity ; therefore he cannot be said to be inferior 
to them, and, by consequence, to depend on them. 

(3.) If God depends on any creature, he does not exist ne- 
cessarily : and if so, then he might not have been ; for the same 
will, by which he is supposed to exist, might have determined 
that he should not have existed. If therefore God be not in- 
dependent, he might not have been, and, according to the same 
method of reasoning, he might cease to be ; for the same will, 
that gave being to him, might take it away at pleasure, which 
is altogether inconsistent with the idea of a God. 

From God's being independent, or in and of himself, we 
infer, 

1. That we ought to conclude that the creature cannot lay 
; any obligation on him, or do any thing that may tend to make 

him more happy than he is in himself; the apostle gives a chal- 
lenge to this effect, Who hath first given to him^ and it shall be 
recompensed unto him again^ Rom. xi. Z5. and Eliphaz says to 
Job, Job xxii. 2, 3. Can a man be profitable to God^ as he that 
is zvise may be prof table unto himself P Is it any pleasure to 
the Almighty^ that thou aj-t righteous ? or is it gain to hitn, 
that thou makest thy rvays perfect ? 

2. If independency be a divine perfection, then let it not, in 
any instance, or by any consequence, be attributed to the crea- 
ture ; let us conclude, that all our springs are in him, and that 
all we enjoy and hope for is from him, who is the author and 
finisher of our faith, and the fountain of all our blessedness. 

III. God is infinite in being, glory, blessedness, and perfec- 
tion. To be infinite, is to be without all bounds or limits, either 
actual or possible : now that God is so, is evident, from his be- 
ing independent and uncreated ; and because his will fixes the 
bounds of all the excellencies, perfections, and powers of the 
creature. If therefore he doth not exist by the will of another, 
he is infinite in being, and consequently in all perfection : thus 
it is said, Psal. cxlvii. 5. his understanding is infnite^ which 
will farther appear, when we consider him as omniscient ; his 
will determines what shall come to pass, with an infinite so- 
vereignty, that cannot be controuled, or rendered ineffectual j 
his power is infinite, and therefore all things are equally possi- 
ble, and easy to it, nor can it be resisted by any contrary force 
or power ; and he is infinite in blessedness, as being self-suffi- 
cient, or not standing in need of any thing to make him more 
happy than he was in himself, from all eternity. The Psalmist 
is supposed by many, to speak in the person of Christ, when 
he says, Psal. xvi. 2. My goodness extendeth not to thee^ q. d. 
" Ho^v' much soever thy relative glory may be illustrated, bv 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 127 

'• what I have engaged to perform in the covenant of redemp- 
" tion, yet this can make no addition to thine essential glory." 
And if so, then certainly nothing can be done by us which ma}' 
in the least contribute thereunto. 

IV. God is all-sufficient, by which we understand that he 
hath enough in himself to satisfy the most enlarged desires of 
his creatures, and to make them completely blessed. As his 
self-sufficiency is that whereby he has enough in himself to de- 
nominate him completely blessed, as a God of infinite perfec- 
tion ; so his all-sufficiency is that, whereby he is able to com- 
municate as much blessedness to his creatures, as he is pleased 
to make them capable of receiving ; and therefore he is able not 
only to supply all their xvants, but to do exceedingly above all that 
they ask or think^ Phil. iv. 19. and Eph. iii. 20. This he can 
do, either in an immediate way ; or, if he thinks fit to make 
use of creatures as instruments, to fulfil his pleasure, and com- 
municate what he designs to impart to us, he is never at a loss ; 
for as they they are the work of his hands, so he has a right to 
use them at his will ; upon which account, they are said, all of 
them to be his servants, Psal. cxix. 91. 

This doctrine of God's all-sufficiency should be improved by 
us, 

1. To induce us to seek happiness in him alone: creatures 
are no more than the stream, but he is the fountain ; we ma}', 
in a mediate. Way, receive some small drops from them, but he 
is the ocean, of all blessedness. 

2. Let us take heed that we do not reflect on, or in effect, 
deny this perfection ; which we may be said to do in various 
instances. As, 

(1.) When we are discontented with our present condition, 
and desire more than God has allotted for us. This seems to 
have been the sin of the angels, who left their first habitation 
through pride, seeking more than God designed they should 
have ; and this was the sin by which our first parents fell, de- 
siring a greater degree of knowledge than what they thought 
themselves possessed of: thus they fancied, that by eating the 
forbidden fruit, they should be as gods^ hioxving good and evi/^ 
Gen. -^ii. 5. 

(2.) We practically deny the all-sufficiency of God, when we 
seek blessings of what kind soever they are, in an indirect way, 
as though God were not able to bestOAV them upon us in his 
own way, or in the use of lawful means : thus Rebecca and Ja- 
cob did, when they contrived a lie to obtain the blessing, chap, 
xxvii. as though there had not been an all-sufficiency in provi- 
dence to bring it about, without their having recourse to those 
methods that \vere in themselves sinful. 

(3.) When we use unlawful means to escape imminent dangers. 



128 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

Thus David did wAe?i he feigned himself viad^ supposing, with- 
out ground, that he should have been slain by Achish, king ol 
■ Gath ; and that there was no other way to escape but this, 1 
Sam. xxi. 13. and Abraham and Isaac, Gen. chapters xx. and 
xxvi. when they denied their wives, concluding this to have 
been an expedient to save their lives, as though God were not 
able to save them in a better and more honourable way. 

(4.) When we distrust his providence, though we have had 
large experience of its appearing for us in various instances : 
thus David did, when he said, in his heart, / shall one day pe- 
rish hij the hand of Saul ^ 1 Sam. xxvii. 1. and the Israelites, 
when thev said, Can God furnish a table in the wilderness 7 
Psai. ixxviii. 19. though he had provided for them in an extra- 
ordinary way ever since thej^ had been there : yea, Moses him- 
self was faulty in this matter, when he said, Whence should I 
have flesh to give unto all this people ? I am not able to bear all 
this people alone ^ because it is too heavy for me, Numb. xi. 13, 
14. and Asa, when he tempted Benhadad to break his league 
with Baasha, v/ho made war against him ; as though God were 
not able to deliver him without this indirect practice, though 
he had in an eminent manner, appeared for him, in giving him 
a signal victory over Zerah the Ethiopian, when he came 
against him with an army of a million of men, 2 Chron. xvi. 
3. compared with chap. xiv. 9, 13. and likewise Joshua, when 
Israel had suffered a small defeat, occasioned by Achan's sin, 
when they fled before the men of Ai, though there were but 
thirty-six of them slain ; yet, on that occasion, he is ready to 
wish that God had not brought them over Jordan, and medi- 
tates nothing but ruin and destruction from the Amorites, for- 
getting God's former deliverances, and distrusting his faithful- 
ness, and care of his people, and, as it were, calling in question 
his all-sufficiency, as though he were not able to accomplish the 
promises he had made to them. Josh. vii. 7, 8, 9. 

(5.) When we doubt of the truth, or certain accomplishment 
of his promises, and so are ready to say, ffath God for gotten to 
he gracious ? Doth his truth fail for ever f This we ai-e apt to 
do, when there are great difficulties in the way of the accom- 
plishment thereof: thus Sarah, when it was told her that she 
should have a child, in her old age, laughed, through unbelief. 
Gen. xviii. 12. and God intimates, that this was an affront to his 
uU-sufficiency, when he says. Is any thing too hard \f or the 
Lord? ver. 14. and Gideon, though he was told that God was 
with him, and had an express command to go in his might, 
with a promise that he should deliver Israel from the Midian- 
ites, yet he says, Lord wherewith shall I save them ? for my 
family is poor in Manasseh, and I am the least in vtyfather\- 
house, Judg. vi. 15. God tells him again, / will be xvith thee. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 129 

and smite the Midianites^ ver. 1 6. yet, afterwards, he desires 
that he would give him a sign in the wet and dry fleece. What 
is this but qutstioning his all-sufFiciency ? 

(6.) When we decline great services, though called to them 
by God, under pretence of our unfitness for them : thus when 
the prophet Jeremiah was called to deliver the Lord's message 
to the rebelhous house of Israel, he desires to be excused, and 
s-xs'i.^ Behold I cannot sptak^for I am a child; whereas the main 
discouragement was the difficulty of the work, and the hazards 
he was like to run ; but God encourages him to it, by putting 
him in mind of his all-sufficiency, when he tells him, that he 
•would be -with him^ and deliver him., Jer. i. 6. compared with 
ver. 8. 

This divine perfection affords matter of support and encou- 
ragement to believers, under the greatest straits and difficulties 
they are exposed to in this world ; and we have many instances 
in scripture of those who have had recourse to it in the like ca- 
ses. Thus, when David was in the greatest straits that ever he 
met with, lipon the Amalekites' spoiling of Ziklag, and carrying 
away the women captives, the peoj)le talked of stoning him, and 
all things seemed to make against him ; yet it is said, that he 
encouraged himself in the Lord his Gody 1 Sam. xxx. 6. so Mor- 
decai was confident that the enlargement and deliverance of the 
ycTvs shoidd come some other way., if not by Estlier's interces- 
sion for them, when she was afraid to go in to the king, Esth. 
iv. 14. and this confidence he could never have obtained^ con- 
sidering the present posture of their affairs, without a due re- 
gard to God's all-sufficiency. 3Ioreover, it was this divine 
perfection that encouraged Abraham to obey the difficult com- 
mand of offering his son : as the apostle observes, he did this as 
knowing that God was able to raise him from the dead., Heb. xi. 
19. and when believers are under the greatest distress, from 
the assaults of their spiritual enemies, they have a warrant from 
God, as the apostle had, to encourage themselves, that they 
shall come off victorious, because his grace is sujfficient for 
them., 2 Cor. xii. 8, 9. 

V. God is eternal : this respects his duration, to wit, as he 
was widiout beginning, as well as shall be without end; or as 
his duration is unchangeable, or without succession, the same 
from everlasting to everlasting : thus the Psalmist sa}'S, Before 
the mountains were brought forth., or ever thou hadst formed the 
earth and the world ; eveii from everlasting to everlasting thou 
art God., Psal. xc. 2. 

1. That God is from everlasting, appears, 

(1.) From his being a necessary, s<. If-existent being, or, as 
was before observed, in and of himself, therefore he must be 
from everlasting; for whatever is not produced is from eternitv. 

Vol,. I. R 



130 THE PEAFECTIONS 0? GdD. 

Now that God did not derive his being from any one, is eVi* 
dent, because he gave being to ali things, which is impUed in 
their being creatures ; thcrelore nothing gave being to him, and 
consequently he was from eteniity. 

(2.) If he is an infinitely perfect being, as has been observed 
before, then his duration is infinitely perfect, and consequently 
it is boundless, that is to say, eternal ; it is an imperfection, in 
I all created beings, that they began to exist, and tlierefore they 
are said, in a comparative sense, to be but of yesterday; we 
must therefore, when we conceive of God, separate this imper* 
fection from him, and so conclude that he was from all eter- 
nity. 

(3.) If he created all things in the beginning, then he was 
before the beginning of time, that is, from eternity : thus it is 
said, In the beginning- God created the heaven and the earthy Gen- 
i. 1.' this is very evident, for time is a successive duration, ta- 
king its rise from a certain point, or moment, which we call the 
begmning : now that duration, which was before this, must be 
from eternity, unless we suppose time before time began, or, 
which is all one, that there was a successive duration before 
successive duration began, which is a coniradiction. There- 
fore, if God fixed that beginning to all things, as their Creator, 
and particularly to time, which is the measure of the duration 
of ail created beings, tl«^n it is evident that he was before time, 
and consequently from eternity. 

(4.) This also appears from scripture / as when it is said. 
The eternal God is thy refuge^ and underneath are the everlast- 
ing arms^ Deut. xxxiii. 27. and when we read of his eternal 
pozver and Godhead^ Rom. i. 20. and elsewhere. Art not thou 
from everlastings Lord^ my God? Hab. i. 12. Thy throne is 
established of old ; thou aft from everlastings Psal. xciii. 2. so 
his attributes and perfections are said to have been from ever- 
lasting. The mercy of the Lord is from everlasting to everlast-' 
ings Fsal. ciii. 17. 

And this may be argued from many scripture-consequences : 
thus, there was an election of persons to holint s and happi- 
ness, before the foundation of the xvorld^ Eph. i. 4. and Christ, 
in particular, was fore-ordained to be our Mediator, before the 
foundation of the world, 1 Pet. i. 20. and set up from everlast- 
ings from the begimiings or ever the earth was, Prov. viii. 23. 
From hence it follows, that there was a sovereign will that fore- 
ordained it, and therefore God, whose decree or purpose it 
was, existed before the foundation of the world, that is, from 
everlasting. 

P^^oreover, there were grants of grace given in Christ, or put 
into his hand, from all eternity : thus we read of eternal life, 
rvhich God promised before the xvorld began^ Tit. i. 2. and of our 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 131 

Ueing "saved^ according- to his purpose and grace^ given us iri 
Christ Jesus^ before the xvorld began^ 2 Tim. i. 9. It hence 
follows, that there was an eternal giver, and consequently that 
God was from everlasting. 

2. God shall be to everlasting ; thus it is said, The Lord 
shall endure forever^ Psai. ix. 7. and that he livethfor ever and 
ever^ Rev. iv. 9, 10. and that his i/ears shall have no end, Psal. 
cii. 27. and the Lord shall reign for ever^ Psal. cxlvi. 10. there- 
fore he must endure for ever. Again, it is said, that the Lord 
keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him, to a thou- 
sand generations, Deut. vii. 9. and he rvill ever be mindful of 
his covenant, Psal. cxi. 5. that is, will fulfil what he has promi- 
sed therein : if his truth shall not fail for ever, then he, who 
will accomplish what he has spoken, must endure to everlast-r 
ing. 

But this may be farther evinced from the perfections of his 
nature. 

(1.) From his necessary existence, which not only argues, as 
has been before observed, that he could not begin to be, but 
equally proves, that he cannot cease to be, or that he shall be 
to everlasting. 

(2.) He is void of all composition, and therefore must be to 
everlasting ; none but compounded beings, viz, such as have 
parts, are subject to dissolution, which arises from the contra- 
riety of these parts, and their tendency to destroy one another, 
which occasions the dissolution of the whole ; but God having 
no parts, as he is the most simple uncompounded being, there 
can be nothing jn him that tends to dissolution, therefore he 
can never have an end from any necessity of nature. And, 

(3.) He must be to eternity, because there is no one superior 
to him, at whose will he exists, that can deprive him of his 
being and glory. 

(4.) He cannot will his own destruction, or non-existence, 
for that is contrary to the universal nature of things ; since no 
being can desire to be less perfect than it is, much less can any 
one will or desire his own annihilation ', especialK' no one, who 
is possessed of blessedness, can will the loss thereof, for that is 
incongruous with the nature of it, as being a desirable good, 
therefore God cannot will the loss of his o\vn blessedness ; and 
since his blessedness is inseparably connected with his being, he 
cannot cease to be, from an act of his own will : if therefore he 
cannot cease to be, from any necessit)^ of nature, or from the 
will of another, or from an act of his own will, he must be to 
eternity. 

Moreover, the eternity of God may be proved from liis other 
perfections^ since one of the divine perfections infers the other. 
As, 



1^2 - THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

1. From his immutability; he is unchangeable in his being, 
therefore he is so in all his perfections, and consequentiy must 
be always the same, from everlasting to everlasting, and not 
proceed from a state of non-existence to that of being, which he 
would have done, had he not been from everlasting, nor decline 
from a state of being to that of non-existence, which he would 
be supposed to do, were he not to everlasting : either of these 
is the greatest change that can be supposed, and therefore in- 
consistent with the divine immutability. 

2. He is the first cause, and the ultimate end of all things, 
therefore he must be from eternitj^, and remain the fountain of 
all blessedness to eternity. 

3. He could not be almighty, or infinite in power, if he were 
not eternal; for that being, which did not always exist, once 
could not act, to wit, when it did not exist ; or he that may 
cease to be, may, for the same reason, be disabled from acting ; 
both which are inconsistent with Almighty power. 

4. If he were not eternal, he could not, by way of eminency 
be called the living God^ as he is, Jer. x. 10. or said to have life 
in himself John v, 26. for both these expressions imply his ne- 
cessary existence, and that argues his eternity. 

3. God's eternal duration is without succession, as well as 
without beginning and end, that it is so, appears, 

(1.) Because, as was hinted but now, it is unchangeable, 
since all successive duration infers a change. Thus the dura- 
tion of creatures, which is successive, is not the sam.e one mo- 
ment as it will be the next ; every moment adds something to 
it ; now this cannot be said of God's duration. Besides, suc- 
cessive duration implies a being, what we were not, in all re- 
spects before, and a ceasing to be what we were, and so it is a 
kind of continual passing from not being to being, which is in- 
consistent with the divine perfections, and, in particular, with 
his unchangeable duration. The Psalmist, speaking of God's 
eternal duration, expresses it by the immutability thereof. Thou 
art the same^ and thy years shall have no end^ Psal. cii. 27. ; 
and the apostle, speaking concerning this matter, says. He is 
the same yesterday^ to day^ and forever^ Heb. xiii. 8. 

(2.) Successive duration is applicable to time ; and the dura- 
tion of all creatures is measured, and therefore cannot be term- 
ed infinite ; it is measured by its successive parts : thus a day, a 
year, an age, a million of ages, are measured by the number of 
moments, of which they consist ; but God's duration is un- 
measured, that is, infinite, therefore it is without succession, or 
without thgse parts of which time consists. (a) 

4. Eternity is an attribute peculiar to God, and therefore we 
call it an incommunicable perfection. There are, indeed, other 



{a) There is not succession in His ideas, but he exists m every point of time. 



THE PERFECTIOKS OF'GOD. 133 

things that shall endure to everlasting, as angels, and the souls 
of men ; as also those heavenly bodies that shaii remain after the 
ci-eature is delivered from the bondage of corruption, to which 
it is now subject : the heavenly places, designed for the seat of 

^the blessed, as well as thtir happy inhabitants, shdl be everlast- 
ing ; but yet the everlasting duration of these things infinitely 
differs from the eternity of God ; for as all finite things began 
to be, and their duration is successive, so their everlasting exis- 
tence depends entirely on the pov/er and will ol God, and vhere- 
fore cannot be called necessary , or independent, as his eternal 
existence is. 

- Object. Since the various parts of time, as days, years, ^c* 
and the various changes, or flux of time ; such as past, present, 
and to come, are sometimes attributed to God ; this seems in- 
consistent with the account that has been given of his eternity. 
Answ, It is true, we often find such expressions used in scrip- 
ture : thus he is called, the ancient of dajs, Dan. vii. 9. and his 
eternity is expressed, by his ymrs having no end, Psal. cii. 27. 
and it is said. He was, i.f, ajic/ is to come. Rev. i. 4. and chap, 
iv. 8. But, for the understanding of such-like expressions, we 
must consider, that herein God is pleased to speak according to 
our weak capacity, who cannot comprehend the manner of his 
infinite duration ; we cannot conceive of any duration but that 
which is successive ; therefore God speaks to us, as he does in 
many other instances, in condescension to our capacities ; but 
yet we may observe, that though he thus condescends to speak 
concerning himself, yet there is oftentimes something added, 
which distinguishes his duration from that of creatures; as 
when it is said, Behold God is great, and xue know him not ; 
neither can the number of his years be searched out. Job xxxvi. 
26. so that though we read of the years of his diiratioii, yet they 
are such as are unsearchable, or incomprehensible years, infi- 
nitely different from years, as applied to created beings ; and it 
is said, A thousand years in thij sight, are but as yesterday^ 
ivhen it is past, Psal. xc. 4. One day is xvith the Lord as a thou^ 
sand years, and a thousand years as one day, 2 Pet. iii. 8. and, 
by the same method of reasoning, it may be said, one moment 
is with the Lord as a thousand millions of ages, or a thousand 
millions of ages as one moment ; such is his duration, and there- 
fore not properly successive, like that of creatures. 

2. When any thing past, present, or to come, is attributed to 
God, it either signifies that he is so, as to his Avorks, which are 
finite, and measured by successive duration ; or else it signifies, 
that he, whose duration is not measured by succession, notwith- 
standing, exists unchangeably, through all the various ages of 
time. As he is omnipresent with all the parts of matter, yet has 
no parts himself, so he exists in all the successive ages of time. 



134 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

but without that succession, which is peculiar to time and crea- 
tures. 

Several things may be inferred, of a practical nature, from 
the eternity of God. As, 

1. Since God's duration is eternal, that is, without succession, 
so that there is no such thing as past, or to come, with him ; 
or if ten thousand millions of ages are but like a moment to 
him ; then it follows, that those sins which we have committed 
long ago, and perhaps are forgotten by us, are present to his 
view J he knows what we have done against him ever since we 
had a being in this world, as much as though we were at pre^ 
sent committing them. 

2. If God was from eternity, then how contemptible is all 
created gloiy, when compared with his ; look but a few ages 
backward, and it was nothing : this should humble the pride of 
the creature, who is but of yesterday, and whose duration is 
nothing, and less than nothing, if compared with God's. 

3. The eternity of God, as being to everlasting, affords mat- 
ter of terror to his enemies, and comfort to Iiis people, and, as 
such, should be improved for the preventing of sin. 

(1.) It affords matter of terror to his enemies. For, 

1st. He ever lives to S-e his threatenings executed, and to 
pour forth the vials of his fury on them : thus the prophet 
speaking of God, as the everlasting King^ adds, that at his 
ivrath the earth shall tremble^ and the nations shall not be able 
to abide his indignation^ Jer. x. 10. Therefore the eternity of 
God ai-gues the etemit}' of the punishment of sin, since this 
great Judge, who is a consuming fire to impenitent sinners, 
will live for ever to see his threatenings executed upon them. 
This appars, if we consider, 

^dly^ That since he is eternal in his being, he must be so in 
his power, holiness, justice, and all his other perfections, which 
are terrible to his enemies : thus the Psalmist says, Who kno-w- 
eth the power of thine anger ? even according to thy fear ^ so is 
thy rvrath^ Psal. xc. 11. and the apostle says. It is a fearful 
thing to fall into the hands of the living God^ Heb. x. 31. 

(2.) It affords matter of comfort to believers, as opposed to 
the fluctuating and uncertain state of all creature-enjoyments ; 
it is an encouragement to them in the loss of friends and rela- 
tions, or under all the other losses or disappointments they meet 
with as to their outward estate in this world. These are, at best, 
but short-lived comforts, but God is the eternal portion and hap- 
piness of his people, Psal. Ixxiii. 26. and, from his eternity, they 
may certainly conclude, that the happiness of the heavenly state 
will be eternal, for it consists in the enjoyment of him, who is 
so ; which is a very delightful thought to all who are enabled by 
faith to lay claim to it. 



THE PERFECTIONS Of GOD. 135 

VI. God is immutable : thus it is said, that with him is no 
variableness^ neither shadow of turnings James i. 17. This is 
somttimts set forth in a metaphorical way, in which respect he 
is compared to a rock^ Deut. xxxii. 4. which remains immove- 
able, when the whole ocean, that surrounds it, is continually in 
a fluctuating state ; even so, though all creatures are subject to 
change, God alone is unchangeable in his being, and all his per- 
fections. 

Here we shall consider, 

1. How immutability is a perfection ; and how it is a divine 
perfection peculiar to God. 

(1.) It must be allowed that immutability cannot be said to 
be an excellency or perfection, unless it be applied to, or spo- 
ken of what is good ; an immutable state of sin, or misery, is 
far from being an excellency, when it is applied to fallen angels, 
or wicked men : but unchangeable holiness and happiness, as 
applied to holy angels, or saints in heaven, is a perfection con- 
ferred upon them ; and when we speak of God's immutability, 
we suppose him infinitely blessed, which is included in the no- 
tion of a God ; and so we farther say, that he is unchangeable 
in all those perfections in which it consists. 

(2.) Immutability belongs, in the most proper sense, to God 
alone ; so that as he only is said to have ijnmortality^ 1 Tim. vi. 
16. that is, such as is underived and independent, he alone is 
unchangeable ; other things are rendered immutable by an act 
of his will and power, but immutability is an essential perfec- 
tion of the divine nature ; creatures are dependently immutable, 
God is independently so. 

(3.) The most perfect creatures, such as angels and glorified 
saints, are capable of new additions to their blessedness ; new 
objects may be presented as occasions of praise, which tend 
perpetually to increase their happiness : the angels know more 
than they did before Christ's incarnation ; for they are said to 
know by the churchy that is, by the dealings of God with his 
church, the manifold wisdom. ofGod^ Eph. iii. 10. and to desire 
to look into the account the gospel gives of the sii^trings of 
Christy and the glory that should follow^ 1 Pet. i. 11, 12. and 
they shall have farther additions to their blessedness, when all 
the elect are joined to their assembly in the gi-eat day ; so that 
the happiness of the best creatures is communicated in various 
degrees ; but God's perfections and blessedness can have no ad- 
ditions made to them, therefore he is immutable in a sense as 
no creature is. 

2. We shall now prove that God is immutable in his being 
and all his perfections. 

(1.) That he is immutable in his being ; this belongs to him 
as God, and. consequently to him alone. All other beings once 



J 36 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

were not; there has been, if I may so express it, a change from 
a state of non-existence, to that of being ; and the same power 
that brought them into being, could reduce them again to their 
first nothing. To be dependent, is to be subject to change at 
the will of another ; this is appHcable to all finite things ; for 
it is said, As a vesture thou s/ialt change the7n, and they shall 
be changed: but God being opposed to them as independent, is 
said to be the same^ Psal. cii. 26, 27. 

Ist^ He did not change fiom a state of non-existence to be- 
ing, inasmuch as he was from everlasting, and therefore neces- 
sarily existent ; and consequently he cannot change from a state 
of being to that of non-existence, or cease to be ; and because 
his perfections are essential to him, and underived, in the same 
sense as his being is, therefore there can be no change therein. 

2dly^ He cannot change from a state of greater to a state of 
less perfection, or be subject to the least diminution of his di- 
vine perfections. To suppose this possible, is to suppose he 
may cease to be infinitely perfect ; that is, to be God : nor can 
he change from a state of less perfection to a state of gi-eater; 
for that is to suppose him not to be infinitely perfect before this 
change, or that there^are degrees of infinite perfection. Nor, 

3(3%/, Can he pass from that state, in which he is, to another 
of equal perfection ; for, as such a change implies an equal pro- 
portion of loss and gain, so it would argue a plurality of infi- 
nite beings ; or since he, who was God before this change, was 
distinct from what he arrives to after it, this would be contra- 
ry to the unity of the divine essence. 

Moreover, this may be farther proved from hence, that if 
there be any change in God, this must arise either from him- 
self, or some other : it cannot be from himself, inasmuch as he 
exists necessarily, and not as the result of his own will : there- 
fore he cannot will any alteration, or change in himself; this is 
also contrary to the nature of infinite blessedness, which cannot 
desire the least diminution, as it cannot apprehend any necessity 
thereof : and then he cannot be changed by any other : for he 
that changes any other, must be greater than him whom he 
changes ; nor can he be subject to the will of another, who is 
superior to him ; since there is none equal, much less superior, 
to God : therefore there is no being that can add to, or take 
from, his perfections ; which leads us, 

(2.) To consider the immutability of God's perfections. And, 

First^ Of his knowledge ; he seeth not as man seeth ; this is 
obvious. For, 

Ist^ His knowledge is independent upon the objects known; 
therefore whatever changes there are in them, there is none in 
him. Things known, are considered either as past, present, or 
to come ; and these are not known by us in the same way ; for 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 137 

concerning things past, it must be said, tiiat we shall know them 
here vfter; whereas God, with one view, comprehends all things', 
past arid future, as chough they were present. 

2^/z/, If God's knowledge were not unchangeable, he might 
be said to have different thoughts, or apprehensions of things 
at one time, from what he has at another, which would argue a 
defect of wisdom. And indeed a change of sentiments implies 
ignorance, or weakness of understanding ; for to make advances 
in knowledge, supposes a degree of ignorance ; and to decline 
therein, is to be reduced to a "state of ignorance : now it is cer- 
tain, that both these are inconsistent with the infitiite perfection 
of the divine mind ; nor can any such defect be applied to him, 
who is called. The only wise Gody 1 Tim. i. 17. 

3<//i/, If it were possible for God's knowledge to be changed, 
this would infer a change of his will, since having changed his 
sentiments, he must be supposed to alter his resolutions and 
purposes ; but his will is unchangeable, therefore his under- 
standing or knowledge is so ; which leads us to prove, 

Sccondhjy That God is unchangeable in his will : thus it is 
said of him. He is of one mind^ and zvho can turn him ? Job 
xxiii. 13. This is agreeable to his infinite perfection, and there- 
fore he does not purpose to do a thing at one time, and deter- 
mine not to do it at another ; though it is true, the revelation 
of his will may be changed, whereby that may be rendered a 
duty at one time, which was not at another : thus the ordinan- 
ces of the ceremonial law were prescribed, from Moses's time 
to Christ ; but after that were abolished, and ceased to be or- 
dinances ; so that there may be a change in the things willed, 
or in external revelation of God's will, and in our duty found- 
ed thereon, when there is, at the same time, no change in his 
purpose ; for he determines all changes in the external dispen- 
sation of his pi-ovidence and grace, without the least shadow of 
change in his own will : this may farther appear, if we consider, 

\sty That if the will of God were not unchangeable, he could 
not be the object of trust ; for how could we depend on his pro- 
mises, were it possible for him to change his purpose ? Neither 
vrould his threatenings be so much regarded, if there were any 
ground to expect, from the mutability of his nature, that he 
would not execute them ; and by this means, all religion would 
be banished out of the world. 

2dlyy This would render the condition of the best men, in 
some respects, very uncomfortable ; for they might be one day 
the object of his love, and the next, of his hatred, and those 
blessings which accompany salvation might be bestowed at one 
time, and taken away at another, which is directly contraiy to 
scrii)ture, which asserts, that the gifts end (\dling of God are 
rvithoiit repentance^ Rom. xi. 29. 
Vol. I. S 



IJg il!E PERFECTIONS Oi' -GOD- 

Q)dhj^ None bi those things that occasion a change in the pur- 
poses of n\en, caR: be ppplied to Godj and therefore there is no-' 
thing in him, that in the least degree can lead him to change hi* 
will, or determination, \v ith respect to the evtnt of things. For, 

\st^ Men change their purpose, from a natural fickleness and 
inconstancy, as there is mutability in thfir very nature ; but 
God being unchangeable in his nature, he must be so in his 
purpose or will. 

2dly^ Men change their purposes in promising, and not ful- 
filling their promise, or, as we say, in being worle than their 
word, oftentimes from the viciousness and depravity of their 
nature ; but God is infinitely holy, and therefore, in this respect* 
cannot change. 

3fl^/z/, Men change their mind or purposes, for want of power, 
to bring about what they designed; this has hindered many 
well concerted projects from taking effect in some, and man) 
threatenings from being executed in others ; but God's will 
cannot be frustrated for want of power, to do what he design- 
ed, inasmuch as he is Almighty. 

4M/j/, Men change their minds many times, for want of fore- 
bight ; something unexpected occurs that renders it expedient 
for them to alter their purpose, which argues a defect of wis- 
dom : but God is infinitely wise ; therefore nothing unforeseen 
can intervene to induce him to change his purpose. 

Stkly^ Men are sometimes obliged to change their purpose 
by the influence, threatenings, or other methods, used by some 
superior ; but there is none equal, much less superior, to God ; 
and consequently none can lay any obligation on him to change 
his purpose. 

VII. God is incomprehensible: this implies that his perfec- 
tions cannot be fully known by any creature ; thus it is said. 
Ca7ist thou hij seayc'hing^ find out God? Canst thou find out tht 
Almighty unto perfection ? Job xi. 7. 

When we consider God as incomprehensible, we do not only 
mean that m.an in this imperfect state, cannot fully comprehend- 
his glorv ; for it is but very little, comparatively, that ^^'e can 
comprehend of finite things, and we know much less of that 
which is infinite ; but when v/e say that God is incomprehensi- 
ble, we mean that the best of creatures, in the most perfect 
state, cannot fully conceive of, Or describe his glory ; and the 
reason is, because they are finite, and his perfections are infi- 
nite ; and there is no proportion between an infinite God, an(* 
a finite mind : the water of the ocean might as w\;ll be contain- 
ed in the hollow of tlie hand, or the dust of the earth weighed 
in a balance, as that the best of creatures should have a ])eifect 
^nd adequate idea of the divine perfections. In this case, wo 
generally distinguish between apprehending, and comprehend- 
ing; the former denotes our having some imperfect, or inadc- 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 139 

vjuate ideas of what surpasses our understanding ; the latter, 
our knowing every thing that is contained in it, which is called 
our having an adequate idea thereof: now we apprehend some^ 
thing of the divine perfections, in proportion to the limits of our 
capacities, and our present state ; hut we cannot, nor ever shall, 
be able to comprehend the divine glory, since God is incom- 
prehensible to every one but himself. Again, we farther dis- 
tinguish between our having a full conviction that God hath 
those infinite perfections, which no creature can comprehend, 
and our being able fully to describe them : thus we firmly be- 
lieve that God exists throughout all the changes of time, and 
yet that his duration is not measured thereby, or that he fills 
idl places without being co-extended with matter; we appre- 
hend, as having an undeniable demonstration thereof, that he 
does sd, though we cannot comprehend how he does it. 

VIII. God is omnipi-esent : this is elegantly set forth by the 
Psalmist, Whither shall I go from thy Spirit ? Or xvhither shall 
I Jiee from thy presence? If I ascend into heaven., thou art 
there ; if I make mij bed in hell^ behold^ thou art there ; if I take 
the wings of the mornings and dwell in the uttermost parts of 
the sea ; even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right-hand 
shall hold me, Psal. cxxxix. 7 — 10. This perfection of the 
Godhead doth not consist merely, as some suppose, in his 
knowing what is done in heaven and earth, which is only a 
metaphorical sense of omnipresence ; as when Elisha tells Ge^ 
hazi, Weiit not my heart rvith thee, when the man turned again 
from his chariot to meet thee f 2 Kings v. 6. Or, as the apostle 
sa3-s to the church at Corinth, that though he was absent in body^ 
yet he was present Avith thena in spirit, 1 Cor. v. o. or, as we 
say, that our souls are with oui- friends in distant places, as of- 
ten as we think of them : nor doth it consist in God's being 
onmipresent by his authority, as a king is said, by a figurative 
wa}- of speaking, to be present in all parts of his dominions, 
where persons are deputed to act under bin?, or In- hi* autho- 
rity : but we must take it in a proper sense, as he fills all pla- 
ces with his presence, Jer. xxiii. Sf. so that he is not confined 
to, or excluded from any place ; and this he does, not by parts, 
as the world or the universe is said to be omnipresent, for that 
is only agreeable to things corporeal, and compounded of parts, 
and therefore bv no means applicable to the divine omnipre- 
sence. This is a doctrine which it is impossible for us to com- 
prehend, yet we are bound to believe it, because the contrary 
hereunto is inconsistent with infinite perfection ; and it is some- 
times called his essential presence, (a) to disvingulsh it from his 

(rt) EfF..cts spring' from /m?!'''/', not A;-.;.?, and prove a TivtuaJ, oj- ir.n'.itnti;;', ti- 
■•''-lutkin, an esyntial ub'.qnit;, 



140 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

influential presence, whereby he is said to be where he acts in 
the method of his providence, which is either common or spe- 
cial; by the former of these he upholds and governs all things; 
by tl:ie latter he exerts his poAver in a wa) of grace, which is 
called his special presence with his people : and as his omni- 
presence, or immensit)^, is necessary, and not the result of his 
will, 80 his influential presence is arbitrary, and an instance of 
infinite condescension, in which respect he is said to be, or not 
to be, in particular places ; to come to, or depart from his peo- 
ple ; soinetimes to dwell in heaven, as he displays his glory 
there agreeably to the heavenly state ; at other times to dwell 
with his church on earth, when he communicates to them those 
blessings which they stand in need of; which leads us to con- 
sider the next divine perfection mentioned in this answer. 

IX. God is almighty. Rev. i. 18. ch. iy. 8. this will evident- 
ly appear, in that if he be infinite in ail his other perfections, 
he must be so in power : thus if he be omniscient, he knows 
what is possible or expedient to be done ; and, if he be an infi- 
nite sovereign, he wills whatever shall come to pass : now this 
knowledge would be insignificant, and his will ineflicacious, 
were he not infinite in power, or almighty. Again, this might 
be argued from his justice, either in rev/arding or punishing; 
for if he were not infinite in power, he could do neither of 
these, at least so far as to render him the object of that desire, 
or fear, which is agreeable to the nature of these perfections ; 
neither could infinite faithfulness accomplish all the promises 
which he hath made, so as to excise that trust and dependence, 
which is a part of religious worship ; nor could he sav, with- 
out limitation, as he does, I have spoken it, I will also bring it 
■ to pass; I have purposed it, I rvill also do it, Isa. xlvi. 11. 

But since power is visible in, and demonstrated by its effects, 
and infinite power, bv those effects vhich cannot be produced 
by a creature, we may observe the almighty power of God in 
all his works, both of nature and grace : thus his eternal power 
is understood, as the apostle says. By the thijigs that are made^ 
Rom. i. 20. not that there was an eternal production of things, 
but the exerting this power in time proves it to be infinite and 
truly divine ; for no creature can produce the smallest particle 
of matter out of nothing, much less furnish the various spe- 
cies of creatures with those endowments, in which they excel 
one another, and set forth their Creator's glory. And the glory 
pf his power is no less visible in the works of proA'idence, 
whereby he upholds all things, disposes of them according to 
his ]3leasure, and brings aboiU events, v/iiich only he Avho has an 
almighty arm can effect. These things might have been enlarg- 
ed on, as> evident proofs of this divine perfection ; but sin.ce the 
works of creation and providence will be particularly considered 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 141 

in their proper place,* we shall proceed to consider the power 
of God, as appearing in his works of grace ; particularly, 

1. In some things subservient to our redempiiori, as in the 
formation of the human nature of Christ, which is ascribed to 
the power of the Highest^ Luke i. 35. and in preserving it from 
being crushed, overcome, and trampled on, by all the united 
powers of hell, and earth : it is said, the arm of God strengthen- 
ed hifji, so that the enemy should Jiot exact vpon him^ nor the 
son of xvickedness ajpict him^ Psal. Ixxxix. 21, 22. It was the 
power of God that bore him up under all the terrible views he 
Jigd of sufferings and death, which had many ingredients in it, 

ftj^ rendered it, beyond expression, formidable, and vvould 
have sunk a mere creature, unassisted thereby, into destruc- 
tion. It was by the divine power, which he calls the finger of 
God^ Luke ix. 20. that he cast out devils, and wrought many 
other miracles, to confirm his mission : so, when he rebuked the 
unclean spirit^ and healed the child^ it is said, they rvere all ama- 
zed at the mighty poxver of God^ chap. ix. 42, 43. and it was 
hereby that he ivas raised from the dead^ which the apostle calls 
the exceeding greatness of the power of God^ Eph. i. 19. and 
accordingly he was declared to be the Son of God^ -with power,, 
by this extraordinary events Rom. i. 4. Moreover, the power of 
God will be glorified, in the highest degree, in his second com- 
ing, when, as he says, he will appear in the clouds of heaven^ 
roith poxver and great glory. Matt. xxiv. 30. 

2. The power of God eminently appears in the propagation 
and success of the gospel. 

(1.) In the propagation thereof; that a doctrine, so contrary 
to the corrupt inclinations of mankind, which had so little to 
recommend it, but what was divine, should be spread through- 
out the greatest part of the known world, by a small number of 
men, raised up and spirited to that end ; and, in order there- 
unto, acted above themselves, and furnished with extraordina- 
ry qucdifications, such as the gift of tongues, and a power to 
work miracles, is a convincing proof, that the power by which 
ail this was done, is infinite. It was hereby that they were not 
only inspired with wisdom, by which they silenced and con- 
founded their malicious enemies, but persuaded others to be- 
lieve what they were sent to impart to them. It was hereby 
that they were inflamed with zeal, in proportion to the great- 
ness of the occasion, fortified with courage to despise the threat?, 
and patiently to bear the persecuting rage of those who pur- 
sued them unto bonds and death. It was hereby that they 
were enabled to finish their course with joy, and seal the doc- 
trines they delivered with their blood. And the power of God 
was herein the more remarkable, inasmuch as thev were not 
men of the greatest natural sagacity, or resolution ; and they 
* Quest. XV. iind xviii. 



142 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD« 

always confessed whatever there was extraordinary in the 
course of their ministry, was from the hand of God. 

(2.) The power of God appears in the success of the gospel, 
the report whereof would never have been believed, had not 
the arm of the Lord been revealed^ Isa. liii. 1. The great mul- 
titude that was converted to Christianity in one age, is an emi- 
nent instance hereof: and the rather, because the profession 
they made was contrary to their secular interests, and exposed 
them to the same persecution, though in a less degree, which 
the apostles themselves met with ; notwithstanding which, they 
willingly parted with their worldly substance, when the neces- 
sity of affairs required it, and were content to have all things 
common, that so the work might proceed with more success. 

It was the power of God that touched their hearts ; so that 
this internal influence contributed more to the work of grace, 
than all the rhf;i:orick of man could have done. It was this that 
carried them through all the opposition of cruel mocking, bonds, 
and imprisonment, and at the same time compensated all their 
losses and sufferings, by those extraordinary joys and supports 
which they had, both in life and death. 

And to this we may add, that the daily success of the gos- 
pel, in all the instances of converting grace, is an e.ident effect 
and proof of the divine power, as will farther appear, when, 
under a following head, we consider effectual calling, as being 
the work of God's almighty power and grace.* 

Object. It will be objected, that there are some things which 
God cannot do, and therefore he is not almighty. 

Anszu. It is true, there are some things that God cannot do ; 
but the reason is, either because it would be contrary to his 
divine perfections to do them, or they are not the objects of 
power ; therefore it is not an imperfection in him that he can 
not do them, but rather a branch of his glory. As, 

?1. There are some things which he cannot do, not because 
he has not power to do them, had he pleased; but the only rea- 
son is, because he has willed or determined not to do them. 
Thus if we should say, that he cannot make more worlds, it is 
not for want of infinite power, but because we suppose he has 
determined not to make them ; he cannot save the reprobate, 
or fallen angels, not through a defect of power, but because he 
has willed not to do it. In this the power of God is distin- 
guished from that of the creature ; for we never say that a per- 
son cannot do a thing, merely because he will not, but because 
he wants power, if he would : («) but this is by no means to be 
said of God in any instance. Therefore we must distinguish 
between his absolute and ordinate power; by the former he 

* Quest. Ixvji. 

' V . ■ ' 

(a) Vide Edwards on Free-will, part I. sect. IV. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. / 143 

rould do many things, which by the latter be will not ; and con- 
sequently, to say he cannot do those things, which he has de- 
termined not to do, does not in the least ovcithrow this attri- 
bute of almight)' power. 

2. He cannot do that which is contrary to the nature of things, 
where there is an impossibility in the things themselves to be 
done : thus he cannot make a creature to be independent, for 
that is contrary to th^ idea of a creature ; nor can he make a 
creature equal to himself, for then it would not be a creature ; 
it is also impossible that he should make a creature to be, and 
not to be, at the same time ; or render that not done, which is 
done, since that is contrary to the nature and truth of things ; 
to which we may add, that he cannot make a creature the ob- 
ject of religious worship ; or, by his power, advance-lTiim to such 
a dignity, as shall warrant any one's ascribing divine perfec- 
tions to him. 

3. He cannot deny himself. It is impossible for God to lie^ 
Heb. vi. 1 8. and it is equally impossible for him to act contra- 
ry to any of his perfections ; for which reason he cannot do any 
thing that argues weakness : as, for instance, he cannot repent, 
or change his mind, or eternal purpose ; nor can he do any thing 
that would argue him, not to be a holy God : now, though it 
may be truly said that God can do none of these things, this is 
no defect in him, but rather a glory, since they are not the ob- 
jects of power, but would argue weakness and imperfection in 
him, should he do them. 

We shall now consider, what practical improvement we ought 
to make of this divine attribute. 

(1.) The almighty power of God aiFords great support and 
relief to believers, when they are assaulted, and afraid of be- 
ing overcome, by their spiritual enemies : thus when they wres- 
tle, as the apostle says, not only against Jiesh and bloody but 
against principalities^ against powers^ against the rulers of the 
darkness of this xvorld^ and against spiritual wickedness in high 
places^ Eph. vi. 12. and when they consider what numbers 
have been overcome and ruined by them, and arc discouraged 
very much, under a sense of their own weakness or inability to 
maintain their ground against them ; let them consider that God 
is able to bruise Satan under their feet, and to make them more 
than conquerors, and to cause all grace to abound in them, and 
to work in them that which is pleasing in his sight. 

(2.) The consideration of God's almighty power gives us tlic 
greatest ground to conclude, that whatever difficulties seem to 
lie in the way of the accomplishment of his promises, relating 
to our future blessedness, shall be removed or surmounted ; so 
that those things which seem impossible, if we look no farther 
tlian second causes, or the little appearance there is, at [n-esent, 



144 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

of their being brought about, are not only possible, but very 
easy for the power of God to effect. 

Thus, with respect to what concerns the case of those who 
are sinking into despair, under a sense of the guilt or power of 
sin, by reason whereof they are ready to conclude that this 
burden is so great, that no finite power can remove it; let such 
consider, that to God ail things are possible ; he can, by his 
powerful word, raise the most dejected spirits, and turn the 
shadow of death into a bright morning of peace and joy. 

Moreov^er, if we consider the declining state of religion in 
the world, the apostacy of some professors, the degeneracy of 
others, and what reason the best of them have to say, that it is 
not With them as in times past ; or when we consider what little 
hope there is, from the present view we have of things, that the 
work of God will be revived in his church ; yea, if the state 
thereof were, in all appearance, as hopeless as it was when God, 
in a vision, represented it to the prophet Ezekiel, when he 
shewed him the valley full of dry bones, and asked him. Can 
these holies live 7 Ezek. xxxvii. 3. or if the question be put, 
can the despised, declining, sinking, and dying interest of Christ 
be revived I or how can those prophecies, that relate to the 
church's future happiness and giorj , ever have their accom- 
plishment in this world, when all things seem to make against 
it ? this difficulty will be removed, and our hope encouraged, 
when we consider the poAver of God, to which nothing is diffi- 
cult, much less insuperable. 

And to this we may add, that the power of God will remove 
all the difficulties that lie in our way, with respect to the resur- 
rection of the dead : this is a doctrine which seems contrary to 
the course of nature ; and, if we look no farther than the power 
of the creature, we should be inclined to say. How can this be ? 
But when we consider the almighty power of God, that will 
sufficiently remove all objections that can be brought against it : 
thus, when our Saviour proves this doctrine, he opposes the 
absurd notions which some had relating thereunto, by saying, 
Te do £•/•?-, not knoxv'ing the scriptures^ nor the power of God^ 
Matth. xxii. 19. 

(3.) Let us have a due regard to this attribute, and take en- 
couragement from it, when we are engaging in holy duties, and 
are sensible of our inability to perform them in a right manner, 
and have too inuch reason to complain of an unbecoming frame 
of spirit therein, of the hardness and impenitency of our hearts, 
the obstinacy and perAcrseness of our wills, the earthliness and 
carnality of our affections, and that all the endeavours we can 
use to bring ourselves into a better frame, have not their desi- 
red success ; let us encourage ourselves with this consideration, 
that God can make us xviUingm the day of his power ^ Psal. ex. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. \45 

3, and do exceeding abundantly above all that roe can aak or 
think^ Eph. ili. 20. 

(4.) Let us take heed that we do not abuse, or practically 
deny, or cast contempt on this divine perfection, by presuming 
that we may obtain spiritual blessings, without dependence on 
him for them, or expecting divine influences, while we continue 
in the neglect of his instituted means of grace : it is true, God 
tan work without means, but he has not given us ground to ex- 
pect that he will do so ; therefore when we seek help from him, 
it must be in his own way. 

Again, let us take heed that we do not abuse this divine per- 
fection, by a distrust of God, or by dependence on an arm of 
flesh ; let us not, on the one hand, limit the Holy One of Israel, 
by saying. Can God do this or that for me, either with respect 
to spiritual or temporal concerns i nor, on the other hand, rest 
in any thing short of him, as though omnipotency were not an 
attribute peculiar to himself. As he is able to do great things 
for us that we looked not for ; so he is much displeased when 
we expect these blessings from any one short of himself ; Who 
art thou^ that thou shouldat he afraid of a man^ that shall die^ and 
forgettest the Lord thy Maker ^ that hath stretched forth the hea-. 
vens^ and laid the foundation of the earth P Isa. li. 12. 

X. God knows all things : it has been before considered, that 
his being a Spirit, implies his having an understanding, as a 
spirit is an intelligent being j therefore his being an infinite 
Spirit, must argue that his understanding is infinite^ PsaL 
cxlvii. 5. 

This may be farther proved, 

1. From his having given being to all things at first, and 
continually upholding them ; he must necessarily know his ov^ n 
workmanship, the effects of his power ; and this is yet more evi- 
dent, if we consider the creation of all things, as a work of in- 
finite wisdom, v/hich is plainly discernible therein, as well as 
almighty power ; therefore he must know all things, for wisdom 
supposes knowledge. Moreover, his being the proprietor of all 
things, results from his having created them, and certainly heJ 
must know his own. 

2. This farther appears, from his governing all things, or 
his ordering the subserviency thereof, to answer some valuable 
ends, and that all should redound to his glory ; therefore both 
the ends and means must be known by him. And as for the 
governing of intelligent creatm-es, this supposes knowledge : as 
the Judge of all, he must be able to discern the cause, or else 
he cannot determine it, and perfectly to know the rules of jus- 
tice, or else he cannot exercise it in the government of the 
world. 

3. If God knows himself, he must know all other things, f9r 
Vol. I, T . 



t4S THE PERFECTIONS OF GOV. 

he that knows the greatest object, must know things of a lesser 
nature ; besides,- it he knows iiimseii, he knows what he can do, 
wih do, or has done, which is as much as to say that he knows 
all things. And that God knows himself, must be granted ; 
for if It be the privilege of an intelligent creature to know him- 
self, chough this knowledge in him be but imperfect, surely 
God must know himself; and because his knowledge cannot 
have any delect, which would be inconsistent with infinite per- 
feccion, therefore he must have a perfect, that is to say, an in- 
finite knowledge of himself, and consequently of all other 
things. 

This knowledge of God, which has the creature for its ob-. 
ject, is distinguished, in scripture, into his comprehending, see- 
ing, or having a perfect intuition of all things, and his approv- 
ing of things, or it is either intuitive or approbative ; the for- 
mer of these ik what we principally understand by this attribute ; 
as when it is said, Knorvn unto "God are all his xvorks^from the 
beginning of the xvorld^ Acts xv. 18. and, thoii knoweat mif 
doxvn-sitting and up-rising^ and art acquainted xvith all mif 
ibaiis ; for there is not a xuordin mij tongiw^ but /c, Lord^ thou 
knoxvest it altogether^ Psal. cx^^xix. 2, 3, 4. and, the Lord search- 
eth all hearts^ and understandeth all the imaginations of the 
thoughts, 1 Chron. xxviii. 9» And as for the other sense of 
God's knowledge, to wit, of approbation, which is less properly 
called knowledge, because it is rather seated in the v?iil than in 
the understanding ; of this we read in several scriptures ; as 
when God tells Moses, I knoxv thee by name. Exod. xxxiii. 12. 
which is explained bv thr following v. ords, A7id thou hast found 
grace in mt/ sight ; so when our Saviour says, concerning his 
enem'xQs, I xvill profess unto you I never knew you, Matth. v'lu 
23. it is not meant of a knowledge of intuition, but approba- 
tion. In the former sense, he knows rji things, bad as well as 
good, that which he hates and will punish, as well as what he 
delights in : in the latter, he only knows that which is good, or 
agreeable to his wilU 

Moreover, God is said to know what he can do, and what 
he hns done, or will do, 

(1.) God knows what he can do, even many things that he 
will not do ; for as tis power ia unlimited, so that he can doin^ 
finitely more than he will, so he knows more than he will do. 
This is very obvious ; for we ourselves, as free agents, can do 
more than we will, and, as intelligent, w^e know in many instan- 
ces, what we can do, though we will never do them : much 
more must this be said of the great God, who calleth. things 
that he not as though they xvere, Rom. iv. 17, so David en- 
quires of God, Will Sard come doxvn ? andxvill the men of Keilah 
dcfr^r ni€ tip into his hand? And God answers him, He xuiU 



THE PERFECTIONS OJF GOB* 14?" 

come doxvn^ dtid th^e men of Keilah xvill deliver thee vp^ 1 Sal\ir 
xxiii. 12. which implies, that God knew what they would have 
done, had not his pixjvidence prevented it. In this respect, 
things known by him are said to be possible, b}' reason ol his 
power, whereas the future existence thcreoi depends on his AvilL 

(2.) God knows whatever he has done, does, or will do, viz* 
things past, present, or to come. That he knows all things pre- 
sent, has been proved, from the dependence of things on his 
providence; and his knowledge being inseparably connected 
"with his power : and that he knows all things that are past, is 
no less evident, for they were once present, and consequently 
known by him; and to suppose that he does not knoM th-.ni, 
is to charge him with forgetlulness, or to suppose that his know- 
ledge at present is less perfect than it was, which is Inconsis- 
tent with infinite perfection. Moreover, if God did not know 
all things past, he could not be the Judge of the world ; and 
particularly, he could neither reward nor punish; both v/hich 
acts respect only things that are past ; therefore such things are 
perfectly known by him. Thus, Avhen Job considered his pre- 
sent afflictions, as the punishment of past sins, he says, Job xiv. 
17. Mij transgression is seeded up in a bag ; thou sexvvst up 
7nine iniquity ; which metaphorical waj' of speaking, implies 
his remembering it : so when God threatens to punish his ad- 
versaries for their iniquity, he speaks of it, as remembered by 
him, laid up in store with him, and sealed vp aynong his trea- 
sures^ Deut. xxxii. 34, Z5. So, on the other hand, when he 
designed to reward, or encourage, the religious duties, perform- 
ed by his people, who feared his name, it is said, a book of re- 
membrance xvas -written before hhn^ for them ^ Mai. iii. 16. 

But that which we shall principally consider, is, God's 
knowing all things future, viz. not only such as are tlie effects 
of necessary causes, where the effect is known in or by the 
cause, but such as are contingent, with respect tons; which is 
the most difficult af all knowledge whatsoever, aiid ai'gues it to 
be truly divine. 

By future contingences, we understand things that are acci^ 
■dental, or, as we commonly sa\', happen by chance, without any 
fore-thought, or design of men. Now that many things happen 
so, with respect to us, and therefore we cannot certainly fore- 
know them, is very obvious ; but even these are foreknov. n by 
(Tod(«) For, 

(a) The Divine knowledge is us undeniable as the Divine e.Mstence, ar.d as cer- 
tain as human knowledge. " He that f()rmo(L the eye doth he not see ? He that 
planted the e:a' iloth he not hear ? He that teueheth man knowledge doth he not 
know ?" liut though human knowledge proves the Divine, as the effect does its 
cause, it by no means follows, that they are simiku-. Our knowledge i)r',nc pally 
••onsists of the images of thu^gs in the mhid, or springs from them; but if the 



148 flJE PERFECTIONS OF GODi 

1. Things that happen M'ithout our design, or fore-thought^ 
and therefore are not certainly foreknown by us, are the objects 
of his providence, and therefore known unto him from the be- 
ginning : thus the fall of a sparroxv to the ground \s a casual 
thing, yet our Saviour says, that this is not without his provi- 
dence, Matth. X. 29. Therefore, 

2. That which is casual, or accidental to us, is not so to him ; 
so that though we cannot have a certain or determinate fo^e» 
knowledge thereof, it does not follow thtt he has not ; since, 

3. He has foretold many such future events, as appears by 
the following instances* 

^-^ — ' — ■• ■ ■ ■■ ■ ' -"- -^ — -^ 

Divine knowledge Avere such, it would result th:;t things were prior to his know- 
ledge, and HO that be is not the Creator of them ; all tilings must tlierefore be the 
representations of his ideas, as an edifice represents the plan of the skilful archi- 
tect On this account our knowledge is superficial, extending only to the exter- 
nal appefj-anccs of thing's ; but their intimate natures are known to him, w1k> 
made them conformed to his original ideas. Our knowledge is circumscribed, 
extending only to the things which ai'e the objects of our senses, or which have 
been described to us ; but the luiiverse, with all its parts, the greatest and the 
smallest things^ are all known to him, who called them into existence, and mould- 
ed them according to his ovni plan. Ovu- knowledge embraces only the things 
which arcj oi' have been ; w.th respect to the future, we can "know nothing, ex- 
cept as he;, upon whom it depends^ siiall reveal it to us ; or as we may draw in- 
ferences from his course df action in former instances. But the Creator knows 
not only the past and the present, but the future. He knows the future, because 
it wholly depends on him ; and nothing can take phice without him, otherwise it 
is independent of God, but this is incompatible with his supremacy. If he know 
not the future, his knowledge is imperfect ; if he is to know hereafter what he 
does not now know, he is increasing in knowledge, this would arg'ue imperfec- 
tion; if his knowledge be imperfect, he is imperfect; and if he be imperfect, he is 
not God.— But all things to come are to be what he designs they shall be; there 
accompanies his knowledge of the future, alsdapurpose, that the thing designed 
shall be effectuated ; and his wisdom and power bein^ infinite guarantee the ac- 
complishment of his purposes. 

To be tlie subjects of foreknowledge, such as has been mentioned, implies the 
absolute certainty of the tilings, or occtUTences, thus foreknown. A failure in 
tiie'tf production, would not less prove imperfection, than a defect of the fore- 
knowledge of them. Contingency belongs not to tlie things in futurity, but to 
the defective knowledge of in^perfect beings, and is always proportional to our 
ignorance. 

That the future is categorically certain with God, appears by the invariable 
succession of effects to their causes in the natural world ; miracles themselves 
may not be exceptions, but would always, it is probable, flow from the same cau- 
ses, which are occult from us. The voluntary actions of moral agents, how un- 
- certain soever to themselves, are also not exceptions from the Divine knowledge 
t!id purposes ; "He doth his will in the army of Heaven, and among the inhabi- 
tants of t!ie earth" ; "'The wrath of man praises him, and the remainder he doth 
restrain." E^•ery prophecy, which has been fidfilled, so far as it was accomplish- 
ed by the voluntary actions of men, proves the certainty of the divine foreknow- 
ledge, tl;e absolute certainty of the then future event, taid that the will of man is 
among the various meansj wliich God is pleased to make use of to accomplish his 
■purposes. 

Tf there be such certainty in God's foreknowledge, and in the events themselves 
in the Kingdom of Providence, we may reasonably expect his conduct will be si- 
•^nilar in the Kingdom of Grace ; and the more especially if man's salvation frorri 
first to last springs from, and is carried on, and accomplished by him. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 149 

(1.) Ahab's death by an arrow, shot at random, may be 
reckoned a contingent event ; yet this was foretold before he 
went into the battle, 1 Kings xxii. 17, 18, 34. and accomphshed 
accordingly. 

(2.) That Israel should be afflicted and oppressed in Egypt, 
and afterwards should be delivered, was foretold four hundred 
years before it canic to pass. Gen* xv. 13, 14. And when Mo- 
ses was sent to deliver them out of the Egyptian bondage, God 
tells him, before-hand, how obstinate Phuraoh would be, and 
with how much difficulty he would be brought to let them go, 
Exod. iii. 19,20. 

(3.) Joseph's advancement in Egypt was a contingent and 
very unlikely event, yet it was made known several years be- 
fore, by his prophetic dream. Gen. xxxvii. 5, ££?c. and after- 
wards, that which tended more immediate!}^ to it, was his fore- 
telling what happened to the chief butler and baker, and the 
seven years of plenty and famine in Egypt, signified by Pha- 
raoh's dream ', all which were contingent events, and were fore- 
told by divine inspiration^ and thereiore foreknown by God. 

(4.) Hazael's coming to the crown of Syria, and the cruelty 
that he would exercise, was foretold to him, when he thought 
he could never be such a monster of a man, as he afterwards 
appeared to be, 2 Kings viii. 12, 13. 

(5.) Judas's betraying our Lord was foretold by him, John 
vi. 70, 71. though, at that time, he seemed as little disposed to 
commit so vile a crime as any of his disciples. 

Thus having considered God's knowledge, with respect to 
the object, either as past, or future, we shall conclude this 
head, by observing some properties, wliereby it appears to be 
superior to all finite knowledge, and truly divine, viz. 

1. It is perfect, intimate, and distinct, and not superficial, or 
confused, or onl)' respecting things in general, as ours often is : 
thus it is said concerning him, that he bringeth out his host btf 
number^ andcalleth them all by names^ Isa. xl. 26. which denotes 
his exquisite knowledge of ail things, as well as propriety in, 
and using them at his pleasure. And since all creatures live 
and move, or act, i7i him^ Acts xvii. 28. or by his powerful in- 
fluence, it follows from hence, that his knowledge is as distinct 
and particular, as the actions themselves, yea, the most indif- 
ferent actions, that are hardly taken notice of by ourselves, such 
as our doxvn-sitting and i/p-rif>ing-^ Psal. cxxxix. 2. and 
every transient thought that is no sooner formed in our minds, 
but forgotten by us, is known by him afar off, at the greatest 
distance of time, when it is irrecoverably lost with i-espect to 
us. That God knows all things thus distinctly, is e\'ident not 
only from their dependence upon him ; but it is said, that when 
he had brought his whole work of creation ^p perfection, He 



ISO ' THE PERrtCTlONS Ot GOD. 

saw every thing that he had made^ and behold it was very gotid^ 
that is, agreeable to his eternal design, or, if we may so express 
it, to the idci, or plat-form, laid in his own mind; and ihis he 
pronounced conctrning every individual thing, which is as 
much the object of his omniscience, as the effect of his power : 
what can be more expressive of the perfection and distinctness 
of his knoM ledge than this t Therefore the apostle might well 
say, that there is not any creature that is not manijest in his 
sight; but ail things are naked^ and opened unto the eyes of hir,i 
7vith whom rue have to do^ Heb. iv. 13. 

2. He knows every thing, even future contingencies, with a 
certain and infallible knowledge, without the least hesitation, or 
possibility of mistake; and therefore, as opinion, or conjecture, 
is opposed to certainty, it is not in the least applicable to him. 
In this his knowledge differs from that of the best of creatures, 
who can only guess at some things that may happen, according 
to the probable fore-views they have thereof. 

3. As to the manner of his knowing all things, it is not in a 
discursive way, agreeable to our common method of reasoning, 
by inferring one thing from another, or by comparing things to- 
geth.,r, and observing- their connexion, dependence, and various 
powers and manner of aciing, and thereby discerning what will 
foiiow ; tor such a knowledge as this is acquired, and presup- 
poses a degree of ignorance : conclusions can hardh be said to 
be known, till the premises, from whence they are deduced, be 
duiv weighed; but this is inconsistent with the knowledge of 
God, who sees all things in himself; things possible in his own 
power, and things future in his will, without inferring, abstract- 
ing, or deducing conclusions from premises, which to do is un- 
becoming him, who is perfect in knowledge. 

4. He knows all things at once, not successively, as we do : 
for if successive duration be an imperfection, (as was before 
observed, when we considered the eternity of God) his knowing 
all things after this manner, is equally so ; and, indeed, this 
would argue an increase of the divine knowledge, or a making 
advances in wisdom, by experience, and daily observation of 
things, which, though applicable to all intelligent creatures, can, 
by no means, be said of him, whose understanding is injinite^ 
Psal. cxlvii. 5. 

We shall now consider what improvement we ought to make 
of God's omniscience, as to what respects our conduct in this 
world. 

Firsty Let us take heed that we do not practically deny this 
attribute. 

1. Bv acting as though we thought that we could hide our- 
selves from the all-seeing eye of God ; let us not say, to use 
the words of Eliphaz, Hotv doth God know ? Can he judge 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD, 151 

through the dark cloud? Thick clouds are a covering to hhn^ 
that he seeth not^ and he walketh in the circuit of heaven^ Job 
xxii. 13, 14. How vain a supposition is this ! since there is no 
darkness, or shadow of deaths where the xvorkers of iniquity maij 
hide themselves^ chap, xxxiv. 22. Hypocrisy is, as it were, an 
attempt to hide ourselves irom God, an acting as though we 
thought that we could deceive or impose on hiiii, which is call- 
ed, in scripture, a lying to him^ Psal. Ixxviii. 36. or, a compass- 
ing him about xvith lies and deceit^ Hos. xi. 12. This all are 
chargeable with, who rest in a form of godliness, as though 
God saw only the outward actions, but not the heart. 

2. By being more afraid of man than God, and venturing to 
commit the vilest abominations, without considering his all-see- 
ing eye, which we would be atraid and ashamed to do, were we 
under the eye of man, as the apostle saith, It is a shame even 
to speak of those things which are done of them in secret^ Eph, 
V. 12. Thus God savs, concerning an apostatizing people of 
old, speaiying to the prophet Ezekiel, Son of man., hast thou seen 
ivhat the ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark., even* 
man in the chambers of his imagery P for they say., The Lord 
seeth us not, the Lord hath forsake?i the earth, Ezek. viii. 12. 

Secondly., The consideration of God's omniscience should be 
improved, to humble us under a sense of sin, but especially of 
secret sins, which are all known to him : thus it is said. Thou 
hast set our iniquities before thee ; our secret sins in the light of 
thy countenance, Psal. xc. 8. and his eyes are upon the zvays of 
man, and he seeth all his goings. Job xxxiv. 21. There are 
man's' things which we know concerning ourselves, that no 
creature is privy to, which occasions self-conviction, and might 
fill us with shame and confusion of face. But this falls infinite- 
Iv short of God's omniscience ; for if our heart condemn iis, 
God istgreater than our heart, and knorveth all things, 1 John 
iii. 20. And this should make sinners tremble at the thoughts 
of a future judgment ; for if sins be not pardoned, he is able to 
bring them to remembrance, and, as he threatens he will do, 
set them in order before their eyes, Psal. 1. 21. 

Thirdly., The due consideration of this divine perfection, 
will, on the other hand, tend very much to the comfort of be- 
lievers : he seeth their secret wants, the breathings of their souls 
after him, and as our Saviour saith. Their Father, 7vhich seeth 
in secret, shall rervard them openly. Matt. vi. 4. With what 
pleasuj-e may they appeal to God, as the searcher of hearts, 
concerning their sincerity', when it is called in question by men. 
And when they are afraid of contracting guilt and defilement, 
by secret faults, which they earnestly desire, with the Psalmist, 
to be cleansed from, Psal. xix. 12. it is some relief to them to 
eon^ider that ppd kngw^ them; and therefor^ is able to gi\ -.^ 



153 JllR P£Rf FACTIONS OF GOD. 

them repentance for them ; so that they may pray with David j 
Search me, God, and hioxo mij heart; try me^ and know my 
thoughts ; and see if there be any wicked xvay in me, and lead me 
in the way everlasting, Psal. cxxxix. 23, 24. Moreover, it is a 
quieting thought, to all who are affected with the church's trou- 
bles, and the deep laid designs of its enemies against it, to con- 
sider that God knows them, and therefore can easily defeat, and 
turn them into foolishness. 

Fourthly, The due consideration of God's omniscience will 
be of great use to all Christians, to promote a right frame of 
spirit in holy duties ; it will make them careful how they be- 
have themselves as being in his sight ; 'and tend to fill them 
with a holy reverence, as those that are under his immediate 
inspection, that they mav approve themselves to him. 

XI. God is most wise, or infinite in wisdom ; or, as the apos- 
tle expresses it, he is the only zvise God, Rom. xvi. 27. This 
perfection considered as absolute, underived, and truly divine, 
belongs only to him ; so that the angels themselves, the most 
excellent order of created beings, are said to be destitute of it, 
or charged with folly. Job iv. 18. For our understanding what 
this divine perfection is, let us consider ; that wisdom contain^ 
in it more than knowledge, for there may be a great degree of 
knowledge, where there is but little wisdom, though there can 
be no wisdom without knowledge : knowledge is, as it were, 
the eye of the soul, whereby it apprehends, or sees, things in a 
true light, and so it is opposed to ignorance, or not knowing 
things ; but wisdom is that whereby the soul is directed in the 
skilful management of things, or in ordering them for the best j 
and this is opposed, not so much to ignorance, or error of judg- 
ment, as to folly, or error in conduct, which is a defect of wis- 
dom ; and it consists more especially in designing the best and 
most valuable end in what we are about to do, in using the 
most proper means to effect it, and in observing the fittest sea- 
son to act, and every circumstance attending it, that is most 
expedient and conducive thereunto i also in foreseeing and 
guarding against every occurrence that may frustrate our de- 
sign, or give us an occasion to blame ourselves for doing what 
we have done,' or repent of it, or to wish we had taken other 
measm-es. Now, that we inay from hence take an estimate of 
the wisdom of God, it appears, 

1 . In the reference, or tendency of all things to his own glo-- 
ly, which is the highest and most excellent end that can be pro- 
posed ; as he is the highest and best of beings, and his glory» 
to which all things are referred, is infinitely excellent. 

Here let us consider, 

(1.) That God is, by reason of his infinite perfection, hatus 
rally and necessarily the object of adoration. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 153 

(2.) He cannot be adored, unless his glory be set forth and 
demonstrated, or made visible. 

(3.) There must be an intelligent creature to behold his glo- 
rv", and adore his perfections, that arc thus demonstrated and 
clispla^'cd. 

(4.) Every thing that he does is fit and designed to lead this 
creature into the knowledge of his glory ,* and that it is so or- 
dered, is an eminent instance of divine wisdom. We need not 
travel far to know this, for wherever we look, we may behold 
how excellent his name is in all the earth : and because some 
are so stupid, that they cannot, or will not, in a way of reason- 
ing, infer his divine perfections from things that ai'e without 
us, therefore he has instamped the knowledge thereof on the 
souls and consciences of men ; so that, at sometimes, they are 
obliged, whether they will or no, to acknoAvledge them. There 
is something which may be known of God^ that is said to be 
inanifest in, and shervn to all ; so that the Gentiles ivho have not 
the laxv, that is, the written word of God, do^ by nature the 
things^ that is, some things, contained therein^ and so are a laxo 
unto themselves^ and shew the work of the laxv written in their 
hearts, Rom. i. 19. chap. ii. 14, 15. And, besides this, he has 
led us farther into the knowledge of his divine perfections by 
his word, which he is said to have magnified above all his name, 
Psal. cxxxvii. 2. therefore having thus adapted his works and 
word, to set forth his glory, he discovers himself to be infinite 
in wisdom. («) 

(«) As knowledge is a fiicultv of which wisdom is the due exercise, the proofs of 
divine wisdom are so many evidencesof the knowledge of God. AVisdom consists 
in the choice of the best ends, and the selection of means most suital)le to attain 
them. The testimonies of the wisdom of (iod must therefore be as nnmcrous and 
various, as the woi'ksof his creation. Tlie mutual relations and subserviency of one 
tiling to another; as the heat of the sun, to produce rain ; twth, to produce vege- 
tation ; and all, to susUiin life ; ensation, respiration, digestion, muscular motion, 
the circulation of tlie fluids, and, still more, intellig'cnce, and above all, the moral 
faculty, or power of distinguishing' good and evil, are unequivocal proofs of the 
wisdom, and consequentl}- of the knowledge, of God. — He that formed the eije, 
(lot/i tie not sec : he that planted the ear, &c. 

Moi-tal artificers are deemed to und(-rstand their own work, though ignorant of 
the formation of the materials and instruments they u.se : but the Creator uses no 
mean or material which lie has not formed. He therefore knows, from the glol>e 
to the particle of dust or fluid, and from the largest living creature to the small- 
est insect. Me has knowledge equally of the other worlds of this s} stem, and 
every system ; of all things in heaven, earth, and hell. 

Our knowledge is conversant about liis works ; he know s all things which are 
known to us, and those things which have not come to our kriow ledge. 

He formed and sustahis the human mind, and knows the thoughts : this is ne- 
cessary to iiim as our Judge. He knows equally all splcitual cieatiurs, and sus- 
tains his holy spirits in holiness. 

Gur knowledge springs from things ; l)ut tilings spring from his purposes : tliev 
are, because he knows them; otherwise they existed before his kiKiwkdge, and 
so independenth' of him. 

Vol. I. ■ U 



i.y4 'IHL PERFECTIONS Of GOD. 

2. The wisdom of God appears, in that whatever he does, 'nr 
m the fittest season, and all the circumstances thereof tend to 
set forth his own honour^ and argue his foresight to be infinite- 
ly perfect :■ so that he can see no reason to wish it had been 
otherwise ordered^, or to repent thereof. For all his ways are 
judgment^ Deut. xxxii.- 4. to every thing there is a season and 
a time^ to every purpose under the heaven; and he hath made 
every thing beautiful in his thne^ Eccl. iii. 1, 11. 

For the larthcr illustrating of this, since wisdom is known 
by its effects, we shall observe some of the traces, or footsteps 
thereof in his works. And, 

(1.) In the work of creation.' As it requires infinite power 
to produce something out of nothing; so the wisdom of God 
appears in that excellent order, beauty, and harmony, that we 
observe in all the parts of the creation ; and in the subservien- 
cy of one thing to another, and the tendency thereof to pro- 
mote the moral governm.ent of God in the world, and the good 
of man, for Avhose sake this lower world was formed, that so 
it might be a convenient habitation for him, and a glorious ob- 
ject, in which he might contemplate, and thereby be led to ad- 
vance the divine perfections, which shine forth therein, as in a 
glass ; so that we have the highest reason to say, Lord^ hoxa 
manifold are thy works; in xvisdom hast thou made them all^ 
Psal. civ. 24. He hatk made the earth by his power ; he hath 
established the world by his -wisdom^ and hath stretched out the 
heavens by his discretion^ Jer. x. 1^. But since this argument 
hath been insisted on, with great ingenuity, and strength of" 
reason by others,* we shall add no more on that subject, but 
proceed to consider, 

* See JRay's Wisdom of God in the IVovks of Creatiwi, wul Derhaiii^s Phi/sico- 
Theolog-^y. See also Fenelon, Newenlyle, Paley, ur.d Adams's Philosophy. 



We know but the external appearances, he the intimate nature of thing's. We 
inquire into th^ properties of things by our senses, by comparing them, by analiz-' 
ing-^Sic: but nothing' possesses a property which he did not purpose and give ; 
otherwise his hands have wrought more than he intended. We look up through 
effects unto their causes : he looks down through intermediate causes, and sees 
them all to be effects from hi.Ti. 

We arc furni;;hed with memories to bring up ideas, being only able to contem- 
plate a part at a time ; but his comprehension embraces all thing.s. 

He never changes ; his purposes of tlie future embrace eternity : all things that 
are really future are certain, because his purposes cannot fail of accomplishment. 
But all futiu'e things to us are contingent, excep'. as iie has revealed their cer- 
taint)-. That tjie future is knowit to him, also appears by the accomplishment ot 
every prophecy. 

But man's sin receives hereby no apology. He gives the brutal creation the ca- 
"pacity of deriving- ])leasure from gratification of sen.se, and provides for such ajj- 
petites. lie ofters to man, pleasiu'es whicli are intellectual : he has tendered him 
the means, and requires man to seek his spiritual h.'ppiness in God. Wlien he rc- 
tiises and withholds his return of service from <iod, man is alone to blame. And 
llie move n'Biveroas and powerful the molivcs which he resists, the gu ill is the 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 15$ 

(2.) The wisdom of God, as appearing in the works of pro- 
vidence, in bringing about unexpected events for the good of 
mankind, and that by means that seem to have no tendency 
thereto, but rather the contrary ; this will appear in the follow- 
ing instances. As, 

l.s?, Jacob's flying from his father's house, was wisely or- 
dered, as a means not only for his escaping the fury of liis bro 
ther, and the trial of his faith, and to humble him for the sin 
ful method he took to obtain the blessing ; but also for the 
building up his familv, and encreasing his substance in the 
world, under a very unjust father-in-law and master, such as 
Laban was. 

2<//«/, Joseph's being sold into Egypt, was ordered, as a means 
of his preserving not only that land, but his father's house, from 
perishing by famine ; his imprisonment was the occasion of his 
advancement. And all this led the way to the accomplishment 
of what God had foretold relating to his people's dwelling in 
Egypt, and their wonderful deliverance from the bondage they 
were to endure therein. 

3<//£/, The wisdom of God was seen in the manner of Israelis 
deliverance out of Egypt, in that he first laid them under the 
greatest discouragements, by suffering the Egyptians to increase 
their tasks and burdens ; hardening Pharaoh's heart, that he 
might try his people's faith, and make their deliverance appear 
more remarkable ; and then plaguing the Egyptians, that he 
might punish their pride, injustice, and cruelty; and, at last^ 
giving them up to such an infatuation, as effectually procured 
their final overthrow, and his people's safety. 

Afthlif^ In leading Israel forty years in the wilderness, before 
he brought them into the promised land, that he might give therr> 
statutes and ordinances, and that they might experience various 
instances of his presence among them, by judgments and mer- 
cies, and so be prepared for all the privileges he designed for 
them, as his peculiar people, in the land of Canaan- 

Sthlif^ We have a very wonderful instance of the wisdom of 
■providence in the book of Esther; when IJaman, the enemy of 
the Jews, had obtained a decree for their desti'uction, and Mor- 
decai was first to be sacrificed to his pride and revenge, provi- 
dence turned whatever he intended agahist him, upon himself. 
There was something very remarkable in all the circumstan-r 
ces that led to it, by which the church's deliverance and ad 
vancement was brought about ; when, to an eye of reason, it 
seemed almost impossible. 

(3.) The wisdom of God appears yet more eminently, in the 



gi"eater. The divine forekno\vled}»e of this is no excuse for m:in. Wlitn the Lord 
overpowers man's evil with good, the glory of man's salvation belongs to flod. 



156 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

work of our redemption ; this is that which the angels da^'ire to 
look into^ and cannot behold without the greatest admiration ; 
for herem God's manifold wisdom is displayed, 1 Pet. i. 12. 
Eph. iii. 10. This solves the difficulty, contained in a former 
dispensation of providence, respecting God's sutFering sin to 
enter into the work), which he could have prevented, and pro- 
bably >vould Jiave done, had he not designed to over-rule it, 
for the bringing about the work of our redemption by Christ ; 
so that what we lost in our first head, should be recovered 
with great advantage in our second, the Lord from heaven. 

But though tliis matter was determined in the eternal cove- 
nant, betwfcn tiie Fadier and the Son, and the necessity of 
man seemed to require that Christ should be immediately in- 
carnate, as soon as man fell, yet it was deferred till inany ages 
after ; and herein the wisdom of God eminently appeared. For, 

\st^ God hereby tried the faith and patience of his chuixh, 
' and put them upon waiting for, and depending on him, who 
was to come ; so that though they had not received this pro- 
mised blessing, yet thty saxv it afar off; rvere ■permaded of and 
embraced it^ and, with Abraham^ rejoiced to see his day^ though 
at a great distance, Heb. xi. 13. John viii. 56. and hereby they 
glorified the faithfulness of God, and depended on his word, 
that the work of redemption should be brought about, as cer- 
tainly, as though it had been actually accomplished. 

2dly^ Our Saviour, in the mean time took occasion to dis- 
play his own glory, as the Lord, and Governor of his church, 
even before his incarnation, to whom he often appeared in a 
human form, assumed tor that purpose, as a prelibation there- 
of; so that they had the greatest reason, from hence, to expect 
his coming in our nature. 

Srdly^ The time of Christ's coming in the flesh, was such 
as appeared most seasonable ; when the state of the church was 
very low, religion almost lost amon^- thein, and the darkness 
they were under, exceeding great; which made it very neces- 
sary that the Messiah should come : when iniquity almost uni- 
versally prevailed among them, then the deliverer must come 
out of Sion^ and turn axvai^ ungodliness from facob^ Rom. xi. 
26. and when the darkness of the night was greatest, it was the 
most proper time for the Sun of Righteousness to arise with 
healing in his zvings^ Mai. iv. 2. compared with Matt. iv. 16. 

(4.) The M-isdom of God farther appears in the various 
methods he has taken in the government of his church, before 
and since the coming of Christ. For, 

Ist^ God at first, as has been before observed,] left his church 
without a written word, till Moses's time, that he might take 
occasion to converse with them more immediately, as an in- 

■\ .See Pag-o 46. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 1.57 

Stance of infinite condescension ; and to shew them, that though 
they had no such method of knowing his revealed will as -we 
have, yet that he could communicate his mind to them another 
way ; and, when the necessity of affairs required it, then his 
wisdom was seen in taking this method to propagate religion 
in the world. 

2dly^ When God designed to govern his church by those 
rules, which he hath laid down in scripture, he revealed the 
great doctrines contained therein, in a gradual way ; so that the 
dispensation of his providence towards them, was like the light 
of the morning, increasing to a perfect day : he first instructed 
them by various types and shado^\'s, leading them into the 
knowledge of the gospel, which was afterwards to be more 
clearly revealed : he taught them, as they were able to bear it, 
like children growing in knowledge, till they arrive to a per- 
fect manhood : he first gave them grounds to expect the bless- 
ings vv'hich he would bestow in afler-ages, by the manifold pre- 
dictions thereof; and afterwards glorified his faithfulness iri 
their accomplishment. 

3(f/i/, He sometimes governed them in a more immediate' 
way, and confirmed their faith, as was then necessary, by mi- 
racles ; and also raised up prophets, as occasion served, whona 
he furnished, in an extraordinary way, for the service to vvhich 
he called them, to lead his church into the knowledge of those 
truths, on which their faith was built. 

And, to this we may add, that he gave them various other 
helps for their faith, by those common and ordinary means ot 
grace, which they were favoured with, and which the gospel 
church now enjoys, and has ground to conclude that they will 
be continued until Christ's second coming. Here we might take 
occasion to consider how the wisdom of God appears in fur- 
nishing his church with a gospel-ministry, and how the manage- 
ment thereof is adapted to the necessities of his people ; in em- 
ploying such about this work, who are duly qualified for it, 
assisting them in the discharge thereof, and succeeding their 
humble endeavours ; and all this in such a way, as that the 
praise shall redound to himself, who builds his house, and bears 
the glory ; but this we may have occasion to insist on in a fol- 
lowing part of this work."* 

(5.) The wisdom of God appears in the method he takes to 
preserve, propagate, and build up his church in the world. 
Therefore, 

\st^ As his kingdom is not of this world, but of a spiritual 
nature, so he hath ordered that it shall not be jiromoted by those 
• methods of violence, or carnal polic}', bv which the seculai- in- 
terests of men are oft-times athanced. He has no where ap- 
* See Quest, clvi. aiid clvii. 



158 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

pointed that wars should be proclaimed to propagate the faith, 
or that persons should be forced to embrace it against their 
wills, or be listed under Christ's banner, by bribery, or a pros- 
pect of worldly advantage ; therefore all the success the gospel 
has had, which is worthy to be called success, has been such 
as is agreeable to the spirituality of Christ's kingdom ; thus his 
house is to be built, 7iot by mighty nor by power^ but by his 
Spirit^ Zech. iv. 6. 

2i//«/, That the church should flourish under persecution, and 
those methods which its enemies take to ruin it, should be over- 
ruled, to its greater advantage ; and that hereby shame and dis- 
appointment should attend every weapon that is formed against 
Sion, as being without success ; and that the church should ap- 
pear more eminently to be the care of God, when it meets with 
the most injurious treatment from men, is a plain proof of the 
glory of this attribute : and, on the other hand, that its flourish- 
ing state, as to outward things, should not be always attended 
with the like marks or evidences of the divine favour, in what 
more immediately respects salvation, is an instance of the di- 
vine wisdom, as God hereby puts his people on setting the 
highest value on those things that are most excellent; and not 
to reckon themselves most happy in the enjo}^ment of the good 
things of this life, when they are destitute of his special pre- 
sence with them. 

odly^ The preserving the rising generation from the vile 
abominations that there are in the world, especially the seed of 
believers, and calling many of them by his grace, that so there 
may be a constant reserve of those, who may be added to his 
church, as others, who have served their generation, are called 
out of it, which is a necessary expedient for the preserving his 
interest in the world : in this the wisdom of God is eminently 
glorified, as well as his other perfections. 

From what has been said concerning the wisdom of God, 
we may infer, 

1. That none can be said to meditate aright on the works 
of God, such as creation, providence, or redemption, who do 
not behold and admire his manifold wisdom displayed therein, 
as well as his other perfections. As we conclude him a very 
unskilful observer of a curious picture or statue, who only takes 
notice of its dimensions in general, or the matter of which it is 
composed, without considering the symmetry and proportion 
of all the parts thereof, and those other excellencies, by which 
the artist has signalized his skill; so it is below a Christian to 
be able only to say, that there are such works done in the 
world, or to have a general idea of its being governed by pro- 
vidence, without having his thoughts suitably affected with th^^^' 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 159 

harmonious subsen'iency of things, and the design of all to set 
forth the glory of him, who is a God of infinite wisdom. 

2. li' we cannot understand the meaning of some particular 
dispensations of providence, so as to admire the wisdom of 
God therein, let us compare all the parts of providence to- 
gether, and one will illustrate and add a beauty to another, as 
our Saviour says to Peter, What I do thou knoxvest not noxi\ 
but thou shalt knoiv hereafter^ John xiii. 7. therefore let us com- 
pare the various dark dispensations, which the church of God 
is under at one time, with the glory that shall be put upon it 
at another. 

3. From the displays of the wisdom of God in all his works, 
let us learn humility, under a sense of our own folly : thus the 
Psalmist takes occasion to express his low thoughts of man- 
kind in general, and says, What is man^ that thou art mindful of 
him ? when he had been meditating on the glory of some; 
other parts of his creation, which he calls, The -work of his fin- 
gers^ Psal. viii. 3, 4. that is, creatures, in which his wisdom is 
displayed in a very eminent degree. But, besides this, w^e may 
take occasion to have a humble sense of our own folly; that is, 
our defect of wisdom ; since it is but a little of God that is 
known by us, and the wonderful effects of divine wisdom ai-e 
known but in part by us, who dwell in houses of clay. 

4. Let us subject our understandings to God, and have a 
high veneration for his word, in which his wisdom is displayed, 
which he has ordained, as the means whereby we may be made 
wise unto salvation ; and whatever incomprehensible mysteries 
we find contained therein, let us not reject or despise them be- 
cause we cannot comprehend them. 

5. Since God is infinite in wisdom, let us seek wisdom of 
him, according to the apostle's advice. If any of you lack wis- 
fifo?n, let him ask it of God^ that giveth to all men liberally^ and 
upbraideth not ; and it shall be given him^ James i. 5. 

XII. God is most holy, or infinite in holiness, which is es- 
sential to him : thus he is often styled, The Holy One of Israel^ 
Isa. i. 4. and this attribute is thrice repeated by the seraphim, 
■who, with the utmost reverence and adoration, cried^ one unto 
another^ Holy^ holy^ holy^ is the Lord of hosts^ chap. vi. 3. And 
he is said to be holy, exclusively of all others, as this is a di- 
vine perfection, and as he is infinitely and independently so, 
Lord, thou only art holy. Rev. xv. 4. and the reason of this 
is assigned, to wit, because he is the only God ; holiness is his 
very nature and essence ; There is none holy as the Lord, for 
there is none besides hi??:, 1 Sam. ii. 2. In considering this di- 
vine perfection, we shall enquire, 

1. What we are to understand by it. Holiness is that where- 
fSy he is infinitely opposite to every thing that tends to reflect 



160 THE pj:rfections of god. 

dishonour, or reproach, on his divine perfections ; and espe- 
cially as he is infinitely opposite in his nature, will, and works, 
to all moral impurity ; as his power is opposed to ail natural 
weakness, his wisdom to the least defect of understanding or 
folly, so his holiness is opposed to all moral blemishes, or im- 
perfections, which we call sin ; so that it is not so much one 
single perfection, as the harmony of all his perfections, as they 
are opposed to sin ; and therefore it is called, The beauty of 
the Lord, Psal. xxvii. 4. and when the Psalmist pravs that the 
church may be made and dealt with as an holy people, he says, 
Let the beauty of the Lord our God be upon us, Psal. xc. 17. It 
is that which, ii we may so express it, adds a lustre to all his 
other perfections ; so that if he were not glorious in holiness, 
whatever else might be said of him, would tend rather to his 
dishonour than his glory, and the beauty of his perfections 
would be so sullied that they could not be called divine : as 
holiness is the brightest part of the image of God in man, 
without which nothing could be mentioned concerning him, 
but what turns to his reproach, his wisdom would deserve no 
better a name than that of subtilty, his power destructive and 
injurious, his zeal furious madness ; so if we separate holiness 
from the divine nature, all other excellencies would be inglori- 
ous, because impure. 

2. We proceed to consider the holiness of God, as glorified 
<>r demonstrated in various instances. 

(1.) In his works. This perfection was as eminently display- 
ed in the work of creation, especially that of angels and men, 
as his power, wisdom, and goodness ; for he made them with a 
perfect rectitude of nature, without the least spot or propensity 
to sin, and with a power to retain it ; so that there was no natu- 
ral necessity laid on them to sin, which might infer God to be 
the author of it : and furthermore, as a moral expedient to pre- 
vent it, as well as to assert his own sovereignty, he gave them 
a law, which was holy, as well as just and good, and warned 
them of those dreadful consequences that would ensue on the 
\'iolation thereof; as it would render them unholy, deprive them 
of his image, and consequentl)- separate them from him, and 
render them the objects of his abhorrence ; and, to this we ma}- 
add, that his end in making all other things was, that his intel- 
ligent creatures might actively glorify him, and be induced to 
holiness. 

(2.) This divine perfection appears likewise in the govern- 
ment of the world, and of the church, in all the dispensations 
of his providence, either in a wav of judgment, or of mercy; 
therefore he shews his displeasure against nothing but sin, 
which is the only thing that renders creatures the objects ol 
punishment, and all the blessings he bestows are a motive to 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 16t 

holiness. As for his people, whom he hath the greatest regard 
to, they are described, as called to be saints^ 1 Cor. i, 2, and it 
is said of the church of Israel, that it was holiness unto the 
Lord^ Jer. ii. 3. and all his ordinances arc holy, and to be en- 
gaged in with such a frame of spirit, as is agreeable thereunto : 
thus he says, I -will be sanctijied in them that come nig'h we, 
Lev. X. 3. and holiness becometh his house for ever^ Psal. xciii» 
5. In like manner, we are to take an estimate of the succes:} 
thereof, when, through the divine blessing accompanving them, 
they tend to promote internal holiness in those who are en* 
gaged therein, whereby they are distinguished from the rest of 
the world, and sanctijied by his truth^ John xvii. 17. 

Object, It may be objected by some, that God's suffering sin 
to enter into the world, which he might have prevented, was a 
reflection cast on his holiness. 

Ans7v. It must be allowed, that God might have prevented 
the first entrance of sin into the worl^, by his immediate inter- 
posure, and so have kept man upright, as M^ell as made him so j 
yet let it be considered, that he v/as not obliged to do this ; and 
therefore might, without any reflection on his holiness, leave an 
innocent creature to the conduct of his own free-will, which 
might be tempted, but not forced, to sin, especially since he de- 
signed to over-rule the event hereof, for the setting forth the 
glory of all his perfections, and, in an eminent degree, that of 
his holiness ; but this will more particularly be considered un- 
der some following answers.* 

From what has been said concerning the holiness of God, let 
us take occasion to behold and admire the beauty and glory 
thereof, in all the divine dispensations, as he can neither do, 
nor enjoin any thing but what sets forth his infinite purity ; 
therefore, 

1. As he cannot be the author of sin, so Vv^e must take heed 
that we do not advance any doctrines from whence this conse- 
quence may be inferred ; this ought to be the standard by which 
they are to be tried, as we shall take occasion to observe in 
several instances, and think ourselves as much concerned to ad- 
vance the glory of this perfection, as of any other : notwith- 
standing it is one thing for persons to militate against what ap^ 
pears to be a truth, by alleging this popular objectiou, that it 
is contrary to the holiness of God, and another thing to sup- 
port the charge ; this will be particularly considered, when 
such-like objections, Ijrought against the doctrine of predesti- 
nation, and several other doctrines, are ansvv^ered in their pro- 
per place. 

2. It is an excellency, beauty, and glory, in the Christian re- 
ligion, which should make us more in love with, it, that it leads 

' Quest, xvl. xvH. x.iri. a?ul J\r- 

Vol. I. X ' 



162 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

to holiness, which was the image of God in man. All other 
religions have indulged, led to, or dispensed with many impu- 
rities, as may be observed in those of the Mahometans and 
Pagans ; and the different religions, professed b)' them Avho are 
called Christians, are to be judged more or less vaUiable, and 
accordingly to be embraced or rejected, as they tend more or 
less to promote holiness. And here I cannot but observe, that 
it is a singular excellency of the Protestant religion above the 
Popish, that all its doctrines and precepts have a tendency 
thereunto ; whereas the other admits of, dispenses with, and 
gives countenance to manifold impurities ; as will appear, if 
we consider some of the doctrines held by them, which lead to 
licentiousness. As, 

(1.) That some sins are, in their own nature, so small, that 
they do not deserve eternal punishment, and therefore that sa- 
tisfaction is to be made for them, by undergoing some penan- 
ces enjoined them by the priest; upon which condition, he gives 
them absolurion, and so discharges them from anv farther con- 
cern about them ; which is certainlv subversive of holiness, as 
well as contrary to scripture, which savs. The wages of sin is 
deaths Rom. vi. 23. the word of God knows no distinction be- 
tween mortal and venial sins, especially in the sense which they 
give thereof. 

(2.) The doctrine of indulgences and dispensations to sin, 
given forth at a certain rate. This was a great matter of offence 
to those who took occasion, for it, among other reasons, to 
separate from them in the beginning of the reformation, where- 
by they gave glory to the holiness of God, in expressing a just 
indignation against such vile practices. It is true the Papists 
allege, in defence thereof, that it is done in compassion to those, 
^v•hose natural temj^er leads them, with impetuous violence, to 
those sins, which they dispense with ; and that this is, in some 
respects, necessary, in as much as the temptations of some, ari- 
sing from their condition in the world, are greater than what 
others are liable to. But none of these things will exempt a 
a person from the guilt of sin, much less warrant the practice 
of those, who hereby encourage them to commit it. 

(3.) Another doctrine maintained by them is, that the law of 
God, as conformed to human laws, respects only outward, or 
overt-acts, as they are generally called, and not the heart, or 
principle, from ^^ hence they proceed ; and therefore that con- 
cupiscence, or the corruption of nature, which is the impure 
fountain, from v>' hence all sins proceed, comes not under the 
cognisance of the divine law, nor exposes us to any degree of 
punishment ; and that either because they suppose it unavoida- 
ble, or else because every sin is an act, and not a habit, the 
off-spring, or effect of lust, which, when (as they pervert the 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOl). 163 

words of the apostle) it has coiiceived^ brings forth sin ; and 
siHy xvheJi it is finished^ bringeth'forth death^ James i. 15. where- 
as the spring of defiled actions is, in reality, more corrupt and 
abominable than the actions themselves, how much soever ac- 
tual sins may be supposed to be more scandalous and pernicious 
to the world, as they are more visible ; if the fruit be corrupt, 
the tree that brings forth must be much more so ; and though 
this is not so discernible by others, yet it is abhorred and pun- 
ished by a jealous God, who searches the heart and the reins; 
therefore this doctrine is contrary to his holiness. 

(4.) The merit of good works, and our justification thereby, 
is a reflection on this divine perfection ;, as it makes way tor 
boasting, and is inconsistent with that humility, which is the 
main ingredient in holiness ; and casts the highest reflection on 
Christ's satisfaction, which is the greatest expedient for the set- 
ting foith the holiness of God, as it argues it not to have been 
absolutely necessary, and substitutes our imperfect works in 
the room thereof. , 

(5.) Another doctrine, which is contrary to the holiness of 
God, is that of purgatory, and prayers for the dead, which they 
are as tenacious of, as Demetrius, and his fellow-craftsmen, 
v/ere of the image of Diana, at Ephesus, the destruction where- 
of would endanger their craft, Acts xix. 25, 27. so, if this doc- 
trine should be disregarded, it would bring no small detriment 
to them. But that which renders it most abominable, is, that 
it extenuates the demerit of sin, and supposes it possible for 
others to do that for them by their prayers, which they neglect- 
ed to do whilst they were alive, who, from this presumptuous 
supposition, did not see an absolute necessity of holiness to sal- 
vation. These, and many other doctrines, which might have 
been mentioned, cast the highest reflection on the holiness of 
God, and not only evince the justice and necessity of the refor- 
mation, but oblige, us to maintain the contrary doctrines. 

If it be objected, by way of reprisal, that there are many doc- 
trines, which we maintain, that lead to licentiousness, I hope 
we shall be able to exculpate ourselves ; but this we reserve for 
its proper place, that we may avoid the repetition of things, 
which we shall be obliged to insist on elsewhere. 

3. Let us not practically deny, or cast contempt on this di- 
vine perfection ; which we may be said to do. 

(1.) When we live without God in the world, as though we 
were under no obligation to holiness. I'he purity of the divine 
nature is proposed in scripture, not only as a motive, but, so fur 
as conformity to it is possible, as an exemplar of holiness : and 
therefore we are exhorted to be holv, not onlv because he is 
holy^ but as he is holy^ 1 Pet. i. 15, 16. or so far as the image 
of 'God in man consists therein : therefore thev who live with- 



it)4- TII£ PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

out God in the Avorld, being alienated from his /ijc, \iz.Jii8 ho- 
liness^ and g-ivin^ themselves over unto lascivionsness, to work 
all uncleanness ivHh greediness^ regard not the holiness of his 
nature or law. These sin presumptuously, and accordingly, are 
Slid to reproach the Lord^ Numb. xv. 30. as though he was a 
God that had pleasure in wickedness ; or if they conclude him 
to be infinitely offended with it, thev regard not the conse- 
quence of being the objects of his displeasure, and fieiy indig- 
nation. 

(2.) Men reflect on the holiness of God when they complain 
6f religion, as though it were too strict and severe a thing ; a 
yoke that sits very uneasy upon them, which they resolve to 
keep at the greatest distance from, especially unless they may 
have some abatements made, or indulgence given, to live in the" 
commission of some beloved lusts. These cannot bear a faith- 
ful reprover : thus Ahab hated Alicaiah, because he did not pro- 
phesy good concerning hirn^ but evil ; and the people did not 
like to hear of the holiness of God ; thei-efore they desire that 
the prophets would cause the Holy One of Israel to cease before 
them^ Isa. xxx. 11. and to this we mav add, 

(3.) They do, in effect, deny or despise this attribute, who 
entertain an enmity or prejudice against holiness in others, 
whose conversation is not only blamt less, but exemplary ; such 
make use of the word saint, as a term of reproach, as though 
holiness were not only a worthless thing, but a blemish or dis- 
paragement to the nature of man, a stain on his character, and 
to be avoided by all who have any regard to their reputation^ 
or, at least as though religion were no other than hypocrisy, and 
much more so, when it shines brightest in the conversation of 
those wIk) esteem it their greatest ornament. What is this, but 
to spurn at the holiness of God, by endeavouring to bring that 
into contempt, which is his image and delight ? 

XIII. God is most just. This attribute differs but little 
from that of holiness, though sometinves they are thus distin- 
guished ; as holiness is the contrariety, or opposition of his na- 
ture to sin, justice is an eternal and visible display thereof ; and, 
in particular, when God is said to be just, he is considered as 
the governor of the world ; and therefore when he appears in 
the glory of his justice,, he bears the character of a judge ; ac- 
cordingly it is said concerning him, Shall not the Judge of all 
the earth do right? Gen. xviiu 25. and he is said, without re- 
spect cf persons^ to judge according to every 7nan'^s ivork^ 1 Pet. 
i. 17. Now the justice of God is sometimes taken for his faith- 
fulness, M-hich is a doing justice to his word; but this will be 
•more particularlv considered, when we speak of him as abun- 
dant in truth. But, according to the most common and known 
sense of the word, it is taken either for his disposing, or his dis- 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 165 

ti'ibutlve justice ; the former is that whereby his holiness shines 
forth in all the dispensations of his providence, as all his ways 
are equal, of what kind soever they be ; the latter, to wit, his 
distributive justice, consists either in rewarding or punishing, 
and so is styled either remunerative or vindictive ; in these two 
respects, we shall more particularly consider this attribute. 

1. The justice of God, as giving rewards to his creatures ; 
this he may be said to do, without supposing the persons, who 
are the subjects thereof, to have done any thing by which they 
have merited them : we often find, in scripture, that the hea- 
venly glory is set forth as a reward. Mat. x. 41, 42. and 1 Cor. 
iii. 14. and it is called, a crown of righteousness^ which the Lord^ 
the righteous judge ^ shall give at that day^ 2 Tim. iv. 8. to wit, 
when he appears, in the glory of his justice, to judge the world 
in righteousness ; and it is also said, that it is a righteous thing 
xvith God to recompense to his people who are troubled^ rest^ 
when the Lord shall be revealed from heaven^ 2 Thess. i. 6. 7. 
But, for the understanding such like expressions, I humbly con- 
ceive, that they import the necessary and inseparable connex- 
ion that there is between grace wrought in us, and glory con- 
ferred upon us : it is called, indeed, a reward, or a crown of 
righteousness, to encourage us to duty ; but, without supposing 
that, what we do has any thing meritorious in it. If we our- 
selves are less than the least of all God's mercies, then the best 
actions put forth by us must be so, for the action cannot have 
more honour ascribed to it than the agent ; or if, as our Saviour 
says, when 7i>e have done all, we ?nust say, xue are improfitable 
servants, Luke xvii. 10. and that sincerely, and not in a way of 
compliment, as some Popish writers understand it, consistently 
with their doctrine of the merit of good works, we must con- 
clude that it is a reward not of debt, but of grace ; and therefore 
the word is taken in a less proper sense. It is not a bestowing 
a blessing purchased by us, but for us ; Christ is the purchaser, 
we are the receivers ; it is strictly and properly the reward of 
his merit, but, in its application, the gift of his grace. 

2. There is his vindictive justice, whereby he punishes sin, 
as im injury offered to his divine perfections, an affront to his 
sovereignty, a reflection on his holiness, and a violation of his 
law, for which he demands satisfaction, and inflicts punishment, 
proportioned to the nature of the crime, which he continues to 
do, till satisfaction be given : this is called, his visiting iniquity, 
Deut. V. 9. or visiting for it, Jer. v. 0. and it is also called, his 
setting his face against a person, and cutting him ojffro.n 
amongst his people. Lev. xvii. 10. and when he does this, his 
wrath is compared to flames of fire ; it is called. The f re of his 
jealousy, Zeph. i. 18. and they, who are the objects hereof, arr 



166 THE PERFF.CTIONS OF GOD. 

soxd to fall into the hands of the living God^ who is a coyisiiming' 
fre^ Heb. X. 31. compared with chap. xii. 29. 

But that we may farther consider how God glorifies this per- 
fection, and thereby shews his infinite h3,tred of sin, we may ob- 
serve, 

(1.) An eminent instance thereof in his inflicting that pun- 
ishment that was due to our sins, on the person of Christ our 
Surety. It was, indeed, the highest act of condescending grace 
that he was willing to be charged with, or to have the iniquity 
of his people laid upon him ; but it was the greatest display of 
vindictive justice, that he was accordingly punished for it, as 
he is said to be made sin for us^ Tvho knew no sin^ 2 Cor. v. 21. 
and accordingly God gives a commission to the sword of his 
justice, to awake and exert itself, in an uncommon manner, 
against him, the man his fellozv, Zech. xiii. 7. In this instance, 
satisfaction is not only demanded, but fully given, in which it 
differs from all the other displays of vindictive justice ; but of 
this, more wnll be considered under some following answers.* 

(2.) The vindictive justice of God punishes sin in the per- 
sons of finally impenitent sinners in hell, where a demand of 
satisfaction is perpetually made, but can never be given, which 
is the reason of the eternity of the punishment inflicted, which 
is called, everlastirig destruction^ from the presence of the Lord^ 
and from the glory of his power ^ 2 Thes. i. 9. this we shall also 
have occasion to insist on more largely, under a following an- 
answer.f 

In these two instances, punishment is taken in a strict and 
proper sense : but there is, indeed, another sense, in which ma- 
ny evils are inflicted for sins committed, which, though fre- 
quently called punishments, yet the word is taken in a less pro- 
per sense, to wit, when believers, who are justified upon the 
account of the satisfaction which Christ has given for their 
sins, are said to be punished for them; as when it is said, 
Thoit^ our God^ hast punished us less than our ifiiquities de- 
serve^ Ezra ix. 13. and if his children forsake my law^ and keep 
not my czunmandments^ then will I visit their transgression 
roith the rod, and their iniquity zvith stripes; nevertheless, my 
loving kindness xvill I not utterly take from him, Psal. Ixxxix. 
30, — ^31. and the prophet, speaking of some, for whom God 
would execute judgment, and be favourable to them in the end, 
so that they should behold his righteousness ; yet he represents 
them, as bearing the indignatio7i of the Lord, because they had 
sinned against him, Micah vii. 9. And, as these evils are ex- 
ceedingly afflictive, being oftentimes attended with a sad ap- 
prehension and fear of the wrath of God ; so they are called 

* T/if Qiir':'. .rliv. andlxxi. ■\ Quest. xxix. and Ixxix. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 167 

punishments, because sin is the cause of them : yet they differ 
from punishment in its most proper sense, as but now mention- 
ed, in that, though justice inflicts evils on them for sin, yet it 
doth not herein demand satisfaction, for that is supposed to 
have been given, inasmuch as they are considered as justified; 
and, to speak with reverence, it is not agreeable to the nature 
of justice to demand satisfaction twice. Nevertheless, it is one 
thing for God really to demand it, and another thing for be- 
lievers to apprehend or conclude that such a demand is made ; 
this they may often do, as questioning whether they are believ- 
ers, or in a justified state : however, God's design, in these af- 
flictive dispensations, is to humble them greatly, and shew them 
the demerit of sin, whatever he determines shall be the conse- 
quence thereof. 

Moreover, the persons, who are the subjects of this punisli- 
ment, are considered not as enemies, but as children, and there- 
fore the objects of his love, at the same time that his hand is 
heavy upon them ; for which reason some ha\e called them cas- 
tigatory punishments, agreeably to what the apostle saith. Whom 
the Lord loveth he chasteneth ; and that herein he dealcih xv'ith 
them as xvith so7is^ Heb. xii. 6, 7. 

From what has been said, concerning the justice of God in 
rewarding or punishing, we may infer, 

1. Since the heavenly blessedness is called a reward, to de- 
note its connexion with grace and duty, let no one presumptu- 
ously expect one without the other : the crown is not to be put 
upon the head of any one, but him that runs the Christian 
race ; and it is a certain truth, that xvithout holiness no nuni 
shall see the Lord^ chap. xii. 14. 

And, on the other hand, as this is a reward of grace, found- 
ed on Christ's purchase, let us take heed that we do not as- 
cribe that to our performances, which is wholly founded on 
Christ's merit. Let every thing that may be reckoned a spur 
to diligence, in the idea of a reward, be apprehended and im- 
proved by us, to quicken and excite us to duty ; but whatever 
there is of praise and glory therein, let that be ascribed to 
Christ ; so that when we consider the heavenly blessedness in 
this view, let us say, as the angels, together v/ith that blessed 
company who are joined with them, are represented, speaking, 
Worthy is the Lamb that xvas slain^ to receive poxver^ riches^ 
xvisdom^ and strength^ and honour^ and glorii^ and blessings Re^ . 
v. 12. It is the price that he jiaid which gives it the character 
of a reward and therefore the glory of it is to be ascribed to 
him. 

2. From what has been said concerning the vindictive jus- 
, tice of God inflicting punishments on his enemies, let us learn 



168 rH£ PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

the evil and heinous nature of sin, and so take warning thereby, 
that we may not expose ourselves to the same or like judg- 
ments. How deplorable is the condition of those, who have 
contracted a debt for which they can never satisfy ! who are 
said, to drink of the xvratli of the Almighty ^rvhich is poured out,, 
•without mixture^ into the cup of his indignation^ Job xxi. 20. 
compared with Rev. xiv. 10. This should induce us to fly 
from the wrath to come, and to make a right improvement of 
the price of redemption which was given by Christ, to deliver 
his people from it. 

3. Believers, who are delivered from the vindictive justice 
of God, have the highest reason for thankfulness ; and it is a 
very great encouragement to them, under all the afflictive evils, 
which they endure, that the most bitter ingredients are taken 
out of them. It is true, they are not in themselves joyous^ but 
grievous ; nevertheless^ aftenvards they yield the peaceable fruit 
of righteousness to them^ who are exercised thereby^ Heb. xii. 
11. and let us not presume without ground, but give diligence, 
that we may conclude that these are the dispensations of a re- 
conciled Father, who corrects with judgment not in anger., lest 
he should bring us to nothings Jer. x. 24. It wull afford great 
matter of comfort, if we can say, that he is, at the same time, a 
just God^ and a Saviour^ Isa. xlv. 21. and, as one observes, 
though he punishes for sin, yet it is not with the punishment of 
sin. 

XIV. God is most merciful and gracious, long-suffering, 
and abundant in goodness, all which perfections are mentioned 
together in Exod. xxxiv. 7. and we shall first consider his 
goodness, which, in some respects, includes the other, though 
in others it is distin crushed froin them, as will be more parti- 
cularly observed. This being one of his communicable perfec- 
tions, we may conceive of it, by comparing it with that good- 
ness which is in the creature, while we separate from it all the 
imperfections thereof, by which means we may arrive to some 
idea of it. 

Therefore persons are denominated good, as having all those 
perfections that belong to their nature, which is the most large 
and extensive sense of goodness ; or else it is taken in a moral 
sense, and so it consists in the rectitude of their nature, as we 
call a holv man a good man ; or lastly, it is taken for one who 
is beneficent, or communicatively good, and so it is the same 
with benignit^'. Now to apply this to the goodness of God, it 
either includes in it all his perfections, or his holiness in par- 
ticular, or else his being disposed to impart or communicate 
t+iose blessings to his creatures, that they stand in need of, in 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 1G9 

■which sense we are here to understand it as distinguished from 
his other perfections. 

This goodness of God supposes that he has, in himself, an 
infinite and inexhaustible treasure of all blessedness, enough to 
fill all things, and to make his creatures completely happy. 
This he had from all eternity, before there was any object in 
which it might be displayed, or any act of power put forth to 
produce one. It is this the Psalmist intends, when he says, 
Psal. cxix. 68. Thoii art good^ and when he adds, thou doest 
good; as the former implies his being good in himself, the lat- 
ter denotes his being so to his creatures. 

Before we treat of this perfection in particular, we shall ob- 
serve the difference that there is between goodness, mercy, 
gi*ace, and patience, which, though they all are included in the 
divine benignity, and imply in them the communication of 
some favours that tend to the creatures advantage, as well as 
the glory of God, yet they may be distinguished with respect 
to the objects thereof: thus goodness considers its object, as 
indigent and destitute of all things, and so it communicates 
those blessings that it stands in need of. Mercy considers its 
object as miserable, therefore, though an innocent creature be 
the object of the divine bounty and goodness, it is only a fall- 
en, miserable, and undone creature, that is an object of com- 
passion. And grace is mercy displayed freely, therefore its 
object is considered not only as miserable, but unworthy; how- 
ever, though the sinner's misery, and worthiness of pity, may 
be distinguished, these two ideas cannot be separated, inas- 
much as that which renders him miserable, denominates him 
at the same time guilty, since misery is inseparably connected 
with guilt, and no one is miserable as a creature, but as a sin- 
ner ; therefore we are considered as unworthy of mercy, and 
so the objects of divine grace, which is mercy extended freely, 
to those who have rendered themselves unworthy of it. And 
patience, or long-suffering, is the suspending deserved fury, 
or the continuing to bestow underserved favours, a lengthen- 
ihg out of our tranquillit)' ; these attributes are to be consider- 
ed in particular. And, 

1. Of the goodness of God. As God was infinite in power 
from all eternity, before there was any display thereof, or act 
of omnipotcncy put forth ; he was eternally good, before there 
was any comnumication of his bounty, or any creature, to 
which it might be imparted > so that the first display of this 
perfection was in giving being to all things, which were the ob- 
jects of his bounty and goodness, as well as the effects of his 
power; and all the excellencies, or advantages, which oiie 
creature hath above another,are as so many streams flowing from 

Vol. I. Y 



170 THE PERtECTIONS OF GOD. 

this fountain, He giveth to all, life and breathy and all things^ 
Acts xvii. 25. (a) 

2. The mercy of God, which considers its object as misera- 
ble, is illustrated by all those distressing circumstances, that 
tender sinners the objects of compassion. Are all, by nature, 
bond-slaves to sin and Satan ? It is mercy that sets them free, 
delivers them, xoho, through fear of death, "were all their hfe- 
t'lme subject to bondage, Heb. ii. 15. Are we ail, by nature, 
dead in sin, unable to do what is spiritually good, alienated 
from the life of God ? Was our condition miserable, as being, 
without God in the world, and without hope ; like the poor 
infant, mentioned by the prophet, cast out in the open field, to 

.'.UL ■ . ■ . . , I I ■. .j_a 

(a) All the good which we behold in Cre.ition, Providence, ;.nd redemption, 
flows irom goodness m God, and arc the proofs of this attribute. If all tlie evil, 
which we discovei-, sprmgs from the liberty given to creature;' to conform, or 
not, to the reve.ded will ; or if all moral evii be productive of good, tlie remaind- 
er being restrained^ then the evil, which exists, is no exception to the proofs of 
Divine goodness. What Deity now is, he always was ; he has not derived his 
g'oodnebs ; he is not a compounded being ; his goodness therefore belongs to his 
essence. His goodness has been distinguished into immanent and communivative. 
The latter discovers to us the former, but his communicative goodness, tliough 
flowing ill ten thousimd streams, and incalculable, is less than his munanent, 
which is £01 eternal fountain of excellency. 

Infinite knowledge discerns things as they are, and a perfect being will esteem 
that to be best, which is so ; God therefore discerns, and esteems his own imma- 
nent goodness as infinitely exceeding all tlie good, which appeai-s in his works, 
for the excellency in these is but ;ui imperfect representation of himself. The 
happiness oi Ueity must coi^ist consequently in his own self-complacency; he 
made all things for his pkusure, or glory, but they are only so far pleasing, as they 
reflect his own pictm-e to himself. Yet when we suppose Deity to be the sub- 
ject of motives, we are ever m danger of errir\g. 

Divine communicative goodness has been termed benevolencewhtn in intention, 
beneficence when carried into effect. This is nearly the same as moral rectitude^ 
because the government of the Universe must, that it may produce the good" of 
the whole, be administered in righteousness. The correct administration of jus- 
tice in rewarding every good, if there be merit in a creatiu-e, iiiid punishing 
every evil i» no less an effect of benevolence, than the confeiring of benefits, 
which are purely gi-atuitous. In like manner the punisliment of offenders in civil 
society has for its object general utility, whether we imagine the power which 
judges and inflicts, to spring from the social compact, or to have been ordained 
of ( u)d. 

The cutting off of flagrant offenders, as by the deluge, the destruction of 
Sodom, &c. has been obviously designed to prevent the spreading contagion of 
sin. But there is a time appointetl, luito which all things are tending, and unto 
which men generally refer the wrongs they sustain, in which perfect justice shall 
be administered. Some attributes of Deity seem to be ground of terror, and 
others of love; but God is one; he is subject to no perturbation of mind ; liis 
wrath and indignation are but other terms for his steady and unchangeable 
goodness, bearing dowr the evil, whicli sinful creatures oppose to his purposes 
of general advantage. Those acts of justice \\'hich are accounted by the guilty 
to, be unnecessary severity, are deemed, by glorified siiints and angels, the effects 
of that goodness, which they make the subject of their Hallelujalis. Thus the 
highe'^t proof of God's g\iodness consisted in his not sparing his own Son, nor 
abating any thmg from the demands of his law. After this all hopes tluit Dijviiie 
goodness shall fuvQUi- tlie finally impenitent must be utterly vain. 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. l^!! 

the loathing of our persons^ xvhom no eye pitied P it was mercy 
that said to its^ live^ Ezek. xvi. 4, 5, 6. accordingly God is 
said to have remembered us in our low estate^ for his mercy en- 
durethfor ever, Psal. cxxxvi. 23. 

The mercy of God is either common or special ; common 
mercy gives all the outward convenieucies of this life, which 
are bestowed without distinction ; as he causes his sun to rise 
on the evil arid the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on 
the unjust, Matth. v. 45. so it is said, his tender mercies are 
over all his works, Psal. cxlv. 9. but his special mercy is that 
which he bestows on, or has reserved for the heirs of salvation, 
which he communicates to them in a covenant way, in and 
through a Mediator ; so the apostle speaks of God, as the Fa- 
ther of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the 
God of all comfort, 2 Cor. i. 3. 

3. As God is said to be merciful, or to extend compassion 
to the miserable, so he doth this freely, and accordingly is said 
to be gracious; and as grace is free, so it is sovereign, and be- 
stowed in a discriminating way ; that is given to one which he 
denies to another, and only because it is his pleasure : thus 
says one of Christ's disciples. Lord, how is it that thou wilt 
manifest thyself unto us, andriot unto the zvorldP John xiv. 22, 
And our Saviour himself glorifies God for the display of his 
grace, in such a way, when he says, / thank thee, Father^ 
Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things 
from the zvise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes ; 
and considers this as the result of his sovereign will, when he 
adds, even so Father, for so it seemed good in thy sight, Matth. 
xi. 25, 26. Now the discriminating grace of God appears in 
several instances ; as, 

(1.) In that he should extend salvation to men, rather than 
to fallen angels; so our Saviour took not on him the nature of 
angels, hut the seed of Abraham, because he designe(il to save 
the one, and to reserve the other, in chains, binder darkness, 
unto the judgment of the great day, Heb, ii. 16. compared with 
Jude ver. 6. And among men, only some are made partakers 
of this invaluable blessing, which all were equally unworthy 
of; and their number is comparatively very small, therefore 
they are called a little fock, and the gate, through which they 
enter, is strait, and the tvay narroru that leads to life, and f-w 
there be that find it, Luke xii. 32. compared with Matth. vii. 
13, 14. And there are many who make a considerable figure 
in the world, for riches, honours, great natural abilities, be- 
stowed by common providence, that are destitute of special 
grace, while others, who are poor, and despised in the world, 
are called, and saved ; the apostle observed it to be so in hi^ 
day, when he says, 7iot many mighty, not many noble, arc call;: 



1T2 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

ed; but God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to con- 
found the wise^ and the weak things of the tvorld to confound 
the things that are mighty^ and base things of the worlds and 
things which are despised hath God chosen^ yea^ things that are 
not, to brbig to nought things that are, 1 Cor. i. 26, 27, 28. 

(2.) In several things relating to the internal means, where- 
by he liis and disposes men for salvation : thus the work of 
conversion is an eminent instance of discriminating grace, for 
herein he breaks through, and overcomes, that reluctancy and 
opposition, which corrupt nature makes against it; subdues 
the enmity and rebellion that was in the heart of man, works a 
powerful change in the will, whereby he subjects it to himself, 
which work is contrary to the natural biass and inclination 
thereof; and that which renders this grace more illustrious, is, 
that many of those who are thus converted, were, before this, 
notorious sinners ; some have been blasphemers, persecutors, 
and injurious, as the apostle says concerning himself before 
his conversion, and concludes himself to have been the chief 
of sinners ; and tells us, how ht shut up many of the saints in 
prison, and, when they were put to death, he gave his voice 
against them ; punished them often in every synagogue, and 
compelled them to blaspheme, and, being exceedingly against 
them, persecuted them unto strange cities, 1 Tim. i. 13, 15. 
compared with Acts xxvi. 10, 11. But you will say, he was, 
in other respects, a moral man ; therefore he gives an instance 
elsewhere of some who were far otherwise, whom he puts iti 
mind of their having been fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, ef- 
feminate, abusers of themselves with mankind, thieves, covetous^ 
drunkards, revilers, extortioners; *?/c/2, says he, w^re some of 
you ; but ye are -washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justi- 
fied. Moreover, the change wrought in the soul is unasked 
for, and so it may truly be said, God is found of them that 
sought him not ; and undesired ; for though unregenerate sin- 
ners desire to be delivered from misery, they are far from de- 
siring to be delivered from sin, or to have repentance, faith, 
and holiness : if they pray for these blessings, it is in such a 
manner, that the Spirit of God hardly calls it prayer ; for the 
Spirit of grace, and of supplications, by which alone we are 
enabled to pray in a right manner, is w^hat accompanies or flows 
from conversion ; if therefore God bestows this privilege on 
persons so unworthy of it, and so averse to it, it must certain- 
ly be an instance of sovereign and discriminating grace. 

(3.) This will farther appear, if wc consider how much they, 
who are the objects thereof, differ from what they were ; or 
if we compare their present, with their former state. Once 
they were blind and ignorant of the ways of God, and going 
astray in crooked paths ; the apostle speaks of this in the ab- 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 17o 

stract, Te were sometimes darkness^ Eph. v. 8. and that the god 
of this worlds had blinded the minds of soyne^ lest the light of 
the glorious gospel of Christ should shine unto them^ 2 Cor. iv. 
4. but now they are made light in the Lord^ and brought into 
the way of truth and peace. Their hearts were once impeni- 
tent, unrelenting, and inclined to sin, without remorse, or self- 
reflection ; nothing could make an impression on them, as 
he'mg past feeling-, and giving' themselves over to lasciviousnessy 
to tvork all uncleanness with greediness, Eph. iv. 19. but now 
they are penitent, humble, relenting, and broken under a sense 
of sin, afraid of every thing that may be an occasion thereof, 
willing to be reproved for it, and desirous to be set at a great- 
er distance from it. Once they were destitute of hope, or 
solid peace of conscience ; but now they have hope and joy in 
believing, and are delivered from that bondage, which they 
were, before this, exposed to ; such a happy turn is given to 
the frame of their spirits : and as to the external and relative 
change which is made in their state, there is no condemnation 
to them, as justified persons ; and therefore they who, before 
this, were in the utmost distress, expecting nothing but hell 
and destruction, are enabled to lift up their heads with joy, ex- 
periencing the blessed fruits and effects of this grace in their own 
souls. 

(4.) The discriminating grace of God farther appears, in that 
he bestows these saving blessings on his people, at such sea- 
sons, when they appear most suitable, and adapted to their 
condition ; as he is a very present help in a time of trouble, 
when their straits and difficulties are greatest, then is his time 
to send relief; when sinners sometimes have wearied them- 
selves in the greatness of their way, while seeking rest and 
happiness in other things below himself, and have met with 
nothing but disappointmeut therein ; when they are brought 
to the utmost extremity, then he appears in their behalf. And 
so wilh respect to believers, when their comforts are at the 
lowest ebb, their hope almost degenerated into despair, their 
'temptations most prevalent and afflicting, and they retidy to 
sink under the weight that lies on their spirits, when, as the 
Psalmist says, their hearts are overwhelmed withirj^theyn ; then 
he leads them to the rock that is higher than they, Psal. Ixi. 2. 
when they are even desolate and aff,icted, and the troubles of 
their hearts are enlarged, then he brings them out of their dis- 
tresses, Psal. XXV. 16, 17. 

Thus the grace of God eminently appears, in what he be- 
stows on his people ; but if we look forward, and consider what 
he has prepared for them, or the hope that is laid up in heaven, 
then we may behold the most amazing displays of grace, in 
which they who shall be the happy objects thereof, will he a 



1T4 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

wonder to themselves, and will see more of the glory of it than 
can be now expressed in words ; as the i-'salmist says, in a way 
of a.dmirati®n, Oh^ hoto great hn thy goodnefis^ which ihon hast 
laid up for them that fear thee; which thou hast xvroiignt for 
them that trust in thee before the sons of men! Psal. xxx. 19. 

Object. 1. If it be objected, that the afflictions, which God's 
people are exposed to in this life, are inconsistent with the 
glory of his grace and mercy. 

Answ. To this it may be replied, that afflictive providences 
are so far from being inconsistent with the glory of these per- 
fections, that they tend to illustrate them the more. For since 
sin has rendered afflictions needful, as an expedient, to hum- 
ble us for it, and also to prevent it for the future, so God de- 
signs our advantage thereby ; and however grievous they are, 
yet since they are so over-ruled by him, as the apostle saj^s, 
that they yield the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto thettiy 
rvho are exercised thereby^ Heb. xii. 11. they are far from being 
inconsistent with the mercy and grace of God. 

And this will farther appear, if we consider that these out- 
ward afflictions are often attended with inward supports, and 
spiritual comforts ; so that, as the apostle says concerning him- 
self, as the sufferings of Christ abonndin them^ their consolations 
abound by him ^"2. Cor. i. 5. or as the outward man perishes^ the 
inward man is renewed day by day ^ chap. iv. 16. it was nothing 
but this could make him say, / take pleasure in infrmities^ in 
reproaches^ in necessities^ in persecutions^ in distresses for 
Christ'' s sake., for ruhen I can xveak^ then am I strongs chap, 
xii. 10. 

Object. 2. It is farther objected, that the doctrine of free 
grace leads men to licentiousness ; and therefore that what we 
have said concerning it, is either not true and warrantable, or, 
at least, should not be much insisted on, for fear this conse- 
quence should ensue. 

Answ. The grace of God doth not lead to licentiousness, 
though it be often abused, and presumptuous sinners take ocr 
casion from thence to go on, as they apprehend, securely there- 
in, because God is merciful and gracious, and ready to for- 
give, which vile and disingenuous temper the apostle obser^^ed 
in some that lived in his days, and expresses himself with the 
greatest abhorrence thereof, Shall we continue in sin, that grace 
7nay abound? God forbid, Rom. vi. 1, 2. But does it follow, 
that because it is abused by some, as an occasion of licentious- 
ness, through the corruption of their natures, that therefore it 
leads to it ? The greatest blessings may be the occasion of the 
greatest evils ; but yet they do not lead to them. That which 
leads to licentiousness, must have some motive or inducement 
?n it, which will warrant an ingenuous mind, acting according 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 175 

' J the i*ules of equity and justice, to take those liberties ; but 
this nothing can do, much less the grace of God. His great cle- 
mency, indeed, may sometimes give occasion to those who hate 
him, and have ingratitude and rebellion rooted in tlieir nature, 
to take up arms against him ; and an act of grace may be abu- 
sed, so as to make the worst of criminals more bold in their 
wickedness, who presume that they may commit it with impu- 
nity : but this is not the natural tendency, or genuine effect there- 
of ; nor will it be thus abused by any, but those who are aban- 
doned to every thing that is vile and ungrateful. As the law of 
God prohibits all sin, and his holiness is opposite to it, so his 
grace affbi-ds the strongest motive to holiness ; it is therefore the 
neglect or contempt of this grace, and a coiTupt disposition to 
act contrary to the design thereof, that leads to licentiousness. 
Grace and duty are inseparably connected, so that where God 
bestows the one, he expects the other ; yea, duty, which is our 
act, is God's gift, as the power to perform it is from him : thus 
when he promises to give his people a new hearty and put his 
Spirit within them^ and cause them to walk in his statutes^ he 
tells them, that they should remember their evil ways and doings, 
and loathe themselves in their owfi sight for their iniquities ; 
which is not only a prediction, respecting the event, but a pro- 
mise of what he would incline them to do ; and when he adds, 
thditfor this he would be enquired of by them^ Ezek. xxxvi. 26. 
27, 31, 2,7. or that they should seek them by fervent prayer, he 
secures to them, by promise, a disposition and grace to perform, 
this great duty, which is inseparably connected with expected 
blessings. God hi' iself therefore will take care that, however 
others abuse his grace, it shall not lead those who are in a distin- 
guishing way, the objects thereof, to licentiousness. 

And to this we may add, that it is a disparagement to this 
divine perfection to say, that, because some take occasion from 
it to continue in sin, therefore its glory is to be, as it were, con- 
cealed, and not published to the world. As some of old did not 
care to hear of the holiness of God, and therefore, if the pro- 
phets would render their doctrine acceptable to them, they must 
jpot insist on that perfection, but cause the Holy One of Israel to 
cease from before them^ Isa. xxx. 11. so there are many who 
are us little desirous to hear of the free and discriminating grace 
of God, which contains the very sum and substance of the gos- 
pel, lest it should be abused, whereas the glory thereof cannot 
fee enough admired ; and therefore it ought often to be recom- 
mended, as what leads to holiness, and lies at tlie very root of 
all religion. 

And that it may be so improved, let it be faither considered, 
that it is the greatest inducement to humility, a^i well as one 
of the greatest ornaments and evidences of a true Christiaw, 



176, THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

This appears from the nature of the thing, for grace supposes 
its object unworthy, as has been but now observed ; and it ar- 
gues him a debtor to God for all that he enjoys or expects, 
which, if it be duly considered, will make him appear vile and 
worthless in his own eyes, and excite in him a degi-ee of thank- 
fulness in proportion to the ground he has to claim an interest 
therein, and the extensiveness of the blessed fruits and effects 
thereof. 

4. We proceed to speak of God as long-suffering, or as he 
is styled by the apostle, The God of patience^ Rom. xv. 5. some- 
times this attribute is set forth in a metaphorical way, and call- 
ed a restraini7ig' his ivrath^ Psal. Ixxvi. 10. and a refraining 
himself and holding his peace ^ or keeping silence^ Isa. xlii, 14. 
and Psal. 1. 21. and, while he does this, he is represented, speak- 
ing after the manner of men, as one that is xveary with forbear- 
ijig^ Isa. i. 13. chap. vii. 13, Mai. ii. 17. and he is said to be 
pressed, under a provoking people, as a cart is pressed that is 
full of sheaves, Amos ii. 13. By all which expressions, this per- 
fection is set forth in a familiar style, according to our common 
way of speaking : but that we may briefly explain the nature 
thereof, let us consider, in general ; that it is a branch of his 
goodness and mercy, manifested in suspending the exercise of 
his vindictive justice, and in his not punishing in such a degree 
as sin deserves. But that we may consider this more particular- 
ly, we shall observe something concerning the objects thereof, 
and the various instances in which it is displayed ; how it is 
glorified ; and how the glory thereof is consistent with that of 
vindictive justice ; and lastly, how it is to be improved by us. 

(1.) Concerning the objects of God's patience. Since it is the 
deferring of deserved wrath, it follows from hence, that an inno- 
cent creature cannot be the object of it, inasmuch as vindictive 
justice makes no demand upon him ; nor has it any reserves of 
punishmeiit laid up in store for him ; such an one is, indeed the 
object of goodness, but not of forbearance ; for punishment can- 
not be said to be deferred m here it is not due : and, on the other 
hand, they caiinot be said to be the objects thereof, in whom the 
vindictive justice of God is displayed to the utmost, when all t^ 
vials of his wrath are poured forth. 'Whether the devils are, m 
some sense, the objects of God's forbearance, as having ground 
to expect a greater degree of punishment after the final judg- 
ment, is disputed by some, who contend about the sense of the 
\vordforbeara7ice; they are said, indeed, to be reservedin chains,, 
under darkness, unto the judgment of the great day, Jude, ver. 
6. that is, though their state be hopeless, and their misery 
great, beyond expression, yet there is a greater degi'ee of punish- 
ment, which they bring upon themselves, by all the hostilities 
ihey commit against God in this world : this farther appears, 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. ITV^ 

from what they are represented, as saying to our Saviour, Art 
thou come to torment us before the time ? Matth. viii. 29. (c/) By 
which it is sufficiently evident that their misery shall be greater 
than now it is. However, this less degree of punishment, inflict- 
ed on them, is never called in scripture, an instance of God's 
patience, or long-suffering, towards them ; therefore we must 
conclude that they are not, properly speaking, the objects of 
the glory of this attribute. Patience then is only extended to 
sinful men, while in this world ; for it is called, in scripture. 
The riches of his goodness^ and forbearance^ and long-svffering^ 
Rom. ii. 4. and it is said to lead those, who are the objects of 
it, to repentance ; therefore there must be, together with the ex- 
ercise of this perfection, a day or season of grace granted, 
which is called, in scripture, with a peculiar emphasis, the sin- 
ner's day^ or the time of his visitation^ in which it ought to be 
his highest concern to knoxv the things of his peace^ Luke xix. 
42, 44. and the gospel that is preached, in this season of God's 
forbearance, is called. The xvord of his patience^ Kev. iii. 10. so 
that there is something more in this attribute than barely a de- 
ferring of punishment. Accordingly God is said, to zvait that 
he may be gracious^ Isa. xxx. 18. and the effects and consequen- 
ces thereof are various, (as may be said of all the other means 
of grace) so that sinners, who neglect to improve it, have not onr 
ly thereby a reprieve from deserved punishment, but all those 
advantages of common grace, which attend it : but, with re- 
spect to believers, it may be said, as the apostle expresses it. 
The long-sxiffering of onr Lord is salvation^ 2 Pet. iii. 15. It is 
evidently so to them, and therefore God doth not spare themj 

a " Maik iii. 11, v. 7 ; Luke viii. 28 ; and Mat. viii. 29. These extraordinary pcr- 
sonag'es in the New Testament, are not called devils, AiJtCoxoi, in tlie oi-ig-inal ; that 
word never occurring in the Christian scriptures, hut m tlie singuho-iuimbcr, and 
as applied to one Being alone. Tliey are called fhcmoas, A'ji/j.ovig (jr i^nty.oviu. Yet 
they are plainly devils m fact; being called Unclean Spirils, tliough bometimes 
only Spirits (Mark ix. 20; aiul Luke x. 20 ;) and showing tiiemselves to be devils, 
by their whole history. In Mat. xii. 24 and 26 particularly, tlie P))arisces say 
" our Saviour casts out devils, (dsmons) by Beelzebub the prince oi' the devils 
*' (dsemons) ;" and our Saviour replies, that then "Satan casts out Satan." See 
also Luke x. 17 — 18; where the apostles rejoicing declare, " even the devils (dw- 
" mons) are subject unto us ;" and our Saviour says unto them, " I beheld Satan 
" as lightning fall from heaven." So ver}- f.dse in itself, and directly contradicteci 
by tlie very words of our Saviour, is that hypotliesis ot Dr. Campljell's in liis new 
translation of the Gospels ; which asserts these possessions oi' the New Testament 
to be nowhere attributed to the devil, and which avers the dominion or authority 
pf the devil to be nowhere ascribed to tlie dsmons ! Beelzebub is expressly cal- 
led the/»v7)re of the dremons, the daemons are expressly denominated Satan with 
liim, and these are only inferior devils subordinate to tlie great one. And though 
the work demons (as Dr. Campbell lu-ges) miglit critically be more exact in a 
translation ; yet the word dc-iiln better accords, with the usages of our language 
and the course of our ideas. Exactness tlierefor^- i^is been ];i(>pr'rly sacrificed tQ 
•itility." winT,nr.r.n 

yor. L Z 



178 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

that he may take a more fit opportunity to punish them ; but he 
waits till the set time to favour them is come, that he may ex- 
tend saivaiion to them ; and, in this respect more especially, the 
exercise of this perfection is founded in the death of Christ. 
And inasmuch as the elect, who are purchased thereby, were, 
by the divine appointment, to live throughout all the ages of 
time, laid to have the saving effects of his redemption applied 
to them, one after another, it was necessary that the patience of 
God should be so long continued, which is therefore glorified 
more immediately with respect to them, as the result thereof ; 
and, in subserviency thereunto, it is extended to all the world. 

(2.) The patience of God has been displayed in various in- 
stancese 

1st, II was owing hereto that God did not immediately de- 
stroy our first parents as soon as they fell ; 'he might then, with- 
out the ie;ist impeachment of his justice, have banished them 
for ever from his presence, and left their whole posterity desti- 
tute of che means of grace, and have punished them all in pro- 
portion to the guilt contracted ; therefore that the world is con- 
tinued to this day, is a very great instance of God's long-suf- 
fering. 

2dli/, When mankind was universally degenerate, and all 
flesh had corrupted their way, before the flood, and God deter- 
mined to destroy them, yet he would not do this, till his pa- 
tience had spared them, after he had given an intimation of this 
desolating judgment, an hundred and twenty years before it 
came. Gen. vi. 2, 3. and Noah was, during this time, a preach- 
er of righteousness, while the long-suffering of God is said to 
have waited on them, 2 Pet. ii. 5. compared with 1 Pet. iii. 20. 

3f//y, The Gentiles, who not only worshipped and served the 
creature more than the Creator, but committed other vile abo- 
minations, contrary to the dictates of nature, and thereby filled 
up the measure of their iniquity, are, notwithstanding, said to 
be the objects of God's patience, though in a lower sense, than 
that in which believers are said to be so ; accordingly the apos- 
tle observes, that in times past, God suffered all nations to walk 
in their own rvai/s, that is, God did not draw forth his sword 
out of its sheath, by which metaphor the prophet sets forth the 
patience of God ; he did not stir up all his wrath, but gave them 
rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, JiUing their hearts xvith 
food and gladness. Acts xlv. 16, 17. Ezek. xxi. 3. 

4thl>j, The church of the Jews, before the coming of Christ, 
had long experience of the forbearance of God. It is said, that 
he suffered their manners forty years in the wilderness. Acts xiii. 
18. and afterwards, when they often revolted to idolatry, fol- 
lowing the customs of the nations round about them, yet he did 
not utterly destroy them, but, in their distress, raised them up 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 179 

deliverers ; and when their iniquity was grown to such a height 
that none but a God ot infinite patience, could have borne with 
them, he, notwithstanding, spared them many )'eai-s before he 
suffered them to be carried away captive into Babylon ; and af- 
terwards, when their rebellion against him was arrived to the 
highest pitch, when they had crucified the Lord of glory, yet 
he spared them some time, till the gospel was first preached to 
them, and they had rejected it, and thereby judged themselves 
vntvorthij of eternal life^ Acts xiii. 46. 

5M/y, After this, the patience of God was extended to those 
v.'ho endeavoured to pervert the gospel of Christ, namely, to 
false teachers and backsliding churches, to whom he gave space 
to repent^ but repented not ^ Rev. ii. 21. And to this we may 
add, that he has not yet poured forth the vials of his wrath on 
the Antichristian powers, though he has threatened, that their 
plagues shall come in one day ^ chap, xviii* 1. 

(3.) We are next to consider the method which God takes in 
glorifying this attribute. We have already observed that, with 
respect to believers, the patience of God is glorified in subser- 
viency to their salvation ; but, with respect to others, by whom 
it is abused, the patience of God discovers itself, 

1.9?, In giving them warning of his judgments before he sends 
them. He speaketh once^ yea trvice^ but man perceiveth it not^ 
that he may zuithdrarv man from his purpose^ and hide pride 
from man^ Job xxxiii. 14, 17. and, indeed, all the prophets 
were sent to the church of the Jews, not only to instruct them, 
but to warn them of approaching judgments, and they were 
faithful in the delivery of their message. In what moving terms 
doth the prophet Jeremiah lament the miseries, which were 
ready to bcfal them ! And with what zeal doth he endeavour, 
in the whole course of his ministry, to bring them to repentance, 
that so the storm might blow over, or, if not, that their ruin 
might not come upon them altogether unexpected ! 

2dly When the divine warnings are not regarded, but wrath 
must be poured forth on an obstinate and impenitent people, this 
is done by degrees. God first sends lesser judgments before 
greater, or inflicts his plagues, as he did upon Egypt, one after 
another, not all at once ; and so he did npon Israel of old, as 
the prophet Joel observes, j?r5? the palmer-xvorm^ then the locust ; 
after that^ the canker-xvorm^ and then the caterpillar^ devoitred 
Hie fruits of the earthy one after another^ Joel i. 4. So the pi-o- 
phet Amos observes, that God first sent a famine among them, 
which he calls cleanness of teeth in all their cities^ ancl after- 
wards some of them xvere overthroxvn^ as God overthrew Sodom 
nnd Gomorrah^ Amos iv. 8, 18. Some think, that the gradual 
approach of divine judgments is intended by what the prophet 
Hosea says, when the judgments of God are compared to the 



fSO' fllE PERFECTIONS OT GOD.' 

light that goeth forth, Hos. vi. 5. which implies more thail i^; 
generally understood by it, as though the judgments of God 
should be rendered visible, as the light of the sun is ; whereas 
the prophet seems hereby to intimate, that the judgments of 
God should proceed, like the light of the morning, that still in- 
creases unto a perfect day. And it is more than probable that 
this is intended by the same prophet, when he represents God 
as speaking concerning Ephraim, that he would be to them as 
a moth, which doth not consuine the garment all at oncef as 
when it is cast into the fire, but frets it by degrees, or like rot- 
tenness, which is of a spreading nature, chap. v. 12. Thus the 
judgments of God are poured forth by degrees, that, at the 
same time, there may be comparatively, at least, a display of di- 
rme patience. 

. 2dly^ When God sends his judgments abroad in the world, 
he often moderates them ; none are proportionate to the deme- 
rit of sin ; as it is said of him, that being full of compassion, he 
forgave the iniquity of a very rebellious people, that is, he did 
not punish thein as their iniquity deserved, and therefore he 
destroyed them not, and did not stir up all his wrath, Psal. 
Ixxviii. 38. so the prophet Isaiah says concerning Israel, that 
God hath 7iot s?7iitten him^ as he had smote those that smote him; 
nor is he slain according to the slaughter of them that are slain bif 
him; but that he -would debate rvith them in measure^ zuho stayeth 
his rough wind i?i the day of his east wind, Isa. xxvii. 7, 8. 

4thly, When God cannot, in honour, defer his judgments any 
longer, he pours them forth, as it were, with reluctancy ; as a 
judge, when he passeth sentence on a criminal, doth it with a 
kind of regret, not insulting, but rather pitying his misery- 
which is unavoidable, because the course of justice must not be 
stopped. Thus the prophet says, that God doth not ajjiict roil- 
.ingly, that is, with delight or pleasure, nor grieve, the children 
of men. Lam. iii. 35; that is, he doth not punish them, because 
he delights to see them miseiable ; but to secure the rights of 
his own justice in the government of the world : so when Israel 
had been guilty of vile ingratitude and rebellion against him; 
and he threatens to turn his hand upon theni, and destvoy them, 
he expresseth himself in such terms, speaking after the manner 
of men, as imply a kind of uneasiness, when he says, Ah I I rvill 
ease jne of mine adversaries , and avenge me of mine enemies, Isa- 
i. 24. and before God gave up Israel into the hands of the As- 
syrians, he seems, again speakmg after the manner of men, to 
have an hesitation or debute in his own mind, whether he should 
do this or no, when he savs. How shed! I give thee up, Ephraim'^ 
Hoti) shall I deliver thee, Israel ? Hozv shall I make thee as Ad'' 
■mail f Hoto shall I set thee as Zeboim V Mine heart is turned 
vAthin w.v, my repentings are kindled together, Hos. xi. 8. and 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 181 

when our Saviour could not prevail upon Jerusalem to repent 
of their sins, and embrace his doctrine, when he was obliged to 
pass a sentence upon them, and to tell them, that the things of 
their peace were hid from their eyes, r.nd that their etiemiea 
fihould cant a trench about the city^ and should lay it even with 
the ground^ he could not speak of it without tears ', when he be- 
held the cityy he wept over it^ Luke xix. 41, &c. 

(4.) The next thing to be considered, concerning the pa- 
tience of God, is, that the glory of it is consistent with that of 
his vindictive justice ; or how he may be said to defer the 
punishment of sin, and yet appear to be a sin-hating God. 

It is certain that the glory of one divine perfection cannot 
interfere with that of another; as justice and mercy meet to- 
gether in the work of redemption, so justice and patience do 
not oppose each other, in any of the divine dispensations. It is 
true, their demands seem to be various ; justice requires that 
the stroke should be immediately given ; but patience insists 
on a delay hereof, inasmuch as without this it does not appear 
to be a divine perfection ; if therefore patience be a divine at- 
tribute, and its glory as necessary to be displayed, as that of 
any of his other perfections, it must be glorified in this world, 
and that by delaying the present exercise of vindictive justice 
in the highest degree, or it cannot be glorified at all : justice 
will be glorified, throughout all the ages of eternity, in those 
w^ho are the objects thereof; but patience can then have no 
glory, since (as has been observed) the greatest degree, either 
of happiness or misery, is inconsistent with the exercise there- 
of; therefore this being a perfection, which redounds so much 
to the divine honour, we must not suppose that there is no ex- 
pedient for its being glorified, or that the glory of vindictive 
justice is inconsistent with it. 

Now this harmtony of these two perfections must be a little 
considered. Justice, it is true, obliges God to punish sin, yet 
it does not oblige him to do it immediately ; but the time, as 
Well as the way, is to be resolved into his sovereign will. In 
fcrder to make this appear, let us consider, th*t the design of 
vindictive justice, in all the punishment it inflicts, is either to 
secure the glory of the holiness of God ; or to assert his rights, 
as the governor of the world ; now if the deferring of punish- 
ment doth not interfere with either of these, then the glory of 
God's patience is not inconsistent with that of his vindictive 
justice. But mcjre particularly. 

Firsts The glory of his holiness is, notwithstanding this, suf- 
ficiently secured ; for though he delays to punish sin, in the 
highest degree, yet, at the same time, he appears to hate it, by 
the threatenings which he hath denounced against sinners, which 
•hall ceHiiluly ha\ e their uccomplishmcnt, if he says, that he is 



182 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

angry with the wicked every day^ and that his sold hateih them^ 
is there ar.y reason to suppose the contrary ? or if he has threat- 
ened that he xvill rain upon them snares^ jire and brimstone^ and 
an horrible tempest^ wh»ch shall be the portion of their cxip^ and 
that because, as the righteous Lord^ he loveth righteousness^ Psal. 
vii. 11. and xi. 6, 7. is not this a sufficient security, for the glory 
of his holiness, to fence against any thing that might be alleged 
to detract from it ? If thi-eatened judgments be not sufficient, 
for the present, to evince the glory of this divine perfection ; 
then it will follow, on the other hand, that the promises he has 
made of blessings not yet bestowed, are to be as little regarded 
for the encouraging our hope, and securing the glory of his 
other perfections ; and then his holiness would be as much ble- 
mished in delaying to reward, as it can be supposed to be in 
delaying to punish. 

If therefore the truth of God, which will certainly accom- 
plish his threatenings, be a present security for the glory of his 
holiness, it is not absolutely necessary that vindictive justice 
should be immediately exercised in the destruction of sinners, 
and so exclude the exercise of God's forbearance and long-suf- 
fering. 

And to this it may Ije added, that there are many terrible 
displays of God's vindictive justice in his present dealing with 
sinners ; as it is said. The Lord is known by the judgments 
•which he executes^ as well as by those he designs to pour forth 
on his enemies ; the wicked are now snared in the rvork of their 
own hands^ but in the end they shall be turned into helly and all 
the nations that forget God^ Psal. ix. 16, 17. If vindictive jus- 
tice takes occasion to inflict many^ temporal and spiritual judg- 
ments upon sinners in this world, then the glory of God's holi- 
ness is illustrated at the same time that his patience is prolong- 
ed. This may be observed in God's dealing with his murmur- 
ing and rebellious people in the wilderness which gave him oc- 
casion to take notice of the abuse of his patience, and to say. 
Numb. xiv. 11, 18 — 21. How long 7vill this people provoke me? 
and hoxv long xvill it be ere they believe 7«e, for all the signs 
xohich I have shexved among them? Upon this, justice is ready 
•to strike the fatal blow; I xvill ^ says God, S7nite them with the 
pestilence^ and disinherit them ; which gives Moses occasion to 
intercede for them, and plead the glory of God's patience. Hie 
Lord is long-sufferings and of great mercy ; Pardon^ says he, / 
beseech thee^ the iniquity of this people^ as thou hast forgiven 
ihemfrom Egypt^ even until noav; by which he means, as I hum- 
bly conceive, spare thy people, as thou hast often done, when, 
by reason of their provocations, thou mightest justly have de- 
stroyed them ; and God answers him in the following words, 
J have pardoned, according to thy Ti'ord ■ but he adds. As truly 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 18G 

as I live^ all the earth shall be jilled xvith the glory of the Lord., 
that is, with the report of the glory of his vindictive justice, 
which should be spread far and near ; and then he threatens 
them that they should not see the land of Canaan, viz. those 
who murmured against him; so that vindictive justice had its 
demands fulfilled in one respect, while patience was glorified in 
the other ; on which occasion the Psalmist says, Psal. xcix. 8. 
Thou answeredst them^ Lord^ namel}', Moses's prayer for 
them, but now mentioned. Thou xvast a God that forgavest them^ 
though thou tookest vengeance of their inventions. 

Secondly^ Consider the vindictive justice of God, as tending to 
secure his rights, as the governor of the world, and being ready 
to take vengeance for sin, which attempts to controul his sove- 
reign authority, and disturb the order of his government : now 
the stroke of justice may be suspended for a time, that it may 
make way for the exercise of patience, provided there be no just 
occasion given hereby for men to trample on the sovereignty of 
God, despise his authority, or rebel against him, without fear : 
but these consequences will not necessarily result from his ex- 
tending forbearance to sinners ; for we do not find that the de- 
laying to inflict punishment among men is any prejudice to their 
government, therefore why should we suppose that the divine 
government should suff'er any injury thereby ; when a prince, 
for some reasons of state, puts off the trial of a malefactor for 
a time, to the end that the indictment may be more fully pro- 
ved, and the equity of his proceedings more evidently appear, 
this is always reckoned a greater excellency in his administra- 
tion, than if he should proceed too hastily therein ; and we ne- 
ver find that it tends to embolden the criminal to that degree 
as impunity would do ; for he is punished, in part, by the loss 
of his liberty, and if he be convicted, then he loses the privi- . 
lege of an innocent subject; his life is forfeited, and he is in 
daily expectation of having it taken away. If such a method 
as this tends to secure the rights of a government, when a prince 
thinks fit to allow a reprieve to some for a time ; may not God 
stop the immediate proceedings of vindictive justice for a time, 
without the least infringement made, either on his holiness, or 
his rectoral justice .'' Which leads us to consider, 

(5.) How the patience of God is to be improved by us ; and, 

\st^ Since it is a divine perfection, and there is a revenue of 
glory due to God for the display thereof, this should put us 
upon the exercise of those graces, which it engages us to. Some 
of the divine attributes tend to excite our fear, but this should 
draw forth our admiration and praise : and we have more rea- 
son to adore and admire the divine forbearance, when we con- 
^jrder, 

Firsts How justly he might destroy us. The best man on 



1&4' THE PERFECTIONS OF GO*D, 

earth may say, with the Psalmist, If thou ^ Lord^ shouldst mark 
iniqinties^ Lord^ -who shall stand f Psal. cxxx. 3. He need 
not watch for occasions, or diligently search out some of the 
inadvertencies of life, to find matter for our conviction and con- 
demnation, since the multitude and heinous aggravation of our 
sins, proclaim our desert of punishment, which might provoke, 
and immediately draw down, his vengeance upon us j and that 
which farther enhances our guilt is, that we provoke him, though 
laid under the highest obligations to the contrary. 

Secondly^ How easil}^ might he bring ruin and destruction 
upon us ? He does not forbear to punish us for want of power, 
as earthly kings often do; or because the exercise of justice 
may be apprehended, as a means to weaken their government, 
or occasion some rebellions, which they could not easily put a 
stop to. Thus David says concerning himself, that he was 
iveak^ though anointed king ^ and that the sons of Zcriiiah -were 
too hard for hvn^ on the occasion of Joab's havmg forfeited his 
life, when the necessity of affairs required the suspending his 
punishment, 2 Sam. iii. 39. but this cannot be said of God, who 
is represented as sloxv to anger ^ and great in power ^ Nah. i. 3. 
that is, he does not punish, though he easily could : it would be 
no difficultv for him immediately to destroy an ungodly world, 
any more than it is for us to crush a moth or a worm, or break 
a leaf : finite power can make no resistance against that which is 
infinite : what are briars and thorns before the consuming fire ? 

2dli/, Let us take heed that we do not abuse this divine per- 
fection ; it is a crime to abuse the mercy of God in the small- 
est instances thereof, but much more to slight and contemn the 
riches of his forbearance, or mercy, extended to so great a 
length, as it has been to most of us ; and this is done, 

1. By those who infer, from his forbearing to pour forth his 
fury on sinners, that he neglects the government of the world ; 
or take occasion from thence to deny a providence, and because 
his threatenings are not executed at present, therefore they do, 
as it were, defy him to do his worst against them ; this some 
are represented as doing, with an uncommon degree of pre- 
sumption, and that with a scoff; for thev are termed scoffers^ 
tvalking after their oxvn lusts ; saijing^ Where is the promise of 
his coming ? for since the fathers fell asleep^ all things con- 
timie as they ruere from the beginning of the creation^ 2 Pet. 
iii. 3, 4. 

2. Ev those who take occasion from hence to sin presump- 
tuously : and because he not only delays to punish, but, at the 
same time, expresses his willingness to receive returning sin- 
ners, at what time soever thev truly repent, take occasion to 
persist in their rebellion, concluding that it is time enough to 
submit to him ; which is not only to abuse, but, as it were, to 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 185 

wear out his patience, and provoke his indignation, like them^ 
of whom it is said, that because sentence ugai7ist an evil -work 
is not executed speedily^ therefore the heart of the sons of men 
is fully set in them to do evil, Eccl. viii. 11. But you will say, 
these are uncommon degrees of wickedness, which only the vi- 
lest part of mankind are chargeable with ; therefore let us add, 

3. That a bare neglect to improve our present season, and 
day oi grace, or to embrace the great salvation offered in the 
gospel, is an abuse of Cod's patience ; and this will certainly 
affect the greatest number of those who are favoured with the 
gospel dispensation ; and, indeed, who are there that improve 
it as they ought ? and therefore all are said more or less, to 
abuse the patience of God, which affords matter of great hu- 
miliation in his sight. 

No^v that we may be duly sensible of this sin, together with 
the consequences thereof, let us consider ; that this argues the 
highest ingratitude, and that more especially, in a professing 
people ; therefore the apostle, reproving the Jews for this siii, 
puts a very great emphasis on every word, when he says. Or 
despisest thou the riches of his goodness, and forbearance, and 
long-suffering P Rom. ii. 4. Let us also consider, that the con- 
sequence thereof is very destructive, inasmuch as this is the on- 
ly opportunity that will be afforded to seek after those things 
that relate to our eternal welfare. What stress does the apostle 
lay on the word notv, which is twice repeated, as well as the 
word behold, which is a note of attention, implying, that he had 
something remarkable to communicate, when he says, Beholdy 
noxu is the accepted time ; behold, nouo is the day of salvation^ 
2 Cor. vi. 2. And to this we may add, which is a very awaken- 
ing consideration, that the abuse of God's patience will expose 
finally impenitent sinners to a greater degree of his vengeance. 
Thus when the forbearance of God had been extended to Is- 
rael for many years, from his bringing them up out of the land 
of Egypt ; and this had been attended all that time with the 
means of grace, and many warnings of approaching judgments, 
he tells them; Tou onlij have I known, of all the families of tJi^ 
earth, therefore xvill I punish you, that is, my wrath shall fall 
more heavily upon you, for all your iniquities, Amos iii. 2, 
and when God is represented, as coming to reckon with Baby- 
lon, the cup of his wrath must be filled double ; hoxo much she 
hath glorified herself, saith God, and lived deliciously, so much 
sorrow and torment give her ; for she saith in her heart, I sit 
as a queen, and am no widozv, and shall see no sorroxv. Rev. 
xviii. 6, 7. 

^dly. Let us, on the other hand, improve God's patience, by 
duly considering the great end and design thereof, and what 
encouragement it affords to universal holiness : it is a ^reat ve= 

Vol. L a a 



fH& THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD, 

lief to those who are at the very brink of despair; for if thej 
cannot say that it has hitherto led them to repentance, as ap- 
prehending themselves to be yet in a state of imregeneracy, let 
us consider, that, notwithstanding this, a door of hope is still 
open d, the golden sceptre held forth, and the invitation given 
to come to Christ > therefore let this excite us to a diligent at- 
tendance on the means of grace, for though forbearance is not 
to be mistaken, as it is by many, for forgiveness, yet we are en- 
couraged to vf ait and hope for it, in all God's holy institutions, 
according to the tenor -of the gospeL 

And they w^ho are not only spared, but pardoned, to whom 
grace has not only been 'offered, but savingly applied, may be 
encouraged to hope for farther displays thereof, as well as to 
improve what they have received, with the greatest diligence 
and thankfulness. 

Afthly^ Let us consider the great obligation we are laid un- 
der, by the patience of God, to a constant exercise of the grace 
of patience, in our behaviour towards God and man. 

1. In our behaviour towards God; we are hereby laid under 
the highest engagements to submit to his disposing will, and, in 
whatever state we are, therewith to be content, without mur- 
muring, or repining, when under afflictive providences. Shall we 
receive good at his hand^ and shall rve not receive evil? job ii. 
10. Has he exercised so long forbearance towards us, not only 
before we were converted, when our life was a constant course 
of rebellion, against him ; but he has since, not only passed by, 
but forgiven innumerable offences ? And shall we think it strange 
when he testifies his displeasure against us in any instances I 
Shall we be froward and uneasy, because he does not imme- 
diately give us what we desire, or deliver us from those evils 
we groan under l 

2. Let us exercise patience, in our behaviour towards men. 
Shall we give wav to, or express, unbecoming lesentment 
against those whom we converse with, for injuries done us^ 
which are often rather imaginary than real ? Or if they are very 
great, as well as undeserved, let not our passions exceed their 
due bounds ; especially let us not meditate revenge, but consi- 
der how many injuries the great God has passed over in us, 
and how long his patience has been extended towards us. 

XV. God is abundant in truth. That we may understand 
what is meant bv this perfection, we may observe the difference 
between his being called a true God, and a God of truth f 
though they seem to import the same thing,, and are not always 
distinguished in scripture : thus he tltat receiveth Christ's tes- 
timou}' , is said to set to his seal that God is triie^ that is, in ac- 
complishing what he ha» promised, respecting the salvation of 
his people, or that he is a God of truth ; and elsewhere it is 



. THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. iP 

said, Let God be true^ but every man a liar^ that is, a God of 
truth : yet they are, tor the most part, distinguished ; so that 
when he is culled the true God, or the only true God, it does 
not denote one distinct perfection of the divine nature, but the 
Godhead, in which respect it includes ail his divine perfec- 
tions, and is opposed to all others, who are called gods, but are 
not so hy nature : but this will be more particularly considered 
in the next answer. 

But when, on the other hand, we speak of him, as the God of 
truth, we intend hereby that he is true to his word, or a God 
that cannot lie, whose faithfulness is unblemished, because he 
is a God of infinite holiness ; aiid therefore whatever he has 
spoken, he will certainly bring it to pass. This respects either 
his thi'eatenings, or his promises : as, to the former of these, it 
is said, that the judgments of God^ that is, the sentence he has 
passed against sinners, is according to truth, Rom. ii. 2. and the 
display of his vindictive justice is called, his accomplishing his 
fury^ Ezek. vi. 12. This renders him the object of fear, and 
it is, as it were, a wall of fire round about his law, to secure 
the glory thereof from the insults of his enemies. 

There is also his faithfulness to his promises, in which re- 
spect he is said to be the^ faithful God^ -a)ho keepeth covenant and 
vxercij xvith them that love him^ and keep his commandments^ unto 
a thousand generations^ Deut. vii. 9. This is that which en- 
courages his people to hope and trust in him, and to expect 
that blessedness, which none of his perfections would give them 
a sufficient ground to lay claim to, were it not promised, and 
this promise secured by his infinite faithfulness. Almighty 
power is able to make us, happy, and inercy and goodness can 
communicate every thing that mav contribute thereunto ; but it 
does not from hence follow that they will, since God is under 
no natural obligation to glorify these perfections : but when he 
is pleased to give forth a promise relating hereunto, and the 
accomplishment thereof ascertained to us by his infinite faith- 
fulness ; this renders these blessings not only possible, but cer- 
tain, and so affords, to the heirs of salvation, strong consola- 
tion. It is this that renders things future as certain as though 
they were present, and so lavs a foundation for our rejoicing in 
hope of eternal life, whatever difficulties may seem to lie in the 
way of it^ 

Here we may take occasion to consider the blessings v.'hich 
are secured by the faithfulness of God, of which some respect 
mankind in general, and the blessings of common providence, 
viz. that the world should be preserved, and all flesh not perish 
out of it, from the deluge to Christ's second coming ; and that, 
during this time, the regular course of nature should not be al- 
tered, but that seed-time and harvest, eold and heat ^ summer and 



188 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

winter^ day and night., should not cease^ Gen. ix. 11. compared 
with chap. vili. 22. 

There are also promises made to the chuixh in general, that 
it should have a being in the world, notwithsttmding all the 
shocks of persecution, which it is exposed to ; and, together 
with these, God has given the greatest security, that the ordi- 
nances of divine worship should be continued, and that, in all 
places xvhere he records his name^ he xvill come to his people and 
bless them^ Exod. xx. 24. And to this we may add, that he 
has promised to increase and build up his church ; and that to 
Shiloh, the great Redeemer, should the gathering of the people 
bcy and that he would multiply them^ that they should not be few^ 
Bnd also, glorify them, that they should not be small, Gen. xlix. 
10. compared with Jer. xxx. 19. and that the glory should be of 
an increasing nature, especially that which it should arrive to 
in the latter ages of time, immediately before its exchanging 
this militant for a triumphant state in heaven. 

Moreover, there are many great and precious promises made 
to particular believers, which every one of them have a right 
to lay claim to, and are oftentimes enabled so to do, by faith, 
which depends entirely on this perfection : and these promises 
are such as respect the increase of grace ; that they shall go fro?}i 
strength to strength, or that they xvho raait on the Lord shall 
renexv their strength, Psal. ixxxiv. 7". and Isa. xl. 31. and that 
they shall be recovered, after great backslidings, Psal. xxxvii. 
14. Psal. Ixxxix. 30, — 33. and be enabled to persevere in that 
grace, which is begun in them, till it is crowned with compleat 
victory, 2 Cor. xii. 9. Rom. xvi. 20. Job xvii. 9. 1 Cor. xv. 57. 
and also that they shall be made partakers of that inward peace 
and jo}', Avhich accompanies or flows from the truth of grace, 
Isa. xi. 1. chap. Ivii. 19. chap, xxxii* 17. and that all this shall 
be attended with perfect blessedness in heaven at last, Psal. 
Ixxiii. 24. 2 Tim. iv. 8. The scripture abounds with promises 
of the like nature, which are suited to every condition, and af- 
ford relief to God's people, under all the difficulties they meet 
with in the world ; the accomplishment whereof is made sure 
to them by this divine perfection. 

Object. 1. It is objected against this divine attribute; that 
God has not, in some instances, fidfilled his threatenings, which 
has tended to embolden some in a course of obstinacy and re- 
bellion against him ; particularly that the first threatening was 
not executed as soon as man fell ; for though God told our first 
parents, that in the ver\^ day they should eat of the forbidde?! 
fruit, they should surely die : yet Adam lived after this, nine 
hundred and thirty years, Gen. ii. 1 7. compared with chap. v. 5. 

It is also objected, that God threatened to destroy Nineveh, 
within forty days after Jonah was sent to publish this message 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 139 

to them, Jonah iii. 4. nevertheless they continued in a flourish- 
ing state many years after. 

Answ. 1. As to what respects the first threatening, that deatli 
should immediately ensue upon sin's being committed, we shall 
have occasion to speak to this in its proper place,* and tliere- 
fore all that need be replied to it at present is, that the threat- 
ening was in some respect, executed the day, yea, the moment 
in which our first parents sinned : If we take it in a legal sense, 
they were immediately brought into a state of condemnation, 
which, in a forensic sense, is often called death ; they were im- 
mediately separated from God, the fountain of blessedness, and 
plunged into all those depths of misery, which Avere the conse- 
quence of their fall ; or if we take death, the punishment threat- 
ened, for that which is, indeed, one ingredient in it, to wit, the 
separation of soul and body ; or for the greatest degree of pun- 
ishment, consisting in everlasting destruction, from the presence 
of the Lord, and the glory of his power ; then it is sufficient to 
say, that man's being liable hereunto was the principal thing in- 
tended in the threatening. Certainly God did not hereby design 
to tie up his own hands, so as to render it impossible for him 
to remit the offence, or to recover the fallen creature out of this 
deplorable state ; and therefore if you take death for that which 
is natural, which was not inflicted till nine hundred and thirty 
years after, then we may say, that his being exposed to, or 
brought under an unavoidable necessity of dying the very day 
that he sinned, might be called his dying from that time ; and 
the scripture will warrant our using the word in that sense, 
sinc€ the apostle, speaking to those who were, by sin, liable to 
death, says. The body is dead^ because of sin ^ Rom. viii. 10. that 
is, it is exposed to death, as the consequence thereof, though it 
was not actually dead ; and if we take death for a liability to 
eternal death, then the threatening must be supposed to contain 
a tacit condition, which implies, that man was to expect nothing 
but eternal death, unless some expedient were found out, which 
the miserable creature then knew nothing of, to recover him out 
of that state into which he was fallen. 

2. As to what concerns the sparing of Nineveh ,: we have 
sufficient ground to conclude that there was a condition annex- 
ed to this threatening, and so the meaning is ; that they should 
be destroyed in forty days, if they did not repent: this condi- 
tion was designed to be made known to them, otherwise Jo- 
nah's preaching would have been to no purpose, and the warn- 
ing given would have answered no valuable end ; and it is plain, 
that the Ninevites understood it in this sense, otherwise there 
would have been no room for repentance ; so that God connect- 
ed the condition with the threatening: and as, on the one hand, 

* See Quest, xa: 



190 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

he designed to give them repentance, so that the event was not 
dubious and undetermined by him, as depending on their con- 
duct, abstracted from his providence ; so, on the other hand, 
there was no reflection cast on his truth, because this provision- 
ary expedient, for their dehverance, was as much known by 
them as the threatening itself. 

Object. 2. It is objected that several promises have not had 
their accomplishment. Thus there are several promises of spi- 
ritual blessings, which many believers do not experience the 
accomplishment of in this life ; which has given occasion to some 
to say, with the Psalmist, Doth his promise fail for evermore f 
Psal. Ixxvii. 8. 

Ansxv. It is true, that ail the promises of God are not lite- 
rally fulfilled in this world to every particular believer j the 
promise of increase of grace is not actually fulfilled, while God 
suffers his people to backslide from him, and the work of grace 
is rather declining than sensibly advancing; neither are the 
promises, respecting the assurance and joy of faith, fidfiUed 
unto one that is sinking into the depths of despair ; nor those 
that respect the presence of God in ordinances, to such as are 
destitute of the influences of his grace therein ; nor are the pro- 
mises of victory over temptation fulfilled, to those who are not 
only assaulted, but frequmiiy overcome by Satan, when it is as 
much as they can do to stand their ground against him ', and 
there are many other instances of the like nature : notwithstand- 
ing, the truth of God may be vindicated, if we consider, 

1. That there is no promise made, whereof there are not 
some instances of their accomplishment in kind ; this therefore 
is a sufficient conviction to the world, that there are such bless- 
ings bestowed as God has promised. 

2^ Those who are denied these blessings, may possibly be 
mistaken when they conclude themselves to be believers ; and 
then it is no wonder that they are destitute of them, for God 
has promised to give joy and peace only in a way of believing j 
or first to give the truth of grace, and then the comfortable 
fruits and effects thereof. But we will suppose that they are 
not mistaken, but have experienced the grace of God in truth; 
yet their graces are so defective, that they know but little of 
their own imperfections, if they do not take occasion from 
thence, to justify God, who with-holdeth those blessings from 
them, and to adore, rather than call in question, the equity of 
his proceeding therein. And if remunerative justice be not 
laid under obligations to bestow these blessings by any thing 
performed by us, then certainly the faithfulness of God is not 
to be impeached, because he is pleased to denv them. 

3. In denying these blessings, he oftentimes takes occasion to 
advance his own glory some other way, by trying the faith and 



THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 191 

patience of his people, correcting them for their miscarriages, 
humbling th^m by his dealings with them, and over-riunig all 
for their good in the end; which is an equivalent for those joys 
and comtorts which they are deprived ol. And, indeed, God 
has never promised these blessings to any, but with this reserve, 
that if he thinks it necessary, for his o^vn glory, and their good, 
to bring about their salvation some other way, he will do it, 
without the least occasion given hereby to detract from the 
glory of his faithfulness. 

4. All these promises, which have not had their accomplish- 
ment in kind, in this world, shall be accomplished in the next, 
with the greatest advantage ; so that then they will have no rea- 
son to complain of the least unfaithfulness in the divine admi- 
nistration. If rivers of pleasures at God's right hand for ever, 
will not compensate for the want of some comtorts, while we 
are in this world, or silence all objections against his present 
dealings with men, nothing can do it ; or if the full accomplish- 
ment of all the promises hereafter, will not secure the glory of 
this perfection, it is a sign that men are disposed to contend 
with the Almighty, who deny it ; therefore to such we may 
justly apply God's own words to Job, He that reproveth God^ 
let him answer it; or, as he farther says. Wilt thou disannul my 
judgment? Wilt thou condemn me^ that thou niayest be righte- 
ous ? Job xl. 2. compared with ver. 8. 

We shall now consider how the faithfulness of God ought to 
be improved by us. And, 

(1.) The consideration thereof may be a preservative against 
presumption on the one hand, or despair on the other. Let no 
one harden himself in his iniquity ; or think that because the 
threatnings are not yet fully accomplished, therefore the}' never 
shall ; it is one thing for God to delay to execute them, and 
another thing to resolve not to do it. We may vainly conclude, 
that the bitterness of death is past, because our houses are safe 
from fear ^ neither is the rod of God upon them ; but let it be con- 
sidered, that the xvicked are reserved for the day of destruction ; 
they shall be brought forth to the day ofxvrath^ Job xxi. 9. com • 
pared with ver. 30. the zeal of the Lord of hosts will do tl;i.s„ 
His threatenings lay him under an obligation to punish finally 
impenitent sinners, because he is a God of truth ; therefore let 
none harden themselves against him, or expect impunity in a 
course of open rebellion against him. And, on the other hand, 
let not believers give way to despair of obtaining mercy, or con- 
clude, that, because God is withdrawn, and hides his face from 
them, therefore he will never return ; or, because his promises 
are not immediately fulfilled, therefore they never shall, since 
his faithfulness is their great security; hetvillever be mindful 
of his ii'jvenant^ Psal. cxi. 5, 



192 THE PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 

(2.) Let US compare the providences of God with his word, 
and see how every thing tends to set forth his faithfulness. We 
are very stupid, if we take notice of the great things that are 
doing in the woild ; and we behold ihem to little purpose, if 
we do not observe how this divine perfection is glorified there- 
in. The world continues to this day, because God has several 
things yet to do in it, in pursuance of his promises ; the whole 
number of the elect are to be gathered, and brought in to 
Christ ; their graces must be tried, and their faith built up in 
the same way, as it has been in former ages ; therefore the 
church is preserved, and the gates of hell have not prevailed a- 
g-ainst it^ according to his word, Matth. xvi. 18. and as it was 
of old, so we now observe that the various changes which are 
made in civil a^airs, are ail rendered subservient to its welfare ; 
the earth helps the rvo?nan, Rev. xii. 16. not so much from its 
its own design, as by the appointment of providence ; and why 
does God order it so, but that his promises might be fulfilled ? 
And that the same ordinances should be continued, and that 
believers should have the same experience of the efficacy and 
success thereof, as the consequence of his presence with them, 
which he has given them ground to expect unto the end of the 
-ivorld^ Matth. xxviii. 20. are blessings in which his faithful- 
ness is eminently glorified. 

(2.) This divine perfection is a sure foundation for our faith. 
As his truth, with respect to what he has revealed, is an infal- 
lible gi'ound for our faith of assent, so his faithfulness, in fulfil- 
ling his promises, affords the highest encouragement for our 
trust and dependence on him : thus we are said to commit the 
keeping of our souls to him in xvell-doing^ as unto a faithful Cre- 
ator^ 1 Pet. iv. 19. and, when we lay the whole stress of our 
salvation upon him, we have no reason to entertain any doubt 
about the issue thereof. Moreover, are we exposed to evils in 
this world ? we may conclude, that as he has delivered^ and does 
deliver^ so we have reason to trust in him^ that he will deliver 
us^ 2 Cor. i. 10. and is there much to be done for us, to make 
us meet for heaven ? we may be confdent of this very thi?2g, 
that he that has begun a good rvork in us, xvill perform it until 
the day of 'Jesus Christ, Phil. i. 6. 

(4.) The faithfulness of God should be improved by us, as a 
remedy against that uneasiness and anxiety of mind, which we 
often have about the event of things, especially when they seem 
to run counter to our expectation. Thus when there is but a 
very melancholy prospect before us, as to what concerns the 
glory of God in the world, and the flourishing state of his 
church in it, upon which we are ready to say with Joshua, 
Lord, xvhat wilt thou do unto thy great name ? Josh. vii. 9. or 
when we have many sad thoughts of heart about the rising 



THE UxVlTY Oi' GOD. i9^ 

generation, and are in doubt whether they vvrill adhere to, or a- 
handon, the interest of Christ ; when wc are ready to fear whcr 
ther there will be a reserve of faithful men, who will stand up 
for his gospel, and fill the places of those who are calltd off the 
stage, after having served their generation by the will of God ; 
or when we are too much oppressed with carkiiig cares about 
our outward condition in the world, when, like Christ's disci- 
ples, we are immoderately thoughtful rvhat xve sliall eat^ what, 
xve shall drink ^ or wherexvithalxve shall be clothed^ Matth. vi. 31. 
or how we shall be able to conflict with the difficulties that lie 
before us : our great relief against all this solicitude is to be de- 
rived from the faithfulness of God ; for since godliness has the 
promise annexed to it, of the life that now is, as well as of that 
which is to come, 1 Tim. iv. 18. this promise shall have its ac- 
complishment, so far as shall most redbund to God's glory, and 
our real advantage. 

(5.) The consideration of the faithfulness of God should he 
improved, to humble, and fill us with shame and confusion of 
face, when we consider how treacherously we have dealt with 
him, how unsteadfast we have been in his covenant, how often 
we have broke our own promises and resolutions that we would 
walk more closely with him, how frequently we have backslid- 
<len from him, contrary to all the engagements which we ^ave 
been laid under. Have we found any unfaithfulness in him ? 
Has he, in the least instance, been worse than his word ? as God 
says, wlven he reproves his people. What iniquity have your fa- 
thers found in me, that they are gone far from me, and have 
walked after vanity, and are become vain ? Jer. ii. 5. 



Quest. VOI. Are there ?nore Gods than one ? 

Answ. There is but one only, the living and true God. 

I. "i^N this answer, God is described as the living and true 
ji_ God. As life is the greatest excellency belonging to the 
nature of any finite being, upon which account some have con- 
cluded that the lowest degree thereof renders a creature more 
excellent in itself, than the most glorious creatures that are 
without it ; and inasmuch as intelligent creatures have a supe- 
rior excellency to all others, because that which gives life to 
them, or the principle by which they act as such, is most ex- 
cellent; so the life of God is that whei-eby he infinitely excels 
all finite beings ; therefore, when he is called the living God, 
this is not one single perfection of the divine nature, but it is 
expressive of all his divine perfections. Thus when Ciod repre- 
sents himself, in scripture, as giving his people the highest as- 
surance of any thing which he designs to do, he useth the form 
Vol. I. ' Ii B 



194 THE UNITY OF GOD. 

ef an oath, and sweareth by his life, As Hive; or, as truly us I 
iive^ Isa. xlix. 18. and Numb. xiv. 21. which imports the same 
thing, as wiien he says, I have szuom by myself^ Gen. xxii. 16. 
so that when he is called the Uving God, his glory is set forth, 
as a God of infinite perfection : but tliis has been considered 
under the last answer. 

Thei'efore we may farther observe, that when God is stjled 
the livmg God, it connotes the display of all his perfections, as 
life is a principle of action ; and hereby he is distinguished from 
lifeless idols, who were reputed gods by their stupid and pro- 
fane worshippers. Thus the apostle lays down both the terms 
of opposition, when he speaks to some, as having turned from 
idols i, or false gods, to serve the living and true- God, 1 Thess. 
i. 9. Here we might consider the origin and progress of idola- 
try, as men were inclined to xvorship the creature more than the 
Creator, Rom. i. 25. or to do service to them, -who, by nature, 
are no- gods. Gal. xv. 8. and shew iiow some seemed to have 
been destitute of common sense, as they were of true religion, 
when they not only worshipped God by idols, of their own mak- 
ing, but prayed to them, and said, Deliver us, for ye are our 
gods ; this the prophet takes notice of, Isa. xliv. 17. and expo- 
ses their unaccountable stupidity, by observing to them that 
these gods were first growing among' th-i trees of the forest, 
then cut down with their own hands, and fashioned into their 
designed form, and part thereof cast into the fire, as destined 
for common uses. These were lifeless gods, without a meta- 
phor, and their senseless worshippers but one remove from 
them, as the Psalmist says, They that make them are like unto 
them, and so is every one that trusteth in them, Psal. cxv. 8. 
But this we shall have occasion to insist on in a following part 
of this work *, and therefore shall pass it over at present, and 
consider, 

II. The unity of the Godhead. Scripture is very express in 
asserting this : thus it is said, The Lord our God is one Lord, 
Deut. vi. 4. and, /, even I, am he ; and there is no God with 
me, chap, xxxii. 39. and. The Lord he is God ; there is none else 
besides him, chap. iv. 2>5> and elsewhere, Thou art God alone^ 
Psal. Ixxxvi. 10. And this is a truth, not barely founded on a 
few places of scripture that expressly assert it, but it may be 
deduced from every part thereof ; yea, it is instamped on the 
verv nature of man, and may be as plainly proved, from the light 
of nature, as that there is a God ; and every one of the divine 
perfections, which were particularly considered under the last 
answer, will supply us with ai'guments to confirm our faith 
therein : but that this may farther appear, let it be considered, 

• See Quest, cv. 



THE UNITY OF GOD. 1'J5 

1. That the idea of a God implies that he is the first cause of 
»il things, in which respect he is opposed to the creature ; it fol- 
lows, therefore, that he was from all eternity. Now there can be 
no more than one being, who is without beginning, and who 
gave being to all other things, which appears from the very na- 
ture of the thing ; for if there are more Gods, then they must 
derive their being from him, and then tkey are a part of his 
creation, and consequently not gods, for Gbd and the creature 
are infinitely opposed to each other : and since there is but one 
independent being, who is in and of himself, and derives his per- 
fections from no other, therefore there can be but one Gc)d. 

2. There is but one bL:ing, who is the ultimate end of all 
things, which necessarily follows from his being their Creator ; 
for he that produced them out of nothing must be supposed to 
have designed some valuable end hereby, v/hich, ultimately con- 
sidered, cannot be any thing short of himself, for that is incon- 
sistent with the wisdom and sovereignty' that is contained in the 
idea of a Creator ; therefore he is said to have made all tiling^- 

for himself Prov. xvi. 4. and consequently the glory that results 
from thence is unalienable, anji so cannot be ascribed to any 
other God ; therefore to suppose that there are other gods, is to 
ascribe a divine nature to them, divested of that glory v> hich 
is essential to it. And to this we may add, that if Ciod be the 
ultimate end of all things, he is to be glorified as supii, and all 
worship is to terminate in him ; and we must proclaim him to 
be our chief good, and only poition and h/appines:?, which is 
plainly inconsistent with a plurality of gocis. Besides, he that is 
the object of adoration must be wor^liipped, and loved xvith all 
our hearty soid^ strength^ and mind. Luke x. 27. our affections 
must not be divided between him and any other. Therefore 
since man is under a natural, obligation to give supreme wor- 
ship to him, it follows that there is no other God that has a 
right to it, and therefore that he is the only true God. 

3. Infinite perf-^ttjon being implied in the idea of a Ciod, as 
has been proved under the last answer, it is certain that it can- 
not belong to niore than one ; for as it implies that this perfec- 
tion is boundless, so it denotes that he sets bounds to the per- 
fections of all others ; therefore, if there are more Gods than 
one, their perfections must be limited, and consequent!)- that 
which is not infinite is not God. And as infinite perfecdon im- 
plies in it all perfection, so it cannot be divided amon^ many, 
for then no being, that has only a part thereof, could be said to 
be thus perfect ; therefore, since there is but one that is so, it fol- 
lows that there is no other God besides him. 

4. Since omnipotency is a divine attribute, there can be but 
one almighty being, and therefore but one God ; which will 
farther appear, if we consider, that if there were more Godt: 



1-J6 THE UNITY OF GOU. 

than one, all 6f them must be said to be able to do all thlngSs, 
and then the same individual power, that is exerted by one, 
must be exerted by another, than which nothing is more absurd. 
And it will also follow, that he, who cannot do that which is 
said to be done by another, is not almight}', or able to do all 
things, and consequently that he is not God. 

5. There is but one being, who has an absolute sovereign 
will, who, though he can controul all others, is himself subject 
to no controul ; who has a natural right to give laws to all who 
are his subjects, but is subject to none himself ; for absolute do- 
minion and subjection are as opposite as light and darkness. 
Two persons may as well be said to give being to each other, 
as to have a right to give laws to each other. Moi'eover, if there 
were more Gods than one, then there would be a confusion in 
f he g-overnment of the world ; for whatever one decrees, another 
may reverse ; or whatever is done by one, the contrary might 
^ done by the other, for that is the consequence from a sove- 
reignty of will. And as there might be opposite things com- 
manded, or forbidden, pursuant to the different walls of a plura- 
lity of gods, so tht; same thing, with respect to those who are 
under an obligation to yield obedience, would be both a sin and 
a duty, and the same persons would be both condemned and 
justified for the same action. 

6. There is but one being, who is, as God is often said to 
be, the best and the greatest ; therefore, if there were more 
Gods than one, either one must be supposed to be more excel- 
lent than another, or both equally excellent. If we suppose the 
former of these, then he, who is not the most excellent, is not, 
God ; and if the latter, that their excell< ncies are equal, then in- 
finite perfection would be divided, which is contrary to the idea 
thereof, as was before hinted ; as well as to what is expressly 
iSaid by God, To w/ioiii xviU ye liken me^ or shall I be equal? 
Saitli the Noli/ One^ Isa. xl. 25* From these, and several other 
arguments to the same purpose, which might have been taken 
from every one of the divine attributes, and from all essential 
and relative glory which belongs to him, the unity of the divine 
essence appears, even to a demonstration. And indeed to as- 
sert that there are more Gods than one is, in effect, to say that 
there is no God ? so the apostle deems it, when he tells the church 
at Ephesus, that, before their conversion, when they worship- 
ped other gods, theif xuere ■without God in the xvorld^ which im- 
plies as much as that they were atheists therein, as the words 
otSso* ki rraivxrixoi may, Vvith equal propriety, be rendered. («) 

« " As gravity is the common quality of all bodies, arising" not from the nature 
rmd properties of mutter, nor to be explained witliout the agency of a foreign cause, 
'-et prodticiiig numberless uniform cftbcts in the corporeal system, it is in all rea 



THE UNITY OF GOD. 197 

Having considered the tlnity of the Godhead, not only as e- 
vinced from scripture, but as it may be demonstrated by the 

son to !)e attributed to one contriviince, rather tJian the difft rent designs of two 
or more partial independent causes. What a vast variety of appeai-anccs in nature 
tiepenil on this one ? The self-balanced earth hangs upon its centre ; tiie moun- 
tains are set fast ; there is a perpetual IJux and rehux of the seu ; vapours contijm- 
ally arise ; tlie clouds are balanced till by theii- own weight they descend in rain ; 
animals breathe and move ; the heavenly bodies hold then- stations, and go on in 
their constant course, by tlie force of gravity, after the ordinance of that wisdom 
which appointed them this law. Now when we see a multitude of effects proceed- 
ing from one Cause, effects so various in their kind and so important, a Cause sim- 
ple and unvaried in all the diversity produced by it, can we avoid ascribing thi.s 
to an unity of intelligence, if there be mtelligence in it all ? For coidd we suppose 
different independent beings, acting witli different designs, and by distinct ope- 
rations to have formed tlie several parts of the world, and the several species of 
creatures which are in it, what reason can be imagined why they should all be 
governed by, and all necessarily depend upon, one law .■' The Maker of the sun, or, 
if a partial cause of nature could be supposed to have an understanding large e- 
nough for it, Uie Contriver of the whole visible heavens, must, one would think, 
have finished his scheme independently on any other, without borrowmg aid from 
the work of another God. In like manner the Gods of the seas and of the dry land, 
and the Creator of animals, would have completed their several systems, each by 
itsellj not depending on any other tor its order and preservation. Whereas, on tht; 
contrarj , we see m fact they are none of them independent, but all held together 
by the common bond of gravity. The heavens and the eanh continue in their situ- 
ations at a proper distance from each other b)' the force of tins law ; tlie sea keeps 
witlun its channels ; and animals live and move by it. All which lead us to ac- 
knowledge one directing Counsel in the whole frame. For what but an under- 
standing which compreliends the whole extent of nature, reaching from tlie ut- 
most circuit of heaven to the centre of tlie eaath, could have fixed such a common 
Jaw, so iwcessary to all its parts, that withciit it not one of them could subsist, 
nor tlie harmony of the whole be preserved .•' The strict cohesion of tlie parts 
v\ hicli constittite paiticidai- bodies requires a peculiiu- cement, diffiirent from that 
of the griivitating force ; and as it can never be explained by tlie nature and pro- 
perties of matter itself, and is absolutely necessary to the foniis and tiie uses of 
bodies in the several far distant regions of the world, it niu^-t i0 like maimer be 
attributed to die contrivance of an uuder>tandiiig, and the agency of a power, 
which takes in the whole corporeal system, not to a partial cause, limited in its 
intelligence and operation. 

2illy, The beautiful order and harmony of the umverse, since it must be acknow- 
ledged to be the work ot' understiuidmg, has all the appearance which is necessa- 
ry to satisfy any fau' inquirer, of its being formed under the dii-ection of one go- 
verning wisdom. Disconcerted counsels can never produce harmony. If a plura- 
lity of intelligent causes pursue each his separate design, disunion wiU continual- 
ly cleave to their works; but when we see an intire piece made up of many parts, 
all corresponding to each other, and conspiring together so as to answer one com- 
mon end, we naturally conclude unity of design. As a work of art is formed ac- 
cording to the preconceived idea of a designing- artiffcer, without whicli it has not 
its necessaiy intii-eness and uniformity, the same may be obser\ ed in tiie works of 
iiiiture. A tree is as much one as a house ; an animal as complete a system m it 
self, (only much more curiously framed,) as a clock. If we carry our views farther 
into naiure, and take in whole regions of the imiversc, with all their contents, 
the same cliaracters of unity are still visible. The eartji itself is not a confused 
mass, or a medley of incoherent and unrelated parts, but a well contri\ed fabric, 
fitted and plainly designed for use. If we consider what a multitude of living crea- 
tijres are iu it, of different kinds and degrees of perfection, each sort having pro- 
per apartments assigned them, where they dwell conveniently together, with suit- 
able provision mad(; for them;, and insti'icls directing tJiem to tlie use of it ; if we 



J 95 THE UNITY OF GOD. 

light of nature, it will be necessary that we obviate an objection 
tiiat may be brought against this latter method of proving it, viz. 



consider the inlerests qf the several kinds, not interfering in the main, but rather 
serviceable to each otlier, furnished with necessary defences against the inconve- 
niences to wliich they are liable, either by the preventing care of nature, which 
without any thought of tiicir own has provided for then- safet;-, by the apj>omted 
advantages of then* situation, or by an implanted wisdom directing them to find 
out the means of it ; and if we consider the constant mterposition of the same li- 
beral intelligent nature, appearing by the daily new productions from the same 
fertile womb of the earth, whereby the returning wants of animals are relieved 
with fresh supplies, all the species of living things having the common benelit of 
the au', witliout which they could not subsist, and the light of the sun, which can- 
not at once illuminate the wliole globe, bemg dispensed among them with so good 
oeconomy, that they have every one wiiat is sufficient to guide tliem in the exer- 
cise of their proper functions, that they may fulfil the purposes of their beings ; — 
when we consider all tins, can we doubt but the eai-th is disposed and governed 
by one intending Cause ? If in a large house, wherein are many mansions, and a 
vast variety of mhibit;mts, there appears exact order, all from "the highest to the 
lowest c6ntinu;diy attending their proper business, and all lodged and constantly 
provided for suitably to then- several conditions, we find ourselves obliged to ac- 
knowledge one wise occonoiny. And if in a great city or commonwealth there be 
a perfectly regular administration, so that not only the whole society enjoys an 
undisturbed peace, but every member has the station assigned him which he is 
best qu:dified to iiil; the unenvied chieis constantly attend their more important 
cares, served by the busy inferiors, who have all a suitable accommodation, and 
food convenient tor them, the very meanest ministering to the public utility and 
protected by thepuljlic care; if, I say, in such a commmiity we must conclude 
there is a ruling (Jouiisel, which if not natm-ally, yet is politically one, iuid, unless 
united, could not produce such harmony and order, much more have we reason 
to recognize one governing Intelligence in the earth, in which there ai-e so many 
ranks of beings disposed of in the most convenient manner, having- all their seve- 
ral provinces appointed to them, and their several kinds and degTees of enjoyment 
liberally provided for, without encroaching upon, but rather being- mutually use- 
ful to each otlier, according to a settled and obvious subordination. What else can 
account for this but a sovereign Wisdom, a common provident nature, presiduig 
over, and caring for tlie whole ? 

But the earth, as gi-eat as it appears to us, complicated in its fi-ame, and hav- 
ing such a vai'iety in its constitution, sustaining and nourishing so many tribes of 
animals, yet is not an intire system by itself, but has a relation to, and dependence 
on, other parts of the universe, as well as the beings it contains have ujion it. It 
owes its stability to the common law of gravitation ; it derives its light and its 
lieat from the sun, by which it is rendered fruitful and commodious to its inhabi- 
tants. In siiort, a bond ot union runs through the whole circle of being, as fai* as 
human knowledge reaches ; and we have reason to m;ike the same judg-ment con- 
cemmg the p;i!-ts of tiie world which we do not know, and to conclude that they 
all together compose one great whole, which natundly leads us to acknowledge 
one supreme uniting LiteUigence. To object against this the possibility of wild 
confusion reigning in worlds iinkiiown is to feign, mk\ not to argue ; and to sup- 
pose disorder prevalent in an infinity of being which we are unacquainted with, 
which is tlie Jitheistic hypothesis, is to take awa} all rationed foundation for regu- 
larity any where, though we see it actually obta.ns ever}' where, as far :.s our ob- 
servation can reach. But confining our specui .( -ns on this subject within tlie 
compass of known existence, as we ought to do in a fair inquiiy, the apparent or- 
der of the effects is a strong evidence of unity in the Cause. For if different inde- 
pendent causes produced, eacli, a part, why arc there no footsteps of th s in the 
whole extent of nature .' Why does not so much as one piece appe; r, as the sepa- 
rate monument of its autlior's power and wisdom ? From divided counsels one 
would naturally expect interfering schemes ; but, on the contrary, we see an unir 



THE UKiTY OF GOt». 199 

'Object. If the unity of the Godhead might be known by the 
dictates of nature, or demonstrated by other arguments, besides 

Tersiil harmony. Men indeed from a sense of their indigence, and by the diieetion 
of instincts, which must be attribiued to the desigiung author of then- constitu- 
tion, joiii m .societies ; uhich, though composed of m.-my, ai-e governed by one 
coiuibcl : but that is only .m artificial union, a submission to the msjonty, or to 
those who have the supreme power delegated to them, rather than an agireinent 
in design. But tliis cannot be the case of independent beings, self-existent, and 
each complete in itself, without relation to any other. And jet we sec in nature 
a pei-lect harmony, from whence it is plam there must be an agreement at least ui 
couHsel and design, if we could suppose a plurality of hidependeiit causes. But 
whence comes this agreement ? To say by chance, is atheislicully, and very unrea- 
sonably, to attribute the most perfect oi all efl'ects, universal order, to no cause at 
all. It we say by design, it musi be one comprehensive design forming the whole 
scheme of natui'e and providence, which directly brings us to what we arc look- 
ing for, one sovereign commanding Intelligence in the cniverse, or one God. This 
was tlie ai'gument by which some of the ancient piiilosophers proved that there 
is one only eternal and iinlependent Principle, the Fountain of being and the Au- 
thor of idl tilings. Pijthaguyas called it ;■- Jlonad; and Aristotle argued from the 
phaenomena that all things are plainly co-ordered, to one, i lie \\ hole world conspir- 
ing mto agreeing haiunony : ^^'hereas, if there were many independent principles, 
tlie sj'stem of the world must needs have been incohei'ent and inconspiring ; like 
an ill-agreeing drama, botched up of maiij impertment interscrUons. And he con- 
cludes that things are well administered, which they could not be under the go- 
vernment of many, alluding to the verse m Homer, qvk etyuQov Uot.vy.oifsivm, u; Yloi- 
g«vo; icv. 

3dlt/, The condition and order of inferior, derived, and evidently dependent in- 
telligent agents shew not only intelligence, but unity of intelligence, in the Cause 
of them. Every man, a single active conscious self, is the image of his Maker. 
There is in him one undivided animating principle, which in its perceptions and 
operations runs thi-ough the whole system of matter that it inhabits; it perceives 
for all the most distant pai'ts of the body ; it cares for all, and goveri's all, leading 
us, as a resemblance, to form an idea of the one gi-eat quickening Spirit, which 
presides over the vvliole frame of nature, the spring of motion and all operation in 
it, underst;indnig and active m all the pm-ts of the universe, not as its sovd indeed, 
but as its Lord, by whose vital directing influence it is, though so vast a bulk, 
and consisting of so many parts^ united into one regular fabric. Again, the general 
apparent likeness which there is among all the individuals of the human kind is 
a strong evidence of their being the children of one Father. I do not mean princi- 
pally tlie similitude of the exterior form, (though even that, in reason, should ix- 
attributed to the direction of one intelligent Cause,) but that whereby we are es- 
pecially God's offspring, our intellectual capacities, which as far as we can judge 
ai'e very nearly alike. A great difference there may be, no doubt there is, in tin- 
improvement of them ; bnt the powers themselves, and all the original modes of 
perception, in the different individuals of mankind, seem to reseinlile each other, 
as much as any real distinct things in nature. Now from a multitude, or a con- 
stant series of similar eflects which do not arise from necessity, we infer uni- 
ty of design in the Cause. So great a number of rational beings as the whole hu- 
man race, disposed of in the same manner, endued with like faculties and affec- 
tions, having many, and those principal things in their condition, common, provid- 
ed for out of the same fund, and made for the same purposes, may reasonably be 
supposed to belong to one familyi to be derived from the same orighi, and still 
under the same paternal care. 

Above all, the moral capacity of mankind, which is a most important part of 
their constitution, tending to the highest perfection of their nature, and the prin- 
cipal bond of regular society among them, as it proceeds from a wise intending 
Cause, shews imity of wisdom in the Cause ; and the government over the moral, 
i*s well as the natural, world evidently appears to be a nionuixhy." 



iiOO ilih UNIlY Of GQPi 

those which are matter of pure revelation, how comes it to pass 
that the heathen owned, and worshipped, a plurahty of gods ? 
and as it was not one particular sect among them that did so, 
but this abominable practice universally obtained, where reveal- 
ed religion was not knov/n, therefore, though this be an un- 
doubted truth, yet it is not founded in the light of nature. 

Ansxv. That they did so is beyond dispute, especially after 
idolatry had continued a few ages in the world, and so had ex- 
tinguished those principles of revealed religion, which mankind, 
before this, were favoured with ; yet it must be considered, that 
though the ignorant and unthinking multitude, among them, 
believed every thing to be a God, which the custom of the coun- 
tries where they lived had induced them to pay divine adora- 
tion to, yet the wiser sort of them^ however guilty of idolatrj^, 
by paying a lower kind of worship to them, have, notwithstand- 
ing, maintained the unity of the Godhead, or that there is one 
God superior to them all^ whom they often call the father of 
gods and men ; to whom probably the Athenians erected that 
altar, as the apostle Paul observes, with this inscription. To 
THE UNKNOWN GOD ,* because he savs, in the words imme- 
diately foiJowing, Whom therefore ye ignorantly worships him 
declare I unto you^ Acts xvii. 23. 

This appears from what they assert to the same purpose, 
whereby they plainly discover their belief of but one supreme 
God, who has all the incommunicable perfections of the divine 
nature, however, in other instances, their conduct seemed to 
run counter to their method of reasoning : thus it appears, by 
their writings, that many of them assert that there is a God, 
who is the first cause, or beginning, of all things ; and that he 
was from eternity, or in the beginning, and that time took its 
rise from him ; that he is the living God, the fountain of life, 
and the best of all beings * : Also, that this God is self-suffi- 
cient, and therefore it is absurd to suppose that he stands in 
need of, or can receive advantage from, any one f ; and that 
he is the chief good, or contains in himself whatever is good^ 
aiid that by him all things consist ; and that no one hath enough 
in hii"nselfto secin-e his own safety and happiness, which is to 
be derived from him ij:. 

And there are oihers also, who plainly assert the unity of 
God in as strong terms, as though they had learned it from 
divine r6velation, calling him, the beginning, the end, and-au- 
thor of all things ; who was before, and is above all things, the 
Lord of all, the fountain of life, light, and all good, yea, good- 
ness itself; the most excellent being; and many other expres- 

* See Jrist. Metaphrjs. Lib. I. Cap. 2. ^ Ub. XII. Cap. ?. f Vid. ejus. 

Maj. Moral. Lib. IL Cop. 15. t Vid. ejus. De Meribus, Lib. IX. Cap. 4. tif 
-De MunJo, Cap. 6. 



THE UNITY OF GOD. 20J 

sions to the like purpose. I could multiply quotations for the 
proof of this, from Proclus, Porphyry, lamblicus, Plotinus. 
Plutarch, Epictetus, and several others ; but this has been air 
ready done by other hands * ; by which it appears, that thougli 
they mention other gods, they suppose them to be little more 
than titular or honorary gods ; or at least persons, who were 
the peculiar favourites of God, and admitted to the participa- 
tion of divine honours, as well as employed in some part of 
the government of the world. They frequently speak of them 
as having derived their being from God, whom they call the 
cause of causes, the God of gods. Some of them speak of God 
in the singular numljer, throughout the greatest part of their 
writiiigs, and only make mention of the gods occasionally, espe- 
cially when they treat of those works that become a God, or 
the greatest honours that are due to him; thus Seneca and Plato, 
and, in particular, the latter of them says, concerning him- 
self f, that when he wrote any thing in a grave and serious 
manner, his custom was, to preface his epistles with the -men- 
tion of one God ; though, it is true, when he wrote otherwise, 
he used the common mode of speaking, and talked of other 
gods ; and it is observed, in his writings, that he sometimes 
uses this phrase ; If it please God, or by the help of God, not 
the gods. 

But, notwithstanding this, they were all idolaters, for they 
joined in the rites of worship performed to the false gods of 
their respective countries ; yea, Socrates himself, who fell un- 
der the displeasure of the Athenians, for asserting the unity of 
the Godhead, which cost him his life, did not refuse to pay 
some religious lionour to the heathen gods. So that it is plain 
they paid some religious worship to them, but it was of an in- 
ferior and subordinate nature, not much unlike to that which 
the Papists give to saints and angels : but they are far from 
setting them upon a level with God ; for they confess they were 
but men, who formerly lived in this world; they give an acr 
count of their birth and parentage ; where they lived and died,' 
write the history of their lives, and what procured them the 
honour they suppose them after death advanced to ^ ; how some 
of them obtained it, as the reward of virtue, or in commemo- 
ration of the good they had done to the world in their life : as 
some were advanced to this honour, who were the inventors 
of arts, beneficial to mankind, or were successful in wars, or a 
public blessing to the country where they lived, others had 
this honour conferred upon them, especially among the Ro-? 
mans, at the request of their surviving friends ; and this was 
done after Julius Caesar's time, by the decree of the senate, 

* Vid. Mortixi de Vent. Relig: Christ, cap. 3. f Kjtist. XUT. iitl Dioiuf, 
4 Sue Cicero rk .Witnra Drurum. 

Vol. I. C c 



202 THE UNITY OF GOD. 

who, at the same time, when they ranked them among the 
number of their gods, appointed also the rites of v/orshlp that 
should be paid to them ; and some of the Roman emj.erors 
obhged the senate to deify them while they were alivf;. These 
things are veiy largely insisted on, by many ancient and 
modern writers *; so that, upon the whole, it plainly appears, 
'that, whatever they say of a plurality of gods, the wiser sort 
among the heatiien did not deny the unity of the divine es- 
sence, in the highest and most proper sense ; and, inasmuch as 
they received the knowledge hereof from the light of nature, 
we may from hence conclude that this truth might be known 
that way, as well as by divine revelation. 

We shall conclude Avith some practical inferences from the 
doctrine contained in this answer. 

1. Since be, Avho is the object of our worship, is the living 
God ; this reproves that lifeless formal way, in which many 
address themselves to him, in the performance of religious du- 
ties, Avithout that reverence and due regard to the divine per- 
fections, which are contained in this character of the Godhead. 
It is also a v-ery great aggravatior.., not onlv of apostacy, but 
of any degree of backsliding, in those who have made a pro- 
fession of religion ; that it is a departure from the living God^ 
Heb. iii. 12. Is he the God and giver of life, and shall we 
forsake him, who has the words of eternal life^ John vi. 68. 
whose sovereign will has the sole disposal thereof? 

Again, this consideration, of his being the living God, ren- 
ders his judgments most terrible, and his wrath insupportable ,• 
as the apostle says. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of 
the living God^ Heb. x. 31. 

2. From his being the true God, we infer, that all hypocri- 
sy, both in heart and life, is to be avoided ; and we should 
draw nigh to him with a true heart and faith unfeigned ; and 
not like those whom the prophet reproves, Avhen he says, God 
was near in their mouthy and far from their reins ^ Jer. xii. 2. 

Moreover, let us take heed that Vv'e do not set up an idol in 
our hearts, in opposition to him as the true God : whatever 
has a greater share in our affections than God, or is set up in 
competition with him, that is, to us, a god, and is therefore 
inconsistent with our paying that regard which is due to him ; 
as our Saviour savs, 2V cannot serve God and mammon^ Mat. 
vi. 24. and, upon this account, covctousness is styled idolatry. 
Col. iii. 5. as the world is loved more than him; and we read 
of some tvhose God is their belly ^ Phil. iii. 19. who make pro- 
vision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof, as though this 
was their chief good. And when we confide in any thing be- 

* See Tertull Apol. Lactav.t. de fulsa Relig. Arnob. contra Geiites ; J\fimtt. 
Fd. Ilerodian. Hist. Lib. IV. See nlsc ,Mede's apostasy of the latter times, map. 3, 4. 



IHK UNITY or GOD. :^0J, 

low him, in a religious way, or expect that from the creature 
which is only to be found in him ; or when we esteem men as 
lords of our faith; or when his sovereignty, or right to govern 
us, is called in question, while we presumptuously, or wilfully, 
rebel against him ; this is, in effect, a dethroning, or denying 
him to be the true God : but more of this when we consider 
the sins forbidden in the first commandment *. 

3. From the unity of the Godhead, we may infer, that we 
ought to take heed that we do not entertain any conceptions ot 
the divine Being, which are inconsistent herewith ; therefore, 
as we are not to assert a plurality of gods, so we are not to 
think or speak of God in such a way as tends to overthrow the 
simplicity of the divine nature; therefore we must not con- 
ceive that it is compounded of various parts, all which, being 
taken together, tend to constitute the divine essence ; which 
gives occasion to that known aphorism, generally laid down by 
those who treat of this subject, that xvhatever is in God^ is God; 
which we must reckon u^s one of the incomprehensibles of the 
divine Being, which when we attempt to speak of, we only 
give an evident proof of the imperfection of our finite under- 
standings, and that we cannot order our words, by reason of 
darkness : however, it is necessary, when we lay down this 
proposition, that we signify what we intend hereby, that so 
we may not be supposed to use words without ideas; and es- 
pecially that we may, in some measure, account for those 
modes of speaking, which are agreeable to scripture, which so 
often describes God as having a plurality of perfections, and 
those, in some respects, distinct ; and yet, at the same time, 
that we may not hereby be led to infer a plurality of gods. 
Here let it be considered, 

(1.) That we have not the least similitude, or resemblance, 
of this in any finite being. Every thing below God is compo- 
sed of parts, some of which we call integral, as all the parts of 
matter taken together constitute the whole ; others are called 
essential, as when we say an intelligent being has various pow- 
ers or properties which are essential to it ; so that it would 
not be complete without every one of them ; and that these 
are all of them distinct, so that we cannot say whatever is in 
the soul of miui is the soul, but every one of those powers, or 
properties, taken together, constitute the man ; but this is by 
no means to be applied to the divine Being ; therefore, 

(2.) When we conceive of God, as holy, powerful, just, 
good, £s?c. we must not suppose that these perfections are so 
many ingredients in the divine Being, or that, v/hen taken to- 
gether, they constitute it, as the whole is constituted of its 
parts ; for then every one of them would have no other than 

* (^ueat, CD. 



^04'- XHE UNITY Of GODr 

H partial perfection, and consequently the essential glor)' of one 
of those attributes would not be equal to the glory of the divine 
Being, which is supposed to consist of them all ; and there- 
fore there would be something in God less than God, or a 
divine perfection less than all the divine perfections taken to- 
gether, which we are not to suppose. These are the proper- 
ties of composition ; and therefore, when we speak of God as 
a simple or uncompoimded Being, we cannot forbear to men- 
tion them as what are inconsistent with his perfection as such. 

Neither are the divine perfections distinct or different from 
one another, as the various parts of which the whole is con- 
stituted are said to be distinct ; which follows from the for- 
mer, since the divine essence has no parts ; therefore we are 
not to suppose, that the divine attributes, considered as they 
are in God, are so distinguished, as one thing, or being, is 
from another; or as wisdom., power, justice, mercy, fc?c. are 
in men ; for that would be to suppose the divine Being as hav- 
ing several distinct, infinitelv perfect beings contained in it^ 
which is contrary to its simplicity or unity ; or, at least, if we 
call it one, it would be only so by participation and dependence, 
as a general or complex idea is said to be one, which partakes 
of, and depends on, all those paiticular or simple ideas that 
are contained in it; or, to illustrate it by numbers, as one 
hundred is one, as it contains such a number of units in it, as 
are, all taken together, equal to a hundred ; this is not what 
we mean, when we say God is one. 

Moreover, when we speak of the divine perfections, as be- 
ing in God, we suppose them all essential to him, as opposed 
to what is accidental. Now an accident is generally described, 
as what belongs, or is superadded, to a being or subject, which 
it might have existed without, or have been destitute of, and 
yet sustained no loss of that perfection, wliich is essential to 
it: thus, wisdom, holiness, justice, faithfulness, are accidents 
in men ; so that they who have them not, do not cease to be 
men, or to have the essential perfection of the human nature : 
but this is by no m'eans to be applied to the divine Being and 
attributes ; for to suppose God to be destitute of any of them, 
is as much as to say that he is not mfinitely perfect, or that he 
is not God. This, I think, is generally intended, when it is 
said, xvhatever is in God^ is God; which, because it may be rec- 
koned by some to be a metaphysical speculation, I should have 
avoided to mention, had it not been, in some respects, neces- 
sary, since the unity of God cannot well be conceived of, un- 
less his simplicity be defended ; and I do not see how that can 
be maintained, if this proposition be not duly considered. If 
I have used more words than are needful, or repeated the 
sam<; ideas too often, in attempting to explain it, I have done 



THE UNITY OF GOD. 205 

it to avoid some scholastic modes of speaking, or with a de- 
sign to render what has been said more intelligible ; but to this 
we maj^ add, 

(3.) That when we speak of the divine perfections as many, 
or distinct from one another, as we often do, and have scrip- 
ture warrant to justify us therein, namely, when we speak of 
the justice of God, as different from his mercy, or these, from 
his power, wisdom, faithfulness, ^c. this must not be deemed 
inconsistent with what has been said concerning the divine 
simplicity : and therefore let it be considered, that the nature 
and perfections of God are incomprehensible ; and therefore all 
the ideas which we have of them are taken from our com- 
paring them with some small resemblance that there is thereof 
in intelligent creatures, and, at the same time, separating from 
them whatever argues imperfection. 

And from hence it follows, that we are not supposed to 
know, or be able to describe, what God is in himself, and, as 
I humbly conceive, never shall : such knowledge as this is 
too great for any but a divine person ; therefore our concep- 
tions of him are taken from and conformed to those various 
ways, by which he condescends to make himself visible, or 
known to us, namely, by various acts conversant about certain 
objects, in which he is said to manifest his perfections : thus, 
when an effect is produced, we call that perfection that pro- 
duces it his power; or as the divine acts are otherwise dis- 
tinguished with respect to the objects, or the manner of his 
glorifying himself therein, these we call his wisdom, justice, 
goodness, £s?c. And this is what we mean, when we speak of 
various perfections in God ; though some suppose that they ex- 
press themselves more agreeably to the nature of the subject, 
or to the simplicity of God, in that, whenever they speak of 
any of the divine perfections, they speak of them in such a waj-, 
as that they are denominated from the effect thereof; as when 
they take occasion to mention the power of God, they call it 
God acting powerfully ; or of his justice or faithfulness, they 
express those perfections by, God acting justly or faithfully*. 
But however we express oui-selvcs, when we speak of the dis- 
tinct perfections of the divine nature, this is what we principal- 
ly intend thereby : and here our thoughts must stop, and makcv 
what is too great for a finite mind to conceive of the subject 
of our admiration, and adore what we cannot comprehend : 
such knowledge is too wonderful for us ; it is high, wc cannor 
I (tain to it. 

*" Ste dc Vvks K'.ryi'UaL RationaJ 



206 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINl'TT. 

Quest. IX. How many persons are there in the Godhead? 

Answ. There be three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, 
the Son, and the Holy Ghost ; and these three are one, true, 
eternal God, the same in substance, equal in power and glo- 
ry ', although distinguished by their personal properties. 

Quest. X. What are the personal properties of the three Per- 
sojis in the Godhead? 

Answ. It is proper to the Father to beget the Son, and to the 
Son to be begotten of the Father, and to the Holy Ghost to 
proceed from the Father and the Son from all eternity. 

Quest. XI. How doth it appear that the Son and the Holy 
Ghost are God equal with the Father P 

Answ. The scriptures manifest, that the Son and the Holy 
Ghost are God tquai with the Father ; ascribing unto them 
such names, attributes, works, and worship, as are proper to 
God only. 

IN these three answers is contained the doctrine of the ever 
blessed Trinity, which is a subject of pure revelation ; (a) 
and, because it is so much contested in the age in AV'^hich we live, 
we are obliged to be more large and particular, in laying down 

(a) " God is One : a most pure, most simple, and most perfect Being. 

The absolute unity and simplicity of this glorious Being is strictly exclusive of 
any division of perfections. Yet, as human knowledge is not intuitive but discui"- 
sive, we find it necessary to form and communicate our conceptions, by refeiTing 
them to distinct and infinite attributes. Such are independence, spirituality, eter- 
nity, immutability, powei', knowledge, rectitude, and benevolence. 

It is absurd to say, that eitlier the abstract essence, or any of the infinite per- 
fections of God, in themselves, or in their exercise, can be grasped, included, or 
compreJiended (or whatever equivalent term be used) by a Imiited intellect. " A 
part of His ways, a little portion of Him," we know; for He has unveiled it. The 
knowledge of the best and greatest finite mind can only be, to immortality, an ap- 
proximation ; and therefoi'e must for ever be infinitely small. God alone is capa- 
BLK of coMi'HEHE\ui>-G His own nature, mode of existence, and perfections. 

The only cjuestions, therefore, that we have to ask, are, Has Deity, in fact, com- 
municated to man any information concerning himself ? And -what has He com- 
municated ? Whatever such revelation maj' be, it is impossible that it should be 
self-contradictory, or :uiy other than most becoming to infinite wisdom and purity. 

This revelation authorizes us, by a variety of inductive proofs, to conclude, 
-♦that, witli regard to the mode of existence of the oxe Divine Essence, the Unity 
of the Godhead includes a Trinity of Persons (so denominated for want of any 
better terms) who are scripturaily stvled the Fatlier, the Son, and the Holy Spi- 
rit : Distinct, not in essence or in perfections, but only personally : One, not per- 
sonally, but in the common possession of the same identical nature and attributes. 

No contradiction or absurdity is involved in this doctrine, because the unity re- 
fers to one respect, and the trinity to another. But we make no difficulty in pro- 
fessing our incapacity to include in our knowledge, or express by any ))ossible 
terms, the respect in which the Trinity of persons subsists in the perfect Onencbb 
of the Deitj'. Such pretension would imply a contradiction." 

Smith's Lettebs tq Beisham. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 20lf 

the reasons of our belief of it, and in our defence thereof, against 
those that deny it. It is a doctrine that has been deftndeci by 
some of the most judicious writers, both in our own ana other 
nations ; whereof some have proved that it was maintaii ■ d by 
the church in the purest ages thereof, which therefore renders 
it less necessary for us to enter into that part of the controver- 
sy ; but we shall principally insist on it as founded on the sacred 
writings : and whereas others have rendered some parts of this 
doctrine more obscure, by confining themselves to the scholastic 
ways of speaking, we shall endeavour to avoid them, that so it 
may be better understood by private Christians ; and the method 
we shall pursue in treating of it shall be, 

I. To premise some things which are necessary to be consi- 
dered, with relation to it in general. 

II. We shall consider in what sense we are to understand the 
words Trinity^ and Persons in the Godhead^ and in what re- 
spect the divine Persons ai"e said to be One. 

III. We shall prove that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, 
have distinct personal properties, and therefore that we have 
sufficient reason to call them Persons, in the Godhead, as they 
are in the first of these answers ; and under this head shall 
consider w^hat is generally understood by what is contained in 
the second of them, which respects the eternal generation of 
the Son, and the procession of the Holy Ghost ; and what cau- 
tions we are to use, lest, by mistaking the sense thereof, we be 
led into any error, derogatory to, or subversive of the doctrine 
of the Trinity ; and also shall endeavour to explain those scrip- 
tures, which are generally brought to establish that doctrine. 

IV. We shall endeavour to prove that these three Persons, 
especially the Son and Holy Ghost, are truly divine, or that 
they have all the perfections of the divine nature ; and there- 
fore that they are, in the most proper sense, the one only living 
and true God. {a) 

(a) " Ti)at which is taug'ht in the scriptures concei-ning' the incomprehensible 
and spiritual essence of G(;cl ought to suffice, not only to overthrow the foolisli 
errors of the common people, but also to confute the fine subtilties of profane 
philosf)phy. One of the old writers seemed to have said very well, ' That (jod is 
all that we do see, and all tliat we do not see.' But by this means lie halh ima- 
f^ined the Godhead to be diffused into all the parts of the world. AUhougli God, 
to the intent to keep men in sobei" mind, speak but sparingly of his own essence, 
yet, by those two names of addition that I liave rehearsed, he dolh both take away 
all gross imaginations, and also repress the presumptuous boldness of maji's mind. 
For surely his immeasurable greatness ought to make us afraid, that we attempt 
not to measure him with our sense : and his spiritual nat(u-e forbiddeth us to ima- 
gine any tiling earthly or fleshly of him. For the same cause he often assigneth 
his dwelling place to be in heaven. For though, as he is incomprehensible, he fiU- 
eth the earth also : yet because he seeth our minds by reason of their duhiesb to lie 
still in the earth, for good cause he lifteth us up above the world, to sh:ike off our 
sloth and ski{rgishness. And heie fallcth to ground the error of the Manichces, 



208 THE DOCTRlxVE OF THE TRINITY. 

I. We shall premise some things which are necessary to be 
considered, with relation to the doctrine of the Trinity in gene- 
ral. And, 



vhich, in appointing two original beginnings, have made the devil m a manner 
equal with God. Surely, this was as much as to break the unity of God, and re- 
strain his unmeasurableness. For where they have presumed to abuse certain tes- 
timonies, that sheweth a foul ignorance, as their error itself sheweth a detestable 
madness. And the Anthropomorphites are also easily confuted, who ha\'e ima- 
gined God to consist of a botly, because oftentimes the scripture ascribeth unto 
him a mouth, ears, eyes, hands, and feet. For what man, yea, though he be slen- 
derly witted, doth not understand tliat God doth so with us speak as it were child- 
ishly, as nurses do with their babes P therefore such manner of speeches do not 
so planily express what God is, as they do apply the understanding of him to our 
slender capacities. Which to do, it behoved of necessity tliat he descended a great 
way beneath his own height. 

2.. But he also setteth out himself by another special mark, whereby he may 
be more nearly known. For he so declareth himself to be but one, that he yet 
giveth himself distinctly to be considei*ed in three persons : which, except we 
learn, a bare and empty name of God without any true God fieeth in our brain. 
And that no man should think that he is a tiireefold God, or that the one essence 
of God is divided in three persons, we mUst here seek a sh<»t and easy defini- 
tion, to deliver us from all error. But because many do make much about this 
word Person, as a thing invented by man, how justly tliey do so, it is best first 
to see. The apostle naming the Son the engraved form of the hy]303tasis of his 
Fathei", he undoubtedly me;metJi, that the Father hath some being, wherein he 
differeth from the Son. For to take it for essence (as some expositors have done, 
as if Ciu-ist like a piece of wax printed with a seal did represent the substance of 
the Father) were not only hard, but also an absurdity. For since the essence of 
God is single or one, and indivisible, he that in himself containeth it all, and 
not by piece-meal, or by derivation, but in whole perfection, should very im- 
pi'operly, yea, f< olishly, be called the engraved form of him. But because the 
Father, although he be in his own property distinct, hath expressed himself 
wholly in his Son, it is for g'ood cause said, that he hath given his hjpostasis to 
be seen in him. Wherewith aptly agreeth that which by and by followeth, that 
he is the brightness of his glory. Surely by the apostle's words we gather, that 
there is a certain proper hypostasis in the Father, that shineth in the Son : where- 
by also again is easily perceived the hypostasis of the Son, that distinguisheth 
him from the Father. The like order is in the holy Ghost. For we shull by and 
by prove liim to be God, and yet he must needs be odier than the Father. Yet 
this distinction is not of the essence, which it is unlawful to make manifold. 
Thei-efore, if the apostle's testimony be credited,it followeth that there be in God 
three hyp<xstasis. This term seeing the Latins have expressed by the name of 
Person, it were too much pride and frowardness to wrangle about so clear a 
matter. But if we list word for word to translate, we may call it subsistance. 
Many in the same sense have called it substance. And the name of Person liath 
not been in use ;tiiK>ng the Latins only, but also the Grecians, perhaps to declare 
a consent, have taught that theiv are tliree Prosopa, that is to say Persons, in 
God. But they, whether they be Greeks or Latins that differ one from another 
in the word, do very well agree in the sum of the matter. 

3. Now howsoever the hereticks cry out against the name of Person, or some 
overmuch precise men do carp that they like not the word feigned by the device of 
men; since they cannot get of us to say, that there be three, whereof every one 
is wholly God, nor yet that there be rnany gods : what unreasonableness is this, 
tct dislike words, which express none other tiling but that which is testified and 
approved by the scriptures ? It were better (sav they) to restrain not only our 
meanings but also our words within the bouncls of scripture, than to devise 
sirange terms, tliat may be the beginnings of disagTcement and bi-awling: so do 
w^tire ourselves with strife about words : so the truth is lost in contendir^g': «o 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 209 

1. It is a doctrine of the. highest importance, and necessary 
to be believed b v' all Christians, who pay a just defer-nce to 



charity iS broken b\ odiously brawling togcthei-. If they call that ;. s^tvar.ge word, 
whicii cimnot be shewed in scviptiue, us it is written in number oi' s\ llables ; 
then they liind us to a hard law, wheveliy is condenmed ail exposition 'hat is not 
pieced tog-ether, with bare laying tog-ttliej- of texts of scripture. Eut if they 
mean tliat to be strang-e, which, being curiously devised, is superstitiously de- 
fended, which maketli more lor contention than edification, which is either im- 
properly, or to no pi-ofit, used, witich withdraweth from the Simi;;.i ly of the 
word ofGod, then with all my heart I embrace tlieir sober minct. ir'.;r I judge 
that we ought with no less devout reverence to talk of God than to think of himj 
tor as much as whatsoever we do of ourselves think of him is foolish, ;ind what- 
soever we speak is unsavoury. But there is a certain mea.sure to be kept. "VVe 
ouglit to learn out of the scriptures a ride both to think and speak, whereby to 
examine all the thoughts of om- mind, and words of our mouth. But wliat hinder-- 
cth us, but tliat such as in scripture are to our capacity doubtful and entangled, 
we may in plainer Mords exjiress tliem, bemgyet such words as do reverently and 
faitlvfuily serve the trutli of tlie scripture, and be used sparingly, modestly, and 
not without occasion ' Of which sort there are examples enough. And v.l.ereas it 
shall by proof appear that the church of great necessity was forced to use the 
names of Trinity, and Persons, if any shall then find fault with the nevrness of 
words, shaW he not be justly thought to be grieved at the light of the truth, as 
he that blameth only this, that the truth is made so plain and clear to discern.-' 

4. Such newness of words, if it be so called, cometh then chiefly in use, when 
the truth is to be defended against wranglers that do mock it out with cavils. - 
Whicli thing we have at this day too much in experience, who have great busi- 
ness in vanquishing the enemies of true and sotmd doctrine. With such folduig 
and crooked winding, these slippeiy snakes do slide away, unless they be strong- 
ly gripped and hoiden hard^whcn they be talcen. So the old fathers, being troubled 
with contending against false doctrines, were compelled to shew their memiings 
in exc[uisite phunness, lest they should leave any crooked byeways to tiie wicked, 
to whom the doubtful constructions of words were hiding-holes of errors. Arius 
confessed Christ to be God, and the Son of God, because he could not gainsay the 
evident words of God, and, as if he had been so sufRciently discharged, did feign 
a certain consent witli the rest. But in the me;uiwhile he ceased not to scatter 
abroad that Christ was created, and had a beginning, as other creatures. But to 
the end that they might draw forth liis winding subtil ty out of his den, the an- 
cient fathers went further, pronouncing- Christ to be tlie eternal Son of the Father, 
and consubstantial with tlic Father, liereat wickedness began to boil, wlien the 
Arians begtm to hate and detest the name Omoovsion, consubstantial. But if in 
the beginning they had sincerely and with plain mean:ng confessed Clirist to be 
God, they would not now have denied him to be consubstantial with the Father. 
Who dare now blame these good men as brawlers and contentious, because, for 
one little word's sake, they were so keen in disputation, and disturbed the peace 
of the church.'' But that little word shev.cd the difference between the true be- 
lieving Christians, and the Arians, who were robbers of God. Afterwards rose up 
Sabellius, who accounted in a manner for nothing the names of the Father, the 
Son, and Holy Gliost, saying in disputation that they were not made to shew 
any manner of distinction, but only were several additions of God, of which sort 
there are many. If he came to disputation, he confessed that he believed the Fa- 
ther God, the Son God, the Holy Ghost God. But afterwards he would readilv 
slip away with saying, that he had in no otherwise spoken than as if he had na- 
nied God, a powerful God, just God, ;md wise God : and so he ,'jurig another song, 
that the Father is the Son, and the Holy Ghost is the Father, williout any oi'der, 
without any distinction. The good doctiirs who then liad care of godlinessj to sub- 
due his wickedness, cried out on the otlier side, that there ovight to be acknow- 
ledged in one God three properties: and to the end to fence themselves against 
the crooked wuiding subtllties -vvith plain and simpk truth, tht) affiimed, that 

Vol. I. D d 



210 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

revealed religion. It may probably be reckoned an ciTor in 
method to speak of the importance of this doctrine, before we 



there did truly subsist in one God, or (n-hich is the same thing) that there did 
subsisl In the unity of God, a Trinity of Persons. 

5. If then the names have not been v.ithout cause invented, we ought to take 
heed, 1 hat in rejecting them we be not justly blamed of proud presumptuousness. I 
would to God they were buried indeed, so that tiiis fa.ith were agreed of all men, that 
the Father, ;.nd the Son, and the Holy Ghost, be one God : and yet thattlie Father 
is not the Son, nor the tloly Ghost the Son, but distinctly, by certain property. Yet 
I am not so precise, that 1 can find in ni}' heart to strive for biu'e words. For I ob- 
serve, thai tlic ancient fathers, who otherwise spake very religiously of such mat- 
ters, did not every where agi-ee one with another, nor every one with himself. For 
what forms of speech used by the councils doth Hilliu-j excuse ? To how great 
liberty doth Augustine sometimes break forth ? How unlike ..re the Greeks to the 
Latins ? But of this disagreement one example shall suffice for this time. AVhen 
the Latins wanted to express the Mord Omooitston, they called it CoTtsubstanHaf, 
declaring- the substance of the Father and the Son to be one, thus using the word 
substance for essence. Whereupon Hierom toDamasus saith, itis sacrilege to say, 
that there are tliree substances in God : and yet above a hundred times you shsdl 
find in Hillary, that there are three substances m God. In the word hupostasit, 
how is Hiei-om difficultcd ? for he suspecteth that there lurketh poison in naming 
three hyposUisis in God. And if a man do use this ^^'ord in a godly sense, jet he 
plainly saith that it is an improper speech, if he spake unfeignedly, and did not 
rather Avittingl}' and willingly seek to charge the bishops of the Kast, whom he 
sought to charge with an unjust slander. Sure this one thing he sjjeaketh not 
veiy truly, that in all profane schools, Ousia, essence, is nothing else but Ini^os- 
tasis, which is pi-oved false by the common and accustomed use. Augustine is 
more modest and gentle, \vho, :.lthough he saj'S, Z>e trint. li. 5. cap. 8, 9. that the 
word hvpostasis in that sense is strange to Latin ears, yet s-o far is it off, that he 
taketh from the Greeks their usual manner of speaking, that he also gently bear- 
eth with the Latins Vv ho hiid followed the Greek phrase. And that which Socrates 
writeth in the fifth book of the Tripartite history tendetli to this end, as though 
he meant that he had by unskilful men been wrongfuUv applied unto tliis matter. 
Yea, and the same Hillary himself layeth it as a great taultto the heretics charge, 
De trill. U. 2- that by their irowardness he is conil)e!lcd to put those things in peril 
of the speech of men, which ought to have been kept in religiousness of mmds, 

Elainl)- confessing" that this is to do things unlawful, to speak what ought not to 
e spoken,, to attempt things not licensed. A little after, he excuseth himseM" 
with manv words, for that he was so bold to utter new names. For after he had 
used the natural names, Father, Sen, and Hoi}- (ihost,he addet>i,that whatsoever 
is sought further is beyond the compass of speech, beyond the reach of sense, 
and beyond the capacity' of understanding. And in another place he saith, that 
happy are tlie bis'iops of Gallia, wholiad not received, nor knew any other con- 
fession but that old and simple one, which from the time of the apostles was re^ 
ceived in all churches. And niucli like is the excuse of Augustine, that this word 
was wrung out o+" necessity, by reason of the imperfection of men's hiLguage in 
so great a matter : not to express that which is, but tliat it should rt<jt be un- 
spoken, how the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, are three. This modesty of 
the holy nien ought to WM-n us, that v,e do not forthwith so severely, like cen- 
sors, brioid tliem with infamy, who refuse to subscTibe.and swear to such words 
as wc propound them : so that they do not of pnde, or frov<'ardness, or of mali- 
cious craf ; . ]5ut let them again consider, by how great necessity we are driven to 
speak so, 'hat by little and little they may be enured M'ith that profitable mannei- 
of speech. Let them also learn to beware, lest since we nuist meet on tlie one 
side with the Arians, on the other side witli the Subellians, while they be ofli^nded 
that we CUV p-ft occasion nom them both to cavil, they bring themselves in suspi- 
cion, that tliey be the disciples either of Arius or of Sabeliius. Arius saith tliat 
Christ is Godj but he muttereth that he was created, and had a beginning. He saith 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. ' 211 

attempt to prove the truth thereol : however, it is not altogether 
unjustifiable, since we address ourselves to those who believe 
it, hoping thereby to offer some farther conviction, or establish- 
ment, to their faith therein, as well as to others who deny it j 
we may therefore be allowed to consider it as an important 
doctrine, that we may be excited to a more diligent enquiry 
into the force of some of those arguments, which are generally 
brought in its defence. 

Now to determine a doctrine to be of the highest import- 
ance, we must consider the belief thereof as connected with 
salvation, or subservient to that true religion, which is ordain- 
ed by God, as a necessary means leading to it, without which 
we have no warrant to expect it : and such doctrines are some- 
times called fundamental, iis being the basis and foundation on 
which our hope is built. Here, I think, it will be allov/ed, by 
all whose sentiments do not savour of scepticism, that there are 
some doctrines of religion necessary to be believed to salva- 
tion. There are some, it is true, who plead for the innocency of 
error, or, at least, of those who are sincere enquirers after 
truth, who, in the end, will appear to have been very remote 
from it, as though their endeavours would entitle them to sal- 
vation, without the knowledge of those things, Avhich others 
conclude to be necessarily subservient to it. All that we shall 
say concerning this is, that it is not the sincerity of our enqui- 
ries after important truths, but the success tliereof, that is to be 
regarded in this, as well as other means, that are to be used to 
obtain so valuable an end. We may as well suppose that our 
sincere endeav^ours to obtain many of those graces that accom- 
pany salvation, such as faith, love to God, and evangelicid obe- 
dience, will suppl)', or atone for, the want of them ; as assert 
that our unsuccessful enquiries after the great doctrines of re- 
ligion will excuse our ignorance thereof; especially when we 



Christ is one with the Fatlier, but secretly lie whispei-eth in the ears oi' his disci- 
ples, that he was made one us the other fjiithfiil Ije, alth.ougli by singular ]irerf)- 
gative. Say once that Christ is consiibstantial with his Father, tlien phick yon off 
his visor from the dissembler, and yet you add nothing- to the scripttu'e. Sahellius 
saith, tiiat the several names, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, signify noiliing in 
God severally distinct. Say that they are three, and he will cry out tliat yon name 
three gods. Say that there is in one essence a Trinity of persons, then shall \ou 
in one word both say what the scripture .speaketii, and stop their v.'iin Ijiibbling. 
Now if any be holden with so curious superstition, that they cannot aliide these 
names, 3 et is tl)ere no man, thougli he would never so fain, that can deny but tliat 
when we hear of one, we must \niderstand an unity of substance : wiien we hear 
of three in one essence, that it is me:uit of the persons of tlie Trinity. Which 
thing being without fraud confessed, we stay no longer upon words. Hut I have 
long ago found, and that often, that whosoever do obstinately quarrel about 
words, do kcej) within them a secret poison : so that it is better willinjjly to pro 
roke them, than for their plcasiu-e to speak darkly." 

C > J V i Jf 



212 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

consider, that blindness oi' mind, as well as hardness of heart, 
is included among those spiritual judgments, which are the con- 
sequence oi" our iallen state ; and also that God displays the so- 
vereignty OI his grace as much, in leading the soul into ail ne- 
cessar}- truth, as he does in any other things that relate to sal- 
vation. Hov/ever, it is not our business to determine the final 
state of men ; or how far they make advances to, or recede 
from, the knowledge of such important doctrines ; or what will 
be the issue thereof; but rather to desire of God, that so far 
as we, or others, are destitute of this privilege, he would grant 
us and them repentance^ to the acknowledgment of the truths 
1 Tim. ii. 25. And here we cannot but observe, that the ques- 
tion relating to important or fundamental articles of faith is 
not whether any doctrines may be hO called.^ but what thf)se 
doctrines are : in determining ot v/hlch, many make provision 
for their own particular scheme of doctrine : and accordingly 
some, as the Papists in particular, assert several doctrines to 
be fundamental, without scriptm-e v/arrant; yea, such as are 
directly contrary thereunto ; and others allow no doctrine to be 
so, but what will, ii adhered to, open a door of salvation to all 
mankind, and these set aside the necessity of divine reveiaiion; 
and others, who desire not to run such lengths, will allow, that 
some scripture-doctrines are necessary to be believed to salva- 
tion : but these are only such as may include those who are in 
their way of thinking ; thus they Vvho deny the doctrine of the 
Trinity, are obliged in conformity to their ov. n sentiments, to 
deny also that it is an important article of faith. These^may 
justly demand a conviiicing proof of the truth thereof, before 
they believe it to be of any importance, especially to them- 
selves ; and therefore it would be a vain thing to tell them, that 
the belief t-hereof is connected with salvation ; or that it is ne- 
cessary, inasmuch as divine worship is so, which supposes the 
belief of the divinity of the Persons, whom we adore ; with- 
out first proving that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are di- 
vine Persons : and it would be as little to their edification to 
say that there are several doctrines necessary to be believed ; 
such as that of Christ's satisfaction, and our justification, de- 
pending thereon, and that of regeneration and sanctificat^on, 
as the effects of the divine power of the Holy Ghost ; all which 
suppose the belief of their being divine Persons ; unless we first 
give some convincing proof of the truth of these doctrines, 
which are supposed to stand or fall with it ; for it would be im- 
mediately replied, that one is false, and consequently far from 
being of any importance ; therefore so is the other. 

But inasmuch as we reserve the consideration of these things 
to their proper place ; we shall only observe at present, that 
there are some who do not appear to deny the doctrine of the 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 213 

Trinity, but rather the importance of it; and express them- 
selves with very great indifference about it, and blame all at- 
tempts to defend it, as needless, or litigious, as though it were 
only a contest about words : thus they say, though we hold it 
ourselves, others who deny it, may have as much to say in de- 
fence of their own cause as we have, and therefore that these 
disputes ought to be wholly laid aside. Now, with respect to 
these, what we have hinted, concerning the importance of this 
doctrine, may not be altogether misapplied ; therefore we have 
taken occasion to, mention it in this place, that we may not be 
supposed to plead a cause which is not worth defending, as 
though the doctrine of the Trinity were no other than an empty 
speculation ;* but as that which we are bound to esteem a doc- 
trine of the highest importance. ^ 

2. We are next to consider what degree of knowledge of this 
doctrine is necessaiy to, or connected with salvation. It can-? 
not be supposed that this includes in it the knowledge of every 
thing that is commonly laid down in those writings, wherein it 
is attempted to be explained; for when we speak of this, as a 
doctrine of the highest importance, we mean the scripture-doc- 
trine of the Trinity. This is what we are to assent to, and to 
use our utmost endeavours to defend ; but as for those expli- 
cations, which are merely human, they are not to be reckoned 
of equal importance ; especially every private Christian is not 
to be censured as a stranger to this doctrine, who cannot de- 
fine personality in a scholastic way, or understand all the terms 
used in explaining it, or several modes of speaking, which 
some writers tenaciously adhere to ; such as hypostasis, sub- 
sistence, consubstantiaiity, the modal distinction of the Persons 
in the Godhead, filiation, or the communication of the divine 
essence by generation, or its being farther communicated by 
procession ; some of which rather embaiTass the minds of men, 
than add any farther light to the sense of those scriptures, in 
which this doctrine is contained. 

But when we consider how far the doctrine of the Trinity is 
to be known, and believed to salvation, we must not exclude 
the weaken Christian from a possibility of knowing it, by sup- 
posing it necessary for him to understand some hard words, 
which he doth not find in his Bible ; and if he meets with 
them elsewhere, will not be much edified by them. That know- 
ledge, therefore, which is necessary to salvation, is more plain 
and easy, and to be found in everv part of scripture : accord- 
ingly, every Christian knows, that the word God signifies a be> 
ing that has all those divine perfections, which are so frequent- 
ly attributed to him therein, and are displayed and glorified in 
all his works of common providence and grace ; and that this 
God is one. To which we may also add, that he learns from 



Si4 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

his Bible, and thertfore firmlj'^ believes that the Father, Son, 
and Holy Ghost, are possessed of these divine perfections, and 
consequently that they are this one God ; and that they are 
distinguished, as we often find in scripture, by such characters 
and properties, which we generally call personal, and so apply 
the word Person to each of them, and conclude that the divine 
glory attributed to them is tht same, though their personal pro- 
perties, or characters, are distmct ; Avhich is the substance of 
what is contained in the first oi those answers, under our pre- 
sent consideration. And he that believes this, need not enter- 
tain any doubt as though he wanted some ideas of this sacred 
doctrine, which are necessary to salvation ; since such a degree 
of knowledge, attended with a firm belief thereof, is sufficient 
to Avarrant all those acts of divine worship, which we are obli- 
ged to ascribe to the Father, Son, and Spirit, and is consistent 
with all those other doctrines, which are founded on, or sup- 
pose the belief thereof, as was before observed under our last 
head. 

3. We shall consider this doctrine as a great myster;-, such 
as cannot be comprehended by a finite mind ; and thert.ior- we 
shall first enquire v/hat we are to understand by the woro Mys- 
tery^ as it is used in scripture. This word sometimes denotes 
a doctrme's having been kept secret, or, at least, revealed more 
obscurely, upon which account it was not so clearly known be- 
fore ; in which sense, the gospel is palled, The mystery -which 
hath been hid from ages^ and from- generations^ hut now is made 
manifest to his saints^ Col. i. 26. It was covered with the cere- 
monial law, as with a vail, v/hich many of the people, through 
the blindness of their minds, did not so fully understand; and 
f&ccordingly, v/hen persons are led into a farther degree of know- 
ledge thereof, it is said, as our Saviour tells his disciples, that 
to them it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of 
heaven^ Matt. xiii. 11. or when something is revealed in scrip- 
ture, which the world was not in the least apprised of before ; 
this is, by way of eminence, called a mystery, as the apostle 
says, speaking concerning the change that shall be ])assed on 
those that shall be found alive at the last day ; Behold^ I shew 
you a mystery ; roe shall ?iot all sleep, but we shall all be changed 
in a moment^ in the twinkling of an eye, 1 Cor. xv. 51, 52. 

But to this we may add, that there is also another idea affix- 
ed to the word Mystery, namely, that though it be revealed, 
yet it cannot be fully comprehended ; and it is in this sense that 
we call the doctrine of the Trinity a Mystery. Both these ideas 
;-eem to be contained in the word, in some scriptures, particu- 
larly where the apostle sa^s. Unto me, who am less than the 
least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among 
the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, and to make aU 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 215 

men see what is thefclloivship of the mijstery^ xvhich^ from the 
hegimiing of the xvorld^ hath been hid in God^ Eph. i'u. 8, 9. 
where he speaks ol the gospel, not only as hid, but unstarcha- 
ble ; and he speaks ot the mystery of God^ even the Father^ and 
of Christy in xvhom are hid all the treasures ofrvisdom and know- 
ledge^ Col. ii. 3. where the word mystery seems to contain both 
these ideas ; for few will deny, that the glory of tiie Father, 
who is here spoken of, as well as Christ, is incomprehensible 
by a finite mind ; and if it be said, that the gospel is hereby in- 
tended, and so that the words ought to be rendered, in -which 
are hid ail the treasures of wisdom and knowledge ', this must 
be supposed to be incomprehensible, as well as formerly less 
known, otherwise this character of it would be too great. 

But suppose the word Mystery were always used to signify 
a doctrine, not before revealed, without the other idea of its be- 
ing incomprehensible contained in it ; this would not overthrow 
our argument in general, since we can prove it to be incom- 
prehensible from other arguments, which we shall endeavour 
to do. 

And that we may prepare our way for this, let it be consi- 
dered, that there are some finite things, which we cannot now 
comprehend, by reason of the imperfection of our present state, 
which are not incomprehensible in themselves. How little do 
we know of some things, which may be called mysteries in na- 
ture ; such as the reason of the growth and variety of colours 
and shapes of plants ; the various instinct of brute creatures ; 
yea, how little do we know comparatively of ourselves, the na- 
ture of our souls, any otherwise, than as it is observed by theii- 
actions, and the effects they produce ; the reason of their union 
with our bodies, or of their acting by them, as the inspired wri- 
ter obser\'es ; so that it may well be said. Thou knoxvest not the 
■way of the spirit^ nor hoxv the bones do groxv in thexvomb of her 
that is xuith child ; even so thou knoxvest not the xvorks of God^ 
xvho maketh all things^ Eccles. xi. 5. and Elihu, together with 
some of the other wonderful works of nature, which he chal- 
lengeth Job to give an account of, speaks of this in particular, 
JDost thou knoxv hoxv thy garments are xuarm, xvhen he (jitieteth 
the earthy by the south xvind? Job xxxvii. 17, £s?<?. which not 
only signifies that M^e cannot account for the winds producing 
heat or cold, as blowing from various quarters of heaven ; but 
that we know not the reason of the vital heat, which is preserv- 
ed tor so many years, in the bodies of men, the inseparable con- 
comitant and sign of life ; or v/hat gives the first motion to the 
blood and spirits, or fits the organized bodj'^ to perform its va- 
rious functions. These things cannot be comprehended by us. 

But if we speak of that which is infinite, we must conclude it 
to be iiicomprehenjible, not only because of the imperfection ol" 



216 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

our present state, but because, as has been before observed, of 
the infinite dispropoiliQii that there is between the object and 
our finite capacities. In this respect we have before shewn 
that the perfections of the divine nature cannot be compre- 
hended, such as the immensity, eternity, omnipresence, and 
simplicity of God ; yet we are to beheve that he is thus infinite- 
ly perfect. And it seems equally reasonable to suppose the 
doctrine of the Trinity to be incomprehensible ; for the mutual 
relation of the Father, Son, and Spirit, to each other, and their 
distinct personality, are not the result of the divine will ; these 
are personal perfections, and therefore they are necessary, and 
their glory infinite, as well as that of his essential perfections ; 
and if we are bound to believe one to be incomprehensible, \vfiy 
should we not as well suppose the other to be so .'' or if there 
are some things which the light of nature gives us some ideas 
of, concerning which we are notwithstanding bound to confess 
that we know but little of them, for the reason but now men- 
tioned, why should it be thought strange, that this doctrine, 
though the subject of pure revelation, should be equally in- 
comprehensible f This consequence appears so evident, that 
some of them, who deny the doctrine of the Trinity to be in- 
comprehensible, do not stick to deny the perfections of the di- 
vine nature to be so, when they maintain that there is nothing 
which is the object of faith but what may be comprehended by 
us, which is to run such lengths in the defence of their cause, 
as no one who hath the least degree of that humility, which be- 
comes a finite creature, should venture to do. But they pro- 
ceed yet faither, as the cause they defend seems to require it, 
and say, that every doctrine which we cannot comprehend is to 
be rejected by us, as though our understandings were to set 
bounds to the truth and credibility of all things. 

This, I think, is the true state of the question about myste- 
ries in Christianitv : it is not whether the word Mystery is never 
used in scripture to signify what is incomprehensible ; for if 
that could be sufficiently proved, which I think hath not yet 
been done, we .would assert the doctrine of the Trinity to be 
more than a mystery, namely, an incomprehensible doctrine ; 
and the proof thereof seems absolutely necessary, since the An- 
titrinitarians, and some of them with an air of insult, conclude 
tliis to be our last resort, which we betake ourselves to when 
they have beaten us out of all our other strong holds ; and 
therefore we may suppose, that this would be opposed with the 
greatest \\'armth, but I do not find that it has hitherto been 
overthrown ; and mdeed when they call it one of our most 
plausible pretences, as though we laid the whole stress of the 
controversy upon it, it might be expected that it should be at- 
tacked with stronger arguments than it generally is. Some- 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 217 

limes they bend their force principally against the sense of the 
word Mystery ; and here they talk not only with an air of in*- 
suit, but profaneness, when they compare it with the abomina- 
ble mysteries of the heathen, which were not to be divulged to 
any but those of them who were in the secret; and the doctrine 
of the Trinity, and that of tra/isubstantiation, are compared to- 
gether, so that they are to be reckoned equally mysterious, that 
is, according to their application of the word, absurd and non- 
sensical. And this way of arguing has so far prevailed among 
them, that no one must apply the word to any doctrines of reli- 
gion without exposing himself to scorn and ridicule ; but this 
will do no service to their cause, nor prejudice to our doctrine, 
in the opinion of those who enquire into the truth thereof, with 
that seriousness and impartiality, that the importance of the 
doctrine calls for.(tf) 

(a) " There are some docti'ines in tlie gospel the understanding could not disco- 
^■er ; but when they are revealed, it hatli a clear apprehension of them upon a ra- 
tional account, and sees the characters of truth visibly stampt on theu* forehead : 
as the doctrine of satisfaction to divine justice, that j)ardon might be dispensed 
to repenting sinners. For our natural conception of God includes liis infinite pu- 
rity and justice ; and when the design of the gospel is made known, whereby he 
hath provided abundantly for the honour of those attributes, so that He doth the 
greatest good without encouraging the least evil, reason acquiesces, and acknow- 
ledges. This I sought, but could not find. Now, although theprimaiy obllgatKju 
to believe such doctrines ariseth from revelation, yet being ratified by reason, 
they are embi-aced with more clearness by the mind. 

2. There are some doctrines, which as reason by its light could not discover; 
so when they are made known, it cannot comprehend ; but they are l>y a clear and 
iiecessai-y connexion joined with the otlier that reason approves : as the mystery 
of the Trinity, and the Incarnation of the Son of God, which are the foinulations 
«fthe whole work of our redemption. The nature of God is repugnant to plura- 
lity, there can be but one essence; and the nature of satisfaction requires a dis- 
tinction of persons : For he that suffers as guilty, must be distinguished from 
the person of the judge that exacts satisfaction ; and no mere creature is able by 
his obedient sufferings to repair the honoui* of God : So tliat a divine person, as- 
suming the natiu-e of man, was alone capable to make diat satisfaction, whicli the 
gospel propounds, and reason consents to. Now, according to the distinction of 
capacities in the Trinity, the Father required an honourable reparation for the 
breach of the divine law, and the Son bore the punishment in the sufferings of 
the humaii nature; that is peculiarly his own. Besides, 'tis clear that the doc- 
trine oftlie Trinity, that is, of three glorious relations in the Godhead, and of the 
incarnation, are most firmly connected with all the parts of the christian reli- 
gion, left in the writings oftlie apostles, which as they were confirmed by mira- 
cles, the divine signatures of their certainty, so tliey contain such authentic 
mai'ks of their divinity, that right reason cannot reject them. 

3. Whereas thei-e are three principles by which we apprehend things. Sense, 
Reason and Faith ; these lights have their different objects that must not be 
confpunded. Sense is confined to things material ; Reason considers thing-s ab- 
stracted from matter ; Faith regards the mysteries revealed from heaven : and 
these must not transgress their order. Sense is an incompetent judge of thuigs 
about which i-eason in only conversant. It can only make a report of those ob- 
jects, which by their natural characters are exposed to it. And reason can only 
discourse of things, within its sphere : supernatiu-al tilings which derive from re- 
velation, and arc purely the objects of faith, ai-e not within its territories and ju- 
risdiction. Those superhuive mysteries exceed all our intellectual abilities. 

Vol. I. E e 



218 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

The question therefore in controversy is ; whether any doc- 
trines of religion may be deemed incomprehensible, that is, such 

'Tis true, the understanding' is a rational faculty, and every act of it Is really 
or in appearance grounded on reason. But there is a wide difference between tli*^ 
proving a doctrine by reason, and the giving a reason why we believe the ti'uth 
of it. For instance, we ciinnot prove the Trinity by natural reason ; and the sub- 
tilty of|the schoolmen, wlio affect to give some reason of all things, is here more 
prejudicial than advantageous to the truth : For he that pretends to maintain a 
point by reason, and is unsuccessful, doth weaken the credit which the authority 
of revelation gives. And 'tis considerable, that the scripture, in delivering super- 
natural truths, produces God's authority as their only proof, without using any 
other way of arguing : But although we cannot demonstrate these mysteries by 
reason, yet we may give a rational account why we believe them. 

Is it not the highest reason to believe the discovery that God hath made of 
himself, and his decrees ? For he perfectly knows his own natiu-e and will ; and 
"'tis impossible he should deceive us : this natural principle is the foundation of 
faith. Wlien God spealis, it becomes man to hear with silence and submission- 
His naked word is as certain as a demonstration. 

And is it not most reasonable to believe that the Deity cannot he. iiiUy under- 
stood by us ? The sun may more easily be included in a spark of fire, than the 
infinite perfections of God be comprehended by a finite mind. The angels, who 
dwell so near the fountain of light, cover tlieir faces in a holy confusion, not being 
able to comprehend Him. How much less can man in this earthly state, distant 
from God, and opprest with a burthen of flesh .'' Now from hence it follows ; 

t. That ignorance of the manner how divine mysteries exist is no suflicient 
plea for infidelity, when the scripture reveals that they are. For reason that is 
limited and restrained caimot frame a conception that is commensurate to the es- 
sence and power of God. This will appear more clearly by considering the mys- 
terious excellencies of the divine nature, the certainty of which we believe, but 
the manner we cannot vuiderstand : As that his essence and attributes are the 
same, without the least shadow of composition ; yet his wisdom and power are to 
our apprehensions distinct, and his merc)^ and justice in some manner opposite.* 
That his essence is intire in all places, yet not terminated in any. That he is 
nbove the heavens, and beneath the eurtli, yet hath no relation of higii or low, 
distant or near. That he peneti-ates ail substances, but is mixed with none. That 
he understands, yet receives no ideas within himself : That he wills, yet hath no 
motion that carries him out of himself. That in him time hath no succession ; 
that which is past is not gone, and that v/hich is future is not to come. That he 
loves without passion, is angry without disturbance, repents without change. 
These perfections are above the capacity of reason fully to understand; yet essen- 
tial to the deity. Here we must exalt faith, and abase reason. Thus in the mys- 
tery of the incarnation, (1 Tim. iii. 16.) that two such distant natures should 
compose one person, without the confusion of properties, reason cannot reach un- 
to ; but it is cleai'ly revealed in the word : {Jolm i. 14.) Here therefore we must 
obey, not enquire. 

The obedience of faith is, to embrace an obscure truth with a firm assent, upow 
the account of a divijie testimony. If reason will not assent to i-evelation, till il 
imderstands the manner how divine things are, it doth not obey it at all. The 
ijnderstandingthen sincerely submits, when it is inclined by those motives, which 
demonstrate that sucli a belief is due to the authority of the revealer, and to the 
qu:Jity of the object. To believe only in proportion to our narrow conception? 
is to disparage the divuie truth, and debase the divine power. We can't know 
what God can do ; he is omnipotent, though we ai"e not omniscient : 'Tis just we 
should humble our ignorance to his wisdom, and tfiat even/ loftii imaginatiov, and 
high thing, that exalts itself again. ft the knowledge of God, should be cast down, and 
every thought captivated into tlie obedience of Cltri.it ; 2Cor.,x. 5. 'Tis our wisdom 

• Tnfinicus, immensiis 8c soli sibi tantus, quantus est notus, nobis vero ad intellectom pectus 
angustum cstj 8;'idf d sic cum dijji i> cstimaniuS; ttim iu.itstim.ibilem lUcimus. Min. Fel. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRIMTV. '219 

as we can have no adequate ideas of, because of the dispropor- 
tion between them and our finite minds ? and whether the in- 



to receive the {jreat mysteries of the gospel in their simplicity : for in attemptr 
ingto give aii exact and curious explication of them, the understanding-, as in an 
hedge of thorns, the more it sti-ives, the mure 'tis wounded and entangled. GoiPs 
ivai/s ave far aboi^e ours, and his thoiicfhts above ours as heaven is above the earth. 
To reject what wc can't comprehend, is not only to sin against faith, hut against 
reason, which acknowledges itself fuiite, and unable to search out the Mmight^ to 
perfection; Jobxi. 7. 

2. We are obliged to believe those mysteries that are plainly delivered in 
scripture, notwitiistanding those seemiyg contradictions wherewith they may be 
charged. In the objects of sense, the contrariety of appearances doth not lessen 
tlie certainty of things. The stars to our sight seem but glittering sparks, yet 
they are immense bodies. And it is one thing to be assured of a truth, another 
to answer to all the diflicnlties that encounter it : a mean understanding is capa- 
l)le of the fii'st ; the second is so difficult, that in clear things the profoundest 
philosophers may not be able to untie all t!ie intricate" and knotty objections 
which may be urged against them. 'Tis sufficient the belief of supernatural mys- 
teries is built on the veracity and power of God ; this makes tJiem prudently cre- 
dible : this resolves all doubts, and produces such a stability of spirit, as nothing 
can shake. A sincere believer is assured, that all opposition against revealed 
truths is fallacious, thougli he camiot discover tiie fallacy. Now the transcend- 
ent mysteries of the Christian religion, the Trinity of persons in the divine na- 
ture, the incaniation of the Son ofGod, are clearly set down in the scripture. And 
■-Uthoug-h subtile and obstinate opponents have Jised many guilty arts to dispirit 
and enervate those texts bj' an inferior sense, and have rackt them with violence 
10 make them speak accoi'ding to their prejudices, }et all is vain, the evidence of 
truth is victorious. A heathen, who considers not the gospel as a divine revela- 
tion, but merely as a doctrine delivered in writings, and judges of its sense by 
natural light, will acknowledge that those things are delivered in It. And not- 
withstanding those who usui-j) a sovereign authority to themsehcs, to judge of 
divine mysteries according to their own apprehensions, deny them as mere con- 
tradictions, yet they can never conclude them impossible : for no certain argu- 
ment can be alledged ag-ainst the being of a thing without a clear knowledge of 
its nature : Now, although we may understand the nature of man, we do not the 
nature of God, the occonomy of the persons, and his power \e unite himself to a 
nature below iiim. 

It is true, no article of faith is really repugnant to reason ; for Cod is the au- 
thor of natural, as well as of supernatural, light, and he cannot contradict hini- 
sell': They are emanations from liim, and though difierent, yet iiot destructive of 
each other. Hut we must distinguish between those thhigs that are above rea- 
son and incomprehensible, and things that are against rea.son and utterly incon- 
ceivable : Some things arc above reason in regard of their transcendent excel- 
lency, or distance from us ; the divine essence, the eternal decrees, the h\-postati. 
cal union, are such high and g-lorious objects, that it is an impossible enterprise 
to comprehend them : the intellectual eye is dazzled with their overpowering 
light. We can have but an imperfect knowledge of them ; and there is no j<ist 
cause of wonder that supernatural revelation should speak incomprL-hensible 
things of God. For lie is a singular and admiraiiie lieing, intinitely above thtt 
ordinary course ofnaiure. The maxims of philosophy are not lo be extended to 
him. We must adore what we cannot fully understand. I5ut those things ar.-i 
against reason, and utterly inconceivable, that involve a contradiction, and have 
a natural rejiugnancy to our understandings, which cannot conceive any thins'; 
rlrat is formally impossible: and there is no such doctrine in the christian reli- 
gion. 

>. We must distinguish between reason corrupted, and right reason. Since 

lie f;dl, the clearness of the human understanding is lost, and the light that rc- 

jn«iiis is eclipsed by the iI■lte^•po^ilion ofscu.^ual lust The (•arnal mind cannot. 



220 THE DOCTRINK OF TH£ TRINITY. 

communicable perfections of God are not to be reckoned among 
these incomprehensible doctrines ? if they are not, then it will 
be reasonable to demand that every thing relating to them be 
particularly accounted for, and reduced to the standard of a 
finite capacity ; and if this cannot be done, but some things 
must be allowed to be incomprehensible in religion, then it 
will be farther enquired, Why should the doctrine of the Tri- 
nity be rejected, because we cannot account for every thing that 
relates to the personal glory of God, anv more than we can for 
those things that respect his essential glory ? or may not some 
things, that are matter of pure revelation, be supposed to ex- 
ceed our capacities, and yet we be bound to believe them, as well 
as other things which appear to be true, and at the same time, 
incomprehensible, by the light of nature? But, that we may 
enter a little more particularly into this argument, v/e shall con- 
sider the most material objections that are brought against it, 
and what may be replied to them. 

Object* 1. It is olTJected that we take up with the bare sound 
of words, without any manner of ideas affixed to them. And, 

2. That it is unbecoming the divine wisdom and goodness to 
suppose that God should give a revelation, and demand our 
belief thereof, as necessary to salvation, when, at the same time, 
it is impossible for our understandings to yield an assent to it, 

' since nothing that is unintelligible can be the object of faith. 

3. That practical religion is designed to be promoted in the 
world herebv, and therefore the will of man must follow the dic- 
tates of the understanding, and not blindly embrace, and be con- 
versant about we know not what, which is to act unbecoming 
our own character as intelligent creatures. 

4. That the design of divine revelation is to improve our 
understandings, and render our ideas of things more clear, and 
not to entangle and perplex them. 

Ansiv. 1. As to our using words without ideas, there is no 

■t - ■ - ' - ' ' 

out .of ignorance, and will not from pride and other malignant habits, receive 
things spiritual. And from hence arises mrjiy suspicions and doubts, (concern- 
ing supernatural ^■enties) the shadows of darkened reason, and of dying faith. Ii 
any divine mystery seems incredible, it is from the corru]5tion of our reason, not 
from reason itself; from its darluiess, not its light. And as reason is obliged to 
correct the errors of sense, when it is deceived either by some vicious quality in 
the organ, or by the distance of the object, or by the falseness of the medium, 
that coiTupts the image in conveying of it. So it is the office of faitli to reform 
the judgment of reason, when either from its own weakness, or the height of 
things spiritual, it is mistaken about them. For this end supernatural revela- 
tion was given, not to extinguish reason, but to redress it, and enrich it with the 
discovery of heavenly things. Faith is called wisdom and knowledge: it doth 
not quench the vigour of the faculty wherein it is seated, but elevates it, and 
gives it a spiritual perception ot' those things that are most distant from its com- 
merce. It doth not lead us through a mist to the inheritance of the saints in 
light." iJATis. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 221 

Christian, that I know of, who thinks there is any religion in 
the sound of words, or that it is sufficient for us to take up with 
the word Trinit)', or Persons in the Godhead, without deter- 
mining, in some measure, what we understand thereby. We 
will therefore allow that faith supposes some ideas of the ob- 
ject, namely, that we have some knowledge of what we believe 
it to be : now our knowledge of things admits of various de- 
grees ; some of which we only know that they are what thej^ are 
determined, or proved to" be; if we proceed farther in our en- 
quiries, and would know how every thing is to be accounted 
for, that may justly be affirmed concerning them, here our ideas 
are at a stand; yet this is not in the least inconsistent with the 
belief of what we conclude them to be. For the illustrating of 
which, let it be considered that we believe that God's eternity is 
without succession, his immensity without extension; this we 
know and believe, because to assert the contrary would be to 
ascribe imperfection to him. In this respect, our faith extends 
as far as our ideas : but as for what exceeds them, we are 
bound to believe that there is something in God, which exceeds 
the reach of a finite mind, though we cannot comprehend, or 
fully describe it, as thougli it was not infinite. And to apply 
this to the doctrine of the Ti-inity ; it is one thing, to say that 
the Father, Son, and Spirit, have the perfections of the divine 
nature attributed to them in scripture, as well as distinct per- 
sonal characters and properties, and because the Godhead is 
but one, that therefore tliese three are one, which we firmly be- 
lieve, inasmuch as it is so clearly revealed in scripture ; and 
another thing, to say, tliat \vc can fully describe all the proper- 
ties of their divine personality, which, though we cannot do, 
yet we believe that they subsist in an incomprehensible man- 
ner. And while we compare them with finite persons, as we 
do the perfections of God with those of the creature, we sepa- 
rate from the one, as well as the other, whatever savours of 
imperfection. 

2. As to the unintelligibleness of divine revelation, and its 
being unbecoming the wisdom and goodness of God to com- 
municate those doctrines that are so, it may be replied, that 
we must distinguish between the rendering a doctrine, which 
would be otherwise easy to be understood, unintelligible, by 
the perplexity or difficulty of the style in which it is delivered, 
and the imparting a doctrine which none can comprehend ; the 
former of these cannot be charged on any part of scripture, and 
it is only a revelation, which is liable to such a charge, that 
could be reckoned inconsistent with the wisdom and goodness 
of God. As to the latter, the design of revelation is not to 
make us comprehend what is in itself incomprehensible : as, for 
instance, God did not design, when he made known his perfec- 



222 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

tions in his word, to give us such a perfect discovery of him- 
self, that we might be said hereby to find him out unto perfec- 
tion, or that we should know as much of his glory as is possi-' 
bie to be known, or as much as he knows of it himself; for that 
is to suppose the understanding of man infinitely more perfect 
than it is. Whatever is received, is received in proportion to 
the measure of that which contains it ; the whole ocean can 
communicate no more water than what will fill the vessel, that is 
to contain it. Thus the infinite perfections of God being such as 
cannot be contained in a finite mind, we are not to suppose 
that our comprehending them was the design of divine revela- 
tion ; God, indeed, designed hereby that we should apprehend 
some things of himself, namely, as much as should be subser- 
vient to the great ends of religion; but not so much as might be 
inconsistent with our humble confession, that zve are but of yes- 
terday^ and knoxv^ comparatively^ nothings Job viii. 9. 

And this is applicable, not only to the essential, but the per- 
sonal, glory of God, Who hath ascended into heaven^ or descend- 
ed ? Who hath gathered the wind in his fists P Who hath hound 
the xvaiers in a garment ? Who hath established all the ends of 
the earth ? What is his' name, and what is his So7i*s name, if 
thou canst tell ? Prov. xxx. 4. Our Saviour, indeed, speaks of 
his hdiv'm^ ascended into heaven, John iii. 13. as having a com- 
prehensive knoAvledge of all divine trtiths ; but this he affirms 
concerning himself as a divine person, exclusively of all crea- 
tures. 

Moreover, when it is said, in this objection, that God makes 
the comprehensive knowledge of these things a term of salva- 
tion, this we must take leave to deny ; and we need not add any- 
more as to that head, since we have already considered what 
degree of knowledge is necessary thereunto, namely, such as is 
subservient to religion, which teaches us to adore what we ap- 
prehend to be the object thereof, though we cannot compre- 
hend it. 

As to that part of the objection, that which is unintelligible, 
is not the object of faith, we must distinguish before we grant 
or deny it; therefore, since the object of faith is some proposi- 
tion laid down, it is one thing to say that a proposition cannot 
be assented to, when we have no ideas of what is affirmed or 
denied in it ; and another thing to say that it is not believed, 
when we have ideas of several things contained therein, ot 
which some are affirmed, and others denied ; as, for instance, 
when we say God is an infinite Spirit, there is a positive idea 
contained in that proposition, or some things affirmed therein, 
viz. that he is able to put forth actions suitable to an intelligent 
being; and there is something denied concerning him, to wix, 
Kis being corporeal ; and in concluding him to be an in^nite 



XHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 22J 

Spirit, we deny that they are limits of his understanding ; all 
this we may truly be said to understand and believe : but if we 
proceed farther, and enquire what it is to have such an under- 
standing, or will ? this is not a proposition, and consequently 
not the object of faith, as well as exceeds the reach of our un- 
derstanding. So as to the doctrine of the Trinity, when we 
affirm that there is one God, and that the Father, Son, and 
Spirit, have all the perfections of the Godhead ; and that these 
perfections, and the personality of each of them, are infinitely 
greater than what can be found in the creature, this we yield 
our assent to ; but if it be enquired how far does God herein 
exceed all the ideas which we have of finite perfections, or per- 
sonality, here our understandings are at a loss ; but so far as 
this does not contain the form of a proposition, it cannot, ac- 
cording to our common acceptation of the word, be said to be 
the object of faith. 

3. As to what concerns practical religion, the ideas we have 
of things subservient to it are of two sorts ; either such as engage 
our obedience, or excite our adoration and admiration : as to 
the former of these, we know what we are commanded to do ; 
what it is to act, as becomes those who are subject to a divine 
person, though we cannot comprehend those infinite perfec- 
tions, which lay us under the highest obligation to obey him : 
as to the latter, the incomprehensibleness of the divine person- 
ality, or perfections, has a direct tendency to excite our admira- 
tion, and the infiniteness thereof our adoration. And, since all 
religion may be reduced to these two heads, the subject matter 
of divine revelation is so far from being inconsistent with it, 
that it tends to promote it. Things commanded are not, as 
such, incompi'ehensible, as was but now observed, and therefore 
not inconsistent with that obedience, or subjection, which is 
contained in one branch thereof; and things incomprehensible 
do not contain the form of a command, but rather excite our 
admiration, and therefore they are not only consistent with, but 
adapted to promote the other branch thereof. Is it not an in- 
stance of religion to adore and magnify God, when we behold 
the display of his perfections in his works ? And is he less to 
be adored, or admired, because we cannot comprehend them ? 
Or should we not rather look upon thc;m with a greater degree 
of astonishment, than if they did not exceed the reach of a finitp 
mind ? Must a person be able to measure the water of the 
ocean, or number all the particles of matter that are contained 
in the world ; or can our ideas be no ways directed to shew 
'orth the Creator's praise ? Or must we be able to account for 
very thing that is a mystery in nature ; or can we not improve 
•t to promote some of the ends of pj-actical religion, that we are 



224 THE D0CTR1N£ Oi' THE TRINITY. 

engaged to thereby ? May we not say, with wonder, Lord, 
hoxv manifold are thy xvorks ! in wisdom hast thou made them^ 
all ; the earth is full of thy riches ? Psal. civ. 24. So when we 
behold the personal glory of the Father, Son, and Spirit, as dis- 
played in the work of redemption, or as contained in scripture, 
which is therein said to be an instance of his manifold -wisdovu 
Eph. iii. 10. should we not admire it the more, inasmuch as ii 
is, as the apostle calls it, unsearchable ? Therefore practical 
religion, as founded on divine revelation, is not, in all the 
branches thereof, inconsistent with the incomprehensibleness of 
those things, -which are, some in one respect, and others in 
another, the objects thereof. 

And as to what is farther contained in this objection, con- 
cerning the will's following the dictates of the understanding, 
and practical religion's being seated therein, I own, that we 
must first know what we are to do in matters of religion, be- 
fore we can act; thus we must first know what it is to wor- 
ship, lovci, and obey, the Father, Son, and Spirit, as also that 
these three divine persons are the object of worship, love, and 
obedience, and then the will follows the dictates of the under- 
standing ; but it is one thing to know these things, and ano- 
ther thing to be able to comprehend the divine, essential, or 
personal glory, which belongs to them, and is the foundation 
of these acts of religious worship. 

4. As to what is farther objected, concerning the design of 
divine revelation's being to improve our understanding ; or, as 
it is sometimes expressed, that it is an improvement upon the 
light of nature ; this seems to have a double aspect, or ten- 
dency, viz,, to advance, or depreciate, divine revelation. 

1. If we take it in the former view, we freely own, 

(1.) That it is a very great improvement upon the light of 
nature, and that, either as we are led hereby, not only into the 
knowledge of many things which could not be discovered by 
at, namely, the doctrine of the Trinity, the incarnation of the 
Son of God, and that infinite satisfaction which was given by 
him to the justice of God, in order to our discharge from con- 
demnation, as also that communion which believers have 
with the Father, Son, and Spirit ; and therefore, since the light 
of nature gives us no discovery of these doctrines, divine reve- 
lation, and particularly the gospel, makes a very great addition 
to those ideas which we are led into by the light of nature. 
It is true, they both take their rise from God, yet one excels 
the other, as much as the light of the sun does that of a star ; 
and is, as the Psalmist says, when comparing them together, 
perfect^ converting the soul; and^ywrf, making wise the simple. 
Psal. xix. 7. 



THE DOCTRINE Of THE TRINITY. 226' 

(2.) That when the same truths are discovered by the light 
of nature, and by divine revelation, the latter tends veiy much 
to improve our ideas : thus when the iight of nature leads us 
into the knowledge of the being and perfections of God, his 
wisdom, power, and goodness, as illustrated in the works of 
nature and providence, we have not so clear ideas thereof, as 
we receive from the additional discoveries of them in divine 
revelation ; and in this respect one does not cioud or darken 
those ideas which the other gives. But neither of these are 
designed by those who bring this objection against the doctrine 
of the Trinity : therefore we must s:uppose, 

2. That they intend hei-eby to depreciate divine revelation, 
and then the sense thereof is this j that though the light of na- 
ture leads mankind into such a degree of the knowledge of di- 
vine truths, as is sufficient, in its kind to salvation ; so that 
they, who are destitute of divine revelation, may thereby un- 
derstand the terms of acceptance with God, and the way which, 
if duly improved, would lead to heaven ; yet God was pleas- 
ed to give some farther discovery of the same things by his 
word, and, in this sense, the one is only an improvement upon 
the other, as it makes the same truths, which were known, in 
some degree, without it more clear, and frees them froin those 
corruptions, or false glosses, which the perverse reasonings of 
men have set upon them ; whereas we, by insisting on inex- 
plicable mysteries, Avhich we pretend to be founded on divine 
revelation, though, in reality, they are not contained in it, cloud 
and darken that light, and so make the way of salvation more 
difficult, than it would otherwise be ; and this certainly tends 
to depreciate divine revelation, how plausible soever the words, 
at first view, may appear to be ; for it supposes those doc- 
trines but now mentioned, and many others of the like nature, 
not necessary to salvation ; so that this objection takes its first 
rise from the Deists, however it may be applied, by the Anti- 
trinitarians, in militating against the doctrine of the Trinit}'. 
Therefore, since it is principally designed to overthrow this 
doctrine, by supposing it to be unintelligible, and consequent- 
ly, according to their method of reasoning, in no sense the ob- 
ject of faith, the only reply which need be made to it is, that 
the discoveries of the glory of God, by the light of nature, are, 
in some respects, as incomprehensible as the doctrine of the 
Trinity ; which we are not, for that reason, obliged to disbe- 
lieve, or reject; and therefore there is no advantage gained 
against our argument, by supposing that the light of nature 
contains a discovery of truths, plain, easy, and intelligible by 
all, in the full extent thereof, and that the doctr'ne of tl*'" 

Vol. I. F f 



226- -IHE DOCTIUNE OF THE TRllSflTT. 

Trinity is otherwise, and consequently must not be contained 
in divine revelation, and, as sucih, cannot be defended by us. 

4. Another thing that may be premised, before we enter on 
the proof of the doctrine of the Trinity, is, that it is not cbntra- 
ry to reason, though it be above it ; neither are our reasoning 
powers, when directed by scripture-revelation, altogether use- 
less, in order to our attaining such a degree of the knowledge 
thereof, as is necessary, and ought to be endeavoured after. 
When a doctrine may be said to be above reason, has beea 
already considered, as well as that the doctrine of the Trinity' 
is so; and now we are obliged to obviate an objection, which 
is the most popular one of any that is brought against it, name- 
1}^, that it is an absurd and irrational doctrine ; and that they 
who maintain it must fa-st lay aside their reason, before they 
can be induced to believe it, for it is as much as to say that 
three are equal to one ; which is contrary to the common sense 
of all mankind, or else, that we maintain a plurality of gods, 
which is contrary to the very first principles of the light of na- 
ture. And here we are reflected on, as though we demanded 
that our antagonists should lay aside their reason, before we 
argue with them, and then it is easy to determine on which 
side the argument will turn ; therefore, to make way for what 
anight be said in defence of the doctrine of the Trinity, we 
shall, under this head, consider, 

(1.) When a doctrine may be said to be contrary to reason. 

(2.) Shew that the doctrine of the Trinity is not so. 

(3.) What is the use of reason, in establishing it, or or any 
Other doctrines, whicli are the subject of pure revelation. 

(1.) When we may conclude, that a doctrine is contrary to 
reason. This it may be said to be, when it is contrary to the 
methods of reasoning made use of by particular persons, which 
are not always just, and therefore it does not follow, from 
hence, that it is false or absurd, because our reasoning about 
it is so, but rather the contrary ; so that when they, on the 
other side of the question, tell us, with an air of boasting, that 
if the doctrine we are maintaining could have been accounted 
for, how comes it to pass that so many men of sense and learn- 
ing, as are to be found among the Anti-trinitarians, have not 
been able to do it ? But this , is nothing to our present argu- 
ment; therefore we suppose that a doctrine is contrary to rea- 
son, when it contradicts some of the first principles, which the 
mind of man cannot but yield its assent to, as soon a5 ever it 
takes in the sense of the words M'hich contain them, without 
demanding any proof thereof; as that the whole is greater than 
the part ; and that a thing can be, and not be, at the same 
time ; or that two is more than one, £ff c. or when we can prove 
■ii thing to be true to a demonotration, and yet suppose that a 



THE DOCTRINE Or THE TRINITY. 22'7 

contradictory proposition, in which the words are taken in the 
same sense, may be equally true, (o) 

(2,) That the doctrine of the Trinity is not contrary to rea- 
son. This appears, inasmuch as we do not say that the three 
Persons in the Godhead are one Person, or that the one divine 
Being is three divine Beings. 

Object. But it is objected, that it is contrar}^to reason, which 
establishes and proves the unity of tire Godhead, to say that 
the divine nature may be predicated of more than one, inas- 
much as that infers a plurality of Gods, and every distinct 
Person must be concluded to be a distinct God ; therefore the 
Trinitarian doctrine is down-right Tritheism, and consequent- 
ly contrary to reason ; and here those words of the Athanasian 
Creed are produced, as an instance hereof, namel)-, that the 
Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God, 

(a) He who has marked the differences between truth and error, good anil 
evil, made them discoverable, and formed hninan minds susceptible of their 
impressions, thereby discovers his will that we should attend to them, and has 
made it our duty to do so. With this sentiment sacred revelation is expressly 
accordant ; " prove all things, hold fast that which is good." The Gospel re- 
quires not faith without evidence, it demands no more assent than is proportion- 
ed to the weight of probability, and charges as a crime only our refusing to at- 
tend to the evidence, or om- coming to it with hearts prejudiced against, and 
therefore insensible to, its evidence. The exercise of reason is essential to faith, 
for how sudden soever om* convictions, still it is the judgment which is con- 
vinced. 

Yetreajson has her due province; she may and ought to ascertain the genuineness, 
flutlienticity, and divine authority of the scriptures. When this is done, she can- 
not correctly delay her assent, because she may not fully comprehend the pro- 
mises or works of God, for this would require wisdom no less than Divine. 
But suppose she should presume to try them, by what balances shall she weigli 
them? To what sliali she compare them.'' To the reasons and fitness of things.' 
what ai'e these but circumstances and relations springing from the works of God ? 
His creation originated from his wisdom uud power, and is ever dejiendent ou 
them. This is therefore to circumscribe infinite wisdom by what has been al- 
I'catly discovered of it ; it is to limit infinite power from effecting- any thing 
which it has not hitherto accomplished. Such judgment is not the work of rea- 
son, it is irrational. Reason can only make an induction, where there exists pre. 
rnises from which a conclasion can be drav>'n ; but here her limits are exceeded, 
she has no standard by which she can measure infinity. Ey reasoning we justly 
infer from the works of God, many of his glorious moral, as well as natural, per- 
fections ; we gather that he is holy, just, true, and good, and we may fan-iy say 
that he will never depart from such rectitude, but tliat all his works will be con- 
formed to such principles. We can go no farther thaai unto generals, we have 
no right to question any word or act of his, and say it is not conformed to such 
perfections, because this would suppose that we possess infinite wisdom. Jf-i 
may have ways of solving our difhculties and objections, with which we arc 
not acquainted. Such judgment is not only irrational, but an-ogimt, as it is an 
extension of the claims of reason beyond her just limits. Our duty in such case 
is exemplified in the father of the faithful. At God's command we nui.st, like 
him, sacrifice our "Isaacs, and leave to him both to accomplish his promises and 
to justify the action .It is evident that the doctiine of the Triiuty is but partially 
revealed to man, but sufficiently to let him into a competent knowled|,c of '•S 
blan of ref'cmption ' ' 



i28 IHE DOCTRIKTE OF THE TRINITY. 

yet there are not three Gods, but one God ; so, that the Far 
ther is Eternal, the Son is Eternal, and the Holy G^st Eter- 
nal, yet there are not three Eternals, but one Eternal ; and the 
Father Almighty, the Son Almight}^, and the Holy Ghost Al- 
mighty, yet are there not three Almighties, but one Almigh- 
ty. This they suppose, though without ground, to be a plain 
contradiction. ' 

Answ. But to this it may be replied, that when we my the 
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are God,, we do not say they 
are distinct Gods, for the distinction between them respects 
their personality, not their deity : and when we assert that 
they are all Eternal, or Almighty, w^e do not suppose that 
their duration, or power, arc distinct ; and the same may be 
said of all other divine perfections that are attributed to them, 
the perfections are the same in all of them, though the persons 
are distinct. So that the charge of Tritheisni lies in a narrow 
compass : they sa}' that there is one divine Being, so do we ; 
and to this the)- add, that this divine Being is a divine person, 
since existence and personality are the same; therefore, if there 
are more divine Persons, there must be more Gods ; this con- 
sequence thev maintain, but we deny. But how do they prove 
it ? The proof amounts to no more than this ,* that there is no 
instance in finite things, when we speak of angels or men, to 
whom alone personality can be applied, of any distinct persons, 
but at the same time their beings are distinct; therefore it 
must be so with respect to the divine persons. This we are 
bound to deny, since our ideas of personality and existence 
are not the same ; therefore, how inseparable soever they may 
be in what respects creatures, we may have distinct ideas of 
them, when we speak of the divine being and personality of 
the Father, Son, and Spirit. Here it will, doubtless, be de- 
manded, that we determine wherein the difference consists ; 
or, in particular, since every distinct finite person is a distinct 
being, what there is in the divine personality, that should ex- 
clude the Father, Son, and Spirit, from being distinct beings, 
because distinct persons ; so that when we conclude that there 
is a small or faint resemblance between divine and human per- 
sonalit\', we must be able to comprehend, and fully to describe, 
that infinite disproportion that is between them, or else must 
be charged with using words without any manner of ideas an- 
nexed to them, and so our cause must fall to the ground. ■ If, 
indeed, the divine personality were finite, like that of the 
creature, then it might be required that a finite mind should 
account for it : but since it is not so, but incomprehensible, we 
are bound to believe what we cannot comprehend. 

But have we no ideas at all of the distinct personality of the 
Father, Son, and Spirit? To this we may answer; that we 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 229 

have finite ideas thereof, and more than these we have not of 
any of the divine perfections. We are taught, by scripture, to 
say that they are distinct persons ; and we know what those 
personal characters, or properties, from whence our ideas take 
their rise, signify, when apphcd to men ; but, at the same 
time, abstract, in our thoughts, every thing from them that ar- 
gues imperfection ; or, in short, our conceptions hereof pro- 
ceed in the same way, as when we think of any of the perfec- 
tions of the divine nature : these, as well as the divine person- 
ality, are equally incomprehensible ; yet, while we say they arc 
infinitely more than can be in any creature, we, notwithstand- 
ing, retain such ideas of them, as tend to answer those ends 
of religion, which suppose that we apprehend something of 
them that is conducive hereunto. We are now to consider, 

(3.) The use of reason in proving or defending the doctrine 
of the Trinity, or any other doctrines of pure revelation. They 
could not, indeed, have been at first discovered by reason, nor 
can every thing that is revealed be comprehended by it, yet 
our reason is not to be laid aside as useless ; therefore some 
call it a servant to faith. Thus revelation discovers what doc- 
trines we are to believe, demands our assent to them, and rea- 
son offers a convincing proof that we are under an indispen- 
sable obligation to give it : it proves the doctrine to be true, 
and such as is worthy of God, as it is derived from him, the 
fountain of truth and wisdom ; and this office of reason, or the 
subserviency thereof to our faith, is certainly necessary, since 
what is false cannot be the object of faith in general ; and no- 
thing unworthy of God can be the matter of divine revelation, 
nor consequently the object of a divine faith. 

Now, in order to reason's judging of the truth of things, it 
first considers the sense of words ; what ideas are designed to 
be conveyed thereby, and whether they are contrary to the com- 
mon sense of mankind; and if it appears that they are not, it 
proceeds to enquire into those evidences that may give con- 
viction, and enforce our belief thereof; and leads us into the 
nature of the^ truths revealed, receives them as instamped 
with the authority of God, and considers them as agreeable to 
his perfections, and farther leads us into his design of revealing 
them, and what we are to infer from them ; and in doing this 
it connects things together, observes the dependence of one 
thing on another, what is the importance thereof, and how they 
are to be improved to answer the best purposes. 

Now this may be applied particularlv to the doctrine of the 
Trinity; for it contains in it no absurdity contradictor}- to rea- 
son, as has been already proved ; and the evidences on which 
our faith herein is founded will be farther considered, when we 



230 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

prove it to be a scripture doctrine, by the express words there- 
of, agreeable to the mind of the Holy Ghost, or by just con- 
sequences deduced from it ; by which it will farther appear, 
that it is necessary for us to use our reason in stating those 
doctrines, which are neither founded on, nor can be compre- 
hended by it. 

5. We are now to consider from whence the doctrine of the 
Trinity is to be deduced, or where we are to search for that 
knowledge thereof, which we are to acquiesce in. And here it 
must be observed, that it cannot be learnt from the light of na- 
ture, for then we should certainly be able to behold some tra- 
ces or footsteps thereof in the works of creation and provi- 
dence, that so this might be understood thereby, as well as the 
power, wisdom, and goodness of God, as the cause is known 
by its effect ; but we should never have known that God made 
all things by his essential word, without whom nothing' was 
made, that was made, as the evangelist speaks, John i. 3. had 
we not received this doctrine frdm divine revelation : likewise, 
we should never have known that the Spirit, as a distinct Per- 
son from the Father, created all things, and performed several 
other works, by which his personal glory is demonstrated, had 
we not received the account which we have thereof from scrip- 
ture. The light of nature could discover to us, indeed, that 
God, who is a Spirit, or incorporeal Being, has produced many 
effects worthy of himself; but we could not have known hereby, 
that the word Spirit signifies a distinct person, which we are 
beholden to diAine revelation for. 

And as for the work of our redemption, in which, more than 
in all the other divine works, the personal glory of the Father, 
Son, and Spirit, is demonstrated, we could have known as little 
of that by the light of nature, as we do the persons to whom it 
is attributed. But I am sensible that it will be objected to this, 

Object. 1. That our first parents knew the doctrine of the 
Trinity as soon as they v/ere created, otherwise they could not 
have given that distinct jglory to the Persons in the Godhead 
that is due to them ; and if we are required, not only to wor- 
ship the divine Being, but to worship the Father, Son, and 
Spirit ,• and, if this worship is due fi"om us, as creatures, and 
not merely as fallen and redeemed ; then it will follow from 
hence, that our first parents must know the doctrine of the 
Trinity : but this they did not know by divine revelation; there- 
fore they knew it by the light of nature. 

Ansxv. We will allow every thing contained in this objection, 
excepting that they did not know this by divine revelation ; for 
certainly they had some ideas conveyed this way at first, other- 
wise they could not have known any thing that related to in^. 



TUE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 231 

i^tituted worship, which, it is plain, they did. And shall it be 
reckoned any absurdity to suppose that they received this doc- 
trine of the Trinity by divine revelation," though we huxe no 
particular account thereof, in that short history which Moses 
gives us of things relating to the state of innocency ? It is there- 
fore suihcient to our purpose, to suppose that it was agreeable 
to the wisdom and goodness of God to make known to them 
this important truth, and consequently that he did so, though 
not by the light of nature. 

Object. 2. It is farther objected, that the heathen knew some- 
thing of the doctrine of the Trinity, as appears by their writings, 
though they were unacquainted with scripture. To support this 
objection, they refer to several mystical expressions in the works 
of Plato, which seem to look that way, when he speaks of three 
principles ; one whereof he calls goodness, or a being that is 
good ; the second he calls his word, or reason ,* and the third a 
spirit, which diffuses its influence throughout the whole system 
of beings, and calls him sometimes the soul of the world ; and 
in other places, he speaks of them as having a distinct sove- 
reignty.* And he supposes the first of these to be the cause of 
things most great and excellent ; the second, the cause of things 
of an inferior nature ; the third, of things yet more inferior ; 
and some of his followers plainly call them three hypostases ; 
and sometimes, Father, Word, and Spirit. 

Answ. The account which Plato and his followers seem to 
have given of the doctrine of the Trinity does not appear to 
have been taken from the light of nature, and therefore this 
makes nothing to the objection. We have sufficient ground to 
conclude that Plato travelled into Egypt, with a design to make 
improvements in knowledge ; and some suppose, that there he 
saw some translation of a part of the Bible into Greek, f more 
ancient than that which is commonly attributed to the LXX, 
which was^ not compiled till an hundred years after his time. 
But whether he did this, or no, is uncertam : it is true, he used 
several expressions, which are contained in the books of Moses, 
and took the plan of his laws from thence ; upon which account 
some have called him a second Moses, speaking Greek : but 
whether he received his notions more immediately from scrip- 
ture, or by conversation witli the Jews, of whom a great num- 
ber settled in Egypt, after Gedaliah's death, is not material ; 
however, it is sufficiently evident, that he had not all of them, 
in a way of reasoning, from the light of nature : and as for his 
followers, such as Plotinus, Proclus, Porphyr}^ and others, they 
lived in those ages, when Christianity prevailed in the world, 
though none of them pretended to be Christians ; and one of 

^ rtd.iPpiit. 2 ad Diovvs: y yfd,BtC^'>. Prrp. Ermtr. lib. XlfJ. cat>. 12. 



^32 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

them was the most inveterate enemy to Christianity that hvc6 ; 
yet these might well be supposed to make their master Plato 
speak several things, as to this mystery, which he never intended, 
were it only to persuade the Christians to believe that he was not 
inferior to JNIoses, or any other recorded in scripture. 

Thus having answered the objections, we shall take leave to 
consider how unwarily some divines, who have defended the 
doctrine of the Trinity, have not only asserted that Plato under- 
stood a great a deal of it, but have made use of this, as an an- 
swer to the Anti-trinitarian objection before mentioned, that 
the doctrine of the Trinity is unintelligible ; and they have ta- 
ken a great deal of pleasure in accounting for this doctrine in 
such a way as these philosophers have done :* and some of them 
have taken notice of a few dark hints, which they have met with 
in some of the poetical fictions, and from thence concluded that 
there was something of the Trinity known, even by the Heathen 
in general : thus v.hen the word three is mentioned by them, 
-and applied to some things, which they relate concerning their 
gods ; or when they speak of gods delighting in an unequal num- 
ber, or in the number three. But this is too gross to be particu- 
larly mentioned, lest it should give us an unbecoming idea of 
this divine mystery, or of those who have better arguments tha*! 
these to defend it. 

The reflection which I would make on this is, that what they 
call an advantage to the doctrine has been certainly very de- 
trimental to it ; and, as a late learned divine observes, has ten- 
ded only to pervert the simplicity' of the Christian faith with 
nfiixtures of philosophy and vain deceit.f And I doubt not but 
the apostle had an eye to this, among other corruptions, which 
they who were attached to the Heathen philosophy began to 
bring into their scheme of divinity, and would notoriously do 
in after ages, which he purposely fences against, when he says. 
Beware^ lest any man spoil you^ through philosophy and vain 
deceit^ after the tradition of men^ after the rudvnents of the 
ivorld^ and not after Christy Col. ii. 8. And this corruption so 
much prevailed, that it has given occasion to some of the Anti- 
trinitarians, to reproach the doctrine of the Trinity, as though 
it were a system of Platonism. And it is their being too fond of 
using Plato's words, in explaining the doctrine of the Trinity, 
that has given occasion to some of the fathers to be suspected, 
as though they were less favourable to the scripture account 
thereof; by which means the adversaries have laid claim to 
them as their own ; and produced some unwary expressions out 
of Justin Martyr, and others, supposing them to be in the Arian 



* Vid. Ititet. Coiicord. Jiatio7i. & Fid. Lib. II. cap. 3. 
/^■$!oricrJ aicoiint, &c. page 94. 



f See Dr. Serriman'ir 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRIKITY. 23$ 

scheme, Avho, in other parts of their writings, appear to be re- 
mote from it. («) 

(a) " Philo uses not the name for his derivative Being in the Godhead, which 
we see the other Jews of the time using in the Gospels. He speaks not of huu, 
ty his nalui-iil appellation of the Son of God. No ! lie takes up anolhcr title for 
him, whicli Indeed was known equally to other Jews, or Philo could not possibly 
have adopted it; which was known equally to the Gtntiles, as I shall show here- 
after; but which was known only to the scholars of either. He calls him " the 
Logos of God." This is a name, that can be borrowed, together with the idea 
annexed to it, only from the Jews, or from the conmion ancestors of them and of 
the Gentiles ; that answers exactly to the Dabar of Jehovah in the Hebrew Scrip- 
tures, and to the Jifetura of Jehovali iu the Cliuldee paraphrasts upon them ; and 
signifies merely " the Word of God." This name has been since introduced into 
our religion, by one of the inspired teachers of.it. And notwithstanding the duc- 
tility of the Greek language in this instance, which would allow it to be rendered 
cither the Word or the Reason of God ; yet the English Bible, with a strict adhe- 
rence to propriety, and in full conformity to the ancient Christians and ancient 
Jews, has rejected the accidental signnfication, and embraced only the immediate 
and the genuine. Yet, even now, tJie name is confined in its use to the more im- 
proved intellects among us. And it mast therefore have peculiarly been, in tlie 
days of Philo, the philosophical denomination of Him, who was popidarU) called the 
Son of God. 

The use of the name of Logos, or Word, by Philo and by St. John in concur- 
rence, sufficiently marks the knowledge of the name among the Jews. But the 
total silence concerning it, by tlic Jewish writers of the three first Gospels ; tlie 
equal silence of the introduced Jews concerning it, in all the four ; and the ac- 
knowled^^ed u^e of it througii all the Jewish records of our religion, merely by St, 
Jolin himself; prove it to have been famili,ar to a few only. It is mdeed too mys- 
terious in its allusion, and too reducible isito metaphor in its import, to have ever 
been the common and ordimon' appellation for the Son of God. Originating from 
the spincual principle of connexion, betwixt the first and the second Being in the 
Godhead ; marking this, bj' a spiritual idea of connexion ; and considering it to be 
as close and as necessary as the JFord is to the energetick J\Iind of God, which 
cannot bury its intellectual energies in silence, but must put tlaem fortii in sjieech , 
it is too spiritual in itself, to be addressed to the fuitli of the niultitude. If with 
so full a reference to our dodilt/ ideas, and so positive nJiHciion of the Second Be- 
ing to the First, we have seen tlie grossness of Arian criticism endeavouring to 
resolve the doctrine into the mere dust of a figure; how much more ready woul4 
it have been to do so, if we had only such a spiriiual denomination as this, for the 
second ?" This would certainly have been considered b\- it, as t<jo unsubstantial 
for distinct personalit}', and thereibre too evanescent for equal divinity. 

St. John indeed adopted this philosophical title, for tlic denomination of the 
Son of God ; only in one solemn and prefatory passage of his Gospel, m two slight 
and incidental passages of his Epistles, and in one of his Book of revelations. 
Even there, the use of the popular instead of tlie philosopliical name, in the tliree 
Gospels antecedent to his, precluded all m-obability of mi.sronstruclion. Yet, not 
content with this, he formed an additional barrier. At the same inst:int in which 
he speaks of the Logos, he asserts him to be distinct from God the Father, and 
yet to be equally God with him. " In the beginning," he says, " was tub Woiui; 
" and THE Word was with God ; and the Wonu was Gon." Having thus secured the 
two gi-and points relatuig to the Logos, he can have nothing more to say upon the 
subject, than to repeat what he has stated, for impressing the deeper conviction. 
He accordingly repeats it. His personality lie impresses again, thus; " thk sat^ie 
was in the beginning loith God." Ilis divinity ;dso he again inculcates, thus : " At;, 

TUIJSrnS WEIIE HABE MT IllJf, and WITHOCT HIM M'AS NOT ANY THIN.'; MADE THAI' 

WAS MAnE." Here the very repetition itself, of enforcing his chimi to divinity, by 
ascribing the creation to him; is plainly an union of two clauses, each announcing 
him as the Creator of the uifuersc, and or.e doubling o\cr the other. And the un - 

Vol. I. ' G j^ 



'234- THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

And this leads us to consider the method which some divines 
have taken, in using similitudes to explain the doctrine of the 



created nature of his own existence is the more strcmgly enforced upon the mind, 
by being" contrRsted with the ci'eated nature of till other existences. These were 
^'r.^.^)s, hut he himself was ; made by Him, \\ ho was with God, and -wag God. Nor 
would lAl this precaution suffice, in the opinion of St. John. He must place still 
stronger fences against the dangerous .'^pirit of error. He therefore goes on to say, 
in confirmation of his personality and divinity, and in application of all to oiu' Sa- 
viour : " Hf. was in the world, and tue wohld was made bt him, and the world 
** knew him not ; He came unto his own [proper domains,] and nis own [proper 
" noHr.sTicKs] received him not." And he closes all, with judiciously drawing 
the several parts of his assertions betbre mto one full point ; and with addition- 
ally e.-^plaining his piiilosojihical term, by a direct reference of it to that popular 
one AV'hich he uses ever afterwai'ds : " and the Wonn was made flesh, and dwelt 
*' among us ; and we beheld his glorj, the glory as of the oniy begotten of the 
" Father, full of grace and truth." 

Yet, \\ hen such guards were requisite, what induced St. John to use tlris phi- 
losophical title at all ? The reason was assuredly this. The title was in high re- 
pute, and in familiar use, among the refined spirits of tlie age; and his Gospel 
was peculiarly calculated for the service of sfffA. The almost perjietual recur- 
rence of vhe H]i])ellation in Plulo's works shoM s evidently tlie use and the repute 
in which it was, among the more spiritualized of the Jews. St. John therefore 
adopted it himself, for the more easy access to tlieir conviction. It was also con- 
genial, probably, of itself to the spii'itualized state of St. John's mind. He, who 
has dwelt so much more than the other Evangelists upon the doctrines of oiu* Sa- 
viour ; and who has drawn out so manj' of them, in all their spiritual refinement 
of ideas ; would naturally pr(-fer the spiritual term of relationship for God the Son 
and God the Father, before the bodily, whenever the intellect was raised enough 
to receive it, and whenever the use of it \\'as sufficiently guarded from danger. 
These were two reasons, I suppose, that induced St. John to use it a^/etw times. 
And these were equally (I suppose) the reasons, that^nduced him, with all his 
guards, to use it onl)'' a few. 

Nor let US be to'd, in the rashness of Arian absiu'dity, that we misunderstand 
St. John in this interpretation of his words. If reason is capable or explaining 
words, and if St. John was capable of conveying his meaning in words to the ear 
of reason ; then we may boldly appeal to the common sense of mankind, and in- 
sist upon tlie truth of our interpretation. Common sense indeed hath already de- 
termined the point, in an impartial person, in an enemy, in a Heathen. I allude to 
that extraordinary approbation, which was given b}' a Heathen of the third cen- 
tury to this pp.ssag-e of St. John. " Of modern philosophers," says Eusebiu.s, 
*' Amelins is an eminent one, being himself, if ever there was one, a zealot for the 
*' philosophy of Plato ; and he called the Divine of the Hebrews a JJarb arian, as 
" if he would not condescend to make mention of the Evangelist John by name." 
Such is Eusebius's account of our reterce. But m hat are the terms of lus awaixi ? 
They are these. " And such indeed was the Logos," he sa3'S, " by w hom, a per- 
" petual existence, the thmgs created were created, as also Keraclitus has said; 
" and who b} Jupiter, the Barbmian says, being constituted in the iiuik and dig- 
'■' nity of a Principle, is with God and is God, by whom all things absolutely wei'e 
" created ; in v, hom the created living thing, and life, and existence, had a birth, 
" and fell into a body, and putting on flesh apjjeared a man ; and, after showing 
" the greatness of his nature, and being wholly dissolved, is again deified and is 
" God, such as he was before be was brought down into the body and the flesh 
" and a man. These things, if translated out of the .Barbarian's theology, not as 
" shaded over thei-e, but on the contraiy as placed in full view, would be plain." 
In this very singular and very valuable comment upon St. John's Gospel in gene- 
i-al, and upon his preface in particulai-, we may see, througli tiie harsh ami ob- 
5cure language of the whole, some circumstances of great moment. The bold air 
■Vai'rogance hi the blinded Heathen over the illuminated Divine must strike at 



THE DOCTRINE Of THE TRINITY. 23j 

'1 rinity, which, at best, tend only to illustrate, and not to prove 
a doctrine : and we can hardly make use of this method of illus- 
trating this doctrine, without conveying some ideas, which are 
unbecoming, if not subversive thereof; and while we pretend 
to explain that which is in itself inexplicable, we do no service 
to the truth. 

I shall here give a short specimen of this matter, that here- 
by we may see how some have unwarily weakened the cause 
which they have been maintaining. Some have taken a simili- 
tude from three of the divine perfections, viz. that there are three 
invisibles of God; power, wisdom, and goodness. Power creates, 
wisdom governs, and goodness conserves ; and so they have 
gone on to explain this doctrine, till they had almost given it 
into the hands of the Sabellians : and, indeed, they might have 
instanced in more divine perfections than three, had it been to 
their purpose. 

Again, others have explained this doctrine by some resem- 
blance which they apprehend to be of it in man ; and so they 
speak of the soul as a principle of a threefold life, rational, 
sensitive, and vegetative. Others speak of three causes con- 
curring to produce the same effect ; such as the efficient, con- 
stitutive and final cause. Others have taken their similitude 
from inanimate things ; as the sun, in which there is light, heat, 
and motion, which are inseparably connected together, and 
tend to produce the same effects. 

Moreover, others illustrate it by a similitude, taken from a 
fountain, in which there is the spring in the bowels of the earth, 
the water bubbling out of the earth, and the stream diffusing it- 
self in a perpetual course, receiving all it communicates from 
the fountain. I am sorry there is occasion to caution any against 

once upon every eye. But the Logos appears, from him, tohave been kno\*'T\ to the 
philosop/wrs oi' a.nt\([mty later than the Tiospel ; and known too as a perpetual 
Existence, and the Maker of the world. St. John also is witnessed by a Heathen, 
and by one who put liim down for a Barbarian, to ha\e represented the Logos as 
THE Mak>;ii of all things, as with God, and as God ; as one likewise, " in 7vhom 
the created living- Thing," or the human soul of our Saviour, " and" even " Life 
and Existence" themselves, those primogenial principles of Deity, " had a birth. 
Bind fell into a boily, and putting' onjlesh appeared a man" who ^\'as therefore man. 
and God m one; who accordingly " shewed tlie gi-eatness of his nature" by hir. 
miracles, was " wholly dissolved," and tlien " was iigain deifieii, and is God," 
even " sucii as he wa.s, before he was brovg-ht dtnun into the body and thefesh and 
a man." And St. John is attested to have dechu-ed tliis, " not even as shaded over, 
but " on the contraiy as placed in full vie-w." We have thus a testimony to the 
plain meaning of St. John, atjd to the evident Godhead of his Logos, a Godhead 
equally before :md after his death ; most unquestionable in its nature, very early 
in its age, and peculiarly forcible in its import. St. John, we sec, is referred to iii 
a language, that .shows him to have been well known to the Grecian cotempora- 
ries of Ainelius, as a writer, as a forf 'gi<."', ttnd n"i a marked as.>^eitor of Divinity 
"for bis Lojfos.' 

WhttIkep. 



^S& ^ i'HE DOCTRINE OF THE TillNItV. 

this method of explaining the doctrine of the Trinit}'. But 
these, and many other similitudes of the like nature, we find in 
the writings of some, v/ho consider not what a handle they give 
to the common enemy. There are, indeed, in most of lacm, 
three things, which iire said, in diiferent respects, to be one ; 
but we may observe, that all these similitudes, and others of 
the like nature, brought to illustrate this doctrine, lead us to 
.think of the whole divided into those parts, of which they con- 
sist, whereof they take notice of the number three ; or they 
speak of three properties of the same thing ; and if .their wit and 
fancy saw it needful to speak of more than three, the same method 
of illustrating would serve their purpose, as much. as it does 
the end for which they bring it. Therefore I would conclude 
this head, by using the words of God to Job, Who is this that 
c'arkeneth counsel by -words xvithout knoivhclge P Job xxxviii. 2. 
Who are these, that, by pretending to illustrate the doctrine of 
the Trinity by similitudes, do that, which, though very foreign 
to their design, tends to pervert it ? 

6. We shall now consider what general rules may be obser^ 
ved for our understanding those scriptures, on wliich our faith, 
with respect to the doctrine of the Trinity, is founded ; and 
since it is a doctrine of pure revelation, as has been before ob- 
served, we m^ist keep close to scripture, even to the words 
thereof, where they are express and distinct, as to this matter ; 
and to consequences dedaced from it, so far as they are just< 
and self-evident ; and, at the same time, Mdhile we are sensible 
that wc cannot comprehend this mj'stery, we must take care 
I hat we pretend not to be wise above what is revealed. Now 
there arc some rule.s, which maV be of use to us, in our enqui- 
ries into the sense of scripture concerning this doctrine ; as, 

(1.) We must not suppose that the words of scripture, rela- 
ting thereunto^ aVe to be taken in a sense, which can be known 
by none but criticks, as though it were designed only for them 
to understand ,' or that the unlearned part of the world should 
he left in the dark, or led "astray, as to several things contained 
in this important doctrine. Ihus we are not to suppose that we 
?.re at a loss as to the proper sense of the word God ; or could 
hardly know how to direct our faith and worship, founded 
thereon, without the help of criticism j or, for Want of being ac- 
quainted with some distinctions, concerning one that may be 
called God by nature, or the supreme God, and others who may 
be called gods by office, or subordinate gods, we should be led 
^o ascribe div ine honour vvliere it is not due ; or else we must 
be able to distinguish also concerning worship, and, instead of 
honouring the Son as we honour the Father, must give him an 
.inferior kind of divine worship, short of what is due to the 
Father. This we have no scripture w tUTant for ',■ neither are we 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 237' 

led by the scriptures to have any notion of a middle being be- 
tween God and the creature, or one that is not properly God, 
so as the Father is, and yet more than a creature, as though 
there were a medium between finite and infinite ; neither are 
we led, by scripture, to conceive of any being, that has an eter- 
nal duration, whose eternity is supposed to be before time, and 
yet not the same with the eternal duration of the Father. These 
things we shall have occasion to mention in their proper place, 
and therefore need make no farther use of them at present, but 
only to observe, from hence, how intelligible the scripture would 
he in what relates to this doctrine, if the words thereof had not 
a plain and determinate sense ; but we must make use of these 
methods of reasoning, if we would arrive to the meaning thereof. 

(2.) If some divine perfections are attributed in scripture to 
the Son and Spit it, all the perfections of the divine nature, may, 
by a just consequence from thence, be proved to belong to them, 
by reason of the simplicity and unity thereof: therefore, if we 
can prove, from scripture, that they have some perfections as- 
cribed to them, which, I hope, it will not be a difficult matter 
to do, we are not to suppose that our argument is defective, or 
that the doctrine of the Trinity is not sufficiently maintained, if 
we cannot produce a scripture to prove every perfection of the 
divine nature to be ascribed to them. 

(3.) When any thing is mentioned in scripture, concerning 
our Saviour, or the Holy Spirit, which argues an inferiority to 
the Father, this is t» be understood consistently with other 
scriptures, which speak of their having the same divine nature ; 
since scripture does not, in the least, contradict itself ; and how 
this may be done, will be farther considered under a following- 
head. 

(4.) If we have sufficient arguments to convince us of the 
truth of this doctrine, our faith ought not to be shaken, though 
we cannot fully understand the sense of some scriptures, whicli 
are brought to support the contrary ; not that Ave are to suppose 
that the scripture gives countenance to two opposite doctrines : 
but a person may be fully satisfied concerning the sense of those 
scriptures that contain the doctrine of the Trinity, and yet not 
be supposed perfectly to understand the meaning of every word 
or phrase used in scripture, or of some particular texts, which 
are sometimes brought to support the contrary doctrine ; so that 
objections may be brought, which he is not able readily to re- 
ply to. Shall he therefore deny the truth, because he cannot 
remove all the difficulties that seem to lie in the way of it ? 
That would be to part with it at too easy a rate, which, when 
he has done, he will find greater difficulties attending the con- 
trary scheme of doctrine. Do they object, that we believr 
rhingg contrary to reason, becau"^c we a?iScrt the incompreben- 



238 THE DOCTRIXE OF THE TRINITY. 

sibleness of divine mysteries ? or that we are Tritheists, bie- 
cause we believe that there are three Persons in the Godhead, 
and cannot exactly determine the diiFerence between divine and 
human personality.'' We could, on the other hand, point at 
some difficulties, that they cannot easily surmount. What shall 
we think of the head of giving divine worship to our Saviour, 
when, at the same time, they deny him to have those perfec- 
tions, that denominate him God in the same sense as the Father 
is so called .'' The Socinians found it very difficult, when the mat- 
ter was disputed among themselves, to reconcile their practice 
with their sentiments, when thev worshipped him, whose Deity 
they denied. And the Arians will find that this objection equal- 
ly affects their scheme ; and it will be no less difficult for them 
to reconcile Christ's character, as Redeemer, Governor of the 
world, Judge of quick and dead, with their l>>\v ideas of him, 
when denying his proper Deity. These things we only mention 
occasionally at present, that it may not be thought that the doc- 
trine of the Trinity is exposed to greater difficulties than the 
contrary doctrine, to the end that they who are not furnished 
witii all those qualifications, which are necessary for its defence, 
may not reckon those arguments, by which they have been con- 
vinced of tlie truth thereof, less valid, because they are not able, 
at present, to answer all the objections that may be brought 
against them. 

(5.) The weight of several arguments, taken from scripture, 
to prove this doctrine, is to be considered, as well as the argu- 
ments themselves ; we do not pretend that every one of them is 
equally conclusive ; there are some, which are oftentimes 
brought to support it, which we can lay no great stress upon, 
:md therefore shall omit to mention them, among other argu- 
ments brought to that purpose, lest we should give occasion to 
the adversary to insult, or conclude that we take any thing for 
an argument that has been brought as such to prove this doc- 
trine. Therefore we will not pretend to ]5rove, or peremptorily 
to determine, that the doctrine of the Trinity is contained in 
those woi'ds of the Psalmist, Psal. xxxiii. 6. By the xvord- of 
the Lordxvere the heavens made^ and all the Hosts of them by 
the breath of his mouth. Nor will we pretend to prove this 
doctrine from the threefold repetition of the word Jehovah, in 
the form of benediction to be used by the high priest, Numb, 
vi. 24, 25, 26. The Lord bless thee^ and keep thee; the Lord 
make his face to shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee ; the 
Lord lift up his countenance npon thee, and give thee peace. Nor 
do we lay any stress on the three-fold repetition of the word 
Holy, hchj, holy, is the Lord of Hosts, Isa. vi. 3. though we 
shall shew, in its proper place, that there are several things 
in this chapter, which prove this doctrine. However, if at 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 239 

ony time, together with arguments that are more conclu- 
sive, we bring some that are less so; this use may be made of 
it, to shew how the scripture way of speaking is consistent 
therewith in those places that do not so directly prove it. This 
we thought proper to mention, because it is a very common 
thing for those, who cannot answer the most weighty arguments 
that arc brought to suppoi-t a doctrine, to bend their greatest 
force against those which have the least strength ; and then to 
triumph, as though they had gained the victory, when thty have 
only done it in what respects that Avhich is less material. 

II. We shall now consider in what sense we are to under- 
stand the words Trinity and Persoufi in the Godhead ; and in 
what respect the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are said to be 
one. It is true, the word Trinitij is not to be found in scrip- 
ture, but what we understand by it is plainly contained therein ; 
therefore we use the word, as agreeable thereunto : thus we 
read of the thj-ee that bear record i?i heaven, viz. the Father^ 
the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and that these three are one, 1 
John V. 7. These three here mentioned are Persons, because 
they are described by personal characters ; and we shall take 
occasion elsewhere, when we prove the Deity of the Son and 
Spirit, to consider their being one, that is, having the same di- 
vine nature, which we shall therefore wave at present, being 
only considering the sense of words commonly used by us in 
treating of this doctrine. All contending parties, however they 
have explained the word Trinity, according to their differeiit 
ways of thinking, have notwithstanding, in compliance with cus- 
tom, vised the word, and so far explained it, as that we might 
understand that the}' intend hereby three, who are, in some re- 
spect one, though some have not cared to use the word Person ; 
or if they have, at is without the most known and proper idea, 
contained in it. Thus the Sabellians, whenever they use the 
word, intend nothing by it, but three relations, which may be 
attributed to the same Person ; as when the same Person ma\' 
be called a father, a son, and a brother, in different respects ; 
or as when he that, at one time, sustains the person of a judge, 
may, at another time, sustain that of an advocate : this is what 
some call a Trinity of names ; and they might as w^ell have de- 
clined to use the words altogether, as to explain them in this 
sense. 

Again, the Arians use the word Person ; but these have run 
into another extreme, inasmuch as that, whilst they avoid Sa- 
bellianism, they would lay themselves open to the charge of 
Tritheism, did they not deny the proper Deity of the Son and 
Spirit ; for they suppose that every distinct Person is a distinct 
being, agreeable to the sense of personality, when aj)plied to 
men ; but this, as has been before considered, is to Ije alx.tract" 



240 TH£ DOCTRINE Of THE TRINITY. 

ed from the idea of personality, when applied to the Persons m 
the Godhead. These also understand the oneness of these di- 
vine Persons, in a sense agreeable to their own scheme, and 
different from ours, and therefore they speak of them as one in 
will, consent, or design, in which respect God and the creature 
may be said to be one : accordingly Arius, and his adherents, in 
the council at Nice, refused to allow that the divine persons 
were 'o^««o; consubstantial, and, with a great many evasions 
and subterfuges, attempted to conceal their sentiments : all that 
they could be brought to own was, that the Son was 'Ofjioia, or 
OfAoatcriof, which amounts to no more than this, that whatever 
likeness there may be, in some respects, yet he has not the 
same proper divine nature with the Father and Holy Ghost. 

Which leads us to consider the sense in which it is generally 
used by those who defend what we think to be the scripture- 
doctrine of the Trinity. There are some, it is true, both among 
ancient and modem writers, that attempt to explain what they 
mean by the word Person, who are so unhappy as to leave the 
sense thereof more dark than they found it, when they have 
given a definition thereof, agreeable to what is used by meta- 
physicians and schoolmen, to this elFect, that it is a suppositum^ 
endowed with reason ; or that it is one entire, individual, in- 
communicable, rational subsistence : and when they define Per- 
sonality, some tell us, that it is a positive mode of a being ter- 
minating and conipleating its substantial nature, and giving in- 
communicability to it, which words need to be explained more 
than the thing defined thereby. And here I cannot but take 
notice of that warm debate which there was between the Greek 
and Latin church about the words Hypostasis and Persona; 
the Latin, concluding that the word Hypostasis signified sub- 
stance or essence, thought, that to assert that there were three 
divine Hypostases, was to sav that there were three Gods : On 
the other hand, the Greek church thought that the word Person 
did not sufficiently guard against the Sabellian notion of the 
same individual being sustaining three relations; whereupon 
each part of the church was ready to brand the other with he- 
resy, till by a free and mutual conference, in a synod at Alex- 
andria, A. D. 362. they made it appear, that it was but a mere 
contention about the grammatical sense of a word ; and then it 
was alloAved, by men of temper on both sides, that either of the 
two words might be indifferently used.* But what signifies the 
use of them, when perplexed with the scholastic explications 
thereof? This has given occasion to some, whose sentiments 
have been very remote as to the doctrine of the Trinity, to ex- 
press themselves with some dislike ; on the one hand, the Soci- 
"nians, and some among the Remonstrants, who made very great 
* Vid. Furbes. Instruct. Hist. Theol Lib. I. cap. 2. 5. 8. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 24| 

advances toward their scheme, viz. Curcellaeus, Episcopius, and 
others,! have comphiined of clouding this doctrine \vilh hard 
words ; and the complaint is not altogether groundless, though, 
it may be their design herein was to substitute such Avords in 
the room of them, as would make the remedy worse than the 
disease. On the other hand, some, who have embraced the 
doctrine of the Trinity, would not have liked its advocates the 
Avorse, had they chose to have defended it in a more plain in- 
telligible manner. Thus Calvin himself wishes, that some 
words, which are so warmly opposed and defended on each 
side, were altogether laid aside, and buried, provided that such, 
might be retained jis express our faith in the doctrine of the 
Father, Son, and Spirit, being the one God, but distinguished 
by their personal properties. :|: And this is that plain sense of 
the word, which I shall make use of, in what I shall farther at« 
tempt to lay down in the defence thereof. And accordingly, 

1. We never call any thing a person that is not endowed 
with understanding and will ; and therefore the most glorious 
inanimate creatures, either in heaven or earth, whatever excel- 
lencies they have, or how useful soever they are to the world, 
they are not persons. Thus, when the sun is described as 
though it were a person, and is compared to a brides-room co- 
ming out of his chamber^ and rejoicing as a strong man to run 
a race., Psal. xix. 5. the words are never understood in any 
other but a metaphorical sense ; so Behemoth and the Levia- 
than, mentioned in Job, being no other than brute creatures, 
are described with personal characters, in the same figurative 
way of speaking ; therefore we suppose a person to have an un- 
derstanding and will. 

2. Whenever /, thou., or //e, are applied to such a subject, 
they always connote a person; /, a person speaking; thou^-A. 
person spoken to; and Ae, ox him., a person spoken of ; and 

.when such modes of speaking are sometimes applied to things 
that are destitute of reason, or to any moral virtues or princi- 
ples of acting, which, from the nature of the thing, cannot be de- 
nominated persons, such expressions are very easily uivaerstood 
in a figurative sense, which may without any difficulty be dis- 
tinguished from the proper one, whereby those who are so de- 
Bcribed are denominated persons. <^^ 

There are some characters which always denote persons, mid 
some works performed which are properly personal, which can 
be; performed by none but persons. Thus the character of a 
father, or a son ; so a Creator, a Redeemer, a benefactor, a 
Mediator, an advocate, a surety, a judge, a lord, a law-giver, 
and many others of the like nature, are all of them personal 

f Vid. Cnrcell in Qvattem. Diaaert. de Voc. Tvinit.p,.r.iona' g". ^, Vid fV'- 
I'lstiUit. Lib. J. cap. 13. § 5, 

Vol. I. H h 



242 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

characters. So that whoever acts with design^ and has such- 
like characters attributed to him, according to the proper ac- 
ceptatiqn of the word, him we call a person ; and these charac- 
ters we shall endeavour to apply to the Persons in the God- 
head, to prove their distinct personality. 

But since we are at present only considering the acceptation 
of words, we shall briefly observe the difference between a di- 
vine and a iiuman person, when some personal properties, cha- 
racters, or works, are attributed to each of them. And, 

(1.) Human persons are separated one from the other : thus, 
for instance, Peter, James, and John, were three persons, but 
they were separated one from the other ; whereas the Persons 
in the Godhead, however distinguished by their characters and 
properties, are never separated, as having the same divine es- 
sence or nature. As for human persons, one of them might 
have had a being and personality, had the other never existed, 
because it exists by the will of God ; but the divine persons 
have a necessary existence and personality, as being, in all re- 
s.pects, independent, so that as they could not but be God, they 
could^not but be divine Persons ; the personality of the Son and 
Spirit are equally independent with that of the Father, and as 
much independent as their being and divine perfections. 

(2.) Human persons have only the same kind of nature, 
which is generally called a common specific nature, but not the 
same individual nature with another person ; so that though 
every man has a nature like that of the rest of mankind, yet the 
human nature, as attributed to one person, is not the same indi- 
vidual human nature that is attributed to another, for then the 
power and understanding, or the ideas that there are in one 
man, M'ould be the .same individual power and ideas, that are in 
another, which they are not. Whereas, when we speak of the 
Persons in the Godhead, as having the divine nature and per- 
fections, v/e say that this nature is the same individual nature in 
all of them, though the persons are distinct, otherwise the Fa- 
ther, Son, and Holy Ghost, could not be said to be truly and 
properly God, and to have the same understanding, will, imd 
other perfections of the divine nature. 

(3.) When we speak of human persons, we say, that as many 
persons as there are, so many beings there arc ; every human 
person has its own proper being, distinct from all other persons 
or beings ; but we do not say so with respect to the divine Per- 
sons, for the divine Being is but one, and therefore the Godhead 
of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, is the very same ; which 
is what we understand when we say, that though there are three 
Persons in the Godhead, yet they r.re the same in substance, or 
the one only living and true God. 

This leads us to consider in what respect the Father, Son, 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 243 

and Holy Ghost, are said to be one ; by which we mean, that 
the Son and Holy Ghost have all the perfections of the divine 
nature, in the same sense as the Father has ,• to say less than 
this, is to assert no more than what our adversaries will allow ; 
for they will not deny them perfections, nor would they be 
thought to deny them to have clivine perfections ; yea, many of 
them will not stick to say, that they are truly and properly God ; 
by which they mean, that \v^hatever deity is attributed to them 
in scripture, by the appointment of the Father, that is, what- 
ever divine authority they have, this properly belongs to them : 
but, I think, they will none of them allow that they have the di-^ 
vine nature in the same sense in which the Father is said to 
have it. This is Avhat we shall endeavour to prove ; and more 
need not be said concerning them, in order to establish that su- 
preme worship which is due to them, as well as the Father ; 
and, in order hereto, we shall consider the force of those argu- 
ments contained in one of these answers, and, together with 
them, the sense of that scripture, John x. 30. in which our Sa- 
viour says, / and my Father are one ; as also that other scrip- 
ture, 1 John V. 7. that the Father^ the Word^ and the Holy 
Ghoat^ who bear record in heaven^ are one ; the consideration 
whereof we shall reserve to a following head. 

And inasmuch as they are said to be equal in power and 
glory, we may observe, that there are two expressions, which 
we often use, to set forth the deity of the Son and Spirit ; some- 
times we say they are God, equal with the Father ; at other 
times, that they have the same essential perfections. To which, 
it naay be, some will reply, that if they are equal, they cannot 
be the same ; or, on the other hand, if they are the same, they 
cannot be equal. For the understanding what we mean by such- 
like expressions, let it be observed, that when we consider 
them as having the divine essence, or any of the perfections 
thereof, we do not chuse to describe them as equal, but the 
same ; we do not say that the wisdom, power, holiness, 8?c. of 
the Son and Spirit are equal to the same perfections, as ascri- 
bed to the Father : but when we speak of them as distinct Per- 
sons, then we consider them as equal : the essential glory of the 
Father, Son, and Spirit, is the same ; but their personal glory is 
equal ; and in this sense we would be undei'stood, when we say 
the Son and Holy Ghost are each of them God, or divine Per- 
sons, equal with the Father.(«) 
-—T — — — — ' ' ■»- — 

(a) " The doctrine of a plurality appears in the very first words of inspiration. 
God would not record the history of oewi/o?;, without informini^- the Cluuch that 
the character of Creator was by no means to be confined to one person. It has of- 
ten been observ-ed, that this is taught in tlie woi-ds rendered God creuted, where 
we have a noun in the plural joined with * ^■eTb in the sinfjiiiar number, plainly 



U.44 HIE DOCl'RINE OF THE TRINITY. 

III. We shall proA^e that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, 
are distinct persons in the Godhead, by applying what has been 



expressing a plurality in unity. Tiiat this is the genuine sense of the passage ap- 
peal's from the work ascribed, in the next verse, to the Spirit of God, who is said 
to have " moved on the face cf the waters." By modern Jews, whom some Chris- 
tians have followed, this expression has been rendered, " a wind of God," or " a 
miglitj- wmd." Eut the firmament, or expanse, was not created till the second 
daj-. This includes the atmosphere which surrounds our earth : for the fowl is 
.said to " fly above the earth in the o]:)en firmament of heaven." Now, it cannot 
reasonably be supposed that there could be a mighty wind, or any wujd at all, 
before the existence of an atmosphere. 

If we turn to the gospel-history, we find a thh-d person mentioned as engaged 
in the woi-k of creation. " All things were made by" that Word, who " in tSe be- 
ginning existed witli God." 

This plurality appe:a-s still more expressly, when the sacred histprian gives an 
account of the creation of man : " And God saifl, Let t/s make man in our image, 
after our lUvcness." But it is a plurality in imity: "So God created man in 
Ms owTi image." It has been justly observed, that to this the language of Elihu, 
andof the royal Preaciier, agrees: "None saith. Where is God my ^lahet^s" 
and, " Remember now thy Creators" Nothing can be more absurd than the va 
I'ious attempts which have been made to .shew, that this language may be otlier- 
wise understood. God could never speak in this manner to wigels, or to any se- 
cond causes. For to whonisoe;ver these words were addressed, they must have 
been co-operators with God in this diviue work. They must have assisted him in 
making miui. Philo the Jew expressly says tliat these words, L?t its make, declare 
a plurality. That the Jewisli writers in general view this language as including a 
mystery, not to be made known to the vulgar, and indeed studiously concealed by 
them, fi"om their abhorrence of Christiariity, hai> been elsewhere demonstrated. 
It is therefore unnecessaiy to enlarge here. I shall onh/ add, that the modem Jews 
are so fully cominced tliat the doctrine of a phirality is contained in these words, 
as to wish to alter the reading. Instead oi Let ns nuike man, they incline to read, 
fyCt man he made ; although the Samaritan text, the Septuagint, the I'almudists, 
and all their translations, wJiether ancient or modern, express tlie language iii the 
same m.anner with oiu- A'ersion. 

The same import.ant doctrine is introduced in the history of the Fall. Tliat 
^lu'ee-one God, wlio said, *• Let us make man after our image," in the same cha- 
racter laments the loss of this image. '• Jkhovah God said. Behold, the man is be- 
rome as one of us ;" or, a.s some read the passage, " Behold the man, who was as 
fine of us !" Here Philo observes ; *' These words, as one oftts, are not ]>ut foi' one, 
but for more than one." The learned AUix has remarked that the ancient Jewisl? 
writers maintain, that God " speaks not this to the angels, who had no common 
1 ikeness to the unity or essence of God, but to Him who was the celestial Adam, 
^viio is one with God." To whom this character applies, we learn from the Tar- 
gum of Jonathan on the place, who here speaks of " the onlv begotten in heaven." 

This doctrine is also taught in the history of tlie Covfnsionoi Tovg^ics. " Jeho- 
vah said. — Go to, let us go down, and there confound tlieir language." Here the 
Jews repeat their contemptible subterfuge, tl4at God addresses his " house ot 
jtidgment," that is, created angels. 'For it is an established doctrine with them, 
that " God does nothing without previously consulting with hLs fam.ily above." 
But it has justly been observed, that tliese words, if spoken to angels, would im- 
ply that God wei*e one of tliem, or that he descended in the Svime mr'nner with 
them, by a real change of place. Besides, in a moment to change one language 
into mamv and to infuse tliese into the minds of nieii, who were utter stj-anjers to 
them before, so that they should entirely forget their former modes of speech, is 
a work that fai- surpasses the pov\er of angels, and can be accomplished by no be- 
ing but that God, with whom to will and to do is the same. 
' it must be evident to eveiy one, who i-eads the Instor}- of the Old Testament 
:«iih any degree of attention, tltut an *7«5. i is oflcu introduced as speaking th^' 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 24o 

i)ut now observed, by which any one may, by our common 
mode of speaking, be denominated a person ; and to this wc; 



language, performing the works, and accepting the worship, which exclusively 
belong to the Supreme Being. In other words, one, who is undoubtedly a divine 
person, often appears in a delegated character. Now, wliile it was the will of God 
in tliis manner constantly to remind his Church of the economy of redemption, lie 
at the same time taught her a distinction of persons in the divine essence. It was 
this Angel who appeared to Abraham on different occasions, to Ha.ij;'ar, to Jacob, 
to Moses, to Joshua, to the Israelites at Bochim, to Gideon, to Manoah and his 
wife. But I enter not into a particular consideration of these appearances, having 
endeavoured to illustrate the character of this divine Messenger in another place. 
'I'here it has also been proved, that the law was given to the Israelites at Mount 
Sinai by the second person of the adorable Trinity, in the character of the Angel 
of Jehovah. It deserves particular attention, that at the very time that the God 
of Israel gave his people a law, by which they were to be distinguished from all 
the idolatrous nations aroimd, one special design of which was to preserve the 
doctrine of the divine unity ; — at the very time that he pronoimced that leading 
precept, " Thou shalt have no other gods before me ;" he, according to the Sa- 
cred History, viewed in its coiuiexion, sustained the character of an Angel, and 
was pleased to communicate the knowledge of this fact to his people. How cati 
these apparent contradictions be reconciled, b>it by admitting that it was the will 
of God to I'eveal himself to his church, as at the same time possessing essentia! 
unity and personal plurality .' 

The more ancient Jewish writers declare, that two persons were engaged in 
promulgating the law. They say ; " The two first precepts were spoken by the 
*' Supreme Spirit, but he spoke all the rest by his Glory, who is called El Shad- 
" dai, known to the fathers ; by whom the prophets foretold future events ; who 
" is called Jah : in whom the Name of God is ; the Beloved of God who dwelt in 
*' the temple ; and the Mouth of tlie Loni) ; and the Face of the Lonn ; and the 
" Rock ; and that Goodness which Moses saw, when he could not see God." Else- 
where they call him *' the ScJiechinah, by whom we draw neai* to God, and pre- 
" sent our supplications to him ; mIio is that Angel in whom the name of God is. 
" who is himself called God and Jehovah." The ch:inge of person, in the promul- 
gjation of the law, asserted by these writers, is evidently a mere fancy. But their 
language deserves attention ; as i,t shews how fully they were convinced of th-r. 
doctrine of a plurality in unity, Wlien they introduced it in this manner. 

It has been universally admitted by the fi-iends of revelation, that the great ei\d 
which God hath in view in the work o? Redemption is the display of his own ado 
rable perfections. But there is doubtless another, although less attended to, nc 
wise incompatible with this, nay, itself lui eminent branch of the supreme eniJ 
Tills is the manifestation of tlie mystery of the Trinity, and of the mode of sub- 
sistence peculiar to each person in the divine essence. I'hls must undoubtedly b( 
viewed as Included in the one great design of the all-vise God in our rtdemp 
tion ; and it is evident that be hath still kept it in eye, in the re% elation given to 
the Church, and especially in the history of Uiat work, as it is recorded in tin- 
gospels. "We may trace the doctrine of a i'linil} in the accounts given of the old. 
/creation ; but It appears with far superior evidence in the history oV the new. This 
corresponds to the superior greatness of tlie work, and to the brighter and more 
extensive display of divine perfection. 

Such was the state of the Church, as to admit of a more full manifestation ot 
this mystery. It was more obscurely revealed to tlie patriarchs, and under the 
Mosaic economy. This was analogous to the general character of the revelation 
then made; as well as to tlie state of the Church, yet in her infancy, and expo- 
sed to constant temptations to polytheism, from the situation of all the sur^ 
rounding nations. But " when the fulness of tlie time was come," that the 
gospel sh<inld be preached to every creature, and the kingdom of Satan fliU a.s 
lightning from heaven, in the overthrow of heathen dai-kness ; tliere were na 
Sui-h impediments to the mo^'C clear revelation of this mvslcriotis doctrine. Tl<'> 



^46 TlIK DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

shall add something concerning those personal properties, menf 
tioned in one of the answers we are explaining, with respect to 

rest of the divine conduct indeed rendered this necessai'y. God had now " sent 
" forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that 
" wei'e under the law." The ends of this mission could not be accomplished, 
without a full revelation of the character of this illustrious Messenger. He 
could not othei-wise receive that homage from the Church, which he merited as 
lier Redeemer, and which was necessaiy, in order to her salvation. Now, his 
character, as essentially tlie Sou of God, and at the same time a divine Messen- 
ger, could not be properly unfolded, \\'ithout a declaration both of the paternity 
of the First Person, and of that wonderful dispensation, according to which the 
Second, although equal in power and gloiy, voluntarily " emptied himself." 
Nor could the unity of the work of redemption, as pervading all the dispensa- 
tions given to the Ciuu'ch, and the beautiful harmony of the law and the gospel^ 
be otherwise displayed. Without a full revelation of this mysterj', how could 
Jt have been known that he, who appeared in the end of ages as sent of God, was 
rhe very same person w1k> had rbrmerly led the Church, as the Angel of his 
face ; that He, who now brought spiritual redemption to his folk, Mas no otlier 
than that Angel-Redeemer, who had akeady so frequently delivei'ed them from 
temporal calamities ? 

If this mystery be unknown or disbelieved, there can be no faith in Christ as 
the Mediator between God and men. For he who believes not that the Son is in 
the Father, and the Father in tlie Son, as to identity of essence, while at the 
same lime there is a distinction of persons, denies the voluntary subjection of 
the Son to the Father in the eternal covenant, and thus the whole foundation of 
his merit and of our salvation. In relation to the work of our redemption, and. 
in the history given of it, ai-e revealed various internal actings of the divine per- 
sons towards each other, as well as those of ait external natui'e. The Father 
appoints, gives, sends, prepai-es a human nature for his Son ; the Son under- 
takes, gives himself, comes, assumes this natiu-e. 

From the history given of the conception of Christ, we find that three divine 
persons were engaged in the creation of this " new thing in the earth." The 
Father appears in the character of " the Highest ;" the Third Person, as " the 
" Holy Ghost," and " the Power of the Highest;" and the Second, as " the Son 
" of God." When this wonderful Person, the incarnate Word, was to be manl- 
iested to Israel at his baptism, each divine Person concurred in the work. The 
Father testified his presence and approbation by a voice from tlie excellent 
glory, announcing Jesus as his beloved Son ; and the Holy Ghost descended like 
a dove, and rested on him. The history of his death, viewed in its connexion, 
affords a proof of a similar kind. As "it pleased Jehovah," in the person of 
the Father, sustaining the character of Judge, to bruise the Son as our Surety; 
and as he, having power over his own life, commended his spirit into the hands 
of his Father, thus presenting unto him a sacrifice of a sweet-smelling savour; 
he did so " tln-ougli the Eternal Spirit." The same thing appears from the re- 
surrection of Jesus. He was " powerfully declared to be tlie Son of God in his 
" Insurrection from the dead ;" for he had " power to take again" that which 
no one could take from him. This work is frequently ascribed to God, where 
the term evidently denotes the f'irst Person. " God hath raised up Jesus again; 
'< as it is also written in the second psalm. Thou ai-t my Son, this day have I be- 
" gotten thee." As he was " put to death in the flesh, he %vas quickened by the 
" Spirit," by that Spirit of holiness, " by which also he went and preached unto 
" the spirits in prison." Nor is this les's evident from the account given of thf. 
effusion of the Spirit. This is undoubtedly a divine work; and it is described 
as belonging to each adorable Person. Jesus had foretold that the Comforter 
should come, that himself should send him, and tliat he should at the same 
time be sent by the Father. Accordingly, from tlie account given of this won- 
<ierful event by the apostle Peter, which is left on record for the instruction of 
the Church, we find that each diviue Person was engaged in accoropUshing' it •. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITV. 247 

f 

the eternal generation of the Son, and the procession of the 
Holy Ghost. And, 

• ' ' ' ' "' ' ' ' Tr 

" Jesus, having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, hath shed 
*• fortli this which ye now see and hear." 

It is undeniable, that one special end, which Christ had in view in his miracu- 
lous works, was to confirm his doctrine with respect to his equality with the 
Father. When he gave thanks at the tomb of Lazarus, before raising him from 
the dead, it was because of the people who stood Ijy, that they might believe, 
that the Father had sent him ; and sent him as a Messenger in\ested with divbie 
power, because essentially possessing divine perfection. For lie had previously 
said to his disciples: "This sickness is not unto death, but for the glorj of God, 
" that the Son of God might be glorified thereby ;" and taught Martha, that if 
she " would believe, she \\-ould see tlie gior\' of God," in seeing the manifesta* 
tion of that power which essentially belonged to himself, as " the Resurrection 
" and the Life." When he cured the man sick of the palsy, it was in order to 
prove that he had " power on earth to forgive sin ;" while he admitted the prin- 
ciple held by the scribes, that no one could forgive sins but God onl}'. On dif- 
ferent occasions he refers to his miraculous works, as irrefragable evidences of 
his having the same essence with the Father; and of the mutual inexistence, a.? 
some have expressed it, of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Fathef", 
in respect of this essential unity, while there is at the same time a real distinction 
of persons. When his enemies accused him of blasphemy, because he said, "f 
" am the Son of God," " making himself God ;" he replied, " If I do not the 
" works of my Father, believe me not. But if I do, though ye believe not me, 
" believe the works ; that ye may know and believe that the Fatlier is in me, 
" and 1 in him." To Philip, when desiring to see the Father, he said, " Believe 
" me, that I am in the Father, and the Father in me ; or else believe me for the 
" very work's sake." The Evangelist John, when refeiTing to the signs recorded 
in the prece(iing history, subjoins this declaration ; " These are writter, that ve 
" might believe that Jesus is the Son of God." That he appropriates iliis cha- 
racter to Jesus, as expressive of supreme deity, is evident from the uiiifiinn tenor 
of the gospel which bears his name. 

The doctrine of the Trinity is peculiarly elucidated by the history of redemp- 
tion ; as it does not merely exhibit all the adorable Persons as engaged in this 
work, but ascribes a peculiar operation to each Person. The contrivance of our 
redemption is ascribed to the Father ; the purchase of it to the Son ; and the ef- 
fectual application of this purchased redemption to the Holy Spirit. I'hc Father 
sends his Son as our Surety ; the Son cheerfully comes in this character ; ;.nd thff 
Holy Spirit is sent by both. The purpose of election is more IniniediateK 
ascribed to the Father; the objects of his love are all chosen in Christ; and the\", 
•w'ho were tlius chosen from eternity, are in time chosen out of the world, and se- 
parated for himself, by the renewing and sanctifying work of the Spirit. 

Nor is this all. The peculiar operation of each Person, in the work of our saU 
vation, is perfectly analagous to the order of subsistence in the Holy Trinity; and 
thus beautifully illustrates the mutual relations of the divine Persons. All the ex- 
ternal works of God, indeed, are common to each Person ; as the divine nature is 
the same indivisible ]n'in.ciple of operation. Yet these works are distinctly ascrib- 
ed to the three Persons, because each Person operates according- to the order of 
subsistence. In the old creation, the Father called all thing's into beintr- by liis 
co-essential Word, communicating life immediately by the vSpirit, as exercisint;- a 
generating power on the unformed mass. When God created man, the First Per- 
son formed him by the Second, as his essential Image, giving iiim life, both natu. 
ral and moral, by the Third, as " the Spirit of life." Yet this implies no inferior- 
ity, or mere instrumentality, in any of the adorable Persons ; but onl) the most 
perfect order and harmony. The c:use is the same in the new creation. It .seem.s 
most consistent with divine wisdom, that he who is first in the order of subsist- 
ence should rather send than be sent ; that the Son, who is "the im:;ge'": :he'^n- 
" visible God," should procure the restoration of that blessed image' lost by sin ; 
and that he, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, should be sent bv'both. 



348 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITV. 

i 

1 . To prove the personality of the Son. If this be reckoned 
needless, inasmuch as the Arians and Socinians never yet called 
it in question, we own that it is not necessary, when we dispute 
with them, to prove it : but inasmuch as the Sabellians deny it, 
as a late writer* has done, who plainly gives in to that scheme, 
and concludes the Son of God to be no other than the eternal 
reason of God; and so he renders that text, John i. 1. In the 
beginmng was the word, that is, reason, and by hitn, that is, by 
it, were all things made; and when it is objected, that this mode 
of speaking signifies nothing more than a quality in God, the 
only answer he g-iyes to it, is, that it signifies no more a quality, 
than if we should translate it. The word,^.s it is generally done : 
I say, if persons, whether they pretend to be Sabellians or no, 
express themselves in such a manner, it is certainly necessary 
for us to prove the personality of the Son. 

* See Le Clerc's Supplement to Dr. Hammojid on the JVeto Teslmneiit, preface 
to John i. 

to quicken those who are spiritually dead. This distinct operation indeed, as it 
coi-responds with the order of subsistence, beautifully harmonizes with the dis- 
tinguishing character belonging to each Person. He, who is essentially the Father, 
assumes the character of patei-nity, in a federal respect, towards those who are 
orphans and aliens. I'he only begotten Son of God is sent forth, made under the 
law, that they may " receive the adoption of sons," and appears as " the first-born 
** among many brethren." The adorable Spirit, " the breath of Jehovah," breathes 
on the slain, that they may live ; giving them a new heart and a right spirit. He, 
who ]5roceeds from the Father and the Son, unites the sinner to both. 

Is It "life eternal to know the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom he hath 
" sent ?" Hath no one the Father, who "denieth the Son }" Caii no one honour 
the Father, " who honoureth not the Son?" Is it the Spirit alone who quickeneth, 
and who teacheth us to " know the things that are freely given us of God ?" Can 
no man " say that Jesus is tlie Lord, but by the Holy Ghost 1" Is it through 
Christ that " we have access by one Spirit mito the Father ?" Let us bless God 
for the revelation of the m^'stery of a Trinity in unity; and especially because he 
hath revealed it so cleaily in the history of our redemption, iji relation to that 
work in which a peculiar operation belongs to each adorable Person, in which the 
love of a tliree-one God is so wondtrfull}^ displayed, in which we discern so bles- 
sed a harmony, not 'only of divine perfections, but of divine Persons ! In all our 
worship, let us view God according to this revelation, ascribing glory to him 
" who is, and who was, anrl who is to come, and to the Seven Spirits which are 
" before his throne, and to Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first- 
'■' begotten from the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth." Let us ear- 
nestly desire cctmmunlon with this tJiree-one God ; with the Father, in his love as 
the spring of our salvation ; witli the Son, in all that grace which he hath pur- 
chased by his blood ; and with the Holy Ghost, in the whole extent of his effica- 
cious o]jeration. In order to this, let us press after imlon with Christ, that in him 
we may be united to the Father by that one Spirit who proceeds from both, and 
who is conferred by both as the Spirit of adoption. Let us cultivate love to the 
>>rethren, as members of the same mystical body, desiring to be "one heart and 
'•' one soul ;" that aithoug-h many, we may be one, and thus be assimilated, in our 
Ae:ik measure, to the blessed Trinitj^ in respect of unity ; as Jesus prays in behalf 
of his Church ; — " That they all may be one ; as thou. Father, art in me, and I in 
•' thee ; that they also may be one in us. — I in them, and thou in me, that the}' 
*' may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent 
me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.'* 

Jamiesok. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 24.9 

It appears, therefore, that the Son is a distinct Person from 
the Father, 

(1.) Inasmuch as we often read, in scripture, of two divine 
Persons speaking to, or of, one another, the distinguishing per- 
sonal characters, /, tlioii^ and /«.',. being applied to them : thus it 
is said, Psal. ex. 1. 'Tkc Lord^ that is the Father, said unto my 
Lord^ nanielv the Son, nht thou at my r'lght^hand^ till I make 
thine enemies thy footstool : this may be observed throughout 
die whole Psalm; thus, ver. 3. Thy people shall be xvilling .; 
and ver. 6. He^ meaning the Son, shall judge among the heathen; 
and ver. 7. He shall drink of the brook in the waij ; so Psal. xlv. 
2. speaking of the Son, Thou art fairer than the children of 
men; and ver. 6. Thy throne^ God^ is for ever and ever. The 
places of scripture, which have such modes of speaking con- 
cerning the Son, are almost inimmerable; and therefore we 
proceed to consider, 

(2.) Other personal characters given him ; thus, when he is 
called the Son of God, whatever we are to understand by that 
relation or character, of which more under a follovv'ing head, it 
certainly denotes him a Person distinct from the Father ; so 
does his being sent into the world by the Father, which expres- 
sion is frequently used in the New Testament ; now a quality, 
relation or property, cannot be said to be sent as the Son is. So 
when he is described as a Redeemer, a Mediator, a Surety, a 
Creator; and when he is styled, by the prophet, the eoerlasting 
Father ; and often described as a prophet, priest, or king; or 
Lord ofaU., or the Prince ofpeace^ or the Prince of the kings of 
the earth ; all these characters sufficiently prove his personalitv ; 
and all those works which he performs, as sustaining these re- 
lations or characters, are properly personal ; and some of them 
are never ascribed to any other person. Thus the Father, or 
Holy Ghost, are never said to assume the human nature, or to 
become sureties for the salvation of men, or to execute media- 
torial offices, subservient thereunto ; from all which it evidently 
appears, that the Son is a distinct Person : that he is a divine 
Person, will be proved under a following head : we shall there- 
fore proceed, 

2. To prox-e the distinct personality of the Holy Ghost. 
This is denied, not only by the Sabellians, but by some of the 
Socinians ; yea, even by Socinus himself; who describes the 
Holy Ghost as the power of God, intending hereby, as his mode 
of speaking seems to denote, the energy of the divine nature, 
or that whereby the Father, who is the only one, to whom, ac- 
cording to him, the divine nature is attributed, produces those 
effects which require infinite power; so that they call the Spirit 
the power of God essentially consid;;red ; these set aside all 
those proofs, that mav be produced from scripture, to evipce 

Vol.. r. I i 



250 tifJi DOCTRINE OF THE TRIMTV. 

Ins personality, which are so plain and evident, that many of 
them have dissented from Socinus herein, and owned the Spi- 
rit to be a person.. Accordingly some of them have described 
him as the chief of created spirits, or the head of the angels, 
because they deny his divine nature. Thus a bold writer ex- 
presses himself; " I believe that there is one principal minister 
■■' of God and Christ, peculiarly sent from heaven, to sanctify 
**• the church, who, by reason of his eminency and intimacy 
" with God, is singled out of the number of other heavenly mi- 
" nisters, or angels, and comprised in the holy Trinity, being 
*■' the third person thereof ; and that this minister of God and 
" Christ is the Holy Spirit. f" 

Now we shall prove the personalit}^ of the Holy Ghost, by 
considering some personal characters ascribed to, and works 
performed by him. Thus there are several such characters, by 
which he is denominated a person ; particularly when he is 
called a Sanctifier, a Reprover, a Witness, a Comforter, it evi- 
dently appears from hence that he is a person : thus when if is 
aaid, in John xvi. 8. that when he^ to wit, the Comforter iscome^ 
he rvill reprove the xvorld ofsm^ of righteousness and judgment ;; 
and also, that he will guide you into all truth ; he shall shexu you 
things to come, &c. And in John xiv. 16, 17. there is the dis- 
tinct personality of the three persons, and particularly of the 
Holy Ghost, asserted; I xvill pray the Father., and he shall give 
you another Comforter., even the Spirit of truth ; and also in ver. 
26. The Comforter., which is the Holy Ghost., whom the Father 
will send in mij name., he shall teach you all things.\ 

It is certain, that to be said to teach, or to instruct, is a per- 
sonal character : so it is to speak, or to dictate, to another vt^hat 
he should say ; but this he is said to do, as our Saviour says to 
his disciples, Whatever shall be giveti you in that hour, that 
speak ye ; for it is not you that speak, but the Holy Ghost, Mark 
xiii. II. . 

Moreover, to witness, or testify, is a personal character ; es- 
pecially when the testimony is not merely objective, as when 
Job calls his rvrinkles and his leanness a xvitness against him, 
Job xvi. 8. But when there is a formal testimony given, he 

1 

f See Bidille\i Coitfesaimt of Fuith, touching tfw holy Tnnity, ,irticle VI. 

i Some hare thought, tliot acs/voc beivg of the masculine gender, becaiise it refers 
Immediutely to Tnej/jLct., ivhich is of the neitter, implies, that the Spirit is taken person- 
ally, -vhich is the ri'.ason ^f this graimnuiical constnictiou ,- but if it be said that the 
reuKon ichy it is mascidine is, becuvse it agrees with rrnpuKKiflo;, it, noticithstanding^ 
pmves the PersonaUty of the Holy (Jhost, since a Comforter is a per so?: id character: 
The sa:mr tiring is observed in t/ie grammatical construction of that scripture, Kph.i 
13, 14. speaking concer^itirig the Holy Spirit of promise, to 7rvfj/uct th^ iTrotyyikiu; ; it if 
Raid, oc ««v ctftfi^mv, winch denotes the personal chui-acter of the Spirit, oihei-tdse it 
'wonld have been o mv eif.pa(Cav, unless yon snj'pose o; agrees -idth ttffKLQea, ivhich seettit 
fo be a more strained sense of the grammatical constiitdion than the other, tvhiek 
jl-'T^v^s hie personality. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. JJ^i 

4 hat gives it is, according to our common way of speaking, ge- 
nerally considered as a person ; and thus the Holy Ghost is de* 
scribed. Acts v. 32. We arc his witnesses of these things^ and so 
is the Holy Ghost^ whom G§d has given to them that obey himp 
Here the Holy Ghost's being a witness is as much a personal 
character, as their being witnesses ; and. Acts xx. 23. it is said. 
The Holy Ghost witnesseth in every city, that bonds atid a^ic- 
tions abide 7ne, 

Again, dwelling is a personal character ; no one ever suppo- 
ses that any thing that is in a house dwells there, excepting 
persons ; but the Holy Ghost is said to dwell in believers, John 
xiv. 17. and alluding hereto, as also connoting his divine per- 
sonality, it is said, 1 Cor. vi. 19. T'onr body is the temple of the 
Holy Ghost ; as a house is the dwelling-place of a person, so a 
temple is the dwelling-place of a divine person. 

Again, to send any one is a personal character ; but this i:J 
attributed to the Holy Ghost, Acts xiii. 4. The apostles being 
sent forth by the Holy Ghost^ departed. 

Again, acting with a sovereign ^^ill and pleasure is what 
belongs only to a person ; but this is applied to the Holy Ghost, 
Acts XV. 28. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to i/s. 

Again, prohibiting, or forbidding, a person to act, is a person^ 
al character ; but this is applied to the Holy Ghost, Acts xvi. 
6. The apostles xvere forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the 
word in Asia, 

Again, to constitute, or appoint, any one to execute an office 
is a personal character ; but v;his the Holy Ghost is said to do. 
Acts XX. 28. he is said to have made them overseers. There are 
several other personal works and characters, which might have 
been mentioned ; but these are, 1 humbly conceive, sufficient to 
prove the thing intended, that the Holy Ghost is a person. 1 
jjave no more than mentioned the scriptures, which contain 
these personal characters, because I shall have occasion under 
a following head, to refer to some of them for the proof of hi? 
At\ty.(ci) 



(a) " THAT the Holy Scriptures make mention of Tlirce by way of great emi' 
nence and distinctmi may appear from inany jja^sages, out of which I shall only 
produce some. At the Prediction qf the blessed Vii-jjui's conception, which was 
to be without the concui-rence of a man, th.e divine niessa^je is delivered in these 
words : The Holy Ghost shall come upon lliee, and the poiver of the Highest shall 
wershadotu thee; Tfiei-efore, aiso that Ilohj Thing, that shall Ik born of t/iee, shall he 
vailed the Son of God. Here are plainh^ distiny^uished from each other, the Hoi^ 
Ghost, or Power overshadowing ; the Highest, whose Power that Spirit is ; and 
the Holy Thing, or Person, vvlio is called the Son of God, beciaisc born of a mother, 
impregnated by that Divine Power. At our Blessed Lord's IJaptism, the Spirit 
nf God, we read, detcended litre u dove and resteti npmi him, and a voice fr^m Hea- 
ren declared him to be t/ie Son of God : Nothing c^n be plainer than three Per- 
sonalities in this transaction ; the Father speukimg from Heasen, the So7i coming 
*)ut of Jordan, ;md the Spirit dti'-cf jidihg ftom above. ' ]n th? Proniisc,. vv-hirJi on'; 



252 THE DOCTRINE 01; THE TRINITY. 

Objett, It will be objected, by those who are favourers of the 
Sabeliian scheme, that the characters which we have laid down, 

»'■ ' ' - ■ ■ ■ ' — 

blessed Suviour makes his disciples, to comfort their heaits against \vh;it ',vas 
coming' upon them, / toill pray the Father, and he shall give you avother comfortery 
that he may abide tiith y 011 for ever, even the Spirit of Truth; and when the com' 
forter is come, tvliom I will send unto you from t/ie Father, eveti the Spirit of Truth, 
■which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me, there are manifestly Acts, 
and Persons, and capacities, different. The i^'fiiV.rr, from whom tlie Spnit /)r&- 
ceeds, whom the Son prays, v.rA by whom, at the Son's Request, tiie Comforter 
7uas given : The Son, praying the Futlier, sending the Comforter from the Father, 
and testified of by the Spirit so sent : And the Spirit, given by the Father, sent by 
the Son, testifying of the Son, and, upon the Son's Departui-e, abiding for ever 
with iht- Dr)Ciples. 

The great Apostle of the Gentiles, to enforce the Doctrine of the resurrection, 
tells the Romans, that if the Spirit of him, who raised Jesns from the dead, dwelt in 
fhem, he that raised Christ from the dead would also qidcken their mortal bodies by 
his S pint, that dwelled in them ; wiiere he evidently refers io Jesus, the Son rti" 
God, laised from tiie Dead; to the iS/;«v« of God, by which he w;is raised; and 
to him thit i-aised Jesrts, and at the last great day shall raise all others, ui whom 
his Spirit dwells. Tiie pr^me apostle, to satisfy the Corinthians of tlie benefits of 
their conversion, after havuig enumer.ited several ranks of sinners, and such were 
smne ofyozi, says he, but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye arc justifed, in 
the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and by the Spirit of our God, i. e. Crod the Father. 
It cannot be denied that Sanctif cation and Justification arc the gifts of God iilonc; 
for none can absolve us from the Guilt and polluticm of sin, butiie only: Kut then 
the Apostle tells the Corinthians, that this benefit they received not only from 
God the Fatlier, but from the I^ord Jesus likewise, and from the Holy Spirit : 
Analogous to which is that other Pass;ige in the same epistle ; There are diversi- 
ties qf gifts, but the same Sjiirit, (there is tiie third Person in the Trinity) there 
are differences of Administration, but the same J^ord, (ihere is the s^to^k/ Person) 
and there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God, (or first person in 
the Trinity) that worketh all in all. Once laore, the same Apostle, in his prayei* 
for the Thessaloniuns, directs his devotion to the ever l)lessed Trinity : J\'oxv God 
himself, even our Father, and our Lord Jes^iis Christ, direct our way unto yoxi, and 
the Lord, (i. e. the Holy Ghost) make you to increase and abound i7i love one towards 
ansther : For that by the Jyord we are here to understand tlie Holy Ghost, I 
think is very plain from the next verse ; " to the end, that he may establish your 
hearts imblameublein holiness before God, even our Fatlier, at the coming of our Jjord 
Jesus Christ with all his saints ; since he is , the Sanctifer, and to establish our 
hearts m holiness is his proper work and office : And if so, then is there a plaiix 
enumeration nf the three Persims of the Trinity m this passage. 

The great Apostle of the Jexvs begins his first Epistle general to his dispersed 
Brethren \v,ih a declaration of the same ai-ticle, -tihcnhe c:dls them elect accord- 
ing to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through Sanctiftcation of the Spirit, 
unto obedience, and sprinkling of t/ie blood of Jesus ; for there we may observe, 
that the three Persons are notonl) expressly named, but *hoii' distinct e)n/;.'s?/wjfn<», 
with reference to man's salvation, are particularly specif nd, while the Father is 
said to elect, the Spirit to sanctify, and the holy Jesus to shed his blood. The be- 
loved \;) ostle St. John, in his Salutation to the Cliurches, Grace, and Peace from 
him, which is, andwhich was, and which is to come, and from the seven spirits which 
are before his Throne, and from Jesus Christ has gi\'en us a distinct enumeration 
of the ilirec Persons in the Deity, if we will but admit, (as most interpreters have 
done) that i^j- tlie Seven Spirits, which was a Kacred number among the Jews, 
that one Person (viz. the lioh' Ghost) is to be understood, from whom all tliat 
Variety of gifts and operations, winch were then conspicuous in the Christian 
Church, did jjrocecd. Rnt however this be, 'tis certain, that the passage m his 
Epistle of the Three which bear record i7i Heaven, the Father, the Word, and the 
ffohf Ghost, are as full and plain a Testimony and declaration of this .Mystery, u5 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 233 

lo prove the personality of the Soj, and Holy Ghost, are not 
sufficient to answer that end ; inasmuch as they are oftentimes 

r ■ ■■ ( ■ ■ . I ■ — 

c;tn be cited in words; and thoiit^li some have endeavoured to inviiiKlute the an- 
tliorlty of this passage, as not extant in some ancient copies, and seldom appealcil 
to by the first dcfen«.lers of the catholick faith ag'ainstthe ^IriansiOid Jlfacedoiduns, 
) et the contrary to tins is most evident. TtrtuUian, St. Cypiian, and Ftdgentiuit 
quote it in their writings : Athunamis made use of it in tine coiuicilof JV'Vre against 
^Iriui- ; and the reason wliy it was left out in some ancient copies Socrates ac- 
quaints us with ui his Ecclesiastical history, when he tells us, " That the Chiis- 
" tian Church had all along complained, that the Epistle of St. John had been cor- 
*• ru]>ted by the first adversai'ies of the doctrine of Christ's divmity." 'Twas b\' 
their artifice therefore that it was omitted; for several learned pens, both of our 
own and other churches, have made it very manifest, that it was* oi'iginally in tlie 
text, and that the most and ancientest copies always had it. 

liut we need not be so tenacious of one text, when, besides these already men- 
tioned, and many more that might be produced upon a farther enquiry, tiie very 
form of our admission into the Christian covenani is intlie vamenfthe Fat/ier, and 
of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost ; the form of our prayers is thus directed, that 
through the Son ive have an access by one Spirit to tJic Father ; and the fonn of our 
dismission from them is, every day, wAli this beiwdiction, 1 'he grace of the Lord 
Jestis, and tfie love of God, and the felk~.vnhip of the Holy G/wsl, he ivith us aU ever- 
more; as if the Wisdom of God had intended to inculcate tliis notion of the Trini- 
ty, and, in every act of our religious vvoi'.ship, to remind us of the manner of his 
subsistence. 

Thus it appears that there are Three, very often occurring in scripture, under 
the different appellations of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost : and that these three 
are not owe and tlie same Being, under different respects and considerations, but 
three real and distinct perso/is, with a peculiar manner of subsisting, is plain from 
the very names o'i Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, if we understand them in a proper 
and natiu'al sense ; because these are opposite relation.^, which can never meet in 
tlie same subject : for a Father cannot be Father to himseH", but to his Son ,- nor 
can a Son be Son to himself, but to his Father,- nor can the Holy Ghost proceed 
from himself, or (in this sense) be his own Spiri; but the Sph-it of the Father, 
and Son, from whom he proceeds : and therefore the Fatht r is not the Son, nor 
the Holy Spirit ; nor the Son the Father, or Holy Spirit ; nor the Holy Sf)lrit eitlier 
Fatiu;r or Son. The only question is, vvhether these names, when spoken of the 
I'rinity liave a proper and natural, or only an allusive and metaphorical signification. 

The divine nature and perfections indeed, (as they are v.a- exalted abo\-e our 
conception) may be brouglit down by metaphors, taken from some things, that 
are analagotis in creatiues ; in which sense we may allow Father and Son to be 
^netdphorical names, when applied to God : not that G(jd the Father is not, in tlie 
highest and most perfect sense, a Father, and his Son a most proper, natural, and 
genuine Son ; but because the divine generation is so peri'ect a communication of 
the di\ine nature and being from Father to Son, that human generations are but 
obscure and imperfect images and resemblances of it. The truth is, when anj 
thing is spoken metapliorically of God, the metaphor and image are always in the 
creatures ; the truth, perfection, and reality of all, in God: and if so, then if God 
be a Father, and have a Son, an only-begotten Son, begotten eternally of himself; 
though this eternal generation be infinitely above what we can imagine or con- 
ceive, yet it is evident, that God the Father is more properly and perfectly a P'a- 
thcr, and God the Son more properly and perfect!} a Son, i han any eirthh- fathers 
or sons ever were. And jf God the f'athei and his Son be truly and perfectly Fa- 

• To confirm this we may add, that, if the difference of copies happened by the ntf^Hgence of 
ttansciibers, such a mistake is muc)i more easily itwide l>y omlllins i cI.il'sc. than l)y inaerlinz 
cuf, especi.illy when the same words occur twice very near together, whith is the present case : 
and that, w iihout this cl.iuae, the next verse is maimed, and haictly good sense, the words, hi 
earth, standing disjointed by themselves ; whereas the words, in JieiiViti. (.is we now re id them) 
make a clcir, strong, and elegant antithesis : and for these reasons, those copies, in which this 
passage ik found, are more likely to be ti-ue, than those in which it is wanting.— Trjji'p'j Dcc- 
trine of the Trinity. 



S54 THE DOCTRINE OF TttE TRINITY. 

applied, in a metapliorical way, to those things which n6 orte 
supposes to be persons, and therefore that they may be taken 

ther and Son, they must be truly and perfectly distinct beings ; for the Fathei' can- 
not be the Son whom he begets ; nor the Son the Father that begat him ; nor the 
Holy Ghost either the Father or the Son, from whom he proceeds: consequently, 
they must be distinctj and real, and proper jOersons ,• for he that begets, and he that 
is begotten, :uid he that proceeds from both, cannot be one and the san:e person. 

And as this difference o^ relations m3k.ts a manifest distinction between the three 
persons ; so the different offices and employments, that are ascribed to them in 
scripture, is a farther note of discrimination. For who sees not, that the work of 
creation of all thing's at first, and ever since the just, and wise, and merciful dis- 
posal of them, are attributed to the Father ,- that the great undertaking of our 
redemption is the care and employment of tlie Soil ; and the business of enlighten- 
ing and sanctifying those, whom the Son redeemeth, the particular provmce of 
the Holy Ghost ? Without supposing them to be three distinct persons, I say, no 
satisfactor}' solution can be given, why, in the great work of man's salvation, a 
distinct office and operation should be proper to each of them ; why the Father 
only should be said to elect ; the Son only to have shed and sprinkUd his blood; 
and the Holy Ghost only to sanctify us unto obedience. So fai- then as a diversity 
of names, offices, and operations, distinguishes one being from another, there is 
plainly a distinction of persons subsisting in the Godhead. But this is not all. 

Those, who pretend to state * the ti'ue notion of a person as a term made use of 
5n this argument, tell us, that it is a being, -vhich has understanding, and is a dis- 
tinct, entire substance of itself; an individual s^ibstance of a rational nature, or d 
Complete intelligent substance, with a peculiar manner of subsistence : so that there 
is a common nature, which must be joined by a peculiar manner of subsisting, to 
make a person, otherwise it would be a mere mode ; for we never conceive a per- 
son ivithoitt the essence in cenjunction ivith it. And this notion may haply be of 
use, not only to state the true distinction of the Persons in the Godhead, but to 
account likewise for some dubious passages in the fathers, and reconcile the dif- 
ferent parties that contend about them : only we must take care (as I said before) 
that, when we discourse of the s.icred Trinity, the word person be not conceived 
in the same sense as among men. Tht persons of men are distinct men, as well as 
distinct persons ; but this is no ground for us to affirm, that the persons in the di» 
vine nature are distinct Gods. The distinction of the persons of men is foimded in 
a separate and divided subsistence ; but this caiinot be the foundation of the dis' 
tinction of tlie divine persons, because separation and division cannot belong to an 
injiyiite Being. In a word, three human persons are three m&n, because, though 
they have the same specific nature, yet they have not the same mimcncal nature : 
but the three Persons in the Godhead ai-e not three Godi, because they liave the 
t,iime numerical essence, which belongs in common to them all: and since it is 
confessed on all liand.'-;, that nature and subsistence go to the making Tip of a per- 
son, M'hy may not tJK; way of their subsistence be as different as the human and 
Diviiie natures (one finite, and the other infinite) are confessed to be ? Thong-h 
therefore in things created it is necessarj' for one single essence to subsist in one 
single person, and no more ; yet tliis does not at all prove that the same must be 
necessary in him, whose nature is wholly different from theirs, and, consequently, 
may diflflsr as much in the manner of his subsistence. For 'tis a thing agi-eeable 
even to the notions of bare reason to imagine, that the divi/ie nature has a way of 
•sul>sisting Veiy different from the subsistence of any created being, and conse- 
quently, may have one and the same nature diffused into three distinct persons : . 
but how, and in what manner this is effected ; how one substance in the Deity is 

• A late learned author has ^ven us this definition of a ningle person. " That it is an intflli- 
pptit agent, havins; the distinctive characters of /, thvu. ;ind }ie, and not divided or distinguished 
iiito more intelligent agents, c:i(>;ible of the tame characte''s." llfalerland's ■■econd Defence,] 
:ind thereu))on he thus arguct in another place. " Our ideas of p rson are plainly taken from our 
conceptions of human persons, and from them transferred to other snhjectt, though they do not 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 253 

in this sense, when applied to the Son and Spirit. To support 
this objection, they produce several instances out of the book 
of Job, and some other parts of scripture, where things are de- 
scribed with personal characters, which are not really persons. 
Thus Job xxxix. 11, 12. speaking concerning the unicorn, it is 
said ; JVilt thou trust him ? Wilt thou leave thy labour to hhn ? 
Wilt thou believe him, that he will bring- home thy seed, and ga- 
ther it i7ito thy barn ? So concerning the horse, it is said, as 
though he acted with design, as an intelligent creature, ver. 21. 
csr'c. He goeth on to lyieet the armed men ; he tnocieth at fear ; 
neither believeth he that it is the sound of the trumpet; he saith 
among the trumpets, Ha, ha ! And concerning the eagle, ver. 
28. She dwelleth in the rock. And concerning the leviathan, 
chap. xli. 3. £?'<?. Will he make many supplications to thee ? Will 
he speak soft words unto thee ? Will he make a covenant with 

communicated to more, and becomes theirs ; how of one and the same essenci^, 
there can be three persons numencally different ; this is the cUfficnlty, and what 
made the holy father (writing upon the argument) confess, " That the mysterij. 
" of the Trinity is immense and incompreliensible, beyond the expression of words, 
" or reach of sense; that it blinds our sight, and exceeds the capacity of ovu- un- 
" derstanding: I understand it not, says bej nevertheless I will comfort m) self in 
" this, that angels ai-e ignorant of it, nor do ages apprehend it ; that neither the 
" apostles enquired after it, nor the Son himself has thought fit to declare it." 

The only ViUid objection (and to which all others are reducible) against these 
personalities, so often occurring in scripture, is taken from the simplicity of the di- 
vine nature, which, in the opinion of some, will not admit of any distinction. But 
though the simplicity of God excludes all mixture, i. e. all composition of tilings 
heterogeneous in the Godhead, (there being nothing in God but what is God) yet, 
notwithstanding this, there may be a distinction of %j&os<ase« in the Godhead, pi'o- 
vided they are homogeneous, and of the same nature. Nay, the siir.plicity of the 
divine nature, if rightly considered, is so far from excluding, that it necessarily 
infers a distinction of /wposiases in the Godhead : for, since the simplicity of the 
Godhead consists chieffy in this, that God is a pure eternal Mind, free from the 
mixture of all kind of matter whatever; an eternal Mind must needs have in it, 
from all eternity, a notion or conception of itself, which the schools call verbum men- 
tin ; nor can it, at any time, be conceived without it. Now this -word cannot be 
in God, what it is in us, a transient vanishing accident ; for then the divine nature 
would be compounded of sM&s?rt?iC(? and acdrfe/j?, which would be repugnant to its 
simplicity; and therefore mustbe a substantial subsisting luord, and though not divi- 
ded, } et distinct from the eternal Mind, from whence it proceeds. This is no 
nox)el subtlety of the schools, but a notion, that* runs through all the Fathers of 
the first ages, and is not destitute of a sufficient foundation in scripture. It proves 
indeed only two Persons in tlie Godhead, not a Trinity ; but then it proves, that a 
distinction of persons in tlie Godhead is very consistent with its s-implicity ; nav, 
that from the true nature of the simplicity of the Godhead, such a distinction ne- 
cessarily follows ; and if tliere is a distinction oi t-wo, tliere may be oi three ; and 
that there is of three, the full evidence of scripture (as I have already shewn) 
abundantly assures us." Stackuouse. 

• It has, with good reason, been Guppoicd by the Catholick writers, that the design of the ■wont 
A4>@' was to intim ite, that the relation of Father and Son bears some resemblance and analo- 
fev to that of thought, vit. that as thought is co-eval with the mind, so the Son is co-eval with 
tne Father ; and that as thought is closely united to, proceeds from, and yet remains in the mind, 
so also mav we understand that the Son is in the bosoin of the Father, p'roceeding from him, and 
>«JC never divided or separatf , but remaining in liim and with \vm,—IVaterland's Sermons at Lir 
lii Moyfr's Lictui'ti. 



256 THE DOCTUIXE OF THE TRINITY. 

thee? He estecmeth iron as straxv^ and brass as rotten xvood^ 
Darts are counted as stubble ; he laiigheth at the shaking' of the 
spear. And ver. 34. He beholdeth all high things ; he is a king 
over all the children of pride. There are many other personal 
characters given to brute creatures, which are taken in a meta- 
phorical sense ; and sometimes they are applied to inanimate 
creatures. Thus Job xxxviii. 28, &c. Hath the rain a father ? 
and rvho hath begotten the drops of dexv f Out of whose xvomb 
came the ice f and the hoary frost of heaven^ zvho hath gendered 
it P Canst thou bind the szveet infiiences of Pleiades^ or loose the 
hands of Orion P Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his sea- 
son^ or canst thoii guide Arcturus xvith his sons ? By which 
nothing is intended but the signs in the Zodiack, or some of the 
constellations, together with the particular stars of which they 
consist ; yet tiiese are described, as though they were persons. 
So ver. iiS. Canst thou send lightnings^ that they may go, and 
say unto thee, here xve are ? Again, the powers and faculties of 
the soul of man have sometimes personal characters ascribed to 
them. Thus, conscience is said to bear xoitness^ Rom. ix. 1. 
And some instances may be brought from scripture of a per- 
son's speaking to himself j jet this doth not connote two per- 
sons in man, one speaking, and the other spoken to. It is there- 
fore inferred from hence, that we cannot prove the personality 
of the Son and Holy Ghost from those personal characters 
ascribed to them, which may be taken in a metaphorical sense, 
as well as in the instances but now mentioned. 

Ansxv. In answer to this objection, several things may be 
considered. 

1. Though the scripture often uses figurative, and particu- 
larly metaphorical, ways of speaking, yet these may be easily 
distinguished from the like phrases used elsewhere, concerning 
which we have sufficient ground to conclude that they are to be 
taken in a proper sense ; therefore, though it is true that there 
are personal characters given to things which are not persons, 
yet we are not to conclude from hence, that whenever the same 
modes of speaking are used, and applied to those who are capa- 
ble of performing personal actions, that therefore these must be 
taken in a metaphorical sense ; which is a known exception 
from the common idea contained in the same words. 

2. Most of those passages of scripture, where personal cha- 
racters are attributed to things which ar- not persons, in a me- 
taphorical sense, are in the poetical books thereof ; or in soihe 
particular places, where there is a peculiar beautiful mode of 
speaking t-tken from thence; will it therefore follow, that these 
personal characters are used in other parts of scripture, in which 
the Holy Ghost does not think fit to express himself in such an 
elegancy of style ? Now it is certain, that the personal charac- 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 257 

ters before mentioned are given to tht Son and Holy Ghost, 
throughout the whole scripture, without designing to use a 
lofty, figurative, or uncommon way oi speaicing, as in the in- 
stances belore mentioned. 

3. We must not suppose that the Holy Ghost uses any figu- 
rative ways of speaking, so as to cast a veil on plain truths, or 
to endanger our being led hereby out of (he way, as we should 
certainiv be, if so man}- hundred places of scripture, in which 
these personal ciiaracters are applied to the Son and Spirit, 
were to be taken in a metaphorical sense, without any intima- 
tion given in the context that they are so to be understood. And 
it will be certainly very difficult to find out any place in scrip- 
ture, that may serve to direct us in our application ol these cha- 
racters, viz, when they are to be taken in a metaphorical sense, 
when applied to the Persons in the Godhead, and when not. 

4. Though we find many metaphors in scripture, yet we ob- 
serve that the most important truths are laid down in the plain- 
est manner ; so that the injudicious and unlearned reader, who 
understands nothing of the art of rhetoric, or criticism, may 
be instructed thereby ; at least they are not universalh^ wrapt 
lip in such figurative ways of speaking; and it would be strange,' 
if the account we have of the Personality of the Son and Holy 
Ghost, which is a doctrine of the highest importance, and such 
as renders them distinct objects of worship, should be express- 
ed in such a way, as that we should be at the greattst uncer- 
tainty whether they are persons or not. 

5. If these personal characters are not metaphorical, when 
applied to men or angels, who are subjects capable of having 
personality attributed to them, why should they be reckoned 
metaphorical, when applied to the Son and Spirit, who, though 
they are not distinct beings, yet they have a divine understand- 
ing and will, and therefore are not rendered incapable of having 
personality ascribed to them, as signified by these characters. 

6. The asserting that personal characters attributed to the 
Son and Spirit are always to be understood in a metaphorical 
sense, would give equal ground to conclude that they are to be 
so taken, when applied to the Father ; and accordingly, while 
we militate against the Personality of these, we should, at the 
same time, overthrow his Personality : and while we deny that 
there are three Persons in the Godhead, we should, in effect, 
suppose that there are no Persons in the Godiiead, any other- 
wise than as the Godhead, which is common to the Father, Son, 
and Spirit, is often described as though it were a Person ; and 
if ever PersoiiaHhj is used or applied in a metaphorical sense, 
it must be when the Godhead is described as though it were a 
Person. 

7. Though some personal characters are occ^-^uonally applied. 
Vol. I. K k 



^58 THE DOCTlilNi: OF THE TRINITY. 

in a metaphorical sense, to things that are not persons, yet it is' 
not usual for them to be described as performing personal 
works, and these not occasionally hinted at, and joined with 
other metaphorical ways of speaking, but a long series of ac- 
tion referred to, and variety of works performed, which must 
certainly be taken in amost proper sense, 1'hus, when the Son 
and Spirit are set forth in scripture as performing those works, 
which are expressive of their personal glory ', the one in what 
respects the purchase of redemption ; and the other in the ap- 
plication thereof: and when each of them is described as stand- 
ing in those relations to men, which are founded in the per- 
formance of these works for them ; certainly this must be taken 
in a most proper sense ; and we must take heed, lest, while we 
attempt to prove that the Persons in the Godhead are to be ta- 
ken in a figurative sense, v/e do not give occasion to any to think 
that the great benefits, which we receive from them, are to be 
understood in the same sense. 

We shall now take notice of some other personal properties, 
whereby the Son and Spirit are distinguished from, one another, 
and from the Father ; particularly, as they are expressed in one 
of the answers under our present consideration : it is proper to 
the Father to beget the Son, or, as it is sometimes expressed,- 
to be unbegqtten ; and to the Son, to be begott^en of the Father ; 
and to the Holy Ghost, to proceed from the Father and the 
Son, from all eteifnity. This is certainly one of the most diffi- 
cult heads of divinity that can be insisted on ; and some have 
made it more so, b}' their attempting to explain it. I have- some- 
times thought that it would be the safest and most eligible 
^vay, to pass it over, as a doctrine less necessary to be under- 
stood ; but since there are several scripture-expressions, on 
which it is founded, which we ought to pay the greatest defer- 
ence to, much more than to those explications which are merely 
human ; and inasmuch as these properties plainly prove the 
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, to be distinct Persons, therefore 
we must humbly enquire into the meaning of those scriptures', 
wherein they are contained ; and so to speak something as to 
what is generally called the eternal generation of the Son, and 
the procession of the Holy Ghost ; and I hope, through divine 
assistance, we shall advance no doctrine that is either subversive 
of our faith in the doctrine of the Trinit}^, which we are en- 
deavouring to maintain, derogatory to the essential or personal 
glory of the Father, Son, and Spirit, or altogether contrary to 
the sense, in which many Christians, v/ho are unacquainted 
with those modes of speaking, used by the fathers and school- 
men, understand those scriptures upon which this doctrine is 
founded. 

And here we shall give a brief account of what we appre-^ 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 259 

rend to be the commonly received sentiments of divines, who, 
m their writings, have strenuously maintained, and judiciously 
defended, the doctrine of the Trinity, concerning the eternal 
generation of the Son, and the procession of the Holy Ghost ; 
which I shall endeavour to do with the greatest deference to 
those who have treated of these subjects, as well as with the 
greatest impartiality ; and shall take occasion to shew how far 
the Arians conclude that we give up the cause to them, and yet 
how little reason they have to insult us upon this head. 

(1.) As to the eternal generation of the Son, it is generally 
explained in this manner ; the Father is called, by some, the 
fountain of the Godhead, an expression taken from some of the 
fathers, who defended the Nicene faith : but others of late, 
have rather chose to call the Father the fountain of the Trini- 
ty ; and he is said to be of himself; or unbegotten ; which they 
lay down as his distinct Personal character, from that of the 
Son. 

On the other hand, the Son, as to his Personality, is gene- 
rally described as being from the Father, and many chuse to 
express themselves about this mvstery in rfiese terms ; that the 
Father communicated the divine essence to the Son, which is 
the most common mode of speaking, though others think it 
safer to say, that he communicated the divine Personality to 
him ; though I cannot tell which is least exceptionable. 

But when I find others calling it the Father's giving the di- 
vine essence to the Son, their mode of speaking being founded, 
as they apprehend, on that scripture, John v. 26. As the Father 
hath life in himself, so hath he given to the Son to have life in 
himself, I cannot but think it an unguarded expression, and fo- 
reign to the design of the Holy Ghost in that scripture, as will 
be hereafter considered. The Arians are ready to insult us upon 
such modes of speaking, and suppose that we conclude that the 
Son receives his divine perfections, and therefore cannot be 
God equal with the Father : but, however, none of them, >vho 
use this expression, suppose that the Son's Deity is founded on 
the arbitrary will of the Father ; for they ail assert that the di- 
vine nature is communicated necessarily, and from all eternity, 
as the sun communicates its rays necessarily, which are of equal 
duration with it ; so that while they make use of a word, which, 
according to its most known acceptation, seems subversive of 
.the truth, they happily, for truth's sake, explain away the pro- 
per sense thereof; so that all they can be blamed for herein, by 
the adversary, is impropriety of expression. 

Again, others speak a little more exceptionablv, when, ex- 
plaining the eternal generation of the Son, they say tliut the 
Father produced him : but this idea they also happily explain 
^way : and therefore say it is not sqch a production, where thf. 



260 tllK DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

cause produces the cff:;ct, ihough some of thq fathers, who have 
been in the Trinitarian scheme, have unwarily called the Father 
the cause of the Sori ; yet our modern divines seldom, or never, 
use that expression, or if they speak of an eternal production, 
they suppose it vastly difters from the production of al crea- 
tures, or from that sense in which the Arians suppose the Son 
to be produced by him ; but certainly this exj^ression had bet- 
ter be laid aside, lest it should be thought that we conclude the 
Son not equally necessary, and, from all eternity, co-existent 
with the Father, which our divines, how unwarily soever in 
other respects they may express themselves, are very far from 
denying. 

(2.) We shall now proceed to consider how some divines 
express themselves, concerning the procession of the Holy 
Ghost, which they generally do in this manner, as though the 
divine essence were communicated by the Father and the Son 
to the Holy Ghost ; and so they suppose that the Holy Ghost, 
at least as he is a divine Person, or has the divine nature com- 
municated to him, cannot be said to be, any more than the Son, 
of himself, but from the Father and the Son, from whom he 
proceeds, or receives, as some express it, the divine nature, and 
others the divine personality. 

Others speak of the Spiration of the Holy Ghost, which they 
suppose to be the same with his procession ; but the world is 
much at a loss to understand what they mean by the word Spi- 
ration : it seems to be a mere metaphorical expression, as when 
they call him the breath of the Father and the Son, and, if so, 
then it will not prove his proper personality : but since v/e are 
pretty much in the dark about the reason of this mode of speak- 
ing, it would be much better to lay it aside, as many modern 
writers have done. 

As to the manner of the procession of the Holy Ghost, there 
was, about the eighth and ninth centuries, a veiy warm dispute 
between the Greek and Latin church ; whether the Spirit pro- 
ce/^ded from the Father only, or from the Father and the Son ; 
and the controversy arose to such a height, that they charged 
one another with heresy and schism, when neither side well un- 
derstood what they contended about ; and if they had agreed 
to the healing expedient, afterwards proposed, that they should 
mutually acknowledge that the Holy Ghost was from the Father 
by the Son, the matter would have been left as much in the dark 
as it was before. 

Some speak of the procession of the Holy Ghost, as though 
he was produced by the Father and the Son, as the Son, as was 
before observed, is said, in his eternal generation, to have been 
produced by the Father ; yet they suppose that neither ol them 
were so produced, as that they may be called effects ; and tliey 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 251 

term it the production of a person in, and not out of, the divine 
essence, for that would be to give away the cause we contend 
for : but which way soever we take it, it contains such an im- 
propriety of expression, as can hardly be defended ; and it is 
much better to explain away the proper and gTammatical sense 
of words, than to corrupt the truth ; however, I would not copy- 
after them in this mode of speaking. 

I\Ioreover, some have pretended to determine the difference 
between the eternal generation of the Son and the Spirit's pro- 
cession ; to which they have, with modesty, premised, that it is 
not to be explained ; but, as far as they enter into this matter, 
they suppose that they differ in this ; that in the eternal gene- 
ration of the Son, the Father communicated the divine essence, 
ou, at least, personality to him, which is his act alone, and here- 
with he communicated a property, or power, to him, to com- 
municate the same divine essence to the Holy Ghost ; whereas, 
when the Holy Ghost is said to proceed Irom the Father and 
the Son, there is no power therewith conveyed to him to com- 
municate the divine essence to any other, as a fourth person in, 
the Godhead. These things may be observed in the writings 
of those who treat of this subject ; but it is to be feared, they 
enter too far into the explication of this unsearchable mystery ; 
and some will be ready to conclude that they attempt to be 
wise above what is written. And, 

If I may be allowed to give my sense of the commvmication 
of the divine essence, though it will probably be thought that I 
do not say enough concerning it, yet I hope that, in othef re- 
spects, none will conclude that I advance any thing subversive 
of the doctrine of the Trinity, when I assert that the divine es- 
sence is communicated, not by the Father to the Son and Holy 
Ghost, as imparting or conveying it to them ; but take the word 
commimicate in another sense, namely, that all the perfections 
of the divine nature are communicated, that is, equally attri- 
buted' to, or predicated of, the Father, Son, and Spirit; this 
sense of the word is what some intend when they say the hu- 
man nature is communicated to every individual, upon which 
account they are denominated men ; and, as the word is used 
in this sense, sometimes, by logicians and schoolmen, so it seems 
to be- taken in the same sense, in Heb. ii. 14. where the Greek 
words, T* TTxiSuL Mx.mmmi a-^fno? mi cufxctlo?, which wc render, the chil- 
dren were partakers of flesh and blood, might be rendered, as 
in the \ ulgar Latin version, Comnmn'icaverunt carni ^ sangumK 
i. e. they have the human nature commimicated to, and predi- 
cated of, them, or they are truly and property men. And it is 
in this sense that we use the word, when we say that the dif- 
ferent properties of the divine and hiunan nature are commu- 
tiirated to, that is, predicated of, the Person of Christ, which di-j^ 



262 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITV. 

vines generally call a communication of properties. In thre 
sense I would be understood, when I say that the divine per- 
fections are communicated to, or predicated of, the Father, Son. 
and Spirit ; and this all who maintain the doctrine of the Trini- 
ty will allow of. The other sense of communication, viz. im- 
, parting, conveying, or giving the divine essence, I shall be veiy 
ready to fall in with, when the apparent difficulties, which, to 
me, seem to lie in the way thereof, some of which have been 
already considered, are removed. 

As to what concerns the farther explication of this mystery, 
we may observe, that the more nice some have been in their 
speculations about it, the more they have seemed bewildered : 
thus, when some have enquired whether the eternal generation 
is one single act, or an act continued ; or whether, when it is said, 
This day have I begotten thee, the meaning is, that the divine 
nature was communicated at once, or whether it is perpetually 
communicating.* And the difficulties that attend their assert- 
ing either the one or the other of them, which they, who en- 
quire into these matters, take notice of, I shall entirely pass 
over, as apprehending that this doctrine receives no advantage 
by such disquisitions. 

Neither do I think it tends much to our edification to enquire, 
as some have done, whether, in the eternal generation, the Father 
is considered as acting, and the Son as him on whom the action 
terminates, as the subject thereof; which, when they suppose 
it does, they farther enquire, whether, in this respect, he is said 
to be passive, which they are are not willing to assert. 

And I cannot but take notice of another nicety of inquiry, 
viz. whether, in the eternal generation, the Son is considered as 
co-existent with the Father, or as having the divine essence, 
and hereby only deriving his Sonship from him, from all eter- 
nity ; or whether he derives both his Sonship and his essence ; 
tiie former of which is the most generally received opinion. 
But I am not desirous to enter into this enquiry, especially 
without first detenmining what we mean by Sonship. 

There is indeed one thing that must be enquired into, and 
that is, whatever be the explication given of the eternal gene- 
ration of the Son, and px-ocession of the Holy Ghost, whether 
they are each of them self-existent, or, as some call it, a. vloBtor^ and 
it is generally determined, that the Son and Holy Ghost have 
the same self-existent divine nature : but with respect to their 
manner of having it, some say the Son has his divine nature 
from the Father, and the Holy Ghost from the Father and Son ; 
or that the Father only is self-existent, as some speak; or, as 
most others say, that he is self-subsistent ; and that this is his 

* Some, -who take deligJit in darkeyiing this matter, by pretending to explain it, 
^aM the former a to vw, stans ; the latter, fluens. 



TllE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 263 

personal property, as he is distinguished froni the Son and Ho- 
iy Ghost, whom they conclude not to be self-subsistent, but the 
one to subsist from the Father, and the other from the Father 
and the Son. This is a generally received opinion ; notwithstand- 
ing I must confess myself to be at a loss to account for it : so 
that the principal thing, in which I am obliged, till I receive 
farther conviction, to differ from many others, is, whether the 
Son and Spirit have a communicated or derived Personality : 
this many assert, but, I think, without sufficient proof; for I 
cannot but conclude that the divine Personality, not only of the 
Father, but of the Son and Spirit, is as much independent, and 
underived, as the divine essence. 

Thus we have considered how some have embarrassed this 
doctrine, by being too nice in their enquiries about it : we shall 
proceed to consider how others have done prejudice to it, by 
pretending to explain it ; and when they make use of simili- 
tudes to that purpose, have rather prejudiced the enemies of 
this doctrine against it, than given any conviction to them. I 
shall only mention what I have found in some of their writings, 
Avhom, in other respects, I cannot but exceedingly value, as hav- 
ing deserved well of the church of God, in defending this truth 
with good success, yet, when they take this method to explain 
this doctrine, to say the best of it, they have done but little ser- 
vice to the cause which they have maintained : thus we find 
them expressing themselves to this purpose ; as the soul of man 
sometimes reflects on itself, and considers its own nature, pow- 
ers, and faculties, or when it is conversant about itself, as its 
object, this produces an idea, which contains the moral image 
of itself, and is like as when he sees his face in a glass, and be- 
holds the image of himself; this, say they, illustrates the eter- 
nal generation of the Son, as God beholding himself, or his di- 
vine perfections, begets an image of himself, or has an eternal 
idea of his own perfections in his mind, which is called his in- 
ternal word, as opposed to the v.rord spoken, which is external ; 
by this they express the generation of the Son, for which rea- 
son he is called, in Heb. i. 3. The brightness of the Father s 
glory ^ and the express image of his person^ as the wax expresses 
the character or mark of the seal that is impressed on it. 

Again, they farther add, that there is a mutual love between 
the Father and the Son, which brings forth a third Person, or 
subsistence in the Godhead, to wit, the Holy Ghost ; so that as 
there is in the divine essence an infinite understanding reflecting 
on itself, whereby it begets, a Son, as was before observed, and 
an infinite will, which leads him to reflect on himself, with love 
and delight, as the chief good, whereby he brings forth a third 
Person in the Godhead, to wit, the Holy Ghost, accordingly 
they describe this divine Person as being the result of the mu- 



264 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

tual joy and delight that there is between the Father and the 
Son : these expHciUions many are at a loss to understand ; and 
we hambi)- conceive it would be much better to let them alone, 
and confess this doctrine to be an inexplicable myster}', or else 
some other wav mav be found out, which is less liable to these 
exceptions, while we explain those scriptures, which speaK of 
the generation of the Son, and the procession of the Holy 
Ghost. 

The scriptures generally brought in defence of this doctrine 
are such as these. 

1. To prove the eternal generation of the Son, there are se- 
veral scriptures referred to, particularly that in which the Fa- 
ther is represented as speaking to him, in Psal. ii. 7. Thoii art 
viij Son ; this daij have I begotten thee ; that is, say they, I have, 
in my eternal, unsuccessive duration, communicated, or impart- 
ed, the divine essence, or, at least, personality, to thee. 

Another scripture brought to this purpose is that in Prov. 
viii. 22, 23, 25. The Lord possessed me^ speaking of his eternal 
Word, or Son, in the beginning of his xvcuj^ before his xvorks of 
old, Ixuas set up from everlastings from the beginnings or ever 
the earth xvas ; before the mountains tv ere settled ; before the 
hills was I brought forth. Where they suppose that God's pos- 
sessing him, v.'-hith is certainly to be taken in a different sense 
from his being the possessor of all creatures, is to be under- 
stood of his being God's proper Son by nature ; and his being 
said to be brought forth, they suppose, proves his eteraal gene- 
ration. 

Another scripture brought to the same purpose is that in 
Micah v. 2. speaking of the Son, it is said. His goi?igs forth 
have been of old^ from everlasting ;. by which they attempt to 
prove his being begotten in the divine essence : but how that 
can be called his going forth, I do not well understand. 

Moreovei", that scripture before mentioned, in Heb. i. 3. 
Who being the brightness of his glory ^ and the express image of 
his person. And another parallel scripture, in Col. i. 15. Who 
is the image of the invisible God^ the first-born of every creature ; 
where, bv first-born, they understand, that he was begotten be- 
fore all worlds : the divine essence, or, at least, personality, be- 
ing communicated to him from eternity. 

Another scripture, which we before referred to, brought to 
prove this doctrine, is John v. 26. As the Father hath life in 
himself so he hath given to the Son to have life in himself; that 
is, say some, as the Father hath all divine perfections in him- 
self originallv, so the Son hath these perfections, by communi- 
ication from him ; which they suppose not to be an arbitrary, 
hut a necessaiy, donation. 

Again, this is farther proved, from John i. 17. where he h 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 265 

said to be the only begotten Son of the Father. And ver. 18. 
The onhj begotten Son^ xuho in in the bosom of the Father. From 
the former of which scriptures thej- prove ilie eternal genera- 
tion of the Son ; and from the latter, his being begotten in the 
divine essence, which distinguishes it from all finite produc- 
tions, which are out of himself. 

Moreover, there are many other scriptures that speak of oui 
Saviour as the Son of God ; and particularly in Matth. xvi. 
16. he is called, The Son of the living God; and in Rom. viii. 
32. his own Son, '"''"'c wof, which some render, his proper Son^ 
that is, not only his Son, who has the same divine nature with 
with himself, but as implying also the manner of its communi- 
cation ; and in Mat. iii. 17. he is called his beloved Son. 

2. We shall now consider the scriptures that are generally 
brought to prove the processioii of the Holy Ghost, in the sense 
before explained. Thus he is said, in John xv. 26. to be sent 
bif the Son from the Father ; and to proceed from the Father ; 
where they suppose that this proceeding from the Father sig- 
nifies the communication of the divine essence, or, at least, his 
personality ; and his being sent by the Son, implies, that this 
communication is from him, as well as the Father. So in Gal. 
iv. 6. it is said, God hath sent forth the Spirit oj his Son ; and, 
in John xvi. 7. our Saviour says, I xvill send him unto you^ and 
ver. 14. He shall receive of mine, and shall shew it loito you,' 
these scriptures, ii not brought directly to prove this doctrine, 
are, notwithstanding, supposed sufficient to evince the truth 
thereof, inasmuch as the Son could not send him, if he had not 
proceeded from him ; nor could he have received that which he 
shews to his people, if he had not, from ail eternity, received 
his divine essence, or personality, from him. 

There is another scripture, brought by some very valuable 
divines, to prove the Spiration of the Holy Ghost, which is so 
termed, either as supposed to be expressive of the manner of 
his having his personality as a Spirit, or else it is taken from 
those words of scripture, brought to prove this Spiration, John 
XX. 22. in which our Saviour is said to have breathed on his 
disciples, saying, Receive ye the Holy Ghost ; wliich external 
sign, or symbol, used in the act of conferring him on them in 
time, proves his procession from him fron> eternity ; as a tem- 
poral procession supposes an eternal one. 

These are tjhe scriptures which are generally brought to provfe 
this doctrine. But we shall take occasion to enquire, whether 
there may not be another sense given thereof, which is less lia- 
ble to exception, as well as more intelligible. It is to be OAvned, 
that they contain some of the deep things of God ; and therefore 
it is no wonder, if they are reckoned among those scriptures 
tliat are hard to be imderstood : but so far as I have any lights 
VoT,. r. I, I • 



265 THE DOCTRIKK OF THE TRI^-ITY. 

either front the context of the respective scriptures, or the ana- 
logy of faith, I cannot but conclude that these, and all others of 
the like nature, that ar>: brought to prove the eternal generation, 
or Sonship of Christ, respect him as God-mati, Mediator ; (a) 
and those other scriptures, that speak of the procession of the 

lf»" ;■ ' ■ ,. :r ■.,■:■', ' ,■- ■ . 

a "In the SiivLmir's exalted reUtion to his P'athei-, the name Son of God comes 
chiefly under observation. It is known that in the sacred word, rational creatures 
are often dignified with the honorary title of Sons or Children of God ; and that 
ifi various respt-Cts, and for obvious reasons. But certainij- tliat name in Christ 
signifies sonictliing higher. John x. 35 — 38. Pie is not only « Son of God, but the 
Son, bj' way of emnience above all i y/oc : So that he is by this, as a peculiar and 
projicr denomination, distinguished from otJier subjects. We know, that the Son 
<;>f God IS come. 1 John v. 20. John viii. 36. — He is God's only-begotten Son. Joha 
1. 14, 18. iii. 16. God's own Son. Rom. viii. 32. " To which of the angels said he 
at any time, Thou ai*t my Son, tliis day have I begotte;i tliee ? Hel). i. 5. When 
Clirist spoke to his disciples conctniing tlie Father, he never said, oitr Fatlier, 
(as he luid taught them to pray ;) but alwaj-s witli an express distinction »m/ Fa~ 
ther. Luke ii. 48, 49. John ii. 16. chiefly John sx. 17. From the prophetic doc- 
trine, that name was known in Israel, as in its full force applicable to the Messi- 
JiS ; which can be clearly evinced from various passages. INIat. xvi. 15, 16. xxvi. 6,3. 
Mark iii. 11. John vi. 69. xi. 27. x. 36. Amidst all the confusion of their appre'nen- 
sions, they found so much emphasis m it, that the acknowledgment of it was a- 
Tuong tliem a ground of adoration. Mat. xiv. 33. John ix. 35 — 38. ; so that when 
Jesus, with the distinction and appropi'iation of the divine works, called God hia 
Father, they thence concluded, wliich the Saviour did not contradict, that lie held 
God for his own Father, and thus made himself equal to God. John v. 18. x. 33 — 36, 
Indeed, however intimate the cunnexion Is betwixt being the Messias, tlie Christ, 
and being tlie Son of God, this last signifies still somethi|ig different, something 
moi*e original. For Paul preached Christ, that he was the Son of God*. In the 
love of the truth, let us ob;>erve the divine testimony, he did not become the Son 
of God by or after his coming in the flesh, by or after the execution of his minis- 
try; but herein is God's great mercy celebrated, that "he sent him who was his 
Son, made him under the lav^r, and delivered him up for us all." This is evident^ 
from a variety of passages. Gal. iv. 4. Eom. viii. 32. Heb. v. 8. 1 John iv. 9, 10. It 
is plainly supposed in tlje ])arahlc, the lord of tlie vineyard sevit to the husband- 
men many serv;ir.ts,somc of wliom they beat, and others they slew. Having there- 
fore jet one son who was deai' to him, he sent him last of all to them, sajing, 
■• they will surely reverence my son. M;u-k xii. 6. — —In his supreme excellence^ 
as the .Son of God, lies the reason of punishing unbelief. As the Son of God, " he 
is the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person." Heb. i. 3- On 
the self-same account, he is, according to the language of men, his heir, that is, 
has a natural right to all the works of Goc^, especially to his chm'ch ; v hich are 
also made by him, in communion with the Father. See this described in a lofty 
strain bi' the apostle, Hel). i. 1 — 3. iii. 3—6. Col. i. 15—17. and also by Jesus himself. 

Mark xii. 6, 7. Tho'igh, therefore, a farther tlieoloe'ical illustration of Christ's 

divine sonshVp should best be preceded by the proof of his true Deity, yet in the 
meantime, the name Son of God, as ascribed to him, points us not only to his dis- 
fing'uisheil elevation abo^'e all creatures, wiiich Arius ackno^vledged, but also to 
his unity uf nature with the Father,f and to the grount^ of his existence in the 
external and necessaiy existence of the Father." v Wtspkhsse. 

• Acts Ik. 20. ; see also chap. viii. 37. In both thr<:c plucts, hcfvever, there is ^ different re.nd- 
I'nR in the Greek. But compare .fesus' fii-st jcci-.s^itioii before Pilate, that he said lie was tlie 
Christ. (Lukrxxiii.S.) with a newantt a later, thxt he rondeUimselt'tfce Son of God. (.Tohn xix. 7. 

t Unity of nature ijith the Father. In the r.riginal it is equality of his uatare. But apprehend- 
ing thnt. ny an error of the press, geiykheiel i'i put tor eeiiieheyd, I have adventured to translate 
^e passage as pj-ove ; and that in the fullest consistcitcy with the dasij^n of the worthy author, 
in the whole of 'nis treatise, and wi'h his express words in the close of the second paraKra;))) •■,'( 
thii very eeciion, where he says, ■ v.c Ave not esteem Christ '.'S3 th;:n (,fJ-'-^irm, that •>;; of i.\^ • 
•<»*« Huiivrsot csseace with Gad, 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. gOT 

Holy Ghost, respect the subserviency of his acting as a divine 
Person to the Mediator's glory, in applying the work of re- 
demption. 

And here we shall consider these scriptures in particular; 
and then answer some objections that may be brought against 
this sense thereof, whereb)^, I hope, it will appear, that we as- 
sert nothing but what tends to the glory of the Son and Spirit, 
establisheth the doctrine of the ever-blessed Trinity, and agi-ees 
with the commonly received faith, so far as it is founded on 
scripture, without being tenacious of those modes of speaking, 
which have the sanction of venerable antiquity, and are support- 
ed by the reputation of those who have used them ; though it 
maj' be, those scriptures will be otherwise understood by them, 
who regard explications that are merely humtm, no farther than 
they are defensible. 

The first scripture before naentioned, which was brought to 
prove the eternal generation of the Son, was Psal. ii. 7. Thou 
art 77iy Son^ this day have I begotten thee. This cannot, I hum- 
bly conceive, respect the communication, of the divine nature, 
or personality to the Son, as appears from the words immediate- 
ly foregoing, in which it is said, / xv'ill declare the decree^ or 
what I had before decreed, or determined. Far be itfrojii us to 
suppose that the divine nature, or personality, of die Son was 
the result of an act of the divine will : and, indeed, the whole, 
-Psalm plainly speaks of Christ as Mediator ; as such he is said, 
ver. 6. To be set as God^s king; on his holy hill of Sion^ and, as 
such, he is said to intercede with, or ask of God ; and, as the 
mjsult hereof, the Father is said, ver. 8. tc give him the heathen 
for his inheritance^ and the tittermosl parts of tlie earth for his 
possession' ; and all this is spoken of him, as a farther explica- 
tion of those words, Thou art my Son^ this day have I begotten 
thee. And the apostle, in Heb. i. 5. refers to this scripture, 
when speaking of him as Mediator, and as havings by inherit- 
ance^ obtained a more excclle7it name than the angels ; which he 
has done, as he is constituted heir of all things : and he subjoins 
that promise, / tvill be to him a Father^ arid he shall be to me a 
Son^ that is, he shall perform that obedience that is due from 
him as a Son ; and I will give unto him those rewards, which 
are due from a Father, who has committed this work to him, 
with a promise of the conferring those i-evenucs of Mediatorial 
glory on him, that should ensue on his fulfilling it. Moreovej", 
this scripture is referred to, by the apostle, in Acts xiii. 32, 33. 
when he says. That the promise^ which was made to the fathers^ 
God hath fidflled the same unto their children^ in that he hath 
raised up Jesus again^ as it is xvritten in the second Psalm.y 
Thou art my Son^ this day have I begotten thet^ So that it is 
plain the Psalmist speaks of him as having finished hi^ vvorl<j 



iJ6B tHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY* 

Gf redemption, ttt which time he was raised from, the dead ; and 
then, in the fullest sense, he had ^?^ heathen for his inheritance. 
And, upon this accounc, he is also called, in Rev. i. 5. Thejirst 
begotten of the dead ; and, in CoU i. 18. The Jirst^born from the 
aead. 

The next scripture brought to prove the eternal getieration of 
the Son, in Prov* viii. 22, 23, 25. refers to Christ, as Media- 
tor ; when God is said to possess him in the beginning of his 
waif, the meaning is, that in his eternal design of grace relating 
to the redemption of man, the Father possessed, or laid claim 
to him as his Son, or servant, appointed in the human nature, 
to bring about that great work ; and accordingly it follows, / 
rvas set tip from everlasting, that is, fore-ordained of God, to 
be the Mediator and head of his elect : and this agrees very 
well with what follows, ver. 30, 31. / xvas daily his delightf 
that is, God the Father was well pleased v/ith him, when lore- 
Seeing from all eternity what he would do in time, to secure 
the giory of his perfections in the redemption of man, as God 
publicly testified his well-pieasedness in him, when he was ac- 
tually engaged in this work. And it is farther added. That he 
rvas ahvaifs rejoicijig bfore him ; rejoicing in the habitable part 
of his' earth, a?id his delights rvere xvith the so?is of men ; which 
signifies the great pleasure Christ had, in his eternal fore-sight 
of what he would do for the sons of men, whom he is elsewhere 
said to have loved ivith an everlasting love. 

The next scripture is in Micah v. 2. where speaking of the 
Son, it is said. Whose goings forth have been of old, from ever- 
fasting. For the understanding of which scripture, let us con- 
sider, that God's goings are sometimes taken in scripture for 
what he does, whereby he renders himself the object of his peo- 
ple's astonishment and praise ; these are his visible goings. 
Thus, Psal. Ixvi. 24. They have seen thy goings, O God, even 
the gohigs of my God, my King, hi the sanctuary ; that is, they 
shall see the great tilings which thou wilt do for man, in the 
work of redemption : so in this scripture, the sense whereof we 
are considering, we read of Christ's goings forth, his invisible 
goings, as we may call them, or his seci-et purposes, or designs 
of grace, relating to the redemption of his people : His goings 
forth -were from everlasting ; that is, he did, from eternit}-, de- 
sign to save them ; the outgoings of his heart were towards 
them, and, as the result hereof, he came into the world accord- 
ing to this prediction, and was born in Bethlehem, as in the 
foregoing words. 

The next scripture is in Heb. i. 3. where he is said to be the 
brightness of hif>\ that is, his Father's glory, and the express 
itnage of his person. B}- the former expression, I humbly con- 
ceiyx?, is meant, that the glory of the divine perfections shiries 



TltE DOCTRINE OF TitE TRINITY. 269 

forth most illustriously in Christ, our great Mediator, as the a- 
postle expresses it elstwhert, 2 Cor. iv. 6. God hath shined in 
our hearts^ to give the knowledge of his glory^ in the face of 
feswi Christ, Bv the latter expression, in which Christ is call- 
ed the express i})inge of his Person, I humbl}' conceive, is meant, 
that though his divine nature be the same with the Father's, 
yet his Personality is distinct ; and therefore it is not said to be 
the same, but the image of his Father'' s ; and it also proves his 
proptr divine Personality, as being, in all respects, like that of 
the Father, though not the same. 

The next scriptui'e is in John v. 26. As the Father hath life 
in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself 
We cannot think that the Father's having given to the Son t9 
have life in himself implies his giving him the divine perfec- 
tions, for the propriety ot that mode of speaking cannot be de- 
fended consistently with his proper underived Deity. But I 
humbly conceive that the meaning of it is this ; that as the Fa- 
ther hath life in himself that is, as he has eternal life, or that 
fulness of grace and glory, which his people are to be made 
partakers of, at his own disposal, and has designed to give it, 
in his eternal purpose ; so hath he given to the Son, as Media- 
tor, to have life in himself, that is, that, as such, he should be 
the treasury of all this grace, and that he should have life in 
himself to dispense to them. This is very agreeable to his cha- 
racter and office, as Mediator, and with what follows, ver. 24. 
where it is said ; Verili/, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth 
my word, and believeth on hi?n that sent me^ hath everlasting 
life, and shall not come into condemnation, but is passed from 
death unto life ; and ver. 27. it is farther added, that He, to 
wit, the Father, hath given him authoritij to execute judgment 
also, because he is the Son of man; which plainly denotes, that 
this lift", which he has received from the Father, is that eter- 
nal life, which he is impowered or commissioned to bestow on 
his people, as Mediator ; this he has in himself, and accordingly 
he is said, John i. 14. to be fill of grace and truth ; and Col. 
i. 1 9. It pleased the Father that in him should allfdness drvelL 

The next thing to be considered, is the seiise of those many 
scriptures, in which our Saviour is described as the Son cfGod^ 
or the Son of the living God, or his only begotten Son, or his own 
or proper Son, as distinguished from all others, which, I hum- 
bly conceive, sets forth his glory, as Mediator, which we shall 
endeavour to prove. But, to prepare our way for the prosecu- 
tion of this argument, as well as to prevent any misconstruction 
that iai2;ht give prejudice thereunto, we shall take leave to pre- 
mise, 

1 . That when we read of the Son of God, as dependent on 
the Father, inferior and obedient to him ; and yet, as being 



2tO THB DOCTRINE Ot THE TRlNIT.f* 

equal with him, and having the same divine nature, wc cannot 
conceive of any character which answers to all these ideas of 
sonship, unless that of a Mediator. If we consider the proper- 
ties of sonship among men, ev'er}^ one who stands in this rela- 
tion to a Father is dependent on him. In this respect, the 
father is the cause of his son, and it is not like other produc- 
tions, for no effect can, properly speaking, be called a son, but 
that which hath the same kind of nature with his father ; and 
the relation of sonbhip always connotes inferiority, and an obli- 
gation to yield obedience. I do not apply this, in every respect, 
to the Sonship of Christ, which no similitude, taken from mere 
creatures, can sufnciently illustrate ; but his character, as Me- 
diator, seems to answer to it, more than any thing else that can 
be said of him, since he has, as such, the same individual na- 
ture with the Father, and also is inferior to, and dependent on 
him. As a son, among men, is inferior to, and dependent on, 
his father, and, as the prophet speaks, Mai. i. 6. Hoqoitreth his 
father; so whatever Christ is, as Mediator, he receives it from 
the Father, and, in all that he does, he honoureth his Father^ 
as he says, John viii. 49. As the whole work of redemption is 
referred to the Father's gloiy, and the commission, by which 
he acts as Mediator, is received from the Father, so, as a Son, 
he refers all the glory thereof to him. 

2. This accovmt of Christ's Sonship does not take away any 
argument, by which w^e prove his Deity ; for when we consider 
him as Mediator, we always suppose him to be both God and 
man, which is what we intend when we speak of the Person of 
Christ in this respect; so that, as God, he is equal with the 
Father, and has an equal right to divine adoration. This be- 
longs to him as much, when considered as Mediator, as it can 
be supposed to do, if we consider his Sonship in any other re- 
spect. 

3. It does not take away any argument to prove his distinct 
Perswnalit}' from the Father and Holy Ghost, or, at least, if it 
sets aside that which is taken from the dependence of his Per- 
sonality on the Father, as received from him by communication, 
it substitutes another in the room of it, inasmuch as to be a Me- 
diator is, witliout doubt, a personal character; and because 
neither the Fathei-, nor the Holy Ghost, can be said to be Me- 
diators, it implies, that his Personality is distinct from theirs ; 
likewise his acting as Mediator from the Father j and the Holy 
Spirit's securing the glory which arises to him from htnce, and 
applying the redemption purchased by him, is a farther proof 
of this distinction of the Persons in the Godhead. 

4. Since we consider the Mediator as both God and man, in 
one Person, we do not suppose that this character respects either 
®f his two natures, considered separately. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 271 

(1.) Not his divine nature. It is true, that his having the 
same nature with the Father might be reckoned, by some, a 
character of Sonship, as it contains one ingredient in the com- 
mon idea that we have among men. They, as sons, are snid to 
have tlie same kind of nature with their fathers ; so our Saviour's 
having the same individual nature with the Father might give 
occasion to some to denominate him, for that reason, his Son ; 
but though this may be the foundation of his being called God's 
proper Son, mc; wo/, yet this is not his distinguishing character 
as a Son : for it would follow from hence, that the Holy Gho5t, 
who has the same nature with the Father, would, for that rea- 
son, be called his Son, Avhich is contrary to the scripture-account 
given of him, as proceeding from the Father and the Son. 

(2.) This character of Christ, as God-man, Mediator, does 
not respect his human nature, considered separately from his 
divine, nor any of those peculiar honours conferred upon it, 
beyond what any mere creatures are made ptrtakers of. 

This leads us to consider the difference between this notion 
of his Sonship, and that which was generally assigned, as the 
reason of his being so called, by the Socinians ; these generally 
speak of Christ, as being denominated the Son of God, because 
of the extraordinary and miraoulous . conception, or formation, 
of his human nature in the womb of the Virgin ; and for this 
they refer to that scripture in Luke i. o5. (a) The Holy Ghost 

(a) '' The meaning of the terms, Son of God, only-begotten Son of God, must 
needs be of importance, inasmuch as the belief oi the idea signified by them was 
made a leading article in the primitive professions of faith. John vi. 69. iii. 18. xx. 
31. Acts xviii. 57. 1 John iv. 15. Whatever disputes have arisen of late among 
christians, tliere seems to have been none on this subject hi tlie times of the apos- 
tles. Both Jews and christirais appear to have agreed in this : the only question 
that divided them was, whether Christ was the Son of God, or not .'' If tliere had 
been any ambiguity in the term, it would have been very unfit to express the fir»L 
article of the christian faith. 

It has been frequently suggested, that the ground of Christ's sonship is given 
us in Luke i. 35, and is no other tlian his miraculous conception : Tlie HoJi) Ghont 
shall come vpon thee, and the po-wer of the Highest shall orershado^v the^: therefore 
tdsQ that holy thing tvhich shall be bom of thee, shall be called the So7i of God. 

It is true tliat our Lord was miraculously conceived of the Holy Spirit, and 
that such a conception was peculiar to him ; but it does not follow that by this 
he became the Son, or onJy-begotten Son of Cod. Nor does the passage in ques- 
tion prove any sucli thing. It has been thought that the phrase So7i of God, 
in this pbice, is used in a peculiar sense, or that it respects tlie origin of 
Christ's human nature, as not be'uig by ordinary generation of man, but by the 
extraordinary' inflvience of God ; and that lie is here called the Son of God ii^ 
the same sense as Adam is so called, (Luke iii. 38.) as being produced by his 
immeiliate power. If this be the meaning of the term in the passage in ques- 
tion, I should think it will be allowed to be pecidiar, and therefore that no gene- 
ral conclusion can be drawn fi-om it, as to the meaning of the term in other pas- 
sages. But griuiting that the sonslilp of Christ, in this" place, is to be understood 
in the same sense as it is commonly to be taken in the new testament, still it does 
not follow that the miraculous conception i.s the origin of it. It mav be a reason 
iKiven why Ckist is culled thy Son of God; but not why he is so. Clirist is c^Uer! 



2r2 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

ahall come upon thee, and the power of the highest shall over- 
shadow thee ; therefore also that Holy Thing, xvhich shall be 
born of thee, shall be called the Son of God. The sense, in which 

the Son of God as raised from the dead, and as exalted at the right haucl of God. 
Acts xiii. 33. lieb. i. 4, 5. Did he then become the Son of God by these events ? 
This is impossible ; for sonship is not a progressive matter. If it arose from his 
miraculous conception, it could not for that reason lU-ise from his resuirection, 
or exaltation : and so on the other hand, if it arose from his resurrect.on, or exal- 
tation, it could not proceed from his miraculous conception. But if each be un- 
derstood of his being hereby proved, acknowledge d, or, as the scripti\res express 
it, declared to be the Son of God witli pov\"er, all is easy and consistent. 

AVhether the tei-ms, Son of God, and o^dy-begotten Sofi of God, be not expres- 
sive of his divine personality, antecedent to all consideration of his being con- 
ceived of the holy Spirit, in the womb of the Virgin, let the following things de- 
termine. 

First: The glory of the oidn begotten of the Father, and the glory of the Word, 
are used as convertible terms, as being the same : but the lattei" is allowed to de- 
note tlie divine person of Christ, antecedent to his being made flesh ; the same 
therefore must be true of the former. Tlie' Word was made flesh, and we beheld 
his glartf ; that is, the glory of the Word, the glory us of the only-begotten of the 
Father, fidl of grace avd truth. John 1. 14. It is true, it was by the Word being 
made flesh, and diuelling amongst its, that his glory became apparent; but the glo- 
ry itself was that of the eternal Word, aid tliis is tlie same as the glory of tite only- 
hegotten of the Father. 

Secondly : The Son of God is said to dwell w« the bosoin of the Father ; that is, 
he is intimately acquainted with, his chai-acter lUid designs, and thciefore fit to 
be employed in nniking them known to men. The mily-b^^gotten Son, -who is in the 
bosom of tlie Father, he hath declared him. John i. 18. If this be applieiJ to h s di- 
vine person, or that eternal life -which was -with the Father, and -was manifested to 
ns, 1 John i. 2. it is natural and proper ; it assigns his omniscience as quahf\ing 
him for making known the mind of God : but if he became the only-begotten of 
the Father by his miraculous conception, or by any otlier means, tlie beauty of 
the passage vanishes. 

Thirdly: God is frequently said to have sent his Son into the world : John vii. 
17. X. 36. 1 Jolin iv. 9, 10. but this implies that he was his Son antecedent to his 
being sent. To suppose otherwise, is no less absurd than supposing that when 
Christ is said to have sent forth his twelve disciples, they were not disciples, but 
in consequence of his sending them, or of some preparation pertaining to their 
mission. 

Fourthly : Christ is called the Son of God antecedently to his miraculous con- 
ception, and consequently he did not become such by it. — In the fulness of time 
God sent forth his Son, made of a luomaii, made under the la~,a, that tie 7night redeem 
them that loere vnder the la-w — God sent his oiun Son, in tlie likeness of sinf id flesh. 
Oal. iv. 4. Rom. viii. 3. — The terms, made of a looman, made nmfer the law, are a 
parentliesis. The position affirmed is, that God sent forth his Son to redeem the 
transgressors of the law. His being made of a woman, and made under the law, 
or covenant of works, which man had broken, expressed the necessary means for 
the accomplishment of this great end ; which means, though preceding our re- 
demption, 3'et follow the sonship of the Redeemer. There is equal proof tliat 
Christ was the Sofi of God before he was made of a ivonian, as that he was t/ie 
Word before he was made flesh. The phraseology is the same in the one case as 
in the other. If it be alleged that Christ is here called the Son of God oji account 
of his being made of a woilian, I answer, If so, it is also on account of his being 
made tinder the la-u, whicli is too absurd to admit of a question. — Moi-eover : To 
say that God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, is equal to saying that 
the Son of God assumed human natme : he must therefore have been the Son of 
God before his incarnation. 

Fifthly : Christ is called the Son of God antecedent to his being manifested ta 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY, 2f3 

they understand this text, is, that Christ is called the Son of 
God, because of this extraordinary event : But we cannot think 
that a miraculous production is a sufficient foundation to sup- 

■-' ■ ■ ' ' ■' '■■■ ' '■' ■ ' - ■ -T 

destroy the work's oftlie devil; but he was manifested to destroy tlie works of the 
devil by taking upon him huni;ui nature ; consequently, he was the Sou of God 
antecedent to tlie human nature being- assumed. There is equal proof from the 
phraseolog-y of 1 John iii. 8. that he was the Son of God antecedent to his being 
7naniffstcd to destroy the -works of the devil, as tliere is from tliat of 1 Tim. iii. 16. 
Ijiat he was God antecedent to his being manifested in the flesh : or from 1 John 
i. 2, that that eternal life, whichioas -with the Father, was such antecedent to hhs 
being manifested to ue. 

Sixthly: The ordinance of baptism is commanded to be admmistercd in the 
name of the Father, and of the ' Son, (Kid of the Holy Spirit. Matt, xxviii. 19. The 
terms. Father and Holy Spirit, will be allowed to denote divine persons ; and what 
good reasons can be given for ;uiother idea being fixed to the term Soii ? 

Seventhly : The proper deHy of Christ precedes his office of Mediator, or Higli 
Priest of our profession, and renders it an exercise of condescension. But the same 
is true of his sonship : llemajketh the Son a Ui^'h Priest — Tlmvgh he -zvas a Son, 
yet learned he obedience, lleb.'vu. 23. V. 8. His being- the Son of God, therefore^ 
amounts to the same thing as'his being a divine person. 

Eighthly ; It is the proper deity of Christ which gives dignity to his office of 
IMcdiator : but this dignity is ascribed to bis being the Son of God. We have u 
OREAT High Priest, Jesus, the Son o/Gou. Heb. iv. 14. His being the Son of God, 
therefore, amounts to the same thing as his being a divine person. 

Lastly : It is the proper deity of Christ which gives efficacy to his sufferings— 
By HIMSELF he purges our sins. Heb. i. 3. But this efficacy is ascribed to his be» 
ing the Son of God — The blood ef Jesus Christ, his Son, clcuvseth va from all sin, 
1 John i. 7. His being the Son of God tlierefore amounts to the same thing as his 
being a divine person. 

Tliose who attribute Christ's sonship to his miraculous conception, (those how- 
ever to whom I refer,) arc ne\ crthelcss constrained to allov/ that the term implies 
proper divinity. Indeed this is evident from John v. 18, where his saying that 
God^oas Ms oiun Father is supjioseil to be making himsrlf eqttial with God. But il' 
tlie miraculous conception be the projier foundation of his sonship, why should it 
contain sucli an imjilication ? A holy crcattire might be produced by the over- 
shadovv'ing of the Holy Spirit, which yet should be merely a creature; i. e. he 
might, on this hypothesis, profess to l)e the Son of God, and yet be so far front 
making himself equal with God, as to pretend to be nothing more than a man. 

It has been objected, that ('hrist, when called the Son of God, is commonly 
spoken of as engaged in the work of mediation, and not simply as a divine person 
antecedent to it. I answer ; In a lustory ol the rebellion in the year 1745, the name 
of his Iloyal Highness, tlie commander in chief, would often be mentioned in con- 
nexion with his equipage and exploits ; but none would infer from hence that he 
thereby became the kini^s son. 

It is further objected, that sonship implies inferiority, and therefore cannot be 
attributed to the divine person of Christ. — Bu*, whatever inferiority may be at- 
tached to the idea of Sonship, it is not an inferiority oi'7taturc, which is the point 
in question : and if any regard be paid to the ScriiJtures, the very contrary is 
true. Christ's claiming to be the Son of God w;is muting himself, not inferior, but 
as God, or equal -with God. 

Once more : Sonship, it is said, implies posteriority, or that Christ, as a Son^ 
ooukl not have existed till after the Father. To attribute no other divinity to 
him, therefore, than what is denoted by sonship, is attributing none to him ; asj 
nothing can be divine which is not eternal. But if this reasoning be just, it wiU 
prove that the divine purposes are not eternal, o»- that there was once a point in 
<luration, in which God was witliout thought, purpose or design. For it is as tnie^ 
and may as well be said, that God must exist before he could purpose, as that 
the Father must exivt befjre !ic])ad.'i,Son : but if God n)U£t exist before UccouttI > 

Voj. I. M ra 



274; THE DOCTRINE OF THE tRlNITY. 

port this character, and therefore must conclude, that the glory 
of Christ's Sonship is infinitely greater than what arises from 
thence : therefore, I humbly conceive that this scripture is to 
be understood, with a small variation of the translation, in this 
sense, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee^ he. because that 
Holy Thing., which shall be born of thee., shall be called^ as he 
really is, the So7i of God; that is, he is as Mediator, an extra- 
ordinary Person appointed to execute a glorious office, the God- 
head and the manhood being to be united together, upon which 
account he is called the Son of God : and therefore it is ex- 
pedient that the formation of his human nature should be in aii 
Extraordinary way, to wit, by the power of the Holy Ghost. 

Again, there is a very wide difference between our account 
of Christ's Sonship, as Mediator, and theirs, as taken from this 
scripture, in that they suppose that his being called the Son of 
God, refers only to some dignities conferred upon him, whom 
they suppose to be no more than a man. This is infmitely below 
the glory, which we ascribe to him, as Mediator, since their 
idea of him, as such, how extraordinary soever his conception 
was, argues him to be no more than a creature ; but ours, as 
has been before observed, proves him a divine Person, since 
we never speak of him, as Mediator, without including both 
natures. 

, Having premised these things, to explain our sense of Christ's 
being called the Son of God, as Mediator, we proceed to prove 
this from scripture. And here we are not under a necessity of 
straining the sense of a few scriptures, to make them speak 
agreeably to this notion of Christ's Sonship ; but, I think, wc 
have the whole scripture, whenever it speaks of Christ, as the 
Son of God, as giving countenance to this plain sense thereof j 
so that I cannot find one place, in the whole New Testament, 
in which Christ is called the Son of God, but it is, with suffi- 
cient evidence, proved, from the context, that it is applied to 
him, as Mediator. Here we shall refer to several scriptures, 
in which he is so considered: thus that scripture before-men- 
tioned, in Matth. xvi. 16. where Peter confesses, Thou art 
Christ., the Son of the living God ; in which, speaking of him as 

.'.Tik..':"' a' , ■ ' , ' ■■■■'• ■! .. . .:'.,■,'■', •: 

purpose, thei"e must have been a point in duration in which he existed without 
purpose, thought, or desig-n ; that is, in which he was not God ! The truth is, 
ihe whole of this apj^aient difficulty arises from the want of distinguishing be-, 
tween the order of nature and the order of time. In the order of nature, the sun 
must have existed before it could shine ; but in the order of time, the sun and its 
rays are coeval : it never existed a single instant without them. In the order ot 
--fiturej God must have exisied before he could purpose ; but in the order of time, 
-,r duration, he never existed witho\it his purpose- for a God, witliout thought or 
purpose, were no God, And thus in the order of nature, the Father must have 
existed before the Son ; but, in that of duration, he never existed without the Son, 
"T}ie Father and the Son therefore are properly eternal." FrixrH, 



Tllfi BOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 2^& 

■ Christ, or the Mediatoi-, that is, the Person who was invested 
m the office, and came to perform the work of a Mediator, he 
is, in this respect, the Son of the living' God ; so when the high 
priest asked our Saviour, Matth. xxvi. 63. Art thou the Christ., 
the Son of God? that is, art thou the Messiah, as thou art sup- 
posed to be by thy followers ? Our Saviour, in ver. 64. replied 
to him, Thou hast said, that is, it is as thou liast said ; and then 
he describes himself in another character, by which he is often 
represented, as Mediator, and speaks of the highest degree of 
his Mediatorial glory to which he shall be advanced at his se- 
cond coming, ver. 64. Nevertheless^ I say unto you, Hereafter 
shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand ofpdwer, 
and coming iii the clouds of heaven. And, doubtless, the centu- 
rion, and they who were with him, when they confessed that 
he xvas the Son of God, in Matth. xxvii. 54. understood by it, 
that he was the Messiah, or the Christ, which is a character by 
which he was most known, and which had been supported by so 
many miracles, and was now confirmed by this miracle of the 
earthquake, which gave him this conviction ; also in Luke iv. 41 . 
when the devib are represented as crying out. Thou art Christy 
the Son of God, it follows, that they knew that he xvas Christ; 
so that the commonly received notion of our Saviour's Son- 
ship was, that he was the Christ. And in John xi. 3. when 
Jesus says concerning Lazarus, that his sickness was not unto 
death, that is, not such as that he should continue in the state of 
the dead, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be 
glorified thereby, the meaning is, that he might give a proof of 
his being the Christ, by raising him from the dead; therefore, 
when he speaks to Martha, with a design to try whether she 
believed he could raise her brother from the dead, and repre- 
sents himself to her as the object of faith, she replies, ver. 27 > 
I believe that thou art the Christ the Son of God, -which should 
come into the xvorid. Again, it is said, in Acts ix. 20. that Saul, 
when converted, preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is" 
the Son of God, that is, he proved him to be the Messiah; and 
accordingly, ver. 22. when he was establishing the same doc- 
trine, it is said, that he proved that he xvas the very Christ, 

Moreover, our Saviour is farther described, in scripture, as 
executing some of his mediatorial offices, or as having received 
a commission to execute them from the Father, or as having; 
some branches of mediatorial glory conferred upon him, at the 
same time that he is called the Son of God, which gives us 
ground to conclude, that this is the import of his Sonship. Thus 
we read, Heb. iv. 14. that we have a great High Priest that is 
passed into the heavens, Jesus, the Son of God; and in John i. 
29. John the Baptist pjives a public testimony to him, as fius- 



rlT& THE DOCTRINE Of THE TRINITY. 

taining such a character, which belongs to him, as Mediator, 
when he says. Behold the Latnb of God which taketh axuay the 
sins of the -world ; and afterwards, referring to the same cha- 
racter, he says, ver. 34. / scav^ and bare record^ that this is the 
Son of God; and at another time he gives a noble testimony to 
him, as God-man, Mediator, John iii. 29, ^c, when he calb 
him, The Bridegroom xvhich hath the bride^ that is, who is re- 
lated to, and has a propriety, in his church, and that he testifies 
xvhat he has seen and heard^ and that it is he whom God hath senty 
tcho speaks thexvords of God^for God giveth not the Spirit by 
measure unto him ; and then, as a farther explication hereof, he 
says, ver. S5. The Father loveth the So?i^ and hath given all 
things into his hand. This is, in effect, the same, as when he is 
called elsewhere, his beloved Son ; and, in Heb. iii. 6. Christ is 
said to be a Son over his oxvn house^ xvhose house are we ; which 
denotes not only his propriety in his church, but his being the 
Head thereof, as Mediator ; and the apostle, 1 Thess. i. 10. 
speaks of him, as the So7i of God^ xvhom rue are to xvait for frotyi 
heaven ; xvhom he has raised from the dead,, even jfesus^ which 
delivered us from thexvrafh to co?ne ; and. Gal. ii. 20. he speaks 
of the Son of God, as one who loved him,, and gave himself for 
him; and Col. i. 13. he is spoken of as God'*s dear Sojiy and, at 
the same time, as having a kingdom, into which his people are 
translated; and in the following verse, as the person in xvhom 
we have redemption,, through his blood,, xvho is the image of the 
invisible God,, the first-born of every creature ; which seems to 
be taken in the same sense as when he said, Heb. i. 2. to have 
been appointed Heir of all things,, and so referring to him as 
God-man, Mediator. 

Moreover, when he is considered as a Son related to his Fa- 
ther ; this appears, from the context, to be a description of him 
as Mediator. Thus, John xx. 17. he saj-s, / ascend unto mif 
Father,, and your Father ; to my God,, and your God ; that is, my 
Father by whom I am constituted Mediator, and your Father^ 
namely, the God who loves }'ou for my sake : he is first my 
God, as he has honoured, loved and glorified me ; and then 
your God, as he is reconciled to you for my sake ; so the apos- 
tle says, 2 Cor. i. 3. Blessed be God,, even the Father of our Lord 
jfesus Christ; the Father ofjfioxies,, and the God of all comfort. 

Object, 1. In these scriptures, and others of the like nature, 
there are tAvo ideas contained ; namely, one of our Saviour, as 
the Son of God, by eternal generation j the other of him, as 
Mediator ; whereas we suppose that one contains only an ex- 
plication of the other. 

Ansxv. If Christ's Sonship, in the sense in which it is gene- 
O^ly explained, were sufRciently proved from other scriptures, 



THE DOCTRIKE OF THE TRINITY. 277 

which take no notice of his mediatorial character, or works, or 
could be accounted for, without being liable to the difiiculties 
before-mentioned, and if hh character, as Mediator, did not 
contain in it an idea of Personality, the objection would have 
more weight than otherwise it seems to hav^e. 

Object, 2. It is said. Gal. iv. 4. God sent forth his Son., made 
of a xuoman, made tinder the lazv; therefore he was the Son of 
God before he was sent into the world, when made of a woman, 
and under the law, that is, his Son by eternal g-eneration. 

Answ, The answer I would give to this objection is, 

1, It is not necessary to suppose that Christ had the charac- 
ter of a Son before he was sent, though he had that of a diviije 
Person ; since the words may, without any strain, or force, 
upon the sense thereof, be understood thus ; when the fulness 
of time was come, in which the Messiah was expected, God 
sent him forth, or sent him into the world, with the character 
of a Son, at which time he was made of a woman, made under 
the law ; the end whereof was, that he might redeem them that 
were under the law. 

2. If we suppose Christ had the character of a Son before he 
was sent into the world, it will not overthrow our argument : 
since he was, by the Father's designation, an eternal Mediator, 
and, in this respect, God's eternal Son ; and therefore, he who 
before was so by virtue of the eternal decree, is now actually 
sent, that he might be, and do, what he was from all eternity 
designed to be, and do : he was set up from everlasting, or 
appointed to be the Son of God ; and now he is sent to perform 
the work which this character implies in it. 

Object. 3. It is farther objected, that his Sonship is distinct 
from his being Mediator, inasmuch as it is said, Heb. v. 8. 
Though he were a So?i.^ yet learned he obedience by the thingi: 
xvhich he suffered. Now it cannot, in propriety of speech, be 
said, though he were Mediator, yet he learned obedience, 
since he was under an obligation to obey, and suffer as Medi- 
ator ; therefore the meaning must be, though he were a Son 
by eternal generation, yet he condescended to put himself into 
such a capacity, as that he was obliged to obey, and suffer, as 
Mediator. 

Anszv. The stress of the objection lies in the word which we 
render though, ^ai sr^ m woe &c. which may be rendered, with a 
small variation, though being a Son, he learned obedience by 
the things he suffered ; but being made perfect, viz. after his 
sufferings, he became the author of eternal salvation, unto all 
them that obey him ; and then it takes away the force of the 
objection. However, I see no absurdity if it be rendered, as 
k is in the vulgar Latin version, And, indeed^ being a Son, hr 



278 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINIT.Y. 

learned obedience *, and then It proves the argument we are- 
cndeavouring to defend, q. d. it is agreeable to the character 
of a son to learn obedience ; it was with this view that it was 
conferred upon him, and in performing obedience, and suf- 
fering as Mediator, and thereby securing the glory of the di~ 
\*ine perfections in bringing about the work of our redemptioHj 
lie acted in pursuance of that character. 

Object. 1. it will be farther objected, that what we have said 
concerning the Sonship of Christ, as referred to his being 
Mediator, has some consequences attending it, \vhich seem 
derogatory to his Person ; particularly, it will follow from 
hence, that had not man fallen, and stood in need of a Media- 
tor, our Saviour would not have had that character, and there- 
fore never have been described as the Son of God, or wor- 
shipped as such. And our first parents, while in the state of 
innocency, knowing nothing of a Mediator, knew nothing of 
the Sonship of Christ, and therefore could not give him the 
glory, which is the result thereof. Moreover, as God might 
have prevented the fall of man, or, when fallen, he might have 
refused to have recovered him by a Mediator ; so our Saviour 
might not have been the Son of God, that is, according to the 
foregoing explication thereof, a Mediator between God and 
man. 

Answ. This objection may be very easily answered, and the 
charge, of Christ's mediatorial Sonship being derogatory to his 
glory, removed ; which that we may do, let it be considered, 

1. That we allow, that had not man fallen, our Saviour 
would not have been a Mediator between God and man; and 
the commonly received notion is true, that his being a Media- 
tor is, by divine ordination and appointment, according to the 
tenor of several scriptures relating thereunto ; and I see no ab- 
surdity in asserting, that his character, as the Son of God, or 
Mediator, is equally the result of the divine will, or decree. 
But this I hope, if duly considered, will not contain the least 
diminution of his glory, when we farther assert, 

2. That though our Saviour had not sustained this character 
if man had not fallen, or if God had not designed to bring 
about the Avork of redemption by him, yet he would have been 
no less a distinct Person in the Godhead, and, as such, would 
have had a right to divine glory. This appears from what 
hath been before said, concerning his personality being equally 

* Kai 5r«^ is %tscd six times in the JN'Vw Testament ; in tteo or three of ivfiich places 
it 7>ujht be rendered, Tvithout deviating from ifie sense of the respective texts, Sc 
quidem, as we// as qiuimvis; and I see tio reason why the enclitic particle TTtp, be- 
ing added to xat, shoidd ahvays, -tvithout exception, alter the sense thereof, a7iy more 
than xohen it is joined to m, «ai', or a. Andxuhereus I render kxi, in ver. 9. But, 
instead of AxkX, that may be jnstified. by several scriptures, luhere it is so rendered.- 
<ts I.uhc vU. .75. MuUh. cii. 39. Actsx. 28, 1 Cor. xvi. 13. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY- 279 

necessary with his Deity, which, if it be not communicated to 
him, certainly it has not -the least appearance of being the re- 
sult of the divine will; and, mdetd, his divine personality is 
the only foundation oi his right to be adored, and not his being- 
invested in an oi^ice, which only drav s forth, or occasions our 
adoration. When we speak oi Chri&t's b^ing adored, as Me- 
diator, it is his divine ptrsonalit} , which is included in that 
character, that renders hin> the objcci of adoration, and not 
his taking the human nature, or being, or doing, what he was, 
or did, by divine appointment ; and I question whether they, 
who assert that he had the divine nature, or personality, com- 
municated to him, v.'ill lay the stress of his right to divine 
adoration, on its being communicated, but on his having it, 
Abstracting from his manner of having it ; so when we speak 
of Christ as Mediator, it is his having the divine glory, or 
personalitv, which is included in that character, that rienders 
him the object of adoration ; therefore, if man had not fallen, 
and Christ had not been Mediator, he would have had a right 
to divine glory, as a Person in the Godhead. And I doubt 
not but that our first parents, before they fell, had an intima- 
tion hereof, and adored him as such ; so that if Christ had not 
been Mediator, it v/ould only follow from thence, that he 
v/ould not have had the character of a Son, but he would, not- 
v/ithstanding, have had the glory of a divine Person; for 
though his sonship be the result of the divine Vvill, his person- 
ality is not so. (a) 



(o) Dr. Ridgley dilTevs from the most of his brethren on the Sonship oiThrist 
as Mediator. The following note, imd the two precedjig", represent, it is pre- 
sumed, tlie orthodox doctrine on this important head. 

" The liedeemer is the Son of God, in a peculiar and appropriated sense, and 
by which he Ls distinguished from every other person in the universe. He is 
therefore called the Jirst begotfep, or first born son of God : his o7ibi begotten son; 
his otvn ton; and eminently The Son, and The Son of the Father. His ckar Son ; 
or, as it is in the original, The Son nf his love ,• His beloved Son, in tv horn he is 
r tell pleased- " For he received from God the Father, honour and glory, when 
there caine such a voice to him from the excellenf gloiy, This is my beloved 
Son, in whom I am well pleased. 2 Pet. i. 17. He is " The only begotten Son. 
luhich is in the bosom of the Father." John i. 18. Who only knows the Father; 
and none does or can reve-al and make him known but the Son. Matt. xi. 27. John 
i, 18. He beijig the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his per- 
son ; he that hath seen the Son, hath seen the Father, John xiv. 9. Hob. i, 3. 
Which epithets and declarations distinguish him from all other sens ; as much 
as his Father is distinguished from all other fathers. He is mentioned as the 
Son of God above an hundred tiwes \n the New Testament ; and fifiv times by 
the apostle John. And ilie Father of Jesus C'mist, tlie Son, is iv.entioned above 
tyvn hundred and t-weiily timesf and more than or.e hiindied and tl)irt\ times iji 
the gospel and epistles of SU John. Jesus Christ often makfs use of tlie epi- 
thets. The Father, J\I}i Father, &f. This cliiu-acter is represented as essential 
to the Redeemer and peculiar to him, and is an essential article of the christian 
faith. This confession Peter made as the coimnou faith of the disciples oiOhrist. 
'-■\Ve believe, and ai-e sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of tlie llvu-sg God " 



28it> TJ-i£ DOCTKlxVE Ot the TE1NIX5. 

Having enquired into the sense of those scriptures whieh 
treat of the Sonship of Christ, we shall next consider those 
that are generally brought to prove the procession of the Holy 

John vi. 69. MaXi. xvi. 16. This was the Eunuch's faith, required in order t» 
las being baptized. " I believe that Jesus Clirist is the SoJi of God." And he 
who believes with all his heart, that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, hath the 
Son, and with him eternal life. When Peter made this coniession, " Thou art 
Christ, the Son of the living- God," Christ said to him, " Blessed art thou ; for 
flesii and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in hea- 
ven." Matt. xvi. 16, 17. " He that believeth on the Son, hath everlastings life, 
and he that believeth not the Son, shall not see life." John iii. 36. And Jehn 
says, " Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwel- 
Icth in him, and he in God. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that 
believeth that Jesus is the Son of God ! He that hath the Son, hath life ; and he 
that hath not the Son of God, hath not life. These things have I written unto 
you tliat believe on the name of the Son of God.- that ye may know ye have eternal 
life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Hon of God." 1 John iv. 15. v. 5, 
12, 13. 

It must be farther observed, that this title, the Son of God, is the Mgkest ti' 
tie tliat is given to tlie Kedecnier, and denotes his divinity, or that he is himself 
God, and therefore equal with the Father, if his divinity be any where express- 
ed in the Bible; and that it is there abundantly declared, we have before sheWi- 
ed. He styles himself, and is called jT/je <S'o7i of Man, raoK t\\Jix\ eighty times m 
the New Testament, by which epithet his humanity is more especially denoted, 
but not excluding his divinitj-. And, on the contrary, he is called the Son of 
God, more particularly to express liis infinitely superior character, his divinity 
or godhead. In this \'iew, let the foUotving passages be considered. When the 
angel, who declared to the vu-gin Mary tliat she should be the mother of the Mes- 
si:ih, expressed to her the greatness of this her Son, he does it by saying that 
he should be called the Son of the Uighrst, the Son of God. " He shall be great, 
and shall be called the Son of the Highest. Therefore also that holy thing which 
shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God." Luke i. 32, 35. If this 
were not his greatest, his highest title and character, he most certainly would 
have given him a higher, and one that did fully express divinity. This, there- 
fore, did express it in the fullest and strongest manner. And no one, who be- 
lieves in the divinity of Christ, can, consistently, have any doubt of it. And 
when the Father gives him the highest encomium, and recommends him to men, 
as worthy of their highest regards, implicit obedience, and unlimited trust and 
confidence, and commands tliem thus to regard, love, trust in, and obey him, 
this is the highest character he gives him, by which his divinity is expressed, 
" 'I'his is my beloved Sox, in whom I am well pleased : Hear ye him." If this 
does not expi-ess his divinity, we may be sure divinity is no part of his charac- 
ter ; and that he is notGod. So, when Peter undertakes to express the idea he 
had of tlie high and glorious cliai-acter of his lord and Master, he does it in the 
following words, " Thou art the Clii-ist, the Son of the living God." If Peter 
belies cd the divinity of Clirist, he certainly expressed this in tliese words ; for. 
he did not conceive of any higher character, tliat could be given in any other 
words. This also appears by Nathaniel's using this epithet, when he was struck 
with wonder and surprise at the omniscience of Christ. " Rabbi, thou art the 
Son of God, thou ;a-t the King of Israel." John i. 49. When our Lord Jesus 
Christ pro])oscd himself to the man wiirm he had restored to sight, as the pro- 
per object of his taith and trust, he said to him, " Dost thou believe on the Son 
of God .'" And when he told the man that he himself was the person, he said, 
'■ Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him." John ix. 35, 38. It appears fi-om 
tliis, that Son of God was the higliest title which Jesus assumed, and that tliis 
had special reference to, and expressed his divinity ; and therefore in this cha- 
lacter, and as tlie Son of God, this pious man paid him divine honour, and ^\o^- 
■hipped liim. When tlie disciples of our Lord, and ail that were iji the ship with 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 281 

aost; the principal of which, as has been before observed, 
«io ivi John xiv. 26. and chap. xv*. 26. and xvi. 7. in which he 
is said to proceed from the Father^ or to be sent by the Father 

them, !i;id seen lum walking upon the sea, in the midst ot'a ternble storm, and 
reducing' Ihe boisterous winds, and rag'ing waves, to a calm, by his word and 
presence, they were struck with a fresh and affecting conviction of his divinity, 
that lie was (iod, and expressed it by commg to him, falling down and worsliip- 
inghim, " saying, ot'a trutii, thou art the Son of God." Matt. xiv. 33. In which 
words they exjjressed his divinity, and gave a reason for their worshipping him, 
as their Lord and their God, viz. that they were sui'e from clear and abundanr, 
evidence, that he was tlie Son of God. The apostle John, when he Would repre- 
sent .lesus Christ ir his highest and most glorious character, gives him this title, 
and adds, " This is the true God." He says, " We know that the Son of God is 
come, iuid iiath given us an understanding-, that we may know him that is true ; 
And we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. 'I'his is the true God, 
and eteniiJ life." 1 John v. 20. 

It is to be farther observed, that when our Lord said to the Jews, " My Father 
worketh hitherto, and I work," the Jews, therefore sought the more to kill him, 
because he said thut God -was his Father, (his o-mh proper Father, as it is in the ori- 
ginal) MAKtvcf iiiMsiLF Eo.uAL WITH GOD." Tliis IS to bc uudcrslood as the sense 
which St. John the Evangelist puts upon the words of Christ, " My Father work- 
eth hitherto, and 1 work." Yor this was making himself equal with God the 
Fath;;r, as doing the same work with him : And this is i epreseuted as implied in 
God's being Ids own Father ; or in his being the Father's own Son, the Son uf God. 
But if we understand it as the sense which the Jews put upon the words of Christ, 
and ih:it they said this was making himself equal v/ith God, it amounts to the 
same thing; for it appears that their inference was just ; and our Saviour is so far 
froi.'i den} ing it to be true, that in his i-eply to them, he contirms it, and asserts 
that whatsoever the Father does, the Son does the same ; and instances in his 
raising the dead, and judging the world, and having all things, and all jxivver in 
his hands. " That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Fa- 
ther." John V. 13 — 17- Thus he makes the Son equal with the Father. Konce it 
appears that to be the Son of God, and God's own Son, is the same with a divine 
person, and denotes one who is truly God ; and that this title is used to express 
the divinity, rather than the humanity of Jesus Christ. 

Tlie same appears from what passed between our Lord and the Jews at another 
time. He said to them, " I and my Father are One." This, they said, was blas- 
phemy, because being a man, he made himself God. It is jilain from the answer 
which he makes to them that they consideied him xs a blasphemer, because he 
claimed to be the Son of God, by calling God his Father. " Say ye of him whom 
the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou bla.sphemest, because I 
said, I am the. Soti of God?" This was tlie blasphemy with which they charged 
him ; because they considered his saying, that he was the Son of God, by calling 
<^d his Father, as an assertion that lie wa.s God. John x. 30, 33, 36. And it ap- 
pears, not only from this passage, but from others, that tiie Jews, and others, did 
:tffix the idea of divinity to the Son of God, and considered this title as expressing 
a character infinitely above a mere creature. When Jesus was arraigned before 
the Jewish council, the High Priest charged him with the solemnity of an oathj 
saying, " I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us, v hethei- thou be the 
Christ, the Son of the living God." And v.hen Jesus answered in the affirmative, 
he with all the members of the council, charged him with blasphemy ; and pro- 
nounced him worUiy of death for making this claim. Matt. xxvi. 64, 65, 66. And 
they brought this accusation against him to I'ilate^, " We have a law, and by our 
law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God. When, tlieiefore, 
Pilate heard that saying, he was the more afraid." John xix. 7, S. By this, it is 
evident that Pilate considered the Son of God, to imply divinity. When the Cen- 
turion, ajid the guard who were with him, saw the earthquake and the other su- 
pernatural events wlilch attended the crucifixion of Jesus Chri'^t, " lliev feared 

Vol. I. N n 



3g2 TlfE UOC TRINE OF THE TRINITT.' 

jH Chrhl^s name, oi- to be sent by the Son. We have alreadj^ 
•considered tlie most commonly received sense hereof, as in-'" 
eluding in it an eternal procession, viz. the communication of 

greatly, saying', Truly this was the Son of God." Matt, xxvii. 54. From this, it is 
evident that they considered the Son (>f God to be more than a man, at least, if 
not really God. 

There was some idea and belief propagated among other nations, as well as the, 
.tews, of an exraordinury personnge, a divinity, who w;is denominated The Son of 
God, and who was to make his ap])earance in the world. To this, Nebuchadnez- 
zar doubtless had reference, when he said, that in a vision, he saw a fourth per- 
son, walking in the midst of the fire of the fuinuce into which he had cast three 
men ; and that none of them had been hurt by the fire ; and the form of the fourth 
•<P-as like the Son of God- Dan. iii. 25. And who but this divine person can be meant 
bv Agur, when he says, " Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? 
Who hath gathered tlie wind in his tists .■' Who hath bound the waters in a gar- 
ment? Who hath established all the ciids of tile earth.' "What is his name, awt/ 
•ii'hat is his Smi's mime, if thou canst tell ?" Prov. xxx. 4. 

This epithet and character we ti?id expressly mentioned by David, the divine- 
]y inspired king of Israel, in the second Psalm. And he is there introduced and 
flescribed, as a dis'inity, who claims divine homage, trust, and worship, as the 
Omnipotent heir, iiossessor and ruler of the world. " I will declare the decree 
'I'he Lord hath said unto me, Thou art MY SON, this day have I begotten thee. 
Ask of mo, and I shall g-ive thee the Jieathen for thine inheritance, and the utter- 
■most parts of tlie eurth for thii poSTiessiov. Thou shalt break them with a rod of 
iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. Be wise now, there- 
fore, O y^ kings ; be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve the Lord with fea^-, 
and rejoice with trembling. Kiss thr. Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from 
the wav, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that pitt their 
trust in him."* From this ancient oracle in Israel, and from a revelation which 
•was made upon the first apostacy, and handed down by tradition, not oilly the 
Jews, but also those of other nations who had any particular connexion with them, 
M'Cre taught to consider the expected Messiah as the Son of God in a peculiai- 
and {.ppropriated sense ; and as implying real divinity. Therefore, it was suppo- 
M-d on all iiands, that this person, the Son of God, the King of Israel, tlie King of 
the Jews, was to be worsliipped as w orthy to receive divine honours. Hence the 
wise men from the East,-being admonished of tlie birth of this glorious personage, 
came to wo'iismr him, to pa} him divine honours ; for which they had a particular 
warr.'iiit, having ha<l him pointed out to them by a stap, M'hich was a known sym- 
bol, or hierogiv])hic of Xht Divinity, or a God. And Herod took it for granted, 
■I liat this person was to be worshipped, and receive divine honours. For he said 
to the wi.'-e men, " W'hen ye have found liim, bring me word again, that 1 may 
come and tvorship him also.''' 

All this will be of no wciglit, indeed, and as nothing with the Anti-trinitai*ians, 
llie Sabellian.'; ; and with all those who deny the divinity of Jesus Christ, the 
Arians and Socinians. But ihey who believe in a Trinity of persons in the Deity,' 
:md that Jesus Christ is (iod, the second person of the Trinity, must be sensible 
that lie is called the Son of God, the Son of the Father, with a special reference 
rohisdi\ Ine nature, and to denote his Godhead, as the .second person in theTrivuie 
<iod. — The A)-ians and Socinians hold that he is the Son of God, considered as a 
juere creature, being by this distinguished from all other creatures ; and coiise- 

• Thi<; is an incontestiMe proof thit the Son is God. even JEHOVAH. The Psalmist often 
;;jivn. " Blepped are they, blci'-cd is the man -wlio trnstelh in tlie Lord." And here he says, Bles- 
.\etl are h11 they who trust in the Son of God, and yet forbids us to put our trust in any Imt God. 
- " Put not vour trust in princes, or in the son of man. in whom there is no help. Happy is he that 
hath the God of Jacoli for his help, whose hope is in the lord his God." Psalm cxlvi. 3. S. An.-; 
he s^vs " My soul, wait thou only upon God ; for my expectation ?s from him.". Psalm l.\ii. 
.<, Tiiev cnlynrc blessed, who trust in God ; and all othe.s are cursed. " Thus saith the Lord. 
<;ursfd be the man that trusteth in man. B'esseJ is the man that trusteth in the Lor<'., and whos? 
hope the Lord is." Jer. }iv-ii. 5, 7. They art bleiscd, who tiubt in the Sun of God. Th.er-t'jr' 
"ift !S ihe Lord. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY, 283 

zlie divine essence, or personality to him, as distinguished frojrt 
the eteraal generation of the Son ; but now \ve shall enquire 
whether there «iay Jiot be another sense given of these scrip- 

quently that there was no Son of" Ciod before tliis creature did exist. The latter, 
op Trinitarians, believe that the sonship ot" Jesus Christ, necessarily includes hi)* 
divinity ; but are not all a^-eed as to die foundation of his sonship, and in what it 
consists. It has been generally believed, aud the common doctrifie of the church 
of Christ, from the beginning of the fourth century, and .so far as appears from the 
jduys of the apostles to this time, that Jesus Christ is the ett-rnal Son of God : That 
his Sonship is essential to him, as the second })erson m the Triuit)-, and that m 
t/iis setise, he is the only begotU'ii Son of the Father, antecedent to his incarnation, 
and independent on it, even from eternity. But theye are some who thuik that 
the Sonship of the Redeemer consists in an union of the sec jnd person of the 
Trinity, or the Word, with the human nature ; and tliat he became the Son oi" 
God b\' becoming man ; and therefore before tlie incarnation, there was no Son of 
God, though there were a Trinity of persoas in the Godhead. This opinion seem.-, 
to be rather gaining ground, and spreading', of late. 

Those on each side of this question diifer in their opinion of the importance of 
-it, and of the bad tendency of either oi'tlicse opposite sentiments. Some suppose 
that the difference is of little or no importance, as both believe the Redeemer to 
be God and man, in one person, and that he is the Son of God, and that this im- 
plies his divinity, though they differ in opinion respecting the time and mannev 
of his fihation. Others think this is a difference so great and irnportant, and at- 
tended with sucli consequences ; and that those wlio are opposed to tliem on thiij 
jjoint embrace such a great and dangerous error, that they ought to be strenuous- 
ly opposed : iind consequently do not desire an accommodation, or think it pos- 
sible. 

Though it be needless and improper here to undertake the labour of entering* 
into all the arguments which have been produced, or may be mentioned in sup- 
port of each side of this question ; yet tlje foUowhig observations may not be al- 
together useless ; but may be of son)e help to form a judgment upon this point, 
agreeable to the scriptures. 

1. As this question respects the character of the Redeemer, it may justly be 
considered as an important one ; as every thing relating to his cliiu-acter is very 
Important and interesting. ^Vho would be willing tu be found at last taking the 
wrong side of this question; and always to have enlertamed so unbecoming ideas 
and conceptitms of the Redeemer, wliich his must be, if on this point he embra- 
ces and contends for that which is directly contrary to the truth ? Though sucli 
an error should not be fatal to him who embraces it, but be consistent with hi.s 
being a real christian ; yet it must be a very criminal mistake, and dishqnourabltj 
to Jesus Clu'ist; aa eveiy idea of him must be, whici) is contrary to hi.s true cha- 
racter : P'or that is so perfect and glorious, that nothing can be tak'.-n from it, or 
added to it, which will not mar and disiionom- it. His character, as it res])ect>* 
the question before us, is without doubt properly and clearly stated in divine reve- 
lation, and if we embrace that whicii is contrary to the truth, it must be wholiv our 
own fault, and a very criminal abuse of the advantages which we enjoy, to (enow 
the only true God, and Jesus Christ his Son, whom he ha.'; sent. Those considern- 
tions ought to awaken our attention to this subject, and excite a coneeru and 
earnest desire to know and embrace the truth; which will be attentled with u 
modest, humble, diligent enquiry, sensiljle of the danger in which we are, througii 
pi-ejudice, or from otiier causes, of embracing error ; and earnestly looking to tiie 
great Prophet to lead us into the truth. 

2. Wliat lias been observed above, and, it is believed, made evident, viz. that 
the term. Son of God, so often given to (Jlirist, is u.sed to denote his divine nature, 
:ind to express his divinity, rather than his humanity, seem: naturally, if not ne- 
cessarily, to lead us to consider this chanicter as belonging to him independent 
of his union to the human nature, and antecedent to his becoming man ; and iherc- 
ibre, that it belongs to him as God, i lie sccoinl person in ti>c Triiii'-}'. Fo.i- if }.),< 



284 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITX- 

tures, agreeable to the analogy of faith, that may be acqiksced 
in b}^ those, who cannot so well understand, or account for, 
the common sense given thereof, which, I humbly conceive, is 

sonship consists in his union to the human nature, and he became a son, only by 
becoming- a man ; then this character depends wholly upon this union, and is de- 
rived fiom his being made flesh : Therefore this epithet could not be properly 
used to denote Ms divinity, independent of his l^umanity, or what he is as a divine 
person, antecedent to his incarnation ; or to express his divine, rather than his 
human nature. And Son of God, wovdd be no higher a character, and express no 
more than Son of man ; which is contrary to the idea which the scripture gives 
us on this head, as has been shown. 

This may, perhaps, be in some measure illustrated by the following instance. 
The son of a nobleman of the first jionour and dignity, came from Europe, and 
married the daughter of a plebian in America, by which he became his son : But 
as his honoQr and dignity did not con.sist in his marrying this woman, or in his 
being the son of the plebian, by this union with liis daughter, but in his original 
character; no man thought of expressing his highest and most dignified chiiracter 
by which he was worthy of the greatest respect, by using an epitliet wliich de- 
noted only his union to thui woman, and which w ;is not applicable to him in any 
other view ; oi- by calling him soji, as expressing this new relation : But the high- 
est title whicli the}^ gave him, was that which had a .speoal respect to, and ex- 
pressed his original character, wliich he sustained antecedent to this union ; and 
in which his highest dignity consisted. And he being the son of a nobleman and 
a lord, in which ail his honour and dignity did consist, they used this phrase. 
My noble Lord, to express theii' highest respect, and his most worthy character. 
This epithet was always used to express his original and highest character and 
relation, and could not, with proj^riety, be used to express any thing else. He 
was often called, indeed, the son of the plebian, when they designed particulai'ly 
to express his union to his v ife, and speak of him as standing in this relation. 

3. The Son of God is spoken of in many instances, if not in every one where 
this term is used, so as will naturally lead the reader to consider him as sustain- 
ing this character and relation antecedent to his incamation, and independent of 
jt. '* God so loved the world tliat he gave his only begotte^i Son." John iii. 16. Do 
not these words seem to express this idea, viz. that there existed an only begot- 
ten son, antecedent to his being gi^ en ; that God gave this his Son to the world 
by his becoming flesh, and being united to the human nature; and not that he 
became his Son by this union f " In this was manifested the love of God towards 
lis, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the -world, that we might live 
through him. Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, andsevt 
his Son to be a propitiation for our sins." 1 John iv. 9, 10. If God sent his only be- 
gotten Son into the world, does not tliis suppose he had a Son to send, antecedent 
to his sending him ; and that he did not become his Son by his sending him into 
the world, or only in consequence of this ! This is expressed in the same manner 
ijy St. Paul. " But when the fulness of time was come God se7it forth his So7i, 
made of a woman, made under the law." Gal. iv. 4. The Son was sent forth. Does 
not this seem at least to imply that there was a Son to be sent fortii luitecedent to 
las being made of a wom:ui, and tliat he was not made a Son, by being made of a 
woman or becoming man? " No man hatli seen God at any time : The only be- 
flatten Son -ivlilch is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him." Jolm i. 18. 
Do not these words naturally lead us to conceive of the only begotten. Son as 
existing in the nearest union with the Father as his Son, independent of tlie hu- 
man nature .■' 

It is said, " God -ims manifested in the fcsh.". lT\m. iii. 16. It would be unnatu- 
ral and absurd to suppose, from this exi)ression, that Jesus Christ was not God, 
antecedent to his being manifested in the flesh, and that by his becoming man, 
he became a God. Directly the contrary to tliis is asserted, viz. that he who is 
God from eternity, did in time appear in tlie human nature, and manifested him- 
self to be God, independent of the flesh, in which he appeared. It is also sait-i_. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 28j 

t'nis : that the Sph-it is considered not with respect to the man- 
ner of his subsisting, but with respect to the subserviency of his 
acting, to set forth the Mediator's glory, and that of the Fa- 

" For this purpose, the Son of God loas manifested, that he might destroy tlie 
work-; of the devil." 1 John iii. 8. These two p;iss:ig-es appear to be parallel. 
God Tnunitesied in the fiesli, and the Son of God munifested, are two expressions 
of the same Viung. From this it may be inferred, that the Son of God, and God, 
are synonymous here, and of the same import. This serves'to confirm what has 
been said abo\'e of the use and meaning of the term, Son of God. And may it 
not with equal certainty be interred from these two passages, compared toge- 
ther, that the Son of God existetl iu this character as the Son of God, antecedent 
to his manifestation in the flesh, and independent of it ; and that he did not be- 
come the Son of God by being made flesh.'' If God be manifested in the flesh, 
tliere must be a God to be manifested antecedent to such a manifestation, and 
indejiendent of it. And is it not equally certain that if the Son of God be mani- 
fested, he must have existed the Son of God, antecedent to such manifestation, 
and independent of it > Consequently he did not become the Son of God by hL^ 
beh)g manifested in the flesh : His Sonship does not consist in the union of thr 
divine and iiuman natures in one person. His personality existed before this 
union with the human nature; and he was the Son of God before this: Thi.ssame 
Son of God, this same person who existed without beghming, assumed the hu- 
man nature, not a human person, into a union with himself, his own person, and 
so appeared, was manifested in the flesh. 

When David speaks of tlie Son of God, and represents the Father as saying, 
" Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee," so long before his incarna- 
tion, the idea which most naturally arises in the mind from this is, that there 
was then such a person as the Son, who did at that time declare the decree, by 
the mouth of David ; and not, that there should in some future time be a Son 
begotten, who sliould then declare the decree. " I will declare the decree : The 
Lord said unto me, thou ai"t my Son, this day have I begotten thee." It is very 
unnatural, and contrary to all proprietj' of speech to suppose, " this day have I 
begotten thee," means I will beget thee in some future time; and that the Son 
should be made to declare the decree, long before any such person existed ; and 
when there was in fact no such Son. The decree which the Son declares is not 
that declaration, " Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee ;" but what 
follows, " ask of me, and I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and 
the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with 
a rod of iron, &c." " This day " that is, noiu, not in time which is passed, or 
which is to come ; for with God there is no succession, no time passed or to 
come ; but lie exists, as we may s^y, in one eternal, unsuccessive now. There- 
fore, when we speak of an eternal/ immanent ;ict, it is most properly expressed 
thus, " This d"y, or now, have I'begotten thee." This therefore is the sense in 
which the best divines have generally understood it. 

St. Pavd cites this passage as being illustrated and verified in the resurrection 
of .Jesus Christ. Acts xiii. o3. But he cannot mean that he by the resurrection 
became the Son of God, and was then begotten : for he had this title before that. 
His meaning is explained by himself in his epistle to the Romans. "Declared 
to be the Son of God by the i*esurrection fj-om the dead." Kom. i. 4. That is 
tliis was a fresh and open manifestation and declaration that he was indeed what, 
had been often asserted of him, and what he always was : The only begotten Son 
of God. 

What tlie angel said to the virgin Mary, " He shall be gi'eat, and shall be call- 
id the Son of the Highest — The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power 
of the Highest shall ovcr.shadow thee : therefore also that holy thing which shall 
:)e born of thee, shall be called the Son of God," cannot reasonably be understood 
as a declaration tliat his sonship consisted In his miraculous conception, or in the 
Tiion of thf second person of the Trinity with tlie human nature, tJius conceivecr- 
ihi* ^iia*^ 'rM clvild, conceived in tliis manner, and born of a virgin, should 



286 IHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

ther that sent him. I chuse to call it a subserviency of acting, 
without connoting any inferiority in the agent ; or if we sup-r 
pose that it argues any inferiority in the Holy Spirit, this is, 



appear, and be known to be the Son of God, that very person who had been spo- 
ken ofiind known in all past ages by this title; of whom Isaiah had particularly 
spoken, when l\e said, " Beliold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and shall 
rail his name Immanuei. Unto us a Son is given, and the government shall be 
upon his shoulder : And his name shall be called. Wonderful, Counsellor, the 
mighty God :" Isaiah vii. 14. ix. 6. That this Son was now to be born of the virgin 
-Mary : the long expected Messiah, who is considered and spoken of by the peo- 
ple of God, by the title of the Son of God, which title he shall bear, as he is in- 
deed the mighty God. 

We are naturally lead to consider the Son of God as existing in this character 
before his incarnation, and the same with the Word, by what is said of him i»] 
the first chapter of John. "The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us; 
and we beheld his glory as of the only begotten of the Father. No man hath seen 
God at any time. The only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, 
he hath declared him. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, this was he 
of whom I spake, he that cometh after me, is preferred before me: For fie 7vas 
before me. And I saw, and bear record that this is the Son of God." Here John 
is represented as asserting that the Son of God, concerning whom he bore wit- 
ness, did exist /;(»/or(5 /jm, which therefore must be before his incarnation; for 
John was conceived before the incarnation of Jesus. But how can this be true, 
if there were no Son of God, before John existed ? But if we consider the Word 
and the Son of God as synonymous, who was in the beginning witli God, and 
who was God, and created all things, this whole chapter will be plain and easy 
to be understood ; and we shall see John bearing witness to the Son of God, who 
existed before him in this cliaractcr, and was now come in the flesh. 

We find the same representation made in the epistle to the Hebrews. " God, 
who spake in time past imto tlie fathers, by the prophets, hath in these last days 
spoken unto us by his Son, whom lie hath appointed heir of all things ; by ivhom 
iiho he made the itiorlds. Who being tlie brightness of his glory, and the express 
image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his po'wer" &c. How 
could God make the worlds by his Son, four thousand years before he had a Son ; 
and on this supposition, w-liere is the propriety or truth of this assertion .i" And 
how could the Son be said to uphold all things by the word of his power, thou- 
sands of years before any Son existed? " And again, rvhen he bringeth the first 
begotten into the -world, "he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him." 
Tills expression naturally suggests tlie idea that God the Father had a first-be- 
gotten Son to bring into the world, whom he commanded the angels to worship. 
How can he be said to bring his first begotten Son into the ivorld, when he had 
no such Son to bring into the world ; and indeed never did bring- this his Son in^ 
«•,» the world, if he was begotten and received his sonship in this vorld, when he 
took the human nature in the womb of the virgin, and was not a son before ? 

Again, speaking of Melchi.sedec, he says, he was " Without father, without 
mother, M'i'tliout descent, having neither beginmng of diws, nor end of life ; but 
made like unto the Son of God." Heb. vii. 3. If there were no Son of God till the 
human nature of Christ existed, then the Son of God did begin to exist; conse- 
quently there was a beginning of his days; and Melchisedec was not made like 
him, but ?^«//X-e to him, by having no beginning of days. 

Since there are so many passages of scripture, (and there are many more than 
have now been mentioned) which seem to represent the Redeemer as the Son of 
(lod, antecedent to his incarns.tion, and independent of it, which will naturally 
lead those who attend to them to this idea of him; and some of them cannot be 
easily reconciled to the contrary opiiiion; this will folly account for the general- 
Iv received doctrine in the christian world from the earliest ages to this time, 
viz. TbattiieRe^ecixierofm.anisthe second person in the Trinity, the eterna' 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 287" 

<tnly an inferiority in acting, as the works that he does are sub- 
servient to the glory of the Mediator, and of the Father, 
though his divine personality is, in all respects, equal with 

Son of God, who in the fulness of time was made flesh, by a personal union with 
the human nature. 

4. It is worthy of consideration, whether the contrary opinion, viz. That the 
|tedecmer is the Son of God, only by the second person in the Trinity being' uni- 
ted to human nature, and becoming man, does not naturally lead to dangerous 
;-.ud evil consequences ; and wliat good end is to be answered by it ? If it be not 
agi'ceable to scripture, we know it must be dangerous and hurtful in a greater 
or less degree, (as all errors respecting the person and character of the Re- 
deemer are) and naturally tends to lead into other mistakes, still greater, and 
of worse consequence. And if it be agreeable to scripture, it cei-tamly has no 
bad tendency. If, thei'efore, it does appeal- i'rom reasoning upon it, or from fact 
;ind experience; that this opinion tends to evil consequences, and has a bad ef- 
fect; we may safely conclude tliat it is wrong, and contrary to divine revelation 

1. Does not this sentiment tcJid to lower our ideas of the Redeemer, and lead 
into a way of thinking less honourably of him ? It has been observed that it ap- 
peal's from scripture, that this title, Son of God, was used to express the high- 
<-st and most honoiu'alile idea which Lis friends had of his person and charactci' 
But if we imderstand b)- it, nothing but what takes place by his union toman, 
by taking flesh upon him, and consider it as signifying nothing but what took 
place by bis becoming* man, nothing is expressed by it moi-e than by So7i of man- 
And \\ are left without any epithet or common scriptui-e phrase, whei'eby to ex- 
press tlie divinity, the Godhead of the Redeemer, and his equality with the Fa- 
tlier. Thus, instead of raising our conceptions of the Redeemer, does it not 
tend to sink them ? Does not tiie sonship of Christ become an infinitely less and 
more inconsiderable matter, upon this plan, tban that whicli has always been 
esteemed the orthodox sentiment on this point, which considers his sonship, as 
wholly independent of the whole creation, as eternal, ;uid akogether divine ? 

We live in an age when the enemies of the Redeemer lift up their hes:ds,' and 
ure suffered to multiply and prevail. The deists attempt to cast him out as aa 
nnpostor. Arians and Socinians strip him of his divinity : And tlie careless, igno- 
rant, immoral and profane, treat him with contem])t, or neglect. 'I'his is agiee- 
able to his great enemy, Satan ; who seeuis now to be let loose in an unusual de- 
gree, and has uncommon power among men, to lead them into gross errors, and 
those especially which are dishonourable to Christ, and injurious to his character. 
And if this sentiment now under consideration, concerning the Sonship of the 
Redeemer, should spread and prevail noiu, this would be no evidence ui favom* ot" 
it; but, considering what has been now obsei-ved, concerning it, would it not give 
reason to suspect, at least, that it is dishonourable to the Son of God, and leads 
to other errors 3 et more dishonourable to him ? 

'I'his leads to observe, 

2. It is worthy of consideration, wliether this doctrine of the filiation of Jesus 
Christ, does not tend to reject the doctrine of the Trinity, as it has been held by 
tJiosc who liave been called the ortliodox in the christian church, and leads to 
what is called Sabelliiuiism ; which considers the Deity as but one person, and to 
be three only out of respect to the different manner or kind of his operations. , 

This notion of the Sonship of Christ, leads to suppose that the Deity is the P"a- 
iher of the Mediatf)r, without distinction of persons ; and tliat by Father so often 
jiientioned in the Xtw Testament, and generally in relation to the Son is com- 
nioiilv, if not always, meant Deity, without distinction of persons. If this be so, 
it tends to exclude all distinction of persons in God, and to make the personality 
of the Redeemer to consist wholly in the human nature ; and finally, to m;dce his 
union with Ddty no more, but the same which Arians and Socinians admit, viz 
tli£ same which takes place between God and good men in general ; but in a high' 
er and peculiar deglec. 



288 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

theirs. This explication of these texts, is allowed of by many, 
if not by most, of those v/ho defend the doctrine of the Trinity, 
notwithstanding their maintaining another notion of the Spirit's 



But if there be no tendency in this doctrine of the sonship of Christ, to tlie 
consequences which have been now mentioned ; and it can be made evident that 
none of those supposed evils do attend it, or can follow from it ; yet it remains 
to be considered lohat advantage attends it, and the good ends it will answer, if 
it were admitted to be true. None will say, it is presumed, that it is more agree- 
able to the general expressions of scripture relating to this point, than the oppo- 
site doctrine ; who well considers what has been observed above. The most that 
any one can with justice say with resjiect to this is, that the scri])ture may be so 
construed and understood, as to be consistent with the sonship of Christ, com- 
mencing at the incarnation, however inconsistent with it some passages may ap- 
pear at first view. 

It may be thought, perhaps, that this notion of the sonship of the Redeemer is 
attended with two advantages, if not with more, viz. It frees the doctrine of the 
Trinity from that which is perfectly incomprehensible, and appears a real contra- 
diction and absurdity; that the second person should be Son of the first, who is 
the Father ; the Son being begotten by the Fatlier from eternity ; than which 
nothing can be more inconceivable, and seemingly absurd. And this appears in- 
consistent with the second person being- equal with the first; for a son begotten 
of a father, implies inf^^riority, and that he exists after his father, and consequent- 
ly begins to exist, and is dependent. Both these difficulties are wholl) avoided, 
it AS thought, by supposing that the second person in the Trinity became a son by 
being united to the human nature, and begotten in the womb of the virgin. And 
it is probable that these supposed advantages have recommended this scheme of 
the Sonship of Christ, to those who embrace it, and led them to reject the com- 
monly reecived opinion ; and not a previous conviction that the former is most 
agreeable to the scripture. This therefore demands our serious and candid at- 
tention. And the following things may be observed upon it. 

1. If we exclude every thing from our creed; concerning God, his existence, 
and the manner of his existence, which to us is incomprehensible and unac- 
countable, we must reject the doctrine of the Trinity in unity, and even of the 
existence of a God. The doctrine of three persons in one God is wholly incon- 
ceivable by us, and Unitarians consider it as the greatest contradiction and ab- 
surdity imaginable. And tliose Trinitarians, who have undertaken to explain it, 
and make it more intelligible, have generally failed of giving any light ; but have 
really made it absurd and even ridiculous, by " darkening counsel by word;^ 
without knowledge." If we reasoned properly on the matter, we should expect 
to find hi a levelation which God has made of himself, his being and manner of 
subsistence, mysteries which we can by no means understand, which ai"e to crea- 
tures wonderful, and wholly unaccountable. For the being of God, and the 
manner of his existence, and of his subsisting, must be infinitely above our com- 
prehension : God is infinitely great, and we know him not. And if we attempt to 
-search out these mysteries by reason, we are prone to think they are contradic- 
tions and absurdities, merely because our reason cannot fethom them ; and they 
appeal- more unintelligible, the more we try to understand them. " Canst thou 
by searching find out God ? Canst thou find out the Almighty to perfection .' It 
is as liigh as heaven, what canst tliou dor Deeper than hell, what canst tliou know? 
The measure thereof is longer than the earth, and broader than the sea." Job ii. 
7, 8, 9. " Teach us what we sliall say unto him, (and what we shall say concern- 
ing him ;) for we cannot order our speech by reason of dai'kness. Shall it be 
told him that I ipeak ?" and attempt to comprehend and explain the mysteries 
that relate to his existence ? " If a man speak, surely he shall be swallowed up." 
Job xxxvii. 19, 20. If a man undertake thus to speak, instead of giving any light, 
he will be involved and overwhelmed in impenetrable darkness. 

They, therefore, who do not believe the eternal sonship of Jesus Christ, be- 
cause it i'- invsterioiis and incomprehensible, and to some it appears to be, ti til 



TftE DOCTRINE OF THE TRIXITY. 2S9 

pvocession from the Father and the Son, from all eternity, in 
the sense before considered. I need only refer to that expli- 
cation which a great und learned divine gives of these, and 

■■" ■ ■ ' ~ ' ' ■ .. - — 

of contradiction, will, li" they be consistent with themselves, for the same rca- 
son, reject the doctrine ofa Trinily of persons m one God.* 

2. 'If the <loctrine of the eternal jjeneration and son^hip of the second person In 
the Trinity be soberly and modesUy considered in the light of the foregoing ob- 
servation, and with a proper sense of our own darkness and infinite inferiority to 
the divine Being, and how little we can knosvofhim; we shall not be forward 
to pronounce it inconsistent with reason, and absurd ; but be convinced, that to 
do thus, is very bold and assuming; and that it may be consistent and true, not- 
witlistanding any thing we may know ; though it be mysterious tmd incompre- 
hensible. Tills is a divine generation, infinitely above any thing that takes place 
among creatures, and infinitely diflei-ent. It is that of which we can have no 
adequate idea, and is infinitely out of our reach. What incompetent judges are 
we then of this matter ? What right or ability have we to pronounce it absurd 
or inconsistent, when we have no capacity to know or determine what is true, 
consistent, or inconsistent in this high point, any farther than Gud li;is been 
pleased to reveal it to us .-' There may be innumerable mysteries in the existeiice 
and niimner of subsistence of the infinite Being, which are, and must be, incom- 
prehensible, by a finite understanding. God has been pleased, for wise ends, to 
reveal tliat of the Trinity, and this of the eternal generation and sonship of the 
second person : And he has done it in a manner, uiid m words best suitetl to con- 
vey those ideas of it to men, which it is necessary they should have : And we 
ought to receive it with meekness and implicit submission, using our reason in 
excluding every thing which is contrary to, or below infinite jiertection, and ab- 
solute independence; without pretending to comprehend it, or to be able to 
judge of that which is infinitely high and divine, by that which takes place among 
creatures, with respect to generation, and father and son. 

God is said in scripture, to repent and be gi'ieved at his heart; to be angry, 
and to have his fury to come up in Ins face ; and hands, feet, eyes, mouth, lips 
and tongue, &c. are ascribed to him. These words are designed and suited to 
convey useful ideas, and important instruction to men. But if we should under- 
stand these expression as meaning the same tiling in the Divine Being, that tlicy 
do when applied to men; we must entertain very unwortliy, and most absui'd 
notions of God, and waoily inconsistent with other declarations in the sacred 
Oracles. But if we exclude eveiy tiling that is human, or that implies any change 
or imperfection from these expressioiiii when applied to the Deity, tiiey will con- 
vey nothing absurd or inconsistent, or that is unworthy of God. And it will 
doubtless be equally so in the cas^ before us ; if it be constantly kept in mind 
that the only begotten Son of God denotes nothing human, but is infinitely above 
any thing wliich relates to natural, or creature generation, and does not include 
any beginning, ciiange, dependence, inferiority, or imperfection. I'his will ef- 
fectually exclude all real absurdity and contradiction. 

It will be asked, perhaps, when all this is excluded from our ideas of genera- 
tion, of Father and Son, what idea will remain in our minds, which is conveyed 
by these words .' Will they not be without any signification to us, and altogether 
u.seless? To this, Iho following answer may be given: From wliat is reveided 
concerning this high :uid incomprehensible mj'sterj', we learn, that in the ex- 
istence of the Deity, Uiere is that which is high above our thoughts, as the hea- 
vens ai"e above tiie earth, hifinitely beyond our conception, and different from 
any thing which takes place among creatures, wlilch is a foundation of a per- 

• It has been lefoie observed, that the denial of the eternal jonshii) of Christ seemed to 
have a tendency to a rejection of the doctrine of the 'trinity; aiid in what way. But v.'liat is 
here observed, sliews how the denial of the former tends, another ■iu.i>. to the reiectiDn of the 
latter. For if the former be rejecad, because it is inconijirehensible, and appears iiiconsislent, it 
may be expected that when the doctrine of the Trinity is more p.uticularly considered, it will 
-appear equally unintelligible; and therefore be rejected, for the same reason. Is it nut ^>rob:i- 
ble, that Salieilius, the ancient Ajiti-triuitariaii, was in this uav led to give up the doctrine ut' 
the Trinity ? 

Vol.. I. g 



290 *rHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

Such like texts, notwithstanding his adhering, in other respectal^ 
to the common mode of speaking, relating to the eternal gene- 
ration of the Son^ and procession of the Holy Ghost. HiB 

soiial (liatinction, as. real and great as that between father and son among men, 
and Intinitely more perfect : which distinction may be in the best manner con- 
veyed to us by Father and Son, to express the most perfect union and equali- 
ty ; that the Sort is the brightness of the Father's glor}', and the express image of 
his person, and that there is mfinite love and endeannent between them ; and that 
in the economy of the work of redemption, the Son is obedient to the Father, &c. 
All thisj and much more, our minds are capable of conceiving from what is re- 
vealed on this high and important subject ; which is suited to impress our hearts 
with a sense of tlie incomprehensible, infinite, adorable perfection and glory of 
the Father and the Son ; and is necessary in ord^r to give us a right understand- 
ing of the gospel ; of the true character of the Redeemer, and of the work of re- 
demption 

What has been now said under this second particular, may serve to remove the 
other supposed difficulty in admitting the eternal filiation of the second person in 
the Trinity, ViZ. that it represents the Son as inferior to the Father, and as exist- 
ing after him, and therefore his existence had a beginning. This is obviated by 
the above obsCi'vations ; and particulax-ly by this, that it is a divine fliation, and 
therefore infinitely unlike that whicli is human ; and above our comprehension. 
Bewides, to suppose eternal generation admits of before or after, or of a begin- 
ning, is inconsistent. It rnay be further observed, 

3. That the opinion that Jgsus Christ is the first and only begotten Son of God, 
by the second person in the Trinity becoming incarnate, and miited to the human 
nature, is, periiaps, attended with as gi-eat difliculties as the other which has been 
considered, if not greater. If so, the inducement to embrace it, and reject tlie 
other, which we are examining, wholly ceases. 

If the Son was begotten by the miraculous formationof the human nature ; then 
the Holy Ghost begot the Son and is the Father, as much as the first person in the 
Trinity. For the angel said to the virgin, " The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, 
and tht- power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also tliat holy 
thing whicli shall be born of thee, sliall be calledthe Son of God." If we take these 
words as referring only to the production of the human nature, and if it be granted 
that by the highest, is meant the first person in the Trinity, of which there does 
ho> appear to be any evidence, yet the third person, the Holy Ghost, is repre- 
sented as doing as much, and being- as active in this production as the first per- 
son. But if this were no difhcuity, and the first person of the Trinity be suppo- 
sed to produce the human nature, and in this sense to be the Father of Jesus 
Christ ; yet this will make him his Father in no other and higher sense than he 
is the Father of angels, and of /Vdam ; and JeSus Christ will be the Son of God in 
no other, or higher sense than they; for they were created and formed in an eX; 
traO''dinary, mii-aculous way. 

11" the Son was begotten by unitmg the second person of the Trinity with the hu- 
man nature, and 'die filiation of the Son is supposed to consist wholly in being thus 
united io man ; this is attended with the following difficulties, as gi-eat, perhaps, 
if not greater, than those which attend the eternal Sonship of the second person. 

1. Til is is as different in nature and kind from natural or creature generation, 
as eternal divine generation ; and the one bears no analogy or likeness to the other. 

2. This union of God with the '.reature so as to become one person, is as mys- 
terious :ind incomprelien.sible, as the eternal Sonship of the second person of the 
Trinity! and as inexplicable: so that notliing is gained with respect to this, by- 
embraciiig- tliis scheme. 

3. Ic is not agreeable to scripture to suppose that the first per? on of the Trini- 
ty only, united the second person to the human nature, and so became a Father 
by thus beget ling a Son. The third person, the Holy Ghost, is represented as 
doing this, ot- at least, being active In it; and there is nothing expressly said of 
the first person doing any thing respecting it as such. " The Holy Ghost shail 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 291 

words are these * : " All that discourse which we have of the 
i-^ mission, and sending of the Holy Gijost, and hib proceeding 
*^ and coming forth from the Father and Son, for the ends 
" specified, John xiv. 26. and xv. 26. .md xvi. 7, 13. concerns 
*< not at all the eternal procession oi the Holy Ghost irom the 
'^ Father and Son, as to his diatinct p; rsonahty and subsistance, 
'•' but belongs to that ceconomy, or dispensation of the ministry, 
*^ that the whole Trinity proceedeth in, for the accomplishment 
" of the work of our salvation." 

Now if these scriptures, which are the chief in ail the New 
Testament, on which this doctrine is founded, are to be taken 
in this sense, how shall we find a suflicient proof, from other 
scriptures, of the procession of the Holy Ghost in any other 
sense ? Therefore, that we may farther explain this doctrine, 
let us consider, that whatever the Son, as Mediator, has pur- 
chased, as being sent by the Father for that end, is applied by 
the Holy Ghost, who therefore acts in subserviency to therri. 
This is generally called, by divines, the oeconprny of persons 
in the Godhead, which, because it is a word that we often use, 
when we consider the distinct works of the Father, Son, and 
Spirit, in their respective subserviency to one another, we shall 
take occasion briefly to explain, and shew how it may be ap- 
plied to them in that respect without inferring any inferiority 
as to what concerns their Personal glory. We shall say nothing 
concerning the derivation, or use, of the word oeconomy^ 
though we cannot forbear to mention^ with indignation, the 
sense which some of the opposers of the blessed Trinity have 
given of it, while laying aside all the rules of decency and re- 
verence, which this sacred mystery calls for, they represent 
us, as speaking of the family-government of the divine Per- 

* St^e Dr. Oiuen agahist Biddle,p. 362. 

come upon thee, and the pow^r of the Highest bhiill overshadow thee : therefore 
also, that holy thing which shall be bonrot thee, shall be called the Son of God." 
*' Now the birth ofJe.siis Chi-ist was on this wise. When his mother, Mar)-, was 
espoused to Joseph, before they came tfjgetliyr, siie 7uas found -with child of the 
Huly Ghost." And the- angel of the Lord sud unlo Joseph, " Fear not to take 
vinto thee Mary thy wife : For that -which is conceived iri her is of the Holy Ghost." 
Matt. i. 18, 20. And this uniting the divine nature with the human, is expressly 
ascribed, not to the first, but to llie second p-rson. " tor as much as the children 
are partakers of flesii and blood, he also himself took part of tiie >.anie. For veri- 
ly he took not on him the natui'e of angels ; but he took on kivi the seed of Abraham." 
Heb. ii. 14, 16. Do not they speak not only without scripture, but contrary to it, 
vi'ho say th.it the first person of the Trinity became a Father by imiting the se- 
cond person to the human nature, in the womb of the virgin Marv ; by w hich the 
latter became the only begotten Son of the Father ? That tlie relation oi Father 
and Son began in the incarnation of Christ, and consists wholly ni this .'' And do 
they by this supposition avoid any difficulty, and render the filiation of tlie Ile- 
''.ecmer more consistent, intelligible, or honourable to Imn .'' Let the thoughtful^ 
undid discevninij reader judge." 

Hopkins, 



292 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

sons, which is the most invidious sense they could put upon 
the word, and most remote from our design in the use of it^ 
NoN\r that we may explain and apply it to our present purpose, 
let it be considered, 

1. That all those works, which are the effects of the divine 
power, or sovereign will, are performed by ail the Persons in 
the Godhead, and attributed to them in scripture ; the reason 
wlnsrtcf is very evident, namely, because the power and will 
of God, and all other divine perfections, belong equally, and 
alike, to the Father, Son, and Spirit : if therefore that which 
produces these effects belongs to them, then the effects produ- 
ced must be equally ascribed to them ; so that the Father is 
no more said to create and govern the world, or to be the au- 
thor of all grace, and the fountain of blessedness, than the Son 
and Spirit. 

2. Nevertheless, since tlie Father, Son, and Spirit, are dis- 
tinct Persons, and so have distinct personal considerations in 
acting, it is necessary that their personal glory should be de- 
monstrated, or made known to us, that our faith and worship 
may be fixed on, and directed to them, in a distinct manner, 
as founded thereon. 

3. This distinction of the Persons in the Godhead cannot be 
known, as their eternal power or Deity is said to be, by the 
works of creation and providence, it being a doctrine of pure 
revelation ; therefore, 

4. We are given to understand, in scripture, when it treats 
of the great work of our salvation, that it is attributed first to 
the Father, then to the Son, as Mediator, receiving a commis- 
sion from him to redeem and save his people, and then to the 
Holy Ghost, acting in subserviency thereunto ; this is what 
we arc to understand when we speak of the distinct ceconomy of 
the Father, Son, and Spirit, which' I cannot better express 
than by considering of it as a divine determination, that the 
personal gloiy of the Father, Son, and Spirit, should be de- 
monstrated in such a way. Now, to instance in some particu- 
lar acts, or works ,• when a divine Person is represented in 
scripture as doing, or determining to do, any thing relating to 
the work of our redemption, or salvation, by another divine 
Person, who must, for that reason, be considered herein, as 
Mediator, it is to be understood of the Father, in this cecono- 
mic sense, inasmuch as, by this means, he demonstrates his 
personal glory : thus it is said, Eph. i. 4, 5. He^ i. e. the Fa- 
ther, hath chosen us in him^ nameh-, the Son ; and he is said to 
have predestinated us unto the adoption of children by yesufi 

' Christ. Though election and predestination are also applied 
to the Son and Spirit, when they have another reference cor- 
responding with the demonstration of their personal glory, yet, 



TflE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 293 

ill this place, they are only applied to the Father. And there 
are several other scriptures, in which things done are particu- 
larly applied to the P'avher for the same reason. Thus, 2 Cor. 
V. 18, 19. it is said, God hath recoficiiedus to himself by Jesus 
Christy and that he was hi Christy reconcilhig the xvorld to him- 
self; and, in 1 Cor. i. 30. it is said, Of him., namely the Fa- 
ther, are ye in Christ Jesus., xvho of God., that is, the Father, 
is made unto us wisdom., &c. in which, and several other scrip- 
tures to the same purpose, the Father is, in a peculiar manner, 
intended, because considered, as no other divine person is, as 
acting by the Mediator, or as glorifying the perfections of the 
divine nature, which belong to him, by what this great Me- 
diator did by his appointment. 

Moreover when a divine Person is considered as acting in 
subserviency to the Father's glory, or executing a commission 
relating to the work of redemption, Avhich he had received 
from him, and accordingly performing any act of obedience in 
an human nature assumed by bim for that purpose, this is pe- 
culiarly applied to, and designed to demonstrate the Son's 
Personal character, as belonging to no other Person in the God- 
head but him. Of this we have several instances in scripture ; 
thu^ though to judge the world be a branch of the divine glory, 
which is common to all the Persons in the Godhead ; yet there 
are some circumstances in the character of a divine Person in 
particular, who is denominated as Judge of quick and dead, 
that are applicable to none but the Son ; and so we are to un~ 
derstand that scripture, John v. 22. The Father judgeth no many 
but hath committed all judgment unto the So7i ; that is, the Son 
is the only Person in the Godhead who displays his Mediato- 
-riai character and glorv% as the Judge of the whole world; 
yet when there is another personal character ascribed to God, 
as the Judge of all; or when he is said to Judge the xuorld in 
righteousness., by that Man., to wit, our Lord Jesus, whom he 
hath ordained., as in Acts xvii. 31. then this personal character 
determines it to belong to the Father. 

Again, to give eternal life is a divine prerogative, and con- 
sequently belongs to all the Persons in the Godhead ; yet when 
a divine Person is said to give eternal life to a people, that 
were given to him for that purpose, and to have received pow- 
er, or authority, from another, to confer this privilege as Me- 
diator, then it is peculiarly applied to the Son : thus John xvii. 
2. Thou hast given hi?n power over all flesh., that he should 
give eternal life to as mayiy as thou hast given him. 

Moreover, when a divine Person is said to do any thing in 
subserviency to the Mediator ; or, as it is said, in John xvi. 
14. He shall glorify me ; for he shall receive of mine., and shall 
shexi} H unto vou, this h peculiarly applied to the Spirit. So 



a94 THK DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

when he is said to give his testimony to the mission, or work 
of the Mediator, by any divine works performed by him, this 
is pecvtliarly applied to him ; or when he is said to sanctify 
and comfort, or to seal and confirm believers unto the day ot 
redemption. Though these being divine works, are, for that 
reason, applicable to all the Persons in the Godhead; yet when 
he is said to perform them in a way of subserviency to Christ, 
as having purchased them, then his distinct personal character, 
taken from thence, is demonstrated, and so these works are es- 
pecially applied to him. This is what we understand by that 
peculiar ceconomy, or dispensation, which determines us to 
give distinct personal glory to each of the Persons in the God- 
head. 

And nov/ we are speaking of the Spirit, considered as acting, 
whereby he sets forth his Personal glory, we may observe, that, 
/in compliance with this way of speaking, the gifts and graces 
of the Spirit, are, by a metonymy, called the Spirit^ as in Acts 
xix. 2. when it is said, Have ye received the Holy Ghost ? They 
s.aid unto him^ We have not so viuch as heard xvhethcr there be 
finy Holy Ghost. We are not to understand it as though they 
had not heard whether there were such a Person as the Holy 
Ghost ; but thev had not heard that there was such an extraor- 
dinary dispensation of the gifts of the Holv Ghost conferred on 
men ; so John vii. 39. it is said. The Holy Ghost xvas Jiot yet 
given^ because Jesus was not yet glorified; the word given be- 
ing supplied in our translation, and not in the original ; it ought 
rather to be rendered, The Holy Ghost xvas not as yet ; by which 
we are to understand the gifts of the Holy Ghost, and not his 
Personality, which was from all eternity. 

And here we may farther observe, that when the Holy Ghost 
is spoken of as a Person, that word which denotes his Perso- 
nality, ought not to be rendered It^ but He, as expressive of 
his Personal character ; but when it is taken in a figurative 
sense, for the gifts or graces of the Spirit, then it should be 
translated It. This is sometimes observed in our translation of 
scripture; as in John xvi. 13. it is said of the Spirit, He xoill 
guide you into all truth, where the Personal character of the 
I Spit-it is expressly mentioned, as it ought to be : but it is not 
duly observed by our translators in every scripture ; Rom. viii. 
16. it is said. The Spirit itself heareth zvitness, which ought to 
have been rendered Himself; as also in ver. 26. The Spirit it- 
self Jnaketh intercession for us. The same ought to be observed 
in all other scriptures, whereby we may be led to put a just 
difterence between the Spirit, considered as a divine Person ; 
or as acting, or pi-oducing those effects, which are said to be 
wrought by him. 

7'hus concerning the Sonship of Christ, and the procession ot 



'^THE DOCTRINE Of THE TRINITY. 29S 

' tie Holy Ghost. What I have said, hi attempting to explain 
those scripture that treat of the Person of Christ, as God-man, 
Mediator, and of his inferiority, in that respect, (or as he is 
said to sustain that character) to the Father; as also those 
which speak of the subserviency of the Spirit, in acting, to the 
Fatiier and the Son, docs not, as I apprehend, run counter to the 
common faith of those who liave defended the doctrine of the 
ever blessed Trinity. Therefore I hope that when I call one the 
Sonship of Christ, and the other the procession of the Holy 
Cihost, this will not be deemed a new and strange doctrine. And 
I cannot but persuade myself, that what I have said concerning 
the Mediator, as acting in obedience to the Father, and the Spi- 
rit, in subserviency to him, will not be contested bv those who 
defend the doctrine of the Trinit}". And, if I have a little varied 
fi om the common way of speaking, I hope none will be offended 
at the acceptation of a word, especially since I have endeavour- 
ed to defend my sense thereof, by referring to many scriptures. 
And, if I cannot give into the common explication of the eter- 
nal generation of the Son, and the procession of the Holy Ghost, 
I am well satisfied I do no more than what many Christians 
do, M^ho have received the doctrine of the Trinity from the 
scripture, and are unacquainted with those modes of speaking 
which arc used in the schools : these appear as much to dislike 
them, when used in public discourses about this doctrine, as 
any other can do, what has been attempted to explain it in a 
different way. 

IV. We shall now proceed to consider the Godhead of th6 
Son, and Holy Ghost, as maintained in one of the answers we 
are explaining, by four general heads of argument. 

I. From those divine names which are given to them, that 
are peculiar to God alone. 

II. From their having the divine attributes ascribed to them, 
and consequently the divine nature. 

III. From their having manifested their divine glory, by 
those v/orks that none but God can perform. 

IV. From their having a right to divine worship, which none 
but God is worthy to receive. 

If these things be made to appear, we have all that we need 
contend for ; and it will be evident from thence, that the Son 
and Holy Ghost are God equal VN^ith the Father. These heads 
of argument we shall apply to them distinctly ; and, 

Firsts To the Son, wko appears to be God equal with the 
Father, 

I. From those divine names given to him, that are peculiar 
to God alone. And here we shall premise something concera- 
■ing the use of names given to persons, together with the de- 



296 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRlNlTf. 

sign thereof. Names are given to persons, as well as things, 
with a twofold design. 

1. Sometimes nothing else is intended thereby, but to dis- 
tingiiisli one from another, in which sense the names given are 
not in themselves significant, or expressive of any property, or 
quaiit} , in those that are so described. Thus most of those 
names we read of in scripture, though not ail of them, are de- 
signed onl}^ to distinguish one man from another, which is the 
most common use and design thereof; notwithstanding, 

2. The)^ are sometimes given to signify some property in 
those to whom they are applied, viz, what they should be, or 
do. Thus we have many instances, in scripture, of persons call- 
ed by names, which have had some special signification annex- 
ed to them, assigned as a reason of their being so called. Thus 
Adam had that name given him, because made of earth ; and 
Eve was so called, because she was the mother of all living. 
The same may be said concerning Seth, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, 
Jacob, Moses, Joshua, Samuel, and several others, whose re- 
spective names have a signification annexed to them, agreeable 
to the proper sense of the words, and the design of their being 
so called. 

And, to apply this to our present purpose, we may conclude, 
that when names are given to any divine Person, they are de- 
signed to express some excellency and perfection belonging to 
him ; and therefore v,e shall have sufficient reason to conclude 
the Son to be a divine Person, if we can make it appear that he 
has those names given to him in scripture, which are proper to 
God alone. And, 

1. The name Jehovah is given to him, which is peculiar to 
God. Here we shall prove, Firsts that the name Jehovah is pe- 
culiar to God. And, Secondly^ that it is ascribed to Christ. 

(1.) That the name Jehovah is peculiar to God, whereby he 
is distinguished from all creatures : thus it is said, Isa. xlii. 8. 
I am the Lordy or Jehovah, that is my name^ and my glory -will 
I not give to another ; or, as the text may be rendered, I am 
Jehovah^ that name of mine ^ and my glory ^ which is signified 
thereby, xuill I not give to another : therefore it follows, that it 
is an incommunicable name of God : and when he says, / xvill 
not give it to another^ it supposes that it necessarily belongs to 
him ; and therefore that he cannot give it to another, since that 
would be unbecoming himself; therefore this name, which is 
expressive of his glory in so peculiar a manner, is never given 
to any creature. 

There are other scriptures to this purpose, in which the name 
Jehovah is represented, as peculiar to God. Thus when the 
prophet Amos had been speaking of the glory of God, as dis- 
played in the works of creation and pro^ idence, he adds, tha 



THE DOCTRINE Or THE TR1NIT,Y. 29^ 

, the Lord^ or Jehovah, is his name^ chap. v. 8. So that those 
works, which are peculiar to God, miglit as well be applied to 
creatures, as that name Jehovah, which is agretable thereunto. 
And in chap. ix. 6. the prophet gives another magnificent de- 
scription of God, with respect to those works that are pecu- 
liar to him, when he says, It is he that buildeth his stories in 
the heaven^ and hath founded his troop in the earth ; he that 
Callethfor the -waters of the sea^ and ponreth them out upon the 
face of the earth ; and then he adds, the Lord^ or Jehovah, is 
his name. 

Again, it is said, in Psal. Ixxxiii. 18. That men may knorv^ 
that thou^ whose name alone is Jehovah^ art the most high over 
all the earth. Tliis is never said of any other divine names, 
which are, in a limited sense, sometimes given to creatures ; 
and, indeed, all creatures are expressly excluded from having a 
right hereunto. 

Again, there are other scriptures, in which this name Jeho- 
vah is applied to God, and an explication thereof sul^joined, 
which argues that it is peculiar to him. Thus when Moses de- 
sired of God, that he would let him know what his name was 
for the encouragement of the faith of the Israelites, to whom 
he sent him, Exod. iii. 13. q. d. he desires to know what are 
those divine glories, that would render him the object of faitlX 
and worship ; or how he might describe him in such a way tp 
the children of Israel, whereby they might express that reve- 
rence and regard to him, that was due to the great God, who 
sent him about so important an errand. In answer to v/hich 
God says, ver. 14. / AM THA T I AJII. Thus shalt thou saif 
tinto the children of Israel^ I AMh^th. sent me unto you ; which 
description of him doth not set forth one single perfection, but- 
all the perfections of the divine nature ; as though he should 
say, I am a God of infinite perfection ; and then he adds, in the 
following verse, Thoti shalt say unto the children of Israel^ The 
Lord^ or Jehovah, the God of your fathers hath sent me unto 
you; where Jehovah signifies the same v/ith / AM THAT I 
AM. And he adds. This is mij memorial unto all generations ; 
therefore this glorious name is certainly peculiar to God. 

What has been already observed, under this head, is suffi- 
cient to prove that the name Jehovah is proper to God alone. 
But we might hereunto add another argument, of less weight, 
which, though we do not lay that stress upon, as though it was 
sufficient of itself to prove this matter ; yet, being added to 
what has been already suggested, it may not be improper to be 
mentioned, viz. that the word Jehovah has no plural number, 
as b^ing never designed to signify any more than the one God; 
neither has it any empliatical particle affixed to it, as other 
words in the Hebrew language have : and particularly sev^ra} 

Vol. I. P p 



298 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

of the Other names of God, which distinguishes him from others, 
who have those names sometimes apphed to them ; and the 
reason of this is, because the name Jehovali is never given to 
any creature. 

And to this v/e might add, that since the Jews best under- 
stood their own language, they may, in some respects, be de- 
pended on, as to the sense they give of the word Jehovah ; and 
it is certain they paid the greatest regard to this name, even to 
superstition. Accordingly, they would never pronounce it ; but, 
instead thereof, use some other expressions, by which they de- 
scribe it. Sometimes they call it, that name^ or that glorious 
name^ or that name that is not to be expressed ; * by which they 
mean, as Josephus says,f that it was not lawful for them to ut- 
ter it, or, indeed, to write it, which, if any one presumed to do, 
they reckoned him not only guilty of profaneness, in an uncom- 
mon degree, but e^^en of blasphemy ; and therefore it is never 
found in any writings of human composui'e among them. The 
modern Jews, indeed, are not much to be regarded, as retain- 
ing the same veneration for this name ; but Onkelos, the author 
of the Chaldee paraphrase on some parts of scripture, who lived 
about fifty years after our Saviour's time, and Jonathan Ben- 
XJzziel, who is supposed to have lived as many years before it, 
never insert it in their writings ; and, doulotless, they were not 
the first that entertained these sentiments about it, but had other 
writings then extant, which gave occasion thereunto. Some 
critics conclude, from Jewish writers, that it was never pro- 
nounced, even in the earliest ages of the church, except by the 
High Priest ; and when he M^as obliged, by the divine law, to 
pronounce it, in the form of benediction, the people always ex- 
pressed an uncommon degree of reverence, either by boAving, 
or prostration ; but this is not supported by sufficient evidence. 
Others think it took its rise soon after their return from cap- 
tivity, which is more probable ; however, the reason they as- 
sign for it is, because they reckoned it God's incommunicable 
name. 

And here I cannot but observe, that the translators of the 
Greek version of the Old Testament, commonly called the 
LXX. which, if it be not altogether the same with that men- 
tioned by AristrTus, which was compiled almost three hundred 
years before the Christian -/£ra, is, without doubt, of consider- 
able antiquity : these never translate the word Jehovah, but, 
instead thereof, put Ky^/of, Lord ; \ and, even when it seems ab- 
surd not to do it, as in Exod. vi. 3. when it is said, by my 

* Ovofx-J avrnfcmnliv. j" Antiq. JAb. III. Cap. 5. 

i This tlie JTohi Ghost has condescended, fur -what reason Iknoio not, to give covn- 
tenavce to, in all those flotations in the JVno Testcnnent, xvhere the name J>.hovah, 
t'3 referred to from tile Old. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. ^9^ 

name, Jehovah, was I not known, they render it, by my name, 
the Lord, was I not known. § 

Tais we take occasion to observe, not as supposing it is a 
sufficient prooi" of- itself, of the argument we are maintaining, 
but as it corresponds with the sense of those scriptures before 
mentioned, by which it appears that this is the proper, or in- 
communicable, name of God. 

O'.jcct. It is objected, by the Anti-Trinitarians, that the name 
Jehovah is sometimes given to creatures, and consequently that 
it is not God's proper name ; nor docs it evince our Saviour's 
Deity, when given to him. To prove that it is sometimes given, 
to cr-atures, they refer to several scriptures ; as Exod. xvii. 15. 
where the altar that Moses erected is called Jehovah Nissi^ i. e. 
the Lord is my banner ; and, in Judges vi. 22. another altar 
that Gideon built, is called Jehovah Shallom ; and Gen. xxii. 
14. it is said, that Abraham called the name of the place, in 
which he was ready to offer Isaac, Jehovah J'lreh ; and, in 
Ezek. xlviii. 35. it is said, that Jerusalem, from that day, should 
be called Jehovah Shammah ; they add also, that the Ark was 
called Jehovah^ upon the occasion of its being candied up into 
the city of David, when it is said, Psal. xlvii. 5. The Lordy i. e. 
Jehovah is gone up ivith a nhout^ even the Lord zuith the sound 
of a trumpet^ and also on other occasions. And the name Je- 
hovah is often, in the Old Testament, given to angels, and 
therefore not proper to God alone. 

Ansxv. 1. When they pretend that the name Jehovah was 
given to inanimate things, and in particular to altars, as in the 
instance mentioned in the objection, that one of the altars was 
indeed called Jehovah Niss'i^ it is very unreasonable to suppose, 
that the name and glory of God was put upon it ; had it been 
a symbol of God's presence, it would not have been called by 
this name, especially in the same sense in which our Saviour and 
the Holy Spirit have it applied to them ; and therefore the 
meaning of this scripture, as I apprehend, is nothing but this, 
that there was an inscription written on the altar, containinj^- 
these words, Jehovah Nissi, the design whereof was to signify, 
to the faith of those who came to worship there, that the Lord 
was their banner : therefore this name, strictly speaking, was 

§ In ttvo places, indeed, it is rendered by ©soj, God, Gen. iv. 1. and Isa. liv. VJ. 
And there in one place in -tuluch some think they attempt a literal translation of it, 
f] Sam. i. 11. ivliere, instead of the people of (he Lord, tliey trmialate the text, i-a-t tct 
vk*c7 'louiTi, in -which, some think, 'louSi, is put for 'leva, or 'lotCst, through the iiusiuke 
of some amtinii^iisis ; but it seems rather to U- an e.rplication than a literal tra7isla- 
tion of tlxe -ivurdti ; and xuhereas sovie think;, the reason of this method med by them in 
their translation, is, because the Hebrew letters, rf which that name co7isists, cannoC 
well be expressed by the letters of tlie Greek alpliabei, so as to compose a word like it, 
tluit does not seem to be the reason of it, inasmuch as they attempt to translate otiier 
■names ef/i('fr''y difficult; as in G^,(. ,'.-. *;;, 'Iwx/, yir /.'.-«ci/;/ rtrrtl. 2 K;r^': J.r..?,. 
'IttSxifor Jclioiada. ' ' " 



dOO FHL DOCTllIiVn OF THE TRIKII'T* 

not given to the altar, but to God ; upon which some, not with- 
out good reason, render the word ; he built an altar, and called 
the name of it, tl>e altar of Jehovah Nissi. The same may be 
said with respect to the altar erected by Gideon, which was 
called Jehovah Shalom y or the altar of Jehovah Shalom^ to the 
end that all who came to offer sacrifice upon it, might hereby be 
put in mind that God was a God of peace, or would give peace 
to them. 

2. As for the place to wliich Abraham went to offer Isaac, 
which is called Jehovah-Jireh, it was the mount Moriah ; and 
it is certain that this was not known by, or whenever spoken of, 
mentioned, as having that name ; neither had Abraliam any 
right to apply to it any branch of the divine glory, as signified 
thereby J therefore when it is said, he called the name of the 
place Jehovah-Jireh, it is as though he should have said, let all 
that travel over this mountain know, that the Lord was seen, or 
provided a ram instead of Isaac, who was ready to be offered 
up ; let this place be remarkable, in future ages, for this amazing 
dispensation of providence, and let them glorify God for what 
was done here, and let the memory hereof be an encouragement 
to their faith. Or else we may farther consider him speaking as 
a prophet, and so the meaning is, this place shall be very re- 
markable in future ages, as it shall be the mount of vision ; 
here Jehovah v/ill eminentlv appear in his temple, which shall 
be built in this place. Or if you take the words in another 
sense, viz» God xvill provide^ it is as though he should say, as 
God has provided a ram to be offered instead of Isaac, so he 
will provide the Lamb of God, who is to take away the sin of 
the world, which was typified by Isaac's being offered. So that 
the place was not really called Jehovah ; but Abraham takes oc- 
casion, from what was done here, to magnify him, who appear- 
ed to him, and held his hand, whom alone he calls Jehovah. 

And to this we may add, that when Jerusalem is called Je- 
hovah Sharnmahy the Lord is there:, the meaning hereof is only 
this, that it shall eminently be said in succeeding ages of the 
Jiew Jerusalem, that the Lord is there; the city, which was com- 
monly knovVn by the name Jerusalem, is not called Jehovah, as 
though it had any character of divine glory put upon it ; but 
it implies, that the gospel church, which is signified thereby, 
should have the presence of God in an eminent degree ; or, as 
our Saviour promised to his disciples, Matth. xxviii. 20. that 
- he xvould be with them ahvays, eveTi unto the end of the world; 
and, as the result thereof, that the gates of hell shoidd not pre- 
vail against it J Matth. xvi. 18. 

3. As for the arl: ; it was not called Jehovah^ though the 
Psalmist takes occasion, from its being carried up into th'e city 
j*.f David, with a joyful solemnity, and an universal shouts with 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 3®| 

the sound of a trumpet, to foretel the triumphant and magnifi- 
cent ascension of our Saviour into heaven, which was typified 
hereby ; concerning whom he says, Jehovah is gone up ; or, 
speaking in a prophetic style, the present, or time past, being 
put for the time to come, it is as though he should say, the 
Lord, when he has completed the work of redemption on earth, 
will ascend into heaven, which shall be the foundation of uni- 
versal joy to the church ; and then he shall, as the Psalmist 
farther obse. ^es, reign over the heathen^ and sit on the throne 
of his holiness. 

Again, it does not appear that the ark was called Jehovah^ 
in Exod. xvi. ZZ^ 34. because, when Aaron is commanded to 
lay the pot full of manna before Ihe testvnony^xhsd. is, the ark^ 
this is called, a laying it before Jehovah : but the reason of the 
expression is this ; viz. God hath ordained that the mercy-seat 
over the ark should be the immediate seat of his residence, 
from whence he would condescend to converse with men, and 
accordingly he is said, elsewhere, to (hvell bctzueen the cheru- 
hims ; and, upon this account, that v/hich was laid up before the 
ark, might be said to be laid up before the Lord. 

But since none are so stupid to suppose that inanimate things 
can have the divine perfections belonging to them, therefore 
the principal thing contended for in this argument, is, that the 
ark was called Jehovah, because it was a sign and symbol of 
the divine presence ; and from thence they conclude, that the 
name of God may be applied to a person that has no right to 
the divine glory, as the sign is called by the, name of the thing 
signified thereby. 

To which it may be answered, that the ark was not only a sa- 
cramental sign of God's presence, for that many other things 
relating to ceremonial worship were ; but it was also the seat 
thereof : it was therefore the divine Majesty who was called 
Jehovah, and not the place of his residence ; and it was he a- 
lone to whom the glory was ascribed that is due to his name. 

4. When it is farther objected, that the name Jehovah is of- 
ten applied to angels, the answer that may be given to this is ,; 
that it is never ascribed to any but him, who is called, by way 
of eminence, the angel, or Messenger of the covenant^ viz. our 
Saviour, Mai. iii. 1. And whenever it is given to, him, such 
glorious things are spoken of him, or such acts of divine wor- 
ship demanded by and given to him, as argue him to be a di- 
vine Person ; as will plainly appear, if we consider what the an- 
gel that appeared, in Exod. iii. says concerning himself, ver. 6- 
J am the God of thy fathers^ the God of Abraham^ the God of I- 
sauc^ and the God of Jacob; and it is said, Moses hid his face^ 
for he zvas afraid to look upon God; and in verses 7, 8. The 
lord, or Jehovah, said^ I have surely seen the o^icfion of mij 



302 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

people that are in Egypt^ and I am come doxvn to deliver them ■: 
and ver. 10. / -will send thee unto Pharaoh ; and then, in the 
following verses, he makes mention of his name, as of the great 
"Jehovah^ the / AM^ who sent him. And Jacob gives divine 
worship to hirn, when he says, Gen. xlviii. 16. The Angei^ that 
redeemed me from all evil^ bless the lads. I might refer to many 
other scriptures, where the Angel of the Lord is said to appear, 
in which from the context, it is evident that it was a divine 
Person, and not a created angel. The most ancient Jewish wri- 
ters generally call him the Word^ of the Lord. 

But this will not properly be deemed a sufficient answer to 
the objection, inasmuch as it is not denied, that the Person, who 
so frequently appeared in the form of an angel, made use of 
such expressions, as can be applied to none but God ; therefore 
they say that he personated God, or spake after the manner of 
his representative, not designing that the glory of the divine 
perfections should be ascribed to him, but to Jehovah, whom he 
represented. 

To which it may be replied, that the angel appearing to Mo- 
ses, in the scripture before mentioned, and to several others, 
doth not signify himself to personate God, as doubtless he 
ought to have done, had he been only his representative, and 
not a divine Person ; as an embassador, when he speaks in the 
name of the king, whom he represents, always uses such modes 
of speaking, as that he may be understood to apply what he 
says when personating him, not to himself, but to him that sent 
him ; and it would be reckoned an affront to him, whom he re- 
presents, should he give occasion to any to ascribe the honour 
that belongs to his master to himself. Now there is nothing, in 
those texts, which speak of this angel's appearing, that signifies 
his disclaiming divine honour, as what did not belong to him, 
but to God ; therefore we must not suppose that he speaks in 
such a way as God doth, only as representing him : we read, in- 
deed, in Rev. xxii. 8, 9. of a created angel appearing to John, 
who was supposed by him, at the first, to be the same that ap- 
peared to the church of o]d, and accordingly John gave him di- 
vine honour ; but he refused to receive it, as knowing that this 
character, of being the divine representative, would not be a 
sufficient warrant for him to assume it to himself; we must there- 
fore from hence conclude, that the angel that appeared to the 
church of old, and is called Jehovah, was a divine Person. 

2. Having considered that the name Jehovah is peculiarly 
applied to God, we now proceed to prove that it is given to 
the Son, whereby his Deity will appear ; and the first scripture 
■ ' ■ ' I J , ' ■ 

* See Dr. AUix's judgment of the Jewish church against the Unitarians, chap. 
xiii. tu xvi. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. S03 

that we shall refer to is Isa. xl. 3. The voice of him that criefii 
in the rvilderness, prepare ye the way of the Lord^ or Jehovah, 
make Straight in the desert a highway for our God. Nov/ it" we 
can prove that this is a prophecy of John's preparing the way of 
our Saviour, then it will appear that our Saviour, in this scrip- 
ture, is called Jehovah. That it is a prediction of John's being 
Christ's fore-runner, appointed to prepare the Jews tor his re- 
ception, and to give them an intimation, that he, wiiom thej'' 
had long looked for, would suddenly appear, is plain from those 
scriptures in the New Testament, which expressly refer to this 
prediction, and explain it in this sense : thus Matth. iii. 3. This 
is he that xvas spoken of by the prophet Esaias^ sayings The 
voice of one crifing in the xvilderness^ Prepare ye the way of 
the Lord,, make his paths straight ; therefore he Avhose way 
John was to prepare, whom the prophet Isaias calls Jehovah, is 
our Saviour. 

Again, it is said, in Isa. viii. 13. Sanctify the Lord^ or Jeho- 
vah, of hosts himself and let him be your fear and your dread ; 
where he speaks of a person, whom he not only calls Jehovah, 
the Lord of hosts, which alone would prove him to be a divine 
Person ; but he farther considers him as the object of divine 
worship, Sanctify him^ and let him be your fear and your dread. 
Certainly, if we can prove this to be spoken of Christ, it will 
be a strong and convincing argument to evince his proper Dei- 
ty ; now that it is spoken of him, is very evident, if we compare 
it with the verse immediately following. And he shall be for a 
sanctuary^ which I would chuse to render, For he shall be for 
a sanctuary^ as the Hebrew particle Van^ which we render And^ 
is often rendered elsewhere, and so it is assigned as a reason 
why we should sanctify him ; and then it follows, though we 
are- obliged so to do, yet the Jews will not give that glory to 
him, for he will be to them for a stone of stumblings and for a 
rock of offence s as he shall be for a sanctuary to those that are 
faithful. That this is spoken of Christ, not only appears from 
the subject matter hereof, as it is only he that properly speaking, 
is said to be a rock of offence, or in whom the world was of- 
lended, by reason of his appearing in a low condition therein ; 
but, by comparing it with other scriptures, and particidarly Isa. 
xxviii. 16. Behold^ J^ ^^y ^"'^ Sion^ for a foundation^ a stone^ a 
tried stone,, a precious corner stone,, a sure foundation ; he that 
believeth shall not make haste,, this will more evidentl}^ appear. 
In the latter of these scriptures, he is stvled, a foundation stont , 
the rock on which his church is built ; in the former a burthen- 
some stone ; and both these scriptures are referred to, and ap- 
])lied to him, 1 Pet. ii. 6, 8. Wliercfore also it is contained in 
the scripture,, Behold,, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone,, elect,, 
precious ; and a^-tone of stmnbUng,, and a rock of offence to them 



304 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

that are duohedient ; where the apostle proves plainly, that our 
Saviour is the Person who is spoken of, in both these texts, by 
the prophet Isaiah, and consequently that he is Jehovah, whom 
we are to sanctify, and to make our fear and our dread. 

Again, there is another scripture, which plainly proves this, 
vi-z* Numb. xxi. 5, 6, 7. And the people spake against God^ and 
against Moses ; and the Lord sent Jierij serpents a,mong the peo- 
ple^ and they bit the people^ and much people of Israel died; 
therefore the people came to Moses ^ and said^ We have sinned^ 
for xve have spoken against the Lord^ or Jehovah, and ag inst 
thee. He, who is called God, in ver. 5. whom they spake against, 
is called Jehovah in ver. 7. who sent fiery serpents among them, 
that destroyed them, for their speaking against him; now tlvs 
is expressly applied to our Saviour by the apostle, 1 Cor. x. 9. " 
Neither let us tempt Christy as some of them also tempted^ and 
rvere destroyed of serpents. 

Again, the prophet Isaiah, having had a vision of the angels, 
adoring and ministering to that glorious Person, who is repre- 
sented, as sitting on a throne, in chap. vi. 1, 2. he reflects or- 
what he had seen in ver. 5. and expresses himself in these 
words. Mine eyes have seen the King^ the Lord^ or Jehovah, of 
of hosts. Now this is expressly applied to our Saviour, in John 
xii. 41. These things said Esaias^ when he saxo his glory ^ and 
spake of him ; where it is plain that he intends this vision ; as 
appeals from the foregoing verse, which refers to a part there- 
of, in which God foretels that he would blind the eyes, and har- 
den the hearts of the unbelieving Jews ; from whence it is evi- 
dent, that the Person who appeared to him, sitting on a throne, 
whom he calls Jehovah, was our Saviour. 

Again, this may farther be argued, from what is said in Isa. 
xlv. 21. to the end. There is no God else besides me^ a just God^ 
and a Saviour^ there is none besides me. Look unto me, and be ye 
saved, all the ends of the earth ; for I am God, and there is none 
else, I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth i7i 
righteousness, and shall not return, that unto me every knee shall 
borv, every tongue shall szvear. Surely, shall one say. In the Lord 
have I righteousness and strength ; even to him shall men come, 
and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed. In the 
Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified^ and shall glory. This 
is a glorious proof of our Saviour's Deity, not only from his 
being called Jehovah, but from several other divine characters 
ascribed to him ; thus the Person whom the prophet speaks of, 
stvles himself Jehovah, and adds, that there is no God besides 
me ; and he is represented as swearing by himself, which none 
ought to do but a divine Person ; and he encourages all the 
ends of the earth to look to him for salvation ; so that if it can 
be made appear that this is spoken of our Saviour, it v/ill be an 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. ^ftj 

undeniable proof oi his proper Dcitv, since nothing more can be 
said to express the glory ot" the Father than this. Now that 
these words are spoken of our Saviour, must be allowed by 
every one, vvho reads them impartially, for there are several 
things that agree with his character as Mediator ; as when all 
the ends of the earth are invited to look to him for salvation. 
We have a parallel scripture, which is plainly applied to him, 
in Isa. xi. 10. And in that day there shall be a root of yesse^ 
that is, the Messiah, who should spring from the root or stock* 
of Jesse ; which shall stand for an ensign to the people^ to if, 
or to him., shall the Gentiles seek., which is the same thing as for 
the ends of the earth to look to him ; and besides, the word look- 
ing to him is a metaphor, taken from a very remarkable type of 
this matter, to wit, Israel's looking to the brazen serpent for 
healing ; thus he, who is here spoken of, is represented as a Sa- 
viour, and as the object of faith. 

Again, he is represented as swearing by himself; and the 
subject matter of this oath is. That unto him every knee should 
bow., and every tongue should swear ; this is expressly applied 
to our Saviour, in the New Testament, as containing a pror 
phecy of his being the judge of the world, Rom. xiv. 10, 11, 
12, IVe shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ ; for ' 
it is written., As I live, saith the Lord., every knee shall bow to 
me, and every tongue shall confess to God; so then every one of 
us shall give an account of hiynself to God. And the same 
words are used, with a little variation, in Phil. ii. 10, 11. 
That at the name of Jesus every knee shoitld borv, of things in 
heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; and 
that every tongue should confess, that Jesus Christ is Lord, to 
the Glory of God the Father. 

Again, the person, of whom the prophet speaks, is one a- 
gainst whom the world was incensed, which can bo meant of 
none but Christ, as signifying the opposition that he should 
meet with, and the rage and fury that should be directed a- 
gainst him, when appearing in our nature. 

Again, he is said to be one in whom we have righteousness, 
and in whom the seed of Israel shall be justifed ; which very 
evidently agrees with the account we have oi: him in the New 
Testament, as a person by whose righteousness we are justi» 
fied, or whose righteousness is imputed to us for that end. 

And this leads us to consider another scripture, Jer. xxiii. 6. 
in which it is said. This is his name, zuhereby he shall be called. 
The Lord, or Jehovah, our righteousness. His being called our 
righti ousness, as was but now observed, implies, that the Mes- 
siah, our great Mediator, is the person spoken of, who is called 
Jehovah. But this is farther evinced from the context, inas^ 
much as it is siyd, ver. 5. Behold the daus come, viz, the Gosr 

Vol. I. Q q 



306 tHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRiNHry. 

pel day, that I rvill raise unto David a righteous branchy and (£ 
king shall reign and prosper ; and shall execute judgment and 
jnsticein the earth; which any one, who judges impartially of 
the sense of Scripture, will conclude to be spoken concerning 
our Saviour's erecting the gospel-dispensation, and being the 
sole lord and governor of his church. How the , exercise of 
his dominiojii over it proves his Deity, will be considered un- 
der a follo\v*ing head. Ail that we need to observe at present 
is, that this description is very agreeable to his character in 
Scripture, as Mediator; therefore he is called Jehovah in 
this verse. 

Object, 1. It is objected, that the words may be otherwise 
translated, viz. This is the narne^ -whereby the Lord our righ- 
feoM.y;2e.M, namely, the Father, shall call him. 

Ansxv. It may be replied^ that the Father is never called in 
Scripture, our righteousness as was but now observed; this 
being a character peculiar to the Mediator, as it is fully ex- 
plained in several places in the New Testament. As to what 
may be farther said, in answer to this objection, it is well 
known that the Hebrew word ns'ip-' signifies either ac- 
tively or passively, as it is differently pointed, the letters 
being the same ; and we shall not enter into a critical dis- 
quisition concerning the origin, or authenticity of the Hebrew 
points, to prove that our translation is just, rather than that 
mentioned in the objection; but shall have recourse to the 
context to prove it. Accordingly it appears from thence, that 
if it were translated according to the sense of the objectors, it 
would be little less than a tautology, q. d. I rvill raise 
to David a righteous branch ; and this is the name where- 
by Jehovah^ our righteousness^ shall call him^ viz. the 
Branch; so that at least, the sense of our translation of the text, 
seems more natural, as well as more agreeable to the gramma- 
tical construction observed in the Hebrew language, in which 
the words of a sentence are not so transposed as they are in the 
Greek and Latin, which they are supposed to be, in the sense 
of the text contained in this objection. 

Object. 2. It is farther objected ; that though our translation 
of the text were just, and Christ were called Jehovah, yet it 
will not prove his Deity, since it is said, in Jer. xxxiii. 16i 
speaking concerning the church, This is the name rvhereby she 
shall be called^ The Lord^ or Jehovah, our righteousness. 

Ansxv. It is evident from the context, that this is a parrallel 
scripture Avith that before mentioned ; the same person", to wit, 
the Branch, is spoken of and the same things predicted concern- 
ing the gospel church, that was to be governed by him. There- 
fore, though it is plain that our translators understood this text, 
as spoken of the church of the Jews or rather the Gospel-Church. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. ^Qf 

as many others do, yet, if we consider the sense of the Hebrew. 
words here used n*7 Nip"", it is very evident that they might, with 
equal, if not, with greater propriety, have been rendered, shall 
be called by her ; and so the sense is the same with that of the 
other but now mentioned ; the Branch, to wit, our Saviour, is 
to be called. The Lord our righteousness, and adored as such 
by the church. 

There is another scripture, in which our Saviour is called Je- 
hovah, in Joel ii. 27. And ye shall knoiv that I am the Lord^ 
viz. Jehovah, your God^ and none else; compared with ver. 32. 
And it shall come to pass^ that xvhosoever shall call on the name 
of the Lord^ viz. Jehovah, shall be delivered. In both these 
verses, it is evident, that our Saviour is called Jehovah ; for the 
person, who is so called, in the former of them, is said, ver. 
28. to Pour oat his Spirit on all jiesh ; &c. which Scripture is 
expressly referred to him, in Acts ii. 16, 17. and this pouring 
out of his Spirit on all flesh here predicted is also applied, in 
ver. 2>%. to him ; Therefore being by the right hand of God ex- 
alted^ and having received of the Father^ the promise of the 
Holij Ghost^ he hath shed forth this xvhich ye now see and hear. 
The argument is therefore this : he who was, according to this 
prophecy, to pour out his Spirit on all flesh, is called Jehovah, 
your God ; but this our Saviour is said to have done, there- 
fore the name Jehovah is jvistly applied to him. As to the lat- 
ter of these verses, viz. 32. Whosoever shall call on the name of 
the Lord shall be delivered ; this also is referred to, and explain- 
ed, as spoken of Christ, in Rom. x. 13. And that the apostle 
hei-e speaks of calling on the name of Christ, is plain, 
from the foregoing and following verses. In ver. 9. it is ex- 
pressed, by confessing the Lord Jesus, and it is there connected 
with salvation. And the apostle proceeds to consider, that, in 
order to our confessing, or calling on his name, it is necessary 
that Christ should be preached, ver. 14, 15. and he farther 
adds, in the following verses, that though Christ was preached, 
and his glory proclaimed in the gospel, yet the Jews believed 
not in him, and consequently called not on his name ; which 
was an accomplishment of what had been foretold by the pro- 
phet Isaiah, chap. liii. 1. Who hath believed our report^ &c. 
intimating that it was pi-edicted, that our Saviour should 
be rejected, and not be believed in by the Jews : so that 
it is very evident the apostle is speaking concerning him, 
and applying to him what is mentioned in this scripture, 
in the prophecy of Joel, in which he is called Jehovah ; 
therefore this glorious name belongs to him. Several other 
scriptures might have been referred to, to prove that Christ is 
called Jehoviih, which are also applied to him in the New-Tes- 
'tament, some of which mav be occasionally mentioned under 



Sdi^ tHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

s6me following arguments ; but, I think, what hath been al- 
ready said is abundantly sufficient to prove his Deity ,^ from his 
having this glorious name given to him j which leads us to con- 
sider some other names given to hin^ lor the proof thereof? 
accordingly, 

2. He is styled Lord and God, in such a sense, as plainly 
proves his proper Deity. We will not, indeed, deny, that the 
names Lord and God^ are sometimes given to creatures ; yet we 
ai'e not left without sufficient light, whereby we may plainly 
discern when they are applied to the one living and true God, 
and when not. To assert the contrary, would be to reflect on 
the wisdom and goodness of God; and it would not only ren- 
der those scriptures, in which they are contained, like the trum- 
pet, that gives an uncertain sound, but w^e should be in the great- 
est danger of being led aside into a most destructive mistake, in 
a matter of the highest importance, and hereby be induced to 
give that gloiy to the creature, which is due to God alone ; 
therefore we shall always find something, either in the text, or 
context, that evidently determines the sense of these names, 
whenever they are applied to God, or the creature. 

And here let it be observed, that whenever the Avord God or 
Lord is given to a creature, there is some diminutive character 
annexed to it, which plainly distinguishes it from the true God : 
thus when it is given to idols, it is intimated, that they are so 
called, or falsely esteemed to be gods by their deceived wor- 
shippers ', and so they are called strange gods, Deut. xxxii. 16- 
and molten gods, Exod. xxxiv. 17. and nev/ gods, Judges v. 
8. and their worshippers are reproved as brutish and foolish, 
Jer. X. 3. 

Again, when the word God, is applied to men, there is also 
something in the context, which implies, that whatever charac- 
ters of honour are given to them, yet they are subject to the di- 
vine controul ; as it is said, Psal. Ixxxii. 1, 6. God standeth in 
the co7igrcgation of the mighty he jiidgeth among the gods ; and 
they are at best but mortal men ; I have said ye aregods^ and all 
of you are children of the most high, but ye shall die like men; 
they are, indeed, described, as being made partakers of the di- 
vine image, consisting in some lesser branches of sovereignt}'- 
and dominion ; but this is infinitely belov/ the idea of sovereig^n- 
tv and dominion, which is contained in the v/ord when applied 
to the great God. 

It is ti-ue, God says to Moses, See, I have made thee a god 
to Phamoh, Exod. vii. 1. by v.hich we are not to understand 
that any of the divine perfections were communicated to, or 
predicated of him ; for God cannot give his glory to another : 
but the sense is plainly tiiis, that he was set in God's stead : 
{hns he is said to be inbtead of God to Aaron, chap. iv. 16, and 



iTHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 309 

the same expression is used by Elihu to Job, chap, xxxiii. 6. 
/ am according to thy xvish in God^s stead; so that Mosts's be- 
ing made a goa to Pharaoh, implies nothing else but this, that 
he should, by bemg God's minister, in inllicting the plagues 
which he designed to bring on Pharaoh and his servants, be 
rendered formidable to them ; not that he should have a right 
to receive divine honour irom them. 

Again, when the word God is put absolutely, without any 
additional character ot" glory, or diminution annexed to it, it 
must always be understood of the great God, this being that 
name by which he is generally known in scripture, and never 
otherwise applied, without an intimation given that he is not in- 
tended thereby : thus the Father and ihc Son are described in 
John i. 1. The Ward was xvith God^ and the Word was God^ and 
in many other places of scripture ; thetore it we can prove that 
our Saviour is called God in scripture, without any thing in 
the context tending to detract from the most known sense of 
the word, this will be sufficient to prove his proper Deity; but 
we shall not only find that he is called God therein ; but there 
are some additional glories annexed to that name, whereby this 
will more abundantly appear. 

As to the word Lord, though that is often applied to crea- 
tures, and is given to superiors by their subjects or servants, 
yet this is also sufficiently distinguished, when applied to a di- 
vine Person, from any other sense thereof, as applied to 
creatures. Now, if we can prove that our Saviour is called 
Lord and God in this sense, it will sufficiently evince his pro- 
per Deity ; and, in order hereto, we shall consider several scrip- 
tures, wherein he is not only so called, but several characters 
of glory are annexed, and divine honours given to him, which 
are due to none but a divine Person, which abundantly deter- 
mines the sense of these words, when applied to him. And, 

(1.) We shall consider some scriptures in which he is called 
Lordy particularly, Psal. ex. 1. The Lord said unto my Lord^ 
Sit thou at my right hand^ until I make thine enemies thy foot- 
stool ; that our Saviour the Messiah, is the person whom Da- 
vid calls his Lord, is very evident, from its being quoted and 
applied to him in the New Testament, in Mat. xxii. 44. ^c, 
and that by calling him Lord he ascribes divine honour to him, 
appears irom hence, that when the question was put to the Pha- 
risees, If Christ were David's Lord, how could he be his Son? 
They might easily have replied to it, had it been taken in a 
lower sense ,• for it is not difficult to suppose that David might 
have a son descending from him, who might, be advanced to 
the highest honours, short of what are divine; but they not 
understanding how two infinitely distant natures could be 
itnited in one person, so thfit auhc same time he should be call- 



olO THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

ed David's son, and yet his Lord, in such a sense as proves his 
Deity, they were confounded, and put to silence. 

But whether they acknowledged him to be a divine Person 
or no, it is evident that David considers him as such; or as the 
Person v/ho, pursuant to God's covenant made with him, was 
to sit and rule upon his tlirone, in whom alone it could be said 
that it should be perpetual, or that of his kingdom there should 
be no end ; and inasmuch as he says, ver. 3. Thy people shall 
he xvilling in the day of thy poxver^ speaking of the Person 
whom he calls his Lord, who was to be his Son, he plainly in- 
fers that he should exert divine power, and consequently prove 
himself to be a divine Person. 

Again, if the word Lord be applied to him, as denoting his 
sovereignty over the church, and his being the Governor of 
the world, this will be considered under the next head, when 
we speak concerning those glorious titles and attributes that are 
given to him, which prove his Deity ; and therefore we shali 
wave it at present, ar^d only consider two or three scriptures, in, 
which he is called Lord, in a more glorious sense than when it 
is applied to any creature : thus in Rev. xvii. 14. speaking of 
the Lamb, which is a character that can be applied to none but 
him, and that as Mediator, he is called Lord of lords, and the 
Prince of the kings of the earth, in Rev. i, 5. and the Lord of 
glory, in 1 Cor. ii. 8. which will be more particularly consider- 
ed, whenj we speak concerning his glorious titles, as an argu- 
ment to prove it ; therefore all that we shall observe at present 
is, that this is the same character by which God is acknow- 
ledged by those that deny our Saviour's Deity to be described 
in Deut. x. 17. The Lord your God, is God of gods, and Lord 
of lords ; a great God a)id terrible ; so that we have zs, 
much ground to conclude, when Christ is called Lord, with 
such additional marks of glory, of which more in its proper 
place, that this proves his Deity, as truly as the Deity of the 
Father is proved from this scripture. 

(2.) Christ is often in scripture called God, in such a sense, 
in which it is never applied to a creature ; thus he is called, in 
Psal. xlv. 6. Thy throne God, is for ever, and ever ; and 
there are many other glorious things spoken of him in that 
Psalm, which is a farther coniirmation that he, who is here call- 
ed God, is a divine Person, in the same sense as God the Fa- 
ther is ; particularly he is said, ver. 2. To he fairer than the 
children of men, that is, infinitely above them; and, ver. 11, 
speaking to the church, it is said. He is thy Lord, and worship 
thou him ; and, in the following verses, the church's compleat 
blessedness consists in its being brought into his palace, who is 
the King thereof, and so denotes him to be the spring and foun- 
tain of compleat blessedness, and his name^ or glory, is to be re-* 



TH^E DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 31 t 

member ed in all generations^ and the people shall praise him for 
ever and ever. This glory is ascribed to him, who is called 
God; and many other things are said concerning him, relating 
to his works, his victories, his tnimphs, which are ver\' agree- 
able to that character ; so that it evidently appears that the 
Person spoken of in this Psalm, is truly and properly God. 

I am sensible that the Anti-trinitarians will object to this, 
that several things are spoken concerning him in this Psalm, 
that argue his inferiority to the Father ; but this only proves 
that the Person here spoken of is considei-ed as God-man, 
Mediator, in which respect he is, in one nature, equal, and, 
ill the other, inferior to him ; were it otherwise, one expression 
contained in this Psalm would be inconsistent with, and con- 
tradictory to another. 

To this we shall only add, as an undeniable proof, that it is 
Christ that is here spoken of, as also that he is considered as 
Mediator, as but now observed ; that the apostle, speaking of 
him as Mediator, and displaying his divine glory as such, re- 
fers to these words of the Psalmist, Heb. i. 8. Unto the Son he 
saith, Thy throne^ God^ is for ever and ever ; a sceptre (^ 
righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. 

Again, another proof of our Saviour's Deit}^ may be taken 
from Matth, i. 23. Behold a virgin shall be xvith child^ and shall 
call his name Einmanuel^ -which being interpreted^ is, God with 
us. His incarnation is what gives occasion, as is plain from 
the words, for his being described by this name or character, 
God xvith us, which imports the same thing as when it is else- 
where said, John i. 14. The Word xuas made flesh, and dxvelt 
among us. This cannot lie applied to any but Christ ; to say 
the Father is called Emmanuel, is such a sti-ain upon the sense 
of the text, as no impartial reader will allow of; for it is plain 
that it is a name given to the Son upon this great occasion ; 
and this is as glorious a display of his Deit}^, as Avhen God the 
Father says, if we suppose that text to be spoken of him else- 
where, in Exod. xxix. 45. I xvill dwell amongst the children of 
Israel, and xvill be their God. 

Again, Christ's Deit}' is proved, in 1 Tim. iii. 16. fronn 
his being styled God, manifest in the flesh, implying, that the 
second Person in the Godhead was united to our nature ,* for 
neither the Father nor the Holy Ghost were ever said to be 
manifested in the flesh ; and, besides, he is distinguished from 
the Spirit, as justified by him. And he is not called God, be- 
cause of his incarnation, as some Socinian writers suppose ; 
for to be incarnate, supposes the pre-existence of that nature, 
to which the human nature was united, since it is called else- 
where, assuming, or taking flesh, as it is here, being mani- 
fested therein, and consequently that he was God before 'thi« 



'SlJi THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRlNtt7. 

act of incarnation ; and there is certainly nothing in the text 
which determines the word God to be taken in a less proper 
sense, any more than wlitn it i^ applied to the Father. 

Object, It is objected that the word God is not found in all 
the manuscripts of the Greek text, nor in some translations 
thereof, particularly the Syriac, Arabic, and vulgar Latin, 
which render it, the mystery which was manifest in the Jlesh^ 
&c. 

Ansxv. It is not pretended to be left out in above two Greek 
copies, and it is very unreasonable to oppose these to all the 
rest. As for the Syriac and Arabic translations; some sup- 
pose that it is not true in fact that the word God is left out in 
the Arabic, and though it be left out in the Syriac, yet it is" 
contained in the sense there, which is, gi'eat is the mystery of 
godliness that he was manifested in the flesh ; and as for the 
vulgar Latin version, that has not credit enough, especially 
among Protestants, to support it, when standing in competi- 
tion with so many copies of scripture in which the word is 
found ; therefore we can by no means give up the argument 
which is taken from this text to prove our Saviour's Deity. 
Besides as a farther confirmation hereof, we might appeal to 
the very words of the text itself, whereby it will pkini\ ap- 
pear, that if the word God be left out of it, the following part 
of the verse will not be so consistent with a mystery as it is 
with our Saviour ; particularly it is a very great impropriety 
of expression to say that a mystery, or as some Socinian wri- 
ters explain it, the will of God *, was manifest in the flesh, 
and received in a glorious manner; for this is not agre.'ible to 
the sense of the Greek words, since it is plain that «► <r^(>it s^"*"/""^*, 
which we render was manifest in the fleshy is justly translated, 
being never used in scripture to signify the preaching the gos- 
pel by weak mortal men, as they undei'stand it : but on the 
other hand it is often applied to the manifestation of our Sa^ 
viour in his incarnation, and is explained when it is said, John 
i. 14. that he was made fleshy and xve beheld his glory \ ; and as 
for the gospel, though it met with reception when preached to 
the Gentiles, and there were man)' circumstances of glory that 
attended this dispensation, yet it could not be said for that 
reason to be received up into glory. " Now since what is said 

* Vid. Catech. Racov. ad Quest. Ux. 

■j- Jt is eheivhere said concermiiff him, 1 John Hi- 5. (hat he -tixis manifested, &c. 
t:pa.vipai(»i, as also inver.H. And as for -uihut is said in the last clause of the verse 
ive are co7isi(k'iing, that he was received up into glory, it is a veij great stndn on 
the sense of these words, to apply it to a mystery, or to the gispel, sivce the toords, 
*.nMf% tvJo^n, plainly intimate a person's meeting with a glorious reception -when at- 
ceiiding into heuven; cLrxK%ij£-).W!J.ti, sej-ni^cs sursuin reciperc, therefore -toe ren- 
der it, received np ; and so it is often applied to our Saviour, Acts i. 2, 11, 22. and 
flfs ascension is called, Luke ix. 51. »^«p* t;;c «va,\!)v|w(, tUt time m which he shoithi, 
he received vp- 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 3X3- 

in this verse agrees to our Saviour, and not to tlie niystery of 
godliness, we are bound to conclude that he is God uiunjfest 
in the flesh, and therefore that this objection is of no force. 

The next scripture which we shall consider, is Acts xx. 28« 
Feed the church ofGod^ xohich he hath purchased with his Qxun 
bloody where we observe, that he who is here spoken of is said 
to have a propriety in the church ; this no mere creature can 
be said to havcj but our Saviour is not only here but elsewhere 
described as having a right to it; thus it is said in Hebrews 
iii. 3, 4, 6. Heivas counted xvorthij of more glory than Moses., 
inasmuch as he xvho hath builded the house^ hath more honour 
than the house; and he that hath built all things is God., which 
is as though he should say, our Lord Jesus Christ hath not 
only built his church but all things, and therefore must be 
God ; and ver. 6. he is called a Son over his own house ; so 
that he is the purchaser, the builder, and the j)roprictor of his 
church, and therefore must be a divine person ; and then it is 
observed, that he that hath purchased this church is God, and 
that God hath done this with his own blood ; this cannot be 
applied to any but the Mediator, the Son of Godj \viiose Deity 
jit plainly proves. 

Object. 1. Some object against this sense of the text, that the 
word (?Ci3^here is referred to the Father, and so the sense is^ 
feed the church of God, that is, of the Father, which He., that 
is, Christ, hath purchased with his own blood. 

Ansiv. To this it may be answered, that this seems a very 
great strain and force upon the grammatical sense of the words, 
for certainly He must refer to the immediate antecedent, and 
that is God, to wit, the Son. If such a method of expound- 
ing scripture were to be allowed, it would be an easy matter 
to make the word of God speak what we please to have it | 
therefore we must take it in the most plain and obvious sense, 
as that is which we have given of this text, whereby it ap- 
pears that God the Son has purchased the church with his own 
blood, and that he has a right to it. 

Object. 2. God the Father is said to have purchased the 
church by the blood of Christ, which is called his bipod, as he 
is the Proprietor of all things. 

Ansxv. Though God be the Proprietor of all things, yet no 
one, that does not labour very hard to maintain the cause he 
is defending, would understand his blood in this sense. Accord? 
ing to this method of speaking, God the Father might be said 
to have done every thing that the Mediator did, and so to 
have shed his blood upon the cross, as well as to have pur- 
chased the church thereby, as having a propriety in it. 

The next scripture, which proves our Saviour's Deity, i$ 
Rom. ix. 5. OfwhQmy as concerning the flesh., Christ came^ who 

Vol. r. ' R r 



314 XlIK DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

M over ally God blessed for ever; where he is not onlv calledf 
Gody but God blessed for ever ; which is a character too high 
for any creature, and is the very same that is given to the Fa- 
ther, in 2 Cor. xi. 31. who is styled, The God and Father of 
our Lord Jesiis Christy xvhich is blessed for everi7iore^ that is, 
not only the Object of worship, but the Fountain of blessed- 
ness. Now if Christ be so called, as it seems evident that he 
is, then the word God is, in this text, applied to him in the 
highest sense, so as to argue him a divine Person. Now that 
this is spoken of our Saviour, is plain, because he is the sub- 
ject of the proposition therein contained, and is considered, as 
being ofthefathers^ concerning' thefiesh^ i. e. with respect to 
his human nature ; so that if we can prove that he is here cal- 
led Gody blessed for ever, we shall have the argument we con- 
tend for, this being the only thing contested by the Anti-trini- 
tarians. 

Object. It is objected, that the words may be otherwise ren- 
dered, namely. Let God^ viz. the Father, ruho is over all^ he 
blessed for ever^ to wit, for this great privilege, that Christ 
should come in the flesh ; therefore it does not prove that which 
we bring it for. 

Anszv. I^ defence of our translation of these words, it may 
be replied, that it is very agreeable to the grammatical construc- 
tion thereof. It is true, Erasmus defends the other sense of 
the text, and thereby gives an handle to many after him, to 
make use of it, as an objection against this doctrine, which, 
he says, may be plainly proved from many other scriptures ; 
it is very strange, that, with one hand, he should build up, 
and, with the other, overthrow Christ's proper Deity, unless 
we attribute it to that affectation which he had in his temper 
to appear singuk»r, and, in many things, run counter to the 
common sense of mankind ; or else to the favourable thoughts 
which he appears to have had, in some instances, of the Arian 
scheme. It may be observed, that the most ancient versions 
render this text in the sense of our translation; as do most of 
the ancient fathers in their defence of the doctrine of the Tri- 
nity, as a late writer observes.* And it is certain, this sense 
given thereof by the Anti-trinitarians, is so apparently forced 
and strained, that some of the Socinians themselves, whose 
interest it was to have taken it therein, have not thought fit to 
insist on h. And a learned writer f , w ho has appeared in the 
Anti-trinitarian cause, seems to argue below himself, when he 
attempts to give a turn to this text, agreeable to his own- 
scheme ; for certainly he would have defended his sense of the 
text better than he does, had it been defensible ; since we can 
^■eceive very little conviction from his alleging, that " It is 

•' Se^ WIdtiu in loc. f See Dr. Claries reply to J\'c!^o?i,J>a^f 86, 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 315 

-' uncertain whether the word God was originally in the text; 
' and if it was, whether it be not spoken ot the Father." To 
say no more than this to it, is not to defend this sense of the 
text ; for if there were any doubt whether the word God was 
left out of any ancient manuscripts, he M^ould have obliged the 
world, had he referred to them, which, I think, no one else 
has done : and, since he supposes it uncertain whether it be 
not there s])oken of the Father, that ought to have been proved, 
or not suggested. We might observe, in defence of our trans- 
lation, that whenever the words are so used in the New Tes* 
tament, that they may be translated. Blessed he God*^ they are 
disposed in a different form, or order, and not exactly so as 
we read them therein : but, though this be a probable argu- 
ment, we will not insist on it, but shall rather prove our trans- 
lation to be just, from the connexion of the words, with what 
goes immediatelv before, where the apostle had been speaking 
of our Saviour, as descending from the fathers, according to 
the flesh, or considering him as to his human nature ; there- 
fore it is very reasonable to suppose he would speak of hiin as 
to his divine nature, especially since both these natures are 
spoken of together, in John i. 14. and elsewhere; and whv 
they should not be intended here, cannot well be accounted 
for; so that if our translation be only supposed to be equally 
just with theirs, which, I think, none pretend to deny, the con- 
nexion of the parts of the proposition laid down therein, de- 
termines the sense thereof in our favour. 

Here I cannot pass over that proof which we have of our 
Saviour's divinity, tn 1 John v. 20. This is the true God, and 
eternal life ; where the true God is opposed, not only to those 
idols, which, in the following verse, he advises them to keep 
themselves from ; in which sense the Anti-trinitarians them- 
selves €ometimes call him the true God, that is as much as to 
say, he is not an idol ; upon which occasion a learned writer j 
observes, that they deal with him as Judas did with our Sa- 
viour, cr}% Hail Master, and then betray him : thev would be 
thought to ascribe ever)' thing to him but proper Deity ; but 
that this belongs to him, will evidently appear, if we can prove 
that these words are spoken of him. It is true, the learned 
author of the scripture-doctrine of the Trinity j, takes a great 
deal of pains to prove that it is tlie Father who is here spoken 
of ; and his exposition of the former part of the text, which 
does not immediately support his cause, seems very just, when 
he says. The Son of God is come, and hath given ks an under- 
standings that xve may know him that is true, viz. the Father, 

* T/ius they are four times, Luke i. 68. 2 Cor. i. 5. Eph. i. 3. and 1 Pet. i. p. 
Tjherein iuKoy>no^ is put before Gtcf. ■\ Dr. 0\uen a^uhtst Biddle, page 256. 

^ See JJr. Clarke's repU) to J\'cLon.J>nje '97 



SIS THE DOCTRINE C)F THE TRINITY. 

and we are in him that is trucy speaking still of the Fathei*| 
by or through his Son Jesus Christ ; but, I humbly conceive, 
he does not acquit hiaiseil so v/ell in the sense he gives of the 
folloMdng words, upon which the whole stress of the argument 
depends, not only in that he takes it for granted, that the word 
«7oc, 77n'6', refers back, as is most natural and usual, not to the 
last word in order, but to the last and principal in sense, name- 
ly, the Father, which is^ at least, doubtful, since any unpre- 
judiced reader^ who hath not a cause to maintain, which obli- 
ges him to understand it so, would refer it to the immediate 
antecedent, viz. the Son, by whom we have an interest in the 
Father! for when he had been speaking of him as Mediator, 
and, as such, as the author of this great privilege, namely, our 
knowing the Father, and being in him, it seems veiy agreeable 
to describe him as a Person every way qualified for this work^ 
and consequently as being the true God; and besides, the 
apostlls had spoken of the Father in the beginning of the verse, 
as him that is true^ or, as some manuscripts have it, Ai»i that 
is the true God^ as the same author observes ; therefore what 
reason can be assigned why this should be again repeated, and 
the apostle supposed to say we know the Father, who is the 
true God, which certainly doth not run so smooth^ to say the 
best of it, as when we apply it to our Saviour: that author, in- 
deed, attempts to remove the impropriety of the expression, 
by giving an uncommon sense of these words, namely. This 
knowledge of God is the true religioji^ and the way to eternal 
life; or, this is the true -worship of God by his Son unto eter^ 
nal life, which, though it be a truth, yet can hardly be sup- 
posed to comport with the grammatical sense of the words ^ for 
why should the true God be taken in a proper sense in one part 
of the verse, and a figurative in the other ? And if we take this 
liberty of supposing ellipses in texts, and suppl3dng them with 
words that make to our own purpose, it would be no difficult 
matter to prove almost any doctrine from scripture ; therefore 
the plain sense of the text is, that our Saviour is the true God 
intended in these M'ords ; and it is as evident a proof of his 
Deity, as when the Father is called, the true God; or the only 
true God, as he is in John xvii. 3. where, though he be so call- 
ed, nevertheless he is not to be considered as the only Per- 
son wli j 1-. God, in the most pi"oper sense, but as having the 
one divine nature ,• in which sense the word God is alwa}'s ta- 
ken, vTf '> C- od is said to be one. 

Moreover, let it be observed, that he who is here called the 
true God, is styled, life eternal^ which, I humbly conceive, the 
Father never is, though he be said to give us eternal life^ in one 
of the foregoing verses ; whereas it is not only said concerning 
our Saviour, that z;z him was life^ John i. 4. but he says, John 



THE DOCTRINE OF 



TlIE TRINITY. 317 



XIV, 6. / am the life ; and it is said iy 1 John i. 2. The life xvas 
manifested^ and ive have seen it^ or him, and shew unto you that 
eternal life^ ivhich -was xvith the Father^ W^ '^»'' ""''s/i* which is 
an explication of his own words, John i. l . w^oc tw e^oy witit. 
God; and then he explains what he had said in v^er. 14. of the 
same chapter, when he says, the word of life ^ or the Person who 
calls himself the lifew^xs manifested UJito us ; which seems to be 
a j^eculiar phrase, used b}- this apostle, whereby he sets forth 
our Saviour's glory under this character, whom he calls life^ or 
eternal life ; and he that is so, is the same Person, who is call- 
ed the true God ; which character of being true., is often used 
and applied to Christ, by the same inspired writer, more than 
by ar.y other, as appears from several scriptures, Rev. iii. 17, 
14, and chap. xix. 11. and though, indeed, it refers to him, as 
JMediator, as does also his being called eternal life^ yet this 
agrees very well with his proper Deity, which we cannot but 
think to be plainly evinced by this text. 

There is another scripture, which not only speaks of Christ 
as God, but with some other divine characters of glorj' added 
to his name, which prove his proper Deity : thus in Isa. ix. 6. 
he is styled, the mig-hty God., and several other glorious titles 
are given to him ; as, the wonderful Counsellor^ the everlasting' 
Father., the Prince of peace ; these are all applied to him, as 
one whose incarnation was foretold, to us a Child is born., &c. 
And he is farther described as a Person who was to be the 
Governor of his church, as it is said, the government shall he 
upon his shoulders ; all which expressions so exactly agree with 
his character as God-man, Mediator, that they contain an evi- 
dent proof of his proper Deity. 

Object, They who deny our Saviour's Deity, object, that the 
words ought to be otherwise translated, viz. the wonderfd 
Counsellor., the mighty God^ the everlasting Father., shall call 
him., the Prince of peace, 

Antrv. We have before observed, in defence of our transla- 
tion of another text, * that the Hebrew word, that we translate, 
he shall be called., (which is the same with that which is used in 
this text) does not fully appear to signify actively ; and also 
that such transpositions, as are, both there and here, made use 
of, are not agreeable to that language ; and therefore our sense 
of the text is so plain and natural, that any one, who reads it 
impartially, without forcing it to speak what they would have 
it, would take it in the sense in which we translate it, which 
contains a very evident proof of our Saviour's divinit)'. 

There is another scripture which speaks of Christ, not only as 
God, but as the great God., in Tit. ii. 13. Looking for that bles^ 

* See Pn^e307. 



;"5l8 ^riiE doctrine of the trikity. 

sed hope^ and the glorious appearing of the great God^ and our 
Saviour Jesus Christ ; none ever denied that he, who is said to 
appear^ is true and pi-oper God, and theiefore the principal 
thing we have to pro\'e is, that the text refers only to our Sa- 
viour, or that the apostle does not speak therein of two Persons, 
to wit, the Father and the Son, but of the Son ; and according- 
ly, though we oftentimes take occasion to vindicate our trans- 
lation, here vfc cannot but think it ought to be corrected ; and 
that the word and should be rendered even : * But, because I 
would not lay too great a stress on a grammatical criticism, 
how probable soever it may be ; we ma}' consider some other 
things in the text, whereby it appears that our Saviour is the 
only Person spoken of therein, from what is said bf him, agree- 
able to his character as Mediator : thus the apostle here speaks 
of his appearing ; as he also does elsewhere, in Heb. ix. 28. 
He shall appear the second time tvithout sin unto salvation ; and 
in 1 John iii. 2. When he shall appear^ roe shall be like hini^ &c. 
and then he who, in this text, is said to appear, is called the 
blessed hope^ that is, the object of his people's expectation, who 
shall be blessed b}- him when he appears : thus he is called, in 
1 Tim. u 1. our hope., and in Coloss. i. 27. The hope of glory ; 
now we do not find that the Father is described in scripture as 
appearing, or as the hope of his^people. It is.true, a late writer f 
gives that turn to the text, and supposes, that as the Father is 
said to judge the world by Jesus Christ, and as when the Son 
shall come at last, it will be in the glory of his Father ; so, in 
that sense, the Father may be said to appear by him, as the 
brightness of his ^oxy shines forth in his appearance. But 
since this is no where applied to the sense of those other scrip- 
tures, which speak of every eye's seeing him in his human na- 

* It is certain, that x*i is oftentimes exegetical, as -luell as copulative ; tmd it ap- 
pears to be so, by a great many instances in tlie J\''e'iv Testament ; -when it is put be- 
txoeen two nouns, the first ivhereof has an article, and Hie otJier none,- thus it will be 
acknowledged by all, that it is taken, in 2 Cor. i. 3. Blessed be God, even the Fa- 
tlier of our Loi-d Jesus Christ, o Qioc xau Tlsilip; so in Eph. i. 3. 2 Thes. ii. 16. 
1. Pet. i. 3. Rom. xv. 6. Phil. iv. 20. 2 Cor. xi. 31. and in Col. ii. 2. Jn these scnp- 
iiircR, and others of the like nature, the ..irians themselves allow that this ride holds 
good, though they will not allow it, when it pro^^es ovr Saitiour's Deity, because it 
militates against their own scheme ; as in Eph. v. .5. wltere the apostle speaks of the 
kingdom of Christ, and of God, as we render it ; hut, I think, it oughi to be ren- 
dered, even of God ;ybr it is, tx Xft^a khi Qm so in 2 Tliess. i. 12. The grace of our 
God, and, or even, of the Lord Jesus Christ, the words are, tk ©as M/ua>v km unpin 
'l^KTtt Xpim. See among many other scriptures to the like purpose, 1 Tim. v. 21. and 
chap. vi. 1;1. 2 Pet. i. 2. It is true there are sei^ei^al exceptions to this rule, though they 
are generally in such instances, in which it is impossible for the latter word to con- 
tain ail explication of the former, thot/gh, in other instances, it, for the most 
part, holds good; and tlierefore it will, at least, amount to a probable argument, that 
the words in this text, t* f/.iyctxov 6«( x«/ a-m'Tiipo; n/um 'I)f«r» X/>«» ought to be render- 
ed, of the great God, even our Saviour Jesiis Christ. Vide Granville Sharp on 
the Greek article, and Middletr/n on the sajne subject. f See Dr. Clark's reply 
in JK'elson, page 85. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. SlSl 

tare, aiid plainly refer to some glories that shall be put upon 
that nature, which shall be the object of sense ; why should we 
sav that the text imports nothing else but that the Father shall 
appear in liis appearing, which is such a strain upon the sense of 
the words, that they who make use of it would not allow of, in 
other cases ? I might have added, as a farther confirmation of 
the sense we have given of this text, its agreeableness with what 
the apostle says, in Tit. ii. 10. when he calls the gospel, Iho 
doctrine of God oiir Saviour^ and with what immediately fol- 
lows in ver. 14. where, having before described him as our Sa- 
viour, he proceeds to shew wherein he was so, namely, by giv^ 
ing himaelf fot- tis\ that he might redeem us from all iniquity ; 
and he is not only called God our Saviour by this apostle, but 
lie is so called in 2 Pet. i. 1. where the church is said to have 
obtained like precious faith^ through the righteousness ofGod^ 
and our Saviour fesus Christ; or as the marginal reading has 
it, of our God and Saviour ; this seems to be so just a reading 
of the text we are considering, that some, on the other side of 
the question, allow that the words will very well bear it ; but they 
think their sense agreeable, as the author but now mentioned 
says, to the, whole tenor of Scripture, which is little other than a 
boast, as though the scripture favoured their scheme of doc- 
trine, which, whether it does or no, they, who consider the ar- 
guments on both sides, may judge; and we think, we have as 
much reason to conclude that our sense of the words, which es- 
tablishes the doctrine of our Saviour's being the great God, is 
agreeable to the whole tenor of scripture ; but, passing that 
over, we proceed to another argument. 

There is one scripture in which our Saviour is called both. 
Lord and God^ viz. John xx. 28. And Thomas answered and 
said unto him. My Lord, and my God. The manner of address 
to our Saviour, in these words, implies an act of adoration, giv- 
en to him ,by this disciple, upon his having received a convic- 
tion of his resurrection from the dead ; and there is nothing iu 
the text, but what imports his right to the same glory which be- 
longs tp the Father, when He is called his people's God. Here- 
in they lay claim to him, as their covenant God, their chief 
good and happiness ; thus David expresses himself, Psal. xxxi. 
14. I trusted in thee, Lord, I said thou art mi^ God; and 
God promises, in Hos. ii. 23. that he would say to them which 
were not his people, Tho^i art viy God; and chap. viii. 2. Israel 
shall cry unto 7ne, My God %ve knoiv thee; and the apostle Paul 
speaking of the Father, says, Phil. iv. 19. My God shall sup- 
ply all your need, Jkc. that is, the God from whom I have all 
supplies of grace ; the God whom I worship, to whom I owe 
all I have, or hope for, who is the Fountain of all blessedness. 
Now if there be nothing in this text we are considering, that 



520 THli, DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

determines the wofds to be taken in a lower sense than this, as 
there does not appear to be, then W€ are bound to conclude, 
that Christ's Deity is fully proved froiti it. 

Object. Some of the Socinians suppose, that the words, my 
Lordy and my God^ contain a form of exclamation, or admira- 
tion ; and that Thomas was surprized when he was convinced 
tliat our Saviour was risen from the dead, and so cries out, as 
one in a rapture, my Lord! my God! intending hereby the 
Father, to whose power aloue this event was owing. 

Amxu. Such exclamations as these, though often used in com- 
inon conversation, and sometimes without that due regard to 
the divine Majesty, that ought to attend them, arfe not agree- 
able to the scripture way of speaking. But, if any scriptures 
might be produced to justify it, it is sufficiently evident, that 
no such thing is intended in these words, not only because the 
grammatical construction will not admit of it,* but because the 
Avords are brought in as a reply to what Christ had spoken to 
him in the foregoing verse ; Thomas ansxvered and said unto 
him^ My Lord^ &c. whereas it is very absurd to suppose, that 
an exclamation contains the form of a reply, therefore it must 
he taken for an explicit acknowledgment of him, as his Lord, and 
his God ; so that this objection represents the words so contrary 
to the known acceptation thereof, that many of the Socinians 
themselves, and other late writers, who oppose our Saviour's 
proper Deity, do not think fit to insist on it, but haye recourse 
CO some other methods, to account for those difficulties, that 
lie in their way, taken from this, and other texts, where Christ 
is plainly called God, as in John i. 1. and many other places in 
the New Testament. 

Here we may take occasion to consider the method which 
the Anti-trinitarians use to account for the sense of those scrip- 
tures, in which Christ is called God. And, 

1. Some have have recourse to a critical remark, which they 
make on the word Skc God^ namely, that when it has the arti- 
cle before it, it adds an emphasis to the sense thereof, and 
determines it to be applied to the Father. And inasmuch as 
the word is sometimes applied to him, when there is no article, 
(which, to some, would appear an objection, sufficient to invali- 
date this remark) they add, that it is always to be applied to 
him, if there be nothing in the text that determines it other- 
wise. This remai'k was first made by Origen, and afterwards 
largely insisted on by Eusebius, as Dr. Clarke observes jf and 
he so far gives into it, as that he apprehends it is never applied. 

• The v/ords, Kupto; and Que are in the nominative case, which denote t that 
they are not spoken in a toay of exclamation. 

i ,SV.» fepfy to JVelson, pnge 67. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITV. 

when put absolutely in scripture, to ariy other Person ; we shall 
therefore enquire into the justice thereof. 

By the word God absolutely taken, (whether 0<oc have an ar- 
ticle before it or no) we understand nothing else but its being 
used without any thing to determine its application, either to 
the Father, Son, or Holy Ghost ; whereas, on the other hand, 
when it is not absolutely used, there are several things, by which 
we may certainly know to which of the divine persons it be- 
longs : thus it is particularly applied to the Father, when there 
is something in the text that distinguishes him from the Son or 
Spirit; so John xiv. 1. Te believe in God^ tyzz. the Father, be^ 
lieve also in me ; and in all those scriptures, in which Christ i^ 
called the Son of God, there the word God is determined to he 
applied to the Father ; and when God is said to act in relation to 
Christ as Mediator, as in Heb. ii. 13. Behold^ I and the\hUdr€n 
■which God hath given me^ it is so applied. 

And the word God is determined to be applied to the Son, 
when he is particularly mentioned, and so called, or described, 
by any of his Mediatorial works or characters ; as in Matt. i» 
23. God^ viz, the Son, with lis ; and 1 Tim. iii. 16. God jjiani- 
fest in the Jlcsh ; or when there is any thing in the context, 
which discovers that the word God is to be applied to him. ■' 

Also, with respect to the Holy Ghost, when any of his Per- 
sonal works, or characters, are mentioned in the text or con- 
text, and the word God applied to him, to whom they are ascri» 
bed, that determines it to belong to the Holy Ghost ; as in Acts 
V. 3, 4. speaking concerning lying to the Holy Ghost, it is ex- 
plained. Thou hast not lyed unto men, but unto God ; and 1 Cor, 
iii. 16. Know ye not that ije are the temple of God, and that the 
Spirit of God dwelleth in you; but more of this when we speak 
of the Deity of the Holy Ghost. In these, and such like cases^ 
the word God is not put absolutely ; but, on the other hand, it 
is put absolutely when there is nothing of this nature to deter- 
mine its application ; as in those scriptures that speak of the 
divine Unity, viz. in Matt. xix. 17. There is none good but 
one, that is God; and in 1 Cor. viii. 4. There is no72e other God 
but one; and in James ii. 19. Thou believest that there is one 
God, &c. and John x. 33. Thou, being a man, mcfkcst thyself 
God; and in many other places of the like nature, in which there 
is an idea contained of the divine perfections ; but it is not par- 
ticularly determined which of the Persons in the Godhead is 
intended thereby. 

This is what we are to understand by the word St^c^ God^ be- 
ing put absolutely without any regard to its having an article 
before it, or not;, from whence nothing certain can be detcr- 
inined concerning the particular application thereof, since many 
scriptures might easily be referred to, in which it is puV without 

Vol,. I. S s ■ ■ ' 



322 THE DOCTRIKE OF THE TRINITY. 

an article, though applied to the Father; and, on the other hand, 
it has very often an article put before it v/hen applied to idols, 
or false gods ; * and the devil is called, « &«« tk cuam tk7«, the god 
of this world; and it may be obsei-ved, that in two evangelists,! 
referring to the same thing, and using the same words, one has 
the word with an article, and the other without. 

Therefore, setting aside this critical remark about the appli- 
cation of the word God^ when there is an article before ^mc^ the 
main thing in controversy is how we are to apply it, when neither 
the context, nor any of the rules above-mentioned, give us any 
direction, therein, namely, whether it is in that case only to be 
applied to the Father, or indifferently to any of the Persons in 
the Godhead. The author above-mentioned, in his scripture- 
doctrine of the Trinity, always applies it to the Father ; and it 
may easily be perceived, that he has no other reason than this 
to apply many scriptures to the Father, which others, who have 
defended the doctrine of the Trinity, in another way, apply to 
the Son, as being directed herein by something spoken of him 
in the context, as in Rev. xix. 4, 5, 6, 17.:): 

And this is, indeed, the method used by all the Anti-trinita- 
rians, in applying the word God^ especially when found abso- 
lutely in scripture. That which principally induces them here- 
unto, is because they take it for granted, that as there is but one 
divine Being, so there is but one Person who is truly and pro- 
perly divine,§ and that is the Father, to whom they take it for 
granted that the word God is to be applied in scripture to sig- 
nify any finite being, as the Son, or any creature below him. 
J3ut this supposition is not sufficiently proved, viz. that the one 
divine Being is a person, and that this is only the Father, whom 
they oiten call the supreme, or most high God, that is, superior^ 
*when compared Avith the Son and Spirit, as well as all crea- 
tures ; but this we cannot allow of, and therefore cannot see 
sufficient leason to conclude, that the word God^ when put ab- 
solutely, is to be applied to no other than the Father. 

That which I would humbly offer, as the sense of the word, 
when thus found in scripture, is, that when the Holy Ghost has 
left it undetermined, it is our safest wav to consider it as such, 
and so to apply it indifferently to the Father, Son, or Spirit, 
and not to one person, exclusive of the others : thus when it is 
said, Mark xii. 29, 32. The Lord our God is one Lord; and there 
is one God^ and there is none other but him ; the meaning is, 

• Acts \\\. 43. chap. xiv. 11. j- See C\Tatt. xix. 26. compare d with Mark X. 27- 
t See Scripture- Jnct ri7ie, &c. page 67, 68, and in many other places. 
§ This is the sense of Dr. Clarke's first section in Part 2, on -which the -whole 
scheme seems to be founded ; and he tpeaks to the same p^trpose in several oi/ier pla- 
ces ; and, in particular, in his reply to J^'elson, page 6t, 68, he concludes the -word 
6mc, God, absolutely taken to import the same, as o TrdvloxpoLrup or o ^i iritvlctv 0eoc, hy 
■which he ahuatjfs intends the Fi-ther. 



TUE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 3.23 

that there is but one divine Being, who is called God, as oppo- 
sed to the creature, or to all who are not God by nature : thus 
when the unity of the Godhead is asserted in that scripture here 
referred to, Deut. vi. 4. and Israel was exhorted to serve him^ 
they are, at the same time, forbidden to go after other gods^ 
ver. 13, 14. And when it is said, that to love the Lord with all 
our heart, soul, mind, and strength, is more than all burnt-ofter- 
ing and sacrifices, Mark xii. 33. it implies, that religious wor- 
ship was performed to God ; but it is certain that this was per- 
formed to all the Persons in the Godhead ; therefore none of 
them are excluded in this scripture, in which the unity of God 
is asserted. And however Dr. Clarke concludes Athanasius, 
from his unguarded way of speaking, in some other instances, 
to be of his side ; yet, in that very place, which he refers to,* 
he expressly says, that when the scripture saith the Father is 
the only God, and that there is one God^ and / am the Firsts 
and the Last ; yet this does not destroy the divinity of the Son, 
for he is that one God, and first and only God, ^c. And the 
same thing may be said of the Holy Ghost. 

Again, when it is said. Mat. xix. 17. There is none good but 
oney that is God; it implies, that the divine nature, which is pre- 
dicated of all the persons in the God-head, hath those perfec- 
tions that are essential to it, and particularly that goodness by 
which God is denominated AU-suificient : so in Acts xv. 18. 
■when it is said. Known unto God are all his xvorks ; where the 
word God is absolute, and not in a determinate sense, applied 
either to Father, Son, or Spirit, the meaning is, that all the Per- 
sons in the Godhead created all things, which they are expressly 
said to do in several scriptures, and, as the consequence thereof, 
that they have a right to all things, which are known unto them. 

Object. It will probably be objected to this, that we assert 
that there are four divine Persons, namely, the Father, Son, and 
Holy Ghost, and the Godhead which is common to them all, 
since we call it God^ which word in other instances, connotes a 
personal character ; and, if so, then it will follow, that we are 
chargeable with a contradiction in terms, when we say that 
there are three Persons in the Godhead, vi-z. in one Person. 

Anszu. To this it may be replied, that though the divine na- 
ture, which is common to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, is 
represented, in scripture, as though it were a Person, when it 
is called God, yet it is to be taken in a metaphorical sense ; 
whereas the Father, Son, and Spirit, as has been before con- 
sidered, are called Divine Persons properly, or without a meta- 
phor.f Moreover, the divine nature, though it be called God, 
is never considered as co-ordinate with, or as distinguished 
from the divine Persons, as though it were a Person in tK(^ 

' SSf: ScfiWiCffi-tf'Jctrine, ptttce ?t. f Si^ pa,g-e T^). 



ii24 THE DOCIRINK Ci run TRINITV. 

same senf.c as they are ; and therefore, whenever it is so called, 
it must he considered as opposed to the creatm^e ; as we before 
observed, th-e one God is opposed to those who are not God by 
nature. It may also be considered, that those divine perfec- 
tions, which are implied in the word God^ taken in this sense^ 
arc known by the light of nature ; (whereas the divine Perso* 
nality, as applied either to the Father, Son, or Spirit, is a mat- 
ter of pure revelation) and it is such an idea of God, or the 
Godhead, that is intended thereby ; so that all the force of this 
objection consists only in the sense of a word, and the principal 
thing in debate is, whether the word God thus absolutely and 
indeterminately considered, is a proper mode of speaking, to 
set forth the divine nature : now if the scripture uses the word 
m this sense, it is not for us to enquire about the propriety, or 
impropriety, thereof; but avc must take heed that we do not 
pervert, or misunderstand, the sense hereof which they do, who 
cither speak, on the one hand, of the Godhead, when called 
God, as though it were distinct from the Father, Son, and Spi- 
rit ; or, on the other hand, understand it only of the Father, as 
opposed to the Son and Spirit, as the Anti-trinitarians do, who 
deny their proper Deity, and when they assert that there is but 
one God, do in effect, maintain that there is but one Person in 
the Godhead. Thus concerning the sense in which the Anti- 
trinitarians take the word Gody when (as it is generally ex- 
pressed) it is taken absolutely in scripture, as applying it only 
to the Father ; we proceed to consider, 

2. That they farther suppose that our Saviour is called God,- 
ju the New Testament, by a divine warrant, as a peculiar ho- 
nour put upon him ; and here they think it not difficult to prove, 
that a creature may ha^^e a right conferred on him to receive 
divine honour ; which if they were able to do, it would tend 
more to weaken our cause, and establish their own, than any 
thing they have hitherto advanced. But this we shall have oc- 
casion to militate against under the fourth head of argument, 
to prove the Deity of the Son, tiz. his having a right to divine 
worship, and therefore shall pass it over at present, and consi- 
der them as intending nothing more by the word God, when ap- 
plied to our Saviour, but what imports an honour infinitely be- 
low that which belongs to the Father ; and this they suppose 
to have been conferred upon him, on some occasions, relating' 
to the work for which he came into the world. The Socinians, 
in particular, speak of his being called God, or the Son of God. 

(1.) Because of his having been scmctiji ed ^nd sent into the 
world, John x. 36. viz. to redeem it, in that peculiar and low 
sense in which they understand the word redemption, of which 
Aore hereafter. 

(2.) Also from his extraordinary conception and birth, by 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITV. 3-25 

the power of the Holy Ghost, as it is said, in Luke i. 35. The 
Hc/lif Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest 
shall overshadow thee ; therefore also that Holy Thing-, whidt, 
shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God. 

(3.) Another reason of his having this honour conferred 
upon him, they take from his resurrection, and so refer to Rom. 
i. 4. in which it is said, that he was declared to be the Son of 
God rvith power, by the resurrection from the dead. 

(4.) Another reason hereof they take from his ascension in- 
to heaven, or being glorified, at which time they suppose that 
he was made an High Priest, and had, in an eminent degree, 
the name and character of God put upon him, for which they 
refer to Heb. v. 3. in which it is said, Christ glorified not him- 
self to be made an High Priest ; hut he that said unto him. 
Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee. 

But they plainly pervert the sense of these respective texts 
but now mentioned, inasmuch as they suppose that his mission, 
incarnation, resurrection, and ascension, are the principal rea- 
sons of his being called God ; and that his deity is founded not 
in the excellency of his nature, but in these relative circum- 
stances, in which, as an act of grace, this honour was conferred 
upon him, which God, had he pleased, might have conferred 
on any other creature, capable of yielding obedience to him, or 
receiving such a commission from him : whereas, in reality, 
these scriptures refer to that glory which he had as Mediator, 
as a demonstration of his Deity, and these honours were agree- 
able to his character, as a divine Person, but did not constitute 
him God, as they suppose. 

But these things are not so particularly insisted on by some 
late Anti-trinitarians, though they all agree in this, that his right 
to divine honour is the result of that authority which he has re- 
ceived from God, to perform the works which are ascribed to 
him, relating to the good of mankind ; whereas we cannot but 
conclude, from the scriptures before brought to prove his pro- 
per Deity, in which he is called Lord and God, in as strong a 
sense, as when those words are applied to the Father, that he is 
therefore God equal with the Father. 

Thus having considered our Saviour's proper Deity, as evin- 
ced from his being called Lord and God ; and also, that these 
names are given to him in such a sense, as that hereby the God- 
head is intended, as much as when it is applied to the Father ; 
we shall close this head, by considering two scriptures, in which 
the divine nature is ascribed to him ; and the first of them is iu 
Coloss. ii. 9. In him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bo- 
dily ; in which we may observe, ths: it is not barely said, that 
God dwelleth in him, which would not so evidently have pro- 
ved his deitv, because God is elsewhere said to dwell in others 



326 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

thus, in 1 John iv. 1 2. it is said, God dxvelleth in us ; but here 
it is said, the Godhead dwelleth in him, which is never appUed 
to any creature ; and the expression is very emphatical, the ful- 
ness, yea, all the fulness of the Godhead dwelleth in him ; what 
can we understand thereby, but that all the perfections of the 
divine nature belong to him ? The apostle had been speaking, 
in ver. 2. of the mysterij of Christy as what the church was to 
know, and acknowledge, as well as that of the Father ; and he 
also considers him as the Fountain of wisdom, ver. 3. In xvhovi 
are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge ; and what is 
here spoken concerning him, very well corresponds therewith, 
as being expressive of his divine gloiy j the fulness of the Ciod- 
head is said, indeed, to dwell in him bodily^ by which we are 
to understand his human nature, as the body is, in some other 
scriptures taken for the man; thus, in Rom. xii. 1. we are ex- 
horted to present our bodies^ i, e. ourselves, a living sacrifice 
to God; so here the divine nature, as subsisting in him, is said 
to dwell in, that is, to have the human nature united to it, which 
is meant by its dwelling in him bodily. 

The account which some give of the sense of this text, to 
evade the force of the argument, taken from thence, to prove 
our Saviour's Deity, does little more than shew how hard the 
Anti-trinitarians are put to it to maintain their ground, when 
ihey say that the word 6«o7))c, which we render Godhead^ signifies 
some extraordinary gifts conferred upon him, especially such 
as tended to qualify him to discover the mind and will of God ; 
or, at least, that nothing else is intended thereby, but that au- 
thority which he had from God, to perform the work which 
he came into the world about ; since it is certain, that this falls 
infinitely short of what is intended by the word Godhead^ which 
must signify the divine nature, subsisting in him, who assumed, 
or was made flesh, and so dwelt therein, as in a temple. 

There is another scripture, which seems to attribute to him 
the divine nature, viz. Phil. ii. 6. where it is said, that he was 
in the form of God^ and thought it not robbery to be equal with 
God; by the form ofGod^ I humbly conceive, we are to under- 
stand the divine nature which he had, and therefore it was no 
instance of i-obbery in him to assert, that he was equal with 
God. If this sense of the text can be defended, it will evident- 
ly prove his proper Deity, since it is never said, concerning any 
creature, that he is in the form of God, or, as the words may 
be rendered, that he subsisted in the form of God ; now it is 
well known, that the word which we render form,, is not only 
used by the schoolmen, but by others, before their time, ta 
signify the nature, or esser'tial properties, of that to which it is 
applied ; so that this sense thereof was well known in the apos- 
tle's days» Therefore, why may we not suppose, that the Holy 



THE DOCTRIKE OF THE TRINITY. 327 

Ghost, in scripture, may once, at least, use a word which would 
be so understood by them ? And it will farther appear, that 
Christ's Deity is signified thereby, if the following words are 
to be understood in the sense contained in our translation, that 
he thought it not robbery to be equal with God ; now this seems 
very plain, for the same word nymrctlo, he thought^ is taken in the 
same sense in the third verse of this chapter ; Let every man 
esteem, or think, others better than themselves ; and it is used 
about twenty times in the New Testament, five times in this 
epistle, besides in this text, and never understood otherwise 
than as signifying to thini, esteem^ or account; and it would de- 
stroy the sense of the respective texts, where it is used, to 
take it otherwise. This the Anti-trinitarians themselves will 
not deny, inasmuch as it does not affect their cause ; notwith- 
standing they determine that it must be otherwise translated in 
this text; and so they render the words, »«x <*/"^*>i"<""'>*"^*7o to ««-«< 
/5-*0£a, /if did not covet to be honoured, or was not greedy, or in 
haste of being honoured as God'*, that is, he did not affect 
to appear like a divine Person, or catch at those divine honours 
that did not belong to him. Could this sense of the text be 
made out to be just, it would effectually overthrow our argu- 
ment, taken from thence, to prove Christ's proper Deity ; but 
this is as foreign from the sense of the words, as any sense that 
could be put upon them ; and all that is pretended to justify it, 
is a reference which they make to a phrase, or two, used in a 
Greek writer, which is not at all to their purpose f. More- 

* See Dr. Clarke's Scripture Doctrine, page 176. 

I iVIdtbif is very particular in layiug doivn this sense ':fthe text, with the de- 
fence thereof, in his minotations on this scripture, from Heliodorus, ivhere he finds 
the -words, a^/antyfxa. ttouiv, luMch he renders, to siiutcli at ; and afrety/xct xytia-Bai, 
■which, he supposes, signifies to pursue, or covet, a thing that is denrabie; but, honu- 
ever, the words going before, orfolloiving, in that author, may determine that to be 
his sense thereof, as the sense of particular words is oftentimes greatly varied there- 
by ; yet this will not justify the rendering them in the same sense, m other instances, 
very foreign thereunto, as certainly the text we are explaining must be reckoned to 
he ; besides, the word is not tlie same, for it is aj(iQra.yfji<t, which properly signifies a. 
prey, or the thing stolen ; and therefore though cL^irsrijLyfxet vciuv ^uvlu^tAv may signify, 
to catch an opportunity, as a person catches at what lie thinks for his advantage, 
yet if the word cifttrnyfAov had been used instead of it, it would very much have alter ^ 
ed the sense thereof; a!so though uprin-ayfxn nytirBcui signifies, to esteem a thing wor- 
thy to be pursued, or catched at, as a prey, yet ctfarAyfjL'.v nyii^d^i, which are the 
words in the text we are considering, signify no such thing, but rather to reckon a 
thing unlawful to be pui-sued, as what he has no right to; and that is tlie sense 
thereof in our text, q. d. He did not think it unlawful to pursue, or lay claim to that 
divine honour, of being equal with God, or, as we render it, thouglit it notrobberv, 
&c. For the JHstiftfing of this sense, every one, that observes the acceptation of the 
Greek words, will find that a.f7rdLy/xai signifies, \ he action of robbing, and uprityfxA 
the thing stolen, as may be observed in many other words, where the former con- 
struction signifies the act,- the latter the effect, as in xcytcfjtoi; and X^.yiar/ua., Ktfji7raia-/j.0i, 
and KC/uTA^fAU., x.oKtt<r/uo( and kokhv/ua, opiT/ua and ofirutt, C7rxia-fxc( and e7r>j(Tfxa, 
<ri))(*TiAoi; and ToX'^cf*"- i and, in the JVew Testament, fiaTrliTiuot signifies the action 
of bapti/iii!^, und ,3xnlit>;ux the ordinance in which it is performed. iSee Murk -Cii. 



P'J^ THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

over the sense of this text, as agreeable to the words of our 
translation, will farther appear to be just, if we consider, that 
our Saviour's being- in the form of God., is there opposed to his 
having afterwards been in the form of a servant., or xh^ fashion 
of a man; now if the latter be to be understood of his being 
truly and properly man, and not to be taken barely for some-* 
thing in him which resembled the human nature; or if his ta- 
king on him the form of a servant., imports, his being in a ca- 
pacity to perform that obedience which was due from him, as 
man to God, in a proper, and not a theatrical sense ; then it 
will follow, that his being in the form of God, as opposed 
hereunto, must be taken for his being truly and properly God, 
or for his having the divine nature, as before mentioned ; which 
was the thing to be proved. 

I might here consider the sense which Dr. Whitby, in his 
annotations, gives of our Saviour's being in the form, of God., 
as opposed to that of a servant, (after he had given up the 
sense of the words, as in our translation, to the adversary) 
which is, that his being in the form of God, implies, his ap- 
pearing, before his incarnation, in a bright shining cloud, or 
light, or in a flame of fire, or with the attendance of an host 
of angels, as he is sometimes said to have done, which the Jews 
call Shechinah, or the divine Majesty, as being a visible em- 
blem of his presence ; this he calls the form of God., and his 
not appearing so, when incarnate in this lower world, the form 
of a servant., as opposed to it ; and adds, that when he ascend- 
ed into heaven, he assumed the form of God; and therefore 
whenever he has occasionally appeared, as to the martyr Ste- 
phen at his death, or to the apostle Paul at his first conver- 
sion, it has been in that form, or with like emblems of majes- 
ty and divinity, as before his incarnation. 

Here I would observe concerning this, that what he says of 
Christ's appearing with emblems of majesty and glory before 
his incarnation, and the glory that was put upon his human na- 
ture after his ascension into heaven, is a great truth; but as 
this is never styled, in scripture, the form of God, nor was 
the symbol of the divine glory ever called therein the divine 
majesty, however it might be called by Jewish writers ; there- 
fore this has no reference to the sense of this text, nor does it, 
in the least, enervate the force of the argument, taken from it, 
to prove our Saviour's proper Deity, any more than this criti- 
cal remark on the words thereof does, the sense of our trans- 
lation, whereby it evidently appears. 

I might also observe the sense which another learned * wri- 
ter gives of the form of God m this text, which is the same that 

8. compared with Matt. Hi. 7. and chap. apxi. 25. Multitvtles ofimtc^ices'rnis^ht. 
hart ieen fiven, but there are sufficient. * Grotius in lot: 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 325 

is given by several of the Socinians ; namely, that it has a re- 
lation to his working miracles while here upon earth, which is 
certainly very disagreeable to the scope and design of the text, 
since he is said to be in the form of God^ before he took upon 
him the form of a servant, that is, before his incarnation : and 
besides, the working miracles, never was deemed sufficient to 
denominate a person to be in the form of God, for if it had^ 
many others, both before and after him, might have had this 
applied to them; whereas it is a glory appropriate to him, who 
thought it not robbery to be equal with God. 

I would not wholly pass over that which some call a con- 
troverted text of scripture, in 1 John v. 7. For there are three 
that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy 
Ghost; and these three are one, lest it should be thought that I 
conclude the arguments, brought by the Ar^ti-trinitarians, suf- 
ficiently conclusive to prove it spurious, (r/) but I shall say the 

(fl) " ft may readily be granted that any tract published hy an apostolick man^ 
in the early Christian church, would be circtxiatcd among tlie Clu'istians of those 
times, with great dispatch, immediately on its publication. This is a natural and 
indefeasible position, since it arises from a principle in human nature itself. It 
is natiural, too, that, in tliose times, it should be copied without delay in such 
churches as were then extant. And Xliisfo'st edition would be circulated to the 
widest extent, of course. Churches that were established afterwards were more 
lii^ely to receive tlie secand edition of such a wi'iter's works ; especially, if they 
had intercourse with the town where he resided in his latter days, and drew their 
copies from thence, immediately. But I think we may say, that for one copy 
of the second edition that was circulated, there would be 20, or 50, or 100 copies 
of the first edition ; since not only would it have the advantage of priority, but 
uot one reader in a hundred would think of the second as different from the first. 
And this has led qnr translators to mark, as doubtful, the first quotation whicU 
I selected from the first Epistle of John, in my last ; chap. ii. 23. I have no 
doubt of the genuineness of the addition ,- but possibly there may be 50 copies 
without it to o7ie which contains it. 

Admitting, then, the residence of St. John be at Ephesus, or any part of Asia 
Minor, for the last thirty years of his life, for which we have the testimony oi 
ancient history, we may date his first epistle, early iJi that period : or even be- 
fore he came to live there. This would spread Jii'st, among the neighbouring 
churches in Asia Minor: tecondly, eastward, to those countries which professed 
Christianity, Antioch, for certain : Syria, Cilicia, Pontiis, Cappadocia, Galatia, 
Babylonia, &c. Toward these countries, there are caravans which go eveiy 
month, or six weeks, from Asia Minor : tliere is a regular intercourse maintain- 
ed, between Smyrna, and the internal parts of Asia Minor, and on through Tar- 
sus to Antioch : — from Ephesus to Sm)rna was easy. We have every re.son to 
aflirm, that it was the same anciently, ;uid tlierefore, there was aii immediate 
conveyance of such addresses as the apostle Jolui published for the general use 
of all Christians, from Eplijesus, eastward to the oriental provinces of the Roman 
empire, where Christianity was settled and flourished. In these churches his 
writings would be in request. Moreover, these churches would be the first to 
translate his writings into their current language, for the use ol tlie natives of 
these provinces, who did not understand Greek (which, however prevalent the 
Greek language was, must have been many;) because here was a great minibci' 
of prafeshing Christians, who desired to be acquainied with Uieh- contents. 

It is evident, tlierefore, that these translations, having for tlicir basis the^rjj/ 
idition, can be no evidences uf what the apostle thoiiglit p'-on?r to addjfl his 

Vol. L Tt 



350 THE DOCTRINE Or THE TRIN*ITY. 

less on this subject, because it is averj^ hard matter to advance 
any thing that has not been very largely insisted on, by vari- 
ous writers ; among whom I cannot but mention, with great 

■j»ra , , ■ ■■■ ' ' ■■ — 

s^co7«c/ addition. The Syi'iac version, for instance, if we suppose that to be the 
earliest of all, would represent the first edition, as would also, all versions made 
irom it, and all copies made from those, at that time, received in those parts. 
Whereas, the Armenian version, because it is much iatci-, would at least stand 
the chance of obtaining (and being made from) the seco7u/ edition. The Syriac 
*ei*sion, therefore, is no evidence against an addition. The Armenian version 
is an evidence /f;?' it. This version contains 1 John v. 7. 

Also, the churches in Africa were not planted till many years after those of 
Asia ; their intercourse with Ephcsus, being- by sea, was irreguliu-, and could 
only take place, occasionally, if it was direct. If we suppose it to be, on the 
subject before us, through Italy, then it was subject to the same circumstances 
as attended the intercourse between Ephcsus antl Rome. I say Rome, 'because 
we have no reason to think that there was any number of Christians, worth men- 
tioning, in any other city of Italy. The apostle Paul, when travelling from Rhe- 
gio upward was met by brethren /rom 7?o?ne/ which when he saw, he thanked 
God, and took- courage. Certainly, then, he bad not met with many friends in 
places that he passed through, and his courage had been somewhat cast down, 
ibr that reason. We find no trace of Christianity in Herculaneum, one of the 
cities of Italy, of the second size, which was destroyed A. D. 79, though we 
meet with traces of Judaism there ; and in short, it must be admitted, that, com- 
pared with Asia, the western provinces had but few Christians. We have no 
reason to think that Rome sentout missionaries early. The south of France was 
christianized from Asia, though so mucli further off than Rome. The natural 
inference is, that these parts would receive later copies of any apostolick wri- 
ting, published in Asia Minor, than tht)se parts which had a regular intercourse, 
half a dozen times in a year, at least, but probably much oftener, wltii Ephesus. 
And whatever versions were extant in the west, would represent the second edi- 
tion with its variations, , whatever they might be. 

As to Rome itself, I infer, that that capital of the empire had, if any place 
had, both editions. Suppose, for a moment, that tlie Jirst edition had reached. 
Rome, when Aristol^idus quitted that city for Britain, or that it was sent to Ar- 
jstobulus, in Britain, from Rome, it will follow, that the ancient British copies 
would net contam tliose additions which the apostle Jolin inserted in the second 
edition. And to this agrees the fact: for Pelagianism could hardly havp been 
repressed by any text nifjre effectually than by the one in question. Yet that 
errour rose in Britain, and it was not so decidedly opposed then, as it is now; 
ininus the testimony of tliis text. Moreover, the text is not quoted by the vener- 
able Bede, in a passage of his works, where we should expect to find it, at least, 
alluded to. He, theiefore, might have the first edition. 

In short, almost all the arguments employed against the authenticity of the 
text may be admitted. They cease to have any great force, after it is once con- 
ceded to those who use them, that xhejirst edition, together with all its repre- 
sentatives, in the first century, suppose, had not the words in debate. They are 
reduced to the infirmity of a negative argument, at best. 

I must now observe, that the African churches being planted long after the 
Asiatick, they, no doubt, would obtain the best transcripts of the works of any 
inspired writer, winch could be procured about the time of theu' being founded; 
i e. the second edition of the letter under consideration. To this agrees tlie fact; 
iJte African bishops qnn^e the passage. 'JVrtuUian, Cyprian, Euclierius, Eugenius, 
with his consistory of 400 bishojis, Yigilius, Fulgentius, &c. Sec. so that it was 
undeniably extant in their copies from tlie second century downwards. 1 he ar- 

§ument, then, is reduced to a point: either these divines /o?/;it/ the passage in 
leir copies, or they /jwi^ it there. The latter alternative is so dishonourable, to 
Christians and to Christianity, that one is AVilling to accept of any hypothesis 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. '3;$1 

.esteem; one who has defended the scripture-doctrine of the 
Trinity with a great deal of learning and judgment, who has 
given a particular account of several that have written on eithei* 
side of the question *. No one pretends to deny, that this 
text is not to be found in a great number of manusc-ipts^ 
among which some are generally allowed to be of great anti- 
quity ; therefore it is less to be wondered at, that it is left out 
in some ancient versions thereof, which were taken from copied 
that were destitute of it; all which only proves, t \at the text 
has been corrupted : but the main question is, which of those 
copies are to bt- reckoned genuine, those which have it, or o* 
thers which have it not ? It must be allowed, that there are a 
considerable nun\ber, in which the text is inserted, as Beza 
and others observe ; and it will be a hard matter to prove that 
these are all spurious, which must be done, before we shall 
be obliged to expunge it out of scripture. 

If it be objected, that the manuscripts, which have the text, 
are not so ancient as those that are without it, it wiil be a dif- 
ficult matter for them to determine the antiquit}' thereof, with 
such exactness, as, by comparing one with the other, it may 
be certainly known, with respect to all of them, which has the 

* Jifr. Abraham Taylor, in his true Scriptiire-ductrine of the Trinity, Part. I. 
chap. 2. in -wldch we have Ids o-ivn method of reasoning in defence t!:ercof, tvldch is, 
«t least, siifficieTit to remove the boasts and insults of those ivho -wonder that we 
should not give up the cause entirely to them. 

which may vindicate professors and teachers from such enormous guilt. — But 
further : 

I have said, that Rome might be expected to procure whatever was most ex- 
cellent in Christian literature, as well :.s In other studies. It had, then, Xhefr.'it 
edition, because that was tiie earliest which could be procured ; and the second, 
because the influx of persons to Rome from all parts was so great, that every 
thing which was portable of a literary nature, might be expected to be brought 
there. Rome had an ancient version of the scriptures, known under the name 
of the old Italic version. Tt is not of any consequence to our argument, whether 
this version contained the text of the heavenly -witnesses, since it was made very 
early; but if the ('cfiseJ Roman version of the New Testament contained it, we 
are reducetl to tiie same dilemma as before, in reference to the Africioi bishop.s 
—The reviser of this edition (Jerom) either found it, or forged it. The same 
arguments that relieve the characters of the African bishops, relieve tlie characr 
ter of tliis father. Tlie accusation is incredible. It is loading the party with a 
crime so far beyond ordinary culpability, that the mind revolts at the charge. It 
is admitted, then, that the Latin version reads this verse ; tliat St. Jerome adopt- 
ed it; that it was adopted by the learned after hiu); as by our own famous Alkwin, 
at the time, and in the court of Charlemagne, and has so continued ever since. 
Tiie inference is, that St. Jerome prefi;rrcd the authority and text of the second 
edition, and followed it. 

These, nioreover, are i7idependent witnesses; for, the African bishops, who 
wrote before Jei'om, could not receive this passage from his revised version : or, 
if any choose to affirm diat tlie African bishops received this passage from the 
old Italic version, then the authenticity of the passage follows of course, in pro- 
ptotion to whatever importance is attaolied to tljis increased antiquit)-. 



$'3S" THE DOCTRINE Ojf THE TlVraiTV. 

preferefrce^ and by wliat a raimber of years: besides, sinte it 
is certain, that more manuscripts of scripture are lost by far>- 
than are now known to be in the world ; unless we suppost: 
that religion, in ancient times, was contracted into a very nar 
row compass, or that very few, in the first ages of the church, 
had copies of scripture by them, which is not to be supposed ; 
and, if so, then it Avill be hard to prove that those manuscripts^ 
•which have the text inserted, did not take it from some others, 
that Avere in being before them ; so that the genuineness, or 
spuriousness of the text, is not to be determined only or prin- 
cipally by inspection into ancient manuscriptSi 

Nor can I think it very material to offer conjectures concern- 
ing the manner how the text came first to be corrupted, Dr- 
Hammond, and others, suppose, that some one, who trans- 
cribed this epistle, might commit a blunder, in leaving out thi? 
text, because of the repetition of the words in the following 
verse. There are three that bare record. It is, indeed, a hard 
thing to trace every mistake made by an amanuensis to its first 
origihal ;■ however, this must be concluded, that it is possible 
for it to be left out through inadvertency, but it could not be 
put in without a notorious fraud ; and no one would attempt to 
do this, unless some end, which he thought valuable, were an- 
swered thereby. Indeed, if the doctrine of the Trinity could 
not have been maintained without such an insertion, I will riot 
say, that e ver)' one, who ever defended it, had honesty enough to 
abhor such a vile practice ; but this I am bound to say, that if 
any one did so, he was guilty not only of fraud, but folly, at 
the same time ; since the divinity of the Son and Spirit, as well 
as of the Fathei-* is maintained throughout the whole scrip- 
ttu'e ; and the principal thing asserted concerning the Son, in 
this text, viz.. that he is One with the Father, is expressly laid 
down in his own words, John x» 30. / and my Father are one^ 

I know the Arians take occasion to censure the defenders of 
the: doctrine of the Trinity,- as being guilty of this fraud, though 
Father Simon * is a little more sparing of his reflections on 
them ; but he is no less injurious to the truth, when he main- 
tains, that some person or other, in the margin of a copy, 
which he had by him, which he supposes to have been about 
five hundred years old, had affixed to ver. 8. these words, as 
an explication thereof^ as though tire Father, Son, and Holy 
Ghost were intended thereby, to wit, by the Spirit^ xvater^ and 
blood ; and from hence concludes, that the next person, who- 
transcribed from this manuscript, rtiistook this note for a part 
of the text ; and so the 7th verse came to be inserted. This 
lue Clerc calls a setting the matter in a clear light ; for some 

* See ilistwr. CriC. du. JVouv. Tustam. chap. 18- pa^e 304. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 33:> 

^rsons are ready to believe that which supports their own 
< ause, how weakly soever it be maintained. 

It might easily be replied to this, that this text was kno\/n 
in the world long enough before that manuscript was wrote, 
and consequently this insertion could not first take its rise from 
♦hence ; and therefore to produce a single instance of this na- 
' ure, is, I humbly conceive, nothing to the purpose *. 

But, passing by what respects scripture-manuscripts, there 
is more stress to be laid on the writings of those who have re^ 
ferred to this text ; and accordingly it is certain, that it was 
often quoted in defence of the doctrine of the Trinity, by an- 
cient writers, in the fifth and following centuries, therefore it 
was found in the manuscripts that they used. It is true, it is 
not quoted by the Fathers, who wrote in the fourth century, to 
wit, Athanasius, Cyril, Gregory, Nazianzen, Chrysostom, nor 
by Augustin, and some others ; but nothing can be inferred 
from hence^ but that it was not in the copies they made use of : 
but it does not follow that it was in no copy at that time ; for, 
if we look farther back to the third century, we find it express- 
ly referred to by Cyprian, which I cannot but lay a very great 
stress on; he has it in two places f, in the former of which, he 
occasionly mentions these words, These three are one ; and, in 
the latter, he expressly quotes this scripture ; and says, it is 
written of the Father^ Son., and Holy Ghost., that these three 
are one ; which evidently proves, that he found it in some 
manuscript extant in his time, which was before any manuscript, 
now in beings is pretended to have been written ; for even the 
Alexandrian manuscript is, I think, supposed by none to be of 
greater antiquity than the fourth century, which seems to me 
to be of greater force than any thing that is suggested, concern- 
ing its being not found in manuscripts of later date ; and we 
may observe, that that Father does not speak of it as a certain 
manuscript, which was reserved, as a treasure, in some pri- 
vate library^ which might be adulterated ; nor doth he pretend 
to prove the authority thereof, nor make use of it, to prove the 
genuineness of the text ; but quotes the text, as we do any 
other place of scripture, as supposing it was generally ac- 
knowledged to be contained therein ; and he also was reckoned 
a man of the greatest integrity, as well as piety, and so would 
not refer to any text, as a part of the sacred writings, which 
was not so.( 

Object. It is objected against this, by the Anti-trinitarians, 
that though he quotes scriptures, yet it is not this, but ver. 8. 
and that not in the words thereof, but in a mystical sense, 
which he puts upon it, by the Spirit, water, and blood, agree- 

* See this conjecture of Father Simon leaimedly opposed in Smith. Jifiscellan. c»n 
J''rt Stnwii^ \ Vid. Jipi.'H. (XTiii. ad J.!ihaicnnpn, & dc TTrntn**' F.rrf. $ -,■. 



334 'lliiL DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

ing in one, intending the Father, Son, and Spirit, being one : 
and this is the sense Facundus, an African bishop, who lived 
about the middle of the sixtii century, puts upon it, and sup- 
poses him thus to quote it. 

Answ. But to this it may be answered, that his judgment is 
no more to be valued, M'ho lived three hundred years alter him, 
than if he had lived in this present age ; nor had he any far- 
ther light to understand Cyprian's meaning, than we have ; and 
we know very wcil, that Cyprian was not so unreasonably fond 
of mystical interpretations of scriptures, as Origen, and some 
others of the Fathers were : /and even they never presumed to 
quote any mystical sense, which they put on scripture, as the 
words thereof, or say, as this Father does, it is so written; 
much less are we to suppose that his words are to be taken in 
this sense. And whatever Facundus's sense was of his words, 
another who lived in the same century, together with, or a lit- 
tle before him, viz, Fulgentius, refers (as the learned author 
above mentioned * observes) to this passage of Cyprian ; not 
as a mystical explication of ver. 8. but as distinctly contained 
in ver 7. and, as such, makes use of it against the Arians. 

As for that known passage in Tertullian f , in which he 
speaks of the union, or connexion, as he calls it, of the Father 
in the Son, and of the Son in the Comforter, making three 
joined together, and that these three are one, that is, one di- 
vine Being, not one Person, and so referring to our Saviour's 
word's, I and the Father are one^ it is a very good explication 
of the sense of this text, and discovers that, in that early age 
of the church, he had a right notion of the doctrine of the Tri- 
nity : but whether it is sufficiently evident from hence, that he 
refers to this scripture under our present consideration, though 
defending the doctrine contained in it, I will not determine. I 
shall add no more in the defence of the genuineness of this text, 
but rather refer the reader to others, who have wrote profess- 
edly on this subject. :t: 

And whereas some of the anti-trinitarians have supposed, 
that if this scripture were genuine, it doth not prove the doc- 
trine of the Trinity, because the words ought to be taken as im- 
plying, that the Father, Son, and Spirit, are one only in testi- 
mony; to this it may be answered, that though it be an un- 
doubted truth that the}^ agree in testimony, yet it doth not a- 
mount to the sense of the words, Theij are one; for if that had 
been the principal idea designed to be conveyed thereby, no rea- 
son can be assigned why the phrase should be different from 

* See true Scripture-doctrine, &c. page 53. ~* 

f Contra Praxeam, cap. 25. 

% See the Author before referred ta^ in the tnte scripture-dottrine, Ue. at also 
Tri^land de trtbns in cmh tesfilniQ 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITT. 335 

what it is in the following verse ; but it would, doubtless, have 
been expressed, at to 'iv uw, They agree in one. 

Thus wc have endeavoured to prove our Saviour's proper 
Deity iioni those scriptures that speak of him, not only as a be- 
ing called Lord and God^ but from others, that assert him to 
have the divine nature, or to be equal with God the Father; 
we shall now proceed to consider some scriptures, by which it 
appears, that he asserts this concerning himself; or what proofs 
we have of his Deity from his own Avords, in several conferen- 
ces which he held with the Jews, by which he gave them reason 
to conclude that he was God equal with the Father ; and the 
opposition which he met with from them, who, for this reason, 
charged him with blasphemy, plainly intimates, that they under- 
stood his words in this sense. And if it be replied to this, as 
it often is, that nothing can be inferred to prove his Deity from 
their misunderstanding his words, and so charging him, with- 
out ground to be guilty thereof; to this it may be answered, 
though we do not lay much stress on what they understood to 
be the meaning of his words, yet it plainh^ appears, that he in- 
tended them in this sense, inasmuch as if they misunderstood 
him, he did not undeceive them, which certainly he ought to 
have done, had he not been a divine Person. If any one seems 
to assume to himself any branch of the glory of God, that does 
not belong to him, though the ambiguity of words, provided 
they may be taken in two contrary senses, may in some mea- 
sure, excuse him from having had such a design, however unad- 
viseable it be to speak in such a way, yet if he apprehends that 
they, to whom he directs his discourse, are in the least inclined 
to misunderstand him, he is obliged, from the regard which he 
has to the divine glory, and the duty which he owes to those 
with whom he converses, as well as in defence of his own cha- 
racter, to undeceive them ; therefore, if our Saviour had not 
been equal with God, he would, doubtless, upon the least sus- 
picion which the Jews might entertain, that he asserted him- 
self to be so, immediately have undeceived them, and would 
have told them, that they took his words in a wrong sense, and. 
that he was far from usurping that glory, which belonged to 
God ; that had he intended them in diat sense, they might just- 
ly have called him a blasphemer; this he would, doubtless 
have done, had he by his words, given them occasion to think 
him a divine Person if he were not so. 

Thus the apostles Paul and Barnabas, when the people at Lys- 
tra, upon their having wrought a miracle, concluded that they 
were gods, with what zeal and earnestness did they undeceive 
them! In Acts xiv. 14, 15. it is said, when they perceived they 
were going to offer sacrifice to them, they rent their clothes^ 
find ran in among the people^ crying oiit^ arid sailings Sirf^ whif 



330 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

f 

do yc thesr things ? xve also are men of like passions with yoiu 
And, at another time, we read, that Peter and John, in Acts 
iii. 11, — 13. when they had cured the lame man, though the 
people did not conclude them to be divine persons, yet, per- 
ceiving that they were amazed, and being jealous that some 
thoughts might arise in their minds, as though they had a right 
to that glory, which belongs to God alone, or that this miracle 
was to be ascribed to themselves, rather than to him, we read, 
that xvhen Peter saw that they marvelled^ and that the people 
ran together^ he ansxvered^ ye men of Israel^ why marvel ye at 
this f or why look ye so earnestly on us, as though^ by our oxvn 
poxver^ or holiness^ we had made this man to walk ? and accord- 
ingly takes occasion to shew, that the glory hereof was due to 
none but God. 

But our Saviour takes no such method to exculpate himself 
from this charge of blasphemy; therefore we must suppose they 
did not mistake his words but that he intended thereby, that 
they should understand him to be a divine Person ; yea, he is 
so far from undeceiving them, if thej^ were deceived, that he 
rather confirms, than denies, the sense, which they put upon 
them. This appears from Matt. ix. 2 — 5. when they brought 
to him a man sick of the palsey, to whom, when he healed him, 
he said. Son he of good cheer,, thy sins be forgiven thee^ he per- 
ceived^ that certain of the scribes said within thefnselves. This 
man blasphemeth, supposing that none had power to forgive sins 
hut God. It is true, the words might have been understood, as 
though he had said, thy sins are forgiven thee, only in a decla- 
rative zuay^ as signifying, that the man had obtained forgive- 
ness from God, without insinuating thereby, that he had a pow- 
er, as a divine Person, to forgive sins. But it is plain, that the 
Jews took his words in this latter sense, from their charging 
him with blasphemy ; but, instead of rectifying the mistake, if 
it was one, he asserts, that notwithstanding the meanness of his 
appearance, while in his humble state on earth, yet he had a 
power to forgive sins ; and he not only asserts, but proves this, 
when he says, ver. 5. Whether it is easier to say^ thy sins be 
forgiven theeP or to say Arise,, andxvalk? Many suppose, that 
our Saviour hereby intends to establish his Deity, by asserting 
his infinite power, which v/as exerted in working a miracle, and 
so it is as though he should say : he that can produce any ef- 
fect, which is above the laws of nature, as miracles are, at least 
if he does it by his own power, must be God : but this he had 
done, and so proved his deity thereby, and consequently his 
right to forgive sins. 

But I am sensible it will be objected to this, that since crea- 
tures have wrought miracles, which were as truly and proper- 
ly so as this that Christ wrought; therefore the working a mit 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITK. 3S7 

iacle will not prove the divinity of the person that wrought it, 
unless we could prove that he did it by his own power, that we 
cannot do without supposing his deity, and therefore that ought 
not to be made use of, as a medium to prove it. 

Some, indeed, attempt to prove it from that scripture, Luke 
xi. 20. in which he says, he cast out devils hy the finger of Gody 
supposing he means hereby his own divine power. Others take 
notice of something peculiar to himself as they suppose, in the 
way of his working miracles, that herein he spake, and acted 
like a God. But, since neither of these arguments will be reck- 
oned conclusive, therefore I would take a method somewhat 
different, which is not liable to the aforesaid objection, to ac- 
count for this matter ; and that is that our Saviour first tells 
the man, that his sins were forgiven him, knowing, before-hand, 
hov/ this would be resented by the scribes, who would, upon 
this occasion, charge him with blasphemy, which accordingly 
they did ; and then, to convince them that he was a divine 
Person, and had a power to forgive sin, he wrought a miracle, 
and so bade the man, sick of the palsey, to arise and walk ; 
whereby he proved his deity, of which he designed to give an 
extraordinary conviction, and consequently of his having a pow- 
er to forgive sin, by an appeal to this miracle. Now though 
miracles do not argue the divinity of the person that works 
them, from any visible circumstance contained therein as but 
now mentioned, yet they effectually prove it, provided this be 
the thing contested, and an explicit appeal be made to the divine 
power to confirm it by miracles, then they are an undoubted 
proof thereof, as much as they prove any thing relating to the 
Christian religion : and, in this sense, I humbly conceive, 
Christ proved his deity by miracles, which he is expressly said 
elsewhere to have done; as in John ii- 11. speaking concern- 
ing his first miracle in Cana of Galilee, it is said, that thereby 
he manifested forth his glory ^ and his disciples believed on him; 
where, by his glory is doubtless, meant his divine glory ; for 
the faith of his disciples, which was consequent hereupon, was a 
divine faith : and we never read of the glory of Christ, in his 
humbled state more especially, but it must import the glory of 
his deit)', which his disciples are said, in some measure to be- 
hold, when they believed in him. This Christ confirnled by 
his miracles, in the same way, as his mission was confirmed 
thereby. By this means, therefore, he proved his deity and 
consequently his right to forgive sin : and therefore was so far 
from endeavouring to convince the Jews, that they were mista- 
ken in thinking him a divine person, he farther insists on, and 
proves, that he was so. 

There is another conference which our Saviour held with 
the Jews, mentioned, John vi. in which we read, that after he 

Vol. t. T^ u 



338 Tri£ DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

had healed a lame man on the sabbath-day, for which, ver. 16^. 
the jfezus sought to slay h'lm^ as a sabbath-breakei-, he rephes^ 
ver. 17. Mij Father xuorketh hitherto^ and I work; upon which 
they were more enraged, and as it is said, ver. 18. sought the 
more to kill hitti^ because he had not only broken the sabbath^ but 
said also., that God xuas his Father^ making himself equal zvith 
God. It is plain they understood his words, as importing that 
he was equal with God ; and, indeed they could do no other- 
wise, for he compares his works with God's, and speaks of 
himself as working co-ordinately with him. Certainly our works 
ought not to be mentioned at the same time with God's ; there- 
fore they suppose that he asserted himself to be a divine Per- 
son, and farther proved it by calling God his Father ; which, 
according to the sense in which they understood it, denoted an 
equality with him. Hereupon they charge him with blasphemy, 
and go round about to kill him for it. Now it is certain, that, 
if he had not been equal with God, he ought to have undeceived 
them, which he might easily have done, by telling them that 
though I call God my Father, I intend nothing hereby, but that 
I worship, reverence, and yield obedience to him ; or that I am 
his Son, by a special instance of favour, in such a sense as a 
creature may be ; but lar be it from me to give you the least 
occasion to think that I am equal with God, for that would be 
to rob him of his glory : but we find that our Saviour is far 
from denying his equality with the Father, but rather esta- 
blishes and proves it in the following verses. 

It is true, indeed, in some passages thereof, he ascribes to 
himself the weakness of a man, as having therein respect to 
his human nature, which is included in his being the Messiah 
and Mediator, as well as his divine : thus he says, ver, 19. The 
Son^ viz. as man, ca7i do nothing of himself ; and ver. 20. The 
Father shexveth him all things ; but, in other passages, he proves 
that he had a divine nature, and farther confirms what he had 
before asserted, namely, that he was equal with God; in ver. 
21. For as the Father raiseth up the dead^ and quickcneth them^ 
even so the Son quickeneth xvhor.i he xvilL Observe, he not only 
speaks of himself, as having divine power, but sovereignty f 
the former in that he quickeneth; the latter, in that he does it 
according to his own will or pleasure ; and, in ver. 23. he sig- 
nifies his expectation from men, that all men should honour the 
Son, even as they honour the Father. Thus he lays claim to di- 
vine glory, as well as ascribes to himself the prerogative of 
raising the whole world, at the general resurrection, and deter- 
mining their state, either of happiness or misery, ver. 28, 29. 
Marvel not at this ; for the hour is coming, in rvhich all that are 
in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall co?ne forth ; they 
that have done goody unto the resurrection of life ; and they that 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 339 

have done evil to the resurrection of damnation. From hence, 
therefore, we may conclude, that our Saviour was so far from 
disclaiming the charge of being equal with God, which they 
called blasphemy, that he proves it by arguments yet more con- 
vincing. 

Another conference, which he held with the Jews about this 
matter, we read of in John viii. wherein, taking occasion to 
speak concerning Abraham, who rejoiced to see his day, he tells 
them plainly, ver. 58. Before Abraham zvas^ I am ; not intend- 
ing hereby, as the Arians suppose, that he was the first crea- 
ture, but that he was equal with God ; and, indeed, there seems 
to be something in his mode of speaking that argues his assert- 
ing his eternal and unchangeable Deity. The phrase here used 
is the same, with a little variation, with that which is used to 
set forth the eternity and immutability of God, in Isa. xliii. 13. 
Before the daif rvas, I am he. If the prophet is to be under- 
stood, as asserting that God the Father existed before time, 
before the day was, or the course of nature began, why may we 
not suppose our Saviour to intend as much, when he says. Be- 
fore Abraham rvas^ I am. 

However, since it will be objected, that this, at best, is but a 
probable argument, though it is such as many of the Fathers 
have made use of in defending his Deity, yet we will not la)^ the 
whole stress of our cause upon it, but may observe, that what- 
ever critical remark others may make on the sense of the %vords, 
it is certain the Jews understood thein no otherwise, than as im- 
plving, that he thought himself equal with God ; therefore it is 
said, ver. 59. that they took up stones to stone him ; which was 
a punishment inflicted, under the law, on blasphemers ; and. 
ought he not, had they misunderstood his words, to have cleared 
himself from this imputation, if he had not been equal with 
God ? But he is far from doing this ; for it is said, in the fol- 
lowing words, that he hid himsef^ and xvent out of the temple^ 
going' through the midst of them ^ and so passed by. 

Again, there is another conference, which he held with the 
Jews, mentioned in John x. in which he speaks like a divine 
Person in several verses; as ver. 14. I ayn the good Shepherd^ 
and knoTv my sheep^ and am knoxvn of mine ; which is the same 
that is ascribed to God, in Psal. xxiii. 1. The Lord is my 
Shepherd; and he lays claim to his church, whom he calls his 
sheep, as his own; and ver. 16. he speaks of himself, as hav- 
ing a power over his own life ; / have poxver to lay it doxvn^ 
<ind I have power to take it again ; which is a greater instance 
of dominion than belongs to a creature, who has not a power 
to dispose of his own life at pleasure ; and, in ver. 28. he as- 
cends yet higher in his expression, when he speaks of himself, 
as having a power to give eternal life to his people, which is cer- 



340 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

tainly the. gift of none but God ; and when, in ver. 29. he owns' 
himself to be inferior to his Father, as man ; notwithstanding, 
in ver. 30. he plainly asserts his Deity, when he says, I and my 
Father are one. 

Object. 1. The Anti-trinitarians object to this, that Christ 
did not speak of himself as one with the Father, any otherwise 
than in consent, or, at least, as having power and authority de- 
rived from him. 

Ansxo, To say that those words, / and my Father are one^ 
imply nothing more than that they are One in consent, does not 
well agree with the sense of the foregoing words, in which he 
speaks of the greatness, and the power of his Father, and in this 
of his being One with him. Besides, had he only meant his 
being One with him in consent, as implying the subjection of 
all the powers and faculties of his soul to him, that is a sense 
in which every good man may be said to be one with God ; there- 
fore the Jews would not have charged him with blasphemy for 
it, which, it is plain, they did, and took up stones to stone him, 
if his own words had not given them ground to conclude that 
he intended more than this, namely, that he was one in nature 
with God. It is therefore farther objected. 

Object. 2. That the Jews, indeed, misunderstood him, and 
nothing can be inferred from their stupidity, to prove his Deity : 
but he seems, in the follov/ing verses, to do more to the unde- 
ceiving them, than he had done in some of the foregoing instan- 
ces ; for he tells them plainly the reason why he spake of him- 
self as a God, namely, because he was a prophet ; and these were 
called g-odsy to zvhom the word of God came^ or, at least, that he 
had a right to be so called, from his being sanctijied^ and sent 
into the -world. 

Ansxv. By these expressions, he does not intend to set him- 
self upon a level with the prophets of old, but they contain an 
argument from the less to the greater ; and so it is, as though 
he should say, If some persons, who made a considerable figure 
in the church of old, and were sent about important services 
to them, are called gods, I have mvich more reason to claim, 
that character, as having been sanctified, and sent into the 
world about the great work of redemption, consecrated, or set 
apart to glorify the divine perfections therein ; which work, as 
will be observed under a following head, proves his Deit)^ ; and 
therefore we are not to suppose that he disclaims it, when he 
speaks of himself, as engaged therein. Then he proceeds yet 
farther, in asserting his Deity, when he speaks of his being" in 
the Father, and the Father in him, which, it is certain, the Jews 
took in a very different sense from what those words are taken 
in, when applied to creatures, for they concluded, that he spake 
of himself as a divine Person ; for it follows, ver. 39. that they 



THK BOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY". 341 

iOug-ht again to take him^ but he escaped out of their hand ; so 
that he still gjvcs them occasion to conclude, that he was God 
equal with the Father. 

Thus he asserted his Deity in all these various conferrences 
with the Jews ; in which, if he had not been what they appre- 
hended him to insinuate that he was, man)-^ charges must have 
been brought against him ; not only as to what concerns mat- 
ters of common prudence, as incensing the people by ambigu- 
ous expressions, and thereby hazarding his own life ; but his 
holiness would have been called in question, had he given oc- 
casion to them, to think that he assumed to himself divine glo- 
ry, had he not had a right to it. (a) 

And this leads us to consider that last public testimony, 
which he gave to his Deity, in the presence of the Sanhedrim, 
which, in some respects, may be said to have cost him his life, 
when he stood before Pontius Pilate ; upon which occasion, the 
apostle says, 1 Tim. vi. \3.t\idit he xuitnessed a good confession t 
this we have recorded, Matth. xxvi. 61. where we observe, that 
when false witnesses were suborned to testify against him, who 
contradicted one another, in their evidence, upon which the 
high priest desired that he would make a reply to what they 
said, in his own defence, he did not think that worthy of an an- 
swer, and therefore held his peace : but when he was asked, in 
the most solemn manner, and adjured by the living God, to tell 
them, Whether hervere the Christy the Son of God P that is, the 
Messiah, whom the Jews expected, who governed his church 
of old, and whom they acknowledged to be a divine Person, 
or the Son of God ; here the whole matter is left to his own 
determination. Had he denied this, he would have saved his 
life ; and if he confessed it, he was like to die for it. On this 
occasion, he does not hold his peace, or refuse to answer ; there- 
fore, says he, ver. 64. Thou hast said ; which is as though he 
he had said. It is as thou hast said, I am the Christ, the Son 
of God ; and then in the following words. Nevertheless^ I say 
unto yotiy Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man^ sitting on the 
right handofpoiuer^ and coming in the clouds ofheavcji ; Avhere- 
iipon the high priest rent his clothes, and appealed to the people 
that they had heard his blasphemy, and accordinglv they judged 
him worthy of death. Here we observe, that he not only asserts 
himself to be the Son of God, and to have a right to the glory 
of a divine Person, but, as a farther confirmation thereof, ap- 
plies to himself a text, which the Jew^s supposed to belong to 
the messiah, Dan. vii. 13. I saxv in the night-visions, and be- 
hold, one, like the Son of man, came ivith the clouds of heaven^ 
&c. So that, from all this, it follows, that if Christ, when he 
conversed occasionally with the Jews, or when he was called 

'«) Vide Abbadie on the Divinity of Christ, per totum. 



542 THh BOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

before the Sanhedrim, asserts himself to be the Son of God, 
which includes in it his Deity, and so does not shun to speak 
of himself, as equal with God, we have the doctrine, which we 
are defending, maintained by himself; therefore we must con- 
clude, that he really is what he declared himself to be, nanielv, 
God equal with the Father. 

II. We proceed to consider how our Saviour's Deity appears, 
from those divine attributes, which are ascribed to him, which 
are proper to God alone ; to which we shall add, those high and 
glorious titles, by which he is described in scripture. The attri- 
butes of God, as has been before observed ^, are all essential 
to him, and therefore cannot, in a proper sense, be any of them 
applied to a creature, as they are to Christ, which will be par- 
ticularly considered in some following heads. 

1. He is said to be eternal, and that not only without end, 
as the angels and saints in heaven shall be, but from everlast- 
ing : this appears from Micah v. 2. Whose goings forth have 
been from of old, from everlasting. If his goings forth have 
been from everlasting, then he existed from everlasting, for ac- 
tion supposes existence. Nothing more than this can be said, 
to prove that the Father Avas from everlasting : and that this is 
spoken of our Saviour is very plain, from the reference to this 
text, in Matth. ii. 6. where the former part of this verse is quo- 
ted and explained, as signifying our Saviour's being born in 
Bethlehem ; therefore the latter part of it, xvhose goings forth^ 
&c. must belong to him. Again, he is said, in John i. 1. to 
have been in the beginning ; observe, it is not said he vizsfrom 
but m, the beginning ; therefore it is plain, that he existed when 
all things began to be, and consequently was from eternity. 

When we consider this divine perfection as belonging to our 
Saviour, we militate against both the Socinians and the Arians ; 
as for the former, they deny, that he had any existence, properly 
speaking, before his conception in the womb of the virgin Mary, 
and interpret all those scriptures that speak of his pre-existence 
to it, such as that in John viii. 58. Before Abrahcnn was^ I 
am^ -or that the Word -was in the beginning, as importing either, 
that he was from eternity, in the decree and purpose of God, 
relating to his incarnation, in which sense every thing that comes 
to pass was eternal, as fore-ordained by God, which is there- 
fore a very absurd exposition of such-like texts ; or else they 
suppose, that his being in the beginning signifies nothing else 
but his being the Founder of the gospel-state, which cannot 
be the sense of the evangelist's words, because he is said to 
be ivith God; and it immediately follows, and all things xuere 
made by him, which every unprejudiced reader would suppose 
to intend the creation of the world, and not the erecting the gos- 

* See Quest, vn. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITW 343 

.])el-dispensation ; this therefore evidently appears to be a per- 
version ot the sense of the text. 

As for the Arians, they distinguish between Christ's being 
in the beginning of time, and his being from eternity ; and so 
they suppose the meaning of the text to be, that the Word was 
from the beginning ; and whatever disguise they seem to put 
upon their mode of speaking, when they say there was not a 
point of time in v/hich Christ was not, or that he was before the 
world, they are far from asserting that he was without begin- 
ning, or properly from eternity. And, in answer hereunto, let 
it be considered, that we cannot conceive of any medium be- 
tween time and eternity ; therefore whatever was before time, 
must be from eternity, in the same sense in which God is eter- 
nal. That this may appear, let us consider that time is the mea- 
sure of finite beings, therefore it is very absurd, and little less 
than a contradiction, to say that there was any finite being pro- 
duced before time ; for that is, in effect, to assert that a limited 
duration is antecedent to that measure, whereby it is determined, 
or limited. If we should allow that there might have been 
some things created before God began to create the heavens 
and the earth, though these things might be said to have had a 
being longer than time has had, yet they could not have existed 
before time, for time would have begun with them ; therefore 
if Christ had been created a thousand millions of ages before 
the world, it could not be said that he existed before time ; but 
it would be inferred from hence, that time, which would have 
taken its beginning from his existence, had continued so many 
ages ; therefore that which existed before time, must have ex- 
isted before all finite beings, and consequently was not produ- 
ced out of nothing, or did not begin to be, and is properly from 
eternity. Therefore I cannot but think the objection evasive, or 
a fruitless attempt to take off the force of this argument, to 
prove our Saviour's Deity, since the expressions of scripture, by 
which his eternity is set forth, are as strong and emphatical, as 
as those whereby the Father's is expressed, and consequently 
his Deity is equally evident. 

2. Our Saviour is said to be unchangeable, which perfection 
not only belongs to God, but is that whereby he is considered 
as opposed to all created beings, which are dependent upon him, 
and therefore changed by him, at his pleasure. Now that 
Christ is immutable, is evident, if we compare the words of the. 
Psalmist, Psal. cii. 25, — 27. Of old hast thou laid the foundation 
of the earth / and the heavens are the work of thy hands. They 
shall perish^ but thou shalt endure; yea^ all of them shall wax 
old like a garment ; as a vesture shalt thou change them^ and they 
shall be changed ; but thou art the sanie^ and thy years shall have 
no end^ with Heb. i. 10. where the apostle uses the same word'. 



344 THE DOCTRINE Or THE TRINITY. 

and considers them as applied to Christ ; so that it will be a ve- 
ry hard matter for any to evade the force of this argument. I 
•am persuaded, that if the apostle had not applied these words 
to Christ, the Auti-trinitarians would have allowed, that the 
Psalmist gives as plain an account of the immutability of God, 
as can be found in scripture, or, indeed, as words can express. 
Some of the writers on that side of the question, have passed 
over this scripture, as thinking, I suppose, that it is better not 
to attempt to account for it consistently with their scheme, 
than to do it in such a way, as will not, in the least, support it ; 
others do not care to own that they are applied to Christ ; but 
that is to break the chain of the apostle's reasoning, and there- 
by to fasten an absurdity upon him< Now, that we may briefly 
consider the connexion between this and the foregoing verses, 
whereby it will evidently appear that our Saviour is the Person 
here described, as unchangeable, let us consider, that the design 
of this chapter is to set forth the Mediatorial glory of Christ, 
to establish his superiority to angels ; and after he had referred 
to that scripture, which speaks of the eternity of his kingdom, 
to wit, the 45th Psalm, ver. 6. he then speaks of him as un* 
changeable, and so applies the words of the Psalmist, but now 
mentioned, to him. We may also observe, in the text, that he 
is not only unchangeable, as to his existence, but his duration 
is unchangeable, which farther confirms what was observed un- 
der the last head, that he is etei-nal, as God is, viz. without 
succession, as well as from everlasting : this seems to be con- 
tained in that expression. Thou art the same^ thy years shall 
not fail ^ as though he should say, thy duration does not slide, 
or pass away by successive moments, as the duration of time 
and created beings do. 

To this we might add what the apostle says, Heb. xiii. 8. 
that he is the same yesterday^ to-day^ and for ever^ that is, 
throughout all the changes of time, he remains unchangeably 
the same in his divine nature. A late writer * supposes the 
meaning of this scripture to be nothing but this, that the doc- 
trine of Christ, once taught by the apostles, ought to be pre- 
served unchanged : it is true, he says elsewhere,| that it is cer- 
tainly true that the Person of Christ is the same yesterday, to- 
day, and for ever .; whether, by yesterday, he means any thing 
more than a limited duration of time past, which he must do, 
or else give up the doctrine that he every where contends for, 
I cannot tell ; but he does not think that this text respects the 
Person of Christ, but his doctrine as above mentioned ; the 
principal argument by which he proves it is, its supposed con- 
nexion with the foregoing verse ; and so it is as though he 

* See Br. Clarke's Scripture doctrine, pa^e 127. 
^ Tieplu to JVelsm, paje 169. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 345 

should say J Have regard to \Vhat has been delivered to you by 
those who ha\e preached the word of God, M'ho, though they 
are no more among you, yet the doctrine the}' have delivered 
is the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever. But it seems to be 
too gl-eat a strain on the sense of the words, to suppose Christ 
to import the same with Ids doctrine i and, with submission, I 
cannot think that this is to be inferred from what goes before, 
or follows after it ; but the sense seems to be this ; Adhere 
to the doctrine you have formerly received from those who 
have preached the word oi God to you, and be not carried 
about with divers and strange doctrines, so as to change your 
sentiments with your teachers, for that would not be to act in 
conformity to Jesus Christ, who is the same yesterday, to-day, 
and for ever ; so that he designs to establish their faith from 
the consideration of Christ's immutability, whatever changes 
they are liable to from the death of their teachers, or the inno- 
vations of those who succeed them, and endeavour to cany 
them away by divers and strange doctrines ; so the text set ms 
to be as plain a proof of our Saviour's immutability as that 
scripture, Hev. i. 4. is of the immutability of God, in which it 
is said. He is^ 7uas, and is to come. If, by his being yesterday y 
we are to understand, as some do, his managing the affairs of 
his church under the legal dispensation ; and to-day^ his govern- ; 
ing them under this present dispensation; andybr ever^ the eter* ' 
nity of his kingdom, it plainly proves, that whatever changes 
he has made in the affairs of the government of the church and 
of the world, yet he is the same, and consequently a divine 
Person. 

3. Another divine attribute ascribed to our Saviour, is om- 
nipresence, as in Matt, xviii. 20- Where txvo or three are gather- 
ed together i?i my 7ia??ie, there am lin the midst oj" them; which 
expression imports the same thing, with that whereby the di- 
vine omnipresence (as is allov/ed by all) is set forth in Exod* 
XX. 24. In all places xvhere I record my name^ I xvill come unto 
thee^ and I will bless thee. Now that Christ's presence in the 
midst of his people, in all places, argues his omnipresence, is 
very evident, since he designs, by this promise, to encourage 
them in all places, and at all times, to perform religious duties, 
with an eye to this privilege ; so that wherever there is a wor- 
shipping assembly, they have hereby ground to expect that 
he will be present with them- Now it is certain, that no crea- 
ture can be in two places at the same time, much less in all 
places, which is the same as to Jill heaven and earthy and is ap- 
plicable to God alone, as the prophet expresses it, in Jer. xxiii. 
24. Moreover, when Christ says, that he will be with his 
people in all places, it must be meant at the same time, and 
not successively, otherwise he could not be where-ever ;v»'o or 

Vol. 1. ■ X x 



346 THE DOCTKIJ^K Of THB TKIMT-Y. 

three are met in his name ; this therefore io a plain proof of his 
omnipresence, which is an incommunicable perfection of the 
divine natuie, and consequently argues him to be true and pro- 
per God. 

Object. 1. It is objected to the sense we have given of this 
scripture, (to weaken the force of the argument taken from it) 
that our Saviour is here said to be present, onl}' by his authori- 
ty, where two or three aie met together in his name ; and ac- 
cordingly the words are to be taken in a metaphorical sense, 
as when a king is said to be present in all parts of his domini- 
ons, where persons, who are deputed to represent him, act by 
his authority". 

Ansu". Though we allow, that v/hatever is done in Christ's 
name, must be said to be done by his authority ; yet we cannot 
allow that his being in the midst of them is to be taken only 
for his being so by his authority ; for we must not suppose that 
our Saviour, in these words, makes use of a tautology ; and, 
indeed, it v/ould be a very jejune and empty way of speaking 
to say, that where two or three are met together in my name, 
that is, by my authori'tV) there am I in the midst of them, by 
mv authoritv. Certainly, Christ's being in the midst of them, 
must be taken in the same sense with that parallel scripture be- 
fore referred to, in Exod. xx. 24. where God's coming to h:6- 
people^ in those places where he records his name, is explain- 
ed, as having a very great privilege attending it, namely, his 
blrssiitg thern^ which he is said to do, when he confers bless- 
edness upon them, and gives them a full and rich supply of all 
their wants ; this therefore must be the sense of our Saviour's 
being in the midst of his people. 

Moreover, as God is said to be present v^'here he acts, so 
Christ's powerful influence, granted to his people in all places, 
which supposes his omnipresence, contains a great deal more 
than his being present by his authority; and if that were the 
only sense in which this scripture is to be taken, it might as, 
well be alleged, that all the scriptures, which speak of the 
divine omnipresence might be taken in that sense, which would 
be to set aside all the proofs we have from thence of this per- 
fection of the divine nature ', therefore this objection seems to 
be rather an evasion, than an argument, to overthrow Christ's 
divinity, taken fiom his omnipresence. 

Object. 2. Others suppose that Christ being in the midst of 
his people, when met together in his name, implies nothing 
more than his knowing wdiat they do Avhen engaged rn acts ot 
religious worship. 

Ansjv. We observe, that thev who make use of this objec- 

. tion, that they may militate against that argument, which is 

brought to prove his Deity from his omnipresence, will, for ar- 



THE DOCTRINE Ot THE TRINIT.T. 34/ 

gUnient^s sake, allow him to be omniscient,' not considering 
that that equally proves him to be a divit^jC Person, as wui be 
considered under our next head. Now, to prove that Christ's 
being- present with his people, is to be understood of his know- 
ing what they do, they refer to that scripture, 2 Kings v. 26. 
in which Elisha says to Gehazi, as knowing what he had done, 
when ^ he followed Naaman, the Syrian, for a reward ; Wefit 
not mine heart with thee^ rvhen the man turned again from his 
chariot xvith thee f But since this scripture signifies nothing- 
else but that this secret was revealed to him, Avhich is, in a 
figurative way of speaking, as though he had been present with 
him, it will not follow from hence that the prophet pretended 
to knoAV what was done in all places, and that at all times, 
which is more (as will be farther observed under the next 
head) than what seems communicable to any creature : but 
this is intended by Christ's knowing all things, and more than 
this, doubtless, is meant by his being in the midst of his peo- 
ple, vv^hei-eby he encourages them to expect those blessings, 
which they stand in need of, from him, in which respect he 
promises to be with them in a way of grace ; and certainly he 
that is so present with his people, must be concluded to be, in 
the most proper sense, a divine Person. 

There is another scripture, which is gaierally brought to 
prove Christ's omnipresence, and consequently his proper Deity, 
to wit, John iii. 13. And no mayi hath ascended rip to heaven but 
he that came down from heaven^ even the Son of man rvhich is 
in heaven. For the understanding of which words, we must 
consider their connexion with what goes immediately before ; 
thus by, No man hath ascended up into heaveti^ but he that came 
doxvnfrofit heaven, It is plain our Saviour means, that no man 
has a full and comprehensive knowledge of heavenly things, 
of which he had been speaking in the foregoing verse, b'at he 
that came down from heaven ; in which he asserts his divine 
omniscience *, as the person in whom ail treasures of wisdom, 
and knowledge are hid, as it is expressed elsewhere ; or none 
knows the mvsteries which are hid in God, but he that is ia. 
the bosom of the Father, who came down from heaven ; or^ 
as the apostle expresses it, 1 Cor. xv. 47. who is the Lord from 
heaven ; and then, as a farther proof of his Deit}', he adds, that. 
he is in heaven ; that is, while he was on earth, in one nature, 
as' being omnipresent, he was in heaven in the other nature; 
and, agreeably to this sense of the scriptui-e, he is said to come 
doivn from Kea-oen, 2i% his- divine nature manifested its glory 
here on earth, when the nature v/as united to it, which is the 
only sense in v/hich Ciod is said to come down into this lower 
^vorid : as we have the same mode of speaking, in Gen. xi. T. 



348 THE DOCTHINE OF THE TRINITT. 

Exod. iii. 8. and odier places ; so that if he is tlius omnipre- 
sent, we must conclude that he is a diviiie Person. 

The Arians give a very different sense of this text, especial- 
ly those words, The Son ofnian^ who is in heaven ;{d) for, they 
suppose, the words ought to be rendered, xvas in heaven; and 
that it does not argue his omnipresence, but that nature, which 
they call divine, first resided in heaven from the beginning, 
when it was produced by the Father; and afterwards in his 
incarnation, by a removal irom heaven to earth it was said to 
come down from thence. But, before we allow of this sense 
of the text, they must prove that Christ was the first creature, 
and that, in this finite nature, he resided in heaven till his in- 
carnation, and that he afterwards, by a change of place, de- 
scended into this lower world; and, if they could make this 
appear, there is yet a difficulty in the expression, as they un- 
derstand the words ; for it is not usual to say, I came from a 
place, and was in that place before I came from it ; therefore 
whether their exposition of the words, or ours, be most pro- 
per, I leave any one to judge. 

As for the Socinians, who 'deny that Christ had any exis- 
tence before his incarnation, these are very much at a loss to 
account for the sense of this scripture ; though Socinus him- 
self, and many of. his followers, have concluded from thence, 
that Christ was taken up into heaven some time after his in- 
carnation, which they suppose to have been in some part of 
those forty days in which the scripture says he was in the 
wilderness tempted of the devil ; but hoAv he could ascend into 
heaven, and yet be in the wilderness, where one of the evan- 
gelists says he was all the forty days, as Mark i. 13. cannot 
be easily understood, or accounted lor; and, indeed, the scrip- 
ture is altogether silent as to this matter : and it is very strange, 
if it had been so, that when we have an account of other cir- 
cumstances in his life, which are of less importance, no men- 
tion should be made of this, which, had it been discovered, 
would have been a great inducement to his followers to have 
paid the highest regard to his doctrine ; for they suppose he 
was taken up into heaven, tl^at he might be instructed in those 
things which he was to impart to the world. And, instead of 
a proof hereof, they only say that this is a parallel instance 
with that of Moses, who was called up to the top of mount 
Sinai, which was then the immediate seat of the divine pre- 
sence, and there received the law, which he was to impart to 
Israel ; so, they suppose, it was necessary, that our Saviour 
should ascend into heaven, that he might there be instructed 
in that doctrine, which he was to communicate to his church. 

But we cannot but conclude, that being omniscient, as will 

ffl) c «v IV T» wfn.mt is admitted by Griesback into his text 



THE DOCTP.INE OF THE TRINITY. 549 

structions, and having, in his human nature, had an unction 
from the Holy Ghost; or, as it is expressed, John iii. 54. that 
God gave not the Spirit by mea-'iure laito him^ therefore it was 
necessary that he should ascend into lieaven, to receive the 
doctrines from thence, which he was to deliver. Moreover, 
according to this conjectui-e, his coming from heaven, in the 
end of time, to judge the world, should have been called his 
third coming, (as his fust coming from thence was in his in- 
carnation, and his second coining is supposed to be his return 
to this world, after he ascended into heaven, during this inter- 
val of time) which is contrary to that text of scripture, in Heb. 
ix. 28. which calls it, his coming the second time, without siuy 
unt9 salvation. And, indeed, it is so vmgrounded a supposi- 
tion, that some of the Socinians themselves reckon it, at most, 
but a probable conjecture, but do not pretend to say that it is 
sufficiently founded in scripture ; and therefore we cannot 
think that this will have any tendency to enervate the force of 
our argument, to prove Christ's Deity, taken from the above- 
mentioned sense of that text; The So?i of man, rvhich is i?i 
heaven. 

4. Our Saviour's Deity may farther be proved, from his 
being omniscient: thus the apostle Peter says, in John xxi. IT. 
Lord thou knoxuest cdl things, thou knowest that I love thee. 
This is too great a glory to be ascribed to any creature ; and 
had it been spoken of the Father, the Anti-trinitarians them- 
selves would have owned, that it is as great a proof of his 
Deity, as any contained in scripture, as importing the same 
thing with what the Psalmist saj^s, Psal. cxivii. 5. His un- 
derstanding is infinite. But, besides this there is another ex- 
pression that abundantly proves this matter, wherein he is de- 
nominated the Searcher of hearts, which is a glory that God 
appropriates to himself, in Jer. xvii. 10. / the Lord search the 
hearts, I try the reins, eveji to give every man according tc 
hisxuays; and elsewhere, 1 Chron. xxviii. 9. The Lord search- 
eth all hearts, and understandeth all the imagi7iations of the 
thoughts; and all creatures are excluded from having any 
branch of this glor)^, when it is said, in 1 Kings viii. 39. Thou 
only knowest the hearts of all the children of men : ^jjb^ such a 
knowledge as this is ascribed to Christ ; sometimeaHf is said 
to know the imvard thoughts and secret reasonings of men 
Tvithin themselves, Mark ii. 8. And, if it be said, that this is 
only a particular instance of knowledge, such as he might have 
had by immediate divine inspiration, and therefore that it does 
not prove his Godhead ; there is another scripture, that speaks 
of his knowledge, as more extensive, viz. that he knows the 
thoughts of all men, John ii. 25. He needed not that any onc 
shoidd testify of man, for he knexv what was in tnan ; and this 
be proved under our next head, he had no need to receive in- 



o3\J- THj: BOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

his knowledge does not only respect men's present, but their fu- 
ture thoughts, which are not known to themselves : tlius it is 
said, in John vi. 64. that he knew from the heginnmg ~ivho they 
were that believed not^ andxvho should betray htm. And if all 
this be not reckoned sufficient to prove him to be the heart- 
searching God, nothing can be expressed in plainer terms than 
this is, concerning him, in Rev. ii. 23. All the churches shall 
knoxv that lam he xvhtch sear diet h the reins and hearts ; and I 
will give unto every one of you ^ according to yotir works. 

Object, 1. It is objected to this argument for Christ's omnis- 
cience, taken from Peter's confession above-mentioned, Lord^ 
thou knowest all things^ &c. that nothing else is intended here- 
by, but that he had a very great degree of knowledge ; not 
that he was strictly and properly omniscient, as supposing that 
it is an hyperbolical expression, not altogether unlike that of 
the woman of Tekoa to David, in 2 Sam. xiv. 20. when she 
says, 3Iy lord is wise^ according to the wisdom of an angel of 
of God, to knoxv all things that are in the earth. 

Answ. It is true, this expression of her's is either an un- 
warrantable strain of compliment, or flattery, occasioned by 
David's suspecting that Joab had employed her tb plead the 
cause of Absalom ; or else it is a sincere acknowledgment of 
his great wisdom, without supposing him to be absolutely om- 
niscient, as though she should say, thou knowest all things 
that are done in the land : there is no plot or contrivance, how 
secret soever it may be managed, but thou wilt, some way or 
other, find it out, as thou hast done this that I am sent about. 
But what reference has this to Peter's confession ? Does it fol- 
low, that because there are hyperbolical expressions in scrip- 
ture, as well as in other writings, that this must be one ? or 
because a wise governor may have a conjectural knowledge of 
what is done by his subjects, when considering the various 
circumstances that attend their actions, that therefore the apos- 
tle intends nothing more than this? It is plain he appeals to 
Christ, as the heart-searching God, concerning the inward 
sincerity of his love to him, as well as of his repentance, after 
a public and shameful denial of him, which might have given 
just ocAwpn for its being called in question; and it is as evi- ■ 
dent a |HN^ of his omniscience, as that is of the Father's, in 
Psal. cx^ix. 23, 24. Search me, God, and knoxv my heart,; 
try me and knoxv my thoughts^ and see if there be any wicked 
way in rue, &c. 

Object. 2. Others, especially some of the Arians, do not so 
much deny Christ's omniscience, as the consequence deduced 
from it, to wit, his proper Deity; and these make use of a 
more abstruse and metaphysical way of reasoning, and accord- 
ingly they suppose that a creature may know all things, th^if 



THE DGCTIIINE OF THE TRINITA'. - oo i 

[ 

;. fe, all finite objects, and consequently all thihgs that are done 
in the world, namely, all creatures, and all their actions, since 
the object of this knowledge is, at most, but finite; therefore 
it is possible for a finite mind to be so enlarged, as to take in 
all finite things, or to have the knowledge of all things coivi- 
municatcd to it, since the object and the recipient are commen- 
surate with each other. Therefore our Saviour may know all 
things ; and yet it will not follow from hence, that his under- 
standing is infinite, or that his knowledge is so properly divine 
as the Father's is ; and consequently this is no sufficient argu- 
ment to prove his Deity in the sense in which we understand it. 

Answ. This method of reasoning might as well be used to 
evade the force of every argument, brought from scripture, to 
prove the Father's omniscience, or, indeed, to evince his infi- 
nite power, since all effects produced, which are the objects 
thereof, are but finite ; and therefore it ma}'^ as well be said, 
that it does not requii-e infinite power to produce them, nor 
prove his eternal power and Godhead. 

JNIoreover, as this would tend to destroy the infmitc dispro- 
portion between God and the creature in acting, so it supposes 
that God caifc:ommunicate a branch of his own glory to a crea- 
ture, by i^nrarging it to such a degree, as to take in all finite 
objects. There are some things not so properlj' too great for 
God to do, as for a creature to be the subject of: we do not 
pretend to set limits to the divine power ; yet we may infer, 
from the nature of things, and the powers of finite beings, that 
it is impossible for any one, below God, to know all things past, 
present, and to come, at one view ; which our Saviour must be 
supposed to do, or else this attribute of omniscience is not justly 
applied to him ; nor would he be fit to govern the world, as 
^\'ill be observed under a following head ; therefore we must 
conclude, from hence, that he is truly and properl}^ a divine 
Person. 

To what has been said, concerning Christ's omniscience, we 
may subjoin those scriptures that speak of him, as the wisdoju 
of God^ the Fountain of all communicated wisdom, the light 
xohich lighteth every man that cometh into the xvorld^ as he ir. 
called, in John i. 9. And it is supposed, by many, that ivisdom 
spoken of in Pro v. viii. is to be understood of our Saviour, as 
the personal wisdom of God, inasmuch as there are several 
personal characters ascribed to him : thus it is said, ver. 23. / 
xvas set xip from everlasting ^^z. and ver. 30, 31, Then., to wit, 
before the creation of all things, I was by him^ as one brought 
up -with him; and I was daihj his delight., rejoicing always he- 
fore him., rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth., and my 
delights were with the sons of men. This cannot properly speak- 
ing, be applied to God's essential wisdom ; it must thrrcfore be 



352 IHK DOCTRINK OF THE TRINITY. 

a description of an eternal divine Person, distinct from the 
Father. 

But since many suppose, that whatever is spoken of wisdom, 
in this and some other chapters of this book, is only metaphori- 
cal, or a beautiful description of divine wisdom, as the instructor 
of mankind ; though we cannot see how this, if nothing else be 
intended by it, can agree with some of the personal characters 
before mentioned, which seem applicable to our Saviour; yet 
we find that he is elsewhere called the xvisdom ofGod^ in a sense, 
that can by no means be supposed to be figurative : thus when 
we read in Luke xi. 49. Therefore also said the xvisdojn of God^ 
I tvill aend them prophets and apostles^ &c. it is certainly un- 
derstood of our Saviour, {a) To which, if it be objected, that, by 
the -wisdom of God^ is meant there the wise God, to wit, the 
Father ; it may be ansv/ered, that another evangelist, referring 
to the very same thing, explains what is meant by the xvisdom 
of God^ and represents our Saviour as speaking in his o^vli Per- 
son, Matt, xxiii. 34. Therefore^ behold^ I send unto uou pro- 
phets^ and zuise vien^ and scribes^ &c. 

5. The next divine perfection that is ascribed to Christ, is 
almighty power. This attribute is appropriated, JiHthe Arians 
to the Fii,ther;* and accordingly they suppose, flR i| implies 
not only his supremacy over all creatures, but ovL»r the Son 
and Holy Ghost; and therefore they peremptorily conclude it 
is never applied to them, and consequently that the Deity of 
our Saviour cannot be proved by it ; and that they may turn 
our own v/eapons upon us, or impro\'e some unwary conces- 
sions, made by some very considerable writers, ^vho have, in 
other respects, very well defended the doctrine of the Trinity, 
ihey seem to insinuate, as though this were a matter to be ta- 
ken, as it were, for granted, though it might easily be made 
appear, that thev strain the sense of those expressions, from 
whence they conclude them to ha^'e given up the cause to them, 
beyond what they ever intended ; and there are many otliers, 
who are far fi-om making such concessions. 

As for the word 7ruvloitp:iJa^i>, Almighty, there is nothing in the 
derivation thereof, from whence it may justly be inferred, that 
it is a perfection, that contains a greater display of the divine 
glory, than the other perfections, that are atributed to all the 
Persons in the Godhead, though indeed it contains in it an idea 
of the universal extent of divine power, with respect to the ob- 
jects tliereof ; yet this is not to be separated from the sense of 
the word^ when pov/er is ascribed to God in those scriptures, 

* Sse I)r. Clarke's Scripture Doctrine, page 63- 

(a) Bv the wisdom of God seems here to be meant the wisdom of God essen- 
tiallv considered. But see Matt, xxiii. 34. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. ■ 353 

where he is called the Ahmghtij ; therefore, if Ave can prove 
that Christ has power ascribed to him, that is properly divine, 
this will evince his Deity, as much as though we could produce 
several scriptures, in which he is indisputably called the AU 
mighty ; and this we shall first endeavour to do, and then en- 
quire whecherwe have not as much, or more reason to conclude, 
that he is called Almighty, th;m diey have to deny it. 

That power, such as is properly divine, is attributed to Christ, 
may be proved from that scripture before-mentlioned, which is 
evidently applied to him, Isa. ix. 6. where he is called, the 
mighty God ; and, in Psal. xlv. 3. which, as has been before 
observed, is spoken concerning him, in which he is called most 
mighty; and, in Phil. iii. 21. v>'e read of his changing our vile 
body^ that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body ; which 
is such an effect of power, as plainly argues it divine, as much 
as the production of all things out of nothing could do ; and 
this is said to be done, according to the xvorking^ ivherehij he 
is able to subdue all things to, hiraself. We might observe many 
other things, v/hich he has done, and will do, that require infi- 
nite power, which we shall have occasion to consider, when we 
prove his deity from his works under a following head. 

But since all this is to no purpose, with respect to those who 
deny his proper Deity, unless we can prove that he is called 
Almighty ; and the whole stress of this argument is laid upon 
it, for no other reason, as I presume, but because they think it 
impossible for us to do it : I shall attempt it ; and I hope to 
make it appear that we have greater probability, on our side, 
that he is so called, than they have ground to deny it. Here I 
shall take notice of this perfection of the divine nature, as we 
find it in the book of the Revelations, in which this attribute is 
mentioned nine times, and, in some places, seerns to be applied 
to the Father, but in others to the Son. 

The first we shall mention is in chap. i. 8. / am Alpha and 
Omega^ the beginning and the endings saith the Lord^ xvhich is^ 
and xvhich u>as^ and xuhich is to come^ the Almighty/ which 
seems to be spoken of our Saviour, 

1. Because he is described at large in the three foregoing 
verses ; and there is nothing which gives the least ground to 
question its application to him, unless that character's being 
given to the Person here spoken of, which is given to the Father, 
in ver. 4. xvhich f?, and xvhich xvas, and xvhich is to come; but 
since we find in other ocriptures, the same divine glories as- 
cribed to the Son that had before been ascribed to the Father; 
as in John v. 21. As the Father raiscth the dead^ and cjuickencth 
them^ even so the Son qmckeneth xvhom he xvill; and'in Tit. iii. 
4. the Father is called God our Saviour^ as appears by com- 
paring it with the ^th and 6th verses : and ^o is Christ called. 



554r fHi: DOCTFvIxVE OF THE TRiNlfV. 

chap, ii. 10, 13. therefore, why m.v) not the Father and the Soft 
be v:ich of them described with this character. Which was, is, 
and is to come P and tliat more especially, if we ccn^iciLr, that 
the ascribing this to Christ, is, in effect, the same with what i« 
said of him elsewhere, Heb. xiii. 8. where he is said to be the 
fame yesterdat/^ to-day^ and for ever.] 

2. It uirther appears, that this texi% in -which the Person spo- 
ken of is called Almighty^ is applied to Christ, because that 
character, Alpha and Omega^ seems to be applied to none but 
him in other places, where it is used. We find it four times in 
this book, viz> not only in this verse, but in ver. 11. in which 
k is indisputably applied to him, as will appear, by comparing 
it with the following verses. And, in chap. xxi. 6. he is again 
calie;i Alpha and Omega, which, that it is applied to him, ap- 
pears from the context ; it is he that makes all things new, or 
puts a new face upon the affairs of his church } and it is he wJio 
commands John to write what he saw and heard ; He said unto 
me. Write these xvords, ver. 5. We may observe^ that where- 
cver John is commanded, in this book, to write, it is Christ 
that gives forth the command : thus he said to him before, chap, 
i. 19. Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things 
which are, and the things xvhich shall be hereafter; and he is 
again commanded to write, Blested are the dead xvhich die in the 
Lord, by him who is called the Son of man, chap. xiv. 13, 14, 

Again, in chap. xxii. 13. he is called Alpha and Omega, y\io 
is described in the foregoing verse, as coming quickly, whose 
reward is xvith him; which is undoubtedly mean of our Sa- 
viour ; for it is said concerning him, ver. 20. Surely I come 
quickly, Amen : eveii so come, Lord Jesus. 

That which I ini^r from hence, is, that if Christ be styled 
Alpha and Omega, in ail other places in this book, it is more 
than probable he is so in this 8th verse of the 1st chapter, in 
which he is said to be the Ahnighty. And as he is called Alpha 
and Omega, so the explication of these words, wherever we 
meet willi it in this book without the words themselves, is ap- 
plied to Christ : thus he is called, chap. i. 17. and ii. 8. the first 
and the last; and, chap. iii. 14. the beginning of the creation of 
God : from henccy I humbly conceive, we have more ground to 
conclude, that Christ is called the Almighty in this verse, than 
the Arians have to deny it. 

Again, there is another place in this hook where he seems to 
be styled the Almighty, chap. xv. 3. And they sing the song of 
Aloses, the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, sayings 
Great and marvellous are thij xvorks. Lord God Almighti/ ; just 
and true are thy xvays, thou King of saints. This triumphant 
gohg is occasioned by one of the greatest victories which the 
■{' Seepage 344, 345, ante. 



IHE DOCTRINE ©F THE TRINIT.Y. 355 

dhiivch expects to obtain in this world : by tlie song of Moses^ 
I humbly conceive, is meant the church's celebrating the glory 
of God, for the greatest victory that ever was obtained under 
the legal dispensation; and the song of the Lamb, is an acknow- 
ledgment ox the greatest that is, or shall be obtained under the 
gospel-dispensation ; and, in celebrating the Lamb's victories, 
they set forth the praises of the mighty Conqueror in the fol- 
lowing words. Great and marvellous are thy ivorks^ Lord God 
Almighty : it is the Lamb that is every where described in this 
book, as fighting the church's battles, and obtaining victory for 
it ; therefore it is his glor}=^ which is here set forth- 

And as he is always described, in this book, as thus fighting 
the church's battles ; so it is he who is described as taking ven- 
geance on i'-s enemies, which is the just consequence thereof. 
Therefore I cannot but conclude, that he is spoken of, in chap, 
xvi. 6, 7. as having giveii their persecutors blood to drink^ for 
they were worthy ; and, in ver. 7. Eveii so Lord God Almighty^ 
true and righteous are thy judgments* 

Again, in chap. xvi. 14. we read of the battle of that great 
day of God Almighty ; and then it immediately follows, ^e/zo/t/, 
1 come as a thief in the nighty &c. which expression is known to 
lif elsewhere applied to our Saviour, and to none but him ; and 
that it is he who fights the church's battles, is evident from chap. 
xvii. 14. These shall make war with the La?nb, and the Latnb 
shall overthroxu them; and from chap. xix. 12, &c. where it is 
said, his eyes were as a fame offre; as he is elsewhere de- 
scribed, chap, i. 14. to denote that die great day of his wrath 
v/as come; and his name is called, in the 13th verse of this 
l^th chapter, the Word of God; and we read of the armies 
zvhich followed hi?n, and that out of his mouth goeth a sharp 
stvord, that he might smite the nations. From whence we may 
conclude, that since Christ is represented, in so many places in 
this book, as fighting with, and triumphing and reigning over 
his enemies, inflicting his plagues upon them, and delivering his 
church from their persecution, which is a work of divine power, 
he is fitly styled in several places. Lord God Almighty^ 

We might consider several other divine attributes ascribed 
to Christ, which prave his Deity, viz^ holiness, truth, and faith- 
fulness : thus, in Rev. iii. 7? These things saith he that is holy^ 
he that is true; and he is farther described in the following 
words, as having uncontroulable power ; who openeth^ and no 
man shutteth ; and shutteth^ and no man openeih. That this is 
spoken of him, is beyond dispute ; and in chap. vi. 10. They 
cried xvith a loud voice^ How long^ Lord, holij and true, dost 
thou not judge a7id avenge our blood on them that dwell upon the 
earth P to whom did they cry but to the Lamb, who is said to 
Ji^vp opened the seals, or to have discovered the mysteries that 



356 IKE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

tvere thereby revealed, as in vtr. 1. ? And when he had opened 
the sixth seal, he is described, as hearing his church's prayer, 
and avenging their blood, and so is represented as coming to 
judgment, in a very terrible manner ; upon which occasion it is 
said, the great day of his xvrath is come; and therefore it is he 
who is described as hohj and true. 

But if it be replied to this, that creatures are sometimes called 
holy and true, we may farther add, that it is Christ to whom it 
is said, chap. xv. 4. Who shall not fear thee^ Lord^ and glorify 
thy name., for thou only art holy ; for all nations shall come and 
rvorship before thee., for thy judgments are made manifest. This 
I infer irom svhat has been before considered, ihat it is he who 
obtains victory over, and pours forth his judgments on his 
church's enemies ; and it is he whose praises are celebrated in 
the song of the Lamb, mentioned in the verse immediately 
foregoing. 

Having considered several divine perfections, as ascribed to 
our Saviour, and these so glorious, that nothing greater can be 
mentioned to set forth the glory of a divine Person ; yet we 
may add hereunto, those glorious titles that are given him with 
a design to excite in us adoring and admiring thoughts of him : 
amongst which we shall only mention some which are either thi" 
same Avith, or are equivalent to those which are given to the 
Father, which they who deny Christ's Deity, cannot but own 
to be distinguishing characters of a divine Person, when so ap- 
plied. Thus, is the Father styled, in Heb. xiii. 20. The God of 
peace ? our Saviour is st}ied, in Isa. ix, 6. The Prince of peace; 
and he is said, Eph. ii. 14. to be ovr peace ; and as peace in- 
cludes in it aU the blessings that accompanv salvation, Christ's 
being styled the Avithor thereof, denotes him to be the Foun- 
tain ot blessedness, which he could not be, were he not a divine 
Person. 

Again, as God is called a Sun., and a Shield., Psal. Ixxxiv. 9. 
so Christ is called, in Mai. iv. 2. The Sun of Righteousiiess ; 
and, in Isa. xxxii. 2. An hiding place from the wind., a covert 
from the tempest^ and the shadow of a great rock in a weary 
land. 

Again, it is said of God the Father, D#Lit. xxx. 20. He is 
thy life., and the length of thij days ; our Saviour says, concern- 
ing himself, in John xi. 25. compared with chap. xiv. 6. that 
he is the life ; and. Acts iii. 15. he is called the Prince of life ; 
and, in Colos. iii. 4. ovr life. Again, is the Father called, in 
Psui. Ixxx. 1. The Shepherd of Israel ? Christ is called, in Heb. 
xiii. 20. That great Shepherd of the sheep. 

Moreover, is God often described in scripture as a glorious 
Xi'ig • as in Zeph. iii. 15. The King of Israel., even the Lord 
in the midst of thee f our Saviour is styled, in Isa. vi, 5. The 



THE DOCTRINE OF THK TRINITY. 357 

Khig^ the Lord of hosts ; and, in John i. 49. The King of Is- 
rael ; and, in Rev. xix. 16. King of kings^ and Lord of lords. 
Again, is God styled the Hope of Israel^ Jer. xiv. 8 i our 
Savioiir seems to be so called by the apostle, when he says, in 
Acts XXV iii. 20. for the Hope of Israel^ I am bound with this 
chatHy that is, for Christ's sake, who is the object of his peo- 
ple's hope. However, whether he is intended thereby, or no, 
in that scripture, he is called elsewhere our hope,, 1 Tim. i. 1. 
compared with Coloss. i. 27. 

Moreover, is God the object of desire, so that there is no- 
thing in heaven or earthy or "vvithin the whole compass of finite 
beings, that is to be desired besides,, or in comparison with him^ 
as the Psalmist says, Psal. Ixxiii. 25 .'' our Saviour is called, in 
Hag. ii. 7. The desire of all nations. I might refer to many 
other glorious titles that are given to him in the 2nd and 3rd 
chapters of the Revelations, in the ej)istks to the seven churches : 
every one of which is prefaced with such a character given of 
him, as is designed to strike them with an holy revci-ence, and 
esteem of him, as a divine Person. Thus concerning those proofs 
of Christ's Deity, which are taken from the names, attributes, 
and titles which are given to him ; which leads us to consider, 
III. The ^ext head of argument taken from those works, 
which have been done by our Saviour, that are proper to God 
alone. Divine works argue a divine efficient, or that he has in- 
finite power, and consequently that he is an infinite Person, or 
truly and properly God, Vv'ho performs them. Now these words 
are of two sorts ; either of nature and common providence, or 
of grace, to wit, such as immediately respect our salvation ; in 
all which, he acts beyond the power of a creature, and there- 
fore appears to be a divine Person. 

1. He appears to be so, from his having created all things. 
He that made the world, must be before it ; and therefore since 
time began with the first creature, as has been before observed, 
it follows that he must be before time, that is, from eternity. 

Again, he that created all things, must have a sovereign will, 
for whose pleasure they are,, and xvere created,, Rev. iv. 11. 
And it follows from hence, that he has an undoubted right to 
all things, and that he might have annihilated them, had it been 
his pleasiu-e ; and also, that he has a right to dispose of them as 
he will, as the potter has power over his clay. All these things 
are consequent on the work of creation-; therefore it is an unde- 
niable argument, that he, who created all things, must be God. 
It ma\' also be observed, that to create, is to exert infinite 
power, or to act above the power of a creature, which, at best, 
is but finite : now whatever is more than finite, must be infinite ; 
and consequently he who created all things, must exert infinite 
power, and that is certainly such as is truly divine.. 



558 THE »eCTRINE OF THE TRfNITT. 

We might farther consider, that there are many scriptures 
which appropriate creation to God, and, indeed, it cannot be 
otherwise ; for to suppose that a creature gave being to itself, 
is to suppose him to be both a cause and an effect, and conse- 
quently to be, and not to be, at the same time, to exist as a crea- 
tor, and not to exist as brought into being, which is a plain 
contradiction ; and it is evident, that, in scripture, the creature 
is opposed to the Creator: thus, in Rom. i. 25. it is said, theif 
7vorshipped and served the creature more than the Creator^ xvho 
is blessed forever. And there are several scriptures that speak 
of creation, as a distinguishing evidence of divine glory : thus, 
in Isa. xl. 28. we have a magnificent description oi God, taken 
more especially from this work, when he is called, The ever- 
fasting" God^ the Lord^ the Creator of the ends of the earth ; and, 
in chap. xiii. 5. Thus saith God the Lord^ he thai created the 
heavens^ and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earthy 
and that rvhich cometh out of it ; he that giveth breath unto the 
people upon it^ and spirit to them, that -walk therein; in vvhich, 
and many other scriptures of the like nature, which might be 
referred to, it appears that creation is a work peculiar to God. 

The next thing we are to prove is, that our Saviour created 
all things. There are many who think that this ma}' be proved 
from the work of creation's being ascribed to more persons 
than one ; and therefore when we read of creators, in the plural 
number, as it is in the original, in Eccies. xii. 1. Remember 
thy Creator^ or creators ; and when God, in creating luan, is 
represented as speaking after this manner, het us make man af- 
ter our own image, &c. this seems to imply that there were 
more divine Persons engaged in this work than the Father. 

I do not indeed lay so much stress on this argument, as many 
do, yet it is not wholly to be neglected ; for, I confess, I can- 
not see any reason why there should be such a mode of ex- 
pression used, were it not to signify this divine mystery, of Ut 
plurality of Persons in the Godhead, to whom this work is as- 
cribecL 

Object, As for the objection, which some of the Anti-trini-= 
tarians, especially the Socinians, bring against it, that this mode 
of speaking, is such as is used in conformity to the custom of 
kings who, speak in the plural number ; 

Ansxu. To this it may be answered, that though kings do of- 
ten speak in the plural number, yet this is only a modern way of 
speaking, implying, that whatever a king does, is by the advice 
of some of his subjects, who are his peculiar favourites, and 
who are also made use of to fulfil his will ; but, nevertheless, 
this way of speaking is not so ancient as scripture-times, much 
less as Moses's time, or the beginning of the world, which he 
refers to, when God is represented as thus speaking. It is the 



THbI doctrine of the trinity. 2S^ 

fcustom of kings, in scripture, to speak in the singular number; 
and it is ver}'^ absurd to pretend to explain any mode ot speaking 
used in scripture, by customs of speech, not known till many 
ages after. 

I am sensible, some think that mode of speaking vistd by 
Ahasuerus Esth. i. 15. What shall zve do unto the gueen Vnshtl^ 
according- to lazu P is a proof that it was used in lormer ages. 
But the words may be rendered, What is to be done^ accordmg 
to law. Sec. or what is expedient for me to do r and therefore 
it doth not prove that kings used, in ancient times, to speak of 
themselves in the plural number; and consequently it cannot 
be argued, that when God is represented as speaking so in 
scripture, it is in compliance with any such custom. Besides, 
whenever he is represented as speaking in scripture, in all other 
instances, excepting those that are supposed to be contained in 
our u'-gviricnt, he is always represented as speaking in the sin- 
gular number; and therefore it seems still more probable, that 
this variation from his usual way of speaking, is not without 
some reason, and that hereby we are led into this doctrine, that 
there are more divine Persons than one, that created all things. 

But not to insist on this, since we have more plain proofs 
hereof in scripture, it evidently appears that Christ made all 
things, not only from what is said in John i. 3. that all thinga 
■were made by him ; and 'without him mas not any thing made 
that xvas yncide ; but, from Col. i. 16. By him -were all things 
created^ that are in heaven^ and that are on earthy visible and 
invisible^ xvhether they are thrones^ or dorninions^ or principalis 
tieSy or pozvers : all things ruere created by him, and for him .,- 
in which he is not only said to be the Creator, but the end of 
all things, which is the same with what is said in Prov. xvi. 4, 
that the Lord hath made all things for himself. 

This farther appears from Psal. cii. 25. Of old hast thou laid 
the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the -work of thif 
hands ; which is expressly applied to Christ by the apostle, in 
Heb. i. 10. 

By these, and such-like scriptures, it evidently appears that 
Christ made all things. The Socinians, indeed, who are sensi- 
ble that creation was an evident proof of divine power, and 
therefore that the Creator of all things must be God, labour 
very hard to prove that all those scriptures that ascribe this 
work to our Saviour, are to be taken in a metaphorical sense, 
and so signify nothing else but his being the author of the gos- 
■pel-state, which is a kind of new creation peculiar to him ; and 
that he did this as a prophet, revealing those doctrines which 
relate thereunto ; and accordingly they take the sense of that 
scripture, in John i. 2, 3. which speaks of his being in the begin- 
nings and that a'l things -were made ky him^ as intending nothing 



360 THE DOCTillNE OF THE TRI^-ITY. 

else, but that he was In tb.e beginning of the gospel, and that 
whatever was made, or ordained, to be a standard and rule of 
faith, was by him ; and that, in the discharge of this work, he 
was to restore decayed religion, and to correct several mistaken 
notioi^s, which the Jews had entertained concerning the moral 
law, to add some new precepts to it, and give directions con- 
cerning that mode of worship which should be observed in the 
church for the future. Tliis is all they suppose to be intended 
by that work, which is ascril^ed to Christ as a Creator ; where- 
as, in this scripture, it is plainly said, that there was nothing in 
the whole frame of nature, nothing that was an ejffect of power, 
made without him. And there is another scripture, which can- 
not, with any colour of reason, be understood in that sense, viz. 
in Col. i. 16. By him were all things created that are in heaven^ 
and that are in earthy visible and invisible ; where the aposde 
speaks of the creation of angels and men, as well as all other 
things : now, certainly, Christ did not come into the world to 
rectify any mistakes or restore decayed religion among the an- 
gels, therefore the apostle here plainly pi'oves that our Saviour 
created all things. 

But since this opinion of the Socinians is nov/ almost uni- 
versally exploded by the Anti-trinitarians, we have no occasion 
to add any thing farther in opposition to it; but shall proceed 
to consider what the Arians say concerning Christ's creating 
all things. These allov/ that the work of creation is ascribed to 
him ; but they deny that this argues him to be God in the same 
sense as the Father is. The account which they give thereof 
is, that Ciod, to wit, the Father, created all things by the Son, 
as an instrument, created by him, immediately for that pur- 
pose J so that the Son was an inferior, or second cause of the 
production of all things; and therefore that it cannot, from 
thence, be concluded that he is God equal with the Father. 

What I would humbly offer, in opposition hereunto is, 

1. That, in this account of creation, there is not a just dif- 
ference put between the natural and supernatural production of 
Things, of which the latter can only be called creation ; there- 
fore, if these two be confounded, the distinguishing character 
of a Creator is set aside, and consequently the glory arising 
from hence cannot be appropriated to God ; nor is that infinite 
perfection, that is displayed therein, duly considered, but ac- 
cording to this scheme or method of reasoning a creature may 
be a Creator, and a Creator a creature ; nor can the eternal 
poxver and Godhead oi the divine Being be demonstrated by the 
things that are inade or created, as the apostle says they are in 
Rom. i. 20. 

2. From that first mistake arises another, namely, that be- 
cause, in natural productions, that which was created by God, 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. o6i 

iijay be rendered subservient to the production of other things j 
in which respect it may be termed an instrument made use of 
by a superior cause, and may have an energy or method of act- 
ing, pecuhar to itself, vi^hereby it produces effects according to 
the course and laws of nature, fixed by God, the first cause of 
all things ; therefore they suppose, though ^vithout sufficient 
ground that God might create all things by an instrument, or 
second cause thereof, as they conclude he did by the Son. 

3. Notwithstanding we must assert, that creation being a su- 
pernatural production of things, what has been said concerning 
natural production, is not applicable to it ; therefore, 

4. Though things may be produced in a natural way, by se- 
cond causes, whose powers are limited, and subjected as afore- 
said, to the laws of nature ; yet supernatural effects cannot be 
produced by any thing short of infinite power ; therefore, since 
creation is a supernatural work, it must be concluded to be a 
work of infinite power. 

5. It follows, from hence, that it is not agreeable to the idea 
of creation, or the producing all things out of nothing, for God 
to make use of an instrument. That this may appear, let it be 
considered, that whatever instrument is made use of, it must 
be either finite or infinite. An infinite instrument cannot be 
made use of, for then there would be two infinites, one supe- 
rior, the other inferior. Nor can a finite one be made use of, 
for that, according to our last proposition, cannot produce any 
supernatural effect, as creation is supposed to be, which requires 
infinite power, and that cannot be exerted by a finite medium, 
therefore no such instrument can be used. Moreover, if it re- 
quires infinite power to create all things, this power, in its me- 
thod of acting, would be limited, by the instrument it makes 
use of; for whatever power a superior cause has in himself, the 
effect produced, by an instrument will be in proportion to the 
weakness thereof. This some illustrate by the similitude of a 
giant's making use of a straw, or a reed, in striking a blow in 
■which the weakness of the instrument renders the power of the 
person that uses it insignificant. Thus if God the Fathiir should 
make use of the Son, in the creation of all things, the power that 
is exerted by him therein, can be no other than finite ; but that 
is not sufficient for the production of things supernatural, which 
require infinite power. To this we may add, , 

6. That the cre-rttion of all things is ascribed to the sovereign- 
ty of the divine will ; accordingly the Psalmist describino- it, 
in Psal. xxxiii. 9. says. He spake and it ivas done ; he com- 
manded., and it stood fast ; so when Cod, in Gen. i. 3. said. Let 
there be light^ and there was light ; and when we read of the 
other parts of the creation, as produced by his almighty word, 
it implies that they were produced by an act pf Iiis will. Nov; 

Vol. i. Z z 



262' tHi: DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

it seems impossible^ from the nature of the thing, that an in- 
strument should be made use of in an act of willing any more 
than in an act of understanding. 

7. No cause can reasonably be assigned why God should 
make nse of an instrument in the production of all things ; for 
certainly he that, by his immediate power, produced the instru- 
ment, might without any difficulty, or absurdity, attending the 
supposition, have created all things immediately without one. 
And we must farther suppose, that if there vvere nothing in 
the nature of things, which required hiiTi to make use of an in- 
sti-ument, he would not, by making use of one, to wit, the Son, 
administer occasion to him, to assume so great a branch f his 
own glory, namely, that of being the Creator of the ends of the 
earth ; or for his being, as the result thereof, worshipped as a 
divine Person supposing him to have a right to divine worship, 
for no other reason. 

Object. 1. Though no one supposes that God stood in need 
of an instrument, or could not have created all things without 
it, yet we must conclude that he did not, because the scripture 
speaks of the Father's creating all things by the Son ; and when 
one person is said to do any thing by another, it implies that he 
makes use of him as an instrument therein. 

Ansxv. This seems to be the only foundation on which this 
doctrine is built. But there is no necessity of understanding 
the words in this sense, especially if we consider that all ef- 
fects are produced by the power of God ; and this power, sup- 
posing the Son to be a divine Person, (which we have endea- 
voured, by other arguments, to prove) must belong to him ; and 
the Father, and the Son being united, in the same Godhead, 
one cannot act without the other ; therefore whatever is said to 
be done by the Father, may, in this sense, be said to be done 
by the Son ; for though the Persons are distinct, the power 
exerted is the same. 

Thus a learned writer * accounts for this matter, when he says, 
that " The Son is of the same nature and substance with the 
" Father, so nearly allied, so closely united, that nothing could 
*' be the vrork of one, M'itliout being, at the same time, the work 
" of both : Hence it Avas, that the Son was Joint-creator with 
*' the Father, that all things w^ere made by him, and nothing 
** without him ; it was not possible for them either to act, or to 
*' exist Separately ; and therefore it is that the work of creation 
*' is, in scripture, attributed to both." This is a very safe as 
well as a just way of reasoning, consistent with, and founded 
on the doctrine of the Father and the Son's being united in the 
same Godhead, though distinct Persons ; and therefore it is 
agreeable to the sense of those scriptures, w^hich attribute this 
* Dr. Wcterlandi Serm. Ill in defence of Christ, pa^'e.106. 



ixi£ DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. SG2> 

work to the Son, in the same sense, as when it is attributed to 
the Father. 

But I am sensible that the Avians will reply to it ; that this 
does not sufficiently account for that subordination in acting, 
that seems to be implied in the sense of those scriptures, in 
which the Father is said to have created all things b}' the Son; 
therefore I shall take leave to speak more particularly to those 
texts that treat of this matter, where the same mode of speak- 
ing is used. And though there are several scrij^tures that re- 
present the Son as a Creator, or consider all things, as being 
made by him, as well as the Father., -or as a joint-creator with 
him ; yet there are but two places in the New Testament, in 
which the Father is said to have created all things by the Son, 
namely, Eph. iii. 9. in which it is said, ihat Go(/^ that is, the 
Father, created all t/wig's by Jesus C/u-ist ; and the other is in 
Heb. i. 2. where it is said, bt/ whom also he made the worlds. 

We have alreadv considered the absurdity of the Socinian 
way of expounding those other scriptures, that speak of Christ 
as a Creator, in which he is not said to act in subserviency to, 
but co-ordinately with the Father. But inasmuch as God the 
Father is, in these scriptures, said to create all things by Jesiis 
Christ, I shall humbly offer it, as my opinion, that though the 
other scriptures, in which Christ is set forth as a Creator, have 
no reference to him as Mediator, nor to the new creation, yet 
this seems to be the more probable sense of both these scrip- 
tures, (ft) 

As for the former of them, though some suppose that it is need- 
less to give the sense of it, sii"!£e the words, by Jesus Christy (Ji) 
are wanting in some ancient copies of scripture, as well as in 
the vulgar Latin and Syriac versions ; ytX^ since there are ma- 
ny copies that have it, we will suppose it to be genuine ; and 
that we may account for the sense of it, we may observe that 
the apostle makes use of the word create three times in this 
epistle ; we find it, in chap. ii. 10. and iv. 24. in both which 
places it is taken for the new creation, which is brought about 
by Christ, as Mediator ; and, I humbly conceive, that it may 
be taken so, in this verse, which we are now considering ; and 
therefore this is a part of that mystery, of which the apostle 

(fl) " That Christ w;is r\ota.increinRtritnu'nt which God used in the work, of crea- 
tion, as the Brians pretend, is plain from tliis, that the Scriptures not only teach, 
that Christ was tiie very supreme God himself that created all tiling's ; Psal. cii. 
25. Heb. i. 10. but also that no instruman wa.? tised in that work. It was wrous^ht 
immediately by God himsdf. As it is written, " God himself formed tlice:u-th find 
made it." Isa. xlv. 18. (This, all grant, was the supreme God: And this God 
was .lesus fJhrist.) «' He alone spread out the lipavens." Job i^-. 8. Not l)y an in- 
strument, but by Idmself alone, Isa.xliv. 24. with l<i^ or.ni hv.Vfl'i. Isa. xlv. 12." 

' ">>) (T/jt lYtrtpj yji{lQU are omitted by Grics1^a^^l 



564 THE DOCTRINE OF TPIE TRINITY". 

speaks in the foregoing words, that was hid in God ; and this 
sense seems not to be excluded, by those who suppose, that in 
other respects, it has some reference to the first creation of all 
things.* ' 

As for the other scripture, by -whom also he made the worlds, 
it a Kdti T8? etiaivn; (■■srcintrev, that is, by whom he made, instituted, or 
ordained, the various dispensations, which the church was un- 
der, either before or since his incarnation ; this was certainly 
done by him as Mediator ; and herein he acted in subserviency 
to the Father, as well as in all other works performed by him, 
as having this character. '' I would not be too peremptory in 
determining this to be the sense of the text, inasmuch as the 
apostle speaks of his upholding all things^ in the following verse, 
which is well put after this account of his having created them : 
I am also sensible that the word which Ave translate worlds^ is 
used in Heb. xi. 3. to signify the world that v/as at first crea- 
ted, in the most proper sense of the \-:ox& creation^ when the 
apostle says, that through faith we understand that the worlds^ 
rm a/w*?, xuere framed by the word of God ^ &c. But yet when I 
fmd that in many other places of the New Testament, where 
the Avord is used, it is taken in the sense but now given,f I can- 
not but conclude it the moi-e probable sense of the text ; but 
that which most of all determines me to acquiesce in it, is, be- 
cause the subserviency of the Son to the Father in this work is 
most agreeable to it. 

If it be objected, that this sense of the text coincides with 
that Avhich is given of it by Socinus, and his followers, which 
we before-mentioned and opposed; 

To this I answer, that the sense I have given of it, is very- 
foreign to theirs, who endeavour thereby to evade the force of 
the argument brought from it, to prove our Saviour's Deity ; 
whereas we only exchange one argument, for the proof there- 
of, for another ; for it seems to me to be as great an evidence, 
that he is a divine Person, when considered as the Author and 
Founder of the church, in all the ages thereof, or the rock on 
which it is built, as Avhen he is called. Creator of the world : if 
he be the supreme Head, Lord, jind Lawgiver to his church, 
in all the ages thereof; if the faith and hope of all that shall be 
saved, is founded upon him, as the great Mediator, Redeemer, 
and Sovereign thereof, then certainly he is God, equal with 
the Father. 

* Vid. Bez. in loc. Uims Thus oimies popiihs condiiUt, sic etiam mine omnes ad se 
'iiocat ; condidit aiUem per CliHsttmi, sic per Christum instaurat. 

f See Matt. xii. 32. 1 Cor. x. 11. Eph. i. 21. and chnp. ii. 7- Hcb. vi. 5. and 
chiip. ix. 26. the apostle speaking- q/"ihe foundation of the world, meani^tg the first 
creation, uses the word Kct/aoc; but -when, in the fullo-wing words, fie speaks o/"Christ's 
appearing in the end of the world, to put away sin, he. he uses the ivords tkh aamm. 



tRE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 365 

Object. 2. To what has been before suggested, upon which 
the chief stress of our reasoning depends, viz. that a finite crea- 
ture cannot be an instrument in supernatural pioductions, it is 
objected, that miracles are supernatural productions ; but these 
have been wrought by men, as instruments in the hand of God; 
therefore the creation of all things may as well be supposed to 
have been performed by the Son, as an instrument made use of 
to this end by the Father. 

Anszv. That miracles are supernatural productions, no one 
denies ; and it follows from hence, that they are either a spe- 
cies of creation, or equivalent to it ; therefore if it be allowed 
that a creature can have power communicated to him to work 
them, and therein may be said to be an instrument made use 
of by God, then we cannot reasonably deny that God the Father 
might use the Son as an instrument in creating all things. But 
we must take leave to deny that any, who are said to have 
wrought miracles, have had infinite power communicated to 
them for that purpose ; therefore they are not properly instru- 
ments in the hand of God, to produce supernatural effects ; but 
all that they have done therein, was only by addressmg them- 
selves to God, that he would put forth his immediate power 
in. working the miracle ; and in giving the people, for whose 
sake it was to be wrought, occasion to expect it; and after- 
wards improving it for their farther conviction. It is true, mi- 
racles are oftentimes said to have been wrought by men ; but, 
I humbly conceive, nothing more than this is intended thereby; 
which, that it may appear, we may observe, that sometimes 
they who have wrought them, have not made use of any action 
herein, but only given the people ground to expect the divine 
interposure : thus, immediately before the earth swallowed up 
Korah and his company, Moses gave the people to expect this 
miraculous event. Numb. xvi. 28 — 30. And Moses said^ Here- 
by shall ye know that the Lord hath sent me. If these men die 
the common death of all me?iy then the Lord has not sent me. But 
if the Lord make a nexv things and the earth opeyi her mouthy 
and sxuallow them up^ then shall ye knoxv that these men have 
provoked the Lord ; and as soon as he had spoken the words, 
the ground clave asunder, and sv/allowed them up. This might 
be reckoned among the miracles wrought by Moses ; though 
all that he did was only what tended to raise the people's ex- 
pectation, that such an extraordinary event should immediate- 
ly happen. Again, at other times, when a miracle has been 
wrought, Ave read of nothing done but only a word spoken to 
signifv that God would work it : thus, when the captain, with 
his fifty men, was sent by the king of Israel, to the pix)phet 
Elijah, to command him to come to him, the prophet uses this 
mode of speaking, 2 Kings i. J 2. If I he a man ofGod^ let firr 



366 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITIT. 

cojne down from heaven^ and consume thee and thy Jifty ; whict'* 
immediately happened accordingly. 

At other times, when miracles have been wrought, the Per- 
son, who, in the sense but now mentioned, is said to work them, 
has made use of some external and visible sign, which was 
either an ordinance for his own faith, if no one was present but 
himself; as when the prophet Elisha smote the waters of Jor- 
dan with Elijah's mantle, and said, 2 Kings ii. 14. Where is the 
Lord God of Elijah ? or else the sign, being given by divine 
direction, was an ordinance for the faith of the people present^ 
whose conviction was intended thereby ; not that they should 
suppose that the action used had any tendency to produce the 
miracle : but it was only designed to raise their expectation, 
that God would work it by his immediate power ; as when Mo- 
ses was commanded, in Exod. xiv. 16. to lift up his rod^ and 
stretch out his hand over the sea., and divide it^ that Israel might 
pass through ; or, in chap. xvii. 6. to smite the rock., whereupon 
God caused water to come out of it ; and in several other ac- 
tions, which he used, by divine direction, when other miracles 
were wrought ; in which respect, though he was said, in a less 
proper way of speaking, to have wrought them, yet he was no 
more than a moral instrument herein, and therefore the divine 
power was not communicated to, or exerted by him ; and it 
creatures have been instruments in working miracles in no other 
sense than this, it cannot be inferred from hence that Christ 
might be made use of by the Father, as an instrument in cre- 
ating the world : a moral instrument he could not be ; for there 
was no doctrine contested, no truth to be confirmed thereby, 
no subjects present to expect a divine interposure ; and, indeed, 
none ever supposed that the Son of God was an instrument in 
this sense ; therefore if no one ever was an instrument in any 
other, nor could be from the nature of the thing, as has been 
already proved, then the force of the argument, which we have 
laid down to prove it, is not in the least weakened by this ob- 
jection. 

Thus we have endeavoured to prove the divinity of Christ 
from the work of creation. 

2. We shall proceed to consider how our Saviour's Deity 
appears, from those works of providence, which are daily per- 
formed by him. Providence is as much a divine work, and 
contains as glorious a display of the divine perfections, as crea- 
tion; and this is twofold, viz. preserving and governing. With 
respect to the former of these, some divines have asserted, 
that it is, as it were, a continued creation, not formally so ; but 
as the one produces a creature, the other prevents its sinking 
into nothing; and because it is, 5n all respects, dependent on 
the power of God, and as much so, for the continuance of its 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINIXV. 367 

being, as it was for its being brought into being; therefore con- 
serving providence is an evidence of the divine power of him 
■who sustains all things. 

Now that this glory belongs to our Saviour, is plain from 
scripture, which speaks of him, in Hcb. i. 3. as upholding all 
things by the xvord of his poxver ; and in Coloss. i. 17. it is 
said, by him (dl things consist ; both these scriptures respect 
this branch of divine providence, namely, his preserving all 
things in being; and this is certainly more than can be said of 
any creature. And it is not pretended that herein he acts asi 
the Father's instrument, even by those who suppose that he 
^vas so, in the creation of all things, inasmuch as scripture does 
not speak of God's upholding all things by him, but of Christ's 
upholding them by his own, that is, the divine power ; so that 
we have as plain a proof of his Deity, from his upholding pro- 
vidence, as there is of the being of a God, which is evidently 
inferred from it. 

As to the other branch of providence, respecting the govern- 
ment of the world in general, or of the church in particular, 
this is also ascribed to Christ, and thereby his Godhtad is far- 
ther proved. Whatever degree of limited dominion may be 
said to belong to creatures ; yet universal dominion belongs only 
to God ; and this is assigned, as one ground and reason ot his 
right to divine honour; therefore it is said, in Job xxv. 2. 
Dominion and power are with him^ that is, there is a holy re- 
verence due to him, as the supreme Lord and Governor of the 
world; and, in Psal. Ixvii. 4. when it is said concerning the 
gi-eat God, that he shall judge the people righteously^ and go- 
vern the nations upon earthy this is considered as the founda- 
tion of universal joy, let the nations he glad^ and sing for joy ; 
and of praise, ver. 5. Let the people praise thee^ G&d; let all 
the people praise thee; and, in Psal. xxii. 28. when it is said^ 
the kingdom is the Lord^s ; and he is the Governor among the na- 
tions ; this is assigned, as the reason of their worshipping him, 
ver. 27. All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn unto 
the Lord; and all the kindreds of the nations shall worship be- 
fore thee. This therefore is, undoubted!}^, a branch of the di- 
vine glory; so that if we can prove that universal dominion 
belongs to Christ, or that he is the Governor of the world, and 
of the church therein, this will plainly evince his Deity. 

1. Let us consider him as the Governor of the world. This 
seems to be the meaning of several expressions of scripture, in 
vvhich royal dignity is ascribed to him ; and he is represented 
as sitting upon a throne, and his throne to be for ever and ever., 
Psal. xiv. 6. and he infinitely greater than all the kings ol the 
earth ; upon which account, he is called, in Rev. i. 5. The 
Prince of the kings of the earth ; and they are commanded to 



368 TH£ DOCTRINE OF THE TRINItEY. 

testify their subjection to him, and all are represented as bles- 
sed that put their trust in him^ Psal, ii. 12. And as his king- 
dom is considered, in John xviii. 36. as not being of this worlds 
and the honours due to him, such as are divine, this farther 
proves his Deity. 

Moreover, his universal dominion, and consequently his God- 
head, is evinced by that glorious character, which we have be- 
fore considered *, as belonging to him, namely, the Lord of 
hosts, as the prophet Isaiah says, speaking of the vision which 
he had of his gloiy, in chap. vi. 5. 3Iijie eyes have seen the 
King-, the Lord of hosts ^ as denoting his sovereignty over all 
the hosts of heaven, and all creatures in this lower world, as 
he governs them, and makes one thing subservient to another, 
and all this is done to set forth his own glory. 

2. This will farther appear, if we consider him as the Go- 
vernor of his church ; in this he has access to the souls of men, 
working in them those graces, which are the effects of almighty 
power, which he does, when they are effectually called ; and 
the work of sanctification, which is consequent hereupon, is 
carried on till it is perfected. We shall have occasion, under 
some following answers f, to prove that these are divine and 
supernatural works ; the more full and particular proof whereof, 
we shall reserve to its proper place, and only observe, at pre- 
sent, that they are spoken of as such in scripture, and ascribed 
to the exceeding greatness of the power of God, no less than 
that xvhich he wrought in Christy -when he raised him from the 

dead^ Eph. i. 18, 20. and elsewhere they are called a nerw 

creation^ chap. ii. \. a quickening ox resurrection^ a breaking 
the rock in pieces^ taking axuay the heart of stone^ giving an heart 
of fleshy or a nezv heart; Jer. xxiii. 29. Ezek. xxxvi. 26. which 
expressions would never have been used, had not the Avork been 
divine and supernatural ; therefore it follows from hence, that 
since Christ is the Author of this internal work, he is a divine 
Person. Now that he is so, is obvious, from many places in 
the New Testament ; as when he is styled, in Heb. xii. 2. The 
Author and Finisher of our faith; and when the apostle, in 1 
Tim. i. 14. speaks of faith and love abounding^ xvhich is in 
Christ jfesus^ he speaks, at the same time, of the grace of our 
Lord abounding, as the spring and fountain thereof ; and when 
the apostles, in Luke xvii. 5. desire him to increase their faith, 
not in an objective way, as affording some greater foundation 
for it, but subjectively, by an internal work, exciting and pro- 
moting the principle thereof, which was before implanted in 
them ; and so causing all those graces, that accompany it, to 
abound, as the effects of his divine power. 

We might farther consider Christ's spiritual government, as 
* See page oQ4!. f &e Q«esf . Ixvii. c?id ixxv. 



'rilE BGCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 369 

extended to his church, collectively considered, which is ex- 
posed to many dangers and difficulties, and meets with much op- 
position from its enemies, who attempt its ruin, but in vain, be- 
cause it is the object of the divine care, kept by the power of 
God, through faith, unto salvation : for which reason, the gates 
of heil shall not prevail against it. Now this is, in a peculiar 
manner the work of Christ ; he is the rock on which it is built ; 
and his presence, in the midst of his people, is not only their 
glory, but their safety ; which it would not be, if he were no 
more than a creature. We might also consider the subserviency 
of the various dispensations of providence in the world to their 
good, as he is Head over all things to the churchy Eph. i. 22. 
which could not answer that valuable end, had he ^ot been a 
divine Person. 

We might farther consider how the divine glory of Christ 
will be demonstrated, in his second coming to compleat the 
work of salvation, begun in this world. To prepare a way for 
this, there will be an universal resurrection of tlie dead, which 
will be no less an effect of almighty power, than the creation 
of all things was at first. I need not therefore say any thing 
farther to prove this to be a divine work ; we need only prove 
that this general resurrection shall be performed by Christ: 
this might be pravtd from several scriptures ; in one whereof 
he expressly asserts it himself, in words very plain and particu- 
lar, viz. John vi. 38. The hour is coming-^ in which all that 
are in their graves shall hear his voice ^ and shall come forth ^ &c. 

Moreover, when, at the same time, he is represented as 
coming in the clouds, with power and great glory, in his oxvJi 
gloru^ as well as that of the Father^ and of the holy angels^ in 
Luke ix. 26. the most naturid sense of that text seems to be 
this, that his divine glory, which is called his oxvn^ which was 
comparatively hid from his people, while he was here on earth, 
shall eminently be demonstrated in his second coming, and also 
that Mediatorial glory, which he has received from the Father, 
as^ what he had a right to, on his having accomplished the work 
of redemption, which he came into the world about > and then, 
there is the glorj' of his retinue, as appearing with all his holy 
angels ; which bears some resemblance to that expression where* 
by the majesty of God is set forth upon another occasion, 
namely, as appearing on mount Sinai, to give the law, when 
it is said, in Deut. xxxiii. 2. The Lord came -with ten thousands 
of saints. And to this we may add, that the work, which he 
shall, immediately after this, be engaged in, to wit, that of 
judging the world in rigiiteousness, plainly proves his Deity, 
since none but a divine Person can judge the secrets of all men, 
and bring to light every thing that has been done, from the be- 
ginning to the end of time ; and this is to be done, in that day • 

Vol. L 3 a 



'S7& IHE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINll'Y. 

for it is said, in Eccles. xii. 14. That (jod shall bring' evern 
■work into judgment^ xvith every secret things -whether it be 
good^ or whether it be evil. Tins is a farther improvement off 
that argument, before laid down to prove his divmity from his 
omniscience ; if his judgment must be, as the apostle says, 
in Rom. ii. 2. according io truths and consequently performed 
with the grouiest impartiality, as v/ell as an exquisite knowledge 
f>r discerning- of the cause, without which it could not be said, 
that the Judge of all the earth docs rights (as he certainly will) 
in Gen. xviii. 25. and if revv^arda shall be proportioned to every 
work done, so that ever}^ one shall receive as the apostle says, 
in 2 Cor. V. 10. according to -what he has done^ -whether it be 
good or bad; and if persons are to be rewarded, or punished, 
for all the secret springs of action, which must be reckoned 
either good or bad, according to what they produce, as well as 
the actions themselves ; and if this respects not particular 
persons only, but all men, who have lived, or shall live, from 
the beginning to the end of the world, it eviden?!}' proves, that 
he, to whom this glorious work is ascribed, must be a divine 
Pei son. 

And to this we may add, that the manner of his appearing, 
with the terror, as well as the majesty of a judge, being such 
as shall strike his enemies with the utmost horror and confusion, 
is a farther proof of this matter. This is represented in a lively 
manner, in Rev. vi. 15 — \7. in which it is said, the kings 
of the earthy and the great men^ those who once rendered 
themselves formidable to their subjects shall desire to hide 
themselves in the dens and rocks of the monntaijis^ and shall 
say to the rocks and to the mountains, fall on ns^ and hide us 
from the face of him that sitteth upon the throne^ and from the 
wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his -wrath is corner 
and -who shall be able to stand ? And, 

Lastly, He will not only pronounce the sentence but execute 
it, and that with respect to his saints and subjects ; and his 
enemies : as to the former of these he will not only command 
them to come, and possess the kingdom prepared for them, 
but the blessedness v.hich he v/ill confer upon them, pursuant 
thereunto, is called the beatific vision, in 1 John iii. 2. We 
shall be like him, for xve shall see him as he is ; and* the happi- 
ness of heaven is described in such a way as plainly proves our 
Saviour to be the fountain thereof, and consequently a divine 
Person j for it is represented as a state, in which they will 
behold his glorij, John xyii. 24. whereas certainly the behol- 
ding the glory of the most exalted ci-eature, falls infinitely 
jshort of this ingredient in the heavenly blessedness. 

And on the other hand, the immediate impressions of the 
wrath of God on the consciences of his enemies, or the power 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 37 i 

of his anger, which shall render them eternally miserable, when 
banished from his presence, proves him to be a divine Person, 
inasmuch as the highest degree ol misery consists in a stpara- 
tion, or departure ;rom him, which it couid not cio, if he were not 
the tountain of blesseduc- ss ; nor could the punishment of sin- 
ners be proportioned to iheir crimes, if it were not to be inilic- 
ted by the glory of his power ; tho apostle joins both these 
togctiier, in 2 Fiicss. i. 9. tliough somu understand the words, 
as implying, caat their punishment proceeds Jrom his immediate 
presence, in the display of the greatness of his power, as a sin- 
avenging Judge .; in either of which senses, it argues him to 
be a divine Person. And that it is our Saviour vvho is spoken 
of, is evident, from the foregoing and foilo^ving verses ; it is 
ht vvno shcJi appear in Jlaming jire^ takuig vengeance on them 
that know not God, and obey not the gospel ; and it is he that 
shall come to he glorijied in his saints, and to be admired in all 
them that believe ; so that v/e have a very plain proof of his 
Deity, from tne exercise of his government, either in this or 
the other world. 

Having endeavoured to prove the divinity of Christ, from 
his v/orks of creation and providence and under the for- 
former of these, offered some ihings in answer to the methods 
taken by the Socinians, and especially the Arians, in accounting 
for the sense of those scriptures that speak of the Father's 
creating all things by the Son ; it is necessary for us now to 
consider ihe most material objections, brought by the Anti- 
trinitarians in general, against what has been said in defence 
oi th's doctrine, tiiken from the works of common and special 
pro idence, as ascribed to him, and, in particular, from the ad- 
ministraLion of his kingdom of grace ; it is therefore objected. 

Object. 1. Tiiat his kingdom, and power of acting, in the ad- 
ministration of the affairs relating thereunto, is wholly derived 
from the Father : thus he says in Luke xxil. 29. / appoint 
unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me; 
and, in Mat. xi. 27. All things are delivered unto me of my 
Father ; and in Psal. ii. 6. Tet have I set 7ny King upon my 
holij hill of Zion. And whatever he does in managing the 
affairs thereof, is by the Father's commission and appointment i 
thus in John v. 36. he speaks of the works which he was to 
perform, as those which the Father had given him to finish^ 
And as for his power of executing judgment, which is one of 
the greatest glories of his kingly government, this is derived 
from the Father, in John v. 22. For the Father judgeth no man^ 
hut hath committed all judgment unto the Son ; and, in Acts 
xvii. 31. it is said, that he hath appointed a day, in which he 
■will judge the xvorldin righteousness, by that maji xvho7n he hath 
ordained, meaning our Saviour ; and when he speaks, in Rev.. 



3r2 THE DOCTRINE Ol- THE TRTNITY, 

ii. 27. of his ruling his enemies xv'ith a rod ofiron^ and break' 
hig thejn to shivers^ as the vessels of a potter^ he adds, that this 
he received of his Father ; from whence they argue, that since 
he received his dominion, or right to govern the world and the 
church, from the Father, therefore he cannot be God equal with 
the Father. As we say, in opposition to their scheme of doc- 
trine, that a derived Deity, such as the}^ suppose his to be, can- 
not be the same with that which the Father has ', so they allege 
this, by way of reprisal, against the argument we have but now 
insisted on, that a derived dominion cannot be made use of as 
a medium to prove him that has it to be a divine Person, in 
the same sense in which we maintain him to be. 

2. In all his works, and particularly in the administration of 
the affairs of his kingdom, he acts for the Fathers glory, and 
not his own ; whereas a divine Person, cannot act, for any other 
end than for his own glory : this therefore rather disproves, 
than evinces, his proper Deity ; as when he says, in John viii. 
49. / honour my Father ; and, in chap. v. 30. he says, I seek 
not raine own ruill^ but the 7vill of mij Father which hath sent 
me. He also speaks of the Father giving him a commandment 
to do what he did; as in John xii. 49. I have Jiot spoken of my 
sef^ but the Father -which sent me ; he g'ave 7ne a comyyuindment^ 
•what I should say^ and xvhat I shoidd speak ; and, in chap. xiv. 
31. As the Father gave 7nc cornmandment^ so do I; and, in chap. 
XV. 10. he speaks of his ha.vmg kept his Father''s commandment^ 
and pursuant hereunto, abiding in his love^ from whence they 
argue, that he who is obliged to fulfil a commandment, or 
who acts in obedience to the Father, is properly a subject, or 
a servant, and therefore cannot be God in the same sense as 
the Father, who gave this commandment, is. 

3. They add, that in the government of his church, and the 
world, in subserviency thereunto, he acts in the Father's name, 
as deputy and vicegerent ; as in John x. 25. The -works that 
I do in my Father'' s name, they bear rvitjiess of me ; and accor- 
dingly his M^orks are called the Father's, in ver. 37. If I do not 
the xvorks of my Father, believe me not ; and these works arc 
said to be done from the Father, ver. 32. Many good -works 
have I shexved you from my FatJier : and, as the consequence 
of all this, he acknowledges, as he ought to do, in John xiv. 
28. that the Father is greater than he. How then can he be 
a divine Person, in the sense in which Ave have proved him to 
be, when there is a God above him, in whose name he acts in 
:A\ he does ? 

4. They farther argue, that he was made both Lord and 
Christ, and that by the Father, as it is expressly said, in Acts 
ii. 36. 

5. They farther argue that the donatives of his kingdom, or 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 373 

those honours which are bestowed on his subjects, are not his 
to give, but the Father's; as it is said, in Matt. xx. 23. To sit 
on my right hand^ and on mij left^ is J7ot mii^e to give ; but it 
shall be given to them^for xvhom it is prepared of my Father. 

6. This kingdom which he received from the Father, and 
thus administers in subserviency to him, is, in the end, to be 
resigned, or delivered up : thus, in 1 Cor. xv. 24. Then cometh 
the end^ ruhen he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God^ 
even the Father ; and in ver, 28. When all things shall be sub- 
dued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto 
him, that put all things under him, that God may be all in all ; 
and accordingly, he shall lay aside those divine honours which 
he now has, or cease to perform those works which give him 
a right to claim them. These are the strongest arguments, of 
any, that are brought by the Anti-trinitarians against our Sa- 
viour's proper Deity; and, indeed, as though they had little 
else to object, there is scarce an argument to disprove it, but 
what is supported in this method of reasoning, which they think 
to be altogether unanswerable, (and there are many morc scrip- 
lures, which might have been brought to the same purpose) 
therefore it is necessary that we should consider what may be 
replied to it. 

The sum of what has been objected, as thus branched out 
into several particulars, is, that since Christ is represented as 
below the Father, or inferior to him, he cannot be equal with 
him, for that is no other than a contradiction, (a) 



(a) " The Fatlier, saith he, is greater than I. John xiv. 28. As Christ is the 
iiead of the church, so tlie head of Christ is God. 1 Cor. iii. 23. xi. 3. He calleth 
the Father his God. Matt, xxvii. 46. John xx. 17. — The Father raised him to Is- 
rael ; Acts xiii. 23. anointed him with the Holy Ghost and with power; Acts x. 
P,8. spared him not, but delivered him up for us all ; Rom. viii. 32. and raised 
h.im from the dead. Acts ii. 24. — God had appoint«l him to execute his siiving 
desij^ns, sent him into this world, and gave him comm.indments. Jolin iii. 16, 17. 
vi. 38 — 40. The work g-iven him he finished, and in it he v,-as faithful to the 
Father. John iv. 34. xvii. 4. Heb. iii. 2. x. 9. — Therefore, God hath also exulted 
him above measure; Phil. ii. 9. set him at his own right hand in heaven; Eph. 
i. 20. and gave him all power. Matt, xxviii. 18. He hath made Iiim Lord and 
Ciirist ; Acts ii. 36. exalted him to be a Prince and a Saviour, to give to Israel 
repentance and remission of sins. Acts v. 31. He hath also ordained him to 
judge the world in righteousness; Acts xviii. 31. and to him, Christ shall then 
be subject, and deliver up the kingdom. 1 Cor. xv. 24 — 28. 

To be the true God, and to be under God, to he the Infinite, and to be the sub- 
ject, are, according to all reason, and the scripture itself, inconsistent propertic:. 
IjV undeniable authority, however, they are ascribed to the same subject; and 
therefore, there must be a way to solve tlie dilRculty. How often do we meet, 
with particulars in the system of truth, which sccni to oppose one anotlier; buv 
when well considered, agree, and even support one another. The human consti- 
tution itself, exhibits a clear instance. The gr.and incjuiry is, upon what foimda^ 
tion every different truth Ls established, and how to reconcile seeming contradic- 
tions. Now, while they who attack the Godhead of Jesus, can never in our opi-. 
'.>ior>, answer the raultil«dc of praofs in its favour; th»re h on the C(>ntraj-y, f.i- 



574 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

Answ. To this it may be replied, that though the scripture- 
speaks of our Saviour, as receiving a commission from the 
Father, and acting in subserviency to him ; yet let it be consi- 
dered, that this does not respect the inferiority of the divine 
nature, but the subserviency of what is done by him, as Me- 
diator, to the glory of the Father, as this character and office 
were received from him. And, indeed, whenever the Son is re- 
presented, as engaged in the great work of redemption, or in 
any diing tending thereunto, or in any v.'^ork consequent there- 
upon, whereby what was before purchased is said to be applied 
by him, this has a peculiar reference to him, as Mediator; 
therefore let us consider, 

1. That nothing is more common, in scripture, than for him 
lo be represented as Mediator, especially in all those things 
that concern the spiritual advantages, or salvation of his church, 
which is the principal thing to be considered in his government; 
and in this sense we are to understand those scriptures, which 
have been brought to support the objection : and it is plain, 
that our Saviour generally speaks of himself under this charac- 
ter, which is included in his being the Messiah, or Christ, 
which is the main thing that he designed to evince by his doc- 
trine and his miracles ; therefore, if we duly consider the im- 
port of this character, it will not only give light to the under- 
standing such like scriptures, but sufficiently answer the objec- 
tion against his Deity taken from them. 



the confessors of that doctrine, the greatest store of solutions, as often as some- 
thing not divine, something beneatli the natuie nnd authority- of his Father, and 
something' finite are testified concerning him. " He who was in the form of God, 
;ind counted it not robbery to be equal with God, took upon him the Ibrrn c." a 
servant." Pliil. ii. 6, 7. " The Word who v/as with God, and who was God, be- 
came flesh; but in that flesh, manifested a gioiy as of the onh-begotten of the 
Father, full of grace and truth." John i. 1, 14. — According to die infallible tes- 
timony, he is therefore true God and true man ; and his saving mediator}' per- 
formances are inseparably founded on both natures. While the value of these, the 
power to save his people forever, and to direct all things in heaven and on turth 
to that end, as also the fitness to be the object of their grateful confidence, and 
his capacity for conducting the general judgment, are founded on, and give an 
invincible proof of his divine perfection; it is at the same time liis finite nature, 
wherein he finished the hunKui ministrations of his teaching office, and of his 
priestly sacrifice. — And tlius it is intelligible, how the giory and majestv with 
which he governs the kmgdom of God, to the mighty ingathering ^'nd defence 
of his people, and to the destruction of all opposition, occm- as an exaltation; in 
as far as the human nature, according to its capacity shared therein, obtained the 
fruit and reward of its labour, and the Lamb that was slain, deserves and receives 
evei'lasting honour, because of the works of Jialvation in both natures. This ap- 
peal's, because every where, his obedience and deepest humiliation are assigned 
as the reason of his exaltation. — " I was dead and behold T am alive for evermore. 
Amen ! and havd the kevs of hell ;ind of death." Rev. i. 38. " To this end Christ 
died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord over the dead and the living." 
Bmn. x'lv. 9. Sec ^Iso Phil. ii. 7—10. Heb. i. .?. John v. 27. Rev. i. 5, 6. v. 12—14." 

WTNPBBSSr. 



THE COCTRINK OF THE THINITY. 37S 

Our adversaries will not deny that Christ is represented as 
a Mediator J but they widely differ from us, when they take 
occjti^ion to explain what they intend thereby : sometimes they 
seem to mean TiOthing else by it, but a middle-Being betwixt 
God and the creature ; and therefore the vrork performed by 
him a': such is not what requires him to be, in the most propel 
sense, a divine Person, and consequently whatever inferiority 
to the Father is contained in this character, they conclude that 
this respects his Deity ; whereas we distinguish between the 
subserviency of the v/ork, performed by him, as Mediator, to 
the glory of God the Father, together with the subjection, or 
real inferiority of the human nature, in which he performed it 
to the Father ; and the inferiority of his divine nature : the 
former we allow ; the latter we deny. 

2. When we speak of him as Mediator, we always suppose 
him to be God and Man, in one Person; and that these two 
natures, though infinitely distinct, are not to be separated. As 
God, without the consideration of a human nature united to his 
divine Person, he would be too high to sustain the character, or 
to perform the work of a servant, and, as such, to yield obedi- 
ence, which was incumbent on him, as Mediator ; and on the 
other hand, to be a mere man, is too low, and would be altoge- 
ther inconsistent with that infinite value anfl dignity, that was 
to be put on the work which he was to perform. Therefore 
it was necessary that he should have two distinct natures, a di- 
vine and a human, or that he should be God incarnate. This 
will be more particularly considered under somie following an- 
swers * ,• and therefore we shall reserve the proof hereof for its 
proper place, and there consider the distinct properties of each 
nature ; and all that we shall observe at present is, that the 
evangelist John, in whose gospel our Saviour is often described, 
as inferior to the Father, as well as equal with him, w^iich is 
agreeable to his Mediatorial character, lays down this, as a kind 
of preface, designing hereby to lead us into the knowledge of 
such like expressions, when he says, in John i. 14. The Word 
was made jle^h and dwelt among us ; which is all the proof we 
shall give of it at present. 

3. It folloAvs from hence, that several things m3v be truly 
spoken concerning, or applied to him, which are infinitely op- 
posite to one another, namely that he has almighty power in 
one respect, as to what concerns his Deity ; and yet that he is 
weak, finite, and dependent in another, as to what respects his 
humanity. In one nature, he is God equal with the Father, 
and so receives nothing from him, is not dependent on him, 
nor under any obligation to yield obedience. In this natvu"e^ 

* Set Quest, vii 



376 THt DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

he is the object of worship, as all worship terminates on that 
Deity, which is common to all the Persons in the Godhead : 
but, in the other nature, he worships, receives all from, and re- 
fers all to the glory of the Father ; therefore, 

4. Those scriptures which speak of him as receiving a king- 
dom, doing all things from, or in obedience to the Father, or 
in his name, and for his glory, and as inferior to, and depend- 
ent on him, are not only applied to him, as Mediator, but they 
have a particular respect to his human nature ; so that all that 
can be infen-ed from such modes of speaking, as those above- 
mentioned, as so many objections against the doctrine which 
we are defending, is, that he who is God is also man, and con- 
sequently has those things predicated of him, as such which 
are proper to a nature infinitely below, though inseparably 
united with his divine. 

Moreover, whereas it is said, that the Father has- conDnitted 
all judgment to the Son, or that he judgeth the world in righte- 
ousness, by that i7ian whom he hath ordained ; all that can be 
inferred from hence is, that so far as this work is performed by 
him, in his human nature, which will be rendered visible to the 
whole world at the day of judgment, it is an instance of the 
highest favour and glory conferred upon this nature, or upon 
God-man Mediator, as man : but whereas he is elsev/here de- 
scribed, as having a right to judge the v/orkl, as God; and as 
having those infinite perfections, v/hereby he is fit to do it, these 
are the same that belong to the Father, and therefore not deri- 
ved from him. 

Again, when, in another scripture, before referred to, it is 
said, that God hath made him both Lord and Christ, it is not 
there said, that the Father hath made him God, or given him 
any branch of the divine glory; but it signifies the unction that 
he received from the Father, to be the King, Head, and Lord 
of his church ; which, so far as this is an act of grace, or con- 
notes his dependence on the Father herein, it has an immediate 
lespect to him, in his human nature, in which, as well as in his 
.divine nature, this dominion is exercised ; whereas his sove- 
reignty, and universal dominion over the church and the world, 
or those divine perfections, w^hich render him, in all respects, 
fit to govern it ; they belong, more especially to the Mediator, 
as God, and are the same as when they are applied to the 
Father. 

Moreover, when he says, / seek not viy oxvn will, but the 
Father^s, that sent f?ie ; and elsewhere, Not my xvill, but tlwie 
be done ; it argues that he had a human will, distinct from his 
divine, in v/hich he expresses that subjection to the Father, 
which becomes a creature ; this is plainly referred to him as 
man ; so, on the other hand, when he says, speaking of himself 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 377 

co-ordinately with the Father, As the Father raiseth up the 
dead^ and qidckcneth them^ so even the Sa7i quickeneth xvhom he 
ri'ill; this, though spoken of him as Mediator, has a peculiar 
reference to his divine nature. 

Again, when he says, in another scripture. The Father is 
greater than /, that is applied to him as man ; whereas else- 
where, in John x. 30. when he says, /, and my Father are one^ 
that is spoken of him as God, having the same nature with the 
Father so that if we suppose our Saviour to be God and Man, 
as he is plainly proved to be, from scripture, then it follows, that 
whatever is said concerning him, as impoiting his light to di- 
vine honour on the one hand, or his disclaiming it on the other, 
these are both true, when we consider him in these different 
natures. 

Thus we are to understand those scriptures, that speak of 
the real inferiority of the Son to the Father : but when, in other 
places, nothing is intended but the subserviency of what is done 
by the Son, as Mediator, or its tendency to set forth the Fa- 
ther's glory, this may be applicable to those divine works, which 
the Mediator performs ; and so we may distinguish between 
the subserviency of the divine actions to the Father's gloiy, 
and the inferiority of one divine Person to another ; the for- 
mer may be a3serted without detracting from his proper Deity, 
while the latter is denied, as inconsistent with it. 

Thus we have endeavom-ed to explain those scriptures, which 
are referred to by the Arians, to overthrow our Saviour's di- 
vinit}- : and, by the same method of explication, I humbly 
conceive, all others, that can be brought to that purpose, may 
be understood. I ha\e passed over that scripture, indeed, 
which respects Christ's delivering up the kingdom to the Fa'- 
ther^ and being subject to him, which it might have been ex- 
pected that I should have endeavoured to expjain ; but I choose 
rather to refer the consideration thereof to its proper place, 
when we speak concerning Christ's kingly office, and his being 
exalted in the execution thereof. 

IV. The next argunient to prove the divinity of Christ is 
taken from his being the object of religious worship, which is 
a practical owning of him to be a divine Person, when there 
is an agreement between our words and actions, in both which, 
we acknowledge him to have the perfections of the divine na- 
ture. This argument is so strong and conclusive, that it is ve- 
ry difficult to evade the force thereof ; and, indeed, it affects 
the very essentials of religion. Now, that we may herein pro- 
ceed with greater plainness, we shall, 

1. Consider what we understand by worship in general, and 
by religious worship in particular. I am very sensible that 
the Anti-trinitarians understand the word m a sense very «ilf- 

Vol. I. ;l B 



STS THL DOCTKIIIE OF THE TRINITY. 

ferent from what we do, as taking it in a limited sense, for oin 
expressing some degree of humility, or reverence, to a person, 
whom vv^e acknowledge in some respect, to be our superior; 
but whatever external signs of reverence, or words, we use, as 
expressive of our regard to him who is the object thereof, this, 
when applied to oui Saviour, is no more than what they sup- 
pose to be clue to a person below the Father. Therefore, that 
we may not mistake the meaning of the word, let it be consi- 
dered ', that worship is either civil or religious ; the former 
contains in it that honour and respect which is given to supe- 
riors, which is sometimes expressed by bowing, or falling down, 
before them, or some other marks of humility, which their ad- 
vanced station in the world requires ; Though this is seldom 
called worshipping them ; and it is always distinguished from 
religious worship, even when the same gestures are used there- 
in. It is true, there is one scripture, in which the same word 
is applied to both, in 1 Chron. xxix. 20. where it is said, All 
the congregation bowed down their heads^ and worshipped the 
Lord and the k'lng^ that is, they paid civil respect, accompanied 
with those actions that are expressive of humility, and that 
honour that was due to David, but their worship given to God 
was divine or religious. This is the onl)- sense in which v.-e 
understand xvorsk'tp in this argument, and it includes in it ado- 
ration and invocation. In the former, we ascribe infinite per- 
fection unto God, either directly, or by consequence ; an in- 
stance whereof Ave have in 1 Chron. xxix. 11, 12. Thinc^ 
Lord^ is the greatness^ and the poxver^ and the glory ^ and the 
victory^ and the majesty ; for all that is in heaven, and in the 
earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, Lord^ and thou art ex- 
alted as Head above all. Both riches and honour come of thee, 
and thou rcignest over all, and in thine hand is potver and might 
andin thine hand it is to make great, and to give strength unto 
all; and, in Deut. xxxii. 3. in which we are said to ascribe 
greatness unto him ; and, in Rom. i. 21. to glorify him as God, 
or, give unto him the glory due to his ?2ame, Psal. xxix. 2. 

Invocation is that wherein we glorify God, as the Fountain 
of blessedness, when we ask those things from him, Avhich none 
but a God can give, which is sometimes called seeking the Lord, 
Psal. cv. 4. or calling upon him, Psal. 1. 15. And this includes 
in it all those duties which we perform, in which we consider 
him as a God of infinite perfection, and ourselves dependent 
on him, and desirous to receive all those blessings from him, 
which we stand in need of; and particularly faith, in the va- 
rious acts thereof, is a branch of religious worship, as connot- 
ing its object to be a divine Person ; as also supreme love, and 
universal obedience ; and, indeed, it contains in ii the whole of 
religion, in w^hich we have a due regard to that infinite di'stance 



THi: DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 3f9 

that there is between hiin and the best of creatures ; and reli- 
gious worship is no where taken in a lower sense than tliis in 
scripture. 

2. Religious worship, as thus described, is to be given to 
none but a divine Person, according to our Saviour's words, in 
Match, iv. 10. Thou nhall xvorship the Lord thy God^ and him 
only alialt thou serve. This is evident, from the idea we have 
of religion in general, which is a giving that glory, or ascribmg 
those perfections to God, wliich belong to him, as being found- 
ed in his nature ; and therefore it is the highest instance of 
blasphemy and profaneness to apply ihein to any creature, since 
it is in effect to say that he is eqvial with God. 

3. It plainly appears, from Scripture, that Christ is the ob- 
ject of religious worship, and consequently that the argument 
we are maintaining is just, namelv, that, fortius reason, he must 
be concluded to be a divine Person. Now that he is the ob- 
ject of religious Avorship, is evident, from many examples in 
scripture of such worship being given to him, when, at the 
same time, they, who have given it, have not been reproved or re^ 
strained, but rather commended, for performing it. We have 
various instances of this nature iij the Old Testament, of which 
I shall mention tM'o or three, viz. in Gen. xlviii. 15, 16. God, 
before zvhom my fathers Abraham and Isaac did xvalk^ the God 
zvhich fed me all my life long imto this day^ the Angel xvhich 
redeemed nxe from all evil^ bless the lads. When he speaks of 
Abraham and Isaac's walking before him, it implies, that, in 
their whole conversation, they considered themselves as under 
liis all-seeing eye ; and Jacob acknowledges hiin as the God, 
who had sustained, presei\ed, and pi'ovided for him hitherto, 
the support of his life, and hi;} Deliverer, or Redeemer, from 
all evil. This divine Person he addresses himself to, in a 
way of supplication, for a lilessing on the posterity of Joseph ; 
and that he intends our Saviour hereby, is evident, because he 
has a reference to his appearance in the form of an angel, and 
therefore describes him under that character. Now we can- 
not suppose that this holy patriarch Is here represented as pra}- 
ing to a created angel, for that would be to charge him with 
idolatry. Moreover, this is the same description that is given 
of Christ elsewhere, in Isa. Ixiii. 9. In all their affliction he 
7vas afflicted^ and the Angel of his presence saved them; in his 
love^ and in his pity he redeemed thein^ and he bare them^ and 
^(uriedthem all the days of old; and in Mal. iii. 1. The Lord^ 
whom ye seek^ shall suddenhj come to his temple ; even the Mes- 
senger^ or Angel, of the covenant^ rvhom ye delight in ; which 
contains a very plain prediction of our Saviour's incarnation, 
whose way is said to be prepared by John the Baptist, who is spov 
'A' in the words immediately foregoing. Now it is certain, that 



330 THE DOCTKINE 0¥ THE TRINIT.V. 

God the Father is never called an angel in scriptuic,.luasaiuch. 
as this is a peculiar description of the M<;diator, who, as such, 
is never mentioned as the Person sending, but sent; in which 
he is considered as one that was to be incarnate, and, in our 
nature, to execute those offices, which he was therein obliged 
to perform. This is the Person then whom Jacob adored and 
prayed to. 

We have another instance, not only of his being worship- 
pfed, but of his demanding this divine honour of him that per- 
formed it, in Josh. V. 14, 15. where he appeared as the Cap- 
tain of the host of the Lord; upon which, Joshua fell on his 
face to the earthy and did xvorship^ and said unto hitn, What 
saith my Lord unto his servant ? And the Captain of the Lord's 
host said unto Joshua^ Loose thy shoe from off thy foot ^ for the 
place "whereon thou standcst is holy; and Joshua did so. It 
cannot be supposed that it was any other than a divine Person 
that appeared ; not onl)- because Joshua fell on his face and 
worshipped him, and expressed his willingness to fulfil his 
command, but because he bid him loose his shoe from his foot, 
since the place on which he stood was holy; vt'hich expression 
js no where used in any other text of scripture, except in Exod. 
iii. 5. in which our Saviour, as we before considered, appear- 
ed to Moses, with the majesty and glory of a divine Person, 
whose immediate presence made the place relatively holy, 
which the presence of a creature never did. Bloreover, the 
character which he here gives of himself to Joshua, as the Cap- 
tain of the Lord's host, not only implies, that ail his success 
was owing to his conduct and blessing, on his warlike enter- 
prizes ; but this is also agreeable to the description which is 
elsewhere given of our Saviour, in Isa. Iv. 4. in which he is 
said to be a Leader and Co7nmander to the people ; and he is 
called in Heb, ii. 10. The Captain of our salvation; and else- 
where, The Prince of life ; and, Tlie Prince of the kings of the 
earth. 

IMoreover, there are various instances in the New Testa- 
ment of worship given to Christ ; in which, by several circum- 
stances contained in it, it is evident, that it wils divine or re- 
ligious. Thus he had divine honour given him by the wise 
men from the East, in Matth. ii. 11. who fell doxvn and xuor- 
shipped htm^ &c. and, in Luke xxiv. 52. when he ascended up 
into heaven, his disciples xvorshipped him ; v/here there is no- 
thing in the mode of expression that distinguishes this from 
that worship that is due to God. Moreover, there is a very 
illustrious instance of his being thus worshipped by a numer- 
ous assembly, represented in that vision, in Rev. v. 11 — 13. 
I beheld, and heard the voice of many angels round about the 
throne^ saying, Worthy is the Lamb that xjuas slain, to receive 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 381 

jwwei\, and riches^ and wisdom^ and stre7igth^ and honour^ and 
salary ^ and blessing : And everij creature that is in heaven^ ana 
on the earth, and under the earth, saying. Blessing, and honour, 
and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, 
and to the Lamb for ever and ever ; in which words there are 
such glories ascribed, that higher expressions cannot be used 
by any, who adore the divine Majesty ; and it is plain, that 
our Saviour is intended hereby, because he is described as 
the Lamb that was slain ; and he is also considered co-ordi- 
nately with the Father, when it is said, that this glory is given 
to him that sitteth upon the throne, and to the Lamb, Now if 
our Saviour be thus worshipped, he must have a right to it, 
or else his worshippers would have been reproved, as guilty 
of idolatry ; thus Peter reproves Cornelius, or rather prevents 
his pa3"ing divine adoration to himself, who was no more than 
a man, in Acts x. 26, Stand up, I myself also am a man ; and 
the angel, in Rev. xix. 10. when John at first, through mis- 
take, thinking him to be a divine person, fell at his feet to 
worship him, expressly forbad him, saying, See thou do it not ; 
I am thy fellow-servant, and of thy brethren that have the tes- 
li/p.ony of fesus; worship God, But our Saviour never for- 
bids any to worship him ; therefore Ave must conclude that lie 
is the object thei*eof, and consequently a divine Person. 

We shall now proceed to consider the various branches of 
divine v/orship that are given to him, viz, 

1. Swearing by his name, whereby an appeal is made to 
him, as the Judge of truth, and the Avenger of falsehood. 
Some think that the apostle, in Rom. ix. 1. intends as much 
as this, when he says, I speak the truth in Christ, I lie not, that 
is, I ajipeal to Christ, as the heart-searching God, concerning 
the truth of what I say. But there is also another sense of 
swearing, namely, when in a solemn manner, we profess sub- 
jectiju to him, as our God and King; v\diich agrees with, oi 
is taken from the custom of subjects, who swear fealty or al- 
legiance to their king: thus it is said, in Isa. xlv. 23. Unto 
me every knee shall botv, and every to?igue shall sxvear ; and, in 
doing this, they acknowledge him to be the object of faith, and 
to have a right to universal obedience, as well as the Fountain 
of blessedness. This religious v/orship, as the prophet fore- 
tels, was to be giyen to the Person here spoken of, who is 
particularly said to be our Saviour by the apostle, referring to 
it in Rom. xiv. 11. 

2. This leads us to consider another act of religious wor- 
ship, v/hich has some affinity with the former, contained in 
the baptismal vow ; in which there is a consecration, or dedi- 
cation, of the person baptized, to the Father, Son, and Holy 
Ghost, according to the command given, in Matt, x.sviii. 19. 



382 THE DOCTRINE OF HIE .TRINITY. 

or a public profession, that it is our indispensable duty to ex- 
ercise an entire subjection to them, in a religious manner. 
This is one of the most solemn acts of worship that can b^e 
performed, %vherein there is an explicit mention of the name of 
the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. And here we may consider, 
in general, that the Son is put co-ordinately with the Father, 
which no creature ever is : and it will be also necessary for 
us to enquire what is meant by being baptized in the name of 
the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, that so it may farther appear 
to be an act of religious worship. 

Some hereby understand nothing else but our being baptized 
by the authority of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or b}- a 
waiTant received from them to do it : but though this be some- 
times the meaning of our acting in the name of God, yet more 
is ixitended by this expression, used in the administration of 
this ordinance, otherv/ise it is not sufficiently distinguished 
irom all odier acts of religious worship; which cannot be 
rightly performed without a divine waiTant. According to 
this sense of the word, ministers. may as well be said to preach 
the gospel, and the church to attend on their ministration, in 
the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; for this cannot 
be done without a divine warrant, upon which account it may 
be deemed an ordinance. 

Moreover, to suppose that this instituted form of adminis- 
tering baptism, conveys no otlier idea, but that of a divine war- 
rant to do it, is to conclude that there is no determinate mean- 
ing of the action performed, contained in it; but the adininis- 
trator is to intend nothing else by it, but only that he has a 
v\^arrant from God to baptize ; whereas its being performed in 
the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, seems plainly 
to intimate the principal thing signified thereby, as a direction 
for our faith, when engaging in it : which is, that they who are 
baptized are consecrated, or devoted to the Father, Son, and 
Holy Ghost, devoted to God professedly, and called by his 
name, in the sense in which the phrase is elsewhere used in 
scripture ; his right to them is' hereby signified, and their in- 
dispensable obligation to be entirelv his ; and that with a pecu- 
liar acknowledgment of the distinct personal glory of the Fa- 
ther, Son, and Holy Ghost, and the concern that each of them 
have in our salvation. The apostle speaking of our being bap- 
tized in the name of Christ, calls it, in Gal. iii. 27. a putcini^ 
on Christ ; which seems to imply a consecration, or dedication, 
to him. Persons as well as things, before this ordinance was 
instituted, were consecrated to God by divers washings, as 
well as other rites, used under the ceremonial law ; and this 
seems to be the sense in which the apostle himself explains 
X\\i?, putting en Christy in ver. 29. when he infers, from thii 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 3S3 

action, that they uho had so done xuere Chrht''s^ not onlv bv 
that right, which he has to them as their Creator and Redeem- 
er, but by another, %vhicl\ is the immediate result of their pro- 
fessed dedication to him; therciore this is such a comprehen- 
sive act of worship, that it includes in it the whole of that sub- 
jection, which is due to the Fal;|ier, Son, and Spirit ; and since, 
in particular, the Son is considered as the object thereof, to- 
gether with the Father, it follows that he is God, equal witl\ 
the Father. 

I might here consider, that it would be not onlv an unwar- 
rantable action, but an instance of the greatest profaneness, for 
us to be baptized in the name of any one who is not a divine 
Person, which farther argues that it is an act of divine wor- 
ship ; upon which occasion, the apostle Paul, speaking con- 
cerning some of the church of Corinth, as being disposed to 
pay too great a veneration to those ministers v.'ho had been in- 
strumental in their conversion, as though, for this reason, thev 
were to be accounted the lords of their faith ; and, in particu- 
lar, that some said they were of Paul, and, being apprehensive 
that the}- thought the minister, who baptized them, had a right 
to be thus esteemed, he not only reproves this ungrounded 
and pernicious mistake ; but takes occasion to tliank God^ that, 
he baptized none of thon^ but Crispus and Gains, tog'ctlier xvith 
the household of Stephanas, lest any should saij he baptized in 
his oiun name ; so that while he testifies his abhorrence of his 
giving any just occasion to any, to conclude that he was the 
object oi this branch of divine worship, he takes a great deal 
of pleasure in this reflection, that the providence of God had 
not led them through the ignorance and superstition that pre- 
vailed among them, to draw this false conclusion from his ex- 
ercising this branch of die ministerial work, which properly 
they would not have inferred from any other's having baptized 
them, who had not so great an interest in their affections as he 
had. This I apprehend to be the meaning of what the apostle 
says, in 1 Cor. i. 12 — 16. which I take occasion to refer to, as 
a farther proof of baptism's being an act of religl(nis worship, 
unalienable from the Father, Son, and Spirit, in whose name 
alone we are to be baptized ; and I cannot but conclude, that 
ii ihe Son were not a divine Person, we might as well be bap- 
tized in the name of Paul, or any other of the apostles, as in 
his name, which is a just consequence from its being an act of 
religious worship ; and therefore he would never have joined 
his own name with the Father's when he gave forth his com- 
mission to baptize, if he had not had a right to it, as well as 
the Father. 

Again, divine worship is due to Christ, as he is the object 
of faith ; and that not only ar, v.c are to depend upon what- 



384 THI. DOCTRINE Or THE TRINITY. 

ever he has revealed, as a matter of infallible vcrit)-, other- 
wise the faith of the church especially under the New Testa- 
ment dispensation, would be built on an uncertain foundation : 
but, since I am sensible it would be objected to this, th?.t 
whatever is transmitted to us by divine inspiration, is infalli- 
bly true, though the instruments made use of herein were not 
divine persons ; and when we assert that what Christ deliver- 
ed was infallible, in a higher sense than this, we rather sup- 
pose than prove his Deity; the Anti-trinitarians will not deny, 
that what he imparted was infallibly true, and therefore the 
object of faith; but they suppose at the same time, that what- 
ever was imparted to the world by the apostles and prophets, 
was equally true and infallible ; therefore they were the ob- 
jects of faith, in the same sense that our Saviour himself was. 
In answer to this I would not compare what was delivered 
immediately bv our Saviour with what Avas transmitted by those 
who spake and wrote by divine inspiration, or suppose that 
one was more infalliblv true than the other ; and therefore that 
which I would principally insist on, Avhen I speak of Christ, 
as the object of faith, whereby he appears to be a div ine Per- 
son, is not only that we are obliged to yield an assent to what 
he has imparted to us, but this is to be attended with a firm 
reliance on him, or trusting him with all we have, or for all 
we expect, to make us completely happy : in this sense we are 
to understand the apostle's words, when he says, in 2 Tim. i. 
12. J knoiv ruhovi I have believed^ or trusted, and I am persuad- 
ed that he is able to keep that xvhich I have committed unto him 
against that day ; this is such a faith, as no creature is the ob- 
ject of. Trust in man is prohibited, and called a departure 
from God, in Jer. xvii. 5. Cursed b^ the man that trusteih in 
mari^ or, by a parity of reason in any other creature, andmaketh 
flesh his arm^ and -whose heart herein departeth from the Lord. 
Trust is such an act of faith, as is appropriated to a divine 
Person; and I cannot but observe, that there is something 
peculiar in the mode of speaking, when Christ is represented 
i!s the object thereof, that is never applied to any creature ; as 
his worshippers are said to believe in him; thus, in John xiv. 
J. Te believe in God^ believe also in me^ where he commands 

* Creatures are said to be believed^ as our Saviour speaking concerning John the 
Baptist, inJMark xi. 31. says. Why did ye not believe hiin ? <r«7< cwv cuk van^tua-ctii 
dvrai; and, in Jlcts viil. 12. tke Samaritans believed Philip, t?ft^iv9-uv toi <f jAMr-jra j 
arid, in John v. 46. Jlloses is described as a person luho ought to be believed; Had 
ye believed jVIoses, SJc. says our Saviour, u yaf trr-i^ivtlt Muo-ii •■, but it is never said 
that a creature is believed in. This luas Augnstin's observation; upon which oc- 
casion he says. In Exposit. Evangel. Johan. Tract. 29. " Though ive may be said to 
" believe Paid and Peter, yet sue are never said to believe in them." But as for 
mir Saviour, ive are not only to believe him, namely, what he has spoken, btit TtKiuu' 
!;s- stwTOk'. 10 believe in him. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 385 

his people to believe in him, in such a way, as that this act of 
faith is accompanied with other graces, which argue him a di- 
vine Person. 

This leads us to consider him as the object of supreme love 
and universal obedience, which are also acts of religious wor- 
ship ; the former respects him, as our chief good and happi- 
ness ; the latter as our undoubted sovereign and proprietor : 
we do not say, that a person's having a right to be obeyed, or 
loved, or trusted, in a limited degree, argues him to be a di- 
vine Person ; but when these gracts are to be exercised in the 
highest degree, without anv possibility of our exceeding there- 
in ; and when the exercise thereof is inseparably connected 
with salvation, as it often is in scripture, and our not exerci- 
sing them, is said to exclude from it, I cannot but from hence 
conclude, that, being thus circumstanced, is an act of religious 
worship ; and it is certain, that our saviour is often represent- 
ed, in scripture, as the object thereof. 

The last thing that we shall consider, under this head, is, 
that he is the object of prayer and praise ; and that these are 
parts of religious worship, needs no proof. Some think, and 
the conjecture is not altogether improbable, that this is intend- 
ed by the Psalmist, Psal. Ixxii. 15. Prai/er also shall be made 
for him continually ; since it might as well be rendered, con- 
tinually made to Az?n, which agrees with what follows. And dai- 
ly shall he be praised; and that this Psalm respects the Mes- 
siah, who had a right to more glory than Solomon, appears 
from several things, which are said concerning him therein ; 
but I will not insist on this, since we have more evident proofs 
thereof in other scriptures. It is also foretold concerning him 
in Isa. xi. 10. that to him^ for so the words ought to be ren- 
dered, shall the Gentiles seek ; which mode of speaking is fre- 
quently used, to signify our addressing ourselves to a divine 
Person with prayer and supplication, for the supplying ot our 
wants. But we have yet more evident proofs hereof in the 
New Testament; the Syrophenician woman's' prayer, which 
was directed to him, was indeed short, but very comprehen- 
sive. Matt. XV. 22. Have mercy on me., Lord., thou Son of 
David; and, in ver. 25. She came and worshipped him., saying-., 
Lord help ?ne; and this act of religious worship was comnit-nd- 
ed by our Saviour, and her prayer answered. And can wc 
suppose any other than an act of religious worship, contained 
in that petition of the man who came to him to cast the devil 
out of his son, in Mark ix. 24 ? Who said., with tears., Lord., I 
believe ; help thou mine unbelief; by which we are not to un- 
derstand that he desired that his unbelief should be removed 
in an objective wav, bv our Saviour's giving him more con- 
vincing arguments to confirm his faith, but by a powerful ac- 

VoL. I. 3 C 



386 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

cess to his heart, as the Author and Finisher of faith, which is 
the peculiar gift of God; and accordingly he is considered as 
a divine Person, by those who thus address themselves to him. 

We shall conclude this head, with giving a few instances of 
short pravers directed to Christ, together with doxologies, or 
ascriptions of praise, in which he is sometimes joined with the 
Father and Holy Ghost ; and he is also argued, from the sub- 
ject matter thereof, to be a divine Person : thus the apostle 
Paul concludes his epistles v/ith. The grace of our Lord Jesus 
Christ be with you all^ Amen; 1 Cor. xvi. 23. Phil. iv. 23. 
\ Thess. v. 28. 2 Thess. iii. 18. and, The grace of our Lord 
Jesus Christ be xvith your spirit; Philem. ver. 25. and. The 
Lord Jesus Christ be xvith thy Spirit ; 2 Tim. iv. 22. which is 
a short and comprehensive prayer directed to Christ, that he 
would bestow on them all those graces that are necessary to 
their salvation ; and that this grace may so govern and influ- 
ence their spirits, as to fit them for his service, which supposes 
him to be the God and Giver of all grace. And, in 2 Cor. x. 
iii. 14. he puts up a prayer to the three Persons in the God- 
head expressly ; The grace of the Lord Jesus Christy and the 
love of God^ and the communion of the Holy Ghost^ be xvith you 
all^ Amen; desiring, that they would communicate those bless- 
ings, which accompany salvation, by which the divine perfec- 
tions, and in particular the Personal glory of the Father, Son, 
and Holy Ghost, are demonstrated ; and herein the Son is as 
much considered as the object of pra3''er as the Father, and con- 
seqiiently hereby proved to be a divine Person. 

To this we ma}^ add those doxologies > whereby praise is 
given to Christ ; and so he is farther considered as the object 
of divine M'orship ; thus, in 2 Pet. iii, 18. speaking of our Lord 
and Saviour Jesus Christ, he says, To him be glory ^ both now 
mid for ever J Amen; and, in Jude, ver. 24, 25. Unto him that 
is able to keep you from fallings and to present you faultless be- 
fore the presence of his glory with exceeding joy ^ to the only 
ivise God our Saviour^ be glortf andmajestij^ dominion and pow- 
er^ both no~a\ and for ever^ Amen; where it is plain tliat he as- 
cribes this divine glory to Jesus Christ ; for he is spoken of in 
ver. 21. Looking for the jncrcy of our I^ord Jesus unto eternal 
life., that is, for that mercy which shall preserve us unto eter^ 
rsal life, and then confer it upon us ; which is the sense of those 
words, Keeping us frora falling., and presenting us faultless be- 
fore the presence of his glory., with a small variation of the 
})hrase ; and the very same thing he is expressly said to do 
cls<^vhere, in Eph. v. 27. to present it to himself a glorious 
church.) not having spot or xvrinkle., or amj such thing., but that 
it should be holy., and xvithout bletnish., that is, that he ma}^ pre- 
stnt it to his ov/n view, as taking a survey of his workmanship. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 3ST 

when brought to perfection ; as God is said to have taken a 
view of all Ihings that he had made at first ^ Avhen he pronounc- 
ed them good Gen. i. 31. and, when he has thus taken a survey 
of iiis church, or presented it to himself, then he presents it to 
the view of the whole world of angels and men, which, as it 
is said, is attended with exceeding joy ; which plainly makes 
it appear that our Saviour is the Person here spoken of; which is 
agreeable to what follows, where he is called, as he is elsewhere, 
God our Saviour^ Tit. ii. 10, 13. which character agrees with 
the name by which he was most known, to wit, Jesus, 

Another doxology we have in Rev. i. 4, 5, 6. Grace be unto 
you., and peace from Jesus Christ., h.c. U7ito hijn that loved us., 
and zuashed us fr07yi our sins in his own blood; and hath made 
Its ki7igs and jyriests unto God and his Father^ to him be glory 
and dominion for ever and ever., Amen. 

There are also two places more, in which, to me, it seems 
naore than probable, that doxologies are directed to Christ, 
namely, in 1 Tim. vi. 15, 16. Who is the b'cssed and only Po~ 
tentate^ the King of kings., ajid Lord of lords ; xvho only hath 
immortality^ dxvelling in the light., xvhich no man can approach 
unto: -whom no man hath seen., or can see; to xvhom be honour 
and power everlastings Amen : All allow that nothing greater 
can be said of God than is here spoken ; therefore the only 
thing denied by the Arians is, that this is applied to any but 
the Father ; but to me, it seems very obvious that it is spoken 
of Christ, because he is mentioned immediatelv before ; thus, 
in ver. 13. it is said, / give thee chaj'ge in the sight of God., 
■who quickeneth all things., and before Christ Jesus * ,• xvho., be- 
fore Pontius Pilate., xvitnessed a good co7ifession ; That thou 
keep this C07nma7id7nent xvithout spot., witil the appeari7ig of our 
Lord Jesus Christ., xvhich in hi.^ times he shall shexv ; Who is 
the blessed and 07ily Pote7itate., ^c, v/here by his ti7nes is meant 
that season in which his glory shall shine most brightly, when, 
what he witnessed before Pontius Pilate, to wit,' that he was 
the Son of God, he will demonstrate in the highest degree, and 
then will eminently appear to have a right to that glory, which 
the apostle ascribes to him. 

Again, there is another scripture, in which a glorious doxolo- 
gy is ascribed to Christ, in 1 Tim. i. 17. Now tinto the King 
eter7ial., im77iortal., i7ivisible., the 07ihj xvise God, be honour and 
glory ^ for ever a7id ever^ Afnen. A late learned writer f puts 

• The words are, nuyartov t>i Qu n ^;tco unTrcixvroe ru. ttx^Ix kui Xptc 'lou^'i>i<r>i; where 
Mdi ieems to be exegeticid, according to the rulu laid dcivn, page 318. a7ul therefore I 
ivould render the ivords, God, who quickcnetli nil thing-s even .lesus Christ ; and, 
if this be a just rendering, then the Father is not mentioned in the conlex-t ,■ unU 
therefore this doxology is not ascribed to him iKit to our Saviour. 

I See Dr. Chirke's Scripture Doctrine, page 58. 7". 



388 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

this among those scriptures which he applies to the Father, 
without assigning any reason for it ; which he ought to have 
done, inasmuch as the context seems to direct us to apply it to 
the Son, spoken of in the foregoing verses; thus, in ver. 12. 
I thank yesiis Christ our Lord^ xuho counted me faithful^ putting 
me into the ministrij ; and, ver. 14. The Grace of our Lordvja^ 
exceeding abundant^ &c. and ver. 15. Christ Jesus came into 
the world to save sin?iers ; and ver. 16. Howbeit^for this cause 
I obiained mercy ^ that in me jirst Jesus Christ might shexv 
forth all long-siiffering^for a pattern to them -which should here- 
after believe on him to Ife everlasting. Thus having mention- 
ed the great things which Christ did for him, it is natural to 
suppose that he would take occasion, from hence, to ascribe 
glory to him, which he does in the words immediately follow- 
ing, Now^ unto the King^ eternal^ immortal^ &c. 

Having considered the force of this argument, taken from 
divine worsliip being ascribed to Christ, to prove his deity, we 
shall now proceed to observe the methods used by the Anti- 
trinitarians to evade it. Some of the Socinians, as though there 
had been no scriptures that speak of him as the object of reli- 
gious worship, have peremptorily denied that it is due to him, 
and thought very hardly of their brethren, as though they were 
involved in the common guilt of idolatry, which they suppose 
his worshippei-s to have been chargeable with. This occasion- 
ed warm debates in Transylvania and Poland, where Socinian- 
ism most prevailed towards the close of the 16 century * ; and, 
indeed, the method of reasoning, made use of by those who de- 
nied that he was the object of worship, though it tended more 
to his dishonour, yet it carried in it a greater consistency with 
that scheme of doctrines, which both sides maintained, who de- 
nied his divinity. 

As for the Arians, they do not expressly deny him to be the 
object of worship, but rather deviate from the true sense of the 
word, when they maintain his right to it : they speak of great 
honours that are to be ascribed to him, by which one would al- 
most be ready to conclude that they reckoned him a divine Per- 
son ; but when these honours are compared with those that are 
due to the Father, they veiy plainly discover that they mean 
nothing more hereby, but what in consistency with their own 
scheme may be applied to a creature. Thus a late writer f, 
in his explication of that text, in John v. 23. That all men 
shoidd honour the Son^ even as they honour Father^ plainly dis- 
covers his sense of divine worship, as due to our Saviour, to 

* The chii'f opfiosers of Chrisf^>! being the object of lanrship, were Jacobus Pa- 
hedogus, Fruncisciif! Havidus, Chrisliuims Franken, Simon Bttthtxns ; arid, on the 
other hand, it wuf defended by Socinus, and se eral others, though not in the same 
«ensc. in -which -tve maintain it. f See Dr. Clarke. i ^cr^J}ture Loci line, pcge 132. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITt. 389 

be very remote from that which is defended by those who 
maintain his proper deity. His explication of this text is, 
*' That the meaning is not that the Son's authority should, like 
" that of the Father, be looked upon as underived, absolute, 
" supreme, and independent ; but that as the Jews already be- 
" lieved in God, so they should also believe in Christ : as they 
** already honoured God the Father, so they should also for 
*' the future, honour the Son of God ; honour him, as having 
" all judgment committed unto him ; honour him, to the ho- 
" nour of the Father, which sent him ; acknowledge him to be 
" God, to the glory of the Father." Which is a very low idea 
of divine honour ; for it is as much as to say, that as the Fa- 
ther is to be honoured as God, so there is a degree of honour, 
which he has conferred upon the Son, infinitely below that 
which is due to himself, but yet called divine, because it is given 
him by a divine warrant. Whether, in this sense, an angel might 
not have had a warrant to receive divine honour, I leave any 
one to judge ; and, indeed, nothing is contained in this sense, but 
what rather tends to depreciate, than advance the glory of 
Christ. But that we may better understand how far they allow 
that religious worship may be given to our Saviour, as well as 
that we may take occasion to defend that right to divine wor- 
ship, which we have proved to be due to him, we shall briefly 
consider, and endeavour to make some reply to the following 
objections. 

Object. 1. To what has been said concerning a right to re- 
ligious worship, being founded only in a person's having the per- 
fections of the divine nature ; and accordingly that it is an ar- 
gument that our Saviour is truly and properly God, equal with 
the Father, because as such, he has a right to it, it is objected, 
that if God commands us to worship a creature, we are bound 
to obey him ; and accordingly, without considering any right 
that is founded in his nature, we are to give divine worship to 
Christ, by divine direction, or in obedience to a command given 
us to that purpose ; and that such a command was given, upon 
which Christ's right to receive divine worship is founded, ap- 
pears from Heb. i. 6. When he hringeth his jirst-hegotteji into 
the -worlds he saith^ and let all the angels of God rvorship him ; 
which supposes that they did not worship him before, nor would 
they have done it afterwards, without this divine intimation. 

AnsTV. 1. As to our yielding obedience to a divine command, 
provided God should require us to give divine worship to a 
creature, it may be replied, that we do not deny but that all the 
divine commands are to be obeyed ; but yet this supposition ijj 
groundless, inasmuch as God cannot command us to worship a 
creature, any more than he can discharge us from an obligation 
to worship himself. This, therefore, is, in effect, to suppose 



390 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

what can never be ; therefore nothing can be inferred from 
such a supposition ; we might as well say, that if God should 
cease to exist, he would cease to be the object of worship ; or 
if a created being had divine perfection, he would have a right 
to equal honour with God ; which is to suppose a thing that is 
in itself impossible ; and it is no less absurd to suppose it war- 
rantable for us to pay divine worship to a creature. This will 
farther appear, from what has been said in explaining the nature 
of religious worship. Adoration is a saying to a person, who 
is the object thereof, thou hast divine perfections, and to say 
this to a creature, is contrary to truth ; and therefore, certainly 
the God of truth can never give us a waiTant to say that which 
is false, as this certainly would be. And if we consider wor- 
ship, as it is our addressing ourselves to him, whom v/e wor- 
ship, in such a way, as becomes a God, he cannot give us a 
warrant so to do, for that would be for him to divest himself of 
his glory : and it would also disappoint our expectations, by-' 
putting us on trusting one that cannot save us ; and such are 
justly reproved, in Isa. xlv. 20. as hav'ins^ no knoxvledge^ ivho 
pray unto a god that cannot save. We must therefore conclude, 
that since God cannot give his glory to another, he cannot give 
any warrant to us to pay divine worship to a creature, as is sup- 
posed in the objection, 

2. As for that scripture, referred to, in which God command- 
ed the angels to worship our Saviour, when he brought him in- 
to the world, it is not to be supposed that he had no right to 
divine worship before his incarnation j for if he be a divine 
Person, as the scriptures assert him to be, the angels, doubt- 
less adored him as such before ; the only new discovery that 
was then made to them was, that the second Person in the God- 
head was now God incarnate ; and therefore this instance of 
infinite condescension was to be considered as a motive to ex- 
cite their adoration, but not the formal reason of it : thus we 
are sometimes commalided to adore and magnify God for the 
visible displays of his divine perfections in his works ; as the 
Psalmist says, Psal. cvii. 8. Oh that inen -would praise the 
Lord for his goodness^ and for his wonderful xvorks to the chil- 
dren of men ! and, in many other scriptures, where the works 
of God are represented, as a means or motive to excite our 
worship or adoration ; whereas the divine perfections, which 
are displayed or rendered visible therein, are the great foun- 
dation or reason thereof; we worship this God because he is 
infinitely perfect ; though we take occasion, from the visible dis- 
play of his perfections, to worship him. In this sense we un- 
derstand the worship given to Christ by the angels, when 
brought into the world ; they took occasion, from this amazing 
instance of his condescension, to adore those perfections, which 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 391 

induced the Son of God to take the human nature into miiou 
with his divine ; not that they supposed his right to worshij-) 
was founded therein. 

Object. 2. Since our worshipping Christ includes in it ascrib- 
ing all that glory to him that is his due ; it is enough for us, 
when we worship him, to confess that he has an excellency 
above the angels, or that he is tlie best of all created beings, as 
well as the most honourable, and the greatest blessing to man- 
kind, as he was sent of God to instruct us in the way of salva- 
tion as a Prophet, to intercede for us as a Priest, and to give 
laws to us as a King, and that he has done all this faithfully, 
and with great compassion to us. These things, and whatever 
else he does for the advantage of mankind, may, and ought to 
be acknowledged to his praise, as a debt due to him, in which 
respect he is to be considered as the object of worship ; never- 
theless, we are not to give him that glory which is due to the 
Father, as though he were a Person trul}'^ and properly divine, 
in the same sense as he is. 

Answ. 1. It is agreed, on both sides, that that glor}-, Avhich 
is due to him, is to be ascribed; but we humbl}^ conceive, that 
the ascribing to a person that honour, which he has a right to, 
unless we suppose it to be divine, is not religious worship; 
or, to confess that those works which he has done, are won- 
derful, and of great advantage to mankind, is no instance of 
adoration, unless we suppose that these works are such, as none 
but a Person who has the divine nature can perform; where- 
as all those works, which they ascribe to him, may, according 
to them, be performed by a finite being, or else they must al- 
low the arguments, which have been taken from thence, to 
prove his proper deity. 

2. If the works that are ascribed to him be considered as 
properly divine, as they are represented to be in scripture, it 
must not be concluded, from hence, that he is to be adored, 
as performing them ; but we are rather to take occasion from 
thence, as was observed in our last head, to adore those di- 
-V ine perfections, which are evinced hereby, which render him 
vPe object of worship; as the works of God are motives to in- 
! 'ce us to woi-ship him, and not the formal reason of that 

orship; as when, in the first commandment, God lays claim 
lo divine honour, or obliges the Isra,elites to have no other s^ods 
before him^ because he had brought them out of the hind of 
Egypt^ we are to Consider their deliverance from thence, in- 
deed, as a motive to worship ; but it is the divine power that 
was exerted therein, that was properly the oi)jcct thereof; so, 
in Psal. cxxxvi. 1. we are to give thanks to the Lord, xuhose 
mercy endurethfor ever ; and, in the following verses, there is 
! particular mention made of some glorious works which God 



392 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

had done, who alone doth great -wonders^ who^ in wisdom^ made 
the heavens^ and stretched out the earth; made the sim to rule 
hy day^ and the moon by nighty &c. These, and several other 
works there mentioned are all considered as motives to excite 
our adoration ; but his being Jehovah^ the God of gods^ and 
Lord of lords ^ as in the 1st, 2d, and 3d verses, is the great 
foundation of his right to worship, since that is infinite; 
whereas his M^orks are only the effects of infinite power, and 
so a demonstration of his right to divine gloty. Now to ap- 
ply this to those works which are done by our Saviour, if we 
suppose them, as we ought, to be properly divine, they are to 
be considered only as evincing his right to divine honour, as 
they are a demonstration of his deity, which is the only thing 
that renders him the object of divine worship. 

Object. 3. But some will proceed a little farther, when they 
speak of Christ as the object of worship, and so will allow, 
that honours, truly divine, may be given to him ; yet that this 
does not prove him to be God equal with the Father, since he 
is herein only considered as the Father's Representative, on 
whom the worship, that is immediately applied to him, must 
be supposed to terminate ; as when an ambassador, who repre- 
sents the prince that sent him, is considered as sustaining that 
character, and so receives some honour, which otherwise he 
would have no right to, or rather he is honoured as personating 
him whom he represents. 

Ansxv. To this it may be replied, that whatever may be said 
to be done by an ambassador, as representing the prince that 
sent him, there is always something contained in the manner 
of his address, or in the honours ascribed to him, that denotes 
him to be more than a subject; and it would be ill represented, 
should he assume that honour to himself that is due to his 
master. Therefore our Saviour, were he not a divine Person, 
but only tlic Father's Representative, could not have a right 
to claim that divine honour that is ascribed to him ; neither 
have we any foimdation, in scripture, to distinguish concern- 
ing a supreme and a subordinate worship, or a worship given 
to a person that does not terminate in him, but in another, 
whom he represents. 

If there be any apparent foundation for this supposition, it 
must be taken from those expressions in which Christ is re- 
presented, as Mediator, as acting in the Father's name, and 
not seeking his own glor)% but the glorj^ of him that sent him, 
or referring all the honour, that is given to him as such, to the 
Father. But to this it may be replied, that when our Saviour 
uses svich a mode of speaking, he disclaims any right to divine 
honour due to him as Man, in which respect he received a 
commission from the Father, and acted in his name; but when 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITA'. 393 

ilie honour of a divine Person is given to him as God, though 
considered as Mediator, he is not to be looked upon as repre- 
senting the Father, or transferring the divine glory that he re- 
ceives, to the Father, but as having the same right to it as the 
Father has, inasmuch as he has the same divine nature, other- 
wise we cannot account for those modes of speaking, in which 
the glory of a divine Person is ascribed to him, without re- 
striction or limitation, as it oftentimes is in scripture. 

OhjecU 4. To what has been said in defence of Christ's di- 
vinit}-, from our being baptized in his name, it is objected, 
that it does not follow, that because we are baptized in the 
name of the Son, as well as of the Father, that therefore he is 
God equal with the Father; for though this ordinance, as it 
respects the Father, contains, properly, an act of divine wor- 
ship, in which we consider him as the great Lord of all things, 
to whom divine worship, in the highest sense is, due; yet we 
consider the Son, as weii as the Holy Ghost, only as having a 
right to an inferior kind of worship, in proportion to the res- 
pective parts which they sustain, by the will of the Fathtn-, in 
the work of our salvation ; and, in particular, to be baptized in 
the name of Christ, implies in it nothing else but a declaration 
that we adhere to him, as the Father's Minister, delegated by 
him to reveal his mind and will to us, and to erect that gos- 
pel-dispensation, which we, in this ordinance, professedly sub- 
mit to ; and accordingly to be baptized in the name of Christ, 
is to be taken in the same sense, as when, in 1 Cor, x. 2. the 
Israelites were said to he baptized tnto Moses^ in the cloudy and 
m the sea; as they signified thereby their consent to be govern- 
ed by those laws, which Moses was appointed, by God, to 
give them ; upon which account, they were denominated a par- 
ticular church, separated from the world, and obliged to Avor- 
ship God in such a way, as was prescribed in the ceremonial 
law : even so, by baptism, we own ourselves Christians, un- 
der an obligation to adhere to Christ, as our Leader and Com- 
mander, who has revealed to us the gospel, which, by subject- 
ing ourselves to, we are denominated Christians ; and to this 
they also add, especially the Socinians, that as baptism was 
first practised as an ordinance, to initiate persons into the Jew- 
ish church, and was afterwards applied by our Saviour, to sig- 
nify the initiating the heathen into the Christian church ; so it 
v/as designed to be no longer in use among them, than till 
Christianity was generally embraced ; and consequently we 
being a Christian nation, are not obliged to submit to it, since 
we are supposed to adhere to the doctrines of Christianity, and 
therefore it is needless to signify the same by this ordinance. 
It was upon this account that Socinus. and some of his follow- 

Vol. L 3D 



394 1H£ DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

ets, not only denied the baptism of infants, but that of all others, 
who were supposed to be Christians. 

Answ. 1. As to the first p?at of this objection, to wit, that 
baptism does not signify the same thing when it is administer- 
ed in the name of Christ, as when administered in the- name of 
the Father, this is foundtd on a supposition, that the Son has 
not a right to the same honour that is due to the Father, which 
ought to be proved, and not taken for granted ; and it alto- 
gether sets aside the consideration of the Father, Son, and 
Holy Ghost's being herein co-ordinately represented, as the 
objects of this solemn dedication, which tends very much to 
derogate from the Father's glory. As it supposes the Son and 
Spirit to have a right to that glory which belongs to him, 
while they deny them to be divn:ie Persons ; and according to 
this method of reasoiiing, God might as v/ell have ordained, 
that we should have been baptized in his name, together with 
the name of any of his prophets and apostles, which were ap- 
pomted to be his ministers, in revealing his will to us, as in 
the name of the Son and Spirit, unless they were accounted 
worthy of having an honour infaiitel}' superior to that which is 
given to any creature given to them herein. 

2. When it is supposed that our professed subjection to 
Christ in baptism, is nothing else but our consent to be govern- 
ed by those laws, v/hich he has given us in the gospel, and so 
is compared with that declaration of subjection to the law of 
'Moses, which was contained in the baptism of the Israelites 
into Moses ; 

To this it may be replied ', that this supposes Christ to be 
no other than a Lawgiver ; and that to be a Christian, is no- 
thing else but to be professedly a member of that society, 
which goes under that denomination ; and that to put on Christ 
is not to consecrate or devote ourselves to him as a divine Per- 
son ; which is a very low idea of Christianity ; and conse- 
quently the character of a Christian does not imply in it so 
much, when assumed by an Anti-trinitarian, as when applied 
to those who suppose that they are hereby obliged to honour 
him, as they honour the Father, or to submit to his govern- 
ment, as truly and properly divine. A Christian is not barely 
one who is of Christ's partj/, in the same sense as a Mahome- 
tan, who adheres to the laws of Mahomet, is of his ; for 
Christianity contains in it an obligation to perform those reli- 
gious duties, of trust, universal obedience, and love, that are 
due to Christ as a divine Person. 

3. As to the supposition, that baptism being an ordinance 
of Proselytism to the Christian faith, therefore a Christian na- 
tion is no longer obliged to submit to it, this is directly con- 
trary to what our Saviour says in the words immediately fol- 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 395 

iowing the institution thereof, in Matt, xxviii. 20. io, / am 
xvith ijou ahvaijs, even unto the end of the xvorld^ that is, you 
may expect my presence with you in administering this ordi- 
nance, as well as preaching the gospel, not only during the 
first age of the churcii, till Christianity shall obtain in the world, 
but as long as there shall be a society of Christians m it. And, 
indeed, if Christianity were nothing more than a public de- 
claration of our obligation, to adhere to the laws of Christ; it 
does not follow, that because we are born in a Christian na- 
tion, therefore such a piofession is no longer necessary. But 
since more than this is contained therein, as hath been before 
observed, namely, our professed subjection to Christ, in a re- 
ligious way, as a divine Person, this extends the baptismal ob- 
ligation much farther than to our being called Christians, and 
argues the necessity of our engaging in this ordinance, as long 
as Christ is the object of faith, or to be acknowledged to be 
the Prophet, Priest, and King of his church, and, as such, the 
object of religious worship, namely, unto the end of the world. 

Object. 5. There is another objection against the argument 
in general, relating to Christ's being the object of divine wor- 
ship, taken from his having refused to have one of the divine 
perfections ascribed to him, and directing the Person that gave 
it, to ascribe it to the Father, in Matt. xix. 1 7. He said unto 
hitn^ Why callest thou me good, there is 7ione good but one, that 
is God; q. d. there is but one Person who is good, as goodness 
is properly a divine attribute, and that is the Father : there- 
fore he alone is the object of that worship, which consists in 
the ascribing the perfections of the divine nature to him, in 
w^hich sense we have before supposed religious worship to be 
understood. 

Anszu. 1. As to what our Saviour says, concerning the di- 
vine unity, when he asserts, that there is none good but one, 
that is God ; it is, doubtless to be understood in the same sense 
with all other scriptures, that deny a plurality of gods, in op- 
position to the principles and practice of idolaters ; but it does 
not follow from hence, that the Father is the only Person who 
is God, or the object of divine worship. This has been be- 
fore considered *, and therefore all that I shall reply to this 
part of the objection is, that the word God is sometimes taken 
for the Godhead, without a particular restriction or limitation 
thereof, either to Father, Son, or Holy Spirit, but may be 
equally applied to them all. In this sense it is to be taken, 
when the being of a God is demonstrated by the light of na- 
ture ; as from the effects of the divine power, we argue, that 
there is a God, who is the Creator of all things; but this ean- 

* See pag-e S22, 5^5. ante. 



3.96 'ill£ DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY, 

not, if ^ve have no other light to guide us herein but that of 
nature, be applied to the Father, as a distinct Person in the 
Godhead, for the distinction that there is between the divine 
Persons is a matter of pure revelation ; therefore all that our 
Saviour intends by this expression is, that no one has a right 
to have divine perfections ascribed to him, but he that has a 
divine nature, which whether it be meant of the Father, Son, 
or Holy Ghost, he is denominated the one only living and true 
God. 

It follows from hence, that when such modes of speaking are 
Tised in scripture, though the Father be called the one or only 
God, the Son is not excluded, as a late judicious writer well 
observes.* 

2. As to that part of the objection, which concerns our Sa- 
viour's blaming the man for calling him good, there are two 
senses given of it ; one is taken from a difterent reading of the 
words, namely. Why dost thou ask me concerning' good.] But 
it will not be much to our purpose either to defend or disprove 

• See Dr. Waterland's defence of the divinity of Christy serm.'w.pag. 127- 8c 
seq. -where he proves, that the exclusive terms of One, only, &c. do not except the 
Son, so as to deny him to have the same Godhead -with the Father: this he proves 
from several scriptures, viz. Alat. xi. 27. No one knoweth tlie Son, but the Fa- 
ther ; no)' any one the Father, sa\'e the Son ; it does not follotv from hence, that 
the Father does not know himself nor the Son himself: and^vhen it is said, in 1 Cor. 
ii. 11. The things of God knoweth no one, but the Spii-it of God; this does not 
exclude the Son, for that icould contradict the scripture bitt now mentioned; no 
more than the Son^s 07dy knowing the Father excludes the Holy Ghost, which would 
be contrary to this scripture ; so in liev. xix. 12. it is said, that the So7i had a name 
written which no one knew but he himself: none ever thought that the Father 
•was excluded by this exclusive term ; so when God ths Father sciith, in Jsa. xliv. 24. 
I am he that maketh all thuigs, that sti-etcheth forth the heavens alone, that 
spreadeth abroad the earth by myself: this would contradict many other scripturet, 
which speak of the Son as the Creator of all things, if he were to be excluded by it. 
^igain, when the Psalmist saith, cwicernijig the Father, in Psul. IXxxiii. 18. that 
his name alone is Jehovah, we mu-^t set aside all those scriptures iVi which our Sa- 
liour is called Jehovah, if he is contained in this exclusive term. See more to this 
purpose in the said sermon, in which this argnment is managed xmth a great deal of 
jndgment. I shall only take leave farther to cite what is well observed in page 3fi ■ 
" That, perhaps t1i£ word God, in those places, namely, stich »n which there are these 
" exclusive terms, is to be understood in the indefinite sen.'te, abstracting from the 
*'• particxdar con.?ideratio7i of this or that perso7t, in like ma7mer as the word man of 
'^ ten stands not for any particular human perso7i, but the whole species, or hipnait 
" tiature ,- as when we say, man is frail ; man is mortal, or the like." 

■j- T/ ,«» f/i*7ac <nr«|« TK «^ si6k. Jieza speaks of t^vo or three of the most ancient 
copies 171 which this reading isfo7md; a7id Grotius also adhei-es to it, from the credit, 
as he says, of the most ancient and correct copies; and it is also obsci'ved, that the 
vulgar Latin versio7i rende7^s it so ; and Augusti7i read it so in the copy that he 
made use of: and whereas the era7igelists, Mai'k and Luke, read it. Why callest 
thou me g'ood, he endeavours ts reconcile this different reading therewith as sup- 
posing there was a seeming coiitradiction betweeii them which lie anight better have 
done, by 7'eferri7ig to S07tw copies 7vhich had it, as we read it, why callest thou me 
g'ood ; frofn -whence, it is probable, he saw 7iQne that so re/idcred it in his time. Vid. 
Agust. de Consensu. Evan. lib. ii. cap. 63. It is also thus translated in the ancietit 
He'brenv version ofthegospd ofMatthe-a' 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 397 

this reading, since Mark and Luke read it, IVht/ callest thoxi 
me good., &c. therefore, passing this over and supposing that 
it ought to be read, as we generally do ; the common answer 
that is given to this objection, which, I humbly conceive, may 
fee well acquiesced in, is ; that our Saviour considers the man, 
as ascribing a divine perfection to him, whom, at the same 
time, he concluded to be no more than a creature ; and there- 
fore it is as though he should say ; either, first, acknowledge 
tne to be a divine Person, or else do not ascribe divine honours 
to me, for then by consequence, thou mightest as well ascribe 
them to any other creature. And accordingly, by the same 
method of reasoning, had he conversed with any Anti-trinita- 
rian, in his day, who had given divine worship to him, and yet 
denied his proper deity, he would have reproved him for this 
mistake arising from an erroneous conscience, as much as he 
does the man, whom he reproves, in the same sense, for styling 
!)im good. 

That Christ does not exclude himself from having a right to 
this divine perfection, is not only evident, from those several 
scriptures, which have been before referred to, that ascribe per- 
fections to him that are equally divine, inasmuch as he that 
has a right to one divine perfection, has a right to all ; but he 
also styles himself, in John x. 14. The good Shepherd, -which 
certainly imports as much as good Master, which expression 
Was used by the man before-mentioned ; and that his being the 
good Shepherd argues him to be the Fountain of blessedness, 
which is certainly a divine perfection, is evident, because he 
speaks of himself, as communicatively good in the highest 
sense, ver. 28. I give U7ito them, viz. my sheep, eternal life, {a) 

(a) " If Dr. Priestley, in his celebrated efforts to establish the Unitarianism 
of the primitive church against Dr. llorsley, fell so short of" complete victory;" 
it mav be presumed, that the failure would, in some degree, airect his greater 
work, The History of Early Opinions concerning Jesus Christ. Many parts of 
tliat elaborate performance are merely a republication of the Letters, excluding 
the peis(jua!ities. Their merits and Iheu" fate must, therefore, be closely, inter- 
woven. ▼ 

This large and capitsd work was given to the world under circumstances which 
appeared vei-y promising for bringing the controversy to a satisfactory issue. 
VVitii great and long continued diligence the indefatigable author collected hi* 
liiaterials. He digested and arranged them, with that lucid perspicuity tor whicU 
!io was .so justly distinguished, lie tried every method to call iovth into the field 
of preparatory discussion, some learned and able I'rinitarians and Arians. He 
waited for some years after the publication of the work ; and then renewed his 
public challenge, aHbrding an additional period for the fate of the question. It 
v.'as, of course, implied, and the obligation wa.s frankly avowed by the Doctor; 
that he would in proper time duly notice what any fair and candid opponents 
sliould produce. 

It is to be lamented, however that the expectations thus excited have not been 
completely answered ; and the decease of Dr. Priestly excludes every hope that 
thev will be so- 



398 THE DOCTRIKE. OF THE TRlxVlTV. 

Secondly^ Having proved the deity of the Son, we proceed 
to consider that of the Holy Ghost, in which we are obliged 
to oppose the Socinians and Arians, though in different respects : 
As for the Socinians, they seem to be divided in their senti- 

Earlv in the year 1790, a mild and amiable wi'iter. Dr. Williams,* addressed ta 
Dr. Priestley his objcc'cions to ilie whole structure of the argument built on the 
History of Early Opinions. He offered reasons to shew, tl\at the appeal to the 
fethers was a method calculated to increase difficulties, and to render the con- 
troversy almost intermmable ; that it has been experimentally proved an insuffi- 
cient mode of argument ; that it has been long ago solidly refuted ■,-\ that it was 
plainly reprehended by Jesus Christ ; that it is highly untheological in its just 
consequences; and that it is illogical and inconclusive. This letter breathed the 
sincere spirit of amicable contro\ersv' ; and I cannot but think that it deserved 
the very candid and serious attention of your learned friend. But I believe it was 
never noticed in any other way than that of private compliment. 

In 1794, Dr. Jamieson published a professed and minute examination of the 
History of Early Opinions. This elaborate and learned work was the very per- 
formance which Dr. Priestley had so long desired and challenged. It surely, 
then, had a just cLiIm on his particular and public notice. At the time of this 
work's appearance. Dr. Priestley uas occu])ied in the important measure of emi- 
gration to America. But when that step was accomplished, he enjoyed, for the 
remaining years of life, a calm and undisturbed retreat. We have, however, yet 
to be informed of the reason why ills former pledge was not fulfilled. 

As tlie con'ci'o\-ersy has been thus left open, it cannot be deemed illiberal in me 
to mention the result of personal observation in i-eading this large work of Dr. 
Priestley's. I am the more inclined to do so, since what I iiave remarked may be 
of use in answering a question of some importance ; What degree of reliance can 
be placed on Dr. Priestley's care and accuracy in his citations of tlie fathers ? 

You, Sir, are well aware of the impoi'Uince which Dr. Priestley attache? to the 
position, that the doctrines of the pre-existence and divinity of Chnst were ac- 
knowledged bv the orthorlox fatliers to have been most cautiously concealed, in 
the earlier preaching of the apostles, and not to have been clearly divulged, till 
John taught them at the close of the apostolic age. 

Dr. Jamieson appears to me to have solidly refuted this assertion. ^ But he h^s, 
by no means, proceeded so far as he might easily have done, in shewing Dr. 
Priestley's remarkable inattention to rigid accurac}' in the allegation of his au- 
thorities. 

The instances of this kind which I have observed have given me much asto- 
nishment. If they concerned merely the literary reputation of this truly eminent 
character, to dra.^them into public notice could only lie the work of a petulant 
and little mind. But they become cases of a very different nature, when conclu- 
sions of prime importance on a ver}' interesiing subject are inferred from egre- 
g'ious misconstructions of an auliior'afcmeaning. In such cases i-egai-d to truth 
must supersede personal delicacies. 

This duty becomes the more urg'ent when we are told, from liigh and respect- 
nble authority, that, " in all the most important controversies in which" Dr. 
Priestley " v/as engaged, he had studied the subject thoroughly, and was a com- 
" plete master of the whole question :" and that, in his reasoning, " there was 
" nothing artificial and ambiguous ; no design to slur over difficulties and objec- 
" tions, or to lay greater stress upon a topic than it would well bear."§ 

The doctor has selected Chrisostom as the father whose evidence is most am- 
ple in support of the opinion, that John first taught the divinity of Christ. 

• Letter to Dr. Priestley, in vol. i. of Dr. Williams' edition of Owen on the Hebrews. 

t Or. Williams refers only to ChiHingworth Ijy name. 1 would take the liberty of adding, 
that M. Daille's admirable work On the Use ef the Fathers in Detennir.ing Religious Cnntrcver. 
iies. is deseivinff of the most careful perusal with ieference to this subject. 

t Sc-e his valuable work. Viudication of the Primitive Faith, &c. in Reply to Dr. Triestley's 
Hist, of Earlv Opinions: vol. i. p. 284— 3J3, 

■^ .Mr, Btishaui's Disc. p. 24, 25. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 399 

merits about this matter, some of them consiclerhig the Holy 
Ghost no otherwise tlian as a divine power ; and thcrciore tliey 
call him Virtus Dfi^ or the divine energy, or power oi acting, 
seeming, by this account of it, to deny his distinct Personalit)', 
as the Sabellians do that of the Son and Spirit ; though others 
cf diem, being convinced that there is sulftcient proof of his 
Personality in scripture, to deny his deity, supposing liim to 
be no other than a created ministring Spirit.* 

As for the Arians, though this controversy was not brought 
upon the stage in tiie council at Nice, which was so much em- 
ployed in defending the deity of our Saviour, by proving him 
to have the same essence with the Father, that they had no 
opportunity to proceed in the defence of the consubstantiality 
of the Holy Ghost ; yet this is universally denied by all who 
give into the Arian scheme : It is true, that as they do not 
question his Personality, so they allow that he has many glories 
ascribed to him, agreeing, in words, v/ith the scripture account 
thereof j but they are, notwithstanding, far from asserting his 
proper deity, any more than that of the Son. 

We have already proved him to be a distinct Person,! and 
therefore nothing remains, but that we consider him as having 
a divine nature. And, to make this appear, we shall proceed 

* In this they agree with thoKe ivho luere formerly called JMacechniaiis. from J\Ta- 
cidojiius, bishop of Conntantinople, -who lived about the middle of the fourth century, 
ivho entertained such sentiments of the Holy Ghost, and luida consida able party that 
udherad to him, luho were also called Pneumatomuchi. 

t See page 249, 250. 

" Chiysostom," says Dr. Priestley, " i-epresents all the precedinc,'- w riters of 
" the New Testament as childi'en, who heiu-d, but did not iindevbtund things, 
" and who were busy about cheese-cakes and childish sports, but John," he 
says, " taught what the ang-els themselves did not know befoi-e he declared it."* 

At the bottom of the page. Dr. Priestley faithfully transcribes the Greek of 
this passage, and no one can say that his translation is materially unfair, so far 
as it goes. The sentence is exactly thus : " All the rest, like little children, hear 
" indeed, yet do not understand what tltey hear, but are captivated with cakes 
" and childish sports." The omission of the clause " all the rest," ('u; yt ctxyot 
TravTic) does not appear of much consequenee. The insertion of it would only have 
led the reader to inquire for the antecedent, and Dr. Priestley has provided a 
ready answer : " all the preceding writers of the New Testament." 

Do me the favour, my dear Sir, to take down tlie volume of Chrysostom, and 
turn to the passage. ^\'ill you find the antecedent to this relative clause to be 
any " writers of the New Testament," or any persons at all connected with the 
New Testament ? No, Sir. You will find it to be the effeminate and dissipated 
spectators of athletic games, and the auditors of musicians and oratofial sophists /■j'" 

S:5iith's Lettehs to Bsi-suak. 

• Hist, of Early Op. vol. iii. p. 128, 129. 

t Mr. Belsham denies that thfse characters are the antecedent to the exceptive clause in 
qaestion, and conceives that it refers to the mass ot unlearned christians, who are placed in op- 
l»o»ition to " the spectators and auditors of John, men that are liecoine anpels. or art desirous of 
" becooiing such." But the Greek fathers give some atlditional features of their character. 
" These," he says, " are devoted to merriment and luxuriousness, living in riches, honours, and 
" gluttony." The candid reader will judge whether this description be more applii:'lile to plain 
a-id honest christians, thaK to the gay and dissipated persons mentioned in a preceding part of 
t!i« discoorsc. 



400 THE DOCTRINE OF THETRINiXV. 

in the same method, in which we have proved the divinity ol' 
the Son, namely, from those divine names, attributes, works, 
and worship, which are ascribed to him ; though we have no 
occasion here to insist on the proof of that proposition, that he 
who is thus described is God, as having done that already under 
each of those distinct heads, in defence of our Saviour's deity; 
and therefore we need only consider them as applied to the 
Holy Ghost. And, 

1. It appears that he is God, equal with the Father and Son, 
inasmuch as the same divine names are given to him that are 
given to them ; particularly, 

(1.) He is called God, without any thing tending to detract, 
Or diminish, from the proper sense of the word, when applied 
to the Father or the Son : thus, in Acts v. 3, 4. Peter said^ 
Ananias, Why hath satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy 
Ghost ? thou hast not lied unto men, hut unto God, where he is 
not only called God, but put in opposition to the creature ; and 
it is as though the apostle should say, thou hast endeavoured 
to deceive him, by whom I am inspired, which is a greater 
crime, than if thou hadst only lied to me. 

Object, It is objected, that it is not the Holy Ghost who is 
here called God, but the Father j in defence of which sense of 
the text it is supposed, that though the lie was immediately 
desigiied to deceive the apostles, or the Holy Ghost, by whom 
thev were known to be inspired, yet this was interpreted by- 
God the Father, as an attempt to impose upon him, whose 
Minister the objectors suppose the Holy Spirit to be, as well 
as the apostles ; and accordingly they thus argue ; he that does 
any thing against God's ministers, to wit, the Father's, may be 
said to do the same against him. And here they refer to some 
scriptures, which, they think, give countenance to this argument 
namely, Exod. xvi. 8. where Moses tells the Israelites, when 
they murmured against him. Tour murmurlngs are not agahist 
us, hut against the Lord; and, in 1 Sam. viii. 7. where God 
says to Samuel, speaking concerning the Israelites, They have 
not rejected thee, but they have rejected me ; and also our Sa- 
viour's words to his diciples, in Luke x. 16. He that hearetk 
If on, heareth me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth me; and 
he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent me; and, in 1 Thes. 
iv. 8. He that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, -who hath 
also given unto us his Holy Spirit.* 

Answ. How plavisible soever this objection may seem to be, 
yet, if duly considered, it will not appear sufficient to overthrow 
the argument we are maintaining ; it is true, indeed, that what 

* See JVolizo^cn, and other Socinian -writers, in loc. and Dr. Clarke's Scripture- 
doctrine, page 13. ivhere he inserts this amotig- those scriptures ; in all tohich he siip- 
fnses th:it the -word God is applied to the Father. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 401 

is done against any one, who acts by a commission, as a servant 
to another, is interpreted to be done against him that gives him 
the commission ; as he that aiTronts a judge, or an ambassador, 
in this respect, affronts the king, whom he represents; or if an 
interior servant is ill treated, in delivering a message from his 
master, this is always supposed to contain a reflection on him 
who sent him ; But, I humbly conceive, this cannot be applied, 
as it is in the objection, to Ananias's not lying' unto men^ but 
unto God, And, to make this appear, let it be considered; 
that here are two terms of opposition ; and these either respect 
God the Father and the apostles ; or God the Father and the 
Hoiy Ghost; or else God the Holy Ghost and the apostles. 

1. God the Father cannot be said here to be opposed to the 
apostles, so as to give countenance to this phrase, or mode of 
speaking used, Thou hast not lied unto men^ but unto God^ be- 
cause it is said, in the foregoing verse, that they had lied to the 
Holy Ghost: if the Hoiy Ghost had not been mentioned, in- 
deed, then there might have been more ground to conclude, that 
Peter opposed himself to God the Father, or intimated hereby, 
that Ananias, in attempting to deceive him, attempted to deceive 
God that sent him ; but even then it would not have fully 
corresponded with the sense of those scriptures but now referred 
to ; for though he that despises a servant, despises him that 
sent him ; and, accordingly, he that despises a minister, when 
he is preaching the gospel, or despises the message that he 
brings, may be said to despise God, whose message it is ; yet 
it does not follow, that if a person designs to impose upon a 
minister, in other respects, that he imposes upon God that sent 
him ; for he may not disown the divine authority, or commission, 
which he has to preach the gospel, and yet may conclude that 
he may deceive him, though he be sensible that he cannot de- 
ceive God, who knovveth all things : But this I need not farther 
insist on, since it is not supposed, in the objection; but God 
the Father is therein opposed to the Holy Ghost, or else there 
would be no appearance of any argument in it; therefore, 

2. Let us consider God the Father as being here opposed 
to the Holy Ghost ; and then it is as much as to say. Thou 
hast lied to the Holy Ghost, wherein thou hast not lied to man, 
but to Ciod, to wit, the Father; to which we may answer, 

That had the apostle designed to oppose the Holy Ghost to 
the Father, and thereby deny his deity, it ought to have been 
expressed thus ; Thou hast not lied unto the Holy Ghost, but 
unto God ; and this would effectually have determined him not 
to have been God, and removed any umbrage or suspicion, as 
though, by the expression, Thou hast not lied unto men., we 
were to understand the apostles ; or since it will be objected, 
that this would have been contrary to matter of fact, for Anani- 

Vol. I. r> E 



402 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

as did lie both to the apostles and to the Holy Ghost ; therefore 
it would have been better understood, had it been said, Thou 
hast not lied to the Holy Giiost, or to men, that is, not to them 
only, but thou hast, interpretatively, in lying to chem, lied unto 
God, to wit, the Father. If it had been so expressed, the sense 
would have been plain and obvious, in iavour of the Anti-thni- 
tarians, as well as agreeable to the scriptures before-mentioned, 
as giving countenance to it ; but since it is not so expressed, 
we must conclude, 

3. That in this text there is no other opposition, but of God 
the Holy Ghost to the apostles ; and accordingly the sense is 
very plain and natural, which is as though the apostle had said, 
Thou hast endeavoured to deceive me, who am under the im- 
mediate inspiration of the Holy Ghost, which is a greater crime 
than if thou hadst only lied to me, at another time, when this 
honour was not conferred upon me ; for herein thou hast com- 
mitted a double criine, inasmuch as thou hast not only lied to 
me, which thou oughtest not to have done, but thou hast lied 
to the Holy Ghost, and, in so doing, hast not lied unto men, 
but unto God ; or, as it is expressed, m ver. 9. that Ananias 
and his xvife had agreed together to tempt the Holy Ghost. 
Which is called a lying to hirn^ in one verse, is styled a tempt- 
ing him in the other ; this therefore seems to be a plain and 
easy sense of the words, which any unprejudiced reader would 
be inclined to give into; and since the scripture is written to 
instruct the most injudicious Christians, as well as others, I 
cannot conceive that such modes of speaking would have been 
made use of therein, which have a tendency to lead persons out 
of the way, by deviating froai the common sense of words, (es- 
pecially in a matter of so great importance as this is) whereby 
some, at least, would be inclined, as we are, bv adhtnng to the 
most proper sense thereof, to acknowledge the Holy Ghost to 
be God, if he v/ere not so. 

There is another scripture, in which the Holy Ghost is called 
The God and the J^ock oj^ Israel, in 2 Sam. xxiii. 3. Now it 
seems very evident, that this is applied to him, by comparing 
it with the foregoing and following words ; in which it is said, 
the Spirit of the Lord spake by me, and his word was in my 
tongue ; and then we have an account of what he said, namely, 
He that ruleth over ma}}., must be Just, &c. It cannot, with any 
colour of reason, be supposed that there is more than one Person 
here intended, who imparted this to the prophet ; and inasmuch 
as this Person is not only called the God, but also the Rock 
of Israel, that is a plain intimation that he is the almighty God 
of Israel, which is the sense of the metaphor, taken from a rock, 
when applied to God in other scriptures. 

Again, it is said, in 1 Cor. iii. 16. Know ye not that ye 
arc the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dxvellcth in yoiu 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 403 . 

Here it must be observed, that their being called the temple 
of God, who is said to dwell in them, denotes the inhabitant 
to be a divine Person, since a temple, according to the known 
acceptation of the word, always connotes a deity ; and so it is 
called die house of God. Now he that dwelt in them, upon 
which account they are called his temple, is expressly said to 
be the Spirit of God, which is agreeable to what is said con- 
cerning him elsewhere, in chap. vi. 19. Knoxu ye not that your 
body is the temple of the Holy Ghost^ which^ or who, is in you ? 

(2.) He. is called Lord; this seems very evident, from Isa, 
vi. 8, 9. And I heard the voice of the Lcrd^ sayings Whom shall 
J send, and zvho will go for us ^ Then said /, Here am /, send 
me. And he said, ^o, and tell this people. Hear ye, indeed^ 
but understand tiot, &c. where we observe, that the person 
sending speaks both in the singular number and the plural, 
Whom shall I send, and who will go for us ? by the former ex- 
pression, Whom shall I send, he evinces his divinity, as having 
a right to give a commission to the prophets, to declare his 
mind and will to man, which, as will be observed under a fol- 
head, none but a divine Person iias a right to do ; by the latter, 
Who shall go for us, he includes him'self among the Persons in 
the Godhead, as it has before been observed * ; viz. that when 
God is represented, as speaking in the plural number, a Tri- 
nity of Persons seems to be intended thereby. 

But that which we shall principally consider is, that the 
Holy Ghost is here called Lord, w^hich appears from what the 
apostle says, in Acts xxviii. 25, 26. Well spake the Holy Ghost^ 
by Esaias the prophet, unto our fathers, sayings Go unto this 
people, and say, Hearing, ye shall hear, and shall not under- 
stand, &c. 

It caimotbe reasonably objected to this, that the apostle only 
refers to the book of Isaiah, and not to this particular part there- 
of; for though, indeed, these words, Thus saith the Holy Ghost, 
might be used, as a preface to any quotation trom scripture, as 
all scripture is given by his inspiration ; yet this message, reler- 
red to by the apostle, was not only transmitted by Esaias to the 
church, but it is distinguished from all those other things, which 
the Spirit of the Lord spake by him ; and therefore it cannot be 
supposed that the apostle means, when referring to this scripture, 
any other than the Holy Ghost's giving him this commission, 
when he says, Well spake the Holij Ghost by him ; and conse- 
quently he that gave this commission, or spake thus to him, 
is the Holy Ghost, who is, in the foregoing words, called the Lord. 

Moreover, there is another scripture, in 2 Cor. iii. 18. where 

it is said, We are changed from glorij to glory, even as by the 

Spirit of the Lord; or, as it is observed in the margin. As by 

the Lord the Spirit ; which reading is certainly as proper as" 

* See page 35Q. 



404 THE DOCTRINE OF TKTE TRINITY. 

any olher, and is preferred, by some, to it ; and therefore it 
contains, at least, a probable argument that the Spirit is expressly 
called Lord.* 

2. The Holy Ghost appears to be God, from those divine 
attributes that are ascribed to him. Accordingly, 

(1.)' He is said to be eternal, in Heb. ix. 24. Christ, through 
the eternal Spirit,, offered himself xvithoiit spot to God. I am 
sensible, many tiiink this eternal Spirit signifies Christ's eter- 
nal Godhead ; which is so called, because of the spirituality of 
its nature ; and that, in this place, it is designed to set forth 
the infinite value, which the oblation that he made of himself, 
in his human nature to God, received from the divine nature, 
to which it was united ; which, though it be a very great truth, 
yet there does not seem to be so great a propriety in the ex- 
pression, when we suppose the eternal Spirit is taken for the 
divine nature, as if it be understood of the Holy Ghost : and 
Christ may be said, by him, to have offered himself, without 
spot, to God, as implying, that the unction, which he received 
from the Holy Ghost, was the means to preserve him from all 
sinful defilement, upon which account his oblation was without 
blemish ; and, indeed, it was no less necessary, in order to its 
being accepted, that it should be spotless, than that it should be 
of infinite value ; therefore I must conclude, that it is the Holy 
Ghost who is here called the eternal Spirit. 

Moreover, his eternity may be evinced from his having crea- 
ted all things, as he that made the w'orid, and all finite things, 
wherewith time began, must be before them, and consequently 
from everlasting; by which the eternity of Christ w^as proved, 
under a foregoing head ; and that the Holy Ghost made all 
things, will be proved under our next argument. 

(2.) His immensity or omnipresence, is a farther proof of 
his deity ; and this seems to be plainly contained in Psal. 
cxxxix. 7. Whither shall I go from thy Spirit ? or xvhither 
shall I fee from thij presence? q. d. there is no place where 
the Spirit is not ; and it is allowed by all, that the divine im- 
mensitj' is here described in a very elegant manner; though, 
it is true, it is objected, that one part of this verse is exegeti- 
cal of the other, and therefore the Psalmist, by the Spirit^ in- 
tends nothing else but the presence of God; but it is equally, 
if not more probable, that the Spirit is distinguished from the 
presence of God, and consequently that he is a distinct Per- 
son in the Godhead ; and this does not contain any strain upon 
the sense of the words, since the Spirit is so often spoken of 
in scripture as a Person, as has been before observed ; f and 

* Several of the Post JVicene Fathers have taken the -xvords, K^QdiTrip oltto Tm 
wnu/xttio;, in the same sense as by tlie Lord, the Spirit ; and, in particular, JUasil. de 
Spirit. Sanct. ad Jlmphiloc. Cap. 21. & Chrys9St. in loc^ 

t .S'ee/>a^e249,250, 251. 



THfc DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 405 

therefore it is not strange that he should be mentioned as such 
in this text ; and, if he be spoken of as a Person, it is bejond 
dispute that he is there proved to be a divine Person. 

(3.) He is said to be omniscient in 1 Cor. ii. 10. The Spirit 
fiearchctli all things ; yca^ the deep things of God, To search, 
indeed, is a word used in condescension to our common mode 
of speaking, as we arrive to tli'j knovdedge of things by search- 
ing, or enquiry, though this idea is to be abstiacted from the 
v/ord, when applied to God ', for him to search, is to know^ all 
things; and, in this sense, it is used, in Psal. cxxxix. 23, 24. 
Search nie^ God, and know my heart; try ?ne, and knoxv my 
thoughts ; and see if there be any wicked xvay in me, &c. It does 
not imply the manner of his knowing, but the exquisiteness of 
his knowledge ; and so we must understand it in this scripture, 
w^hen applied to the Spirit's searching all things, in Avhich M'e 
have an account of the objects of his knowledge, namclv, the 
deep things of God : thus he knows ail those things, which were 
hid in the divine mind from all eternity, and the infinite per- 
fections of the divine nature, which are incomprehensible to a 
creature, and which none can, by searching, find out to per- 
fection, Job xi. 7. in which respect the highest creatures, viz. 
the angels, are said to be charged xvith folly, whose knowledge 
is comparatively imperfect, chap. iv. 18. Moreover, we may 
observe, that the manner of the Spirit's knowing all things, is 
not like ours, that is by inferring consequences from premises, 
in a way of reasoning; for it is said, in the verse immediately 
following, that he knoxvs the things of God, in such a way, as 
a man knoxveth the things of a man, that is, his own thoughts, 
by an internal principle of knowledge, not by revelation, or any 
external discovery : thus the Spirit knows the divine nature, 
as having it ; therefore his omniscience is a plain proof of his 
Deity. 

3. The Deity of the Holy Ghost may be farther evinced, 
from his performing those works which are proper to God 
alone. And, 

(1.) He is said to have created all things: thus, in Gen. i. 
2. The Spirit of God moved upon the face of the xvatcrs ; where, 
by the Spirit of God, cannot be meant, as some suppose, the air 
or the wind ; for that was not created till the second day, when 
God made the firmament. Again, it is said, in Job xxvi. 13. 
By his Spirit he hath garnished the heavens ; and, in chap, 
xxiii. 4. The Spirit of God hath made me. Some of the Arians 
are so sensible that the Spirit is represented as the Creator of 
all things as well as the Son ; that they suppose him to be an 
instrument to the Son in the creation thereof; which is as much 
as to say, he is an instrument of an instrument ; and, indeed, 
to say the Son created all things, as an instrument, has 



406 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

been considered as an indefensible notion ; * but this is much 
more so. 

(2.) Extraordinary or miraculous works, which are equiva- 
lent to creation, have been performed by the Spirit ; thus the 
apostle, speaking concerning extraordinary gifts, subservient to 
the propagation of the gospel, in the first preaching thereof, 
Attributes tiiem to the Spirit, which he largely insists on, in 
1 Cor. xii. and when he says, ver. 4, 5, 6. that there are di- 
versities of gifts ^ but the same Spirit; and there are differences 
of administrations^ but the same Lord; and there are diversities 
of operations^ but it is the same God, -which xvorketh all in all $ 
which many who defend the doctrine of the Trinicy, take for 
granted, that it signifies all the Persons in the Godhead, that 
our Saviour is called Lord, and the Father God, therein ; and 
some of the Anti-trinitarians, from hence, would argue, that 
the Spirit is not God, because he is distinguished from the 
Father, whom they suppose to be there called God, I cannot 
but from hence conclude, that the Holy Spirit is set forth un- 
der all these three names ; and the works attributed to him, 
notwithstanding the variety of expressions, are the same, and 
included in that general term of spiritual gifts. And so I take 
the meaning of the text to be this, there are diversities of gilts, 
or extraordinary operations, which some Avere enabled to put 
forth in the exercise of their ministry, which are ail from the 
same Spirit, who is called Lord and God, who has an infinite 
sovereigntv, and bestows these blessings as he pleases, as be- 
comes a divine Person ; and this agrees very well with what 
is said, in ver. 11. All these xuorketh that one and the self-same 
Spirit, dividing" to every man severally as he will. 

(3.) The Spirit of God commissioned and qualified minis- 
ters to preach the gospel, and thereby to gather and build up 
churches, determining that their ministry should be exercised 
in one place, and not in another ; which is a peculiar branch of 
the divine glory, and no one has a right to do it, but a divine 
Person. A creature mav as well pretend to command the sun 
to shine, or stop its course in the heavens at his pleasure, as he 
can commission a minister to preach the gospel, or restrain the 
preaching thereof. And here we may observe, that the Holy 
Ghost is plainly said to have called and appointed the apostles 
to exercise their ministry in the first preaching of the gospel, 
after he had, by conferring extraordinary gifts upon them, 
qvialified them for it ,* and accordingly he speaks in a style truly 
divine, in Acts xiii. 2. The Hohj Ghost said, separate me Bar- 
nabas and Saul, for the rvork xvhereunto I have called them ; and, 
in Acts XX. 28. the apostle tells the elders, or ministers of tlie 
church at Ephesus, that the Holy Ghost had made them, over- 
* See pa je 259, 360. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 407 

seers. We read also of the Spirit's determining where they 
should exercise their ministry ; thus he comnianded Philip to 
go and preach the gospel to the eunuch, in Acts viii. 29. Then 
the Spirit said unto Philips Go near^ and join thyself to this 
chariot ; ana, at another time, the Spirit bade Peter to go and 
preach the gospel to Cornelius, when he doubted whether it 
were lawful for him to do it or no, m Acts x. 19, 20. The Spi- 
rit said unto him^ Behold^ three men seek thee; therefore ^'et thee 
dotuny and go with them^ doubting nothings for I have sent them ; 
and, at another time, it is said, in Acts xvi. 6, 7. They xvere 
forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the xvord in Asia; and 
that they assayed to go into Bithynia^ but the Spirit suffered 
them not ; and, in ver. 9, 10. the apostle Paul was ordered, in 
a vision, to go to Macedonia; w^hich command he obeyed, 
assuredly gathering that the Lord^ that is, the Spirit, had called 
him to preach the gospel unto them. Nothing can be a greater 
argument of the sovereignty of the Holy Ghost, in what re- 
spects this matter, which was of the highest importance ; there- 
fore it is an evident proof of his divinity. But to this wc 
may add, 

(4.) That his divinity farther appears from the unction, 
which he confeired on our Saviour, to perform the work of si 
Mediator in his human nature: thus it is said, in Isa. Ixi. 1. 
The Spirit of the Lord God is upon we, because the Lord hath 
anointed me to preach good tidings to the meek^ &c. And this 
is particularly referred to, as signifying our Saviour's unction 
by the Holy Ghost, in Luke iv. 18, 19. The Spirit of the Lord 
is upon me, because he hath anointed me., &c. And, indeed, it 
is not denied that this is spoken of the Holy Ghost, even by 
those who do not infer his deity from it; accordingly it is in- 
serted, by a late writer, among those scriptures that speak par- 
ticularly of the Holy Ghost ; * and it would be a great strain 
on the sense of the text, to suppose that he hath anointed me, 
refers to the Father, and not to the Spirit. As to the meaning 
of the word unction^ it is borrowed from the ceremonial law, 
under which the prophets, priesls, and kings were publickly 
anointed with oil, as used to signify the wairant, or commis- 
sion, they had received from God, to execute these offices, to- 
gether with the qualifications which were to be expected for 
the discharge thereof. In this sense our Saviour is said to have 
been anointed by the Holy Ghost, to wit, in his human nature, 
in which he was obliged to yield obedience and subjection to 
God, and accordingly he was authorized and qualified to per- 
form this obedience by the Holy Ghost ; so that, lipw difficult 
soever it was, it might be discharged by him, without the least 
failure or defect therein, as we observed before, that it was 

• See JOr. Clarhfs's Sa ipture-tl»i-ti'ine, pa§-<- 19a. 



-^08 THE DOCTRINK OT THE TRINITY. 

owing hereunto, that his oblation was without spot : the work was 
ctrtainiy extraordinary, and consequently the glory redounding 
to the Holy Ghost from hence, is such as proves him to be a 
divine Person. 

(5.) He farther appears to be so, inasmuch as the work of 
grace, both as to the beginning, progress, and completing of 
it, in the souls of believers, is ascribed to him, as well as to the 
Father and the Son. That this is a work of God's almighty 
power, and consequently too great to be performed by any crea- 
ture ; and that the Holy Ghost is, in particular, the author 
thereof, we shall here take for granted, without attempting to 
prove it, which would not be a just method of reasoning, were 
we not led to insist on this subject, under some following an- 
swers, in which this will be more particularly proved.* And if 
the work appears to be the effect of the exceeding greatness of 
the power of God, whereby we are regenerate and sanctified, 
and enabled to overcome all the opposition which attends it, 
till we ai-e !)rought to glory, then he, v/ho is the author hereof, 
will evidently appear to be the God of all grace ; and therefore 
we shall proceed to consider, 

4. That the Holy Ghost appears to be God, inasmuch as he 
has a right to divine worship. That none but a divine Person 
has a right hereunto, has been already proved ; and that the 
Spirit has a right to it, might be evinced, from his having those 
divine perfections, which, as has been before observed, are as- 
cribed to him in scripture; since he has the perfections of the 
divine nature, which are the objects of adoration, then it fol- 
lows, that he is to be adored ; and if he has performed those 
works, which argue him to be the proprietor of all things, this 
must be acknoMdedged ; and if all that grace, which is neces- 
sarv to make us meet for the heavenly blessedness, be his work 
and gift, it follows from hence, that he is to be sought to for 
it, wJhich is a great branch of religious worship. But this be- 
ing only an improvement of, or a deduction from those fore- 
going arguments, laid down to prove his Deity, we shall en- 
quire whether we have not something that contains in it the 
obligation of a command, or whether there are not some exam- 
ples, which are equivalent thereunto, which will farther warrant 
«ur giving divine worship to him. Some suppose, that that 
praver is directed to the Holy Ghost, which is mentioned in 
Acts i. 24, 25. Thou^ Lord, zvhich knoweth the hearts of all 
men, skew whether of these two thou hast chosen, that he maij 
take part of this ministrij and apostleship ; and the reason of 
this supposition is, because the designation of persons to the 
exercise of their ministry, as well as the extraordinary gifts 
with which they were furnished, is peculiarly applied to the 
* .SV*" Quest, llx, Ixvii. Ixxii. Ixxv. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 409 

Holy Ghost in this book ; therefore, it is supposed, they prayed 
to the Holy Ghost, that he would signify whom he had chosen 
to the apostleship, in the room of Judas, of those two that were 
nominated by them ; but this being, at most, but a probable 
argument, I shall lay no stress upon it. 

But, I humbly conceive, that we have a more evident exam- 
ple of prayer made to the Holy Ghost, in 2 Thess. iii. 5. The 
Lord direct your hearts into the love of God^ and into the patient 
•waiting for Christ ; it seems more than probable that the Holy 
Ghost, who is here called Lord, is prayed to ; for he is distin- 
guished from the Father and Son ; and the apostle prays to 
him that he would direct them into the love of the Father, and 
enable them patiently, to wait for the Sop. 

Again, there is another instance hereof, in 1 Thess. iii. 12, 
13. The Lord make you to increase and abound in love one to- 
ivards another^ to the end^ that he may establish your hearts nn- 
blameable iii holiness before God our Father^ at the coming" of 
our Lord Jesus Christ ; where the Holy Ghost seems to be the 
person prayed to ; and is plainly distinguished from the Father 
and Son, inasmuch as what is prayed to him for, is their being 
holy before the Father, at the coming of the Son. 

There is another scripture, in which it is still more evident, 
that the apostle prays to the Holy Ghost, together with the 
Father and Son, viz. Cor. xiii. 14. The grace of the Lord Je- 
sus Christ, and the love of God, and the communio7i of the Holy 
Ghost, be rvith you all, amen ; where, in that part of this prayer, 
which respects the Holy Ghost, is contained an humble suppli- 
cation, that he would be pleased to manifest himself to them, 
or that he would communicate to them those graces which they 
stood in need of; that so, as the church is said elsewhere, in 
John i. 3. to h^xc fellorvship xvith the Father, andxvith his Son 
Jesus Christ; here the apostle prays that they may have fellow- 
ship with the Holy Ghost ; and how can this blessing be pray- 
ed for, without supposing him addressing himself herein to the 
Holy Ghost ? Whenever any thing is desired, or prayed for, 
that can be considered no otherwise than as an effect, produ- 
ced by a free agent, this prayer, or desire, is supposed more 
immediately to be directed to him : As suppose a person should 
use this mode of speaking, in presence of a disobliged friend ; 
Oh that he would look upon me, that he would converse with 
me, or that he would discover his wonted love to me ! though, 
according to the form of expression, it seems not be directed 
to him, yet every one would suppose it to be equivalent to an 
immediate address made to him to that purpose ; wherefore, for 
the apostle to desire that the Holy Ghost would have commu- 
nion with, that is, converse with, and manifest himself to them, 
in performing all those works, which were necessary for their 

Vot. I. 3 F 



410 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

edification and salvation, this desire cannot contain less than a 
prayer to him. 

We shall now proceed to consider some objections, brought 
by the Anti-trinitarians, against the deity of the Holy Ghost. 

Object. A divine Person cannot be the gift of God, for that 
supposes him to be at his disposal, and inferior to him ', but 
the Spirit is said to be given by him, in Neh. ix. 20. Thou 
^avest also t/ir/ good Spirit to instruct them; and, in Acts xi. 
17. God gave them the like gift, meaning the Spirit, that he did 
unto Its ; and, in Luke xi. 13. God, the Father, is said to give 
the Holy Spirit to them that ask him. Again, the Spirit is said 
to be sent, and that either by the Father, as in John xiv. 26. 
The Comforter, ivhich is the Holy Ghost, xohom the Father xvill 
send in i7iy name ; or by the Son, as in chap. xvi. 7. If I depart, 
I will send him inito you. Again, he is said to receive what 
he communicates from another, in John xvi. 14. He shall re- 
ceive of mine, and shcdl shexv it unto you; which is inconsistent 
■with the character of a divine Person, who is never said to re- 
ceive what he imparts to others, as the apostle speaks concern- 
ing God, in Rom. xi. ^5. Who hath first given to him? Again, 
he is said not to speak of himself, but what he hears, when lie 
shews things to come, John xvi. 13. Accordingly he did not 
know that which he Vv'as to communicate before he heard it. 
Again, he is said to have a mind distinct from God, unless we 
suppose that there are a plurality of gods, and so more distinct 
divine minds than one ; for this, they bring that scripture, in 
Rom. viii. 27. He that sear cheth the heart, knoxveth the mind of 
the Spirit, Again, he is represented as making intercession, 
which is an act of worship, and consequently he cannot be the 
object thereof; ver. 26. The Spirit itself maketh intercession 
for us, &c. this also argues that he is not possessed of the bles- 
sings which he intercedes for. Again, he is not only said to 
be resisted and grieved, which expressions, it is true, are 
sometimes applied to God, though in an improper sense, speak- 
ing after the manner of men ; but the Spirit is said to be 
quenched, or extinguished: thus, 1 Thess. v. 19. this, toge- 
ther with what has been before said concerning him, is not 
applicable to a divine Person. These are the most material 
objections that are brought against the doctrine which we have 
been endeavouring to maintain, and the sum of them all is this; 
that it is inconsistent with the character of a divine Person to 
be thus dependent on, and subjected to the will of another, as 
the Spirit is supposed, by them, to be. 

Ansxv.T\\^t we may defend the Godhc r.d of the Holy Ghost, 
against such-like objections as these, we shall first premise 
something relating to all those scriptures which speak of the 
Spirit, as given or sent by the Father, and then apply it to the 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 411 

?ense of those in particular which are brought to support the 
objections, as before-mentioned. 

1. It may be easily observed, that in several places of scrip- 
ture, especially in the New Testament, the Holy Ghost is of- 
ten taken for the gifts or graces of the Spirit ; and more par- 
ticularly for that extraordinmy dispensation, in which the apos- 
tles were endowed with those spiritual gifts, which were ne- 
cessary for the propagation and success of the gospel : these, 
by a Metonymy^ are called the Spirit; and, I humbly conceive, 
all those scriptures, which speak of the Spirit's being poured 

forth^ as in Prov. i. 23. and Joel ii. 28. compared with Acts 
ii. 17. and elsewhere, are to be understood in this sense; and 
thus it is explained, in Acts x. 44, 45. The Holy Ghost fell on 
all them xvhich heard the ivord; upon which occasion it is said, 
that upon the Gentiles ivas poured ont the gift of the Holy Ghost. 
'1 nus we are to understand that scripture, in Acts xix, 2. IVe 
have not so much as heard whether there he any Holy Ghost; 
and another in John vii. 39. the Holy Ghost ivas not yet^ be- 
cause Jesus luas not yet glorified ; the word given is supplied 
by our translators, probably, to fence against a weak argument 
of some Anti-trinitarians, taken from that text, to overthrow 
the eternit}^ of the Spirit ; but whether the word be supplied or 
no, the sense of tiie text is plainly this, that the gifts of the 
Holy Ghost were not conferred before Christ's ascension into 
heaven ; which is a farther confirmation of this acceptation of 
the word, or of this figurative way of speaking, being used in 
this, and several other places of scripture, to the same purpose. 

2. All those scriptures which seem to represent the Holy 
Ghost, as inferioi" to the Father and Son, some of which are 
contained in the objection, may be understood as denoting the 
subserviency of the works of the Spirit, which are also called 
the Holy Ghost^ to those works which are said to be perform- 
ed by the Father and Son : Now it is certain that the subser- 
viency of one work unto another, performed by different per- 
sons, does not necessarily infer the inferiority of one person to 
the other : accordingly we must distinguish between the Spirit, 
as subsisting, and as acting ; in the former sense, he is a di- 
vine Person, equal with the Father and Son ; in the latter, he 
may be said to be subservient to them. 

But now we shall proceed to consider the sense of those 
scriptures, brought to suppoit the objection, in consistency 
with what has been premised. The first scripture mentioned, 
is that in which it is said. Thou gavest them thy good Spirit to 
instruct them; where the Holv (>host is described with a per- 
sonal character, and probably it is not to be understood me- 
tonymically for his gifts and graces ; according!}' the meaning 
*)f it seems to be this; that the Spirit's efficiency, in guiding 



412 , THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

and instructing them, was a special gift of God conferred upon 
them; and, in this respect, though he was a sovereign Agent, 
yet he is said to act by the will of the Father, which is the 
same with his own will : for though the Persons in the God' 
head are distinct, yet they have not distinct wills ; and it is no 
improper way of speaking to say, that when a divine Person 
displays his glory, and therein confers a blessing upon men, 
that this is given ; as when God is said to give himself to his 
people, when he promises to be a God to them. There is, in-» 
deed, in this mode of speaking, a discriminating act of favour 
confen-ed on men, upon which account it is called a gift ; but 
this does not militate against the divinity of the Holy Ghost, 
though he is said to be given to them. 

As for the other scripture, in which it is said, God gave 
them the like gift^ as he gave to us, meaning the Holy Ghost, 
that is plainly taken for the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit, the 
conferring whereof is called, in the foregoing words, a being 
baptized with the Holy Ghost ; as it is particularly explained in 
that scripture, referred to, in Acts x. 45, 46. where it is said, 
that 071 the Gentiles was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost ; 
what this gift is, we may learn from the following words. They 
spake xvith tongues, and magnified God. 

Again, when it is said, in Luke xi. 13. that your heavenly 
Father shall give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him; this is 
explained by another evangelist, in Matt. vii. 11, where it is 
taken for good things in general, and so includes the graces of 
the Spirit, that accompany salvation, when it is said, your 
Father, that is in heaven, shall give good things to them that 
ask him ; so that here the Spirit is taken for all those blessings 
which he bestows upon his people, in answer of prayer. 

As for those scriptures before mentioned, in which the 
Spirit is said to be sent, either by the Father, or the Son, they 
iire not, indeed, to be understood in the same sense, as when 
the Son is said to be sent in his human nature, appearing in 
the form of a servant, to fulfil the will of God ; but when God 
IS said to send his Spirit, the word is to be taken in a meta- 
phorical sense ; in which, sending imports as much as giving } 
;ind when the Spirit is said to be given, it has a peculiar refer- 
t^nce to the grace which he was to bestow upon them. If we 
enquire into the reason of this metaphorical way of speaking, 
it may probably be this ; that vft may understand hei-eby that 
the Spirit, which was to produce these effects, was a divine 
Person, and that the effects themselves were subservient to 
those works which were performed, by which the Personal 
glories of the Father and Son were demonstrated. 

Again, when it is farther said by our Saviour, in John xvi. 
-*4. that the Spirit shall receive of mine, and shew it unto you ; 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 413 

this plainly intends the Spirit's applying to them those blessings 
which Christ had purchased by his blood, which tended to his 
glory ; and still it signifies only the subserviency of the Spirit 
to the Son, in working, as the application of redemption tends 
to render the purchase thereof effectual, to answer its designed 
end. 

As to the next scripture, before mentioned, in John xvi. 13. 
where the Spirit is said not to apeak of himself^ but whatsoever 
he shall hear^ that shall he speak ; this does not argue, in the 
least, that the Spirit receives what he communicates, as de- 
pendent on the Father, for the knowledge of those things he 
is to impart, or that he has ideas impressed on his mind, as 
creatures are said to have ; for that is inconsistent with what 
has been before proved from scripture, viz. That the Spirit 
knoweth the deep things of God^ even as the spirit of a man 
knoxveth the things of a man; or, as an intelligent being, is 
conscious of his own thoughts, or actions, not by information, 
but by an immediate internal perception. The sense therefore 
of this text is this; that the Spirit shall communicate no other 
doctrines, or give no other laws, but what Christ had before 
given in the gospel ; or that what he revealeth, is the same that 
Christ had given them ground to expect : accordingly, it is so 
far from militating against the Spirit's divinity, that it proves 
the harmony and consent of what is suggested by one divine 
Person, with what had been before delivered by another ; and 
as to the mode of expression here used, concerning the Spirit's 
speaking what he had heard ; this is spoken after the manner of 
men, and is no more inconsistent with his divine omniscience, 
or the independence thereof, than when God is said, in other 
scriptures, to know things by searching them, or, as it were, 
by enquiry, as hath been before observed, in considering om- 
niscience, as attributed to the Holy Ghost. These, and such- 
like expressions, by which God is represented, by words, ac^ 
commodated to our usual way of speaking,when applied to men, 
are to be understood, notwithstanding, in a way agreeable to 
the divine perfections, by abstracting from them every thing 
that argues the least imperfection in him, when applied to 
the Holy Ghost; as when some expressions, agreeable to hu^ 
man modes of speaking, are elsewhere used, with a particular 
application to the Father, without detracting from his divine 
glory. 

Again, when it is objected, that the Spirit hath a distinct 
mind from God, as when it is said, God knoiveth the mind of 
the Spirit; and, as though he were represented as engaged in 
an act of worship, he is, in the following words, described, as 
praying, or, making intercession for us, according to the luill 
of God; as, in Rom. viii. 26, 27. it is plain, that, by the mind 



414 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

of the Spirit^ we are to understand those secret desires in 
prayer, wliicli are wrought in believers by the Spirit, when 
they want words to express them ; instead of which, they ad- 
dress themselves to God, as it is said, xvith groanings that can- 
not be littered^ which are from the Spirit, as the Author of these 
secret desires, which are only known to the heart-searching 
God, who knows the meaning of them, what it is we want, in 
which respect, this is culled the mind of the Spirit, as the Au- 
thor theieof, though it is subjectively our own mind or de- 
sires, which we want words to express ; and when the Spirit is 
said to make intercession for us, it implies nothing else but 
his enabling us, whether in more or less proper modes of speak- 
ing, to plead with God for ourselves. 

Lasthj^ As to those expressions, by which the Spirit is re- 
presented, as quenched., or cxtingiashed., these are to be under- 
stood in the same sense as when by a metonymy., as before men- 
tioned, the gifts of the Spirit; as when those extraordinary 
gifts were first promised, they were led to expect that they 
should be baptized xvUh the Holy Ghost., and-ivithjire., that is, 
they should have the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost 
conferred upon them, which were to be signified by the em- 
blem oi perij ionguesy that sat on them., in Acts ii. 3. the rea- 
son of which emblem might probably be this; that as a neces- 
sary qualification from their preaching the gospel, they should 
be filled w ith an holy flame of love to God, and zeal for his 
glor)^, as well as with the gift of tongues, by which they might 
communicate his mind to the world. This privilege, which 
they had received, the apostle exhorts them not to forfeit, a- 
buse, or provoke the Holy Ghost to take from them, which is 
called a quenching the Spirit ; therefore this metaphorical way 
of speaking, accommodated hereunto, must not be supposed to 
be inconsistent with his divinity. 

I shall conclude with some inferences, which more especial- 
ly respect tliG practical improvement of the doctrine of the Tri- 
nity. And, 

1. We may take occasion, from hence, to observe the dif- 
ierence that ihere is between natural and revealed religion. 
As the former respects the knowledge of God so far, as it may 
be attained without tlie help of divine revelation, and that 
w'orship, which the heathen, who have nothing else to guide 
them but the light of nature, are obliged to give to the divine 
Being; the latter, which is founded on scripture, contains a 
display of the Personal glory of the Father, Son, and Holy 
(ihost, which is necessary to be known and believed, as being 
the foundation of all revealed religion; so that the sum of 
Ghristianity consists in our subjection to, and adoring the God- 
iiead, as subsisting in the Father, Soo, and Holy Spirit. 



THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 415 

2. As this doctrine is eminently displayed in the work of 
redemption, it is necessary for us to consider how it is accommo- 
dated to, and demonstrated by all the branches thereof. The 
price that was given, by our great Redeemer, has a value put 
upon it, in proportion to the dignity of his Person, and lays a 
sure foundation for our hope of being accepted in the sight of 
God, on account of his obedience and sacrifice, which was of 
infmite value : and the application of redemption being a work 
which the Spirit, who is a divine Person, has undertaken to 
perform, encourages us to expect that it shall be brought to 
perfection ; so that they, who are the objects of redeeming love 
and sanctifying grace, shall, in the end, be completely saved. 

3. As it is necessary for us to adore and magnify the Father, 
Son, and Holy Ghost, for the hope which we have of this in- 
estimable privilege in the gospel ; so we must observe the dis- 
tinct glory that is to be given to each of these divine Persons 
for this work ; to the Father, in that whatever is done by the 
Mediator, to procure this privilege for us, is considered, in 
scripture, as taking its rise from him, 1 Cor. i. 30. Of him are 
ye in Christ Jesus, xvho of God is made unto tis, wisdom, and 
rig'hteousness^ and sanctijicatioji, and redemption: And what- 
ever was done in the human nature, or by God incarnate ; that 
is, in a peculiar manner, the work of the Son, and a revenue 
of glory is due to him for it, who gave his life a ransom for 
many, and herein expressed the highest instance of condescen- 
sion, which is enhanced by the infinite dignity of his Person. 
Moreover, whatever work is performed in subserviency to the 
Mediator's glory, whereby the Spirit demonstrates his distinct 
Personal glory ; this gives us o<xasion to adore him, in all the 
displays of his power, in beginning, carrying on, and completing 
the work of grace in the souls of men. 

4. As to what respects that fellowship or communion, which 
believers have with the Father, Son, and Spirit, this depends 
on the account we have, in scripture, of the distinct methods, 
in which their Personal gloiy is set forth therein : Thus we 
have access to God the Father, through the Mediation of the 
Son, by the powerful influence of the Holy Spirit, as the apos- 
tle says, in Eph. ii. 18. Through him xve have an access, by one 
Spirit unto the Father ; and our hope of blessedness proceeds 
this way, as it is the gift of the Father, who has prepared an 
inheritance for us, the purchase of the Son, on whose death it 
is founded, and the work of the Holy Ghost, as bringing us to 
and putting us into the possession of it. 

5. This directs us as to the way of performing the great du- 
ty of self-dedication, to the Father, Son, and Spirit ; to the 

JFather, as our covenant God in Christ ; to the Son, as the Me- 
diator, Head, and Surety of this covenant ; and to the Spirit, 



416 THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

by whom we are made partakers of the blessings promised 
therein ; in all these, and many other respects, we are to have 
a particular regard to the persons in the Godhead, in such a 
way, as their Personal glory is set forth in scripture. 

6. Since the Father, Son, and Spirit, are one, though we 
distinguish them as Persons, yet we must consider them as 
having the same divine perfections, the same divine under- 
standing and will, lest, while we give glory to each of the Per- 
sons in the Godhead, we should suppose that there are more 
Gods than one ; therefore, though the Person of the Father is 
distinct from that of the Son and the Holy Ghost, we are not 
to suppose the power, wisdom, goodness, and faithfulness, or 
any other divine perfections, belong, in a more or less proper 
sense, to one Person than another. 

7. This doctrine is of use to direct us how we are to address 
ourselves to God in prayer : thus, when therein we call him 
our Father, we are not to consider him in the same sense, as 
when he is represented as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ; 
but we address ourselves to him, as the Author of our being, 
the God of all grace, and the Fountain of blessedness ; in which 
respect, the Son and the Holy Ghost are not to be excluded, es- 
pecially unless we consider him as our Father in Christ, and 
so express our faith with respect to his distinct Personality, 
from that of the Son and the Spirit. And though only one di- 
vine Person be particularly mentioned in prayer, the blessed 
Trinity is to be adored ; or whatever Personal glory we ascribe 
to one, as subsisting distinctly from the other, we must, not- 
withstanding, consider the Father, Son, and Spirit, as the one 
only living and true God. 

Thus we have gone through this great and important sub- 
ject, and therein have taken occasion, particularly, to insist on 
the chief matters in controversy relating to the doctrine of the 
ever-blessed Trinity, and consider the various methods taken 
to oppose it both by the Socinians and Arians, and endeavour- 
ed, not only to defend the Deity of our Saviour, and the Holy 
Ghost by enquiring into the sense of those many scriptures, in 
which our faith therein is founded, but to answer the most 
material objections that are brought against it; and our enlarg- 
ing more on it, than we shall do on several following answers, 
cannot be reckoned a needless work, inasmuch as a great deal 
hath been written in opposition to it, whereby the faith of some 
has not only been shaken, but overthrown. I would never at- 
tempt to speak of this doctrine, or any of the divine perfec- 
tions, without being sensible of the difficulty of the subject, it 
being such as is not to be comprehended by a finite mind. I 
hope nothing will appear to have been suggested inconsistent 
with the essential, or Personal glory of the Father, Son,, or 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 417 

Spirit ; and it may reasonably be expected that there should be 
allowances made for great defects, since it is but a little of God 
than can be known by us ; therefore, when we pretend to speak 
concerning him, it will not be thought strange if we give occa- 
sion to any to say, that we have the greatest reason to acknow- 
ledge, that, in many instances, we cannot order our words, by 
reason of darkness. 



Quest. XII. JVhat are the decrees of God f 

Answ. God's decrees are the wise, free, and holy acts of the 
counsel of his will ; whereby, from all eternity, he hath, for 
his own glory, unchangeably fore-ordained whatsoever comes 
to pass in time ; especially concerning angels and men. 

Quest. XIII. What hath God especially decreed concerning 
ang'els and men P 

Answ. God, by an eternal and immutable decree out of his 
-mere love, for the praise of his glorious grace, to be mani- 
fested in due time, hath elected some angels to glory, and, 
in Christ, hath chosen some men to eternal life, and the 
means thereof; and also, according to his sovereign power, 
and the unsearchable counsel of his own will (whereby he 
extendeth, or with-holdeth favour, as he pleaseth) hath pass- 
ed by, and fore-ordained the rest to dishonour and wrath, 
to be for their sin inflicted, to the praise of the glory of his 
justice. 

HAVING considered the perfections of the divine nature, 
and the Personal glories of the Father, Son, and Spirit, 
the next thing to be insisted on is, what God has purposed to 
do from eternity, or does, or will do, in pursuance thereof; 
the former we call his decrees ; the latter, the execution of 
them. The object of his decree is whatever comes to pass, 
which is the most large and comprehensive sense of his pur- 
pose : but whereas his determinations, in a particular manner, 
respect angels and men, or the intelligent part of the creation, 
and more especially the eternal happiness of some, or the dis- 
play of his righteous judgments against others ; in these re- 
spects, they being taken in a more limited sense, are called as. 
relating to the former, election, and, with respect to the latter, 
reprobation, which is the subject matter of these two answers. 
And, before we proceed to insist on this sublime and difficult 
subject, it may not be inexpedient for us to premise some things 
concerning it in general. 

1. It is well known that there is no doctrine, contained in 

Vol. I. 3 G 



418 TIIR DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 

scripture, which is more contested than this, which lies before 
us ; and it is not only denied by some, but treated with the 
utmost dislike or detestation, and that to such a degree, that 
we must either wholly forbear to mention it in public discour- 
ses, or writings, or else must be liable to the hard fate of be- 
ing censured by those who will not do that justice to the ar- 
gument, to consider what may be advanced in defence thereof, 
as though it were to be taken for granted that we are main- 
taining a doctrine chat is not only indefensible, but injurious 
to mankind, and subversive of all religion. 

2. If there be any who give just occasion to these prejudi- 
ces, by the methods which they have used in explaining, as 
well as the weakness of their arguments in defending it, or by 
laying themselves open to those popular objections, which are 
usually brought against it, we cannot but conclude that they 
are highly to blame ; and therefore we are far from approving 
of any unguarded expressions, which are to be met with in 
some writings, whereby a stumbling-block is laid in the way 
of those who are disposed to make men offenders for a word, 
rather than to judge impartially of the main drift of their dis- 
course : it is to be owned, that this has done dis-service to the 
cause, vv'hich might have been better defended. 

3. If these prejudices against this doctrine are ill grounded, 
and the objections only founded on the popular cry, by which 
it is endeavoured to be run down, and condemned with re- 
proach and censure ; and if persons know not, nor desire to 
know what may be said in defence thereof, how such-like ob- 
jections may be answered ; the disgust and opposition is both 
unreasonable and uncharitable, and contains a capricious reso- 
lution not to be- undeceived, and consequently renders the per- 
son thus prejudiced, highly culpable in the sight of God, espe- 
cially if there be any ground to conclude that his cause is there- 
in maintained. 

4. Let it be farther considered, that it is not a new doctrine, 
or such as was altogether unheard of in the world before ; nor 
lias it been only defended by the more ignorant or licentious 
part of mankind, or those who have been bold and presump- 
tuous in affirming that for truth, which they had not duly 
■weighed, or been convinced of, from the strongest evidence. 
Whether it . be as ancient as scripture, and, indeed, founded 
upon it, we shall leave others to judge, when we have consider- 
ed what may be said from it in defence thereof. 

5. It was generally asserted, and publicly owned in most of 
the confessions of faith of the reformed churches in the last 
age, and, in particular, in the church of England, as contained 
in one of the articles thereof, and there is no apparent ambi- 
guity in t!ie words themselves, however, some-have endeavour- 



THE DOCTRINE OT ELF.CTION. 419" 

kid, of late, to strain the sense thereof, and put such a meaning 
on them, as is very different from the Avritings of those who 
compiled them, which might serve as a comment on them. 

And to this we may add, that it was maintained b}^ far the 
greatest number of divines, in their public discourses and wri- 
tings in the last century, how much soever the contrary doc- 
trines are maintained at this day : however, we do not insist on 
this as a proof of the truth thereof, as though it needed to be 
supported by numbers of advocates for it, or were founded 
thereon; nor do we suppose, that when it has been most 
strenuously, and almost universally defended, there were not 
at the same time, others who opposed it. This I only mention, 
that I may, if possible, i-emove those prejudices that are incon- 
sistent with persons judging impartially of it. 

Since Ave are considering the head of prejudices against this 
doctrine, we think it necessary to add, that we shall endeavour 
to vindicate it, from the reproach tliat is generally cast on it, 
by tliose who suppose that it cannot be defended, without as- 
serting God to be the author of sin, or supposing him to he 
severe, cruel, and unjust to his creatures, as some conclude wa 
represent him to be, b}^ unjust consequences deduced from It. 
We are far from asserting, as will hereafter appear, that God 
from all eternity, purposed to damn a great part of the world, 
as the result of his mere sovei-eign will, without the foresight 
of sin, which would render them liable to that condemnation. 

Moreover, we shall endeavour to make it appear, in oppo- 
sition to the calumnies of some, that the decree of God does 
not destroy, or take aAvay, the liberty of man's will, with re- 
spect to things, within its own sphere ; or that considered in 
itself, it doth not lay a natural necessity on him, to rush into 
inevitable damnation, as though the destruction of sinners were 
only to be resolved into the divine purpose, and not their own 
wickedness. In considering which, we shall maintain, that the 
decree of God does not lay any force on the will of man, nor 
preclude the means of grace, as ordained by him, for the sal- 
vation of them that do, or shall hereafter, believe unto life 
everlasting ; nor does it obstruct the preaching of the gospel, 
and therein proclaiming the glad tidings oi salvation, to those 
who set under the sound thereof, as an ordinance for their faith. 

And inasmuch as many are prejudiced against this doctrine, 
as being influenced by that popidar out-cry, which is made by 
some, as though it were of a very pernicious tendency, either, 
on the one hand, to lead men to presumption, as giving occa- 
sion to persons to conclude that they may be saved as being^ 
elected though they live as they list ; or, on tlie other har.d, that 
it leads to despair, as supposing, that if there be such a decree, 
as that of reprobation, they must necessarily be included in it. 



420 THE DOCTRINE ©r ELECTION. 

and, by this means, instead of promoting holiness of life, it is in- 
consistent therewith : if we cannot maintain this doctrine, with- 
out giving just ground for such exceptions, we shall not only 
think our labom- lost, but condemn it as pernicious and unscrip- 
tural, as much as they do, as it must of necessity be, if it cannot 
be defended from such-like exceptions ; which, I hope, we shall 
be able to do, and at the same time, make it appear, that it is 
not only consistent with, but a very great motive and induce- 
ment to practical godliness : and, if this can be made to appear, 
the greatest part of the censorious prejudices, that are enter- 
tained against it, will be removed, and persons will be better 
able to judge whether truth lies on that side of the question, 
which we shall endeavour to defend, or the contrary. 

I could not but premise these things in our entrance on this 
subject, as being sensible that such-like reproaches, as these we 
have ment\oned, are brought by many, without duly weighing 
whether they are well grounded or no ; so that this doctrine is 
often opposed, in such a way of reasoning, that the premises, 
as well as the conclusions drawn from them, are rather their 
own than ours ; or, at least, if some ideas thereof may be found 
in the writi^^gs, or taken from the unguarded expressions, which 
some who have defended this doctrine, have made use of; yet 
they have appeared in such a dress that even they, who are 
supposed to hiive advanced them, would have disowned and 
rejected them. If persons who are in another way of thinking, 
resolve noc to V.y aside these misrepresentations, it plainly ap- 
pears that they are not disposed to lie optu to conviction, and 
then all attempts to defend this doctrine will be to no purpose ; 
the preventlr.g whereof has rendered these prefatory cautions 
needful. 

We shall only add, to what has been said, some rules, by 
which we de^-ire that the truth, either of this or the opposite 
doctrine, may be judged of. 

1. If v/e do not confirm what we assert, by proofs taken from 
scripture, let it not be received ; but if we do, whatever may 
be said of our method of managing this controversy, the great- 
est deference ought to be paid to the sacred oracles : But since 
it is very common for persons to answer the arguments taken 
from one scripture, by producing other scriptures, which seems 
to assert the contrary, as desirous to shift aside in the dispute, 
and put us upon solving the difficulties which they suppose to 
be contained in them ; though this is not to be declined, yet a 
more direct answer must be given before the doctrine itself is 
r>verthrown. Whether our explication of those scriptures, on 
which our faith therein is founded, be just, we shall leave others 
to judge; and also whether the sense we give of other scrip- 
tures that are brought as objections against it, be not equally 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 421 

probable with that of those that bring them ; which is all that 
need be insisted on in such cases, 

2. Let that doctrine be received, and the contrary rejected, on 
which side of the question soever it lies, that is most agreeable 
to the divine perfections, and explains those scriptures, brought 
in defence of it, most consistently therewith; which is a fair 
proposal; and such as ought not only to be applied to this par- 
ticular head of doctrine, but to the whole of religion, as found- 
ed on scripture, which is far from overthrowing the divine glo- 
ry, the advancement whereof is the great end of it. 

3. Let that doctrine be rejected, as inconsistent with itself, 
and not worthy to be believed or embraced, whether it be ours, 
or the contrary thereunto, that shall detract from the harmony 
of the divine perfection, or pretend to set up, or plead for one, 
and, at the same time militate against the glory of another ; and 
I desire nothing more than that our whole method of reasoning 
on this subject may be tried by these rules, and be deemed true 
or false, agreeably to what is contained therein. 

In considering this subject, relating to the decrees of God, as 
in the two answers, which we are explaining, we sliall proceed 
in the following method ; and shew, 

I. What we are to understand, by God's fore-ordaining what- 
ever comes to pass, according to the counsel of his own will ; 
wherein we shall compare the decree with the execution there- 
of, and observe how one ev.actly answers to the other, and is to 
be a rule for our judging concerning it. 

II. We shall prove the truth of that proposition, that God 
hath fore-ordained whatever shall come to pass, either in time, 
or to eternity. 

III. We shall then particularly consider intelligent creatures, 
such as angels and men, and that both good and bad, with re- 
spect to their present, or future state, as the objects of God's 
eternal decree or purpose, and so shall proceed to speak con- 
cerning the decree of election, and reprobation, as contained in 
the latter of these answers. 

IV. We shall lay down some propositions concerning each of 
these, tending to explain and prove them, and that more espe- 
cially as to what respects the election and reprobation of men. 

V. We shall consider the properties thereof, and how the di- 
vine perfections are displayed therein, and endeavour to make 
it appear, in various instances, that the account we shall give 
thereof is agreeable thereunto, as well as founded on scripture, 

VI. We shall enquire whether the contraiy doctrine defend- 
ed by those who deny election and reprobation, be not dero- 
gatory to, and subversive of the divine perfections, or, at least, 
inconsistent with the harmony thereof; ©r whether it doth not, 



422 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

in many respects, make God altogether such an one as our- 
selves. 

VII. We sh^.n endeavour to prove that their reasoning from 
scripture, who maintain the contrary doctrine, is not sufficiently 
conclusive ; and that the sense they give of those scriptures, 
generally brought to support it, does not so well agree with the 
divine perfections, as it ought to do, but that they may be ex- 
plained in a different way, more consistent therewith. 

VIII. We shall endeavour to answer the most material ob- 
jections that are usually brought against the doctrine that we 
are maintaining. And, 

IX. Shew how it is practically to be improved by us, to the 
glory of God, and our spiritual good and advantage. 

I. What we are to understand by God's fore-ordaining what- 
ever comes to pass, according to the counsel of his own will. 

1. By God's fore-ordaining whatever comes to pass, we do 
not understand barely his fore-knowledge of all things, that are, 
or shall bo done in time, and to eternity, although this be in- 
cluded in, and inseparably connected with his eternal purpose, 
since no one can purpose to act without the foreknowledge there- 
of; yet more than this is certainly contiiined therein ; therefore, 

2. God's pre-determining, or fore-ordaining whatsoever 
comes to pass, includes not only' an act of the divine under- 
standing, but an act of his sovereign will : It is not only his 
knowing what shall come to pass, but his determining, by his 
own agency, or efficiency, what he will produce in time, or to 
eternity''. Accordingly, some call the decrees of God his eter- 
nal providence, and the execution thereof his actual providence ; 
by the former, he determines what he will do ; by the latter, he 
brings his determinations to pass, or effects v/hat he before de- 
signed to do. It follows therefore, 

3. That God's fore-odaining whatsoever shall come to pass, 
is vastly different from his bringing things to pass : the one is 
an internal act of his will; the other, an external act of his al- 
mighty power : He fore-ordained that they should come to pass, 
and therefore, till then, they are considered as future ; though 
this determination necessarily secures the event, unless we sup- 
pose it possible for his eternal purpose to be defeated, which is 
disagreeable to the divine perfections, as will farther appear un- 
der some following heads. And, on the other hand, when we 
consider him, as bringing all things to pass, or producing them 
by his power, this renders what was before future, present. 
With respect to the former, he decrees what shall be ; and, with 
respect to the latter, his decree takes effect, and is executed ac- 
cordingly. 

They who treat of this matter, generally consider things, ei» 
ther as possible or future. Things are said to be possible, with 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 423 

respect to the power of God, as every thing that he can do, is 
possible to be done, though some things, which he could have 
done, he never will do. As for instance: He could have 
made more worlds, had he pleased ; or have produced more 
men upon earth, or more species of creatures ; or have given 
a greater degree of perfection to creatures, than he has done, 
or will do; for it is certain, that he never acted to the utmost 
of his power, accordingly he could have done many things that 
he will never do ; and those things are said to be possible, but 
not future. 

Moreover, things future are rendered so, by the v/ill of God, 
or his having fore-orcfained, or determined to produce them ; 
this is what we call the decree of God, which respects the event, 
or determines whatever shall come to pass. 

We are now to consider, what we are to understand by God's 
fore-ordaining all things, according to the counsel of his will ; 
which is a mode of speaking used in scripture, in Eph. i. 11. 
Being predestinated according to the purpose ofhimxvho ruork- 
eth all things after the counsel of his own will, 

1. We are not hereby to understand that the decrees of God 
are the result of deliberation, or his debating matters within 
himself, as reasoning in his own mind about the expediency, or 
inexpediency of things, or calling in the advice of others, as 
creatures are said to do, when acting with counsel ; for he must 
not be supposed to determine things in such a way, since that 
would argue an imperfection in the divine mind; JFith whom 
took he counsel, and xvho instructed him, and taught him in 
the paths of judgment, and taught hbn. knowledge, and shewed 
to him the way of understanding ? Isa. xl. 14. But, 

2. It implies, that his decrees are infinitely wise. As what 
is done with counsel is said, according to human modes of 
speaking, to be done advisedly, in opposition to its being done 
rashly, or with precipitation ; accordingly all the works of God 
are done with wisdom, therefore all his purposes and determi- 
nations to do what is done in time, are infinitely wise, which, 
according to our way of speaking, is called the counsel of his 
will; thus it is said, He is xvonderful in counsel, and excellent 
in xvorking, chap, xxviii. 29. 

We are now to consider the object of God*s decree ; This, 
as has been before observed, is every thing that has, or shall 
come to pass, and it may be considered in different respects. 
There are some things which he has determined to effect, name- 
ly, such as are the objects of his poAver ; or all things, which 
have a natural or moral goodness in them, which are becoming 
an infinitely holy God to produce : and this includes in it evciy 
thing but sin, which God does not produce, it not being die ob- 
ject of power : Nevertheless, this must be supposed to be com- 



424 T«« DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. 

mitted by his permission, and therefore it is the consequence of 
his decree to permit, though not, as other things, of his decree 
to effect; it is one thing to suffer sin to be committed in the 
world, and another thing to be the author of it. But this we 
shall have occasion to enlarge on, under a following head. 

II. We shall now proceed to prove the truth of what is laid 
down in this answer, namely, that God hath fore-ordained what- 
ever comes to pass. This will evidently appear, if we consider 
the five following propositions in their due connexion. 

I. Nothing comes to pass by chance, with respect to God, 
but by the direction of his providence, which we are bound to 
assert against the Deists, who speak of God, as though he were 
not the Governor of the world. This cannot be denied by any, 
who think, with any degree of modesty, concerning, or pay a 
due deference to the divine perfections, since God may as 
well be denied to be the Creator as the Governor of the 
world, (a.) 

(c) " Certainly, it is not to be understood, in a literal or strict sense, that He 
does, all that is done. " Far be it from God," says Elihu, " that he should do 
wickedness : and from the Almighty, that he should commit iniquity." Doing 
wickedness, and committing iniquity, are synonymous phrases : but to impute to 
the Most High, any thing like what is commonly meant by either of these phrases, 
is evident blasphem)-. 

Nor are we to imagine, certainly, that God makes his creatures do, whatever is 
done by them, in any such manner as is inconsistent with their own proper agen- 
cy. Rational creatures certainly act ; and act as freely, as if there were no being 
above them to direct their steps, or to govern their actions. AVhen God works 
in men, to will and to do that which is good; they, nevertheless will and do it 
themselves ; and are really praise-worthy. And he does not, surely, so influence 
any to evil, as to render them unactive, involuntary, or undesex"\"ing of blame. 

Nor do I believe it true, literally and strictly speaking, that God creates, what- 
soever comes to pass ; particularly darkness, and moral evil. 

But this must not be taken for gi'anted, nor hastily passed over : because, 
however indisputable, it is disputed. There are some among us, and some who 
are deservedly in reputation for wisdom, and general soundness in the faith ; who 
appear to be of opinion, that God is the direct Author — the immediate Cause — 
the proper Creator, of all evil, as well as of all good — of all sin, as well as holi- 
ness, in heart and life — in thought, word, and deed. 

This opii\ion, liowever, notwithstanding my high esteem and particulai- friend- 
ship for some of the holders of it, I am not yet ready to adopt, for several reasons. 

1. To suppose that the actions of men, whether virtuous or vicious, are crea- 
ted, seems to confound all distinction between creation and Providence ; or rather, 
wholly to exclude the latter. 

The work of creation, we used to think, was God's making creatures and 
things, at first ; or giving the beginning of existence to matter and minds, witli 
their various properties, instincts and organizations. And that God's works of 
Providence, were his preserving things already made, and governing all their 
operations. But according to this new philosophv, creation is all ; Providence 
is nothing. For what preserving and governing of creatures or actions can there 
he, when every creature and every action, is every moment created anew ? Aa 
action, a thought, or volition, whether good er evil, is a new and strange kind of 
creature, or created tiling. But, in a theological view, the question before us is 
of chief importance, as it respects moral evil. I add, therefore ; 

2. It appears to me, that to suppose God the Creator of ain, whether in princl- 



THL DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOK. 425 

2. It follows from hence, that nothing is done without the 
divine influence, or permission. The former (as was before 
observed) respects things that are good, which are the effects 

pie Of action, is liurdly reconcilable with Ills perfect holiness. " Doth a fountain 
send forth, at the same place, sweet waters and bitter ?" Can darkness proceed 
iVoiTi Him, as its proper source, in whom there is no darkness at all ? 

It is true, God has created many things which are of a different nature from 
himself; as the bodies of men and beasts, and all parts of the world of matter : 
but nothing, I conceive, directly opposite to his own nature ; as is sin. The sun 
is the immediate cause of the growth of vegetables ; though these are essentially 
different from the sun itself: but it is not thus the cause of ice and darkness , 
which are no more of a contrary nature to it, than sin is to the natm-e of God.* 

I am sensible it has been said, there is no more inconsistency with the holiness 
of God, in supposing liim the efficient, immediate cause of sin, for necessary good 
purposes ; than in supposing he only permits it, for wise ends, and so orders things 
that he knows it will be committed. 

But these two ways of accounting for the existence of moral evil, appear to me 
materially dilferent. I'liere are supposable cases in which it would be right for 
a man, not to hinder another from sinning, when he could hinder him ; and also 
to place him in circumstances of temptation, expecting that he would sin. For 
instance, a parent may leave money inthe wayof acliild suspected of being givcii 
to theft ; and may conceal himself and let the child steal it; with a view to cor- 
rect him, in order to reclaim him, or as a warning to his other children. All thin 
miglit be perfectly right in the parent ; however certainly he might know, that 
the child vvould be guilty of the expected crime. But 1 question whether any 
case can be supposed in which it would not be; wrong, directly to influence ano- 
ther to do evil, that good might come. Exciting one to sin by power or persua* 
sion ; and placing one in circumstances of ti-ial, wherein he would be tempted to 
sin, without restraining him froni it, are surely different things, although the cev- 
lainty of his sinning may be the same. 

3. 1 dare not think that God creates sin, and all kinds of evil, because this seems 
plainly contraiy to the general current of the holy scriptures. 

In the first cliapter of (ienesis, it is said, " God saw every thing that he had 
made, and, behold, it was very good." Of his making two great lights, we are 
told ; and that he made the stars also : but no accoinit is there given of his creur 
ting darkness. Respecting our own species, the inspired historian particularly 
informs us, that " God created man in his own image : in the image of God crea- 
ted he him : mule and female created he them." Nor do we find in that book, oj. 
in all the Bible, that he hath since ever created them otherwise. Solomon three 
thousand years after the fall, having made diligent search among men and wo- 

• There is a v.ist difTerence between the sun's being the cause of the lightsomeness anct 
■warmth ot" the atmosphere, and ot the brightness of K'^ld and diamonds, by its presence and 
jiositive influence ; and its being the occasion of darkness and frost in the night, by its motioii 
n' hereby it descends lielnw the horizon. T2ie motion ot the sun is tiie occasion of the latter kind 
of events ; but not the proper cause, elficient. or producer of tliem.— No more is any action of 
the divine Being, the cause of the evil ot men's wills. If the sun svere the proper cause of cold 
^nd darkness, it vould be the fountain of these thnii;s, as it is the fountain of light and beat: and 
then something might be argued from the nature of cold and darkness, to a likeness of nature i'l 
tlic sun ; and it might be justly infered that the sun itself is dark and cold: but from its bein'f 
the cause of these, no otherwise tlian by its absence. r>o such thin^ can be infered, but the con- 
trary. It may justly be argued tliat ihi^ sun is a bright and hot body, if cold and darkness 
are found to be the consequence of it^withdrawment ; :\nd tb^- more constantly and necessarily 
rhese effects are connected with and confined to its absence, the more strongly does it pi>;ue the 
s'ui to be the fountain of light and heat. So, in as nnich as sin is not the fruit of any positive in- 
,'l«en:;e of the Most High, but on the contrary, arises from the wiiluirawment of his action and 
energy, and under cert. tin circumstances, necessarily follows on the want of his influence, this is 
no argument that he is sinful, or his operation evil ; but on the coi;trary that he and his agency 
are altogether holy, and that he is tne fountain of .ill h<diness. It would be strange ar;^uing iu- 
■Jred, bcca'ise men never commit sin. but onlv wbrn liod leaves them to themselves; .and ne- 
ocisarily sin wnen he does 'io, that therefore their sin Is not from themselves, but from God : as 
srrange as it would be to argue, because it is always dark wh-n the sun is gone, and never d.frk 
■vhen he is present, that thetefoie d*ikni.ss is from' the san, atid llut his illsk .ind lu-ams m-'.'t br 
Viack." Ed-^'-irdi ^i t' a H-'i.'.' 

Pai'e 259. Boston Ed. 17J4. 

Vol. I. 3 H 



4-26 THK DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

of his power; the latter, sin. That nothing comes to pns.s with- 
out the divine influence, or permission, is evident; for if any 
thing came to pass, which is the object of power, without the 



men, to find out their true chru-acter, and the cause of their so universal depra- 
vity, says ; " IjO, this only have I found, that God made man upright ; but they 
have sought out many inventions." Wicked pi'actices, and deceitful inventions 
to conceal their crniiin^lity, are ever ascribed in scripture to mankind them- 
selves, or to other fallen creatures, and never to God, as tlieir efficient cause. 

In the Jfew-Testanient, christians are said to be " created luito good works :" 
and we read of" the new man, which after God, is created in righteousness and 
" true holiness." But no where do we read of any one that was created imto evil 
works ; or after Satan in unrighteousness and sin. It is wi'itten, 1 Cor. xiv. 33, 
" God is not the author of contusion, but of peace." And James i. 13 — 17, " Let 
no man say, when he is tempted, I am tempted of God : for God cannot be tempt- 
ed witli evil, neither tempteth he any man : but every man is tempted when he 
is led away of his own lust and enticed. — Do not err, my lieloved brethj-en. Eve- 
ry good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Fa- 
ther of lights." Can any thing be more express to teach us, tliat a distinction 
ought cai'efully to be made between the origin of good and evil ; and that we 
should not conceive them both alike to come from (iod ? 

For scripture i)roof tliat God is not the eflicient author of sin, I will only add, 
that the fruits of the Sjiirit, and works of the flesh, ai"e set in conti-ast and spoken 
of as diametrical opposites : whereas, did God create sinful propensities in men, 
or direct!)' influence them to evil actions, the works of the flesh would be as real 
andimmediate fruits of the divine Spirit, as tlie holiest exercises of the best saints. 

4. I see no occasion for the supposition ot God's being thus tlie author of all 
evil : nor any good ends that it can answer. 

Could it be seen how evils might be accounted foi', without supposing them 
any part of the creation oi' God ; iuid how God might liiive an absolute dominion 
over all events, without being the immediate cause of bad things; no good man, 
1 conclude, would wish to conceive of Him as being thus the proper soiu'ce of 
darkness and evil. And indeed, were it so, that our weak minds were unable to 
comprehend liow God can work all things after the counsel of l.is own will, or 
how natural and moral evil could ever have been, without believing that God is 
as much, and as inmiediateiy, tlie cause of evil as of good ; yet it miglit be more 
modest, and more wise, to leave these among other incomprehensibles, than to 
liave recourse to so bold an hypothesis for the solution of them. But, I appre- 
?^end, there is i.o need of this hypothesis in order to accoimt lor the existence of 
evil, or in order to an understanding belief of the universal government of the 
Most High. 

Fivils, of most if not all kinds, are such negative things — such mere defects, in 
their origin at le^^st, as do not need creation, or require a positive omnipotent 
cause. This is the case, evidentlj-, with respect to natund darkness : it is only 
the v.ant of light. This is the case, also, with respect to natural death : it is on- 
ly the cessation, the loss, the want of life. And this may be the case, with re- 
spect to spiritual darkness, and spiritual death. It has heretofore been the or- 
thodox opinion, t'nat all moral evil consists radically in privation -, or, tiiat unho- 
liness, at bottom, is the mere want of holiness. And, notwithstanding all the 
floods of light , from various quarters, which haye come into the world in this age 
f)f new discoveries, possibly this one old opinion may yet be true. " God made 
man 7ipright.^' That l.s, lie formed him with a disposition impartially just and 
g-ood : He created in him a principle of imlversal righteousness. When man fell, 
»>y eating the forbidding fruit, this principle had not been preserved in perfect 
strength and exercise. In consequence of that disobedience, the divme internal 
influence was so withdrav. ii, tluit this principle was entirely lost. But we are 
not told, nor need it be supposed, that any opposite principle was then created in 
iiim. Qur first parents had, 1 believe, in their original formation, all the radical 
iBstincts otiiavmc wliich they hud alter the fall; or which any of their posterity 



THE DOCTRINE OF EI.ECTIOrf. 427 

divine influence, then the creature would he said to exist, or act 
independently on the power of God; and, if so, then it would 
follow, that it would exist, or act necessarily i but necessary ex- 
istence is a perfection appropriate to God. 



now have. Such as a principle of self-presei'vation, a desire of self-promotion, 
and a propensity to increase and multiply ; totijethur with all the more particular 
appetites and passions, subservient to these purposes. All these are innocent 
in themselves, though not in themselves virtuous. But these private instincts, 
when left to operate alone, without die governing influence of a public spirit, or 
ajust regard for other beings, will naturally lead to all maimer of iniquity, m 
heart and life. To avarice and ambition ; to envy and malice ; to intemperance 
and lewdness ; to frauds and oppressions ; to wars and fightings. 

There is no need of supposing any other divine agency, than only to uphold 
in existence creatures that have lost their ^'irtue, amidst surrounding tempta- 
tions, in order to account for all the evil aftections which we ever feel, and for 
all the external wickedness that is ever committed. Nor, In order to the holi- 
est creatures losing their virtue, need any thing more be supposed on God's 
part, than only his leaving them to themselves ; or not upholding in them, and 
coastantly invigorating, a virtuous disposition. 

And as, in this way, we can account for the existence of all manner of evil ; 
so we can thus understand liow it is possible for God to bring about whatso- 
ever comes to pass, without liis being the actor, or maker, or instigator, of any 
thing that is not perfectly good. "When lie does not cause light, there will be 
darkness. When lie does not make peace, there will be evil. The darkness 
takes place according to his appointment, with the same exactness and certain- 
ty, as if He actually created it; and so docs evil of eveiy kind. VVhat He deter- 
mines to permit, knowing perfectly the circumstances and dispositions of every 
agent concerned, will as infallibly come to pass, as what he determines to do 
himselti or to effect by his own positive influence. The king's heai-t, and the 
rivers of water ; the waves of the sea, and the tumults of the people, are in the 
hand of tlie Lord, to all iniportanl intents and purposes, if it be only true thafc 
}£e restrains them, or lets them run ; stilleth them, or suffereth them to rage, 
just as he sees fit. 

In this sense, I conceive, it is to be understood, that God forms the light, and 
creates darkness ; makes peace, and creates evil. He has the absolute govern, 
ment — the perfect control — the entire supcr'ntendency, of all these things. 

When any folly has been committed or any mischief has been done, some are 
ready to say. It ~uas so ordered; as if therefore nobody was to be blamed. But 
this is a false inference, from just premises. True, it was so ordered of God ; 
and ordered righteously and wisely : but it was so ordered by the doer of the 
mischief :dso; and ordered carelessly, perhaps, or wickedly. You will say. It 
must have been so, and the actor could not have done otherwise : but, I say, he 
might have done otherwise, if he would. It is true, there is a kind of necessity 
in the actions of men. Tliey necessarily act according to theii- own choice ; and 
they necessarily choose to act according to their own disposition. Under tliis; 
kind of necessity God himself acts. It is impossible for him to do, because it is 
impossiljle for him to will that which is contrary to his own nature. He neces- 
sarily wills and does, what is agreeable to his moral perfections. But such a 
necessity as this, is so far from being inconsistent with freedom, that it is es- 
sential to all free agency. Actions which can and do take place, contrary to the 
inclination of the agent, are not /»« actions. He has no command over them; 
and therefore can deserve no praise or blame for them. 

The necessity of acting according to our own minds, is all the necessity which 
need be supposed, when we suppose that all our actions were decreed, and are 
ordered of God. A creatm-e that acts according to any laws of uature, and not 
at perfect random, without any self-government, acts in such a manner tliat He 
who knows what is in lum, may foreknow all his actions ; and in such a manner 



423 I HE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

As to what respects the latter, namely, sins being committed 
by divine permission, it is evident, that if it might be commit- 
ted without the divine permission, it could not be restrained by 
God : and to suppose that he could not hinder the commission of 
sin, is to suppose that sin might proceed to the greatest height, 
%vithout any possible check or controul, which would argue a 
great defect in the divine government of the world, as it is also 
c ontrary to daily experience, as well as scripture. Certainly 
he who sets bounds to the sea, and says to its proud waves, 
Hitherto shall ye come^ and no farther^ must be supposed to set 
bounds to the corrupt passions of wicked men: thus the Psalm- >,s^ 
lit s^ys^ Surely the wrath of men shall praise thee; the remain- 
der ofzvrath shalt thou restrain^ Psal. Ixxvi. 10. 

Notwithstanding, this does not argue his approbation of sin, 
or that he is the author of it ; since it is one thing to suffer, or not 
to hinder, and another thing to be the author of any thing. Thus 
it is said. These things hast thou done^ and I kept silence^ Psal. 
1. 21. that is, I did not restrain thee from doing them, as I could 
have done ; so it is said, in ti7nes past he suffered all natio7is to 
xvalk in their oxvn xvays. Acts xiv. 16. 

3. God never acts or suffers any thing to be done, but he 
knows, beforehand, what he will do or suffer. This an intelli- 
gent creature, acting as such, is said do, therefore it must not be 
denied of him, who is omniscient, and infinitely wise : He who 
knows all things that others will do, cannot but know what him- 
self will do, or what others will do by the interposition of his 
providence, or what he will suffer to be done, before it is acted. 

4. Whatev^er God does, and consequently knows before-hand 



ihat He in whose hand his times are, may govern all his volitions. Men follow 
their several courses, as freely as the rivers of water, and with a higher kind of 
freedom ; yet, since they run agreeably to their own inclination, and cannot do 
otherwise, a Being omniscient and omnipotent, can calculate before hand all 
their motions ; can keep them in the channels decreed for them, and can turn 
tlieni whithersoever he will. If any do not comprehend this, yet let them not 
think they so fully comprehend the contrary, as to feel certain, that either man 
cannot be free, or God cannot govern the world. Certainly the providential 
government of God, over the hearts and ways of men, though most absolute, is 
not such Invt that, if tliey do well, they are praise-worthy ; and if tiiey do not 
well, the sin lie th at their own door. 

Neither let it be imagined that the criminality of a bad action is taken aw.w, 
or at all extenuated, bo-cause it will be over-ruled for good. Actions arc good or 
evil, according to the nature of them, and the intention of the agent, and not ac- 
cording to undesigned consequences. ^Vllen we act wickedly, and with a wick« 
ed mind, its being producti-.e of happy effects, altars nothing in regard to our 
♦ilume-worthiness. in tiie divine decrees, and in the divine providence, "What- 
ever is, is right :" but in the conduct of creatures, many tilings that are, are not 
at all tbe less wrong. God'.s governing all things, so as to make them subserve 
his wise and holy designs, should not lead us to think any more favourably of 
WP ow.n, or of our nciglibuut's foolisli and sinful actions." 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 429 

that he will do it, that he must be supposed to have before deter- 
mined to do : This must be allowed, or else it argues him de- 
fective in wisdom. As no wise man acts precipitantly or with- 
out judgment, much less must the wise God be supposed to do 
so ; concerning wliom it is said, that all his ways are judgment^ 
Deut. xxxii. 4. 

5 It therefore appears, even to a demonstration, that God 
before determined, or fore-ordained, whatever comes to pass, 
which was the thing to be proved. 

And inasmuch, as he never began to determine, as he never 
began to exist, or as he never was without purposes of what he 
would do ; therefore it is evident, that he before ordained, from 
eternity, whatever should come to pass, either in time, or to 
eternity. 

It farther appears, that God fore-ordained whatsoever comes 
to pass, otherwise he did not determine to create all things be- 
fore he gave being to them ; and then it could not be said, O 
Lord^ hoTu mam fold are thy works I in xvisdoni hast thou made 
them all^ Psal. civ. 24. There are, indeed, many admirable 
discoveries of wisdom, as well as power, in the effects produced ; 
but to suppose that all this was done without fore -thought, or 
that there was no eternal purpose relating thereunto, would be 
such a reflection on the glory of this perfection, as is inconsis- 
tent with the idea of a God. Moreover, if herein he designed 
his own glory, as he certainly did, since every intelligent being 
designs some end, and the highest and most excellent end must 
be designed by a God of infinite wisdom ; and, if he did all 
this for his own glory, then it must be allowed, that it was the 
result of an eternal purpose : all which, I am persuaded, will 
not be denied by those on the other side of the question, who 
defend their own cause with any measure of judgment. 

To this we may farther add, that to deny that God fore-or- 
dained whatever comes to pass, is, in effect, to deny a provi- 
dence, or, at least, that God governs the world in such a way, 
as that what he does therein was pre-concerted. And herein 
we expect to meet with no opposition from any but the Deists, 
or those who deny a God ; and if it be taken for granted that 
there is a providence, or that God is the Governor of the world, 
we cannot but conclude from hence, that all the displays of his 
glory therein, are the the result of his eternal pupose. This is 
also agreeable to what is said concerning him, that he doth 
according to his zvilliri the anny of heaven^ and among the in- 
habitants of the earth, Dan. iv. 35. the meaning of which is 
not barely this, (which is a great truth) that he acts without 
controul, inasmuch as his power is infinite : But that all he does 
is pursuant to his will; and, indeed, it cannot be otherwise, if 
we suppose that the divine power, and will, are so inseparably 



400 THE DOCTRINE OF ILECTIOK. 

connected, that he cannot be said to produce any tiling, but hv 
the word of his power; or when he willeth that any thing should 
come to pass, it is not in an efficacious will, as ours is, for want 
of power, to effect what we have done. Therefore for God to 
will the present existence of things, is to effect them, which 
seems to be the reason of that mode of speaking, which was used 
when he pi-oduced all things at first; he said, let them exist in 
that form, or perfection, which he had before designed to gi^ e 
them, and the effect immediately followed, Gen. i. 3, 6, 9, &c. 

Hitherto, I presume, our argument will not be much con- 
tested ; for the main thing in controversy is what relates to the 
divine determination respecting intelligent creatures, which Avill 
be considered under a following head : What I have hitherto 
attempted to prove is, the proposition in general, namely, that 
whatever God brings to pass, or is the effect of power, is the 
result of his determinate purpose. And herein, I think, I have 
carefully distinguished between God's will to effect, and his will 
to permit; but that will be farther explained, when we speak 
of the decrees of God, with a particular application to angels 
and men, under the head of election. 

Having endeavoured to prove that God hath fore-ordained 
whatever comes to pass, we shall lay down the following pro- 
positions relating to his end and design in all his purposes, to- 
gether with the nature of things, as coming to pass pursuant 
thereunto, and the method in which we are to conceive of the 
decree, when compared with the execution thereof. 

1. God cannot design any thing, in his eternal purpose, as 
the highest end, but his own glory, which is here assigned, as 
the end of his decrees. As this is the principal motive, or rea- 
son, inducing him to produce whatever comes to pass ; so it 
must be considered as the end of his purpose relating there- 
unto : This is very evident; for since the divine glory is the 
most excellent of ail things, he cannot, as an infinitely wise God, 
design any thing short of it, as the great motive or inducement 
for him to act ; therefore, whatever lower ends are designed by 
him, they are all resolved into this as the principal, to wit, the 
^advancement of his divine perfections. Though God designs 
his own glory as the highest end, yet he has purposed not only 
that this should be brought about, by means conducive there- 
unto, but that there should be a subserviency of one thing to 
another, all which are the objects of his decree, as well as the 
highest end, namely, his own glory. As, for instance, he de- 
termines that the life and health of man shall be maintained' by 
the use of proper means and medicine, or that grace shall be 
wrought instrumentally by those means, which he has ordained, 
in order thereunto : thus his purpose respects the end and 
means, together with the connexion that there is between theua. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 431 

2. According to the natural order of things, the divine pur- 
pose is antecedent to the execution thereof. Therefore it seems 
very absurd to distinguish the decree of God, as some do, in- 
to antecedent and consequent, one going before the use of 
means, the other following, of w hich more hereafter : It is cer- 
tain, that every intelligent being first determines to act, and 
then executes his determinations ; so that nothing can be more 
absurd, than to say, that a person determines to do a thing 
which is already done. Therefore we conclude, that God first 
decreed what shall come to pass, and then brings it tcr pass : 
Accordingly he first determined to create the world, and then 
created it ; he first determined to bestow the means of grace 
on men, and to render them effectual to the salvation of all who 
shall be saved, and then he does this accordingly ; so, with re- 
spect to his judicial actings, he first determined by a permissive 
decree, not to prevent the commission of sin, though infinitely 
opposite to his holiness, and then, knowing the consequence of 
this permissive decree, or that men, throvigh the mutability or 
corruption of their nature, would rebel against him, he determin- 
ed to punish sin after it should be committed. Thus the decree 
of God is, in all respects, antecedent to the execution of it ; or his 
eternal providence, as his decrees are sometimes called, is antece- 
dent to, and the ground and reason of, his actual providence. 

3. Though the purpose of God be before the execution there- 
of, yet the execution of it is first known by us ; and so it is by 
this that we are to judge of his decree and purpose, which is 
altogether secret, with respect to us, till he reveals it ; there- 
fore we first observe the discoveries thereof, as contained in his 
word, or made visible in his actual providence, and from thence 
we infer his eternal purpose relating thereunto. Every thing 
that is first in the order of nature, is not first with respect to 
the order of our knowing it : thus the cause is before the effect, 
but the effect is often known before the cause ; the sun is, in 
the order of nature, before the enlightening the world by it ; 
but we first see the light, and then we know there is a sun, 
which is the fountain thereof: or, to illusti-ate it by another si- 
militude, which comes nearer the matter before us ; A legisla- 
tor determines first to make a law, which determination is an- 
tecedent to the making, and that to the promulgation of it, 
whereby his subjects come to the knowledge thereof, and act 
in conformity thereunto ; but, according to our method of judg- 
ing concerning it, we must first know that there is such a law, 
and from thence we conclude, that there was a purpose rela- 
ting to it, in him that gave it ; Thus we conclude, that though 
the decree of God be the ground and reason of the execution 
thereof, yet we know that there was such a decree by its exe- 
cution, or, at least, by some other way designed to discover 
this to us. 



432 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

These things being duly considered, may obviate an objec- 
tion, which is no other than a misrepresentation of the doctrine 
we are maintaining, as though we asserted, that our conduct of 
life, and the judgment we are to pass concerning ourselves, re- 
lating to our hope of future blessedness, were to be principally, 
if not altogether regulated, by God's secret purpose or decree ; 
as though we were first to consider him as determining the 
event, that is, as having chosen or rejected us, and, from this 
supposition, to encourage ourselves to attend upon the means 
of grace ; or otherwise that we should take occasion to neglect 
them : since it is a preposterous thing for a man, who considers 
himself as reprobated, to attend on any of those means, which 
are ordained to salvation. 

What has been said under the foregoing heads, is sufficient 
to take away the force of this objection ; but this w ill be more 
particularly considered, when we come to answer several objec- 
tions against the doctrine of election : Therefore all I shall add 
at present is, that since our conduct and hope is to be govern- 
ed by the appearances of things, and not by God's secret pur- 
pose relating to the event thereof, we are to act as those who 
liave not, nor can have, any knowlege of what is decreed, with 
relation thereimto, till it is evinced by the execution thereof; 
or, at least, those graces wrought in us, which are the objects 
of God's purpose, as well as our future blessedness ; and our 
right to one is to be judged of by the other. 

This leads us to consider the properties of these decrees of 
God, as mentioned in the former of the answers we are now 
considering; in which it is said, they are xvise^free^ and holy. 
This is very evident, from the wisdom, sovereignty, and holi- 
ness, which appear in the execution of them j for whatever per- 
fections are demonstrated in the dispensations of providence, 
or grace, these God designed to glorify in his eternal purpose ; 
tberefoi-e if his works, in time, are wise, free, sovereign, and 
holy, his decree, with respect thereunto, which is fulfilled there- 
by, must be said to be so likewise. These things we shall have 
occasion to speak more particularly to, under a following head, 
when we consider the properties of election, and particularly 
that it is wise, sovereign, and holy ; I shall therefore, at pre- 
sent, only add, that whatever perfections belong to the nature 
of God, they are demonstrated by his works, since he cannot 
act unbecoming himself; for that would give occasion to the 
world to deny him to be infinitely perfect, that is, to be God. 
If we pass a judgment on cr(?atures by what they do, and so 
determine him to be a wise man, who acts wisely, or a holy 
man, who acts holily, or a free and sovereign agent, who acts 
without constraint, certainly the same must be said of the di- 
vine Majesty '■ and consequently, since whatever h^ does ha* 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOJ^. 43.> 

the marks of infinite wisdom, holiness, and sovereignty, im- 
pressed upon it, it is evident that these properties, or perfec- 
tions, belong to all his purposes. If all his works are perfonned 
in wisdom, as the Psalmist observes, Psal. civ. 24. then we 
have reason to admire that wisdom which appears, from hencCj 
to be contained in all his purposes relating thereunto, as the 
aposde doth, Rom. xi. 33. the depth of the riches^ both of the 
wisdom and knoxvledge of God! How unsearchable are hisjxidg- 
ments^ and his ways past finding" out / If he be righteaus in all 
his waijs^ and holy in all his wor ki; ^ Psal. cxlv. 17. and therein 
demonstrates a divine sovereignty, as acting without any obli- 
gation, or constraint laid upon him to bestow the favours he 
confers on mankind ; then we must certainly conclude, that his 
eternal purpose which is executed hereby, is free and sove- 
reign. This leads us to consider, 

III. That intelligent creatures, such as angels and men, with 
'•espect to their present or future state, are the objects of God's 
eternal decree, or purpose, which is generally called predesti- 
nation^ And this, as it relates to the happiness of some, or 
inLs;ry of others, is distinguished into election or reprobation, 
"vv'.ich is a very awful subject, and ought never to be thought 
of, or mentioned, but with the utmost caution and reverence, 
lest v/e speak those things that are not right concerning God, 
and thereby dishonour him, or give just occasion to any to deny 
or reproach this doctrine, as though it were not founded on 
scripture. 

Hitherto we have considered the purpose of God, as inclu- 
ding in it all things future, as the objects thereof; and now we 
are to speak of it in particular, as it relates to angels and men. 
When we confine the objects of God's purpose to those things 
that come to pass, which have no dependence on the free-will 
of angels or men, we do not meet with much opposition from 
those, who are in other respects, in the contrary scheme of 
doctrine ; for most of them, who are masters of their own ar= 
gument, and consider what may be allowed without weakening 
their cause, do not deny that God fore-ordained v/hatever comes 
to pass, nor that he did this from all eternity, if we except what 
respects the actions of free agents. Thus they will grant that 
God, from all eternity, determined to create the world, and 
then to govern it, and to give laws to men, as the rule of go- 
vernment, and a free-will, or power to yield obedience there- 
unto : but when we consider men's free actions, as the objects 
of a divine decree, and the final state of men, as being deter- 
mined by it, here we are like to meet with the greatest opposi- 
tion, and therefore must endeavour to maintain our ground in 
the following part of this argument. 

Vol. I. 3 1 



4u'i' THL DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOK. 

The decree of God, respecting intelligent creatures, is to be 
considered as containing in it two branches, namely, election 
and reprobation : the former of which is contained in those 
words, that God, out of his mere love, for the praise of his 
glorious grace, hath elected some to glory in Christ, and also 
to the means thereof; and as for reprobation, that is described 
in the following words ; that according to his sovereign power, 
and the unsearchable counsel of his own will, he hath passed 
by, and fure-ordained the rest to dishonoiu" and wrath, to be, 
for their sin, inflicted, to the praise of the gloiy of his justice. 
Both these are to be considered ; and, 

Firsty What respects the doctrine of election. To elect, or 
choose, according to the common use, or acceptation of the 
word, signifies the taking a small number out of a greater, or 
a part out of the whole ; and this is applied, either to things or 
persons. 

(1.) To things. As when a person h^s a great many things 
to choose out of, he sets aside some of them for his own use, 
and rejects the others, as refuse, that he will have nothing to 
do with. 

(2.) To persons. As when a king chooses, out of his sub- 
jects, some whom he will advance to great honours; or when 
a master chooses, out of a number of ser\^ants offered to him, 
one, or more, whom he will employ in his service ; this from the 
nature of the thing, implies, that all are not chosen, but only a 
part, in which there is a discrimination, or a difference put be- 
tween one and another. 

But we are more particularly to consider the ineaning of the 
word election, as we find it in scripture, wherein it is used in 
several senses. 

To elect or choose, according to the acceptation of the word, 
does not connote the particular thing that a person is chosen 
to, but that is to be understood by what is farther added to de- 
termine the sense thereof; as sometimes we read of persons 
being chosen to partake of some privileges, short of salvation ; 
at other times, of their being chosen to salvation ; sometimes 
it is to be understood as signifying their being chosen to things 
of a lower nature, at other times their being chosen to perform 
those duties, and exercise those gi-aces that accompany salva- 
tion ; and we may, very easily, understand the sense of it by 
the context. 

Again, it is sometimes taken for the execution of God's piu*- 
pose, or for his actual providence, making choice of persons to 
fulfil his "pleasure, in their various capacities ; at other times, 
as we are here to understand it, for his fixing his love upon his 
people, and purposing to bring them to glory, making choice 
of some out of the rest of mankind, as the monuments of his 



THE DOCTSINT, OF ELECTION. 4-35 

discriminating grace ; we have instances of all these senses of 
the word in scripture ; and, 

1. It is sometimes taken for God's actual separation of per- 
sons, for some peculiar instances of service, which is a branch 
of his providential dispensation, in time : thus we sometimes 
read in scripture, of persons being chosen, or set apart, by God, 
to an office, and that either civil or sacred : thus, upon the oc- 
casion of Saul's being made king, by God's special appoint- 
ment, Samuel says, See ye him whom the Lord hath chosen^ 
1 Sam. X. 24. so it is said elsewhere. He chose David also his 
servant, and took him from the sheep-fold ; from folloxving the 
ewes great xvith youngs he brought him to feed facob^ his peo- 
fJcy and Israel his inheritance, PsaL Ixxviii. 70, 71. 

It also signifies his actual ajjpoiutm.ent of persons to perform 
some sacred office : thus it is said, concerning the Levites, that 
the Lord had chosen them to carrij the ark, and to minister unto 
him, 1 Chron. xv. 2. and our Saviour says, to his disciples. 
Have not I chosen you, namely, to be my disciples, and as such 
to be employed in preaching the gospel, and one of you is a 
devil, John vi. 70. 

2. It is sometimes taken for God's providential designation 
of a people, to be made partakers of those external pri^nleges 
of the covenant of grace, which belong to them as a church, 
which, as such, is the peculiar object of the divine regard : thus 
the people of Israel are said to have been chosen, or separated, 
from the world, to enjoy the external blessings of the covenant 
cf grace, as Moses tells them, Because the Lord loved your 

fathers, therefore he chcse their seed after them, Deut. iv. 37- 
and elsewhere, Thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God ; 
the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto 
himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth, 
chap. vii. 6, 7. And, in many other places in the Old Testa- 
ment, the word election is taken in this sense, though some- 
thing more than this seems to be included in some particular 
scriptures in tlie prophetic writing!^, in which the Jews arc de- 
scribed, as God's chosen people, as we shall endeavour to shew 
under a following head. 

3. It also signifies God's bestowing special grace on somCj. 
v/ho are highly favoured by him, above others, as having call- 
ed, or set them apart for himself, to have communion with him, 
to bear a testimony to him, and to be employed in eminent sev> 
vice, for his name and glory in the world. Thus it seems to be 
taken, in 1 Cor. i. 26, 27. where the apostle speaks of their 
calling, which imports some special privileges, that they were 
made partakers of, as the objects of divine power, and grace, to 
whom Christ was made xvisdom, righteousness, snnctif cation^ 
mid redemption; which therefore signifies the powerful, intcrnaU 



436 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

effectual call, and not barely the external call of the Gospel, as 
appears, by the foregoing and followmg verses, ver. 24. com- 
pared with 30. and they, whose calling he speaks of, are said 
to be chosen : Ton see your calling, hoxv that not many -wise 
ineJi^ &c. are called, but God hath chosen the foolish things of 
this -world. See. so that to be chosen, and effectually called 
there, seem to import the same thing. 

And sometimes it is taken, for some peculiar excellency, 
which one Christian has above another; as that hospitable, or 
public-spirited person, to whom the apostle John directs his se- 
cond epistle, is called by him, The elect lady, ver. 1. as an ex» 
cellent person is sometimes styled a choice person. 

But, though the word is taken, in scriptvire, in these va- 
rious senses above mentioned, yet it is not confined to any, 
or all of them; for we shall endeavour to make it appear, 
that it is often taken, in scripture, as it is expressed in this 
answer; for God's having fore-ordained particular persons, 
as monuments of his special love, to be made partakers of 
grace here, and glory hereafter, as it is styled, their being cho- 
sen to eternal life, and the means thereof. This is what we shall 
pndeavour to prove, and accordingly shall consider the objects 
thereof, namely, angels and men, and that it is only a part of 
mankind that is chosen to salvation, to wit, that remnant which 
f-hall be eventually saved; and that these are chosen to the 
means thereof, as well as the end ; and how this is said to be 
in Christ. 

The objects of election are angels and ynen. A few words 
may be said concerning the election of angels, as being particu- 
larly mentioned in this answer ; we have not, indeed, much de- 
livered concerning this matter in scripture, though the apostle 
calls those v/ho remain in their state of holiness and happiness, 
in which they were created, elect angels, 1 Tim. v. 21. But, 
had we no mention of their election in scripture, their being 
confirmed in their present state of blessedness, must, from the 
foregoing method of reasoning, be supposed to be the result of 
a divine purpose, or the execution of a decree relating there- 
unto ; though there is this difference between their election, and 
that of men, in that the latter are chosen unto salvation, which 
the angels are not subjects capable of, inasmuch as they were 
never in a lost, undone state ; neither are they said to be chosen 
in Christ, as men are. 

But we shall proceed, to that which more immediately con= 
terns us, to consider men as the objects of election. This is 
variously expressed in scripture; sometimes it is called their 
being appointed to attain salvation, or being ordained to eternal 
life or their names being xvritten. in the book of life ; and it is also 
'i'lled, the purpose of Ged.. according to election^ or his having 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 43f 

loved them before the foundation of the ivorld^ or his having 
predestinated them, (who have been blessed with all spiritual 
(blessings, in heavenly places in Christ) unto the adoption of 
children^ by him, according to the good pleasure of his will. 
That the scriptures speak of persons as elect, and that this is 
always represented as a great instance of divine favour and 
goodness, is not denied : But the main thing in controversy 
is, whether this relates to the purpose of God, or his pro- 
vidence; and whether it respects particular persons, or the 
church of God in general, as distinguished from the world-; 
and, if it be supposed to relate to particular persons, how these 
are considered in God's purpose, or what is the order and rea* 
son of his determination to save them. 

That election sometimes respects the disposing providence 
of God, in time, has been already considered, and some particu- 
lar instances thereof, in scripture, referred to ; but when they, 
on the other side of the question, maintain, that this is the on- 
ly, or principal sense in v/hich it is used therein, we must take 
leave to differ from them. There is a late writer *, who some- 
times misrepresents, and at other times, opposes this doctrine, 
with more assurance and insult, than the strength of his reason- 
ing will well allow of; and his performance on this head, and 
others, that have some affinity with it, i^ concluded, by many 
of his admirers, to be unaiaswerable ; and the sense that he has 
given of several scriptures therein, as well as in his paraphrase 
on the New Testament, in which he studiously endeavours to 
explain every text, in conformity to his own scheme, has tend- 
ed to pi-ejudice many in favour thereof; and therefore we shall 
take occasion sometimes to consider what he advances against 
the doctrine that we are maintaining; and particularly, as to 
this head of election, he supposes, " 1. That the election, men- 
" tioned, in scripture, is not of particular persons, but only that 
" of churches and nations, or their being chosen to the enjoy- 
" ment of the means of grace, rather than a certainty of their 
" being saved by those means ; that it does not contain any ab- 
" solute assurance of their salvation, or of any such grace, as 
" shall infallibly, and without any possibility of frustration, pro- 
" cure their salvation. 2. That the election to salvation, men- 
'^ tioned in scripture, is only conditional, upon our perseve- 
'■'• ranee in a life of holiness f; and he attempts to prove, that 
" election, in the Old Testament, belongs not to the rigliteouS 
" and obedient persons only, but the whole nation of the Jews, 
" good and bad; and that, in the New Testament, it is applied 
" to those who embrace the Christian faith, without any regaitl 
** had to their eternal happiness." These things ought to be 

* Dr. Whitby, in his discourse of election, &c. 

■• Sff /r/f dincovvc cancel nivg election, pa^e 36. 37- s^c: 



438 THE POCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

particularly considered, and therefore we shall endeavour to 
prove, 

1. That though election oftentimes, in the Old Testament, 
respects the church of the Jews, as enjoying the external means 
of grace, yet it does not sufficiently appear that it is never to be 
taken in any other sense; especially when there are some of 
those privileges which accompany salvation mentioned in the 
context, and applied to some of them, who are thus described ; 
or when there are some promises made to them, which respect 
more than the external means of grace ; therefore if there were 
but one scripture that is to be taken in this sense, it would be 
a sufficient answer to the universal negative, in which it is sup- 
posed, that the Old Testament never intends by it, any privi- 
lege, but such as is external, and has no immediate reference 
to salvation. Here I might refer to some places in the evan- 
gelical prophecy of Isaiah, which are not foreign to our pur- 
pose ; as when it is said. Thou Israel, art viy servant, "Jacob, 
■whom I have chosen ; and / have chosen thee, and not cast thee 
away, Isa. xli. 8, 9. that this respects more than the continu- 
ance of their political and religious state, as enjoying the ex- 
ternal means of grace, seems to be implied in those promises 
that are made to them, in the following words, which not only 
speak of their delivesance from captivity, after they had con- 
tinued sometime therein, but their being made partakers of 
Gods special love, which had an immediate reference to their 
salvation : thus it is said, in the following, Fear not, for I am 
'with thee ; be not dismay ed, for lam thy God ; I rvill strengthen 
thee, yen, I -will help thee ; yea, I xvill uphold thee with the right 
hand of my righteousness ; and elsewhere God, speaking to the 
Jews, says, /, even I, am he thatblotteth out thy tra7isgressio7isfor 
mine own sake, and I will not remember thy sins, chap, xliii. 25. 
and, Israel shall be saved in the Lord, zuith an everlasting sal- 
vation; ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded, xvorld without 
end, chap. xlv. 1 7. There are also many other promises, which 
seem to import a great deal more than the external privileges 
of the covenant of grace, which many very excellent Christians 
have applied to themselves, as supposing that they contain those 
blessings which have a more immediate reference to salvation ; 
and it would detract very much from the spirituality and use- 
fulness of such-like scriptures, to say that they have no relation 
to us, as having nothing to do with the Jewish nation, to whom 
these promises were made. 

Object. To this it may be objected, that these promises are 
directed to the church of the Jews, as a chosen people ; and 
therefore to suppose that there were a number elected out of 
them to eternal salvation, is to extend the sense of the word 
be)^ond the design of the context, to destroy the determinate 
sense thereof, and to suppose an election, ovu of an election. 



THE DOCTRIKE OF ELECTION. 439 

Anstv. Since the word elccti07i, denotes persons being chosen 
to enjoy the external means of grace, and to attain salvation by 
and under them, it ma)% without any impropriety of expression, 
be applied in these different senses, in the same text ; so that 
Israel may be described as a chosen people in the former sense, 
and yet there might be a number elected out of them, who 
were chosen to eternal life, to whom this promise of salvation 
more especially belonged, who are distinguished from the gene- 
ral body of the Jewish nation, who are called, in the other sense, 
God's elect; as when it is said, I xvill leave in the midst of thee 
an afflicted and poor people^ and they shall triini in the name of 
the Lord', the remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity^ nor speak 
lies^ &c. Zeph. iii. 12, 13. So that as Israel was an elect peo- 
ple, chosen out of the world to enjoy the external privileges 
conferred upon them, as a church, which they are supposed to 
have mis-improved, for which they were to be carried captive in- 
to Babylon ; there was a remnant chosen out of them to be made 
partakers of the blessings that accompany salvation, such as 
are here promised ; these are not considered as a church, gov- 
erned by distinct laws, from those that Israel was governed by ; 
and therefore not as a church selected out of that church, but 
as a number of people among them whom God had kept faith- 
ful, as having chosen them to enjoy better privileges than those 
which they had as a professing people ; or as a number elected 
to be made partakers of special grace, out of those which had 
been made partakers of common grace, which they had misera- 
bly abused, and were punished for it. 

2. Our Saviour speaking concerning the final destruction of 
Jerusalem by the Roman army, and a great time of distress 
that should ensue hereupon, tells them, in Matt. xxiv. 22. that 
those days should be shortened yir the elect's sake^ that is, those 
who were chosen to eternal life, and accordingly should be con- 
verted to the Christian faith, not from among the heathen, but 
out of the Jewish nation ; for it is to them that he more parti- 
cularly directs his discourse, forewarning them of this desola- 
ting judgment ; and he advises them to pray that their flight 
be not on the Sabbath-day^ ver. 20. intimating thereby, that that 
nation deemed it unlawful to defend themselves from the as- 
saults of an enemy on the Sabbath-day, though their immediate 
death would be the consequence thereof; therefore this advice 
was suited to the temper of the Jews, and none else : No peo- 
ple in the world, except them, entertained this superstitious 
opinion concerning the prohibition of self-defence on the Sab- 
bath-day ; from whence it may therefore be inferred, that our 
Saviour speaks of them in particular, and not of the Christiana, 
which were amongst them ; upon which account it seems pro- 
bable, that these are not intended by the electa namely, that 
small number for whose sake those days of distress and tribu- 



440 THE DOCTRINE 01 ELECTION. 

iation were to be shortened ;* therefore there were an elect 
people whom God had a peculiar regard to, who should after- 
wards be converted to Christianity, namely, a number elected 
to eternal life out of that people, who were elected to the ex- 
ternal privileges of the covenant of grace. And this farther 
appears from what follows, where our Saviour speaks concern- 
ing y^/if? Chr'ists^ and false prophets^ that should s hero great 
signs^ and xvonders^ insomuch that^ if it were possible^ they 
should deceive the very elect^ Matt. xxiv. 24. Now it cannot be 
supposed of them that are called false Christs, that they would 
attempt to pervert the Christians, by pretending to be the Mes- 
siah ; for that would be impracticable, inasmuch as they did not 
expect any other to come with that character since our Sa- 
viour ; whereas the Jews did, and many of them were pervert- 
ed thereby to their own ruin ; but it is intimated here, that the 
elect people, which was among them, should be kept from be- 
ing deceived by them, inasmuch as they were chosen to obtain 
salvation, and therefore should believe in Christ by the gospel. 

There is also another scripture, which seems to give counte- 
nance hereunto, where the apostle shews, that God had not cast 
away his people^ Rom. xi. 2. to wit, the Jews, that is, he had 
not rejected the whole nation, but had made a reserve of some 
who were the objects of his special love, as chosen to salvation; 
and these are called, A remnant according to the election of 
grace^ ver. 5. and this seems still more plain from what follows, 
ver. 7. What then ? Israel hath not obtained that which he seek- 
cijifor^ that is, righteousness and life, which they sought after^ 
as it werey by the "works of the law^ which, as is mentioned in 
the foregoing verse, is inconsistent with the attaining it by 
grace ; but the election, that is, the elect among that people have 
obtained it ; for they sought after it in another way, and the rest 
tvere blinded, that is, the other part of the Jewish nation, which 
were not interested in this privilege, were left to the blindness 
of their own minds, which was their ruin. 

To this let me add one scripture more, Rom. ix. 6, 7. where 
the apostle, speaking concerning the nation of the Jews, dis- 
tinguishes between the natural and spiritual seed of Abraham, 
when he says. All are not Israel that are of Israel, that is, there 
was a remnant according to the election of grace, who were 
chosen to eternal life out of that people, who were in other re- 
spects, chosen to be made partakers of the external privileges 
that belonged to them, as God's peculiar people. The sum of 
this argument is, that though, it is true, there are some scrip- 
tures that speak of the church of the Jews, as separated from 
the world, by the peculiar hand of divine providence, and fa- 
voured with the external means of grace, yet there aie others 

* SiC the rnnfrary opinion d.^fenJed iv Whitby in loc. 



THE DOCTRINE Or ELECTION. 441 

in which tlicy are said to be chosen to partake of privileges of 
an higher nature, even those which accompany salvation ; there- 
fore election, in the Old Testament, sometimes signifies God's 
purpose, relating to the salvation of his people. 

2. We shall proceed to consider how election is taken in the 
New Testament, in opposition to those who suppose that it is 
there used only to signify God's bringing persons to be members 
of the Christian church, as being instructed in the doctrines re- 
Sating thereunto by tlie apostles :* Tlie principal ground of this 
opinion is, because sometimes whole churches are said to be elec- 
ted, as the apostle speaks of the church at Babylon, as elected 
together with them, to v;hom he directs his epistle, 1 Pet. i. 2. 
compared with chap. v. 13. by which it is supposed that nothing 
is intended, but that they were both of them Christian churches. 
If this be the sense of every scripture in the New Testament, 
that treats of election, then we must not pretend that the doctrine 
we are maintaining is founded on it: But on the other hand, 
we think we have reason to conclude, that when we meet with 
the word in the New Testament, it is to be understood, in 
most places, for God's ecernal purpose relating to the salvation 
of his people. I will not pz-etend to prove an universal negative, 
i)iz. that it is never taken otherwise, but shall refer to some 
scriptures, in which it is plainly understood so, and endeavouf' 
to defend this sense thereof. 

The first scripture that we shall refer to, is in Eph. i. 4. He 
hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the xvorld^ that 
xve should he holy^ and xvithout blame before him in lov€ ; and, 
in ver. 5. he speaks of their being predestinated to the adoption 
of children bij fesiis Christ; that this respects not the external 
dispensation of God's providence, in constituting them a 
Christian church, or giving them the knowledge of those doc- 
trines, on which it was founded ; but their being chosen to sal- 
vation and grace, as the means thereof, according to God'o 
eternal purpose, will veiy evidently appear from the context, 
if we consider that they who are thus chosen, are calledyaiM- 
ful in Christ fesus^ which implies much more than barely to 
be in him by external profession : they are farther described, 
as blessed rvith all spiritual blessings in C/wist^ in ver. 3. or 
blessed with all those bletjsings which respect heavenly things j 
grace, which they had in possession, and glory, which they had 
in expectation ; and they are farther described, as having obtain- 
ed redemption through the blood of Christy and forgiveness of 
sins ; and all this is said to be done, according to the riches of 
his grace^ and the good pleasure of his rvill^ xvho xvorketh all 
things after the counsel thereof ; and certainly all this must 
contain much more than the external dispensation of providence 
* See JVhitbt/'s discourse, &c. pugc \0, U seq 

Vol. I. 3 K 



442 filE DOCTRINE Of ELECTION. 

relating to this privilege, which they enjoyed as a church of 
Christ. 

Again, in 1 Thess. i. 4. the apostle says concerning them, 
to whom he writes, that he knew their election of God. That 
this is to be understood of their election to eternal life, is very 
evident ; and, indeed, he explains it in this sense, when he says, 
God hath^ from the beginnings chosen you unto salvation^ through 
sanctifcation of the Spirit^ and the belief of the truth^ Wherexinto 
he called you by our gospel^ to the obtaining the glory of our 
Lord Jesus Christy 2 Thess. ii. 13, 14. the gospel is considered 
as the means of their attaining that salvation, which they are 
said to be chosen to ; so that their election contains more than 
their professed subjection thereunto as a church of Christ : Be- 
sides, the apostle gives those marks and evidences of this matter, 
which plainly discover that it is their election to salvation that 
he intends ; accordingly he speaks of their work offaith^ labour 
of love s and patience of hope ^ in our Lord Jesus Christy and of 
the gospeV s coming not in xvord onb^^ but also in poxver^ 1 Thess. 
i. 3, 5. by which he means not the power that was exerted in 
working miracles, for that would be no evidence of their being 
a church, or of their adhering to the doctrines that were con- 
firmed thereby, since every one, v/ho saw miracles wrought, 
did not believe ; therefore he means, that by the powerful in- 
ternal influence of the Holy Ghost, they were' persuaded to be- 
come followers of the apostles, and the Lord, and were en- 
samples to others, and public-spirited, in endeavouring to pro- 
pagate the gospel in the world. Certainly this argues that 
they were effectually called by the grace of God, and so proves 
that they were chosen to be made partakers of this grace, and 
of that salvation, that is the consequence thereof. 

There is another scripture, in which it is very plain that the 
apostle speaks of election to eternal life inasmuch as there are 
several privileges connected with it, which the Christian church, 
as such, cannot lay claim to : thus, in Rom. viii. o3. Who 
shall lay any thing to the charge of God''s elect ? It is God 
that justifeth. Now if justification or freedom from con- 
demnation, accompanied with their being effectually called here, 
which shall end in their being glorified hereafter, be the result 
of their election, as in ver. 30. then certainly this includes in 
it more than the external privileges of the covenant of grace, 
which all who adhere to the Christian faith are possessed of, 
and consequently it is an election to salvation that the apostle 
here intends. 

Object, It is objected, tKat it is more than probable, when 
%ve find, as we sometimes do, v/hole churches styled elect in the 
New testament, that some among them were hypocrites ; par- 
ticularly those to Vt'hom the apostle Peter writes, who were con- 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 443 

verted from Judaism to Christianity, whom he calls elect, ac- 
cording to the fore-knowledge of Godthe Father : uotwithstanding 
they had some in communion with them, concerning whom it 
might be said, that they had only a name to live, but yet were 
dead ; and he advises them, to lay aside all malice^ K^^^^^i ^^^ 
hypocrisy^ envies^ and evil speakings and^ as new born babes^ to 
receive the xvord^ if so be they had tasted that the Lord is graciouSy 
1 Pet. ii. 1. which makes it more than probable, that there were 
some among them who had not, in reality, experienced the 
grace of God ,* so when he says, that there should be false 
teachers among them^ whose practice should be as vile as their 
doctrine, and that many amongst them shoidd follow their per- 
nicious ways. 2 Pet. ii. 1, 2. it seems to argue that the whole 
church he writes to, were not chosen to salvation ; therefore 
their election only signiiies their being chosen to enjoy the privi- 
leges, which they had, us a professing society of Christians. 

Ansxv. It is certain that there was a very considerable number 
among them who were not only Christians in name ; but they 
were very eminent for the exercise of those graces, which evin- 
ced their election to eternal life ; and particularly he says con- 
cerning them, Whom having- not seen-, ye love; and in whom- 
believing^ ye rejoice with Joy unspeakable., and full of glory ; 
receiving the end of your faith^ even the salvation of your souls, 
1 Pet. i 8, 9. which agrees very Avell with the other character 
given them of their being elect, through sanctification of the 
Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the bhcd of fesus Christ, 
ver. 2. Therefore the only thing that seems to affect our ar- 
gument is, that this character did not belong to every individual. 
But supposing this should be allowed, might not the church be 
here described as chosen to salvation, inasmuch as the far greater 
number of them were so ? Nothing is more common, in scripture, 
than for a whole body of men to be denominated from the 
greatest part of them, whether their character be good or bad : 
thus when the greatest part of the Jewish church were revolted 
from God, and guilty of the most notorious crimes, they are 
described as though their apostacy had been universal, Thcij 
are all grievous rcvolters, xvalking xvith slanders, Jcr. vi. 28^ 
whereas it is certain, there were some who liad not apostatized ; 
some of them were slandered and reproached for the sake of 
God, and therefore were not included in the number of thep.i 
that walked with slanders, though. their nun-i,ber were very 
small; as God says by the prophet Ezekiel, / sought for a 
man among them that shoidd make up the hedge, and stand in 
the gap before vie for the land that I should not destroy it, but 
I found none, Ezek. xxii. 30. whereas at that time, in which 
the people were most degenerate, there were found some who 
:<ighed aiul cnjedfor all the abomination that were done In the 



44i'i THE DOCTRINE OI ELECTION. 

midst gJ themy chap, ix, 4. So on the other hand, when %\\c 
greater number of them kept their integrity, and walked before 
God in holiness of life, the whole church is thus characterized, 
/ remember the kindness of thy youth^ the love of thine espousals, 
when thou xventest after me iti the xvilderness ; Israel -was holiness 
to the Lord, Jer. ii. 2, 3. whereas it is certain, that, at that 
time, there were a great many who rebelled, murmured, and 
tevolted from God, and were plagued for their iniquities ; yet 
because the greater number of them were upright and sincere, 
this character is given in general terms, as if there had been 
no exception. And the prophet looked back to some age of 
the church, in which a great number of them were faithful ; 
and therefore, he speaks of the people in general, at that time, 
as such, and accordingly calls them. The faithful city^ Isa. i. 21. 
and the prophet Jeremiah calls them, The precious sons ofZion., 
comparable to fine gold. Lam. iv. 2. yet there never was u 
time when there were none among them that rebelled against 
God. Therefore may not this be supposed concerning the first 
gospel clmrches that were planted by the apostles ; and ac- 
cordingly, when they are styled elect, to whom the apostle Peter 
v/rites, 1 Pet. v. 13. as v/ell as the church at Babylon, win- 
may not this be supposed to signif)^, that the greatest part <<)f 
them were really sanctified, and therefore chosen to sanctification ? 
And consequently their character, as elect, does not barely signify 
their being chosen to be made partakers of the external privi- 
leges of the gospel. We might also consider, that it is very 
agreeable to our common mode of speaking, to denominate a 
city, or a kingdom, from the greater number thereof, whether 
we call them a rich, or a wise or a valiant people, we never 
suppose there are no exceptions to this character ; therefore 
why may we not, in this instance, conclude, that the apostle 
Peter, when he describes this church as elected, intends their 
election to salvation ? Thus we have endeavoured to prove 
that election, in scripture, is not always taken, in the Old Tes- 
tament, for the external privileges which the Jewish nation had, 
as a church ; nor in the New Testament for those who belonged 
to the churches^ namely, such as professed the Christian faith. 
And probably that learned author, before mentioned, was ap- 
prehensive that this observation of his would not hold universally 
true; and therefore he has another provisionary objection against 
the doctrine of particular election of persons to eternal life, and 
says, as Arminius and his contemporaries before did, that all 
those scriptures, which speak of this doctrine, contain nothing 
more than God's conditional purpose, that if a person believes, 
he shall be saved. It is necessary for us to consider what 
may be said in answer hereunto ; but inasmuch as we shall have 
fsccasion to speak to this v/hen v/e consider the properties of 



THE DOCTRIKE of ELECTION'. 445 

'. lection, under a following head, we shall rather chuse to reserve 
it to that place, than be obliged to repeat what might be here 
said concerning it. 

Thus having premised something concerning election in 
general, and the sense in which it is to be understood, in scrip- 
ture, v/e shall briefly mention a matter in dispute, among divines 
relating to the objects thereof, as they are considered in God's 
eternal purpose : and here we shall take notice of some different 
opinions relating thereunto, without making use of those schol- 
astic modes of speaking, which render this subject much more 
difficult, than otherwise it would be : and shall take occasion 
to avoid, and fence against those extremes, vthich have only 
had a tendency to prejudice persons against the doctrine in general 

The object of election is variously considered by divines, who 
treat of this subject. 

1. There are some who, though they agree in the most 
material things in their defence of this doctrine yet thev are 
divided in their sentiments about some nice metaphysical spe- 
culations, relating to the manner how man is to be considered, 
as the object of predestination : accordingly some, who are 
generally styled Supralapsarians, seem to proceed in this way 
of explaining it, namely that God from all eternity, designed 
to glorify his divine perfections, in some objects out of himself, 
which he could not then be said to have done, inasmuch as they 
did not exist ; and the perfections, which he designed to glorify, 
were, more especially, his sovereignty and absolute dominion, 
as having a right to do what he will with the work of his hands ; 
and also his goodness, whereby he would render himself the 
object of their delight ; and, as a means conducive to this end, 
he designed to create man an intelligent creature, in whom he 
might be glorified; and since a creature, as such, could not be 
the object of the display of his mercy, or justice, he farther de- 
signed to permit man to fall into a state of sin and misery, that 
so, when fallen, he might recover some out of that state, and 
leave others to perish in it : the former of which are said to be 
loved, the other hated ; and when some extend the absoluteness 
oi God's purpose, not only to election but reprobation, and do 
not take care to guard their modes of speaking, as they ought 
to do, but conclude reprobation, at least predamnation, to be, 
not an act of justice, but rather of sovereignty ; they lay them- 
selves open to exception, and give occasion to those, who oppose 
this doctrine, to conclude, that they represent God as delighting 
in the misery of his creatures, and with that view giving being 
to them. It is true, several, who have given into this way of 
thinking, have endeavoured to extricate themselves out of this 
difliculty, and denied this and other consequences of the like 
nature, v/hieh many have thought to be necessarv deduction-* 



416 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

from this scheme ; whether they have done this effectually, or 
no, may be judged of by those who are conversant in their 
writings *. I cannot but profess myself to set a very high value 
on them in other respects, yet I am not bound to give into 
some nice speculations, contained in their method of treating 
this subject, which renders it exceptionable ; particularly, I 
cannot approve of any thing advanced by them, which seems 
to represent God as purposing to create man, and then to suffer 
him to fall, as a means by which he designed to demonstrate 
the glory of his vindictive justice, which hath given occasion 
to manv to entertain rooted prejudices against the doctrine of 
predestination, as though it necessarily involved in it this sup- 
position, that God made man to damn him. 

There are others, who are generally styled Sublapsarians f, 
who suppose, that God considered men as made and fallen, and 
then designed to glorify his grace in the recovery of those who 
M^ere chosen, by him, to eternal life | and his justice in them, 
whom he designed to condemn, as a punishment for their sins, 
w-liichhe foreknew that they would commit, and purposed not to 
hinder; and he designed to glorify his sovereignty, in that 
one should be an object of grace, rather than another, whereas 
he might have left the whole vi^orld in that state of misery, in- 
to which he foresaw they would plunge themselves. 

That which is principally objected, by those who are in the 
other way of thinking, against this scheme, is, that the Sablap- 
sarians suppose that God's creating men, and permitting them 
to fiill, was not the object of his eternal purpose. But this they 
universally deny, and distinguish between God's purpose to 
create and suffer men to fall ; and his purposes being consider- 
ed as a means to advance his sovereignty, grace, and justice, 
in which the principal difference between them consists. We 
shall enter no farther into this controversy, but shall only add, 
that whatever may be considered, in God's eternal purpose, as 
a means to bring about other ends ; yet it seems evident, from 
the nature of the thing, that God cannot be said to choose men 
to salvation, v.iihout herein considering them as fallen; for 

' See Twiss. Vind. Grat. & iV- Praedest. and his riches of God's lore, a£-ai?)si 
Jjurd; und also that part uf the lin'itings of some others, hi tvhich they treat of pi'e- 
ilcitinafion, ViZ. JJeza, Gomurus, J-'iscutor, Aliucovhis, Rutherfurd, IVhitaker, and 
ffrkins. 

f Among these, luere bishop Daxmnnt, and other divines, tuho raet in the synod 
<f Dort; also V(ihi?i, P. Du^JVIoulin, Turrettin, and, indeed, the greater number 
of t,hose vjho have defended the doctrine of predestinatio?i ; and there are many o- 
thers, tvho, when theif treat of it, seem to tcare the partiadar matter in controversv, 
as tkijihing it of no great importance or that this doctrine may be as 7ueU defended, 
■isithout confining tlieinseives to certain modes of speaking, -which have betn the. 
ground of ma/!_ /■ '■;',' • ■■ - .; ',v? ,'t, -vhvse pruut-r.ce ami conduct /'f-rin can^tot ie 
^usth biuined. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 447 

as no one is a subject capable of salvation, but one who is fall- 
en into a state of sin and misery ; so when God purjoosed to 
save such, they could not be considered as to be created, or 
created and not fallen, but as sinners. 

2. There are others M'ho deny particular election of persons 
to eternal life, and explain those scriptures, which speak of it, 
in a very different way: these suppose, that God designed, 
from all eternity, to create man, and foreknew that he would 
fall, and, that, pursuant to this eternal foreknowledge, he de- 
signed to give him sufficient means for his recovery, which, by 
the use of his free will, he might improve, or not, to die best 
purposes ; and also, fore-knowing who would improve, and who 
"would reject, the means of grace, which he purposed to be- 
stow, he determined, as the consequence thereof, to save some, 
and condemn others. This method of explaining God's eter- 
nal purpose is exceptionable, as will farther appear, in the 
n\ethod we shall take, in prosecuting this subject, in two re- 
spects. 

(1.) As they suppose that the salvation of men depends on 
their own conduct, or the right use of their free w'ill, without 
giving the glory which is due to God, for that powerful, effica- 
cious grace, which enables them to improve the means of grace, 
and brings them into a state of salvation, 

(2.) As the result of the former, they suppose that nothing 
absolute is contained in the decree of God, but his fore-know- 
ledge, which is rather an act of his understanding, tlian his 
will; and therefore it seems to militate against his sovereignty 
and grace, and, to make his decrees depend on some condi- 
tions, founded in the free-will of man, which, according to 
them, are not the object of a peremptory decree. Thus hav- 
ing considered intelligent creatures, and more particularly men, 
as the objects of predestination. 

IV. We proceed to the farther proof and explication of this 
doctrine; and, in order thereto, shall insist on the following 
propositions. 

1. That it is only a part of mankind that were chosen to sal- 
vation. 

2. That they who were chosen to it, as the end, were also 
chosen to sanctification, as the means thereof. And, 

3. That they were chosen in Christ ; which propositions are 
contained in that part of this answer, in which it is said, that 
God has chosen some men to eternal life, and the means there- 
of. 

1. That some were chosen to salvation; not the whole race 
of mankind, but only those that shall be eventually saved : that 
the whole world is not the object of election appears from the 
known acceptation of the word, both in scripture, and in our 



448 TH£ DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

common modes of speaking ; since to choose, as has been be- 
fore observed, is to take, prefer, or esteem, one thing before 
another, or to separate a part from the whole, for our own 
proper use, and what remains is treated with neglect and dis- 
regard : accordingly it is not a proper way of speaking, to say 
that the whole is chosen ; and therefore it follows, that if all 
mankind had been fore-ordained to eternal life, which God 
might have done if he had pleased, this would not have been 
called a purpose, according to election. 

But there are other arguments more conclusive, than what 
results barely from the known sense of the word, which wc 
shall proceed to consider, and therein make use of the same 
method of reasoning, which we observed, in proving that God 
fore-ordained whatever comes to pass, with a particular ap- 
plication thereof to the eternal state of believers. As we be- 
fore observed, that the decree of God is to be judged of by the 
execution of it, in time; so it will appear, that those whom 
God in his actual providence and grace, prepares for, and 
brings to glory, he also before designed for it. Were I only 
to treat of those particular points in controversy, between us 
and the Pelagians, I would first consider the method which 
God takes in saving his people, and prove that salvation is of 
grace, or that it is the effect of the power of God, and not to 
be ascribed to the free-will of man, as separate from the di- 
vine influence ; and then I would proceed to speak concern- 
ing the decree of God relating hereunto, which might then, 
without much difficulty, be proved : but being obliged to pur- 
sue the same method in which things are laid down, in their 
respective connexion, we must sometimes defer the more par- 
ticular proof of some doctrines, on which our arguments de- 
pend, to a following head, to avoid the repetition of things ; 
therefore, inasmuch as the execution of God's decree, and his 
power and grace manifested therein, will be insisted on in some 
following answers, we shall, at present, take this for granted, 
or shall speak but very briefly to it. 

, (1.) It appears that it is only a part of mankind that are cho- 
sen to be made partakers of grace and glory, inasmuch as these 
invaluable privileges are conferred upon, or applied to no 
more than a part of mankind : if all shall not be saved, then 
all were not chosen to salvation; for we are not to suppose 
that God's purpose, relating hereunto, can be frustrated, or 
not take effect ; or if there be a manliest display of discrimina- 
ting grace in the execution of God's decree relating thereunto, 
there is, doubtless, a discrimination in his purpose, and that 
is what we call election. This farther appears from some 
scriptures, which represent those who are saved as a remnant : 
thus when the apostle is speaking of God's casting away the 



THL DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 449 

greatest part of the Jewish nation, he says of some of them 
notwithstanding, that at this present time also there is a rem- 
nant according' to the election of grace^ Rom. xi. 5. that is, 
there are some among them who are brought to embrace the 
faith of the gospel, and to be made partakers of the privileges 
that accompany salvation : these are called a remnant ; as when 
it is said, in Rom. ix. 27. Though the number of the children of 
Israel be as the sand of the sea, it is no more than a remnant 
of them that shall be saved. He doubtless speaks in this and 
other scriptures, concerning the eternal salvation of those who 
are described as a remnant, according to the election of grace. 
Here it will be necessar}' for us to consider, that this rem- 
nant signifies only a small part of the Jewish church, selected, 
by divine grace, out of that nation, of whom the greater num- 
ber were rejected by God ; and that the salvation, here spo- 
ken of, is to be taken not for any tempoi-al deliverance, but for 
that salvation which the believing Jews should be made parta- 
kers of in the gospel day, when the rejection of the others had 
its full accomplishnent. That this may appear, we shall not 
only compare this scripture Avith the context, but v/ith that in 
Hosea, from whence it is taken : as to what respects the con- 
text, the apostle, in ver. 2. expresses his great heaviness, and 
continual sorrow of heart, for the rejection of that nation in 
general, which they had brought upon themseU-es ; but yet he 
encourages himself, in ver. 6. with this thought, that the word 
of God, that is, the promise made to Abraham relating to his 
spiritual seed, who were given to expect greater blessings, than 
those which were contained in the external dispensation of the 
covenant of grace, should not take none i'ffi^'ct, since, though 
the whole nation of the Jews, who were of Israel, that is, 
Abraham's natural seed, did not attain those privileges; }'et a 
part of them, who are here called Israel, and elsewhere a rem- 
nant, chosen out of that nation, should be made partakers 
thereof; the former are called The children of the ficsh, in 
ver. 8. the latter, by way of eminence, The children of the 
promise; these are styled, in ver. 23, 24. I'he vessels of mercy, 
which he had afore prepared unto glory, to xvhom he designed 
to make known the riches of his glory, namely, those "whom he 
had called ; not of the fexvs only, but also of the Gentiles^ 
which he intends by that remnant, which were chosen out of 
each of them, for so the v/ord properly signifies.* And this 
sense is farther confirmed, by the quotation out of the prophe- 
cy of Hosea, chap. 1. 10. compared with another taken out of 
the prophecy of Isaiah, chap. x. 22. both which speak only of 
a remnant that shall be saved, when tlie righteous judgments 

* Ou /y-ovo^ «5 'ijnToMa-y. non solum ex JucIkIs; that is, those tv/w are cuUeJfio/n 
cmo7i^ the Jewsy as distingmshed from the vest uf litem tluit ucie u-ji^clcd- 

Vol. I. 3 L 



430 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

of God Avere poured forth, on thut nation in general; and the 
•prophet Ilosea adds another promise relating to them, which 
the apostle takes notice of, namely, that in the place where it 
rvas said unto tlicm^ Te are not my people^ there it shall be said 
unto them, Te ajcthe sons of the living God, which plainly re- 
spects this remnant; for he had before prophesied concerning 
the nation in general, Te are not, that is, ye shall not be my 
people, and / will not he your God; so that here is a great sal- 
vation furetold, which, they, among the Jews, should be made 
partakers of, Vvlio were fore-ordained to eternal life, when the 
rest were rejected. 

Object. The prophet seems to speak, in this scripture, of a 
temporal salvation, inasmuch as it is said, in the words imme- 
diately following. Then shall the children of Judah, and the 
children of Israel, be gathered together, and shall appoint them- 
selves one head, and they shall come up out of the land, viz. of 
Babylon, for great shall be the day of Jezreel. Therefore this 
remnant, here spoken of, which should be called the sons of 
the living God, respects only such as should return out of cap- 
tivity, and consequently not the election of a part, to wit, the 
believing Jews, to eternal life : for it is plain, that, when this 
])rediction v/as fulfilled, they were to appoint themselves one 
head, or governor, namely, Zerubbabel, or some other, that 
should be at the head of affairs, and help forward their flour- 
ishing state, in, or after their retura from captivity. 

Afisw. It seems very evident, that part of this prophecy, 
viz. chap. iii. 5. respects the happiness of Israel, at that time, 
when they should seek the Lord their God, and David their 
King, a7id should fear the Lord and his goodness, i?! the latter 
days; therefore Avhy may not this verse also, in chap. i. in 
which it is said, that they shall be called the sons of the living 
God, have its accomplishment in the gospel-day, when they 
should adhere to Christ, Vi'^ho is called, David their King? 
The only diiUculty which affects this sense of the text is, its 
being said, that tliey shall return to their own land, under the 
i.onduct of a Head, or governor, whom they should appoint 
over th em, w'Kich. seems to favour the sense contained in the ob- 
jection : but the sense of the words would be more plain, if we 
render the text, instead of [then] And the children of Judah, 
&c. as it is rendered in most translations, and is most agreea- 
ble to the sense of the Hebrew word.* According to our 
translation, it seems to intimate, that the prophet is speaking 
of sometliing mentioned in the foregoing verse ; and inasmuch 
as the latter respects their return from the captivity, therefore 
>".•« former DQUFt do 50; whereas if we put fw^?', instead oi thcn^ 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 45'1, 

the meaning of both verses together is this : there are two bles- 
sings which CtocI promised, namely, that a part of the Jewish 
nation should be made partakers of the saving bk^ssings of the 
covenant of grace, which was to have its actomphshmcnt when 
they were brought to beheve in Christ, by the gospel, or when 
this remnant, taken out from them, should be saved; and 
there is also another blessing promised to the whole nation, 
•which should be conferred upon them, when they returned 
from the Babylonish captivity; 

If it be objected, to this sense of the text, that their return 
from captivity is mentioned after that promise, of their being 
called the sons of the living' Gody therefore it cannot be sup- 
posed to relate to a providence that should happen; before it ; 
I need only reply to this, that it is very usual, hi scripture, for 
the Holy (xhost, when speaking concerning the privileges 
which the churcli should be made partakers of, not to lay them 
down in the same order in which they were to be accomplish- 
ed ; and therefore, why may we not suppose, that this rule 
miay be applied to this text? And accordingly the sense is 
this: the prophet had been speaking, in the tenth verse, of that 
great salvation, which this renmant of the Jews, ccmverted to 
Christianity, should be made partakers of in the gospel-day ; 
mid then he obviates an objection, as though it should be said. 
How can this be, since the Jev^'s are to be canied into captivi- 
t)'^, and there broken, scattered, and, as it were ruined ? In an- 
swer to this, the prophet adds, that the Jev/s should not be 
destroyed in the captivity, but should be delivered, and re- 
turn to their own land, and so should remain a people, till this 
remnant was gathered out of them, who were to be made par- 
takej-s of these spiritual privileges under the gospel-dispensa- 
tion, as mentioned in the foregoing words. 

Thus having endeavoured to prove, that this remnant, spo- 
ken of in Rom. xi. are such as should be made partakers of 
eternal salvation, we may now apply this to our present argu- 
ment. If that salvation, which this remnant was to be made 
partakers of, be the tifcct of divine power, as the aposde says, 
in Rom. ix. 16. It is not of him that xvilleth^ nor of him that 
runneth, but of God, that sheweth 7ncrcy; and if it be the gift 
of divine grace, as he says elsewhere, in Eph. ii. 8. Bij grace 
are ye saved, through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the 
gift of God; then it follows from hence, that God designed, 
before-hand, to give tliem these blessings ; and if he design- 
ed them only for this remnant, then it is not ail, but a part of 
mankind, to wit, those that shall be tvenlually saved, that 
were chosen to salvation. 

(2.) The doctrine of election may be farther proved, from 
God's having foreknown whom he will satictify and save. It 



452 IHli DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

will be allowed, that God knows all things, and consequently 
that he knows all things that are future, and so not only those 
whom he has saved^ but whom he will save. We need not 
prove that God fore-knew all things, for that is not denied by 
those who are on the other side of the question, or, at least, by 
very few of them ; and, indeed, if this were not an undoubted 
truth, we could not depend on those predictions, which re- 
spect things that shall come to pass ; and these not only such 
as are the effects of necessary causes, or things produced ac- 
cording to the common course, or laws of nature, but those 
which are contingent, or the result of the free-will of man, which 
have been foretold, and consequently were fore-known by God; 
and if it be allowed that he foi-e-knew whatever men would be, 
and do, let me farther add, that this foreknowledge is not bare- 
ly an act of the divine mind, taking a fore-view of, or observ- 
ing what others will be, or do, without determining that his 
actual providence should interest itself therein ; therefore it fol- 
lows, that if he fore-knew the salvation of those who shall be 
eventually saved, he fore-knew what he would do for them, as 
a means conducive thereunto ; and if so, then he determined, 
before-hand, that he would bring them to glory ; but this re- 
spects only a part of mankind, who were chosen by him to 
eternal life. 

In this sense we are to understand those scriptures that set 
forth God's eternal purpose to save his people, as an act of 
fore-knowledge : thus, in Rom. xi. 2. God hath Jiot cast axvay 
his people^ xvhom he fore-knexv^ that is, he hath not cast them 
all away, but has reserved to himself a remnant^ according to 
the election of grace. That he either had, or soon designed, to 
cast away the greatest number of the Jewish nation, seems very 
plain, from several passages in this chapter: thus, in verses 17, 
19. he speaks of some of the branches being broken o^and ver. 
22. of God's severity^ by which we are to understand his vin- 
dictive justice in this dispensation : But yet we are not to sup- 
pose, says the apostle, that God has cast them all away, as in 
ver. 1. and so he mentions himself, as an instance of the con- 
trary, as though he should say, I am called, and sanctified, and 
chosen, though I am an Israelite. 

Moreover, God's not casting away his remnant of the Is- 
raelites, being the result of his fore-knowledge, does not barely 
respect his knowing what they should be, or do, whom he had 
chosen to eternal life, for it is represented as a discriminating 
act of favour > whereas, in other respects, they, who are rejected 
by him, are as much the objects of his knowledge, as any 
others, since the omniscience of God is not the result of his 
will ; but it is a perfection founded in his nature, and therefore 
not arbitrary, but neccssaiy. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELFXTION. 453 

Again, the apostle, in 1 Pet. i. 2. speaks of som^ who v^ere 
elected^ according" to the forekno'ivledge of God the Father^ unto 
obedience^ &c. that is, not chosen, because of any obedience per- 
formed by them, which God foreknew ; for this is considered, 
as the result of his fore-knowledge, not the cause of it ; and 
this v/ord is yet farther explained in another place, where 
it is used, when the apostle says, in 2 Tim. ii. 19. The Lord 
knoweth them that arc his. He had before been speaking of 
the faith of some, who professed the gospel, being overthrown ; 
nevertheless, says he, that foundation of hope, which God has 
laid in the gospel, is not hereby shaken, but stands sure ; the 
faithful shall not be overthrown, for the Lord knoweth them that 
are his^ that is, he knows who are the objects of his love, who 
shall be kept by his power, through faith, unto salvation ; so 
that God's fore-knowledge, considered as a distinguishing pri- 
vilege, is not to be understood barely of his knowing how men 
will behave themselves, and so, taking his measures from 
thence, as though he first knew what they would do, and then 
resolved to bestow his grace ; but he knows whom he has set 
apart for himself, or designed to save, and, with respect to 
them, his providence will influence their conduct, and prevent 
their apostasy. 

God's knowledge, in scripture, is sometimes taken for his 
aate"oving, or loving, those who are the objects thereof: thus 
he says unto Moses, in Exod. xxxiii. 17. Thou hast found 
grace in 7ny sight, and L knoxv thee by name, where one expres- 
sion explains the other, and so it imports a knowledge of ap- 
probation ; and, on the other hand, when our Saviour says to 
some, in Matt. vii. 23. / xvill profess unto you, I never knen) 
you, it is not to be supposed that he did not know they would 
behave themselves, or what they would do against his name 
and interest in the world ; but L never knexv you, that is, I never 
approved of you, and accordingly, it follows. Depart from ??ze, 
ye that xvork iniquity ; and when it is said concerning know- 
ledge, as applied to man, in John xvii. 3. This is life eternal, 
that they may know thee, the only true God; no one supposes 
that a speculative knowledge of divine truths will give any 
one ground to conclude his right to eternal life ; therefore to 
know God, is to love, to delight in him : and the same is ap- 
plied, by the apostle, to God's loving man, when he says, in 
1 Cor. viii. 3. If any 7nan love God, the same is knorvn of hi?):, 
that is, beloved by him. Now if God's knowing his people sig- 
nifies his loving them, then his fore-knowing them must signify 
his determining to do them good, and to bestow grace and glory 
upon them, which is the same as to choose them to eternal life : 
he fore-knew what he designed to confer upon them ; for he 
prepared a kingdom for them, from the foundation of the world. 



454 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

Matt. XXV. 34. which is the same with his having, IVoin the 
beginning, chosen them to salvation. 

Object. As all actions, performed by intelligent creatures, as 
such, suppose knowledge, so their determinations are the result 
of fore-knowledge, for the will follows the dictates of the un- 
derstanding ; therefore we must suppose God's fore-know- 
ledge, to be antecedent to, and the ground and reason of liis 
determinations. This the apostle seems to intimate, when he 
says, in Rom. viii. 29. Whom he did fore- know ^ he did predesti- 
7iatey that is, he had a perfect knowledge of their future con- 
duct, and therefore determined to save them. 

A71SW. I do not deny that, according to the nature of things, 
we first consider God as knowing, and then as willing : but this 
does not hold good, with respect to his knowing all things fu- 
ture ; for we are not to suppose that he first knows that a thing 
shall come to pass, and then wills that it shall. It is true, he 
first knows what he will do, and then does it ; but, to speak of 
a knowledge in God, as conversant about the future state, or 
actions of his people, without considering them as connected 
with his power and providence, (v/hich is the immediate cause 
thereof) I cannot think consistent with the divine perfections. 

As for this scripture. Whom he did fore-knorv^ them he did 
predestinate^ we are not to suppose, that the meaning is, that 
God fore-knew that they, whom he speaks of, would be ^Hlfx- 
formed to the image of his Son, and then as the result hereof, 
determined that they should ; for their being conformed to 
Christ's image, consists in their exercising those graced whicii 
are agreeable to the temper and disposition of his children, or 
brethren, as they are here called ', and this conformity to his 
image is certainly the result of their being called : but their 
calling as well as justification and glorification, is the conse- 
quence of their being fore-known ; therefore God's fore-know- 
ing here, must be taken in the same sense as it is in the scrip- 
tures, but now referred to ; for his having loved them before 
the foundation of the world, or chosen them to enjoy those 
privileges which are here mentioned. 

(3.) It farther appears, that there is a number chosen out of 
the world to eternal life, from the means which God has or- 
dained for the gathering a people out of it, to be made parta- 
kers of the blessings which he has reserved for them in heaven. 
This is what we generally call the means of grace ; and from 
hence it appears, that there is a chosen people, whose advan- 
tage is designed hereby. For the making out of this argument, 
let it be considered, 

1st, That there always has been a number of persons, whom 
God, by his distinguishing providence, has separated from the 
world, who have enjoyed the ordinances, or means of grace^. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 455 

,td to whom the promises of eternal life have been made. We 
do not say that these are all chosen to eternal life ; but it ap- 
pears, from the design of pro^ddence herein, that thei-e have 
been some, among them who were ordained to eternal life. If 
God gives the means of grace to the church, it is an evident 
token that some are designed to have grace bestowed upon 
them, and consequently brought to glory. 

"■Zdlij. They who liave been favoured with these means of 
grace, have had some peculiar marks of the divine regard to 
tliem. Thus we read, in the early ages of the world, of the 
distinction between those, who had the special presence of God 
among them, and others, who were deprived of it ; as Cain is 
said, to go out from the presence of the Lord^ Gen. iv. 16. as 
one, who, together with his posterity, was deprived of the 
means of grace, and also of God's covenant, in which he pro- 
mised to be a God to some, from which privilege others were 
excluded: thus he was called the God of Shem^ chap. ix. 16. 
and afterwards of Abrahcan^ Isaac, and Jacob, Exod. iii. 6. 
whose descendants were her^^by given to expect the ordinances 
and means of grace, and many instances of that special grace, 
which a part of them should be made partakers of: and would 
he have made this provision, for a peculiar people, in so dis- 
criminating a way, if there had not been a remnant among 
them, according to the election of grace, to whom he designed 
to manifest himself here, and bring to glory hereafter ? No, 
he would have neglected, or over-looked them as he did the 
■world ; whereas both they and their seed had the promises of 
the covenant of grace made to them which argues, that there 
was a reinnant among them, v/hom God designed hereby to 
bring into a state of grace and salvation, and, in this respect, 
they are said to be the objects of divine love. 

"I'his leads us to consider the meaning of that text, which is 
generally insisted on, as a very plain proof of this doctrine, in 
Rom. ix. 11, 12, 13. TJie children being not yet born, neither 
having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according 
to election, might stand; not ofxvorks, but of him that ccdleth : 
It 7vas said unto her, the elder shall serve the younger ; as it 
is written, facob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. Here is 
an express mention of the purpose of God, according to elec- 
tion, and Jacob is, pursuant thereunto, said to be the object of 
divine lo\'e. For the understanding of which, let us consider 
Tbe sense that is given of it, by those on the other side of the 
question ; and how far it may be allowed of, and what there is 
in the words to prove this doctrine, and wherein our sense of 
.them differs from their's. 

It is supposed, by those who deny particular election, that 

Tacob and Esau arc not here considered in a personal r;»pacity, 



4:5-d THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOM. 

but that the apostle speaks of their respective descendants, as 
referrhig to two divine predictions ; in one of which, Gen. xxv. 
23. God told Rebckah, before her two sons were born, that 
two nations xvcre in her xvomb ; and the elder ^ that is, the pos- 
terity of Esau, should serve the ijounger^ namely, that of Jacob; 
and in the other, I^Ial. i. 2, 3. he sajs, I lovedjfacoh., and hated 
Esau^ and laid his mountains tvaste ; so that if, in both these 
scriptures, referred to by the apostle, nothing else be intended 
but the difference that should be put between them as to the 
external dispensations of providence, or that Jacob's family, in 
future ages should be in a more flourishing state than that of 
Esau, v.e must not suppose that he designed thereby to repre- 
sent them as chosen to, or excluded from eternal life. 

This seems a very plausible sense of the text ; but yet the 
apostle's words may very well be reconciled with those two 
scriptures, cited to enervate the force of the argument taken 
from it ; and at the same time, it will not follow from thence, 
that there is no reterence had to the doctrine of eternal elec- 
tion therein. Therefore, 

1. We will not deny, when it is said, yacoh have I loved^ 
end Esau have I hated^ that their respective descendants were 
intended in this prediction, yet it will not follow from hence, 
that Jacob and Esau, personally considered, were not also in- 
cluded. Whoever reads their history, in the book of Genesis, 
will evidently find in one the marks and characters of a person 
chosen to eternal life ; whereas, in the other, we have no ac- 
count of any regard which he expressed to God or religion, 
therefore he appears to have been rejected; yet, 

2. So far as it respects the posterity of Jacob and Esau Vv'e 
are not to suppose that God's having loved the one, and rejected 
the other, implies nothing else, but that Jacob's posterity had 
a better country allotted for them, or exceeded Esau's in those 
secular advantages, or honours, which were conferred upon 
tht-m. This seems to be the principal sense, which they, on the 
other side of the question, give of the apostle's words ; when 
comparing them with those of the prophet Malachi, who, 
speaking concerning Esau's being hated, explains it, as relating 
io his lands being laid waste for the dragons of the xvilderness. 
This had been foretold by some other prophets, Jer. xlix. 17, 
18. Ezek. XXXV. 7, 9. Obed. ver. 10. and had its accomplish- 
ment soon aucr the Jews were carried captive into Babylon, 
from which time they ceased to be a nation; but, certainly, 
tliough this be that particular instance of hatred, which the 
prophet Malachi refers to, yet there is more contained in the 
word, as applied to them by the apostle Paul. It is true, the- 
prophet designs, in particular to obviate an objection which the 
Jews are represented as making, ag-uinst the divine dispensa- 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 457 

tjons towards them, as though they had not such an appearance 
of love, as lie supposes theiu to have had, therefore they are 
brought in as speakuig to this purpose : how canst thou say, 
that God has loved us, Avho have continued seventy years cap- 
tives in Babylon, and since oiu* return from thence, have been 
exposed to many adverse dispensations of providence ? The 
prophet's reply is to this effect : that, notwithstanding, they still 
remained a nation, and therefore were in this respect, more the 
objects of the divine regard, than the posterity of Esau were, 
which is represented as hated, for they never returned unto their 
former state ; or what attempts soever they made to recover it, 
thty were all to no purpose. This the prophet alleges, as a 
sufficient answer to the Jews' objection, in the same sense in 
which they understood the words, love or hatred; but, doubt- 
less more than this was contained in the prediction before Ja- 
cob and Esau were born, and in the apostle's application of it, 
in the text before-mentioned. If nothing Avere intended but 
outward prosperity, or their vying Avith each other in worldly 
grandeur, Esiiu's posterity, in this respect, might be concluded 
to have been preferable to Jacob's ; thus when thej'- are reckon- 
ed, by their genealogies. Gen. xxxvi. they are many of them 
described as dukes and kings who made a considerable figure 
in the world. When Jacob's posterity were few in number, and 
bondmen in the land of Egypt, and when the Israelites were 
carried captive into Babylon, the Edomites are represented by 
the prophet, as looking on, and rejoicing in their destruction, 
as being, at that time, in all appearance, secure, and enjoying 
their former liberty. 

Neither could this love or haired signify nothing else but 
the descendants of Jacob being planted in a more fruitful soil ; 
for there is little difference put between them, in this respect, 
in the patriarchal benediction pronounced by their father, who 
tells Jacob, that God would g-ive hhn the dexv of heaven^ and 
the fatness of the earthy and plenty of corn and wine ; and to 
Esau he says, 77??/ dwelling- shall be the fatness of the earthy 
and the dew of heaven from above^ chap, xxvii. 28, compared 
with 39. therefore, when one is described, in the prediction, a' 
I(j\ ed, and the other as hated, we are not to suppose, that out- 
ward prosperity on the one hand, or adversity on the other, 
are jirincipally intended thereby, for that might be said of both 
of tiiem by turns ; therefore let me add, 

3. That God's loving or hating, as applied to the posi.erit'' 
of Jacob or Esau, principally respects his determining to give 
or deny the external blessings of the covenant of grace, or the 
means of grace, and therewith many special tokens of his fti- 
\oui-. In Jacob'ii line the church was established, out of wliicb, 
us has been befuie obsened, there was a remnant chosen, and 

Vo),. I„ 3 M 



456 THE DOCIRIME Ol LLKC IIOIV. 

biougVit to eternal life; Iioav fjir this may be said of Esau's, h 
hard to determine. 

Object. 1. But to this it will be objected, that Job and his 
friends were of Esau's posterity, as is more than probable ; 
but these were far from being rejected of God. 

Answ, To this it may be replied, that a few single instances 
are not sufficient to overthrow the sense we have given of this 
divine oracle, since the rejection of Esau's posterity may take 
its denomination from the far greater number thereof, without 
including in it every individual, as it is very agreeable to the 
sense of many scriptures. Moreover, we may consider, that 
these lived, as we have sufficient ground to conclude, before 
the seed of Jacob were increased, and advanced to be a dis- 
tinct nation, as they were after their deliverance from the 
Egyptian bondage ; as also before that idolatry, which first 
overspread the land of Chaldea, in Abraham's time, had uni-^ 
versally extended itself over the country of Idumea, M'here 
Esau's family was situate ; so that it doth not follow from 
hence, because this prediction did not take place in a very con- 
siderable degree, in the first descendants fron\ him, that there- 
fore it does not respect their rejection, as to what concerns the 
spiritual privileges of that people afterwards. And, indeed, 
idolatry seems to have had some footing in the country where 
Job lived, even in his time, which gave him occasion to excul- 
pate himself from the charge thereof, when he signifies, that 
he had not beheld the sun ruhen it shineth^ or the moon -walking i?i 
bnght7iess^and his heart had not been secretly enticed^ or his month 
kissed his hand^ Job xxxi. 26, 27. alluding to some modes of 
worship, practised by idolaters in his day, who gave divine ho- 
nour to the sun and moon ; and, soon after his time, before Is- 
rael had taken possession of Canaan, there seems to have been 
an universal defection oi the Edomites from the true religion, 
Otherwise, doubtless, Moses might, without any difficulty, have 
got leave to have passed through their country, in his way to 
the land of Canaan, which he requested in a most friendly and 
obliging manner, but to no purpose. Numb. xx. 14 — 21. espe- 
cially considering they had no reason to fear that they would 
tlo any thing against them in a hostile manner ; therefore the 
unfriendly treatment they met with from them, proceeded from 
vhe same spring with that of the Amalekites, and other border- 
ing nations, namely, they had all revolted from the God and 
religion of their father Abraham ; so that this prediction seems 
to have been lultiHed, before the promise, respecting Jacob's 
posterity, in any considerable degree, began to take place. 

Having briefly considr-red this objection, we return to the 
argument, namely, ^that God's loving or hating, in this scrip- 
ture, as it hiis a relation t<; the distinct nations that descended 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 459 

from Jacob and Esau, includes in it his determining to give or 
deny the external privileges of the covenant of grace, Vi^hich we 
generallv call the ordinances, or means of grace. These were 
the spiritual and more distinguishing instances of divine favour, 
which Jacob was given to expect, when he obtained the bless- 
ing. As for the double portion, or the greatest part of the pa- 
ternal estate, that descended with it, together with the honour 
of having dominion over their brethren, or a right (as it is pro- 
bable they had) to act as civil magistrates in their respective 
families, these were all small things, if compared with those 
spiritual privileges, wherein God's love to Jacob, and his pos- 
terity, was principally exprf;ssed ; it was this which is so often 
signified by God's being the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Ja- 
cob : In other respects, Esau was blessed as well as Jacob ; for 
the apostle, speaking concerning that part of Isaac's prediction., 
which respected the temporal advantage of their posterity, says, 
that he hlesaed Jacob and Esau^ concerning things to come^ Hcb. 
xi. 20. yet Esau was rejected, as to what concerns the spiritual 
part of the blessing, which v/as his birth-right, that he is said 
to have despised^ Gen. xxv. 34. and, for this reason, he is sty- 
led, by the apostle, a profane person^ Heb. xii. 16. If it had 
been only a temporal privilege that he contemned, it might have 
been a sin ; but it could not then have been properly said to 
have been an instance of profancness, for that has respect onlv 
to things sacred; therefore it evidently appears, that the bless- 
ings v/hich Esau despised, and God had before designed to 
confer on Jacob, and his seed, as a peculiar instance of his love, 
were of a spiritual nature. 

Object. 2. It will be farther objected, that men's enjoying 
the external privileges of the covenant of grace, has no imme- 
diate reference to their salvation, or election to it. 

Amnv. Since salvation is not to be attained, but by and un- 
der these means of grace, we must conclude, that whenever 
God bestows and continues them, to a chvnch or nation, he has 
a farther view therein, namely, the calling some, by his grace, 
to partake of those privileges that accompany salvation. If there 
were no such blessings to be conferred on the world, there 
would be no means of grace, and consequently no external dis- 
pensation of the covenant of grace ; for it is absurd to suppose 
that any thing can be called a meaiis, where all are excluded 
from the end which they refer to ; therefore the sum of thi-i 
argument is, that God had a peculiar love to the posterity of 
Jacob, and accordingly he designed to give them those privi- 
leges which were denied to others, namely, the means of grace, 
which he would not have done, had he not intended to make 
them effectual to the salvation of some of them ; and this pur- 
pose, relating hereimto, is what is called election, which, though 



460 THE DOC; IIXNE 0^ ELFCTiON. 

k be not applicable to all the seed of Jacob ; for all, as the apos- 
tle says elsewhere, are not Israel who are of Israel ; yet, inas- 
much as there was a remnant of them, to whom it was applied, 
they are that happy seed, who are represented, by the apostle, 
as the objects of God's compassion, or vessels unto honour^ in 
ivhom he designed to make knoxon the riches of his glory ^ havings 
in this respect, afore prepared them unto glory ^ Rom. ix. 15, 
21, 23. 

Thus having considered that God has chosen a part of man- 
kind to salvation, we may, without being charged with a vain 
curiosity, enquire whether this privilege belongs to the greater 
or smaller part of mankind, since the scripture goes before us 
in this matter* If we judge of the purpose of God by the exe- 
cution thereof, it must be observed, that hitherto the number 
of those, who have been made partakers of the special privile- 
ges of the gospel, has been comparatively small. If we look 
back to those ages before our Saviour's incarnation, what a very 
inconsiderable proportion did Israel bear to the rest of the 
world, who were left in darkness and ignorance ! And, after 
this, our Saviour observes, that many rvere called^ in his time, 
butfexv rvere chosen^ Matt. xx. 16. and he advises to enter in 
at the strait gate, chap. vii. 13, 14. by which he means the way 
to eternal life, concerning which he says, that there are, com- 
paratively, y^ry that find it. And when the gospel had a greater 
spread, and wonderful success attended the preaching thereof, 
by the apostles, and many nations embraced the Christian faith, 
in the most flourishing ages of the church, the number of Chris- 
tians, and much more of tliose who wei-e converted, and effec- 
tually called, was comparatively small. Whether the number 
of true believers shall be greater, when there is a greater spread 
of the gospel, and a more plentiful effusion of the Spirit, to 
render it more successful, as we hope and pra^' for that time, and 
that not altogether without scripture-warrant ; I say, Avhether 
then the fewness of those who have hitherto been chosen and 
sanctified, shall not be compensated, by a far greater number, 
who shall live in that happy age of the church, it is not for us 
to be over-curious in our enquiries about : However, we may 
determine this from scripture, that, in the great day, when all 
the elect shall be gather^^d together, their number shall be ex- 
ceeding great, if what the apostle says refers to this matter, as 
some suppose it does, when he speaks of a great multitude^ 
rvhich no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and 
people and tongues, rvho stood before the thrsne, and before the 
Lamb, clothed xvith xvliite robes, and palms in their hands. Rev. 
vii. 9. But these things are no farther to be searched into, than 
as we may take occasion, from thence, to enquire whether we 
are of that number; and, if we are, we ouc^ht to bless (iod for 



THE DOGTRIHE OF 5LECTI0N. 461 

his discriminating grace, which he lias magnified therein. And 
this leads us to consider, 

2. That they who are chosen to salvation, are also ciiosen 
to sanctification, as the means thereof: As the end and means 
are not to be separated in the execution of God's decree, so 
they are not to be separated in our conception of the decree rt-^ 
self; for, since God brlngo none to glory, but in a way of ho- 
liness, the same he determined to do hoia all t tcrnity, that is, 
to inake his people holy, as well as happy ; or lust to give them 
laith and repentance, and then, the end of their faith, the sal- 
vation of their souls. 

There are many scriptures, in which the purpose of God, 
relating hereunto, is plainly intended; as when it is said, He 
hath chosen us that rue should be holy^ and without blame^ before 
htm in love^ Eph. i. 4. and elsewhere the apostle tells others, 
that God had^ from the beginnings chosen them unto salvation^ 
through sanctification of the Spirit^ and belief of the truth^ 2 
Thes. ii. 13. and the apostle James saith, that God hath chosen 
the poor of this roorld^ rich in faith ^ and heirs of the kingdom ^ 
James ii. 5. and elsewhere the apostle Paul speaks of persons 
being predestinated to be conformed to the image of his Son^ 
which he explains of their being called^ justifed^ tuvA glorified ^ 
Rom. viii. 29. and it is also said, speaking of those who were 
converted under the apostle Paul's ministry, as many as wer^- 
ordained unto eternal life believed^ Acts xiii. 48. according!) 
thev were ordained to one as well as the other. 

The argument, which seems very plainly contained in these, 
and such-like scriptures, is, that God's eternal purpose respect, 
the grace that his people are made partakers of here, as well as- 
the glory that they expect hereafter, which are inseparably con- 
nected ; this cannot reasonably be denied by those who are not 
willing to give into the doctrine of election : But if the insepa- 
rable connexion between faith and salvation be allowed, as hav- 
ing respect to the execution of God's purpose, it will be no dii- 
ficult matter to prove that this was determined by him, or that 
liis purpose respects faith, as well as salvation. Therefore the 
main thing^ in controversy between us is, whether this grace., 
that accompanies salvation, is wrought by the power of God, 
or whether it depends on the free-will of man. That which in- 
duces them to deny that God has chosen persons to faith, is 
this supposition ; that that which is the result of man's free- 
will, cannot be the object of God's unchangeable purpose, and 
consequently that God has not chosen men to it. This is the 
hinge on which the whole controversy turns, and if the doctrine 
of special efficacious grace be maintained, all the prejudices 
against that of election would soon be removed ; but this we 
must refer to its proper place, being obliged to insist on that 



462 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 

subject in some following answers ;* and, what may be farther 
considered, concerning the absoluteness of election, as one of 
the properties that belong to it, under a following head, will 
add some strength to our present argument. All that we shall 
do, at present, shall be to defend our sense of the scriptures, 
but now referred to, to prove that election respects sanctifica- 
tion, as well as salvation ; and that it does so, is plain from the 
first of them, in Eph. i. 4. which proves that holiness is the end 
of election, or the thing that persons are chosen to, as appears 
from the grammatical construction of the words : It is not said 
he had chosen us, considered as holy, and withiout blame, but 
that we should be holy ;f that which is plainly intended, as the 
result of election, cannot be the cause and reason of it. 

As to what the apostle says, in 2 Thess. ii. 13. God hath^ 
from the beginnbig^ chosen you unto salvation^ through sancti- 
ficatwn of the Spirit^ and belief of the truth^ that plainly inti- 
mates, that sanctification is the end of election; and therefore 
the principal answer that some give to it, which appears to be 
an evasion, is, that the apostle does not speak of eternal elec- 
tion, because God is said to have done this from the beginning, 
that is, as one explains the words, from the beginning of the 
apostle's preaching to them : But if we can prove that there 
is such a thing as a purpose to save, it will be no difficult mat- 
ter to prove the 'eternity of the divine purpose ; and tiiis is not 
disagreeable to the sense, in which the words, From the begin- 
nmg', are elsewhere used.:]: 

As for that other scripture, in James ii. 5. where it is said, 
God hath chosen the poor of this world^ rich in faith, and heirs 
of the kingdom. / here the words. That they may be,§ (which 
are inserted by the apostle, in the scripture but now mentioned) 
n:iay, without any strain on the sense thereof, be supplied, and 
so the meaning is, God hath chosen them, that they might be 
rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdo)7i: But if it will not be 
allowed, that these v/ords ought to be supplied, the sense is the 
same, as though they were these, " God has chosen the poor of . 
this vt'orld, who are described as rich in faith, to be hc^irs of 
the kingdom ;" and so we distinguish between election's being- 
founded upon faith, and faith's being a character by which the 
elect are described ; and, if faith be a character by which thev 
are described^ then he who enabled them to believe, purposed 
to give them this grace, that is, he chose them to faith, as wcii 
as to be heirs of the kingdom. 

As for that other text, in Rom. viii. 29. He hath predesti- 
nated us to be conformed to the image of his Son ; these words, 
to be, are supplied by our translators, as I apprehend they ought, 

* See Qnestims Ixvii, Ixvili, lxx% Ixxv, Ixxvi. -j- nyoi >;u^'. ayiii;. '■ S'-v 
Prov. viii 23. ^ fiv:'.i. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 463 

?oi the reason but now mentioned, taken from the parallel scrip- 
ture, m Eph. i. 4. But, to evade the force of the argument, to 
prove that we are predesthiated to grace, as well as to glor}', 
they who deny this doctrine, give a very different turn to the 
sense of this text, as though the apostle only intended hereby, 
that the persons, whom he speaks of, were predestinated to an 
afflicted state in this life, a state of persecution, in which they 
are said to be conformed to the image of Christ ;* But though 
it is true that believers are said to be made partakers of the 
sufferings of Christ, and, by consequence, are predestinated 
thereunto, yet that does not appear to be the sense of this text, 
as not well agreeing with the context ; for the apostle had been 
describing those, whom he speaks of, as loving God, and 
called according to his purpose, and then considers them as 
predestinated, to be conformed to the image of his Son, \vhieh 
must be meant of their being made partakers of those graces, 
in Vv hich their conformity to Christ consists, as well as in suf- 
ferings ; and then he considers them, in the following verse, 
as called^ justified, and glorijied; and all this is the result of 
tiieir being predestinated. 

As for that scripture, in Acts xiii. 48. As many as were or- 
dained to eternal life believed ; their faith is here considered as 
rhe result of their being ordained to eternal life, or they are 
represented as pi'edestinated to the means, as v/ell as the end. 

Object. 1. But it will be objected by some, that this is not 
agreeable to the sense of the Greek word here used;f partly, 
because it is not said they were fore-ordained to eternal life, 
but ordained; and the genuine sense thereof is, that they were 
disposed to eternal life, and consequently to faith, as the means 
thereof. And this is also taken in a different sense ; some 
h 'ppose that it imports a being disposed, by the providence of 
Ciod, or set in order, or prepared for eternal life ; others, 
r.greeably to the exposition which Socinus, and some of his 
follov^ers, give of the text, (which sense a late learned writer 
falls in with t) understand the words, as signifying their hav- 
ing an internal disposition, or being well inclined, as having an 
earnest desire after eternal life, for which reason they believ- 
ed ; or were fitted and prepared for eternal life, by the temper 
of their minds, and accordingly they believed. 

Answ. 1. If the word, which we render ordained^ be justly 
translated, the thing which they were ordained to, being some- 
thing that was future, it is, in effect, the same, as though it 
were said they were fore-ordained to it, as Beza observes .§ 

2. Su])pose the word ought rather to be translated, they 
were disposed unto eternal life ; that seems to contain in it a 

* Vid. Grot ui lor ~ TtTnyjuiw, t Vid. WhUby in toe. § Vid Beza 
:n he. 



454 IHE DOCIRINE OJi ELECTION. 

metaphor, taken from a general's disposing, or ordering his 
soldiers to their respective posts, or employments, to which he 
appoints them, and so it is as though he should say, as many 
as God had, in his providence, or antecedent purpose, intend- 
ed for salvation, believed, inasmuch as faith is the means and 
way to attain it ; and that amounts to the same thing with our 
translation. But, 

3. As to that other sense given of it, viz. their being inter- 
nally disposed for eternal life, it seems very disagreeable to 
the import of the Greek word ; and those texts, that are gen- 
erally brought to justify this application thereof, appear to be 
very much strained and forced by them, to serve their pur- 
pose ;* and, indeed, if the word would bear such a sense, the 
doctrine contained therein, namely, that there are some inter- 
nal dispositions in men, antecedent to the grace of God, where- 
by they are fitted and prepared for it, does not well agree with 
the sense of those scriptures, which set forth man's natural op- 
position to the grace of God, before he is regenerate and con- 
verted, and his enmity against him ; and others that assert the 
absolute necessity of the previous work of the Spirit, to pre- 
pare for, as well as excite the acts of faith. 

Object. 2. It is fiirther objected, that it cannot respect their 
being ordained, or chosen to eternal life, who believed, inas- 
much as none that plead for that doctrine suppose that all, v/ho 
are elected in one place, believe at the same time ; had it been 
said, that all, who believed at that time, were ordained to e- 
tenial life, that would be agreeable to what is maintained by 
those who defend the doctrine of election; but to say, that 
all, who are elected to eternal life, in any particular city, are 
persuaded to believe at the same time, this is what they will 
not allow of : besides, it is not usual for God to discover this 
to, or by, the inspired writers, that, in any particular place, 
there are no more elected than those who are, at any one time, 
converted ; and, indeed, it is contrary to the method of God*s 
providence, to bring in all his elect at one time, therefore we 
cannot suppose that this was revealed to the inspired writer, 
and consequently something else must be intended, and not 
eternal election, namely, that all those that were prepared for 
eternal life, or who were disposed to pursue after it, believed.f 

* The principal text that Dr. Whitby refers to, as justifyi7\g his sense of the 
vord, is in Acts xx. 13. We went to Assos, there intending to take in PauJ, for 
so had he appointed, minding himself to go afoot; tlie viords are, cvru yufi nv 
anTtlu.yiJi.ini fjiiWay Avro; TTi^iuuv ; yvhich he understands as though the ineimirg- 
\:>as, that tlie apostle xuas disposed, in his otvn mind, to go afoot ; biit that sense is 
not agreeable to the scope of the text, for the nieuiiitig of it seems to be this : TJiat 
It toas determined, m^dered, or preconcerted by them, before they set sail, that Paid 
should be taken in at ..issos, since he ivas to go there afoot ; so that this makes no- 
thing to that author'' s purpose, but rather to the sense that ~.ce have given of the 
iiionl. f See Grot, in loc. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 46^ 

Ansru. When the apostle says, as many as were ordained to 
eternal life believed, we are not hereby led into this hidden 
mystery of the divine will, so as to be able to judge, whether 
more than they that then believed, were ordained to it in that 
place ; but the meaning is, that there were many that believed, 
and that ail of them \\ere ordained to eternal life; and so it is 
as though he should say, that God has a people in this place, 
whom he has ordained to eternal life, v/ho were to be convert- 
ed, some at one time, others at another : some of them were 
converted at this time, to wit, a part of those who were or- 
dained to eternal life, if more were ordained to it; so that the 
objection supposes that the words, which we render, as many 
as, imports the whole number of the elect in that place; where- 
as, we think that the meaning is, that there were many who 
believed, and these were only such who were ordained to eter- 
nal life, of which there might be many more, who then did 
not believe, but hereafter should ; but this remained a secret, 
which the inspired writer was not led into, nor we by him. 

Object. 3. There is another objection, which the learned au- 
thor,* (whose paraphrase on the New Testament, and dis- 
course on election, I am sometimes obliged to refer to in con- 
sidering the objections that are made against this doctrine) pro- 
poses with a great deal of warmth ; and if no reply can be gi- 
ven to it, it will be no wonder to find many prejudiced against 
it ; his words are these : " If the reason why these men believ- 
*' ed be only this, that they were men ordained to eternal life 
*' the reason why the rest believed not, can be this only, that 
" they were not ordained by God to eternal life : and, if so 
" what necessity could there be that the word of God should be 
" first preached to them, as we read, ver. 46. was it only that 
" their damnation might be the greater ? This seems to charge 
*' that Lover of souls, whose tender mercies are over all his 
" works, with the greatest cruelty, seeing it makes him deter- 
" mine, from all eternity, not only that so many souls as capa= 
" ble of salvation as any other, shall perish everlastinglv ; but 
" also to determine, that the dispensations of his providence 
" shall be such towards them, as necessarily tends to the ag- 
" gravation, of their condemnation ; and what could, even their 
*' most malicious and enraged enemy, do more ? What is it the 
" very devil aims at, by all his temptations, but this very end 
" viz. the aggravation of our future punishment? And'there- 
*' fore to assert that God had determined that his word should 
" be spoken to these Jews, for this very end, is to make God 
" as instrumental tp their ruin, as the very devil, and seemeth 
" wholly irreconcileable with his declarationa, that he would 

* See Br. Wldtby in loc. 

Vol. I. 3 N 



466 THE DOCTRINE OI ELECTION. 

*' have all men to be saved, and would not that any man should 
" perish." 

Anszu. According to this author, we must either quit the 
doctrine we are maintaining, provided it be the same as he re- 
presents it to be, or else must be charged by all mankind, with 
such horrid blasphemy, as is shocking to any one that reads it, 
as charging the Lover of souls with the greatest cruelty, and 
with acting in such a way, as their greatest enemy is said to 
do ; determining, that the dispensations .of his providence should 
tend to aggravate their condemnation, and that the gospel should 
be preached for this end, and no other. But let the blasphemy 
rest on his misrepresentation, and far be it from us to advance 
any such doctrine ; therefore that which may be considered, in 
answer to it, is, 

1. The immediate reason why men believe to eternal life, 
is, because God exerts the exceeding greatness of his power, 
whereby he works faith ; and the reason of his exerting this 
power, is, because he determined to do it, as it is the execu- 
tion of his purpose. 

2. It does not follow, from hence, that the only reason why 
others do not believe, is, because they were not ordained to 
eternal life. It is true, indeed, that their not having been or- 
dained to eternal life, or God's not having purposed to save 
them, is the reason why he does not exert that power that is 
necessary to work faith : and unbelief will certainly be the con- 
sequence thereof, unless man could believe without the divine 
energy ; yet the immediate spring and cause of unbelief, is the 
corruption and perverseness of human nature which is charge- 
able on none else but man himself. We must certainly distin- 
guish between unbelief's being the consequence of God's not 
working faith, whereby corrupt nature takes occasion to exert 
itself, as being destitute of preventing grace ; and its being the 
effect hereof. Is God's denying the revengeful person, or the 
nuirderer, that gi'ace, which would prevent his executing his 
bloody designs, the cause thereof? Or his denying to others 
the necessary supply of their present exigencies, the cause of 
their making use of unlawful means, by plundering others to 
subsist themselves ? No more is his denying special grace, 
which he was not obliged to give to any, the cause of men's 
unbelief and impenitency ; for that is to be assigned only to that 
wicked propensity of nature, which inclines us to sin, and not 
to the divine efficiency ; and how farsoever this may be the re- 
sult of God's determining to deny his grace, it is not to be 
reckoned the effect of that determination. 

3. The design of the word's being preached, is not to aggra- 
vate the damnation of those that shall not believe, according to 
this vile suggestion ; but that men might be hereby led to know 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 467 

their duty and that the sovereignty of God, and the holiness 
of his law, which requires faith and repentance, as- well as man's 
obligation hereunto might be made known to the world. I do 
not deny, but that unbelief, and the condemnation consequent 
thei-eupon, is aggravated by the giving of the gospel, for that 
appears from many scriptures. Matt. xi. 21. Luke x. 13. as 
when our Saviour upbraids Chorazin, Bethsaida, Capernaum, 
and other places, amongst whom he was conversant, with their 
unbelief, and represents their condemnation as greater than 
that of others, who were destitute of those privileges : But yet 
it is a malicious insinuation, to suppose we conclude that the 
gospel was given for this end ; and we must still distinguish 
between the greater aggravation of condemnation's being the 
result of giving the gospel, or the remote consequence thereof, 
and its being the effect of it in those that reject the gospel, and 
much less the design of God in giving it. 

4. God's denying that grace, which would have enabled men 
to believe, is not to be charged as an instance of cruelty, any 
more than his denying it to fallen angels, but it is rather a dis- 
play of his justice. He was not obliged to give grace to any 
of the apostate race of man ; shall therefore his denying the 
grace of faith be reckoned an instance of cruelty, when we con- 
sider the forfeiture that was before inade thereof, and man's 
propensit}' to sin, which is chargeable only on himself? 

5. God's purpose to deny the grace of faith to those whom 
he has not ordained to eternal life, is not inconsistent with that 
scripture, 1 Tim. ii. 4. in which it is said, that he ivill have oil 
men to be saved; so that, as will be farther observed elsewhere,* 
it respects either God's determinining ihat salvation should be 
applied to all sorts of men, or else his declaring by his revealed 
will, that it is the duty of all men to believe, and to acknow- 
ledge the truth, as made known to them in the gospel. 

3, They who are elected to salvation, are chosen in Christ ; 
thus it is expressly said, in Eph. i. 4. He hath chosen us in him^ 
before the foundations of the xvorld. We are not to suppose that 
the apostle intends hereby, tliat wc are chosen for the sake of 
Christ, as though any of his mediatorial acts were the ground 
and reason thereof; for election is an act of sovereign grace, 
or is resolved into the good pleasui-e of the will of God, and 
is not to be accounted a purchased blessing ; therefore when 
we speak of the concern of the Mediator, with relation here- 
unto, this is to be considered as a means ordained by Ciod, to 
ijring his elect to salvation rather tlian the foundation of their 
election. This proposition necessarily follovvs from the former; 
for if they, who are chosen to the end, are chosen to the means, 
then Christ's mediatorial acts being the highest and first means 
• See Qt^est. xliv, Ixviij. 



4^8 Tli£ DOCTRINE Of ELILCTION. 

of salvation, God's eternal purpose respects this, as subservient 
thereunto. 

There are some very considerable divines,* who distinguish 
between our being chosen in Christ, as an Head, and being cho- 
sen in him as a Redeemer ; and accordingly, they conclude, that 
there are two distinct relations, in which the elect are said to 
stand to Christ, both which are mentioned by the apostle, when 
he says, Christ is the Head of the church, and the Saviour of the 
body, Eph. V. 23. and they are also mentioned distinctly else- 
where. He is the Head of the body, the church, and then it fol- 
lows, that he made peace through the blood of the cross. Col. i. 
18, 19, 20. and they add, that the elect are considered as his 
members, without any regard had to their fallen state ; and that 
the blessings contained therein, are sucli as render their condi- 
tion more honourable and glorious, than otherwise it would 
have been, had they been only considered as creatures, w' ithout 
any relation to him as their Head ; and this Headship of Christ 
they extend not only to men, but to the holy angels, whom they 
suppose to be chosen, in this respect, in Christ, as well as men, 
and that it is owing hereunto that they have the grace of con- 
iii-mation conferred upon them ; and it also follows, from hence, 
that Christ would have been the Head of the election of grace, 
though man had not fallen, and that our fallen state rendered 
that other relation of Christ to his elect necessary ; so that as 
they are chosen to salvation, they are chosen in him as a Re- 
deemer, designed to bring about his great work for them, and, 
for this end, set up, as it is expressed, yrow everlasting, Prov. 
viii. 23. 

This distinction of Clu'ist's double relation to the elect, is, 
doubtless, designed by those who thus explain this doctrine to 
advance his glory ; notwithstanding it remains still a matter of 
doubt to me, whether Christ's Headship over his church be not 
a branch of his Mediatorial glory ; and, if so, it will be very 
difficult to prove that a Mediator respects any other than man, 
and him more particularly considered as fallen; and according- 
ly, God did not design hereby to advance him to an higher 
condition, than what was barely the result of his being a crea- 
ture, but to deliver him from that state of sin and misery, into 
which he foresav/ that he would plunge himself. Therefore, in 
considering the order of God's eternal purpose, relating to the 
salvation of his people, we must suppose that he first designed 
to glorify all his perfections in their redemption and salvation ; 
and, in order hereunto, he fore-ordained, or appointed Christ 
to be their great Mediator, in whom he would be glorified, and 
l»y whom this work was to be brought about : He appointed him 
«o be their Head, Surety, and Redeemer; first, to purchase 
* See Dr. Coiilwin, vol. 2. of election. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 469 

salvation for them ; and then, to make them meet for it, in the 
same, order in which it is brought about hy him in the execu- 
tion thereof; so that, as the glory of God, in the salvation of 
the elect, was the end, Christ's redemption was the means 
more immediately conducive thereunto, and, as such, he is said 
to be fore-ordained, to Avit, to perform those offices that he 
executes as Mediator, 1 Pet. i. 20. and as Christ, when he was 
manifested in the flesh, did all things for his people, that were 
necessary to bring them to gloiy, he is, in God's purpose, con- 
sidered as the great Mediator, by whom he designed this work 
ghould be brought about : thus he is set forth in the gospel, as 
a propitiation for sin ; and the apostle seems to speak of it, 
as what was the result of God's purpose, in Rom. iii. 25. whom 
God hath set forth to be a propitiation ; the Greek word * 
properly signifies, as it is observed in the marginal reference, 
fore-oi'dained so to be ; and accordingly, we must consider him 
as from all eternity in God's purpose, appointed to be the fede- 
ral Head of those who are said to be chosen in him, and to 
have all the concerns of the divine glory, relating to their salva- 
tion, committed to his management. 

V. We shall now consider the properties of election, and 
how the divine perfections are displayed therein, agreeably to 
what is said concerning it in scripture. 

1. As it is taken for the purpose of God, relating to the 
sanctification or salvation of men, as distinguished from the ex- 
ecution thereof, it is eternal : This is evident, because God is 
eternal, his purposes must be concluded to be of equal duration 
with his existence ; for we cannot suppose that an infinitely 
wise and sovereign Being existed from all eternity, Avithoutany 
fore-thought, or resolution what to do, for that would be to sup- 
pose him to have been undetermined, or unresolved, when he 
first gave being to all things; nor is it to be supposed that there 
are any new determinations in the divine will, for that would 
argue him to be imperfect, since this would be an instance of 
mutability in him, as much as it would be for him to alter his 
purpose ; but neither of these are agreeable to the idea of an in- 
finitely perfect Being. 

Moreover, if God's purpose, with respect to the salvation of 
men were not eternal, then it must be considered as a new af- 
ter-thought arising in the divine mind, which, as to its first rise, 
is but, as it were, of yesterday, and consequently he would have 
something in him that is finite. If it be contrary to his om- 
niscience to have new ideas of things, it is equally contrary to 
the sovereignty of his will to have new determinations, there- 
fore all his purposes were eternal. 

3. God's purpose relating to election, is infinitely wise and 



4T0 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

holy. This appears from the footsteps of infinite wisdom, and 
holiness, which are visible in the execution thereof, namely, in 
bringing men to giace and glory ; nothing is more conspicuous 
than the glory of these perfections in the work of redemption, 
and the application thereof; as hereby the salvation of man is 
brought about in such a way, that the glory of all the divine 
perfections is secured, and the means made use of, as conducive 
thereunto, the most proper that could have been used, therefore 
it is a work of infinite wisdom. And inasmuch as herein God 
discovers the infinite opposition of his nature to sin, and there- 
by advances the glory of his holiness, it follows from hence, 
that these perfections of the divine nature had their respective 
concern, if we may so express it, in the purpose relating here- 
unto ; for whatever glory is demonstrated in the execution of 
hir. purpose, that was certainly before included in the purpose 
itself. 

3. The purpose of God, relating to the final state of man, is 
secret, or cannot be known, till he is pleased to discover it. 
Nothing is more obvious than this ; for even the purposes or 
resolutions of creatures are secret, till they are made known by 
them : thus the apostle says. What man knotveth the things of a 
man^ that is, what he designs to do, save the spirit of a man^ 
-which is in him ? and infers, in the following words, so the 
things of God knoweth no inan^ but the Spirit ofGod^ 1 Cor. ii. 
12. and elsewhere he says. Who hath knoxvn the mind of the 
Lord? or who hath been his councellor ? Rom. xi. 34. And, for 
this reason, it is called, The mystery of his xvill^ Eph. i. 9. and 
this also follows from its being eternal, therefore it Avas hid in 
God, from before the foundation of the world, and consequent- 
ly would for ever have been so, had he not, by his works, or 
■word, made some discoveries thereof, to those whom he first 
brought into being, and then gave some intimations of his pur- 
pose to them. 

Therefore it could not have been known that God had purpo- 
sed to save any, had he not revealed this in the gospel : much 
Jess have any particular persons ground to conclude themselves 
to be elected, without first observing those intimations which 
Oiod has given, "whereby they may arrive at the knowledge 
thereof. This head ought to be duly considered, by those who 
deny, and are prejudiced against this doctrine, though it be 
genei-aliy neglected in the methods they take to oppose it ; for 
they will not consider the distinction we make between God's 
having chosen a person to eternal life, and a person's having a 
right to conclude that he is thus chosen ; but take it for granted, 
that if there be such a thing as election, that we must necessa- 
lily determine ourselves to be the objects thereof, and ought to 
regulate our future conduct accordingly. It is from thence they 



THE DOCiRiN£ Of ELECTION. 471 

conclude, that the doctrine of elt- ction leads nu n to presump- 
tion, or gives them occasion to say, that they may live as they 
list ; whereas we suppose that it is an instaixe of prcsax^nptiou 
in any one to determine that he is electetl, unless there be some 
discovery hereof made to him ; and this discovery cannot tak^ 
its rise from God, unless it be accompanied with that holiness, 
which is, from the nature of the thing, inconsistent v/ith our be- 
ing led hereby to licentiousness. And here we take occasion to 
consider, that God does not make known his secret purpose, re 
lating to this matter, to any, by inspii-ation, especially since th?;;: 
extraordinary dispensation of pi-ovidence is ceased ; and, indeed, 
it never was his ordinary way to discover it hereby to these, 
who, in other instances, were favoured with the gift of inspira- 
tion. The means therefore by which we come to the knowledge 
hereof, is, by God's giving certain marks, or evidences of grace, 
or by shewing us the effects of the divine power, in calling and 
sanctifying us, whereby we have a warrant to conclude that we 
were chosen to eternal life ; and, whilst we make a right im- 
provement thereof, and conclude that our judgment, concern- 
ing our state, is rightly founded, or not, by the holiness of our 
lives, we are in no danger of abusing this great and important 
doctrine, to tiie dishonour of God, or our ov^a destruction. 

This leads us to consider a distinction, which we ai-e often 
obliged to make use of, when we speak concei-ning the will of 
God, as secret or revealed, by which we account for the sense 
of many scriptures, and take occasion from it to answer several 
objections that are brought against this doctrine. I am sensible 
that there is nothing advanced in defence thereof, which they, 
who are in the other way of thinking, are more prejudiced a- 
gainst, than this distinction, which they suppose to contain a re- 
proachful idea of the divine Majesty, and is the foundation of 
many popular prejudices against the doctrine we are defending, 
as though we hereby intended that God has a secret meaning, 
different from what he reveals ; or that we are not to judge of 
his intentions by those discoveries which he makes thereof, 
which it would be the highest reproach to charge any creature 
with, and contrary to that sincerity which he cannot be destitute 
of, btit he is hereby rendered the object of detestation ; there- 
fore no one, who conceives of an holy God, in such a way as he 
ought to do, can entertain a thought, as though the least appear- 
ance thereof were applicable to him. HoM^ever, this is the com- 
mon misrepresentation that is made of this distinction. Wheth- 
er it arises from its being not sufficiently explained by some ; 
or a fixed resolution to decry the doctrine of election, and ren- 
der it odious, as it must certainly be, if supported by a distinc- 
tion, understood in so vile a sense, 1 will not determine. How- 
ever, that we may remove this prejudice, and consider how it 



472 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

is to be understood, in a sense more agreeable to the divine per-' 
fections, we shtill proceed to explain it ; and here we may observe, 

Firsts That the will of God is sometimes taken, in scripture, 
for that which he has, from all eternity, determined, which is 
unchangeable, and shall certainly come to pass, Avhich is im- 
possible for any creature to disannul, resist, or render ineffectu- 
al ; and it is such a branch of divine sovereignt)^, that to deny 
it, would be, in effect, to deny him to be God. This the apos- 
tie intends, when he represents the malicious and obstinate sin- 
ner as replying against God, and defending hiniself in his bold 
crimes, by saying, IVht/ doth he yet find fault ; for who hath re- 
sisted his xvill? Rom. ix. 19, 20, 21, 22. In answer tb which, he 
asserts the sovereignty of God, and that he is not accountable to 
any for what he does, nor to be controuled by them ; and this is 
also intended in another scripture, in Eph. i. 11. where it is 
said, that God worketh all things after the counsel of his own 
xvill ; and elsewhere he says. My counsel shall standy and I will 
do all my pleasure^ Isa. xlvi. 10. This will of God is the rule 
of his own acting, and, as it determines the event of things, it 
is impossible for him to act contrary to it ; and it is equally dis- 
agreeable to his perfections, to signify to his creatures, that he 
determines to do one thing, but will do another ; therefore, in 
this sense, we are far from asserting that there is a revealed will 
of God, which contradicts his secret. 

Secondly y We often read, in scripture, of the will of God, as 
taken for what he has prescribed to us, as a rule of duty ; and 
also of our judging concerning the apparent event of things. 

(1.) The will of God may be considered as a rule of duty, 
which is a well-known and proper sense of his revealed will : 
thus our Saviour teaches us to pray. Let thy ■will be done on 
earthy as it is in heaven,- by which he principally intends his 
revealed will, or law. Enable us to yield obedience to thy law, in. 
our measure, as thou art perfectly obeyed in heaven. So our 
Saviour says. Whosoever shall do the xvill of God^ the same is my 
brother^ and my sister ^ and mother^ Mark iii. 35. which can be 
meant of no other than his revealed will, or of his law, in which 
it is contained j because no one can act contrary to God's de- 
termination, which is that sense of his will, contained in the 
foregoing head ; and, consequently, a doing his v.dll, in that 
sense, would not have been laid down as a distinguishing char- 
acter of those whom Christ preferred above all, who were rela- 
ted to him in the bonds of nature. 

Again the apostle understands the will of God in this sense, 
when he says. Thou knowest his xvill^ Rom. ii. 18. where he 
speaks to the Jews, who were instructed out of the law, in which 
it is contained ; and elsewhere, Eph. vi. 6. he speaks of his will, 
as what is to be obeyed, and therefore gives this description of 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 473 

faithful seiTants, that they do the xvill of God^ namely, what lie 
has commanded, from the heart. And there are many other 
scriptures thus to be understood j and this we call his revealed 
will, as it ifi the rule of duty and obedience. 

(2.) The revealed will of God may be considered as a rule 
which he has given us, whereby we are to judge of the appa- 
rent event of things. I make this a branch of God's revealed 
will, inasmuch as sometimes he condescends to discover future 
events to his creatures, which otherwise they could never have 
known ; but yet there is a difference, as to the manner of their 
judging thereof, puisuant to the intimations which he has given 
them. Accordingly, when God has told us expressly, that this 
or that particular thing shall come to pass, then we are infalli- 
bly sure concerning the event, and need no other rule to judge 
of it, but by considering it as revealed : As Vt'hen God has said, 
that there shall be a general resurrection of the dead, and that 
Christ shall come to judgment, and receive his redeemed, and. 
sanctified ones, to heaven, to behold his glory, we are inf;iilibly 
assured of these events, because they are expressly revealed ; 
and, when we speak of the secret and revealed will of God, as 
applicable to things of this nature, we intend nothing else here- 
by but what all will allow of, viz, that what v/ould have been 
for ever a secret, had it not been discovered, is now revealed, 
and therefore ceases to be so ; and in that sense, the revealed 
will of God, in all' respects, agrees with his secret ; in this case, 
we suppose that God expressly revealed the event. 

But there are other instances, in which the event of things is 
not expressly revealed ; as when God has only discovered to us 
what is the rule of our duty. Nevertheless;, since it is natural 
for man, when any duty is commanded, to pass some judginent 
concerning the event thereof; and, inasmuch as we suppose the 
event not expressly revealed, it follows, that the judgment, which 
we pass concerning it, is only what appears to us, or what, ac- 
cording to our rule of judging, seems to be the probable event 
of things. In this case we are not infallibly assured concerning 
it ; and when we pass a judgment relating thereunto, we ma) 
conclude that some consequences may attend our pi-esent duty, 
which, perhaps, will never come to pass. As if a general of an 
army gives forth a command to his soldiers, to marcli towarue> 
the enemy, they will readily conclude, that he designs, by thii 
command, that they should enter on some action, which, had 
he expressly told them, he must either change his purpose, or 
else the event must certainly happen ; but, inasmuch as he has 
not discovered this to them, all the judgment that they can form, 
at present, concerning it, is only such, as is founded on the ap- 
pearance of things, and the event might probably afterwards 
shew, without any impeachment of his veracity or conduct here- 

VOL. I. SO 



4r4'' THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTiONr 

in, that his only design was to try whether his soldiers would 
obey the word of command, or riot. Or if a king should order 
a number of malefactors to the place of execution, without dis- 
covering the event thereof, the apparent event is their immedi- 
ate death ; but if, pursuant to his secret purpose, he resolved^ 
there to give forth a pardon to them, it cannot be supposed that 
he changed his purpose ; but the event makes it appear, that 
his purpose was not then known ; whatever the apparent event 
might be, his real design was to humble them for their crimes, 
and afterwards to pardon them. 

It is only in such-like instances as these, that we apply this 
distinction to the doctrine that we are maintaining ; and there- 
fore it must be a very great stretch, of malicious insinuation, 
for any one to suppose, that hereby we charge God with in- 
sincerity in those declarations of his revealed will, by which 
we pass a probable judgment concerning the event of things. 
But to apply this to particular instances. God commanded 
Abraham to offer up his son Isaac, Gen. xxii. 2. whereas it 
is certain, unless we suppose that he altered his purpose, that 
he intended, not that he should lay his hand upon him, but, 
Avhen Isaac was upon the altar, to forbid him to do it. Here 
was a great and a difficult duty, which Abraham was to perform 
pursuant to God's revealed will, which was the rule of his obe- 
dience ; had Abraham known, before this, that God designed 
to hold his hand, and prevent him from striking the fatal blow, 
it had been no trial of his faith ; for it would have been no difficult 
matter for him to have done every thing else. The holy patri- 
arch knew well enough that God could prevent him from doing 
it ; but this he had no ground to conclude, because he had no 
divine intimation concerning it ; therefore that which appeared 
to him to be the event, was the loss of his son, and he reconciled 
this with the truth of the promise before given him, that in 
Isaac his seed should be called^ by supposing that God, at some 
time or other, would raise him from the dead^ as the apostle 
observes, Heb. xi. 19. therefore that which Abraham concluded 
as judging, not by iua express revelation, but by the voice of 
providence, was, that Isaac must be slain by his hand : But 
this was contrary to the real event, as is evident, from the ac- 
count thereof in scripture; and, consequently since the real 
event was agreeable to the divine determination, as all events 
are, it follows, that there is a difference between the wiK of 
God, determinirig the event of things, which shall certainly 
come to pass accordingly ; and the revelation of his will, relating 
to what is the creatures present duty, which may, at the same 
time, appear to them, when judging only by the command, 
■which is the rule of duty, and some circumstances that attend 
't, to be coutiary to what will afterwards appear to have been 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 475" 

Ae real design of God therein. God's real design was to try 
Abraham's faith, and to prevent him from slaying his son, when 
he had given a proof of his readiness to obey him ; but this re- 
mained, at first, a secret to Abraham, and the apparent design 
was, that he should slay him. Therefore there is a foundation 
for this distinction, as thus explained, concerning tl>e secret and 
revealed will of God ; the former belongs not to us, nor are we 
to take our measures from it, as being unknoAvn : and, when 
the latter appears contrary to it, we must distinguish between 
two things, that are contrary in the same, and different respects ; 
or between the judgment which we pass concerning events, 
which are appai-ent to us, and, at most, are only probable and 
conjectural, as we judge of the consequence of a duty command- 
ed ; and those events, which, though they are infallibly certain, 
yet are not revealed, nor can be known, till they come to pass. 
In this sense we understand the distinction between God's 
secret and revealed will, when they seem to oppose each other ; 
which it was necessary for us thus to explain, inasmuch as we 
shall frequently have occasion to mention, and apply it, when 
we account for the diiference that there seems to be, between 
the purpose of God, relating to the event oi things, and our 
present views thereof, whereby we may understand and account 
for the difficulties contained in several scriptures, which I would 
have mentioned in this place, for the farther illustration hereof, 
had it been necessary. But this is sufficient to explain and 
vindicate it from the prejudices entertained against it, by those 
who are disposed to misrepresent what is said in defence of 
this doctrine. 

From what has been ?aid, concerning God's secret and re- 
vealed will, we may infer, 

Ist^ That it is a great boldness, and unwarrantable instance 
of presumption, for any one to enter into, or judge of God's 
secret purpose, so as peremptorily to determine, beyond the 
present appearance of things, that this or that shall certainly 
come to pass, till he makes them known ; for secret things be- 
long unto the Lord our God^ but those things 'which are revealed 
belong unto us, and to our children forever^ Duet, xxiv^ 29. 
Therefore no one ought to determine that he is elected to salva- 
tion, before the work of grace is wrought, and, some way or 
other, made visible to him ; or, on the other hand, to determine 
that he is rejected or reprobated, when he has no other ground 
to go upon, but uncertain conjecture, which would be a means 
to drive him to despair : that some are, indeeed, elected, and 
others rejected, is no secret because God has revealed tliis in 
'lis word; so that we may assert it as a proposition, undoubt- 
<'(lly true, when we do not apply it to particular persons; and 
therefore this doctrine has not that pernicious tendency^ whiplj 
rjiany pretend that it has^ 



4?'6 rilfi DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 

2r//y, The first act of saving faith does not consist in our be- 
lieving that we are elected ; neither is it the duty of unregene- 
rate persons, as such to apply this privilege to themselves any 
more than to conclude themselves rejected : But our business, 
is, so long as the purpose of God remains a secret to us, to 
attend on the means of grace, hoping and waiting for the dis- 
play of divine power, in effectually calling us ; and afterwards 
for the Spirit's testimony, or seal, to be set to it, whereby he 
discovers his own work ; and then it may, in some measure, be 
reckoned a branch of his revealed will and will afford us matter 
ef thanksgiving and praise to him, and a foundation of peace 
and comfort in our own souls. But this may be farther 'm~ 
sisted on, when we come to consider the improvement we ought 
to make of this doctrine. We proceed to consider tiie next 
property of election. 

4. It is fi-ee, and sovereign, or absolute, and unconditional ; 
for that ^\■hich would be a reflection on the divine perfections, 
if applied to God's method of working, is, by no means, to be 
said concerning his puipose to work, or, (which is the same) 
his decree of eleclion ; therefore if there are no obligations laid 
on him by his creatures, to display or perform any of his works 
of grace, but they are all free and sovereign, then it follows, 
that the fore-sight of any thing that shall be done by them, in 
time, could not be the motive, or reason of his purpose, or 
decree, to save them, or of his choosing them to salvation. 

This may be fai-ther argued, from the independence of the 
divine nature : if his nature and perfections are independent, 
his will must be so. But more particularly, 

(1.) The displa3's of God's grace, in time, are expressly re- 
solved into his sovereign pleasure, in scripture, in Rom. ix. 15, 
lie saith to Moses^ I will have mercij on xuhom I xvill have 
mercy; and I xvill have compassion on "whom I xvill have com- 
"^assion. And there are many other scriptures, which might 
be referred to, where all merit, or motives, taken from the 
creature, which might be supposed to induce him to bestow 
spiritual and saving blessings, are entirely excluded, and the 
"whole is resolved in to the glory of his own name, and in par- 
ticular, of those perfections which he designed herein to illus- 
trate. This is applied, even to the common blessings of provi- 
dence ; Nevertheless^ he saved them for his name^s sake^ that 
ke might make his mighty power to be knoxvn^ Psal. cvi. 8. and 
^:t is also applied to sparing mercy, or the exercise of God's 
patience, For my name''s sake will I defer mine anger, and for 
pty praise will I refrain for thee, that I cut thee not off, Isa. 
xlviii. 9. and to pardoning mercy, For thy name''s sake, U Lord^ 
pardon ?nine iniquity, for it is great, Psal. xxv. 11. And when 
Be is represented as doing great things for his people, he puts 



THE DOCTRINE 01 ELECTlOK. 477 

them in mind, at the same time, of their own vileness and im- 
worthiness, that the freeness and sovereignty of his grace, to 
them, might be more conspicuous : Thus, when he tells them 
how he delivered Israel out of Egypt, he puts them in mind 
of their idolatry in that land; therefore no motive could be 
taken, from their behaviour towards him, which could induce 
him to do this for them ; as it is said. But they rebelled against 
me,, and xuoidd 7iot hearken unto vie ; they did not every man 
cast away the abominations oj" their eyes,, neither did they forsake 
the idols of Egypt ; then I said,, I xvill pour out my fury upon 
them., to accomplish my anger against them,, in the midst of the 
land of Egypt. But I xvrought,, for my name's sake,, that it 
should not be polluted before the heathen,, among ruhom they 
ivere,, in whose sight J made myself known unto them,, in -bring- 
ing them forth out of the land of Egypt,, Ezek. xx. 8, 9. 

(2.) If the grace of God, and consequently his pui'pose re- 
lating thereunto, were not absolute, free, and sovereign, then all 
the glory thereof could not be attributed to him, neither would 
boasting be excluded ; but as the creature might be said to be 
a worker together with God, so he would lay claim to a share, 
if not to the greatest part of the honour, that will redound to 
him from it ; which is directly contrary to the divine perfec- 
tions, and the great design of the gospel. This will farther ap- 
pear, if we consider, 

\st. That a conditional purpose to bestow a benefit, cannot 
take effect till the condition be performed, and accordingly it 
is said to depend on it. This is obvious, from the known idea 
affixed to the word conditio7i, and the common signification 
thereof; it follows therefore, 

2dly. That the performance of the condition is the next, or 
immediate cause of a conditional purpose's taking effect ; and, 
to apply this to the case before us, 

3dly. If, on our performing the condition of God's purpose 
to save us, it be rendered effectual, which otherwise it would 
not have been, (agreeably to the nature of a conditional pur- 
pose) then we are more beholden to our own conduct, than the 
divine purpose, and so the glory thereof will be due to our- 
selves ; which would not only cast the highest dishonour on 
the divine perfections, but it is contrary to the design of the 
gospel, which is to stain the pride of all flesh, and take away 
all occasions of glorying, from the creature. Thus the prophet 
Isaiah, fore-telling the glory of the gospel-state, considers its 
tendency to humble the pride of man, when he says, The hfti- 
7iess of man shall be bozved down,, and the haughtiness of men. 
shall be made low,, and the Lord alone shall be exalted in that 
day,, Isa. ii. 17. and the apostle, describing the nature of faith, 
considers its tendency to exclude boasting ; Rom. iii. 27. and 



478 TH.E DOCTRINE OF ELECTION* 

our Saviour, speaking concerning the discriminating grace of 
God, that appears in election, either hi his purpose relating to 
it, or in the execution thereof, says, Te have not chosen me^ but 
J have chosefi ijou^ John xv. 16. thut is, you have done nothing 
that has laid any obligation on me to choose you by that act of 
faith, whereby you are inclined to prefer me to all others ; for 
this is the consequence and result of my discriminating grace. 

We shall now proceed to consider those arguments, which 
are generally made use of by those, who are in the other way 
of thinking, to support the conditionality of God's purpose, as 
well as of his works of grace, in opposition to what has been 
said concerning the freeness and sovereignty thereof. They 
generally allege those scriptures for that purpose, that are laid 
down in a conditional form ; as when the apostle speaks of such 
a confession of Christ •with the mouth,, as is attended with he- 
iiccmg in the hearty that God raised him from the dead^ and 
calling on the name of the Lord^ as connected with salvation, 
Rom. X. 9, 13. and our Saviour says, that whosoever believeth 
07t him should not perish^ but have everlasting life^ John iii. 15. 
and that he that believeth shall be saved^ Mark xvi. 16. and 
elsewhere, Except ye repent^ ye shall all likewise perish^ Luke 
siii. 3. and many other scriptures of the like nature ; from 
whence they argue, that since the dispensations of God's pro- 
vidence, the gifts of his grace, and the execution of his pur- 
pose are all conditional, the pui'pose itself must be so. Were 
it but allowed that election is conditional whether it respects 
tlve purpose or providence of God, we should meet with no op- 
position from those who are on the other side of the question; 
but as such a purpose to save, as is not absolute, peremptory, 
cr independent on the will of man, has many absurd conse- 
quences attending it, which are derogatory to the glory of the 
(sivine sovereignty, as has been already considered ; so this can- 
Tiot be the sense of tliose scriptures, that are laid down in a 
conditional form, as those and such-like are, that we have but 
now iTientioned ; for no sense of scripture can be true or .just, 
that has the least tendency to militate against any of the divine 
perfections ; so that there may without any strain or violence 
offered to the sense of words, be another sense put upon these, 
:md all other scriptures, in which we have the like mode of 
•speaking, whereby they may be explained, agreeably to the 
analogy of faith; therefore let us consider, 

1. That all such scriptures are to be understood as import- 
ing the necessary connexion of things, so that one shall not be 
fcrought about without the othei- ; accordingly, repentance, faith, 
and all other graces, are herein no otherwise considered, than 
as inseparably connected with salvation ; which depends upon 
one of those propositions, which was before laid down, viz, that 



THE DOCTRIXE OF ELECTION. ■i79 

God having chosen to the end has also chosen to the means. 
We are far from denying that faith and repentance are neces- 
sary to salvation, as God never gives one without the other, 
and consequently they are insepaiably connected in his eternal 
purpose relating thereunto. If nothing else were intended by 
a conditional purpose than this, we would not offer any thing 
against it ; but certainly this would be to use words without 
their known or proper ideas ; and die word condition^ as appli- 
cable to other things, is never to be understood in this sense. 
There is a necessary connection between God^s creating the 
world, and his upholding it, or between his creating an intel- 
ligent creature, and his giving laws to him ; but none ever sup- 
posed one to be properly a condition of the other : so a king's 
determining to pardon a malefactor, is inseparably connected 
with his pardoning him, and his pardon given forth, with his 
having a right to his forfeited life ; but it is not proper to say, 
one is a condition of the other ; so a person's seeing is insepa- 
rably connected with his opening his eyes ; and speaking, with 
the motion of his lips ; but we do not say, when lie determines 
to do both of them, that one is a condition of the other. A con- 
dition, properly speaking is that which is not only connected 
with the privilege that follows upon the performance thereof, 
but it must be performed by a subject acting independently on 
him who made the conditional overture, or promise. 

If it be said, that a duty, which we are enabled to perform 
by God, who promised the blessing connected with it, is pro- 
perly a condition, w^e will not contend about the propriety, or 
impropriety, of the word ; but inasmuch as it is taken by man)', 
when applied to divine things, in the same sense as in matters 
of a lower nature, and so used to signify the dependence of the 
blessings promised, or the efRcacy of the divine purpose, rela- 
ting thereunto, on our performance of the condition, v.hich is 
supposed to be in our own power, whereby we come to have a 
right and title to eternal life ; it is this that we principally mi- 
litate against, when we assert the absoluteness of God's purpose, 

2. Whatever ideas there may be contained in those scrip- 
tures, which are brought to support the doctrine we are oppos- 
ing, that contain in them the nature of a condition, nothing- 
more is intended thereby, but that what is connected with sal- 
vation is a condition of our claim to it, or expectation of it : In 
this sense, we will not deny faith and repentance to be condi- 
tions of salvation, inasmuch as it would be an unwarrantable 
instance of presumption, for impenitent and unbelieving sin- 
ners, to pretend that they have a right to it, or to expect the 
end without the means, since these are inseparably connected 
in God's purpose, as well as in all his dispensations of grace. 
This being Uid down, as a general rule for our understanding 



480 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

all those scriptures, which are usually brought to prove that 
God's purposes are sometimes conditional, we shall farther il- 
lustrate it, by applying it to three or four other scriptures, that 
are often brought in defence thereof, which we shall endeavour 
to explain, consistently with the doctrine we are maintaining. 

One is taken from Gen. xix. 22. where the angel bade Lot 
escape to Zoar^ telling him, that he could not do anij ^hing till 
he came thither. If we suppose this to have been a created an- 
gel, as most divines do, yet he must be considered as fulfilling 
the purpose of God, or acting pursuant to his commission ; and 
therefore it is all one, to our present argument, as though God 
had told Lot, that he could do nothing till he was gone from 
that place. It is plain, that he had given him to understand, 
that he should be preserved from the flames of Sodom, and that, 
in order thereunto, he must flee for his life ; and adds, that he 
could do nothing, that is, he could not destroy Sodom, consist- 
ently with the divine purpose to save him, till he was escaped 
out of the place ; for God did not design to preserve him alive 
(as he did the three Hebrew captives, in Daniel) in the fire, but 
by his escaping from it ; one was as much fore-ordained as the 
other, or was designed as a means conducive to it ; and there- 
fore the meaning of the text is, not that God's purpose, relating 
to Sodom's destruction, was founded on Lot's escape, as an un- 
certain and dubious condition, depending on his own will, ab- 
stracted from the divine determination relating to it ; but he 
designed that those two things should be connected together, 
and that one should be antecedent to the other ; and both of 
them, as well as their respective connection, were the object of 
God's absolute and peremptory determination. 

There is another scripture, sometimes brought to the same 
purpose, in Gen. xxxii. 26. where the angel says to Jacob, Let 
me go^ for the day breaketh ; and Jacob replies, Izviil not let 
thee go^ except thou bless me, which does not infer, that God's 
determinations were dependent on Jacob's endeavour to detain 
him, or his willingness to let him depart ; but we must consider 
Jacob as an humble, yet importunate suppliant, as it is said 
elsewhere, Weeping and making supplication^ Hos. xii. 4. Let 
me go, says God, appearing in the form of an angel, and speak-. 
ing after the manner of men, that he might give occasion to Ja- 
cob to express a more ardent desire of his presence and bless- 
ing, as well as to signify how unworthy he was of it ; not as 
though he was undetermined before-hand what to do, but 
since the grace which Jacob exercised, as well as the blessing 
which he received, was God's gift, and both were connected in 
the execution of his purpose, we must conclude that the pur- 
pose itself was free, sovereign, and unconditional. 

A^ain, there is another scripture, in which God condescends 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 48i 

to use a mode of speaking, not much unlike to the other, in 
which he says to Moses, speaking concerning Israel, in Exod. 
xxxii. 10. This is a stiff-necked people i noxo therefore let me 
alone^ that my wrath may xuax hot against them^ and that I may 
consume them ; we are not to suppose that the whole event was 
to turn upon Moses's prayer, as though God's purposing to save 
his people were dependent on it ; or that that grace, which in- 
clined him to be importunate with God, did not take its rise 
from him. Moses, indeed, when first he began to plead with 
God, knew not whether his prayer would be prevalent or no ; 
however, he addresses himself, with an uncommon degree of 
importunity, for sparing mercy ; and, when God says, Let me 
(done^ it signifies, that his people were unworthy that any one 
should plead their cause ; and, if God should mark iniquity, 
then Moses's intercession would be altogether in vain, and so 
he might as well let him alone, in that respect, as ask for his 
mercy. He does not, indeed, at first, tell him what he designed 
to do, that he might aggravate their crime, but afterwards he 
answers his prayer in Israel's favour, and signifies that he 
v/ould work, not for their sakes, but for his own name's sake ; 
so that he takes occasion, on the one hand, to set forth the peo- 
ple's desert of punishment; and, on the other, the freeness of 
his own grace. 

There is but one scripture more that I shall mention, among 
many that might have been brought, and that is what is said 
concerning our Saviour, in Matt. xiii. 58. that he could not do 
many mighty works there^ at that time, in his own country, be- 
cause of their unbelief? where he speaks either of their not . 
having a faith of miracles that was sometimes required, in those 
for whom they were wrought : or else of the unaccountable 
stupidity of that people, who were not convinced, by many 
others that he had wrought before them ; therefore he resolves 
to put a stop to his hand, and not, for the present, to work so 
many miracles amongst them, as otherways might have been 
expected : If we suppose that their want of faith prevented his 
working them, this is not to be considered as an unforeseen 
event. And as he had determined not to confer this privilege 
upon them, or to continue to work miracles amongst them, if 
those, which he had already wrought, were disregarded and 
despised by their unbelief, we must conclude that he had a per- 
fect knowledge of this before-hand, and that his determinations 
were not dependent on uncertain conditions, though he had re- 
solv^ed to act in such a way, as v/^as most for his own glory ; 
and that there should be an inseparable connexion l)etween that 
faith, which was their duty, and his continuing to exert di-v ine 
power, as an ordinance adapted to excite it. 

5. God's purpose concerning election is unchangeable ; this 

Vol. I. 3 P 



482 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

is the result of his being infinitely perfect. Mutability is an 
imperfection that belongs only to creatures : As it would be an 
instance of imperfection, if there were the least change in God's 
understanding, so as to know more or less than he did from all 
eternity ; the same must be said with respect to his will, which 
cannot admit of any new determinations. There are, indeed, 
many changes in the external dispensations of his providence, 
which are the result of his will, as well as the effects of his pow- 
er ; yet there is not the least appearance of mutability in his 
pui'pose. We have before considered, in speaking concerning 
the jmmutabilit}- of the divine nature *, that whatever may be 
a reason obliging men to alter their purposes, it cannot, in the 
least, take place, so that God hereby should be obliged to alter 
his : No unfoiseen occurrence can render it expedient for him 
to change his mind, nor can any superior power oblige him to 
do it ; nor can any defect of power, to bring about what he had 
designed, induce him to alter his purpose. 

If it be objc :ted to this, that the obstinacy of man's will may 
do it ; that is : > suppose his will exempted from the governing 
influence of divine providence, and the contrary force, that of- 
fers resistance, superior to it, which cannot be supposed, Avith- 
out detracting from the glory of the divine perfections. It would 
be a very unworthy thought for any one to conclude that God 
is one day of one mind, and another day forced to be of the 
contrary ; how far this is a necessary consequence from that 
scheme of doctrine that we are opposing, let any one judge. It 
will be very hard to clear it of this entanglement, which they 
are obliged to do, or else all the absurdities that they fasten on 
the doctrine of election, which are far from being unansAvera- 
ble, will not be sufficient to justify their prejudices against it. 

They who are on the other side of the question, are sensible 
that they have one difficulty to conflict with, namely, the incon- 
sistency of God's infallible knowledge of future events, with a 
mutability of will relating thereunto ; or how the independency 
of the divine fore-knowledge is consistent with the dependence 
and mutability of his will. To fence against this, some have 
ventured to deny the divine prescience ; but that is to split a- 
gainst one rock, whilst endeavouring to avoid another. There- 
fore others distinguish concerning the objects of the divine pre- 
science, and consider them, eithet as they are necessary or con- 
tingent, and accordingly suppose that God has a certain fore- 
knowledge of the former ; but his knowledge of the latter, (from 
the nature of the things known) is uncertain, and consequently 
the determination of his will is not unalterable. But this is to 
set bounds to the fore-knowledge of God, with respect to its 
object, and, indeed, to exclude the free actions of the creature 
* Seepage 137. 



THK DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 483 

from being the objects thereof, which is a limiting and lessen- 
ing of this perfection, and is directly contrary to the idea of 
omniscience ; and therefore we must insist on their proving this 
to be consistent with the infinite perfection of God, which they 
will find it very difficult to do ; and to suppose, on the other 
hand, that any thing is the object of God's certain fore-know- 
ledge, about which his will is no way conversant, or only so, 
in such a way, as that it is subject to change, according to the 
mutability of things, is altogether as indefensible, and equal- 
ly subversive of the independency, wisdom, and sovereignty 
thereof. 

Object. The most material objection against this doctrine, is 
taken from some scriptures, which seem to represent God as re- 
penting, and therein, as it is supposed, changing his purpose. 
Thus he is sometimes said to repent, that he had bestowed some 
blessings upon men, when he perceives how they have been 
abused by them, and accordingly he purposes to bring evil on 
them ; as we read, in Gen. vi. 6, 7. It repented the Lord that 
he had made rnan^ and it grieved him at his heart ; and the Lord 
said^ Ixvill destroy man^ -whom I have created ; and, at other 
times he is said to repent of the evil that he designed to bring 
upon them, and alter his purpose in their favour ; thus it is said, 
in Deut. xxxii. 36. The Lord shall judge his people^ and repent 
himself for his servants ; xvhen he seeth that their poxver is gone, 
and there is none shut up^ or left ; and in Joel ii. 13. Rend your 
hearts^ and not your garments^ and turn unto the Lord yout 
God; for he is gracious and merciful^ sloxv to anger ^ and of 
great kindness^ and repenteth hi?7i of the evil ; and in Psal. xc. 
13, Return^ Lord^ hoxv long ? and let it repent thee concern- 
ing thy servants ; and in Jer. xviii. 8. If that nation^ against 
ruhom I have pronounced^ turn from their evil, Ixvill repent of 
the evil that I have thought to do unto them. And we have a 
very remarkable instance of this, in God's sparing Nineveh, on 
their repentance, after he had threatened, by the prophet Jonah, 
that xvithin foj-ty days they should be destroyed, 

Ansxv. It is true, there are many scriptures, in whicli re*- 
pentance is ascribed to God, which, if we consider nothing else 
but the grammatical sense of the words, seem to favour the ob" 
jection ; but we are bound to conclude, that such a sense of re- 
pentance, as that on which it is founded, is inconsistent with 
the divine perfections, and therefore those scriptures, referred 
to therein, cannot imply a change in God's purpose. And, in- 
deed, there are other scriptures, which assert what is directly 
contrary thereunto ; as when it is said, in Numb, xxiii. 19. 
God is not a man^ that he should lye, neither the son of man, that 
he should repent ; hath he said, and shall he not do it f or hath 
he spoken^ and shall fr- no^ mnhf if good? And elsewhere, in 1 



484 THU DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

Sam. XV. 29. it is said, The strength of Israel will not lye^ nor 
repent ; for he is not a mem that he should repent. 

But we must have recourse to some methods to reconcile 
this seeming contradiction, and so consider the sense thereof, 
in different respects, as applicable to them both ; in some scrip- 
tures, God is said to repent ; in others, it is said that he can- 
not repent. That these may not appear inconsistent with one 
another, nor either of them infer any imperfection in God, let 
it be considered, that God is sometimes represented, in scrip- 
ture, in condescension to our common mode of speaking, as 
though he had human passions, as in others, he is described, 
as though he had a body, or bodily parts : But such expressions 
are always to be taken in a metaphorical sense, without the 
•least supposition, that he is subject to any such imperfections ; 
and particularly we must not conclude, that repentance is ever 
ascribed to God in the same sense as it is to men, viz, as im- 
plying a change in his purpose, occasioned by an unforeseen 
occurrence, which is the sense contained in the objection. Such 
a repentance, as this, is a passion peculiarly belonging to the 
creature, and therefore in this sense we must understand those 
words; God is not a man^ that he should lye,, nor the son of man ^ 
that he should repent ; accordingly, he is said to repent, not by 
changing his purpose, but by changing his work. Thus when 
it is said, that he repented that he had made many nothing is 
meant by it, but that he determined to destroy him, as he did 
afterwards by the flood. And this was no new determination 
arising from any thing in the creature, which God did not fore- 
see ; he knew before-hand that all flesh would corrupt their way, 
and therefore his determination to punish them for it, was not 
a new resolve of the divine will, after the sin was committed | 
but God determined things in their respective order, first to 
permit sin, and then knowing what would be the consequence 
thereof, namely, that they would rebel against him, he deter- 
mined to punish it, or to destroy the old world, which is, in 
eflfett, the same, as though he had repented that he made it. 
He cannot be said to repent as we do, by wishing that he had 
not done that which he is said to repent of, but by denying ub 
the advantage, which we might have otherwise expected from 
it. In this sense we are to understand all those scriptures that 
speak of God, as repenting of the good that he had bestowed 
on man. 

And, on the other hand, when he is said to repent of the evil 
which he threatened to bring on men, as in the case of Nineveh, 
this does not argue any change in his purpose ; for he deter- 
mined that Nine%'eh should be destroyed, provided they did 
not repent, and it was not uncertain to him whether they would 
repent or no ; for, at the same time, he determined to give them 



THE DOCTRIKE OF ELECTION. 485 

repentance, as appears by the event, and so not to inflict the 
judgment threatened ; and therefore when Jonah was sent to 
make a public proclamation to the people, that in forty days 
they should be destroyed, it is plain that they understood the 
threatning in this sense, that they had no ground to expect any 
thing else, except they repented, which accordingly they did, 
and so were spared, without having any reason to conclude that 
God changed his purpose relating thereunto. 

If it be objected hereunto, that this is nothing less than to 
establish a conditional purpose in God, and so overthrows the 
argument that we are maintaining ; the reply that may be made 
to it, is, that we distinguish between a conditional purpose, in 
God^s secret will, and a conditional proposition, which was to 
be the subject of the prophet's ministry : The prophet, it is 
plain, was not told, when he received his commission to go to 
Nineveh, that God would give them repentance, but only, that, 
without repentance, they should be destroyed ; whereas God, 
as the event makes it appear, determined that they should re- 
pent, and therefore that they should not be destroyed; and, con- 
sequently, we must not suppose, that, when God sent him, he 
was undetermined, in his own purpose, whether to destroy them 
or not, or that there was any thing conditional in the divine 
mind, that rendered the event uncertain to God, though there 
was a condition contained in the subject-matter of the prophet*s 
message, which the Ninevites very well understood, namely, 
that they had no ground to expect deliverance without repent- 
ance, and therefore they repented, in hope of obtaining mercy, 
which they supposed would be connected with their repentance; 
and it is evident, that Jonah himself suspected that this might 
be the event, though God had not told him that it would be so, 
and therefore says, in chap. iv. 2. For I knexv that thou art a 
gracious God^ and merciful^ slow to anger ^ and of great kind' 
ness, and repentest thee of the evil. 

6. The purpose of God, in choosing men to eternal life, ren- 
ders their salvation necessar}^ ; so that nothing shall defeat, or 
disannul it. What God says concerning Israel's deliverance 
from the Babylonish captivity, may be applied to all his other 
determinations, and particularly to what relates to the eternal 
salvation of his people ; My counsel shall standi and Ixvill do all 
my pleasure ; yea^ I have spoken ??, / -tvill also bring it to pass ; 
I have purposed it, Izvill also do it^ Isa. xlvi. 10, 11. The pur- 
poses of God, indeed, are distinguished from his bringing them 
to pass ; it is one thing to design to bring his people to glory, 
and another thing to bring them to it. It is not to be supposed 
that the decree of God has, in itself, a proper efficiency to pro- 
duce the thing decreed : * for then there would be no difference 

* This is what is rreant h th«tt ariom, tKed bv th ::ckof>l'77tfn, Decretnm Dei , 
nihil ponit in e5se. 



486 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

between an eternal decree, and an eternal production of things ; 
whereas the apostle plainly distinguishes between man's being 
predestinated to glory, and brought to it, when he says. Those 
ivhom he predestinated^ them he glorified^ Rom. viii. 30. 

The purpose of God, is, indeed, the internal moving cause, 
or the first ground and reason of the salvation of thos.. t^/ho are 
elected to it; but his power is the more immediate C3>jise of it, 
so that his purpose is the reason of his exerting this power, 
and both concurring to the salvation of men, render it certain 
and necessary. Therefore some distinguish, for the explaining 
of this, between the determining and powerful will of God; the 
latter of which, is sometimes called the word of his power, and 
renders the former effectual; this it must certainly do, other- 
wise God would be said to will the existence of things, that 
shall never have a being. In this respect, the purpose of God 
renders things necessary, which are in themselves contingei.:, 
or arbitrary, and would otherwise never come to pass."* 

This is a great encouragement to those who are enabled to 
make their calling and election sure ; for their perseverance in 
grace, notwithstanding all the opposition that they meet with, 
is the necessary consequence of their election to eternal life. 
Thus, as we before distinguished predestination into election 
and reprobation, we have considered the former of these, and 
we proceed, 

Secondly^ To speak concerning the doctrine of reproba- 
tion ; (ci) which is become obnoxious to those on the other side 
of the question, almost to a proverb ; so that if any doctrine is 
considered as shocking, and to be answered no otherwise than 
by testifying their abhorrence of it, it is compared to this of 
reprobation ; and, indeed, if it were not a consequence from the 
doctrine of election to eternal life, that doctrine would not be 
so much opposed by them. How far some unguarded expres- 
sions, or exceptionable methods of explication, may have given 

* Thus the school-men distinguish betiieen necessitas consequentis, and conse- 
quentise ; so that that, tohich is not in itself necessary, is rendered eventually so, as 
the conseqiiejice of God's purpose, that it shall be. 



(a) " There is no necessity for supposing a predestination to death, ai the 
same sense as unto life, that is to the means and the consequent end : For the 
occurrence of sin may be satisfactorily accounted for on other principles ; though 
without pretending to the removal of every difficulty in a subject the entire com- 
prehension of which is probably unsuited to our present state and faculties.* 

• It is acknowledged that this view of the subject is different from that which most Calvinis- 
tic writers have given. Yet several eminent divines have laid down the fundainentul principles, 
at least, of this sentiment, and have opened the way to it: particularly Augustine, Theophilus 
Gale, and a class ot German Theologians who mav be termed the school of Leibnitz A short 
sime ago an attempt was made to excite the attention of thinking men to his doctrine, by a Ser- 
tiUJH on the Divine glory, displayed by the Permission of Sin. But, since the publication of that 
VaiPjjhlet, the subject has been more ably and fully treated by my reverend tutor, the Rev. Dr, 
V'illiumr., in his DiscmrK en Predestin.ttion to L'/e, published very lately, 

SaiTU's LETT£JR3 to BstSHA^l. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOK, 487 

occasion for this prejudice, it is not to our present purpose to 
enquire; but we shall take occasion, from thence, to explain it 
in such a way, as that a fair and unprejudiced disputant will 
not see just reason to except against it, at least to reproach it, 
as though it were a doctrine subversive of the divine glory, 
and to be defended by none but those who seem to have a de- 
sign to raise prejudices, in the minds of men, against religion 
in general. 

And here we shall take occasion to consider the meaning of 
the word, as it is contained in, or deduced from scripture, where 
the same word that is used to signify the execution of this de- 
cree, may be applied to express the decree itself. Thus we read 
of God's rejecting, or disregarding men, as a punishment of 
their rebellion against him : and these are compared by the 
prophet Jeremiah, chap. vi. 30. To reprobate silver^ because the 
Lord hath rejected them; or, as it is in the margin. The refuse 
of silver ; and, in the New Testament, the same word * is some- 
times translated reprobates ; at other times, disapproved or re- 
jected, 1 Cor. iv. 27. 2 Cor. xiii. 5. Heb. vi. 8. and when this 
disapprobation, or rejection, respects not only their actions, as 
contrary to the holy nature of God, but their persons, as 
punished for their iniquities ', and when this punishment is con- 
sidered as what respects their eternal state, as the objects of 
vindictive justice, the purpose of God, relating hereunto, is 
what we call reprobation. 

But, that we may more particularly consider the sense of the 
word, it seems, in scripture, to contain in it two ideas. 

1. God's determining to leave a pai-t of the world in that 
state of sin and misery, which he from all eternity, fore-knew 
that they would bring themselves into, or his decreeing not to 
save them ; and, since all will allow that a part of mankind 
shall not be saved, it cannot reasonably be denied that this was 
determined by him before-hand ; and this is what divines gene- 
rally call preterition. 

2. There is another idea in the word reprobation^ which \?, 
also contained in scripture, or deducible from it, and that re- 
spects the purpose of God to punish those for their iniquities, 
whom he will not save. Not to be saved, is the same as to be 
punished xvith everlastinq- destruction^ from the presence of the 
Lord^ and the glory of his power. And God's purpose, relating 
hereunto, is expressed in scripture by his appointing them to 
rvrath^ 1 Thess. v. 9. for those sins which he fore-saw they 
would commit. This is what some call pre-damnation^ as taken 
from that expression of the apostle, Jude, ver. 4, 13. concern- 
ing some who had crept into the church unaxvares^ whom ho 
describes as ungodly men, that is, notoriously so, xvho turned 

* nSoKlfA'it, 



488 '1""E DOCTRINE or ELECTION. 

the grace of God into lasciviousness, for whom is reserved the 
blackness of darkness forever ; of these he says, that tlicy were 
before of old^ ordained to this condemnation^ where God is re- 
presented as punishing sinners, in proportion to their crimes; 
and this is considered as the resuh of that eternal purpose, 
which was founded on his fore-sight of their contracting that 
guih whereby they would render themselves liable to it. 

If this doctrine be thus explained, it will appear agreeable, 
jiot only to scripture, but to the divine perfections, and there- 
fore too great a truth to be treated with that abhorrence, with 
which it generally is, without explaining, distinguishing or fair- 
ly entering into the merits of the cause. It is a very easy mat- 
ter to render any doctrine odious, by misrepresentation, as they 
on the other side of the question, have done this of reprobation, 
which we shall briefly consider, and therein take leave to ex- 
plain it in a different manner, whereby it will appear not only 
worthy to be defended, as redounding to the glory of God, but 
a plain and evident truth, founded on scripture. 

If this doctrine were to be considered no otherwise, than as 
it is often represented by them, we should dislike it, as much as 
they do ; for when they pretend that we herein suppose God to 
be severe and cruel to his creatures, delighting himself in, and 
triumphing over them, in their misery : and that he decreed, 
from ail eternity, to damn the greatest part of mankind, with- 
out any consideration of their sin, as the result of his arbitrary 
will, or dominion, as he has a right to dispose of his creatures, 
according to his pleasure, and that as a means to attain this end, 
as though it were in itself desirable, he leaves them to them- 
selves, blinds their minds, and hardens their hearts, and offers 
these occasions of, and inducements to sin, which are as stum- 
bling-blocks in their way, and that he determined that his pro- 
vidence should be so conversant about the will of man, as that 
it should be under a natural necessity, or kind of compulsion, 
to what is evil, v/ithout considering the corruption and depra- 
vity of nature, as a vicious habit, which they had contracted ; 
and that all this is done in pursuance of this decree of repro- 
bation. 

It is very probable that many who give this account of this 
doctrine, have no other foundation for it, but the popular out- 
cry of those who are not apprised of the methods that are gene- 
rally taken to explain and defend it ; or else they suppose that 
it cannot be defended, without being exposed to those excep- 
tions which are contained in the account they give of it. But 
we shall take no farther notice of this, but proceed to explain 
and defend it another way. And, 

1. As to the former branch thereof, namely, pretention, or 
God's passing by, or rejecting those whom he hath not chosen 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 489 

to salvation, let it be premised ; that God, in his eternal pur- 
pose, considered all mankind as lallen, which must be supposed 
to have been foreknown by him, otherwise he would not be said 
to be omniscient, and the result of his fore-knowledge is his de- 
termining to leave a part of them in their fallen state, in which 
he miglit have left the whole world to perish without being lia- 
ble to the least charge of injustice. This is what we call his 
rejecting them, and accordingly it is opposed to his having cho- 
sen the rest to eternal life. These terms of opposition are plain- 
ly contained in scripture : thus it is said, The election hath ob- 
tained it^ and the rest rvere blinded^ Rom. xi. 7. not by God's 
leading them into mistakes, or giving them false ideas of things, 
but they were left to the blindness of their minds, which was the 
result of their apostasy from God ; and elsewhere our Saviour 
says. Thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent^ and 
hast revealed them unto babes^ Matt. xi. 25. Thou hast hid, that 
is, not revealed them; and that either objectively, as respecting 
those who are destitute of the light of the gospel; or subjec- 
tively, as he did not eifectually, or savingly enlighten them witli 
the light of life, by revealing Christ in them^ as the apostle calls 
it. Gal. i. 16. and therefore it is as though he had said, thou hast 
determined not to give to some the means of grace, nor to others 
the saving efficacy thereof, such as they are partakers of, who 
are chosen to salvation. Accordingly, he is said to have suf- 
fered all luitions to walk in their oxvn ways^ Acts xiv. 16. that 
is, not to restrain or prevent the breaking forth of corruption, 
as he might have done; and elsewhere, to have winked at ^ chap, 
xvii. 30. that is, as it may be rendered, over-looked the greatest 
part of the world, which is no other than his rejecting or pass- 
ing them by ; and in this sense we are to understand that diffi- 
cult mode of speaking used by the apostle. Whom he will he 
hardeneth^ Rjom. ix. 1 8. by which nothing else is intended but 
his purposing to leave many to the hardness of their own hearts. 
God forbid that any one should think that there is a positive act 
contained in those words, as though God infused hardness into 
the hearts of any ; for the meaning is only this, that he deter- 
mined to deny heart-softening grace to that part of mankind, 
whom he had not fore-ordained to eternal life. That there was 
such a purpose relating hereunto, is evident, because whatever 
God does in the methods of his providence, is the result of an 
eternal purpose. This no one, who observes the dispensations 
of God's providence, and allows as every one must do, that all 
that he does was pre-concerted by him, can justly deny. 

But that which must be farther enquired into, as to this mat- 
ter, is, whether God's determining to pass by a part of mankind, 
be an act of sovereignty or of justice. And this may also be 
judged of, by the external dispensation of his providence; so 

Vol. I. 3 Q 



490 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOK. 

far as there is sovereignty, or justice, Ansible in them, w& are 
to conchide that this purpose, relating thereunto, was the result 
of one or other of these perfections. In some respects it is an 
act of sovereignty : As, lor instance, that God should give one 
nation the gospel, or the means of grace, and deny it to ano- 
ther; it is not because he sees any thing in one part of the world, 
that obliges him thereunto, more than in the other ; but the 
reason is, as was observed in the scripture but now mentioned, 
because it seemed good in his sight., Matt. xi. 26. Moreover, 
his giving special grace, whereby some are effectually called 
and sanctified ; and denying it to others, is an act of sovereign 
pleasure. 

But on the other hand, God is said sometimes, in the exter- 
nal dispensations of his providence, to leave men to themselves, 
to give them up to their own hearts lust, in a judicial way, 
which supposes not only the commission of sin, but persons 
being obstinate and resolutely determined to continue in it. 
Thus God saith concerning his people ; Israel would none of 
me ; so I gave them up to their oxvn hearta'' lusts^ and they xvalk- 
ed in their orv7i counsels, Psal. Ixxxi. 11, 12. and the Psalmist 
says elsewhere, Add iniqvitij to their iniquity, Psal. Ixix. 2^. 
which words I would rather consider as a prediction than a 
prayer, or as an expression of the church's acquiescence in 
God's righteous judgments, Avhich they had ground to con- 
clude, that he would inflict on an impenitent, incorrigible peo- 
ple ; these are expressed, by adding iniquity to iiiiquity, not as 
though he designed to infuse any habit of sin into them, for 
that IS inconsistent with the holiness of his nature ; but that he 
would reject, and leave them to themselves, in a judicial way, 
as a punishment inflicted on them for their iniquities, the con- 
sequence whereof would be their own adding iniquity to ini- 
quity. Thus, in different respects, the purpose of God, in pass- 
ing by a part of mankind, mav be considered, either as the re- 
suit ol his sovereign pleasure, or as an act of justice. 

2. We shall now proceed to consider the other branch of re- 
probation, which some call pre-damnation, or (to use the scrip- 
ture—expression before referred to) God's fore-ordaining those 
who shall not be saved, to that condemnation, which they shall 
fall under, as exposing themselves to it by their ov/n wicked- 
ness ; which is nothing else but his determining, from all eter- 
nity, to punish those, as a judge, Avho should, by their own 
crimes, deserve it, and thereb)' to vindicate the holiness of his 
nature and laAV. Here kt it be obser\ ed, that vv'hen this doc- 
trine is reproached or misrepresented, it is described as an act 
of divine sovereignty, but that we are as read> to deny and op- 
pose as they are, since, according to the description we have 
given of it, it can be no other than an act of iustice ; for, if to 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 491 

condemn, or punish, be an act of justice, then the decree, rela- 
ting hereunto, must be equally so, for one is to be judged of 
by the other. If God cannot punish creatures as such, but as 
criminals and rebels, then he must be supposed to have consi- 
dered them as such, when, in his eternal purpose, he determined 
to punish them. No man can style this an act of cruelty, or 
severity in God, but those who reckon the punishing of sin to 
be so, and are disposed to charge the Judge of all with not do- 
ing right, or offering an injuiy to his creatures, when he pours 
forth the vials of his wrath on them, who, by their bold and 
wilful crimes, render themselves obnoxious thereunto. 

Here let it be considered, that God, in his actual providence, 
is not the author of sin, though he suffer it to be committed in 
the world. And, since his permitting, or not hindering it, can- 
not be said to be the cause of its being committed, there being 
no cause thereof, but the Avill of man ; it follows, from hence, 
that God's punishing sin, is not to be resolved into his permis- 
sion of it, as the cause thereof, but into the rebellion of man's 
will, as refusing to be subject to the divine law ; and thus God 
considered men, when, in his eternal purpose, he determined 
to condemn those, whose desert of this punishment was fore- 
seen, by him, from all etei^nity. And is this a doctrine to be 
so much decried ? 

I cannot but wonder the learned author, whom I have before 
referred to, as opposing this doctrine,* should so far give into 
the common and popular way of misrepresenting it, unless he 
designed, by this way of opposing it to render it detested; when 
he speaks concerning them, mentioned in Jude, ver. 4. -who 
■were before^ of old^ ordained to this condevinat'ion^ he says, 
"■ This cannot be meant of any divine ordination, or appoint- 
" ment of them, to eternal condemnation, because it cannot be 
" thought, without horror, that God doth thus ordain men to 
" perdition, before they had a being." If he had expressed his 
horror and resentment against God's ordaining men to perdi- 
tion, as creatures, it had been just; but to express this detes- 
tation against God's ordaining men to perdition, who are de- 
scribed as these are, is to expose this doctrine without reason ; 
and it is still more strange that he should cast this censure upon 
it, when he owns in his farther explication of this text, " That 
" God ordaineth none to punishment but sinners, and ungodly 
" men, as these persons here are styled, and that these were 
" men of whom it was before written, or prophesied, that they 
" should be condemned for their wickedness ;" since there is 
not much difference in the method of reasoning, between say- 
ing that the condemnation of sinners, for their wickedness, was 
before written, or prophesied, and saying, that God fore-ordain- 
ed them to eternal punishment. 
' * See Whitby's Paraphrase, £^c. on Jude, ver. 4. 



492 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

I am sensible that many are led into this mistake, by suppo- 
sing that we give a verv injurious and perverse sense of that 
text, in which the doctrine of reprobation is contained, which, 
it may be, has occasioned this reproach to be cast upon it. For 
when the apostle says, in Rom. ix. 22. IFhat if God rvilling to 
shew his xvrath, and to make his porver knoxvn^ endured with 
much long'Suffering^ the vessels of xvrath fitted to destruction^ 
some suppose that we understand this text, as though these 
vessels of wrath were, from all eternity, prepared for destruc- 
tion by God, and that his eternal purpose, is his fitting them 
for it, as intending to bring about that end, viz. his destroying 
them. But if any have expressed themselves in such a way, as 
is equivalent thereunto, let them be accountable for their own 
sense of the text ; though this I may say, that some, even of 
them, who give into the Supralapsarian way of explaining the 
doctrine of predestination, have not understood it in this sense ;* 
and the sense Avhich I would give of it is this, that those, whom 
the apostle speaks of as vessels of wrath, are persons whom 
God had rejected, and from the foresight of the sins which 
they would commit, he had appointed them to xvrath^ which is 
an expression the apostle uses elsewhere, 1 Thess. v. 9. but 
they were appointed to wrath, not as creatures, but as sinners; 
they are described as fitted to destruction, not by God's act, 
but their own, and that is the reason of their being fore-ordain- 
ed to it,f 

There is another scripture, which is generally cited by those 
who treat on this subject, that we are to use the utmost caution 
in explaining, lest we give just occasion, to those who oppose it, 
to express their abhorrence of it, as inconsistent with the divine 
perfections, namely, what the apostle says concerning those that 
were not elected, whom he calls the rest of the Jewish nation, 
in Rom. xi. 7 — 10. that they xvere blinded^ and that God had 
given them the spirit of slumber^ eyes that they should not see^ 
and ears that they should )\ot hear ; and he speaks of their table 

* Thus Beza in Ice. calls them vessels, becmise, as creatures, they are the -work- 
manship of God, the great potter, but vessels prepared for destruction by themselves, 
and therefore adds, Exitii veras causas minimc negem in ipsis vasis hrerere juxta 
iWwA per ditio, tua ex te est. 

j- It ought to btl observed, that the ivord, here used, is x.ctT>;pTt(7/uivei w tf!ra>>.ticLy, 
and not 7rpcK,*T»pT/5'«6i'* ; nor is there any thing added to the -word, that signifies, that 
this preparation thereunto was antecedent to their being ; or as thougli it took its rise 
from Cod, as the catise of that sin for which he designed to punish them; -whereas, 
on the other hand when the apostle in the following verse, speaks of God's inaking 
known the riches of his glor\ on the vessels ot" mercy, to wit, the elect, they are 
described as those whom he had afore prepared unto glory, a TrpohToi/uita-iv w ^o^-j-v. 
What should be the reason that the apostle alters the phrase, but that we may hereby 
be led to consider, that wlien God cho.se the elect to glory they are considered in his 
pxirpose as those whom he designed, by his grace, to make meet for it ! So that the 
vessels of wrath are considered as fitting themselves for destruction ; the vessels of 
mercy, as persons whom God wotdd first prepare for, and then bring to glory. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION". 493 

being' made a snare., and a trap and a stumbling-block., and a 
recompense to them; let their eyes be darkened., that they may 
not see., and bow down their back always. The sense which they, 
who misrepresent this doctrine, suppose that we put upon this 
scripture, is, tliat they, who arc reprobated, have, as a conse- 
quence thereof, occasions of sin laid in their way, some things 
designed to blind their minds, cast a mist before their eyes, and 
so lead them out of the way, and other diings, that prove a snare 
to them, a trap, and occasion of sin, and all this with a design to 
bring about that damnation which God had ordained for them, 
in this decree of reprobation ; v-^hich sense of this scripture 
never was, nor could be given, by any one, who has a due re- 
gard to the divine perfections. 

And shall this doctrine be judged of hereby, when it is very 
hard to find any, how unguarded soever they are in their modes 
of speaking, that understand this text as they represent it ? We 
shall therefore consider what is probably the meaning of this 
scripture, with which the doctrine we have laid down is very 
consistent. It is not to be understood as though God were the 
audior of these sins, which they are said to be charged with ; 
but this blindness and stupidity, which is called, A spirit of 
slumber as it is connected with the idea of their being rejected 
of God, and his determining not to give them the contrary gra- 
ces, is considered, as the consequence, not the effect thereof, 
and that not the iranaediate, but the remote consequence there- 
of, in the same sense as stealing is the consequence of poverty, 
in those who have a vicious inclination thereunto. Thus when 
a person, who has contracted those habits of sin, that tend to 
turn men aside from God, is destitute of preventing and re- 
straining grace, the consequence thereof, is, that these corrup- 
tions will break forth with greater violence ; and God is not 
obliged to give this grace to an apostate, fallen creatui-e, much 
less to one who has misimproved the means of grace, by which 
a multitude of sins might have beeii prevented ; so that nothing 
is intended hereby but this, that they are left to themselves, and 
permitted to stumble and fall, and to commit those abomina- 
tions, which, if they had not been thus judicially left, would 
iiave been prevented, and as the consequence thereof, they run 
into many sins, which they might have avoided ; for though we 
suppose that it is not in a man's own power, as destitute of the 
grace of God, to bring himself into a regenerate or converted 
state, (as will be farther considered, in its proper place) never- 
theless, we do not deny but that men might, in the right use of 
the gifts of nature, avoid many sins, which they, who are said 
to be thus blinded, and hardened, rim into, and so increase their 
guilt and miser\% especially where they are not prevented by 
the grace of God, which he may, without any impeachment of 



494 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

his providence, deny to those whom he has not chosen to eter- 
nal life, as he might, had he pleased, have denied it to the whole 
world, and much more to those who have not improved the 
common grace, which they received, but have, through the 
wickedness of their nature, proceeded from one degree of sin 
vmto another. 

There is another scripture, which, some suppose we under- 
stand in such a sense, as gives the like occasion of prejudice 
to many against this doctrine, in 2 Thess. ii. 11, 12. For this 
cause God shall send them strong delusion^ that they should be- 
lieve a lie^ that they all might be damned who believed not the 
truth., but had pleasure in unrighteousness ; the meaning where- 
of IS this, that God suffered them to be deluded, who, in the 
following verse, are represented as not receiving the love of the 
truth; not that God was the author of these delusions, or de- 
ceived them by a false representation of things to them, or by 
exciting or inclining them to adhere to the suggestions of those 
who lie in wait to deceive ; but, since he did not design to give 
them grace under the means of grace, or to enable them to re- 
ceive the truth in the love thereof, which he was not obliged to 
do to any, much less to those who rebelled against the light 
that had been already given them; hereupon, through the biind- 
nes! of their own minds, they became an easy prey to those 
who endeavoured to ensnare or delude them ; so that the de- 
cree of God only respects his denying preventing grace to those, 
who, through the corruption of their own nature, took occasion, 
from thence, to run greater lengths in their apostasy from, and 
rebellion against God. And as for that mode of speaking here 
used, that God shall send them strong delusions, that only re- 
spects his will to permit it, and not his design to delude them. 

There is another scripture to the same purpose, in Psal. 
Ixxxi. 12. So I gave them up unto their own heart''s lust^ and 
they xvnlked in their orvn coimsels ; the meaning of which is, 
that God left thrm to themselves, and then lust, or the corrupt 
habits of sin, v/hich they had acquired, conceived, and, as the 
apostle James speaks, brought forth sin, chap i. 15. or greater 
acts of sin, which exposed them to a greater degree of con- 
demnation ; and all this is to be resolved into God's permis- 
sive will, or purpose, to leave man, in his fallen state, to him- 
self, which he might do, without giving occasion to any to say, 
on the one hand, that he is the author of sin ; or, on the other, 
that he deals injuriously with the sinful creature. 

And to this -we may add our Saviour's words concerning the 
Jews, in John xii. 39, 40. Therefore they could not believe, be- 
cause that Esaias said again, He hath blinded their eyes, and 
hardened their heart ; that they shotild not see luith their eyes, 
nor understand with their heart, and be converted^ and I should 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 495 

heal them. The sense which they, who misrepresent this doc- 
trine, suppose we put upon them, and conclude, that no other 
is consistent with the argument we re maintaining, is, that the 
unbelief, which the Jews are charged with, was principally, if 
not altogether, resolved into Gou's eternal purpose, to blind 
their eyes, and harden their hearts, namely, by some positive 
act, as a cause producing this effect, with this view, that they 
should not be converted, and saved, that thereby his decree to 
condemn them, might take effect. It is no wonder to find per- 
sons prejudiced against this doctrine, when set in such a light; 
but as this is very remote from the explication we have given 
thei-eof, so our Saviour's design, in this text, is to give an ac- 
count why those miracles, which he wrought before the Jews, 
were ineffectual for their conviction; the more immediate cause 
whereof was the blindness of their mind, and the hardness of 
their hearts, inasmuch as they had shut their eyes against the 
light, and, through the corruption of their nature, had harden- 
ed their own hearts. As to what God is said to have done, in 
a judicial way, agreeable to the mode of speaking here used, 
when it is said, He hath hardened their hearts^ it imports no- 
thing else but his leaving them to the hardness of their own 
h arts, or denying them heart-softening grace, which would 
have been an effectual remedy against it. And may not God 
deny his grace to sinners, without being charged as the author 
of sin, or the blame thereof devolved on him, and not them- 
selves ? And, since this judicial act of providence cannot but 
be the result of an eternal purpose, is there any thing, in this 
decree, that reflects on his perfections, any more than there is 
in the execution thereof? 

There is another scripture, in Prov. xvi. 4. The Lord hath 
made all things for himself; yea^ even the xvicked for the day of 
evil ; from whence they infer, that the doctrine of reprobation, 
Avhich they suppose to be founded on a perverse sense given 
of it, includes in it the divine purpose to make man to damn 
him ; for they conclude that we understand it in that sense : 
and they proceed a little farther than this, and pi'etend that we 
infer from it, that God made men wicked, or that he made 
them wicked for his glory, as if he had need of sinful man for 
that end. I should never have thought that so vile a conse^ 
quence could be drawn from this doctrine, if the learned wri- 
ter, before mentioned, had not told the world that we infer this 
from it ; * and, to give countenance to this suggestion, he quotes 
a passage out of Dr. Twiss ; f his M'ords ai-e these : " That all, 
" besides the elect, God hath ordained to bring them forth into 

the world in their corrupt mass, and to permit them to them- 



* Sec Whitby's Diacottrse, &c. page 10. 

\ See his Biche^ of God^s hue, ag^Mnst Uord. Part It. pdcre 



5P. 



496 THE DOCTRINE GF ELECTION. 

*' selves, to go on in their own ways, and so finally to perse- 
" vere in sin ; and, lastly, to damn them for their sin, for the 
" manifestation of the glory of his justice on them." 

I am not ashamed to own my very great esteem of this ex- 
cellently learned and pious writer, who was as considerable for 
that part of learning, which his works discover him to have 
been conversant in, as most in his day ; though I cannot think 
myself obliged, in every respect, to explain this doctrine as he 
does ; and Dr. ^Vhitby knew very well, that if such an in- 
ference, as what we have been speaking of, were to be dedu- 
ced from the writings of any, who maintain the doctrine of 
reprobation, it must be from one who gives into the Supi-alap- 
sarian way of explaining it 5 and this expression, which, it*may 
be, was a little unguarded, seems to bid as fair for it as any 
other he could have found out : But any one that reads it, 
without prejudice, and especially chat compares it with what is 
connected therewith, would not suppose that any thing is in- 
tended hereby, that gives the least ground to conclude that God 
made men wicked for the manifestation of his justice. The 
most obnoxious part of this quotation, is, God ordained to bring 
forth into the "world the non-elect^ in their corrupt mass^ that is, 
that persons, who are every day born into the world, are the 
seed of corrupt and fallen man, and so have the habits of sin 
propagated with their nature, which many other divines have 
endeavoured to maintain. What my sentiments are concern- 
ing this matter, I sliall rather choose to insist on, under a fol- 
lowing answer, in which we shall be lead to speak of the doc- 
trine of original sin, and of that corruption of nature, which is 
the consequence of it ; therefore, passing this by, there is no- 
thing, in what remains of this quotation, but what is very de- 
fensible, and far from making God the author of sin ; for we 
may observe, that all he says, concerning the providence of God 
relating to this matter, is only, that he permits, or leaves them 
to themselves, and he supposes them finally to persevere in sin, 
without Avhich they cannot be liable to damnation, or the dis- 
play of the justice of God therein ; and if the author, who brings 
this quotation, had duly considered the words immediately be- 
fore, he might have seen the reason to have saved himself the 
trouble of making this reflection upon it ; for Dr. Twiss, who, 
though a Supralapsarian, says, " That he reckons that contro- 
" versy, relating to the order of God's decrees, to be merely,. 
" Apex Logicns^ as he calls it, a logical nicety ;'^ and adds, 
-' That his opinion about it is well known, namely, that God 
" doth not ordain any man to damnation, before the considera- 
" tion of sin ;" and, a few lines after, be says, " That God, of 
" his mere pleasure, created all, but, of his mere pleasure, he 
*•' damneth none ; but every one that is damned, is damned for 
" his sin, and that wilfully committed, and contumaciously 



niE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. <^7 

*" continued in by them that come to ripe years.'' And if no- 
thing more than this is intended by the doctrine of reprobation, 
it ought not to be so misrepresented, with a design to cast an 
odium upon it. 

But to return to the scripture but now mentioned : When 
God is said to have made the -wicked for the day of evil, the 
meaning is not that man's damnation was the end designed by 
Cod, in creating him, for there are some other ideas that inter- 
vent between God's purpose to ci'eate and condemn him ; he 
must be considered not barely as a creature, but as a sinner ; 
now, as God did not create man that he might sin, he could 
not be said to create him, that he might condemn him. Accor- 
dingly, the sense which some give oi this text, is, that God. is 
said to have ?nade all tilings for himstf to wit, for his own glo- 
ry. And inasmuch as some Avill be ready to object, that God 
will have no gioi v from the wicked, who oppose his name and 
interest in the world ; the answer to this is, that in them, from 
whom he shall have no glory, as a Saviour, he will, notwith- 
standing, be glorified as a Judge ; which judicial act, though it 
be deferred tor a time, while his long-suffering waits upon 
them, yet it shall fall heavily on them, in the day of evil '. 
•which is very remote from that supposition, that God made 
man to damn him. And there is a sense given of it by some., 
who are on the other side of the question, which seems equal- 
ly probable, or agreeable to the mind of the Holy Ghost, and 
is not in the least subversive of the doctrine we are maintain- 
ing, namely, " That the Lord disposeth all things throughout 
*' the world, to serve such ends as he thinks fit to design, which 
^'' they cannot refuse to comply withal ; for if any man be so 
*' wicked as to oppose his will, he will not lose their service i 
" but when he brings a public calamity upon a country, employ 
" them to be the executioners of his wrath : Of this there was 
•' a remarkable instance in the destruction of Jerusalem, by the 
"•* Roman soldiers, whom our Saviotir used, to punish his cru- 
'^' cifiers, not that they undertook that war out of any design or 
'* desire to do our blessed Saviour right, but out of an ambition 
" to enslave the world ; yet God made use of them for another 
" design, as public executioners, by whom he punished the un- 
* godly *." So the Assyrian is said, in Isa. x. 5, 6. to be the 
rod of GodPs anger ^ and to be sent against the people of Israel^ 
and to lead them captive^ and therein to tread them down, like 
the mire in the streets f , And as to what concerns the purpose 

• See Bishop Patrick in loc. -j- Tins agrees idth the sense give^) of it by 

Grot, in loc. and WIdtby in hir. discourse, &c. page 11. a7td it agrees vein/ veil with 
the sense of the Hebrew ivords, iTuyO*? Si' £3 ""^hich does not 6o much signifij to make, 
as to dispose, and adapt one thing to another, luhich the Ixx. render, <tuKara-(T*i # 
oeo-^nf, iJc. the wicked is r«ser>cil to the day of evil 

Vol. I. 3 R 



498 1"HE DOCTRINL 01 ELECTION. 

of God, on which these judicial proceedings depend, this is to 
be judged of by the execution thereof, as is evidently to be infer- 
red from thence. And tiiis is the sense in which we under- 
stand the doctrine of reprobation, ^.s in the foregoing argument. 
Thus we have endeavoured to prove the doctrine of election 
and reprobation, and defend it from the reproaches and misre- 
presentations cast upon it by considering it, not only as agree- 
able to the divine perfections, but as foimded on scripture. We 
shall therefore proceed, 

VI. To enquire, whether the contrar}- doctrine as defended 
by some, be not derogatory to the divine perfections, and there- 
fore does not contain greater absurdities ; or, if expressions of 
detestation were a sufficient argument to set it aside, whether 
we have not as much reason to testify our dislike that way, as 
they have against the doctrine we are maintaining ^ As to that 
pai't of the charge brought against us, as though we represent- 
ed God as severe and cruel to his creatures ; or that it is incon- 
sistent with his goodness to suppose that he leaves any to them- 
selves in their fallen state, so as not to give them the means of 
grace, when he knew that being destitute thereof, they could 
not believe, and so would fall shoil of salvation, pursuant to his 
eternal purpose relating thereunto : can this be said to be in- 
consistent with his goodness, any more than all his other dis- 
plays of vindictive justice ? If they suppose that it is, we might 
easily retort the argument upon them since they will not assert, 
that the whole race of fallen man shall be saved ; and, if so, 
must we not suppose that God certainly fore-knew this, other- 
wise where is his infinite understanding ? And if he knew that 
this would be the consequence of their being born, and living 
in the world, where is his goodness in bringing them into it ? 
If it be said that they have a free-Avill to choose what is good, 
and so had a power to attain salvation ; therefore their not at- 
taining it, is wholly owing to themselves. Suppose this were 
taken for granted, without entering on that subject at present; 
yet it must be farther enquired whether they will allow' that 
God fore-know tliat they would abuse this freedom of will, or 
power to make themselves holy or happy ; and, if so^ could he 
not have prevented this ? Did he make a will that he could not 
govern or restrain ? Could he not have prevented the sin that he 
knew they would commit? And, if he could, why did he not 
do it, and thereby prevent their ruin, which he kncAV would be 
the consequence hereof? So that if men are disposed to find 
fault with the divine dispensation, it is no dillicult matter to in- 
vent sotne methods of reasoning to give umbi-age to it ; and, 
indeed this objection is not so much against God's fore-ordain- 
ing what comes to pass, as it is a spurning at his judicial hand, 
and finding fltult with the equity of his proceedings, when he 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 4Q9 

takes vengeance on sinners for their iniquities ; or charging 
severity on God, because all mankind are not the objects ot 
his goodness, and consequently not elected to eternal life. 

But passing by this, we shall proceed to consider how, in 
several instances, the methods used to oppose the doctrine, which 
■we are maintaining, are attended with many absurd conse- 
quences, derogatory to the divine perfections ; which farther 
discovers the unreasonableness of their opposition to it ; par- 
ticularly, 

1. It represents God as indeterminate, or unresolved what 
to do, which is the plain sense of their asserting that he has 
not fore-ordained v/hatever comes to pass. To suppose him 
destitute of any determination, is directly contrary to his wis- 
dom and sovereignty, and it would argue that there are some 
excellencies and perfections belonging to intelligent creatures, 
which are to be denied to him, who is a God of infinite perfec- 
tion : but if, on the other hand, they suppose that every thing, 
which comes to pass, is determined by him ; nevertheless, that 
his determinations, as they respect the actions of intelligent 
creatures, are not certain and peremptory", but such as may be 
disannulled, or rendered ineffectual as taking his measures from, 
the uncertain determinations of man's will ; this is, in effect to 
say, that they are not determined by God ,* for an uncertain dc" 
termination, or a conditional purpose, cannot properly be called 
a determination. Thus for God to determine, that he that be- 
lieves shall be saved, without resolving to give that faith which 
is necessary to salvation, is, in effect, not to determine that any 
shall be saved ; for, since they suppose that it is left to man's 
free-will to believe or not, and liberty is generally explained 
by them, as implying that a person might, had he pleased, have 
done the contrary to that which he is said to do freely ; it fol- 
lows that all mankind might not have believed, and repented, 
and consequently that they might have missed of salvation, and 
then the purpose of God, relating thereimto, is the same as 
though he had been indeterminate, as to that matter. But, if, 
on the other hand, they suppose that to prevent this disappoint- 
ment, God over-rules the free actions of men, in order to the 
accomplishment of his own purpose, then they give up their 
own cause, and allow us all that we contend for ; but this they 
^re not disposed to do ; therefore we cannot see how the inde- 
pendency of the divine will can be defended by them, con- 
sistently with their method of opposing this doctrine. 

Again, if it be supposed, as an expedient to fence against 
this absurd consequence, that God fore-knew what his creatures 
would do, and that his determinations were the result thereof, 
and, consequently, that the event is as certain as the divine 
fore-knowledge, this is what is n©t universally allowed «f by 



OUO XtLlL DOCTRINE Of ELECTION* 

them ; for many are sensible that it is as hard to prove, thai 
God fore-knew what must certainly come to pass, without in- 
ferrmg the inevitable necessity of things,, as it is to assert that 
he willed or determined them, whereby they are rendered 
eventually necessary. And if they suppose that God fore-knew^ 
what his creatures would do, and, particularly, that they would 
convert themselves, and improve the liberty of their will, so as 
to render themselves objects fit for divine grace, without sup- 
posing that he determined to exert that power and grace, which 
was necessary thereunto ; this is to exclude his providence 
from having a hand in the government of the world, or to assert 
that his determinations rather respect what others will do, than 
what he wiU enable them to do, which farther appears to be 
inconsistent with the divine pertections. 

2. There are some things, in their method of reasoning, which, 
seem to infer a mutability in God's purpose which is all one as 
to suppose, that he had no purpose at all relating to the event 
of things : Thus, in opposing the doctrine of election, they re- 
fer to such-like scriptures as these, namely, that God will have 
all men to be saved^ and come to the knowledge of the truths t 
Tim. ii. 4. applying this act of the divine will to every individual^ 
even to those who shall not be saved, or come to the knowledge 
of the truth ; and they understand our Saviour's words, Hov) 
bften xvould I have gathered thy children together as a hen ga- 
thereth her chickens under her xoings^ and rje woitld not ? Be- 
hold your house is left unto you desolate, Mat. xxiii. 37, 38. as 
implying, that God purposed to save them, but was obliged af- 
terwards, by the perverseness of their actions, to change his 
purpose. What is this, but to assert him to be dependent and 
mutable ? 

3. They, who suppose that salvation is not to be resolved 
into the power and will of God, must ascribe it to the w^ill of 
inan, by which Ave determine ourselves to perform those du- 
ties, which render us the objects of divine mercy ; and then. 
M'hat the apostle says, Jt is not of him that xvilleth, nor of him 
that runneth, but of God that shexveth mercy, Rom. ix. 16. would 
hardly be intelligible, or a defensible proposition ; and when 
it is. said, We love him, because he first loved us, 1 John iv. 19. 
the proposition ought to be inverted, and it should rather be 
said. He loved us, because we first loved him ; and that hum- 
bling question, which the apostle proposes, IVho maketh thee ta 
differ, 1 Cor. iv. 7. should be answered, as one proudly did, 
I make myself to differ. 

4. As to what concerns the doctrine of discriminating grace,, 
■which cannot well be maintained, without asserting a discri- 
mination in God's purpose relating thereunto, which is what 
We fail election: if this be denied, there, would not be. so 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 501 

Ijreat a foundation for admiration, or thankfulness, as thei-e 
is, or for any to say, as one of Christ's disciples did, speak- 
ing the sense of all the rest, Lord^ how is it, that thou wilt 
manifest thyself unto us^ and not unto the worlds John xiv. 22. 
Nor ig there so great an inducement to humility, as what will 
arise from the firm belief, that, when no eye pitied the poor 
helpless and miserable sinner, he was singled out of a ruined 
and undone world, among that remnant whom God first design- 
ed for, and then brought to glory. 

VII. We shall now consider those methods of reasoning, by 
which the contrary doctrine is defended, and enquire into the 
sen^e of those scriptures, which are generally brought for that 
purpose ; and shall endeavour to mak* it appear, that they may 
be explained, in a different way, more consistently with the di- 
vine perfections. It is plain that the main design of those, 
who oppose the doctrine of election, is to advance the goodness 
of God; and, since all mankind cannot be said to be equally 
partakers of the effects of this goodness, inasmuch as all shall 
not be saved, they suppose that God has put all mankind into 
a salvable state ; and, accordingly, as the gospel-overture is 
vuiiversal, so God's purpose to save, includes all to whom it is 
made ; but the event, and consequently the efficacy of the di- 
vine purpose relating hereunto, depends on the will of man : 
and, that there may be no obstruction which may hinder thisf 
design from taking effect, God has given him a power to yield 
obedience to his law, which, though it be not altogether so per- 
fect as it was at first, but is somewhat weakened by the fall ; 
yet it is sufficient to answer the end and design of the gospel, 
that is to bring him to salvation if he will, and the event of 
things is wholly put on this issue ; so that, though there be not 
an universal salvation, there is a determination in God to save 
all upon this condition. Hov/ far this is inconsistent with the 
divine perfections has been already considered ; and we arc 
farther to enquire, whether there be any foundation for it in 
scripture, and what is the sense of some texts, which are often 
brought in defence thereof. 

One text referred to, is, those words of the apostle, in 1 
Tim. ii. 4. Who will have all men to be saved, and come to the 
•knowledge of the truth ; and another scripture, to the same pur- 
pose, in 2 Pet. iii. 9. The Lord is not willing that any should 
perish, but that all should corne to repentance ; and several others, 
from whence they argue the universality of the divine purpose 
i^lating to the salvation of mankind, or that none are rejected^ 
or excluded from it, by any act of God's will, and consequent- 
ly that the doctrine of election and reprobation is to be explo- 
ded, as contrary hereunto. 

That the sense of these scripture<5 rangpt be, that God de- 



502 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 

signed that all men should be eventually saved, or come to the 
knowledge of the truth, so that none of them should perish, is 
evident, from many other scriptures, that speak of the destruc- 
tion of ungodly men, which, doubtless, will be allowed by all; 
therefoi-e it follows, that the meaning of these two scriptures, 
is not that God purposed, or determined, what shall never come 
to pass, which is inconsistent with the glory of his wisdom and 
sovereignty, as has been befare observed ; but the^ are to 
be understood with those limitations, which the word a//, which 
refers to the persons mentioned, as designed to be saved, is 
subject to in ether scriptures ; as will be more particularly con- 
sidered, when we treat of universal and particular redemption, 
under a following answer *. And therefore, at present, we 
need only observe, that these scriptures may be set in a true 
light, that the v/ord all is oftentimes taken for all sorts of men, 
or things ; as when it is said, that of every thing that creepeth 
upQji the earthy there xvent in txvo and two unto Noah into the 
ark^ Gen. vii. 8, 9. that is all the species of living creatures, 
not every individual ; so. Acts x. 12. in the vision that Peter 
saw of the sheet let down from heaven, in which there xvere all 
manner of four-footed beasts f, £s?c. and it is said concernitig 
our Saviour, that he W(?n^ aioz^?, healing all manner of sickness , 
and all manner of diseases among the people \ ; and elsewhere ^ 
God promises, that he xvill pour out his Spirit on allfiesh^ Acts 
\\. 17. that is, persons of all ages and conditions, young and old. 

There are many instances of the like nature in scripture, 
which justify this sense of the word all; and it seems plain, 
from the context, that it is to be so taken in the former of the 
scriptures, but now referred to, when it is said, God xvill have 
all men to he saved; for he exhorts, in ver. 1. that prayer and 
.supplication should he made for all men., that is, for men of all 
characters and conditions in the world, and, in particular, for 
kings.^ and all that are in authority^ and thereby he takes occa- 
sion to resolve a matter in dispute among them, whether those 
kings that were tyrants and oppressors, ought to be prayed for, 
when he tells them, that all sorts of men are to be prayed for ; 
and the reason of this is assigned, namel)^, because God xvill 
have all men^ that is, all sorts of men, to be saved. 

Moreover, they whom God will save, are said to be such as 
shall co?«e, that is, as he will bring to the knowledge of the truth. 
Now it is certain, that God never designed to bring every 
individual to the knowledge of the truth ; for, if he did, 
Jiis purpose is not fulfilled, or his providence runs counter to 

* See Qnest. xiiv. 

■J TJie -L'ords are, ■!Tu.\']a. Tilp^rroSn, that is, all four-footed beasts. 
_ + JSfatt. iv. 23. T/>e words are, GtpaTrtuttv vaintv v^sov Kut 7rAf±v /uetxuKMv, every 
'r.ckness, and every disease ; a7id s<> the same words are translated, in Mutt. ix. 35 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. oOS 

jt, ior every individual of mankind have not the gospel ; there- 
fore it follows, that since God did not purpose that all men 
should come to the knowledge of the truth, the foregoing words. 
Who xviil have all men to be saved^ are not to be understood 
in any other sense, but as signifying all sorts of men. Neither 
can it well be proved, Vvhatever may be attempted in order 
thereto, that the following words, which speak of Christ's be- 
ing a Mediator beixueen God and men^ intend, that he performs 
this office for every individual man, even for those that shall 
not be saved ; for then it would be executed in vain for a great 
part of them, as will be farther considered in its proper place ; 
therefore we must conclude, that, in the former of these scrip- 
tures, nothing else is intended, but that God determined -^o 
give saving grace to all sorts oi men. 

And as for the latter, in which the apostle Peter says, that 
God is not zvilling- that any shot/Id perish, but that all should 
C07ne to repentance ; there the word all is expressly limited, in 
the context, as referring only to those who are elect and faith- 
ful ; and therefore he says, including himself among them, 
that the Lord is long-suffering to us-xvard. Now if we observe 
the character which he gives of the church, to which he writes, 
in the beginning oi both his epistles, (which, as he says, in ver. 
1. of this chapter, were directed to the same persons) it is as 
great as is given of any in scripture ; and they are distinguish- 
ed from those profane scoffers, xvho xvalked after their oxvn 
lusts, and other ungodly men, whose perdition he speaks of, as 
vv'hat would befal them in the dissolution of the world, by fire, 
in the day of Judgment ; and they are described not only ar» 
elect unto obedience, and as having obtained like precious faith 
with the apostles, but they were such as God would keep^ 
through faith, unto salvation; therefore the apostle might well 
say, concerning them, that God determined that none of them 
should perish, without advancing any thing that militates agains;, 
the docirine we are maintaining. 

Object. The apostle, in this verse, speaks of God, as wil- 
ling that all should come to repentance ; therefore they are dis- 
tinguished from that part of the church, who had obtained like 
precious faith, and were included in the character that he gives 
of some of them, in both his epistles, which infers their oeing 
then in a state of salvation ; therefore the word, all, in this 
text, is not subject to the limitation before mentioned, but must 
be applied to cdl the. xvorld, and consequently the meaning is, 
that God is not willing that any of mankind should perish, but 
that all should come to repentance. 

Anszu. The apostle, in this text, speaks of God's deferring 
the day of judgment, and perdition of ungodly men, and so 
exercising his loDg-syiTering towards the world in general ; not 



•,504 THE DOCTHIN^ Olf ELECTiOK. 

that he designed to bring them all to repentance hereby, to;; 
?hat would be to intend a thing which he knew should never 
come to pass : But the end of his patience, to the world in 
general, is, that all whom he designed to bring to repentance, 
or who were chosen to it, as well as to obedience, and sprink- 
ling of the blood of Jesus, should be brought to it. 

There are other arguments, which they bring in defence of 
their sense of the doctrine of election, as supposing that it is 
not peremptory, determinate, or unchangeable, and such as in- 
fers the salvation of those who are the objects thereof, taketi 
from those scriptures, which, as they apprehend, ascribe a kind 
of disappointment to God ; as when he says, in Isa. v. 4. con- 
cerning his vineyard, to wit, the church of the Jews, Where- 
fore^ xvhen I looked that it should bring forth grapes^ brought 
it forth -wild grapes ? and our Saviour's v/ords, in Luke xiii. 
6. that he sought fruit on the fig-tree^ meaning the church of 
the Jews in his day, but found none ; and, speaking concerning 
Jerusalem, he sars, in Matth. xxiii. 37", 38. Hoiv often would 
I have gathered thy children together.^ even as a hen gathereth 
her chickms under her xvings^ and ye would not I Behold^ your 
house is left unto you desolate ; therefore they conclude, that 
God's purpose, or design of grace, may be defeated ; so that 
these, and many other scriptures, not unlike to them, are incon- 
sistent with the doctrine of election, as ascertaining the event, 
to wit, the salvation of those who are chosen to eternal life ; 
which leads us, particulai-ly to consider the sense thereof. 

As to the first of them, in which God says, by the prophet^ 
What could have been done more to my vineyard^ that I have 
not done in it ? Wherefore^ -when I looked that it should bring 
forth grapes^ brought it forth -wild grapes P He condescends 
therein to speak of himself after the manner of men, as he of- 
ten does in scripture, and is said to look for what might rea- 
sonably have been expected, as the consequence of all the 
means of grace, Vv'hich he had vouchsafed to them ; the reason- 
ableness of the thing is called his looking for it, as though he 
should say, it might have been expected, from the nature of 
the thinc^, that they, who had been laid under such obligations, 
should exprcEs some gratitude for them, and so have brought 
forth some fruit, to the glory of God. And those words, which 
seem to attribute disappointment to him, when it is said, / 
looked^ &c. signifying nothing else but the ingratitude of the 
people, that they did not walk agreeably to the obligations they 
were under; not that God was really disappointed, for that 
would militate against his omniscience. He knew, before he 
laid these obligations on them, what their behaviour would be; 
therefore, had he eyes of flesh, or seen as man seeth, their be- 
haviour would have tended to disappoint him j but there is no 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 505 

disappointment in the divine mind, though the sin reproved in 
the people be the same as though it had had a tendency to de- 
feat the divine purpose, or disappoint his expectation. 

As for that other scripture, in which it is said, that he sought 
fruit on the jig-tree^ but found none^ that is to be explained in 
the same way, /^e sought fruity that is, it might reasonably 
have been expected, but he found none, that is, they did not 
act agreeably to the means of grace which they enjoyed. 
Therelbre neither this, nor tlie other scripture, does in the least 
argue, that the purpose of God was not concerned about the 
event, or that he did not know what it would be ; for, as his 
providential dispensation gives us ground to conclude, that he 
determined to leave them to themselves, so he knew before- 
hand that this, through the corruption of their nature, would 
issue in their unfruitfulness, otherwise he is not omniscient. 
Therefore it follows, that neither of these scriptures have the 
least tendency to overthrow the doctrine of the certainty and, 
peremptoriness of the divine purpose. 

As to what our Saviour says, relating to his willingness, to 
have gathered ferufialem, as a hen gathereth her chickens under 
her zvings, but they xvould not^ it may be taken, without the 
least absurdity attending the sense thereof, as referring to the 
end and design of his ministry among them ; and it is as though 
he should say, your nation shall be broken, and }'ou scattered, 
as a punishment inflicted on you for your iniquities, and this 
destruction would have been prevented, had you believed in 
me ; so that ail that can be inferred from hence, is, that Christ's 
ministry and doctrine were attended with that convincing evi- 
dence, being confirmed by so many undoubted miracles, that 
their unbelief was not only charged on them as a crime, but 
was the occasion of their ruin ; or (as it is said in the following 
words) of their houses being left unto them desolate. And this 
might have been prevented, by their making a right improve- 
mient of that common grace, which they had ; for though it be 
not in man's power, (a) without the special influence of divine 
grace, to believe to the saving of the soul ; yet I know no one 
who denies that it is in his power to do more good, and avoid 
more evil, than he does, or so far to attend to the preaching of 
the gospel, as not to oppose it with that malice and envy as 
the Jev.s did ; and, had they paid such a deference to Christ's 
ministry, as ^lis amounted to, they would not have been ex- 
posed to those judgments which afterwards befel them ; for it 
is one thing to say, that nnen, by improving common grace, can 
attain salvation, and another thing to conclude, that they might 
have escaped temporal judgments thereby. 

CaJ It is improper to say we have no power, when we can do the thing if we 
will ; and criminal to take the glory, which is God's. 
Vol. I. 3 S 



J<(jG 'IHK DOCTRINE Of ELECTIOX. 

Thercibre, it it be enquired, what was God's intention in 
giving them the gospel ? the answer is very plain : It was not 
that hereby he might bring them all into a state of salvation, 
for then it Avould have taken effect ; but it was, as appears by 
the event, to bring those, that should be saved among them, to 
that salvation, and to let others kivDW, whether they would hear, 
or whether they would forbear, that God had a right to their 
obedience, and therefore that the message which the Redeemer 
brought to them, ought to have met with better entertainment 
from them, than it did. And if it be farther enquired, whether^ 
provided they had believed, their ruin would have been pre- 
vented I This is an undoubted consequence, from our Saviour's 
words ; but yet it does not follow, from hence, that it was a 
matter of uncertainty with God, whether they should believe 
or no ; for it is one thing to say, that he would not have punish- 
ed them, unless they rejected our Saviour ; and another thing 
to suppose that he could not well determine whether the) 
would reject him or no. So that the purpose of God must 
be considered, as agreeing with the event of things, and the 
design of Christ's ministry, as being what it really was ; yet he 
might, notwithstanding, take occasion to charge the Jews' de- 
struction upon their own obstinacy. 

There are many other scriptures, which they bring to the 
like purpose, Avhich I pass over, because the sense they give of 
them differs not much from that, in v/hich they understand the 
scriptures before-mentioned, and their reasoning from them, in 
opposition to this doctrine is the same, and the same answer 
may be given to it. 

However, I cannot but observe, that as, from some scrip- 
tures, they attribute disappointment to God, they represent 
him, from others, as wishing, but in vain, that it had happened 
otherwise, and as being grieved at the disappointment ; so they^ 
understand those words, in Psal. Ixxxi. 13, 14. Oh ! that my 
people had hearkened unto me^ and Israel had walked in my ways I 
I should soon have subdued their enemies^ and turned my hand 
against their adversaries ; and that, in Luke xix. 42. If^ or, 
Oh ! that thou hadst knotvn, even thou at leasts in this thy day, 
the things which belong unto thy peace / but noxo theij are hid 
from thine eyes. 

As for the sense of these, and such-like scriptures, it is no 
more than this, that the thing which they refused to perform, 
was, in itself, most desirable, or a matter to be wished for, and 
not that God can be said to wish for a thing that cannot be at- 
tained. And when our Saviour laments over Jerusalem, a;> 
apprehending their destruction near at hand, whether the words 
iire to be considered in the form of a v*^ish, that it had been 
otherwise, or an intimation, that if they had known the things 
of their peace, their destruction would not have ensued, it is 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 50? 

only to be understood as a representation of the deplorableness 
of their condition, which, with a tenderness of human compas- 
sion, he could not speak of, without tears : Yet we are not to 
suppose that this mode of expression is applicable to the divine 
will ; so that, when the misery of that people is hereby set 
forth, we are not to strain the sense of words, taken from hu« 
jnan modes of speaking, so far, as to suppose that the judicial 
acts of God, in punishing a sinful people, are not the execution 
oi his purpose relating thereunto. 

Again, when the Spirit is said to be grieved^ Eph, iv, 30. or 
resisted^ Acts vii. 15. nothing else is intended hereby, but that 
men act in such a way, as that, had the Spirit of God been 
subject to human passions, it would have been matter of grief 
to him. But far be it from us to suppose that the divine na- 
ture is liable hereunto, or that any disappointment can attend 
his purposes, which has a tendency to excite this passion in 
men. And when he is said to be resisted, it is not meant as 
though his will, or design, could be rendered ineffectual, but it 
only implies, that men oppose what the Spirit communicated by 
the prophets, or iu his word. This a person may do, and yet it 
may be truly said, that the counsel of the Lord standeth for ever^ 
the thoughts of his heart to all generatio7is^ Psal. xxxiii. 11. 

VIII. We sliall proceed to consider several objections that 
are made against the doctrine we have endeavoured to maintain, 
and what reply may be given to them. Some have been oc- 
casionally mentioned under several foregoing heads, and there 
are others which require a distinct reply. 

Object. 1. That the doctrine of absolute Election and Re- 
probation was altogether unknown by the Fathers in the three 
first centuries, and that it was first brought into the Christian 
world by Augustin ; before whose time, the only account we 
have of it, is, that God foreknowing who would live piously, 
or believe and persevere to the end, accordingly predestinated 
them to eternal life, or determined to pass them by, and so is 
said to have rejected them.* 

Anszu. This objection, were it literally true, cannot have any 
tendency to overthrow this doctrine, in the opinion of those, 
who depend not on the credit of Augustin, as defending it, on 
the one hand, nor are staggered by the opposition made to it 
by some of the Fathers, who lived before his time, on the other ; 
and therefore we might have passed it by, without making any 
reply to it. However, since it contains a kind of insult, or 
boast, -which will have its weight with some, it may be expected 
that a few things should be said, in answer to it. 

We will not deny but that the Fathers, before the Pelagian 
heresy was broached in the world, expressed themselves, in 
many parts of their writings, in so lax and unguarded a manner 
* Se; Whitby ofElection, Chap. 5. Lirr.borch. JrJc. Co'.lat. pajs2i2. 



508 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

concerning the doctrines of predestination, free-will, and gi-ace, 
that, had they lived after those doctrines began to be publickly 
contested, one would have thought that they had verged too 
much towards Pelagius's side ; but, since they were not the 
subject-matter of controversy in those ages, it is no wonder to 
find them less cautious in their modes of expressing themselves, 
than they might otherwise have been ; and therefore it is a just 
observation, which one* makes of this matter, that they had 
to do with the Manichees, and some of the heathen, who sup- 
posed that men sinned by a fatal necessity of nature, as though 
there were no wicked action committed in the, world, but some 
would be ready to excuse it, from the impotency or propensity 
of human nature to sin, which rendered it, as they supposed, 
unavoidable ; and others took occasion, from hence, to charge 
God with being the author of sin. It is very probable the Fa- 
thers, in those ages, were afraid of giving countenance to this 
vile opinion, and therefore they were less on their guard, in 
some respects, than they would have been, had they been to 
encounter with Pelagivis, or his followers. 

And indeed, Augustin himself, before he took occasion to 
enquire more diligently into the state of this controversy, gave 
into the same way of expressing his sentiments about the power 
of nature, or the grace of God, as some others of the Fathers 
had done, and concluded that faith was in our power, as well 
a duty incumbent on us, but afterwards retracted such modes 
of speaking as the result of more mature deliberation-! But 
notwithstanding though he expressed himself in a different wa}' 
from them, yet he often takes occasion, from some passages 
which he purposely refers to in their writings, to vindicate them 
as holding the same faith, though not always using the same 
phrases. And, after he had thus defended Cyprian and Am- 
brose, in that respect, he puts a very charitable construction 
on their unguarded way of expressing themselves, and says, 
that this arose from their not having any occasion to engage in 
that controversy, which was on foot in his day.^ The same 
might be said to Gregory Nazianzen, Basil, Chrj'sostom, and 
several others, whom some modern writers defend from the 
charge of favouring the Pelagian scheme, by referring to some 
places in their writings, in which they acknowledge, that the 

* Vid Sixt Senens. Bibliothec. Lib. V. Annotat 101. Annotavit quidavi Chry- 
aostomvm inierdvm naturx nostrie vires phis tegiio extulisse ex contentiove discep- 
taniK cum JManichxis & Gentilibits, qui homiitem asserebant, vel natura malum vel 
Jati violentia ad peccandum compelU. 

t Vid. Aug. Hetrac. I. Cap. 25. 

t Vid. Aug. de Pradest. Sanet. Cap. 14. Quid igitur opus est, ut eorum scmte-< 
mur opuscida, qui prius quam ista hxresis oriretnr, non hahverunt vecessitatem in 
iiac difficiH ad solvendum quxstione Tersari : quod proculdubio facerent, si respor.- 
d^e talibus cogerentur. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 509 

salvation of men is owing to the grace of God, whereby all oc- 
casions of glorying are taken away from the creature,* or ex- 
pressions used by them to the like purpose. And the learned 
Vossius, though he acknowledges, that the Fathers, before Au- 
gustin, expressed themselves in such a way, as is represented 
in the objection, yet he vindicates them from the charge of 
verging towards the Pelagian, or Semi-Pelagian heresy ; inas- 
much as he concludes, that when they speak of God's pre- 
destinating men to eternal life, on the foresight of good works, 
they only intend those good works, which God would enable 
them to perform ; and this will clear many of those expressions 
which they use, from this imputation.! But if all these en- 
deavours to establish our claim to those Fathers, who lived 
before Augustin, as not being opposers of this doctrine, ap- 
pear to be to no purpose, yet this will not weaken the truth 
thereof; for we suppose it to be founded on scripture, and 
several consequences plainly deduced from it, and therefore it 
doth not want the suffrage of human testimony to support it. 

But if it be said, that this is a very desirable thing as doubt- 
less it is, we might consider this doctrine, as obtaining very 
much in, and after Augustin's time, being examined and de- 
fended by very considerable numbers of men, who have trans- 
mitted it down to posterity, throughout the various ages of the 
church. Notwithstanding, by whomsoever it is defended, or 
opposed, we lay no great stress on human authority, as a judi- 
cious divine well observes :(;. We shall therefore proceed to 
consider some other objections, which it will be more necessary 
for us to give a particular answer to. 

Object. 2. To the doctrine of God's purpose's ascertaining 
all events, it is objected that he has not determined the bounds 
of the life of man, but that it may be lengthened, or shortened, 
by the intervention of second causes. This is nothing else but 
the applying one branch of this controversy, relating to the de- 
crees of God, to a particular instance. And it was very warmly 
debated in the Netherlands, towards the beginning of the last 
century.^ This objection is managed in a popular v\^ay, and 
is principally adapted to give prejudice to those who are dis- 
posed to pass over, or set aside, those necessary distinctions, 
which, if duly considered, would not only shorten the debate, 
but set the matter in a clearer light, which Ave shall endeavour 
to do ; but shall first consider their method of reasoning on 

* Vid. Fohes. Instruct. Historico-Theol Lib. VIII. Cap. 28. § 16, 8.C. & Joh. Ja- 
colli Hottingeri, Fata Doctriiue de Prtedcstinat Lib. L § 35, &c. 

t Vid. G. J. Vossii Hist. Pelag. Lib. VI. Tlies. 8, 9, 10. 

k Vid. Cah). Instit. Lib. III. Cap. 22. ■§ 1. Certiur est hie Dei Veritas, quain vt 
concvtiatur, c/uriov (jvam lit obruatur homimtm authoritatp. 

§ See the epistles that passed between lierevoi: phiisician at IJort, and several 
tUrlfh's at that time, in Lib. de Term vitsc, 



510 THE DOCTRINE OF ELE-CTIOX. 

this subject, and the sense they give of some" scriptures, which 
as they suppose, give countenance to this objection. 

They therefore thus argue, that if the term of life be im- 
moveably fixed by God, then it is a vain thing for any one to 
use those means that are necessary to preserve it, and the skill 
of the physician, as well as the virtue of medicine, is altogether 
needless ; and the good advice which is often given to persons, 
to take heed that they do not shorten their lives by intemper- 
ance, will be to no purpose ; for they have a reply ready at 
hand, namely, that they shall live their appointed time, do what 
they will. And that, which is still more absurd, is, that if a 
person attempts to lay violent hands upon himself, it will be to 
no purpose, if God has determined that he shall live longer ; 
or if he has determined that he shall die, then he is guilty oi 
no crime, for he only fulfds the divine purpose. 

They add, more*bver, that this not only renders all our sup- 
plications to God to preserve our lives, or to restore us from 
sickness, when we are in danger of death, needless; but our 
conduct herein is a practical denial of the argument we main- 
tain ; for what is this, but to suppose that the bounds of life 
are unalterably fixed. 

As to what concerns the countenance, which they suppose, 
scripture gives to this objection, they refer us to those places 
in which the life of man is said to be lengthened or shortened} 
accordingl)^ there are promises of long life given to the righ- 
teous who love Gody and keep his comtna7idmentSy Exod. xx. 12« 
Deut. iv. 40. 1 Kings iii. 14. and Solomon says expressly, The 
fear of the Lord prolongeth days ; but the years of the xvicked 
shall be shortened^ Prov. x. 27. and elsewhere he speaks of the 
xvicked^s dying before their time^ Eccl. vii. 1 7. and the Psalmist 
says, that bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their 
days^ Psal. lv.*?33. 

They also refer to that scripture in which Martha tells our 
Saviour, that if he had been rvith her brother Lazarus^ before 
his death, he had not diea\ John xi. 21. which either contra-* 
diets the argument we are maintaining, or else Martha was 
mistaken ; which, had she been, our Saviour would have re- 
proved her, for asserting that which was false. 

Moreover, they add, that when the old world was destroyed 
in the deluge, and so died before their time, they might have 
prolonged their lives, had they repented in that space of time, 
wherein J^oah as a preacher of righteousness y gave them warn- 
ing of this desolating judgment, and Christ, by his Spirit^ in 
him, preached to theiriy as the apostle says, 1 Pet. iii. 20. which, 
doubtless, was with a design to bring them to repentance, and 
save them from tliis destruction. 

And when Abraham pleaded with God in the behalf of So- 



THE DOCTRINE OF £LECTI©N. Jll 

dom, God tells him, that if he found but ten righteous persons 
in the city^ he would spare it for their sake^ Gen. xviii. 32. 
which is inconsistent with his determination, that they should 
all die by an untimely death, if the bounds of their lives had 
been fixed. 

And lastly, they refer to that scripture, in which God first 
told Hezekiah, that he should die^ and not live^ and afterwards, 
that he would add to his days ffleen years, Isa. xxxviii. 1. 
compared with 5. 

Ansxv, To prepare our way for a reply to this objection, let 
us consider that the contrary side of the question, which we 
are maintaining, is equally supported by express texts of scrip- 
ture : thus it is said His days are determi?ied, the number of his 
months are xuith thee ; thou hast appointed him bounds that he 
cannot pass. Job xiv. 5. than which, nothing can be more ex- 
press, where he speaks concerning that decree of God, which 
respects all mankind, without exception, and sets forth his ab- 
solute sovereignty, and the irreversibleness of his purpose here- 
in ', and the apostle Paul, in reasoning with the Athenians con- 
cerning the decree and providence of God in whom we live, 
move, and have our being says, that he hath determined the 
times before appointed, andfxedthe bounds of their habitation. 
Acts xvii. 26. As he has placed men upon the earth, by his 
decree and providence, so he has determined not only the place 
where they should live, but the time of their continuance in 
the world. This was no new doctrine ,* for the heathen had 
been instructed in it by their ovvn philosophers and therefore 
the apostle speaks their sense, especially that of the stoicks, 
about this matter.* When he mentions the times are deter- 
mined, it is not to be understood of the seasons of the year, 
which God has fixed to return in their certain courses, but the 
seasons appointed for every work, or for every occurrence of 
life ; and, among the rest, the time of life, and of serving our 
generation therein, as Solomon expressly says, in Eccl. iii. 1, 2. 
To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose ; 
a time to be born, and a time to die* Several other scriptures 
might be brought to the same purpose, as a farther proof here- 
of, namely, those in which God has foretold the death of par- 
ticular persons, 2 Sam. xii. H. 1 Kings xiv. 12. chap. xxii. 28. 
Moreover, if the providence of God is conversant about all 
the actions of men, and the hairs of their head are all numbered. 
Matt. X. 30. so that the smallest changes in life do not come 
by chance, but are subject thereto; then certainly the time of 

• Seneca de Comol. ad Marciam, cap. 20. JVemo ?iimis ciio n-.oritnr, qnivicturus 

■ diutius qiiam vixit non fuit, Jtxua est cidque termimis, manebit semper ubi poaitue 

est, 7i£c ilium ulterius diligentia aut gratia promwebit. Et Cicero de Senect. Quod 

citique temporis ad vivendum datum, eo debet contentits esuK Vir^. JEn. X Stat 

3un cuiqae dies. Ser-x<. Fixim e'.t tempus vitu. 



512 TIIL DOCTRINE OF ELECTION^ 

life must be subjected to his providence, who is styled, Our life^ 
and the length of our days^ Deut. xxx. 20. He must therefore 
certainly be considered as the sovereign Arbiter thereof, which 
doctrine none that own a providence, can, with any shadow of 
reason, gainsay ; so that this doctrine is agreeable not only to 
several scriptures, but to the very nature and perfections of 
God. 

This being premised we return to the arguments laid down 
against it, and the scriptures cited to give countenance to them. 
It is certain, that two contradictory propositions cannot be both 
true in the same sense ; and the scriptures, which are exactly- 
harmonious, as well as infallibly true, no where contradict 
themselves. Therefore we must consider what answer may be 
given to the objections before-mentioned; and, that our work 
herein may be shortened, we may observe, that the bounds of 
life are twofold ; either such as men might have lived to, ac- 
cording to the common course of nature if nothing had inter- 
vened to ruin the constitution, or no disease, or violent death, 
had broken the thread of life before ; or that time which God 
has ordained that men shall live, whether it be longer or short- 
er : the former of these respects the lengthening or shortening 
of life, by the influence of second causes ; and, in this respect, 
•we do not suppose that the terms of life are immoveably fixed» 
but that in some, it is longer, and, in others shorter ; for it is 
certain, that by intemperance, or other methods, men may 
shorten their days ; or, by laying violent hands on themselves, 
not live the time that otherwise they would have done. But if 
we consider the over-ruling, or disposing providence of God, 
as conversant about this matter, there is nothing happens with- 
out the concurrence thereof. Therefore persons, who shorten 
their days by intemperance, do this by the permissive provi- 
dence of God; though he be not the author of their intem- 
perance, which is sinful, yet he permits, or determines not to 
hinder it, and consequently though he has fixed the bounds of 
life, which can neither be lengthened or shortened, yet know- 
ing what men will do, in a natural way, to shorten them, he de- 
termines that this shall put an end to their lives, {a) And when 
we read, in scripture, of God's delivering him, who dies a vio- 
lent death, into his hands^ who is the immediate cause of it, 
Exod. xxi. 13. God is not the author of the sin of the mur- 
derer ; yet providence is not wholly to be exempted from that 
action, so far as it is not sinful, but purely natural, or the eifect 
of power ; and, when this is said to have a tendency to shorten 
the life of man, it does not detract from the time that he had 

(a) Evil as well as good actions are links in the chain of providence, and yet 
do not impeach Divine holiness. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 513 

in his own purpose affixed to it. We must also consider, that 
his decree and providence respects the means, as well as the 
end, which are always inseparably connected, and equally sub- 
ject thereimto. 

These things being premised, we proceed more particularly 
to answer the arguments brought against this doctrine. And, 

1. When it is said, that God's fixing the bounds of life, ren- 
ders all means for the preservation thereof unnecessary, that 
depends upon a false supposition, namely, that God does not 
ordain the means as well as the end. If God had determined 
that persons shall live, he has determined to give them the sup- 
ports of life, and to prevent every thing that might tend to de- 
stroy it ; so, on the other hand, when he takes them away, by 
a disease, this is ordained by him, as a means conducive there- 
unto. If .health is to be supported, or recovered, by means, 
and thereby life preserved, God has ordained that these means 
shall be used, as well as the end attained. 

2. As to persons shortening their lives by intemperance, this 
has a natural tendency to do it ; so that, though God be not 
the author of the sin, he certainly knows, before-hand, Avhat 
methods the sinner will take to hasten his end, and leaves him 
to himself; so that, though the sin be not from God, the punish- 
ment, which is the consequence thereof, may truly be said to 
be from him, and therefore this was determined by him. 

And when it is farther objected, that they, who destroy their 
health, or lay violent hands on themselves, cannot be said to 
sin in so doing, because they do that which tends to fulfil the 
divine will, provided God has determined the fatal event; here- 
in they oppose this doctrine, without taking the v/ords in the 
same sense in which it is maintained ; for it is well known, that 
the will of God is sometimes taken for that prescribed rule that 
he has given us, which is the matter of our duty, in which 
sense we readily allow, that he that fulfils it, cannot be said to 
sin. But, beaides this, it is sometimes taken for his pui'pose to 
permit sin ; or, to give the sinner up to his own heart's lusts, 
to act that which he hates, and Is resolved to punish. In tliis 
sense, the sinner is said to do that which God would not have 
suffered him to do, had he willed the contrary ; but it is a very 
groundless insinuation, to suppose that this exempts Uim from 
the guilt of sin. 

3. To say, that God's fixing the bounds of life, is inconsis- 
tent with our praying, that our lives may be prolonged, or that 
we may be delivered from sickness, or death, v.hen we are ap- 
prehensive that we are drawing nigh to it, is no just conse- 
quence; for as we do not pray that God would alter his purpose, 
when we desire any blessing of him, but suppose this to be hid 
from us, and expect not to know it any otherwise than by the 

Vol. L 3 T 



514 THE DOCTRlNi 01 ELECTION. 

event ; so a person, ■who prays to be delivered from sickiifjss, 
or death, is not to address the divine Majesty, as one who pre- 
sumptuously, and without ground, supposes that God has de- 
creed that he shall immediately die, but as one who hopes, or 
who has no ground to conclude otherwise, but that he will make 
it appear, by answering his prayer, that he has determined to 
spare his life. For the secret purpose of God, relating to the 
event of things, is no more to be a rule of duty, inasmuch as 
k is secret, than if there had been no purpose relating there- 
unto ; but yet it does not follow from hence, that this matter is 
not determined by him. 

4. As to those scriptures, that seem to give countenance to 
this objection, they may, without the Jcast absurdity, be under- 
stood consistently with other scriptures, which have been before 
produced, whereby it is proved, that God has fixed, or deter- 
mined the bounds of life. As for those promises, which God 
has made of a long life, to those that love him, and keep his 
commandments, the meaning thereof is this, that he will certain- 
ly bestow this blessing, either in kind or value, on those whose 
conversation is such as is therein described ; this none can de- 
ny, who rightly understand the meaning of that scripture, in 
which it is said, that godliness hath the promise of the life that 
Tioxv is, as well as of that which is to come, 1 Tim. iv. 8. But, 
so far as it affects the argument we are maintaining, we must 
consider, that that efficacious grace, whereby we are enabled 
to love God, and keep his commandments, is as much his gift, 
and consequently the result of his purpose, as the blessing conr 
nected with it ; therefore if he has determined that we shall en- 
joy a long and happy life in this world, and to enable us to live 
a holy life therein ; if both the end and the means are con- 
nected together, and are equally the objects of God's purpose, 
then it cannot justly be inferred from hence, that the event, re- 
lating to the lengthening or shortening our lives, is not deter- 
mined by him. 

As for those scriptures that speak of the wickeds' dying be^^ 
fore their time, or iiot living half their days, these are to be un- 
derstood agreeably to that distinction before-mentioned, be- 
tween men's dying sooner, than they would have done accord- 
ing to the course of nature, or the concurrence of second causes 
thereunto, in which sense it is literally true, that many do not 
live out lialf their days .: and their dying sooner than God had 
before determined. May not the sovereign Disposer of all 
things inflict a sudden and immediate death, as the punishment 
of sin, without giving us reason to conclude that this was not 
pre-concerted, if we may so express it, or determined before- 
hand? 

As for that other scripture, referred to in the objection, in 
which Martha tells our Saviour, that if he had been with Laza= 
'/ ■ ■ 



THL OOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 515 

rus, when sick, he had not died, she does not suppose Christ's 
being there, would have frustrated the divine purpose, for then 
he would, doubtless, have reproved her for it ; whereas, in 
reality, he did not come to visit him, because he knew that God 
had purposed that he should die, and he afterwards raised from 
the dead ; so that this does not argue that he has not fixed the 
bounds, or term of life. 

Again, as for that argument, to support this objection, taken 
from the destruction of the world in the flood, or that of Sodom, 
by fire from heaven, that they znight have prolonged their lives, 
had they repented, we do not deny but that this would have 
been the consequence thereof, but then their repentance would 
have been as much determined by God, as their deliverance 
from that untimely death, wdiich befel them. 

The last scripture mentioned, in which God, by the prophet 
Isaiah, tells Hezekiah, that he should die, and Jiot live; not- 
withstanding which, fifteen years v/ere added to his life, which 
is very frequently insisted on, by those who deny the unaltera-» 
ble decree of God, relating to life and death, as that which 
they apprehend to be an unanswerable argument to support it: 
to this it may be replied, that when God says. Set thine house 
in order, for thou shalt die, and not live, he gave Hezekiah to 
understand, that liis disease was what we call mortal, namely, 
such as no skill of the physician, or natural virtue of medicine, 
could cure, and therefore that he must expect to die, unless 
God recovered him by a miracle ; and Hezekiah, doubtless, 
took the warning in this sense, otherwise it would have been 
a preposterous thing for him to have prayed for life, as it would 
have been an affront to God, to have desired to have changed 
his purpose. But God, on the other hand, designed, by this 
warning, to put him upon importunate prayer for life ; there- 
fore when he savs, / will add to thy days ffteen years, the 
meaning is only this, though thou mightest before have ex- 
pected death, my design in giving thee that intimation, was, 
that thou shouldest pray for life, which might be given thee by 
a miracle, and now I will work a miracle, and fulfil, in this re- 
spect, what I before purposed in adding to thy life fifteen years. 

Object. 3. It is farther objected, against the doctrine of elec- 
tion and reprobation, and particularly the immutability of God's 
purpose therein, that it tends to establish a fatal necessity of 
things, and overthrow that known distinction that there is be- 
tween things, as necessary, or contingent, as though nothing in 
the whole series of causes and effects could happen otherwise 
than it does, and God himself were confined to such a method 
of acting, that it was impossible for him to have done the con- 
trary'; which is nothing else but the Stoical doctrine of fate 
applied to, and defended by some scriptures, though it be con- 
trary to others, which speak of the uncertainty of future events. 



ul6 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. . 

Thus God speaks of the Jews, turning from their iniquities,, 
and his bestowing pardoning mercy, as the result thereof, as 
an uncertain event, when he says, in Jer. xxxvi. 3. It may be 
that the house of Judah xuill hear all the evil, which I purpose 
to do unto them, that they may return every ma7i from his evil 
%vay, that I may forgive their iniquity and their sin. So when 
God gave the Jews a sign, immediately before the captivity, 
taken from the prophet Ezekiel's personating one that was re- 
moving his stuff, or household-goods, as signifying, that the 
nation in general should soon remove to other habitations, when 
carried captive into Babylon, he adds, upon this occasion, It 
may be they will consider, though they be a rebellious house, 
Ezek. xii. 3. And the prophet Zephaniah exhorts the people 
to seek righteousness and meekness, and, as the consequence 
thereof, says, It may be ijc shall be hid in the day of the Lord^s 
anger, Zcph. ii. 3. And the apostle speaks of the uncertainty 
of the divine dispensations of grace, when he advises Timothy, 
in meekness, to instruct those that oppose themselves, if God,per- 
adventure, will give thefti repentance, to the achiowledging of 
the truth, 2 Tim. ii. 25. which is directly contrary to the un- 
alterable necessity of events, depending upon the divine pur- 
pose, according to the doctrine of election. 

Ansxv. 1. As to the former part of this objection, in which 
diis doctrine is pretended to have taken its rise from, and to 
be agreeable to, that of the Stoics, concerning fa'te and destiny, 
it will not be much to our purpose to enquire what was the 
opinion of that sect of philosophers concerning it ; and, indeed, 
it will be difficult to fix on a just sense thereof, in which they 
all agree. Some are of opinion, that many of them intended 
nothing else thereby, but the immutability of God's purposes, 
but the dispensation of his providence, being a necessary 
execution theieof ; and when he is said to be bound by the 
laws of fate, they mean, that he cannot act contrary to what 
himself has detei-mined.* And, had it been universally ex- 
plained by them in this sense, it would not have done them 
much service, who oppose the doctrine of election, to have 
compared it therewith; for it would only have proved the 
agrecableness of the doctrine of the immutability of God's 
purpose, relating to all events, to the light of nature, as some 
of the heathen were thereby instructed in it. But since this 
does not appear to be the sense of all the Stoicks about the 
doctrine of fate, but some of them understood it in the same 
sense as it is represented in the objection, this we cannot but 
militate against, and assert the doctrine of election to be very 
remote from it. 

Therefore we need only, in answer to this part of the objec- 

* Vid. Saiac. de Trov. cap. 5. AugXiit, ik Civ. Dei, Lib. V cap. 1,^8. Lip-' 
Phyi. Stoic, Lib. I JDisi. 12. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOK. ol/ 

tion, explain what we mean, when we maintaiii the necessity of 
events, as Ibunded on the will ol God. We are far from assert* 
ing that there is a necessary connexion between second causes, 
and their respective effects, in which some are produced arbi- 
trarily, by the will of intelligent creatures ;^ and when we call 
any thing a necessary caui;e, producing effects, according to its 
own nature, we suppose that this is agreeable to the order, or 
course of nature, which was fixed by God. All that we pre- 
tend to prove, is the dependence of things on the divine will, 
and the necessity of God's purposes taking effect; so that that 
which is arbitrary or corttingent, which might be, or not be, as 
depending on, or relating to second causes, is eventually ne- 
cessary, as it is an accomplishment of the divine purpose. 
Therefore we always distinguish between things being contin- 
gent, with respect to us, and their being so, with respect to 
God ; and, consequently, though it may be^ or per adventure^ 
may be applied to the apparent event of things, these words can 
never be applied to the fulfilling of the divine will ; and this 
leads us to consider the latter part of the objection ; therefore, 
2. As to the scripture*s speaking concerning the uncertainty 
of future events, in those places mentioned in the objection, 
these, and all others of the like nature, in which such a mode 
of speaking is used, may be explained, by distinguishing be- 
tween what might reasonably have been expected to be the 
event of things, supposing men had not been given up to the 
blindness of their mind, and hearts, to act belov.^ the dictates of 
reason, without consulting their own safety and happiness, or 
expressing their gratitude to God ; and what would be the real 
event of things, which God was not pleased to reveal, and 
therefore was unknown to them. Thus, when the prophets 
Jeremiah and Ezekiel represented the repentance and refor- 
mation of Israel as an uncertain event, as well as their forgive- 
ness, and deliverance from the captivity, connected with it, in 
such dubious terms. It may be they xvill consider and return^ 
every man from his evil way ; it implies, that this was what 
might have been reasonably expected by men, though it was 
no matter of uncertainty to the heart-searching God, who 
knoweth the end from the beginning, and perfectly foresees 
what will be the event of things, which, in various respects, 
are under the direction of his providence. Though it could 
hardly be thought, by men, that such an admonition should be 
treated with such contempt, yet God knew how they would 
behave themselves ; there was no peradventiire with respect to 
his judgment thereof; he knew that they would not repent, 
otherwise he would have inclined their wills, and effectually 
have persuaded them to exercise this grace, and thereby have 
prevented his expectation, or determination, from being dis- 
appointed, or frustrated. 



518 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

If it be objected, that, according to this sense of the text, the 
prophet's message to the people would have been to no purpose, 
and his ministry, among them, exercised in vain ,* or that it 
was contrary to the wisdom and goodness of God to make this 
overture to them, when he knew it would not be complied 
with. 

To this it may be replied, that the great God is not bound 
to decline the asserting his right to man's obedience, or requi- 
ring that which is a just debt to him, though he knew that they 
would not comply with his demand thereof; and, indeed, this 
objection cannot be maintained, without supposing, that, when 
the gospel is preached to man, the glory of the divine wisdom, 
and goodness therein cannot be secured, unless we conclude 
either that God doth not know whether man will embrace it, 
or no, which is contrary to his omniscience ; or that he deter- 
mines, that all, to whom the gospel is preached, shall embrace 
it, which is contrary to matter of fact. But there may be a 
medium between both these, which vindicates the divme per- 
fections, in ordering that the gospel should be preached, and 
thereby asserting his sovereignty, and unalienable right to their 
obedience ; accordingly, there might be a small remnant among 
them, in whom God designed that this message should take 
effect. And will any one say, that because the goodness of God 
was not herein demonstrated to all, that therefore no glory was 
brought to that perfection ? 

And if it be farther said, that supposing there were some 
who turned from their evil ways, the captivity, which was 
threatened, was not hereby prevented, and therefore the pro- 
mise, relating thereunto, did not take place ; to this it may be 
replied ; that as God did not give them ground to expect this 
blessing, unless this repentance should be more universal, than 
it really was, so he had various ways to testify his regard to 
those who should receive advantage by this message, for whose 
sake it was principally intended. 

As for that other scripture, in which God advises his people 
to seek righteousness and meekness^ and, as the consequence 
hereof, says, it may be zje may he hid in the day of the hordes 
fierce anger ; the meaning is, that they, who were enabled to 
exercise these graces, should either have some instances of 
temporal deliverance vouchsafed to them ; or if not, that they 
should have no reason to complain that the exercise thereof 
was altogether in vain. 

As for that scripture, in which the apostle bids Timothy to 
exhort those that oppose the gospel, if peradventure^ God would 
give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth ; the 
meaning is, that it was uncertain to Timothy whether God 
would give this grace or no ; and therefore he must preach the 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 519 

gospel, whatever were the event thereof : Nevertheless, it was 
no matter of uncertainty, with respect to God, who must be 
supposed to know what grace he designs to bestow, and there- 
fore the event of things may be dubious to us, and yet be cer- 
tain with respect to him. 

Object. 4. Another objection, against the doctrine of election 
and reprobation, is, that it is altogether inconsistent with the 
preaching of the gospel ; for if God has determined the final 
state of man, so that his purpose cannot be altered, then it is a 
pi-eposterous thing, not to say illusory, for grace to be offered 
to the chief of sinners, which must certainly argue, that it is 
impossible to be attained by them j and, since the overture is 
universal, we must conclude that God has put all mankind into 
a salvable state, and consequently not excluded any from sal- 
vation by his peremptoiy and unchangeable decree. To what 
purpose are the promises of the gospel held forth, to all that 
sit under the sound thereof, if it be impossible for them to at- 
tain the blessings promised therein ? Or what regard could men 
be supposed to have to the promises, if they were not a decla- 
ration of God's purpose ? And, on the other hand, the threat- 
nings denounced would be as little regarded, as an expedient 
to deter men from sinning, if their state were unalterably fixed 
by God, according to this doctrine of election, as it has been 
before considered. 

Answ. That we may proceed with greater clearness in an- 
swering this objection, we shall first shew what we mean by 
preaching the gospel, which is nothing else but a declaration of 
God's revealed will, and our duty pursuant thereunto, which 
is to be made known, particularly what is contained in the 
word of God, relating to the salvation of men, and the way 
which he has ordained in order to their attaining it. Therefore, 

1 . When this salvation is said to be offered in the gospel, we 
intend nothing else thereby, but that a declaration is made to 
sinners, that there are many invaluable privileges which Christ 
has purchased for, and will, in his own time and way, apply to 
all those whom God has purposed to save ; and, since we can- 
not describe them by name, and no unregenerate person has 
ground to conclude that he is of that number, therefore there 
is a farther declaration to be made, namely, that God has in- 
separably connected this salvation, which he has chosen them, 
to, with faith and repentance, and the exercise of all other gra- 
ces, which, as they are God's gift, and to be prayed for, and 
expected, in a diligent attendance on all his ordinances ; so they 
are to be considered as the mark and evidences of their being 
chosen to salvation, without which, it is certainly a vain and 
presumptuous thing for any one to pretend that he has a right 
to it, as the object of God's eternal election. 



J20 iHt DOCiKlNE Of ELECTION. 

2. No one, who preaches the gospel, has any warrant from 
God to tell any individual person that whether he repents and 
believes, or no, he shall be saved ; or, to direct his discourse 
to him, as one that is chosen thereunto, much less to give the 
impenitent sinner occasion to conclude, that, though he obsti- 
nately, and finally, remain in a state of rebellion against God, 
notwithstanding he may hope ta be saved, because there is a 
number of mankind chosen to salvation; for this is not to de- 
clare God's revealed will, but that which is directly contrary to 
it, and therefore not to preach the gospel. Therefore, 

3. Ail, who sit under the sound of the gospel, ought to look 
upon it as a declaration of God's design to save a part of man- 
kind, under the preaching thereof, and among them the chief 
of sinners, which they have a sufficient ground to conclude 
themselves to be ; but yet a door of hope is so far opened here- 
by, that they have no reason to conclude that they are rejected, 
any more than that they are elected ; and, while they wait on 
God's instituted means of grace, they have, at least, this encour- 
agement, that, peradventure, they may be of the number of 
God's elect .: and, when they find in themselves that faith, 
which is the evidence thereof, then they may determine their 
interest in, and lay claim to this privilege, when they are ena- 
bled to make their calling, and thereby their election sure. 

And as for the promises and threatnings, these are to be con- 
sidered by unregenerate ])ersons, without determining their 
right to the one, or falling under the other, as elected or re- 
jected ; for that is still supposed to be a secret ; therefore they 
are to regard the promise, as a declaration' of God's purpose, 
relating to the connexion that there is between faith and sal- 
vation, as an inducement to perform the one, in expectation of 
the other. And as for the threatnings, though they determine 
the present state of impenitent sinners to be such, in which they 
Sive undone and miserable, yet they are not to be extended to 
those events, which ai-e hid in the purpose of God, so as to 
give any one ground to conclude that he is thereby finally ex- 
cluded from salvation, since such an exclusion as this is inse- 
parably connected with final impenitency and unbelief. 

Object. 5. It is farther objected, that this doctrine is, in ma- 
ny instances subversive of practical religion. And, 

1. That it is inconsistent with the duty of prayer ; for if God 
has determined to save a person, what need has he to ask a 
blessing, which is already granted ? and, if he has determined 
to reject him, his prayer will be in vain. 

3. It is farther supposed, that it leads to presumption, on the 
one hand, or despair, on the other ; election, to presumption ; 
reprobation, to despair. And, 

f). They add. that it leads to licentiousness, as it is incon- 



THE DOCTRIKE OF ELECTIONS 59A 

M Stent with our using endeavours that we may be saved: for 
to what purpose is it for persons to strive to enter in at tlie 
sti-ait gate, when all their endeavours will be ineffectual, if they 
are not elected ? or to what purpose is it for persons to use anv 
endeavours to escape the wrath of God, due to sin, if they are 
appointed to wrath, axid so must necessarily perish ? 

Answ. This objection is, beyond measure, shocking ,• and it 
is no wonder, that a doctrine, that is supposed to haN'e such 
consequences attending it, is treated with the vitmost degree of 
detestation : but as the greatest part of the objections against it, 
are no other than misrepresentations thereof, so it is no difficult 
matter to reply to them, to the conviction of those who are dis- 
posed to judge impartially of the matter in controversy^ between 
us. We shall therefore proceed to reply to the several branches 
of this objection. And, 

1. As to what concerns the duty of prayer; when we are 
engaged in it, we are not to suppose that we are to deal with 
God, in such a way, as when we have to do with men, whom 
we suppose to be undetermined, and that they are to be moved, 
by intreaties, to alter their present resolutions, and to give us 
what we ask for ; for that is to conceix^e of him as altogether 
such an one as ourselves : accordingly, we are not to conclude, 
that he has not determined to grant the thing that we are to 
pray to him for ; for that would be presumptuously to enter into 
his secret purpose, since h,e has no v/here told us wit shall be 
denied the blessings we want ; but rather that there is forgive- 
ness with him, and mercy for the chief of sinners, as an en- 
couragement to this duty ; and, besides this, has given us far-^ 
ther ground to hope for a gracious answer of prayer, where he 
gives a heart to seek him-, Therefore we are tx) behave our- 
selves, in this duty, as those who pretend not to know God's 
secret purpose, but rather desire to wait for some gracious in- 
timation or token for good, that he will hear and answer our 
prayer ; therefore his secret purpose is no more inconsistent 
with this dut)-, than if, with those that deny the doctrine we are 
maintaining, we sliould conclude that this matter is not deter- 
mined by him. 

2. As to this doctrine's leading to presumption, or despair,^ 
there is no ground to conclude that it has a tendency to eitlier 
of themo It cannot lead to presumption, inasmuch as election 
is not discovered to any one till he believes ; therefore ap un- 
converted jjerson has no ground to presume and conclude, that 
all is well with him, because he is elected ', for that is boldly to 
determine a thing that he knov/s nothing of; the objection 
thei-efore, with respect to such, supposes that to be known, which 
remains a secret. And, on the other hand, they have no ground 
to despair, on a supposition that they are finallv rejected ; for 

Vol. I. 3 U 



522 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

it is one thing to be the object of the deci-ee of reprobation, 
which no one can, or ought to determine, concerning himself, 
so long as he is in this world, much more if we consider him 
as enjoying the means of grace, and a door of hope is open to 
him therein ; and God has pleased to declare, in the gospel, 
that he will receive sinners that repent and believe in him, how 
unworthy soever they are ; therefore such are not to conclude 
that their state is desperate, though it be exceeding dangerous, 
but to wait for the efficacy of the means of grace, and those 
blessings that accompany salvation. 

And as for those that are in a converted state, this doctrine 
IS far from having a tendency, either to lead them to presump- 
tion, or despair^ but, on the other hand, to thankfulness to God, 
for his discriminating grace, which, when persons experience, 
they are not only encouraged to hope for farther blessmgs, but 
to perform those duties whereby they may express their gra- 
titude to him. As for presumption, which is the only thing that 
election is pretended to lead them to, that cannot be the natu- 
ral consequence or tendency thereof; lor if they presume that 
ihey shall be saved, this is not to be reckoned a crime in them; 
for that presumption which is supposed to be so in the objec- 
tion consists in a person's expecting a blessing without reason ; 
but this is contraiy to the supposition that he is a believer ; and 
5t would be a strange method of reasoning to infer, that he, 
who has ground to conclude that he has a right to eternal life, 
from those marks and evidences of grace, which he finds in 
iiimself, is guilty of a sinful presumption, when he is induced 
hereby to lay claim to it; and therefore the sense of the objec- 
tion, must be this, that a believer having been once enabled to 
conclude himself elected, may, from hence, take occasion, sup- 
posing that his work is done, and his end ansv/ered, to return 
to his former wicked life, and yet still presume that he shall be 
saved ; whereas that Vv^ould be a certain indication that he had 
BO ground to conclude this, but was mistaken, when he thought 
that he had ; so that this doctrine cannot lead a believer, as 
such, to presumption, and consequently the objection, in which 
at is supposed that it does, is founded on one of these two mis- 
takes, viz. that every one, who is elected to salvation, knows 
his interest in this privilege, as though it were immediately re~ 
X'ealed to him, without inferring it from any marks and eviden- 
ces of grace that he finds in himself; or else, that it is impossi- 
ble for any one, who thinks that he believes, and, from thence, 
concludes that he is elected, to appear afterwards to have been 
mistaken in the judgment, which he then passed upon himself; 
but either of these contain a misrepresentation of the consequen- 
ces ol the doctrine of election ; neither is there any regard had 
tx> that necessary distinction that there is, between a persou'a 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION* ^^3 

being chosen to eternal life, and his being able to determine 
himself to be interested in this privilege ; and it is contrary to 
what we havr beiore considered, that whenever God chooses 
to the end, he chooses to the means, which are inseparably con- 
nected with it, which is the only rule whereby we are warrant- 
ed, when applying it to ourselves, to conclude that we shall be 
saved. 

3. It cannot, in the least, be proved that this doctrine has 
any tendency to lead persons to licentiousness ; nor is it incon- 
sistent with our using the utmost endeavours to attain salvation. 
If it be said, that many vile persons take occasion, from hence, 
to give the reins to their corruption ; that is not the natural, or 
necessary conseq^uence thereof; since there is no truth but what 
may be abused. The apostle Paul did not think the doctrine 
of the grace of God, which he so strenuously maintained, was 
less true, or glorious, because some drew this vile consequence 
from it. Let iiscontmuein sin ^that grace may aboiindyKom. vi. l- 

And as for those means, v/hich God has ordained to bring 
about the salvation of his people, we are obliged to attend upon 
them, though we know not, before-hand, what will certainly be 
the event thereof; and if through the blessing of God accom- 
panying them, we are effectually called and sanctified, and tiiere- 
by enabled to know our election, this will (agreeably to the ex- 
perience of all true believers,) have a tendency to promote ho«> 
liness. 

Object. 6. It is farther objected, that more especially a* 
gainst the doctrine of reprobation, that it argues God to be the 
author of sin ; and particularly in such instances as these, viz* 
with respect to the first entrance of sin into the world, and in 
God's imputing the sin of our first parents to all their posterity, 
and afterwards suffering it to make such a progress as it has done 
ever since ; and, most of all, when it is supposed that this is not 
only the result of the divine purpose, but that it also respects 
the blinding men's minds, and hardening their hearts, and so 
rendering their final impenitency and perdition unavoidable. 

Answ. To this it may be answered, 

1. As to what concerns the first entrance of sin into the 
world, it cannot reasonably be denied, that the purpose of God 
was concerned about it, before it v/as committed, in the same 
sense as his actual providence was afterwards, namely, in per- 
mitting, though not effecting it ; notwithstanding this was not 
the cause of the committing it, since a bare permission has no 
positive efficiency in order thereunto ; the not hindering, or ren 
straining a wicked action, does not render him the author of it. 
It is true, God knew how man would behave, and particularly, 
that he would mis-improve and forfeit that original righteous- 
ness, in which he was created, and that, by this means, he 



;i24. THE DOCTRINE 01 ELECTION, 

would contract that guilt, which was the consequence thereof^ 
and thereby render himself liable to his just displeasure ; to 
deny this, would be to deny that he foreknew that, from eter- 
nity, which he knew in time. And, so far as the actual provi- 
dence of God was conversant about what was natural therein, 
so far his purpose determined that it should be ; but neither 
does this argue him to be the author of sin. But this will be 
farther considered, when we speak concerning the actual pro- 
vidence of God under a following answer.* 

2. As to that part of the objection, which respects the im- 
puting the sin of our first parents to all their posterity, that is 
■more frequently brought against this doctrine than any other ; 
and it is generally represented in the most indefensible terms, 
without making any abatements as to the degree of punishment 
that was due to it; and, accordingly, they think that we can 
hardly have the front to affirm, that our arguments, in defence 
hereof, are agreeable to the divine perfections, as we pretend 
those others are, which have been brought in defence of this 
doctrine. But, I hope, we shall be able to maintain the doc- 
trine of original sin^ in consistency with the divine perfections, 
as well as scripture, in its proper place, to which we shall refer 
k.f Therefore all that I shall add, at present, is, that if the 
doctrine of original sin be so explained, as that it does not ren- 
der God the author of sin, his purpose relating thereunto, 
which must be supposed, in ail respects, to correspond with it, 
does not argue him to be the author of it. 

3. As to the progress of sin in the world, and the proneness 
of all mankind to rebel against God ; this, as before was ob- 
served, concerning sin in general, is the object of his permis- 
sive, but not his effective will ; though there is this difference 
between God's suffering sin to enter into the world at first, and 
his suffering the continuance, or increase of it therein, that, at 
first, he dealt with man as an innocent creature, and only left 
him to the mutability of his own will, having before given him 
a power to retain his integrity. But the fallen creature is be- 
come weak, and unable to do any thing that is good in ail its 
circumstances, and afterwards is more and more inclined to 
sin, by contracting vicious habits, and persisting therein. Now, 
though God's leaving man to himself at first, when there wa~. 
no forfeiture made of his preventing grace, must be reckoned 
an act of mere sovereignty, his leaving sinners to themselves 
may be reckoned an act of justice, as a punishment of sin be- 
fore committed, and neither of these argue him to be the aii- 
thor of it ; neither does the purpose of God, relating there- 
unto, give the least occasion for such an inference. 

" See quest, XVIll \ See Qtcest. XXI, XXIL 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 325 

Again, we must distinguish between the occasion and the 
cause of sin. God's providential dispensations, though unex- 
ceptionably holy and righteous, are oiten-times the occasion 
thereof: thus his afflictive hand sometimes occasions the cor- 
ruptions of men to break forth, in repining at, and quarrelling 
with his providence ; and his giving outward blessings to one, 
which he withholds from another, gives occasion, to some, to 
complain of the injustice of his dealings with them ; and the 
strictness, and holiness of his law, and gives occasion, to cor- 
rupt nature to discover itself in the blackest colours ; the apos- 
tle plainly evinces this truth, when he says, S'm taki7ig occasion 
hij the commandment^ xvrought in me all manner of concupi- 
scence^ Rom. vii. 8. and, indeed, there is nothing in the whole 
compass of providence, or in the methods of the divine govern- 
ment therein, but what may be, and often is, an occasion of sin, 
in wicked men. But certainly it is not the cause of it ; even as 
the clemency of a prince may occasion a rebellion among his 
subjects; but it is the vile ingratitude, and wickedness of their 
nature, that is the spring and cause thereof; so the providence, 
and consequently the purpose of God, which is executed there- 
by, may be the occasion of sin, and yet the charge brought in 
this objection, as though God hereby was argued to be the au- 
thor of sin, is altogether groundless. 

4. As to what is farther objected, relating to the purpose of 
God, to blind the minds, and harden the hearts of men, and 
that final impenitency, which is the consequence thereof, God 
forbid that we should assert that this is a positive act in him ; 
and, so far as it contains nothing else but his determining to 
deny that grace, which would have had the contrary effect, or 
his providence relating thereunto, this does not give any coun- 
tenance to the objection, or weaken the force of the arguments 
that we have before laid down, which is very consistent there- 
with. 

Object, 7. There is another objection, which is generally laid 
down in so moving a way, that, whether the argument be just 
or no, the style is adapted to affect the minds of men with pre- 
judice against this doctrine, and that is taken from the incon- 
sistency thereof with God's judicial proceedings against the 
wicked in the day of judgment, and that it will afford the sin- 
ner a plea, in which he may say to this effect : Lord, I sinned 
by a fatal necessity ; it was impossible for me to avoid that 
which thou art now offended with me for ; it was what thou 
didst decree should come to pass. I have been told, that thv 
decrees are unalterable, and that it is as impossible to change 
the course of nature, or to remove the mountains, which thou 
hast fixed with thy hand, as to alter thy purpose ; wilt thou then 
condemn one, who sinned and fell pursuant to thy will ? Dost 



526 THE DOCTRrNE OF ELECTION. 

thou will that men should sin and perish, and then lay the blame 
at their door, as though they were culpable for doing what thou 
hast determined should be done ? 

Anszu. This objection supposes that the decree of God lays 
a necessary constraint on, and enforces the will of man to sin ; 
which, if they could make it appear that it does, no reply could 
be made to it. But this is to represent the argument we are 
maintaining in such a way, in which no one, who has just ideas 
of this doctrine, would ever understand it, and it is directly 
contrary to the foregoing method of explaining it. We have 
already proved, in our answer to the third objection, that sin 
is not necessary in that sense, in which they suppose it to be, 
or that, though the decree of God renders events necessary, 
yet it does not take away the efficiency of second causes, and 
therefore the purpose of God, relating thereunto, is not to be 
pleaded, as an excuse for it, or as a ground of exemption from 
punishment. We read of the Jews, that, zvith wicked hands, 
they crucified onr Saviour; the crime was their own; but this 
is expressly said to have been done by, or, in pursuance of, 
the determinate counsel mid fore-knoioledge of God, Acts ii. 23. 
He fore-knew what they would do, and purposed not to pre- 
vent it ; but yet he did not force their will to commit it. And 
elsewhere God says, concerning Israel, Thou heardest not ; yea, 
thou knevoest not, from that time thine ear xvas not opened; and 
then he adds, / knew that thou woiddest deal very treacherous^ 
ly, Isa. xlviii. 8. Israel might as well have pleaded, that God 
knew, before-hand, how they would behave themselves, and so 
have thrown the blame on him, for not preventing this fore- 
seen event, but suffering them to go on in this destructive way, 
with as much reason, as the sinner is supposed, in the ol^jec- 
tion, to have, when taking occasion so to plead, as he is repre- 
sented, as having ground to do, in the day of judgment, as a 
consequence from the doctrine we are maintaining. 

Again, whatever has been said concerning the immutability 
of the divine purpose, yet this does not give the least counte- 
nance to any one's charging his sin on God ; as we have, ink 
answer to the last objection, proved that it does not render him 
the author of sin ; and therefore man's destruction must lie at 
his own door. It is one thing to say, that it is in the sinner's 
power to save himself, and another thing to say, that the siu 
he commits is not wilful, and therefore that guilt is not con- 
tracted thereby ; and, if so, then this affords no matter of ex- 
cuse to the sinner, according to the import of the objection. 

IX. We are now to consider some things that may be in- 
ferred from the doctrine we have been insisting on, and how it 
is to be practically improved by us, to the glory of God, and 
our spiritual advantage. And, 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. S^V 

1. From the methods taken to oppose and decry it, by mis- 
yepresentations, which contain little^ less than blasphemy, we 
infer, that however unjust consequences deduced from a doc- 
trine may be an hindrance to its obtaining in the world ; yet 
this method of opposition will not render it less true, or de- 
fensible; nor ought it to prejudice the minds of men against 
the sacred writings, or religion in general. We cannot but ob- 
serve, that while several scriptures are produced in defence of 
this doctrine and others in opposition to it, and the utmost 
cautions have not been used to reconcile the sense given there- 
of with the natural ideas which we have of the divine perfec- 
tions; and many, in defending one side of the question have 
made use of unguarded expressions, or called that a scripture- 
doctrine which is remote from it; and others, in opposition 
hereunto, have, with too much assurance, charged the defenders 
thereof with those consequences, which are neither avowed by 
them, nor justly deduced from their method of reasoning; the 
unthinking and irreligious part of mankind have taken occasion, 
from hence, with the Deists, to set themselves against revealed 
religion, or to give way to scepticism, as though there were 
nothing certain, or defensible, in religion; and take occasion 
to make it the subject of satire and ridicule. But, passing this 
by, though it is a matter very much to be lamented we will con- 
sider this doctrine as rendered less exceptionable, or more just- 
ly represented; and, accordingly, 

2. We may infer from it, that as it is agreeable to the di- 
vine perfections, so it has the greatest tendency to promote 
practical godliness. For, 

(1.) Since God has fore-ordained whatever comes to pass; 
this should lead us to an humble submission to his will, in all 
the dispensations of his providence. When we consider that 
nothing, in this respect comes by chance ; this should haVe a 
tendency to quiet our minds, and silence all our murmuring and 
uneasy thoughts, whatever afflictions we are exposed to. We 
are too apt to complain sometimes of second causes, as though 
all our miseries took their rise from thence ; and, at other times, 
to afflict ourselves beyond measure, as apprehending that those 
proper means have not been used, which might have prevented 
them ; as Martha tells our Saviour, If thou hadst been here^ 
my brother had not d'led^ John xi. 21. whereas we ought rather 
to consider, that all this befalls us in pursuance of God's pur- 
pose : had he designed to have prevented the affliction, he 
would have directed to other means conducive to that end, or 
would have attended those that have been used, with their de- 
sired success. We use the means as not knowing what are the 
,eecret purposes of God, with respect to the event of things ; 



.528 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

but, when this is made known to us, it should teach us to ac- 
quiesce in, and be entirely resigned to the divine will. 

(2.) When we cannot see the reason, or understand the 
meaning of the dispensations of divine providence, and are not 
able to pass a judgment concerning future events, whether re- 
lating unto ourselves, or others ; and, when all things look with 
a very dismal aspect, as to what concerns the interest and 
church of God in the world, we must be content to wait till he 
is pleased to discover them to us ; what he oftentimes does, roe 
knoxv not noxv^ but shall knoxv hereafter^ as our Saviour said to 
one of his disciples, John xiii. 7. It is no wonder that we are 
at a loss, as to God's purposes, since secret things belong ^;o 
him ; and therefore all that we are to do, in such a case, is, to 
rest satisfied, that all these things shall, in the end, appear to 
have a tendency to advance his own perfections, and bring 
about the salvation of his people. 

(3.) Since the purpose of God respects the means, as well 
as the end, this should put us upon the use of those proper 
means, in which we may hope to obtain grace and glory j and 
therefore this doctrine does not lead us to sloth, and indifference 
in religion ; for that is to suppose, that the ends and means are 
separated in God's purpose : and when, through his blessing 
attending them, the ordinances, or means of grace, are made 
effectual for the working of faith, and all other graces, these 
being connected, in God's purpose, with glory, it ought to en- 
courage our hope relating to the end of faith, even the salva- 
tion of our souls. 

(4.) Let us take heed that we do not peremptorily, without 
gi"0ifnd conclude ourselves elected unto eternal life, on the one 
hand, or rejected on the other. To determine that we are cho- 
sen to salvation, before we are effectually called, is presump- 
tuously to enter into God's secret counsels, which we cannot. 
:it present, have a certain and determinate knowledge of; but 
to lay this as a foundation, as to what concerns the conduct of 
our lives, is oftentimes of a very pernicious tendency. If, as 
the result of this conclusion made, we take encouragement to 
go on in sin, this will cut the sinews of all religion, and expose 
us to blindness of mind, and hardness of heart, and a greater 
degree of impenitency and unbelief, as the consequence of tliis 
bold presumption and affront to the divine Majesty. 

Neither, on the other hand, are we to conclude that v;e are 
not elected ; for though we may be in suspense about the e\'ent 
of things, and not know whether we are elected or rejected, 
this is not inconsistent with our using endeavours to attain a 
good hope, through grace ; yet to determine that we are not 
elected, is to conclude, against ourselves that all endeavours 
will be to no purpose ; which we have no ground to do, since 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 529 

It is one thing to conclude that we are in a state of unregene- 
racy, and another thing to determine that we are not elected. 
The consequence of our concluding that we are in an uncon- 
verted state, ought to be our praying, waiting, and hoping for 
the efficacy of divine grace, which extends itself to the chief of 
sinners, as a relief against despair, though such can have no 
ground to say, they are elected ; therefore the safest way, and 
that which is most conducive to the ends of religion, is to be . 
firmly persuaded, that though the final state of man be certain- 
ly determined by God, yet this is to be no rule for an unre- 
generate person to take his measures from, any more than if it 
were a matter of uncertainty, and, in all respects, undetermined 
by him. 

(5.) Let us, according to the apostle's advice. Give diligence 
to make our calling and election siire^ 2 Pet. i. 10. It is certain- 
ly a very great privilege for us, not barely to know, that some 
were chosen to eternal life, but to be able to conclude that we 
are of that happy number ; and, in order hereunto, we must 
not expect to have an extraordinary revelation thereof, or to 
find ourselves described by name in scripture, as though this 
were the way to attain it; for the rule by which we are to judge 
of this matter, is, our enquiring whether we have those marks, 
or evidences thereof, which are contained therein ; and there- 
fore we are, by a diligent and impartial self-examination, to 
endeavour to know whether we are called, or enabled, to per- 
form the obedience of faith, which God is said to elect his peo- 
ple to ; or whether we are holy, and without blame, before him 
in love ? whether we have the temper and disposition of the 
children of God, as an evidence of our being chosen to the adop- 
tion of children, and as such, are conformed to the image of 
Christ ? 

(6.) If we have ground to conclude that we are chosen to 
eternal life, this ought to be improved to the glory of God, and 
our own spiritual advantage ; it ought to put us upon admiring 
and adoring the riches of discriminating grace, which is herein 
eminently illustrated ; and such are under the highest obliga- 
tion to walk humbly with God, as well as thankfully ; for it is 
owing to his grace, not only that they are chosen to eternal life, 
but that they are enabled to discern their interest in this pri- 
vilege, (a J 



(a) " When we contend for this doctrine as a truth, it should be viewed in 
connexion with its real importa7ice. These two objects are extremely different 
in things natural, civil, and religious. There are many things true in histoi-y, in 
philosophy, in politics, and even in theolog\', which no sober person deems im- 
portant. There are other things hypothetically important, whether actually true 
•r not. And of this kind is the subject before us. Such is the nature, tlie con- 
nexion, and consequence; of it, that if it he true, it ciumot fail of beu)g of the 
Srst importance. 

Vol. L .3 X 



530 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION* • 

But how are v/e more particularly to estimate the importance of this subject? 
By the influence which the admission or the denial of it has on the very founda- 
tions of religion. For instance, if it be not true, either man himself or mere 
chance has the principal share m effecting our actual salvation, and investing us 
with eternal glory. Some indeed are so lost to modesty and self-knowledge, and 
so unacquainted with the leading truths of Christianity, that they do not scruple 
to ascribe the eventual difference in our future state, whether good or bad, to 
man himself, but attended with sorae verbal, unmeaning compliment to divine 
mercy. Such persons should first learn the rudiments of Christianity, before they 
have a right to expect any deference shewn to their opinions. On the other hand, 
if this BL true, its utility is plain ; it will hide pride from man; it wili exclude 
chance from having any share in our deliverance ; it will exalt tlie grace of God ; 
it will render salvation a certain, and not a precarious thing ; and, in a word, it 
will secure to them who have the Spirit of Christ the greatest consolation. 

This was the view which our episcopal reformers had of the doctrine, both as 
to its truth, and the importance of it. " Predestination to life" say tliey, " is the 
everlasting purpose of God, whereby, before the foundations of the world were 
laid, he hath constantly decreed by his counsel, secret to us, to deliver from 
curse and damnation those whom he hath chosen in Clirist out of mankind, and 
to bring them by Chi-ist to everlasting salvation, as vessels made to honour. — 
The godly consideration of Predestination iuid our election in Christ is full of 
sweet, pleasant, and unspeakable comfort to godly persons, and such as feel in 
themselves the woi-kmg ot the Spirit ot" Christ mortifying the works of the flesh, 
and their earthly members, and drawing up their minds to high and heavenly 
things ; as well because it dolh greatly establish and confirm their faith of eter- 
nal salvation, to be enjoyed through Christ, as because it doth fervently kindle 
their love towards God." — Another observation I would make is, 

2. That it is highly proper, in order to investigate the present subject with 
success, to keep it perfectly distinct, and free from all imp^ire mixtures. This is 
what some of our early reformers, and many of tlie modern defenders of this doc- 
trine have not done. For v/ant of this, many bitter enemies have opposed it. Dr. 
Whitby, for instance, and most who have written on the same side of the ques- 
tion since his time, place predestination to death, or reprobation to misery, as 
the very Ibundation of Calvinism, and inseparable fi'om predestination to life. But 
so far is predestination to death from being true, that nothing can be more un- 
true. It is but an arbitrary assumption ; a foreign, impure mixture, having no 
foundation either in the real meaning of holy writ, or in the nature of things ; ex- 
cept indeed we mean by it, what no one questions, a determination to punish the 
guilty.* 

• Predestination to Death or misery, as the end, and to sin as the means, I call " an impure 
tnixture;" 3. mixture, because its connexion with I'redestination to life is arbitrary and For- 
ced;— impure, because the suptiosition itselt is a fbul aspersion of the divine character. St. Au- 
gustine, Calvin, Perkins, Twisse, Rutherford, ?iC ?iC. though highly valuable and excellent men. 
upon the whole, were not Free from this impure mixture of doctrine. But oFall modern authors, 
It we except the philosophical Necessarians, Hobbes, Collins, Hume. Hartley. Priestly, &c. Dr. 
Hopkins, of America seems the most open in his avowal of the sentiment, that sin and misery 
are decreed in the same manner as holiness and happiness, in order to produce the greatest gene- 
ral good. The substance of his reasoning is thus expressed by himself: " AH future existences, 
" events, and actions, must h;ive a cause of their futurition, or there must be a reason why they 
'' are future, or certainly to take place, rather than not. This cause must be the divine decree 
"• determinini; their future existence, or it must be in the future existences themselves. But the 
"future existences could not be the cause of their own futurition; for this supposes them to ex- 
" ist as a cause, and to have influence, before they have any existence, even from eternity. --The 
" cause therefore can be nothing but divine decree, determining their future existence, without 
•• which nothing could be future, consequently nothing could be known to be future." -See his 
System of doctrines, 2 vol. 8vo. especially Vol. i p 110— 217. 

On the sentimenr itself, by whomsoever held, I would offer the following strictmes : 

1. It is a mere assumption, that i/n, which the above proposition avowedly includes, has no 
possible cauie of its futurition but either the divine decree, or the future existences themselves. 
For though God's decrees are the cause of our being, faculties, and volitions, none of these, nor 
any thing else th^t can be traced to divine causation, will constitute sin. Nor yet is it true that 
sin is thec3a,9f of itself ; for then sin would he self-existent. It follows therefore that it must 
have another origin than either the divine decree or its own existence. 

2. It is equally plain that the cause of sin is not itself morally evil; for this would involve a 
contradiction, making cause and effect to be the same thing. Nor yet can the cause be morally 
good. For as from truth nothing but truth can ligitimately proceed, so from good nothing but 
good can flow. Evil, indeed, is related to good, but not as cause and effect. Though evil could 
Rct follow were there no infinite good, no creature, no will, no freedom, yet something else must 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 531 

But is not one m:in's misery as certain as another man's happiness ? Yes f 
iT.qually certain. What then; must they thei'cfore be equally /jretfesftHuierf .? No, 
But how can a thing be certain, if it be not predestinat.-d? Have a liitle patithce 
and I v'lll tell you. The previous question is. Does God predestinate to sm as 
the nieans^ and to death or misery as the end, in the same way as he predesti- 

be sought as the matrix, where the monster sin is generated and fostered, and which, morally 
considered, is neither good nor evil.— Pheretore, 

3. We assert, that the origin of moral e'cil is to be found in the«n/un of two principles, neither 
of which considered alone partakes ot a moral character. These two principles are Liberty and 
Pasiive Poiuer. Liberty, it is manifest is morally neither good nor bad, but is a mere natural 
instc umeut, if 1 may so speak, and may be termed a natural good of which God is the author and 
decreer. On the contrary. Passive Power is a tiattiral evil of which God is not the author or 
decreer, yet morally considered is not evil. But this term, being little understood, requires fur» 
ther explanation ; at least it is incumbent on me to shew in what sense 1 use it. ^Iy design is 
not to vindicate the ust of it by others, but I adopt it to convey a specific idea, for which 1 find 
no other word or phrase more appropriate. By " Passive Power," then, I mean. That which is 
of unavoidable necessity found in every creature, as such, in direct opposition to the Self-exis- 
tence, independriice. and all-sufficiency of God. In other words. It is that tendency to nihility, 
ph\si';jily considered, and to defection, morally considered, which ot absolute necessity belongs 
to eve""} dependent or created nature. That there is su^h aprinciple is self-evident, nor is it pro- 
bable that any reasonable being will ever controvert its existence. Now, it is dem.^nstrable that 
this, from tlie definition, cannot be the object of divine decree, or of will ; for it is stated to be 
o( absolute or unavoidable necessity ; besides, it is absurd to suppose that God has decreed, or pro- 
duces, any thing the existence of wiiith stands in direct contrariety to himself. That it is not a 
moral evil is plain, for the holiest creatures are subjects of it— God alone is exempt 

4. Let it be further observed, that the First Cause, bein^ goodness itself, impels, whether de^ 
cretively or efficiently, to good only ; and < f this character is even oar beingj necessitated to exer- 
cise our volitions Yet, when the exercise of liberty, in itself innocent, unites with passive pow- 
er, the fruit or offspring of this union is moral evil. 1 his, I am fully persuaded, is the true so- 
lution of this question, JVhence Cometh moral evil? If any person shall think proper candidly to 
assign his reasons to the contrary, due regard shall be paid to them. 

5. If it be asked, where lies the difference between decreeing and permitting sin to take place.' 
\ answer, the difference is, that the one would be an act of injustice, the othei is doing nothing. 
So that until it can be shewn that there is no difTerence between injustice and doing nothing, 
there is no force in the objection. That to necessitate sin decretively would be an act ot injus- 
tice, and therefore incompatible with the divine rhaiacter, is, ! think, demonstrable; for.it would 
he to decree to destruction antecedently to desert-to aiiihiUite the sinfulness of any act, making 
its evil nature to consist in its effects — and to destroy the iinmutalile essences of good and eviL 
AVhereas to permit, or to suffer to take place without prevention, is not to act not to decree. To 
" decree to permit," therefore, is a contradiction in terms. 

6. But, it has been said, the event is the same to the sinner, whether he be hurried on to sin 
and misery by a decretive impulse, or these effects are not prevented when in the power of om- 
nipotence to interpose. This objection would have some weight, if the happiness of the creature 
were the only, or even the principal end of God in creation. But this not oeing the case, its 
weight vanishes. To illustrate this we may suppose, that the event of a man's execution is well 
known to a judge ; but, instead of proceeding on the principles of l.iw and e<iuity, and to effect 
conviction and condemnation according to legal evidence, he orders the man to be executed clan- 
destinely without any eijuital'le pro. ess, under pretence that it could make no difference to the 
sufferer, for the event of his execution was certain ! Besides, the spirit of the objection reflects 
on God's actual dealings with his creatures, in every instance of their sufferings; because it is 
in the power of omnipotence to interpose. And in fact, it must be allowed, either that the hap.. 
pintss of the creature is not the chief end of creation, or that the permission of sin is an act of 
injustice. But the case is plain, that his own glory is the chief end of creation and government, 
and that there is no injustice in the permission of sin. 

7. It may be .'said, It the union of liberty with passive power be the origin of moral evil, and if 
the holiest creatures in heaven are both free and the subjects of passive power, how is it that they 
do not sin ! If both are united in the same persons, does the one never terminate upon, or unite 
itself to the other? In answer to this enquiry, we must distinguish between having the piinci* 
pie, and being under its influence without controul. Though the spirits ot the just, and holy 
angels, have in them the principle, as the condition of their created existence, yet it is counter- 
acted by sovereign favour. They may say, as well as Paul, by the 3;race of God we are what 
■we are. The object of divine support is the disposition, or the seiJt of moral action : this beine 
made good, or pure, or holy, prior to all acts of the will, effectually co'.inte'-.acts the influence ot 
passive power. The Lilierty and choice of a heavenly being therefore, terminating on such a dis- 
|(0sition. no acts but such as are holy can ensue. Hence, 

8. if we would know how this is consistent with the actual fall of beings who were once in 
this condition, we must attend to another important consideration ; whicli is. th.ir when God at 
any time deals in mere cijuity with a moral agent, v/ithout the counteracting inflierce of sove- 
reign favour, the inevitable consequence is. that his liberty, or free choice will t.?' miiiate upon 
his passive power. Hence the certainty of the futuritlon ot moral evil, in ,)U possible degrees and 
circumstances, without any decretive efficiency in its production.— If it e asked, why the exer- 
cise of equity is assigned as the occasion of this union rather than sovereignty ; or, why leaving 
a free agent to the influence of his passive power should rot be considci ed i sovereign rither than 
an equit.ible act ! The best answer to this enquii y, is a definition of the two tt ri..si By equity 
then I mean the principle that tcives to each his due ; by sovereignly, a right to do whatsoever is 
not inconsistent with equitv. And from this definition it must appear that there may lea two- 
fold deviation from equity, vi/. p;iving more than is due. or less than is Aie ; more good and 'ess 
evil, or more evil and less good than is equitable. The former of these, n.r-re r.ood and less evil, 
must needs be for the advantage of the creature; and therefore it may be r.-.Ile;' a graci'us de- 
viation. Without it, there would be no room for either mercy or grace. The latter, more evil 
and less good thaij is due, is properly called injustice, and is such a deviation frcm equity as is 



532 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

nates to holiness as the means, and eternal glory as the end ? This we deny, as 
it would be infinitely unworthy of God, making him the author of sin, or doing 
evii that good may come. Some indeed have distinguished between bemg the 
author or the cause of sin, and being a smner. But the distinction itself is not 
Solid, nor could it fully satisfy those who have made it in cleai'ing the divine 
character.* 

not cocnpatible ^Yith the divine character. Therefore, to do us good beyond our claim is an act 
of sovereignty ; out to give us neither more nor less than is our due is to deal with us in pure 
equity.. 1 

9. Hence it follows, that when God deals with angels or men ih sovereignly, according to the 
definitions, he docs them good beyund their claim. But to make this to be the immediate cause 
of the sin of men and angels is ausuicl. On the other hand, it is incompatihle with the divine 
character, as before observed, to give them less good and more evil than is their due ; and there- 
fore this cannot be the cause of sin, as sure as God is incapable of exercising injustice.— Where- 
fore, it remains that then alone can moral agents fall into sin when dealt with in pure equity. 
In the act of defection, or becoming sinfui, they are equally free from being impelled by injus- 
tice, and upheld by sovereign favour. 

COaOLIARlES. 

1. All the good and happiness in the universe of created beings are the fruit of Sovereignty and 
Decree. 

2. AH the moral evil and misery in the universe are the offspring of liberty, a natural pood, 
terminating or acting upon, or united lo passive poTver. a natural evil, not count racted by sove- 
reignly gracious acts on the disposition, or the seat of the moral principle, which may be called 
analogically the heart. 

3. As every act and dei;ree of liberty is perfectly fore-known to God as the eftect of his own 
decree, and every hypothetical tendency of passive power, thoujjh itself not an object of decree, 
is equally foieknown, it follows, that every sin is as accurately tore.kiiown as if decreed, and has 
an equally infallible ground of certain futurition. 

*. It is allowed that there is a diiference between the cause of sin. as a principle, and being a 
pinner ; but when applied to an agent, to be the author or the cause of sin, and to be a sinner, is 
the same thinij. Therefore, when applied to Gnd, in no proper sense whatever can it be said that 
he is the author of sin. — '• If by the author of sin is meant (says President Edwards) the pern.lt. 
ter, or a not hinderer of sin, and at the same time a disposer of the state of events in such a maii- 
ner, for wise, hoiy, and most excellent ends and purposes, that sin infallibly follo"'s : 1 say , if this 
be all that is meant by the author of sin, I do not deny that God is the author of sin, though 1 
dislike and reject the phrase, as that vyhich by use and custom is apt to carry another sense." 
Edwards on the Will, Part iv. Sect. xi. 

But though this acute and excellent writer disavows the use of tbe phrase, he no where assigns 
the true ground why it should not be used. The truth is, he does not seem to have been aware of 
any alternative between the certain futurition of sin and its being decreed. And his only method 
of warding off the most ruinous consequences appears to have been adopted for want of a better, 
and not from the satisfactory nature of that method. His view, in brief, is this : God is a being 
of infinite goodness and wisdom ; he can will nothing but good ; the system he hath adopted is 
the best; now, says he, "if the will be good, and the object of his will be, all things considered, 
good and best, then the choosing ?nd willing it, is not ivilling evil. And if so, then his ordering 
according to that will is not doing evil " 

\t is very seldom that this eminent author fails in his reasoning ; but here certainly he does 
fail. The phrases "willing evil, and doing evil, are not used in the same sense in both parts of the 
premises, from whence the conclusion is inferred. A system, all things considered, being best, 
IS no good reason why each individual part of it is good. And it may be forcibly retorted ; a 
system which includes an infinite evil as a part of its institution cannot be from God. Nor can it 
be said that this is arguing against /«c^, without begging the question, that God has appointed the 
«v»7which is blended with the good.— On the subject itself letthefollowingthings be considered; 

1. If choosing and willing a system in which sin is a decreed part is not ivilling evil, because 
the system is good and best, all things considered then it would inevitably follow, that sin, be« 
cause such a part of that system is not an evil. But, it may be said. It is willing it for a good end. 
Does then a good end or intention destroy the nature of sin I Was the sin of I'aul or any other 
saint anihilated because he sincerely aimed at the Glory of God f Or has any design, however com- 
prehensive, exalted or sincere, the least tendency to alter the nature of sin ? 

2. Allowing as incontrovertible that the present sytem of things is the best, all things consider- 
ed, and that sin is actually blended with it. it does not thence follow that the sin itseliis decreed, 
or is any part of divine appointment. For not to hinder sin, is extremely different from being 
the cause or author of it. The one is perfectly consistent with equity, the other would be an act 
oi injustice. 

3. It is a sentiment so repugnant to all analogical propriety, to do evil that good may come, that 
it cannot be supposed a man of Mr. Edw.ird's piety would'have adopted any thine like it, but 
from what appeared to him an inevitable necessity. And indeed whoever assumes the principle, 
that every event comes to pass from decret ive necessity , sin not excepted,must of course be driven 
to his conclusion. But this v ilusble author had no need to recur to that opinion, in order to es- 
tablish his theory of hypothetical necessity; for this will stand on a rock, immoveably, without 
such aid. 

4. In reality, the certain futurition nf good, and thutofevil, arises from different, yea from dia- 
metrically opposite causes. The one flows from the operative will of God, and is fore-known to 
he future bec.iuse decreed, the other flows from a deficient or privative cause, passive power, 
when united to liberty, as before explained, which exists only in created beings, and in all these, 
as a contrast to self-existence, independence, and all-sufficiency. Yet this is the subject of hypo- 
thetical tendencies and results no less than the good to which it stands opposed, in all the bound- 
less varieties of its blendings ; therefore no case can be so complicated, but to infinite prescience 
the event mult appear with equal certainty as if decreed. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 53$ 

in {act, sin and holiness are not only different, but opposite effects, and their 
clauses equally opposite ; but as God is the sole cause, the sole exclusive cause 
ot holiness, the creature, in some way, must be tlie sole and exclusive cause ot 
sin. If you ask how ? 1 reply, by exercising his liberty, which is a mere natural 
instrument, on himself, rather tlian on God. But liow came he to do that ? By 
his passive power. What is passive power i* In general, it is that which distin- 
guishes the creature from the Creator. But more particularly, it is that tenden- 
cy to nothing as to being-, and to defection as to well being, which is essential to 
ever}' created existence. If ever)' creature huve, and must of necessity have this 
passive power, you will ask, how came the holy angels, and the spirits of tjie 
just, not to sin? The answer is, because divine grace upholds them. These 
tilings duly considered, though briefly stated, will shew, that as God is not the 
author of sin, so neither has he predestinated sin. He is the author and cause of 
good only. He is the author of our liberty ; but that in itself is not evil. And he 
is the author of our nature as liitiited ; that also of itself is no moral evil. But 
when our liberty unites vv'ith this limited nature, or terminates on passive power, 
M'hen this latter is not controuled by gi-ace, their offspring is imperfect, or sin- 
fulness attaches to our moral acts. 

Hence you may learn, that sin and future misery are events perfectly certain, 
tliough not predestinated. It has been often assumed, but without propriety or 
• rutii, that an event is foreknown only because it is decreed. In reality aliquot/ 
:s foreknown, because it is decreed ; for tliere is no other ground of its exisience. 
But sin, as before sliewn, has another ground ofexistence, namely, passive power, 
which can no more be an object of divine predestination or decree than its per- 
fect opposite, tlie all-sufficiency of Jehovah. Yet, observe attentively, this has 
Its proper nature, and God sees all things, and all essences, in their proper na- 
ture. What ! Does not God foreknow tlie sinfulness of anv event in its defcient 
cause, as well as the goodness of another in that which is efficient ? Beside, pas- 
sive power in union with liberty is an adequate, a fully adequate ground of sin 
and death ; and therefore to introduce a predestination of sin and death, is to as- 
cribe to God what is equally impious and needless.* — Let us, therefore, keep tliis 
doctrine free from all impure mixtures, and now proceed to a 

3rd Observation, that is. When the end is maintained to be infallibly certain, 
the means to promote that end are included. Thus you may suppose a chain sus- 

* " Equally impious and nsidless." Ifeedliss, lierause the existence of sin is fairly nnd fully 
accounted foronaiKjthen.rinciple ; impious, becauseit asciilies toGodtlie worst of all principles, 
the causation of sin. That God superintends, directs, and over-rules the actions of men is \vor» 
thy of him ; and equally so that he does not hinder the existence of moral evi! ; tiut that he is a 
positive and efficacious cause of moral evil, or that this is consistent with either his justice or 
holiness can never be proved. Dr. Hopkins, indeed. s:iys. that " the attempt to di.\linguish be- 
tween the sinful volitions or actions of men as natural and moral actions; and making God the 
origin and Cause of them considered as natural actions, and men the cause and authors of the di;- 
fira'jily and sin which is in them, is, it is believed, unintelligible— an\ii% by making this distinc- 
tion it be meant, that in every sinful action, God is not the sinful cavise of it." The author, how- 
ever, candidly adds, " But if the contrary can be made to appear, this doctrine, with all that is 
implied in it, shall be ^iven up and renounced." hs the removal of this principle, and the esta- 
blishment of the other, appear to ine of the highest kiuportance in theology, a few remarks, in 
addition to those already made, may not be superfluous, as tending to exhibit the ))rinciple here 
maintained in different lights and connexions; and when all are properly examined, it is proba- 
ble they will not be wholly " unintelligiblt." 

1. God, JEHOVAH, is the infinite and eternal Essence, whicli is nf absolute ««(:«f(7jy- the sell- 
existent, independent, and all-sufficient Being— from eternity to eternity generating his own light 
and joy, called his only begotten .Son ; not from mere will, but ot the same necessity 

2. God in his boundless all-sufficiency views ;dl pussibhs with all their positive and privative 
tendencie.i. That all po<^sibles have their positive tendencies is as plain as that two added to 
three make five. Were there no positive tendeiK ies, there could be no hypothetical certainty, 
no law of nature, no conmxion between cause and eff -ct. And it is equally true, though not 
equally plain, that there are priv.itive tendencies in all beings but that one who exists of ahsohtte, 
necessity. To suppose the contrary, is the same as to supy.ose that a creature may be ni,ide in- 
dependent, aiid all-sufficient. But thnr is, every reasonable being niust allow, absolutely iwposi- 
ble, as implving the grossest contradiition. On this demonstr.itcd f;ict rests unavoidably thp 
existence of that principle in every created nature which I call Passive Poiuer. Ytt. 

3. It does not follow that the mere collateral existence of these two principles in the same .sub- 
ject must needs jiroduce moral evil. Tlien alone does this take place when the one terminates 
upon, or is united to the other, without the interposition of sovereign favour It is not in thft 
power of equity to assist. For the exercise of eiuity is^) give each his due . hut to prevent sin 
is not due to the subject of it. otherwise no one could ever sin but on condition of /B;!(j//(.f in God. 

4. After all, it may be objected, that the scriptures ascribe to God the causation of moral evil ; 
fl<<, hardening the heart of Pharaoh— hardening whom he will— making the wicked for the day 
ot evil— appointing to destruction— determining the diath of Christ— delivering him by determi. 

Vol. I. .3 y 



i>S4 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 

pended from a great height, and to the lowest link a weight is fixed, which is 
bome by it. You do not suppose that this link is unconnected with the next, and 
so on till you come to the iughesv. Every one of the links is equally necessary 
with that "which is next the v. eight ; and the whole is connected with something 
else which is stronger than the weight, including that of the chain also, however 
long and heavy. 

Thus also in the cultivation of our land, though it is decreed that on such a 
field there shall be this very season a crop of wheat, this was not independent of 
providential virtue giving the increase, the genial showers, the solar warmth, and 
the vivifying air. It is not unconnected with the proper seed sown, needful till- 
age, plowing and harrowing, and the quality of tiie soil. And the same holds 
true as to the health of tlie body, r.nd'tlie prolongation of life to an appointed 
period. He who dies must first have life ; he who grows to manhood must arrive 
at it through the previous stages of youth, childhood and infancy. So likewise 
in the education of our children ; if learning be the end, that supposes the pre- 
vious means of application ; and if it is determined who shall be the first scholar 
of the age m which he lives, it is equally determined that he shall begin with the 
rudiments of letters, and diligently prosecute his literary studies. And respect- 
ing religiOus attainments the matter is equally plain ; if life or eternal glory be 
the end predestmated, the previous steps of purity of heart, justification and a 
new birth unto righte.'usncbs, preservation in Christ, and every individual event 
and circumstance preceding, is included in the decree, as far as there is any 

nate counsel— doing all evil in a city making vessels to dishonour— fitting them for destruction, 
&c.— In reply to this objection it must be considered, that whatever the import of such represen- 
lations may De, no interpretation which i^ nnnvorthy of God can be the true meaning— that the 
idiom'? of the sacred langusges a<.crihing cause or operation to God must be nnderstood according 
to the nature of the suhje.t— and, what is particularly to out purpose, that active verbs which 
denote making, doing, causing, and the like, ofien denote a declaration of the thing done, or that 
shall take \,'.?.cc ; or a permission of it. 

Take a few ,;i-:iniens. f hus .A.cts x. 15. " What God hath cleansed," means, what God hath 
declared to he lesi.— sai. vi. 9 in The prophet i- co ni::ndecl to teil the people, " understand 
not, perccivf -.-c-' ." and he is ordered to " make the heart of this people fat, to make tlieir ears 
jjeavy, and to ,'iut their eyes." And what can this mean more than to declare a fact, either -whsit 
they then were. 01 what they would 1 e?— So .Ter. i. 10. The Prophet's declaration of what should 
be, is called his rooting out pulling ,iown, &c.— Ezek xliii. 3. The prophet says, '■ when 1 came 
to destroy the city ;" hi? meaning undoubtedly is, When I came to prophecy or declare that the 
city should be destroyed- -Exod. v. 22. ' Lord, wherefore hast thou evil entreated this people.' 
Moses mean?, Wher fore hast thou permitted them to be evil entreated!— Jer. iv. 10 " Lord 
God, thou hast gre.itlViirrL'i-jai this people;" that h,permittedarnot hindered them to be deceiv- 
ed by the false Prophet-. — Kzek xiv. P. ' 1 the Lord have deceivedthsit prophet." Can any thing 
else he meant than .suffering hiii- to deceive himself?— Matt. xi. 25. Thou hast hid these things" 

i. e. not revealed. Thus also. Rom. ix 18. "Whom he will he hardeneth," he sufTereth to be 

Isardened. — Rom. xi. 8. " God gave them a spirit of slumber," i. e. permitted them to slumber. 
2 Thes. ii. 11, "God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie;" i. e. shall 
permit them to be deluded so that they shall believe a lie.— I2xod. vii. 3. &c. " And 1 will harden 
Pharaoh's heart," i. e I will suffer it to be hardened. Matt. x. 34, 35. •'! am not come to send 
peace, but a s'^ord ; For 1 am come to set a man at variance against his father," That is, my 
coming shall be the innccsnt occasion of wars and variance.— .fude 4. " Who were before of old 
ordained to this condenmation ;" i e foretold, or forewritten, as the word signifies; announced 
in the sacred pafres, and proscribed by divine law. 

But the v>as^age above all others, which appears to countenance the notion, that God is the 
cause of sin, is 1 Per. ii. 8. " A stone of slumblinf;, and a rock of offence, even in them which 
stumble at the word being disoLiedirnt. "Khereunto also they "were appointed, i e unto "which 
thing, their stumhling. they Wt>-e appointed because disobedient. The Greek participle includes 
the cause of their falling ; as H"b. li. 3 Neglecting so gri at salvation, how shall we escape .'' Jo 
•which not escaping!', they ivere appointed, fur neglecting so great salvation. A striking contrast 
to this we have, .Tnhn vii. 17 " If any man will dn his •irill. he shall knoiv of the doctrine ;" but 
the disobedient shall, according to an awful but equitable appointment, "stumble, and fall, and be 
broken, and be snar,-d, and be Taken." — (!sa. viii. 15.) We have a further illustration of this 
meaning in H=li. iit 18. "To whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to 
thein that believe not?" i. e. Who were appointed to destniction? The answer ii, the di.iobe- 
dient ; tor the original word is the same here as in Peter, under a different inflection. And it is 
added, ver 19 - So they could not enter in because of unbelief ." -Thus also Rom. xi. 7. "The 
rest -were blinded or hardtnid ;", i. e. were suffered to I • blind or hard And that this is the 
meaning is dc ided by ver ?o •• Because of unbelief ^)\ey were broken off" 

Upon th» whole. Peter intimates, that none should be offended at suchcharacters.men of learn- 
Sn? and emin'-n< e reiecting the Messiah ;ind his gos] el. T heir end is what might be expected, 
as foretold bv th* prophet?, .iccordin'/ to God's ri;;hteous rovernment, and his eternal appoint- 
Tnent. or determinr'tion. respecting all such offenders. Their habitual unbelieving disobedience 
■wa'- the cause, 'ut 'heir actual stumbling at the word to their destruction was the natural, the 
jighteons, the appointed effect. To this they were appointed, placed, or .vet forth (as rharaoh 
•«<ra« raised up) bv the righteom judi-ment of God, who resisreth the pfood and disobedient; in 
nrder to shew forth thp glor^i of his justice in them They were personally appointed to exalt- 
«tl situations, eing civil and ecclesiastical builders ; they were suffered to reje(.t Christ, in pure 
equity ; and thus were deservedly car.stsituted awful warnings to others. 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 535 

goodness in them. As to the evil with which any events or circumstances are 
blended, that has been alreitdy accounted fur on another principle. Nothing can 
be more true or plain, God had predestinated an everlasting righteousness to be 
brought in by the Lord Jesus Christ. But is it not equally true and plain that 
the birth of Jesus, and of his virgin mother, the existence of David, the call of 
Abraliam, the preservation of Noah, and the creation of Ad.im and Eve were 
predestinated ? — Let us iheretiire guard against separating the end and the 
means ; and what God joins together in his predestmating care and love, let no 
man put asunder. — We now come 

II. To consider some proofs of this doctrine. — That the scriptures, especially 
those of the New Testament, appear, at least, to mamtain the doctrine m ques- 
tion, no person of common modesty will deny. Thus, for instance, Rom. viii. 29, 
SO. " Whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the im- 
age of his Son." Again, Eph. i. 4 — 6. *' Accordaig as he hath chosen us in him, 
before tlie foundation oi' tiie world, that we should be holy and without blame 
before him in love ; having predestinated us unto the adopuon o i" children by Je- 
sus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise of 
the glory of his grace." And again, ver. IL " In whom also we have obtained aa 
inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh 
all things after the coimselof his own will." Believers ai'e said to be " called ac- 
cording to God's ptirpose ;" and certain discriminations are made between man 
and man, between nation and nation, " that the purpose of God according to elec- 
tion, might stand, not of works but of him who calleth." " The election hath ob- 
tained it." " So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of 
God that sheweth mercy." " Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it. 
Why hast thou made me thus ?" — " I will have mercy on whom I will have mer- 
C}-, and I will have compassion on w^hom I will have compassion," 

These arc some of the many passages of holy writ which at least seetn to hold 
this doctrine. But it is of importance to observe, that to establish this very doc- 
trine is the main drift of the apostle Paul's elaborate argiunent in a considerable 
part of his epistle to the Romans. See Rom. ix. — xi. — But more particularly, 

1. It is evidently inconsistent with God's infinite perfection to suppose that he 
has no purposes, designs, or aims in his operations ; or, which is virtually tlie 
same thing, to suppose that he decrees or predestinates nothing: Wherein would 
he then differ from bhnd, unmeaning chance, which hath neither wisdom, power, 
nor properties ? An intelligent spirit without any plan or purpose, is inconceiv- 
able ; much less is the infinitely perfect Jehovali such a being. 

But if he purposes any thing, what can be conceived of in this world of higher 
importance, or more worthy of his predestinating care, than the salvation of his 
people, that is, of those who are eventually saved ? Shall he purpose from eter- 
nity to give his Son to appear in the form of a servant, to suffer an ignominious 
death, and to be head over all things to the cliurch, at an uncertainty ? Does he 
bestow his Holy Spirit without knowing, or without intending, who shall be 
ultimately changed into the divine image from glory to glory, and made meet 
for the inheritance of the saints in light .' Truly, if in time he draws with loving- 
kindness, it is because he has loved with an everlasting love. 

2. What scripture and experience teach of man's condition as a sinner, utter- 
ly excludes every other cause of salvation but God's predestinating love. From 
our very birth we are sinful, guilty, and without strength. The carnal mind is 
enmity against God. The graceless heart is a heart of stone ; in spiritual Con- 
cerns unfeeling and im;>enetrable. Well may our Lord say to his disciples. Ye 
have not chosen me, out I have chosen you. If then those who were dead in tres- 
passes and sins have been quickened, if persecutors have been arrested and 
alarmed, if those who were fully bent on rebellion have been instantly rendered 
humble, meek, loving and obedient, to what can we rationally ascribe it but to 
the discriminating and sovereign pleasure of him who worketh all things after 
the counsel of his own will .' If such are not predestinated, how came they to be 
called, converted, and regenerated .' 

Consult the good man's experience. Will he coolly and deliberately arrogate 
any thing to himself? Follow him to the throne of grace; what is his language 
before God .'' Listen to his most holy, happy, and aniinated praises in th« churcb^ 



536 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, 

Attend to hisn in his happiest frames — or, when emerging from tlie deep waters 
of affliction — when restored fi-om backslidings — or with faltering speech on the 
brink of eternity ; and you will find him steady to one point ; " Beliold, God ie 
my salvation." My recover}' from sin and woe is all of grace. Yea, follow him to 
heaven, when he joins the noble army of martyrs, and the countless myriads of 
the redeemed from among men, and there he shouts aloud in chorus, " Unto him 
that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, and hath made us 
kings and priests unto God and his Father ; to him be glory and dominion for 
ever and ever. Amen." — " Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory, artd ho- 
nour, and power ; for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are 
and were created." If we search eternally into the origin and cause of our de- 
liverance fi'om sin, and our exaltation to happiness and glory, none can be found 
but God's predestuiating love. 

3. Nothing short of eternal predestination could secure that which is demon- 
strably the most worthy, the most glorious, the most real end of God in the sal- 
vation of man, that is, the praise of the glory of his grace. No end can be com- 
pared to this in excellence : it is expressly the end which God has proposed to 
himself in the s .'*"'i 11 of his people ; " having predestinated us unto the adop- 
tion of children by Jt. i- ■ C'nst to himself, according to the good pleasure of 

"his will, to the praise of the gloiy oi ' 5 grace." If there be no predestination, 
how can such an end ever be propose^, and how infallibly seciu-ed ? Can there 
be any effect without an adequate cause ? Or can the invention of men or angels 
discover any other cause than predestination ? 

On any other supposition, how can d ivine love, grace, and mercy be glorified. 
i/y'rtWii/!/" glorified ? Is the honour of these glorious and blessed perfections of 
Jehovah to be suspended on a feeble peradventure ? Or is the spiritual temple 
constructed of some materials which come by chance, or approach of them- 
selves, while others are brought forth by a divine hand oat of the quarry of na- 
ture, and placed on the living foundation ? Is the gluiry of the Creator to depend 
upon the precarious will of man .'' The supposition is too absurd to admit a 
thought. — Again, 

4. Predestination to life is essentially necessary to secure the full end of the 
■j/e«f/i o/C'/^r/si and the efficacy of divine influence. What though he laid down 
his life for his slieep, if after all he do not bring them into his fold ? For him to 
lay down his life a ransom for many, and then leave it to the^m whether they should 
come for life, and all the benefits of his death, righteousness and grace, is to 
suppose them possessed of more power than Adam had before the fall. I*or the 
power he needed was only that which might keep him from falling ; but the 
power which fallen man requires is that by which he may rise from his fallen 
state, and enter mto the favour of God, into union with Christ, into spiritual sen- 
sibility and life, into wisdom, righteousness and holiness, and into eternal glory. 
Now what can be adequate to this but omnipotent power helping our infirmities ? 

Ifitbesaid, Tlx)ugh we cannot of ourselves do this, may we not through 
Christ and his holy Spirit assisting us .'' I reply, assistance is of two kinds ; it is 
either affording us proper means, such as the holy scriptures, the ministry of the 
Word, ordinances of religion, and precious promises by way of encouragement ; — 
or, it is actually to inftuence the mind by supernatural agency. If this latter as- 
sistance be afforded, the event is secured; for nothing is requisite to secure the 
volitions, and all the exercises of the will, in faith, repentance, love, hope, and 
even perseverance therein unto the end, hut this kind of influence to a certain 
degree. But does God impart any gracious influence \\'\i\^D{\\. purposing to do sos' 
And does he not know what influence is necessary to secure the end .' Without 
predestination to life, what security can there be, that the death of Christ will 
not prove abortive and unavailing } 

The notion tliat a sufficient degree of grace is given to all, but that a degree 
mnre than sufficient is given to t!ie elect ; that all the elect are certain!}' and in- 
fiillibly sailed, but the others left at uncertainty, \-. ith a perhaps that some of 
them raay be saved in addition to the elect — this notion is neither founded in re • 
vealed truth, no? capable of rational consistency.* 

" This notion, peifiapj more than any other, has been termed Baxterianism, and yet it iino: 
;r»y to say thai iV>r. Bsuct-r ever main?ained it. He cyys ind^eii " all have so rnuch 'grace.) as 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. S37 

Without predestination to life, the influences of the Holy Spirit, which, it is 
confessed, are given to some, might be given in vain, or without effecting any 
saving purpose in any one of the human race. Where then could be the wisdom 
of a dispensation of the Spirit, or of communicating the influence of grace ? Does 
God foresee that some will be so good and pliable as to improve a common favour 
in such a way and to such a degree as to constitute the difference between them 
and others that perish ? But where is this divinity taught, and by whom is it 
sanciioned ? It is not sanctioned by the patriarchs and prophets, by Christ and 
his apostles, nor is it contained in the words of inspii-ation, or even in the tablet 
of unsophisticated reason. 

5. Setting aside tliis doctrine, or supposing it not true, what room is left fop 
a covenant of grace between the Father, Son, and Spirit ? Has not the Father 
given to the Son a people for whom he should be obedient imto death, for whom 
he should give his life a ransom, for whom he should rise, live, and reign till all 
his enemies be subdued, and to whom Christ has engaged to give eternal life ? 
If we reject predestination to life, what meaning is there in his oflSce of surety ? 
Is not Jesus a surety for his people ? But what is a surety ? It is one who under- 
takes for another. What does Jesus undertake to do ? lie undertakes not only 
to become incarnate for them, to obey the law, to endure the contradiction of 
sinners and cope with tlie rigid demands of equity, but also to justify many, to 
give them life, to keep them from every rapacious hand, to purify them by his 
blood, to save them from sin and hell, and to bring them to the beatific vision of 
his glory. 

In a word, take away this doctrine, and you take away the foundation of God — 
tlie foundation of his covenant — the tbundation of his temple, the church — the 
foiaidation of the saints* hope and joy. But, blessed be God, his foundation stand- 
cth sure, having this seal. The Lord knoweth them that are his. Known unto 
God are all his ways, and all his people from the beginning. Blind chance and 
impotent free will shall never be the partners of his throne. 

We next come to notice 

III. Some objections which may be, and often are, made to this doctrine. And 

1. If this doctrine be true, it is urged by some, God would then be an arbi- 
trary and partial being. This objection supposes that God has 7io right to be so; 
but on the contrary, nothmg appears more worthy of him than to exercise arbi- 
trary power, and to manifest partiality. No such right is vested in man, as to do 
what he pleases, while he disdains to consult any other will than his own. But 
whose will beside his own can the infinitely perfect Cod consult ? Who hath 
known the mind of the Lord,or who hath been his counsellor ? Or, who hath fii-st 
given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again ? For of him, and 
through him, and to him are all things ; to whom be glory for ever. 

Let us appeal to Htcts. Are there not marks of higli sovereignty and holy par- 
tiality through universal nature ? Are they not visible in the heavens above, and 
in tills lower world ? Is there not a greater light that rules the diiy, and the lesser 
lights that ride the night ? And does not cue star differ from anotlier star in glo- 
ry ? Are not these marks visible in the operations of providence, in the persons 
of men, their corporeal forms and mental endowments .■' Are they not constantly 
seen in the history of nations, the changes of empires, and the dispensations of 
grace to different tribes of men ? How conspicuous is this in God's conduct to-< 
wards .\braham and his posterity for a series of ages, and afterwards in the call- 
ing of the Gentiles ? And how becoming in us to adopt the same language with 
the apostle Paul on that occasion : " O the depth of the riches both of the wis- 
dom and knowledge of God ! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways 

bringeth and leaveth the success to man's -will ;" and this in a di«coarse wherein he allows thaC 
God hath " positively elected certain persons by an absolute decree to overcome all their resis- 
tances of" his Spirit, and to draw them to Christ, and by Christ to himself, by such .\ power and 
way as shall infatlibty convert and save them." He moreover sa) s, " What if men cannot here 
tell how to resolve the question, whether any or hew many are ever converted or saved by thaC 
mere grace which we call sufficient, or rather necesiary. and common to those that are not con- 
vertrd; and whether man's will ever make a s.iving determining improvement of it.'— " And 
yet," he .idds, •' this question itself is formed on false suppositions and is capable of a satisfacto- 
ry solution." Baxter's Works, Vol. ii. p. 929.— On the subject of this Nott; the author .-tjjs 
>;vve to refer his vonders to Uctldiidge's Wcr&s> Vol v, •,% 283, 229, Note?. 



538 THE DOCTRINE OP ELECTIOif, 

past finding out !" And is not the same partiality visible at this very day ; Yet 
is he holy in ail his works, and righteous in all his ways. 

2. It is objected. If thjis doctrine be true, then is man reduced to a mere ma- 
chine. No, a mere machine has no sensibility, no consciousness, no reason, and 
no will. But he is acted upon, they say, and therefore not an agent. Is it then 
essential to an agent not to be acted upon ? Then there is but one agent in the 
universe ; for every thing but the first cause is acted upon more or less. The 
fact is, there is no contrariety in these two things. Angels and men are acted 
upon, yet they are moral agents. The holy agency upon them respects chiefly 
their disposition Itself, but the agency they exert is the exercise of their faculties, 
will, and disposition. Whether their disposition be good or bad, still they are 
agents. If this be made good, it must be by sovereign influence ; and then the 
agency and choice will be good : but if this be bad, the ugcncy is bad too. 

But granting to the objector that the objects of predestination are, in the sense 
now mentioned, machines, or instruments in the hand of divme sovereignty ; what 
'then .'' I fain would know what better lot can be assigned us than to be instru- 
ments in the hand of a predestinating God .'' I solemnly protest that I desire no 
better, no other lot. And who can describe the nature of this high privilege ! 
This people have I formed for myself, they shall shew forth my praise. O the 
blessedness of being entirely passive in the hand of that God who predestinates 
nothing but good ? Was Paul obliged to the Lord, or was he not, for arresting 
him in the midst of his wicked career ? Has that man any reason to complain, 
who is restr.ained from wickedness, but conjpelled to embrace happiness ? Then, 
say some, his will would be forced. O no ! this by no means follows. My people, 
saith the Lord, shall be willing In the day of my power. Surely God can put his 
Holy Spirit in either man or child without forcing the will. And let there be but 
the active, regenerating renewing presence of this divine agent, the choice of 
good will be no more compelled, or the will no more forced, than in the most 
free acts of which the human mind is capable. 

3. This doctrine, it is said, tends to licentiousness. — This is an assertion which 
has been often made, but, I apprehend, never fairly proved ; for it is contrary to 
universal experience. Turn your eyes to a vast army, headed by experienced of- 
ficers — what is the language of nature and experience ? You uniformly find gieat 
generals anxious to impress the sentiment on the minds of their troops that they 
are desti7ied to victory. What gives rise to this kind of oratory .'' What is the 
philosophy of such rhetoric ? It is founded in the nature of man, and confirmed by 
the experience of ages, that confidence in a favourable issue animates exertion. 

Consult a serious christian, who, through a long pilgrimage, has believed this 
doctrine. Will he deliberately tell you that it has this tendency, or that he has 
found this effect in his own experience ? No, he will tell you nothing gives him 
more courage and vigour against sin. — It is not when in a dry, backsliding frame 
of mind, or when verging to licentiousness, that he can rest in this doctrine ; but 
when he is most resolved for God and heaven — when most diligent in the high 
way of holiness. Then, indeed, he can say, I know that all things work together 
for my good — my predestination includes conformity to Christ, my calling, my 
justification, and warfare against sin. If God be for me, who can be against me? 
Who shall lay any thing to my charge ? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that 
condemneth .'' It is Christ that died, is risen, and maketh intercession. Who 
shall separate me from the love of Christ ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or 
famine, or persecution, or nakedness, or peril, or sword .■' Nay, in all these things 
I am more than conqueror through him that loved me. For I am persuaded, 
that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things 
present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall 
be able to separate me from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus my Lord. 

4. Some would insinuate, that though this doctrine be true, yet it should not 
be preached, because it is a secret in the mind of God. But I hope it has been 
proved, that as a doctrine it is not a secret, but is revealed in the holy scrip- 
tures, and supported by the soundest arguments. The objects, Indeed, or the 
persons who are predestinated, are known to God only before they bear fruit,, 
By their fncits we can come to know them, in the (rrdinary course of things ; 



THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION. 539 

nor is it any part of the doctrine asserted, that it belongs to man to ascertain the 
individual objects any farther than by character. 

But there are other ends to be answered by this doctrine. — To be in the way 
to eternal glory is an unspeakable privilege ; and it is the proper part of a chris- 
tian to enquire into the cause of it. His own humility and gratitude are involved 
in it. The honour of God, the wisdom of his counsel, and the lustre of his grace ; 
the offices of Christ, the surety of a better covenant, and the good Shepherd of 
the sheep ; his powerful intercession, and his government over all things to the 
church — all are involved in the proper declaration of this truth. — Once more, 

5. This doctrine, it may be said, is dangerous, in proportion as it is insisted 
upon, in that it prevents the more needful enquiry, " Am I born again !" Yes, 
there would be danger, li all the attention of ministers and people, or even a dis- 
proportionate share of it were confined to this. But, thou mistaken objector, be- 
cause there are some who will take the bread of children and cast it away, are 
tiie children not to be fed .' Because there were corrupt men disposed to turn 
the grace of God into lasciviousness, would you rob any child of God of this 
holy triumph. He will choose our inheritance fon us ! The Lord will not cast 
off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance. For the Lord is our de° 
fence, the Holy One of Israel is our King. I will trust and not be afraid, for the 
Lord Jehovah is my strength and my song, he also is become my salvation. — ^ 
For the same reason that we ought not to be ashamed of the gospel of Christ, 
We need not, we ought not to be ashamed of this doctrine. 

I would now offer 

IV. A few practical uses of the subject. And, 

1. Tliis doctrine is a source of great comfort, when contrasted with the fickle- 
ness of men, and the perpetual vicissitudes of the world. The lot may be cast, 
but the Lord is the disposer of it. He worketh all things after the counsel of his 
own will. His counsel shall stand, and he doeth, and will do, all his pleasure. 
The wrath of man shall praise him, and ihe remainder of wrath he will restrain. 
All things work together for good to them who love God, to them who are the 
called according to his purpose. He doeth all things well. 

After viewing the present perturbed state of the world, the revolutions of 
empire, the devastations of war, the alarms of invasion, the degradation of some, 
and the exaltation of other characters — how pleasing and consolatory to view a 
steady hand over-ruling, guiding, and influencing all ! Providence is " as it were 
a wheel in the middle of a wheel." — As for their rings, they are so high that 
they are dreadful, and are full of eyes round about them. But how delightful to 
reflect, that within these perpetually revolving wlieels there is an immoveable 
centre ! God's aim is steady, he is of one mind, who can turn him } 

2. As the predestination for which we contend is only to good, it affords the 
most pleasing view of the divine character. God is love. In him is no such in- 
consistency as is but too frequently found among men. He is not a fountain send- 
ing forth at the same place both sweet water and bitter, yielding both salt water 
and Iresh. With the utmost safety and confidence may a humble soul commit 
itself into the arms of such a being. No one has any thing to fear from God but 
the proud and rebellious, the unbelieving and impenitent. And surely bad must 
be the doctrine that speaks peace to the wicked. 

3. As in tlie present case the end, and the way leading to it, are inseparable; 
every reason and argument, every alarming topic, every scriptural exhortation, 
and every obligation to duty, are in full force. They who represent these things 
as inconsistent with predestination, either have a wrong view of the subject, or 
care not what they suy nor whereof they affirm. Obligation to duty is founded 
on widely and totally different considerations.* 

God sustains, with respect to man, a twofold character, the one is that of an 
equitable governor, the other that of a sovereign disposer. Answerably to this, 

• The nature of God, his holy will, and our peculiar relation to him, form an adamantir.echain 
of oljligation to duty which cannot with impunity be broken; from which predestinatinn is so 
far from releasing us, that it forms another chain of gold that shall finally prevail ; and divine 
grace personally experienced is a silken cord to draw the soul along in the patJi of duty. But do 
these powerful ties render useless God's reasoning with sinners, his exhortations to repentance, 
to believinp. to obedience, and to every particular branch of duty .' No: for these methods arc 
Jbe very nutans to strain the end, and form a part of the decree itself. 



540 THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION'. 

man sustains a twofold character also; that of an accountable agent, aiid tLat 
of a disposable, subject. As passive in the hand of a sovereign God, he is neces- 
sitated to good, in proportion as goodness attaches to him ; and in the heirs of 
salvation this is predestination to life. As active, or a moral agent, man is treated, 
according to the rules of reason and equity, yet mingled with undeserved fa- 
vours. So that every man is, in these different respects, at once the subject of 
liberty and necessity- 
Equal ly vague and unprofitable, therefore, is all controversy on the subject 
now alluded to while one side contends for liberty and the other for necessity to 
the usual exclusion of the opposite. Neither can be wholly right. For, as sure 
as God disposes of a man for final good, the doctrine of necessity is true ; and as 
sure as a man is a transgressor of divine law, and thus is fitted for destruction, 
he IS free from all decretive necessity. Therefore, 

4. Here is no room for the impious inference, that when we do evil we are pre- 
destinated to it. Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God ; for 
as God cannot be tempted with evil, so neither teinpteth he any man ; but every 
man is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when 
lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin ; and sin when it is finished, bringeth 
forth death. Do not err, my beloved brethren ; every good gift, and every per- 
fect gift is fiom above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom 
is no vai-iableness, neither shadow of tiirning.— But evil, in whatever person, in 
wfeatever place, at whatever time, in whatever form or degree, is from a quar- 
ter diametrically opposite. — On the contrary, 

, 5. When at any time we are engaged ii> the work of God, in any thing what- 
ever that is morally good, then are we employed in the execution of the divine 
purposes ; for there is no good done in time but was decreed to be done, in all 
its circumstances, from eternity. Even all the actions of the wicked, except the 
deformity or sinfulness which is in them, are also worthy of God to predestinate 
Thii. ci)nsideratlon, every one must allow, is a great incentive to virtue and holi- 
ness. This remark is applicable both to ministers and people. Are ministers en- 
gaged in preaching tile law for conviction, the promises for encouragement, and 
the unseai'chable riches of Christ for consolation ; are they urging, according to 
scripture commands and example, repentance towards God and faith in our Lord 
Jesus Christ ; do they enforce christian duties, teaching the disciples all things 
whatsoever our Lord and lawgiver has commanded ; do they warn sinners to flee 
from the wrath to come, or invite the bui-dened and heavy laden to seek restln 
the meek and lowly, the merciful and loving Saviour ? They are in all this only 
Jhe instruments of a sovereign God, or the appointed means whereby he executes 
his eternal purposes. Again, has God enjoined the necessity of repentance, faith, 
holiness, obedience, and perseverance; poverty of spirit, holy mourning, purity 
of heart, love to enemies, &C.'' our personal compliance, whicli is evermore of 
grace, is only the decreed meiiiodni bnnging us to that eternal glory which is 
the end. Once more, 

6. This doctrine properly guarded, and riglitly understood, shews with pecu- 
liar f'>rce the true ground of repentance, and the obligations of gratitude and 
holiness. — If the sinfulness of no action is decreed, but proceeds wholly from 
that in us which is opposil." to God and his will, whether secret or revealed, 
rectoral oi- decretive, what can be more binding and reasonsible than i-epentance 
toward God } And if allgood, whether natural, supernatural, moral or spiritual, 
in ourselves and others, in time and to eternity proceed from God's predestina- 
tion, what a foundation is there laid for gratitude ! Put on, therefore, as the elect 
of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, 
meekness, long-suffering. Give all diligence to make your calling and election 
sure. And let the peace of God ruleinyour hearts, to the wliich also ye are 
called in one body, and be ye thankful. And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, 
do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by 
him. Amen" 

Db. Williams. 



r.ND OF TJHE FIRST VOLUME. 



'Ik