This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world's books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. + Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. + Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. About Google Book Search Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web at |http : //books . google . com/ r L SELECTIONS L FROM THE UNPUBLISHED WRITINGS OF JONATHAN EDWARDS, OF AMERICA. -N EOINBUROH : PRIKTKD BY BALLANTTNE AND «.X>MPAHy, PAUL'S WORK. 1 ^'^' ^^r.. A^- 4^X~ <^* ^'-^^-^ ■%, ■^. y 30/ --^^^ *-->^ .€t-. ^c«- ^*- r.^.,_ ^ <^ ^y ^^ C.^^ ^^i^ Lf-'^ ^'•^.t-^- **^ f^^ ^ r^ A..>->^ /^*^o '9 -3^ % f 2 2.. ^.^-r <^ .V-^ >*«^ ^-/C- or \ SELECTIONS PROM THE UNPUBLISHED WRITINGS OP JONATHAN EDWARDS, OF AMERICA. EDITED FROM THE ORIGINAL MSS., WITH FACSIMILES AND AN INTRODUCTION, BY THE • / REV. ALEXANDER Bl' GROSART, *' I oonsider JoxATHAH Edwards the greatest of the sons of men. He ranks with the brightest luminaries of the Christian Church, not excluding any country, or any age, since the apostolic. " Robert Hall. *' This remarknble man, fAcmotaphjmician of America. .... His power of subtile ar- gument^ PKBHAPS USMATCHED. CERTAINLY UNSlTRPAaSED AMONG MEN, was jOiDCd, aS in SOmO of the ancient Mystics, with a character which raised his piety to fervour." Sir James Mackinto6S. "Edwards comes ne:iror Bishop Butler as a philosophical divine than any other theo- logian with whom we are acquainted. " Robert Morshsad. ' THREB HUNDRED COPIES.] PRINTED FOR PRIVATE CIRCULATION. 1865. h \'V':\ • • -f^^ ^--''^ ■ 175:>46 .*> ! I J CONTENTS. 1. Facsimiles, {jirefixed to title-page.) 2. Dedication, ....... 9 3. Introduction, .11 4. Treatise on Grace, . . .17 Chap. I. — [Shewing] that Common and Saving Grace diflfer, not only in Degree, but in Nature and Kind, . .19 Chap. II. — Shewing wherein all Saving Grace does summarily consist, . . . . . .30 Chap. III. — Shewing how a Principle of Grace is from the Spirit of God, .39 5. Annotations on Passages op the Bible,* . .57 6. Directions for Judging of Persons* Experiences, .181 7. Sermons — I. Matthew vii. 14—" Few there be that find it," . 189 II. 2 Timothy iii 16 — "All Scripture is given by inspira- tion of God," . . . . .191 III. and IV. Romans v. 1 — " We have peace \s'ith God,'' 196 V. and VI. Acts xxiv. 2r>— « Felix trembling," . 200 VII. and VIII. 1 Peter iii 19, 20—" The spirits in prison," 203 * It hafi not been deemed necessary to insert here a list of the texta, (upwards of three hundred, beeidefl others incidentally noticed), seeing they are given in th« reg\ilar order of the Books as arranged in our English Bible. — 0. CONTENTS. FACSIMILES. No. 1. Page from Sermon. *^* It will be noticed that this is written on a fragment of an unsent letter to Edwards's publisher, concerning his life of Brainerd. Nearly all the MSS. are on similar bits of paper. No. 2. Page from Treatise on Grace. I JONATHAN EDWARDS Bom at Wiudiior, Connecticut 5th Oct. 1703 His fiBither was the Rev. Timothy Edwards, pastor of a church in Windsor for sixty years. Became a Student of Yale College, Ncwhaven, in 1716 Graduated B.A 1719-20 ''Licensed*' as a Minister of the Gospel 1722 ^ Preached" for eight months to a congregation of English Pres- byterians, in the years 1722-23 Returned to Windsor and passed M. A. at ** Yale "... 1723-24 <'Tutor"at Yale I724teq. ** Accepted** a ** call" to be *• Colleague*' with his maternal Grand- father, at Northampton, Mass 1726 Ordained 1727 Married Miss Sarah Pierpoiit 1727 Left Northampton 1750-51 Removed to StockbnJge, Mass., where he preached to the Indians and a few white settlers 1751-52 His treatise on " The Will " published in 1754 Chosen to be President of the College of New Jersey, Princeton . 1757 Died 22d March n^iS TO JOHN VEITCH ESQ., M.A., PRurSSSOB OP LOGIC AND RIIKTORIC IN THV UNIVERSITT OF QLASOOW, THESE ** REMAINS *' OF A GREAT THINKER, IN MEMORIAL OF COLLEGE-DAYS, WHILE FELLOW-STUDENTS UNDER HAMILTON AND WILSON; WITH HIGH ADMIRATION AND REGARD, ALEXANDER B. GROSART. \ INTRODUCTION. Ten years ago I crossed the Atlantic in order to consult and arrange with the representatives of Jonathan Edwards, about a complete and really worthy edition of the Works, published and unpublished, of that " master in Israel.'* Commissioned by Publishers of position and chaiacter thereto, and the way having been prepared by corre- spondence, I had immediate access given me to all the Manuscripts of Edwards, . . . these having been committed to the keeping of the Rev. Tryon Edwards, D.D., of New London, Connecticut, "as sole permanent trustee, by all the then surviving grandchildren of their author." * Very pleasant, if onerous, was the labour of examining the numerous MSS. ; which were found to embrace, — besides papers of rare biographical interest and value, — the originals of some of the works already published, and a mass of his ordinary " sermons," in part fully written out, in larger part half-written out, and in largest part in simple "notes,*' — these three classes being of very various worth. The treasure of the whole proved to be a Treatise on Grace, carefully finished and prepared for the press : and second to it, if second, an interleaved Bible, containing numerous annotations. Circumstances, which it is not at all needful to state here, have hitherto prevented the carrying out of the scheme of a complete collective edition of the Works : but a forloin hope is indiJged, that if the deplorable Civil war were ended, it may yet be achieved under the joint-editorship of the above Rev. Dr Tryon Edwards and myself. Meantime, in response to very frequent and urgent requests ad- dressed to me, 1 have personally transciibed from the original MSS. now in my possession, the contents of the present volume. * Introduction to Edwards's " Charity and it» Fruits ; or, Chriatiau Love as mani- fe«ted in tlie Heart and Life." Edited from the Original MSS. by Tryon Edwards, D.I). (London : Niubet & Co. 1852. 8vo.), page iv. : an inestimable book. 12 INTRODUCTION. With a collective edition of the Works in possible prospect, I did not deem myself at liberty to publish anything ; but there seems no valid objection to the printing of a limited impression for subscribers only, willing and wishful to share the cost with the Editor. I may briefly notice the several portions of our Selections. I. Tkeatise on Grace. — This Manuscript was found by itself, carefully placed within folds of thick paper, and tied up with a silk ribbon. It proved to be arranged into chapters and sections, all paged ; and, in short, precisely as now printed. Our facsimile pre- fixed to the title-page, shews the size and appearance of the original. Many of the pages have interlineations and erasures ; but there can be no doubt that the Manuscript was intended for publication. It is possible that I may have the usual bias of a discoverer and editor. But I shall be surprised if this Treatise do not at once take rank with its kindred one, on " the Religious Affections." There is in it, I think, the massive argumentation of his great work, on " The Will ; " but there is, in addition, a fineness of spiritual insight, a holy fervour not untinged with the pathetic "frenzy" of the English Mystics, as of Peter Sterry and Archbishop Leighton, and — especially toward the close — a rapturous exultation in the "excellency and loveliness " of God, a glow in iteration, of the wonder and beauty and blessedness of Divine Love, and a splendour of assertion of the CLAIMS, so to speak, of God the Holy Spirit, which it would be diflScult to over-estimate II. Annotations on the Bible. — I give an account of the copy of Holy Scripture whence these Annotations are drawn, in the Note prefixed to them. It is perhaps necessary to explain that not one of these has been hitherto printed. In the " Works" as supplemented by Mr Robert Ogle of Edinburgh,* there is a series of " Notes on the Bible," and in the ** Works" as now in circulation in America,f a few pages (seven in all) are occupied with " Observations upon Particular * This supplement is titled volume IX. and volume X. of the Works, intending thereby to range with Williams's edition in 8 vols, royal 8vo, and the American bel^w. The former contains, I. Notes on the Bible, (pp. 397 ;) and, II. Types of the Messiah. The latter, I. Miscellaneous Observations ; II. Seventeen Occasional Sermons. Those who have Williams's edition ought to possess themselves of these ; and those also who have the American edition, inasmuch as none of their contents are in the one, and only a comparatively small part in the other. Messrs Ogle & Murray, South Bridge, Edinburgh, are the present publishers, and few copies remain. t 4 vols. 8vo, vol. iii. pp. 547-553. See footnote at end of this Introduction. INTRODUCTION. 1 3 Passages of Scripture," the former omitting the latter, and the latter, strange to say, omitting the former, as well as other equally important portions of Edwards's writings. But the present is a wholly independ- ent aeries, — ^the old Bible having been in the possession of one of the grandchildren until the general committing of all in 1849-50 to Dr Tryon Edwards, as stated ante. In the " Notes on the Bible " mentioned above, there are various references to " the Blank Bible," which were not understood, but now are, in the light of our recovery of the present Annotations. Students of Edwards have always prized "above rubies" the "Notes" and "Observations" already extant; and I run no great hazard in anticipating that those now for the first time printed, will be equally valued. They seem to us to be of a more richly experi- mental character than the others, while there is the same acumen, quickness in discernment of Scriptural harmonies and parallelisms, soundness of interpretation of difficulties, happy accommodation, sweetness and tenderness of enforcement, overshadowed at times with solenm appeal, and rare ingenuity of " improvement," — as the Puritans were wont to call it III. DiEECnONS FOR JUDGING OF PERSONS' EXPERIENCES. — I have come upon this searching and very precious MS. since the issuing of my Proposals. It evidently formed the author's guide in his test- conversations with enquirers during the great Awakenings or Re- vivals. This — as well as eight instead of two sermons — is substi- tuted for specimens of the original MS. of the treatise on " The Will," as explained onwards. rv. Sermons. — As stated, the great mass of the Edwards's MSS. consists of his " Sermons." From among these a noble volume might be gathered, that is, of fully written out and magnificent Discourses : and another of equal weight and value, consisting of select passages from those less perfect, and, as a whole, of ordinary type, together with what clerics know as "skeletons" or "sketches," — many of them, as No. 2 of our selection wiU shew, mammoth-boned. I have given eight Sermons : Nos. 3 and 4, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8, consisting of two Ser- mons in each case from one text — in place of Uuo Sketch-sermons only, as originally designed and announced — to illustrate the usual style of preparation by Jonathan Edwards for the pulpit. No. 1 is the more frequent example of his preparations ; No 2 is fuller, and is peculiarly interesting, as being one of those delivered to the Indians of Stock- 14 INTRODUCTION. bridge ; Nos. 3 and 4 are still fuller ; Nos. 5 and G yet more so ; and Nos. 7 and 8 elaborate, but, as will be seen, not filled up, so far as the wording goes. I have selected the last, as being on a difficult pas- sage, — which is at once assumed to mean that which strikes our com- mon sense as its only meaning, — and because it furnishes us with a well-nigh awsome specimen of the purged and Dantesque style of Edwards's grandest preaching, as well as, in its final " Applications ** and " Directions," of his unexpected, and pungent, and penetrating rebukes of prevalent sin. It should make a fine picture to call up the scene of the great Preacher delivering the sennon on " The Word of God " to the swarthy Indians, in what was then the outskirts of civil- isation, though, as we can testify, a finer landscape now is nowhere to be seen ; nor found, a more winsome or kindly Community. The common notion is that Edwards was what is called a " Reader" of his Sermons. Never was anything more untnie. Having gone over every page, line, and word that the great Preacher has left behind him, as preserved by Dr Tryon Edwards, I beg to state that the ex- ception is to find a fully written-out Sermon. On great occasions^ and during " The Revivals," he evidently prepared with fulness and verbal accuracy : and the tradition is that the most extraordinary of all his sermons, — perhaps the most extraordinary that ever has fallen from uninspired lips, find not less so in its momentous results, — " Sin- ners in the Hands of an Angry God," was read very closely, amid such a hush of awe and silent dropping of tears as we conceive of at the base of Sinai*s flaming peaks, and as still thrill in the recollection of descendants of the hearers in New England. But his MSS. shew, beyond all gainsaying, that his rule — in the proportion of 95 to 100 — was to jot down the leading thoughts and illustrations, and trust to the sug- gestions of the moment for the recall of previous study, and medita- tion, and prayer, and for the language. Let not, then, the great name of Jonathan Edwards be adduced in support of the practice of invariably " reading" Sermons ; a prac- tice that, except in rare instances, quenches all real eloquence, breaks the spell of influence, unlooses the links of the electric chain that ought to bind a speaker and his audience and pass and repass thriUs of feeling, and, above all, leads to frauds of the most damaging and perilous sort. Our facsimile will shew the thing better than any words. Such " Notes," be it kept in mind, compose the great mass of Edwards's ordinary and habitual preparations. INTRODUCTION. 15 V. Letters. — I have not printed any of Edwards's " Letters," re- serving those obtained, and others expected, for his " Life," one day to be written ; and than which few comparable have been lived, I possess already priceless and hitherto unknown materials for a worthy Biography. Finally : I had intended adding specimens, with facsimiles, of the original Manuscripts of the treatise on " The Will ;*' but a critical ex- amination of the MSS. has revealed such valuable unpublished mate- rials, sucli remarkable uncoverings of the processes of that master- book, such suggestive studies, and such jottings-down, at the moment, of profound thinking and speculation, under the heading of " The Mind," as should far exceed our limits. It is possible that I may prepare an edition of the Treatise, embracing these Studies and Preparations. If so, the friends into whose hands I now place this present volume may expect to hear of it. It only remains to add, that the several MSS. of our Selections are given with scrupulous accuracy. Sometimes a word has been dropped, and I have inserted it ; but invariably within brackets [ ]. I have adhered to the contractions of the age, — e.g., "'tis" for "it is," "don't" for '*do not," "'em" for "them,"&c.; because we have herein a characteristic which is noticeable in the history of language and literature. Sometimes I would fain have corrected, what is now regarded as an ungrammatical construction, a clumsy phrase ; but that had been to import into the eighteenth, rules of the nineteenth century. Another has said, " Edwards's style, like Butler's, is very much that of a man thinking aloud ; yet, in both these authors, the train of thinking in their own minds is more clearly exhibited to us than, perhaps, by any other author, whilst they shew us, with great truth and distinctness, what their notions are, and how they came by them, with very little concern about the form of expres- sion in which they are conveyed. "* This Volume is printed uniform in size with, by far the best edition extant of, the "Works," — viz., that by Williams, and the supplementary volumes by Ogle. Its broad margins will also admit of its cutting down to range with the American edition,-!* which, spite of its singularly careless omissions and now worn stereotypes, has * Encyc. Brit., as before. t New York, 4 volumes 8vo., with double indices, 8th edition, 1851 : now the property, it is believed, of the Messrs Carter, Broadway, who have done more for the higher Uieological literature of America, than, perhaps, any other American publishers. As a Scotchman, it may be allowed me to congratulate my " brither Scots," on the honourable position they have honourably won for themselves. ] (> rNTBODUCTION. advantages over the others in its full Indices, and is, indeed, the only one, (save the somewhat inconvenient two huge volumes bearing the imprint of Bohn,) in print '* Charity and its Fruits," noticed ante, is unfortunately a small 8vo. Alexander B. Grosart. l8T MaNSK, Kinross, Decetnber 26th, 1804. TREATISE ON GRACE. NOTK. See Introduction I., page 12.— O. I TREATISE ON GRACE. CHAPTER I. [SHEWINCJ] THAT COMMON AND SAVINO (IKACE DIFFER, NOT ONLY IN DEGREE, BUT IN NATURE AND KIND. Such phrases as conimon grace, and special or saving grace, may be understood as signifying either diverse kinds of influence of God's Spirit on the hearts of men, or diverse fruits and effects of that in- fluence. The Spirit of God is supposed sometimes to have some influence upon the minds of men that are not true Christians, and [it is supposed] that those dispositions, frames, and exercises of their minds that are of a good tendency, but are common to them with the saints, are in some respect owing to some influence or assistance of God's Spirit. But as there are some things in the hearts of true Christians that are peculiar to them, and that are more excellent than any thing that is to be found in others, so it is supposed that there is an operation of the Spirit of God different, and that the value which distinguishes them is owing to a higher influence and assist- ance than the virtues of others. So that sometimes the phrase, com- man grace, is used to signify that kind of action or influence of the Spirit of God, to which are owing those religious or moral attain- ments that are common to both saints and sinners, and so signifies as much as common assistance ; and sometimes those moral or reli- gious attainments themselves that are the fruits of this assistance, are intended. So likewise the phrase, special or saving gi-ace, is some- times used to signify that peculiar kind or degree of operation or influence of God's Spirit, whence saving actions and attainments do arise in the godly, or, which is the same thing, special and saving as- sistance; or else to signify that distinguishing saving virtue itself, which is the fruit of this assistance. These phrases are more frequently understood in the latter sense, viz., not for common and special assist- ance, but for common and special, or saving virtue, which is the fruit of that assistance, and so I would be understood by these phrases in this discourse. "* And that special or saving grace in this sense is not only different 20 TREATISE ON GRACE. from common grace in degree, but entirely diverse in nature and kind, and that natural men not only have not a sufficient degree of virtue to be saints, but that they have no degi*ee of that grace that is in godly men, is what I have now to shew. 1. This is evident by what Chinst says in John iii. 6, where Christ, speaking of Regeneration, says — " That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. ' Now, whatever Christ intends by the terms flesh and spirit in the words, yet this much is manifested and undeniable, that Christ here intends to shew Nicodemus the* necessity of a new birth, or anotlier birth than his natural birth, and that, from this argument, that a man that has been the subject only of the first birth, has nothing of that in his heart which he must have in order to enter into the kingdom. He has nothing at all of that which Christ calls spirit, whatever that be. All that a man [lias] that has been the subject only of a natural birth don't go beyond that which Christ calls flesh, for however it may be refined and exalted, yet it cannot be raised above flesh. 'Tis plain, that by flesh and spirit, Christ here intends two things entirely different in nature, which cannot be one from the other. A man cannot have anything of a nature superior to flesh that is not born again, and therefore we must be " born again." That by flesh and spirit are intended certain moral principles, natures, or qualities, entirely different and opposite in their nature one to another, is manifest from other texts, as particularly: Gal. v. 17 — " For the flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh : and they are contrary the one to the other ; so that ye cannot do the things which ye would ; " Ver. 19, " Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these : Adultery, fornication," &c. Ver. 22 — " But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace," &c. ; and by Gal. vL 8 — " For he that soweth to the flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption : but he that^soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting." Rom. viii. 6-9 — " For to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace," &c. 1 Cor. iil 1 — " And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even,as unto babes in Christ." So that it is manifest by this, that men that have been the subjects only of the first birth, have no degree of that moral principle or quality that those that are new born have, whereby they have a title to the kingdom of heaven. This principle or quality comes out then no otherwise than by birth, and the birth that it must come by is not, cannot be, the first birth, but it must be a new birth. If men that have no title to the kingdom of heaven, could have something of the Spirit, as well as flesh, then Christ's argument would be false. It is plain, by Christ's reasoning, that those that are not in a state of salvation, cannot have these two opposite principles in their hearts together, some flesh and some spirit, lusting one against the other as the godly have, but that they have flesh only. 2. Thai the only principle in those t/iat are savingly converted, whence gracious acts flow, which in the language of Scripture is called the SpiHt, and set in opposition to the flesh, is that which oth^s w* \ K i \ TREATISE ON GRACE. 21 only have not a sujficient degree of, but have nothing at all of, is fur- ther manifest, because the Scripture asserts both negatively, that those that have not the Spirit are not Christ* s. Eoin. viii. 9 — *' But ye are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His ;" and also [positively] that tliose that have the Spirit are His. 1 John iii. 24i—** Hereby we know that he abideth in us by the Spirit which he hath given us." And our having the Spirit of God dwelling in our hearts is mentioned as a certain sign that persons are entitled to heaven, and is called the earnest of the future inheri- tance, (2 Cor. L 22, and v. 5, Eph. i 14? ;) which it would not be if others that had no title to the inheritance might have some of it dwelling in them. Yea, that those that are not true saints have nothing of the Spirit, no part nor portion of it, is still more evident, because not only a hav- ing any particular motion of the Spirit, but a being of the Spirit is given as a sure sign of being in Christ. 1 John iv. 13 — " Hereby know we that we dwell in Him, and He in us, because He hath given us of His Spirit** If those that are not true saints have any degree of that spiritual principle, then though they have not so much, yet they have ofiti and so that would be no sign that a person is in Christ If those that have not a saving interest in Christ have nothing of the Spirit, then they have nothing ; no degree of those graces that are the fruits of the Spirit, mentioned in GaL v. 22 — " But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance.'* Those fruits are here mentioned with that very design, that we may know whether we have the Spirit or no. 3. Those that are not true saints, and in a state of salvation, not only have not so much of that holy nature and Divine principle that is in the hearts of the saints, but they do not partake of it, because a being ''partakers of the Divine nature** is spoken of as the peculiar privilege of true saints, (2 Pet. i. 4.) It is evident that it is the true saints that the Apostle is there speaking o£ The words in this verse with the foregoing are these : " Accordiug as his Divine power hath given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him that hath called us to glory and virtue ; whereby are given to us exceeding great and precious promises ; that by these ye might be pai takers of the Divine nature ; having escaped the cor- ruption that is in the world through lust." The " Divine nature" and " lust" are evidently here spoken of as two opposite principles in man. Those that are in the world, and that are the men of the world, have only the latter principle; but to be partakers of the Divine nature is spoken of as peculiar to them that are distinguished and separated from the world, by the free and sovefeign grace of God giving them all things that pertain to life and godliness, giving the knowledge of Him and calling them to glory and virtue, and giv- ing them the exceeding great and precious promises of the gospel, and that have escaped the corruption of the world of wicked men. And a being partakers of the Divine nature is spoken of, not only 22 TREATISE ON GRACE. as peculiar to the saints, but as one of the highest privileges of the saints. 4. That those that have not a saving interest in Christ have no degree of tJuit relish and sense of spiritxud things or things of the Spirit, oftlieir Divine truth and excellency, which a true saint has, is evident by 1 Cor. ii. 14? — "The natural man receiveth not the tilings of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned" A natu- ral man is here set in opposition to a spiritual one, or one that has the Spirit, as appears by the foregoing and following verses. Such we have shewn already the Scripture declares all true saints to be, and no other. Therefore by natural men are meant those that have not the Spirit of Christ and are none of His, and are the subjects of no other than the natural birth. But here we are plainly taught that a natural man is perfectly destitute of any sense, perception, or dis- cerning of those things of the Spirit. [We are taught that] by the words "he neither does nor can know them, or discern them ;'* so far from this they are "foolishness unto him ;" he is a perfect stranger, so that he does not know what the talk of such things means ; they are words without a meaning to him ; he knows nothing of the matter any more than a blind man of colours. Hence it will follow, that the sense of things of religion that a natural man has, is not only not to the same degree, but nothing of the same nature with that which a true saint has. And besides, if a natural person has the fruit of the Spirit, which is of the same kind with what a spiritual person has, then he experiences within himself the things of the Spirit of God ; and how then can he be said to be such a stranger to them, and have no perception or discerning of them ? The reason why natural men have no knowledge of spiritual things is, because they have nothing of the Spirit of God dwelling in them. This is evident by the context : for there we are told that it is by the Spirit that these things are taught, (verses 10-12;) and godly persons in the next verse are called spiritual, because they have the Spirit dwelling in them. Hereby the sense again is confirmed, for natural men are in no degree si)iritual ; they have only nature and no Spirit. If they had anything of the Spirit, though not in so great a degree as the godly, yet they would be taught spiritual things, or things of the Spirit, in proportion to the measure of the Spirit that they had. The Spirit that searcheth all things would teach them in some measure. There would not be so great a difference that the one could perceive nothing of them, and that they should be foolish- ness to them, while to the other they appear divinely and remarkably wise and excellent, as they are spoken of in the context, (verses 6-9,) and as such the apostle spoke here of discerning them. The reason why natural men have no knowledge or perception of spiritual things is, because they have none of the anointing spoken of, (1 John ii. 27 :) " The anointing which ye have received of Him, abideth in you, and you need not that any man teach you." This TBEATISE ON GBACE. 23 anointing is evidently spoken of here, as a thing pecnliar to true saints. Ungodly men never had any degree of that holy oil poured upon them, and therefore have no discerning of spiritual things. Therefore none of that sense that natural men have of things of re- ligion, is of the same nature with what the godly have. But to these they are totally blind. Therefore in conversion the eyes of the blind are opened. The world is wholly unacquainted with the Spirit of God, as appears by John xiv. 17, where we read about " the Spirit of truth whom the world cannot receive, because it knoweth Him not" 5. Those tlmt go for those in religion tliat are not true saints and in a state of salvation have no charity, as is plainly implied in the beginning of the XIII.*^ chapter' of the 1st Epistle to the Corinthians, Therefore they have no degree of that kind of grace, disposition, or affection, that is so called. So Christ elsewhere reproves the Phari- sees, those high pretenders to religion among the Jews, that they had not the love of God in them, (John v. 42.) 6. That tliose that are not true saints have no degree of that grace that the saints have is evident^ because they have no connnunion or fellowship with Christ. If those that are not true saints partake of any of that Spirit, those holy inclinations and affections, and graci- ous acts of soul that the godly have from the indwelling of the Spirit of Christ, then they would have communion with Christ. The com- munion of saints with Christ does certainly very much consist in that receiving of His fulness and partaking of His grace spoken of, John L 16 — " Of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace ;" and in partaking of that Spirit which God gives not by measure unto Him. Partaking of Christ's holiness and grace, His nature, inclina- tions, tendencies, love, and desires, comforts and delights, must be to have communion with Christ. Yea, a believer's communion with the Father and the Son does mainly consist in his partaking of the Holy Ghost, as appears by 2 Cor. xiiL 14 — " The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost." But that unbelievers have no fellowship or communion with Christ appears, (1.) because they are not united to Christ. They are not in Christ. For the Scripture is very plain and evident in this, that those that are in Christ are actually in a state of salvation, and are justified, sanctified, accepted of Christ, and shall be saved. Phil. iiL 8, 9 — " Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord : for whom I have sufiered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, and be found in Him** 2 Cor. v. 17 — " If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature : old things are pasi?ed away ; behold, all things are become new." 1 John il 5 — '' But whoso keepeth His word, in him verily is the love of God perfected : hereby know we /' that we are in Him;'* and iii. 24 — " He that keepeth His command- ments dwelleth in Him, and He in him : and hereby we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us." But those that r. are not in Christ, and are not united to Him, can have no degree of 24 TREATISE ON GRACE. communion with Him. For there is no communion without union. The members can have no communion with the head or participation of its life and health unless they are united to it. The branch must be united with the vine, otherwise there can be no commiuiication from the vine to it, nor any partaking of any degree of its sap, or life, or influence. So without the union of the wife to the husband, she can have no communion in his goods. (2.) The Scripture does more directly teach that it is only true saints that have communion with Christ, as particularly this is most evidently spoken of as what belongs to the saints, and to them only, in 1 John i. 3, together with verses 6, 7 — " That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us : and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." Ver. 6 — " If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth : but if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanseth us from all sin." Also in 1 Cor. L 9 — " God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of His Son Christ Jesus our Lord." 7. The Scripture speaks of the actual being of a truly holy and gracious principle in the heart, as inconsistent tvith a mans being a sinner or a wicked nian, 1 John iii. 9 — " Whosoever is bom of God doth not commit sin ; for his seed remaineth in him : and he cannot sin, because he is born of God." Here it is needless to dispute what is intended by this seed, whether it be a principle of true virtue and a holy nature in the soul, or whether it be the word of God as the cause of that virtue. For let us understand it in either sense, it comes to much the same thing in the present argument ; for if by the seed is meant the word of God, yet when it is spoken of as abiding in him that is bom again, it must be intended, with respect to its effect, as a holy principle in his heart : for the word of God does not abide in one that is bom again more than another, any other way than in its effect. The word of God abides in the heart of a regenerate person as a holy seed, a Divine principle there, though it may be but as a seed, a small thing. The seed is a very small part of the plant, and is its first principle. It may be in the heart as a grain of mustard- seed, may be hid, and seem to be in a great measure buried in the earth. But yet it is inconsistent with wickedness. The smallest de- grees and first principles of a Divine and holy nature and disposition are inconsistent with a state of sin ; whence it is said " he cannot sin." There is no need here of a critical inquiry into the import of that expression ; for doubtless so much at least is implied through this, " his seed being in him," as is inconsistent with his beinir a sinner or a wicked man. So that this heavenly plant of true holiness cannot \ be in the heart of a sinner, no, not so much as in its fiist principle. '^ 8. This is confirmed by the things that conversion is repre- ^ sented by in the tScriptures, jmrticularly its being represented as a work of creation. When God creates He does not merely establisli and perfect the things which were made before, but makes wholly and H TREATISE ON GKACB. 25 immediately something entirely new, either oat of nothing, or out of that which was perfectly void of any such nature, as when He made luan of the dust of the earth. " The things that are seen are not made of things that do appear." Saving grace in man is said to be the new man or a new creature, and corrupt nature the old man. If that nature that is in the heart of a godly man be not different in its nature and kind from all that went before, then the man might possibly have had the same things a year before, and from time to time from the beginning of his life, but only not quite to the same degree. And how then is grace in him, the new man or the new creature ? Again, conversion is often compared to a resurrection. Wicked men are said to be dead, but when they are converted they are represented as being by God's mighty and effectual power raised from the dead. Now there is no medium between being dead and alive. He that is dead has no degree of life ; he that has the least degree of life in him is alive. When a man is raised from the dead, life is not only in a greater degiee, but it is all new. The same is manifest by conversion being represented as a new birth or as regeneration. Generation is not only perfecting what is old, but 'tis a begetting from the new. The nature and life that is then received has then its beginning : it receives it^ first prin- ciples. Again, conversion in Scripture is represented as an opening of tlie eyes of the blind. In such a work those have light given them that were totally destitute of it before. So in conversion, stones are said to be raised up children to Abraham : while stones they are alto- gether destitute of all those qualities that afterwards render them the living children of Abraham, and not only had them not in so great a degree. Agreeably to this, conversion is said to be a taking away a heart of stone and a giving a heart of flesh. The man while unconverted has a heart of stone which has no degree of that life and sense that the heart of flesh has, because it yet remains a stone, than which nothing is further from life and sense. Inference 1. — From what has been said, I would observe that it must needs he that conversion is vrrought at once. That knowledge, that reformation and conviction that is preparatory to conversion may be gradual, and the work of grace after conversion may be gradually carried on, yet that work of grace upon the soul whereby a person is brought out of a state of total corruption and depravity into a state of grace, to an interest in Christ, and to be actually a child of God, is in a moment. It must needs be the consequence ; for if that grace or virtue that a person has when he is brought into a state of grace be entirely different in nature and kind from all that went before, then it will follow that the last instant before a person is actually a child of God and in a state of grace, a person has not the least degree of any real goodness and of that true virtue that is in a child of God. Those things by which conversion is represented in Scripture hold forth the same thing. In creation something is brought out of no- 26 TREATISE ON GRACE. thing in an instant. God speaks and it is done, He commands and it stands fast. When the dead are raised, it is done in a moment. Thus when Christ called Lazarus out of his grave, it was not a gradual work. He said, " Lazanis, come forth/' anve is Hie sum of all duty ; and that all that God requires of us is ful- filled in it, — i.e.. That Love is the sum of all duty of the heart, and its exercises and fruits the sum of all [the] duty of life. But if the duty of the heart, or all due dispositions of hearts, are all summed up in love, then undoubtedly all grace may be summed up in Love. The Scripture teaches us that all our duty is summed up in love ; or, which is the same thing, that 'tis the sum of all that is re- quiretl in the Law ; and that, whether we tiike the Law as signifying the Ten Commandments, or the whole written Word of God. So, when by the Law is meant the Ten Commandments : Kom. xiii. 8 — " Owe no man anything, but to love ime another : for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law ;" and, therefore, several of these com- mandments are there rehearsed. And again, in ver. 10, " Love is the fulfilling of the Law." And unless love was the sum of what the Law required, the Law could not be fulfilled in Love. A law is not fid- filled but by obedience to the sum of what it contains. So the same Apostle again : 1 Tim. i. 5 — " Now the end of the commandment is charity" [love.] If we take the Law in a yet more extensive sense for the whole written Word of God, the Scripture still teaches us that Love is the sum of what is required in it. [Thus] Matt. xxii. 40. There Christ teaches us that on these two precepts of loving God and our neighbour hang all the Law and the IVophets, — that is, all the written Word of God. So that what was called the Law and the Prophets was the whole written Wonl of God that was then extant The Scripture teaches this of each table of the Law in particular. Thus, the Lawyer that we read of in the X."' chapter of Luke, vv. 25-28, mentions the love of Goil and our neighbour as the sum of the two Tables of the Law ; and Clirist approves of what he says. When he stood u]) and tempteertains to it arises, is a relish of the excellency of the Divine nature ; which the soul of man by nature has nothing of. The first effect that is produced in the soul, whereby it is carried above what it has or can have by nature, is to cause it to relish or tast« the sweetness of the Divine relation. That is the first and most fundamental thing in Divine Love, and that from which every- thing else that belongs to Divine Love naturally and necessarily pro- ceeds. When once the soul is brought to relish the excellency of the \ TREATISE ON GRACE. 37 Divine nature, then it will naturally, and of course, incline to God every way. It will incline to be with Him and to enjoy Him. It will have benevolence to God. It will be glad that He is happy. It will incline that He should be glorified, and that His will should be done in all things. So that the first effect of the power of God in the heart in Regeneration, is to give the heart a Divine taste or sense ; to cause it to have a relish of the loveliness and sweetness of the supreme excellency of the Divine nature ; and indeed this is all the immediate effect of the Divine Power that there is, this is all the Spirit of God needs to do, in order to a production of all good effects in the soul. If God, by an immediate act of His, gives the soul a relish of the excellency of His own nature, other things will follow of themselves without any further act of the Divine power than only what is necessary to uphold the nature of the faculties of the soul. He that is once brought to see, or rather to taste, the superlative love- liness of the Divine Being, will need no more to make him long after the enjoyment of God, to make him rejoice in the happiness of God, and to desire that this supremely excellent Being may be pleased and glorified.* And if this be true, then the main ground of true love to God is the excellency of His own nature, and not any benefit we have received, or hope to receive, by His goodness to us. Not but that there is such a thing as a gracious gratitude to God for mercies be- stowed upon us ; and the acts and fruits of His goodness to us may [be,] and very often are, occasions and incitements of the exercise of tnie love to God, as I must shew more particularly hereafter. But love or affection to God, that has no other good than only some benefit received or hoped for from God, is not true love. [If it be] without any sense of a delight in the absolute excellency of the Divine nature, [it] has nothing Divine in it. Such gratitude towards God requires no more to be in the soul than that human nature that all men are born with, or at least that human nature well cultivated and im- proved, or indeed not further vitiated and depraved than it naturally is. It is possible that natural men, without the addition of any fur- ther principle than they have by nature, may be affected with grati- tude by some remarkable kindness of God to them, as that they * In the MS. the followiog is placed within brackets at this place, and so again it interrupts the argument and illustration. It is transferred to this footnote : — " Love is commonly distinguished into a love of complacence and love of benevo- lence. Of these two a love of complacence is first, and is the foundation of the other, — i.e., if by a love of complacence be meant a relishing a sweetness in the qualifications of the beloved, and a being pleased and delighted in his excellency. This, in the order of nature, is before benevolence, because it is the foundation and reason of it. A person must first relish that wherein the amiableness of nature consists, before he cau wish well to him on the account of that loveliness, or as being worthy to receive good. Indeed, sometimes love of complacence is explained something differently, even for that joy that the soul has in the presence and possession of the beloved, which is different from the soul's relish of the beauty of the beloved, and is a fruit of it, as benevolence is. The soul may relish the sweetness and the beauty of a beloved ob- ject, whether that object be present or absent, whether in possession or not in posses- sion ; and this relish is the foundation of love of benevolence, or desire of the good of the beloved. And it is the foundation of love of affection to the beloved object when absent ; and it is the foundation of one's rejoicing in the object when present ; and so it is the foundation of eveiy thing else that belongs to Divine Love."— G. 38 TREATISE ON GRACE. should be so affected with some great act of kindness of a neighbour. A principle of self-love is all -that is necessary to both. But Divine Love is a principle distinct from self-love, and from all that arises from it. Indeed, after a man is come to relish the sweetness of the supreme good there is in the nature of God, self-love may have a hand in an appetite after the enjoyment of that good. For self-love will necessarily make a man desire to enjoy that which is sweet to him. But God*s perfections must first savour appetite and [be] sweet to men, or they must first have a taste to relish sweetness in the per- fection of God, before self-love can have any influence upon them to cause an appetite after the enjoyment of that sweetness. And there- fore that divine taste or relish of the soul, wherein Divine Love doth most fundamentally consist, is prior to all influence that self-love can have to incline us to God ; and so must be a principle quite distinct from it, and independent of it. TREATISE ON GKACK. 39 (CHAPTER III. SHEWING HOW A PRINCIPLE OF GRACE IS FROM THE SPIRIT OF G<3D. I. That this holy and Divine principle, which we liave sltewn does radicaUy and Huvunarily consist in Divine Love, canies into existence in the soul by the power of God in tlie influences of the Holy Spirit, the Thii^d Person in the blessed Trinity, is abundantly manifest frmn the Scriptures, Regeneration is by the Spirit: John iii 5, 6 — " Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be bom of water, and of the Spirit, he can- not enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh ; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit*' And verse 8 — " The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it gocth : so is every one that is born of the Spirit." The renewing of the soid is by the Holy Ghost : Titus iii 5 — " Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and re- newing of the Holy Ghost." A new heart is given by God's putting His Spirit within us : Ezekiel xxxvi. 26, 27 — " A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you ; and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments and do theuL** Quickening of the dead soul is by the Spirit : John vi. 63 — " It is the Spirit that quickeneth." Sanctification is by the Spiiit of God : 2 Thess. ii 13 — " God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit, and belief of the truth." Romans XV. 16 — " That the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost." 1 Cor. vi. 11 — "Such were some of you : but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God." 1 Peter i. 2 — " Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ." All grace in the heart is the fruit of the Spirit : GaL v. 22, 23—** But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance." Eph. v 9 — " The fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness, and righteousness, and truth." Hence the Spirit of God is called the Spirit of grace, (Heb. x. 29.) This doctrine of a gracious nature being by the immediate influ- ence of the Spirit of God, is not only taught in the Scriptui-es, but is irrefragable to Reason. Indeed there seems to be a strong disposi- 40 TREATISE ON GRACE. tion in men to disbelieve and oppose the doctrine of true disposition, to disbelieve and oppose the doctrine of immediate influence of the Spirit of God in the hearts of men, or to diminish and make it as small and remote a matter as possible, and put it as far out of sight as may be. Whereas it seems to me, true virtue and holiness would naturally excite a prejudice (if I may so say) in favour of such a doctrine ; and that the soul, when in the most excellent frame, and the most lively exercise of virtue, — ^love to God and delight in Him, — would naturally and unavoidably think of God as kindly communi- cating Himself to him, and holding communion with him, as though he did as it were see God smiling on him, giving to him and con- versing with him ; and that if he did not so think of God, but, on the contrary, should conceive that there was no immediate communi- cation between God and him, it would tend greatly to quell his holy motions of soul, and be an exceeding damage to his pleasure. No good reason can be given why men should have such an in- ward disposition to deny any immediate communication between God and the creature, or to make as little of it as possible. 'Tis a strange disposition that men have to thrust God out of the world, or to put Him as far out of sight as they can, and to have in no respect im- mediately and sensibly to do with Him. Therefore so many schemes have been drawn to exclude, or extenuate, or remove at a great dis- tance, any influence of the Divine Being in the hearts of men, such as the scheme of the Pelagians, the Socinians, &c. And therefore these doctrines are so much ridiculed that ascribe much to the immediate influence of the Spirit, and called enthusiasm, fanaticism, whimsy, and distraction ; but no mortal can tell for what. If we make no diflficulty of allowing that Grod did immediately make the whole Universe at first, and caused it to exist out of no- thing, and that every individual thing owes its being to an immediate, voluntary, arbitrary* act of Almighty power, why should we make a diflSculty of supposing that He has still something immediately to do with the things that He has made, and that there is an arbitrary* in- fluence still that God has in the Creation that He has made ? And if it be reasonable to suppose it with respect to any part of the Creation, it is especially so with respect to reasonable creatures, who are the highest part of the Creation, next to God, and who are most immediately made for God, and have Him for their next Head, and are created for the business wherein they are mostly concerned. And above all, in that wherein the highest excellency of this highest rank of beings consist, and that wherein he is most conformed to God, is nearest to Him, and has God for his most immediate object. It seems to me most rational to suppose that as we ascend in the order of being we shall at last come immediately to God, the First - Cause. In whatever respect we ascend, we ascend in the order of \ I fi time and succession. ^4 II. The Scinpture speaks of this holy and Divine principle in the heart as not only from the Spirit, but as being spiritual. Thus • and * That is = self choice, uncontrolled. — G. ^l TREATISE ON GRACE. 41 saving knowledge is called spiritual understanding: Col. i. 9 — "We desire that ye might be filled with the knowledge of His will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding." So the influences, graces, and comforts of God*s Spirit are called spiritual blessings : Eph. i. 3 — " Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ." So the imparting of any gracious benefit is called the im- parting of a spiritual gift : Rom. i. 1 1 — "For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift." And the fruits of the Spirit which are offered to God are called spiritual sacrifices : 1 Peter ii. 5 — " A spiritual priesthood to offer up spiritual sacrifices, accept- able to God by Jesus Christ." And a spiritual person signifies the same in Scripture as a gracious person, and sometimes one that is much under the influence of grace: 1 Cor. ii. 15 — "He that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man;" and iii. 1 — " And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual but as unto carnal." Gal. vi. 1 — *'If a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual restore such an one in the spirit of meekness." And to be graciously minded is called in Scripture a being spiritually minded : Rom. viii. 6 — " To be spiritually minded is life and peace." Concerning this, two things are to be noted. 1. Thxit this Divine principle in the heart is not called spiritual, because it has its seat in the soul or spintual part of man, and not in his body. It is called spiritual, not because of its relation to the spirit of man, in which it is, but because of its relation to the Spirit of God, from which it is. That things are not called spiritual because they appertain not to the body but the spirit of man is evident, be- cause gracious or holy understanding is called spiritual understand- ing in the forementioned passage, (Col. i. 9.) Now, by spiritual understanding cannot be meant that understanding which has its seat in the soul, to distinguish it from other understanding that has its seat in the body, for all understanding has its seat in the soul ; and that things are called spiritual because of their relaticm to the Spirit of God is most plain, by the latter part of the 2d chapter of 1st Corinthians. There we have both those expressions, one immediately after another, evidently meaning the same thing : verses 13, 14— "Which things also we speak, not in the words which mans wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth ; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God." And that by the spiritual man is meant one that has the Spirit is also as plainly evident by the con- text: verses 10-12 — "God hath revealed them unto us by His Spirit : for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man," &c. Also ver. 15 — " He that is spiritual judgeth all things," by which is evidently meant the same as he that hath the Spirit that " searcheth all things," as we find in the foregoing verses. So persons are said to be spiritually minded, not because they mind things that relate to the soul or spirit of man, but because they mind things that relate to the 42 TBBATISE ON (IBACE. Spirit of God : Romans viii. 5, 6 — " For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh ; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. For to be carnally minded is death ; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace." 2. It must he observed that where this holy Divine principle of saving grace wrought in the mind is in Sculpture called spiritvai, what is intended by the expressian is not merely nor chiefly that it is from the Spirit ofOod, but that it is of the nature of the Spirit of Ood. There are many things in the minds of some natuiid men that are from the influence of the Spirit, but yet are by no means spiritual things in the scriptural sense of the word. Tlie Spirit of God convinces natural men of sin, (John xvi. 8.) Natural men may have common grace, common illuminations, and common afifec- tions, that are from the Spirit of God, as appears by Hebrews vi. 4. Natural men have sometimes the influences of the Spirit of God in His common operations and gifts, and therefore God's Spirit is said to be striving with them, and they are said to resist the Spirit, (Acts vii. 51 ;) to grieve and vex Grod's Holy Spirit, (EpL iv. 30 ; Isaiah Ixiii 10 ;) and God is said to depart from them even as the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul : 1 Sam. xvi 14 — **But the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the Lord troubled him." But yet natural men are not in any degree spiritual The great diSerence between natural men and godly men seems to be set forth by this, that the one is natural and carnal, and the other spiritual ; and natural men are so totally destitute of that which is Spirit, that they know nothing about it, and the reason given for it is be- cause they are not spiritual, (1 Cor. ii. 13-15.) Indeed sometimes those miraculous gifts of the Spirit that were common are called spiritual because they are from the Spirit of God ; but for the most part the term seems to be appropriated to its gracious influences and fruits on the soul, which are no otherwise spiritual than the common influences of the Spirit that natural men have, in any other respect than this, that this saving grace in the soul, is not only from the Spirit, but it also partakes of the nature of that Spirit that it is from, which the common grace of the Spirit does not. Thus things in Scripture language are said to be earthly, as they partake of an earthly nature, partake of the nature of the earth ; so things are said to be heavenly, as they in their nature agree with those things that are in heaven ; and so saving gi*ace in the heart is said to be spiritual, aTtti^ therein distinguished from all other influences of the Spirit, that it is > of the nature of the Spirit of God. It partakes of the nature of that Spirit, while no common gift of the Spirit doth so. But here an enquiry may be raised, viz. : — Enq. How does saving grace partake of the nature of that Spirit that it is from, so as to he called on that account spiritual, thus es- sentially distinguishing it from all other effects of the SpiHt ? for every effect has in some respect or another the nature of its cause, and the common convictions and illuminations that natural men have are in some respects [of] the nature of the Spirit of God ; for there r TREATISE ON GBACE. 43 is light and understanding and conviction of truth in these common illuminations, and so they are of the nature of the Spirit of God — that is, a discerning spirit and a spirit of truth. But yet saving grace, by its being called spiritual, as though it were thereby distinguished from all other gifts of the Spirit, seems to partake of the nature of the Spirit of God in some very peculiar manner. Clearly to satisfy this enquiry, we must do these two things : — 1. We must bear in mind what has already been said of the nature of saving grace, and what I have already shewn to be that wherein its nature and essence lies, and wherein all saving grace is radically and summarily comprised — ^viz., a principle of Divine Love. 2. We must consider what the Scripture reveals to be in a peculiar manner the nature of the Holy Spirit of God, and in an enquiry of this nature I woidd go no further than I think the Scripture plainly goes before me. The Word of God certainly should be our rule in matters so much above reason and our own notions. And here I would say — (1.) That I think the Scripture does sufficiently reveal the Holy Spirit as a proper Divine Person ; and thus we ought to look upon Him as a distinct personal agent. He is often spoken of as a person, revealed under personal characters and in personal acts, and it speaks of His being acted on as a person, and the Scripture plainly ascribes every thing to Him that properly denotes a distinct person ; and though the word person be rarely used in the Scriptures, yet I believe that we have no word in the English language that does so naturally repre- sent what the Scripture reveals of the distinction of the Eternal Three, — Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, — as to say they are one God but three pei-sons. (2.) Though all the Diviiie perfections are to he attributed to ea^h person of tJie Trinity, yet tlte Holy Ghost is in a peculiar manner called by the name of Love — jiyaTrrj, the same word that is translated charity in the XIII."* chapter of 1st Corinthians. The Godhead or the Divine essence is once and again said to be Love : 1 John iv. 8 — " He that loveth not, knoweth not God ; for God is love." So again, ver. 16 — " God is love ; and he that dwelleth in love, dwelleth in God, and God in him." But the Divine essence is thus called in a peculiar manner as breathed forth and subsisting in the Holy Spirit ; as may be seen in the context of these texts, as in the 1 2th and 1 3th verses of the same chapter — " No nuin hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and His love is perfected in us. Hereby know we that we dwell in Him, and He in us, because He hath given us of His Spirit." It is the same argument in both these verses: in tlie 12th verse the apostle argues that if we have love dwelling in us, we have God dwelling in us ; and in the 13th verse he clears the face of the argument by this, that this love which is dwelling in us is God's Spirit. And this shews that the foregoing argument is good, and that if love dwells in us, we know God dwells in us indeed, for the Apostle supposes it as a thing granted and allowed that God's Spirit is God. The Scripture elsewhere does 44 TREATISE ON GRACE. abundantly teach us that the way in which God dwells in the saints is by His Spirit, by their being the temples of the Holy Qhost Here this Apostle teaches us the sarae thing. He says, " We know that He dwelleth in us, that He hath given us His Spirit ;" and this is mani- festly to explain what is said in the foregoing verse — viz., that God dwells in us, inasmuch as His love dwells in us ; which love he had told us before — ver. 8 — is God himself. And afterwards, in the 1 6th verse, he expresses it more fully, that this is the way that God dwells in the saint — viz., because this love dwells in them, which is God. Again the same is signified in the same manner in the last verses of the foregoing chapter. In the foregoing verses, speaking of love as a true sign of sincerity and our acceptance with God, beginning with the 18th verse, he sums up the argument thus in the last verse : " And hereby we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us. We have also something very much like this in the apostle Paul's writings. Gal. V. 13-16 — "Use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this. Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. This I say then. Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the Inst of the flesh." Here it seems most evident that what the apostle exhorts and urges in the 13th, 14th, and loth verses, — viz., that they should walk in love, that they might not give occasion to the gratifying of the flesh, — he does expressly explain in the 16th verse by this, that they should walk in the Spirit, that they might not fulfil the lust of the flesh ; which the great Mr Howe takes notice of in his " Sermons on the Prosperous State of the Christian Interest before the End of Time," p. 185, published by Mr Evans. His words are, " Walking in the Spirit is directed with a special eye and reference unto the exercise of this love ; as you may see in Galatians v., the 14th, 16th, and 16tli verses compared together. All the law is fulfilled in one word, (he means the whole law of the second table,) even in this. Thou shjjt love thy neighbour as thyself. But if ye bite and devour one another, (the opposite to this love, or that which follows on the want of it, or from the opposite principle,) take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. This I say then, (observe the inference,) Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. To walk in the Spirit is to walk in the exercise of this love." So that as the Son of God is spoken of as the wisdom, understanding, and ^0709 of God, (Proverbs viiL ; Luke xi. 49 ; John i., at the begin- ning,) and is, as Divines express things, the personal Wisdom of God ; so the Spirit of God is spoken of as the Love of God, and may with equal foundation and propriety be called the personal Love of God. We read in the beloved disciple's writings of these two — ^40709 and ^Ayairq, both of which are said to bo God, (John i. 1 ; 1 JoVn iv. 8-16.) One is the Son of God, and the other the Holy Spirit. There are two things that God is said to be in this First Epistle of TREATISE ON GRACE. 45 Jolm — flight and love: chap. i. 5 — "God is light." This is the Son of God, who is said to be the wisdom and reason of God, and the brightness of His glory ; and in the 4th chapter of the same epistle he says, " God is love," and this he applies to the Holy Spirit Hence the Scripture symbol of the Holy Ghost is a dove, which is the emblem of love, and so was continually accounted (as is well known) in the heathen world, and is so made use of by their poets ind mythologists, which probably arose partly from the nature and man- ner of the bird, and probably in part from the tradition of the story of Noah*s dove, that came with a message of peace and love after such terrible manifestations of God's wrath in the time of tlie deluge. This bird is also made use of as an emblem of love in the Holy Scriptures ; as it was on that message of peace and love that God sent it to Noah, when it came with an olive-leaf in its mouth, and often in Solomon s Song: Cant. i. 15— "Thou hast doves' eyes:" Cant. v. 12— "His eyes are as the eyes of doves :" Cant v. 2 — "Open to me, my love, ujy dove," and in other places in that song. This bird, God is pleased to choose as the special symbol of His Holy Spirit in the greatest office or work of the Spirit that ever it has or will exert — viz., in anointing Christ, the great Head of the whole Church of saints, from which Head this holy oil descends to all the mem- bers, and the skirts of His garments, as the sweet and precious ointment that was poured on Aaron's head, that great type of Christ As God the Father then poured forth His Holy Spirit of love upon the Son without measure, so that which was then seen with the eye — viz., a dove descend- ing and lighting upon Christ — signified the same thing as what was at the same time proclaimed to the Sen — viz., This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. This is the Son on whom I pour forth all my love, towards whom my essence entirely flows out in love. See Matt iii. 16, 17 ; Mark i. 10, 11 ; Luke iil 22 ; John i. 32, 33. This was the anointing of the Head of the Church and our great High Priest, and therefore the holy anointing oil of old with which Aaron and other typical high priests were anointed was the most eminent type of the Holy Spirit of any in the Old Testament This holy oil, by reason of its soft-flowing and diffusive nature, and its unparalleled sweetness and fragrancy, did most fitly represent Divine Love, or that Spirit that is the Deity, breathed forth or flowing out and softly fall- ing in infinite love and delight It is mentioned as a fit representa- tion of holy love, which is said to be like the precious ointment on the head, that ran down upon the beard, even Aaron's beard, that went down to the skirts of his garments. It was from the fruit of the olive- tree, which it is known has been made use of as a symbol of love or peace, which was probably taken from the olive-branch brought by the dove to Noah in token of the Divine favour ; so that the olive-branch and the dove that brought it, both signified the same thing — viz., love, which is specially typified by the precious oil from the olive-tree. God's love is primarily to Himself, and His infinite delight is in Himself, in the Father and the Son loving and delighting in each other. We often read of the Father loving the Son, and being well 46 TREATISE ON GRACE. pleased in the Son, and of the Son loving the Father. In the in- finite love and delight that is between these two persons consists the infinite happiness of God : Prov. viiL 30. — " Then I was by him, as one brought up with him : and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him ; " and therefore seeing the Scripture signifies that the Spirit of God is the Love of God, therefore it follows that Holy Spirit proceeds from or is breathed forth from, the Father and the Son in some way or other infinitely above all our conceptions, as the Divine essence entirely flows out and is breathed forth in infinitely pure love and sweet delight from the Father and the Son ; and this is that pure river of water of life that proceeds out of the throne of the Father and the Son, as we read at the beginning of the XXIL* chapter of the Revelation ; for Christ himself tells us that by the water of life, or living water, is meant the Holy Ghost, (John vii 38, 39.) This river of water of life in the Revelation is evidently the same with the living waters of the sanctuary in Ezekiel, (Ezek. xlvii. 1, &c.;) and this river is doubtless the river of God's pleasure, or of God's own in- finite delight spoken of in Ps. xxxvi. 7-9 — " How excellent is thy lov- ing-kindness, God ! therefore the children of men put their trust under the shadow of thy winga They shall be abundantly satisfied with the fatness of thy house ; and thou shalt make them drink of the river of thy pleasures. For with thee is the fountain of life." The river of God*s pleasures here spoken of is the same with the foun- tain of life spoken of in the next words. Here, as was observed be- fore, the water of life by Christ's own interpretation is the Holy Spirit. This river of God's pleasures is also the same with the fat- ness of God's house, the holy oil of the sanctuary spoken of in the next preceding words, and is the same wi^h God's love, or God's excellent loving-kindness, spoken of in the next preceding verse. I have before observed that the Scripture abundantly reveals that the way in which Christ dwells in the saint is by His Spirit's dwell- ing in them, and here I would observe that Christ in His prayer, in the XVII.*^ chapter of John, seems to speak of the way in which He dwells in them as by the indwelling of the love wherewith the Father has loved Him : John xviL 26 — " And I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare it ; that the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them, and I in them." The beloved disciple that wrote this Gospel having taken [such] particular notice of this, that he after- wards in his first epistle once and again speaks of Love's dwelling in the saints, and the Spirit's dwelling in them being the same thing. Again, the Scripture seems in many places to speak of love in Christians as if it were the same with the Spirit of God in them, or at least as the prime and most natural breathing and acting of the Spirit in the souL So Rom. v. 5 — '* Because the love of Grod is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost, which is givei* unto us :" CoL L 8 — " Who also declared unto us your love in the Spirit :" 2 Cor. vL 6 — " By kindness, by the Holy Ghost, by love unfeigned :" Phil. iL 1 — " If there be therefore any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any bowels and mercies, fulfil TREATISE OS OBACE. 47 ye my joy, that ye be like-niinde