(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
See other formats

Full text of "Jesuit juggling. Forty popish frauds detected and disclosed"

Columbia ^^uitier^ttp 










" I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the moutii of 
tho dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth 
of the false prophet ; for they are the spirits of devils, which go 
forth unto the whole world." — John. 









1?, 3 2.^ 

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1835, 
in the Clerk's office of the Southern District of New- York. 























NeiO'York, Qclober 12, IS35. 


Introductoiiy Address, 
Epistle Dedicatory, 

Adoration of Anj^cls, 
Allcifiance tlenied, 
Ambiguity of Romanists, 
ArijuiniMits against. Popery, 
Baptism, lloiicncration. 
Belief of the Church, 
Belief of the Truth, 

Boy of Bilson, 
Brothels licensed at Rome, 
Calumnies on Protestant 

Calumny of Papists, 

Canonized Saints, 
Catholic Church and the 
Popedom contrasted, 
Celibacy of Priests, 
Character of Popes, 
Character of Rome, 
Christian Profession, 
Church of Rome ceased, 
Concubines of Priests, 
Continuance of Popery, 
Corporeal presence of Christ 

in the mass, 
Corrui)tions of Authors, 
Council of Lyons, 
Controversies of Roman 

Crimes of Popes, 
Decision of Controversies, 
Denial of Faith, 
Denial of Marriage, 
Despotism of Popery, 
Divisions in the Popedom, 
i^^etection of Jesuits, 
Dispensation for oaths. 
Dispensations for conceal- 

Pa^c, Pafre 

7|End of controversy, 83 

25 Equivocation of Papists, 298 

33 l'>rors in faith overthrow 
164| Popery, 

310 Rncrnnins IV. Pope, 

56 Evan<j;elical Ministry, 
109 Evidence of Scripture, 

49 Evidence of the senses, 
272 Extirpation of heretics, - 
161 FaitlV, love and obedience, 
263 False allegations of Jesuits, 269 
196 False doctrines of Ronian- 
310 ism, 

184 False interpretations, 
218 False miracles, 

JFasting among Papists, 
200 Forgiveness of Sin by Rom 
182 'ish Priests, 
191 Fraudulent divisions, 
213 Fri irs and Monks, 

|General councils, 
129 Godly men not Papists, 
22-2 Head of the church, 

63 Henry IV, of France, 
221 Hugo's account of Lyons, 
263 Hojuenots, 

68Hucnan depravity encour- 
225I aged by Roman Priests, 261 









236:Ignorance invincible, 

[Image worship, 
271|lmpeifecfion of works, 
178 Implicit faith, 
220|Inti(lel Popes, 

jinterprclation of Scripture, 
200, Invocation of Saints, 
219,lrisli Massacre, 
107!Jansenists and Jesuits, 
275 Jesuit doctrines, 
273JJesuit principles, 
284| Jesuit proselytism, 

66:Jesuit reproaches, 
3001 John XII. Pope, 
267 John XXIII. Pope, 

Judge of controversies, 
297'julius III. Pope, 

Diversity of opinion, 152, 280: Justification by faithj 
Divisions in the Popedom, 66 Law of Chiist, 
Doctrines contrary to Scrip- Legends, 

lure, 76 Lusher, 

























Page Pogi 

Lyons, 220| Praying for the dead, 164 

Massacre of Huguenots, 310 Pretended Miracles, 184 

Mental reservation, 298|Priestly celibacy, 222 

Meritorius good works, 278 Principles of faith, 100 

Miracles, 180, 184 Principles of Papists, 78 

Monks and Friars, 

Murder of Governors, 

Mystery of Jesuitism, 

Novel opinions. 

Novelty of Popish corrup- 

Novelty of Protestantism, 


Oaths derided. 

Oaths nullified, 

Opinions ot councils, 

Opus operatum. 

Original sin, 

Papal artifices, 

Papal decretals. 

Papal innovations, 

Papal sovereignty, 

Papal unity, 

Pardon of sin. 

Pastoral authority, 

Paul II. Pope, 



Personal holiness, 

Peter not Vicar of Christ, 

Pius I[. Pope, 

Popery contrary to the 

Popery contrary to unity. 
Popery is antichrislian. 
Popery past amendment, 
Popes are antichrist. 
Popish ceremonies. 
Popish concealment. 
Popish confusion. 
Popish deceitfulness. 
Popish forgeries. 
Popish perjury. 
Popish sanctity. 
Popish slaughters. 
Popish succession a novelty. 
Popish treason. 
Popish unity. 
Prayers to the dead, 

22llP:ohibilion of the Scriptures, 264 
3041 Proofs of Papists, 78 

95lProtestant divisions, 89 i^ 

230'Purgatory, 266 

Renunciation of Christian 
226; love, 55 

142 Richlieu's catalogue of errors, 270 
220 Roman Hierarchy no part 
306' of the true church, 
299; Roman Saints, 
157 Romish ancestors, 
263 Romish legends, 
263 Scandalous sins, 


295 Schism, 
57 Schisms among Papists, 

234 Simony of Popes, 

131 Sins ot ignorance, 
89 Sovereignty of the Pope, 

266 Spanish armada, 

266, Spiritual worship, 

219,Succession of doctrines, 

299iSuccession of ministers, 

308 Succession of Popes, 

266JThccla's miracles, 


219 Translations of the Bible, 

69 Uncertainty of Romanism, 

45 Uncharitableness of Popery, 252 
248 Uncleanness sanctioned by 
312 Popery, 225 

288 Unfair disputants, 293 

225|T'm godly Popes, 215 

297|T iiiiolincss of Rome, 60 

1 1 6j r 1 1 married Priests, 221 \/ 

187 Veneration of relics, 166 

178j Venial sins, 264 

303 Vices of Romish Priests, 220 
210 Vi'/ors of Jesuits, 297 

308 Wuldenses, 310 

153 Woaltti of convents, 202 

303 Wicked men not Christian 

64 believers, 275 

163 William Perry, 184 





The rapid increase of the Papal Apostacy, and of 
the principk'S of Jesuitism, in our Republic, is the most 
astonishing modern development of "the Mystery of 
Iniquity." Viewed in reference only to civil society, 
nothing can be more contradictory to all reasonable 
anticipation, than that Popery should have been able 
to force an admission into our community; much less 
that it should have been acceptable to American Citi- 
zens. Our whole national polity is so widely severed 
from the entire system of Romanism, under every pos- 
sible modification, that the correct motives, and the true 
causes, should be ascertained and specified, for that 
astounding aberration from rectitude, self-interest and 
decorum, the existence of which, the present appalling 
predominance of Popery, and the evident extending 
sway of the Roman Pontiff' throughout our land, so 
unequivocally shows. 

The inquiry is often propounded — how can the ex- 
traordinar}'- spread of Popery, and the manifest multi- 
plication of the Papists be rationally accounted for in 
the present state of our country ? It is often said in 
reply, that the increase of Papal vassals in the United 
States, results entirely from foreign immigration, and 
the expenditure of European money. Admit that the 
former of those causes augments the number of Roman 
devotees ; and that the latter enables the Jesuits to erect 
male and female convents, and seminaries — neverthe- 
less both do not exhibit the whole existing relative 


position of the Pontifical authority in our confede- 
rated republics. 

Two anomalous facts undeniably declare, that other 
causes are in operation which give life and encourage- 
ment to the efforts that Roman Priests and disguised 
Jesuits make to subjugate these States to the Italian 
Pontiff. Neither the crowds of Papists who are con- 
stantly arriving, nor the sums of money which are 
regularly transmitted from Europe, at all account for 
the peculiar favor with which Romanism is regarded, 
and the special solicitude which so many citizens ex- 
emplify to propitiate its priests. Nor do those princi- 
ples afford any plausible solution of another mysterious 
circumstance ; that the whole body of American citi- 
zens are manifestly imbued with an overpowering dread 
of the malign influence, and appalling machinations of 
the Papists. 

There has been a general neglect of that department 
of ecclesiastical literature which comprises the history 
of the Christian church, and especially of that portion of 
it which appertains to the Papal hierarchy. Except in 
a few more prominent stations. Popery was almost un- 
known in the United States, until subsequent to our 
last contest with Britain ; nor had its progress attracted 
any marked interest, until about six years ago, it was 
first proposed, that an attempt should be made to direct 
the attention of the Protestant churches to the charac- 
ter, wiles and pernicious acts of the grand apostate ene- 
my of the kingdom of God. From that cause, the re- 
cent polemical discussions concerning the "lying won- 
ders and strong delusion" o( Pontifical Rome have 
either been disregarded or opposed ; and there is an 
almost universal dearth of information respecting the 
Scriptural prophecies and delineations of that enemy of 
** our Lord, and of his Christ," who is generically de- 


nominated "the Man of sin;" the "scarlet colored 
Beast full of names of hlasphemy, having seven heads 
and ten horns" — and "Mystery, Babylon the great ; 
Mother of Harlots and the abominations of the earth." 

It is also not a little perplexing, that the Apocalypse, 
to the reading and hearing of the words of which book 
alone of the sacred canon, a unique blessing is attached 
by the " Faithful Witness, and prince of the kings of 
the earth" — the Apocalypse, or the revelation of John is 
far less studied in its connection with the past annals 
of the Christian church, than any other portion of " the 
oracles of God." Hence, there is an almost universal 
ignorance or misconception of the genuine attributes 
and ungodly proceedings of the Romish " seducing 
spirits, and false teachers, who speak lies in hypocrisy." 

The predominating sensibility throughout the Amer- 
ican Protestant churches is an undefinable dread of the 
Pope's vassals who are domiciliated among us. From 
which cause, public controverted discussions of the dog- 
mas, superstitions, frauds, and corruptions of Popery 
and Jesuitism are sternly counteracted. Publications 
both in the form of volumes and periodicals are slighted 
and decried. Houses of prayer are premptorily refused 
for the purpose of preaching the Gospel of Christ in 
illustration of Scriptural predictions — and not only is 
every effort to arouse the slumbering disciples repelled ; 
but those Watchmen, who " see the sword coming upon 
the land, and blow the trumpet to warn the people," 
are censured and denounced, as if they were disturbers 
of the public peace. 

This is not the work of our Romish inveterate ad- 
versaries. Having latterly discovered that their scorn- 
ful superstition of Protestants excited both disgust and 
alarm, the Jesuits now have become comparatively 
lamb-like, and " beguile with enticing words." They 


perceive that the cause of their foreign despot, the Ro- 
man Pontiff, is more efficiently promoted in this republic, 
by their deceptions than by their menaces ; and through 
their covert artifices, than with open assault. The com- 
bined apathy and opposition of Protestant Ministers 
and other influential professed adherents of the Refor- 
mation are consolidating the Papal system, and facili- 
tate its enlargement and sway throughout the United 
vStates, far more than all the priest-ridden multitudes, 
who are transported from Europe: and all the treas- 
ures which pontifical ambition and ignorant bigotry 
can squander, upon the marvellous design to subjugate 
the minds and hearts, the bodies and souls of American 
citizens to the accursed iron yoke of Pope Gregory. 
Whence does this slavish fear of the Papists eman- 
ate? There is a deep-rooted impression that the vas- 
sals of Rome are a turbulent, lawless, and ferocious 
confederacy, who are impelled by an unpricipled priest- 
hood. What are the Jesuits and Dominicans ? Men 
who know no authority but the supreme pontifical man- 
date ; who are united to mankind by none of the nat- 
ural bonds of relationship; who have no motive of ac- 
tion but personal indulgence, and the aggrandizement 
of their craft; and who being exempt from all govern- 
ment, except that of their ecclesiastical superiors, and 
having no permanent residence, because they are al- 
ways subject to the order of removal from their prelat- 
ical master ; constantly, and in every place, are ihe 
enemies of all that portion of the human family who 
will not submit to their infernal despotism. Therefore, 
timid Protestants conclude, that it is preferable not to 
irritate the Beast, lest they should feel the compound 
anguish arising from the Bear's gripe, and the Lion's 
mouth, inflicted with leopard-like suddenness and fero- 
city. Baxter has luminously depicted that absurdity. 


" Some think that it is the safest way to please tlie Pope 
and Jesuits; and so will be Papists," or support their 
cause, "on the same terms that some of the Indiana 
worship the devil, because he is so naught, that he may 
not hurt them." If we reflect upon the pi'esent situa- 
tion of Jesuitism in this republic, it is scarcely credible, 
that the revered author of the "Juggling of Jesuits," 
one hundred and eighty years ago could have so pre- 
cisely described existing realities. Vast numbers of 
Protestants, act upon the same principle, as the man 
who bowed to the images of Jupiter and Satan. When 
he was reproved for his infatuation ; he retorted; " It 
is impossible to know what may happen, or where we 
may go ; so it is best to have friends in every place." 

But who can estimate the mischiefs that follow from 
the large donations which are made not only by merely 
nominal Protestants, but also by actual members of the 
Reformed churches, towards the erection of those idol- 
atrous temples where the Romish superstitious cere- 
monial is performed ? In many places throughout our 
land, the sites of the edifices or materials for the erec- 
tion of them, or money to pay the mechanics, have 
been profusely lavished by the avowed followers of 
Christ, to complete Mass houses and Jesuit male and 
female convents. To admit that those donors thus be- 
stowed their gifts from a profound non-acquaintance 
with Popery is an impeachment of their rationality; 
and yet to suppose that they have thrown away their 
superflu.ous wealth from a predilection for. Romanism, 
or from a supposition that it is Christianity, altogether 
makes void their sincerity. ^Whatever may be the 
cause, the efiects are most pernicious. The energies 
of the Protestant champions are enfeebled, and the 
power of the Roman Priests is invigorated and be- 
comes more extensive and unshaken. 


Since the commencement of the more direct " war 
upon the Beast," in America, nearly six years have 
passed away ; and two facts have been elicited from the 
occurrences which have transpired. The vast majority 
of American citizens, and even of American christians 
are nearly altogether ignorant of Popery — and a spuri- 
ous liberalism prevails throughout our country ; which 
unfolds itself nearly in our Lord's graphical descrip- 
tion of the ancient Jewish blind guides — " who strained 
at a gnat and swallowed a camel." 

It is demonstrable, that each of those principles, and 
especially both them conjoined, must have a decisively 
injurious tendency upon the churches of Christ. Po- 
pery, through their joint operation, is considered to be 
either harmless and so may be tolerated without oppo- 
sition ; or it is viewed as a species of modified Christi- 
anity, which demands our occasional conformity with 
its principles and ritual. Such a contradictory inter- 
pretation of Scripture can arise only from entire igno- 
rance of the tenth, and the subsequent chapters of the 
Apocalypse. However incompetent through our finite 
judgments, we may be to determine the times and sea- 
sons, and also some of the prophetical figures, with 
the application of them ; yet one thing is certain as de- 
rived from the whole tenor of the sacred volume; 
that idolatry is a crime most abhorent to Jehovah ; that 
the system of Popery is doomed by God to utter de- 
struction ; and that all Papists being idolaters, unless 
they come out of Babylon the Great, will be " partakers 
of her sins, and will receive of her plagues." 

The erroneous judgment that is formed of the genuine 
attributes of Romanism is both the cause and the effect 
of that false charity which urges so many of our citi- 
zens to look with complacency upon that antichristiati 
system, and to consider it on account of its fraudulent 


appellative, as an emanation from " the glorious GovSpel 
of the ever blessed God." 

The same combined delusion and fondness for its 
pageantry, its music, its ornaments, and its shows, 
actuate that resistance which is so general, and so con- 
tinuously displayed, to the use of evangelical means 
for the overthrow of Popery. Indeed it seems to be 
entirely forgotten, by almost all orders of people both 
within the church, and in the world; that "the work- 
ing of Satan" is a most alarming curse to every nation 
who tolerate and succumb to it; and that "the testi- 
mony ol Jesus which is the spirit of prophecy" has dis- 
tinctly foretold that the admission and progress of "the 
mystery of iniquity" among any community is a deci- 
sive expression of the displeasure of Jehovah, designed 
by him as a punishment for their transgressions and 
their sins. Thus the Apostle Paul, 2 Thessalonians, 
2: 10 — 12; emphatically declares — " They received 
not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. For 
this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that 
they should believe the lie; that they all may be 
damned, who believed not the truth, but had pleasure 
in unrighteousness." 

This reflection is peculiarly impressive, if considered 
in connection with the retributive dispensations of the 
Omnipotent Governor. We have always boasted of 
the unequalled illumination and freedom which over- 
spread our country ; and the questions instantly arise ; 
has that light been duly improved ? has that liberty 
been used for evangelical objects, and according to di- 
vine prescriptions ? 

Reflect upon the contrast. Popery is a system of 
darkness and slavery, mental, bodily and spiritual. No- 
thing more directly at the antipodes to all our republi- 



can civic theories in legislation and political economy 
can possibly be imagined, than the dogmas, injunctions 
and appointments of the Court of Rome, exclusive of 
their total contradiction to Christianity; and yet that 
'' So7i of Perdition,^' who has withered the comforts, 
blasted the prosperity, promoted the contentions, extin- 
guished the improvements, polluted with blood, and be- 
cause it is a ceaseless God-robber, Malachi 3: 8, 9; 
has "cursed with a curse," during the last twelve hun- 
dred years, every one of the ten kingdoms of the Beast, 
is now nourished in this country as if he were " the 
Friend of sinners, and the Prince of Peace." 

Those irreconcilable contradictions between all that 
Americans exult in, of the rights of conscience, and civil 
liberty, when contrasted with the gloom and vassalage 
of the Papacy, combine the most intensely exciting in- 
quiries in reference to the prospective advances of the 
pontifical predominance throughout our land. Here 
we have a fact, v;hich in its primary aspect appears to 
be utterl}^ inexplicable — that men who are sensitive 
beyond description to the least apparent infringement 
of their privileges by their own elected official person- 
ages; at the same time deliberately choose and obsti- 
nately encourage the grasping usurpations of a foreign 
despotic potentate; whose boundless arrogance claims 
the illimitable control of all the affairs of every indi- 
vidual not only during his earthly pilgrimage, but 
throughout eternal ages ; and also assumes to determine 
and regulate not merely his own forced and voluntary 
minions, but the concerns of all the tribes of mankind, 
without a murmur of resistance, and forever. 

Whether the supreme and all righteous arbiter of 
human transactions would alarm us by tlie fearful inti- 
mation that he can permit men voluntarily so to blind 
themselves, that they will aid the tyrant to forge the 


•chains which shall fetter themselves, and build the pri- 
son for their own incarceration, and manufacture the 
scourges with which themselves shall be lacerated ; is 
a topic which demands serious investig-ation, and may 
properly excite penitent humility. The signs of the 
times are full of melancholy portents for the American 
churches; and that light of which in one aspect we 
have boasted, and in another, endeavored to extinguish, 
is rapidly becoming obscured by the smoke of the bot- 
tomless pit: and that liberty which has been so per- 
verted into licentiousness on one side, and been so 
grievously despoiled on the other, seems to be gradu- 
ally transforming into the feudal bondage of the dark 
ages, when a Monk's cowl was the highest object of 
reverence, and a Friar's approbation was the most 
richly valued possession. 

If we were asked for an example of human depra- 
vity which should be too palpable to admit either of 
denial or proof, we would adduce the present condi- 
tion of Popery in the United States. No other reason 
can be assigned for the progress which it, has made, 
and the cordiality with which it has been received; 
than the sanction which indirectly by example, and im- 
mediately by its accomrnodating doctrines and license, 
that " all deceivableness of unrighteousness" imparts 
to every unhallowed indulgence. Popery is silently 
but gradually undermining all the moral principles of 
our people. " The leaven, the doctrine of the Phari- 
sees and of the Sadducecs" almost imperceptibly, except 
unto a very perspicacious observer, is embittering and 
corrupting our whole code of ethics, both theoretical and 
in practice. 

Examine three facts in connexion with the fourth, 
seventh, and ninth commandments. What has been the 
prime cause of that vast addition to the sabbath break- 


ing which in our h\rge cities especially has transform^ 
ed the latter half of the Lord's day into one unrestricted 
scene of sensual revelry. What are the Sunday eve- 
ning " Sacred Concerts," as they are called, but an ex- 
cuse for the continued perpetration of the regular disso- 
luteness of the other six days, with the scene and place 
only shifted from the seductive theatre to the fascinating 
garden. This is a master-piece of satan ; to gild over 
sabbath breaking with a pretended sacred concert ; as 
if any thing could be sacred, where theatrical profli- 
gates perform, and notorious " lovers of pleasure" re- 
sort. But it is the genuine effect of Popery. The 
Papist's sabbath ends as soon as mass is closed ; and 
then every species of inordinate gratification may be 
indulged with impunity. The desecration of the Lord's 
day is one of the indelible and most obvious features of 
the Popedom ; and as the natural and inevitable conse- 
quence, infidelity, and all diversified ungodliness with 
their ineffable evils speedily overflow the land. It being 
also proper to be remembered, that this dishonor of the 
Lord's day, so far from being condemned by the Papal 
creed, is an essential ingredient in their system, and 
from their superstitions inseparable. 

The transgression of the seventh commandment is 
indissolubly conjoined with Popery. That character- 
istic of the Romish apostacy is declared by both the 
Apostles Paul and John, to be an infallible mark of the 
mystical Babylon ; and according to the testimony of 
the Papal historians, the Scriptural delineations are 
most minutely accurate. That the various crimes and 
the scandalous disorders, which are implied in the 
Lord's mandate, are increasing not only in frequency, 
but also in openness, and likewise in aggravated enor- 
mity, is a fact which is so obvious, that alas! it requires 
DO evidence to verify its melancholy truth, Can it be 


believed, that Jesuitism is not principally chargeable 
with this awfully wide spreading desolation? Do 
not the Jesuit Priests teach, that many of the sins of 
unchastity are merely venial ? are they not pardoned 
for a slight penance ? are not dispensations for all past 
delinquencies sold for a trifle? Cannot indulgence for 
one or more years, be obtained for a given price, which 
permits the purchaser to violate the law of God as often 
as he ploases, and promises him exemption from the 
divine displeasure ? "When we remember the propor- 
tion of Papists in our large cities and towns, is it possi- 
ble that such an irreligious and contaminating system 
should exist, and be in full operation among them, and 
that all other persons should escape the infectious con- 
tagion ? Is it conceivable that the large. multitudes of 
sinners who are anxious to live unrestrained by the ju- 
risdiction of Jehovah will not be gratified, without ex- 
amining its genuineness, Vv'ith a pretended Christianity, 
which tolerates them in every licentious practice, and 
which guarantees their eventual security, through the 
power of a Priesthood so condescending to human pro- 
pensities, and Avhose beneficence is so cheaply pur- 
chased ? 

But probably survej^'ed in all their operations in civil 
society throughout our Federal Republic, the doctrines 
and practices of the Jesuits and other Roman Priests, 
and their devotees, respecting the ninth commandment, 
are more pernicious than even the desecration of the 
Sabbath, and the deluge of impurity with which they 
are desolating public morals and decorum. The equiv- 
ocations, mental reservations, nullifying of oaths, in- 
fringement of covenants, and in short, all the innumer- 
able modes which those deceivers have invented to in- 
validate apparently the most solemn obligations, and 



yet to remove any dread of guilt from the Falsifiers ; 
are the most awful proofs of outrageous impiety, and 
daring perfidy which are found among human annals. 
Yet all those perjuries of the most flagrant character are 
constantly perpetrated in the United States, and by all 
classes of Papists, not only with impunity ; but with the 
approbation and according to the instruction of their 
Priests. Can those barefaced violations of truth and 
sincerity be openly displayed without injury to others 
who witness them? Can the doctrine that the Roman 
Pontiff and his subordinate priests can nullify an oath 
or a contract ; and dispense with the most solemn ob- 
ligations, and authorize deliberate perjury, be openly 
taught as a part of the Romish Religion, without dete- 
riorating the minds and consciences of men not possess- 
ed of that fear of the Lord which is the beginning of 
wisdom? Lying and false swearing are essential to 
the very existence of Popery. 

It must also be remembered, that this Sabbath-break- 
ing, uncleanness, and deception are taught in all the 
Seminaries and Convents whether of boys or girls in 
this Union. It is of no importance, by what name those 
institutions are known ; Jesuit Priests and Ursuline 
Nuns substantially impart the knowledge, and entice 
to the doing of all that loathsome iniquity. This is 
one of the great prospective dangers to our country. 
Multitudes of youth and of the moat influential rank 
in the American community recently have been and 
now are in the course of tuition under those consummate 
adepts in every diabolical art. From their course of 
tuition, all evangelical instruction is most cautiously 
excluded. The juvenile mind is enchanted with pomp 
and mummery; and beguiled with blandishments, or 
menaced with alarm, or operated upon by both alter- 
nately, until the creature has become a mere machine 


whicli tlie priestly artificer adapts to any purpose 
that may promote his desig-ns or gratify his vicious 
desires. All tiiat youth truly learn in any Jesuit insti- 
tution, whether it be a college or nunnery, is the most 
efficient manner to impose upon the world around them. 
That is beyond all dispute' the most dangerous of all 
the results which flow from those monastic establish- 
ments, in which Protestant boys and girls are immur- 
ed. There they learn every possible abomination ; and 
also are taught every ingenious device by which they 
can elude discovery in the midst of their crimes: and 
deceive all persons who are not minutely conversant 
with their chicanery and turpitude. 

Jesuitism cannot proceed onward in its progress 
throughout our country, as it has done for the last ten 
years without speedily illustrating its baneful effects, 
in the increasing indifference of the public to sterling 
knowledge; in growing immorality; in prevailing 
scepticism; in a silent but systematic and deadly change 
in the spirit of our statute laws : and in an accelerating 
corruption and debasement of the national character. 

Jesuitism cannot exercise its present wicked influ- 
ence many years longer before the Christian churches 
will find themselves cowering to the audacity, and 
writhing under the usurpations of those vile emissaries 
of the Roman Pontiff 

It is therefore " high time to awake out of sleep, 
to cast off the works of darkness, and to put on the ar- 
mor of lightV The welfare of the community and 
the vital interests of the Christian churches are deeply 
concerned in a prompt renovation of the character and 
actions of Protestants in reference to Popery. Two 
measures are indispensable. An accurate and a gen- 
eral acquaintance with the qualities and mischievous 
effects of the grand apostacy ; and the adoption of 


efficient and evangelical means to counteract and di* 
minish that unholy predominance which the Romish 
accursed despotism has already attained. 

The former course necessarily implies the dissemi- 
nation of knowledge hy periodicals, standard volumes, 
and popular discussions, especially by lectures on the 
prophecies which advert to Romanism. The latter 
comprises a correct understanding of the evils which 
flow from the existence of Popery in its connection with 
civil society, and of the proper methods to extirpate 
that insidious poison which it infuses into the whole 
mass of the community, and by which their energies are 
paralyzed, and the system corrupted with a loathsonje 
and direful mortification. With this point however 
the Christian churches, in their associated relations 
cannot interfere. No man wishes to infringe 
upon the rights of conscience; and no citizen would be 
willing to rebuild the dungeous, forge the fetters, shar- 
pen the sword, and kindle the fires of Dominican In- 
quisitors, and Papal Butchers. It may confidently be 
anticipated that the coflag rations of the Auto da Fe, 
and the indiscriminate massacre of Protestants by the 
blood-hounds of the Mother of Harlots, who furnished 
the blood of the Saints with which she became drunken, 
have passed away not to be reiterated. But the 
events which have occurred since the commencement 
of that shaking of the nations, the French Revolution 
in 1789, not only in France; but also in Spain, Portu- 
gal, Italy and Austria, assure us ; that the Romish 
priestly assassins will not surrender their stilettos, 
their poison, their frauds, and their long enjoyed su- 
premacy without a struggle ; which although it will 
terminate in their overthrow, will previously have con- 
vulsed the nations who had submitted to them to their 
centre; and will spread desolation, anguish, penury 


and slaughter, through all tliuir boundaries, to tlic ut- 
most extremity. Tlic United States of America will 
not escape the experience of the storm and the wo, in 
exact proportion to the number of the Papal Ecclesias- 
tics, and the extent to which their power and abomina- 
tions have controlled throughout our country. 

It is therefore desirable to promulge among our 
churches a work that exhibits in the most compendious 
form the various artifices by which the emissaries of 
the Roman PontilT endeavor to delude the unwary 
to their ruin ; thereby to enlighten those who are not 
acquainted witfl the fallacies and the Popish corrup- 
tions ; and also to excite becoming watchfulness on the 
part of the Protestant churches against the snares of 
their insidious foes. For that purpose, the best proba- 
bly of all the controversial disquisitions by the immor- 
tal Richard Baxter was selected. During the civil 
commotions in Britain which followed the lawless and 
destructive exhibitions of '* King craft," by James I. 
and Charles I. the Jesuits attempted to increase the 
ferment, and the divisions among the Protestants, that 
the unthinking multitades, weary of their unceasing- 
commotions, might for quietude as they supposed, take 
refuge in a Jesuit's absolution, and within the turrets 
of Babylon. The authentic history of that period cer- 
tifies that to accomplish their schemes, every subter- 
fuge and trick were adopted by those ingenious and 
fox-like masters of fraud and deception. They had re- 
ceived dispensations from the Pope and the General of 
their order to wear every kind of vizor, to appear in 
all sorts of disguise, to assume any name or profession, 
and to perpetrate every possible crime so as to promote 
the grand scheme, the restoration of the Pontifical au- 
thority throughout those kingdoms. 

In consequence of those Papal indulgences, Jesuits 


were found in all characters ; and always exceeding in 
extravagance even the wildest efiervescence of those 
who felt more than ordinary excitement during that 
agitated period. It was then partially known, and has 
since been amply ascertained and proved ; that Nuns 
ohtruded themselves amoni? the female followers of 
George Fox, and that many of the scandalous public 
exhibitions of women in a state of nudity were by those 
well trained prostitutes of the Romish Priests. The 
leaders also of those minor sects who promulged as 
their cardinal tenet, a community of property and sex- 
ual intercourse, were chiefly Jesuits and Nuns, or oth- 
ers whom they had artfully selected as suitable tools to 
carry on their pernicious schemes. Many of those who 
pretended to be preachers of different sects, and who 
were distinguished for the infuriated extravagance of 
their opinions, and the apparent madness of their be- 
haviour, were Roman Priests and Monks ; who had 
but one design, to augment the national discord, to dis- 
grace Protestantism, to deceive the ignorant, and thus 
to proselyte the people to the Roman superstitions. 
Baxter wrote the ensuing work expressly to unfold 
their wickedness : and it is a lasting memento, that Po- 
pery is immutable in its treachery and ungodliness. 

The attentive American Reader of the ''Juggling 
of Jesuits,^^ and the specifications of the ''Forty Popish 
Frauds,^'' which Richard Baxter has detected and dis- 
closed ; will be deeply impressed with the exact simili- 
tude which there is between the period of Oliver Crom- 
well's supremacy in Britain, and the principles and 
acts of the Jesuits in this republic. Admitting even 
that a modern polemic could have composed a volume 
exactly identical in fervor and in materials, it would 
not have been in any way so impressive as this devel- 
opment of the spirit, and practices of Jesuitism, which 


was first published one hundred and eighty years since ; 
and which is as exactly adapted to the present situation 
of Romanism in the United States, as if it had been com- 
posed under the superintendence of the spirit of proph- 
ecy, or as if it had been a philosophical and historical 
delineation of a preexistent controversy. 

Among the multifarious polemical works in refer- 
ence to Romanism, and the means which its treacher- 
ous partizans use to disseminate it in this country, it is 
believed that no treatise could be selected which pre- 
sents stronger claims upon the attention of the ministers, 
officers, and members of the American churches, than 
this display ot "■ Jesuitical Juggling,^'' by Richard Bax- 
ter. Not only does he confute the system of Popery as 
incurably corrupt and totally anti-christian, by a few 
concise arguments, which all can comprehend ; but he 
also describes the dexterous artifices of the Jesuits so 
lucidly and in such diversified forms, that none can 
deny the accuracy of the narrative; and no one can 
plead an excuse for being ensnared by their " sleight 
and cunning craftiness, whereby they lay in wait to 

It is deliberate treason to the Lord of all, or it is ju- 
dicial infatuation in all those ministers and members of 
the Christian churches, who assert that the alarm re- 
specting Popery is fictitious, and that the battle with 
Jesuitism has not yet to be fought in this Union. Are 
there not at the present hour, probably twelve hundred 
thousand Papists in the United States, with half a mil- 
lion more in Canada at the North, and several millions 
adjoining on the South West in Mexico ? Are not 
France and Spain, and Portugal, and Ireland, and 
Austria, constantly disgorging the very dregs of Rom- 
ish ecclesiastical corruption in the shape of Monks and 


Nuns upon our land and in a continuously augment* 
ing stream ? Monks and Nuns also of such abandoned 
profligacy, that even those pitiable priest-ridden slaves 
could no longer tolerate their turpitude, or their existence 
among them ? The time will speedily arrive when 
their morbid influence will be felt by the body politic, 
and their iron grasp will convince our citizens that if 
they would preserve their rights and enjoy the gospel, 
they must "put on the whole armour of God, and wres- 
tle against the rulers of the darkness of this world, and 
against spiritual wickednesss in high places." 

Therefore Ministers and Churches! hear the words 
of " the son of Go(f, the Amen, who hath his eyes like 
unto a flame of fire." — " I have a few things against 
you, because you sufler that woman Jezabel, who calleth 
herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my ser- 
vants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed 
to idols. Be watchful and strengthen the things which 
remain, that are ready to die. Be zealous therefore 
and repent ! He that hath an ear, let him hear what 
the Spirit saith unto the churches!" 




These papers tender you their service, because the 
subject of thvm so nearly concerneth both us and you, 
that you should be well acquainted with them. The 
Roman Canons that batter the unity, Catholicism, and 
purity of the Church of Christ, are mounted on the 
frame which I have here demolished. The swords and 
pens, and tongues that you are now engaged against, 
and which you must expect henceforth to assault you, 
are whetted and managed by the senseless, tyrannous, 
ungodly principles which I have here detected. Un- 
. reasonable as they appear to the unprejudiced, they 
have animated the studies and diligent endeavors 
of thousands to captivate tlie princes and nations of the 
earth to the Roman yoke. Vain as they appear to us 
that see them naked, they have divided and distracted 
the churches of Christ, and troubled and dethroned 
princes, and laid them at the feet of the Roman Pope, 
They have absolved subjects from their oaths and other 
obligations to fidelity; and have involved many na- 
tions in blood. O the streams of the blood of saints that 
have been shed by Roman principles, in Savoy, France, 
Bohemia, Poland, Germany, Ireland, England, and 
many other lands ! The war 1 here manage, is against 
those adverse principles that have armed thousands and 
millions against the innocent, or against their lawful 
sovereigns, whom God had bound them to obey. They 
have fastened knives in the breasts of the greatest kino-s, 
as the lamentable cases of Henry the Third and Fourth 
of France do testify. They have, in a few days time, 
in Paris, and the adjoining parts of France, perfidiously 
butchered nobles, and other persons of eminence, and 
people of all sorts, to the number of forty thousand. 
The doctrines which I here confound, have invaded 
England by a Spanish armada, by the Pope's consent, 
and upon the account of religion. They have prepared 



knives and poison for our princes, which God did frus- 
trate. They have laid gunpowder to blow up king and 
parliament, and hellishly execute the fury of the delu- 
ded zealots in a moment, and then charged the Puritans 
with the fact. In a time of peace, by a sudden insurrec- 
tion, they murdered so many tliousands in Ireland in a 
few days or weeks as posterity will scarcely believe. 
They are dreadful practicals, and not mere speculations, 
that we dispute against. I beseech you, therefore, that 
you receive not this as you would do a scholastic or 
philosophical disputation about such things as seem 
not to concern you ; but as you would interest yourself 
in a disputation upon the question, whether you should 
be murdered as a heretic, and whether we should be 
tormented and burnt as heretics, and whether the lives 
of all the princes and people upon earth, whom the 
Pope judgeth heretics, should be at his mercy. I speak 
not this to provoke you to deal bloodily with them, as 
they do with the servants of the Lord ! I abhor the 
thought of imitating their cruelty I It is only the ne- 
cessary defence of your life and dignity, and the lives 
of all the Protestants that are under your protection 
and government, and the souls of men, that I desire. 
On what terms we stand with those men whose religion 
teacheth them to kill us if they can, and to venture their 
lives for it, is easy to understand. When we have no 
security from them for our lives, but their inability to 
destroy us, we must disable them or die. I ulter not 
melancholy dreams nor slanders. I have here showed 
it in the plain and copious decrees of ihe approved 
General Council at Lateran, that the deposing of princes, 
and absolving their subjects from their fidelity, and 
giving their dominions to others, not only for supposed 
heresy, but for not exterminating such as denytransub- 
stantiation, &c., is an article of their faith; and no man 
can disown it without disowning Popery in the essen- 
tials. If once they will renounce the decrees of general 
councils approved by the Pope, we shall be soon agreed. 
Costerus, Enchirid. cap. 1, p. 46, saith ; Qucn. sane de- 
creta si i^eriiatem, si obsignationem Spiriius Sa7icii, si 
pra^senliam Christi species, idem liabeni pondus et mo- 
mentum quod Sancta Dei Evangclia ; " which decrees. 


if you advert to the truth, or the seal of the Holy Spirit, 
or the presence of Christ, have the same authority as 
the holy gospel of God." They believe those decrees 
to be as true as the gospel. Bozius Hostiensis, and 
many more of them make the Pope to be the Lord of 
all the world. Bellarmin and the stronger side do 
carry it as the common jutlgment of all Catholic di- 
vines ; see what a rabble he heaps up. De Pontif Rom. 
li. 5, c. 1, that the Pope ratlune spiriliialis, habct saltern 
iiulircclc 'polestatem quandam, camque aummavi in tcm- 
jwralibus ; "by reason of his spiritual office, has the 
chief power in temporal affairs!" Which, cap, 6, he 
saith, is just such over princes as the soul hath over 
the body or sensitive appetite; and that thus he may 
change kingdoms, and take them from one and give 
them to another, as the chief spiritual prince, if it be 
but necessary to the safety of souls. Cap. 7. Whether 
the Pope do take your government to be for the good 
of souls, I need not tell you. It is the stupendous judg- 
ment of God on Christina princes for their sins, that 
they have been so far blinded as to endure such a 
usurper so long, and have not before this blotted out 
his name from among the sons of men. It is not law- 
ful , saith Bellarmin, ib. c. 7, for Christians to tolerate 
an infidel, or heretical king, if he endeavor to draw his 
subjects to his heresy or unbelief: but to judge whether 
a king do draw to heresy or not, belongeth to the Pope, 
to whom the care of religion is committed: therefore it 
belongs to the Pope to judge a king to be deposed, or 
not deposed. You see here it is not lawful for such 
Christians as the Papists to tolerate you ; which may 
help your judgment in the point of their toleration. Si 
Christiani, saith Bellar. ib. olim nondeposuerunt Nero- 
■,icm — Valentem Arianuin ct similes, id fuit quia dee- 
rant vires temporales Christianis ; "if Christians for- 
merly did not depose Nero, Valens the Arian, and 
others, it was because they were deficient in temporal 
power!" You have your government, and we our 
lives, because the Papists are not strong enough. They 
tell you what to trust to. Toilet, one of the best Jesuits, 
li. 1. de Instruct. Sacerd. c. 13, saith; They that were 
bound by the bond of fidelity or oath, shall be freed 


from such a bond, if he fall into excommunication : and 
during that, debtors are absolved from the obligation of 
paying to the creditor that debt that is contracted by 
words. These are no private, ineflectual opinion*. 
Pope Pius V. himself, in his bull against Queen Eliza- 
beth, saiih ; We will and command that the subjects take 
arms against that heretical and excommunicated queen. 
But their cruelty to mens' souk and the Church of 
Christ, doth yet much more declare their uncharitable- 
ness. It is a point of their religion to believe that no 
man can be saved but the subjects of their Pope. Knotty 
and a late pamphlet called " Questions for Resolution 
of unlearned Protestants, &c.," and Bishop Morton hath 
recited the words of Lindanus, Valentia, and Vasquez. 
Apol. lib. 2, c. 1, defining it to be of necessity to salva- 
tion, to be subject to the Roman Bishop. Would not a 
man think, that for such horrid doctrines, as damn the 
far greatest part of Christians in the world, they should 
produce at least some probable arguments? But what 
they have to say, I have here faithfully detected. If we 
will dispute Avith them, or turn to them, the scripture 
must be no further judge than as their church expound- 
eth it. The judgment of the ancient, yea, or present 
church, they utterly renounce ; for the far greatest part 
is known to be against the headship of their Pope ; and 
therefore they must stand by for heretics. Tradition 
itself they dare not stand to, except themselves be judges 
of it ; for the greatest part of Christians profess that 
tradition is against the Roman Vice-Christ. The in- 
ternal sense and experience of Christians they gainsay;- 
concluding- all besides themselves to be void of charity 
or saving grace; which many thousands of holy souls 
do find within them, that never believed in the Pope. 
Yea, when we are content to lay our lives on it, that we 
will show them the deceit of Popery, as certainly and 
plainly as bread is known to be bread when we see it, 
feel, and taste it, and as wine is known to be wine when 
we see and drink ; yet do they refuse even the judgment 
of sense, of all mens' senses, even their own and others. 
So that we must renounce our honesty, our knowledge 
of ourselves, our senses, our reason, the common expe- 
rience and senses of all men, and the judgment of the 


far greatest part of the present church, or else by the 
judgment of the Papists we must all be damned. 

VVhethei such opinions as those should by us be un 
contradicted, or by you be sullered to be taught your 
subjects, is easy to (.liscern. If they had strength, they 
would little trouble us with disputing. Nothing is more 
common in their writers than that the sword or fire is 
fitter for heretics than disputes. This is but their after- 
game. Though their church must rule princes, as the 
soul rukth the body, yet it must be by secular power. 
Excommunication doth but give fire; lead and iron do 
the execution. When they arc themselves disabled, it 
is their way to strike us by the hands and swords of 
one another. He that saw England, Scotland, and Ire- 
land awhile ago in blood, and now sees the lamentable 
case of so many Protestant princes and nations destroy- 
ing one another, and thinks that Papists have no hand 
in contriving, counselling, andinstigating,or executing, 
is a stranger to their principles and practices. 

Observing, therefore, that of all the sects that we are 
troubled with, there is none but the Papist that disputeth 
with us with flames and gunpowder, with armies and 
navies at their backs, having so many princes, and so 
great revenues for their provision ; I have judged it my 
duty to detect the vanity of their cause. 

We earnestly request, that you will, resolvedly, 
adhere to the cause of truth and holiness, and afford the 
reformed churches abroad the utmost of your help for 
their concord and defence, and never be tempted to own 
an interest that crosseth the interest of Christ. How 
many thousands are studiously contriving the extirpa- 
tion of the Protestant churches from the earth .'' How 
many princes are confederate against them 1 The more 
will be required of you for their aid. The serious en- 
deavors of your renowned father, Oliver Cromwell, for 
the Protestants of Savoy, hath won him more esteem 
than all his victories. 

*We humbly request, that you will faithfully ad- 
here to those that fear the Lord in your dominions. In 
your eyes let a vile person be contemned; but honor 
them that fear the Lord. Psal. xv. 4. Know not the 
wicked; but let your eyes be upon the faithful of the 



land. Psal. ci. 4. 6. Compassionate ihe weak and 
curable. Punish the incurable j restiain the froward, 
but love and cherish the servants of the Lord. They 
are, under Christ, the honor and the strength of the 
commonwealth It was a wise and a happy king that 
professed that his good should extend to the saints on 
earth, and the excellent, in whom was his delight. Psal. 
xvi. 2, 3. This strengthening of the vitals is one of the 
chief means to keep out Popery and all other danger- 
ous diseases. We see few understanding godly people 
receive the Roman infection, but the profane, licen- 
tious, ignorant, or malignant that are prepared for it. 

We earnestly request your utmost care, that we 
may be ruled by godly, faithful magistrates, under you ; 
and that your wisdom and vigilance may frustrate the 
subtilty of masked Papists or Infidels, that would creep 
into places of council, command, or justice, or any pub- 
lic office. If ever such as those should be our rulers, 
we know what Ave must expect. The reasons of our 
jealousies of such men are, because we know that the 
design is agreeable to their principles and -interests. 
We know it is their usual course : and we find that such 
men swarm among us. We hear their words; we read 
their writings, we see their practices for Popery and 
Infidelit3\ The jealousies of many wise men in Eng- 
land are very great, concerning the present designs of 
this generation of men ; and not without cause. We 
fear the masked Papists and Infidels more than the bare- 
faced enemy. The men that we are jealous of, and over 
whom we desire you to be vigilant, are those hiders, 
that purposely obscure and cover their religion. He 
that wilfully concealeth his faith, alloweth me to sus- 
pect it to be naught. Those men we are jealous of; and 
if ever you advance them into places of command or 
power, it will increase our jealousies. I have no per- 
sonal grudge to any of them. But the gospel, and the 
souls of men, and the hopes of our posterity, are noMo 
contemptible as to be given away as a bribe to purchase 
those men*s good will, or to stop their mouths, lest they 
should reproach us. As it i-s the common, but a poor 
redress, that after the massacres of thousands, the sur- 
viving Protestants have still had from the Papists, to 

dl:dicatorv. 31 

disclaim tlje fact, or cast it upon some rash.disconteiitcJ 
iiieii, which will not make dead men alive again. So 
will it be a poor relief to us, when those men are our 
masters, and have deprived us of all that was dear to 
us in the world, that we escaped their ill hmguage 
while the work was doing. 

Papists disown abundance of the abominations which 
they propagate ; but as plain dealing in religion is bet- 
ter than juggling, so, we had rather that open Papists 
were tolerated, than those juggling deceivers. They 
that know the Jesuits and Friars, profess that they arc 
moro common in princes, councils, and families, and in 
the houses, if not the closets of noblemen, commanders, 
and persons of public trust or service, than we that live 
and mean simply, do imagine. And who would have 
thought that had not known it, that they had so insinu- 
ated into the several sects among us, and that they were 
so industrious in their work, as the Newcastle Scottish 
Jew was, to be circumcised or become Jew, and then 
re-baptized. Sec, and all to deceive? 

Judge how fiir their seductions are to be tolerated. 
They preach treason against princes and states as a 
principal part of their religion. 

Their doctrine corrupteth all morality, what need we 
fuller, clearer proof, than the Jansenian hath given us 
in his •* Mystery of Jesuitism?" Morton hath long ago 
produced enough to tell us what to expect from such 
men. Apolog. part I. 1. 2. c, 13. Toilet, himself, 1. 4. 
de Instruct. Sacerd., c. 9, saith ; Quantum ad intentio- 
ncm dilectionis, non teacmur sub preceplo Dcum plus 
omnibus diligere. " As to the intention of delight, we 
are not bound by the command to love God, more than 
others." Stapleton, 1. 6. de justif, c. 10., and Valent. 1. 
de Votis, c. 3, saith ; Hoc preceytum diligendi Deum e.c 
tola mente, doctrinalc est, non obllgatorium. "The 
precept t:) love God with all the mind, is merely doctri- 
nal, and not obligatory." See here, a precept, and the 
greatest precept, even to love God above all, is not obli- 
gatory ? And p. 322, he reciteth the words of Toilet- 
ibid. 1. 4. c. 21, and 22;- teaching equivocation upon 
oath before a magistrate, and so maintaining perjury. 
And p. 327, he citeth the same author, maintaining that 


murder and blasphemy, in a passion, and not delibe- 
rate, is no mortal sin, unless in one that is used to blas- 
pheme. And p. 329, Bellarm. Costerus, and Valentia 
maintain, that fornication in a priest, is better, or a 
smaller sin than to marry. The like he shows of their 
doctrine of theft, false witness, &c , p. 332, 333. &c. 

Above all their other mischiefs, the propagating of 
infidelity is the greatest. Under the vizor of inhdels, 
they plead against scripture and Christianity, to loosen 
men from all religion, and persuade them that they 
must be infidels or papists. Veron and his followers 
have given them full directions to manage that design. 
And while with debauched consciences they thus per- 
suade men to be infidels in jest, they have made abun- 
dance such in true sadness; so that there are many 
such swarm among us, that sometimes seemed pious 
persons, that plead against Christianity itself. The 
leading papisis seem to be Christians in jest, and infi- 
dels in good earnest themselves. 

If you ask who it is that presumeth thus to be your 
monitor .'' It is one that serveth so great a master, that 
he thinks it no unwarrantable presumption in such a 
case to be faithfully plain with the greatest prince. It 
is one that stands so near eternity, where Lazarus shall 
wear the crown, that unfaithful man-pleasing would 
be to him a double crime. It is one that rejoiceth in the 
present happiness of England, and earnestly wisheth 
that it were but as well with the rest of the world ; and 
that honoreth all the providences of God, by which 
we have been brought to what we are. He is one that 
concurring in the common hopes of greater blessings 
yet to these nations underyour government, and observ- 
ing your acceptance of the frequent addresses that from 
all parts of the land are made unto you, was encour- 
aged to concur with the rest, in the tender of his service. 
That the Lord will make you a healer and preserver of 
his churches here at home, and a successful helper to 
his churches abroad, is the earnest prayer of 



The controversies here handled are those that still 
are making the iT:reatest combustions in the Christian 
world ; and yet they seem exceeding- easy. I seldom 
meet with a learned Protestantbuttaketh Popery for such 
transparent fallacies, that he is little or no whit troubled 
with any doublings in the business. 

We are confident of our own religion, because we 
believe the gospel: and we have no other rule and test 
of our religion : and we are confident that Popery is a 
deceit, because we both believe the gospel and the judg- 
ment of the ancient and present churches, and because 
we believe our sense itself As sure as we know bread 
from flesh, and wine from blood, by seeing, tasting, &c., 
so sure know we that Popery is false. And if a contro- 
versy is not at an end, when it is brought to the judg- 
ment of all the senses of all the sound men in the world, 
it being about the object of sense, then we are past liope 
of ending controversies; and therefore, as we will not 
waste our time to dispute that snow is black, or the fire 
cold, no more will we trouble ourselves with those men 
that tell us that bread is not bread, and wine is not wine. 

Two things the Papists are still liarping on. The first 
is, that in our way, we liave no assurance that the Chris- 
tian religion is true, or that scripture is the word of 
God. Their second is, that thread-bare question. Where 
was your church before Luther? Where hath it been 
successively in each age .^ And here mere sophistry 
carrieth it through the papal world, to the deluding of 
the simple, that are not able to see things for names. 

The men that ask us where our chuixh and religion 
was, either know not, or will not let others know what 
our religion is. Show us, say they, a church in all 
ages that held all that the Protestants hold, or else they 


were not Protestants. Forsooth, we must receive from 
them a definition of a Protestant, and then we must 
prove the succession of such. Know therefore, what 
is the thing whose succession is questioned. A Pro- 
testant is a Christian that holdeth to the holy scriptures, 
as the sufficient rule of faith and holy living, and pro- 
testeth against Popery. The Protestant churches are 
societies professing the Protestant's religion. The Pro- 
testant religion is an improper speech; but the Protest- 
ant's religion is a phrase that we shall own. For Pro- 
testancy is not our religion itself, but the rejection of 
Popish corruptions of religion or defiling additions. 
The l^rotestant's religion is the holy scriptures alone. 
The Papist's religion is all that is decreed by the Pope 
and councils. Our religion, contained in the scripture, 
hath its essentials and integrals. All the essentials and 
as much of the integrals as in the use of means we are 
enabled to understand, we believe particularly and ex- 
plicitly: the rest we believe generally and implicitly to 
be all true. The essentials of our religion are only 
the baptismal covenant expounded in the creed, Lord's 
Prayer, and Decalogue, as opened by Christ, the sum- 
maries of things to be believed, willed, and done; bap- 
tism being appointed by Christ himself, for the true and 
sufficient symbol of our faith, to put men into the right 
and possession of church communion ; and the depart- 
ing from this test or symbol, made by Christ himself, 
for this use, is the lacerating of the churches. But the 
whole scriptures contain more, even the integrals and 
accidentals of our religion. 

So that, as the Papists will not permit us to take the 
writings of Gretser, Bellarmin, or any of their doctors, 
or the articles of their divines at Thoren, Ratisbon, 
&c., to be articles of their faith, but only those that are 
contained in general councils approved by the Pope ; 
so we require that they call nothing the articles of our 
faith, but what is contained in the said summaries and 
in the holy scriptures, which are the only rule of our en- 
tire religion. Do they know our religion better than 
we do .-' 

The Christian religion hath been in all ages since 
Christ in visible societies. The religion of Protestants 


is the Christian religion. Therefore, the religion of 
Protestants hath been in all ages since Christ, in visible 

That religion which is contained in the holy scrip- 
ture, as its rule or sullicient revelation, hath been pro- 
fessed in all ages in visible churches; but the religion 
of Protestants is contained in the holy scriptures as its 
rule or sulficient revelation : therefore, the religion of 
Protestants haih been professed in all ages in visible 

We name the societies from the places of their resi- 
dence. Our church began at Jerusalem, and thence 
was dispersed into Asia, Africa, and Europe. It hath 
continued in Syria, Ethiopia, Egypt, India, Greece, &c. 
If I could name but one nation that had been of my 
religion, I should suspect it were not the true religion. 
It is the Christian world that is instead of a catalogue 
to us. 

O but, say the jugglers, this is a general answer, to 
say vou are Christians : there are more sorts of Chris- 
tians than one. I reply, it is the general or Catholic 
religion and church that we are speaking of; and, there- 
fore, if it were not such a general answer, it were not 
pertinent to the question. There are no sorts of true 
Christians but one ; that is, there is no essential 
difference among them. But may not Christians of 
several degrees of knowledge be in the same Catholic 
church .'' Our question is not, where any sect, or any 
particular church liath had its succession; but where 
that Catholic church hath been, of which we are mem- 
bers. And surely Christ hath but one Catholic church. 
but, say they, would you make men believe that 
Ethiopians, Armenians, Greeks, &c., are Protestants i* 
Is it the name of Protestants, or their Religion, that 
you would have us prove a succession of? Those de- 
ceivers cheat abundance of poor souls by this one 
device, even supposing that the word Protestant doth 
denominate our church from its essential parts, and so 
call for a catalogue of Protestants. But I would ask, 
whether we or they do better know our religion ; 
and consequently what a Protestant is ? If they 
know it at all, it is from our writings or expres- 
sions .'* For they will not pretend without signs to 


know our hearts, and that better than ourselves. A 
Protestant is a Christian that protesteth against Popery. 
Christianity is our religion. Protestinnr against Popery 
is our rejection of your corruptions of religion. Men 
that never lieard of the name of Papist or Protestant, 
may be of the same religion with us. If many nations 
of the world never received Popery, and we reject it- if 
they never knew it, and we know it and disown it: are 
we not both of one religion, even in the integrals ? 
One man never heard of the leprosy: another catcheth 
it and is cured of it: and' a third flieth from it and pre- 
venteth it ; all those are tr.uly sound men. When you 
call to us for a proof of our succession, either you mean 
it of the essentials of our religion and church, or of the 
negation of your corruptions. Either you mean it of 
the points that we are agreed in, or of those we differ in. 
Christianity we are agreed in ; and that is our religion, 
and nothing but that, Protestancy is but our wiping 
off' the dirt, that you have brought upon our religion. 
Is he not a man as well as you that will not tumble 
with you in the dirt, or go into your Pesthouse ? If 
we know not our own religion, then we cannot tell it 
you: and then you cannot know it: but if we do know 
it, believe us when we profess our own belief. We owti 
no religion but the Christian religion, nor any church 
biit the Christian church, nor dream of any catholic 
church but one, containing all the true christians in the 
world, united in Jesus Christ the Head. W^e protest 
before men and Angels that it is the Holy Scriptures 
that are the law and rule and test of our religion ; and 
why are we not to be believed in this our own profes- 
sion, as well as you are in yours, when you make the 
decrees of Popes and councils to be your law and rule 
and tests? 

We perform therefore more than you demand. You 
ask us where was our church before Luther? and we 
answer where ever the Christian religion was, and the 
Holy Scriptures were received. But we tell you not 
only where our church and religion was, but where 
there were men that owned not your grand corruptions, 
more than we. What can you demand more of us, 
when you call for a succession of Protestants, than that 


we tell you of a succession of christians of our religion 
who were not Papists, and against Popery, who therefore 
were of our integrity. Who knoweth not that the Abas- 
sines, Armenians, Egyptians, Greeks, &c., are against 
your Papal sovereignty, infallibility, and all that is by 
us renounced as essential to Popery, though not against 
every one of your anti-christian errors ? 

O, but, say the jugglers, those are not Protestants; 
they differ from you in many particulars. Call them 
by what name you please, they are anti-papists, or free 
from Popery, and then they are of our religion. But 
must the \Vorld be made to believe that all that we be- 
lieve is essential to our religion, and that no man that 
differeth from us can be of our religion, be the differ- 
ence ever so small. -^ 

But, say they, tell us of a church that professes your 
articles. Silly deceivers! Do not those very articles 
profess that the " holy scripture containeth all things ne- 
cessary to salvation, so that whatever is not read there- 
in, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of 
any man that it should be believed as an article of the 
faith, or bethought requisite or necessary to salvation."' 
We never took those articles instead of the Scripture, 
but the articles and all Protestants profess the Scripture 
to be the only entire rule and test of their faith and reli- 
gion. The substance of our articles may easily be 
proved to have been successively held by the church 
from the beijinninG:: but it is not incumbent on us to 
prove that every word in the writings of every divine 
or church hath been so continued ; no more than you 
will own the writings of any divines or provincial sy- 
nods of your own, as being the rule of your fauh. As 
you profess that the decrees of Popes and general 
councils approved by him, besides the Scriptures, are 
the rule and test of your religion : so do we profess that 
the Scripture alone, with the law of nature, is the rule 
of ours. 

But, what! say they, will you be ot the same church 
with Nestorians, Eutychians, and oth r heretics.'' I 
answer: we will not take all for Nestorians, or Euty- 
chians, that a railer can call such, that never knew 
them, nor can prove it. Heretics, indeed, that deny anv 



essential part of Christianity, are no Christians, an^, 
therefore, not of the churcli that we are of: but if you 
will call those heretics that have all the essentials of 
Christianity, because they err in less points, \re know 
that there are such in the Catholic church. We will be 
none of them ourselves, if we can escape it : yet, indeed, 
we have no hope of escaping all error till we are per- 
fect in knowledge; but we will not run out of the iamily 
of God, because there are children and sick persons in 
it ; nor will we forsake the Catholic church because 
there are erring persons in it. 

O but, saith the Papist, we acknowledge not your 
distinction of points essential and not essential ; all 
points of faith are essential with us, and of necessity to 
salvation. That is such impudent and faithless juggling 
as may make one blush to think that Christianity hath 
such professors. The outside of that assertion damneth 
all the world who live to the use of reason. The inside 
of their deceitful meaning is almost clean contrary, and 
leaveth heathens and infidels in a state of salvation as 
well as Christians. It makes no one article of faith 
essential to a Christian, or to one that shall be saved ; 
and turns the church into an invisible thing, clean con- 
trary to their own assertions of its visibility. Thus 
they wrangle themselves into a wood of contradictions 
and unchristian absurdities. 

The outside of their assertion is this ; that every 
point that we are bound to believe by a divine faith, is 
fundamental or essential to Christian faitli, or of neces- 
sity to salvation : and if then no man breathing can be 
saved, for no man knoweth all that he is bound to know, 
no man believeth that which he understandeth not. It 
is impossible to believe that a proposition is a truth dis- 
tinctly and actually, when 1 understand not what the 
proposition is. That we all know but in part, even 
what we are obliged to know, no man will deny. All 
that God hath revealed in his word, is tlie matter of our 
faith. No man can say, I have no culpable ignorance 
of any one truth of God that I should believe. Had we 
been more perfect in our diligent studies and prayers, 
and use of all means; and had we never sinfully griev- 
ed the spirit that should illuminate us, to say nothing 

rilLFACE. 30 

of our original sinful darkness, tlicre is not one of us 
but mi^ht iiave known more than we do. If sin of the 
will and life be consistent with true faith, then some sin 
in the understanding" is consistent with faith. But, ac- 
cording to the outside of their doctrine, no man that 
hath any sinful ignorance, and consequently, unbelief 
in his understanding, can be saved; that is, no man in 
the world. If he that thinks he knoweth any thing, 
knoweth nothing as he ought to know, I Cor. viii. 2., 
what shall be said of those men that think they and all 
the church do know all things that they ought to know, 
and that their understandings havp no sin ? 'And must 
we be of that faith that damneth all men, and of thai 
church where none are saved? 

As the outside of their assertions is made for a bug- 
hear lo frighten fools, so the inside is this that heathens 
and infidels may be of their church, or saved, and that 
nothing of the Christian foith at all is necessary to 
salvation. For they tell us that they mean, that all 
points are of necessity, where they are sufficiently pro- 
posed, and men's ignorance is not invincible ; but where 
there is no sufficient proposal, but men's ignorance is 
invincible, or such as comes not from a wilful neglect 
of means, there no ignorance of the articles of faith is 
damnable, and so no article absolutely necessary. 
Hence, the question indeed is not whether men believe 
or not, but whether they are unbelievers or heathens, 
or ignorant persons, by a wilful neglect of sufficiently 
proposed truth, or not. So that all that part of the 
heathen or infidel world that have no proposal of the 
Gospel, may not only be saved, but be better and safer 
than Christians, who certainly are ignorant of some 
truth which they ought to know^ 

But, say they, it will not stand with faith to deny be- 
lief to God in any thing sufficiently revealed ; for he 
that believeth him in one thing, believeth him in all. 

Very true, if they know it to be the word of God. 
And if this be all, Protestants believe every thing with- 
out exception which they know to be a divine revela- 
tion : and no wonder, for so doth every man that believes 
that there is a God, and that he is no liar. But may it 
not stand with faith to be ignorant, and that through 


sinful negleet, of some revealed truth of God, or of the 
meaning of his word ? If you are so proud as to think 
that all the justified are perfect and have no sin, yet at 
least consider wlielher a man that livethin Heathenism 
till fourscore years of age, and then turns Christian, is not 
afterward ignorant through his former sinful negligence 1 
But dare you say that you have no sinful ignorance to 
bewail / Will you confess none, nor beg pardon, nor 
be bolden to Christ to pardon it ? Thus they make no 
point of faith necessary, while they seem to make all 

By this Protean juggling, they make the church in- 
visible. For what man breathing knoweth the secrets 
of the souls of others, whether they have resisted or 
not resisted the light i'-^and whether they are ignorant 
of the articles of faith upon sinful contempt, or for want 
of some due means of faith, or internal capacity, or op- 
portunity? We are as sure that all men are ignorant 
of something that C4od hath revealed to be known in 
nature and Scripture, as that they are men. But now 
whether any one of those men be free from aggrava- 
tions of his ignorance, and that in every point, upon 
which the Papists make him an unbeliever, is unknown 
to others. When the faith or infidelity of men, and so 
their being in the church or out of it, must not be 
known by the matter of faith which they profess, but 
by the secret passages of their hearts, their willingness 
or unwillingness, resistance or non-resistance, and such 
like, the church then is invisible. No man can say 
which is it, nor who is of it. He that professeth not 
the faith, may be a Catholic ; and he that professeth it, 
for ought they know, may be an infidel, as being sin- 
fully ignorant of some one truth that is not in his 
express confession. Thus by confusion the builders of 
Babel mar their own work. 

Bellarni, de Verbo Dei, lib. 4. cap. 11, saith : "In 
the Christian doctrine both of faith and manners, some 
things are necessary to salvation to all ; as the know- 
ledge of the articles of the Apostles' creed, of the Ten 
Commandments, and of some sacraments. The rest 
are not so necessary, that a man cannot be saved with- 
out the explicit knowledge, belief, and profession of 


ihcm — Tliose things tliat are simply necessary and 
are prufitable to all, the Apostles preached to all. — 
All things are written by the Apostles which are neces- 
sary to all, and whicii they openly preached to all." 

Costeru:3 Enchirid. c. 1. p. 49. " We deny not that 
those chief heads of the faith which are to all Chris- 
tians necessary to be known to salvation, are perspic- 
uously enough comprehended in the writings of the 

Thus they are forced after all their cavils, to say as 
we, in distinguishing of articles of faith. They can- 
not be ignorant, that the church hath still had forms of 
profession, 'which were called her symbols, as being the 
badge of her members; and did not suspend all upon 
ancertain conjectures about the frame and temper of the 
professor's minds. 

But if indeed it be not the want of necessary articles 
cf faith thatlhey accuse us of, but the want of willing- 
ness or diligence to know the truth, let them prove 
their accusaiions. Do they think we would not as wil- 
lingly know the truth as they / and that we do not pray 
as earnestly for Divine illumination .-' Do we not read 
their books? and are we not willing to confer with the 
wisest of them that can inform us .'' When Ave prove 
a succession of our religion, by proving a succession 
of such as adhered to the Scriptures, which are the doc- 
trines of our religion, an argument that no Papist under 
heaven -can confute, they vainly tell us, that all heretics 
pretend t) Scripture, and therefore that will not prove 
the point. 

Doth it follow that Scripture is not a sufficient rule of 
our religion, because heretics may pretend to it ? You 
take our articles for our religion, and yet may heretics 
that are far from our minds, pretend to them ; and 
would borrow credit from it to their heresies. The 
law of the land is the rule of our justice ; and yet law- 
yers and th'?ir clients that are contrary to each other, do 
plead it for their contrary causes. Must we have no rule 
or test or discovery of our religion which a heretic can 
pretend for his impiety.'' What words of God or man 
are not capable of being misinterpreted .'' If we should 
give you every day a confession of faith, some heretics 


42 przva.cz. 

might pretend to hold the same. No wonder then if 
they do so by the Scriptures, 

Can any learned Papists be so ignorant, as not to 
know that the authority of Popes and Councils is fre- 
quently pretended for contrary opinions among them, 
and by many heretics. Will they therefore grant that 
the decrees of Popes and Councils are no sufficient dis- 
covery of their faith ? If heretics pretending to your 
test of faith , disprove not that to be your faith, then 
heretics pretending to our rule and test of faith, v/hich 
is the Holy Scripture, U no proof that it is not our rule 
of faith. 

Therefore, the proof of a succession of such churches 
as have received the Holy Scriptures, is a valid proof 
of a succession of churches of our religion, seeing we 
have no religion, doctrinally, but the Holy Scriptures : 
yet adding that we prove a succession also of churches 
that never owned Popery: even the greatest part of the 
Christian world. But let those men themselves but 
prove to us a succession of their church, even such as 
they require of us, let them prove that from the Apos- 
tles' days, the Catholic church, or any one congrega- 
tion of twenty men, did hold all that now their Councils 
and Popes have decreed, and are esteemed articles of 
their faith, and I am contented to be their bond slave 
forever, or to be used by them as cruelly as their malice 
can invent. 

In the very principal point of their Papal Sove- 
reignt}', ihei/ have nothing but this gross deceit to cheat 
the ivorld ivilh. The Roman emperors divers ag^es 
after Christ did give the Bishop of Rome a primacy 
in their empire, and hence those men would persuade 
us, that even from Christ they have had a sovereignty 
over all the Christian world. Wink but at these four 
mistakes ; that Christ's Institution stands in stead of the 
emperor's ; that ;divers hundred years after Christ, it 
had been m the Apostles' days ! that primacy is sove- 
reignty or universal government : and especially grant 
them, that the Roman Empire was all the Christian 
world ; and then they have made good that part of their 

That many nations without the reach of the Roman 


Empire liad received the Cliristian fiiiih, is a Ijistorical 
luct which is past doubt. Those countries were not 
under the Roman power : and none of them were gov* 
erned by the l*ope. 

If all that pan of the Christian world that was out 
of the reach of the lUiman Empire, did never submit 
to the sovereignty of the Pope, then hath he not been 
successively, or at any time the actual head of the uni- 
versal church. The Emperor's mother of Abassia, 
ballled the Jesuits, by asking them, how it came to pass, 
if obedience to the Pope be necessary to salvation, that 
they never had heard from him till now? 

The Indians, Abassines, Persians, and many more 
in the East ; and the Scots, and Irish, and Danes, and 
Swedes, and Poles, and Muscovites, and most of Ger- 
many in the West and North, were not subjects of the 

If the rule and test of the faith of Papists never had 
a real being, or no succession from the Apostles, then 
their faith and church hath either no real being, or no 
such succession. 

It is either general councils, or Popes, or the church 
essential, as they call it, that is, the whole body, that is 
the rule of their faith. If it be general councils ; they 
had no being from the Apostles till the council of Nice ; 
therefore the rule of the Papists' faith was then un- 
born. They never had a being in the world: for there 
was never any thing like a general council since the 
days of the Apostles to this day. The first at Nice 
had none, and the following councils, as Constantinop. 
1. &c. were only out of one piece of the empire. 

If it be not general councils, but the Pope that is the 
rule of their faith ; then, theiv faith hath been inter- 
rupted, and turned to heresy and to infidelity when the 
Pope hath so turned. Why then do they tell our 
people, that they take not the Pope for the rule of their 
faith ? 

If it be the major part of the universal church, it 
is known that two to one are against them : therefore by 
that rule, their faith in the Papal sovereignty is false 
and it would be hard, if a man must be of no belief, 
till he have brought the world to the polls for it 


If all the stir that the Papists make in the world for 
the Papal government he but to rob Christian magis- 
trates of their power, then are they but a seditious sect. 
There are but two sorts of government in the church: 
the one is by the word applied unto the conscience, 
which worketh only on the willing; either by preach- 
ing, or by personal application, as in sacraments, ex- 
communication and absolution : and this is the work of 
the present pastors, and cannot be performed by the 
Pope. The other is by command, that shall be seconded 
with force ; which is proper to the magistrate. 



PoPEaT contrary to Unity. — Dirsctions for Prolesiunls iclio argue 
with P.:pisls. — Seven argnmenls ae;(iinst Pop ry. — Popery is falss. — 
Opposes Ckrislian love. — Teadics ri bellian to civil ^ovcrnm^its. — Is (ni 
itnlioJy suslem. — Tke Papists are two coniinunilies, and h tve iico sov- 
ereign heaJs. — The ancient Roma jicli arch has ceassd. — Popery is con- 
trary to our senses. 

The thoughts of the divided state of Christians have 
Inonght grord and constant sadness to my soul : espe- 
ciallv' ^Yhen 1 remember, that while we are quarrelling', 
and plotting, and v/riting, and fighting against each 
other, so many parts of the world remain in the infidel- 
ity of Heathenism, Judaism or Mohammedism, where 
millions of poor souls do need our help; and if all 
our strength were joined together for their illu- 
mination and salvation, it would be too little. Oh 
horrible shame to the face of Christendom, that the na- 
tions are quietly serving the devil, and yet that instead 
of combining to resist him, and vindicate the cause and 
people of the Lord, we are greedily sucking the blood 
of one another, and tearing in pieces the body of Christ 
with furious hands, and destroying ourselves to save 
the enemy a labor; and spending that wit, that treas- 
ure, that labor and that blood, to dash ourselves in pieces 
on one another, which might be nobly, and honestly, 
and happily spent in the cause of God. 

These thoughts provoked me to consider, how the 
wounds of the church might yet be healed : and I have 
made it long a principal part of my daily prayers, that 
God would give healing principles and dispositions 
unto men. But the more I studied how it might be 
done, the more difficult, if not impossible it appeared, 


because of the Roman tyranny] the Vice-Christ or 
pretended Head of the church, being with them become 
an essential part of it, and the subjection to him essen- 
tial to our Christianity itself So that saith Bellarmin 
de Eccles. 1. 3. c. 5. No man, though he would, can 
be a subject of Christ, that is not subject to the Pope ; 
and this with abundance of intolerable corruptions they 
have fixed by the foncy of their own infallibility, and 
built upon this foundation a worldly kingdom, and the 
temporal riches and dignity of a numerous clergy, 
twisting some princes also into their interest, so that they 
cannot possibly yield to us in the very principal points 
of difference, unless they will deny the very essence of 
their new society, pluck up the foundations which they 
have so industriously laid, and leave men to a suspi- 
cion that they are fallible hereafter, if they shall con- 
fess themselves mistaken in any thing now ; and unless 
they will be so admirably self denying, as to let go the 
temporal advantages in which so many thousands of 
them are interested. Whether so much light may be 
hoped for, or so much love to God, and self denial in 
millions of men so void of self denial, it is easy to con- 
jecture : and we cannot in these greatest matters come 
over to them, unless we will flatly betray our souls, 
and depart from the unity of the Catholic church. If 
we should thus cast away the truth and favor of God, 
and sin against our knowledge and conscience, and so 
prove men of no faith or religion, under pretence of 
desiring a unity in faith and religion, yet all would not 
do the thing intended, but we should certainly miss of 
those very ends which we seek, when we had sold the 
truth and our souls to obtain them. For there is no- 
thing more certain, than that the Christian world will 
never unite with the Roman Vice-Christ, nor agree with 
them in their corruptions, against plain Scripture, tra- 
dition, consent of the ancient church, and the reason 
and common sense of mankind. Never did the uni- 
versal church, or one half of it center in the Roman 
sovereignty : and why should they hope for that which 
never yet was done .'' When they had their primacy 
of place, it made the Pope no more a sovereign and a 
Vice-Christ, than the King of France is sovereign to 


the Duke of Saxony or Bavaria; or tlian the senior 
justice on the bench is the soverei<^ii of the rest: and 
yet even this much he never had but from the Roman 
Kmpire. What chiim did he ever lay in his first usur- 
pations to any ciiurch without those bounds/ It was 
the empire that raised him, and the empire limited his 
own usurpations. Reinerius, Cont Waldens. Catal. in 
Ciblioth. l\iir. to 4. p. 773; saith : " the churches of the 
Armenians, and Ethiopians, and Indians, and the rest 
which the Apostles converted, are not under the church 
of Rome," In Gregory's days, they found the churches 
of Britain and Ireland both strangers and adversaries to 
their sovereignty : insomuch that they could not procure 
them to receive their government, nor change the time 
of Easter for them, nor to have communion with them. 
In the year G14, Laurentius wrote a letter, Avith Mellitus 
and Justus, to the Bishops and Abbots in Scotland. 
' We happened to enter this island, called Britain, before 
we knew them; and believing that they walked after 
the manner of the universal church, we reverenced both 
the Britains and the Scots in great reverence of their 
sanctity. When we knew the Britains, we thought the 
Scots were better. But we have learnt by Daganus 
and by Columbanus the Abbot, that the Scots do nothing 
differ from the Britains in their conversation. For 
Daganus coming to us, refused not only to eat with u?, 
but even to eat in the same house where we did eat." 
Usher. Epist. llibern. 

The work that here I have undertaken, is this — to 
give you a few invincible arguments, which the weak- 
est may be able to use, to overthrow the principal 
grounds of the Papists; and to .letect their frauds, with 
sufficient directions for the confutation of all the Pa- 
pists in the world. 

Before I mention the grouiids or cause that you must 
maintain, I must premise this advice. 

Understand what the religion is that you must hold 
and maintain. It is the ancient Christian religion. 
Do not put every truth among the essentials of your 
religion. Our religion doth not stand or fall with every 
controversy that is raised about it. That which was 
the true religion in tne Apostles' days is ours now : 


that which all were baptized into the profession of, and 
the churches openly held forth as their belief Re- 
formation brings us not a new religion, but cleanseth 
the old from the dross of Popery, which by inno- 
vation they had brought in. A man that cannot con- 
fute a Papist, may yet be a Christian, and so hold fast 
the true religion. It followeth not that our religion is 
unsafe, if some point in controversy between them and 
us be questionable or hard The Papists would fain 
bring you to believe that our religion must lie upon 
some of those controversies. |-*erhaps you will say, 
that then it is not about religion that we differ from 
them. I answer, yes : it is about the essentials of their 
religion, and for the preserving of the integrity of 
ours against the consequences and additions of theirs. 
They have made them a new religion, which we call 
Popery, and joined this to the old religion, which we 
call Christianity. Now we stick lo the old religion 
alone ; and therefore there is more essential to their reli- 
gion, than there is to ours ; so that our own religion, even 
the ancient Christianity, is out of controversy between us. 
The Papists do confess that the creed, the Lord's prayer, 
the Ten Commandments arc true, and that all the 
Scripture being the word of God, is certainly true: so 
that our religion is granted us as past dispute. There- 
fore it is only the Papists' religion that is in question 
between us, and not ours. If you will make those 
lower truths to be of the essence of your religion which 
are not, you will give the Papists the advantage which 
they desire. 

If the Papists call for a rule, or test of your religion, 
and ask you where thay may find it, assign them the 
Holy Scriptures, and not any confessions of churches, 
further tiian as they agreee with that. We know of 
no divine rules and laws of faith and life, but the Holy 
Scripture. The confessions of churches are but part of 
the Holy Scripture, or collections out of them, contain- 
ing the points of greatest weight. And if in phrase or 
order, much more in matter, there be any thing human, 
we make it not our rule, nor are we bound to make it 
good, no more than tlie writings of godly men. A 
point is not therefore with us an article of faith, because 

JtJGOLl^IG. 49 

our churches or a synod put it into a confession, but 
because it is the word of God. For a council's deter- 
minations do with us difler but gradually from the 
judgment of a single man, in this respect. And there- 
fore we give them the Scriptures only as the full doc- 
trine of our faith, and the perfect law of God. Those 
points in it, which life or death is laid upon, and God 
hath told us, we cannot be saved without, we take 
them as the essentials of our religion, and the rest as 
the integrals only. The essentials are the Baptismal 
Covenant, explained in the Creed, Lord's Prayer and 

Understand well what is the catholic church, that 
when tiie Papists ask you what church you are of, or 
call to you to prove its antiquity or truth, you may give 
them a sound and catholic answer. The catholic 
church is the whole number of true Christians upon 
earth ; for we meddle not with that part which is in 
Heaven. It is not tied to Protestants only, nor to th« 
Greeks only, much less to the Romanists only, or to 
any other party whatsoever; but it comprehendeth all 
the members of Christ : and as visible, it containeth all 
that profess the Christian Religion by a credible pro- 
fession. If the Christian Religion may be known, then 
a man may know that he is a Christian, and conse- 
quently a member of the catholic church. But if the 
Christian Religion cannot be known, then no man can 
know which is the church or which is a Christian. All 
Christians united to Christ the head are this catholic 

I shall now give you some easy arguments, by which 
even the weakest may prove that Popery is but " all 
deceivahleness of unrighteousness.'''' — 2 Thess .2 .9, 10. 

I. If there be any godly honest men on earth be- 
sides Papists, then Popery is false and not of God. 
But there be godly honest men on earth besides Papists 
— therefore Popery is false, and not of God. 

It is an article of Popish faith, that there are no god- 
ly honest men on earth besides Papists : therefore if 
there be any such. Popery is false. By godly honest 
men, I mean such as have true love to God, and so are 
in a state of salvation. Their very definition of the 



church doth make the Pope the head, and confine the 
membership only to his subjects, making the Roman 
Catholic Church, as they call it the whole. But lest 
^ny ignorant Papist say, / may he a Roman Catholic 
uithout believing that all others are ungodly, and 
shall be damned, I give it you in the determination of 
a Pope and general council. Leo, X. Abro^: Pragm. 
sanct. Bull, in the seventeenth general council at the 
Lateran, saitb, seeing it is of necessity to salvation, 
that all the faithful of Christ be subject to the Pope of 
Rome, as we are taught by the testimony of Divine 
Scripture, and of the Holy Fathers, and it is declared 
in the constitution of Pope Boniface VIII. Pope Pius 
II. was converted from being j^noias Sylvius by this 
doctrine of a cardinal, approved by him at large, Bull. 
Retract. inBinius, vol. 4., p. 514. I came to the foun- 
tain of truth, u-hich the holy doctors both Greek and 
Latin shew ; icho iciih one voice say, that he cannot be 
saved that holdeth not the unity of the holy church of 
Rome; and that all those virtues are maimed to him 
that refuseth to obey the Pope of Rome: though he lie 
in sackcloth and ashes, and fast and pray both day and 
night, and seem in all other things to fulfil the law of 
God. So that if a Pope and general council be false, 
then Popery is false. For their infallibility is the 
ground of their faith, and they take it on their unerring 
authority. But if the Pope and a general council be 
believed, then no man but a subject of the Pope can be 
saved: though he fast and pray in sackcloth and ashes 
day and night, and fulfil the law of God. Itis certain 
therefore that if any Roman Catholic do not believe 
that all the world shall be damned save themselves, they 
are indeed no Roman Catholics, but are heretics ; for 
they deny a principal article of their faith ; the infalli- 
bility of the Pope with a general council, which is 
your very foundation. 

Therefore even in the great and charitable work of 
reducing the Ahassines, the Jesuit Gonzalus Roderi- 
cus in his speech to the emperor's mother laid so great 
a stress on this point, that when she professed her sub- 
jection to Christ, lie told her, that None are subject to 
Christ, that are not subject to his Vicar. Godignus 
de reb. Abassin. Lib. 2. c. 18. Roderic. liter, j). 323. 


Bcllnrnihisahh, dc Eccl. I. 3. c. 5. No man ihov<rh 
lie uould can he subject to Christ that is not subject to 
(be Pope , that is he cannot be a (.'hrislian. Therefore 
Cardinal Richlicu told the Protestants tliat they were 
not to be called Christians. Abundance more of them 
^assert that Protestants cannot be saved I now prove 
that your Pope, and council, and faith are false, and 
that others beside you may be in a state of charity and 
salvation. For you confess yourselves, that he that is 
in a state of charity, is in a state of salvation. 

If a man may know his own heart, then there are 
others besides Papists that are in charity, and arc god- 
hi men : and so in a state of salvation. 

The consequence is plain by inward experience to 
every godly honest man that knoweth himself If I 
can know my own heart, I must needs say, I love God, 
and am not void of sincere godliness and honesty. 
And that I may know my own heart I can tell also by 
experience: for to know my own knowledge and will 
is an ordinary certain thing, if not by intuition itself 
And if a man cannot know whether he believe and love 
God or not, then no man can give thanks for it, nor 
make profession of it : for men cannot converse togeth- 
er, if they cannot know their own minds. Bellarmin 
confesseth that we may have a moral conjectural cer- 
tainty that we have true love and are justified. Then 
I have a moral conjectural certainty at least, that Po- 
pery is false ; because I have at least such a certainty 
that I am not ungodly or unjustified. So that what 
measure of knowledge or persuasion any Protestant 
hath that he is truly honest and justified, that measure 
of knowledge must he needs have, if he understand.* 
himself, that Popery is a deceit. 

So that hence you may gather these four conclusions : 
That all that have any knowledge or 'persuasion that 
they are not ungodly, unjustified persons themselves, 
and void of the true love of God ; are quite out of dan- 
ger from turning Papists, if they understand but what 
Popery is ; and if they do not, they cannot turn to 
it, but in part. 

That never any honest godly man did turn Papist] 
and this the Papists themselves will justify. For they 


say, by a Pope and general council, that no man can 
be saved but a Papist : and they generally hold, that all 
that have charity and are justified, shall be saved if 
they so die. So that if Popery be true, then no man 
had charity or true godliness before he was a Papist; 
and therefore never did one godly man or woman turn 
Papist. And therefore let them take the honor of their 
wicked seduced ones. What glory is it to them that 
none ever turned to them but ungodly people? 

It folio welh that the Papists do yiot so much as desire 
or ifiviie any godly man to turn to them. If you under- 
stand their meaning, they call you not to turn to them, 
if you are not ungodly persons. 

Hence, every one that turneth Papist, doth thereby 
confess that he was a wicked man before, and that he 
had not the least true love to God ; that he was not jus- 
tified, but a graceless wretch. 

All you that do but know or hope that you have 
any saving grace, have an argument here against 
Popery, which all the Jesuits in the world cannot 
confute. For you know your own hearts belter than 
they: and they have no way to turn you to them, but 
by persuading you that you are not what you are, and 
that you know not what you know. So that plain- 
ly this is your argument; / know, or I have good 
persuasioji that I am not utterly void of charity or sa- 
ving grace] therefore I know, or have the same per- 
suasion that Popery is false, which determineth thai 
none have charity or saving grace hut Papists. 

A man may have a very strong conjecture that 
many others that are no Papists have saving grace; 
though he had no persuasion that he hath such grace 
himself; consequently he must have as strong a con- 
jecture that Popery is false. What abundance of holy, 
heavenly persons have we known of all ranks among 
us! Such as have lived in daily breathings after God, 
spending no small part of their lives upon their knees, 
and in the serious and reverent attendance upon God 
in holy vvorsliij), meditating day and night upon his 
law; hating all known sin, and delighting in lioli- 
ness, and longing for perfection ; and living in con- 
stant temperance and chastity, abhorring the very ap- 


pearance of evil, and making conscience of an idle 
word or thought, devoting their lives and labors, and 
all they have to God, giving all their estates to pious 
and charitable uses, except what is necessary for their 
daily bread, even mean clothing and food ; taming their 
bodies, and bringing them into subjection, and deny- 
ing themselves, and mortifying the flesh, and contem- 
ning all the honors or riches of the world, resolving 
to suffer death itself, as many of their brethren have 
done from the Papists, rather than sin willfully against 
God and their consciences : in a word living to God 
and longing to be with him, and manifesting those long- 
ings to the very death; grieving more at any time, if 
they have but lost the sense and persuasion of the love 
of God, than if they had lost all the world; and would give 
a thousand worlds, if they had them, for more of the love 
of God in their souls, and fuller assurance of his love 
and communion with him. As far as words, and 
groans, and tears, and the very drift of a man's life, 
and the expending of all that he hath, can help us to 
know another man's heart, so far do we know all this 
by others, that have lived among us. And may we 
not conjecture, and be strongly persuaded that these, 
or some of these, or some one of these, was a holy, 
justified person? 

If ever you are tempted to be a Papist, look on one 
side on the lives of holy men, such as Bradford, Glo- 
ver, Sanders, Hooper, and the rest that laid down their 
lives in the flames in testimony against Popery: be- 
sides all the thousands that in other nations have died 
by the Papists' hands, because they durst not sin against 
God: and besides all the learned holy divines of other 
nations, and the millions of godly Protestants there; 
as also look upon all the godly that are now living, 
men or women, that live in most earnest seeking after 
God and serving him ; look on those about you, inquire 
of others; read the writings of holy divines: and then 
remember, you cannot turn Papist till you have con- 
cluded that all those are daimied, and are utterly void 
of saving grace and love of God. If there be but one 
Protestant that you know, or any one of all that have 
been, that you take to be in a saving state, you cannot 



possibly turn Papist, if you know what you do. For 
it is essential to Popery to contradict all this. 

Is this an easy task to one that hath the heart of a 
rnan in his breast? If you are not true Christians your- 
selves, dare you conclude that not one of those are true 
Christians? If j^ou confess that you love not God 
yourselves, dare you say that among the far greater 
part of the Christians of the world, there is not one 
man or Avoman that loves God ? This you must say, 
if you will be a Papist. 

Many who are not Papists are good Christians, and 
consequently Popery is a deceit, and that is the testi- 
mony of many of their onm writers. I will not call 
for their testimony concerning ourselves, but concern- 
ing other churches whom they condemn as heretics, 
that are jiot subjects of the Pope of Rome. I will con- 
tent myself with one of many that might be cited. 
Burchardus, that lived in the Holy Land, saith of them 
as followelh, ;;. 325, 326 — And for those that we judge 
to be damned heretics, as the Ncstorians, Jacobites, 
Maronites, Georgians, and the like, I fou7id them to be, 
for the most part good and simple men, aiid livirig sin- 
cerely toward God and men 

Of the Roman Catholics he saith, p. o2o.—^Thcre 
are in the Land of Promise men of eve'/ y nation under 
Heaven, and every nation live after their oicn rites: 
ayid, to speak the very truth, to our oion great confu- 
sion, there are none found in it, that are worse, and 
more- corrupt in manners than Papists. 

He also tells us, p. 324, that the Syrians, Greeks, Ar- 
menians, Georgians, Nestorians, Nubians, Jubeans. 
Clmlda:ans, Maronites, Ethiopians, Egyptians, and 
many other nations, theie inhabit; and that some arc 
not subject to the Pope ; and others called Heretics, as 
the Nestorians, Jacobites, &c. but there are many in those 
sects that are very sincere, know nothing of heresies: 
devoted to Christ: so that they far excel the religious 
of Rome. So you hear an adversary's testimony. 

Well then, when a Papist can prove to me, that 1 
love not God, contrary to my own experience of myself: 
and when he can make me believe that no one of all 
the holy heavenly Christians of my acquaintance, min 


isters, or people, are in a slate of charily or justification : 
and tliat no one Christian on e: rth shall be saved but a 
Papist, then I will turn Papist But I must solenanlv 
profess that this belief is so difficult to inc, and abhorred 
by niy reason, and wy whole heart, and so contrary to 
niy own knowledge, and to abundant evidence, and to 
all Christian charity, that 1 think 1 shall as soon be 
persuaded to believe that I am not a man, and that 1 
have not the use of sense or reason, or that snow is 
black, and the crow white, as to believe this essential 
point of Popery. I should a hundred times easier be 
brought to doubt whether I have the love of God my- 
self than to conclude all the Christians in the world 
to be the heirs of damnation. 

II. Tkat docirhie is not true nor of God, which 
Icachcth men to renounce all christian love and works 
of Christia?i love, towards most of the Christians tipon 
earth : but so doth the doctrine of Popery ; therefore 
it is not of God. 

If their error were merely speculative, it were the 
less: but here we see the fruits of it, and whither it 
tends. By this shall all men know that ye are my dis- 
ciples, if ye love one another. — John 13: 35. 

This special love is the commandment of Christ, the 
new commandment ; without this, no man can be a 
lover ot God, nor be loved of him as a member of 
Christ. 1 John 3: 11, 12, 14,23; 4: 7, 8, 11, 12, 20, 

21. 2 John 5. John 13: 34; 15: 12, 17. 1 Pet. 1. 

22. lie that loveth not a Christian as a Christian, 
with a special love, is none of the sons of God. Papists 
teach men to deny this special Christian love to most 
Christians in the world. They that teach men to take 
most true Christians in the world for no true Christians, 
but for heretics or ungodly persons that shall be damned, 
do teach them to deny the special love and works of 
love to most true Christians : but thus do the I^apists. 
How can a man love him as a Christian or a godly 
man, whom he must take to be no Christian, or an un- 
godly man? It is true they may yet love them as 
creatures, and so they must the devils; and they may 
love them as men, and so they must the Turks and 
Heathens: but no man can love him as a member of 


Christ, whom he believes to be no member of Christ, 
but of the devil. All Papists are bound to this unchax- 
itableness by their religion, even by the Pope and gen- 
eral councils. Christ bindeth his servants to love one 
another with a special love ; so the Pope and council 
bind the Papists not to love the most true Christians 
with a special Christian love. They cannot do it with- 
out being heretics themselves, or overthrowing the 
foundation of Popery, 

Here you have a taste of the Popish charity, when 
they boast above all things of their charity. It is their 
horrible inhuman uncharitableness that seems to me 
their most enormous crime. Also you may see here 
the extent of their good works, which they so much 
glory in. He that is bound not to love me as a Chris- 
tian, is bound to do nothing for me as a Christian. So 
that they will not give a cup of cold water to a disciple 
in the name of a disciple, unless he be also a disciple of 
the Pope : nor can they love or relieve Christ in his 
servants, when they are bound to take them as none of 
his servants: and so the special love and charity of a 
Papist extendeth to none but those of their own sect, 
Let them take heed lest they hear, inasmuch as you did 
it not to one of the least of these, you did it not to me. 

HI. That dcctrine ichich tKachcth men to destroy 
or undo them whom Christ hath bound them to love 
as Christians, and absolveth subjects from their alle- 
giance to their princes, and requireth the deposing of 
them, and committing the government of their domin- 
ions to others, because they arc judged to be heretics by 
the Pope ; or if they will 7iot destroy and extripatc 
such as he calleth Heretics; that doctrine is not God. 
But such is the doctrine of Popery. 

A paper entitled An explanation of the Roman 
Catholic' s belief and others like it seem to renounce 
the opinion of breaking faith with heretics, and of 
promise breaking with magistrates. It seems they 
think they owe no more obedience to their magistrates 
than they promise. But I refer the reader to what King- 
James and his defenders have said on this point, and 
now give you the words of fheir own approved general 
council the fourth at the Lateran under Innocent III., 


as Binius and others record it. In the first chapter 
they set down their Catholic Faith, two articles of 
which arc; That no man can bo saved out of their 
universal clinrch; That the bread and wine in the sa- 
crament of the altar are transubstantiated into the body 
and blood of Christ, the appearances remaining. In 
the third chapter they say, "We excommunicate and 
anathematize every heresy extollino- itself against this 
holy orthodox Catholic faith, which we have before 
cxponed, condcmnins^^ all heretics by what names soev- 
er they may be called — And being condemned, let 
them be left to the present secular powers, or their 
bailifts to be punished, the clergy being first degraded 
of their orders; and let the goods of such condemned 
ones be confiscate, if they be laymen, but if they be 
clergymen let them be given to the churches whence 
they had their stipends. And those that are found no- 
table only by suspicion, if they do not by congruous pur- 
gation demonstrate their innocency, according to the 
considerations of the suspicion and the quality of the 
person, let them be smitten with this word o^ Anathema, 
and avoided by all men, till they have given sufficient 
satisfaction ; and if they remain a year excommunicate, 
let them then be condemned as heretics. And let the se- 
cular powers, in what office soever, be admonished and 
persuaded, and if it be necessary, commpelled by ec- 
clesiastical censure, that as they would be reputed and 
accounted believers, so for the defence of the faith, they 
lake an oath publicly, that they will study in good ear- 
nest according to their power, to exterminate all that 
are by the church denoted heretics, from the countries 
subject to their jurisdiction. So that when any one 
shall be taken into Spiritural or temporal power, ho 
shall by his oath make good this chapter. But if the 
temporal lord, being required and admonished of the 
church, shall neglect to purge his country of heretical 
defilement, let him by the metropolitan and other com- 
provincial bishops be tied by the bond of excommuni- 
cation. And if he refuse to satisfy within a year, let it 
be signified to the Pope, that he may from thenceforth de- 
nounce his vassals absolved from their fidelity, and 
may expose his country to be seized by Catholics, who 


rooting out the heretics, may possess it without con- 
tradiction, and may iveep it in the purity of faith ; saving 
the right of the principal lord, so be it that he him- 
self do make no hindrance hereabout, and oppose any 
impediment: and the same law is to be observed with 
them that are not principal lords. And the Catholics 
that taking the sign of the Cross shall set themselves 
to the rooting out the heretics, shall enjoy the same 
indulgences and holy privileges which were granted 
to those that go to the relief of the holy land. More- 
over we decree, that the believers, receivers and de- 
fenders, and favorers of heretics, shall be excommuni- 
cate: firmly decreeing, that after any such is noted by 
excommunication, if he refuse to satisfy within a year: 
he shall from thenceforth be ipso jure infamous, and 
may not be admitted to public offices or councils, or 
to the choice of such, nor to bear witness. And he 
shall be intestate and not have power to make a will, 
nor may come to a succession of inheritance. And no 
man shall be forced to answer him in any cause ; but 
he shall be forced to answer others. And if he be 
a judge, his sentence shall be invalid, and no causes 
shall be brought lo his hearing. If he be an advocate, 
his plea shall not be admitted. If a notary or regis- 
ter, the instruments made by him shall be utterly void, 
and damned with the damned author. And so in 
other the like cases, we command that it be observed." 
Thus they go on further commanding bishops by 
themselves, or their arch-deacons, or other fit persons, 
once or twice a year to search every parish where 
any heretic is found to dwell, and put all the neighbor- 
hood to their oaths, whether they know of any here- 
tics there, or any private meetings, or any that in life 
and manners do difler from the common conversation 
of the faithful, &c. And the bishops that neglect those 
things are to be cast out, and others put in their places 
that will do them. 

Pope Gregory 7. I. 4. Episi. 7., expressly stirs up 
the people to cast of their princes, saying ; '"For the 
conspiracy of heretics and the king, we believe it is 
not unknown to you that are near them, how it may 
be impugned by the Catholic bishops and dukes, and 


many others in the German parts : for the failliful of 
the Church of Rome are come to such a numher, tliat 
unless the king shall come to satisfaction, they may 
openly profess to choose another king, and observing 
justice we have promised to favor them, and will keep 
our promise firm, &c." 

The sum of all is, that all that the Pope calls 
heretics, must he condemned and destroyed, and all 
kings, princes or lords, that will not execute his 
sentence and root them out, must be dispossessed of 
their dominions, and the subjects absolved from their 
fidelity, whatever oaths they had taken, and all others 
that do but favor or receive them be utterly undone. 

I fetch these things out of the very words of a general 
council confirmed by the I^ope, and unquestionably ap- 
proved by them. Many ages saw this doctrine put in 
execution, when the emperors of Germany were de- 
posed by the Pope, and the subjects absolved from 
their allegiance. 

Perhaps some will say, that this decree was not de 
fide, but a temporary precept. When a precept requi- 
reth duty, it may be a point of faith to believe it. Pre- 
cepts are the objects of faith, at least as they are assertions 
that the thing commanded is our duty. It is an article 
of faith, that God is to be loved and obeyed, and 
our superiors to be honored, and our neighbor to be 
loved, and charity to be exercised, &c. The creation, 
the incarnation of'Christ, his death, resurrection, ascen- 
sion, glorification, intercession, his future judgment, 
the resurrection of the body, &c., are all matters of fact, 
and yet matters of faith too. If practicals be not ar- 
ticles of faith, then we have no articles of faith at 
all: for all our theology and religion is practical. Do 
Papists murder po^r Christians by thousands, and 
yet noi fide diviaa believe that it is their duty so to do ? 
Either it is a duty, or a sin, or indiflerent. If a sin, 
woe to their Popes and councils; and if this be no sin 
with them, I know not why the world should be 
troubled by them with the name of sin. If it be in- 
different, what then shall be called sin ? If they can 
swallow such camels as the blood of many thousand 
Christians, what need they strain at gnats, and stick 

60 JESUlT' 

at private murders, or fornication, or lying", or slan- 
dering, any more than the Jesuit casuists do? But 
if those murders and deposing kings be indeed a duty, 
bow can they know it to be so, but by believing ? In- 
deed if a general council and the Pope are to be believ- 
ed, who give it us with a Decernimus et fir miter stat- 
uimus, then it is doubtless a point of faith: and if they 
are not to be believed, then Popery is but a mere de- 

But may we not be Roman Catholics though we 
join not with them in this point? Have not many 
such renounced it ? and so may we. If you renounce 
the decrees of a Pope and general council, you re- 
nounce your religion in the very foundation of it. 
and cannot be J^apists ; but are in the Roman ac- 
count as errant heretics as those that they have tor- 
tured and burn to ashes : though here, where they 
cannot handle you as they would do, they dare not tell 
you so. If you may renounce the decrees of a Pope 
and general council, when they say; it is a duty, or 
lawful to exterminate all heretics, that believe not tran- 
substantiation, and to seize upon the lands of princes 
that will not do it, and to deliver them to others that 
will, and absolve their vassals from their fidelity; if 
you may renounce them in this, why may not we re- 
nounce them in other things as groundless? 

IV. The true catholic church is holy: the Church 
of Rome hath for many generations been unholy : 
therefore the Church of Rome icas not in any oj 
those generations the true catholic church. 

The major proposition is an article of the creed pro- 
fessed by themselves, as much as by us; I believe the 
holy catholic church. 

The unholiness of the Church of Rome, I prove 
undeniably, thus: if an essential part of the Church of 
Rome, even its head, hath been unholy through many 
generations, then the Church of Rome hath been un- 
holy, for many generations : but an essential part, even 
the head, hath been unholy. 

Though it will not follow that the Church is holy, 
because one essential part is holy, yet it clearly follovv- 
eth that the Church is unholy, because an essential 


part is unholy. As it followeth not that the body is 
Sound, because the head is sound ; yet it followeth, that 
the man, or the body is unsound or sick, because the 
head is unsound or sick. As it is not a church with- 
out al! its essential parts, so it is not a holy church 
without the holiness of all its essential parts. 

They make the Pope the head of the Catholic 
Church, and an essential part ; which is the principal 
controversy between them and the true catholics. 

Abundance of their Popes have been unholy, and 
they dare not deny it. Their own historians describe 
their impieties, ami their own writers, even those that 
are bitterest against us, do freely confess it: and gen- 
eral councils have judged them and cast them out 
The number of those monsters is so great, that it 
would make a volume but to name them, and recite 
their crimes. 

Pope John XXIII. was accused and deposed by 
the general council at 'Constance, upon seventy articles, 
The first article was, that he was from his youth, a man 
of a bad disposition, immodest, impudent, a liar, a rebel, 
and disobedient to his parents, and given to most vices; 
and then was, and yet is, commonly taken for such a one 
by all that knew him. The second article was, how by 
fiimoniacal and unjust means he grew rich. The third 
Article, that by simony he was promoted to be a car- 
dinal. The fourth article, that being legate at Bonnonia 
he governed tyranically, impiously, unjustly, being 
wholly alien from all Christian justice, divine and hu- 
man, &c. The fifth article, that thus he got to b« 
Pope, and yet coniinued as bad, and as a Pagan des- 
pised the worship of God ; if he performed any, it was 
more lest he should be totally blamed of heresy and 
cast out of the Papacy, than for any devotion. The 
sixth article was, that he was the oppressor of the poor, 
the persecutor of righteousness, the pillar of the unjust 
and the simoniacal, a server of the flesh, the dregs of 
vices, a stranger to virtue, flying from public consisto- 
ries, wholly given to sleep and carnal desires, altogether 
contrary to the life and manners of Christ, the mirror 
of infamy, and the profound inventor of all mischiefs : 
so far scandalizing the Church of Christ, that among: 



Christian believers that knew his life and manners'^ 
he was commonly called the devil incarnate. The sev- 
enth article was, that being a vessel of all sins, repel- 
ling the worthy, he simoniacally sold benefices, bish- 
oprics and church-dignities openly, to the unworthy 
that would give most for them. 

Threescore more of those articles were all proved to 
be notorious, by cardinals, arch-bishops, prelates, and 
many more. I add a few of the last. That he came 
to be Pope by causing Pope Alexander and his phy- 
sician Daniel de Sophia to be poisoned. That he com- 
mitted incest with his brother's wife, and with iiuns, 
and whoredom with virgins, adultery with men's wives, 
and other crimes of incontinency, for which the wrath 
of God cometh on the children of disobedience. That 
he was notoriously guilty of murder, and other grievous 
crimes, a dissipator of the Church goods, a notorious 
simonist, and a pertinacious heretic. That often, he ob- 
stinately asserted, dogmatized, and maintained, that 
thereisno life everlasting, nor any other after this; more- 
over,he said and obstinately believed that the soul of man 
doth die and is extinct with the body like the brute 
beasts, and that the dead shall not rise again at the 
last day, contrary to the article of the resurrection. 
Thereupon the council deposed him. 

Now judge, whether the Roman Church had a holy 
head, when it had a heathen and a devil incarnate? 

The general council at Basil deposed Pope Eugeiiius 
IV. as being a rebel against the holy canons, a notori- 
ous disturber and scandalizer of the peace and unity of 
the Church, a simonist and a perjured wretch, incor- 
rigible, a schismatic, and an obstinate heretic. 

Pope John XIII. alias XII. was in council convicted 
of ravishing maids, wives, and widows at the Apostolic 
doors: and committing many murders. He drunk a 
health to the devil, and at dice called to Jupiter and 
Venus for help, and at last was slain in the act of adul- 
tery. Platina saith, he was from his youth a man con- 
taminated with all dishonesty and filthiness, and if he 
had any time to spare from his lusts, he spent it in 
hunting, and not in praying; a most wicked man or 
rather a monster. The life of that most wicked man 


being" judged in a council oi Itaiian bishops; for fear 
of them he iled and lived like a wild beast in the woods. 
At last he got the better ai^ain by the help of his friends 
at Rome, till an angry man found him with his wife, 
and sent him to answer it in another world. Their 
own writers note that this was the first Pope that 
changed his name, whom his followers imitated. Do 
you think' the head of the Roman Church was then 

Many others of them have been most wicked wretches, 
common adulterers, fornicators, and sodomites, who 
poisoned their predecessors to get the Popedom. Bar- 
onius their flntlering champion saith, Annal. ad an. 
912. "What then was the face of the holy Roman 
Church i* How exceedingly filthy, when the most 
potent, and yet the most sordid whores did rule at Rome/ 
by whose pleasure sees were changed, prelates were 
given, and which is a thing- horrid to be heard, and not 
to be spoken, their lovers or mates, were thrust into 
Peter's chair, being false Popes, who are not to be writ- 
ten in the catalogue of the Roman Popes, but only for 
the marking out of such times. And what kind of 
cardinals, priests, and deacons think you we must im- 
agine that those monsters did choose, when nothing is 
so rooted in nature as for everyone to beget his like.'"' 

Genebrard, that spleenish Papist, Lib. iv. Sec. x. 
saith, "in this one thing that age was unhappy, that for 
near one hundred and fifty years about fifty Popes did 
wholly fall away from the virtue of their ancestors, 
being rather irregular and apostatical, than apostolical." 
So that the Church of Rome had not then either a holy 
or apostolical head. 

Pope Adrian Vf. writeth, De Sacram. Confir. Art. 
4, that there have many Popes of Rome been here- 
tics. Two or three several general councils condemned 
Pope Honoriiis for a heretic. 

If I should tell you what their own writers say of 
the wickedness of the Roman clergy, in many ages ; 
and of the wickedness of the Roman people; of 
the large sums of money that the Pope hath yearly 
for the licensed or tolerated brothels in Rome, you 
would think that the body of the particular Roman 

64 jEsriT 

church was near kin to the head, and therefore not 
the holy mistress of all churches. 

But perhaps some will say, that the Pope was holy be- 
cause his office was holy, though his person was vicious. 
If this be the holiness of the Catholic church mention- 
ed in the creed, then the institution of offices is it that 
makes it holy, and while the office continueth, the 
holiness cannot be lost. Then let them prove their 
holiness by saints no more. Let them not then delude 
the people, but speak out, and tell them that they mean 
such holiness as is consistent with heathenism, or infi- 
delity murders, sodomy, and may be in an incarnate 
devil ! Is that the holiness of the Catholic church? 

By this means you leave no room for the Church of 
Rome, or any Papifc^t in the Catholic church which is 
truly holy. 

Not as Papists: they can be no members of it. But 
if with any of thern Christianity be predominant, and 
prevail against the infection of J-'opery, so that it prac- 
tically extinguish not Christianity, then as Christians 
they may be members of the church, and be saved too 
but not as Papists. 

V. The true catholic church of Christ is but one : 
the pretended Roman Catholic church is more than 
one : therefore the freiended Roman Catholic church 
is not the true catholic church of Christ. 

1. Where there are two heads or sovereign powers, 
specially distinct, there are two societies, or churches. 
But those called Papists, or the Roman Catholic 
church, have two heads or sovereign powers specially 
distinct. Therefore they are two churches. 

There are many volumes written by both sides for 
their several forms. Bellarmin, Gretser, and the 
rest of the Italian fncticn assert that the Pope \i 
the chief power, and above a general council, and 
the seat of infalMbilit}-, and not to be judged by any, 
being himself the judge of the whole world. The oth- 
er party aver that a general council is above th« 
Pope, and that he is to be judged by them, and may b© 
deposed by them. If any say, that they are but few 
and not true Papists of this opinion, I answer, then a 
general council are but few, and not true Catholic*, 


which yet is said by them to represent the whole 
Catholic church: for the g"cneral council of Constance 
and of Basil have preinptorily asserted it, and repeat 
it over and over. Tlie council of Basil say, Ses 
ultim. that "not one of the skilful did ever doubt but 
that the Pope was subject to the judgment of a gen- 
eral council, in things that concern faith. And that 
he cannot without their consent dissolve or remove 
a general council; and that this is an article of 
faith, which without destruction of salvation cannot 
be denied, and that the council is above the Pope, de 
ride, and it cannot be removed without their consent, 
and that he is a heretic that is against these things." 
Bbiius p. 43. 79, 96. Pope Eugenius owned that coun- 
cil, p. A2. For the council of Constance, Martin V, 
was chosen by it, and present in it, and personally con- 
firmed what they did as a council, and not'what pri- 
vate members did. You see that even general coun- 
cils representing the Papal church do not only say 
that a council is above the Pope, but make it an article 
of faith, and damn those that deny it. What then is 
become of Bellannin and the rest of their champions.^ 

But perhaps you will say, they are but few on the 
other side. Not only most Popes, and the Italian 
clergy, and the predominant party of Papists, but an- 
other general council, the Lateran, under Julius II. 
and Leo X. expressly determine that the Pope is above 
a general council. So that here is not only an unde- 
niable proof that general councils are fallible by their 
contradicting each other, and that there is a necessity 
of rejecting some of them, and consequently that the 
foundation of Popery is rotten : but also here is one 
representative catholic church against another repre- 
sentative catholic church, and one council for one spe- 
cies of sovereignty, and another for another species of 
sovereignty. So that undoubtedly it is not the same 

The nations that are on both sides to this day, are 
a proof beyond denial of their division. The French 
on one side, and the Itilians on the other; and other 
nations divided between both. So thai the thing which 

66 jEBvit 

they call by one name, is two indeed. But So it not 
the true catholic church. 

2. Where there are two, three or four heads or sov' 
eieigns at once numerically distinct, there are two 
three or four churches. But the Roman Church pre- 
tending to be catholic, hath had two or three or four 
heads at once numerically distinct; therefore it wa« 
two or three or four churches. 

It is not only two species of sovereignty, but two in^ 
dividual sovereigns that are inconsistent with the nu' 
merical unity of a political body. Two, or ten, or two 
hundred may join in one sovereignty, as one political 
person, but if there be two sovereigns, there are cer- 
tainly two societies: for if both be suprt me, neither is 
subordinat \ The I'apists lay their very foundation on 
a supposed division. Peter and Paul were both at once 
their Bishops. There are not many of them who ven- 
ture to tell us, that Peter only was the supreme, and 
that Paul was under him : but they make them as 
equals, or co-ordinate ; and some of them say, that Paul 
was the bishop of the uncircumcision, and Peter of the 
circumcision, and then Pettr''s church is confined to 
the Jews. And they do not tell us, that one headship 
was divided between them: for then that example 
would direct them still to have two Popes, or two bish- 
ops to a Church: so that Peter being a head, and 
Paul a head, they had distinct bodies. 

They cannot deny their many following divisions. 
The twenty third schism, as Werner a zealous Papist, 
in flisciculo tempor. reckons them was between Felix V^ 
and Eugenius: of which Werner saith, that "hence arose 
great contention among the writers of this matter, ^ro 
and contra, and they cannot agree to this day : for one 
part saith, that the council is above the Pope, the other 
part on the contrary saith, no, but the J^ope is above 
the council. God grant his church peace, &c." 

Of the twenty-second schism, Werner saith thus, ad 
an. 1373, "The twenty-second was the worst and most 
*ubtle of all. For it was so perplexed, that the most 
learned and conscientious men were not able to find 
out to whom they should adhere. And it was contin- 
ued for forty years to the great scandal of the whole 

JuaoLiNo. 67 

(tlcTgy, and the great loss of souls, because of heresies 
ftnd other evils that then sprung up, and because there was 
no discipline in the church against them. And there- 
fore from Urban VI. to Martin V. I know not who was 

After Nicholas IV. there was no Pope for two years 
nnd a half; and CeUsline V. that succeeded him re- 
signing it, Boniface VIII. entered, that styled himself 
lord of the whole world in spirituals and temporals, of 
whom it was said, he entered as a fox, lived as a lion, 
and died like a dog. 

The twentieth schism was great between Alexander 
III. and four schismatics, and lasted seventeen years. 

The nineteenth scliism, was between Innocent II. and 
Peter Leonis. Innocent got the better because he 
had more on his side. 

The thirteenth schism was between another and 
Benedict VIII. 

The fourteenth schism was scandalous and full of 
confusion between Benedict IX. and five others, which 
Benedict was wholly vicious; and therefore being damn- 
ed, appeared in a monstrous and horrid shape ; his head 
and tail were like an ass, and the rest of his body like 
a bear, saying, I thus appear, because I lived like a 
beast. In that schism there was no less than six Popes 
at once. 1. Benedict was expelled. 2. Silvester III. 
got in, but was cast out again, and Benedict restored. 
3. But being again cast out, Gregory VI. was put into hii 
place; who because he was ignorant of letters, and yet 
infallible no doubt, caused another Pope to be consecrated 
with him to perform Church offtces ; which was the 
fourth; which displeased many, and therefore a third 
was chosen, wliich was the fifth instead of the two 
that were fighting with one another; but Henry tho 
emperor coming in, deposed them all, and chose Clem- 
ent II. who was the si.xth of all them that were aliva 
at once. 

But above all schisms, that between Formosus and 
Sergius, and their followers, was the foulest; such say- 
ing and unsaying, doing and undoing there was, be- 
sides the dismembering of the dead Pope, and casting 
him into the water. And of eight successors, saith 
Werner, I can say nothing observable of them ; be- 

6B jESUlt 

cause I find nothing of them but scandal, because of 
the unheard of contention, in the holy apostolic see one 
against another, and together mutually against each 

One Pope in those contentious times, I find lived in 
some peace, and that was Silvester II. of whom saith 
Werner, Silvester was made Pope by the help of 
the devil, to whom he did homage: that all might go 
as he would have it : — but he quickly met with the 
usual end, as one that had placed his hope in deceitful 

I now appeal to reason itself, whether this were one 
church, that for fifty years together had several heads, 
some of the people following one, and some another, 
and the most learned and the most conscientious not 
able to know the right Pope, nor know him not to this 
day. But the true catholic church of Christ is but one. 

VI. The true catholic church hath never ceased or 
discontinued, si?ice the founding of it to this day. The 
Church of Rome hath ceased or discojitinued : therefore 
the Church of Rome is not the true catholic church. 

If the head which is an essential part hath discontin- 
ued, then the Church of Rome hath discontinued. But 
the head hath discontinued. 

1. There have been many years interregnum or va- 
cancy, when there was no Pope at all. And where 
then was the church when it had no head ? 

2. There have been long successions of such as 
were not apostolical, but apostatical. 

3. Your own Popes and councils command us to 
take such for no Popes. Pope Nicholas in his decretals, 
Caranza p, 393. saitii ; He that by money or the favor 
of men, or popular or military tumults is intruded in- 
to the apostolical seat without the concordant and can- 
onical election of the. cardinals and the following re- 
ligious clergy, let him not be taken for a Pope, nor 
apostolical, but for apostatical. And even the priests, 
he commandeth ; Let no 7nan hear inass of a priest 
whom he certainly knoweth to have a concubine or wO' 
man introduced, Caranza, p. 395. and priests that 
commit fornication, cannot have the honor of priest- 


But our greater argument is from the authority of 
God, and the very nature of the office. A?i infidel, or 
notorious uiiiiodly man, is not capable of being the 
pastor of a Church, while he is such. Bui the Popes 
ef Rome have been infidels, and notoriouslij ungodly 
men : therefore they were incapable of being pastors of 
the Church, and consequently that Church was head- 
less, and so no church. Where there is not the neces- 
sary matter and disposition of the matter, there can be 
no reception of ihe form. But infidels and notoriously 
ungodly men, are not matter sufficiently disposed to 
receive the form of pastoral power: therefore they can- 
not receive it. As every true church is a Christian 
Church, it being only a congregation of Christians 
that we so call, so every pastor is a Christian pastor: 
but an infidel or not:)riously ungodly man is not a 
Christian pastor: therefore not a true pastor. Other- 
wise a Mohamedan, .Tew, or Heathen may be a true Pope. 
If any disposition or qualification at all be necessary 
to the being of the pastoral office, then is it necessary, 
that he own God the Father, and the Redeemer, that 
IS, be not notoriously an infidtd, or ungodly. 

Popes have been such as 1 mention. Marcellinus sac- 
rificed to an idol ; Liberius subscribed to the Arian 
profession. I believe there is a hundred times more 
hone of their salvation by repentance, than of a hun- 
dred of their successors, John XXII. held that the 
soul dies with the body, of which the Parisians and 
others condemned him. John XXIII. denied the life 
to come, and so was an infidel. The witchcraft, pois- 
onings, simony, sodomy, adulteries, incest, &c. of oth- 
ers, are recorded by their own historians. 

VII. If a man may be sure, that he knows bread to be 
bread, and wine to he wine, lohtn he seeth, feelelh and 
f.astcth them., then he may be sure that Popery is a deceit. 
But a man may be sure that he knoweth bread to be 
bread, and loine to be icine, when he seeth, feeleth, and 
iasteth them. 

I speak of such a knowledge as belongs to men of 
sound sense, and a convenient object and medium. It 
is the senses of the wliole world that I appeal to ; it 
is bread and wine that are near us, in the hand or 


mouth that I speak of, and not at a mile's distance : in 
the day lig"ht, and not in the dark. So that take the 
bread and wine into your hand and judge it, and let 
that decide our controversy. If you can tell whether 
that be bread or no bread, you may tell whether the 
Papists or we are in the right. Those therefore that 
be not learned enough to judge by disputations and 
writings of learned men, may yet judge by their sight 
and feeling. Either you know bread and wine when 
you see it, taste it, feel it, or you do not. If you do, 
then the controversy is at an end ; for the senses of 
all sound men in the world, will be against the Pa- 
pists, that say the bread after consecration is no bread, 
and the wine is no wine. But if you cannot know 
bread when you see, feel, and eat it; 1. Then we are 
sure that the Pope and all his council is not at all to be 
trusted : for if sense be not to be trusted, then the Pope 
and his council know not when they read the Scrip- 
ture, and canons, and fathers, and hear traditions, but 
that they are deceived. 2. Then we are uncertain of 
any judgment that Pope or council can give: for when 
they spoke or wrote it, we are uncertain whether our 
eyes and ears, or reason judging by them, are not de- 
ceived in the hearing or reading of their words. 3. 
How ridiculously then do they call for a judge of con- 
troversies ? and what a foolish quarrel is it that they 
make, who shall be the interpreter of Scriptures, or 
judge of controversies? For what can a judge do 
but speak or write his mind .'' and when he hath done, 
you know not what it is you hear or read, because your 
senses may deceive you. It is a far harder matter to 
understand a sentence or book of the Pope or council 
when you read or hear it, than to know bread when 
you see, and feel it. Many thousands know bread, 
that know not the Pope's sentence, nor a word of a 
book. 4. By this rule, it is uncertain whether Scrip- 
ture be true, or Christianity the true religion. For we 
cannot know it but by our senses: and if they are so 
uncertain, all our religion must needs be uncertain, 
5. We cannot tell what revelation to desire that should 
end our controversies and make us certain. For if 
God shall send an angel or other messenger from 


Iieaven to decide the controversies between us and 
Papists, what could he do more but speak it to us as 
from God ? and we shoukl still Ite uncertain of what 
we see or hear: so that we are left incurably in our 
ignorance and controversies, if Popery be true. 

Elcre you may see upon what terms we dispute 
with Papists, and what hope there is of its satisfying 
them. We dispute with men that will not believe their 
own senses, or senses of the world. The damned man, 
Lul(c 16. thought if one might have been sent to his 
bri'thren from the dead, they would have believed. 
And if Abraham sa}'' to them, if they will not hear 
Mosc.^ and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded 
though one rise from the dead ; wc may say of Papists, 
if they will not believe their own eyes, and ears, and 
taste, and know not bread when they see, and feel and 
eat it, how should they be persuaded, though one were 
sent to them from heaven to resolve them? Can we 
think by all our arguments to make any matter plainer 
to a man than that bread is bread, when he seeth and 
eateth it? If this be uncertain to them, what can you 
prove to them, or what way can you devise to deal 
with them? For indeed, if sense be uncertain, we 
have no certainty of any thing in the world. 

But to this, Tiibervillc, in his Manual of Contro- 
versies saith, substance is not the proper and immedi- 
ate object of sense, but color, quantity, &c. Nor can 
sense judge at all of substance though it be under sen- 
sible accidents, unless it be the subject of those acci- 
dents, and have a sensible and corporeal manner of be- 
ing, which the body of Christ neither is, nor hath in 
that sacrament. It hath a spiritual manner of being, 
and is not the subject of the accidents of bread. They 
are without a subject by miracle ; therefore no wonder, 
if sense be deceived in this matter. Here sense and 
reason must vail bonnet to faith, and submit to the au- 
thority of God revealing, and the church propounding: 
they are not competent judges what God can do by liis 

Is this all that those Rabbles have to satisfy the 
world that it is not bread and wine which is seen, and 
felt, and tasted I Is this not like the rest of their 



contradictory imag-inations? That Christ hath not jt 
corporeal manner of being in the sacrament: and yet 
h is not bread, but is the body that is there: he saith, 
we maintain not his corporeal, but real and spiritual 
presence in the sacrament. So that either they affinu 
that his body is present, and yet deny his bodily pres- 
ence, but not his corporeal presence. Most learnedly ! 
We shall at last be taught to distinguish between 
bodily and corporeal! But is not the juggle in the 
word manner? Perhaps the corporeal presence is not 
denied, but the corporeal manner. In term it is said, 
We maintain not his corporeal presence. And can a 
bodybe present and not in a bodily manner ? And why- 
is spiritually, put as contradistinct .'' When Paul said 
our bodies shall be raised spiritual bodies, he thought 
that they were nevertheless bodies for being spiritual ; 
and therefore it is nevertheless a bodily manner of 
presence, for being a spiritual manner. But if by 
the corporeal presence or manner denied, be meant 
nothing but the qualities and quantity by which it is 
fit to be the object of our senses, why had we not 
this plainly without juggling? To say Christ is pres- 
ent in body but not sensibly, is plainer English, than 
to say that he is present in body but not bodily present. 

He calls them the accidents of bread, and ye^. 
saith, they are without a subject. And so doth the cx- 
planations of the Roman Catholic belief, and their or- 
dinary writers say that the body of Christ is under the 
forms of bread and wine, and yet say that bread and 
wine are none of the subject of those forms. 

He professeth transubstantiation is a miracle, and 
so every ignorant, drunken, adulterous priest of theirs 
hath the gift of miracles, which he worketh as oft 
as he consecrateth. Such miracles are the glory of 
their church, and the proof of their infallibility. 

He tells you that substance is not the proper and 
immediate object of sense, but color, quantity, &c. But is 
not the mediate object proper, as well as the immedi- 
ate ? Be it a proper or improper object, we may yet 
believe that reason by the help of sense doth judge as 
infallibly of substances as accidents. If you think 
otherwise, then all the forementioned consequences 


are undeniable. You know not whether tlic world 
saw Christ on earth : or wliethor he were crucified, 
dead, buried, rose, or ascended. It might be but 
color and quantity which men saw; and when Christ 
told them a spirit hath not flesh and blood as ye see 
me have, they might have answered, we see no flesh 
and blood, but color and quantity. Thomas had then 
small reason to be convinced by seeing and feeling, 
when he saw but color and quantity, and felt but quan- 
tity and quality. By this reasoning the world is not 
sure that ever there was a Pope of Rome, but the col- 
or of a Pope, or other accidents. You know not that 
there is any earth under your feet, or that you are a 
man, or have a body, because your senses perceive but 
the accidents of it. 

What manner of men did Tuberville imagine he 
had to deal with, when he puts off' his readers with 
such an answer as this ? Mark the unfaithful dealing 
of those men, and how grossly they abuse poor people 
that follow them with mere deceits. The question or 
objection which he undertook to answer was, wheth- 
er sense telling us that it is bread after the consecra- 
tion be deceived? To this he tikes on him to give 
an answer, and cunningly speaks to another question, 
and passeth this by. It is one question whether sense 
can infiiUibly discern Christ in the sacrament, if he 
were there, or discern that he is not there? and anoth- 
er question whether sense can infallibly discern bread 
and wine, and know whether they be there? The 
last was the question in hand : but he slyly answers to 
the first instead of it; and. tells us, that sense cannot 
judge of substance, though under sensible accidents, 
unless it be the subject of those accidents, and have a 
sensible and corporeal manner of being, which the body 
of Christ neither is nor hath in the sacrament. There- 
fore Christ may be in the sacrament and you not dis- 
cern him by sense. What is that to the question ? is 
it not the holy truth of God that you are about ? and 
should you thus abuse it, and the souls of men ? The 
question is, whether sense and the intellect thereby be 
infallible in judging bread to be bread when we see, feel 
and eat it ? Had you never a word to say to this ? to 



persuade men thai they have eyes and see not, feel not, 
or that the world knoweth not certainly what they 
seem to know by seeing and feeling? Ilereafrer deal 
by US as fairly as Bellarmin did, who quite gave away 
the Roman cause by granting and pleading that sense 
is infallible in positives : and therefore we may thence 
say, this is a body because I see it ; and so this is bread 
or wine because I see, feel and taste it, but not in nega- 
tives: and therefore we cannot say, this is not a body 
because I see it not. Give over talking of the Pope, 
or church, or religion, or men, if you are uncertain of 
substances which are the objects of your sense. 

But you say, sense and reason must here vail bon- 
net to faith. In the negative case let it be granted, 
and any case where faith can be faith. But if sense 
and the intellect therewith be fallible in positives, so 
that we cannot know bread when we see and eat it, 
faith cannot be faith then. What talk you of faith, if 
you credit not the soundest senses of all the men in the 
world, when sense and reason are presupposed to faith ? 
How know you that faith here contradicteth sense? 
You will say, because the church or Scripture saith : 
this is my body : and there is no bread ? But how know 
you that there is any such thing in Scripture? or that the 
church so holdeth ? You think you have read or 
heard it : but how know you that your sense deceived 
you not i' He that cannot know bread when he seeth 
and eateth it, is unlikely to know letters and their mean- 
ing when he seeth them. 

• The simplest reader that hath honesty and charity, 
is secured against Popery by the first argument, which 
he may make good to his own soul against all the 
Jesuits on earth. And he that is unable to proceed on 
that account, may by the evidence of this last argu- 
ment confute any Papist living, if he be a man of sense 
and reason : and having brought all our controversies 
so low, that sense itself may be the judge, it is in vain 
to use any reason with that man who will not believe 
his own eyesight, nor the sight, and feeling, and taste 
of all the world. 



Error in fuitk in ow point is a per/ ct confnlalion of all Poprry. 

I now proceed to the principal part of my task which 
is to open the deceits of the Jesuits; and to give direc- 
tions for the discovering- and confutation of them, that 
you may see the truth. 

If you prove them guilty hnt of any one error in 
points of belief determined by their church, you there- 
by disprove the ichole body of Popery. For you pull 
up the foundation which they build on, and the aiUhor- 
ity into which they resolve their faith. They will 
grant you, that if they are deceived by the church in 
one thing-, they have no certainty of any thing upon 
the church's credit. So that if you read PauVs dis- 
course against praying in an unknown tongue, or the 
many precepts for our reading and meditating in the 
law of God, or the like, and can but perceive that the 
Popish Latin service, or their forbidding men to read 
the Scriptures, &c. is contrary hereto, or if you find 
out but any one of their errors, you cannot be a Papist, 
if you understand their profession. 

Thougii we know that the Scripture and all that 
is in it is of infallible truth, and that every true Chris- 
tian, while such, is infallible in the essentials of Chris- 
tianity ; for else he were no Christian : yet we pro- 
fess that we know but in part, and that our own writings 
and confessions may possibly in somethings be beside 
the sense of Scripture; and there being much more 
propounded in Scripture to our faith, than what is 
of absolute necessity to salvation, we may possibly, af- 
ter our studying and praying, mistake in some things 
that are not of the essence, but the integrity of Christi- 
anity, and are necessary to the strength or comfort, 
though not to the being of a Christian. So that every 
error in their faith, destroys their grounds, and their 
new religion ; but so doth not every error of ours. 

Or to speak more distinctly ; let us distinguish be- 
tween their objective faith, and our subjective faith. 
Their objective faith hath errors in it, but ours hath 


none by their own confession : for theirs is all the de- 
crees of their Popes and councils: and ours is only 
the Holy Scripture : which they confess to be infallible. 
Our own writings do but show how we understand the 
Scriptures, and so whether our subjective faithhe right 
or not. We confess that it is not only possible but 
probable, that we are mistaken in some lower points, 
about the meaning of the Scriptures, and yet our foun- 
dation is still sure. But they have confounded their 
subjective and objective faith: and one believes it on 
that account, because others do believe it, and so one 
age or part do but seek for the object of their faith 
in the actual faith of the other. They conclude that 
every point which is of faith, that is determined by the 
church to be so, is of such necessity to salvation that 
no man can be saved that denieth it, or that doth not 
believe it, if sufficiently proposed. But we are assur- 
ed, that though all that is in Scripture be most true, 
yet through misunderstanding, some points there pro- 
posed to oar faith may possibly be denied and disputed 
against by a true believer ; and yet his salvation not 
be overthrown by it. The Papists cry out against us 
for distinguishing between the fundamentals or essen- 
tials of religion and the integrals : but we know it to 
be necessary. 


That doctrine ichich is conlranj lo Scripture is erroneous. 

When you have brought the matter thus fur, and see 
that if they have one error in faith, their whole cause 
is lost, then consider, whether it be possible for that 
doctrine vhich is so contrary to Scripture, and to it- 
self to be free from all error 1 1. How contrary it is to 
Scripture: to forbid the reading of Scripture in a 
known tongue : their public praying in an unknown 
language: their administering to the people by the 
halves, denying them the wine, and giving tliem the 
bread only: their affirming men to be perfect without 


«in in this life: their calling some sins venial which de- 
serve a pardon, and yet are truly no sins: their ab- 
solute forbidding their priests to marry, and saying 
that there is no bread and wine left after the consecra- 
tion. Dent. vi. 7, 8, 9. Deut. xi. 18, 19, 20. Isa. xxxiv. 
16. Psal. i. 2. Nehem. viii. Josh. viii. 34, 35. Matt.xu, 
35. xix. 4 xxi. 16. xxii. 31. Mark xW. \0/ZQ>. Ads \\\\. 
28. xiii. 27. xv. 21. 1 Thess.x 27. Co/, iv. 16. Deut. 
xxxi. 1 1. Epk. iii. 4. Matt. xxiv. 15. Rev. i. 3. 2 Tim. 
iii. 16. John \, 39. Jlcis xvii. 2, 11. xviii. 28. Rom. 
XV. 4. 2 Ti?7i. iii. 15. /s^. viii. 16, 20. xl. 4. Rom. vii. I. 
James i. 25. Hos. viii. 12. 

1 Cor. xiv. 31^//. xxvi. 27, 28. I Cor. xi. 25, 26, 
27, 28. 1 Cor. x. 16. Eccl. vii. 20. Ja7}ies iii. 2. 1 
JoAw i. 8. PA«7. iii. 12. LwA-e xi. 4. Dez^^. xii. 32. 
Gal iii. 10. 1 JoA/i iii. 4. I .Tm. iii. 2, 4, 5, 11, 12. 
Ti^ i. 6. 1 Ti?n. iv. 3. 1 Cor. ix. 5. I Cor. x. 16. 1 
Cor. xi. 23, 26, 27, 28. Ads ii. 42. Ads xx. 7, 11. 

2. They are contrary to themselves. Not only sev- 
eral persons, but several countries go several ways; the 
Trench are of one way, and the Italians of another, 
even in the fundamentals of their faith, into which 
all the rest is resolved. Their Popes have ordinarily 
been contrary to one another in their decrees ; which 
made PLatina say, following Popes do still either in- 
fringe or wholhj abrogate the decrees of the former 
Popes. Erasmus saith, that Pope John XXII. and 
Pope Nicholas are contrary one to another in their 
ichcle decrees., and in things that belong to matters of 
faith Had we no instances but of Sergiiis and For- 
mosus and their following partakers, it were enough. 
And Celestinc' s case puts Bellarmin to silly shifts. 
Their councils contradict each other. They confess 
that the Arians have had as many councils as general 
as ever the orthodox had: and if it be only the want 
of the Pope's approbation that nulliheth their authority, 
then let them tell us no more of councils and of all 
the church, but say plainly that it is but one man that 
they mean. 

But even their approved councils have been con- 
trary : The sixth council at Constantinople approved 
by Pope Adrian, is now confessed to have many er- 


78 JEStJiT 

rors. The council of Neocaesarea, confirmed by Pope 
Leo IV. and by the Nicene council, as saith the coun- 
cil of Florence ses. 7. condemned second marriages, 
contrary to Scripture. The council at Lateran under 
Leo. X. determines that the Pope is above a general 
council ; and the councils of Constance and Basil de- 
termine that the general council is above the Pope, 
and that it is heresy to deny it. 


Principles and Proof. 

If you enter into dispute tvith any Papist, inquire 
first what he will take for sufficient proof, aiid what 
common principles you aie agreed on by which the 
rest must be decided. Men that agree in nothing Q.i all, 
are not capable of a dispute. For the principles in 
which they are agreed, are those that the rest must 
be reduced to. And when you have made this in- 
quiry, you shall find that the Popish way of dispu- 
ting is to forbid you to dispute, unless you will first 
yield the cause to them as beyond dispute; and that 
they are not agreed with ihe rest of the world in any 
common principles to which the differences may be 
reduced for trial; and so there is no sort of proof 
that they will admit of as sufficient. If there be any 
ground of proof at all, it must be ; from the senses': 
or from reason: or from Scripture: or from the 
church; but they will stand to none of those. 

Begin at the bottom of all, and know of them wheth- 
er they will take that for a valid proof, which is fetch- 
ed from sense, even from the sound senses of all men 
in the world, supposing a convenient object and me- 
dium ? If they will not take this for proof, how can 
you dispute with them ? Or what proof can be ad- 
mitted, if this be not admitted? We havo this advan- 
tage in dealing, even with those heathen that have blotted 
out much of the law of nature itself, that yet they will 
yield to an argument from sense. 


But if they would yield to the validity of this proof: 
then they give away their cause, seeing sense telleth ua 
that it is bread which we see, feel, and eat after the 
consecration. They know this; and therefore they 
disown and deny that proof, 

But will they then admit of proofs from reason 1 
No, that cannot be, if proof from sense be not admit- 
ted. For reason receiveth its object by means or oc- 
casion of the senses, and must needs be deceived if 
they are deceived. Reason hath not a principle that it 
holds faster, than that sense is to bo credited ; that 
this is white or black which my own eyes and the 
eyes of all other men do see to be so: and so that 
this is bread which we all see, and feel, and taste to 
be so. Therefore Papists tell us that reason must 
stoop to f:iith ; that is, they will not stand to reason 
when it contradicteth the doctrine of their sect. It 
seems they are in some parts of their religion unrea- 
sonable. But I would know, wliether tliey have any 
reason to be unreasonable. If they have, then why 
might not our reason be valid as well as their reason 
which they bring against reason? by which they con- 
tradict themselves. For if reason be vain, why rea- 
son they to prove its vanity or invalidity.'' But if 
they have no reason against reason, let them confess 
it, and offer us none, and then their disputes will do no 
harm. AV^e easily yield, that we have reason to be- 
lieve God's revelation, about those things whi<'h we 
had no reason to believe if they were not revealed: 
and that many of those revelations are above reason, 
so far as that reason cannot discern the truth of the 
thing without them : yea, it would rather judge the 
tilings improbable. But yet revelations are received by 
reason, and inform reason, and not destroy it ; nor do 
they so contradict sense or reason, as to make that cred- 
ible which sense and reason have sufficient ground to 
judge false. 

So that here we must break with a Papist, even where 
we might join in dispute with a heathen. And how 
will Papists deal with heathens if they will deny the 
proofs from sense and reason .'' 

But will they stand to the validity of proofs from 

so JEBtJlT 

Scripture ? No : for they take it to be but part of God's 
word, so that \vc may not argue negatively, it is not in 
the Holy Scripture : therefore it is not an article of faith 
or a law of God. For they will presently appeal to 
tradition, &•:, And even so much as is in Scripture, 
though they confess it to be true, yet they confess it not 
to be by us intelligible, and will not admit of any proof 
from it but with this limitation, that you take it in that 
sense as the church take it. For they are sworn by the 
Trent oath, to take it in that sense as the holy mother 
church doth hold and hath held it in, and never to take 
or interpret it, but according to the unanimous sense of 
the fathers. So that they must know what sense all the 
fathers are unanimous in before they can admit a proof 
from Scripture. And before that can be done, a load of 
books must be read over or searched: and when that is 
done, they will find that most texts were never meddled 
with by most of those fathers in their writings : and in 
those that they did meddle with they disagreed in mul- 
titudes, and where they agree they are not unanimous: 
and thus the Papists are sworn to believe no sense at 
all. If they would have come down to a major vote, it 
is no short or easy matter to gather the votes. If they 
know the fathers' unanimous consent, yet must they 
have the sense of the present church too : but is it not 
all one to make your adversary the judge of your cause, 
as the judge of your evidences and all your proofs .'' 

Will they stand to the judgment of the catholic 
church? No; for when they deny proof from sense 
and reason, they must needs deny all that is brought 
from the church : for the church cannot judge itself 
but on supposition of the infallibility of sense. When 
you argue from the judgment and practice of the great- 
er part of the church, they presently disclaim them all as 
heretics or schismatics, and will have no man to be a 
valid witness but themselves. The Greeks, the Ethio- 
pians, the Armenians, the Protestants, all are heretics 
or schismatics save they ; and therefore may not be 
witnesses in the case. So that you see that Papists will 
admit of no proofs from sense or reason, or the suffi- 
ciency of Scripture, or the testimony of the catholic 
church, but only from themselves. 



Judge of Controversies. 

Understand what the Papists mean ivhcn they call 
ripon you for a judge oj controversies. 

If you dispute with them, they ask you, icho shall be 
the judge? and \ ersuado you tirit it is in vain to dis- 
pute witliout a living judge : for every man will be the 
judge himself; and every man's cause be right in his 
own eyes, and all the world will be still at odds till we 
are agreed who shall be the judge. 

1. You may easily observe that this is the plain drift 
of all, to persuade you to make them your judges, and 
yield the cause instead of disputing it. For it is no oth- 
er judge but themselves that they will admit. Yield 
first that the Pope or his council is the judge of all con- 
troversies, then it is folly to dispute against them : so 
that if you will yield them the cause first, they will 
then dispute with you after. 

The necessity of a judge is a pretence : for it is against 
all reason and experience to think that all inquiries or dis- 
putes are vain, unless there be a judge to decide the 
case. A judge is a ruling decider ; not to satisfy men's 
minds, so much as to preserve order, and peace, and 
justice in society. But there are thousands of cases 
to be privately discussed, that we never need to bring to 
a judge. Every husbandman, or tradesman, or naviga- 
tor, or other artificer meets with doubts and difficulties in 
his way which he laboreth to discern, and satisfieth 
himself with a judgment of discretion without a ruling 
judge. We eat and drink, and clotlie ourselves, and fol- 
low our daily labors without a judge, though we meet 
with controversies in almost all. Men marry, and build, 
and buy, and sell, and take physic, and dispatch their 
greatest worldly business without a judge. Judges are 
only for such controverted cases as cannot well be decided 
without them, to the attaining of the ends of govern- 

2. Is it not against the daily practice of the Papists 
to think or say that all disputes and controversies must 


have a judge ? Who is the judge between the nominals, 
reals, and formalists, the Dominicans, Franciscans and 
Jesuits, in all those controversies which have cartloads 
of books written on them ? Their Popes or councils 
dare not judge between them. Do they not daily dis- 
pute in their schools among themselves without a judge? 
and still write books against one another without a judge? 
3. Understand well the use and differences of judg- 
ment. The sentence is but a means to the execution : 
and judges cannot determine the mind and will of man : 
but preserve outward order, if men will not see the truth 
themselves. The Jesuits that are so eager for free will, 
should easily grant that the Pope by his definition can- 
not determine the will of man. They see that heretics 
remain heretics, when the Pope hath said all that he can : 
and if he can cure them all by his determinations, he is 
much to blame that lie doeth not. If a man's mind can 
be settled, an infallible teacher is fitter than a judge. 
Judgment then being for execution, w^hen you ask, who 
shall be the judge ? I answer, judgment is either total, 
absolute and final: or it is only to a certain particular 
end, limited and subordinate, from which there is an ap- 
peal. In the former case, there is no judge but Christ, 
and the Father by him. No absolute decision can be 
made till the great judgment come ; and then all will 
be fully and finally decided. And for the limited pres- 
ent judgments of men, they are of several sorts accord- 
ing to their several ends. When the question is, who 
shall be corporally punished as a heretic ? the magistrate 
is judge : for coercive punishment being his work, the 
judgment must be his also. But when the question is, 
who shall be excommunicated as a heretic ? as God's 
law hath told us who, so is the rule of decision about in- 
dividuals. To try individual persons, and cases accor- 
ding to this law, belongs to the governors of the church : 
but not to the governors of other churches a thousand 
miles off, that never received such an authority, and are 
not capable of the work : but to the governors of the 
church in which the party hath communion, and into 
which he shall at any time intrude and seek communion. 
All men have a judgment of discerning that are concern- 
ed in the execution. 


So thai if ti disputing Papist will sfiy tliat iiis business 
is not to dispute with you, but to cxconiniunicato, or 
hang, or burn you for a heretic, then 1 confess there 
is all the reason in the world that you should first 
agree upon the judge. But why the Po])c should be the 
judge, 1 know not. 


End of contrctversy. 

Papists tell you, that in their icay there is an end of 
co}itroversics, but in yours there is none : for if you ivill 
not stand to One^s judgment as infallible^ you may dis- 
pute as long as you live before you come to an end. 

In discussing this part of the deceit : — 1. We confess 
that on earth there will be no end of all controversies among 
the best : nor of the great controversies which salvation 
lieth on, between the believers and unbelievers : that is, 
there will be still infidelity and heresy in the world, and 
error in the godly themselves. IJath it not been so in 
every age till now \ And wh}'^ should we expect that 
it should now be otherwise ? Doth not Paul tell us that 
here we know but in part, and prophesy in part 1 and 
that which is imperfect will not be done away, until that 
which is perfect is come "? While we know but in part, 
we shall ditVer in part. 

2. Hath your way put an end to controversies any- 
more than ours 1 Are you not yet at controversy with 
infidels, whether Christ be the Redeemer, and with here- 
tics whether he be true eternal (Jod ] Are you not yet 
as full of controversies among yourselves, as any Chris- 
tians on the face of the earth 1 In the many volumes of 
your schoolmen, casuists, and commentators, I can shew 
more controversies yet depending, than you can find 
among all Christians in the world together. 

3. Is there any thing in your way that better tondeth 
to the deciding of controversies than in ours ? Con- 
trarily, you have made more controversies than you have 
ended. We have a certain infallible rule to decide 


our controversies by, such as you confess yourselves 
to be infallible; even the Holy Scriptures. But you 
have an uncertain rule, even the decrees of your Popes 
and councils, and the many volumes of the fathers, 
which are at odds among thcniseh es ; your very rule is 
self-contradictino-, and your judges are together by the 
ears. Our Faith consistcth in those points which are 
granted by yourselves, and so are beyond controversy 
between us and you. But yours lieth in a mixture of 
men's corruptions, which will ever be controverted and 
condemned. Our Faith consistcth in the few ancient 
articles by which the church was always known as to 
its essentials. But you confound the essentials with the 
integrals : and the number of your necessary articles is 
so great, as must need be matter of more controvers}' 
than ours. 

4. We know our religion, and where to find it. It 
was perfect at the first, and receiveth no additions or 
diminutions. One generation cometh, and another goeth, 
but the word of the Lord endureth forever. But you 
never know when you have all, because you know not 
when your Pope will have done defining. That is an 
article of faith to you one year that was none the year 
before, nor ever before. 

5. We need no judge to decide any controversies 
among us in the points of absolute necessity to salvation: 
both because the Scripture is so plain in those points, as 
to serve for decision without a judge ; and because we 
abhor to make a controversy of an}' of them ; and where 
there is no controversy there needs no judge. We are 
all agreed, through the plainness of the Scripture, that 
there is but one, eternal, most wise, and good, and om- 
nipotent God : and that there is one Mediator between 
God and man, wbo is himself both God and man, that 
was crucified, dead, buried, went to liadcs, rose again, 
ascended, intercedeth for us, and is king and head of 
the church : and will raise tlic dead, and judge the 
world, some to heaven, and some to hell. These and 
all the rest of the essentials of our fahh, and many more 
points that are not essentials, are so plain in Scripture, 
that we are past making them a matter of controversy. 
If any man deny an essential point of faith, he is none 


of US. But you are so deep iii infidelity, tlint you must 
have a judj^e to decide your controversies in the neces- 
sary articles of faitli. For wliatever is of faitli you 
make to he of sucli equal necessity, that you deride 
our distinguishing^ the fundamentals from the rest. Do 
you think Ciuistians need a judge, or must put it to a 
judge to decide, ivhethcr Christ be the 3Icssias or not? 
whether he died and rose again or not 1 whether he will 
judge the world or not ? W he he a judge, he must 
have power to oblige you to stand to his determination 
on which side soever he determine. And if John 

XXII. determine that the soul is not immortal, or John 

XXIII. that there is no resurrection or life to come, but 
a man dicth like a beast : would you stand to that de- 

G. If you say that your judge hath power to oblige 
you only on one side, that is, when he judgeth right, and 
so make no judge of him, but a teacher, we have such 
judges as well as you, even teachers to show us the evi- 
dence of truth. 

7. If you say that you have a judge to determine of 
iieresy in order to excommunication, so have we; even 
the pastors of the churches, who are bound to unite and 
assist each other in such works. What is to be account- 
ed heresy, the law of God sufficiently determineth : and 
what particular persons are to be judged heretics and 
excommunicated according to that law, the particular 
pastors that are on the place can better decide, than a 

, Pope that is a thousand, or five thousand miles off, and 
cannot hear the witnesses. And do you not yourselves 
decide almost all such cases of your subjection, by the 
present priests and prelates, and not by the Pope ? And 
why may not we do so then as well as you ? 

8. But you lay all upon your Pope's and council's in- 
fallibility. Believe that infalibility if you can. I should 
think myself a miserable man, if I were not myself more 
infallible than your Popes have been. Every Christian, 
while such, is infallible in his belief of the Christian 
faith ; and the Scripture is an infallible ground of our be- 

9. Is it not a plain judgment of God upon you, that 
while you make the Scripture so dark and not intelligi- 

86 jEsuif 

ble, and cry up the necessity of a living judge; you 
should not only swarm with difl'erences among yourselves, 
but should be utterly disagreed, and at a loss to know 
who is that judge of controversies ; one saying it is the 
Pope, and another that it is the council : and what the 
better are you for saying, there must be a judge, as long 
as you cannot tell who it must be 1 It is not only un- 
certain among you, whether Pope or council be the in- 
fallible judge, but also which is a true Pope, and which 
is a lawful general council? For forty years at least to- 
gether the church could not know the true Pope, but 
the more learned and upright men were divided : nor is it 
known to this day. Frequently the strongest carried it, 
and success was his best title. General councils them- 
selves knew not the right Pope. The council at Con- 
stance and Basil knew not tlie right Pope. They at 
Basil thought Felix Y. the true Pope, and Eugenius no 
Pope : but friends and strength confuted a general 
council, and proved that Eugenius was the Pope. Who 
knows which council to take for authority? What cata- 
logues have you of reprobated councils, and of doubtful 
councils, and partly approved, partly reprobate, and 
who knows wliich and how far ; but only that is approv- 
ed, that plcaseth the Pope, and tlmt reprobate that dis- 
])leascth him, and yet perhaps approved by a former 
Pope. So that you are all confusion and uncertainty 
about your true Popes and general councils. 

What a loss are you at to know their decrees and ca- 
nons? What a fardel of false decretal epistles have you 
thrust upon the world ; decretals that use a translation 
of the Scripture that was formed a long time after the 
death of tlie supposed authors of those epistles. Decre- 
tals which make mention of persons and things that 
were many score hundred years after the death of the 
feigned authors. Those are your new Scriptures, and by 
those our faith must be regulated, and our controver- 
sies decided. 

Your canons are uncertain. Some have but twenty 
canons of the first general council at Nice : and others 
have the new found rabble of additions. Much more 
uncertainty or certain forgery there is in the canons 
called the apostles. 


1 appeal to all tlic impartial reason in the world, wheth- 
er your voluniinousi, apocryphal uncertain faitii that 
needs a living judjie, and cannot find one, or agree upon 
him, tliat leaves your controversies still undecided, be u 
liker way to peace and unity, than our short and plain 
articles and infallible Scripture faith, that hath less mat- 
ter of contention, and better means to prevent it, even 
faithful teachers and judges in every church and com- 
monwealth, which shall so far determine as may preserve 
tiie peace of those societies, leaving the final full decis- 
ion of all to the eternal judge that is even at the door. 

10. Is not God's hand of judgment yet more obser- 
vable against you, that when your Popes and councils 
have passed their ju Igment, the several sects are unable 
to understand them] Witness the sentence against the 
Jansenisls, of which the persons that seem to be condemn- 
ed, say, that there is no such thing or words in all Jan- 
senius' writings, as the Pope saith are in him, and con- 
■demneth as his : and the controversy is as far from a de- 
cision, as if the Pope had held his peace. Your great 
disputer White, is the same, for all the Pope's determi- 

Take another instance, whether the Pope or council 
be supreme ] The councils of Constance and Basil de- 
termined it one way as of faith, and yet that made no 
end of the controversy. The council of Lateran and 
Pope Leo X. determined it the other way ; and yet it 
is a controversy after two contrary decisions : and som« 
say one way, some the other: and others say, it is yet 
undecided, for fear of angering the French by casting 
them ofi' as heretics. The council at Basil, scss. 36., fully 
determined the controversy between the Franciscans and 
Dominicans about the Virgin Mary's immaculate concep- 
tion: and yet it is undetermined still ; and White afiirms, 
that certainly there is no tradition for it, nor any proba- 
bility that ever the negative will be defined. Apolog, 
for tradit. p. 64, 65, G(^. He carricth it as boldly out, as 
if no council had made or meddled with it. The words 
of the council are these: "A hard question hath been 
in divers parts, and before this holy synod, about the 
conception of the glorious Virgin Mary, and the begin- 
ning of her sanctification ; some saying that the Virgin 


and her soul were for some time or instant of time actu- 
ally under original sin : others on the contrary, saying, 
that from tlie heginning of her creation, God loving 
her, gave her grace by which preserving and freeing 
that blessed person from the original spot, ifcc. We, 
having diligently looked into the authorities and reasons, 
which for many years past have in public relation on 
both sides been alleged before this holy synod, and 
having seen many other things about it, and weighed 
■them by mature consideration, do define and declare, 
that the doctrine affirming that the glorious Virgin 
Mary, the mother of God, by the singular preventing and 
operating grace of God, was never actually under origi- 
nal sin, but was ev^er free from all original and actual 
sin, and was holy and immaculate, is to be approved, held 
and embraced of all catholics as godly and consonant to 
church worship, catholic faith, right reason, and sacred 
Scripture: and that henceforth it shall be lawful for no 
man to preach and teach the contrary." Is not this 
plain defining'? 

But it is said, that was not an approved council. It was 
owned by Pope Eugcnius himself. The council of 
Basil was approved by the Pope : for Pope Felix V. 
ane of the best Popes that ever Rome had for a thous- 
and years past, approved it in this point : not only bv 
accepting their election, but in express terms "professing 
firmly to hold the faith of the councils of Constance and 
Basil, and to keep it inviolate to a tittle, and confirm it 
with his soul and blood : promising faithfully to labor to 
defend the catholic faith, and for the execution and ob- 
servation of the decrees of the councils of Constance 
and Basil, swearing to prosecute the celebration of gen-» 
eral councils, und confirmation of elections, according to 
the decrees of the holy council of Basil," sess. 40. " If 
they say that Felix was not a true Pope : then Martin 
y, chosen by the council at Constance was no true Pope ; 
and then where is your succession ? These things are 
plain and cannot be denied, though unconscionable 
shifters, that argue according to their wills, may find 
words to beguile the simple. 

Hence your catholic church representative is nothing 
if one man like it not. 


How largely hath the council of Trent dealt about 
original sin: and yet the foresaid White saith, that "If 
the people were taught that original sin is nothing but a dis- 
position to evil, or a natural weakness, which unlcs?; 
prevented brings infallibly sin and damnation : and that 
in itself it deserves neither reproach nor punishment, aa 
long as it proceeds not to actual sin, the heat of vulgar 
devotion would bo cooled, <fcc." which is a mere Pelagian 
issue of all the determinations about original sin, which 
thev swear to believe. 


Papal Unity. 

You may thus see what to think of theii' glorying in 
their uniti/, and accusing our divisions. One of the 
principal arguments that they prevail by, is by tel- 
ling the people into how^ many sects we are divided. 
That the catholic church is but one ; but we are many. 
And they will tell you of all the names they can reckon 
up ; and that all the division comes by departing from 
the Roman Church ; every man being left to be of what 
religion his fancy leadeth him to, for want of an univer- 
sal judge of controversies. They ask you what reason 
you have among all those sects to believe one of them 
rather than another l So they would persuade you that 
there is no way for unity but by turning Papists, that 
we may be united in the Pope of Rome. 

1. To all that dvoceit, wc give them a full answer. It is 
not every kind of unity that is desirable : but unit}' with 
truth, and honesty, and safety. It is easier to agree in 
evil than in good : for evil findeth more friendship with 
corrupted nature, and hath more servants in the world. 
The wicked are more airreed, and f\ir more in number, of 
one mind, than the godly are. The Mohammedans are 
far more agreed ; and in a far greater number, than 
the Papists are. Tiie devils have some agreement in 
their way. They are all agreed to hate Christ and his 
members, and to s^ek night and day whom they may 


90 SESVit 

devour. It is easier to agree in a Papist's work than in 
ours. To center carnally in a sinful, and a most wicked 
man. To agree in certain forms and ceremonies, which 
flesh and hlood are glad to delude themselves with, instead 
of the life of f^iith and love. It is easy to agree in such 
a carnal religion. To spare the lahor and time of study 
and searching after truth, and to cast their souls upon 
the faith of others, even the Pope or a council ; that is 
an easy thing for lazy ungodly men to agree in. But to 
make the truth our own, and get the law of Christ 
written in our own hearts, and to live upon it, and walk 
in the light, and emhrace all those truths that are most 
against our fleshy inclination and interest, is not so easy 
for corrupted nature to ageee upon. 

2. Christ has told us that it is a little flock to whom he 
gives the kingdom, Luke 12. 32., and that the gate i& 
strait, and way narrow that leads to life, and few there 
be that find it; and the gate is wide and the way broad 
that leads to destruction, and many there be that enter 
at it. And therefore it is no great wonder if en or and 
sin have tiie greater number. 

3. There is a far more excellent unity and concord 
among the true reformed catholics, than among the Pa- 
pists, who do but cheat poor souls with the false pretence 
of unity. 

They are utterly divided and disagreed about thai 
very power in which they should unite, and which they 
pretend must harmonize them in all other things. One 
half of them are for the sovereignty of a Pope, and 
the other of a general council: and that as a point of 
faith. So that tliere is no possibility of union with them, 
who arc divided in the very point in which they invite 
us to unite with them. If the eye be dark how shall 
the body see ? If they cannot agree about that power 
that they say must unite them in all things else, what 
hope is there of an agreement witli tiiem ? 

But for our parts we are all agreed that Christ onl\ 
is the head of the church, and in him wc all unite. 

With us, they are but some few half-witted self-con- 
ceited novices that fall ofl' and disagree from us in any 
thing that destroyeth salvation. But with the Papists, 
princes arc against princes, and nations against nations, 


anJ much more, general councils against general coun" 
cils, even in tiie foundation of their faitii. 80 tliat let 
the general councils he never so full and learned, and 
justly called, yet if they be against the Pope's sover- 
eiijuty over them, the other party call them hut false 
councils and conventicles. Of how greilt moment this 
diflerence is, let Cajetan he a witness, who in his ora- 
tion in the council at the Lateran, under Leo. X< in- 
veighing against the councils at Pisa, Constance and Ba- 
sil, makes one to be Babel, and the other Jerusalem. 

Papists are divided into two several pretended church- 
es, hy nuikiug themselves two sovereigns : but so are not 
we: for we have but one head Jesus Christ. That they 
are two churches, hear the words of Cajetan, Bin. p. 552. 
" This novelty of Pisa sprung up at Constance, and 
vanished. At Basil it sprung up again and exploded. 
If you he men, it will also be repressed as it was under 
Eugenius IV'. For it cometh not from heaven and there- 
fore will not be lasting. Nor doth it embrace the prin- 
cipality of that one, who is in the church trumphant, and 
j)reserveth the church militant ; and which the Synod of 
Pisa ought to embrace if it came from heaven, and not 
as it doth, to rely on the government of a multitude. 
The church of the Pisans therefore doth far differ from 
this church of Christ. For one is the church of believ- 
ers ; the otlier of cavillers. One of the household of 
God ; the other of the erroneous. One is the church 
of Christian men : the otlier of such as fear not to tear 
the coat of Christ, and divide the mystical members of 
Christ from his mystical bod^^ " This was spoken in 
that council with applause. Can there bo greater divi- 
sions than those 1 

4. They have been utterly divided about the very 
power of choosing their Pope, in whom they must unite. 
In one age the people chose him. In another the 
clergy chose him. Sometimes both together. For a 
long time the emperors chose him. At last, only the 
cardinals chose him. Sometimes a general council hath 
chosen him. Our catholic church hath no such uncer- 
tain head, but one who is the same yesterday, to day, 
and forever. 

5. They have often had two or three Popes at once, 


and one part of the church followed one, and another 
the other. For forty years together, none knew the 
true Pope. Cajetan saith ; "Of the schism of that time 
there were three so accounted Popes, tliat none of them 
miglit bo esteemed the successor of Peter, either certain, 
or without ambiguity." For many ages one part ran after 
one, and the other after the other, or strove about them. 
But we are all agreed in our head without controversy. 

6. They killed multitudes of persons in their divisions 
about the choice of their Pope, as in the choice of Da- 
masus. They had many bloody wars to tlie dividing of 
the church about their Popes, and between Pope and 
Popo. That was their unity. It would make a Chris- 
tian ashamed and grieved to read of the lamentable wars 
and divisions of Christendom ; between and about their 

7. Popes and christian emperors, kings and princes, 
have been in lonfr and sfrievous wars. 

8. They have set princes against princes, and nations 
against nations, in wars about the causes of the Popes 
for many ages together. 

9. They have set kings and tlieir own subjects to- 
gether in wars, as all Christendom have known by sad 

10. They have excommunicated princes, and encour- 
aged their subjects to expel them, and to murder them: 
hence were the inhuman murders of Henry III. and 
Henry IV. kings of France ; and the powder plot, and 
many treasons in England. That is their unity. 

11. They center and unite the Church in an impotent, 
insufficient head, that is not able to do the office of a 
head, and therefore cannot possibly preserve unity. But 
our head is all sufficient. 

12. They set up not only a controverted head, which 
all the churches never agreed to, nor ever will do, but 
also a false usurping head, in whom the churches dare 
not and ought not to unite. Whereas Jesus Christ is 
beyond controversy the just and lawful head of the 

13. Your agreement and unity are with none but your 
own sect: and is this so great a matter to boast of? You 
divide yourselves from the catholic church, and cast 


tlicMu oft' as heretics, or scliisniritics ; and llioii boast of a 
unity anioni; yourselves. If you nia<^nity your unity 
from tiie <2^reatness of your number tiiat aLn'CM,', tlic (jJreek 
church also is lunnerous : and yet in this we far exceed 
you. For tiie true catiiolic is in union witii all tlic mem- 
bers of Christ on eartli. We lay our unity on the es- 
sentials of ciu-istianity, and so are united witii all true 
Cinistians in the world ; even with many of them that 
reproach us : when you laying your unity on many doubt- 
ful points, wliich you know not what yourselves, can 
extend it no farther than to your sect. Which is the 
more notable and glorious unity 1 to be united to the tru- 
ly catholic body, containinff all true Christians in the 
world, or to be at unity with a sect, which is the lesser 
and more corrupted part of the church? 

14. With what face can Papists dory in their unity, 
that are the greatest dividers of the church on earth? 
Who is it that condemneth the greatest part of the church, 
and prosecuteth that condemnation with fire and sword, 
or so much vehemence, as the Papists do ? when they 
have most audacious!}^ divided themselves from all oth- 
ers, and arrogated the title of catholics to themselves, 
they call this abominable schism by the name of unity. 
If you say that the reformers have divided themselves 
from others : I answer, not as from heretics, or no mem- 
bers of the same body with us, as you do : but only 
from unsound brethren : and therefore properly we are 
not divided from th'^m, but only from th'ir mistakes. 
We think it not lawful to join with the dearest brethren 
in sinning, or in that worship, by personal local com- 
munion, where we cannot keep our innocency. But we 
hold the the unity of the spirit with them in the bond of 
peace : and are one with them in all the substance of 
Christianity, and holy worship. Even where distance of 
place, or circumstantial dilferences keep us from com- 
munion in the same asseml)lies ; yet our several assem- 
blies have communion in faith, and love, and the sub- 
stance of worship as to the kind : so that our division 
from other Christians is nothing to the Papists. 

15. But when any difier from us in any point essen- 
tial to Christianity, they are none of us, nor owned by us ; 
^nd therefore you cannot say that we are at difterenc^ 


among ourselves, because some apostates have fallen off 
from us. You will not allow us to say, you have many 
sects, because some of you have turned socinians, or be- 
cause thousands of yours have turned to the reformers, in 
the days of Luther, Calvin, 6cc. And why then should 
those sects be numbered with those that are not of us, 
but went out from us ? If men turn infidels, ifcc, they 
are not of us no more than of you. If you say that we 
bred them : I answer no more than you breed them, 
when they turn to the same sects from you : and no 
more than you bred the Lutherans. The}^ went out 
from you and yet you bred them not : but on the other 
side, you cherish those as part of your church, who 
differ from you in your fundamentals ; so that the Pope 
dare not unchurch or disown them. 

16. Our unity is in positives, and theirs is in nega- 
tives. Ours is a unity in faitii, and theirs is in not be- 
lieving the contrary. Dead men have a fuller unity in 
the grave than Papists have. White's "Way to the true 
chuixh." Sect. 53. 

17. Our union is divine, having a divine head and 
centre, and divine doctrine and law in which we agree. 
But the Papists' is human, having a carnal head and cen- 
tre, and human decrees and canons for its matter and rule. 

18. They have not so sure a means of retaining men 
in their unity as wo have: for where one hath forsaken 
our unity and communion, hundreds if not thousands, 
have forsaken theirs ; as France, Belgium, Germany, 
Sweden, Denmark, Poland, Hungary, Transylvania, 
England, Scotland, Ireland, «Slc. can witness : and if 
themselves might be believed, the Greek church, and all, 
or almost all the Christians else in the world have gone 
from their unity. Yet will thjsy glory in the effectual- 
ness of their means of unity ? VVhy then did they not 
retain all those nations in their unity ? 

19. They have very little religious unity at all among 
them ; for force and terror keep men in their church. 
Who can tell under such violence how many stick to 
them in conscience and willingly ? He that will forsake 
their religion in Spain is tormented and burnt at a stake, 
and in other countries where they have full power, he 
niust be at least undone. So that theirs is a unity of 

ju6gli^g. 05 

bodies more than of minds: and tiieir union is jiot pro- 
cured by the Pope as Pope; but by tlio temporal sword, 
which the Pope iiatli usurped over some countries, and 
wiiich dehided princes use by his persuasion in other 
countries. Wiiat a jugiillng deceit tlien is this, to [)er- 
suade poor souls, that the only way to unity is to cen- 
tre in the Pope of Rome, as the most eflectual means of 
ending difl'eronces ! when in the mean time they make 
so little use of it, and place so little confidence in it 
themselves, but uphold their unity by tiie magistrate'' s 
sword? Besides that force, it is tiie riches and j)refer- 
ment of their clergy, with their imnuinity from secular 
])Ower, and the like, that is the means of their unity. 
But it is the light of Holy Scripture opened by a faithful 
ministry, and countenanced by Christian magistracy 
without tyranny, tiiat is our means of unit}'. 

If the Papal headship be so effectual a means of unity 
as they pretend, and if they are so much of a mind as 
they say, let them give us leave to preach tux-lve months 
in Spain and Italy if they dare : or let them give men 
leave without fire or sword to choose their religion. 

20. After all their tyranny, they have more difference 
among themselves than we have, or than all the Chris- 
tians in the world. To hide the infamy of ilieir differ- 
ences, they tolerate them, and extenuate them. For 
differences in discij)line, and order of worship, they al- 
low abundance of sects called orders, that men and wo- 
men may chose which they please. The voluminous 
differences of their schoolmen, casuists and commenta- 
tors, they say are not in matters of faith. But call 
them what you will, they are greater differences than 
are with us. Read "The Mystery of Jesuitism," and take 
notice of the differences between the Jesuits and the 

Filiutius the Jesuit holds, that "if a man have purpose- 
ly wearied himself with satisfying a prostitute, he may 
be dispensed with from fasting on a fasting day, and he 
is not obliged to fast." The Jansenians think otherwise. 

The Jesuits Basilius, Pontius, and Bauny teach, that "a 
man may seek an opportunity of wilfully sinning, when 
the spiritual or temporal concernment of ourselves or our 
neighbors inclineth him thereto." The Jansenists think 
the contrary. 

96 iEstiT 

Kman. Sa the Jesuit liolds, that "a man may do what 
lie conceives lawful according to a probable opinion, 
though the contrary be the more certain : and for this 
the opinion of one doctor is sufficient." Filiutius the 
Jesuit held, "that it is lawful to follow the least 
probable opinion, though it be less certain; and that 
this is the common opinion of modern authors." The 
Jansenists are against it. 

Layman the Jesuit holds, that "if it be more favora- 
ble to them that ask advice of him, and more desired, 
it is prudence to give them such advice as is held pro- 
bable by 8ome knowing person, though he himself be 
convinced that it is absolutely false," The Jansenists 
are against this. 

Bauny the Jesuit holds, "that when the penitent fol- 
lows a probable opinion, the confessor is bound to ab- 
solve him, though his judgment be contrary to that of 
the penitent : and that he sins mortally if he deny him 
absolution." The Jansenists deny this. 

Reginald and Cellot hold, that "the modern casuists 
in questions of morality are to be preferred hefore the 
ancient fathers, though they were nearer the apostles' 
times," The Jansenists think otherwise. 

Pope Gregory XIV. declared that murderers are un- 
worthy to have sanctuary in churches. But the Jesuits 
and Jansenists agree not wlio are the murderers. The 29 
Jesuits in their Praxis p. GOO. by murderers understand, 
"those who have taken money to kill one treacherously: 
and that those who kill without receiving any reward, 
but do it only to oblige their friends, are not called mur- 
derers." The Jansenists think otherwise. No marvel 
if you cannot understand the Scripture without a judge, 
when you cannot understand your judge, what he means 
by a murderer. Crashaw's "Religion of Rome as bad 
as ever." 

Vasquez the Jesuit saith, "that in this question, rich 
men are obliged to give alms out of their superfluity ; 
though the atTumative he true, yet it will seldom or nev- 
er happen, that it is obligatory in point of practice." The 
Jansenists think otherwise. 

Valentia the Jesuit, and Tanner hold, that "if a man 
give money not as the price of a benefice, but as a motive 

JUOGLiNa. 97 

to resign it, it is not simony, thougli he that resigns do 
look at the money as his principal end." Tlio Jan- 
scnists think otherwise. 

Caspar Ilurtado saith, "that an incumbent may with- 
out mortal sin wish the death of him that hath a jK^nsion 
out ot' his living, and a son his father's death ; and may 
rejoice when it happens, so it proceeded only from a 
consideration of the advantage accruing to him thereby, 
and not out of any personal haired." The Jansenists 
believe it not. 

Layman the Jesuit, and Peter Ilurtado think, that a 
man may lawfully fight a duel, accepting the challenge to 
defend his honor or estate. The Jansenists think other- 

Sanchez and Navarrus allow a man "to murder his 
adversary secretly, or despatch him at unawares to avoid 
the danger of a duel." Molina thinks "you may kill one 
that wrongfully informs against us in any court." Regi- 
naldus ; "that you may kill the false witness which the 
prosecutor brings." Tannerus and Emanuel Sa, that 
"you may kill both witness and judg^ which conspire 
the death of an innocent person." So think not the Jan- 

Henriquez saith, "one man may kill another who 
hath given him a box on the ear, though he run away 
tor it, provided he do it not out of hatred or revenge, 
and that by that means a gap be open for excessive mur- 
der, destructive to the state. And the reason is, a man 
may as well do it in pursuance of his reputation, as his 
goods ; and he that hath had a box on the ear is accoun- 
ted dishonorable tUl he hath killed his enemy." Azorius 
saith, "is it lawful for a person of quality to kill one that 
would give him a box on the ear, or a bang with a stick ? 
Some say not. But others affirm it lawful, and for my 
part I think it probable, when it cannot be avoided 
otherwise : for if it were not, the reputation of innocent 
persons were still exposed to the insolency of the ma- 
licious." Many others are of the same mind, insomuch 
that Lessius saith, "it is lawful, by the consent of all 
casuists, to kill him that would give a box on the ear, or 
a blow with a stick, when a man cannot otherwise avoid 
it." Baldellus saith, "it is lawful to kill him that saith 



to you, thou liest, if a man cannot right himself other- 
-Hvise/' Lessius saith, 'Mf you endeavor to ruin my rep- 
utation by opprobrious speeches before persons of hon- 
or, and I cannot avoid them otherwise than by killing 
you, may I do it i* I may; though the crime you lay 
to my charge be such as I am really guilty of, it being 
supposed to have been so secretly committed, that you 
cannot discover it by ways of justice. It is proved, if 
when you would take away my reputation by giving me 
a box on the ear, it is in my power to prevent it by force 
of arms, the same defence is certainly lawful, when you 
would do me the same injury with your tongue. Besides, 
a man may avoid the affront of those whose ill language 
he cannot hinder. In a word, honor is more precious 
than life, but a man may kill in defence of his life, e?'go, 
he may kill in defence of his honor." The Jansenists 
are against all this. 

Escobar saith, that "regularly it is lawful to kill a man 
for the value of a crown." according to Molina. Ami- 
cus saith, "it is lawful for a churchman or a religious 
man to kill a detractor that threatens to divulge the scan- 
dalous crimes of his community or himself, when there 
is no other means left to hinder him from doing it, as if 
he be ready to scatter his calumnies, if not suddenly 
despatched out of the way." Caramavel in his funda- 
mental theology takes it for certain, that "a priest not 
only may kill a detractor on certain occasions, but some- 
times ought to do it." The Jansenists believe none of 

You may read in "the Mystery of Jesuitism," a volume 
of such passages of the Jesuits, allowing men to give and 
receive the sacrament when they come that day from 
adultery, and allowing a man to eat and drink as much 
as he can with his health : and discharging men from a 
necessity of loving God, unles it be once in their lives, 
or as others say upon holy-days, or as Hurtado de Men- 
doza, once a year, or as Conink, once in three or four 
years, or a sHenriquez, once in five years, or as Anthony 
Sirmond, not at all, so we do not hate him, and do obey 
his other commands. 

Are all those differences among the Papists so small 
as to be no matters of faith ? Judge then whether Pa- 

3 uccriNc. 99 

pi.sts or tho reform.;;! arc more at unity among tliem- 

Altliough the loving of God, the avoiding of murder, 
brihcry, and the like, are no matter of faith at Rome, 
3'ct I desire to know whothi^r tlic Holy Scripture be mat- 
ter of faith or not? I'lify dare not deny but it is. What 
is the Scripture, but tho words and the sense or matter'? 
Are the Papists agreed among th.emselves about either 
of those? No: for some of the best learned of them 
have stood for the preeminence of the Hebrew and 
Greek texts : and others, and the most for the vulgar Lat- 
in. But that vulgar Latin translation hath been often 
altered by them. After many others. Pope Sixtus V. 
made it so complete, that the church was required to use 
his edition ; yet after him came Pope Clement VIII. 
and mended it in many thousand places, and imposed 
that upon the church ; which of those Popes were infal- 
lible ] They much differ in their translations. 

For tho sense of Scripture although men swear to take 
the Scriptures in the sense of the church, yet will not 
any Pope or council to this day, teli us the sense of them, 
either by giving us an infallible commentary, or by de- 
ciding the many thousand differences that are among 
their commentators. Do not all these commentators 
forswear themselves, those who lived since the council 
of Trent, having sworn to expound Scripture in the sense 
of the church, and only according to the unanimous con- 
sent of the fathers 1 Why doth not the Pope decide 
these controversies? seeing he is a judge of controversies 
to keep them all of a mind 1 

But perhaps they will say ; "all those Scriptures are 
not matters of faith." WMicre are we then 1 what is 
matter of faith if Scripture be not? If all be not, how 
shall we know which is ? Is no one of all those many 
hundred or thousand texts which your commentators dif- 
fer about any matter of faith 1 If not, then you have no 
faith. If it be, then the Papists differ amon^ themselves 
in matters of faith. James Bellum Papale, vel Con- 
cordia Discors. 



Principles of Faith. 

Thus you may discern how to deal with them, tohen 
thei/ industrioiisli/ confound the essentials and the inte- 
gral parts of our jaith : for this is another of their jug- 

They cannot endure to hear us distinguish tlie funda- 
mentals, that is the essentials of our religion from the 
rest : and therefore they call for a catalogue of our fun- 
damentals : and would persuade us that whatsoever is 
matter of faith, is of no necessity to salvation to be believ- 
ed, and those are damnable heretics that deny them, and 
therefore we must not make any such difference. Their 
design in this is to persuade people that the world must 
be wholly of their mind in matters of faith, or else they 
cannot be saved. And by this trick they would prove 
that the Protestants and many other churches are all 
heretics, and therefore have no place in general councils, 
and are no parts of the catholic church. 

We desire the Papists to tell us whether Christianity 
be any thing or nothing ? If any thing, it hath its es- 
sence. Whether this essence of Christianity be know- 
able or not ? If not, then they cannot know a Chris- 
tian from another : and they cannot know the church 
from other societies. If it be knowable, then its essence 
must needs be knowable. Whether all true Christians 
in the world are of the same stature or degree of knowl- 
edge and explicit belief? If they be, then there is no 
difl'erence between fathers and babes, strong and weak, 
priest and people ; and then the Jesuits have no more 
knowledge or faith than tlic simplest woman of their 
church. But if there be a diiference, whether the es- 
sence of Christianity be varied according to those degrees. 
If so, then there are as many sorts of Christianity in the 
world, as there be degrees of faith. If not, then the es- 
sence of Christianity is distinguishable from the integrity 
or superadded degrees, whicli is the thing that we 
contend for. Whether the apostles did not go on to 
teach their people more, after they had made them 


Cliristians, in a state of salvation? And whetlier the 
priests, friars, and Jesuits will give men uj), and teach 
them nothiiii^ more wiien they have made them Chris- 
tians. I know they will say, there is more to he taught. 
If so, then the essentials of Christianity are distinguish- 
ahle from the integrals or degrees. We would know 
how they will understand, Ileb. v. 10, 11, 12, 14. and 
vi. 1, 2. " For when for the time ye ought to he teachers, 
ye have need that one teach you again which he the first 
principles of the oracles of God, and ar^ become such 
as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. For ev- 
ery one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righte- 
ousness, for he is a babe. But strong meat belongeth to 
them that are full of age, who by reason of use have 
their senses exercised to discern good and evil : therefore 
leaving the pri!ici})les of the doctrine of Christ, let us go 
on to perfection, not laying again the foundation, &.c." 
Tell us whether the apostle do not here distinguish be- 
tween babes and strong men; milk and strong meat; 
the principles or foundation or perfection 1 Whether all 
that is revealed by God be of absolute necessity to every 
man's salvation that do or may hear it ? If so, then no 
man can be saved that knoweth not all that God hath 
revealed ; and then no one in the world can be saved : 
for here we know but in part. Their own commenta- 
tors diller about the word of God, wiiicli sheweth that 
they are imperfect in the knowledge of its senses. The 
Pope knows it not, or else he is shamefully to blame, 
that he will not toll it the world, and reconcile his com- 
mentators and disputers. But if all revealed be not of ab- 
solute necessity, then we may have leave to distinguish 
between points absolutely necessary, and the rest. 
Whether all shall be damned, that know not as much as the 
most learned and wise \ If not, then still we may have 
leave to distinguish; — Whether any ignorance or error 
that is culpable, will stand with charity and salvation 1 
If not, then who shall be saved % If so, then we may 
still distinguish the points of absolute necessity from the 
rest. Whetlier the whole Holy Scripture be the word of 
God \ If so, then whether we ought not to believe it all 
as far as we can understand it 1 And whether it be not 
all matter of fai^h ? If not they must tell us, what part of 


102 jEstJir 

God's word is to be believed, and what not. If so ; tfieli 
dertainly men may err in points of faith, and yet have 
charity, and be saved : as their disas^reeinsf commenta- 
tors, casuists, and schoohiien do. Whether the matters 
that their divines aie disagreed in, be revealed by God, 
or things unrevcalcd ? If not revealed, do they not de- 
serve to be kicked out of the world, for troubling the 
world so v/ith unrcvealcd tilings 1 If they be revealed, 
arc they not revealed to be believed, and so are of faith? 
Whether there be not some things essential to true ohe^ 
(Hence, and some things not esscntian If not, then no 
sinner hath sincere obedience, and can be saved : if so ; 
then why may not the same be said of faith ? Whether 
they require any profession of the faith or not ? If the}' do, 
then what is that profession 7 Is it a profession of every 
particular truth that God hath revealed to be believed? 
Or is it a profession of some particular truths only ? If 
of some only, why of those more than the rest, if they be 
not the essentials distinguishable from the rest 1 What 
is the use of the church'^s creed, and why tliey have used 
frequently to make confession of their faith ? Was it 
not the whole fahh essential to Christianity which they 
confessed ? If not then it was not fit to be the badge of 
the church; or of the orthodox: if so, then it seems those 
creeds had in them the essentials distinguished from the 
rest. Whether every thing delivered or defined by any 
general council, be of such necessity to salvation, that 
all must explicitly believe them all, that will be saved ? 
It so, then whether any Papist can be saved, seeincp they 
understand them not all ? . If not, then a distiTiction 
must be made. How can the}' countenance ignorance 
so much as they do, if all things revealed be of equal 
necessity to salvation. What mean they to distino-uish 
of implicit and explicit faith ? Is it enough to believe as 
the church believes, and not know what in any particu- 
lar ? then it is not necess^ary to salvation to believe the 
resurrection of Christ, or of man, or the life to come. 
For a man may believe that the church is in the rio-ht, 
and yet not know that it holdeth any of these. Is it 
enough to believe the formal object of faith, which with 
us is God's veracity, without the material ? Or is it 
enough to remain infidels, and only believe that the 


church arc true believers ? If you hold to this, you make 
no act of faith, but one, the believing that the church, 
that is, the Pope or council are true believers, to be of 
necessity to salvation. Hut if there be someiiiini^ that is 
necessary to be actually, that is ex|)licitly, believed, then 
nuist not that be distmguished from the rest and made 
known? Whence is it that you denominate men be- 
lievers with you .'' Is it from a positive faith, or for not 
holding the contrary ? If the latter, then stones, and 
beasts, and pagans, and their infants may be believers. 
If the former, then the positive faith whence all believ- 
ers are denominated must be known. Is not that truth 
faitli and all that is essential to Christianity, which doth 
consist with saving grace, or to nse your phrase, with true 
charily? If not, then either infidels and no Christians 
may have true charity, or else true charity may be in 
the unjustified, or both. If then men of lower know- 
ledge and faith than doctors, may have true charity; and 
therefore true faith. Bellarmin often distinguislieth be- 
tween the points that all must of necessity explicitly be- 
lieve, and the rest, Suarez in 3. part. Thorn. Disp. 43. 
Sect. 4. saith of the article of Christ's descending into 
hell — " If by an article of faith we understand a truth 
which all the faithful are bound explicitly to know and 
believe, so I do not think it necessary to reckon this 
among the articles of faith, because it is not altogether 
necessary for all men." Here Suazer. distinguislieth be- 
tween articles of necessity to all, and tliosethat are not: 
and excepts even the descent into hell from this number 
of articles necessary to all. 

But perhaps you will say, that though all that is of 
faith is not necessary to be believed explicitly by all, 
yet implicitly it must. That which you call implicit be- 
lieving is no believing that point, but another point: yea 
a point that doth not so much as infer that, for it tollow- 
eth not, the church is infallible ; therefore Christ descend- 
eth into hell. 

We believe all that is of faith, with an implicit faith as 
well as you : but it is an implicit divine faith and not human : 
for we are sure all that God saith is true ; and his divine 
veracity is the formal object of our faith. We believe 
that all that is in Scripture is true, and all that was ever 
delivered by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost is true. 


But all that is of faith is so necessary, that it will not 
stand with salvation to helieve the contrary, or deny or 
disbelieve any point of faith. That cannot be true ; for 
no man can prove that a point may not be denied and 
disputed against by a true believer as long as he is igno- 
rant tliat it is true, and from God : the same ignorance 
that keeps him from knowing it, may cause him to de- 
ny it, and gainsay it. Do not your own differing com- 
mentators, sciioolmen and casuists dispute voluminously 
against some truths of divine revelation? If you change 
a man's mind from the smallest error by dispute, do you 
take that to be a change of his state from death to life ? 
^Ena?as Sylvius thought a general council was above the 
Pope : but when he was Pope Pius II. he thought the 
l*ope above a general council; was that a change from 
death to life. It seems by his bull of retractation, he thought 
so, but so did not several general councils. Was the 
Council of Basil, or Constance, or Pisa in a state of death 
and damnation for believing the Pope to be subject to a 
general council ? or was the council at Lateran in a state 
of death for holding the contrary 1 Must citJicr Pope John 
or Pope Nicholas be damned because of the contrariety 
of their decrees 1 If the council of Tolet ordain that he 
thai hath a concubine instead of a wife, shall not be 
kept from the sacrament, doth it prove them all in a 
state of death ] If Bellarmin confess that the sixth gen- 
eral council of Constantinople have many errors, doth it 
follow that they were in a damnable state? If the second 
council at -Sice maintain the corporeity of Angels, and 
the lirst council at Lateran maintain the contrary, doth ii 
follow that one of them was in a state of death 1 I think 
!iot : though it proves a general council fallible, when 
approved by the Pope, and therefore Popery a deceit. 
Bellarmin tells us the change of his own mind. 

Th.e retractations of Austin tell us of the cliange of his 
mind in many things: and yet it lolloweth not that he 
was in a state of death and unjustified before. 

But all that is of faith is of necessity to the salvation 
of some, though not all. If that be granted, yet you 
must distinguish between points necessary to be believed 
by all. But in what case is it that you n^.ean, that oth- 
er points are of necessity to some ? Is it to those some 

- JUGGLING. 105 

that know thorn to be ot* divine revelation ? But lliat is 
not because the thinLi^s tlieuisclvcs an.' simply necessary 
to salvation ; hnt because a belief of Ciod's veracity, and 
the trutli of all that lie revealetli in i^cneral, is of neces- 
sity : and lie that believeth tliat God is true, cannot 
chose but believe ail to i)e true which he knows God re- 
vealetli. He that thiuketh God to be a liar, in one word, 
<loth not believe his veracity, and so hath no divine faith 
at all. Tlioreforc you need not fear lest any one should 
be guilty of not believing that which they know is the 
word of God, but those that take God to be a liar ; and 
that is those that take him not to be God, and so are 
atheists. But still the thing of absolute necessity is to 
believe in general that God is true in all his word ; and 
to believe the truth of the essential points of Christianity 
in particular embracing the good propounded in them. 
Now it is true that secondarily all known truths are of 
necessity, to be believed, because else our general be- 
lief of God's veracity is not sincere. But yet we must 
say that antecedently even to that person, those super- 
added truths were not of necessity to his salvation to be 
believed, because they were not of such necessity to 
bo known ; and it' they had not been known, there had 
not been such necessity of believing them. 

But if you say, thai all were obliged to know them, or 
that had opportunity, or the revelation of the trutli, and 
yet did not, and thereupon deny them culpably, are in a 
state of death: I deny that, and shall prove it false. A 
wilful refusing the light, because men love darkness rath- 
er than light, is a certain sign of a graceless wretch. 
But every culpable ignorance and unbelief is not damn- 
ing ignorance or unbelief. Otherwise no man should 
be saved : for no man is void of culpable ignorance, and 
consequently of culpable unbelief. Had we never been 
wanting in the use of means, there is no man but might 
have known more than he doth. Is there any one that 
dare refuse to ask God forgiveness of ignorance, unbelief, 
or the negligence that is the culpable cause of them, or 
that dare say, you need no pardon of them ? If you 
plead for venial sin, how can you deny a venial unbelief, 
upon venial ignorance ? But then learn more piety, than 
to say that your venial unbelief or sin is no sin, save as 


analogically so called ; or that it deserves a pardon, or 
deserves not everlasting punishment. But if you call it 
venial, because being consistent with the true love of 
God and habitual holiness, and saving faith, the law of 
grace doth pardon it, and not condemn men for it ; thus 
we would agree with you that lliere is venial sin ; but 
then there is venial unbelief. 

We easily prove this from the law of God. It is the 
nature of the preceptive part to constitute duty only, 
and the violation of that is sin : but it is the sanction, 
the promise and threatening that determines the reward 
and penalty. -» Now it is only the old law of works that 
makes the threatening as large as the prohibition, con- 
demning man for every sin : but so doth not the law of 
grace. The precept still commandeth per feet obedience, 
and so makes it a duty ; but the promise maketh not 
perfect obedience the condition of salvation; but faith, 
repentance, and sincere obedience, though imperfect. 
The law of nature still makes everlasting death due to 
every sin : but it is such a due as hath a remedy at hand 
provided and offered in the gospel ; and is actually rem- 
edied to all true believers. So that as it is not every 
sin that will damn us, though damnation be due to it, 
because we have a present remedy ; so it is not very 
culpable ignorance or unbelief that will damn us, though 
it deserve damnation ; because the gospel doth not only 
not damn us for it, but pardons it, by acquitting us from 
the condemnation of the law. All this may teach you, 
not only to mend your abominable doctrine about mortal 
and venial sin ; but also to discern the reason why a 
man may deny some points of faith that are not of the 
essence of Christianit}- , and yet not be damned for it ; 
because the law of grace doth not condemn him for it, 
thouirh he be cul[)able, for the law of grace may com- 
mand further tlian it premptorily condemneth in case of 
disobedience. It is the promise that makes faith the 
condition of life, though it bo the prece it that makes it 
a duty. Now it saveth not as a performed duty directlv, 
because the precept gives not the reward, but as a per- 
formed condition. Therefore unbelief condemneth not 
effectually as a mere sin directly, but as such a sin as is 
the violation of nonperformance of that condition. 

jucoLiNa. 107 

CHAP ti:r vttt. 

Decision of Conlrcversits. 

Anotlior of their juffirlings is, to extol the jiulgmcni 
of the catholic church (ts that irhich must be the ground 
of faith, and the decider of all controversies. To tliis 
end they plead against the sufficiency of Scripture, 
and l)end all the force of tiieir arguings and designs, as 
if all their hope lay in this point, and as if it were grant- 
ed that we arc lost, if the catholic church he admitted to 
be the judge. Hence it is that they cry out against pri- 
vate faith and opinions, and calll men to the faith of 
the church, and persuade the poor people, that the 
church is for them, and we are but branches broken 

We are content to deal with them at their own weap- 
01^, and at that one in which they put their trust. We 
know that the true catholic churcli or any member of it, 
cannot err in any of the essentials of Christianity, for then 
it would cease to be the church : but we have too much 
reason to judge that it is not free from error in lesser 
things. Yet in the main cause between the Papists and 
us, we refuse not their judgment. Nay we turn this 
canon against the canoneers, and easily prove that the 
Papists cause is uttterly lost, if the catholic church be 

But it is the ancient church, or the present church 
that must decide the cause ? It shall be which you will. 
For the most ancient church in the apostles' days, we 
are altogether of its belief, and stand to its decision in 
all things ; and if you prove we mistake them in any 
thing, we shall gladly receive instruction and be re- 
claimed. To them we appeal for our essentials 
and integrals. For some following ages, we will 
be tried by them in the articles of our faith, and in the 
principal controversies we have with the Papists. 

But this will not serve their turn : it is the present 
church that must judge or none : for, they say, if the 
ancient church had power, so hath the present : and il 
the ancient church had possession of the truth, how shall 


we know it by the present ? We may know it by the 
records of those times lar surer than by the reports of 
men without writing. Controversies on numerous mys- 
terious points are sorrily carried in the memories, es- 
pecially of the most, even of the teachers ; especially 
when men's memories die with them, and they cannot 
make their children the heirs of their knowledge or memo- 
ries. Do you now remember what was done in the 
days of Ignatius, Justin, Cyprian, ifcc. that never saw 
them ? And can you, that hardly teach your children 
a long catechism, teach them to carry in memory all 
your voluminous councils better than written records can 
preserve them. For the records, one diligent skilful 
man willl know more than ten thousand others. Bar- 
onius, Albaspinasus, Petavius, among the Papists, and 
Usher, Blondell, Salmasius, Gataker, &c. among the 
protestants, knew more of the mind of antiquity, than 
a whole country besides, or than general councils have 

If you appeal to the greater number, to them shall 
you go. You must be tried by the present church ; then 
you are condemned. Is it the less number, or the great- 
er, or the better that must be judge? You will not say 
the less ; if you do, you know where you are. If you 
say the better part shall be judge : who shall be judge 
which is the better part ? We are ready to prove the 
reformed churches the better part : and if we do not, 
we will give you the cause. But will you appeal to the 
greater part ? Then you are lost. The Greeks, Mos- 
covites, Armenians, Abbasines, and all other churches 
in Asia, Africa and Europe are far more than the Pa- 
pists ; and your own pens and mouths tell us that those 
are against you. Many of them curse you as heretics 
or schismatics ; the rest of them know you not, or re- 
fuse your government. They all agree against your 
Pope's universal headship or sovereignty, and so against 
the very form of your new church. So that the world 
knows the judgment of the far g eatest part of Chris- 
tians on earth to be against you in the main. This you 
get by appealing to the catholic church. 

But you say, that all those are schismatics or heretics, 
and none of the Catholic Church : but they say as much 

JUdOLlNG. 109 

by you; and how do you prove it.^ Who shall be 
judg-e whether they, or you be the catholic church? 
You tell us of your succession, and twenty tales that 
are good, if you may be judges yourselves ; but so do 
they say as much which is good if they be judges. 
When we offer to dispute our case with you, you ask 
us who shall be judge, and tell us the Catholic Church 
must be judge. But who shall be judge between you 
and them which is the catholic church? You will not 
let us be judges in our own cause, and why then should 
you? Are we Protestants the less number as to you? 
so are you to all the rest that are against you. And 
what reason have we to let the less number judge over 
the greater ? If still you say, because you are the bet- 
ter, let that be first tried ; but not you be the judges. 

So that the case is plainly this : either the Papists 
must stand to the greater number, and then the contro- 
versy is at an end: or they must shamefully say, v:e 
will not dispute with you, unless ive may be the judges 
ourselves. Or else they must dispute it equally with 
us, by producing iheir evidence. 


^9inhiguity of Romunlsts in controversy. 

The most common and prevalent deceit of Papists is 
by ambiguous terms to deceive those that cannot force 
them to distinguish, and to make you believe they mean 
one thing, when they mean another, and to mock you 
icith cloudy loords. Look to them therefore especially 
in three terms, on which much of their controversies 
lies; the words church, pope, and council. Few un- 
derstand what they mean by any one of these words. 

When you dispute of the church with them, agree 
first upon the definition of church. When you call 
them to define it, you will find hov^ many things they 
call the church. Sometimes they mean the whole bod}', 
pastors and people : but more commonly they mean 
only the pastors. Sometimes they mean the church 



real : and sometimes the church representative, as they 
call it, in a general council. But whether they mean 
the pastors or people, they exclude all saving the pope 
and his subjects, and so by the church, mean but a part 
or a sect. Sometimes in the question about tradition, 
some of the French take the church for the community, 
as fathers deliver the doctrine of Christ to their children, 
&c. Sometimes they take it in its political sense, for a 
society, consisting of a visible head and members : but 
then they agree not of that head, some setting the pope 
highest, and some the council. Frequently they take 
the word church for the supposed head alone, as in 
most questions about infallibility, judging of controver- 
sies, expounding Scripture, keeping of traditions, defin- 
ing points of faith, &c. The}' say, the church must 
do these : but commonly they mean the supposed head. 
One part mean a general council: and the Jesuits and 
Italians, and predominant part mean only the pope. 
So that when they talk of the whole catholic church, 
and call you to its judgment, and boast of its infallibili- 
ty, they mean all this while but one poor sinful man : 
and such a man as sometimes hath been more unlearn- 
ed than many school-boys of twelve years of age ; a 
murderer, adulterer, heretic, infidel, or an incarnate 
devil. This man is their church, as Gretser, Bellarmin, 
De concU. author. Lib. 2, Cap. 19., and others profess. 

So that if you force them to define and explain what 
they mean by the church, you will either cause them 
to open their nakedness, or find them all to pieces about 
the very subject of dispute. 

When they use the name pope in disputation, make 
them explain themselves ; and tell you in a definition 
what they mean by a pope. For, though you would 
think this term sufficiently understood, yet you find 
them utterly at a loss about it. Consider distinctly the 
efficient, matter, and form. As to the efficient cause of 
their pope, there must concur a divine institution, 
which they can no where show, and a call from man. 
What man or men have power to make a head to the 
catholic church.!' But whether they will call it an ef 
ficient cause, or only an essential cause, election and 
ordination must go to make a pope. Now either they 


will put these into their definition, or not. If not, know 
of them wliether a man witlioiit election and ordination 
may be pope : if so, wiiat makes him one .'' If posses- 
sion, then he that can conquer Rome and sit down in 
the chair is pope. If not possession, what then ? why- 
may not any man say I am pope .'' But doubtless they 
will tell you that an election, or ordination, or both 
are necessary. If so, then is it necessary to the being 
of a pope, that some certain persons elect who have the 
power, or will any electors serve whosoever? If any 
will serve, then every monastery or every parish may 
choose a pope ? If there must be certain authorized 
electors, see that those be named in the definition. 
Then first know whether those electors are empowered 
to that work by divine law, or by human. If by divine, 
let them show it if they can. In Scripture they can 
never find who must choose the pope. And their tra- 
dition hath no such precept, as appeareth by the alter- 
ations and divers ways. If it be but by a human eccle- 
siastical canon, then the Papacy is so too : for the power 
received can have no higher a cause than the power 
giving or authorizing. 

When you know who those electors must be, you 
open their nakedness. For if they say, it must be the 
cardinals, ask them, where then was the pope when 
there were no cardinals in the world ? and whether 
that were a pope or not that was chosen by the whole 
Roman clergy ? or whether those were popes oi* not 
that were chosen by the people .'' or those that were 
chosen by the emperor ? or those that were chosen by 
councils? If they tell you that it must be the Roman 
clergy : know whether the cardinals be the whole Ro- 
man clergy ? Whether the people, the council or the 
emperors were the Roman clergy? If they would per- 
suade you, that cither the people, or the emperor, or 
the council did not elect the pope, but only show whom 
the Roman clergy should elect, interposing exorbitantly 
some unjust force with the due election ; then all his- 
tory crieth shame against them. Nothing is more 
evident in the Papal history than that there have been 
at least five ways of election among them. 

Jf they allow of any of those as valid, which it ever 


be, as they must, or give up their succession, then by 
what law of God did the emperor of Germany choose a 
head for the church, any more than the emperor of 
Habassia, or the king of France or Spain? When the 
emperor hath chosen one and the clergy another, and 
some others a third, were all true popes, if each party 
was authorized electors ? If yet the people choose 
one, and the Roman clergy another, and the cardinals 
alone a third, and the emperor a fourth, and a council 
a fifth, must all those stand, or which of them, aad 
why ? Or if they tell you that it must be the particular 
Roman church ; then if the people of that church choose 
one, and the clergy another, and the cardinals a third, 
which is the true pope ? The succession is gone : for 
they were no popes that emperors or councils chose. 

If they tell you that it is not election but consecra- 
tion that makes a pope or that consecration is of neces- 
sity with election : then demand of them whether it be 
any one whosoever that may consecrate, or whether 
that high power be confined to certain hands'? If any 
may serve, or any bishops, then he that can get three 
drunken bishops to consecrate him may be pope. And 
then there may be an hundred popes at once. But if 
it be confined to certain hands, let it be declared who 
those are that must ordain or consecrate him. If they 
say, that it must be only the Italian bishops that must 
consecrate, then know of them by what law of God 
they have power to consecrate a head to the universal 
church : by what law they can form a creature of a 
more noble species than themselves ; or whether this 
prove not, that as a bishop at first was but like the fore- 
man of a jury, thence sprung an archbishop, and thence 
a patriarch, so in process of time, when pride grew ri- 
per, the pope grew to be the head or governor of the 
universal church. 

But if they can show us no law of God empowering 
those special consecrators, any more than others, then 
where is the Papacy that dependeth on if? There is 
nothing in Scripture to empower the Italian bishops 
any more than the Gallican, German, or Asian, to con- 
secrate a head for the catholic church. 

But suppose there were, yet we must be resolved 

jrOGLlNG. 113 

whether it be some or all the Italian Bishops that must 
do it? U but some which be they? and how is their 
power proved ? If all or any, then what shall we do 
when some of them consecrate one pope, and some 
another, and some a third ? Which of those is the pope? 
If consecration give the power, all are popes. And 
still the Papal succession is overthrown, while many 
popes had no consecration by Italian bishops. 

Thus you may sec what a case the Jesuits will be in, 
if you put them to insert the necessary electors and 
consecrators in their definition of a pope. 

You must also require them to put his necessary 
<lualification in the description. For if no disposition 
of the matter be necessary, then a Jew or other infidel 
maybe pope: which they will deny. If any dispo- 
sition of the subject be of necessity to the reception of 
the form, cause them to put it down. It is either true 
godliness, or it is common honesty and sobriety : and 
then farewell Papacy ; or it is learning and knowledge : 
and then Alphonsus Castro, and other Papists, 
will bear witness that some popes understood not 
their grammar, and one good man, saith Wernerus, 
being ignorant of letters, was fain to get another com- 
pope to say his offices, though it happened that they 
could not agree, and so a third was chosen, and his 
choice disliked, and a fourth chosen, till there was six 
chosen popes alive at once. If age be necessary, then 
children popes iiave interrupted the succession. If the 
masculine gender be necessary. Pope Joan interrupted 
the succession, unless fifty of their own historians de- 
ceive us. But the question is whether faith in Christ 
be of necessity to a pope ? If so then what will you 
say to John XXII I. that denied the life to come, and to 
those that have been guilty of heresy ? So that by 
that time they have put the necessary qualification of 
a pope into their definition, you shall find them silenced. 

But they are not agreed about the very form of the 
papacy. Some say he is the head of all the church : 
others, with the general councils of Constance and Ba- 
sil say, that he is the head only of the singular mem- 
bers, but subject to a council. So that you may see what 



a case they will be in, if they tell you what they mean 
by a pope, and define him. 

If they use the name of a general council, call them 
to define what they mean by a general council. Some 
of them will say, it must be a true representative of the 
whole catholic church : so that morally they are all 
consenting to what is there done. But then the doubt 
remaineth, whether there be a necessity of any eertam 
number of bishops? If not; it seems the whole church 
may agree that twenty, or ten, or two, or one shall rep- 
resent them, and be a general council. But if this must 
not hold, then must all the bishops of the world be there, 
or only some, and how many? Binius saith, vol. 1, p. 
313. that a general council is that where all the bishops 
of the world may and ought to be present, unless they 
be lawfully hindred, and in which none but the Pope 
of Rome by himself or his legates, is wont to preside. It 
is when all the church is morally represented, the 
pope presiding. 

How prove they that only bishops should be mem- 
bers of a council, and not presbyters ? 

By their definition they nullify many general councils, 
because the pope presided not there : even the first 
general council at Nice. 

By this rule we never had a general council. At the 
first session of the council of Trent, there were but four 
archbishops aud twenty-two bishops, taking in the tit- 
ular bishops of Upsal, Armagh, and Worcester. At 
divers other sessions after but eight or nine, or every 
few more. In the fourth session which decreed to re- 
ceive tradition with equal pious affection and reverence 
as the Holy Scriptures, and which gave a false cata- 
logue of the canonical books, there were but the pope's 
legates, two cardinals, nine archbishops, and forty one 
prelates. Now was that the whole church morally rcn- 
resented ? were those twenty-two, or forty-one all the 
bishops of the world, or the hundredth part of them? 
and ought all the bishops of the African, Asian, and 
other churches to have been there? 

It is plain by this definition, that a general council 
is but a name, and that no such thing is to be expected 
in the world. For, if all bishops, or half come thither, 


what shall their flocks do the while f How many 
years must they be traveling from America, Ethiopia, 
and all the remote parts of the Christian world ? So 
much shipping-, and provision, arc necessary for the 
convoy of so many, that the bisliops are not able to de- 
fray the hundredth part of the charge. Abundance of 
them are so aged and weak, that they are unfit for the 
journey. Their princes are some of them infidels, and 
some at wars, and will never give them leave to come. 
They must pass through many kingdoms of the ene- 
mies, or that are in wars, that will never suffer them to 
pass. The lediousiiess, and hazards of the journey 
would be death to most of them, and so it is but a plot 
to put an end to the church. The length of general 
councils is such, some of them being ten years, that at 
Trent eighteen, that so many bishops to be long absent 
from home, is but to give up the church to infidelity or 
impiety: unless the bishops be such things as the 
church can spare. When they come together, they 
could not understand one another, because of the diver- 
sity of their languages. The number would be so 
great, that they could not converse in one assembly: 
so that a true general council now, is but a name to 
amuse those that think the world is no bigger than a 
man may ride over in a week's short journey. 

This definition is ridiculous for it is enough that all 
the bishops of the world may and ought to be there, 
whether they be there or not. But then what if lazi- 
ness or danger deter them or detain them ? Is that a 
council where bishops ought to be and are not? How 
many must be present, any or none? Prove that forty 
bishops are a general council, because the rest ought to 
be there. Who shall be judge of each man's case, 
whether he could or ought to have been there? Will 
you judge men before they are heard, or their cause 
known ? Your saying that they ought to have been 
there, is no proof. 

Binius hath one exception, unless lawfully hinder- 
ed. If all the bishops in the world be Ijfwfully hin- 
dred, it seems it is a general council when no body is 
there : you see now what you put the Papists too, if 
you put them to define a general council, or tell you 
what they mean by that word. 



Pupal Coyifusion. '^ 

When the}?- go about from councils or other history 
to prove the sovereignty of the pope, let them not cheat 
you by confounding ; a human ordinance with a di- 
vine : an alteiahle point of order loith an unalterable 
essential part of the church: or a mere primacy in 
the same order or office, tcith a governing sovereignty 
or a different order or office. 

Therefore we would learn of them, whether the pre- 
eminence and order of the five patriarchal sees, began 
not about the first council but was settled some while 
after: for till there were general councils, so called, 
there was no occasion of determining which should 
have the first, second or third seat. 

Whenever the time was, we inquire; whether the 
sees of Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, were not pa- 
triarchal as soon as Rome ? and whether councils that 
speak of priority, or posteriority, do not in the same 
manner, and on the same grounds, and to the same ends 
give Alexandria, and Antioch, their places, as they do 
to Rome? We find them speaking of them as matters 
of the same order and nature. Whether all those have 
not the same kind of right to their preeminence, wheth- 
er it be divine or human ? The very foundation of the 
patriarchal order, and of Rome's patriarchal primacy, 
which was the preparative to its universal sovereignty, 
was a mere human invention, given on occasion of the 
imperial seat at Rome, and not any institution of Christ 
to Peter and his successors. All that will not be be- 
fooled out of all historical verity by Popish audacity, 
may take it from the express words of the council of 
Calcedon, Act. 16, — "We following always the defini- 
tions of the holy fathers, and canon, and knowing 
those that ngw have been read of the 150 bishops, that 
were congregated under the emperor Theodosius at 
Constantinople, things, concerning the privileges of 
the same church of Constantinople. For to the seat of 
old Rome, because the empire of that city, the fathers 


consequently gave the privileges. And the 150 bish- 
ops being moved with tlie same intention, have given 
equal privileges to new Rome: reasonably judging, 
that the city adorned with the empire and senate, shall 
enjoy equal privileges with old regal Rome." Binius 
p. 134. 

It may confound all the Papal jugglers on earth to 
find an approved general council affirming that Rome's 
primacy was given by the fathers ; because it wa«> the 
imperial city. On the same reason they do the like by 
Constantinople ; for the council of Constantinople which 
had gone before them on those grounds : so that you have 
the vote of two councils, that it was not so from the be- 
ginning, nor an apostolical tradition, but the act of the 
fathers, because of the imperial city. If a general 
council can err. Popery is a deceit. If it cannot err, 
then the very primacy in the pope was then but new, 
and done by man, that might do the like by others, and 
therefore undo this again. 

But say they. Pope Leo confirmed not this. Then the 
church representative may err, and the pope only is in- 
fallible. Leo and his delegates never expected one 
word against the saying, that it was because of the ern- 
pire, that Rome by the fathers had the primacy given it. 
The reason given by themselves Concil. Constant, 
can. 5. is this, because Constantinople is new Rome. 
Binius saith that Rome receiveth not the canons of^ 
this council neither, but only their cuiideuuiation oi 
Macedonius : and that every council hath just so much 
strength and authority as the apostolic seat bestoweth 
on it. For unless this be admitted, no reason can be 
given why some councils of greater numbers of bishops 
were reprobated ; and others of a smaller number con- 
firmed." Vol. 2. p. 515. 

What would you have more ? Do you not see what 
the Popish church is ; and what they mean when they 
ask you, whether your private judgment be safer or 
wiser than that of the whole church, or of all the Chris- 
tian world ? You see they mean all this while but one 
man, whom Gretser and others plainly confess they 
call the church. So that indeed it is general councils, 
and all the Christian world or church that are the ig- 

118 ' JESUIT 

norant, fallible, and oft erring part: and it is one man, 
who has been reputed an incarnate devil by a general 
council, that is the unerring pillar of the church, and 
wiser than all. They make a mere nothing or mockery 
of general councils, any further than they please the 
pope? And can you expect that any thing should 
please them that is agaiiist his greatness, or as Julius 
II. calls it, his holding the place of the great God, 
the maker of all things, and laws ? What a vile abuse 
is it then of the pope to trouble the world by the meet- 
ings and consultations of general councils, when he 
can sit at Rome and contradict them infallibly, and 
save the catholic church from the errors that general 
councils would else lead them into : and therefore could 
he not with less ado infallibly make us laws, canons 
and Scriptures without them? For that which the 
pope can do against a general council, he can do with- 
out them. If he can infallibly contradict a general 
council, and infallibly rule us without them. There- 
fore 3"0U may look long enough before you see 
another general council. The council of Constance 
were neither prognosticators nor effectual lawgivers, 
when they prognosticated and ordained decennial coun- 

Here also you may see what account the Papists 
make even of the first general councils. It is all one 
with them to judge others heretics for contradicting es- 
pecially the four first general councils, compared to the 
four evangelists as the Scripture itself: and yet they 
profess themselves to reject the canons or decrees of 
both those, the first of Constantinople, and that of Cal- 

Thus the pope is privileged from all possibility of 
being an heretic personilly: and not only the Romish 
universal monarchy and vice-godhead, but even its pa- 
triarchal primacy was no apostolical tradition, but a 
human institution, founded on this consideration, that 
Rome was the imperial seat and city. 

Human it must needs be: for councils did not de- 
clare any part of the law of God, but ordain it as an 
act of their own. They and the patriarchate of Con- 
stantinople, which was a new seat, neither patriarch 

JUGGLING. ' 119 

nor bishop residing- tlicrc in tlio apostles' clays, or Ion"- 
after. Tlicy give this new patriarcii the second place 
and once made him equal with old Rome, which they 
would never have presumed to do, if they had thought 
that the jiatriarchship of Alexandria, Anlioch, or Rome 
had been of divine institution: for what horrible arro- 
gance would that have been, when the Holy Ghost 
by the apostles had made Alexandria second, and An- 
lioch third, and Rome first, for a council to set Con- 
stantinople befove two of them, and equal with the first. 

Therefore if patriarchs be desirable creatures, there 
may more new ones now be made, as lawfully as that 
of Constantinople. 

Therefore we judge, that to disobey the pope, or 
withdraw from his subjection, if he had never forfeited 
his patriarchship by the claim of an universal headship, 
were no greater a sin, than to disobey or withdraw 
from the patriarch of Alexandria, Antioch, or Constan- 
tinople. Either the government by patriarchs and 
archbishops is of God's ordaining and approving, or 
not: if not then it is no sin to reject any of them. If 
it be of God, then to reject any of them, though in sim- 
ple error, is a sin of disobedience through ignorance, 
but is far from proving a man to be no member of the 
catholic church : for patriarchs are far from being es- 
sential parts of the catholic church. 

As in the Papists' own judgment, the catholic church 
may be without the patriarch of Constantinople, Alex- 
andria, or Antioch; so may it therefore without the 
Pope of Rome. All the Greek church which hath set 
up the patriarch of Constantinople in competition with 
the pope, must needs hold that the universal primacy 
is of human institution: for Constantinople never pre- 
tended to a divine institution : and they could never 
have had the impudence to prefer a human before a di- 
vine : and therefore never thought the primacy of Rome 
to be of divine right. 

120 JEsuit 



The great endeavor of the Papists is to advance tra- 
dition : the council of Trent ses. 4. hath equalled it 
with the Scriptures as to the pious affection and reverence 
wherewith they receive it. On pretence of this tradition 
they have added abundance of new articles to the faith, 
and accuse us as heretics for not receiving their tra- 
ditions. This is a principal difference betwixt us, that 
we take the Scriptures to be sufficient, to acquaint us 
with the will of God, as the rule of faith and holy liv- 
ing: and they take it to be but part of the word, knd that 
the other part is in unwritten tradition, which they 
equal with this. For the maintaining of tradition it is 
that they write so much to the dishonor of the Holy 

For the discovery of their desperate fraud in this 
point, and the right confuting of them , you must dis- 
tinguish them out of their confusion : you must grant 
them all that is true and just, which we shall as stifly 
defend as they: you must reject their errors and con- 
fute them : and you may turn their own principal weap- 
on against them, to the certain destruction of their 

We must distinguish the tradition of the Scriptures, 
or the Scripture doctrine, from the tradition of other 
doctrines, pretended to be the rest of the word of God : 
between a certain proved tradition, and that which is 
unproved and uncertain, if not grossly feigned: between 
the tradition of the whole catholic church, or the great- 
er part, and the tradition of the lesser more corrupted 
and selfish the Roman part ! between a tradition of 
necessary doctrine or practice, and the tradition of mu- 
table orders : between tradition of testimony, or history, 
or of teaching ministry, and tradition of decisive judg- 
ment, as to the universal church. Suffer them not to 
jumble all those together, if you would not be cheated 
in the dark. 

Concerning tradition, we grant the following propo- 


That the Holy Scriptures come down to us by the cer- 
tain tradition of our fathers and teachers ; and that what 
the seeing and hearing of the apostles was to tiiem that 
lived with them, that tradition and belief of certain tradi- 
tion is to us, by reason of our distance from the time and 
place. So that thougii the Scripture bears its own evi- 
dence of a divine author, in the image or superscription 
of God upon it, yet we are beholden to tradition for the 
books themselves, and for much of our knovvlt-dge that 
those are the true writings of the apostles and prophets, 
and all, and not depraved, &c. 

The essentials of the faith have been delivered even 
from the apostles in other ways and forms, besides the 
Scriptures: as in the professions of the faith of the 
churches. In the baptismal covenant and signs, and 
whole administration. In the Lord's Supper. In Cat- 
echisms. In the prayers and praises of the church. 
In the hearts of all true believers, where God hath 
written all the essentials of the Christian faith and law. 
So that we will not do as the Papists perversly do : 
when God delivereth us the Christian religion with 
two hands. Scripture completely and verbal tradition, 
in the essentials ; they quarrel with Scripture on pre- 
tence of defending the other: so will not we quarrel with 
tradition, but thankfully confess a tradition of the same 
Christianity by unwritten means, which is delivered 
more fully in the Scripture: and this tradition is in 
st)me respect subordmale to Scripture, and in some 
respect co-ordinate, to hold us out the truth. 

The apostles delivered the Gospel by voice as well 
as by writing, before they wrote it to the churches. 

By that preaching we confess there were Christians 
made, who had the doctrine of Christ in their hearts, 
and churches gathered that had his ordinances among 
them, before the Gospel was written. 

We confess that the converted were bound to teach 
what they had received to their children, servants and 
others: that there was a settled ministry in many 
churches ordained to preach the gospel as they had 
received it from the apostles before it was written : that 
baptism, catechising, profession, the eucharist, prayer, 
praise, &c, were instituted and in use, before the Gos- 



pel was written for the churches : that when the Gos- 
pel was written as tradition bringeth it to us, so minis- 
ters are commissioned to deliver both the books and 
the doctrine of that book, as the teachers of the church, 
and to preach it to those without, for their conversion ; 
that parents and masters are bound to teach that doc- 
trine to their children and servants: if a minister or 
other person were cast into the Indies or America with- 
out a Bible, he must teach the doctrine, though he re- 
membered not the words ; and by so doing might save 
souls : that to the great benefit of the church, writers 
of all ages in subserviency to Scripture have delivered 
down the sacred verities, and historians the matters 
of fact: that the unanimous consent of all tiie churches 
manifested in their constant professions, and practices, 
is a great confirmation to us : so are the sufferings of the 
martyrs for the same truth : the declaration of each 
consent by councils is also a confirming tradition : and 
the confessions of heretics, Jews and other infidels, are 
providential and historical traditions, for confirmation : 
and we also profess thai if we had any certain proof 
of a tradition from the apostles of any thing more than 
is written in Scripture, we would receive it. 

But we take the Holy Scriptures as the complete 
universal rule or law of faith and holy living. We 
know of no tradition that containeth another word of 
God; and we know there is none such because the 
Scripture is true, which asseiteth its own sufficiency. 
Scripture, and unwritten tradition are but two ways of 
acquainting the world with the same christian doctrine ; 
and not with divers parts of that doctrine, that tradition 
adds to Scripture. It is but the substance of greatest 
virtues that are conveyed by unwritten tradition : but 
that and much more is contained in the Scripture, where 
the christian doctrine is complete, and containeth the 
integrals as well as the essentials. 

The manner of delivery in a form of words, which 
no man may alter, and in so much fulness and perspi- 
cuity, is mucli to be preferred before the mere verbal 
delivery of the same doctrine. The memory of man 
cannot retain as much as the Bible doth contain, and 
preserve it safe from alterations or corruptions ; or if 


one man were of so strong a memor3% no man can ima- 
gine that all should be so ; or if one orcneration had such 
wonderful memories, we cannot imagine that all their 
posterity should have the liUe. 

If all the world had such Tniraculous memories, yet 
men arc apt to be negligent either in learning or keep- 
ing of lioly doctrine. All have not that zeal that ex- 
cites them to such wonderful diligence without which 
such a treasure could not be preserved. 

When so much matter is committed to bare memory 
without a form of unalterable words, new words may 
make an alteration before men are aware. The change 
of one word sometimes makes a whole discourse have 
another sense. 

There are so many carnal men in the world that 
love not the strictness of that doctrine which they do 
possess, and so many heretics that would pervert the 
holy doctrine, that it would purposely be altered by 
them if it could be done ; and it might much more 
easily be done, if it lay all upon mens' memories : for 
one party would set their memory against the others, 
and tradition would be set against tradition : especially 
when the far greater part of the church turn heretics, 
as in the Arians' days ; then tradition would be most 
at their keeping and interpretation ; and if we had not 
then had the unalterable Scriptures, what might they 
not have done ? 

A whole body of doctrine kept only in memory, will 
soon be disjointed; and if the matter were kept safe, 
yet the methud and manner would be lost. 

There could not be such satisfactory evidence given 
to another of the integrity or certainty of it, as when 
it is preserved in writing. We should all be diflident 
that the laws were corrupted, or that lawyers might 
combine to do it at their pleasure, if there were no law 
books or records, but all lay in their memories. If 
they were faithful, yet they could not give us evidence 
of it. 

The holy truths of God, historical, doctrinal, practi- 
cal, prophetical, &c., without a course of miracles, or 
extraordinary means, could not have been kept through 
all ages, as well without writing, as with it. 


If writing be not necessary, why have we so many 
fathers, histories, and canons? Why do they fetch 
their tradition from those and ridiculously call them 
unwritten verities ^ Are they unwritten, when they 
turn us to so many volumes for them? If man's writ- 
ing be necessary for their preserv^ation, men should 
thankfully acknowledge that God hath taken the best 
way in giving it us in his own unalterable phrase. 

If they prove that some matters of fact are made 
known to us by tradition that are not in the Scripture, 
or that any church orders or circumstances of worship 
then used are so made known to us, which yet we 
wait for the proof of, it will not follow that any of those 
are therefore divine institutions, or universal laws for 
the unchangeable obligation of the whole church. If 
there be some things historically related in the Scrip- 
ture, that were obligatory but for a season, and ceased 
when the occasion ceased, as the washing of feet, the 
abstaining from things strangled and blood, the anoint- 
ing of the sick, the prophesyings one by one, 1 Cor. xiv. 
31. miraculous gifts and their exercise, &c. it will not 
follow, that they are universal laws to the church. 

We will never take the pope's decision for a proof of 
tradition: nor will we receive it from pretended au- 
thority, but from rational evidence. Their saying, ice. 
are the authorised keepers of tradition, shall not go 
with us for proof. 

It is not the testimony of the Papists alone, who are 
not only a lesser part of the church, but a part that hath 
espoused a corrupt interest against the rest, that we 
shall take for certain proof of a tradition, but we will 
prefer the testimony of the whole church before the 
Romish church alone. 

They that can produce the best records of anliquitv, 
or rational proof of the antiquity of the thing they plead 
for, are of more regard in the matter of tradition than 
millions of unlearned men. Universal tradition is 
preferred before the tradition of the Romish sect, and 
rational 7;roo/ of antiquity is preferred before ignorant 
surmises. But where both those concur w/iircrsa/ co«- 
$ent, and records or other credible evidence of antiqui- 
ty, it is most valid. 

JtGGLINO. 125 

As for the Romish traditions which they take for 
part of God's word ; they must produce sufficient proof 
that they came from the apostles, before we can receive 
them as apostolic tradition : and also that it was deliv- 
ered by the apostles as a perpetual universal doctrine 
or law for the whole church. 

Either those traditions have evidence to prove them 
apostolical, or no evidence. If none, how can the pope 
know them ? If they have evidence, why may not we 
know it as well as the pope? 

If there be any proof of these traditions, it is either 
some ancient records or monuments : or it is the prac- 
tice of the church ; but then how shall we know how 
long- that practice hath continued, without recourse to 
the writings of the ancients:'' Reports are very uneer- 
tain. If it may be known without the search of ancient 
records, then we may know it as well as they. 

If the pope and his priests have been the keepers of 
it, have they in all ages kept it to themselves or declared 
it to the church ? If they have concealed it, then it be- 
longed not to others : or else they were unfaithful and 
unfit for the office. Then how do succeeding popes 
and priests know it ? If they divulged it, then others 
know it as well as they. We have had abundance of 
preachers from among the Papists, who were once Pa- 
pists themselves, as Luther, MelanrAhon, Zuingluie, 
Calvin, Beza, Peter Martyr, Bucer, S^*c., and yet they 
knew not apostolical traditions. 

It mars your credit with us, because we are nble to 
prove the beginning of some of your traditions, or a 
time when they had no being : also the death and burial^ 
of many things that have long gone under the name of 

You are so confounded between your ecclesiastical 
decrees and traditions, and your apostolical traditions, 
that we despair of learning to know one from the other 
and of seeing under the hand of the pope and a general 
council a catalogue of the true apostolical traditions. 
It seems to us scarce fair dealing that in one thousand 
years time, the church could never have an enumeration 
"and description of those traditions, with the proofs of 



It is abominable impiety for you to equal your tradi- 
tions with the Holy Scripture, till you have enumerated 
and proved them. It makes us suspect your traditions, 
when we perceive that they or their patrons have such 
an enmity to the Holy Scriptures, that they cannot be 
rio^htly defended without casting some reproach upon 
tlie Scriptures, But this is no new thing with the ap- 
plauders of tradition. The eighth general council at 
Constantinople, Can. 3, decreed that the image of Christ 
should be adored with equal honor iciih (he holy Scripture. 

If your own councils themselves, are for the suffi- 
ciency of Scripture, what then has become of &il your 
traditions ? Binius, p. 299, Council of Basil, Ragusii 
Orat. — " Faith and all things necessary to salvation, 
both matters of belief and matters of practice, are founded 
in the literal sense of Scripture, and only from that may 
argumentation be taken for the proving of those things 
that are matters of faith, or necessary to salvation ; 
and not from those passages that are spoken by allegory, 
or other spiritual sense. The Holy Scripture in the 
literal sense soundly and well understood, is the infal- 
lible and most sufficient rule of faith.'' ^ This is the 
Protestant doctrine. There is nothing any way neces- 
sary to faith or salvation, but what is contained in the 
Scriptures, either expressly, or as the conclasion in the 
premises. We grant tradition or church practices are 
very useful for our better understanding of some Scrip- 
tures : but, what is this to another traditional word ot 
God? Prove your traditions by inference from Scrip- 
ture and we receive them. 

This is the doctrine for Scripture. Sufficiency and 
perfection are the rule of faith and life, admitting no ad- 
dition as necessary, but explication. When this doc- 
trine past so lately in a Popish council, you may sec 
that the very doctrine of tradition equalled with Scrip- 
ture, or being another word of God, necessary to faith 
and salvation, containing what is wanting in Scripture, 
is but lately sprung up in the world. 

Tiie Papists get liitle by their argument from tradi- 
tion : they lose by it all their cause. 

For two things they much plead tradition ; their pri- 
vate doctrines and practices, in which they disagree 


from all Christians ; and there they lose their lahor 
with the judicious : because tliey ^ive us no sufficient 
proof tjjat their tradition is apostolical, and because tlir> 
dissent of other churches showeth that it is not universal. 

Tlie other cause for which they plead tradition is the 
doctrine of Christianity itself; with a desic^n to lead 
jnen to the church of Rome : as if we must be no (chris- 
tians, unless we are Christians upon the credit of the 
pope, and his subjects. 

We do not strive against tradition or testimony of an- 
tiquity for the Scripture, or for Scripture doctrine : we 
make much advantage of such just tradition. We ac- 
cept our religion from both the hands of Providence that 
bring it us ; Scripture and tradition ; and we abhor the 
contempt which those partial disputers cast upon Scrip- 
ture ; but we are not tlierefore so partial ourselves as to 
refuse any collateral or subordinate help for our faith. 
Tlij more testimonies the better. The best of us have 
need of all the advantages for our faith that we can get. 
When they have extolled the certainty of tradition to 
the highest, we gladly join with them, and accept of any 
certain tradition of the mind of God. I advise all who 
would prove themselves wise defenders of the faith, to 
take heed of rejecting arguments from providences, or 
any necessary testimony of man, especially concerning 
matter of fact, or of rejecting true church history, be- 
cause the Papists overvalue it under the name of tra- 
dition, lest such prove guilty of the like partiality and 
injuriousness to the truth as the Papists are. Whereas 
the Papists imagine, that this must lead us to their church 
for tradition, I answer we go beyond the Papists in ar- 
guing for just tradition of the Christian faith, and make 
far greater advantage of it than they can do. They ar- 
gue but from authoritative decision by the pope, under 
the name of church tradition, whereas we argue from 
true history and certain antiquity, and prove what we 

Their tradition is no tradition : for it must be taken 
upon the credit of a man, supposed infallible iby super- 
natural, if not miraculous endowment ; which is not tra- 
dition but prophesy. If they prove the man to be such 
a man, it is all one to the church whether he say that 


this was the apostles' doctrine, or this I deliver myself to 
you from God. For he is so qualified, he has the pow- 
er and credit of a prophet or apostle himself : therefore 
they must prove tlie pope to he a prophet, before their 
tradition can get credit : and when they have done that 
there is no need of it. 

When Papists speak of tradition confusedly, they give 
us just reason to call them to define their tradition, and 
tell us what they mean by it, before we dispute with 
them upon an ambiguous word ; seeing they are so divid- 
ed among themselves, that one party understands one 
thing by it, and another another thing ; which we must 
not sufler tliose jugglers to jumble together and confound. 

Another advantage in which we go beyond the Papists 
for tradition, is, that as we argue not from the mere pre- 
tended supernatural infallibility or authority of any ; as 
they do, but from rational evidence of true antiquity ; 
so we argue not from a sect or party as they do, but from 
the universal church. As far as the whole church of 
Christ is of larger extent and greater credit than the 
Popish party, so far is our tradition more credible than 

The Papists are fewer by far than the rest of the nom- 
inal christians in the world. And the testimony of many 
is more than of a part. The Papists above other parties 
have espoused an interest that leads them to preten 1 
and corrupt tradition, and bend all things to that inter- 
est of their own, that they may lord it it over all the 
world : but the whole church can have no such interest 
and partiality. The Papists are but one side ; and he 
that will judge rightly, must hear the other sides speak too. 
But the tradition that we make use of, is from all sides 
concurring ; even Papists themselves agree with us in 
many points. 

Our tradition reacheth farther than the universal church, 
for we take in all rational evidence of Jews, heathens, 
heretics, and persecutors ; that bear witness to the mat- 
ters of fact, and what was the doctrine and practice of 
the cluistians in their times, and what books they made 
tlie ground of their faith. So that as impartial history 
or testimony differeth from private assertion, or from the 
testimony of one party only ; so doth our tradition excel 


both the sorts of Popish tradition, both that of the Papal, 
and that of the council pariy. 

But \vc have not done with tiiom, till tradition has 
given them their mortal stroke. You appeal to tradition, 
to tradition you shall go. l>ut what tradition? The 
tradition of the catholic church'? and where is that to he 
found and known ? hut in the profession and practice of 
tlie church, and in the records of the church? 

The great questions between you and us, arc these : 
Whether the pope be the head and sovereign ruler of 
the whole catholic church ? and ichether the catholic 
church and the Roman are of equal extent? 

Inquire of the present church : and there we have the 
profession and practice of all the Greeks; the Syrians; 
the Moscovites ,* the Georgians; and all others dispers- 
ed throughout the Turk's dominions, with the Jacobites, 
Armenians, Egyptians, Abassines, and all other church- 
es in Europe, &-c. which disclaim the headship of the 
Roman pope. All those with one mouth proclaim that 
the church of Rome is not, and ought not to be the mis- 
tress of the world, or of all other churches, but that the 
l)0})e for la^'ing such claim is a usurper, and the anti- 
Christ. This is the tradition of the Greeks; of the Ab- 
assines, and the greatest part of the church on earth 
agree in this. What then is become of the Roman sov- 
ereignty, by the verdict of tradition ; even from the 
vote of the greatest part of the church ? Rome hath no 
right to its pretended sovereignty, Babylon is fallen by 
the judgment of tradition. 

If you say that all those are heretics or schismatics, 
and therefore have no vote, we answer : a minor party, 
]>artial and corrupt, seeking dominion over the rest, may 
not step into the tribunal, and pass sentence against the 
catholic church, or the greatest part of it. 

But your common saying is, that the Greeks, 
Protestants, and all the rest were once of your church, 
and departing from it, they can have no tradition 
but yours. Go to former ages, seeing it is not the 
present church whose voice you will regard. But 
iiow shall we know the way and mind of the ages 
past ! If by the present age, then the greater part 
giveth us their sense against you. If by the records of 


those times, we arc content to hear the testimony of 
these. When we look into the ancients we find them 
against you ; and no footsteps of your usurped sover- 
eignty, but a contrary frame of government, and a con- 
sent of antiquity ajrainst it. When we look into later 
history we find, how by the advantages of Rome's tem- 
poral greatness and the emperor's residence there your 
greatness begun, and preparation was made to yout 
usurpation, and how the translation of the imperial seat 
to Constantinople made them your competitors, in the 
claim of an universal headship ; and how it being once 
made a question, you got it by a murdering emperor who 
took your side for his own advantage. It was not till 
Hildcbrand's days that you could get any possession. In- 
stead of apostolical tradition for your sovereignt\^ ; eight 
hundred years after the days of Christ, you had not so 
much of the catholic church in your subjection, as you 
have now. At six hundred years after Christ no known 
part of the world acknowledged your universal sover- 
eignty ; but only the Latin western church submitted to 
the pope as their patriach, and the first in order among 
the patriarchs. In the days of Constantino and the 
Nicene council, he was but a bishop of the richest and 
most numerous church of Christians : and for a hundred 
years after Christ, he was no more than the presbyter of 
a particular church. 

The Ethiopian churches of Habassia, the Indians, Per- 
sians, <fec. were never your subjects. England, Scot- 
land and Ireland were not only long from under you, 
but resisted 3'ou, maintaining the council of Chalcedon 
against you, and joining with the eastern churches 
against you, about Easter day. The eastern churches 
also were never your subjects. 

Canus Loc. 'Ilicol. lib. 6. cap. 7. saith; not only the 
Greeks, but almost all the rest of the bishops of the whole 
world,have vehemently sought to destroy the privileges of 
the church of Rome : and indeed they had on their side, 
both the arms of emperors, and the greater number of 
churches : and yet they could never prevail to abrogate 
the power of the pope of Rome. The catholic church 
was not then your subjects, when the greater number of 
churches, and most of the bishops of the whole world, as 


u ell as Greeks, were against you, and vehemently foutlii 
against your protended privilege's. 

JOiincrius contra ^Vuhh m scs Caial. in IjibHotluca 
Patrum, Tom. 4. p. 773. saitli, tlie cliurdies of the Ar- 
menians, and Ethiopians, and Indians, and tlic rest 
uliicli ti;e apostles converted, aie not under the churcli 
of Konic. What would you have plainer ? You may 
conjecture at tiie nundjers of those churches by what 
a legate of the pope that lived among them, saith of one 
corner of them, Jacob, a Vitriaco llistor. Orient, cap. 
77: the churches in the easterly j>arts of Asia alone ex- 
ceeded in multitude the Christians both of the Greek 
and Latin Churches. Alas, how little a thing then was 
the Roman church ! 

If all this were not enough, the tradition of your own 
church destroys the papacy utterly. "A general coun- 
cil is above the pope, and may judge him and depose him ; 
that is of faith, it is heresy to deny it ; and this is so sure 
that no wise man ever doubted it." Tiiis is the judg- 
ment of the general council of Basil, with whom that of 
Constance doth agree. Whether those councils were 
confirmed or not, they confess them lawfully called and 
owned, and extraordinarily full. So they were their 
church representative ; and so the pope's sovereignty 
• over the council is gone by tradition. If a free general 
council should be called, all the churches in the world 
nmst be equally there represented : and if they were so, 
then down goes the usurped headship of the pope: for 
most of the churches in the world are against it : and 
therefore in council they would have the major vote. 
And thus by the concession of the Roman representa- 
tive church the pope is gone by tradition. 


Papal Soveriignly. 

Another of the Roman frauds is this : The^ persuade 
men that the Greeks, the Protestants, and all other 
churches, icere once under the Pajjal sovereignty, and 

132 JEsuit 

have separated themselves without any just cause : 
and therefore we arc all schismatics ; and have no 
vote in general councils, <fec. 

This is a vain accusation. Abundance of churclies 
bad not any notable communion witb you. The Greek 
churches withdrew from your communion, but not from 
your subjection. If any of the patriarchs or emperors 
of Constantmople did for carnal ends submit to you, it 
was not the act of the churches, nor owned, nor of long 
continuance. So that it w,is from your communion and 
not from your subjection that they withdrew. 

We that are now living, our fathers or our grandfath- 
ers, were not of your church: and therefore we never 
did withdraw. 

There were churches in England before the Roman 
power was owned : therefore it was a sin to change, the 
first change was the sin, when they subjected themselves 
to you ; and not the later, in which they returned to 
their ancient state. 

The Germans or English or whoever did relinquish 
you, have as good reason for it, as for the relinquishing 
of any other sin. If they did by the unhappiness of ill 
education or delusion, submit to the usurped sovereignty 
of the pope they had no reason to continue in such an 
error. Repentance is not vice, w hen the thing repented 
of is a vice. Justify therefore your usurpation, or else 
it is in vain to be angry with us for not adhering to the 
usurper, and the many corruptions that he brought into 
the church. 



Another deceit that they manage with great confi- 
dence is this : Jf the church of Rome be the true 
church : then yours is not the true churchy arid then 
you arc schismatics in sepcrating from it : but the 
church of Rome is the true church; for you will con- 
fess it was a true church, when Paul wrote the epistle 

JUOOLINC. 13.*^ 

to the Romans : and if it ceased to be a true churchy 
tell us when it ceased^ if t/oii can : if it ceased to be a 
true church, it was either by heresy, or schism, or 

A mail would think that cliildron can sec the pal- 
pable fallacy ef this argument ; and yet of few do the 
learned Papists make more use. The deceit lieth in 
the ambiguity of the word church. It is taken often in 
Scripture for one particular church, associated for per- 
sonal communioH in God''s worship. And thus there 
were many churches in a country, as Judca, and Galatia. 
It is taken by ecclesiastical writers often for an associ- 
ation of many of those churches for communion by 
their pastors ; such as were diocesan, provincial, national 
churches ; whereof most were then ruled by assemblies, 
where a bishop, archbishop, metropolitan or partriarch, 
as they called them did preside. It is taken in Scrip- 
ture for the body of Christ ; the holy catholic or uni- 
versal church containing all true believers as mystical, 
or all professors of true faith as visible. It is taken by 
the Papists for one particular church lohich is the mis- 
tress or ruler of cdl other churches^ 

If the question be of a true particular church, we 
grant that the church of Rome was a true and noble 
church, in the days of Paul and long after ; and thus 
Paul ownetli it in his epistle as a true church. To 
die question when it ceased to be a true church : I an- 
swer, what matter is it to us whether it ceased or not, 
any more than whether Corinth, Ephesus, Coloses, Thes- 
salonica, or Jerusalem be true churches or be ceased ? In 
charity we regard them all: but otherwise what is it to 
the faith or salvation of the world, whether Rome or any 
one of those be yet a true church, or ceased ? I know 
not that there is any church at Coloses or Philippi, or 
some other places that had then true churches : and doth 
it therefore follow that I am not a true believer? What 
would you say to one who should argue thus concerning 
other churches, as those men do of Rome ? and say, if 
Philippi, be a true church, then England has no true 
churches, if it be not, when did it cease to be a true 
church ? Would you not answer him : what is it to me 
whether Philippi be a true church or not? may not w** 



and they be both true churches ? how j)rovc you that ? 
and wlietlier it be ceased or not ceased, doth no whit 
concern my faitii or salvation, fartlier than as my chari- 
ty is to be exercised towards them. So say we of Rome, 
it was a true particular church in the apostle's days. And 
if it be still a true church what hinders but we may be 
so too? But whether it be so or not, is little to me. It 
concerneth not my faith or salvation to know whether* 
there be any such place as Rome on earth, or whether 
it were consumed long ago. If a man were so simple as 
to believe a report that Rome was destroyed by Charles 
of Bourbon, and never inhabited, or had a pope since, 
he were but such a heretic as Pope Zachary and Bishop 
Boniface made of Virgilius, for holding there be anti- 

If you take the word church for a diocesan or pa- 
triarchal church, or association of churches; supposing 
such forms proved warrantable, the same answer serveth 
as to the first. 

But if by a true church you mean either the whole 
universal church: or a mistress church that must rule all 
ihe rest, there never was such a church in Paul's days. 

Therefore we turn this argument of the Papists against 
themselves. If the church of Rome itcre neither the 
ivhole catholic church, nor the inistress of all other 
churches lohen Paul wrote his epistle to them, then it 
is not so now, nor ought to be so accounted. That the 
church of Rome was not the whole catholic church then, 
no man can doubt, that reads what a church there was 
at Jerusalem, what a church at Ephcsus, and Philadel- 
phia, Smyrna, Thyatira, Laodicea, Corinth, and abun- 
dance more. Where doth Paul once name them either 
the catholic church, or the mistress or ruler of all churches'? 
or give the least hint of any such thing? or mention any 
pope among them whom the wliole world was to take to 
be their sovereign head ? Is it not an incredible thing that 
Paul, and all the apostles would forget to make any 
mention of this privilege, or teach them how to use it, 
or teach other churches ther duty in obeying the churcli 
of Rome, if indeed they had been made the mistress 
church ? Men that can believe what they list, may say 
what they list. But for my part I will never accuse 


l*aul anil all the apostles, of so great oblivion or negli- 
gence. And therefore I conclude, Rome was neither 
the universal churcli, nor the mistress church then, and 
therefore it is not so to he accoinited now. 

But tiie matter of the? Roman church must he distin- 
guished from its iww political form. For the matter, so 
many of its members as are true christians, are part of 
the catholic church of Christ tiiough not the whole. But 
as to the |)olitical form of the Roman church, as it is a 
body kcaded by one claiming an universal monarchy, so 
the form is false and anticin-istian, and therefore the 
church as Papal can bo no better. 

This is our answer to the question, wliethcr the church 
of Rome, be a true church 1 There arc I doubt not 
among them many true members of the catholic church, 
though I am confident that salvation is much more rare 
and dilTicult with them, than it is with the reformed cath- 
olics ; but tlie pope as a pretended universal monarch is 
a false head, and consequently their Papal church, as 
such, is a false antichristian church, and no true church 
of Jesus Christ. 


Another great endeavor of the Papists is, to make, 
men believe that they only have a fixedness ^unity^ consis- 
tency and scttlcdness in religion : but we arc still ai 
uncertainty, incoherent, not tied together by any certain 
bond, but still upon divisons, and upon change. 

Is this difieronco so great a business ? Do not those 
cheaters know, that if for this they would reproach us, 
they must do so by themselves 1 Know they not that 
among their own schoolmen there is the same difference ? 
and know they not that if differences in ceremonies or 
modes should unchurch us, or disgrace us, it would fall 
as foul on the whole catholic church, in the very primi- 
tive times ? Did they never read of the difference be- 
tween the Asian and the Roman churches, about the 


celebration of Easter day, and how Polycrates and the 
rest did plead tradition against the church of Rome's 
tradition ; how IrencX'Us did reprehend the Bishop of 
Rome for his uncharitable censure of the churches for so 
small a difference ? and how Polycarp and Anicetus 
Bishop of Rome could not agree, as building upon 
contrary traditions : but yet maintained Christian peace ; 
Euschius Lib. 5. Hist. Eccl. cap. 26. The English and 
Scottish churches long after that adhered to the Asian 
way ; even after the council of Nice had ended the 
controversy on the Roman side. Who knows not how 
many more controversies greater than those of ours have 
been among the churches of Christ, without their un- 
churching or disparagement to religion ? 

For the doctrinal controversies, most of them lie more 
in words than in sense, and all of them are far from the 
foundation, though they be about Christ, who is the 
foundation. Those of us that say Christ died for all, 
and those that say he died not for all, do agree as your 
schoolmen do, that he died for all, as to the sufficiency 
of his death and price : but he died not for all as to the 
actual efficiency of pardon and salvation : is not this 
•your doctrine ? and is not this ours 1 and are you not as 
much disagreed about it as we ? what else meant the 
late decision against the Jansenists 1 and the persecution 
of them in France 1 And yet have you the face to 
make this a reproach of us .'* For the righteousness of 
Christ, we are commonly agreed that it is both his obe- 
dience and passion that we are justified and saved by : 
though we are not all of a mind about the reason of their 
several interests. 

For different forms of worship those men do wilfully 
forget what a number of offices and Mass books have 
been among themselves and other churches : and the 
number of Litanies or Lituriiies of several a<res and 
churches they have given us. 

As for the changes and unfixedness which they charge 
us with, we are contented that our principles and our 
practices be compared with the Papists, and then let 
modest and judicious enemies be judges which of us are 
more fixed, or more mutable. 

For our principles, we take only Christ to be the chief 

jrooLiNG. 137 

foundation of our faith, and liis inspired pro|)hets and 
apostles to be tiio secondary foundation : wliercas tiic 
Papists build upon many a most ungodly man, because 
he is the Pope of Rome. Which of those is the firmer 
foundation ? 

We take nothing; for our rule but tlie sure word of 
God contained in the Holy Scriptures : but the Papists 
take the decrees of all popes and councils for their rule. 
Our rule they confess to be divine and infallible : their 
rule we affirm to be human and fallible. Which 
then is like to be more firm ? Our rule the Sacred 
Scriptures in the original languages, as to the words, 
and the matter of them, as to the sense, the Papists 
themselves confess is unchangeable ; but they will not 
say as much of their own ; that alteration which Pope 
Sixtu>, and Pope Clement made in the vulgar Latin 
Bible, which is one part of their rule, and the other part 
is their decrees, of which Pope Leo. X. Bulla contr. 
Luth. saith, the popes our predecessors never erred in 
their canons and constitutions. And yet Pope Julius 
IL said is his general council at the Lateran with their 
approbation, Cont. pragmaf. sand, monitor. — Though 
the institutions of sacred canons, holy fathers, and popes 
of Rome — and their decrees be judged immutable, as 
made by divine inspiration ; yet the pope of Rome, who, 
thouch of unequal merits, holdcth the place of the eter- 
nal king, and the maker of all things, and all laws on 
earth, may abrogate these decrees when they are abused. 

You see here from the mouth of infallibility itself, if 
the Roman faith have any, of what continuance we may 
judire their immutable decrees to be, which are made as 
by divine inspiration: they are immutable till the pope 
abrogate them, who being in God's place, is of power 
to do it. 

We have a rule tliat was perfected by Christ and his 
apostles, to which nothing can be added, and therefore 
we are at a certainty for our religion : for we have a 
sure and perfect rule from heaven. Nothing may be ad- 
ded to it, or taken from it. But the Papists do profess 
that the determinations of the pope or council may make 
a point, and so five thousand points, for there is no cer- 
tain number, to be articles of faith, and necessary to 



salvation. So that the Papists never know when their 
faith is perfect and grown to its full stature. For ought 
they know a thousand more articles may be added. 
And yet these men of uncertain growing faith, have the 
face to persuade men that we are mutable, and they are 

We never changed our head, our Lord, our faith, or 
one article of our faith : if malice itself be able to charge 
us with changing the smallest article of our faith, let 
them say their worst : we change not our rule, the Holy 
Scriptures, nor one clause or sentence of it, but endeav- 
or the preservation of the same, which at the first we re- 
ceived. In our contests with the Papists, our great of- 
fence is at their mutation from the ancient rule and way ; 
we contend but for the faith once delivered to the saints : 
the old way with us is the good way : we abhor a 
new religion. If we change in any thing, it is 
but by repenting of our former changeableness wliile 
our nation was Popish ; having then changed from the 
apostolic simplicii}^, we change from that sinful change, 
and return to the ancient way again. And if we have 
made any further changes since our first cliange at the 
reformation, it is but perfecting the change to antiquity 
and apostolic simplicity, which we tiien begun. Rome 
was not built in one day, and is not pulled down in a 
day. The work of reformation is but one change, 
though it be not done all at one time. If we find some 
spots of Romish dirt upon us, that escaped us at our 
first washing, it is no dangerous mutability yet to wash it 
ofl. If a man converted by saving grace be not perfect- 
ly rid of all his former sin the first day of his conversion, 
should he be reproached as mutable for striving against 
it all his life after, and casting it ofl' by degrees as he is 
able ? If a man did but recover by degrees from the 
relics of his disease, they will not therefore rej)roach him 
as mutable. If he sweep the dust or dirt out of his house 
every day, they will not say, he is mutable, and knows 
not where to rest. Those men might as well reproach 
us as mutable, because we rise in the morning and do 
not still lie in bed ; or because we go to bed at nicrht, 
and do not stay up entirely. 

But what is it that we are changeable in 1 We have 


changed none of the substance of worship: did we ha|)- 
tiso befoiv, and do we not so still 1 did we pray or admin- 
ister tiie Lord's Supper before, and do we not still ] what 
is the change 1 Do these men think us so sottish as to 
place our relitrion in circumstances 1 God hath bid us 
pray contiiuially: but he hath not told us whether we 
shall use a prayer-book or not, but left that to men's 
necessities or conveniences to determine. Doth a man 
change his religion or worshij) of Ciod, if he either begin 
or cease to use a book] but whether we use them, or 
not use them, is no part of our religion at all, but a mere 
accident, or common helj) and a|)purtenance. God hath 
not told jireachers whether they shall use notes for their 
memory in |)reaching : to one it is a hindrance, to an- 
other a help. Doth a man change his religion when 
he changeth a custom of using notes'? God hath not told 
us what chapter we shall read, or what psalm we shall 
sing, or what text we shall jireach on this day or that 
day. What if one age think it best that pastors shall 
read no chapter preach on no text, and sing no psalm 
but by direction : and the next age think it meeter to 
leave that to each minister, as thinking it unfit to ordain 
such ministers as have not wit enough to choose their 
text, chapter, or psalm according to occasions. Will you 
say that here is a change of religion 1 These outside 
hypocrites tell the world what a thing they take religion 
to be, and in what they place it. What if one read a 
chapter with spectacles, and another without, or if one 
preach in a pulpit, and another below : or if one preach 
in a white garment, and another in a black : are we 
therefore of several religions 1 or is this any part of the 
worship itselfl do we not all stand or sit at the hearing 
of a sermon, as we please? do we not kneel or stand at 
prayer as we please 1 Yea, do not men commonly in 
singing psalms or prayer or praise to God, sit or stand 
as they please ? Doth standing, kneeling, or sitting 
make another religion, or any part of it? And for mar- 
rying, burying, baptising, and the rest, we have altered 
no part at all of the worship of God ; what ignorant 
souls are these, that think that the using a book, or a ges- 
ture, or certain words to the same sense, make difl'erent 
religion, or ordinances of worship? Those are tricks 


that none but the ignorant will be deluded with, that 
know not what religion or worship is. They may as 
well say if I cliange my lecture day from Thursday to 
Friday, that I change my religion or the worship of God. 

But they have changed the very essence of their 
church ; the officers, the doctrine, the discipline, the 
worship, as though they had been born for change, to 
turn all upside down. 

In the primitive times the church had no universal 
monarch but Christ: but they have set up a new uni- 
versal monarch at Rome. 

In tlic primitive times the catholic church was the 
universality of Christians : they have changed it to be 
only the subjects of the pope. 

in. the primitive times Rome was but a particular 
church as Jerusalem and other churches were : but they 
have changed it, to be the mistress of all churches. 

For many hundred years after Christ, the Scripture 
was taken to be a sufficient rule of faith : but the}' have 
changed it to be hni part of the rule. 

In the ancient church all sorts were earnestly exhor- 
ted to read, or hear, and study the Scripture in a known 
tonsfue : but they have changed that into a desperate re- 
straint, proclaiming it the cause of all heresies. 

In the ancient church the bread and wine was the 
body and blood of Christ representative and relitive: 
but they have changed it into the real body and blood. 

Heretofore there was bread and wine remaining after 
the words of consecration : but they have changed so, 
that there remaineth neither bread nor wine, but the 
({ualities and quantity, without the substance, and this 
must be believed, because they say it, against Scripture 
and antiquity, and sense itself. 

In the ancient church the Lord^s Suppc? ?vas admin- 
istered in both kinds, bread and wine to all : but they 
have lately changed this into one kind only to the peo- 
))le, denying them one half of the sacrament. 

Of old the Lord^s Supper was but the commemora- 
tion of the sacificc of Christ upon the cross, and a 
sacrament of our communion icith him and his members: 
but now they have changed it into a propitiatory sa- 
critice for the sins of the quick and dead : and in it 


they adore a piece of bread as very God, wiili divine 

Of old, men were tauglit to make daili/ ronfrssfon 
of shi, and bcf^ pardun ; and when they had done all, 
to confess themselves unprofitable servants : but now 
they are so chanircd, that they pretend not only to be 
perfect without sin, and to merit by the condignity of 
their works with God, but to supererogate and be more 
perfect than innocence could make them, by doing more 
than their duty. 

Of old those things wore accounted sins deserving 
hell, and needing the blood of Christ for pardon, which 
now are changed into venial sins, which properly are no 
sins, and deserve no more than temporal punishment. 

Of old the saints had no proper merits to plead for 
themselves ; and now men have some to spare for the 
buying of souls out of purgatory. 

Of old the pastors of churches were subject to the rul- 
ers of the commonwealth; even every soul, not only for 
wrath, but for conscience' sake was obliged to be sub- 
ject : but now all the clergy are exempted from secular 
judgment, and the secular power is subject to them : for 
the pope hath power to depose princes, and dispossess 
them of their dominions, and put others in their room, 
and dissolve the bonds of oaths and covenants, in which 
the subjects were obliged to them, and to allow men to 
murder them. 

I might fill a volume with all the changes they have 
made in doctrines, and church orders, and discipline, 
and religious orders and their discipline, and in worship 
and ceremonies. Their Liturgy or Mass-book hath been 
changed, and abundance of additions it iiath had since 
the beginning of it. 

Now I am content that any impartial man shall judge 
whether Papists or the reformed churches are the more 
mutable and unsettled in their religion ? and which of 
them is at the greater certaintv, firmness, and immuta> 
bility ] 



J^oveUy and Succession. 

xVnotlier fraud of the Papists, vvliich they place not 
the least of their confidence in, is this : the^ persuade 
the i^cople that our church and religion are but neto^ 
of the other day''s invention : and that theirs is the 
only old religion. And therefore they call upon us to 
give them a catalogue of the professors of our religion 
in all ages ; which they pretend we cannot do : and ask 
us where our church was before Luther. 

To this we sliall give them a hrief but satisfactory 
answer. We are so fully assured that the oldest relig- 
ion is the best since the date of the Gospel, that we are 
contented our whole cause shall stand or fall by this tri- 
al. Let him be esteemed of the true religion, that is of 
the oldest religion. This is the main difference between 
us and the Papists. We are for no religion that is not 
as old as the days of the apostles : but the\^ are for the 
novelties and additions of popes and councils. Poly- 
dore Virgil Inv en. Rcrum, lib. 8. c. 4. calling us a sect, 
gives 3'ou a just description of us, ''''having once got 
leave to speak that sect did marvelously increase in a 
short time; ivhich is called evangelical, because they 
affirm that no law is to be received which belongeth to 
salvation, but what is give?! by Christ or the apostles.'''' 
Yet these very men hav^e the face to charge us with nov- 
elty ; as if Christ and his apostles were not of sufficient 
antiquity for them. Our main quarrel with them is, for 
adding new inventions in religion, and their principal 
business against us is to defend it, and yet they call 
theirs the oM religion, and ours the new. 

That which is most conformed to the doctrine and 
practice of Christ and his apostles, is the truly ancient 
religion and church. But our religion and church is 
most conformed to the doctrine and practice of the apos- 
tles : therefore it is the truly ancient religion and church. 

That religion which is most conformed to the Holy 
Scripture is most conformed to the doctrine and practice 
of Christ and his apostles. But our religion and churches 


arc most coiilbrined to the Holy Scrii)tiiics. Tiiey c;iu 
say nothing against tiiis but that the Scri[)turc is insuf- 
ficient without tradition : hut wo have no rule of faith 
which is not hy themselves confessed to he true: they ac- 
knowledge Scripture to he tlu; true word of God ; so 
that the truth of our ride is justified hy themselves. Let 
tiiem sliow us as good evidence that their additional ar- 
ticles of faith or laws of life came from the apostles, as 
we do that the Scriptures came from them, and then 
we shall confess that we come short of them. Let tlicm 
take the controversies between us point by point, and 
hriuir their proof, and we will bring ours, and let tliat 
religion carry it that is apostolical. Tlieir traditions in 
matter of faith superadded to the Scripture, are mere 
heretical or erroneous forgeries, and they can give us no 
proof that ever they were apostolical. The Scripture 
alTu'meth its own sufficiency ; and therefore excludeth 
tlieir traditions. In their own general council at Basil, 
the Scripture sufficiency was defended. The ancient 
fathers were for the sufficency of Scripture. Their tra- 
ditions are the opinions of a dividing sect, contrary to 
the traditions or doctrine of the present catholic church : 
the far greater jmrt of Christians being against them. 
For some hundred years after Christ, most of their pre- 
tended traditions were unknown or abhorred by the 
Christian church, and no such things were in being 
among them. The chief points of controversy maintain- 
ed against us, are not only without Scripture, but against 
it, and thence we have full particular evidence to dis- 
prove them. If the Scri[)tures be true, as they confess 
them to be, then no tradition can be apostolical or true, 
that is contrary to them. The Papist's tradition is, that 
the clergy is exempt from the magistrate's judgment : 
but the Holy Scriptures saitii, Jet tvcri/ soul he subject 
to the higher powers, Rom. xiii. The Papists' tradition 
is for serving God lyublichj in an unhioum tongue : but 
the Holy Scripture is fully against it. Their tradition is 
against laymen's reading the Scripture in a known tongue, 
without special license from their ordinary : but Scrip- 
ture and all antiquity are against them. 

These seven ways we know tiieir traditions to be de- 
ceitful ; because they are unproved ; against the sufficien- 


cy of Scripture, their own former confessions, and the 
consent of the fathers ; contrary to the judgment of the 
catholic church ; once the church was without them ; 
and many of them are contrary to express Scripture. 

If Scripture will show which of us is nearest the doc- 
trine and practice of the apostles, then the controversy 
is ended. For we provoke them to try the cause by 
Scripture, and they deny it. We profess it is the rule 
and test of our religion; but they appeal to another rule 
and test. Thus you may see which is the old religion. 

Our church and religion have continued from the days 
of Christ till now. The promise of Christ cannot be 
broken. Christ promised in his word, that that church 
and religion which are most conformed to the Scriptures, 
shall continue to the end : but our church and religion 
are most conformed to the Scripture : therefore Christ 
hath promised that it shall continue to the end. 

The Christian religion and catholic church have con- 
tinued from the days of Christ till now. But ours is the 
Christian religion, and catholic church : therefore ours 
hath continued from the days of Christ until now. That 
religion which hath all the essentials of Christianity, and 
doth not deny or destroy any essential part of it, is the 
Christian Religion. That religion which the apostles 
were of is the Christian religion. They who believe all 
that is in the Holy Scripture are of the Christian reli- 
gion ; but thus do the reformed churches believe. 

They who are of that one holy catholic church, where 
Christ is the head and all true Christians are members, 
are of the true church ; for there is but one catholic 

They who are sanctified, and justified, have the love of 
God in them, are members of the true catholic church : 
but such are all that are sincere professors of our reli- 

But all this will not serve them without telling them 
where our church was before Luther: to this we an- 
swer we have no peculiar catholic church of our 
own ; for there is but one, and that is our church : where- 
ever the christian church was, there was our church. 
Wherever any Christians were congregated for God's 
worship, there were churches of Uie same sort, as our 

jrflKGLlNQ. 145 

particular churches. Wherever Christianity was, there 
our religion was ; for we know no religion but Chris- 
tianity. Would you have us give a catalogue of all 
the Christians in the world since Christ ? Or would you 
liave us as vain as Tuherville who names some popes, 
about twenty professors of their faith in each age, as if 
twenty or thirty men were the catholic church : or as 
if those men were proved to be Papists by his naming 
them ? 

Our religion is Christianity. Christianity hath cer- 
tain essentials, without which no man can be a Christian ; 
and it hath moreover many precious truths, and duties 
necessary to the better being of a Christian. Our being 
as Christians is in the former ; and our strength and in- 
crease and better being are much in the latter. From the 
former, religion and the church are denominated. Our 
implicit and actual explicit belief, as the papists call 
them, must be distinguished ; or our general and our 
particular belief. And also the positives of our belief 
must be distinguished from the implied negatives ; and 
the express articles themselves, from their implied con- 

Now I shall tell 3'ou where our church hath been in 
all ages since the birth of Christ. 

In the days of Christ and his apostles our church was 
where they and all Christians were : and our religion was 
with them in all its parts, both essential and perfective. 
That is, we now believe all to be true that was delivered 
by the apostles as from God, with a general faith ; and 
ail the essentials and as much more as we can under- 
stand, with a particular faith. But we cannot say that 
with such a particular faith we believe all that the apos- 
tles belieN-TDd or delivered ; for then we must say that 
we h.ave the same degree of understanding as they ; and 
that we understand every word of the Scriptures, 

In the days of the apostles themselves, the consecta- 
ries, and implied verities, and rejection of all heresies 
were not particularly and expressly delivered either in 
Scripture or tradition. 

In the next ages after the apostles, our church was the 
one catholic church, containing all true Christians, headed 
by Jesus Christ : and every such Christian was a mem- 



ber of it. The essential parts of our religion were con* 
tained both in the Holy Scriptures, and in the public 
professions, ordinances, and practices of the church in 
those ages, which you call traditions; and the rest of it, 
even all the doctrines of faith and universal laws of God, 
which are its perfective parts, were fully contained in 
the Holy Scripture. And some of our rejections and 
consectaries, were then gathered and owned by the 
church, as heresies occasioned the expressing of them: 
and the rest were all implied in the apostolical Scrip- 
ture doctrine which they preserved. 

By degrees many errors crept into the church : so, 
that neither the catholic church, nor one true Christian 
did reject any essential part of Christianity. All parts of 
the church were not alike corrupted with error, but some 
more, and some less. The whole church held the Holy 
Scripture itself, and so had a perfect general or implicit 
belief, even while by evil consequences they oppugned 
many parts of their own profession. 

When in process of time by claiming the universal 
sovereignty, Rome had introduced a new pretended 
catholic church, by superadding a new head and form, 
there was then a two-fold church in the West; the Chris- 
tian as Christian headed by Christ ; and the Papal as 
Papal headed by the pope ; and by that usurped monarchy 
they endeavored to make but one of them, by making both 
the heads essential, when before one only was tolerable. 
If the matter in any part may be the same ; and the 
same man may be a Christian and a Papist, and so the 
same assemblies : yet still the forms are various : and 
as Christians and part of the catholic church, they arc 
one thing: but as Papists and members of the separat- 
ing sect, they are another thing. 

In the time of the Romish usurpation, our church was 
visible in the Imvest degree among the Papists them- 
selves, not as Papists, but as Christians. For they ne- 
ver did deny the Scriptures, nor the ancient creeds, nor 
baptism, the Lord's Supper, nor any of the substance of 
our positive articles of religion. They added a new re- 
ligion and church of their own, but still professed to hold 
all the old in consistency with it. 

Wherever the truth of the Hohj Scriptures and the 


ancient creeds of the church was professed, tliere was 
our relijOfion before Liitlier : but even among tbe Papists, 
the Holy Scriptures and tlie said creeds were visibly pro- 
fessed, theiefore among ibem was our religion. 

Popery itself was not ripe for a corruption of the 
Christian faith professed, till Luther's opposition height- 
ened them. For the Scripture was frequently before, 
by Papists held to be a most sufficient rule of faiih, as I 
have sliowed from the council of Basil; and consequently, 
tradition was only pleaded as conservatory and exposi- 
to) y of the Scripture, but now the council of Trent hath 
equalled them, when they found that out of Scripture 
ihey were unable to confute or suppress the truth. 

At the time of the Church's oppression by the Papa- 
cy, our Religion was visible, and so our Church: in a 
more illustrious sort, among the Christians of the most of 
the world, Greeks, Ethiopians, and the rest^ who never 
were subject to the usurpation of Rome, but only many 
of them took him for the first patriarch, but not the 
governor of the universal church. So that here was a 
visibility of our church doubly more eminent than among 
the Romanists ; in that it was the far greatest pari of 
the catholic church that thus held our religion, to whom 
the Papists were then but few ; and in that they did not 
only hold the same positive articles of faith with us, but 
also among their rejections did reject the chief of the 
Popish errors as we do. 

They rejected with us, the pope's Catholic Monarchy^ 
the pretended infallibility of the pope or his councils : 
the new form of the Papal church, as headed by him, 
with other points; which are the very fundamental con- 
troversies between us and the Papists. So that the ma- 
jor part of the catholic church did profess it, with the 
rejection of the Papacy and Papal church, and so you 
may as easily see where our religion was before Luther, 
as where the catholic church, or most of Christians were 
before Luther. 

Our religion was professed with a yet greater rejec- 
tion of Romish corruptions, by many thousands that lived 
in the western ehurcli itself, and under the pope's nose, 
and opposed him in many of his ill endeavors against the 
church and truth, together with them that gave him th« 


hearing, and were glad to be quiet, and gave way to his- 
tyranny, but never consented to it. 

Concerning those we have abundant evidence, though 
abundance more we might have had, if the power and 
subtilty of the Papal faction had not had the handling of 
them. Histories tell us of the bloody wars and conten- 
tions that the emperors of both East and West have had 
with the pope to hinder his tyranny ; and that they were 
forced by his power to submit to him, contrary to their 
former free professions. Treatises were written against 
him, both for the emperors and princes, and against his 
doctrine and tyranny. Histories and professions of the 
Albigenses, Waldenses, Bohemians and others were very 
numerous, and they affirmed about the year one thousand 
one hundred, that they had continued since the apostles, 
and no other original of them is proved. General 
Popish councils have contended and borne witness against 
the pope's superiority over a council. In that and other 
points, whole countries of their own are not yet brought 
over to the pope. They have still among themselves 
Dominicans, Jansenists, &c., who are reproached by the 
Jesuits. Most points of ours which we oppose to Po- 
pery, are maintained by some or other of them. But 
the fullest evidence is the certain history or knowledge 
of the case of the common people and clergy among 
them, who are partly ignorant of the main matters in 
controversies between us, and are generally kept under 
the fear of fire, and sword, and torments ; so that the 
truth of the case is this : the Roman bishops were as- 
piring by degrees to be archbishops, and so to be pa- 
triarchs, and so to have the first seat and vote, and to be 
called the chief bishoj)s or patriarchs^ and at last they 
made another thing of their office, and claimed, about 
six hundred years after Christ, to be universal monarchs 
or governors of all the church. But though that claim 
was soon laid, it was comparatively but icvf^ even in the 
West, that made it any article of their faith ; but multi- 
tudes sided with the princes that would have kept the 
pope lower, and the most of the people meddled not with 
tlie matter, but yielded to necessity, and gave place to 
violence, except the Albigenses, Bohemians, Wickliffites 
and the rest that more openly opposed. So that no man 

JtTOOLlNO. 149 

could judge of the multitude clearly, which side they 
were on, being forced by fire and sword, and having not 
the freedom to profess their minds. 

Our religion was at first with the apostles, and the 
apostolic church : and for divers hundred years after, it 
was with the universal Clirislian church. Since Rome's 
usurpation, it was even with the Romanists though abus- 
ed, and with the greater part of tlie catholic church that 
renounced Popery then, and so do now ; and also with 
the opposers of the pope in the West. This is the 
succession we plead, and where our church and religion 
still was. 

If any deny that we are of the same church and re- 
ligion with all that is truly christian, I easily prove 
it. They tliat <ire Ciiristians joined to Christ the head, 
are all of the same church and religion, for none else are 
Christians or united to Christ, but the church which is 
his body : but all sincere Christians and we are united 
to Christ the head : therefore we are all of the same 
church and religion. 

They who believe the Holy Scripture, and differ in no 
essential part of the Christian faith, are of the same 
church and religion : but so do both we and all true 
Christians : therefore we are all of one church and re- 

They who are truly regenerate, and justified, hating 
all known sin, longing to be perfect, loving God above 
all, and seeking first his kingdom and righteousness, and 
accounting all tilings but loss in comparison of Christ, are 
all of the true catholic church, and the true Christian 
religion': but such are all that are sincere, of the reform- 
ed churches ; as we to prove others by our profession 
and practice, by which only tlicy are capable of judging 
of us; and to ourselves infallibly against all the enemies 
of our salvation in hell or eartli, by the knowledge and 
acquaintance with our own hearts, and the experience of 
the work of God upon them. All the Jesuits in the 
world cannot persuade me that I love not God, and hate 
sin, and prefer not the love of Christ before all the 
world, when I feel and know that I do; till they can 
prove that they know my heart better than I do. 

If Christ consent to it, and we consent to it, then ve 



all who are sincere in our profession are of the true cath- 
olic church and religion; for ifhe consent and we consent^ 
who is there that is able to break the match 1 But 
Cbrist consenteth, and we consent. His consent is ex- 
pressed in his Gospel, that whoever helieveth in him 
shall not perish, but have everlasting life ; and who- 
ever will may drink of the water of life freely. Our 
consent we openly j rofessed at baptism, and have fre- 
quently renewed; and our own souls are acquainted with 
the sincerity of it, whatever any that know not our hearts 
may say against it. 

All that are truly baptized, and own their baptismal 
covenant, are visible members of the true catholic church; 
for it is the very nature and use of baptism to enter us 
into that church. Protestants, are all truly baptized, 
and own their baptismal covenant : therefore we are all 
of the true catholic church. 

Tuberville says ; The true church of God hath had 
a continued succession from Christ J3ut the Pro- 
testant church, and so of all other sectaries, hath not a 
continued succession from Christ to this time. Judge 
what this man or any Papist ever said with sense and 
reason, to prove that the Eastern and Southern churches 
have no true succession. Are they not now of the same 
church and religion as ever they have been? All the 
change that many of them have made, hath been but in 
the entertaining of some fopperies, common to Rome 
and them : and if any of those, which you call sectaries 
can prove their succession, it destroys your argument 
and cause. 

We will begin with him at the first century, and so to 
the second ; and if he can prove that Jesus Christ, or 
the Virgin Mary, or John I3aptist, or the apostles, or 
any one of the rest that he hath named, were Papists, 
much more all of them, I am resolved to turn Papist. 
But unless he intended to provoke his reader to an 
irreverent laughter about this abuse of holy things, one 
would think he should not have named John Baptist, 
who was dead not only before Rome had a church, but 
also before the time that Bellarmin and his brethren pre- 
tended that Peter received his commission, to be the 
universal head. Did not that writer know that Protes- 


taiits can give him the same names, as for them ] And 
if printing them be proof, their proof is as good : if it 
be not, wliat proof shall we have / Our proof is the 
Holy Scriptures, written by the inspiration of the Holy 
Ghost in those times. Thence we prove that the fust 
church held the same belief as we have; and we will 
thence jirove that the catholic church was not then Pa- 
pists. Why else do we still appeal to Scriptures, and 
they refuse to stand the trial of it any otherwise than as 
expounded by the pope, but that we are confident, and 
they diftident of them ? We know the apostles' faith 
from the apostles ; but the Papists will not know it but 
from the present church of Rome. They tell you the 
apostles were for them : but how know we that? by the 
testimony of the next age : and where is that testimony ? 
because the fourth age was of dieir mind ; and how prove 
vou that 1 because the present age is of their mind : but 
most Christians of the present age are against them : 
vet they are not of the church : it is only the present 
church of Rome ! but the present church of Rome repre- 
sented in a general council may err, but the pope can- 
not err in appoving a council. So that the sum is this : 
if the pope himself may be judge, the apostles were 

I make no doubt, though Bellarmin deny it, but that 
other churches can prove as good a succession as the 
Roman, as to bishops; and Bellarmin after all gives up 
this mark as insufficient to prove a true church. Lib. 
3. de Hcclts. cap. 8. By his own confession then, suc- 
cession will not prove the Romanists a true church. 

As to a succession of religion, and a continuation of 
the catholic church, I am so lar from declining it, in ar- 
gumentation, that I here solemnly profess to all Papists, 
who shall read these words, that, as soon as I shall 


TURN Papist without delay: and I challenge 


they will prove that in the fust age, or the second, or 
third, the catholic church were Papists, I am resolved 
to turn Papist: but I am most confident that they can- 


not prove that in any one age to this day, the catholic 
church were Papists. 


Diversity of opinion. 

Another notable fraud of the Papists, is this : to con* 
found all their own errors and corruptions together, 
and then to instance in some of those errors that are 
common to them with some others, and to omit the es- 
sential parts of Popery. Thus they would make the 
world believe, that if they prove the antiquity of any 
points in difference between them and us, they do there- 
by prove the antiquity of Popery, and so of the succes- 
sion : so they would make our religion essentially to 
consist in every inferior difference between us. 

Suffer them not thus therefore to juggle in the dark, 
but distinguish between the essentials of popery, or the 
main difference between them and us, and the other 
errors, which are not proper to them alone. 

Bellarmin opens his juggling, lib. 4. dc Eccles. cap. 9, 
where he pleadeth antiquity of doctrine as a note of the 
true church. Two ways we may by this mark prove 
our church. By showing the sentences of the ancients, 
by which we confirn) all our tenets, and refute our ad- 
versaries. But this way is most prolix, and obnoxious 
to many calumnies and objections : the other way is 
shorter and surer, by showing first from the confession 
of the adversaries, that our tenets are the doctrine of all 
the ancients. If the weakness or rashness of any Pro- 
testants be the Papists' strength, it is time for us to be 
more prudent : but if it be the Papists' unhappiness that 
cannot understand the ancients, but only from the pope 
or the Protestants, the fathers are fallen into the hands 
of babies as well as the Scrij)tures ; and the Protestants 
have too little wit if they will join with the pope in an 
abusive interpreting the fathers for tli*; Pa})ists. Bellar- 
min proceeds to cite Calvin, and the ccnturists, as giving 
them the fathers, in the point of freewill, Limbus, Con- 


ciipiscence, Lent, lay baptism in necessity, &-c., there- 
fore by our confessions antiquity is for the Papists. 
Tliis is their shortest and surest way. Is not here great 
diffidence in tlie fatliers, when they have more confi- 
dence in our sayings tlian their writings 1 

But this jugghng will not serve the turn. Take up the 
essentials of Popery, and prove a catholic succession of 
them, and you shall win the day. I here again solemnly 
promise and protest, that when ever I see a valid 
PROOF OF A Popish succession of these following 

POINTS, I will presently TURN PaPIST : OR OF 

I provoke the Papists tliat boast of tradition, succession 
and antiquity, to do this if they are able. 

1. Let them prove that the pope of Rome is appointed 
by Christ to be tlie universal monarch, sovereign, governor, 
head of the catholic church, and the vicar of Christ on 
earth, and holding the place of God himself, whom all must 
obey : — 2, That the true and only catholic church is a socie- 
ty thus headed and governed bythe pope, and that no man 
is a true member of the catholic church, that is not the 
subject of the pope as universal monarch : nor can any 
other be saved, as being without the church: — 3, That 
the church of Rome is by God's appointment the mistress 
of all other churches : — 4, That the pope of Rome is in- 
fallible : — 5, That we cannot believe the Scriptures to 
be the word of God or the Scripture doctrine to be true, 
but upon the authoritative tradition of the Roman church, 
and upon the knowledge or belief of their infallibility : 
that is, we must believe in the pope as infallible, before 
we can believe in Christ, who it is pretended gave him 
that infallibility : — 6, That no Scripture is by any man 
to be interpreted but according to the sense of the pope or 
Roman church, and the unanimous consent of the fathers: 
— 7, That a general council approved by the Pope 
cannot err ; but a general council not approved by the 
pope may err : — 8, That nothing is to us an article of 
faith till it be declared by the pope or a general council ; 
though it was long before declared by Christ or his apos- 
tles as plain as they can speak : — 9, That a general 
council hath no more validity than the pope giveth it : — 
XO, That no pastor hath a valid ordination, unless it be 


derived from the pope : — 11, That there are articles of 
faith of necessity to our salvation, which are not con- 
tained in the Holy Scriptures, nor can be proved by 
them : — 12, That such traditions are to be received wiUi 
equally pious affection and reverence as the Holy Scrip- 
teres : — 13, That images have equal honor with the 
Holy Gospel : — 14, That the priests of the catholic 
church ought to swear obedience to the pope as Christ's 
vicar : — 15, That the pope shall be a temporal prince : 
— 16, That the pope and his clergy ought to be exempt- 
ed from the government of princes, and princes ought 
not to judge and punish the clergy, till the pope deliver 
them 10 their power, having degraded them': — 17, That 
the pope may disposess princes of their dominions, and 
give them to others, if those princes be such as he judg- 
cth heretics, or as will not exterminate heretics : — 18, 
That in such cases the pope ma}^ discharge all the sub- 
jects from their allegiance and fidelity : — 19, That the 
pope in his own territories, and princes in theirs, must 
burn or otherwise put to death, all that deny transub- 
staotiation, the pope's sovereignty, or other doctrines, 
when the pope hath sentenced them : — 20, That the 
people should ordinarily be forbidden to read the Scrip- 
ture in a known tongue:— 21, That public prayers, praises, 
and other public worship of God, should be perfomed 
constantly in a language not understood by the people : 
— 22, That the bread and wine in the eucharist, is tran- 
substantiated into the very body and blood of Christ ; so 
that it is no more true bread or wine, though our eyes, 
taste, and feeling tell us that it is : — 23, That the con- 
secrated host is to be worshipped with divine worship, 
and called our Lord God : — 24, That the pope may 
oblige the people to receivt^ the eucharist only in one 
kind, and forbid them the cup : — 25, That the sins called 
venial by the Papists, arc properly no sins, and de- 
serve only temporal punishment : — 26, That we may 
be perfect in this life by this double pt^rfection ; to have 
no sin, but to keep all God's law perfectly : to superero- 
gate, by doing more than is our duty : — 27, That our 
works properly merit salvation of God, by way of com- 
mutative justice, or by the condignity of the works as 
proportioned to the reward : — 28, That priests should be 

JtJGOLiNG 155 

forbidden marriage : — 29, Tliat there is a fire called pur- 
gatory, where souls are tormented, and where sin is par- 
doned, in another world: — '50, That in haptisin there is 
an implicit vow of obedience to the pope of Rome : — 
'31, That God is to be worshipj)ed ordinarily by the ob- 
lation of a true proper propitiatory sacrifice for the living 
and the d<uid, where the priest only shall cat and drink the 
body and blood o( Christ, while the congregation look on 
and partake not: — 32, That the canon of Scripture is the 
same that is declared by the council of Trent. 

lam resolved to receive as many of them, as they 
can prove that they were in all ages the doctrine of the 
universal church. 

Till they perform that task, let them never more for 
shame call to us for catalogues or proof of succession. 
But if they are so unkind that they will not give us any 
j)roof of such a succession of Popery, we shall be ready 
to supererogate, and give them full proof of the negative, 
that there hath been no such succession of those thirty 
two points. 

Certainly it bclongeth to them that sujDrrinduce more 
articles of faith, to prove the continuation of their own 
articles through all ages. 

One of those articles, the pope's sovereignty, Tuber- 
ville proves in the first age from Peter's words. Act. xv. 
7, 8, 9, 10. God chose Peter to convert Cornelius and 
his company : therefore the popo is the universal mo- 
narch. Are you not convinced by that admirable argu- 
ment ? but he forgot that Bellarmin, Ragusius in Concil, 
Basil: and others say, "no article can be proved from 
Scripture, but fi'om the proper literal sense." 

In the second age he hath nothing but the names of a 
few that never dreamt of Popery, and a canon which 
you must believe was by the apostles, that priests must 

In the third age he nameth fifteen bishops of Rome, 
of whom the last was deposed for olVering incense to Sa- 
turn, Jupiter, &.C. but not a syllable to prove that one of 
those bishops was universal monarch ; much less that 
the catholic church was for such monarchy. But he tells 
you that the second and third age produced no councils; 
the greater deceivers are the Papists that have found us 


councils then ; an^ so you have no succession proved. 
Yea, but, lie saith, they have successions of popes, mar- 
tyrs and confessors, which is sufficient for their purposes. 

See the strength of Popery ! Rome had bishops, there- 
fore they were the universal rulers of the church : Rome 
had martyrs and confc^ssors : therefore it was the mis- 
tress of all churches. Who can resist those arguments 1 
but why did you not prove that your confessors and 
martyrs suffered for attesting the pope's sovereignty ? if 
they suffered but for Christianity, that will prove them 
but Christians, and not Papists. Thus to the confusion 
of the Papists, they have nothing to show for the suc- 
cession or antiquity of Popery for the three first ages. 
Worse than nothing : for he comes in with decretals of 
some of their bishops: decretals unknown, till lately in the 
world : brought out by Isidore Mercator : but with so 
little cunning as left them naked to the shame of the 
world ; the falsehood of them being fully proved, and 
confessed by some of themselves. Here you see the 
first foundation of Papal succession, even a bundle of 
fictions, lately fetched whence they please to cheat the ig- 
norant part of the world. 

In the fourth and fifth ages Tuberville makes us 
amends for his want of proof from the three first. 
But what is that to a succession, while the three first ages 
are strangers to Popery 1 His first proof is from the 
council of Nice ; and what saith that'? it defined that the 
Son of God is consubstantial to his father and true God. 
And what is that to Popery ? It defined the pope's sov- 
ereignty : but how prove you that? In the thirty-ninth 
Arab, canon. O what consciences have those men that 
dare thus abuse and cheat the ignorant ! As if the can- 
ons of the first general council had never been known 
to the world, till Alphonsus Pisanus a Jesuit published 
them out of Pope Julius, and some Arabic book. Men 
that can make both councils and canons at their plejis- 
ure above a thousand years after the supposed time of 
their existence, never want authority. This is a cheaper 
way of canon — making in a corner, than to trouble all 
the bishops in the world with a great deal of cost and 
travel to make them. But if this be the foundation, the 
building is answerable. Zosiraus had not been acquaint- 


led with those new articles of an old council, when he 
put his trick upon the sixth council of Carthage, where 
ibr the advancement of his power, though not to an uni- 
versal monarchy, yet to a preparative degree, he laid 
his claim from the council of Nice, as saying, " if an ejec- 
ted hishop appeal to Rome, tlie hishop of Rome shall ap- 
point some ol tiic next province to judge; or ifyet he desire 
his cause to be heard, the bishop of Rome shall appoint 
a presbyter his legate, iSiDC." In that council were 217 
bishops, Aurclius being President, and Augustin being 
one. They told the pope that they would not yield to 
him till the true copies of the council of Nice were 
searched : for those that they had seen had not those 
words, which Zosimus alleged. Hereupon they sent to 
the churches of the East; to Constantinople, Ale.fandria, 
Antioch, &c. for the ancient canons. Thence they re- 
ceived several copies which all agreed; but none of 
them had either Zosimus' forgery, nor the forged 
clause which Bellarmin has, much less the eighty can- 
ons of Pisan the Jesuit, but only twenty canons, which 
have not a word for the pope's sovereignty. 

Zosimus knew not then of Pisan's canons, or else 
he would have alleged them; nor yet of Bellarmin's 
new part of a canon for the primacy of the bishop of 
Rome. Zosimus himself had not the faith, the wit or 
the memory, to plead either Scripture, apostolical insti- 
tution, or tradition, for his privilege: but only a false 
canon of the council of Nice; as looking no higher 
it seems for his authority The Roman bishops early 
began both to aspire, and make use of forgeries to ac- 
complish it. There was no such apostolic or church 
tradition for the Roman power, as masters of tradition 
now plead for; which all the catholic church must 
know. The whole council, with all the churches of 
Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, &c., that is all 
save Rome were ignorant of that which Zosimus would 
have had them believe. Little did the church then be- 
lieve the pope's infallibility. Upon the reception of 
the several copies of the Nicene canons, they modestly 
convicted Zosimus of falsehood: and the council re- 
solved against his usurpation. In the African councils, 
the epistle of Cyril of Alexandria, and Atticus of Con- 



stantinople : and the epistles of the council to Boniface 
and Celestine, before they had received their answers 
from other churches about the Nicene canons, they de- 
clare that would not suffer that arrogancy. 

That council looked no higher for the power of the 
pope and other metropolitans, than to the council of 
Nice, and thought it a good argument, that the pope 
had no such power, because no council had so subjec- 
ted the African church: therefore they never dreamed 
that Christ or the apostles had given it to him. They 
evince the nullity of his pretended power out of the 
Nicene council. They took him not to be above a coun- 
cil, having power to dispense with its canons. By 
the Nicene council, not some, but all business must be 
ended where they begin ; and therefore there is no ap- 
peal to the pope. He that saith otherwise unjustly 
chargeth the Holy Ghost to be wanting to the church. 
They took it for a sufficient reason against appeals to 
Rome, because all might appeal to a provincial or gen- 
eral council. They thought it a thing not to be imag- 
ined, that God should give his spirit to any one man, 
even to the pope to try and judge, and deny it to a coun- 
cil, general or provincial : so that they little dreamed of 
the Roman infallibility or power of judging all the 
world. They thought the pope to be incapable of this 
universal judgment, were it but by distance, and the 
natural impediments of age, sex, and many the like, that 
must needs hinder the necessary witnesses from such 
a voyage or journey: so that they give an argument 
from natural necessity against the pope's pretended sov- 
ereignty and judgment. They plainly make such judg- 
ments to be invalid for want of necessary witness and 
means of prosecution. Whereas the pope might object 
that h ' could prevent all this by his legates, they flatly 
rejected that too, and say they find no such thing con- 
stituted by any synod : so that they both rejected the 
pope's trying and judging by legates in other metro- 
politans' jurisdiction ; and they took it for a sufficient 
ground to do so, that there v,-as no council had so con- 
stituted ; much less a Scripture constitution, or apostoli- 
cal tradition. If the pope may neither judge them by 
himself nor his legates, he may sit still. They convict 


the Roman blsliop of stMidin<jf thcni a false canon of the 
Nicene council. Tln-'y show us wljat way tlie po|>e 
then took to get and Weep his power: by sending to 
the secuhir commanders of the provinces, in whom they 
had special iulcrciit by their residence at Rome, to ex- 
ecute their wills by force. The council plainly accuse 
them of introducing secular arrogance into Christ's 
church, that better loveth simplicity and humility and 
light. They plainly require the bishop of Rome to do 
so no more. They tell him that Faustinus remaining 
any longer in Africa will not stand with that honesty 
and moderation of the bisliop of Rome which is neces- 
sary to brotherly charity. 

I give you the plain passages of the council, and 
screw no forced consequences from them. Now let 
Binius and liis brethren make childicn believe that it 
was not appeals to Rome, but a troublesome manner of 
trial that the council was aofainst : and tell men that take 
him for infallible, of a Nicene canon for the pope's su- 
premacyand monarchy: and persuade idiotsanddoiards 
that the catholic church in the fourth and fifth ages 
was for the universal government of the pope. 

The first Constantinople council, saith Tuberville, 
decreed the bishop of Constantinople to be chief next 
the bishop of Rome. 

Then that primacy was but the institution of councils. 
It was grounded on a secular reason ; for so sailh the 
canon, because it is new Rome. The pope's primacy 
was but honorary, and gave him no universal govern- 
ment; for the primacy here granted to Constantinople, 
gave them no government over Alexandria, Antioch, 
&c. And the second canon expressly limits all bish- 
ops without exception to their own diocess. The third 
canon affirmed, that according to the Nicene council^ 
in every j)i'oi'iiice the provi?icial cou?icil ought to ad- 
minister and govern all things. See how clearly the 
succession of the Roman monarchy is disproved to that 

The next proof is from the third act of the first coun- 
cil of Ephesus, that Peter yet lives and exercises judg- 
ment in his successors. The words, that Peter was 
the head of the apostles, though nothing to their pur- 


pose, are neither spoken nor approved by the council, 
but only by Celestine's legate. The council, though 
specially moved by his concurrence to extol Celestine 
to the highest, yet never spake a word of his governing 
pov^rer or sovereignty, but only his consent: and when 
they mention the Roman church, it is only their con- 
sent which they predicate. They extol Cyril equally 
with Celestine. Binivs, Tom. 2. Cap. 15. 

The next witness brought is the council of Chalce- 
don, as calling Leo, universal archbishop and patriarch 
of old Rome, and sentence is pronounced against Dio- 
scorus in the names of Leo and St. Peter. 'I'his is one 
of your common frauds. It was not the council that 
called him universal archbishop, but two deacons in the 
superscription of their libels, Theodorusand Ischirion. 
Were they the catholic church? 

By universal archbishop is plain that they meant no 
more than the chief in dignity and order of all arch- 
bishops, and not the governor of all. That universality 
was only in the empire, and not over the world. 

That very council in its canons not only gives the 
bishop of Constantinople equal privileges with the 
bishop of Rome, but expressly saith that Rome received 
this primacy of order from a council, because it was 
the seat of the emperor. When Bellarmin comes to 
that canon, he plainly charges that farnous fourth 
general council with falsehood, and says that the 
pope approved not this canon. But approved or not 
approved, if that was the catholic church representative, 
their testimony is valid to prove that there was then no 
reception of the Roman monarchy as of God, but con- 
trarily a mere primacy of dignity and honor given it 
newly by men. 

In the sixth and in the seventh age though then the 
sovereignty was claimed by Boniface, he citeth no 
council for it neither. 

In the eighth age he cites the second council of Nice, 
as approving an epistle of Pope Adrian, wherein he 
saith that the Roman church is the head of all churches. 
Whether Adrian himself by the head meant the chief 
in dignity, or the governor of all, is a great doubt. 
Tharasius seems to imply the contrary, as if his see 


had llie privilege only of being the primate of Rome, 
and not tlie ruler of the world. That council did not 
openly own the Papal sovereignty. 

I am content that any impartial sober person may 
judge, whether here be a satisfactory proof of a catholic 
succession of the Papal sovereignty, when through so 
many ages, they bring not a word for any succession 
at all ; much less that it was owned by the catholic 
church : and least of all, that all the rest of Popery was 
so owned. 

Having showed you that Papists cannot prove any 
succession, or continuation, or tradition of their religion, 
let us consider their silly shift, in other points. 

I have already proved that ignorance or difference 
about many points not essential to Christianity, may 
consist with our being of one religion and catholic 
church, and therefore such differences are nothing to 
the point of succession of the catholic church or reli- 
gion : and Papists tolerate or plead for the toleration 
of greater differences among themselves, which yet 
they affirm to consist with the unity of faith. 

The Jesuits maintain, that if a man do but believe in 
their pope and church as infallible, he may not only as 
some say, be ignorant of some article of the creed itself, 
and yet be a true catholic, and be saved, but also be- 
lieve a f^ilse article as from 3od and the church. The 
former is commonly taught not only by such as Suarez, 
that say the article of Christ's Descent into Hell is not 
to all of necessity to salvation, but by many others in 
the doctrine of implicit faith. The latter clause you 
may see among others in AlbertiJius the Jesuit, Corol- 
lar. p. 250, where his objectors put this case : " Suppose 
twenty bishops preach to a countryman a false article, 
as if it were spoken by God and the church : that pro- 
posal of the twenty bishops is so sufficient, that the 
countryman prudently formeth an evident practical 
judgment, and morally certain, to believe with a specu- 
lative assent the article proposed by the twenty bishops, 
for the authority of God as the formal reason. Three 
absurdities seem hence to follow. That the country- 
man should be obliged under mortal sin, to believe the 
twenty bishops, and so the precept of faith should bind 



to believe a falsehood. The countryman should be in 
God's grace without faith. In grace, because he com- 
mits no mortal sin, yea he obeys the command of be- 
lieving: yet without faith, because he believes a false- 
.hood opposite to faith, and so loseth faith. God should 
concur to deceive. To the first Albertinus an- 
swereth that its no absurdity that the command of faith 
do oblige to believe a falsehood. To the second he 
saith, that the countryman doth not lose his grace or 
faith; because the falsehood believed is not formally 
opposite to the true faith, but materially." A man there- 
fore may hold an article opposite to the faith materi- 
ally, and yet not only be a true Christian in grace and 
faith, but also in so doing obey by accident the com- 
mand of believing, so be it he believe in their church, 
If that be so, with what face can these men say that our 
church or religion is new, or not the same with the 
Greeks, &c., when we have the same formal object of 
faith, and differ in no essential material point ? See here 
their lubricity and partiality. 

The second Council of Nice that decreed for image 
worship, expressly decrees, that Latria, divine worship 
is to be given only to God : Thomas Aquinas Sum. 3. q. 
25. art. 3 & 4, maintaineth that Latria, " divine wor- 
ship is to be given to the image of Christ, and to the 
Cross that he died on ; and to the sign of that CrossJ^ 
Here is an article of their faith expressly contradicted: 
yet Aquinas is a member of their church. If any say 
ne is no member, it is proved past doubt, for the pope 
hath canonized him for a saint : so that now it is a part 
of their religion to take him for a true believer. Alber- 
tinus, as he thinks, proved, that though in many other 
matters of fact the pope be fallible, yet in the canonizing 
of saints he is infallible, because of some promise of 
God's special assistance. Abundance of such instances 
might be brought to prove, that the Papists oicn men as 
true believers, who deny or contradict articles of their 
faith. But what need we more, than that France and 
thousands elsewhere are yet members of their church, 
that deny the Latcran and Florentin definition for the 
pope's supremacy above a general council ? and when 
most Papists hold that angels are incorporeal, contrary 


to the definition of the said second Council of Nice. 
Therefore by their own law, we may say, that those 
were of our religion that differed from us in nothing 
that is essential to the faith. 

Papists tell us tiiat Jerom. Austin, Ambrose, &c., 
held the invocation of saints. If any desire the de- 
parted saints to pray for them, as they do the living, we 
have reason enough to take it for their error. 

The primitive church was unacquainted with the 
Romish prayer to saints. Till the end of the fourth 
century, they are not able to prove that ever three men 
were for prayer to the dead at all, except such a condi- 
tional speech in an oration as Gregory Nazianz hath ; 
if holy souls have any f.are or feeling of such things as 
these, receive this oration, Orat. 11. Usher in his an- 
swer to the Jesuit, page 418, saith, that fo/ niju parts 
of the first four hundred years, the Jesuit is not able to 
'produce one true testimony out of any father ivhcrehy 
it may appear that any account at all v:as made of it. 
He citeth the full express words of the fathers of those 
first ages against praying to saints, as Origen in Jos. 
Horn. 16 In Rom. lib. 2. cap. 2: and Contr. Celsum. 
lib. 8, lib. 5. Tertullian Apol. cap. 30. Tertullian and 
Cypiian on Prayer. Athanasius Orat. 4. Cont. Arium. 
Eccles. Smyrn. apud Euseb. Hist. lib. 4. 

When prayer to the dead came in, it exceedingly 
differed trom the Romish prayers to the dead. Those 
adorations and devotions offered by the Papists to the 
Virgin Mary, are enough to make a Christian tremble, 
and are horrid blasphemy or idolatry. 

The reason why in the Old Testament men were not 
wont to pray to saints, Bcllarmin saith, was because then 
they did not enter into Heaven nor see God. Bellar. dc 
sand. Beat. li. 2. cap. 19. Saurez Tom. 2. disp. 42. 
Sect. 1. But as the chief doctors of the church for 
divers ages were of opinion that the saints are not ad- 
mitted into Heaven to the clear sight of God before the 
day of judgment, as most of the Eastern churches do to 
this day, therefore they could not be for the Popish 
prayer to saints. 

Men may be of the same faith and church \vith us, 
who differ and err in as great a matter as this. The 


council of Florence defined it, that " departed souls 
are admitted into heaven to the clear sight of God. Yet 
Stapletonand Francis. Pegna.a Castro, Medina and So' 
tus, ajffirm that Irenceus, Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Cle- 
mens Ronianus, Origen, Ariibrose, Chrysostome, Austin, 
Lacta?itius, Victorinus, Prudentius, Theodoret, Aretas, 
Oecumenius, Theophylact, Euthymius, and even Ber- 
nard, have delivered the contrary sentence. Staplet. 
Defens. Eccles. author, cojit Whitak. lib. 1. cap. 2. 
Pegna. Part 2. Director. Inquisitor, com. 21. ■ 

All those are against the Popish invocation of saints, 
so they were against that which now is determined to 
be of faith, whence I gather that the Romish faith in- 
creaseth, and is not the same as heretofore. That they 
had not this article by tradition from any ol those fathers, 
or from the apostles by them, unless from the Scrip- 
tures. That men that err in such points as are now 
defined by conncils to be of faith, are yet accounted by 
Papists to be of their church and faith: and therefore 
they may be of ours, notwithstanding such errors as 
this in baud. Whence the Papists are a perjured gen- 
eration, that swear not to e.xpound Scripture but accor- 
ding to the unanimous consent of the fathers. 

The council of Laodicea condemned them as idola- 
ters who prayed to angels, Can. 35. The full testimo- 
nies of Greg. Nyssen, Athanasius, Epiphaniiis, <^v. 
are against praying to saints and angels, and the de- 
tection of Bellarmin's fraud, that pretendeth the fathers 
to speak of the Gentile idolatry, when they mention the 
Virgin Mary and the saints, and say expressly they 
were not to be adored; may be found in Usher's An- 
swer; 470 — 472. 

But for all ttat Tahervillc hath fathers for his ado- 
ration of angels and saints. And who are they? The 
first is Dionysius : to which I answer, there is not 
such a word in the place cited in Dionysius. We are 
for praying the saints to pray for us too, that is, those 
on earth: and the words cited by him, mention not the 
saints in heaven. Dionysius is a spurious apocryphal 
book : not once known and mentioned in the world till 
six hundred years after Christ, as Bellarmin himself 
saith ; Lib. de Scriptor, Eccles. de Dionysi. et lib. 2. de 
Monach. cap. 5. 


The second is Clevi. Apostol. Conslit. 5. The words 
spealv only of honoring- the martyrs, which is our un- 
questioned duty; but not of praying to them. It is an 
apocryphal forgery, and neither the apostle's nor Cle- 
ment's work which he citeth. Let him believe Bcllar- 
mill de scriplor. Eccles. p. 38, 39, who saiih that in the 
Latin church, those constitutions are of almost no ac- 
count ; and the Greeks themselves, canon 2. Trul. reject 
them as depraved by heretics, and the receiving of them 
misleadeth the Ethiopians. 

The third testimony is from Justin's second Apol. 
It is not praying to angels that Justin intends, but giv- 
ing them due honor. His intent is to stop the mouths 
of heathens that called the Christians impious for re- 
nouncing their gods ; to them he replieth, that we yet 
honor the true God, and his angels, &c. 

His testimony for the third age is only Origen 
in his Lamentations. Origen there mentioneth the 
saints, but not the dead saints. It is the saints in the 
church on earth whose prayers he desireth. You cite 
a forgery that is none of Origen's works. Not only 
Erasmus saith that this lamentation was neither writ- 
ten by Origen, nor translated by Jerom, but is the fic- 
tion of some unlearned man, that by this trick devised 
to defame Origen. Baronius Annal. Tit. 2. ad an. 253. 
witnesseth that pope Gelasius numbers it with the apo- 

The next exception to be considered is, praying for 
the dead : which they say the ancient church was for. 

We are for the commemoration of holy lives and 
sufferings of the saints. And the first sort of the an- 
cients' prayers for them began here, as the occasion. 
We are for thankful acknowledgment of God's mercies 
to the departed saints, and to the church by them. 
And the first prayers for them were such as those. 
Usher hath proved that they were saints, supposed to 
be in heaven or paradise, and not in purgatory, that 
were then prayed for : and therefore that it was not the 
Popish praying for tormented souls that was then prac- 
tised: and therefore their prayers then besides commem- 
orations and thanksgivings were the petitioning of all 
those following mercies for them which are not to bo 


received till the resurrection. Bellarmin himself prov- 
ing that though we were certain that the blessed souls 
shall have a raised glorified body, and be justified in 
the last judgment, yet may it be prayed for, because it 
is yet future. Now' we are far from being of another 
church or religion than those thai hold such an opinion 
as this. Usher when he had cited many testimonies 
saith ; " in those and other prayers of the like kind, we 
may descry evident (ootsteps of the primary intention of 
the church in her suppl ications for the dead : which was 
that the whole man, not the soul separated only, might 
receive public remission of sins, and a solemn acquittal 
in the judgment of that great day; and so obtain both 
a full escape from all the consequences of sin, the last 
enemy being now destroyed, and death swallowed up 
in victory, and a peifect consummation of bliss and hap- 
piness: all which are comprised in that short prayer of 
Paul for Onesiphoras, though made for him while he 
was alive, the Lord grant unto him that he may find 
mercy of the Lord in that day. Yea, divers prayers 
for the dead of that kind are still retained in the Roman 
offices; of which Medina thus writes : "Although I have 
read many prayers for the faithful deceased, which 
are contained in the Roman Missal, yet have I read in 
none of them that the church doth petition, that they 
may more quickly be freed from pains: but I have 
read that in some of them, petition is made, that they 
may be freed from everlasting pains. Again there be 
other prayers wherein petition is made, that God would 
raise the souls of the dead in their bodies unto bliss at 
the day of judgment." 

Here you may see the differences between the prayers 
for the dead which are used by the I^apists and by the 
Eastern churches to this day. 

Another point that they much ch illenge us about is ; 
the veneration or adoration of images, relics, and the 
cross, to which I may join peregrinations to places 
esteemed by them to be otjeminent holiness. Concerning 
peregrinations, Gregory ISyssen wrote purposely against 
going on pilgrimage to Jerusalem. He adviseth even 
the retired monastics, in those countries that were 
near to Judtea, to forbear such pilgrimages as dangerous 


and unnecessary, and not at all commanded in the 
Scripture. Tlie l^apists did as lon"^ as they could per- 
suade the world that this epistle was not by Gregory; 
and when they were made ashamed of that, they would 
expound it as prohibiting- pilgrimages to none but the 
monastics : and sure if it should be forbidden them, 
then much more should others be forbidden, that have 
not the leisure, and pretend not to their devotions. 

But it is one thing to use images, and another to use 
them Popishly, which is to make them mediate objects 
of divine worship, yea to worship the very image itself, 
and the cross and sign of the cross, with the same wor- 
ship as we do him that is signified by them : so that we 
confidently affirm, that the primitive church did make 
no use of images at all in the worship of God ; nor en- 
dui'e them in the place of worship. When they were 
first brought in, the Popish use of them was renounced 
and detested. Clemens Ale xandr inns Protrcpt. ad 
Gent, saith that, we are plainly forbidden to use that 
deceitful art of painting or image making : — we have 
no sensible image made of any sensible matter, but such 
an image as is to be conceived with the understanding. 
Origen against Celsus lib. 7. is large and plain against 
the use of images, as the Protestants are. The Eliber. 
concil. C. 36. saith it seemeth good to us, that pictures 
ought not to be in the church, lest that which is wor- 
shipped or adored should be painted on walls. Some 
Papists would fain find a sense for this canon contrary 
to the words: but Melch. Canus plainly saith, that the 
council did not only imprudently but impiously make 
this law to take away images. Loc. Theol. lib. 5. cap. 4. 
cone. 4. 

They have no better shift to save their credit, than to 
set their own school-men and general council together 
by the ears. The second council of Nice, that did 
most for images, did openly renounce the adoring them 
with divine honor, and Tharasius solemnly professed, 
they did refer and repose faith and divine worship in 
the true God alone. Aquinas Sii7n. 3. 9. 25., maintaineth 
that the images of Christ, and the cross, and the sign of 
the cross, are to be worshipped with divine worship. 
What saith Tuberville to this? This is a mere school 


opinion and not of faith with us: urge not therefore, 
whai some particular divines say, but hearken to the 
doctrine of God's church. 

Is not this a gross kind of juggling, that would never 
down if devout ignorance and implicit faith had not pre- 
pared the people? You see here that to contradict the 
determination of a general council, is not of faith with 
them. But is it not against your faith ? Do you give 
leave to mere school opinions to contradict general 
councils ? See here what's become of the Popish faith? 
If the determinations of councils be not articles of faith 
with you, then you have no faith, but give up your 
cause : and if they be, then Aquinas and his followers 
are heretics. Then what's become of the Pope's infal- 
libility in canonizing saints, that have sainted Thomas 
Aquinas, who is proved a heretic by your law : so that 
your cause is gone which way ever you turn. What it 
is to pray to saints, when some of them are made here- 
tics by your own laws ? Then also see, at what unity 
the church of Rome is among themselves, when it is the 
very common doctrine of their learned schoolmen, 
which contradictelh a general council. What a holy 
church you have, when your most learned divines are 
thus made heretics. Usher's allegations of Arundel's 
provincial council at Oxford, 1408. Naclantus in Rom. 
cap. 1. saith : " We must not only confess, that the faith- 
ful in the church do worship before the image, as some 
cautiously speak, but that they adore the image, with- 
out any scruple: yea and that they worship it with the 
same worship as the prototype; so that if it be worship- 
ed with divine w^orship, the image must have divine 
worship." Cabrera, part 3. Thorn., qu. 25. art. 3. 
aisp. 2. num. 15, saith : " it is of faith that images are 
to be worshipped, in churches and without : and we 
must give them signs of servitude and submission, 
by embracing, lights, offering incense, uncovering the 
head, &c. Images are truly and properly to be adored, 
with an intention to adore tliemselves, and not only the 
samplars represented in tliem. This conclusion is 
against Duiandus and his followers, whose opinion by 
the moderns is judged dangerous, rash, and savoring of 
heresy. Medina reporteth that Victoria reputed it 

iUOGLlNC. 169 

heretical: but our conclusion is the common one of 
divines. If images be improperly only adored, then 
they arc not to be adored simply and absolutely; which is 
manifest heresy. And if images are to be worshipped 
only by way of remembrance, because they make us 
remember the samplars, which we thus adore as if they 
were present, it would follow that all creatures are to 
be adored with the same adoration as God — which 
is absurd. The opinion of Thomas, that the image 
must be worshipped with the same act of adoration, as 
the samplar which it representeth, is most true, most 
pious, and very consonant to the decrees of faith. Ca- 
brera adds, that this is the doctrine of Thomas and all 
his disciples, and almost all the old schoolmen, and 
particularly of Cajetan, Capreolus, Paludanus, Fer- 
rariensis, Antoninus, Soto, Alexander, Alesius, Albertus, 
Magnus, Bonaventura, Richardus de media villa, Dio- 
nysius Carthusianus, Major, Marsilius, Thomas, Wal- 
densis, Turrecremata, Clichtovaeus, Turrian, Vasquez ; 
&c. Azorius saith, it is the constant opinion of divines. 
Institui. Moral, torn. 1. lib. 9. cap. 6. In the Roman 
pontifical published by the authority of Clement, it is 
exprsssed, that the legate's cross shall have the right 
hand, because divine worship is due to it. Here the 
pope himself is a heretic; and the pontifical contains 
heresy: and all the schoolmen are heretics, by contra- 
dictingthe determination of the second general council at 
Nice, and the doctrine which they say, is the doctrine 
of God's church. Such is the faith and unity of th« 

But they also maintain "that though all those worship 
the very cross and Images themselves, and that with 
divine worship, yet there be some that do but worship 
God by the image. Do you think that rational pagans 
did not know as well as you that their images were not 
gods themselves, and so worshipped them not as gods, 
but as the representers and instruments of some deity ? 
Lactantius Instit. lib. 2. cap 2. brings them in saying 
thus ; we fear not them, but those whom they represent, 
and to whose names they are consecrated. Arnobius 
thus ; It is the gods that we worship by images. Au- 
gustin thus reporteth the pagans saying, I do not wor- 


ifO JESUiJf 

ship that stone, nor that image, which is without sefls^/ 
Psal. 113. cojic. 2. I worship neither the image nor 
a spirit in it ; but by the bodily Hkeness I behold the 
sign of that which I ought to worship. That many of 
them renounced the worshipping of devils, appearelh by 
Auguslin's report of their words, in FsaL 96. " We 
worship not evil spirits : it is those that you call angels, 
that we worship, who are the powers of the great God, 
and the ministers of the great God." To whon\ Austin 
answers ; would you would worship them, that is honor 
them aright, then you would easily learn of them not ti3 
worship them. Few could be so silly as to think there 
were as many Jupiters or ApoUos as there were images 
of them in the world. So that you see here that some 
of the pagans as to image-worship disclaimed that which 
the Papists ascribe to them, divine worship. 

Oh but, saith Tuberville, tell us not of particular doc- 
tors, but of the doctrine of God's church. What! not 
of Thomas 1 not of the army of school divines before 
mentioned.? not of the common judgment of divines'? 
for so they call it; not of that wliich is of faith, or con- 
sonant to it, and whose contrary is heresy, or savors of 
heresy 1 not of Pope Clement VIII. and the Roman 
pontifical? Wonderful! are all those no body in your 
church ? O admirable harmony that is in your united 
church ! 

But you agree to leave out the second commandment 
lest the very words should deter the people from image 
worship ; and to make an irrational division of the tenth 
to blind their eyes. Yet you cry up the testimony of 
the fathers, when you are fain to hide one of the ten 
commandments, so that thousands of your poor seduced 
followers, know not that there is such a thing. No won- 
der if you cast away Gregory Nyssen's epistle against 
pilgrimages; and Epiphanius in the end of his epistle to 
Joban. Hierosol. against images, and if \'asquez 3. Thom. 
disp. 105. c. 3. contrary to the plain words feigns that 
it was the image of a profane or common man that 
Epiphanins pulled down ; and Al. Cope Dial 5. c. 2L 
says, that the epistle is counterfeit and not by Epiphanius; 
and if Bellarmin de imag. c. 9. and Baronius an. 392 
say that this part of the epistle is forged : and if Alphons. 


Ti Castro, cont. IlcPros. do imag. reproach Epiplianius for 
it as an Iconoclast. So well are yon agreed in tlie con- 
futation of tlic lathers' testimonies, that any way will 
■serve yonr turn, though each man liavc his several way. 
Vasquez plainly confesseth, *' indeed the Scripture doth 
forbid not only the worship of an image for God, but 
also the worshipping the true God in an image : but this 
commandment is now repealed, and therefore under the 
Gospel we mav do otherwise." Vasq. lib. 2. de Adorat. 
Disp. 4.' f . 3. 'Sect. 74. 75. et c. 4. Sect. 84. 

Many Christian churches do reject images from their 
churches as well as Protestants. More reject statutes 
that reject not pictures. Many that keep them, worship 
them not, nor God in them, or by them, as by a mediate 
object. General councils have been against images, 
that want nothing bnt the pleasure of the pope, to make 
them of as good authority as the council that was for 
them. That second council that was for them, of Nice, 
condemn oth the schoolmen and Pope Clement 
himself f^s heretics, for worshipping them, or the 
•cross with divine worship. Of the judgment of the an- 
cient catholic church against the Popish use of images, 
peruse what Cassander, an honest Papist hath written 
to that end, Consultat. de imag. et simulac. "In refer- 
ence to the images of saints, it is certain that at the be- 
ginning of the preaching of the Gospel, neither among 
Christians nor in the churches, images were not used, so 
Clement and Arnobius testify. At length, pictures were 
introduced into the churches, under the pretext of ex- 
plaining the sacred iiistorical facts." He also alleges 
antiquity against the Popish use of images. 


Popish false interpretations. 

Another of the Papists' deceits, and one of the prin- 
cipal juggleries with which they support their cause is this' 
False interpretations and applications of all the say- 
ings of the fathers, which they force to countenanct 
their usurped supremacy. 


1. Any claim that ambitious prelates have made to pow- 
er, they use as an argument for their universal sover- 
eio-nty. There was too much pride and ambition in pre- 
lates, even in some that otherwise might be good men. 
Zosimus would have extorted a confession of his usurp- 
ed power, and a submission to it from vVurelius, Augus- 
tin, and the rest of the African council : but he could 
not do it. Leo I. and Gregory I. and others, were very 
busy for the extending of their power: the Roman pre- 
lates long endeavored to put tlie halter on the Africans* 
heads, and about the French before they got them under. 
Shall those ambitions men be witnesses ? and because 
they would have had more power, doth it follow that it 
was their due ? 

2. If they find that any distressed churches or bishops 
sent to Rome for help, it is gathered thence that they took 
the pope to be Christ's vicar general. As when Chrys- 
tom sent to Innocent, and Basil and the rest in the East 
did send often for help into the West ; because Rome 
during the emperor's residence there, was the place 
where life or death was last pronounced on every man's 
cause by secular power ; and therefore the Bishop of 
Rome had the greater opportunity to befriend other 
churches : — afterwards Rome had a great secular influ- 
ence on the empire : — because in the diyisions of the 
Easterns about Arianism, they thought that the counte- 
nance of the orthodox in the West might have done some- 
what to turn the scales : — and because the Bishop of 
Rome being taken for the patriarch of the first place, 
his voice might do much against an adversary. 

Eusebius, Mclctiiis, Basil, and the rest of the ortho- 
dox, being both pestered with the Arians, and all to 
pieces also among themselves, sent for help to the West. 
Basil. Ep. 69. But whom? and for what ? not to the 
bishop of Rome only, nor by name, but equally to the 
bishops of Italy and France, without any mention of the 
Roman power. Not that the pope might cecide all by 
his sovereign power, which certainly was so near a way 
to their relief, that no wise man can imagine them so 
mad as to forget it, if it had been a thing then known and 
afjproved of : but only they desire that some may be 
sent to help them to be the stronger party in a synod, or 


^t least some one to comfort them, and put sonic coun- 
tenance on tlicir cause* Epist* 70, Basil writetli liiinself 
in the name of tiie rest : but to whom 1 to the hisho{)S 
©f France and Italy ; and France before Italy ; without 
taking notice of a universal head of the church at Rome. 
What doth he importune them fori not that the pope 
would decide the controversy: but that they would ac- 
quaint the emperor with their state, because the West 
had an orthodox emperor, and the East an Arian, or 
send some to see how it stood with them. So that it 
was but either help from the emperor, or countenance 
from the number of bishops because they were over- vot- 
ed, tliat they desired. Epis. 74, Basil again writes to 
the bishops of the West, no more to the Roman bishop 
than the rest : and he giveth those reasons ; " for what we 
here speak is suspected, as if we spoke through private 
contention. — But for you, the fartlier you are remote 
from them by habitation, so much credit you have with 
the people, whereto is added that the grace of God 
helpeth you to relieve the oppressed : and if many of 
you unanimously decree the same things, it is manifest 
that the multitudo will produce a certain reception of 
your opinion." Wonderful ! if there were a vicar general 
of Christ at Rome, that it never came into their mind to 
crave his decision or help, as such.? 

O but say the Papists, that was because they had to 
do only with the Arians, that cared for no authority that 
was against them. But would the Arians have so much 
regarded the votes of the French and Italian bishops, or 
a few men sent from them, and yet not regard the head 
of the church 1 The Arians had heard of this headship, 
if any had. And would not the orthodox desire so much 
as a word from Rome for this advantage ? But it is false 
that against the Arians only they called for help. They 
expressly say; that it was also because they were divid- 
ed among themselves, by personal quarrels. How im- 
portunately doth Gregory Nyssen afterward call for help 
from others, and telf Flavianus, in his epistle to him, of 
their misery as if all were lost 1 And the only sad in- 
stance was, that Helladius had proudly neglected him, 
and made him stand at his door, when he went to visit 
him, a great while before he was let in ; and then did not 


It4 JESuif 

bid him sit down ; and then did not speak to him first 
but two or three strange angry words: That was the 
great business. Basil. Epist. 77. chided the Western 
bisliops, lor not sending to them, nor regarding them 
and their communion : and to touch their pride, he adds, 
*• We have one Lord, one faith, one hope. Whether you 
think yourselves the head of the universal church, the 
head cannot say to the feet, I have no need of you, or if 
you place yourselves in the order of other church mem- 
bers, you cannot say to us, we need you not." Would 
you believe that the Papists cite this passage of Basil, 
for their headship, because here is the word head! When 
it is plain, tliat Basil by the head means but llie c/iiefesi 
part, and not the sovereign power. It is also most evi- 
dent, that he speaks to all the bishops of the West, and 
not to the Roman bishop ; and that he doth it as a smart 
reproof of their arrogancy, and not in any ap[)robation 
at all of their usurped power. 

3. When the Papists find any heresy condemned by tlie 
Bishop of Rome, they cite tliis as a testimony of their 
sovereignty. As if other patriarchs and bishops con- 
demned them not as well as they ; or as if we knew not 
that the church desired the most general vote against 
heretics, and therefore would be loth to leave so great a 
bishop out. 

4. When they find the pope excommunicating foreign 
bishops, they cry up this as a testimony of the headship : 
as if to refuse communion witli another church or bishop 
is an act of jurisdiction over them. Other bishops have 
also excommunicated the pope : Niccphorus lib. 17. 
cap. 26., sailh Vigilius, proceeded to that insolence, that 
ho excommunicated Mennas for four months. Mennas 
did the same by him ; but Justinian being moved to an- 
ger with such things, sent some to lay hold on him. 
Vigilius being afraid of himself, fled to the altar of Ser- 
gius the Martyr, and laid hold on the sacred pipes, and 
would not be drawn away till he had pulled them down. 
But by the mediation of tlie Empress Theodora, tho 
pope was pardoned, and Mennas and he absolved one 
another. A fair proof of llie vicarship ! Pope flonorius 
was condemned tor an heretic by two or three general 

jtaoLiKG. 175 

5. When they meet with any big words of tiieii own 
popes, they take it for a proof of the vicarshi[): as if 
big words did j>rove authority. Or as if we knew not 
iiow lowly they sj)oke to those tiiat were above them. 
Gregory was high enough towards tliose that he tlioiight 
he could master : but what low submissive language doth 
he use to secular governors above him ? VV hat llattering 
language did his successors use to the most base mur- 
derers and usurpers of the empire 1 

6. Another Roman deceit is tliis : When thej find any 
mention of the exercise of the thriving Roman power, 
over their own diocess or patriarchal circuit, they would 
hence prove that universal power over all. By that rule 
the patriarcii of Alexandria or Constantinople may prove 
as much. 

7. When they meet with passages that speak of the 
elevation of their pope to be the first patriarch in the 
Roman empire, or any power that by the emperors 
was given him, they cunningly confound the empire 
with the world, and especially if they find it called by 
the name of the world, and they would persuade you 
that all other Christians and churches on earth, did 
ascribe as much to the Bishop of Rome, as the Roman 
empire did. It is true that he was in the empire, ac- 
knowledged to be first in order or dignity, because of 
Rome the seat of his episcopacy, especially when gene- 
ral councils begfan to trouble themselves and the world 
about such matters of precedency. They usually called 
the empire all the world : and from such passages would 
the Papists prove tlie primacy at least of the pope over 
all the world. But put these Jugglers to it, to prove if 
they can, that beyond the river Euphrates, and beyond 
the bounds of the Roman empire, the pope did cither 
exercise dominion, or was once so niuch as regarded by 
them, any more than any other bishop, except there were 
atiy adjacent island or country that had their dependence 
upon the empire. They will not deny that the church 
extended much beyond the empire. Let them prove if 
they can, that ever any of those churches had any re- 
gard to the Roman bishop any more than to another 
man. Let them tell you where any empire out of tho 
line of the imperial power, was any whit subject to tho 


8. But their chief fraud is about names and words* 
When they meet with any high complimcntal title given 
to the Bishop of Rome, they presently conclude that it 
signifieth his sovereignty. 

".Sometimes the Roman bishops are called Summi Pon- 
tifices, the chief popes : and hence some gather their 
supremacy. But Baronius their chief flatterer tells in 
Martyrolog. Roman, April, 9, that it was the ancient 
custom of the church to call bishops not only pontifices 
popes, but chief popes. And then citing a passage of 
Jerom. Epst. 99, he adds, " Those that understand not 
this ancient custom of speech, refer those words to the 
po])cdom of the church of Rome." 

The names Papa, Pope, Dorainus, Pater sanctissimus, 
beatissimus, dci amantissimus, ifcc, were commonly 
given to other prelates. 

What if Rome were called the mother of all churches? 
Basil saith, that the church of Ccesarea is the mother of 
all churches in a manner. Jerusalem has oft that title. 

Sometimes they find Rome called Caput Ecclesiaruni, 
and then they think they have won the cause. But it is 
no more than that priority of dignity which not Christ, 
but the emperors and councils gave them, that is intend- 
ed in the word. It is called the head, that is the chief 
seat in dignity, witliout any meaning that the pope is the 
universal monarch of the world. 

The pope is called the archbishop of tlie catholic 
church, or the universal bishop ? Three flattering monks 
at the council of Chalcedon, do so supersciibc their 
libels : but they plainly mean no more than the bishop 
that in order of dignity is above the rest, and many par- 
ticular churches are oft called catholic churches. Tliere 
is a diflercnce between a catholic church and the catho- 
lic church. Tiie prelate of Constantinople had that title, 
even by a council at Constant, an. 518, before the 
15isliop of Rome had it publicly, or owned it. It was set- 
tled on the patriarch of Constantino[)le to be called the 
oecumenical or universal patriarch. Who knoweth not 
that emperors gave such titles at their pleasure ] Jus- 
tinian at one time would give the primacy to Rome, and 
at another time to Constantinople, saying, " the church 
of Constantinople is the head of all other churches." 


An. Dom. 530. C de Episcopis. I. 1. lege 24. Justi- 
nian who sonictinies calls Rome the head, when the sixth 
ircneral council iiad condemned Vigilius Pope of Rome, 
permitted Theodora his empress to cause him to he fetched 
to Constantinople, and dragged about the street in a 
halter, and then banished, till they had forced him to sub- 
scribe and submit to tlie council: even as they had de- 
posed Pope Silverius his predecessor. Baronius himself 
mentioned a Vatican monument which calls Agapetus 
cliief bishop so doth it call Mennas, the apostolic univer- 
sal bishop : which Baronius sailh, doth mean no more 
tlian that he was universal over his own provinces : and 
if that be so, any bishop may be called universal. One 
council of Carthage decreed that the bishop should be 
called, " not the chief priest, or the chief of priests, but 
tlie bishop of the first seat." And how long will they 
shut their eyes against the testimony of two of their own 
popes, Pelagius and Gregory who condemned the namo 
of universal bishop 1 

They find the church of Rome called apostolic, and 
»o were others as well as that. 

The pope is called the pillar of the church ; and what 
of that ? so are many others as well as he ; as all the 
apostles were as well as Peter? the church is built on 
the foundation of the apostles and prophets. The pas- 
tors of the church were ordinarily called the pillars and 
props of it. 

When the Papists read their popes called the succes- 
sors of Peter, they take this as a proof of their sover- 
eignty. Whereas Peter himself had no such sovereignty. 
They succeeded him not in his apostleship. They are 
called Paul's successors as well as Peter's. Others are 
called Peter's successors too as well as they, by the 
fathers. And other bishops ordinarily are called the 
apostles' successors, and other churches called apostolie 

Hcsych. Hierosol. apud Plwtium Cod. 2G9. says of 
Andrew the apostle; "the first begotten of the apostolic 
choir, the first fixed pillar of the church ; the Peter of 
Peter, or the Rock of Peter, the foundation of the foun- 
dation ; the principal of the principal, who called before 
he was called, and brought others to Christ before ho 
was brought to him by any others." 


Hesychius also saith of James apud Photium Cod, 
275. "with wliat praises may I set forth the servant and 
brother of Christ, the chief emperor or commander or 
captain of the new Jerusalem ; the prince or chief of 
priests, the president or principal of the apostles, the 
crown or leader among the heads, the principal lamp 
among the lights ; the principal planet among the stars ? 
Peter speaketh to the people ; but James giveth the 
law, or sets down the law." Where is more than this 
said of Peter himself] much less of the pope? 


Popish For :^eries ; and Corruptions of authors. 

Another of the principal deceits of the Papists is 
this; they forge and corrupt councils and fathers, aiid 
then cite those forgeries. Be careful therefore how you 
receive their allegations, till you have searched and know 
the books to be genuine, and the particular words to be 
there, and uncorrupted. 

1. Tiiey obtained the opportunity of possessing so 
many libraries, that they might the easilier play this 
abominable game. But God in mercy hath kept so 
many monuments of antiquity out of their hands, partly 
in the Eastern, and partly in the reformed churches, as 
suffice to discover abundance of their wicked forgeries 
and falsifications. 

2. Of their forging canons and feigning councils which 
never were as Concil. Sinucssan. Concil. Rom. sub Sil- 
vester; Ushfr^s Ansiccr to the Jes. p. 12, 13. Of their 
forging Constant ineh Donation and Isidore Mcrcator''s 
forging a fardel of decretals; and of their falsifying and 
corrupting in the doctrine of the sacrament, read the 
works of Ambrose, Chrysostom, Fulbert, Raban, Bertram, 
Ratrannus, &c., who detect their horribly impious 
cheats. But their Indices expurgatorii will acquaint 
you with mu.^h more. Yet their secret expurgations are 
worst of all. James^ corruption of councils. 

3. Andreas Schottus the Jesuit publishing Basil's 



works at Antwerp A. I). 1616. with Jesuitical fidelity, 
left out the epistle, in whicii is the followinij^ passage. 
Speaking of the Western bishops lie saith, "verily the 
manners of proud men grow more insolent, if they bo 
honored. If God he niercifid to us, what other addition 
have we need of t hut if (Jod's anger on us remain, what 
help can the pride of the West bring us? when they 
neither know the truth, nor can endure to speak it; but 
being prepossessed with false suspicions, they do the 
same things now, which they did in the case of Marcellus, 
contentiously disputing against those that taught the truth, 
but for heresy, confirming it by their authority. Indeed I 
was willing, not as representing the public person of the 
East, to write their leader Damasus, but nothing about 
church matters ; that 1 might intimate that they neither 
knew^ the truth of the things that are done with us, nor 
did admit the way by which they might learn them. 
And in general, that they siiould not insult over the calam- 
itous and alllicted, nor think that pride did make for 
their dignity, when that one sin alone is enough to make 
us hateful to God." In which you may see the Roman 
power in those days, in the consciences of Basil and 
other fathers in the East. 

4. How Tertullian reverenced them, you may see lib. 
tic pudicit. where he condemns Zepherinus. The Asian 
bishops condemned A'ictor, and IreucKus reproved him. 
Cyprian and Firniilian condemned Stephen : Marcellin- 
us was condemned by all. Liberius was oft cftiathema- 
tized by Hilary. Tiie resistance of Zosimus and Boni- 
face by the Africans, «fcc. shows plainly in what esteem 
the now infallible universal head was then among the 
fathers and in all the churches. Wlien the Papists men- 
tion such passages, what juggling do they use? some- 
times they silence them : sometimes they pass them over 
in a few words that are buried in a heap of other mat- 
ters : and sometimes they bring in forgeries to obscure 
them. But commonly they make a nose of wax of coun- 
cils and fathers, as well as of Scripture, and put any 
ridiculous sense upon them that shall serve their turn, 
though perhaps six among them may have six expositions. 
An epistle of Cyril of Jerusalem to Austin is forged 
by one that Molanus calleth a barbarous impostor ; His- 

180 JEStTt 

tor. Imag. I. 3. c. 36. about the miracles of Jeroni^ 
where purgatory and other errors are befriended. When 
Cyril died thirty years before Jerom. Yet Suarez and 
other most learned Papists make use of that forgery. 
Mendham'* s Policy of Home. 

Of their abominable legends the wiser sort of ihem- 
selve« are ashamed. If any ancients have abused the 
church by shameless forgeries, the Papists make use of 
such as confidently as if they were the word of God. 
Let any man but read the life and miracles of Thecla, 
and try his faith upon it, whether he be able to believe 
that "Thecla stood so long at the window to hear Paul 
while all those daily applications and orations were made 
to her 1 that Demas and llermogenes were there to stir 
up the people against Paul as a deceiver, under the cloke 
of being his companions; that any of those orations re- 
cited are true, that her mother Theoclaea, and her lover 
Thamiris were on the sudden so cru<^l as to burn her, 
while they are said so much to burn in love to her; that 
when Tliecla had lormed her body like a cross, and cast 
herself into the flaming pile, the flames in reverence of 
the cross, became as a chamber to her, covering her like 
a vault from the people's sight, and not approaching her ; 
and that the earth making a grevious noise, the showers 
and hail destroyed the people, and Thecla went her way 
without observance, finding Paul and Onesiphorus 
hid in a sepulchre at prayer for her: that Paul permitted 
lier to cut her hair, and change her habit, and become 
his fellow traveller ; that Alexander the governor was so 
inflamed with her beauty at Autioch, even before she 
came in full sight of the people in the city gate, that he 
could not forbear, but presently must leap upon her like 
a mad dog : that she tore his cloak and threw ofl' his 
crown, and so saved her virginity ; that for this she was 
cast and tied to wild beasts, and the lions couched to 
her, and one lioness fought for her, and killed the rest 
that assaulted her ; that yet they turned more upon her : 
that she leaped into the fish pond among the devouring 
gea calves ; and that (ire from heaven came down into 
the water, and there made her a chamber and saved her 
from those sea beasts ; that Falconilla's soul appeared 
to her mother Tryphaeua to beg Thecla's prayers that 

}UG6LING. 181 

she might be admitted into heaven, telling her how much 
Tiiecla was admired in heaven. That at Thccla's pray- 
ers she was admitted into heaven ; Thelca was again 
tied to the wild hulls, and fire set to them to enrage them, 
the fire killed them, and burnt the bonds, and she was 
unhurt. That Thecla again put on man's clothes, and 
sought Paul: that Paul hereupon pronounced her an apos- 
tle and ordained her to go and preach the Gospel, and 
appointed her to one Pagan city ; that she fixed at Seleucia, 
and there converted and baptised many ; and at last 
after many miracles did not die, but entered alive into 
the earth, which opened itself for her in the place where 
the lioly table stood ; that after her death she wi'ought 
one and thirty miracles; appearing to Basil, and encour- 
aging him when he was weary, to go on in the writing 
of her praises, and plucking him by the ear, and so cur- 
ing his headache, which else would have prevented his 
oration in her praise the next day." 

I have instanced but this one case of Thecla, because 
it would be endless to tell you of their fictions. Nor do 
I mention this as one of their legends, nor as a piece of 
Metaphrastes, but as the works of an ancient father. 
Now either this is Basil's work, or it is not. If it be not, 
then what trust is to be given to the Papist antiquities, 
and supposed fathers : for this is one of them, and this 
story is vindicated by Petrus Pantinus, and Baronius, 
An. 47, who bringcth a whole army of fathers to attest the 
acts of Thecla, and approveth of this of Basil's, and the 
like of Metaphrastes. Two testimonies trouble him 
shrewdly. One is Tertullian, Baptis. cap. 18. who 
saith thus, "but if any women read the pretended writings 
of Paul, and the example of Thecla, for women's liberty 
to teach and baptise, let them know that a presbyter in 
Asia, that framed that writing, putting Paul's name in- 
stead of his own, was cast out of his place, being convict- 
ed of it, and confessing that he did it in love to Paul." 

The other is Jerom's testimony Script. Eccles. who 
quoting the fore-cited words, saith, "the travels therefore 
of Paul and Thecla, and the whole fable of the baptised 
lion, we reckon among Apocryphal writings: for how 
can it be, that Luke the inseparable companion of the 
apostle was ignorant of this only among all his matters ?" 


182 jEsvtr 

But Baronlus thinks that tliose arc not the same books 
that TertuUian and Jerom speak against : and why so '? 
because here is no mention of Thecki's preaching and 
baptising, nor of the lion baptised ; and because so many 
fathers attest the story. But this is a visible falsehood, 
contrary to the express words of the story, which feign 
Paul to have sent her to preach as a true apostle, and 
mention her baptising the people of Seleucia. This 
shows how unfit the fathers are to be the authors of our 
faith, or to be esteemed infallible, who so easily believe 
and recite the forged stories of an Asiatic presbyter, 
even when TertuUian had before revealed the deceit. 

But if this book was written by Basil of Seleucia, and 
was not spurious, then they who rest ujion the Holy 
Scriptures alone for the matters of their faith, do take a 
surer and wiser way, than they who build on the credit of 
eredulous impudent fabulous fathers. 

By this you may see that the records and testimonies 
from antiquity are not to be trusted : even as Zosimus' 
report of the Nicene canon to the African council was not, 
who proved it a forgery, and so rejected it. When the 
writings are only in their keeping, and their interest call- 
eth them to deprave them, they are not to be trusted ; 
who venture to corrupt those which are in the hands of 
the Christian world. 


Popish Calwmuj. 

Another of the Popish devices is, when they have 
laid their oion cause upon so many forgeries^ and up- 
hold it by so many false reports, to make the people 
believe that it is we that are the liars, and that ice are 
not to be believed in any thing that ice say of them, and 
that we misreport the fathers, belie the Roman catholies: 
and therefore no man should read our books, or dis- 
course with us so as to afford us any credence. We 
cannot quote what is in their own writers, but the igno- 
rant people are taught to say we slander them. Though 


u'C cilc the book, aiul puijjc and line, and tell them tliat 
they were jirinted at Konie, or Antwerp, or Paris, by 
men of their own profession, yet they believe us not, for 
they are instructed to hold us for liars, that we may be 
incaj)able of doing them good. If we cite any of the 
fathers, they tell us wo misallege them, (tr have corruj)t- 
ed them or they say no such thing. If we show them 
the books published by their own doctors, and licensed 
by their superiors, and printed by Papists, yet they will 
not believe us. And so they are taught the easiest way 
in the world to repel the truth, and confute those that 
would do them good. It is no more but to say, "you 
lie," and all is done. 

In such a case as this, what is there to be done 1 igno- 
rance and incredulity thus purposely conjoined, are the 
wall of brass that is opposed to our endeavors. To what 
purpose should we speak to them that will not hear? In 
such a case 1 know but two ways. 1. Endeavor to revive 
the stupified humanity and reason of those men : and 
ask them, is religion the work of a man or of a beast '^ 
of a wise man or of a mad man ? Is it a reasonable or 
an unreasonable course ? if it be reasonable, why then 
will you go without reason upon other men's bare words 1 
but if you are so liulc men as to venture your souls 
without reason, you should not venture against it? would 
you rest on the bare word of one of those men, if it 
went against reason? if so then you renounce your man-^ 
hood. But suppose you will be so unreasonable, yet 
you have your five senses still ? If a priest shall tell 
you that the crow is white, and the snow is black, or 
that you see not when you know^ you sec, will you be- 
lieve him ? If you will believe them before your eyes, 
and taste, and feeling, then I have done ^vith you. Who 
can dispute with stocks and stones, or men so far for- 
saken of God, as to renounce all their senses ? but if 
you will not believe a Papist against your eyes, and 
other senses, \vhy then do you believe that bread is not 
bread, and wine is not wine, when the eyes, and smell, 
and taste of all men say it is ? and if your senses tell 
you that your priests deceive you in one thing, you 
should not be so confident of them in olher things, as to 
believe aod hearken to none but them. 


2. Try whether you can procure the priests to discuss 
those points hefore the incredulous people, that so they 
may hear both sides speak together. Get a conference 
between them, and some experienced judicious divine. 
But this will hardly be obtained. For if it be to dispute 
with one that is able, they pretend a danger of persecu- 
tion ; and no promise of security will satisfy them. But 
if it be a weak inexperienced man that challengeth them, 
then they will venture, and take the advantage. 

If nothing else can be done, the best way is to offer 
them some small book against Popery to read. If they 
are so captivated that they will neither hear nor read, 
and their leaders will not be drawn to a dispute, I know 
not what to do but leave them, and let them take what 
they get by their unreasonable obstinacy. They are un- 
worthy of truth that set no more value upon it. 


Popish Miracles. 

Another of their deceits is hi/ pretended miracles. 
If they hear of a girl who hath hysterical })assions in any 
violent degree, they presently go to cast the devil out of 
her, that so they may make deluded people think that they 
have wrought a miracle. And weak people, and per- 
haps the diseased woman herself, may be so much unac- 
quainted with the disease, as verily to believe the priests, 
tlf^t they have a devil indeed : and so turn Papists when 
the cure is wrought, as thinking it was done by the fineer 
of God. 

The same course they take also in distractions of othe^" 
diseases ; and sometimes persons are trained up by them 
to dissemble and counterfeit a lunatic or possessed state. 
Because Tuberville pleads their miracles, I shall revive 
the memory of one of the great miracles that was done 
among their proselytes in the parish of Wolverhampton. 

At Bilson, in the parish of Wolverhampton in Stafford- 
shire there was a boy named William Perry, who 
througli Popish devices seemed to be possessed with a 

JtOOLING. 185 

devil, about thirteen years old, but of special wit above 
Jiis age. In his fits he seemed to be deaf, and blind, 
writhini^ his mouth aside, continually groaninc^ and pant- 
ing, and when he was pricked, pinched, whipped, he 
professed not to feel. Ho seemed to take no food that 
would digest, but with it cast up rags, thread, straw, pins, 
&c., his belly almost as Hat as his back, his throat swelled 
and hard, his tongue stiff and rolled up towards the roof 
of his mouth, so that he appeared always dumb, save that 
once in a fortnight or three weeks he would speak a few 
words. It was thought he was bewitched by Joan Cocks, 
because he would discern when that woman was brought 
into the room, though it were secretly done, as was tried 
before the grand jury at Staflord. lie would not 
endure the repeating of tlie tirst verse of Jolm. In the 
beginning was the loonl., c^'c, but other texts he would 
endure. When the parents had been wearied with him, 
and the country flocked in to see him, a priest of the 
Romish religion was invited to cure him. The priest 
exorcised him, praying in Latin over him, hanging a stone 
about his neck, washing him with holy water, witch water, 
and anointing him with holy oil, &c., which seemed to ease 
him, and make him speak, and sometimes cure him for the 
time. They hallowed all his meat and drink. He would 
not so much as eat raisins, or smell to flowers, unless they 
were blessed by the priest. He told them that while the 
puritans stood by him he saw the devil assault him in the 
shape of a black bird. The priest required the chief 
fiend to show himself: then the boy put out his tongue 
swelled. Tiie priest commanded him to show the peo- 
ple by the sheet before him, how he would use those that 
died out of the Roman church : whereupon he pulled and 
bit and tossed the sheet, till the people cried out and 
wept. Then he commanded the devil to tell him, how 
he did use Luther, Calvin and John Fox : and he play- 
ed the same part more fiercely than before. Then the 
priest commanded him to show what power he had of a 
good catholic that died out of mortal sin : and then he 
thrust down his arms, and hanged down his head and 
trembled. The boy promised when his fit was over, that 
he would live and die a catholic, persuading his parents 
and friends, <fec. In this manner three priests one after 


186 JEStit 

the other followed the cure, still succeeding, but yet ilot 
curing him ; that they might draw the country to a 
longer observance of them, and preached to them in the 
house, that the miracle might be the more famous. For 
there were many devils in him, they saidyto be cast out; 
and it stopped the cure because the mother would not 
promise them to turn Papist if they cured him. But in 
the mean time the supposed witch was brought to trial 
at Stafford assizes, 1620, before Judges AVarburton and 
Davies. But the judges desired Bishop Morton then 
present to take care of the boy^ who took him home to 
his castle at Eccleshall, and after certain weeks time, 
having determined to try him, the bishop came to the 
boy, and told him that he understood that he could not 
endure the first verse of John. And, saith he, " the 
devil understandeth Greek as well as English, being a 
scholar of almost six thousand years standing, and there- 
fore he knows when I recite that verse in Greek :" and 
so calling for a Greek testament, he read the 12th verse, 
and the boy thinking it had been the first, fell into his 
fit: and when that fit was over, the bishop read the first 
verse, and then the boy liad no fit, thinking it had been 
some other verse. And thus they proved him a deceiver, 
and the boy was much confounded ; but pretended more 
distraction : and then that he might get away, he com- 
plained of extreme sickness, and water wa? in the urinal, 
as black as ink, groaning when he made it : but the third 
day after, they spied him mixing ink, and nimbly con- 
veying away the inkhorn. When they came in upon 
him, and found him in the conveyance, he broke out into 
tears, and was suddenly cured ; and confessed all, how 
he had been taught his art, and how he did all, and con- 
fessed that his intent was to be cured by a priest, and to 
turn Papist. 

But before the bishop had discovered the knavery, one 
of the conjuring priests wrote the narrative of the' busi- 
ness, entitled A faithful relation oj the proceedings of 
the catholic gentlemen with the hoy of Bilson, shoiving, 
<fec. And they begin with. Not to us, O Lord, but to thy 
name give the glory ! And so they proceed to make 
their report o{ it, for deluding the people, as a miracle. 
At last the bishop brought the boy at the assizes, 1621, 


to ask pardon openly of God, and the woman accused by 
hini, and of ilie conntiy cheated by liini, and tliere was 
an end of tliat Popisli miracle. Abundance more such 
1 could give you out of certain records; but I recite 
this for the sake of the Papists of Wolverhampton, where 
Tuberville lived. 

For miracles, if you regard not us, yet open your ears to 
a Jesuit that speaks the truth. Joseph Acosta de tcmporib, 
novis. lib, 3. c. 3. " To all the miracles of Antichrist, 
though he do great ones, the church shall boldly oppose 
the belief of the Scriptures : and by the inexpugnable 
testimony of tliis truth, shall by most clear light dispel 
all his jugglings afe.clouds. Signs are given to infidels^ 
Scriptures to believers; and therefore the primitive 
church abounded with miracles, when infi ^els Were to 
be called: but the last, when the faithful are already 
called, shall rest more on the Scripture, than on miracles. 
I will boldly say, that all miracles are vain and emj)ty, 
unless they be approved by the Scripture; that is, have a 
doctrine conformed to the Scripture. The Scri})ture is of 
itself a most tirm argument of truth.'* 

If miracles be so much to be looked at, why not give 
us leave to observe them ? The same miracles that vou 
boast of, do testify against you, if they be true. Prosper 
makes mention of a miracle, which TlnjrcBus de DcBtnoniac. 
p. 76, recites was done by the sacramental wine. " A 
person possessed by the devil was cured, after many 
other means used in vain, by the drinking of the wine 
in the Eucharist." Doth not this miracle justify us that 
give the people the wine, and condemn you, that refuse 
to give it them 1 Many other miracles the fathers say 
were done by the sacrament in both kinds received, 
which condemn vou that forbid it. 


Popish D eceitf Illness. 

Another of the Papist ways of deceiving is, by int' 
pudent lies and slanders against their adversaries ; 
which they vent with such confidence^ that the seduced 

188 JEstJlt 

people easily believe them. They who are taught to believe 
their priests against their own seeing, hearing, feeling, 
tasting and smelling, will believe the vilest lies that they 
are i)leaseci to utter, in cases wh.^re the miserable peo- 
ple are unable to disprove them. 

1. In a manuscript of the Papists which I lately re* 
ceived there are those words ; "Luther having richly 
supped, and made his friends merry with his facetious 
conceits, died the same night. This is testified by Coch- 
leus in vita Luthtri. John Calvin, a branded sodomite, 
consumed with lice and worms, died blaspheming and call- 
ingf upon the devil. This is registered by Sclilusselburge 
and Bolsec. These were the ends of the parents of 
the Protestant and prcsbyterian pretended reformed re- 

As if their own tongue must sentence them to hell, 
in the very words before they say, " all liars, their part 
shall be in the pool burninaf with fire and brimstone, 
which is the second death;" and so make application 
of it to the Protestants, as being liars; and when they 
have done, conclude with the two fore-cited impudent 
lies of Luther and Calvin. The like words of Calvin, 
Daily hath in his papers to Charles I. the whole writ- 
ing being stuffed with such impudent falsehoods, thnt one 
would wonder that human nature should be capable of 
such wickedness, and that the silly people should swal- 
low dov»'n such heaps of deceits. Not those two alone, 
but multitudes of Papists have written those lies of 
Luther and Calvin. Thyrteus the Jesuit in his book dc 
Dccmoniacis^ part. 1. cap. 8. p. 21, tells us; "the same 
day that Luther died, tliere was at Gheola a town in 
Brabant, many persons posessed of devils, that waited on 
tiieir Saint Dymna for deliverance, and were all that day 
delivered : but the next day they were all possessed 
again ; whereupon the exorcist or some body asked the 
devils where they had been the day before; and they 
answered, that they were commanded by their prince to 
be at the funeral of their fellow laborer Luther. And 
for proof of this, Luther's own servant that was with him 
at his death, looking out at the window, did more than 
once, to his great terror, see a company of ugly spirits 
leaping and dancing about without : and also that the 


crows lollowcd the corpse all the way with a jj^reat noise." 
O wonderful |)atienco and mercy of God, that sufler 
such most ahominahle liars to live, and doth not cause 
some sudden vengeance to hefall them! I will tell the 
case of those two servants of Christ that are thus reviled, 
even as their master was hefore them, who was said to 
do miracles hy the power of the devil. 

Luther was taken with a great pain in his breast, 
about the mouih of the stomach, and thought his death 
when it came would be sudden ; which made him say : 
"strike Lord, strike mercifully, for I am ready." Hav- 
ing preached his last sermon at Wittemberg, Jan. 17, 
he took his journey the 23d, to Isleben, whither he was 
called. When he came thither, he was grown so weak, 
that they almost despaired of his life ; yet by the use of 
fomentations he had so much ease, as that he preached 
sometime, and did other work from Jan. 29, to Feb. 17. 
The last day of his life, though he was weak, yet he sat 
at the table with them, and at supper his discourse was 
upon the question, whether we shall know one another 
in heaven.'' Which he affirmed and proved, in that 
Adam knew Eve as soon as he saw her, that she was 
flesh of his flesh: and therefore much more shall we 
know one another in heaven, &c. After supper, he 
withdrew himself as he used, for private prayer ; but the 
pain of his breast increased on him. When he had ta- 
ken a medicine, he lay down on a couch and slept 
sweetly two hours, and then went to his chamber, saying 
to those about him ; "Pray God to preserve the doc- 
trine of the Gospel to us; for the pope and council of 
Trent have stange contrivances." When he was laid 
down and had slept a while he awakened, and found by 
the increase of his pain, that h^ was near his end, and 
spoke to God as followeth, in their hearing : "O my 
heavenly father, the God and father of our Lord Jesus 
Christ, the God of all consolation, I thank thee that thou 
hast revealed to me thy son Jesus Christ, in whom I have 
believed, whom I have professed, whom 1 have loved, whom 
I have honored, whom the Pope of Rome and the rest of the 
rabble of the ungodly do persecute and reproach : I beseech 
thee, O my Lord Jesus Christ, receive my soul. O my 
heavenly father, though I am takeii from this life, and 


though my body must now be laid down, yet I know 
certainly that I shall abide with thee forever, and that 
none can take me out of thy hands." Then he said ; 
"so loved God the world, that he gave his only Son, 
that whoever believeth in him, should not perish, but 
have everlasting life." Then he repeated part of Psalm 
68 : and when he had drank a medicine that was given 
him, he said; "I go hence : I now return my spirit unto 
God," presently adding, "Father into thy hands I com- 
mend my spirit, thou hast redeemed me O God of truth." 
And so he died as if he were setting himself to sleep, 
without any sign of farther pain. But when they saw 
him dying, Jonas and Cselius asked him, "do you die 
constant through Christ in his doctrine which you have 
hitherto preached ?" and he answered. Yes ; and never 
spoke more. When he was dead at Isleben ; Count 
Mansfield would have kept his body, but the duke of 
Saxony would not suffer him, but caused it to be carried 
back to Wittemberg, and tliere with great solemnity 

This is the true report in brief of Luther's death, 
delivered to the world by those who stood by him, and 
were eye-witnesses. Yet impudent lying Papists have 
persuaded their followers that the devils were seen danc- 
ing about him, that when he was buried, there was a hor- 
rible thunder, and the body was taken away out of the 
coflEin by the devil, and a stink of brimstone left behind ; 
with more such stuff as this, which they have printed, 
and of which one would think even the father of lies would 
be ashamed. 

Of Calvin, not only those before mentioned, but also 
Bolsec, Surius, Prateolus, Demochares, Lindanus, Sanc- 
tesius, Cahierus, and others publish to the world, not 
only that he was an epicure, but a sodomite. Lessius 
the Jesuit impudently calls Christ to witness, that shall 
judge all men according to their works, that he doth not 
devise these things out of his own brain, but from good 
authors, and forty years current fame. His authors are 
those Papists, Bolsec, Brigerus, Stapleton, Campian, 
Duraeus, Surius, and Reginald. Hath hell any greater 
calunmies than those to fill the mouths or writings of 
men with all I 

iUGOLlNG. l9l 

As (or the time when they say lie was stigmatized for 
sodomy, it was when he was a Papist, and therefore if 
it liad been true, it had been a greater dishonor to them 
than to us. But it is a mere forgery of the devil and a 
friar. Bolsec a friar seemed to turn Protestant, and 
coming to Geneva, began to preach the Pelagian doc- 
trine there, and openly contend against the pastors in 
tho congregation ; and being confounded ])y Calvin, llie 
magistrates imprisoned liiu), and banished him for sedi- 
tion. Then he went to the neighboring towns, to play the 
same game there : but the magistrates of Berne also ban- 
islied him out of their country. Whereupon he turned 
Papist again, and when Calvin was dead, he wrote alt 
those abominable lies of him. And all the rest took up 
the report from that one lying lieretical Papist: and so 
it became current fame with them, as if it were as true 
as the Gospel. Whereupon our writers challenged them 
to search the records at Noviodunum, where they say 
the thing was done, and prove that ever there was such 
a thing ; or else bear the open shame of liars. They 
can bring no proof, but call on us to disprove it; though 
the city are Papists, and haters of Calvin. But the 
Papist dean of that city. Jacobus le Vasscur, published 
at Paris, 1633, the annals of their cathedral church, v.nd 
therein pouring out his hatred against Calvin, doth yet 
out of their records clear him of all those accusations, 
and lets the world know that there was never any such 
thing, and that they had no crime at all against him, bui 
thathe turned from the Papists; and that the mayor 
of the city went away with Calvin, when he was forced 
to fly from his native country. He recites all the pas- 
sages of Calvin's life there, but professeth that they 
had no more against him. Thus God confounded the 
lying Papists by one of themselves, and the records 
of that city, where they said the thing was done. And 
yet they believe one another, and carry on the lie to 
this day. 

Arastrowther the chaplain to the King of England's 
ambassador with the emperor, being at Vienna, heard 
the Jesuits and others repeating confidently that slan- 
der of Calvin : whereupon he opened to them that evi- 
dence against it, and satisfied them of the falsehood. 

102 jESUlT 

Riret Sum. Conlr. against Baily. Jesuita Vaputans 
cap. 2. 

As for the life of Calvin after he forsook the Papists, 
if you will believe the city of Geneva, and all the minis- 
ters and others that were about him, in his life and at his 
death, who knew better than Bolsec a fugitive apostate Pa- 
pist that was his enemy, and then far off, you may see at 
larse in Melchior Adamus, and Beza, the description of 
a shining burning light of which Rome hath not to boast. 
He was a man of admirable judgment, industry, and 
piety. When he had forsaken his own country for the 
Gospel's sake, and taken up in Geneva, and planted the 
Gospel there, with Farel and Viret, at last the ungodly 
part getting the head, the ministers were banished ; and 
so he settled in another city. The four bailiffs of Ge- 
neva that banished the ministers, within two years were 
ruined by the judgments of God. One of them accused 
of sedition, seeking to escape througli a window, fell and 
was broken to death. Another was put to death for 
murder. The other two being accused of mal-adminis- 
tration, fled and were condemned. Calvin was sent for, 
and intreated to return to Geneva, which by importunity, 
and Bucer's persuasion, he yielded. There was he con- 
tinually molested by the ungodly, and loved by the good. 
The malignants whom he would restrain by discipline 
from drunkenness, and other wickedness, were still plot- 
ting or raging against him, and called their dogs by his 
name. But shame was slill the end of their attempts. 
His revenge was to tell them, " I see I should have but 
sorry wages if I served man : but it is well for me that I 
serve him that always performeth his promises to his ser- 
vants." He preached every day in the week each se- 
cond week, and read three days a week a divinity lec- 
ture. Every Thursday he guided the presbytery ; and 
every Friday at a meeting he held an expository confer- 
ence and lecture ; so that tiie whole came to almost 
twelve sermons a week. Besides this, he wrote epistles 
to most countries of Christendom, to princes, divines 
and others ; and all those great volumes of the most 
learned judicious controversies, commentaries, and other 
treatises, which one would liave tiiought might have been 
work enough for a man that had lived an hundred years, 


if ht3 had done no other. Many heretics ho confuted, 
and some convinced and reduced. lie set up among 
ministers a course of teaching every family from house 
to house, of which he found incredible fruit. For all 
this his labor he endured the affronts, contradictions, 
and reproaches of the rabble, and sometimes was beaten 
by them. Because he would not administer the sacra- 
ment to ungodly men, that were lulers in the place, he 
was at first banished, and after threatened, and contin- 
ually molested by them, and railing fellows set to 
preach and write against him. He always used a very 
spare diet : and for ten years before his death did never 
taste one bit, but at supper, as his constant course: so 
that every day was with him a better fast than the Pa- 
pists make on their fasting days. By this extreme la- 
bor, speaking, and fasting, and watching-, for he dicta- 
ted his writings as he lay in bed much, he overthrew 
his body ; falling first into a tertian fever, and then into 
a quartan ; and after that he fell into a consumption, 
with the gout and stone, and spitting of blood, and the 
disease in the hemorrhoid veins, which at last ulcer- 
ated by over-much fasting, speaking, and use of aloes; 
besides the head-ach which was the companion of his 
life. In those sicknesses he would never forbear his 
labor, but when he was persuaded to it, he told them, 
that he could not bear an idle life. And when he was 
near to death was still at work, asking those that in- 
treated him to forbear, whether they would have God 
find him idle ? Under all those pains of gout, stone, 
cholic, headache, hemorrhoids, consumption, &c. 
those that were about him testified to the world, that 
they never heard him speak a word unbeseeming a 
patient Christian. The worst was that oft repeated 
word, "how long, Lord! how long!" as being weary 
of a miserable world. Witnesses he had enough ; for 
he could scarce have rest for people crowding to him 
to visit him. On March 23, he went among the minis- 
ters to their meeting, and took his farewell of them 
there. The next day he was wearied by it: but the 
twenty seventh day he was carried to the court, to the 
senate of the city ; where he made a speech to them, 
and took his farewell of them, with many tears on both 


i04 JEStlTT 

sides. April 2, he was carried to church, and staid the 
sermon, and received the sacrament. Afterwards the 
senate of the city came to him, and he made a heavenly 
exhortation to them. On April 25, he dictated his will. 
His library itself, and ail his goods, amounted scarcely 
to three hundred crowns. May H, he wrote his farewell 
to FarelL May 19, all the ministers came to him, 
with whom he sat and did eat, and cheerfully took his 
leave of them. On the twenty-seventh of May his voice 
seemed to be stronger, and so continued till his last 
breath that day, which was with such quietness as 
men compose themselves to sleep. The next night and 
day tlie city magistrates, ministers, scholars, people 
and strangers, were taken up in weeping and lamenta- 
tion. He was buried according to his desire in the 
common church yard, without any monument or pomp ; 
and hath left behind him such a name, as in spite of all 
the devils in hell, and all the Papists on earth, shall be 
precious till the coming of Christ: and such waitings 
hath he left as are the comfort of the disciples of truth, 
and the shame of the reproaching adversaries. 

This is that Calvin who is so hated by the bad, and 
loved and honored by the good: whom those Papists 
have called an epicure and sodomite, and said that he 
died blaspheming, and calling upon th€ devil, and was 
eaten with lice and worms. Is not God exceedingly 
patient, that will suffer such wretches to live on the 
earth? what man could they have named since Augus- 
tin, yea since the apostles' days, that was more unfit 
for such a slander than Calrin ? yet because Bolsec, 
who was banished and turned Papist, hath written 
those things against him, the rest take them up as con- 
fidently, as if the infallible chair had uttered them. 

But yet if you think Bolsec is more to be believed 
than those who lived with Calvin, and the city of Gen- 
eva, who had continual access to him, I will give a 
testimony which shall shame the Papists that have a 
spark of modesty. Hear then what other Papists say, 
that knew better, or made more conscience of their 

Florimund Raimund a Papist of Bourdeaux, or the 
Jesuit Richeome that wrote in his name, wr iting for 


the pope and ai^aiiist Calvin, hath tliese words of liim: 
"Under a dry and lean body he had a sharp and lively 
wit; ready in answering; bold in attempting; a great 
faster ; even from his youth, whether for his health to 
overcome the lieadache, or for his studies. There is 
scarce a man found that ever matched Calvin in labors : 
for the space of twenty-three years, in which he remain- 
ed in Geneva^ he preached every day once, and twice 
on the Lord's day often times. And every week he 
read public lectures of divinity besides ; and every Fri- 
day he was at the conference of the pastors: the rest of 
his time he spent cither in writing books, or answering 

Papirius Massonius a learned Papist, who wrote 
Calvin's life ; saith of him, "no day almost passed in 
which he did not preach to the citizens. Thrice every 
eight days, as long as ho lived, he professed or publicly 
taught divinity in the schools; being laborious, and al- 
ways w^riting or doing something. Of a weak body, 
but worn by watchings, reading, writing, meditations, 
diseases, business, preachings. He took very little 
sleep, and therefore much of his works he dictated in 
bed to his servant that wrote them from his mouth. He 
did eat but once a day; and confessed that he found 
not a more present or surer remedy for his weakness 
of stomach and headache. His clothing was of small 
price, to cover him rather than adorn him. At Worms 
and Ratisbon he exercised the strength of an excellent 
wit with so great applause of the German divines, that 
by the judgment of Melartchton and his associates, by a 
peculiar privilege, he was called the divine. He wrote 
as much and as well as any man of the contrary par- 
ties, whether you respect number, acuteness, language, 
sharpness, emphasis or subtilty. Not a man of all his 
adversaries, whether catholics, anabaptists, Lutherans, 
Arians, or the forsakers of his party, that wrote against 
him, did seem to match him, in gravity of writing, and 
weight of words, and sharpness in answering his prin- 
ciples. He almost terrified Pighius himself discours- 
ing of free will, and Sadaletus." 

Papists tell us a story how Calvin hired one in Gen- 
eva to take on hinj to be dead, that he might have the 


honor of raising him from the dead. This the Jesuit Thy- 
rseus de D^emoniacis writes, and it goes among them 
for a truth ; from the report of Bolsec. But Massonius 
confuteth this also, and saith that Baldwin knew noth- 
ing of it, who lived at Geneva, andaftei turned Papist, 
and was Calvin's enemy: and other reasons he giveth to 
disprove this and the other slanders that were raised of 
Calvin; saying, that they were but vulgar writers, that 
study or love to reproach or speak evil, that vend those 

As they have done by those, so by others also. When 
Beza was eighty years of age, a false report came to 
the Papists that he was dead : whereupon Claudius 
Puteanus with his Jesuitical companions wrote a book, 
that at his death he turned Papist and renounced his 
religion. So that the old man who lived seven years 
longer, wrote against them, to prove that he was not 
dead, nor turned Papist. Those be the means by which 
men are recDuciled to the church of Rome. 

They have printed also a story that Calvin's own 
son being bitten by a mad dog, was sent by his father 
to one of their saint's images for cure, when no other 
means would serve ; and being cured, he turned Pa- 
pist: but the world know that Calvin never had a son. 
Also they tell us of a saying of Luther's, that "this 
cause was not begun in the name of God, nor will it 
be ended in the name of a God ;" which Luther spoke 
of Eckius and the other Papists, yet those shameless 
liars confidently publish that he spoke this of himself 

They annex that Luther would have men not con- 
tain, but he vehemently detcsteth it, and urgeth the con- 
trary, telling th m that God no doubt will enable them 
to be continent, if they will use his means. Serm. de- 
Matrimon. They forgot that the fifth supposititious epis- 
tle of their Clement pleading for the community of all 
things, adds, "among those all, no doubt wives and hus- 
bands are contained." 

Of the horrid lies of Genebrard, Possevin, and other 
Papists against Peter Martyr, Beza, Calvin and others, 
see Raynolds. de Idololatria Rom^ Eccl. 5. 

When the fall of their house at Blackfriars had 
killed their priest^ and such abundance oi the people 

who were hearing- him in the midst of the sermon ; they 
printed a book to persuade the people beyond sea, that 
it was a company of the heretics or puritans, that were 
killed at the hearing of one their preachers. 

When the Gunpowder Plot was in hand, they con- 
trived presently to give it all abroad that the puritans 
did it. Clark^s Mirror of God^s Judgments. 

When Fisher the Jesuit had held his conference 
with Featly and White, there being present two earls ; 
one of them, the Earl of Warwick, having business 
shortly after beyond sea, fell unknown into Weston's 
company, at Saint Omers, who presently told him for 
news, how Fisher had confounded the Protestant doc- 
tors, and that two earls and so many people were turn- 
ed by it to the Church of Rome; not knowing that he 
who heard him was one of the two earls, and that there 
were not so many people there, and how they were 
confirmed against Popery by that dispute. When the 
Earl of Warwick brought home that jest, Weston hear- 
ing what sport was made with it in England, wrote an 
excuse for his lying. 

Their very worship of God is composed of lies, and 
is that acceptable worship? Their offices and legends 
are stuffed with fictions. Cassander saitK : " so few of 
the relics in all Germany vvojild be found true ones if 
examined, that it is better quite to take off people 
from the veneration of them ;" instancing in one that 
was worshipped as a saint, and upon inquiry was found 
to be the bones of a thief. 

Agobard of Lyons, complained about eight hundred 
years ago, that the " Antiphonary used in his church 
had many ridiculous and phantastical things in it : and 
that therefore he corrected much of it : cutting off what 
seemed superfluous, or light, or lying, or blasphemous " 
Agobard. ad Cant. Lugd. de Correctione Antiphon. 
Lindan made the like complaint; " Not only apocry- 
phal matters out of the gospel of Nicodemus and other 
toys are thrust in, but even the secret prayers, and alas 
for shame and grief, the very canon varying and re- 
dundant, are defiled with the most filthy faults." 

Therefore, as thou lovest thy soul, trust it not on the 
bare reports of such liars, but try before thou trust ; and 


I9S jEStIt 

give not up thy sense and reason to men that make sa 
little or so ill a use of their own. 


Translations of the Bible. 

Another of their Deceits is to quarrel with our 
Translations of the Bible ; and make the people believe 
that we have so corrupted it, that it is none of the word 
of God and so they openly scorn it, and deride it. 

Though learned men can soon confute them by vin- 
dicating the text as in the original languages, and then 
vindicating our translation, yet the common disputant 
need not put them and himself to so much trouble If 
they will but let the law of God contained in the Holy 
Scripture be the rule by which our difference shall be 
tried and decided, we will cut short the rest of the con- 
troversy, and take it wholly together ; and we will 
stand to the vulgar Latin, which themselves applaud: 
and that shall be the rule between us. Rather than 
they shall shift off' the unlearned by these tricks, we 
will admit of their own translation, which the Rhemists 
have composed. Only their commentaries and conceits 
shall not be taken into the text as part of the word of 
God. That quarrel is quickly at an end. The Scrip- 
ture is so full against them, that no translation that 
makes it not another thing, can be on their side. Kid- 
der's "Reflections on the French Testament, printed at 


Popish Reproaches of Protestant Ministers. 

Another of the designs of the Papists is io bring' 
all the faithful pastors of the churches into contempt, 
or suspicion at least, icith the people, so that they may 

JvdOLisG. 109 

draw them to refuse our helps, and the Papists may 
deal with them alojie, ivhoni they know they are 
easily able to overreach. Though our people have 
not that absolute dependence upon their teachers as 
theirs have, yet an ordinate dependence is necessary to 
them, or else God would never have appointed teach- 
ers and pastors for his church, The Papists dare not 
trust their followers so much as to read a Bible in their 
vultrar tono-ue : much less to read our writinofs acrainst 
their errors and impieties. Their priests and friars 
ordinarily do not read them; nor commonly the writ- 
ings of their own party: nor the strongest of those that 
are written against us : for fear lest the objections should 
prove too hard for the answer, or lest they should un- 
derstand in some measure, the truth of our doctrine. 
Sandys, in his Europa Specul, tells how hard he 
found it, to meet with the works of Bellarmin himself 
in any book-seller's shop in Venice or other parts of 
Italy ; but our people have all leave to keep and read 
the Papist writings. We dare venture them upon the 
light upon equal terms : but yet we know them to be 
insufficient, for the most part, to defend even plain and 
necessary truths, against the cavils of adversaries that 
overmatch them in learning and other abilities. Now 
lest we should but afford them our assistance, the Pa- 
pists' principal design is to bring them into false con- 
ceits of the ministers, and make us odious to them ; that 
they may neglect our help, and the easier hearken to 
other teachers. If they can but prevail in that design, 
the souls of our people are like to be undone. 

The more is it to be feared, lest at last they should 
this way prevail, both because of the sin that lieth on 
ourselves in too reserved and negligent a doing of our 
work; and because of the great obstinacy and unprofit- 
ableness of the people, that hate the light, and unthank- 
fully despise it, or will not obey it, and work by it 
while they may. 

The designs of the Papists against the ministry are 
these. They principally endeavor to delude the rulers 
of the land, and set them aginst them. 

They labor by scoffs and nicknames to make them 
odious. As they were the authors or chief fomenters 


of the old scorn under the name of Puritans, so are 
they of many more of late. If you hear men set them- 
selves of purpose to scorn or vilify the ministry, they 
are either secret Papists, or their deluded servitors. If 
they speak of men that regard the ministry, and be not 
hardened as they to a despising of Christ in his ser- 
vants, they call such priest-ridden ; and the pastors they 
scornfully call jack-presbyters, drpvines] and many- 
other scoffs are at hand, to serve the ends of the devil 
and the pope, by alienating the affections of the people 
from their teachers, that so they may devour them at 

Another of their ways of reproach is this : they tell 
the people what odious divisions are among us, and 
how many minds we are of and how oft we change; 
and such like reproaches. While they never tell them 
how much more changeable they have been, and what 
divisions are among themselves, incomparably beyond 
all ours. 

Another reproach that the Papists cast on the minis- 
try, is greediness, covetousness, and being hirelings. 

I will give a brief comparison between the Papist 
priests and the ministers of Christ, that thou mayest 
see whether those men be fit to rail at us as mercena- 
ries, and such as are the servants of mammon. 

It is well known that the ministers of this land, and 
of all the reformed churches commonly, do many of 
them want necessaries, and some want food and rai- 
ment, and the rest of them, for the most part have little 
more, and no superfluities. Some that have not wives 
and children give all they can gather to the poor. 
Some give more to charitable uses, than they receive 
for the work of their ministry; living on their own 
means. This is the height of their covetousness and 

Take a view of the Popish clergy, for greatness, 
riches, and numerousness. The pope who is their 
chief priest, pretendeth to the government of all the 
Christian world. Emperors and kings have kissed his 
feet, and held liim the stirrup. One emperor was forced 
to wait bare foot at his gates a long time in patience, 
till he pleased to open them, Another being forced to 


prostrate himself to liim, the pope set his foot upon his 
neck, profanely abusing ihe words of Psalm 91. 13. 
He shall tread on the lion and adder, &c. Divers 
princes hath he deposed. He hath claimed a supre- 
macy in temporals and spirituals, and his most moder- 
ate flatterers subject princes to him. General councils 
approved by him, decreed that he shall excommunicate 
and depose princes, who will not extirpate those that he 
calleth heretics, and shall commit the government to 
others, or give their countries to the first that can seize 
on them, and absolve all their vassels for their allegi- 
ance, in despite of oaths and God's commands. He is 
a temporal prince himself, having large dominions. 
He hath so numerous a clergy in the countries of all 
Popish princes, as makes him great and formidable to 
them. His cardinal priests are equal to princes, and 
greater than many princes are. 

For their riches and numbers, to say no more of 
their pope and cardinals, they have such multitudes of 
arch-bishops, priests, abbots, priors, friars, and 
Jesuits, as to take up a great part of the land where 
they live. Take one instance of the Popish clergy in 

Bodin, a French judge in France, saith: Hcylin's 
Geography, page 148. "That the revenues of the 
clergy there are five millions seven hundred and sixty 
thousand dollars per annum ; and that they possess 
seven parts of twelve of the whole revenue of the king- 
dom." Comment de stat. saith, " The clergy have near 
a fourth part of the lands of all the kingdom, besides 
the ofllerings, churchings, burials, dirges, and such like 
casualties, which amount to as much as their rents, 
which comes to half the kingdom: upon which Ed- 

' '11' 

win Sandys computes their revenue at six millions 
sterling yearly." One kingdom hath thirteen arch- 
bishops, a hundred and four prelates, a thousand four 
hundred and fifty abbies, five hundred and forty arch- 
priories, twelve thousand three hundred and twenty 
priories, five hundred sixty seven Nunneries, seven 
hundred Convents of friars, and two hundred fifty nine 
Commanderies of Malta ; besides all the colleges of the 
Jesuits. The parish priests are one hundred and thir- 


ty thousand of all sorts. The kingdom is supposed to 
have about fifteen millions of people; but the clergy 
and their ministers are judged to be three millions of 
them. This account is only for France. 

Are the tongues of those men fit to call us mercena- 
ries, or hirelings, or such as preach for filthy lucre? 
Was ever greater impudence manifested by the vilest 
son of Adam, than for such men that lord it over em- 
perors, kings and princes, and devour the wealth of the 
Christian world, to call poor ministers of Christ, covet- 
ous, or hirelings, that are content with food and rai- 
ment, and a common education of their children? If 
you had rather have the Popish priesthood, with the 
numberless swarm of friars, you may take them, and 
say, you had your choice ! White's " Orthodox faith, 
and way to the church explained and justified." 

ICP' The great Abbey of St. Alban's, if all the old lands were 
united together, is now worth, in all its rents, profits, and reve- 
nues yearly about 200,000 pounds, one million of dollars. The 
Abbey of Glastonbury, 300,000 pounds : the Abbey of Augusiin, 
at Canterbury, 200,000 pounds ; Edmondsbury, the same ; Romsey, 
300,000 pounds ; Crowland, 100,000 ; Leicester, 100,000 ; Evesham, 
100,000, Tewksbury, 100,000; Abingdon and Readmg, 300,000. 
If the revenues of all the Abbey lands should be accounted accord- 
ing to the true \alualion of these times, it would be found to be so 
many millions as is incredil)le. Treasury of England, or account 
of all taxes; London, 1725. The above is an account of only ten 
rnonasteiics ; and one hundred and ten years ago ; their annual 
rent was computed at nine millions one hundred and twelve thou- 
sand dollars — and at the present valuation it may be reckoned 
tuenty mi lions of dollars. The present interest of the national 
debt in Great Britain is far less than the actual robberies of the 
Popish priests and friars, and nuns, during the reign of Popery. 

1 ne English Episcopal dioceses before the Reformation were va- 
lued by Stevens, a Papi-t writer, at the yearly income of five 
hundred thousand dollars each, which alone made about fifteen 
millions of dollars. From the above facts, may be ascestained the 
enormous pillage of the Pvoman hierarchy when they ruled ; and 
also the undeniable cause of the ignorance, poverty, immorality 
and debasement of Papists: in every generation, and in all parts of 
tlie world. 



Evangelical Laivfid Ministi'y. 

Another of tlieir designs is this: to persnade the 
icorld that they only have a true ministry or priest- 
hood, and an apostolical episcopacy and true ordina- 
tion : and that ice and all other Protestant churches 
have no true ministers, but are mere laymen under 
the name of ministers, because u-e have no just ordina- 
tion. How prove the}^ all that? They say, that they 
have a pope, that is a true successor of Peter: but we 
have no succession from the apostles, and therefore no 
just ordination, because no man can give that power 
which he hath not : and that we are schismatics sepa- 
rated from the church, and therefore our ordinations 
are invalid: and that some of our churches have no 
bishops, and therefore §ay they, we have no true min- 
istry, nor are they true churches. 

1. Though we need not fetch our ordination from 
Rome, 3'et we may truly say, that if they have any 
true ordination and ministry, then so have we ; for 
our iirst reformers were ordained by their prelates, 
which is enough to stop their mouths. If they say 
that our schism hath cut off our power of ordination, 1 
answer, that though they are notorious schismatics, 
yet if we were what they falsely say we are, it would 
not annul our ordination. This is the judgment of 
their own writers. Thomas a Jesu Conversione gen- 
tium, lib. 6. cap. 9. affirms it to be one of the certain- 
ties agreed on ; " schismatics lose not, nor can lose 
any spiritual power consisting in the spi^-itual character 
of baptism, or orders For this is indelible, as Thom- 
as teacheth, Art. 3. and Turrecremata confirmeth, lib. 
4. sum. part. 1. c. 7: and Silvester verb, schismatici : 
and it appeareth by Pope Urban's can. ordinationes, 9. 
q. 1 ; who judgeth those to be truly ordained, that were 
ordained by schismatical bishops : and from Austin lib. 
6. de Bapt. Cont. Donatist. cap. 5, where hesaith "a se- 
paratist may deliver the sacrament as well as have it. He 
next addeth, that yet such are deprived of the faculty 


of lawfully using the power which they have, so that it 
will be their sin to use it: and that thus those are to 
be understood that speak against the ordination, &c. of 
schismatics. It is unlawful, because their power is sus- 
pended by the church, but not a nullity, because they 
have the power. He puts the question whether schis- 
matical presbyters and bishops do want the power of 
order, or only want jurisdiction ? and he answereth out 
of Thorn. 22.* q. 39. art. 3, "they want jurisdiction, and 
cannot absolve, excommunicate, or grant indulgences, 
and so they cannot elect and give benefices, and make 
laws. But yet they have the power of orders ; and 
therefore a schismatical bishop doth truly make and 
consecrate the Eucharist and truly ordain ; and when 
he electeth and promoteth any to ecclesiastical orders, 
they truly receive the character of order, but not the 
use, because they are suspended, if knowingly they are 
ordained by a schismatical bishop. He next asketh, 
whether this punishment depriving them of jurisdiction 
take place with all schismatics? and answers, that some 
say before the council of Constance this punishment be- 
longed to all notorious schismatics, but not to the un- 
known ones : but since that council, it takes place only 
on those that are expressly and by name denounced, or 
manifest strikers of the clergy. But he himself an- 
swers ; if a schismatic be tolerated, and by the com- 
mon error of the people be taken for lawful, there is no 
doubt but all his acts of jurisdiction are valid ; which 
we shall affirm also of heretics. But if a presbyter or 
bishop be a manifest schismatic, then some say, that 
those acts that require jurisdiction are invalid, but oth- 
ers say, that they are all valid in case the schismatic be 
not by name excommunicated, or a manifest striker of 
the clergy." It is their own canons, that the Papists 
here plead when the council of Constance hath so 
altered the business. 

2. Though this that is said is enough as to the Pa- 
pists, yet I add, that their sucoession is interrupted, and 
therefore they are the most unfit to be our judges. 
They have had long schisms, in which no man knew 
who was the right pope, nor knoweth to this day; and 
such long removes and vacancies, and such interpositions 


of various ways of choosing their pope, and interrup- 
tions by heretical popes, condemned by general coun- 
cils ; besides murderers, adulterers, simonists, and such 
as their own writers, Genebrard, and others expressly 
say, were not apostolical, but apostatical ; and popes 
who by general councils have been judged or charged 
with heresy and infidelity, that there is nothing more 
certain than that their succession hath been interrupted. 

3. They cannot be certain but it is in every age inter- 
rupted, and that there is no true pope or bishops among 
them, because the intention of the ordainer or conse- 
crator i« with them of necessity to the thing: and no 
man can be certain of the intention of the ordainers. 
Yet Bellarmin says, that though we cannot be sure 
that he is a true pope, bishop or prebyter that is ordain- 
ed, yet we are bound to obey him. Where then is the 
certainty of succession ? Bellarmin Justificat. Cap. 
8. sec. 5. 

4. What succession of episcopal consecration was 
there in the church of Alexandria, when Jerom Epist. 
ad Evagrium, tells us : "At Alexandria, from Mark the 
evangelist even till Heraclius and Dionysius their bish- 
ops, the presbyters did always name one man that bish- 
op, whom they chose from among themselves, and 
placed in a higher degree : even as if an army make 
an emperor, or the deacons choose one of themselves, 
whom they know to be industrious and eall him the 
chief deacon." Thus Jerome shews that bishops were 
then made by presbyters. In the same epistle he 
proves from Scripture, that presbyters and bishops were 
one. Medina accusing Jerom of error, saith that Am- 
brose, Austin, Sedulius, Primasius, Chrysostom, Theo- 
doret, Oecumenius, and Theophylact were in the same 
heresy, as Bellarmin himself reporteth him. So that pres- 
byters now may make bishops as those of Alexandria 
did. Jerom there saith, "all are the successors of the 
apostles," yet apostles as apostles have no successors 
at all, as Bellarmin teacheth, lib. 4. de Ponlif. cap. 25. 
"Bishops do not properly succeed the apostles ; because 
the apostles were not ordinary, but extraordinary, and 
as it vv«re delegated pastors, who have no successors. 
Bishops h ive no part of the true apostolic authority. 



Apostles could preach in the whole world, and found 
churches, but so cannot bishops. The apostles could 
write canonical books, but so cannot bishops. Apos- 
tles had the gifts of the tongue and miracles, but so 
have not bishops. The apostles had jurisdiction over 
the whole church, but so have not bishops. And there 
is no succession but to a predecessor : but apostles and 
bishops were in the church both at once, as appeareth 
by Timothy, Titus, Evodius, and many more. If there- 
fore bishops succeed apostles, to what apostle did Titus 
succeed/* and whom did Timothy succeed"? Bishops 
succeed apostles in the same manner as presbyters 
succeed the seventy-two disciples : but it is manifest 
that presbyters do not properly succeed the seventy-two 
disciples, but only by similitude, i^hilip, Stephen and 
others that were of the seventy-two, had never been 
after ordained deacons, if they had been presbyters be- 

Now what is become of the Popish apostolical suc- 
cessors among their bishops? The scope of all this 
is to prove, that all prelates receive their power from 
the pope; and so their succession is confined to him 
alone : and therefore as oft ViS there have been inter- 
ruptions in the Papal succession, so often the succession 
of all their church was interrupted. 

But if bishops succeed not apostlts, and have not 
any of the apostolic power, who then doth the bishop of 
Rome succeed? Bcllarmin, cap. 25, saith; "The pope 
of Rome properly succeedeth Peter, not as an apostle, 
but as an ordinary pastor of the whole church." Let 
us then have no more talk of the apostolic seat, or at 
least no more arguing from that name : for Peter was 
not the universal vicar as an apostle, nor doth the 
people so succeed him. Doth not that give away the 
vicarship .-' which way will they prove it ? 

But an objection falls in Bellarmin's way; "if this 
be so, then none of the bishops of Afric, Asia, &c. were 
true bishops, that were not made by the pope." To 
which he answers, that " it is enough that the pope do 
consecrate them mediately, by making patriarchs and 
archbishops to do it ; and so Peter did constitute the 
patriarchs of Alexandria and Antioch : who thus re- 


ceiving authority from the pope, did rule, almost all 
Asia and Afric." Hut that almost marreth the whole 
cause: for where is the universal headship i' did Bel- 
larmiii think that Alexandria and Antioch were made 
at first the seats of patriarclis, having- a large jurisdic- 
tion as afterward they attained i* How will he prove 
that Peter made those two patriarchates, not as an 
apostle, but as an ordinary vicar general 1 Who 
made the patriarchate of Constantinople, and gave it 
that vast jurisdiction i* did Peter many hundred years 
after his death ? or did the Pope of Rome, that resisted 
and sought to diminish his power? or rather did not 
the general councils do it by the emperor's commands, 
the pope excepting and repining at it i' who made the 
patriarch of Jerusalem i* who made James bishop of 
Jerusalem ? Did Petsri* who made Timothy and Ti- 
tus bishops ? did Peter or Paul ? Who gave Paul that 
powev? not Peter certainly. Do not those men jest 
with holy things? or do they believe themselves ? Bel- 
larmin confesseth, that the potestas Ordinis, et interi* 
oris jurisdictionis, power of order and interior jurisdic- 
tion, is immediately from God to ewQxy bishop as to 
the pope, cap. 22. Why then should it be denied of 
the exterior jurisdiction ? Is one part of the essence of 
the office given by the pope, and the rest without him/ 
What if it be proved, that the exterior and the interior 
jurisdiction of a pastor are one ? though the obedience be 
exterior, yet the jurisdiction is exercised on the soul 
in one case as well as another ; it being the mind 
on which the obligation lieth, and the pastoral rule is 
powerful and efl^ectual, aud further than you procure 
consent you are despised. For it is the magistrate's 
work to use violence. Bishops as bishops, can but 
persuade and deal by words with the inner man. What 
then is become of the Papist succession ? 

5. He that is ordained according to the apostles' 
directions, or prescript in Scripture, hath the true apos- 
tolical ordination ; but so are we ordained. The apos- 
tles never confined ordination to those prelates that de- 
pend on the pope of Rome. The bishops to whom the 
apostles committed that power, are the same who are 
called presbyters by them, and they were the overseers 


or pastors each but of one single church and not of 
many churches, in Scripture times, so Hammond as- 
serts'. Such are those who ordain among us now. 
Grcgor. Nazianzen. oral. 18, saith, "I would there was 
no presidency, nor prerogative of place and tyrannical 
privileges ; that so we might be known only by virtue. 
But now this right side, and left side, and middle and 
lower degree, and presidency, and concomitancy, have 
begot us many contritions to no purpose, and have driv- 
en many into the ditch, and have led them away to the 
region of the goats." 

Isidore Pelusiat. lib. 3. Epist. 223. ad Hierace??i, 
saith: "When I have shewed, what difference there is 
between the ancient ministry and the present tyranny, 
why do you not crown and praise the lovers of equality.''"' 

Refer to Sedulius on Titus 1. Ansclm Enarrat. in 
Phil.i. 1. Beda on Ads 20. Alcuin Divinis Officiis ; 
Cap. 35, 36. ayid John Lib. 5. ; and Epist. 108. Anselm 
on I Timothy \\. 14. histitut.in Concil Colo?i. de Sacr. 
Ordin. Bucer Script. Anglic. Peter Martyr, Loc. 
Com. Clas. 4. Loc. 1. sect. 23; a7id Wiclifs argu- 
ments on the Waldenses. Cassander Consult, artic. 
14, saith; It is agreed among all, that of old in the 
apostle's days, there was no difference between bishops 
and presbyters, but afterwards for order's sake and the 
avoiding of schism, the bishop was set before the pres- 
byters." Occam determineth, that "by Christ's insti- 
tution all the priests of what degree soever are of equal 
authority, power and jurisdiction." Reynold Peacock, 
wrote a book de ministrorum ciqualitate, which your 
party caused to be burnt. Richard Armachan, lib. 9. 
cap 5, ad Quceest. Armen. saith, "there is not found in 
the evangelical or apostolical Scriptures any difference 
between bishops and simple priests, called presbyters; 
whence it tollows, that there is one power in all, and 
equal from their order." Cap. 7, answering the ques- 
tion, whether any priest may consecrate churches, &c. 
he saith, "priests may do it as well as bishops, seeing 
a bishop hath no more in such matters than any sim- 
ple priest. It seems therefore that the restriction of 
the priest's power was not in the primitive church ac- 
cording to the Scripture." 


G. The chief error of the Papists in this cause is ex- 
pressed in their reason, "no man can give the power 
that he hath not :" wherein they intimate, that it is 
man that giveth the ministerial power. Whereas it is 
the gift of Christ alone. Man doth but design the 
person that shall receive it, and then Christ giveth it, 
by his law, to the person so designed : and then man 
dotli invest him, and solemnize his introduction. Asa 
woman may choose her husband, but it is not she that 
giveth him the power over her, but God who deter- 
mineth of that power by his law : affixing it to the per- 
son chosen by her, and her action is but a condition, 
or cause of that capacity of the matter to receive the 
form. xMcn do but obey God in a right choice and des- 
ignation of the person : his law doth presently give 
him the power, with which for order's sake he must be 
in solemn manner invested. But matters of order may 
^possibly vary; and though they are to be observed as 
far as may be, yet they always give place to the ends 
and substance of the work for ordering whereof they 
are appointed. 

7. Temporal power is truly and necessarily of God, 
as ecclesiastical, and it was at first given immediately 
by him, and he chose the person : and yet there is no 
necessity that kings must prove an uninterrupted succes- 
sion. God useth means now in designing the persons 
that shall be governors of the nations of the earth. But 
not always the same means. Nor hath he tied himself 
to a succesive anointing or election: else few kings on 
earth would hold their sceptres. And no man from 
any diversity in the cases is able to prove, that a man 
may not as truly be a lawful church-governor, as a law- 
ful governor of the commonwealth, without an uninter- 
rupted succession of ministerial collation. 

Bellarmin is forced to maintain, that with them it is 
enough that a pastor have the place, and seem lawful 
to the people, and that they are bound to obey him, 
though it should prove otherwise. 

Our ordination therefore being according to the law 
of Christ, and the pope's so contrary to it: we are 
ready at any time, more fully to compare them, and 
demonstrate to any impartial man, that Christ doth 



much more disown their ordination than ours ; and 
that we enter in God's appointed way. Mr. Elliot in 
New England may better ordain a pastor over the In- 
dians converted by him, than leave them without or 
send to Roiae, for a bishop or for orders. Voetius de 
desperata causa papatus. JVlason upon English ordi- 


Popish Sa..ctUy. 

Another of their deceits is this : ihcy pretend the 
holiness of their churches and ministry, and the unho- 
liness of ours. This being matter of fact, a willing 
and impartial mind may the easier be satisfied. They 
assert their holiness, by the canonized saints among 
them: by the devotion of their religious orders, and 
their strictness of living: by their unmarried clergy : 
and by their sanctifying sacraments and ceremonies. 
In all which they say that we are so far wanting, that 
being out of the church, there is no true holiness among 

I had never the happiness to be acquainted with any 
Papist of a serious spiritual temper, and holy life, but 
only some of a ceremonious formal kind of religion, 
and but with very few that lived not in gross sin. Pa- 
pists make it an article of their faith, and an essential 
point of Popery, that no one Protestant hath charity, or 
can be saved ; and that no Christian in the world is 
sanctified really, and can be saved but a Papist. They 
necessitate us to mention their ungodliness by so cal- 
ling us to it, and laying the stress of all our cause upon 
the point : and laying the very christian faith iiself 
upon the holiness of their church. For we must not 
know that Scripture is God's word, or that Christianity 
is the true religion, till we first know that the church 
of Rome is the true church, that we may receive it on 
their credit : and we must know that they are the true 
church by being the only holy people in the world. If 

JUGCLINC. _ 211 

my faltli lay on tliis foundation, 1 know so much of tiiu 
falsehood of it, that I must tnrn infidel : and 1 can no 
more believe this than 1 can believe that snow is not 

They confess tliat tiieir common people are bad; hut 
yet they say, "there arc same good ones among us, but 
among the heretics not one is good." Thomas a Jcsu 
dc convcrs. omu. Gent. iJ. 531. Tuhcrville Manual 
p. 84. saith, but "I never yet heard of any Protestant 
saints in the world." O wonderful perversness of the 
hearts of sectaries! O wonderful patience of God ! Did 
not that man's heart tremble or smite him to write so 
iiorrid, so impudent a reproach against so many precious 
saints of God ? Durst he thus attempt to rob the Lord 
of tlie fruit of his blood? and to villify his jewels? and 
as Rabshakeh, to reproach the Israel of God .'' to at- 
tempt to pluck them out of Christ's hand that arc given 
him by his Father ; and to shut them out of heaven, tliat 
are redeemed and made heirs by so dear a price ; and 
to spit in their faces whom Christ hath washed with liis 
blood ? did he not fear that dreadful threatening of 
Christ, Mat. 18. 6, "But -who shall offend one of these 
little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that 
a millstone were hansed about his neck, and that he 
were drowned in the depth of the sea." Though I see 
so much impiety among tlie Papists, I dare not say, I 
dare not think, that God hath not some holy one among 
tiiem. It is dangerous to condemn those that Chsist 
will justify, and make his members to be the members 
of the devil, and abusing so grossly the apple of his eye. 
If I see a man live wickedly, I dare say he is of a wick- 
ed life; but 1 dare not say that all are so, unless it be 
among men, whose principles I am sure are inconsistent 
with godliness, and I know that they hold those princi- 
ples practically or prevalently. I have been acquainted 
with some Papists, learned and nnlearned. Few of the 
unlearned know what Christianity is, nor whether 
Christ were God or man, male or female, nor whether 
ever he was the king, prophet or priest of the church, 
nor for what end he died, nor what faith or repentance is ; 
but were infidels under the name of Papists or catholics. 
Nearly all the learned at 4 unJearned live in gross 


sin, the better sort would ordinarily swear by their 
lady, and by the mass, and some greater oaths. The 
rest were fornicators or adulterers, drunkards or 
revellers and gamesters. Never had I the happiness to 
be acquainted with one that could speak experimentally 
of tlic work of grace upon his soul, of the life of faith, 
of communion with God, and of the life to come. Their 
religion lay in being the Pope's subjects, and in fasting 
on Fridays and in Lent from some sorts of meat, and in 
saying over so many Ave Maries, Pater Nosters, or the 
like; and in observing days, and hours, and ceremonies. 

But if those men that never heard of a Protestant 
saint, and conclude there is no one saved but a Papist ; 
and build their salvation on this as an article of their 
faith, had known but those that I have known, and yet 
know ; they would either have been of another mind, or 
have been left inexcusable in a malicious reproaching of 
the saints of the most high. I bless the Lord that I can 
truly say, that I know many, as far as the heart of another 
can be known, by words and a holy life, who live in 
much communion with God: whose souls are daily long- 
ing after him, and some of them spending much of their 
lives upon their knees, having had many a special ex- 
traordinary return to their importunate requests : whose 
delight is in the law of the Lord, in which they meditate 
day and night, which is locked up among the Papists : 
whose hearts smite them for vain words or thouglits, or 
the loss of time : that live in examplary humility, meek- 
ness and selfdenial, bearing wrongs patiently, and doing 
good to as many as they can, as the servants of all, con- 
temning the riches and honors of the world, mortifying 
the flesh, and some of them longing to be dissolved and 
to be with Ciuist : in whom the world never knew either 
once drunkenness, fornication, or one rash oath, or any 
other gross sin. And is it certain that all those shall be 
damned, because they believe not in the pope? or is it 
not certain by promise that all such shall be saved? 

When Papists lay their faith and cause on this, that 
their church is holy, and ours and all others are every 
man unholy, it is almost to me as if they said that no 
men but Papists have souls in their bodies, and laid their 
faitli on this ; and as soon should I believe them, if this 


W(!re their belief. It is a jrood preservative against po- 
perv, when a man c-innot turn Papist without puttint^ 
out his eves, and renouncing his wit, and reason, and 
common experience, as well as his charity ; and without 
denying what he knoweth by his own soul ! 

1. But let us come to their evidences. They say, we 
have no canonized saints. I answer all the apostles and 
saints of the first ages were of our religion ; and many 
of them have been beholden to the pope for canonizing 

We have no usurper among us that pretendeth infal- 
libly to know the hearts of others, nor to number God's 
saints. But with us the Holy Ghost maketh saints, and 
their lives declare it ; and those that converse with them 
discern it, so far as to be highly confident ; and men 
discern it themselves, so far as to be infallibly, though 
not perfectly, certain. 

The pope takes saints to be rare with them, that they 
musi be named and written with red letters in an alma- 
nack. TuherviUe Manual p. 85, sends us for proof to 
their chronicles and martyrologies, and he nameth four 
saints that they have had, Austin the Monk, Benedict, 
Dominick, and Francis, Now we all know that none 
but saints are saved, and without holiness none can see 
God; Heb. 12. 14. So that it seems if sanctity be so 
rare among the Papists, salvation must be rare. 

But as for us, we make it our care to admit none but 
saints to our church communion, though we preach to 
others to prepare them for it : for we believe that the 
church is a holy society, and find Paul calling the whole 
churches that he writes to by the title of saints, and we be- 
lieve it is the communion of saints that is there to be 
held. And if we had no more saints in one county at 
once, yea in one parish at once, than would fill up the 
pope's calander, so as to have one for every day in the 
year, we should betake ourselves to bitter lamentation. 
Whereas the church of Rome takes in all sorts of the 
unclean, and is so impure and polluted a society, that it 
is a wonder how they should have the face to boast of 
their holiness, to men who live among them and know 
them. Thousands of their members are stark infidels, 
not knowing the essentials of the Christian faith. In 


Ireland many of them know not who Christ was, but 
that he was a better man than Patrick. Usher saw 
and lamented, that they perished as heathens for want 
of knowing Christianity itself, while they went under 
the name of catholics : and therefore he would have per- 
suaded the popish priests to have consented that they 
should be all tau:dit a catechism of the common princi- 
pies that we are agreed in ; but he could not procure it. 
White asked one of them in Lancashire, who Jesus 
Christ was 1 she answered, that it was some good 
thing, or else it would not have been put into the creed. 
While's Key to the Church. 

How much swearing, whoredom, drunkenness, and 
other wickedness are in their church is known not only 
by the complaints of their own writers, but by the com- 
mon experience of travelers. We have known Papists 
who have turned from them by the experience of one 
journey to Rome, and seeing what is there. As for 
church censures by which any of those evils should be 
purged out, they are laid by, and reserved for other 
uses ; even as thunder-bolts for the pope's adversaries, 
and the servants of Clirist whom they take for heretics, 
and for princes whom the pope would have deposed and 
m.urdered. The lives of many kings and princes have 
been the sacrifice of the Roman ungodliness. 

What need you any further proof, that their church is 
a common wilderness, and not the garden of Christ, and 
is a cage of all unclean birds, than that they actually 
keep them all in their communion. It made my heart 
rise at their hypocrisy and filthiness, to read one sen- 
tence in one of the most learned, and sober, and honest 
of all their prelates that have written. Albaspinccus 
Observat. " If ever any one man in this age was put 
from the comnmnion, which I know not whether such a 
thing hath come to pass, it was only from the receiving 
the Eucharist ; in the other parts of his life, he retained 
the same familiarity and converse with other believers, 
which he had before his excommunication." Thus a pre- 
late of France knew not any one person in the age that 
he lived in, who was ever excommunicated for ungodli- 
ness. Let the Christian world then observe by their 
practice, what an abominable hypocritical contest the^ 

iVGOLlSG. 215 

ni.'ikc, to jn-ovc the power of clmrch-f^overnmcnt to he 
only in their pope, and the prelates to whom he givcth 
it ; and when tlu^y have done, do make so little use of 
the power which they so pretend to, as not to exercisci 
the censures of the church upon any one offender. How 
were that man worthy to he thought of, or used, that 
would set all the world on fn-e hy contending, that no 
schoolmaster or physician should he suffered in the whole 
world, hut liimself and such as he giveth power to : and 
when he hath done, will not hy himself or his subjects 
and dependents teach or heal one person in an age ? 
Were such an one meet to live on the earth ? Or should 
we judge that man in his wits that would believe him 1 
O what a sty is the Roman society ! What corruption 
in their assemblies ! And yet thc*^hovel or the besom 
must not be used once in an age ? no weed pulled up ? 
no superlluous branch cut off? Is this the use of all the 
canons of their church concerning excommunication. 
Must the Christian world be at such vast expense, to 
maintain so rich and numerous a clergy for this 1 JMust 
we cast out our pastors to receive such as these? When 
we should be ashamed, if we had not exercised more of 
the cleansing power in one church, than AlhaspincBus 
knew among the Papists in a whole age. — Alhaspiu. 
Vet. Eccl&s. Ritib. Observed. 

But perhaps you think there is little of this fdth among 
them to be cast out. He that readeth their writers, or 
llveth among them, and seeth their lives, will not so think. 
He that had seen the murders of their popes for the ob- 
taining of the popedom, or how Pope Stephen raged 
against the carcass of Pope Formosus, drawing it out of 
the grave, and changing its j)ontifical habit to a secular, 
and cutting off his fingers ; or he that had seen Pope Chris- 
topher casting the corpse of Pope Leo V. into the river 
Tiber; or Pope Sergius keeping the said Christopher 
bound in prison ; or Pope Boniface VII. putting out his 
cardinals' eyes, would scarce believe that the seat of 
Peter were holy : all which Platina and others of their 
own writers notice. Baronius himself tells us an. 897. 
" Pope Stephen VII. defiled Peter's seat with unheard 
of sacrilege, not to be named ; and the princes of Tus- 
cany were brought into Peter's chair and Christ's throne. 


being monstrous men, of most filthy lives and desperate 
manners, and every way most filthy. An. 900. Ugly 
monsters were thrust into the Papacy ; so that it was de- 
filed with filthiness, and followed by those with a perpet- 
ual infamy. An. 912. At Rome, the most powerful and 
the most sordid whores did rule; at whose will the seats 
were changed, prelates were made, and, which is horrid 
to be heard, and not to be spoken, their sweet-hearts, 
false popes were thrust into Peter's seat." " For one 
hundred and fifty years the Popes were wholly fallen 
from the virtue of their predecessors, being disorderly, 
and apostatical, rather than aj)Ostolical, not entering i3y 
the door, but by the backdoor:" saith Genebrard Chron. 
Lib. 4. a?i. 901. He that shall read those writers impar- 
tially, will scarce tkink the head of their church hath 
been holy, which is an essential part of it ; nor that 
their succession is interrupted. 

Read Nic. Clemangis. Alvarus Pelagius de planctu 
EcdesicB, lib. 2. art. 2., and many such like ; and their 
poets Mantuan, Dante, &c., or Petrarch, Mirandula, 
&:c., and you will think the holiness of Rome the poorest 
proof in the world of their being the only church. 
Jirowne^s Fasciculus Rerum Kxpetend. et. Fvgiend. 

Espencceus and others recite that distich : 
" Vivere qui cupitis sancte, discedite Roma : 
Omnia cum liceant, non licet esse bonum.^^ 

" If you desire to live holy, fly from Rome. All 
things there are lawful, except to be good." Baptist 
Mantuan. Voetii Causa desperata Papatus. 

Platina saith. Vita Marcellini ; " Our vices are so in- 
creased, that they have scarce left us any place for mer- 
cy with God. How great is the covetousnessof the priests? 
especially of those that rule all ! how great lust ! how 
great ambition and pomp ! how great ignorance of them- 
selves, and of the Christian doctrine ! how little religion, 
and that rather counterfeit, than true ! how corrupt man- 
ners ! even such as in the profanest secular men are to 
be detested ! it is not worth the speaking ; when they 
sin so openly and so publicly, as if they sought praise 
by it." 

Claude 1, Espencapus on Titus, saith ; " Where is 
there under the sun a greater liberty, clamor, impunity 


of all evil, infamy and impudence, than at Rome : verily 
it is such as no man can believe but he that hath seen it, 
and no man can deny it that hath seen it." Tiiis was 
written since the council of Trent. In the council of 
Trent, a Popish Prelate Cornelius Muss, and the won- 
der of his age among the Papists, saith " there is no 
monstrous fdthiness, or sink or plague of uncleanness, 
with which both people and priest are not defiled. In 
the very sanctuary of God, there is no shame, no modes- 
ty, no ho}>e or regard of good living : but unbridled and 
untamed lust, singular audaciousness, incredible wicked- 
ness. Would they had not fallen from religion to super- 
stition, from faith to infidelity, from Christ to antichrist, 
yea as men that had no souls from God to Epicurus, or 
Pythagoras, saying in an impious heart, and an impudent 
mouth, there is no God. And yet now of a long time, there 
hath been no pastor that would require, or seek them again; 
because they all sought their own things, but not one 
the things of Jesus Christ." Muss after the council wrote 
thus ; Scrm. 2. " The Roman name is hateful with all na- 
tions ; and see, how little esteem the church itself is of, be- 
cause of the scandals that are heard, seen and felt. I 
speak not now of enemies, that call it the whore of Ba- 
bylon, hell, and the sink of all errors : but I speak of 
friends, that groan and daily sigh within themselves, say- 
ing, O holy city, how art thou thus profaned ! O glorious 
city ! that are thus become vile, thus condemned and ne- 
glected." Rivet. White's Wat/ to the true Church, 

Guicciardin their historian saith ; "Those are called 
good popes, whose goodness is not worse than other 
men's wickedness." 

Claud. EspenccEus on Titus 1. complains, that the 
promises made by the pope, of reformation at the coun- 
cil of Trent, were all broken, and nothing done but de- 
ceit and shows. Of Pope Sixtus V. Bellarmin gave his 
judgment, that he thought, when he died he went to the 
devil, saying, "he that lives without repentance, and 
dieth without repentance, undoubtedly goeth to hell." 
Bellarmin also said, "as far as I can reach, as lar as I 
have any wisdom, as far as I understand, in plain terms, 
our Lord the pope is gone to hell." Barthol. JIarisof. 
life of Henry the great of France, caj). 17. saith; 



" When the Spaniards perceived his contrivances to for- 
sake their party, lest he should join witli the enemy, they 
caused liim to be stranirled in the night by a Franciscan, 
or one in a monk's habit, and the next day gave out that 
a domestic devil had strangled him ; and to make good 
the report a book was written of his life and printed, 
where all the wickedness of Pope Alexander ^ I. is 
charged on him. " How the popes are still chosen by 
impious jugglings and combinations, cardinal Perron, 
tells in his Legationes et Negotiat. Cardinal Ossatus 
Epist. 87. said concerning pope Clement VIII. esteem- 
ed one of the very best of them : who persuaded the 
King of France to join with the Spaniards in the inva- 
sion of England ; and when the cardinal answered that 
the King of France was under an oath of peace with 
the Queen of England ; their best pope replied, " the 
oath was made to a heretic, but he is bound by anoth- 
er oath to God and the pope. Kings and oiher sover- 
eign princes tolerate themselves in all things that make 
for their commodity, and it is now come to pass that it is 
not imputed to them, nor taken to be their fault." He 
alleged the saying of Francisc. Marice Duke of Urbin, 
" a noble man or great man that is not the sovereign, is 
blamed and counted infamous of all men. if he keep not 
his faith ; but supreme princes may make covenants, 
and break them again without any danger to their credit, 
and may Ife, betray, and commit such like practices.'* 
Those are the best popes, that can forgive other men's 
sins and pardon them the pains of purgatory, and can- 
not save their own souls from hell ! Can they not gov- 
ern the universal church well, that can no better govern 
themselves, or that one city where they dwell 1 are not 
those men worthy to be consulted as infallible oracles, 
by those that dwell at tlie antipodes, though it cost them 
their lives to sail or travel to them ? can he be a Chris- 
tian or be saved that bclievoth in one of those men? or 
can any man receive the Christian faith or Scriptures, 
till he first know those wicked men to be Christ's infallible 
vicars 1 

How many thousands of prostitutes are licensed in 
Rome ; how sumptuously they live, and what revenues 
the popes derive from their fornication many Papist 


authors mention. Some of them defend it ; and even 
the present pope niaintains it. However the Jesuit 
Mariana, akiioii<:;h lie justified tiie murder of kin^^s ; Re- 
gis ct Regis instutiunc, lib. 1. cap. (i ; disallows that 
uncleanness, Spectaculis, cap. 16. Claude EspciiC(cus, 
Confine nfia^ lib. 3. cap. 4. laments that "all Rome is 
turned into one vast hrothel." "The Jews, says that 
Roman priest, so far shame you, that none of their 
daughters may hecome a harlot, unless they first turn 
Papists, and tiien they can obtain the license to live in 
lewdness," for the stipulated price. 

Of the gain that comes to the pope and prelates by 
the simoniacal market of benefices, read Clcmangis 
Tract, dc annatibus non solvendis. Alvar. Pclag. jjlanC' 
ill Eccles. lib. 2. art. 15; and I. 1. art. 67. Claude JEs- 
penc. Tit. 1. Cardinal Cusanus Concord, cathnl. lib. 
2. cap. 40. JIarc. Ant. Rcpub. Eccles. lib. 9. c. 9. Bu- 
doeus lib. 5. dc Asse ; Duarenus Sacris Eccles. 3Iinist, 
lib. 5. c. 8. 

The odious sin of sodomy was common with many 
of the clergy and popes themselves; gluttony, drunken- 
ness and whoredom being the common smaller sins. 

Papirius INIassonius who wrote the deeds of the popes 
for their honor and sought his reward from Sixtus V. 
saith ; Episcop. urb. lib. 6. " No man doth now look 
for holiness in popes: those are judged the best, that 
are a little good or less wicked than other mortals used 
to be." 

Pius II. was one of the best that the Papal seat a long 
time had ; and yet in liis ej)istle to his father ; Epist. 
15. who was angry with him for fornication, he 
saith ; " you say you are sorry for my crime. 
I know not what opinion you have of me. You 
know what you were yourself. Nor am I an hypocrite, 
that I should desire rather to seem good, than to be 
good. It is an ancient and usual sin* I know not who 
is without it. This plague is spread far and near ; 
though I see it not, seeing nature, which doth nothing 
amiss, hath bred this appetite in all living creatures, that 
mankind should be continued. " He who was the glory 
of the Papacy, knew none of all the Hierarchy without 
beasily sin. 

Orichovius informs Pope Julius III. that Pope Paul 


II. his predecessor had a daughter in the eyes of all 

Of Pope Julius III. Onuphrius saith, "being a car- 
dinal ho followed voluptuousness as by stealth, but being 
made popOj and having what he would have, he cast 
away all care, and gave up himself to his mirth and 
disposition. " Thuanus also declares ; Hist. lib. 6, *' he 
was very infamous as a cardinal, but afterwards past 
his life in greater infamy." 

Alvarus Pelagius, lib. 2. art. 73. lamenting whore- 
dom as a common sin, but specially of the clergy, tells 
us that the cause is, "because the religious of that age 
were gluttons or bell^'^-gods, arrogant, proud, incompar- 
ably beyond secular men, conversing with women, &c. 
And drink more wine in their religious state than before, 
and are commonly carnal. That the monks had their 
female devotees, with whom, by the prelate's license, 
they conversed. Being sent to preach they go to lewd- 
ness. That there was scarcely any of the nuns with- 
out her carnal male votary, by which they broke their 
faith with Christ." That was the holy Papacy. 

In book 2. art. 28, he says, " Most of the clergy mix 
themselves with gluttony, drunkenness and whoredom, 
which is their common vice, and most of them give 
themselves to tlie unnatural vice. Thus continually, 
yea and jjublicly, do they offend against that chastity 
which they promised to the Lord : besides those evils 
not to be named which in secret they commit, which 
papers will not receive, nor pen can write." Abundance 
more he hath of the same subject, and their putting their 
choicest youth into houses of sodomy. That book of 
Alvarus Pelagius, Bellarmin calls Liber insignis ; de 
Scriptor. JEcclesiast. 

Matth. Paris, p. 819, tells us of cardinal Hugo*s 
farewell speech to the people of Lyons when he departed 
with the pope's court; "Friends, said he, since we came 
to this city we have brought you great commodity and 
alms. When we came hither we found three or four 
brothels, but now at our departure we leave but one, 
but that one reacheth from the east gate to the west 
g«te." O holy pope ! and holy church ! 

Costerus the Jesuit easily answers all that is said, £»* 


chirid. cap. 2. dc JBccles. "The cliurch losotli not the 
name Holy, as long as there is but one wlio is truly iioly.'* 
Is tliis your sanctity? If the head be unlioly, an essen- 
tial part is unholy; and therefore the church cannot be 
lioly. One person is not the matter of the church, as one 
drop of wine cast into the sea doth not make it a sea of 
wine ; one Italian in England makes not England Ital- 
ian ; nor docs one learned man make England learned. 
Let the Pai)ists observe, that it is from the very 
words of their own authors, that I have spoken of them 
what is here recited, and not from their adversaries. 
And therefore I am so far from believing- the Gospel 
upon the account that their church is holy that recom- 
mendcth it, or from believing them to be the only 
church of Christ because of their holiness, that I must 
bless God that I live in a sweeter air and cleaner society, 
and should be loth to come out of the garden to go into 
their sink to be made clean or sweet. The traveller 
learned more wit, who left us his resolution ; — 

"Rom. a vale; vidi ; sati^ est vidisse ; revarta? 
Cum Icno aut ?nc/'etriz, sciirra, cinoidus ero.'*'^ 

*'Rome! Farewell; enough! Ihave seen thee. 1 will 
return to thee when I am a villain and a beast ! " 

2. The second proof which they bring of the holiness 
of their church, is, the strict life of their friars, as 
Carthusians, Franciscans, and others. Travellers tell 
lamentable stories of friars ; and Guil. de Amore, and 
his companions have said much more, and many other 
Popish writers paint them in an odious garb. 

This also shows the pollution of your church in 
comparison to our churches, that holiness and religion 
are such rarities and next to miracles among you, that 
it must be cloistered up, or confined to certain orders 
that are properly called religious, as if the people had 
no religion or holiness. When our care and hope is to 
make all our parishes far more religious and holy than 
your monasteries or convents. 

3. Their third proof of the holiness of the Papists is 
derived from tiieir unmarried priests. Because the es- 
sential parts of your church nearest concern your cause, 
I ask — Was it not Pope John XI. who had Theodora for 



his mistress? Was it not Pope Sergius III. who was the 
father of Pope John XII. by Marosia? Did not John 
XII. or XIII., according to Luhprand and other Po- 
pish writers defile virgins ; and married women even at 
the doors of liis palace, and was finally killed by a hus- 
band who caught him in adultery? Did not a Papist 
write the following distich of Pope Innocent? 

^^ Octo Nocens pueros genuit totidemque puellas, 
Hunc merito poi'uit dicere Rome patrem ! " 

" That sinner had eight sons and eight daughters. 
Rightly did Rome call him their Father!'''' 

Whose son was Aloisus, made Prince of Parma by 
Pope Paul III. ? For your archbishops, prelates, priests 
&c. I shall add but the words of Dominicus Soto de 
Instit. et Jure qu. 6. art. 1. "We do not deny that the 
clergy keep concubines, and are adulterers.'' 

Paul directed Timothy and Titus to ordain a bishop 
that was the husband of one wife, and ruled well his 
house, having his children in subjection. The church 
long held to that doctrine. Greg. Nyssen was a married 
bishop. But if you are wiser than the S))irit of God, 
or can change his laws, or can prove the Holy Ghost so im- 
mutable as to give one law by Paul and other apostles, 
and another by the pope, we will believe you and for- 
sake the Scripture, when you can bewitch and charm 
us to it. 

We believe that a single life may be of convenience 
to a pastor, when it can be held ; but that Christ's rule 
must be observed, " every man cannot receive this say- 
ing, but he that can, let him receive it;" but we do not 
teach, as the Jesuits do, that a man may lawfully go 
into a brothel, though he hath found by experience he 
is overcome. 

Lest the vices of your priests should be laid open 
and punished, you exempt them from the secular power, 
and will not have a magistrate question them for any 
crimes. It is one of Pope Nicholas' decrees, Caranza, 
p. 395 ; " No layman must judge a priest, nor examine 
any thing of his life. And no secular prince ought to 
judge the facts of any prelates or priests whatsoever." 
That is the way to be wicked quietly, and sin without 
noise and infamy. 


Those among us who are known to he unj^odly and 
scandalous, are not owned hy us, nor arc niemhers of 
our church, or admitted to the Lord's Supper in tiiosc 
congregations that exercise churcli discipline ; hut thev 
arc only as catechumens, whom we preach to and in- 
struct, if not cast out. 

Your eighth general council at Constantino[)le, Can. 
14. decreed, " ministers must not fall down to princes, 
nor eat at their tables, nor debase themselves to them ; 
but emperors must take them as equals." But we are 
so far from establishing pride and arrogancy by a law, 
that tliough we hate servile flattery and man pleasing, 
yet we think it our duty to be the servants of all, and 
to condescend to men of low estate, and much more to 
honor our superiors and God in them. 

The same council decreed, Canon. 21, *-'■ None must 
compose any accusations against the pope." No mar- 
vel then if all popes go for innocents. 

Because you charge our churches with unholiness, and 
that with such an height of impudence, as I am certain 
the devil himself doth not believe you, even that there 
is not one good among us, nor one that hath charity, nor 
can be saved, unless by turning Papist ; I tell you, that 
I doubt not but the churches in England, are purer far 
than those were in the days of Augustin, Jerom, &.c., 
and that the pastors of our churches are less scandalous 
than they were then. What if I should compare many 
of them to Augustin, Jerom, and such others, both in 
doctrine and holiness of life? Should I do so, I know 
you would account it arrogance. But yet I will pre- 
sume to make some comparison. 

As for the heavenliness of their writings, let some of 
ours be compared with them, and you will see at least 
that they spake by the same spirit. For their commen- 
taries on Scripture, did we miss it as oft as Ambrose, 
Jerom, and many more, we should bring ourselves very 
low in the esteem of the church. Even cardinal Cajetan 
doth boldly censure the fathers' commentaries. 

As to our lives, I have no pleasure in opening any of 
the faults of his saints, nor shall I mention any, but what 
are confessed by themselves, and to boast of our own 
purity I take to be a detestable thing, and contrary to 


that sense of sin that is in every Saint of God : but yet if 
the Lord's churches and servants are slandered and re- 
proached, as they were by the heathens of old, the vin- 
dicating them is a duty which we owe to Christ, and you 
are the cause of the inconveniences. 

Those ministers that I converse with, are partly mar- 
ried and partly unmarried. The married live soberly, 
in conjugal chastity, as burning and shining lights before 
the people, in exemplary holiness of life. The unmar- 
ried also give up themselves to the Lord and to his ser- 
vice. And for the people of our communion, through 
the mercy of God, open sins are so rare, that if one in a 
church be guilty once, we all lament it, and bring them 
to penitence, or disown them, and they are the pity of all 
the congregation. 

Were the churches better in the third, fourth, fifth, 
sixth, or following ages ] No. That is proved by the sad 
histories of the crimes of those times, and by the lamen- 
table complaints of Basil, Gregory Nazianzen, and 
Gregory Nyssen, and Chrysostom, Austin, &c. What 
complaints are made by Gildas of the British Church ? 
What a doleful description have we of the Christian 
pastors and people in his days from Salvian de Guber- 
nat. 1 

I judge also by the canons, and by the fathers' direc- 
tions concerning offenders. Thus Gregory saith of 
drunkards ; Quod cum venia siis ingcnio sunt relin- 
quendi, ne deteriores jiant^ si a tali cotisuetudine evel- 
lantur. Was this the Roman sanctity even then ? Was 
that Saint Gregory's sanctity, that drunkards must be 
let alone with j)ardon, lest if they be forced from their 
custom they be made worse 1 If such advice were but 
giv'On by one of us, it would cast us out of our ministry. 
We dare not lot one drunkard alone in our church com- 
munion, where church discipline is set up. 

Augustin saith ; " Drunkenness is a mortal sin, if it 
be daily or usual. And that they must be dealt with 
gently and by fair words, and not roughly and sharply." 
If one of us should make so light of drunkenness, what 
should we be thought 1 Aquinas 22. q. 150. art. 1. 4 ; 
art. 2. 1. 

Many canons determine, " Priests that will not part 


witli tlioir roiirnbincs, shall be suspended from ofTiria- 
tiiii^, till they let them go." Whereas with us, a man is 
ejected who should have a concubine but once. 

Gratian Distinct. 34, citeth c. 17, of the Tolotan coun- 
cil, saying, " He that bath not a wife, but a concubine 
in her stead, shall not be put from the communion." The 
whole canon is thus ; *' If any believer have a wife and 
a concubine, let him not communicate. But he that 
hath no wife, and hath a concubine instead of a wife, may 
not be put from the communion. Only let him be con- 
tent with one woman, either wife or concubine, which he 
will. He that liveth otherwise, let him be cast off, till 
he give over, and return to penitence." 

In an English council at Berghamsted an. 697, the se- 
venth canon is this; "If a priest leave bis adultery, and 
do not naughtily defer baptism, nor is given to drunken- 
ness, let him keep his ministry, and the privilege of his 
habit." Spelman. King Alured in the preface to his 
laws tells us ; " except treason and desertion of their 
Lords, the councils of the clergy did lay but some pecu- 
niary mulct on other sins." Spelman. Johnson's Laws 
and canons. 

All this shows that the church then was much more 
corrupt than ours now in England. 

The best of the fathers had such blots, that I may well 
make their confessions another discovery that our 
churches are as pure and holy as theirs. Augustin, 
whilst he leaned to the JManichces. confesseth himself 
guilty of fornication. Jerom that was so vehement for 
virginity and lived a monastic life, doth yet confess that 
he was not a virgin. Bernard, who lived so contem- 
plative a life, in his Serm.de beata virgine de Assumpt. 
confesseth se car ere virgmitate. 

When we tell the Papists of their licensing brothels 
at Rome, Bononia, 4fec., they fly to the words of Austin 
lib. de ordine ; " Take away harlots from among men, 
and you will disturb all things with lusts." Though this 
was written when Austin was but a young convert, and 
he afterwards changed his mind ; yet it shows that our 
times are far from the abominations of those, and our pas- 
tors are far more strict than Austin was. 

As for the holiness of their church by ceremonies, as 


holy water, holy oil, relics, altars and a hundred such 
things, it is not worthy of notice. All things are sanc- 
titied to us by the word and prayer. We devote our- 
selves and all that we have to God, and then to the pure 
all things are pure. We neglect no ordinance of God 
that we can know of and enjoy. He is a spirit, and 
seekefh such as will worship him in spirit and truth. 
This is the holiness that we look after. Bur for num- 
bering beads, and ylyeJ/arigs, and going on pilgrimages, 
and such inventions of arrogant men, we place no holi- 
ness in them ; as knowing tiiat God desireth not a mimi- 
cal or histrionical worship ; and that none knows what 
will please him so well as himself. 


J^oveUy of Popish Corruptions. ' 

Another of their deceits is, hi/ calling us to tell 
them ichcn every one of their errors did first begin., and 
what pope did bring them in ; or else they tvill not 
believe but they are from the Apostles. 

1. It belongs to you to prove the continuance of your 
opinions or practices, more than to us to prove the be- 
ginning. It sufficcth that we prove that there was a 
time when your errors were not in the church, and that 
we can do from the Scriptures and the Fathers. You 
know yourselves of abundance of changes which you 
know not who did first introduce. Who first adminis- 
tered the Lord's Supper in one kind only 1 that was not 
from the beginning"? Who first laid by the standing on 
the Lord's day, and used kneeling ? Can. 20. Council 
Niccn. 1. Alvarus Pelagius de planet. Ilccles. li. 2. art, 
2. saith ; "The church bewaileth the sins of the people, 
but specially the clergy, as greater than the sin of Sodom. 
For we see that faith aud justice have forsaken the earth. 
The Holy Scri[)ture and sacred canons are accounted as 
fables. He is now a man of no knowledge that inventeth 
not novelties." You see that then novelties were brought 
in^ Vincentius Lirinensis complaineth of, and not only 


roniplaiiiotli of, hut irivoili diioction what to do; " If any 
novel coiitaii^ioii shall fiidcavor to stain not only a part 
of the church, hut the whole church alike." J lis advice 
is to appeal from novelty to antl<|uity, and not to the 
pope or present church. " This direction is hut for new 
heresies at their first rising ; hefore they falsify the 
rules of ancient faith, hefore they corrupt ancient writers, 
or can pretend to antic[uity, and hefore hy the larjre 
spreading of the venom, they endeavor to corrupt the 
volumes of our ancestors." But dilated and inveterate 
heresies are not to he set upon this w'ay, hecause they 
have had a long occasion of stealing truth ; and there- 
fore we must convince such ancient heresies and schisms 
by the only authority of the Scripture if there be need 
or avoid them. Lirincns. cap, 4. «fcc. 

Augustin ad Januariuni said ; " they load our religion 
w^ith servile burdens, which God in mercy would have 
to be free, with a very few and most manifest sacra- 
ments of celebration ; so that the condition of the Jews 
was more tolerable, that were subject to legal sacra- 
ments, and not to the presumptions of men." Gersoii. 
Vita Spirit, anima, led. 2. par 3, addeth, " If in thy 
days thou didst mourn, O wise Augustin, what wouldst 
thou have said in our time 1 where according to the 
variety and motion of heads, there is incredible variety 
and dissonant multiplicity of such servile burdens, and 
as thou callest them, of human presumptions. Among 
which as so many snares of souls, and entangling nets, 
there is scarce any man that walks secure, and is not 
taken, or caught." 

In the judgment of Augustin and Gerson, have any 
novelties been brought into the church? did all your 
presumptions and burdens, and as Gerson calls them, 
halters for souls, come from the apostles, or are they your 
own 1 When all is thus overcome with novelty, do you 
make any question whether any thing be new 1 

Bernard thought that human traditions were too mucii 
befriended, when he thus describeth the assemblies that 
he approveth, Epist. 91 ; " Such a council do I delight 
in, in which the traditions of men are not obstinately 
defended, or superstitiously observed : but they do dili- 
gently and humbly inquire, what is the good and well 
pleasing, and perfect will of God" 


General councils by error introduced novelties, when 
later councils were fain to undo what the former had 
done: for so doth Augustin profess they did, saying, Z^c 
Bapiis. cont. Donat. lib. 2. cap. 6, " Councils them- 
selves that are gathered through several regions and 
provinces, do without any scruple yield to the authority 
of more plenary councils that are gathered out of the 
whole Christian world ; and those same plenary coun- 
cils do often yield or give place, the former to the later, 
when by some experiment of matters, that which was 
shut is opened, and that which lay hid is known." 

What should hinder the introduction of novelty when 
general councils do so often err ? If such councils be 
morally and interpretatively the whole church, as the 
Papists say, then the whole church doth err in the 
reception of some novelty, before they declare it 
by their decrees. If you say that general councils can- 
not err, nor introduce such novelties, Bellarmin and 
many give you the lie : for De concil. lib. 2. cap. 11, 
he saith, " it cannot be answered that those councils 
erred because they were not lawful ; for to most of them 
there was nothing wanting but the pope's assent. The 
second at Ephesus was altogether like that at Basil: for 
both were called by the pope; in both of them the pope's 
legate shortly after went away ; in both of them the pope 
was excommunicated; and yet, that the council of Ephe- 
sus erred; the adversaries will not den3^ Hence he con- 
cludeth that " the chief power ecclesiastical is not in the 
church, nor in the council, the pope being removed." 

What should hinder, when there is but one man's vote 
against it, even the pope's, but that novelty and error 
may enter at any time, and when that one man is so 
wicked and heretical as he is ? General councils are 
but mere name and mockery. The packing of them ; 
the paucity and non-universality of them ; and the man- 
agement of their affairs show it. They do nothing since 
the papal reign, but what the pope will, excepting the 
condemned councils. They have no being till he will, 
nor make any decrees but what he will, nor arc their 
decrees of any further power than ho is pleased to give 
them. So that his will is the sense of the general coun- 
cil or universal church. Sleidan and \ ergerius of Trent 


tell US ; "The Holy Ghost went to that council in a 
cloakbag from Rome." Espencccus Titus I. Bellar- 
min de coiicU. lib. 2. cap. 11, says; "We must know 
that the pope is vvout to send legates, instructed con- 
cerning- the judgment of the apostolic seat, with this 
condition, that if the council do consent to the judgment 
of the apostolic seat, it shall be formed into a decree; 
if not the forming of the decree shall be deferred till 
the Pope of Rome, being advised with, shall return his 
answer. In the council of Basil, Ses. 2, it was decreed 
by common consent, together with the pope's legate, 
that a council is above the pope; which certainly is 
now judged erroneous." The councils of Lateran 
and Florence decreed the contrary. Pighius saith, 
Hierarch. Eccles. 1. 6. " The councils of Constance 
and Basil went about, by a new trick and pernicious 
example, to destroy the ecclesiastical hierarchy, and 
instead of it to bring in the domination of a promiscu- 
ous confused popular multitude ; that is, to raise again 
Babylon itself, subjecting to themselvs, or to the com- 
munity of the church, which they falsly pretend that 
they represent, the very head and prince of the whole 
church, and him that is the vicar of Christ himself in 
this his kingdom; and this against order and nature, 
against the clearest light of Gospel verity, against the 
undoubted faith and judgment of the orthodox church 

Thus general councils with the pope's nuncio may 
bring in novelties in faith, against the^clearest light of the 
Gospel, and the full consent of antiquity; and yet those 
councils affirmed their opinions to be matters of faith, 
and the opposite to be heretical and damnable, and con- 
trary to all antiquity. Hence novelties are matters of 
faith. The French to this day are guilty of those nov- 
elties, and charge their adversaries with innovation. 

General councils themselves are but novelties, though 
they are the foundation of the faith of one half of the 
Papists, as the pope is of the other ? Pighius Hie- 
rarch. Eccles. lib. 6. cap 1. saith; "General councils 
have not a divine or supernatural original, but merely 
human original and are the invention of Constantino; 
profitable indeed sometimes to find out in controversy 



which is the orthodox catholic truth : though to this they 
are not necessary, seeing it is a readier way to advise 
with the apostolic seat.*' Is your representative 
church the foundation of your faith, a novelty of Con- 
stantine's invention ; and yet are you in the old way, 
and must we be put to prove you to be novelists'? 

Do you think those popes did go the old way, of 
whom Alvarus Pelagius speaks, Planctu Eccles. art. 
15. lib. 2; "They succeeded in authority, but not in 
sanctity, intruding themselves, procuring, bargaining, 
&c. building towers and palaces in Babylon, that is in 
Rome according to Jerom." Some foul innovation sure 
they were guilty of that so re-edified Babylon. 

This is my first proof that you are novelists; from 
the general accusations of others, and confessions of 
your own. 

2. Another proof that changes may be, and yet the 
time and authors be kn wn ; is, from the instance of 
other churches, which have b*en corrupted or subvert- 
ed by innovations, and yet the time and authors are 
unknown. You accuse the churches in Habassia of 
many errors yourselves; and you are not able to tell 
us when they came in, or who introduced them. The 
same may be said of the Georgians, Armenians, Egyp- 
tians, and of the Greeks and Russians. Can you tell 
us when, and by whom, each error was introduced, 
that corrupted the churches mentioned in the Scripture .'* 
Corinth, Philippi, Colosse, Thessalonica, Ephesus, Lao- 
dicea, and the rest. You can give us no better account 
of that than we can of the authors of your own corrup- 

Among the primitive fathers, whose writings are 
come to our hands, many errors had the major vote ; 
as that corporeity of angels, which your second general 
council at Nice owned, the millenary conceit, and many 
more which you confess to be errors. Tell us when 
any of those came in, if you can, unless you believe 
that Papias received the last from John, and then it is 
no error. Who did first induce the Asian churches to 
celebrate Easter at a season differing from yours? who 
first brought the Britons to it ? We know not certainly 
who first converted many nations on earth, nor when 


they first received tlioir Cliristianity : and how then 
should we know wlien they first received each error .' 

Good men did bring in novelties: and what was by 
them introduced as indifferent, by custom grew to seem 
necessary : and what they received as a doubtful opin- 
ion was esteemed a point of faith. The presbyters 
and whole clergy of Neocesarea were oflfended with 
Basil for his innovations ; for bringing in a new psalm- 
ody, or way of singing to God, and for his new order 
■of monastics : and they told him that none of that was 
so in Gregory's days. What answered Basil ? He 
denieth not the novelty of this psalmody, but retorts 
again on them, that their litany also was new, and not 
knoNvn in the time of Gregory Thaumaturgus ; " How 
know you, says he, that those things were not in the 
days of Gregory? for you have kept nothing unchang- 
ed to this day of all that he was used to." You see 
what changing was then in the church among all sorts, 
when such an alteration was made in less than forty 
years. Yet Basil would not have any unity to be laid 
on any of those things, but addeth ; "We pardon all 
those things, though God will examine all things : only 
let the principal things be safe. " Basil Epist. 63. Isi- 
dore Pelusiota lib. 1. Epist. 90, saith ; "The apostles 
.of the Lord studying to restrain and suppress unmeet 
loquacity, and shewing themselves masters of modesty 
and gravity to us, did by wise councils permit women 
to sing in the churches. But as all God's documents 
are turned into the contrary, so this is turned to disso- 
luteness, and the occasion for sin. For they are not 
affected with deep compunction in singing divine 
hymns; but abusing the sweetness of the singing, to 
the irritating and provoking of lust, they take it for no 
better than stage-play songs." Therefore he adviseth 
that they be suffered to sing no more. 

Here you see ; that changes had happened about 
many divine things: that he adviseth himself the intro- 
ducing of this novelty, that wom^n be forbidden singing 
in the church, because of the abuse, though he confess 
it a wise apostolic order. So that for novelty by good 
men to creep into God's worship, is not strange. 

3. Moreover the nature of the thing may tell all the 


world, that neither you nor we can account for the be- 
ginning of every error that crcepeth into the church; 
for the distance of time is great. Historians are not 
so exact: and what they tell us not, neither you, 
nor we can know — Much history is perished — Much 
is corrupted by your wicked forgeries — Mixtures of 
fables have hindered the credit of much of it — Nations 
are not individual persons, but consist of millions of 
individuals: and as it is not a whole nation that is con- 
verted to the faith at once, so neither is it whole nations 
that are perverted to heresy at once, but one receiveth 
it first, and then more and more, till it overspread the 
whole. Paul saitli that such doctrine eateth like gan- 
grene'; and that is by degrees, beginning on one part, 
and proceeding to the rest. That which is at first re- 
ceived but as an opinion and an indifl^erent thing, must 
have time to grow into a custom, and that custom maketh 
it a law, and makes opinions grow up to be articles of 
faith, and ceremonies grow to be necessary things. This 
is the common way of propagating opinions in the 
world. Usher dc successu, et statu Ecchs. Mornaifs 
Mysteiy of Iniquity, and Rivet in the defence of him 
against Costcrellus. Pet. Molinaus hath purposely 
written a book de Novitate Pa'pismi, et Antiqvitate 
veri Christianismi, showing the newness of Popery in 
the several parts of it. 

4. Can you tell us yourselves, when many of your 
doctrines or practices sprung up ? When took you up 
your Sabbath'' s fast, for such you have been condemn- 
ed by a council ? When the twentieth canon of the 
Nicene council, and when the canons at Trull were 
made. It was the practice of the church through the 
known world, to pray and perform other worship stand- 
ing, and to avoid kneeling on the Lord's day: Tell us 
when this canon and tradition was first violated by you, 
and by whom 1 It was once the custom of your church 
to give infi\nts the Eucharist: Who first broke it of!'? 
It was once your practice to communicate in both 
kinds : Who first denied the cup to the Laity? At first 
it was only a doubtful opinion, that saints are to be 
prayed to, and the dead prayed for, which came into 
men's minds about the third or fourth century: But 


who first made them articles of faith ? Augustin began 
to doubt, whether there were not some kind of Purga- 
tory: But who first made this also a point of faith? 
Who was it that first added the books of the Maccabees, 
and many others to the canon of Scripture, contrary to 
the council of Laodicea, and all the rest of the consent 
of antiquity. Who was it that first taught and prac- 
tised the putting an oath to all the clergy of the Chris- 
tian church to be true to the Pope, and to obey him as 
the Vicar of Christ ? Wlio first taught men to swear 
that they would not interpret Scripture, but according to 
the unanimous consent of the Fathers ? Who was the 
first that brought in the doctrine or name of Transub- 
stantiation 1 and who first made it an article of faith ? 
Who first made it a point of faith to believe that there 
are just seven sacraments, neither fewer nor more? 
Did any before the council of Trent swear men to re- 
ceive and profess without doubting, all things delivered 
by the canons and Oecumenical councils, when at the 
same time they cast off themselves the canons of many 
general councils, and so are generally and knowingly 
perjured? These and abundance more you know to be 
novelties with you, if wilfulness or gross ignorance 
bear not rule with you ; and without great impudence 
you cannot deny it. Tell us when these first came up, 
and satisfy yourselves. 

Apneas Sylvius, Epist 288, saith, " before the coun- 
cil of Nice, there was little respect had to the church 
of Rome." You see here the time is mentioned, when 
your foundation was not laid. 

Cardinal iVico/a5 Cusanus, de Concord. Cathol. c. 13, 
&c., as plainly tells you; "that the Papacy is but of 
positive right ] and that the priests are equal : and that 
it is subjectional consent that gives the pope and 
bishops their majority; and that the distinction of dio- 
cess, and thai a bishop be over presbyters, are of posi- 
tive right ; and that Christ gave no more to Peter than 
the rest; and that if the Congregate Church should 
choose the bishop of Trent for their president or head, 
he should be more properly Peter's successor than the 
bishop of Rome." Tell us now when did the contrary 
doctrine first arise? 



Gregory de Valcntia, de leg. usu Euchar. ca'p. 10. 
states, '• that the receiving the sacrament in one kind, 
began not by the decree of any bishop, but by the very 
use of the churches, and the consent of believers : and 
that it is unknown when that custom first begun, or got 
head, but that it was general in the Latin Church, not 
long before the late council of Constance." And may 
you not see in this, how other points came in ? 

If Pope Zosimus had but had his will, and the fa- 
thers of the Carthage council had not diligently dis 
covered, shamed, and resisted his forgery, the world 
had received a new Nicene canon, and we should ne- 
ver have known the original of it. 

The Latin tongue was the vulgar tongue, when the 
Liturgy and Scripture was first written in it; at Rome, 
and far and near, it was understood by all. The service 
was not changed, as to the language: butthe language it- 
self changed : and so Scripture and Liturgy came to be 
in an unknown tongue. When did the Latin tongue 
cease to be understood by all? Tell us what year, or 
by whom the change was made? Erasmus Decl. ad 
ceiisur. Paris, tit. 12. sect. 41, saith ; "The vulgar 
tongue was not taken from the people, but the people 
departed from it" 

5. Your errors were not in the times of the apostles, 
nor long after, and therefore they are innovations. If 
I find a man in a dropsy, or a consumption, I would 
not tell him, that he is well, and ought not to seek 
remedy, unless he can tell when he began to be ill, and 
what caused it. 

You take us to be heretical : and yet 3'ou cannot tell 
us when our errors did first arise. Will you tell us of 
Luther? You know the Albigenses whom you mur- 
dered by hundreds and thousands, were long before 
him. JDo you know when they begun ? Your Reine- 
rius saith, that some said, they were from Silvester's 
days; and some said since the apostles : but no other 
beginning do you know. 

6. What need we any more than to find you owning 
the very doctrine and practice of innovation? When 
you maintain that you can make us new articles of 
faith, and new worship, and new discipline, and that 


the Pope can dispense with the Scriptures, and such 
like: what reason have we to believe that your church 
abhorreth novelty ? 

Pope Leo X., among other of Luther's opinions, 
reckoned and opposed this as licretical ; " It is certain 
that it is not in the hand of the church or pope, to make 
articles." Bulla co?tt. Luther. 

The council of Constance that took the supremacy 
justly from the pope, did unjustly take the cup from 
the laity in the Euciiarist; " Though in the primitive 
church this sacrament was received by believers under 
both kinds.-' 

The council of Trent say, Sess. 21. cap. 1,2; " This 
power was always in the church : that in dispensing 
the sacraments, saving the substance of them, it might 
ordain or change things, as it should judge most expe- 
dient to the profit of the receiver." 

Vasquez To. 2. Disp. 216. N. 60, saith : "Though 
we should grant that this was a precept of the apostles, 
nevertheless the church and pope might on just causes 
abrogate it : for the power of the apostles was no greater 
than the power of the church and pope, in bringing in 

Pope Innocent says ; by the fulness of our power, we 
candispense with the law above law. The Gloss therein 
saith; '-The pope dispenseth against the apostle; 
against the Old Testament. The pope dispenseth with 
the Gospel, interpreting it." Gregory de Valent. Tom. 
4. disp, b. 8; saith; " Certainly some things in later 
times are more rightly constituted in the church than 
they were in the beginning." Cardinal Perron said, 
lib' '2: Obs. 3. cap. 3. against King .Tames; on the 
authority of the church to alter matters contained in 
the Scripture: and he instanced of the form of sacra- 
ments being alterable; and the Lord's command, drink 
ye all of it, mutable and dispensable. Tolet ; " It is cer- 
tain, that all things instituted by the apostles were not 
of divine right. Andradius Defens. Concil. Trid. lib. 
2. p. 236 ; hence it is plain that they do not err that say 
the popes of Rome may sometime dispense with laws 
made by Paul and the four first councils. Bzovius 
saith : " The Roman church using apostolical power, 


doth according to the condition of times, change all 
things for the better," And yet will you submit to be 
taken for changers and novelists ? Chemniiius Exam- 
in. concil. Trident. 

Augustin Triumph, cle Ancon. q. 5. art. l,saith; "To 
make a new creed, belongs only to the pope : because 
he is the head of the Christian faith, by whose author- 
ity all things belonging to faith are confirmed and 
strengthened." Art. 2] "As he may make a new 
creed, so he may multiply new articles upon new arti- 
cles." I?}i Prafat. sum. ad Johan 22; " The pope's pow- 
er is infinite ; because the Lord is great, and his strength 
great, and of his greatness there is no end :" and Q 36 ; 
" The pope giveth the motion of direction, and the 
sense of knowledge, to all the members of the church ; 
for in him we live and move and have our being. The 
Vv'ill of God, and consequently the pope's will, who is 
his vicar, is the first and chief cause of all motions cor- 
poral and spiritual " Then no doubt he may change 
without blame. 

Abbas Panormitan. cap. C. Christus de hacret. n. 2. 
saith : " The pope can bring in a new article of faith," 
Peter de Anchoran. asserts: " The pope can make new 
articles of faith; such as now ought to be believed, 
when before they ought not to be believed." 

Tiirrecrcmat. sum. de Eccl. lib, 2. cap. 20d, said; 
"The pope is the m asiire and rule, and science of 
thing's to be believed." August, de Ancona shews us 
that "the judgment of God is not higher than the pope s, 
but the same ; therefore no man may appeal from the 
pope to God :" Qu. 6. Art, 1. 

The following is a great Popish argniiunt for the Papacy. 

" It will not be denied that the church of Rome was 
once a most pure, excellent, flourishing and mother 
church ; and her faith renowned, in the world, Ro?n. 1. 
8. ct 6. et 16. Whitens Def. Wkiiaker^ s Answer to 
Sanders. Fulke cap. 21. Thes. 7. Reynolds Conclusion^. 

That church could not cease to be such, but she 
must fall either by apostacy. heresy, or schism. 

Apostacy is not only a renouncing of the faith of 
Christ; but of the name and title of Christianity. No 
man will say that the church of Rome had such a fall, 
or so fell. 


Heresy is an adhesion or fast cleaving" to some pri- 
vate or singular opinion, or error in faith, contrary to 
the generally approved doctrine of the church. 

If the church of Rome did ever adhere to any singu- 
lar or new opinion, disagreeable to the common receiv- 
ed doctrine of the Christan world, I pray you satisfy 
me in those particulars; by what general council was 
she ever condemned i* which of the fathers ever writ 
against her? by what authority was she otherwise re- 
proved / 

For it seems to be a thing very incongruous, that so 
great a church should be condemned by every private 
person, who hath a mind to condemn her. 

Schism is a departure or division from the unity of 
tlie church, whereby the bond and communion held 
with some former church ir^ broken and dissolved. 

If ever the church of Rome divided herself from any 
body of faithful Christians, or broke communion, or 
went forth from the society of any elder church, I pray 
you satisfy me in those particulars: whose company 
did she leave ? from what body went she forth? where 
was the true church she forsook / 

It appears not a little strange, that a church should 
be accounted schismatical, when there cannot be assign- 
ed any other church different from her, which from 
asfe to ag-e since Christ's time hath continued visible, 
from which she departed." 

^inswer to the foregoing ^Irgument. 

If the author of this argument thinks as he speaks, 
it is a case to be lamented with tears of blood, that the 
church of Christ should be abused, and the souls of 
men deluded by men of so great ignorance. But if he 
knew that he doth but juggle and deceive, it is lamenta- 
ble that any matter of salvation should fall into such 

The word church here is ambiguous, and either sig- 
nifieth, a particular church which is an association of 
Christians for personal communion in God's worship, 
or divers such associations, or churches associated for 
communion by their officers or delegates, for unity 
sake. Or else it may signify one mistress church 
that is the ruler of all the rest in the world. Or else it 


may signify the universal church itself, which contain- 
eth all the particular churches in the world. 

The Papist should not have played either the blind 
man or the juggler by confounding those, and never tel- 
ling us which he means. For the first we grant him 
that Rome vvas once an excellent flourishing church; 
and so was Ephesus, Jerusalem, Philippi, Colosse 
and many more. 

As to the :^econd sense, it is human or from church 
custom, so to take the word church ; for Scripture doth 
not so use it: but for the thing we are indifferent: 
though it cannot be proved that in Scripture times Rome 
had any more than one particular church. 

As to the third and fourth senses, we deny, as confi- 
dently as we do that the sun is darkness, that ever in 
Scripture times Rome was either a mother to all churches, 
or the raler and mistress of all, or yet the universal 
church itself. Prove that and I will turn Papist I 

But there is not a word for it in the texts cited, but 
an intimation of much against it. Paul calleth Rome 
a church and commendeth its faith : but doth he not so 
by the Thessalonians, Colossians, Ephesians, Philip- 
pians, &c. and John by the Philadelphians, Pergamos, 
Thyatira, and others, as well .'' And will not this 
prove that Rome was but such a particular church as 
one of them ? 

Rome was once a true and famous particular church, 
but never the unitersal church, nor the ruler of the 
world, or of all other churches, in Paul's days. Would 
you durst lay your cause on this, and put it to the trial.? 
Why else did never Paul make one word of mention of 
this power and honor, nor send other churches to her 
to be governed ? 

What is it to me, whether Rome be turned either 
apostate, heretical, or schismatical, any more than 
whether Jerusalem, Ephesus, Philippi, or any other 
church be so fallen? if you are not fallen I am glad 
of it; if you are I am sorry for it; and so I have done 
with you, unless I knew how to recover you. Would 
you not laugh at the church of Jerusalem that was truly 
the mother church of the world, if they should thus 
reason; " We are not fallen away: therefore we must 


rule over all the world, and no man is a Christian that 
dotli not obey us? " 

We accuse you not of renouncing the name of Christ; 
but according to your own definition of heresy, you are 
guilty of many heresies. 

To your questions, I answer. What general coun- 
cils did ever condemn onehalf of the heresies mention- 
ed by Epiphanius, August in or Philastrius ? Was there 
ever a greater rubble of heresies than before ever a ge- 
neral council was known? and were they dead and 
buried before the first general council was born? Did 
you not smile when you wrote those delusory questions ; 
How can a general council condemn you, or any great 
part of the church ? for instance, the Greeks, &c. If 
you be not there, it is not a general council ? And will 
you be there to condemn yourselves ? You have more 
wit, and less grace. General councils did ever con- 
demn the Greeks, for those many errors charged on 
them ? If the Greeks themselves were not there, it was 
not a general council : so considerable a part are they of 
the professing church. And what general council hath 
condemned the Abassines, Egyptians, &c. 

Do you think general councils are so stark mad or 
horridly impious, as to condemn so many kingdoms 
with one condemnation for heresy? They know that 
men must be heard, before they be condemned, and a 
kingdom consisteth of many millions ot souls. It is 
not enough to know every man's faith, if we know the 
faith of the king, or pope, or arch-bishop, or prelates. 
How long shall they be examining each person in 
many kingdoms.? 

Yet I can say more of your church than of others. 
He that kills the head, kills the man. Your usurping 
head is an essential part of your new-formed church : 
but your head hath been condemned by councils ; there- 
fore your church in its essential part hath been con- 
demned by councils. Do you not know that all 
the world condemned your Pope Marcellinus for offer- 
ing to idols ? Know you not that two or three general 
councils condemned Pope Honorius as a monothelite ? 
that the second general council of Ephesus condemned 
and excommunicated your pope? And that the council 


of Basil, called by him, did the like 1 If you do not, 
see Bellarmin's parallel of them, de. ConcUiis lib. 2. 
cap. 11. Do I need to tell you what the council of 
Constance did ? Or for what Jo/m XXII, alias XXIII, 
and Johii XIII, and other Popes were deposed by coun- 
cils? Do I need to tell you how many Fathers condemned 
Marcellinus, Liberius, Honorius and others/ How 
oft Hilary Pictavius fragmentis in Epist. Liberii, 
doth cry out. Anathema iibi, Liberi, prcevaricator : 
presuming to curse and excommunicate your pope. 
Need I tell you what Tertullian saith against Zephe- 
rinus .'' what Alphonsus a Castro, and divers of your 
own, say against Liberius, Honorius, Anastasius, Ce- 
lestin; and tell us that many popes have been heretics .-' 
At least permit us to believe Pope Adrian VI., himself. 
Bannes in T. 2. q. 1. art. 10, proves at large against 
Pighius, that a pope may be a heretic; and laughs at 
Pighius that now, after two hundred years, would 
prove them false witnesses, who write that Pope Hon- 
orius was condemned for a heretic by three popes, 
Agatho, Leo II. and Adrian II. 

But though the popes have been condemned by 
councils, yet so have not your maintained doctrines. 
Did not the councils at Constantinoplecondemn the doc- 
trine of the second Nicene council for image-worship, 
and the council at Frankford do the like 7 and those 
two at Constantinople were much more general than 
your council of Trent was. 

That same council at Nice condemned the doctrine 
of Thomas Aquinas, and your doctors commonly, of 
worshipping the image of Christ, and the cross, and 
sign of the cross, with Latria, divine worship. 

Did not your general councils at Lateran and Flor- 
ence declare that the pope i above a council, and that 
they cannot depose him ? Yet your general councils 
at Constance and Basil determine the contrary as an 
article of faith, and expressly affirm the former to be 
heresy. Then your own doctrine, even in a fundamen- 
tal point, is condemned by general councils of your 
own, which side soever you take, the pope's, or the 

Did not the sixth eouncil of Carthage, of which 


Augustia was a priiicipal member, not only detect Pope 
Zosimus' forged canon of Nice, but also openly and 
prevalently resist and reject his usurpation, and refuse 
his Legates and Appeals? Pope Boniface, Epist. ad 
Eidalium, says, " Aurelius, sometime bishop of Carth- 
age, with his colleagues, did begin, by the deviTs insti- 
gation to wax proud against the church of Rome, in the 
times of our predecessors, Boniface and Celestin." 

Harding against Jewel's challenge, art. 4. sect. 19: 
says, " After the whole African church had persevered 
in schism the space of twenty years, and had removed 
themselves from the obedience of the apostolic seat, 
being deduced by Aurelius Bishop of Carthage." Aus- 
tin was one of them. 

But you say, that this was not a general council. 
True; for when part riseth against part, it cannot be 
the whole that is on either side. 

Do you not know that the Greeks have often con- 
demned you? Truly their councils have been much more 
general than yours at Trent was ; where about forty 
bishops altered the canon of Scripture, and made tradi- 
tion equal with it. This one county would have af- 
forded a far better council of a greater number. 

One general council hath condemned your very 
foundation; and that is the fourth general council at 
Calcedon, Act. 15. Can. 28, and Act. 16; where you 
may find, that the ancient privileges of the Roman 
throne were given them by the fathers in council. 
That the reason was, because Rome was the Imperial 
city. That they give equal privileges to the seat of 
Constantinople, because it was now become new Rome: 
and that the Roman Legates would not be present at that 
act. But the next day when they did appear, and pre- 
tended that this act was forced, the bishops all cried: 
" No man was compelled. It i.s a just decree. We all 
say thus. We approve it. AVe all approve it. Let that 
stand that is decreed. It is all right." 

That general council thought they needed not the 
pope's approbation for the validity of their decrees : 
when they pass them and take them for valid, even 
contrary to the will of the pope. Did that council 
think that their decrees were invalid, if the pope ap- 



prove them not? They did not. And who is now to 
be believed ? Bellarmin and his party, and the present 
prevalent party oi the Papists, that say, councils not 
approved by the pope are invalid or without authority: 
or the council of Calcedon that thought otherwise? 

The pope's legates called that proceeding; " A hum- 
bling, and depressing, and wronging of the Papacy ; 
and therefore entered their dissent." Bellarmin Con^ 
fession lib. 2. de Pontif. cap. 17. Binius Notes on that 
council. Baronius cm. 451. 

The shifts of Bellarmin, Binius, Baronius, Becanus,- 
Gretser, &c., are false which say that canon was sur- 
reptitiously brought into the council, j^tiiis, Act. 16, 
openly professed the contrary, and all the bishops gave 
their consent to the last. 

This is one of the four great councils which the Pa- 
pists themselves compare to the four Gospels; and in it 
were six hundred and thirty fathers. 

That great council is against them, and on the Pro- 
testant side, in the very foundation of all our differences, 
whether the Roman privileges be of divine or human 
right? And though it be but the privileges, and not 
the now claimed vicarship that was in question, yet the 
conclusion is the stronger against them, because the 
lesser was denied. 

But their last shift is, that this clause or canon was 
not approved, and so is null. Mark then ; we have 
general councils against you ; but we want the pope's 
approbation. Was that the meaning of your question, 
what council ? that is what pope condemned our 
church? Can it be expected that a man should con- 
demn himself? or, can you be no heretic till then? 

Did not your pope aprove of that council, when 
Gregory L likened it with the other three to the four 
Gospels? and said " I embrace it with my whole de- 
votion : I keep it with most entire approbation," Greg. 
1. Regist. I. 1. Epist. 24. Decrees, Dist. 15. c. 2. This 
is expressly a full approbation, not without excepting 
any part only, but excluding all such exceptions. The 
like approbation of Gelasius in the Roman council, is 
cited there also in the decrees. 

It is no hard matter to prove you condemned by your 

JtlGOLING. 243 

own popes. If you could but undorstand llio plaincsl 
words, there needed no talk to persuade you that Pope 
Gregory I. condemned the title of universal bishop 
or patriarch ; proressing earnestly that he was the fore- 
runner of antichrist that would usurp it. But the plain 
truth is, as sad experience tcachcth us, no words of 
fathers, popes or councils, much less of Scripture, arc 
intelliafible to you. But we may truly say of you, thai 
lay all on the will of the pope, as Lodovicus Vives 
freely speaketh, Schol. in August, lib. 20. de Civit. 
Del, cap. 20 ; " Those are taken by them for edicts and 
councils, which make for them, or are on their side : 
the rest they no more regard than a meeting of women 
in a workhouse or a \vashing place." Do you under- 
stand this lano-uaire o[ one too honest to have much 

You have a third question; "By what authority 
was she otherwise reproved?" By the authority of 
that precept, Levit 19. 17. By the same authority that 
Paul reproved Peter, Galatians 2, and withstood him 
to the face. By such authority as any man may 
quench a fire in his neighbor's house: or pull a man 
out of the water that is drowning : or as any one psistor 
may reprove another when he sinneth. By the same 
authority as Irenasus rebuked Victor, and the Asian 
bishops withstood him ; and as Cyprian and the coun- 
cil of Carthage repro^ved Stephen ; and the rest afore- 
cited did what they di'd. By as good authority as the 
church of Kome condemneth the Greek church, doth 
the Greek church and many others condemn the 
priests of Rome. 

The next case is about the Roman schism. To 
question whether Papists be schismatics, is to question 
whether Ethiopians be black. Do you not at this day 
divide from all the Christian world, save yourselves? 
do you not unchurch all the Christians on earth. O 
dreadful presumption ! when Christ is so tender of his 
interest and his servants, and is bound, as it were, by 
so many promises to save them and not forsake them. 
" You ask, what church you left.? and when was it.? and 
whose company .?" Senseless questions ! By a church, 
if you mean the universal church there is but one in 


all: and therefore one universal church cannot forsake 
another : but when part of it forsaketh the other part, 
and arrogateth the title of the whole to themselves, do 
you doubt whether that be schism 1 If you mean a par- 
ticular church: how can Spain, Italy, France, and 
many more kingdoms, go out of a particular church, 
that contain so many hundred particular churches in 
them? No more than London can go out of Paul's 
church. The catholic is but one, containing all true 
Christians on earth: and you have been guilty of a 
most horrid schism. You have set up a church in the 
church; universal church in the universal church; a 
new form destructive to the old. Your pope as Christ's 
representative, is now an essential part of it, and no 
man is a member of it, that is not a member of the 
pope's body, and subject to him. So that even the an- 
tipodes, and the poor Abassines, that know not whether 
the pope be fish or flesh, or never heard of such a name 
or thing, must all be unchristened, unchurched and 
damned, if you be judges. Bellarmin tells us, which 
indeed your church constitution doth infer, that all that 
are duly baptized, are interpretatively or implicitly 
baptized into the pope. 

As you have devised a new catholic church, so you 
hereby cast off and disown all the Christians of the 
world that be not of your party, determining that none 
of them can be saved : who yet had rather venture on 
your curse and censure than into your heresy and 

You fix yourselves in this schism, and put us who 
unfeignedly long for peace, out of all hope of ever hav- 
ing peace with you ; because you will hearken to it on 
no terms, but that all men become subjects to your 
usurping representative-Christ : which we dare as soon 
leap into the flre as do. Do you know now where the 
church or body was that you forsook ? It was all over 
the world where ever there was any Christians. 

Were it not a great schism, think you, if a few Jes- 
uits should say, we are the whole church, and all oth- 
ers arc heretics or schismatics? Or was it not a great 
schism of the Donatisls to arrogate that title to them- 
selves, and unchurch so many others ? and what church 


did they forsake ? Augustin tells them over and over, 
what tlie catholic church was that they willidrcw from ; 
even all true Christians dispersed over the earth: or 
that churcli which began at Jerusalem, and thence dif- 
fused itself tjjrough the world. But he never blames 
them for separating from the universal Roman head or 
vicar. But from the conspicuous combination of par- 
ticular churches, Optatus and he do blame them for 

What if John of Constantinople, in piosecution of 
his title of universal patriarch, had concluded as you, 
that none in the world are Christ's members but his 
members, nor of the church but his subjects, had not 
this been a notorious schism ? Tell us then what 
church he had forsaken. 

But your last caution doth condemn yourselves. 
Must that church that is true be visible from Christ's 
timei* then Constantinople, nor most other, were never 
true churches, and Rome itself was never a true church. 
Did you think that there was a church at Rome in 
ChrisVs time? you are not so ignorant. By this rule 
there should be'no true church, but that at Jerusalem, 
and those in Judea. 

But suppose you had said, since the apostles' time; 
that also had excluded most churches on earth. ^ But 
if you mean the universal church; it hath been visible 
ever since Christ's time : but not always in one place 
or country. Is not the greater part of Christians in 
the world, whom you schismatically unchurch, a visi- 
ble company ? The Abassines and many churches out 
of the Roman empire did never so much as submit to 
your primacy of order, nor had you ever any thing to 
do with them, more than to own them as Christians; 
yet now are condemned by your arrogancy, because 
they will not begin, in the end of the world, to enter 
into a new church on which they nor their forefathers 
had ever any dependence. It was a shrewd answer of an 
old woman, that the emperor of Habassia's mother gave 
to Rodericus the Jesuit, pressing her to fee subject to 
the Pope as Vicar of Christ, or else shQ could not be 
subject to Christ. " We are in tht^ same belief as we 
were from the beginning: If it ^vere not right why did 


no man in so many ages warn us of our error till now'?''' 
Mark here a double argument against the pope : one 
from apostolical tradition ; for Godignus himself saitli, 
that no man doubts but Ethiopia received the faith from 
tlie beginning even from the Eunuch. The other is, 
that pope, who cannot in so many ages look after his 
flock, to send one man to tell them that they erred till 
about one thousand five hundred years after Christ, was 
never intended by Christ to be the universal governor 
of the world. Will Christ set any on an impossible 
work 1 or make it so necessary to people to olje}' one 
that they never so much as hear from ? But what said 
the Jesuit to the old woman ! he told her ; " The Pope 
of Rome who is ihe pastor of the whole church of Christ, 
was not able in the years past to send doctors into Hab- 
assia, because the Mohammedans compassed all, and left 
not any passage to them. But now the seas are open, 
he can do that which he could not do before." Liter. 
Gonzal. Roder. in Godign. de llch. Abass. lib. 2. cap. 
18. As if Christ had set either the pope or the Abas- 
sines an impossible task; and appointed a governor that 
for so many hundred years could not govern : or the 
people must be so man}- hundred years no Christians, 
though they believed in Christ, till the pope could send 
to them ? and how should those and all such countries 
send prelates to a general council 1 

Canus Loc. Tlieol. saith of the Jesuits'; so say I of 
your new church ; " You are called to the society of 
Jesus Christ, which society being undoubtedly the church 
of Christ, let them see to it, that arrogate this title to 
themselves, whether they do not imitate heretics by a 
lying affirmation that the church is only witli them." 
Lib. 4. c. 2. 

But we do not hence conclude that all that have lived 
and died in your profession, have been no members of 
the church, because your church is guilty of heresy, and 
notoriously of schism. Millions that live among you 
consent not to your usurpations ; and do not so much 
as understand your errors. Some hold them but no- 
tionally as inelTectual opinions. Every one is not a 
heretic that holdeth a point that is judged heretical, and 
which is heresy in another, that holdeth it in another 


sort. And then; arc errors callcil heresies \)y most, 
wliich are not destructive to the essentials of Chris- 
tianity, hut only to some integral j)art. There is a 
schism tliat doth not unchurch men, as well as a schism 
that doth. But your own writers put you hard to it, 
who conclude, as IJellarmin and many more do, that 
heretics and schismatics are no memhers of the churcii. 
Melch. Canus hoc. TlicoL lib. 4. cap. 2. saith ; " That 
heretics are no |)art of the church, is the common con- 
clusion of all divines; not only of those that have writ- 
ten of late, hut of them also that hy their antiquity are 
esteemed the most nohle : this is attested hy Cyprian 
Augustin, Gregory, the two councils of Lateraii and 
Florence. Rightly therefore did Pope Nicholas define 
that the church is a collection of catholics. " If this be 
true, it is an article of faith : and then Alphonsus a Castro, 
and all of his mind are heretics and lost men. Two ap- 
proved general councils have determined that a heretic 
is no member of the church: but multitudes of your 
own writers, and Pope Adrian, and many more of your 
popes have judged that a pope may be a heretic : and 
consequently no member of the church. What is be- 
come of your church, when an essential part of it is no 
part of the church 1 

Your common shift, which Canus and others fl}' to, is, 
that "he must be a judged heretic before he is dismem- 
bered." But that is for manifestation to men; before God 
he is the same, if men never judge him. Where the 
case is notorious, the offender is cut off. Then it is in 
the pope's power, to let whole millions of heretics to be 
still parts of the church : and so the world shall be 
Christians or no Christians as he please. And why may 
he not let Turks and infidels on the same grounds be 
part of the church] for he may forbear to judge them, 
if that will serve. Then all the Christians in tlie world 
that the pope hath not yet judged and cast out, are 
members of the church. Millions thus are of the church 
that never were subjects of the pope. If you say it is 
enough that there is a general condemnation, of all that 
are guilty as they are : then it is enough to cut ofi' a 
pope, that there was a general condemnation against 
such as he is. 


Two or three councils and three popes did all judge 
Pope Houorius guilty of heresy, and consequently both 
popes and general councils have judged that a pope may 
be an heretic: therefore you have been judged hereti- 
cal in your head, which is an essential part of your 

' Thus I have shewed what is the Romish schism, 
which being but a part, hath attempted to cut off all 
the rest, and so hath made a new pretended catholic 
church. As a part of the old church which con- 
sisteth of all Christians united in Christ, we confess, all 
those still to be a part, that destroy not this Christianity, 
but as you are new gathered to a Christ-representative, 
or vicar general, we deny you to be any church of Christ. 
If you be church members^ or saved,it must be as Chris- 
tians ; but never as Papists : for a Papist may be a 
Christian, but not as a Pap>ist. 

If you cannot see the church that you separate from, 
open your eyes and look into much of Europe, and all 
over Asia, where are any Christians: look into Armenia, 
Palestine, Egypt, Ethiopia, and many other countries, 
and you shall find that you are but a smaller part of the 
church. Antony Marinarius in the council of Trent 
complained ; " That the church is shut up in the corners 
of Europe, and yet domestic enemies arise, that waste 
this portion shut up in a corner. " 

Sonnius of Antwerp, l>cwo?i.9^ra^. Relig. Christian, 
lib. 2. Tract. 5. c. 8, saith ; " I pray you what room 
hath the catholic church now in the habitable world ? 
scarce three ells long in comparison of that vastncss 
which the Satanical church doth possess." 

If 3'et you boast tliat 3^ou have the same seat that 
formerly you had: I answer ; so have the bishops of 
Constantinople, Alexandria, and others whom you con- 
demn. Gregory Nazianz. Orat. dc laud. Athanasii, 
says ; " It is a succession of godliness that is properly 
to be esteemed a succession. For he that professeth 
the same doctrine of faith, is also partaker of the same 
throne : but he that embraceth the contrary belief, 
ought to be judged an adversary though he be in the 
throne. This indeed hath the name of succession ; but 
the other hath tiie thintr itself, and the truth. For 



he that brcakcth in hy force, as ahiindanco of poj)f'.s difl, 
is not to be cstcenied a successor; hut rather lie ihat 
sullereth force : nor he that breakctii tlic hiws ; but lie 
that is chosen in maimer agreeahli; to the laws : nor he 
tiiat iiokleth conlraiy tenets; but lie that is endued with 
tiie same faith. Unless any man call him a successor, 
as we say a sickness succeedeth health, or darkness 
succeedeth lii,dit, and a storm succeds a calm, or mad- 
ness or distraction succeedeth prudence. " 

To which may be added another Papist decision; 
" Because many princes and chief priests or popes and 
other inferiors, have been found to apostatize, the church 
consisteth in those persons in whom is the true knowl- 
edge and confession of faith and verity." Lijra Gloss. 
MaUhcio 16. 


Succession of ('octfines. 

Another of their deceits is this : I'o charge lis with 
introducing new articles of faith or points of religion, 
hi cause ice contradict the neto articles ichich ihcj/ in- 
troduce, and then they recjiiire us to ijrove our doctrines 
inhirh are but the negatives of theirs. 

We receive no doctrine of faith or worship but what 
was delivered by the apostles to the church. Those 
men bring in abundance of new ones, and say without 
proof, that they received them from t.he apostles. And 
because we refuse to receive their novelties, they call our 
rejections of them, the doctrines of our religion; and 
feign us to be the innovators. By this device, it is in 
the power of any heretic to force the church to take up 
new points of faith. If a Papist shall say, that besides 
the Lord's prayer, Christ gave his disciples anotlier 
form, or two, or three, or many ; or that he gave them 
ten new commandments not mentioned in the Bible ; or 
that he oft descended after his ascension, and conversed 
with them ; or that Christ instituted twenty sacraments, 
how should we deal with those men, but by denying their 


fictions as sinful novelty, and rejecting them as corrupt 
additions to the faith? and were tliis any novelty in us? 
and should they hid us prove in the express words of 
Scripture or antiquity, our negative propositions, that 
Christ gave but one form of prayer, that he did not oft 
descend, that he gave no more decalogues, s?icraments, 
^c. ? Is it not a sufficient proof of any of these, that 
they are not written ; and that no tradition of them 
from the apostles is proved ; and that they who hold the 
affirmative, and introduce the novelty, must prove, and 
not we ? Our articles of faith are the same, and not 
increased, nor any new ones added : but the Papists 
come in with a new faith, as large as all the novelties in 
the decretals and the councils : and those innovations of 
theirs we reject. Now our rejections do not increase 
the articles of our faith, no more than my beating a dog 
out of my house, or keeping out an enemy, or sweeping 
out the filth, doth enlarge my house or increase my fam- 
ily. They do not take all the anathemas and rejections 
in their own councils, to be canons or articles of faith. 
The pope hath made it an ariicle of faith, " no Scrip- 
ture is to be interpreted but according to the unanimous 
consent of the fatliers. " This we reject and make it 
no article of our faiih, bu^t an erroneous novelt}'. Do w^e 
hereby make a new article, because we reject a new one 
of theirs l part of the oath made bj/ Pope Pius after the 
council of Trent. If this be an article, j)rove it. If it be a 
truth and no novelty, which be fathers, and which not? 
help us to know certainly, when we have all or the unan- 
imous consent. Then tell us, whether every man is not 
forsworn with you,. that interprets any text of Scripture 
before he have read all the fathers; or any text which 
they do not unanimously agree on? We can easily 
prove to you, that this is a new article of your devising. 
Because else no man must expound any Scripture at all 
before those fathers were born. For how could the 
church before them have their unanimous consent l oth- 
erwise those fathers themselves wanted an article of 
faith ; unless it was an article to them, that they must 
expound no Scripture but by their own consent. Few 
of those fathers ex[)ound the twentieth part of the Scrip- 
ture. They took liberty to disagree among themselves, 


and thcrofoi'C do not unanimously consent in abundance 
of particular texts. Tliey tell us that tliey an; fallihle, 
and bid us not take it on their trust. The apostles have 
left us no such rule or |>recept, hut nuich to the contrary. 
Your own doctors, for all their oath, char<;<! the fathers 
with error and niiscxpoundint]^ Scripture, ('aims and 
many others charge Cajetan, a cardinal and |)illar in 
your church, with making it his practice to difl'er from 
the fathers, and choosing exjiositions purposely for the 
novelty ; as his custom. And when he hath highly ex- 
tolled Cajetan, Loc. Thcol. lib. 7. he adds; *' yet his 
doctrine was defiled with a lej)rosy of errors, by an af- 
fection and lust of curiosity, or confidence in his wit, 
expounding Scripture as he list ; more acutely than 
happily : because he regarded not ancient tradition, and 
was not versed in the reading of the fathers, and would 
not learn from them the mysteries of the scaled book." 
He also blames him, that he always followed the Hebrew 
and Greek text. Many Papists arc blamed for the 
same faults. Andradius, and others plead for it. Yet 
those men are counted members of your church, that 
iro against an article of your new faith and oath. 

Transubstantiation is one of your new articles in that 
oath. Do we make a new one now if we reject it ? 
Or need we be put to prove the negative ? Albertinus 
hath done it unanswerably. 

Another of your articles is, that "it belongeth to 
your holy mother the church to judge of the true sense 
of Scripture. " You mean the Roman church ; and that 
they must judge of it for all the Christian world. Prove 
this to be the ancient doctrine if you can. If we reject 
this novelty, are we innovators'? or need we prove the 
negative? yet we can do it. Did Athanasius, Basil, 
Nazianzen, Nyssen, Augustin, Jerom, Chrysostom, Ep- 
iphanius, and the rest of the fathers, send to Rome for 
the sense of the Scriptures which they expound; or did 
they procure the pope's approbation before any of them 
published their commentaries ? 

The like may be said of all the rest of yonr new ar- 
ticles, and practices. Some of your novelties we 
reject as trit!es, some as smaller errors, and some as 
greater : but still we keep to our ancient faith, of which 


the Scripture is a full and sufficient rule, as Vineentius 
Lirinensis saith, though we are glad of all helps to un- 
derstand it. We say with Tertullian de came Christie 
cap. G. " Nothing depends upon it, because Scripture 
does not exhibit it. — They prove it not, because it is not 
written. — Those who thus argue we resist." 


Popish xcant of Chanty. 

Another of their deceits is this: They take ad- 
vantage of our chariiahle judgment of the7n, and of 
their uncharitahle judgment of ns and all other Chris- 
tians., to affright and inticc people to their sect. They 
say, that we cannot be saved, nor any that are not of 
the Roman church : but we say, that a Papist may be 
saved. They say, that we want abundance of the arti- 
cles of faith that are of necessity to salvation. We say, 
that the Papists hold all that is necessary to salvation. 
Luther saith, that the kernel of true faith is yet in the 
church of Rome ; therefore say they, let Protestants 
take the shell. Hence they make the simple people 
believe, that even according to our own confiessions, 
their church and way is safer than ours. 

Vergerins Opera, page 230, says ; " That great good 
the truth doth not flow from the Papac}', but from the 
true church of Christ persecuted by Rome." 

1. The Papists' denying the faith and salvation of all 
other Christians doth not invalidate our faith, nor shake 
our salvation. Our religion doth not cease to be true, 
whenever a peevish adversary will deny or accuse it. 
Men are in never the more danger of damnation, be- 
cause a Papist tells them that they shall be damned. 
W^e believe not that the pope hath the power of the keys 
of heaven, that he can keep out whom he please. We 
have a promise of salvation from Christ, and we can 
bear the threatening of a pope. When Bellarmin judged 
Pope Sixtus damned himself, it is strange that he should 
have a power before to dispose of heaven to others, and 


shut out whom lie pleased, that must be shut out lilm- 
self. The Novatiaus, Donatists, or any sect, that held 
the substance of the Christian faith, might have pleaded 
this argument as well as the Papists. For they also 
have the courage to pass the sentence of damnation upon 
others, if that will serve turn: and we have the charity 
to say, that some of them may be saved. 

2. If by the Papists' own confession, charity be the 
life of all the graces or holy qualities of the soul, and 
that which above all others proveth a man to be justified, 
and in a state of salvation, then judge by this argument 
of their own, whether our charitableness or their unchar- 
itableness be the better sign, and whether it be safer to 
join with the charitable or the uncharitable? yea with 
them that are so notoriously uncharitable, as to condemn 
the far greatest part of the church of Christ merely be- 
cause they are not Papists 1 

3. When we say, that a Papist may be saved, it is 
with all these limitations : that a Papist as a Christian 
may be saved, but not as a Papist. As a man that 
hath the plague may live ; but not by the plague ; that 
Popery is a great enemy and hindrance to men's salva- 
tion ; and therefore that those among them that are 
saved, must be saved from Popery and not h)/ it ; that 
therefore salvation is a rarer thing among the Papists, 
than among the reformed catholics. Where it is most 
difficult, it is like to be most rare. Many more of the 
orthodox are likely to be saved than of the Papists; be- 
cause where Popery prevaileth against Christianity, and 
so much mastereth the heart and life, that the Christian 
doctrine is not practically received, there is no salvation 
to be had for such, without conversion. Thus is it that 
we say a Papist may be saved. Hunnius wrote a book 
to prove them no Christians, and Perkins hath written 
another to prove, that a Papist cannot go beyond a rep- 
robate. I must needs say so too, of all those in whom 
Popery is predominant practically, and overcometh 
Christianity, But yet I doubt not, but God hath thous- 
ands among them that shall be saved : of the common 
people that are forced to forbear contradicting the priests, 
and that understand not, or receive not all the mysteries 
of their deceit : and practically give themselves to a 



holy life. Though I have known none such, yet when 
I read ihc writings of Gerson, Kenipis, Thauler, Ferus, 
Barbanson, Benedictus, Anglus, Renty, and such others; 
though I see much of error, and mere affectation; yet 
I am easily persuaded to believe, that they had the Spirit 
of God, and that there are many more such among 
them. But I should be sorry if holiness were not much 
more common among us, and freer from the mixtures of 
error and affectation. 

4. For our saying, that they have the kernel, and so 
much as is necessary to salvation, it is true, but ii is the 
same kernel that we hold, and we have it undefilcd and 
unpoisoned ; and the Papists mix it with the venom of 
their errors. He that hath all things in his meat and 
drink that I have in mine, may yet make it worse than 
mine, if he will put poison in it. When you have all 
things necessary in a precious antidote or other medicine, 
you may soon mar all, by putting in more as the Pa- 
pists do. 

Christianity is enough to save them that mar it not, 
but keep it practically and predominantly. Even as a 
man that takes poison, and he that taketh none, are both 
of them men; and he that takes the poison may be said 
to have all the same parts and members as the other, 
and yet not be so likely to live, as he that lets it alone : 
and I cannot say but many that take it may recover : 
and if you ask me ; which be they ? I say, all tliose that 
timely cast it up again, or else whose strength of nature 
prevaileth against it and keepeth it from mastering the 
heart or vital powers, shall be recovered and live ; but 
those in whom the poison prevaileth and is predominant, 
shall die. So all those Papists that receive the errors 
of Popery, as either to cast them up again ; or that they 
are not predominant to the subduing of the power of 
Christian faith and holiness, by keeping them from be- 
ing sincere, and practical, and predominant, those shall 
be saved but not the rest. 

Now if upon those grounds, an}- man shall think thai 
Popery is the safer way, because we say, that they have 
all that is necessary to salvation, objectively in their 
creed, and that a Papist may be saved ; upon the same 
terms that man may be persuaded that it is safer taking 


poison, becauso tliat lio liatlj all tlio parts of a man that 
takes it, and possihly nature may prevail, and he may 
live, lint yet 1 shall let the poison alone. 

5. Papists that say, that a Protestant cannot he saved, 
do yet maintain that an inlidel may be saved, or one 
that hclicveth not the articles of the Christian faith* 
Vou will think this strange. But I insist on the i)roof 
of it, to the uses, that 3'oii may see, that their censures 
proceed from mere design or partiality; that they make 
believing in the pope to be more necessary than believ- 
ing in Christ, or in the Holy Ghost', how holy their 
church is that admitteth of infidels ; — on what grounds 
they deny, that we may be one catholic church with the 
fathers, Greeks, Egyptians, Abassines, Armenians, Wal- 
denscs, <fec. because of son)e diftcrences ; when yet they 
themselves can be one church with inlidels, or such as 
deny the articles of the creed, or at least believe them 
not ; and how well their religion hangs together, and 
also how well they are agreed among themselves, even 
abont the essentials of Christianity itself, whether they 
be of necessity to salvation or not. 

Franc, a Scuicta Clara in his Deus, Natura, Gra- 
iia, Problem. 15, et 16, tells us ; " The doctors com- 
monly teach, that a just and probable ignorance ought to 
excuse : and that, it is probable, when one hath a prob- 
able foundation or ground. As a countryman, when he 
believes that a thing is lawful, drawn by the testimony of 
his parish priest or parents: or when a man seeing rea- 
sons that are probable on both sides, doth choose those 
which seem to him the more probable; which yet indeed 
are against the truth, to which he is otherwise well af- 
fected. In this case he erreth without fault, though he 
err against the truth, and so labor of the contrary igno- 
rance. Hither is it to be reduced, when the articles of 
iaith are not propounded in a due manner ; as by fri- 
volous reasons, or by impious men : for then to believe, 
were an act of imprudence, saith Aquinas L. 2. q. 1. 


So that if the truth of Scripture be so propounded as 
to seem most improbable, it is no sin to disbelieve it : 
and if such are excused, as by a parent or parish priest 
are seduced, and that have not a due proposal of the 


truth ; then it must follow, that the heathens and infidels 
are innocent, that never had Christ proposed any way 
to them, and by iheir parents have been taught Mo- 
hammedanism, or Paganism. But I can prove, that even 
the want of a due proposal is a punishment for their sin? 
and that they ought themselves to seek after the truth ? 
and that it is of "their own sins that necessary truths do 
seem improbable to them? will sin excuse sin? 

He alsotelleth us; "As to the ignorance of things ne- 
cessary as means to salvation, the doctors diflcr: for Soto 
4. d. 5. q. 5 ; and lib. do natur. ct grat, c. 12 ; and Vega 1. 6, 
c. 20. will have no more explicit faith required now in 
the law of erace, than in the law of nature. Vega and 
Gabriel (1.21. qu. 2, art. 3. and 3. d. 21. qu. 2. think ; 
that in the law of nature, and in many cases, in the law 
of grace, a man may be saved witii only natural know- 
ledge, and that the habit of faith is not required. Hor- 
antius, being of the contrary opinion, saith, that they are 
men of great name that are against him, whose gravity 
and great and painful studies moved him, not to condemn 
tiiem of heresy, in a doubtful matter not yet judged." O 
happy Rome that hath a judge that can put an end to 
all tlieiv controversies 1 And yet cannot determine 
whether it be necessary to salvation to be a Christian ! 
Alvarez de Auxil. disp. 56, with others, seems to 
hold, that to justification is not required the knowledge of 
a supernatural object at all. Others say that both to 
grace and to glory an explicit faith in Christ is necessa- 
ry, Bonavent. 3. d. 25. Others say that to salvation at 
least an explicit faith in the Gospel, or Christ is requir- 
ed, though not to grace or justification. And this is 
the commoner in the schools, as Herera declared and 
followeth it. 

Clara saith; I take Scotus to be of that opinion, that 
it is not necessary as a means to grace or glory to have 
an explicit belief of Christ or the Gospel; as he seems 
at large to prove. Lib. 4. Dist. 3. Quest. 4. 

What is clearer, than that at this day, the Gospel 
bindeth not, where it is not authentically preached ; that 
is, tliat at this day men may be saved without an ex- 
plicit belief of Christ : for in that sense speaks the doc- 
tor concerning the Jews. And verily, whatever Scotus 


hold witli liis wicked master ITerera, I tliink tliat tliis 
was the opinion of Scotus, and tlie coniujon one; which 
also Vega a faithful iScoiist Iblloweth ; and Faher 4. d. 3, 
Petigianis 3. d, 25. q. 1, and of the Thoniists, Bannes, 
22. q. 2, a 8. Canus and others. 

He also gathers it to be the mind of the council of 
Trent, Ses. 6. caj). 4. It is eflectually proved by the 
doctor, from John xv. If 1 had not come and spoke to 
them, they had not had sin. I know the doctors of the 
contrary opinion answer, that such are not condemned 
for tlie sin of infidelity jirecisely, but lor other sins that 
hinder the illumination and special hel[) of God. But 
verily the doctor there argueth, that the Jews might by 
circumcision be cleansed from original sin, and saved 
without the Gospel: and accordingly he may argue, as 
to all otliers to vv'hom the Gospel is not authentically 
promulgated : else his reason would not hold. Corduba 
I. 2. qu. Thcol. q. 5, subscribes to this opinion, saying 
— since the promulgation of the Gospel, an explicit 
belief of Christ is ncessary : except with the invincibly 
ignorant, to whom an implicit sufficethto the life of grace : 
but wOiether it suffice to the life of glory, is a pro- 
blem ; but it is more probable that here also an implicit 
sufticeth. To which opinion consent both Medina clt 
recta in Deum Jidc, lib. 4. cap. idt. and Bradwardin 
fol. 62, that an implicit belief of Christ is sufficient to 

Clara also saitli ; " this is the way to end the debates 
of them that think ihe articles of the trinity, of Christ, of 
the incarnation, «fcc. are neccessary to salvation, though 
not to justification: and answering them, he saith that 
such are not formally without the church. You see then 
formally, infidels are in their church, and maybe saved, 
in his opinion. 

After a blow at Vellosillus, he citeth also Victoria 
Relict. 4. dc Indis. et Richard, de Med. Villa, 3. 25 
ait. 3. qu. 1 ; and others for this opinion: and tells you 
what his implicit fahh is; "to believe as the church be- 

From Scotus he answers the question, whether such 
persons may hold the contrary error to the truth that 
they are itrnorant of? and saith, No; while it is preach- 



ed but in some one place : till he know it to be believed 
as a truth by the church, and then he must firmly ad- 
here to it. Which the charitable friar applieth to Eng- 
land, as excusable for not beleiving some of their arti- 
cles. And he citcth Petigianis saying ; " If a simple 
old woman shall hear a false opinion from a false prophet, 
as that the substance of the bread remains with Christ's 
body in the Eucharist, and believe it: doth she sin be- 
cause of this ? No ; this were to'o hard and cruel to af- 

He citeth Anglus, and agreeth with him, that, "such 
as have no knowledge of those things to stir them up, 
are not bound so much as to seek information." 

Vega lib. 6. cap. 18, says ; that as ignorance of pure 
denial about many articles of faith may be without fault: 
so there is the same reason of ignorance from depraved dis- 
positions. Which he maintains against Gerson and 
Hugo. Clara adds ; " To speak my sense freely, I 
think that the common people committing themselvs to 
the instruction of the pastois, trusting their knowledge 
and goodness, if they be deceived, it shall be accounted 
invincible ignorance, or probable at least : so Herera : 
which excuseih from fault. Yea some doctors give so 
much to the instruction of doctors on whom the care of 
the flock lieth, that if they teach that God should be 
hated, a rude parishioner is bound to believe them. 
Whence he concludeth, that he hopeth many of us are 
saved; to which he citeth the consent of Azorius, To, 
1. I. 8. fust. c. 6, and Corduba. He also says ; " It 
seemcth to be the common opinion of the schools and 
doctors at this day, that the laity, erring with their teach- 
ers or pastors, are altogether excused from fault: yea by 
erring thus many ways materially, they merit, for the 
act of Christian obedience, which they owe their teach- 
ers, as Valentia saith ; To?)i 3. disp. 1. q. 2. Anglus, 
Vasquez^ S^^c. 

Cajetan cites Zanchez, teaching ; that those that are 
brought up among heretics are not to be accounted he- 
retics, till they refuse belief sufficiently propounded to 
them. Alph. a Castro, Simancha, Arragon, Tanner, 
and Faber say the same. 

Eman. Sa, affirms ; *' even among catholics many are 

juaoLiNo. 259 

excused from the explicit knowledge of the trinity and 
incarnation, specially if there want a teacher. For 
what ! shall we say that an infinite nuinher of Christians, 
otherwise good people, perish, that scarce know any 
thing aright of the mystery of the trinity and incarnation ; 
yea judge j)erversly or falsely of them, if you ask them? 
Rozella and Medina are of the same mind ; and N'alcn- 
tia Anal if s. fid. lib. 2. cap. 3. lit. D. 

In the sixteenth problem he puts another question, 
whether the law of nature and the decalogue may be un- 
known without fault? to which he answers; that though 
"Alex. Ales says, no : yet it is the common and receiv- 
ed o[)inion, citing Adrian, Corduba, llerera, and others, 
that there may be such invincible ignorance in respect 
of the law of nature and the decalogue." 

That which they call an implicit faith in Christ is no 
actual faith in Christ at all. lie that onl^^ believes as 
the church believes, and knows not that the church be- 
lieves in Christ, in the resurrection of Christ, &c., hath 
no actual belief in Christ or the resurrection at all. If 
I believe, that one of you is true in his word ; it doth 
not follow, that I actually believe the particular propo- 
sitions which I never heard. That which they call an 
implicit belief, is nothing but the explicit actual belief 
of the formal object of faith, divine or human ; as that 
God is true, or the church true and infallible ; but it is 
no belief at all of the particular material object. 

Every one in the world that believeth that there is a 
God, must needs believe that he is no liar ; and so hath 
in God an implicit belief. Now if this will save men, 
without a particular belief in Christ, then Christianity is 
not necessary. Every Turk, and Jew, and infidel that 
beHeveth in God, may then be said to have an implicit 
faith in Christ, in the Popish language ; because he be- 
lieveth all that God revealeth to be true : but if an im- 
plicit faith in God will not serve, how should an implicit 
faith in the church serve ; unless the church, that is the 
pope, be better than God. 

By a general council and the pope it is determined 
that no man can be saved out of their church, as headed 
bv the pope. To believe in the pope is of necessity to 
salvation ; bnt to believe in Christ, in his incarnation, 


death, resurrection, is not so. An implicit faith in the 
pope or church, yea or erring doctors may save, and 
men may merit by following them in error : but an im- 
plicit faith in God himself will not save, if we believe 
not in the pope. So that if we were infidels we might 
be saved, if we were of the church of Rome, and be- 
lieved in the pope : but the holiest Christian that be- 
lieveth explicitly in God and all the articles of faith, can- 
not be saved, if he believe not in the pope. Do you 
tliink they believe those doctrines themselves ? or rather 
frame them to the building of their kingdom? 

What a wonder is it that learned doctors see not their 
own contradiction? They suppose a man to believe in 
the pope, or as the church believeth, and yet not to be- 
lieve in Christ! and is not the church essentially a com- 
pany of Christians ; the spouse, and body, and school, 
and kingdom of Christ? and is not the pope essentially 
the pretended vicar of Christ. How then can they be- 
lieve in Christ's vicar, or Christ's school, or kingdom, or 
followers, before, they believe in Christ himself ( 

By all this you may perceive the holiness of the Ro- 
man cimrch, and the nature of that discipline or church 
government that all the world must needs submit to, or be 
damned. Even such as takes in infidels and all, and 
layeth the church as common to the world, for as many 
as will but believe in the pope and his priests. 

You see here also another mystery opened : that a 
man may have enough to justify him, that yet will not 
save him. For most of them are here said to hold that 
a man may be justified without an explicit faith in Christ, 
or that the knowledge of Christ is not necessary to his 
justification, but to his salvation it is: though tlie other 
half say that it is necessary to neither. If a man die 
in a justified state, must he be condemned? When Paul 
saith, Rom. 8. 30. Whom he justified them he also glo- 
rified ? 

You see also here what their baptism doth, that can 
ex nperc opcrato infallibly put away the sins of all those 
infidels, and so the Eucharist, &.c. And yet they must 
not be saved although their sins are all done away. O 
what a maze is the Romisli divinity ! you see how well 
they are agreed about those fundamentals, when half of 


them tliinlt, that " actual heliof in Christ is nccessnry to 
salvation, and not to jiistilication : and others that it is 
noccssarv to hoth : and a greater part that it is necessa- 
ry to neither." You also see here the henclU of hav- 
ing an infallihle living judge of controversies, and ex- 
pounder of Scriptures : and how adniirahly he hath end- 
ed all their dift'erences. 

If formally those unhelievers arc in their catholic 
church ; then the Cireeks and other Eastern and South- 
ern Christians arc in the same catholic church as we arc, 
when we difler not so much. 

When they have made the non-belief of articles of 
the faith consistent with salvation ; they will never while 
they breathe be able to confute him that on the same 
grounds afHrmeth the contrary belief consistent with 
salvation, in the case of the same want of teaching and 
sufficient means. 

You see therefore of how small moment the Popish 
censures are, when tliey judge that a Protestant cannot 
be saved. 

Clara judgeth otherwise. But his book was burnt 
or condemned at RciK' for it ; and thereby proveth him- 
self a heretic, seeing a geneial council and pope have 
determined the contrary, even that it is necessary to sal- 
vation to be a subject of the Pope of Rome. 


Popery encourages human depravihj. 

Another of their deceits, and the most successful of 
all the rest is this ; They suit their doctrines and gov- 
ernment and worship to the fleshly hiimors of the ungod- 
ly : by which means the greatest and the most arc al- 
ways on their side. Our doctrine, discipline and wor- 
ship are all so contrary to carnal interest and conceits, 
that w^e are still likely to lose the most and the greatest 
and consequently to be a persecuted people in the world. 
This is their unanswerable argument. By this means 
they captivate the nations to their tyranny. The most 



are every where sensual, worldly and unsanctified. Wise 
men and godly men are few in comparison of the rest of 
the world. It is the multitude commonly who have the 
strength, and the great ones who have the wealtji. So 
that I take it for a wonder of mercy, that they are not 
lords in every country, that the reformed catholics be 
not used every where as they be in Spain in Italy. For 
where they have but opportunity to shew themselves, 
the principles and practices of the Papists are such, as 
will be most likely to win the rabble rout to them, and 
make them masters of the multitude, and of all except 
a few believing heavenly persons : for the flock is little 
that must have the kingdom. Then, when they have 
got the multitude thus to follow them, and clubbed the 
rest into prisons, or burned them in the flames, they 
reckon that as one of the surest evidences that they are 
the catholic church ; because forsooth they are the 
greater number in the countries where they have ad- 
vantage, and it is but a few whom they were able to 
persecute or burn as heretics that were against them. 
The very argument of the Jews against Christ and his 

The reasons why they have not by this policy won 
the Christian world to thcii- side, under God the great 
defender of the innocent, are these : Because in the 
Eastern and Southern churches they have not had op- 
portunity to lay their snares, as the}' have had here in 
the West: and also those churciies have too many cor- 
ruptions and neglects at home for the gratifying of the 
worse sort. Because God hath been pleased in some 
places to bless the endeavors of the smaller part, as to 
enable them against the multitude to preserve some lib- 
erty. Because God hath sometimes given wise and godl}' 
princes to the people, that will not be cheated with the 
popular decehs. And because the papal tyramn- is di- 
rectly contrary to the rights of princes, so that it is only 
those that are hlinded by ignorance, or strengthened by 
an extraordinary league with Rome, or forced by the 
multitude of popish subjects and neighbors, that put 
their necks into the Romish yoke. For by the popes 
pretended power in temporals, and by his excommunica- 
ting princes, and his pretended power to depose them. 


and give their kiiigdoins to otliors, so as to alisolvc their 
subjects from tlier ojiths and fidelity, whirli is an article 
of their faith agreed on by the pope and general coun- 
cil, Later, sub. Innuc. S. cap. 3: and by ids exempting 
the clergy from their princes' j)o\ver; aiid by the pillag- 
ing their countries for money ; and by their doctrine 
and practices of murdering princes who are not of their 
mind: and by other evidences, they have awakened 
many of the princes of the earth to look about them, 
and consequently to befriend the truth against those 
tyrannous usur^ ers. Had it not been for those helps 
under God, wc should not have had liberty to breath in 
the common air. 

That all the doctrines, government, and worship of 
the papists are suited to the humor and sensual multi- 
tude, and fitted to take with ungodly men, I shall prove 
in twenty particulars. 

1. The reformed catholics hold, that none should be 
taken into the church, unless they make profession of 
the Christian faith, and of an holy life, for the time to 
come, and seem to understand what they say and do, 
and be serious in it ; which exasporateth the grossly 
ignorant and ungodly, when we deny them this privi- 
ledge of believers. But the Papists admit of the igno- 
rant ungodly, and such as believe not in Christ, and fill 
their antichristian community. 

2. The orthodox hold, that Baptism seals remission 
of sin to none but true believers and their seed. The 
Papists persuade sinners that all their sins are not only 
pardoned, but actually abolished, ex opere operato 
in baptism ; which is comfortable news to such ungodly 

3. Protestants say, that original sin liveth after bap- 
tism in some degree ; though it reign not, or condemn 
not those that arc true believers ; and that concupis- 
cence, that is, all inordinacy of the sensual appetite, 
or inordinate inclination to sensual objects, is a sin. 
The Papists tell them that when once they are baptised, 
there is no such thing in them as original sin, and that 
concupiscence is no sin at all. 

4. The orthodox hold, that none are to be admitted to the 
eucharist, and communion of the church therein, but 


those that believe actually, or profess so to do, the arti- 
cles of faith, and understand the nature of the sc\crament, 
and live according to the law of Chtist. But the Papists 
give it to all, and drive men to the sacrament; so that 
Albaspinfcus saith, he knows not whether ever any one 
was kept away in his age. 

5. Protestants hold, that men are not to be let alone 
in scandalous sin ; but admonished privately, and then 
openly before the church, and if yet they repent not, to 
be cast out; and not to be absolved or re-admitted, 
without a public confession and penitence answerable 
to the sin: and this wicked people hate at their very 
heart, and will not endure. But the Papists have got a 
device to please them, by auricular secret confession to 
a priest, where if he will but confess and sin, and sin and 
confess again, he may have pardon of course without 
any open shame or true reformation. If we durst but 
imitate the Papists in this one particular, we should do 
much to please the people that are now exasperated : for 
almost any of them will confess in secret that they have 
sinned, that will not endure the open shame. 

6. Protestants hold, that every sin deserveth death, 
and that every breach of the law is such a sin ; though 
God will not inllict the punishment on them that liave a 
pardon. But the Papists tell us of a multitude of sins that 
are but venial, that is, sins that deserve pardon, and not 
hell, and are indeed no sins, but analogically so called. 
And they make those to be venial sins, which are prop- 
erly no sins : all sins that are not deliberated on, are 
with them but venial sins. So that if they will but 
sufficiently brutify themselves by suspending the exer- 
cise of reason, and will swear, curse, murder, without 
deliberation, they are then free from sin and danger. 
How easy and pleasing is this to the ungodly ? Those are 
but evangelical counsels with the Papists, that are the 
precepts or laws of Christ to the Protestants. 

7. Protestants teach men that it is their duty to seek 
the understanding of the Holy Scripture, and to medi- 
tate in it day and night. But Papists forbid the com- 
mon people to read it in a language which they under- 
stand, and save them all that labor that Protestants put 
them on. Nothing can win the people more than 
cherishing them thus in sloth and ignorance. 


8. Protestants say, that a man cannot be justified or 
saved without actual fuith in Clirist, and that tiiis laith 
must extend to all things that are essential to Christian- 
ity. But Papists atVuni the justification and salvation 
of infidels, if they believe in the pope. A comfortable 
doctrine to the unbelieving world, to whom God hath 
spoken no such comfort. 

We confess that those that never had the Gospel, 
are under the law of nature or works, and under such a 
law of grace as was made to Adam and Noah in the 
substance, as to the obligation and the ofl'ers of it, and 
that by such a law they shall be judged, but of the jus- 
tification of Christians we have clear and certain prom- 

9. Protestants say, tbat all our best works are imperfect, 
and the sin that adhereth to them deserves God's wrath, 
according to the law of works, though he pardon it by 
the law of grace, and that when we have done all we 
are unprofitable servants, and properly merit nothing of 
God, for the worth of our works or in commutative jus- 
tice- But the Papists take those very works to merit 
heaven ex Condigno ; and some of them, say by tht 
proportion of the work and in commutative justice ; 
which the Protestants declare, deserve damnation for 
their sinful imperfections, and therefore need a pardon 
through the blood of Christ. Yet they take those works 
to be perfect, and the man to be perfect, and say, that by 
such works as those, they may merit for others as well 
as for themselves. How easy and pleasing is this to 
proud corrupted nature 1 

10. Protectants think, that no faith justifieth : but 
that which is accompanied with unfeigned love and 
resolution for obedience. But the Papists make a faith 
that is separated from charity, and joined with attrition, 
to be sufficient for admission t) the sacrament, which 
shall be instead of love or contrition, and so shall put 
away all sin. 

11. Protestants knowing that God is a spirit, and 
will be worshipped in spirit and in truth, teach people 
a spiritual way of worship, to which carnal men are 
indisposed. But Papists accommodate them with a 
multitude of ceremonies, images, and a pompous his- 



trionical kind of worship, which is easy and pleasant 
to flesh and blood. To have an image before them, 
and copes, and ornaments, and abundance of formali- 
ties, and to drop so many beads, and be saved for say- 
ing over so many Ave Maries, or such like words ; 
what an easy kind of religion is that, and how agreea- 
ble to flesh and blood? how much easier is it to say 
over their offices than to love God above all, and desire 
communion with him in the spirit, and to delight 
in him, and to pray in faith, and heavenly fervor ? 

12. Protestants tell men of hell-fire, as the remedi- 
less punishment of those sins, which Papists say deserve 
but a purgatory : and they have hope of coming out of 
purgatory, but there is none of coming out of hell. 

13. Protestants tell them of no hope of ease or par- 
don of sin after this life, if it be not pardoned here. 
But Papists tell them, that when they are in purgatory 
the pope hath power to pardon them, and the saying of 
so many masses for their souls may ease them or rid 
them out, and the merits of other folks may deliver 

14. Protestants tell them, that they must be holy for 
themselves. But Papists tell them, that they may hire 
another man to say their prayers for them, which may 
serve their turn. 

15. Protestants ingenuously confess, that they have 
no way to end all controversies in this life : but that 
we have a sufficient way so far to decide them, as is 
necessary to the peace of the soul, of the church, and 
of the commonwealth; but no way for a final absolute 
decision, till the day of judgment. Pastors of the 
church are to be judges, so far as they are to execute : 
and Magistrates are to be judges, so far as they 
must execute; and every christian hath a judgment of 
discerning, so far as he is to execute : but the absolute 
final judgment is reserved to the last day, when God 
■will fully end all our controversies. That satisfieth not 
men who would have all in hand, and the sentence 
past before the assizes. Therefore Papists tell them of 
an end of all their controversies at hand; of an easy 
cheap remedy by believing the infallible pope anS 
council, and so putting an end to all divisions and 


Ih. Prolffttants would havo none but professing 
saints in their churches. But Papists canonize a sainl 
as a wonder, and shut them up in monasteries, and call 
a few, rcli^iouif, who are separated from other Chris- 
tians, as Christians formerly were from the world. 
Which brings the peojde to think that holiness and 
religion arc not necessary to all, but to a few devotees 
that will be better than they are commanded to be. 

17. Protestants bind men to keep their vows, and 
fidelity to their governors. But Papists tell them that 
the pope hath power to free them from their fidelity, 
and dispense with their oaths. 

18. Papists teach men to fast: by eating the pleas- 
antest meats. But Protestants use a total abstinence 
while they fast. 

19. The main business and administration of Prot- 
estant pastors, is against that flesh that is unregenerate, 
and therefore must needs be distasteful to the multitude 
of the ungodly. Our preaching is to open men's sin 
and misery, and cause them to perceive their lost con- 
dition, and so to reveal to them a crucified Christ and 
then to set them on the holy self-denying heavenly life 
that Christ hath prescribed them: to speak terror to 
the rebellious, and to cist the obstinate out of our com- 
munion, and to comfort none as the heirs of heaven, 
either in life or death, but only the truly sanctified and 
renewed souls. The preaching of Papists is but sel- 
dom ; but they have a mass in Latin, and the old say- 
ing is ; "The mass doth not bite:" it galleth not a guilty 
conscience to see a mass and hear prayers which he 
understandeth not. When they do preach, they flatter 
and deceive men by their false doctrine. They cannot 
humble them in the sense of their original sin and mis- 
ery; for that they tell them was quite extinct and done 
away in baptism: and for their following sins, absolu- 
tion upon their customary confessions, hath done away 
all the guilt at least. So that here is no misery for the 
miserable souls to see ; unless perhaps some gross ac- 
tual sin be apparent among them, and then they shall 
have an oration against it, to drive them to auricular 
confession and to receive the body of Christ and be 
absolved. Thus do they by ceremonies quiet the con- 


sciences of unsanctified men, and humor them in all 
their rites and customs, and at last turn them to heaven 
or purgatory with an absolution and extreme unction. 
How pleasing a religion that is to the ungodly people, 
those ministers can tell, that see the rage of such against 
those that deny them evenlDetter forms and ceremonies 
when they desire them to pacify their consciences in- 
stead of real holiness and obedience. 

20. The Jesuits have fitted their whole frame of moral 
doctrine and case-divinity to humor the unconscionable. 
Those that would escape any worldly trouble or dan- 
ger, the Jesuits have a help at hand for, even their doc- 
trine of equivocation, and mental reservation, which 
makes the pope's dispensation with oaths and promises 
needless. What accommodations they have for him 
that hath a mind to murder his adversary, to calumni- 
ate another, to forbear restoring ill-gotten goods, to com- 
mit fornication, to rob another, and many the like, you 
may see in their own books ; and what comfort they 
have for a man that loveth not God, so hi?, will not hate 
him. Mystery of Jesuitism. 

So we see the advantage that Papists have to sweep 
away the vicious ignorant multitude, and then to boast 
that they are the catholics, and we but schismatics, 
because they are the greater part: and then they are 
armed also by the multitude, to oppress us by their vio- 

Now the only remedy to use against this fraud, is 
to deal plainly and faithfulh^, though it displease, and to 
administer God's ordinances as he prescribeth, though 
never so distasteful to flesh and blood : and so to com- 
mit ourselves to God, and trust him with his church 
and cause, who is able to preserve it, and is most en- 
gaged to appear for us when we lay all upon him, and 
have none to trust but himself alone. Let us not hearken 
in this case to flesh and blood that would advise us to 
remit the reins of discipline, and to bend our adminis- 
trations to some pleasing compliance with carnal minds. 
We disengage God when thus we begin to shift for our- 
selves out of his way. HalV s " Quo vadis?^^ Censure of 



Popish falsi (Ulcgdtiuns. 

Another of their frauds is this: They cull out all 
the harsh u/ihandsomc passages, or mistakes that they 
meet with in any Protestant icriters, and charge all 
those upon the Protestant religion; as if they were so 
many articles of our faith, or at least v^ere the common 
doctrines of our churches. 

They will not give us leave to do so by them, when 
we have much more reason for it. They teach the 
people, that they are bound to believe as their teachers 
bid them : and they reproach us for confessing-, that we 
are not in all points of doctrine infallible. Yet we 
still confess this fallibility, and say in plain terms, thai 
we know but in part. Divers of their particular doc- 
tors that we cite, are such as the pope hath canonized 
for saints : and they tell us that in canonizing he is in- 
fallible. And therefore an infallibly canonized saint 
must not be supposed to err in a point of faith. They 
boast so much of unity and consent among themselves, 
that we may the better cite particular doctors, And 
yet we think ourselves bound to stand to their own law 
in this, and to charge nothing on them as their faith, 
but what their churcJi doth own. Therefore while 
they refuse to stand to particular doctors, we will not 
urge them to It : for all men should be the professors 
of their own belief. 

But what reason is there then that we may not have 
the same measure from them which they expect.!* We 
protess to take no man, nor council of men, for the 
lords of our faith, but for the helpers of our faith. They 
tell us, that they know not where to find our religion. 
We assure them that it is entirely in the written word 
of God, and that we know no other infallible rule ; be- 
cause we know no other divine revelation. They tell 
us; "all heretics do pretend to Scripture, and there- 
fore that cannot be the test of our religion.^ I answer 
that so all cavillers, and defrauders may pretend to the 
law of the land to undo poor men by quirks of wit. or 



tire them with vexatious suits : and yet it follows not 
that we must seek another rule of right, and take the 
law for insufficient. What if heretics pretend to tra- 
dition, to general councils, and the decretals of the 
popes, as frequently they do, will you yield therefore 
that those are an insufficient rule, or test of your own 
religion ?- Open your eyes and judge as ye would be 

But I come to some of the particular opinions with 
which they charge us. And because I know not a more 
weio-hty renowned champion of their cause than Cardi- 
nal Richlieu I shall take notice of his twelve great errors, 
which he so vehemently chargeth on the reformed 
churches, as contrary to the Scripture. I shall do much 
to make clean our churches, if I fully wipe off all the 
pretended blots of error, that so crafty a man could 
charge upon them- In his Defens. contra script. 4. 
Ministr, Charenton. cap, 2., he thus begins his enumer- 

1. " The Scripture saith, Jam. 2, that a man is not 
justified by faith only : But you say, that he is justified 
by faith alone, and by faith only, which is found in no 
place of Scripture: and do vou not then resist the Scrip- 
ture r' 

We believe both the words of Paul and James, that 
a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law, 
and saved through faith not of works, lest any man 
should boast, Rom. iii. 28. Ephes. ii. 8, 9 ; and also that 
a man is justified by works, and not by faith only, Jam. 2. 
We believe all the Bible? Why then should he charge 
us with denying that, which we retain and publicly 
read in our churches as the word of God ? If he can 
prove that we understand not those words aright, he 
should have evinced it better than by the use of the 
words faith alone ; for our churches by faith alone, do 
profess openly to mean no more than Paul doth by faith 
without works : and can they find fault with Paul 1 We 
are not all agreed upon the fittest notion of the interest 
of faith and works in our justification : but our diflerence 
is more in words and notions than matter. Why do you 
not quarrel with your own Cardinal Contarenus and 
others who join with us in the doctrine of justification? 


2. His second accusation is this, "Tlic Scripture saith, 
that we can love (iotl witii all the heart. You say, that 
man can love God with all the heart, which is no where 
read in Scripture ; and yet do you not resist the Scrip- 
tures ?" 

We distinguish hetwcen loving God with all the 
hearty as it signifieth the sincerity and predominant 
degree of love, and so every true Christian hath it : and 
as it signifieth some citraordinanj degrccc above thi.'^ 
mere sincerity, and so some eminent stronger christians 
have it: and as it signifieth the highest degree, which is 
our duty, and which excludeth all sinful imperfection, 
and thus we say, tiiat no man actually doth love God 
perfectly in this Ife ; nor do we think he speaks like a 
Christian, that dare say, " Lord, I love thee so much, 
that I will not be beholden to thee to forgive the imper- 
fection of my love, or help me against any sinful imper- 
fection of it." Your own followers whom you admire 
as the highest lovers of God, do oft lament the imper- 
fections of their love. But now, if the question be only 
of the posse and not the act; we say, that the natural 
power is in all, and the nominal power which is the 
habit is in the sanctified ; but this moral power is not 
perfect itself, that is, of the highest degree, and witho.ut 
any sinful imperfection ; though yet it hath the perfec- 
tion of sincerity, and in some, the perfection of an emi- 
nent degree. 

3. His third accusation is this ; "The Scripture saith, 
that the eucharist is the body and blood of Christ, with 
the junction of those words that signify a true body and 
blood : you say that it is not Christ's body aixl blood, 
but only a figure, sign and testimony, which the Scrip- 
ture no where saith." 

The Scripture saith not, that it is his body and blood 
substantially, or by transubstantiation : and we say not, 
as you feign, that it is not his body and blood, but a 
figure, &c. For we say, that it is his bod}- and blood 
sacramentally and representatively ; as he that person- 
ateth a king on some just account, is called a king: 
and as in actions of investiture and delivery, the deliv- 
ering of a key is the delivering of the house, and the 
delivery of a twig and turf is the delivery of the land, 


and the deliverer may say, take, this is my house, this 
is my land, which I deliver th«e. If you be among 
many images in a room, you will not blame him that 
saith, that is Peter, and that is Paul, and that is the 
Virgin Mary, The Scripture often calls it bread after 
the consecration ; which you condemn us for : therefore 
we are taught to call it so. The Scripture saith ; 1. Cor, 
X. 5, that Rock was Christ: and he saith, I am the 
door, John x. I am the true vine, John xv. 1. David 
saith I am a worm and no man, Psalm xv. 6. We believe 
all this. But must we be therefore reproached, if we 
say that Dayid was a man; that the rock was Christ typ- 
ically; that he was a vine and door metaphorically only ; 
and yet those are as plain as, " this is my body and 
this is my blood." • 

4. His fourth accusation is this; "The Scripture 
saith, that baptism saveth us, and that we are cleansed 
and regenerated by the washing of water: on the con- 
trary you say, that baptism doth neither save us, nor 
regenerate us, but is only to us a symbol of salvation, 
and regeneration, which is no where said in Scripture." 

A childish contest about words ! We say that two 
thing's go to our full possession of our state of regener- 
ation, justification, and cleansing: one is our funda- 
mental right, w^hich the promise of the Gospel gives 
us upon our heart-consent or covenant with God : the 
other is our solemn investiture. In regfard to the for- 
mer, we are Christians, and regenerated and justified, 
before baptism. In regard to the latter, we are made 
Christians, regenerated, justified, saved, by baptism. 
This we commonly hold, and so never denied what 
you falsely sa}^ we deny. As a man is made a king 
by his coronation, that yet in a sort was one before : 
or as marriage makes them husband and wife by pub- 
lic solemnization ; that were fundamentally so before 
by private covenant : or as possession is given by a key, 
or a twig and a turf, of that which a man had a right to 
before; so are we solemnly invested with those bene- 
fits by baptism, which we had a fundamental title to 
before. Do not your own writers confess this of a man 
that is baptised many years after he had faith and char- 
ity ? Do you think that Cornelius and the rest that 

jrf:r.LiNc. 273 

had the Holy Ghost before baptism, Act. x. had not 
justification before i' Do you think tliat Constantint' the 
great was unpardoned, U!iro<j^enerale and no Christian 
till he was haptiseri? Or would you quarrel against 
your own confessions? 

5. His fifth accusation is this. "Scriptuie saiih, that 
priests do forgive sin : on the contrary you say that 
they do not remit them, but only testify that they arc 
remitted, which the Scriptures no where say." 

We say, that whose sins the pastors of the church 
remit, they are remitted. Pastors as God's embassa- 
dors, do proclaim his general conditional pardon unto 
all. They are God's ministers to make a particular 
application, and delivery of pardon in baptism ; on 
supposition that the baptised be qualified for pardon. 
They are, as his ministers, to make the same applica- 
tion by declaration and delivery in the absolution of 
the penitent ; on suposition that their penitence be sin- 
cere. As church governors, they may sometimes re- 
mit some humbling disgraceful acts, that were imposed 
on the penitent for the testification of his repentance, 
and the satisfaction of the church. And are not those 
four concessions enough? or are you minded to pick 
fuel for the rancor and uncharitablencss of your minds ? 

We do not think that any man can primarily ds 
the chief agent forgive sins: but God must be the first 
pardoner. Nor that any man can pardon the sins of 
the dead, and abate or shorten the pains of the soul, in 
a fire called purgatory. 

Verily, if the pope have power to remit but the very 
temporal punishment, he is a cruel wretch that will not 
forgive men, even good men, the torments of the gout, 
and the stone, and an hundred diseases; nay that will 
not remit them to himself; nor the pains ot death, 
when he is so loath to die. He that cannot remit the 
punishments which we see and feel, how shall we be- 
lieve him, that he can remit a penalty that he never 
saw nor felt, nor can be proved to exist. 

6. His sixth accusation is this; "Scripture saith, if 
a virgin marry she sinneth not : but you say that the 
just sin in all works: which Scripture mentions not." 

Do you believe in your conscience that the Scrip- 


ture meaneth that a virgin sinneth not at all in any 
circumstance or defect in the manner or concomitants 
of her marriage ? Then tell your nuns so, that if they 
marry they sin not. Tell priests so, that if they marry 
they sin not. Your own reason can expect no other 
sense in the words, but that marriage, as such, is no 
sin to the virgin. But if you think that in this or in 
any other work, you see God as apprehensively, and 
believe as strongly, and restrain every wandering 
thought as exactly, and love God as much as }'t)u are 
bound to do by tl)e very law of nature itself: so that 
you are perfectly blameless, and need not to be beholden 
to the blood of Christ, to the mercy of God, to the 
spirit of grace either for the forgiveness of those fail- 
ings, or the cure of them : you show a proud pharisa- 
tcal spirit, unacquainted with itself and with the Gos- 
pel. Do you go on and say. Lord I thank thee that I 
am not as other men: and I will rather say, Lord be 
merciful to me a sinner : and which shall be rather 
justified, Christ hath told iis. The streams cannot be 
perfectly sinless till the fountain be so; and who can 
say, I have made my heart clean, I am pure from my 
sin? Prov. xx. 9. For there is not a just man upon 
earth, that doeth good and sinneth not, Eccl. vii. 20. 
Christ telleth us that the fruit will be like the tree, the 
actions like the heart : and therefore an imperfect heart 
will have imperfect duties. If you dare say there is 
no remnant of sin in your hearts, you have so much 
of it that it hindereth you from seeing it. Humility 
and self-know'ledge would soon end this controversy. 
We say not that all our works are sins, that is either 
materially forbidden, or done in wickedness and from 
vicious predominant habits. But that the same works, 
which materially are good, are tainted with our sinful 
imperfections, having not in them that ineasure of 
knowledge, faith, love, &e. that we ought to have ; and 
therefore that we must beg pardon for our imperfec- 
tions, and fly to the blood and merits of Christ, through 
whom God will accept both our works and us, for all 
the imperfection, which he pardoneth to us of his 

7. His seventh accusation is thisj "Scripture saith, 


that there are wicked men and reprobates, who believe 
in Christ: but you contend that they believe not, but 
have only a shadow of faith: which no Scripture 

We say that reprobates do believe, and we say that 
they believe not, taking belief in dilferent senses. We 
believe whatever the Scripture saith, even that the devils 
believe and tremble : and yet as believers and Chris- 
tians are all one, we do not call the (devils believers 
and Christians ; but you may do it if ycu please. As 
belief signifieth a bare ineflectual conviction or super- 
ficial assent which you call informed faith, so we still 
confess that the wicked may believe. But as belief 
signifieth our receiving of Christ, and coming to him, 
and being planted into him as his members, and taking 
him heartily as Christ, our Lord and Saviour, and so 
becoming Christians and disciples; as it signifieth such 
a faith that hath the promise of pardon, of sin of adop- 
tion, and of glory: So we say that the wicked have 
but a show or shadow ot it. 

8, His eighth accusation is this; "Scripture saith, 
that there are some that believe for a time, and after at 
another time believe not : you deny that there are 
any that believe for a time, and then fall from faith, 
and that he that once believeth doth never lose that 
faith; which is not in any Scripture to be found." 

We maintain, that there are some that believe but 
for a time, and afterward fall away ; but we say it is 
but with an ineffectual or common assent that they be- 
lieve, such as you call unformed faith ; your accusa- 
tion therefore is false. The living seed are meant of 
saving. If any of you think that faith is called justi- 
fying or saving faith, only by an extrinsecal denomi- 
nation, from a concomitant, and that there is no differ- 
ence in the faith itself between that of the unjustified 
and of the justified, you are mistaken against all rea- 
son. Your own philosophers frequently maintain that 
the will, which is the seat of charity, followeth the 
practical dictates of the intellect, which is the seat of 
assent: and therefore according to those philosophers, 
a practical belief must need be accompanied with 
charity. Those that deny this, do yet maintain that 


a powerful clear assent of the intellect will infallibly 
procure the determination of the will, though every 
assent will not, and though it do it not necessarily. So 
ihat on that account, and in common reason, there 
must needs be an intrinsic difference between that as- 
sent which prevailed with the will to determine itself, 
and that which cannot so prevail: and therefore 
your unformed and your formed faith, have some 
intrinsic difference. 

Are you not at odds among yourselves about per- 
severance.^ Some laying it first on man's free will; 
and some, with Austin ascertaining perseverance to 
the elect, and laying it on God's free gift ; and some 
Jesuits and school men affirming, that the confirmed in 
grace are not only certain to persevere, but that they 
necessarily believe and are saved, and cannot moitally 
sin. Strange doctrine for a Jesuit ! 

9. His ninth accusation is this; " Scripture saith, if 
thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments : you 
say there is no need of keeping the commandments, 
and that he who saith it, doth deny Christ and abolish 
faith, of which the Scripture speaketh not a word." 

We distinguish between the keeping of that law of 
works, or nature, which made perfect obedience the 
only condition of life : and the keeping of the law of 
Moses as such : and the keeping of the law of Christ. 
For the two first, we say that no man can be justified 
by the works of the law. Is this a doubt among Pa- 
pists who believe Paul's Epistles? But as for the law 
of Christ, as such, we must endeavor to keep it per- 
fectly ; and must needs keep it sincerely, if we will be 
saved. In this all Protestants are agreed; and dare 
any Papist deny it ? If we be not all agreed on the 
sense of that text of Scripture, yet are we agreed on 
the doctrine. 

10. His tenth accusation is this; "Scripture saith, 
that some that were illuminated and made partakers of 
the Holy Ghost, did fall, and crucif}'- again to them- 
selves the Son of God : but you defend, that whoever 
is once a partaker of the Holy Ghost, you cannot fall 
from his grace: which Scripture speaketh not." 

We maintain that those words of Scripture are of 

JU-ooLiNo. 277 

certain truth. But we distinguish between the common 
and the special gifts of the spirit. The common gifts 
may be lost. The special gifts which accompany sal- 
vation, some judge are never lost. Otliers think they 
are lost only by those that are not predestinated as 
Austin and your Dominicans think. 

II. £lis eleventh accusation is this; "Scripture 
saith, that God taketh away, and blotteth out our iniquity 
as a cloud, and puts our iniquities far from us, as the 
east is from the west, and maketh us as white as snow : 
you say, that he takes not away nor blotteth out our 
sin, but only doth not impute it, and doth not make us 
white as snow, but leaveth in us the fault and unclean- 
ness of sin: which Scripture no more speaks." 

That is half falsehood, and half confusion. It is 
false that we say, he doth not take away, nor blot out 
our sin, nor make us white as snow. Do not all Prot- 
estants in the world affirm this ? There are these 
things to be considered. The act of sin : the habit, 
the guilt or obligation to punishment: and the culpa- 
bility. As for the act, how can you for shame say, 
that God takes it away, when it is a transient act that 
is gone of itself as soon as acted, and hath no existence, 
as Scotus and all your own take notice ? As to the 
culpability, you will not surely for shame say, that God 
so put away David's adultery, as to make it reputable 
as a virtue, or not a vice. As to the full guilt, we 
maintain that it is done quite away: and it is in regard 
of that guilt and punishment that the Scriptures men- 
tioned by you speak. For what else can they mean, 
when they speak of actual sins that are past long ago, 
and have no existence .'' Would you make us believe, 
that grace is given to David to put away the act of his 
murder and adultery, so that it may be a thing past and 
gone ; which it is without grace ? So that when you 
feign us to say, that God takes not away sin, but only 
imputeth it, you feign us to make synonymal terms to 
be of different senses. He takes them away, by not 
imputing them. 

But if you speak not of the sense of a particnlar 
text, but of the matter in difference, it can be nothing 
but the habit of sin that you mean, that we say, that 


278 jTEsuil* 

God takes not away. And here you are partly calttm- 
niators, and partly erroneous Pharisees. You calum- 
niate, in feigning us to deny, that habitual sin is done 
away. Because our divines say, that it is not the 
work of mere pardon, which we call justification, to 
put it away ; therefore you falsely say, that we hold, 
it is not put away at all. Whereas we hold, that all 
that are justified, are sanctified, converted, regenerated, 
renewed, and must live an holy life: and that all their 
sins are so far destroyed, that they shall not have do- 
minion over them : that gross and wilful sin they for- 
3ake : and the least infirmities, they groan, and pray, 
and strive against to the last : and then obtain a perfect 
conquest. But if you mean, that no degree of habit- 
ual sin, or absence of holy qualities remaineth in the 
justified soul, it is a Pharisaical error. Dare you say 
that you have no sin to resist or purge or pardon .'' are 
you in heaven already? The whole have no need of a 
physician, but the sick, and have you no need of Christ 
to heal your soul 1 would you be no better than you 
are? O proud souls ! and strange to themselves and 
the purity of the law 1 hath not the Holy Ghost pro- 
nounced him a liar and self deceiver, that saith he hath 
no sin, 1 John, i, 8, 10/ In many things we offend 
all, James iii. 2. I shall recite two canons-of a council, 
which if you use the Lord's Prayer, are fit for you to 
consider. Concil. Mllevit. coat. Pelagianos Can. 7. 

That council curseih all those as intolerable liars, 
that say the Lord's Prayer, desiring him daily to for- 
give or remit sins, and yet think that they have no sins 
to forgive, or that every saint hath not such sins. 
What can a Papist say to this, but by making councils 
as void of sense, as they feign the Holy Scriptures to 

12. His twelfth and last accusation is this ; "The 
Scripture saith, that blessedness is the reward, the 
prize, the penny, the wages of laborers, and the crown 
of righteousness: you contend that its merely the free 
gift of God, and not reward, which no Scripture doth 

We constantly say that eternal life is given as a re- 
ward and crown of righteousness. But we distin- 


guish between the act of God in his Gospel promise, 
which is a conditional deed of f^ift of Christ and life to 
all that will accept them, and the execution of this by 
judj^nient and glorilication. We also say that it was 
merely of God's free grace that he made such a deed 
of ijift, the blood of Christ being the purchasing cause, 
and nothing of our works had a hand in the procure- 
ment. Our justification in judgment, and our glorifi- 
cation, which are the execution of the law of grace, do 
make our works the reason ; not as having merited it 
in commutative justice, but as having performed the 
condition of the free gift, and so being the persons to 
whom it doth belong.. This is the sense of Scotus and 
of one half of the Papists, who say that merit of con- 
dignity is but by virtue of God's promise. 

I leave it to the conscience of any sober Papist, wheth- 
er we be guilty in any one point that this great cardinal 
chargeth us with ? And whether Papists and Protes- 
tants were not in a fair way for reconciliation, if we 
differed not more in other thin.crs than in these? 

Scripture only is the rule and test of our faith and 
religion. Polydore Virgil speaks truly of us, saying; 
" They are called evangelical, because they maintain 
that no law is to be received in matters of salvation, 
but what is delivered by Christ or his Apostles." If 
therefore any man speak in any word amiss, blame the 
man that spoke it for that word ; but blame not all, or 
any others for it. Austin retracted his own errors ; 
and which of us dare justify every word that hath fallen 
from our mouths or pen before God i* How many 
hundred points do schoolmen and commentators charge 
on one another as erroneous, among yourselves / Shall 
all the errors of the fathers be charged on the catholic 
church, or all your writers' errors upon yours .'' 

That we do well to stick to the Holy Scriptures as 
the sufficient rule, we are the more encouraged to think, 
by the concessions of our adversaries of greatest note, 
as well by the testimony of the Scripture itself, and 
the consent of the ancient doctors of the church, and 
the unprovedness of their pretended additional. Even 
Cardinal Richlieu saith ; " As for us, we put, or assert, 
no other rule but Scripture, neither of another sort, nor 


total : and we say that it is the whole rule of our sal- 
vation, and that on a double account ; both because it 
containeth immediately and formally the sum of our 
salvation, that is, all the articles that are necessary to 
man's salvation, by necessity of means ; and because 
it mediately containeth whatsoever we are bound to 
believe, as it sends us to the church to be instructed by 
her, of whose infallibility it certainly confirmeth us." 
Thus he grants us that all articles necessary to our 
salvation, as means, are immediately and formally in 
the Scripture : then surely they may be saved that be- 
lieve no more than is in the Scripture: that we are to 
believe no church but that which the Scripture sends 
us to, and to believe its infallibility no further than the 
Scripture doth confirm it: and that the Scripture is our 
whole and only rule. Othat all Papists would adhere 
to this ! But let them not blame us now for standing 
to it. 


Diversity of opinion. 

Another of their frauds is this; by ranking the 
Protestants among the rabble of sects and heresies that 
are in the world, and then asking ignorant souls, if you 
will needs be of any sect how many are before you? 
and what reason have you rather to be of the Protes- 
tants, than of any oiher / 

This question is worth the considering by a Papist, 
or any sectary; but the true catholic is quite out of the 
reach of it. The church of Christ is one, and but one, 
This one catholic church containeth ail the true Chris- 
tians in the world. This is the church that I am a 
member of; which is far wider than the Popedom. 
The church that I profess myself a member of contain- 
eth three parts; The most sound and healthful part; 
and that is the reformed churches. The most un- 
sound in doctrine, though possess d of many learned 
men ; not as Papists but as Christians, though infected 


with Popery. Tlic middle part, which is sounder 
than the Papists ip. doctrine, hut less learned, and below 
the Protestants in both; and that is all the Greeks and 
other Eastern and Southern churches that are no sub- 
jects of the pope. All those, even all true Christians, 
are members of the church that I belong to; thoug'h 
some of them be more sound, and to these I may add 
many particular lesser sects, that subvert not the 
foundation. Will you ask me now why I will not 
be of another sect, as well as of the Protestants/ 
My answer is ready, a sect divided from the body, 
1 abhor. I am of no sect. It is the unity, universality 
and antiquity of the church that are its honorable 
attributes in my eyes. I^rotestants that unchurch 
all the rest of the world, and count themselves the 
whole church of Christ, do in some sort make them- 
selves a sect. But where is there any such ? There- 
fore Protestants are no more a sect, than the patients 
in a hospital who are almost healed, or than the higher 
form of sc holars in school, or than merchants or richer 
sort of tradesmen in a city Such vl sect God grant 
that I may be of, even one in the church that shall be 
of soundest understanding, and of purest worship, and of 
the most careful, holy, honest life. But still I shall 
acknowledge them of the lowest form, even them that 
learn the A. B. C. to be in the same school Vv'ith me. 
And if they. Papists or any others, will disclaim me, 
that shall not unchurch me, as long as Christ disclaims 
me not. Nor shall it provoke me to disclaim them any 
further than Christ leads the way. So that the Papists 
may see that if they will deny the church that I am 
of, they must deny their own, and all the Christian 

But how will they answer this themselves? It is 
one of the greatest reasons why I dare not be a Papist, 
because then I know I must be a sectary. What is a 
Papist but as mere a sectary as any that retaineth a 
name in the church i* They are a company of men 
that have set up a human usurping head or vice-Chritt 
over the catholic church, owning him themselves; and 
unchurching and condemning all the church that will 
not own him. The church that I am of is near thrice 



as big as the Papist church is. Theirs is but a pollut- 
ed piece, that would divide itself from all the rest by 
condemning them. 

I would seriously desire any Papist living to resolve 
the question ; If he will needs be of a sect, and forsake 
the universal church, why of the Popish sect rather than 
another? If because it is the greatest, I answer it is 
less than the whole. If because it is the purest, it is 
the most impure. If for antiquity, it is founded upon 
novelty. If because it is the richest? their money per- 
ish with them that measure the church and truth of 
Christ by the riches and splendor of this world ! 


Romish Ancestors. 

Another of their jugglings is this; By working 
upon the people^s natural affections, and asking them, 
where they think all their Jorefathers are that died in 
the communion of the Roman church? Dare they 
think that they are all damnedl intimating that it is 
cruelty to say their ancestors are in hell ; and if they 
say they be in heaven, then there is but one way thith- 
er, and therefore you must go the way that they went. 

1. A weak understanding may easily deal with that 
sophistry. What if we grant that many of our fore- 
fathers that died Papists are in heaven ? doth it follow 
that we must therefore be Papists? It was not by Po- 
pery that they went to heaven, but by Christianity. 
What if many recover and live that eat not only earth 
and dirt, but hemlock or other poisons .'* Must 1 there- 
fore eat them ? Or doth it follow that there is no other 
way to health ? 

2. Our forefathers were all saved that were holy, 
justified persons, and no others. But among so many 
and great impediments as Popery cast in their way, we 
have great reason to fear that far fewer of them were 
saved, than are now among the reformed churches. 
Must I needs go that difficult way to heaven, because 


some of them get thither? Must I travel a way that 
is commonly beset with thieves, because some that go 
that way do escape them? 

3. It tliis were good reasoning, then may all the 
heathens, inHdels, Mohjimmedans use it, that have been 
educated in darkness. It is the argument which the 
barbarous heathens use, when the Gospel is preached 
to them ; what think you, say they, is become of our 
fathers ? If they were saved without the Gospel, so 
may we. The story of that infidel prince is common 
that being ready to go to the water to be baptized, 
stepped back, and asked where are all my ancestors 
now? And when he was told that they were in hell, 
and that the Christians go to heaven, he told them, then 
he would be no Christian, for he would go where his 
ancestors are. 

4. Where be all our forefathers that are dead since 
the reformation? and where be all those that died be- 
tween the resurrection of Christ and the appearing of 
Popery, or the prevailing of it in the world ? and where 
be all that die in the eastern and southern churches, that 
are no subjects of the Pope of Rome? Have we not 
as little reason to think that all these millions of men 
are damned, as to think so of our Popish ancestors? 

5. Why should we be more foolish for our souls 
than for our bodies? I would not be poor because my 
ancestors were so. Nor would I have the stone or 
gout because my ancestors had them. Nor will I say 
3iat they are no diseases, tor fear of dishonoring my 
ancestors that had them. And why then should I wil- 
fully lick up any Popish errors, because my ancestors 
by the disadvantage of the times and of their education 
were cast upon them? 

6. It is not oar forefathers but God that we must 
follow. It is he, and not they, who is the Lord of our 
faith and of our souls. It will not excuse us in judg- 
ment for disobeying God, to say that our forefathers 
led us the way: nor will it ease us in hell to suffer 
with our forefathers. Christ tells us, Z/wAe xvi. of a 
rich man that in hell would have his brethren warned, 
lest they should follow him: but these men would have 
us follow our forefathers, even in their sin against 


God. Whereas the Scriptures constantly make it an 
aggravation of a people's sin, when they follow their 
fathers in it, and take not warning by their falls. The 
son that foUowelh his father in his sins, shall die, and 
he that takes warning and avoideth his father's sins, 
shall live. EzehieJ xviii. 

7. Our forefathers might be saved that sinned in 
the dark, and yet we be damned if we follow them in 
the light; or at least we shall be beaten with more 
stripes than they, if both must perish. They had not 
our means, or liberty. If they had seen and heard 
Avhat we have done, many of them would have repented 
long ago in sackcloth and ashes. Shall we sin wil- 
fully after the knowledge of truth, because our fath- 
ers sinned ignorantly for want of information? 


Popish Despotism. 

Another of their frauds is this; Pretend'uig to a 
divine institution, and natural excellency of a visible 
monarchical govarnment of the church. And so they 
would derive it from Peter, from Christ or from na- 
ture, and God the author of nature. 

All their writings take this as their strength. I shall 
refer chiefly to a cheating consultation, by Boverius, 
Ratione vera fidei, (S^c. ad Carolum Principem, in- 
tended for the perverting of Charles I. then in Spain. 

Part I.Reg. 6. he asserteth, that " besides Christ 
the invisible head of the church, there is a necessity 
that we acknowledge another certain visible head sub- 
rogate to Christ, and instituted of him, without which 
none can be a member of Christ, or any way subsist 

He begins his proof with a cheat, as gross as com- 
mon, an abuse of Cyprian's words, /. 1. Ep. 3. where 
Cyprian speaks for the necessity of obeying one in the 
church, meaning a particular church, as the whole 
scope of his epistle testifieth : and this man would 


make the simple believe that he speaks of the univer- 
sal church. 

K His reasons proceed thus: He tells us, that " the 
invisible God thinks meet to govern the world by vis- 
ible men." Who denies that Christ also governeth his 
church by men ? 

But he concludeth hence; "Still we believe that 
Christ doth govern his church in another way than 
God governeth the whole world ?" Doth not this man 
give up the cause of the pope, and say as much against 
it fundamentally as Protestant ? " We must not believe 
that Christ doth govern the church in any other way 
than God doth govern the world." But saith common 
sense and experience ; God doth not govern the whole 
world by any one, two, or ten, universal vice-monarchs : 
therefore Christ doth not govern the church by any 
one universal vice-monarch. 

His next reason is, '• Because Christ was a visible 
monarch once on earth himself: and if the church 
had need of a visible monarch then, it hath need of it 
still." 1. Here the reader may see, that it is to no 
less than to be Christ's successor, or a vice-Christ, that 
the pope prelendeth. And then the reason, if it were 
of any worth, would as well prove, that there must be 
one on earth still that may give the Holy Ghost imme- 
diately, and make articles of faith de novo, and laws 
for the church with promise of salvation, and may ap- 
point new offices and orders in the whole church, &c. 
And why not one also to live without sin, and die for 
our sins, and rise again, and be our Saviour? And 
why not one to give us his own body and blood in the 
sacrament ? 

2. Christ himself doth oppose himself to all terres- 
tial inhabitants, saying; One is your master even 
Christ. Be not ye called masters ? but he that is 
greatest among you shall be your servant. Be not ye 
called Rabbi, for one is your master even Christ, and 
all ye are brethren. J»f^^ xxiii. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Where 
most evidently he shows that neither Peter, or any of 
his own disciples were to be called masters, as Christ 
was, nor was any such to be on earth, and so no vice- 
Christ ; yea that all his apostles being brethren, were 



not to be masters one to another, but servants : so that 
here is a plain bar put in against any of Peter's mas- 
tership or headship of the universal church. Hence, 
it follows not that we must still have a Christ on earth, 
because we once had. 

3. Christ hath chosen another vicar, though invisi- 
ble, as Tertullian calls him; and that is, the Holy Ghost, 
whom he sent to make such supply as was necessary, 
by vari()us gifts proportioned to the several states and 
members of the church. 

4. If Christ would have left a vice-Christ upon 
earth, w^hich should have been an essential part, even 
the head oi his church: he would doubtless have plainly 
expressed it in Scripture, and described his office and 
power, and given him directions to exercise it, and us 
directions how to know which is he, and to obey him ; 
but there is not a word of any such matter in the 
Scripture, nor antiquity ; when yet is a point of such 
unspeakable importance? 

5. You might as well feign, that if it were then 
necessary to have twelve or thirteen apostles, it is so 
still: and, if then it was necessary to have the gift of 
tongues and miracles, it is so still: of which the pope 
himself is void. 

6. It is not enough for your silly wit, to say it is fit 
that Christ have a successor, therefore he hath one: 
but let him that claimeth so high an honor as to be the 
vice Christ, produce his commission, and prove his 
claim it he will be believed. 

7. Christ is still the visible head of his church, seen 
in heaven, and as much seen in heaven, and as much 
Been over all the world, except Judea and Egypt, as 
ever he was. When he was on earth, he was not visible 
at Rome, Spain, Asia, &c. He that is emperor of the 
Turkish Monarchy, perhaps was never personally a 
hundred miles from Constantinople. The King of 
Spain is no visible monarch in the West Indies. If all 
the world except Judea might be without a present 
Christ, then why that may not as well as the rest you 
may give him nn account, if you will tie him to be 
here resident. 

8. If the pope would usurp no more power than 


Christ exercised visibly on eartli, he wouhi not then 
divide inheritances, nor beatipmporal princo, nor wear 
a triple crown nor keep a court and retinue, nor depose 
princes, nor deny thein tribute, nor exempt his prelates 
from it, nor from their judgment seats, nor absolve 
their subjects from their fidelity, &c. nor trouble the 
world as now he doth. He would not exercise the 
power of putting any to death ; much less would he 
set up in([uisitions, to burn poor people for reading the 
Scriptures, or not being of liis mind. 

He makes Christ tlie " visible pope while he was 
on earth, and tells us that promulgating the Gospel, 
sending apostles, instituting sacraments, &c. weie Pon- 
tificalia iiumcra, Papal ofiices.'' AVas Christ a pope: 
and is the pope a Christ ? Jesus I know : and Peter 
and Paul I know : but this vice-Christ I know not. If 
indeed the vice-Christ have power to do those Papal 
works, to promulgate a new Gospel, to send out Apos- 
tles, to institute sacraments, &c. as Christ did, let us 
but know which be the pope's sacraments, and which 
be Christ's; which be the pope's Apostles, and which 
be Christ's ; and which be the pope's Grospel, and 
which is Christ's, and we shall use them accordingly. 
The law and testimony will help us to distinguish 

He tells us as Card. RicliUcu and the rest commonly 
do, that "it is no dishonor to Christ to have a deputy, 
no more than ior the king of England to have a deputy 
or vice-king in Ireland." But our first question is, 
whether de facto such a thing be .'* Prove that Christ 
hath commissioned a vice-Christ, and we will not pre- 
sume to say that he hath dishonored himself. 

Though it should not dishonor Christ, it is such a 
transcendent honor to man, as we will not believe that 
any man hath, that proveth not his claim. It was no 
dishonor to the Godhead to be united to the manhood 
of Christ in personal union ; but if the pope say that 
the Godhead is thus united to his manhood I will not 
believe him. 

Though we should not have presumed to question 
Christ if he had done it, yet we must presume to tell 
the pope that he is guilty of dishonoring Christ by his 


usurpation. Because he sets up himself as vice-Christ, 
without his commission ; and takes that to himself, 
Christ's prerogative. God saith, " This is my beloved 
son in whom lam well pleased, hear him: And the 
Papists.say of the Pope, " This is the vice-Christ, hear 
him." • Because the power of the king is more com- 
municable, than the power of Christ, it being such as 
is fit for one mere man as well as for another. But 
the power of Christ is such as no mere man is fit for. 
The capacity of the subject is considerable as necessa- 
ry to the reception of the form of power. He that is 
God as well as man is fit for a universal monarchy, 
when he that is mere man is not. Whence we ar- 
gue thus: — If there was never such a thing by God's 
institution as a mere man to be the Christ or universal 
head of the church, then there is no such thing to be 
imagined now : but there never was such a thing. 

Christ that was the visible head was God and man : 
when the pope is so, we will believe in him, as his suc- 

The reading of their immodest arguings, to prore 
the pope to be the vice-Christ on earth, doth exceedingly 
increase my suspicion that he is the Antichrist. For 
to be Peter's successor, as a first Apostle, is a contempt- 
ible thing in those men's eyes. This is not it that they 
plead for. Bellarmin expressly tells us, that the pope 
succeeds not Peter as an Apostle: it is as a vice-Christ 
to the whole church, as Boverius maintaineth: and 
this they -make the foundation of their catholic church, 
and the acknowledgment of it essential to every mem- 
ber of it. 


Scripture Evidence. 

Another of their devices is, to take noUdng as evi- 
dence from Scripture ; but ike letters or express words. 

They will not endure to hear of consequences, no 
nor synonymous expressions. Bellarmin himself saith, 


Verb. Dei, Lib. 3. Cap. 3. " It is agreed between us 
and our adversaries, that efficient arguments should 
be sought from the literal sense alone : for that sense 
which is immediately collected from the wortls, is the 
certain reasoning of the Holy Spirit." Cardinal Per- 
ron in his reply against King James devised this 
deceit: but Gonter and Veronius the Jesuits have per- 
fected it. Vedelius shows; Rationale Theologicum 
Cap. 6. that it was hatched in Germany by the Luth- 
erans for the defending of consubstantiation, and from 
them borrowed by the revolter Perron ; whose father 
was a Protestant ; but the sons of profligacy being in- 
tolerable to the Huguenot Christians he became a Pa- 
pist. Voctiits Cans. Disp. Pap. 

Our judgment in this point, I shall lay down dis- 
tinctly. 1. The Holy Scripture is the doctrine, testa- 
ment and law of Christ. And we shall add nothing to 
it, nor take aught from it. The use of it as a doctrine, 
is to inform us of the will of God in points there writ- 
ten. The use of it as a testament, is to signify to us 
the last will of our Lord concerning our duty and sal- 
vation. The use of it as a law, is to appoint us our 
duty and reward or punishment ; and to be the rule of 
our obedience^ by which we shall be judged. 

2. All laws are made to reasonable creatures, and 
suppose the use of reason for the understandingof them. 
To use reason about the law, is not to add to the law. 

3. The subject must have this use of reason to dis- 
cern the sense of the law that he may obey it : and 
the judge must rationally pass the sentence by it. 

4. This is the application of the law to the fact and 
person : and though the fact in person be not in the 
law, yet the application of the law to the fact and per- 
son is no addition to it. Otherwise to use any such thing 
would be to add to it. 

5. As the fact is distinct from the law, so must the 
sentence of the judge be, which results from both. 

6. To speak the sense or thing in equipollent terms, 
is not to the law in matter or sense : else we must not 

7. Yet we maintain the Scripture sufficiency in 
terms and sense, so that we shall confess that equipol- 


•^90 JESUET 

lent words are only Holy Scripture as to sense, but no^' 
as to the terms ; even translations themselves. 

8. But there is no law but may many ways be bro- 
ken, and no doctrine but may be divers ways opposed. 
And therefore though we yield, that nothing but the 
express words of God are the Scripture, for terms and 
sense, yet many thousand words may be against Scrip- 
ture, that be not there expressly forbidden in terms.^ 

The law of nature is God's law, and the light of na- 
ture is his levelation. And therefore that which the 
light of nature seeth immediately in nature, or that 
which it seeth from Scripture and nature compared 
together, and soundly concludeth from these premises, 
is truly a revelation from God. 

10. The conclusion followeth the more from the 
premises, in point of evidence or certainty to us 
Where the Scripture is the more dark, there the con- 
clusion is of the Scripture faith : but where the fact 
or proposition fi'om the light of nature is more weak, 
there the conclusion is of natural evidence: but in both, 
of divine discovery. For there is no truth and light 
but from God the father of lights. 

Now for the Papists, you may see their folly thus ; 
if nothing but the bare word of law may be heard in 
trials, then all laws in the world are void and vain. 
For the subjects be not all named in them ; nor the fact 
named: and what then have witnesses, and jurors, and 
judges to do ? The promise saith, he that beiieveth 
shall be saved : but it doth not say that Bellarmin or 
Veronius beiieveth : doth it follow, that therefore they 
may make no use of it for the comforting of their souls 
in the hopes of salvation .'' The threatening saith, that 
he that beiieveth not is condemned : but it saith not 
that such or such a man beiieveth not : should they 
not therefore fear the threatening ? 

By this trick they would condemn Christ himself 
also, as adding to the law in judgment. He will say 
to them, I was hungry and ye fed me not, &c. But 
where said the Scripture so, that such or such a man 
fed not Christ? Christ knows the fact without the 
Scripture. The Scripture is sufficient to its own use, 
to be the rule of obedience and judgment; but it is not 
sufficient to every other use which it was never made 



kor. The law said to Cain, thou shak not murdiT. Bui 
it is not said to him, thou hast killed thy brother, tliere- 
forethoii shall die. It was the judge's part to deliver this. 

By this trick they would give a raan leave to vent 
any blasphemy, or do any villainy, changing but the 
name. But they shall find that the law intended not 
bare words, but by words to signify things : and if they 
do the things prohibited, or hold the opinions condemn- 
ed, whatever names or words they clothe them with, 
they shall feel the punishment. 

By this they would leave almost nothing provable 
by the Scripture, seeing a Papist or heretic may put 
the same into other terms, and then call for the proof of 
that. For example, they may ask where God com- 
mandeth or institateth any of the sacraments in Scrip- 
ture? And when we tell them where Baptism and 
the Lord's Supper was instituted, they may reply, that 
there is no mention of Sacraments ; and so turn real 
"ontroversies into verbal. 

By this they would make all translations to be of 
"little use. A man might lawfully sin in English, be- 
cause God forbad it only in Hebrew and Greek. 

Let them tell us what Scripture saith, that Peter was 
the vicar of Christ, or the head of the catholic church: 
or the bishop of Rome, or that the pope is his succes- 
sor, or that the pope is the vice-Christ, or universal 
bish:)p. Where is there express Scripture for any of 
this? or so much as Bellarmin's literal sense? 

Why do not those blind and partial men see, that 
the same course also must be taken with their own laws? 
And all their decretals and canons are insufficient, ac- 
cording to these rules. It is easy for any heretic to 
form u^ his error into other words than those con- 
demned by pope or council: and if you go again to 
the pope, and get him to condemn those new expres- 
sions, the men in Mexico may use them long to the det- 
riment of the souls of men, before the damnatory sen- 
tence be brought to them. And when it comes they 
can again word their heresy anew. The Jansenists 
in France show how well the pope's decision of wordy 
controversies is understood, and doth not avail. But if 
they will hold that no part of the pope's laws oblige 
hut in the literal sense, or that none offend that violate 


not the letter, they will make a great alteration in their 
affairs. Any of their subjects may blaspheme the pope 
himself in French, Dutch, Irish, English, Slavonian, 
«&c. because he forbids it only in Latin ; for if transla- 
tion be not God's word then they are not the pope's 
word neither. A pretty crotchet for a Jesuit ! It is said 
that a traitor or murderer may be hanged : but it is not 
said that such or such a man shall be hanged ; or that 
he was a traitor or murderer. Whitaker Disput. 
Script. Sac. Quest. 2. Cap. 10. 

Their common instance is; "The Scripture no 
where calls itself the whole word of God ; nor no 
where tells us which be the canonical books, &c. and 
yet those are articles of faith." The Scripture doth 
call itself the word of God, and signifies its own suffi- 
ciency, and several books have particular testimonies to 
be canonical. Though secondarily so far as Scripture 
affirmeth its own divinity, it should be believed : yet pri- 
maril}', that this is God's word, and that these are the 
books, and that they are not corrupted, nnd that they are 
all, &c. are points of knowledge antecedent in order of 
nature to divine belief of them. There are two great 
foundations antecedent to the matter of divine faith. 
The one is God's veracity; that God cannot lie: the 
other is, his revelation ; that this is God's word: the first 
is the formal object of faith. The second is a neces- 
sary medium between the formal object and the subject, 
without which there is no possibility of believing. The 
material object called the articles of faith, presupposes 
both these, as points of knowledge, proved to us by 
their proper evidence. And that this is all the word of 
God, is a mere consequence, from the actual tradition of 
this much and no more. 

To give you an undeniable illustration. Let us 
inquire which be the administering laws of this com- 
monwealth. We shall find that the law-giver is none 
of them ; for that is in the constitution, before the ad- 
ministration : and it is the formal object of every law, 
which is more noble than the materi^il object. The 
promulgation of these laws is not itself a law; but a 
necessary medium to the actual obligation of the law. 
That there is no other laws but these, is not a law; 
but a point known by the non-promulgation of more. 

JUODLING. '^\)o 

That all these laws are the same that they pretend to 
be, and that they are not changed or depraved since, 
this is not a law neither, but a truth to be proved by 
vommon reason, from the evidences that may be brought 
from records, practise, and abundance more. 

So is it in our case. Tliat God is true, and the sov- 
'^reign rector, is a point first to be known by evidence, 
'he one being the I'ormal object of faith, and the other 
the formal object of obedience: and easily proved by 
natural light before we come to Scripture. That this 
is God's revelation, or promulgation of his law, is a 
point also first to be proved by reason; not before we 
see the book or hear the word, but out of the book or 
doctrine itself, with the full historical evidence, and 
many other reasons, whirh in order of nature lie before 
our obligation to believe. So that this is not primarily 
an article of faith, but somewhat hio-her as beino- the 
necessary medium of our believing. That there is no 
other law, or faith, is not primarily a law or article of 
faith, but a truth proved by the non-revelation or pro- 
mulgation of any other to the world. He that will 
prove us obliged to believe more, must prove the valid 
promulgation or revelation of more. That these books 
are the same, and not corrupted, is not directly and 
primarily a law or article of faith, but a historical ver- 
ity to be proved, and yet Scripture is witnesss to all or 
most of these, and so they are of faith. 

Thus it is manifest, that it is an unreasonable de- 
mand of the Papists to call for express Scripture, for 
those things that are not articles of faith in a proper 


Unfair DisptUants. 

One of their practical deceits consisteth in the choos- 
ing of such persons to dispute with, against whom they 
find that ihey have some notable advantage. 

Commonly they deal with women and ignorant peo- 



pie in secret, who they know are not able to gainsay 
their falsest silliest reasonings. Naked Popery ; error 
of unvritten Iradition. 

If they deal with a iVIinister, it is usually with one 
that hath some at least of these disadvantages. Either 
with some young or weak unstudied man, that is not 
versed in their way of controversy. Or one that is 
not of so voluble and plausible a tongue as others. 
For they know how much the tonguing and toning of 
the matter doth take with the common people. Or 
with one that hath a discontented people, that bear him 
some ill will, and are ready to hearken to any one that 
contradicteth him. Or else with one who hath fixed 
upon some unwarrantable notions, and is like to deal 
with them upon terms that will not hold. If they see 
one hole in a man's way of arguing, they will turn all 
the brunt of the contention upon that, as if the discove- 
ry of his peculiar error or weakness were the confuta- 
tion of his cause. None give them greater advantage 
there, than those that run into some contrary extreme. 
They think to be Orthodox by going as far from Pope- 
ry as the furthest. About many notions in the matter 
of justification, certainty of salvation, the nature of 
Jaith,.the use of works, &c. they will be sure to go 
with the furthest. A .Jesuit desires no better sport, 
than to have the baiting of one that holds any such 
opinion, as he knows himself easily able to disgrace. 
One unsound opoinion or argument is a great disad- 
vantage to the most learned disputant. Most of all the- 
insultings andsuccess ofthe Papists, are from some such 
unsound passages that they pick up from some wri- 
ters. They set all those together, and tell the world 
that this is the Protestant religion. Just as if I should 
2;ive the descrintion of a nobleman from all the blem- 
ishes that ever I saw in one nobleman. As if I have 
seen one crook-backed, another blind, another lame, 
another dumb, another deaf, another a drunkard, &c. 
I should say, that a nobleman is a drunkard, that hath 
neither eyes, nor ears, nor limbs to bear him, &c. So 
deal they by protestants. What a character could we 
give of Papists on those terms? 

I would intreat all the ministers of Christ to take 
heed of giving them any such advantage. By over- 


doing, and running to far into contrary extremes, you 
will sooner advantage them, and give them the day, 
than the weakest disputants that stand on safer grounds. 
Inconsiderate heat and self conceitedness, and making 
a faction of religion, carry many into extremes: when 
judgment, and charity and experience, are all for stand- 
ing on the safe ground. 


Fraudulent Divisions. 

Another of their practical frauds is this; seeking 
to divide the Protestants among themselves, or to 
break them into sects, or poiso7i the ductile sort loiih 
heresies, and then to draw them to some odious ]jrac- 
iices, to cast a disgrace on the Protestant cause. 

In this and similar hellish practices, they have been 
more successful than in all their disputations; and thus 
the cause of hell must be upheld. 

If their own priests are to be believed, Watson^s 
important considerations, Jesuits have set many nations 
in those, flames, whose cause the world hath not ob- 
served. John Brown, in his voluntary confession to a 
committee of parliament, said ; " The whole Christian 
world dotii acknowledge the prediction which the uni- 
versity of Paris did foresee in two several decrees they 
made Anno 1565, when the society of Jesuits did labor 
to be members of that university : That race of men is 
born for the destruction of Christianity and the subver- 
sion of literature." They were the only cause of the trou- 
bles which fell out in Muscovy, when under pretence of 
reducing the Latin church, and plant themselves, and 
destroy the Greek church, King Demetrius and his 
dueen, and those that followed him from Poland, were 
all in one night murdered by the monstrous usurper of 
the crown, and the true progeny rooted out. They 
were the only cause that moved the Swedes to take 
arms against their lawful King Sigismund, and chased 
him to Poland: and neither he nor his successors were 
ever able to take possession of Sweden. For the Jes- 

'^96 JESUIT 

uits' intention was to bring in the Romish religion, and 
root out Protestants. They were the only cause that 
moved the Polonians to take arms against the said Sig- 
ismund, because they had persuaded him to marry two 
sisters, one after the other ; both of the house of Austria. 
They have been the sole cause of the war entered in 
Germany, since the year 1619, as Pope Paul V. told 
the General of their order, Vicelescus : for their ava- 
rice, pretending to take all the church lands from the 
Flussites in Bohemia to themselves, which hath caused 
the death of many thousands by sword, famine and 
pestilence in Germany. They have been the cause of 
civil wars in France, during all which time moving 
the French King to take arms against his own Protes- 
tant subjects, where innumerable people have lost 
their lives, as the seige of Rochelle and other places 
give sufficient proof. For the Jesuits' intentions were 
to set their society in all cities and towns conquered by 
the king, and quite to abolish the Protestants. They 
w^ere the cause of the murder of the last king of France. 
They were the only projectors of the gunpowder trea- 
son, and their penitents the actors thereof They were 
the only cause that incensed the pope to send so many 
fulminate Bulls to these kingdoms, to hinder the oath 
of allegiance and lawful obedience to their temporal 
prince. Their damnable doctrine to destroy and de- 
pose kings, hath been the cause of the civil wars, 
likely to befal these kingdoms, if God in mercy do not 
stop it. Prynne' s Introduction. 

If their own pens are to be credited, those very 
actions of the Swedes, Germans, French, which 
they cast, as a reproach in the face of the Protestant, 
as you may see in a book called The Images of the 
two Churches, were indeed their own and to be laid 
at their own doors. 

How far they were the causes of the old broils in 
Scotland, Knox and Spotswood and all their latter 
histories will tell you. 

How busy they were in England in Queen Eliz- 
abeth's days, the pope's Bulls, and the many treach- 
eries committed signify. Moulin'' s answer to Philanax. 

' JUCGLINO. 297 

C U A V T I-: R X X X V 11 . 

Popish ConceAment. 

Another practical fraud of the Paj)ist3 is, In hiding 
themselves and their rcUgiun^ that they may do their 
work ivith the more advantage. 

I. The principal means by which they conceal them- 
selves is, by thrusting themselves into all sects and par- 
ties, and putting on the vizor of any side, as their 
cause rcquircth. It is well known that formerly we 
had abundance of them that went under the name of 
Protestants, and were commonly called by the name of 
Church Papists: but there is great reason to think that 
there are more such now. Some of them are prelatists, 
and some of them call themselves independents, some 
creep in among the Baptists, some "o under the cloak of 
Arminians, some of Socinians, and some of Millenians. 
They animate all the Jugglers and hiders of the times. 
Thev keep life in libertinism, and infidelity itselfl 
Among every one of tliose parties you may find them, 
if you have the skill of unmasking them. 

Another way of hiding themselves is, by having a 
dispensation to come to any of our assemblies, or join 
in worship with any party good or bad. Or else they 
will prove it lawful without a dispensation, where the 
j>ope interdicteth it not. Their way is this : all the old 
known Papists, especially of the poorer sort, shall bo 
forbidden to come to our assemblies, lest they bring the 
blot of levity and temporizing on their religion, and 
lest there should not be a visible party among them to 
countenance their cause. But the new j)roselylcs, espec- 
ially such as are of any power and interest in the world, 
and may do them more service in a masked way, and 
can fairly avoid the imputation of Popery, those shall 
have leave to come to our assemblies, when their cause 
may make advantage of it. That you may see I feign 
not all this of them, besides the proof from certain ex- 
perience which we daily see ; I lay before you the de- 
cisions of one of their principal directors, in this work 
of propagating their faith ; Thom a Jesu de Convcrs, 
Gentium. How far they are for favoring of heathens 


and infidels, and liberty of conscience for them, for all 
tlieir cruelty to Protestants, you may see; Lib. 5. Dub. 
4. where he tells you that the sentence commonly re- 
ceived, in the schools is, that it is not lawful for Chris- 
tian princes to use any force against infidels, for sins 
against the law of nature itself: and citeth Cajet. Vic- 
toria, Covarruv. Greg de valent. He decides it in the . 
middle way of Azorius, " that pagans may not be pun- 
ished for despising the honor and worship of God, 
though they may for not giving every man his own, 
and for theft, murder, false witness, and other sins that 
are against men's right." 

Lib. 5. part. 1. Dub. 6. he teacheth, that " a catho- 
lic living among heretics ma}', when the scandalizing 
of others forbid it not, for fear of death, go to the tem- 
ples of heretics, and be among them in their meetings, 
and assemblies^, because of itself it is a thing indifferent ; 
for a man may for many causes go to the temples of 
heretics, and be among thorn in their assemblies ; 
that he may the easier and more effectually and com- 
modiously confute their errors, or on other just occa- 
sions, unless accidentally it scandalize others. As Azor- 
ius saith, he may do it to obey a prince, though he be 
an heretic, when he feareth the loss of his honor, main- 
tenance or life : for in this he only obeyeth his prince : 
especially if among the Papists he openly affirm, that 
he doth it only to obey his prince, and not to profess 
the heretical sect : for by that open attestation he avoid- 
eth the offence and danger of catholics, and well de- 
clineth the unjust vexation of the prince." 

Papists may eat ilesh on days when their church for- 
bids it, to hide themselves among heretics." Dub. 5. 
So that the Papists are abundantly provided for their 
security, against such as would discover them when it 
gtands not with their ends to disclose themselves. 

Another most effectual way of hiding themselves is, 
by equivocation or mental reservations, which we call 
lying, when they are examined about their religion, their 
orders or their actions. Lying that hurtetli not another, 
they maintain to be but a venial sin, which say they 
is properly no sin at all. To equivocate or reserve 
one half of your answer to yourselves, say the Jes- 
uits is- not lying, nor unlawful, in case a man's interest 


icqiiiretli him to do it^ Thnjiias a Jcsu the Cannclite, 
Dub. 4. seciirclh them sufl'»cienlly : his question is ; 
" Whether one tiiat tlenyeth it when he is asked of a 
heretic wiietlicr he he a priest, or a rclipfio\is man or 
whether lie heard divine service, do sin against the con- 
fession of faith 1" lie answereth ; No: for liiat is no 
denying himself to he a Christian, or catholic : for it 
is lawful to dissemble or hide the person of a clergy- 
nian or a religious man, without a lie in words, lest a 
man be betrayed and in danger of his life ; and for the 
same cause he may lay by his liabit, omit prayers, 
&,c. — because human laws for the most part bind noi 
the subject's conscience, when there is great hazard 
of life as in this case Azorius hath well taught." 
Just. Mor. Tom. 1. lib. 8. c. 27. So that by the con- 
sent of most, there is no danger to a Papist in any 
such case from his own confession. 

Another way of hiding their religion and them- 
selves, is by false oaths, which we call wilful perjury, 
but the Jesuits take for a lawful thing, when a mental 
reservation or equivocation supplieth the want of ver- 
bal truth. Who will ever want so easy, so obvious, 
so cheap a remedy against all danger of perjury, as a 
mental reservation is '? 

The pope can sufficiently dispense with any of 
their oaths of fidelity or allegiance,. Hear the words 
of one of their owji priests — Brown's Voluntary Con- 
fess, in Pri/nnc's Introducf. He saith ; "It is strange 
to see the stratagems which they use with their pen- 
itents concerning the oath of allegiance ! If they be 
poor, they tell them flatly when they are demanded 
to take the oath, that it is damnable and no ways to 
be allowed by the church : If they be of the richer 
sort, they say they may do as their conscience will 
inspire them. And there be some of them that make 
no conscience at all, to have it taken so oft as they 
are demanded. What would you have more, than such 
discoveries by themselves 1 

II. What get they by this hiding? WHiy screen them- 
selves from danger, and more easily prevail to muln- 
ply their sect : for worldly persons would not so 
easily flock into them without some such security 
from suffering. They preserve those that are come 


over to them from revolting, by the discouragement of 
suffering, especially the rich and honorable. They an- 
gle for souls with the less suspicion, when they stand 
behind the bush. Papists are become so distasted 
with the people by the powder plot, and many other 
of their pranks, that they may take more with them, 
if they come masked under another name. By tliis 
means they may openly revile and oppose the min- 
istry, and ordinances, churches, and Protestant doc- 
trine, without disturbance by the magistrate. A Pa- 
pist in a Protestant's coat may rail at us and our 
doctrine in the open streets, and market place, and 
call us all to naught, and teach abundance of their own 
opinions without control. And many a poor soul will 
take a Papist into their bosom, and familiarly hear him, 
and easily swallow down what they say, that would be 
afraid of them if he knew them to be Papists. By this 
means they have easier access to a greater number than 
openly they could have : and they insinuate into our 
c<3unsels, and know all our ways, and how to resist us. 
But above all, by this means they are capable of any 
office and trust among us. It is easy therefore to discern 
that their principal artifice lyeth in hiding themselves, 
so there be a visible body of their open professors ; 
those deceivers who have such stretching consciences. 

III. But how shall these hiders be detected"? Suspect 
all tliat use a mask, and purposely hide their minds. A 
man that intendeth deceit, what ever his end be, should 
not take it ill to be suspected for a deceiver. God is 
so good a master that no body should be ashamed of 
him. Truth is so amiable, that the genuine sons of 
truth are not ashamed of it. True religion assureth 
men of that which will save them harmless, and bear out 
against all the malice of earth and hell, and repair all 
the losses that they can sustain in the defending of it. 
But saith one ; "Would you not hide your mind or re- 
ligion in Spain ? " I would not whenever I found my- 
self capable of serving God most by the discovery, not 
make use of positive juggling and dissembling to hide 
my religion. If Christians among infidels, or Protes- 
tants among Papists, had thought this dissimulation 
lawful, there had not been so many thousands of them 
martyred or murdered as were. What opinion is it that 


brings men in England into any great danger at this 
(\a.Y? I will never be of a religion that is not worthy 
my open confession ; even to death, when there j.s .so 
much danger. 

The juggling Papists may be known thus, that they 
are always loosening people from their religion, and 
leading them into a dislike of what they have been 
taught; that they may be receptive of their new im- 

The juggling Papists may be much detected by this, 
that they are all upon the destructive part in their 
disputes, and very little on the assertive part. They 
pull down with both hands, but tell you not what they 
build up, till they have prepared you for the discovery. 
They tell you what they are against : but what they 
are for, you cannot draw out of them. As if any wise 
man will leave his house or grounds till he knows 
where to be better : or will forsake his staff that he 
leaneth on, or the food that he feedeth on, till he know 
where to have a better provision or support. Do they 
think wise men will be made irreligious? They deal 
by the poor people, as one that should say to passen- 
gers on shipboard; "What fools are you to venture 
your lives in such a ship that hath so much incumb- 
rance- and danger, and so many flaws, and but a few 
inches between you and death, and is guided by such 
a pilot as may betray you, or cast away your lives for 
aught you know ?'^ They know now that none but 
mad men v/ill be persuaded by such words as those to 
leap into the sea to escape those dangers ; and there- 
fore they do this but to make men willing to pass into 
their ship, and take them for their pilots. If you are 
wise therefore hold them to it, till they have shewed 
you a safer vessel and pilot. 

You may conjecture the quality of those jugglers, by 
their constant opposition against the ministry. It is 
ministers that are their eye-sore ; the hinderers of their 
kingdom. Could they but get down those, the day 
were their own. Therefore their main business, what- 
ever vizor they put on, is to bring the people mto a 
dislike or contempt of the ministry. They will rail 
at them. 



The juggling Papists, what vizor soever they wear, 
are commonly putting in the necessity of a judge of con- 
troversies, an infallible church, a state of perfection here, 
and the magnifying of our own inherent righteous- 
ness, without justification by the forgiveness of sin : 
and oppose the authority and sufficiency of Scripture ; 
which they impugn, and lead men aside to another rule, 
the Papal traditions. 


Jesuit Proselytism of men of Wealth and Influence. 

Another of their practical frauds is; their exceed- 
ing industry for the jperverting of men of power and 
interest, that are likely to do much in helping or hin- 
dering them. 

\ Be not too confident of your own understandings 
to deal with such jugglers in your own strength, with- 
out assistance. They have made it their study all 
their days, and are purposely trained up to deceive . 
whereas you are much wanting in their way of study, 
and much unfurnished to resist, how highly soever 
you may think of yourselves. 

2. Read learned solid writings against the Papists. 

3. Hearken not to Papists secretly, nor masked, nor 
coming to you by indirect and juggling ways : but 
open their persuasions, and call to some able studied 
divines to deal with them in your hearing, if needs you 
will hear them, that so you may hear one side as well 
as the other. 

4. Take heed_,! what retainers, servants, or familiars 
are about you. We fear not any thing that they can 
do in an open way, in comparison of their secret whis- 
pers and deceits, when there is no body to gainsay 
them. Had they the truth, we should be glad to en- 
tertain it with them. Let not all our peace and safety 
be hazarded by the self conceitedness, or imprudence 
of our rulers. Seeing it is you that must govern us 
or set the vulgar the pattern which they are so much 


addicted to imitate; wc adjure you in the name of the 
most High God, that you hearken not to seducers, and 
•corrupt tliosc intellects in which the whole nation hath 
so great an interest, We are willing to be as chan 
table to that proud throne of Rome, and usurping 
Vice-Christ, as will stand with the safety of our souls 
and of the church. But God forbid that v/e should 
be so blind, as to run into their pest-house, and drink 
the poison by which they are intoxicated. 


Popish Pet-jury and Treason. 

The most desperate of their practical frauds is this , 
Their treasons against the lives of 'princes, and the 
peace of nations, and their dissolving the bonds of oaths 
and covenants, and making perjury and rebellion 
duties and meritorious ivorks. 

Horrid treason and tyrannical usurpation over all ihe 
Christian Princes caused England, Denmark, Sweden, 
and many other princes to shake off the Roman yoke. 
Kings are not fully kings where the Pope is fully 

I need not tell the many treacheries since the refor- 
motion against our princes : or who it was that would 
have deposed as well as excommunicated Queen Eliz- 
abeth, and exposed her kingdoms to the will of others 
or who were the actors of the hellish powder plot. 
Do I need to mention their approving of the murdering 
of princes and the pretence of power to dispense with 
oaths of allegiance and fidelity, and who hath actually 
so oft pretended to expose princes and their dominions 
to the first occupant? Many in England disowned 
that doctrine : but the pope having owned and practis- 
ed it; by disowning it they disown popery itself. It is 
an article of their faith; and essential to their religion, 
and is determined by a pope and the approved general 
council at Lateran under Pope Innocent III. 

Albineus the Jesuit heard the murderer of Henry 


IV. confess before he did the fact, and put off the exam- 
iners with this answer, that God had given him that 
special gift to forget when once he had absolved a sin 
ner whatsoever was confessed by him. Why was it 
that France expelled the Jesuits and set up a pillar of 
remembrance of their villanies, till Henry IV. grati- 
fied the Pope by calling them in again, and told the 
Parliament the peril of it should be upon him and 
so it was; for it cost him his life. Why did the same 
Parliament of Paris, Novemb. 1610, condemn Bellar- 
min's book against Barclay, as an engine of treason and 
rebellion? And the Theological faculty of Paris, 
April 4. 1626, condemned Santarell's book as guilty 
of the same villany, stirring up people to rebellion and 
kinor-killinir: which the university confirmed : while 
the Parliament condemned the book to be burnt. 

Rivet recites of the answers of the Jesuits in Paris, 
when the Parliament asked them their judgment of 
that book: seeing: their general had approved the book, 
and judged the things that are there written to be cer- 
tain, whether the}'- were of the same mind ? They an- 
swered, that, " living at Rome he could not but approve 
what was there approved of." But say the Parliament: 
What think you ? say the Jesuits, " the contrary.'' Say 
the examiners, but what would you do if you were at 
Rome ? Say the Jesuits, "that which they do who are 
at Rome.'' At which said some of the Parliament, 
have thev one conscience at Rome, and another at 
-Paris .'' God deliver us from such confessors as those. 

But some of the Papists say that private men may 
not kill a king till he be deposed. Very true ! But it 
iS their doctrine, that. if once he be excommunicated, 
he is then no king, or if he be an heretic; and so 
bem^ no king, they may kill the man, and not kill the 
king. Suarez advers. Sect. Anglic, lib. 6. ca'p. 4. 
Sect. 14. Co.p. 6. Sect. 22, 24. Azorius Jcsuita Instil. 
Moral, 'part. 1. Z. 8. c. 13. Mysterium Patrum Jesui- 
farvm. Janseaian^s mystery of Jesuitism. Abbot's 
Antilogia ad Apolog. Eudccmojohan. But what need 
we more than the decrees of a pope and general coun- 
cil, and the practice of the church of Rome for ?o many 


For the pope's power to absolve from all oaths of 
allegiance and ficlelity, Pope Innocent III. and his 
approved general council have told the world enough 

The Papists have lately had the confidence to atfirm 
that the powder plot and the Spanish invasion in 1588, 
were not a quarrel of religion, nor owned by the pope. 

Cardinal Ossatus in his 87. Epist. to Villeroy, tells 
us that Pope Clement VIII, pressed the King of France 
to join with Spain in the invasion of Eng-land, and the 
cardinal answered that the king was tied by an oath 
to the Queen of England : to which the pope replied, 
that " The oath was made to a heretic, but he was 
bound in another oath to God and the pope; that kings 
and other princes do permit themselves all things which 
make for their commodity; and that the matter is gone 
so far that, that it is not imputed to them, or taken for 
their fault : and he alleged the saying of Francis Duke 
of Urbin, that indeed every one doth blame a noble- 
man, or great man that is no sovereign, if he keep 
not his covenants, or fidelity, and they account him in- 
famous ; but supreme princes may without any danger 
of their reputation, make covenants and break them, 
lie, betray, and perpetrate other such like things " 
That was Pope Clement VI I L Can we look for better 
from the rest? 

Thuanus a moderate Papist and impartial historian, 
tells, lib. 89. p. 248, 249, an. 15S8. that, "the Spaniards 
pretended to undertake the expedition only for relig- 
ion's sake, and therefore took with them Alarco vicar 
general of the Holy Inquisition, with Capuchins and 
Jesuits : and that they had with them the Pope's Bull, 
which they were to publish as soon as they landed; 
and that cardinal Allan was appointed as the pope's 
legate, to land at the same time, and with full power 
to see to the restorinf? of relio-ion. That the said bull 
had these expressions. ' The pope, by the power given 
from God by lawful succession of the catholic church, 
for the defection of Henry VIII. who forcibly sepa- 
rated himself and his people from the communion of 
Christians, which was promoted by Edward VI. and 
Elizabeth, who being pertinacious and impenitent in 
the same rebellion and usurpation — therefore the poT[}e 


;-)ti6 JESUIT 

jnciicd by the continual persuasions of n^any, and by 
the suppliant prayers of the Englishmen themselves, 
hath dealt with divers princes, and specirally the most 
potent King of Spain — to depose that v/oman, and pun- 
ish her pernicious adherents in their kingdom.' 
That Pope Sixtus before proscribed the Q,ueen, and 
took from her all her dignities, titles, and rights to the 
Kingdom of England and Ireland, absolving her sub- 
jects from the oath of fidelity and obedience: he charg- 
eth all men on pain of the wrath of God, that they afford 
her no favor, help, or aid, but use all their strength 
to bring her to punishment ; and then that all the En- 
glish join with the Spaniards as soon as he is landed : 
offering revrards and pardon for sin, to them that will 
lay hands on the Queen ; and so shewing on what 
conditions he gave the Kingdom to Philip of Spain.'* 

Yet some of the jugglers that say they are no Papists, 
persuade the world that Papists hold not the deposing 
of princes, nor absolving their subjects from the oaths 
of fidelity and that the Spanish invasion was merely 
on civil accounts, and that they expected not any En- 
glish Papists to assist them. 

Dominicus Ba'/ines in Thorn. 22. qu. 12. art. 2. saith, 
•' Quando adest Evide?is notitio., &c. when there is evi- 
dent knowledge of the crime, subjects may lawfully 
exempt themselves from the power of their princes, be- 
fore any declaratory sentence of a judge, so they have 
but strength to do it. Hence it follows that the faithful 
Papists of England and Saxony are to be excused, that 
do not free themselves from the power of their superi- 
ors, nor make war against them : because commonly 
they are not strong enough to manage those wars, and 
great dangers hang over them." You may see now 
how far the Papists are to be trusted : even as far a? 
they are sufficiently disabled. 

August. Triumphus saith, de potest. Eccles. qu. 46. 
art. 2. " Duhium no^i c^t quhipapapossit omnes reges. 
cvm .^ubest causa ratio7f.abiIis, deponere : there is no 
doubt but the pope may depose all kings, when there 
iS reasoriable cause for it " Is not this a Vice-Christ 
and a Vice-God ? 

Add to this, that th^ pope^is judge when the cause 


is reasonable, far no doubt he must judjc, if he must 
e.xecute ; and then you have a pope in his universal 
sovereignty, spiritual and temporal. 

Suarez and others say; when the pope hath deposed 
a king, any man may kill him. Mariana directs to 
poison him or secretly despatch him : dc reg instit^ 
Lib. 1. caj). 7. Suarez says; Defens. fid. Cat hoi. li. 6. 
c. 4. sect. 14. ''Post se/itentiarn, &c. After sentence 
past he is altogether deprived of his kingdom, so 
that he cannot by just title possess it: therefore from 
thence forward he may be handled as a mere tyrant; 
and consequently any private man may kill him " 

I conclude with one testimony of a Roman Rabbi, 
cited by Usher, Epistol. J. R. 1609, who hath excused 
the powder-plot from the imputation of cruelty, "be- 
cause both seeds and root of an evil herb must be 
destroyed," and adds a derision of the simplicity of 
the king in imposing on them the oath of allegiance, 
in the most memorable expressions, worthy to be en- 
graven on a marble pillar. " Sed vide in tanta astutia, 
quanta sit simplicitas ! &c. But see what simplicity 
here is in so great a craft ! When he had placed all 
his security in that oath ; he thought he had framed 
such a manner of oath, with so many circumstances, 
which no man could any way dissolve with a safe con- 
science. But he could not see, that if the pope dis- 
solved the oath, all its knots, whether of being faithful 
to the king or admitting no dispensation, are accor- 
dingly dissolved. I will say a thing even more admi- 
rable. You know I believe, that an unjust oath, if it be 
evidently known to be such, or openly declared such, 
obligeth no man. That the king's oath is unjust, is 
sufficiently declared by the pastor of the church him- 
self. You see now that the obligation of it is vanished 
into smoke, and that the bond which so many wise 
men thought was made of iron, is less than straw." 
These are the words of Papists themselves 
Renounce your treacherous principles, and we will 
cease to charge you with them. Let a general coun- 
cil and pope but decree the contrary to what the fore- 
cited pope and general council have decreed; or else 
do you all declare that you think that pope and coun- 


cil erred, and then you will either cease to be true Pa 
pists, or at least become tolerable members of human 
societies. Why doth not the pope himself condemn 
those doctrines, if really he disowns them ? 


Popish Persecution and Slaughter. 

Their last course when all others fail, is, to turn 
from fro.ud to force, and o'pen violence, stirring up 
princes to wars and bloodshed; that they may destroy 
the professors of the reformed religon, as far as they 
are able, and do that by flames and sword, by halters 
and hatchets, which they cannot do by argument. 
Hence have proceeded the bloody butcheries of the 
Waldenses and Albigenses, the wars in Bohemia, the 
league and wars and Massacres in France, the desola- 
ting wars of Germany, the plots, invasions and wars 
m England. Most of the flames in Christendom have 
been kindled for the pope by his agents, that he might 
warm him by that fire by which others are consumed. 
Hence his own pretences to the temporal sword, and 
so many volumes written to justify it, and so many 
tragedies acted in the execution. Yet these men cry 
up antiquity and tradition. What bishop in all the 
world for above three hundred years after Christ, did 
ever claim or exercise the temporal sword, as much as 
to be a justice of peace? It was their judgment that 
It did not belong to them. Neither the pope nor any 
bishop on earth, as such, hath anything to do with the 
coercive power of the sword; nor may not inflict the 
smallest penalty on body or purse, but only guide men 
by the word of God ; and the utmost penalty they can 
inflict is, to excommunicate them. They have nothing 
to do to destroy men, when they have excommunicated 
them, nor to cause the magistrate to do it : but rather 
should still endeavor their conversion. Synesius Epis- 
tol. 57. Why doth not the pope when he hath past 
his excouimunications, content himself that he hath 


done his part: but he must excite princes, and force 
them to execute his rage, and fall upon the lives and 
dominions of such princes as he will call heretical? 
He knows how small account would be made of his 
thunder-bolts, if he had not a secular arm to follow them. 
If it were not for arms and violence, lie would soon be 
cast out by the Christian world. 

The same doctrine also Bernard taught the pope 
himself, Ad Eiigeu. P. R. dc Considerat. I 2. ''Quid 
tibi dimisit Apostolus? &c. What did the holy apos- 
tle leave thee? Such as I have, saith he, that give I 
to thee ; and what was that ? One thing J am sure of; 
it was not gold, nor silver, when he said himself, sil- 
ver and gold have I none. It thou canst claim this 
by any other title, so let it be; but not by apostolical 
right: for he could not give thee that which he had 
not : such as he had, he gave, a care of the churches, 
but did he give thee a domination ? Hear himself. Nci 
as lords or ruling lords, saith he, in the heritage, but 
as examples of the flock. And lest thou think that he 
spoke it only in humility, and not in verity, it is the 
voice of the Lord himself in the Gospel : the kings of 
the Gentiles rule over them, and they that have power 
over them, are called benefactors, but you shall nor 
be so. It is plain that domination is forbidden the 
Apostles. Go thou therefore, and usurp ifthoudar- 
est, either apostleship whilst thou rulest as a Lord ; or 
a Lordly domination, while thou ar t Apostolic. Plainly 
thou art forbidden one of the two : U thou wilt have 
both alike, thou losest both." Thus the pope and his 
bishops are deprived of both, by grasping at both lone- 

The pope makes himself a temporal prince in every 
prince's dominion on earth, where he is able to do it. 
and takes all the clergy out of their government into 
his own. So that actually he hath dispossessed them 
of part of their dominion already, by taking so consid- 
erable a part of their subjects from under their power. 
If any believe not that th-.' pope doth not thus exempt 
his clergy from the secular power, it is because he 
knows not their most notorious principles and practi- 
se.'=^ Even in England, in King- Charles' articles for 


the Spanish match, the pope had the confidence to de- 
mand that prerogative ; and therefore himself added to 
the sixteenth article, which freed them from laws 
about religion, " ecclesiastic persons shall be under no 
law, but of their superior ecclesiastics^ So that no 
church-man must be under any law of the land, or 
government of secular princes. When they have 
such a strength in our own garrison, a foreign enemy 
is easily lei in. To the exciting of whom they will 
never be wanting, having their agents, in one garb or 
other, at the ears of all the princes and states in Chris- 
tendom, and of most of the persons that are deeply 
interested in the government. With infidel princes 
sometimes, as Cyril the Patrick of Constantinople proved 
to the loss of his life, for being so much against the 
Papists. The more cause have all Christian princes 
and states to be vigilant against those incendiaries ; 
because they trust to war and violence, and build their 
kingdom on it, and therefore study it day and night. 
Because they have Jesuits all abroad continually upon 
the design ; whose contrivances and endeavors are 
day and night to bring nations to their will, and to 
kindle divisions and wars among them to attain their 
ends. If the Papists can but deceive the- rulers, they 
will give us leave to dispute, and write, and preach 
against them, and laugh at us that will stand talking 
only, while they are working : and when the sword 
is in their hand, they will soon answer all our argu- 
ments, with a fagot, a hatchet, or halter. Smithfield 
confuted the Protestants, that both the universities 
could not confute. Their inquisition is a school where 
they dispute more advantageously than in academies. 
Though all the learned men in the world could not 
confute the poor Albigenses, Waldenses and Bohemi- 
ans, jret by those iron arguments they had men that 
presently stopped the mouths of hundred thousands of 
them : even as Mohammedans confute the Christians. 
A strappado is a knotty argument. In how few days, 
did they confute thirty thousand Huguenots in and 
about Paris, till they left them not a word to say? In 
how few weeks space did the ignorant Irish thus stop 
the mouths of two hundred thousand Protestants ? Even 


in Ulster alone, about one hundred and fifty thousand 
men were mortally silenced. Alas i many of the poor 
Irish know little more of Christ, but that he is abetter 
man than Saint Patrick. How long might they have 
been before they could have silenced so many Protes- 
tants any other way ? There is nothing like stone- 
dead with a Papist. They love not to tire themselves 
with disputes, when the business may be more success- 
ful dispatched. 

Seeing this is the way that they are resolved on, 
and no peaceable motions will serve for the preventing 
it, all men that have any care of the church and cause 
of Jesus Christ, and the happiness of their posterity, 
have cause to stand on their watch guard : Not to be 
cruel to them, but to be secured from their cruelty. 
Let them have the rule, and then make the best you 
can of your arguments. If they can once get Protes- 
tant countries, into the case of Spain and Italy, their 
treachery shall not be cast in their teeth; for they will 
leave none alive and at liberty to do it. 

Therefore in the name of God be vigilant, and 
watch for the security of the chureh as those that must 
give account. Let all that love the Gospel, and the 
prosperity of the Christian world, and of their poster- 
ity, have their eyes in their heads, and take heed of 
that bloody hand, that hath already spilled so many 
streams of Christian blood. 

Some think that it is their safest way to please the 
pope and Jesuits, and so will be Papists on the same 
terms that some of the Indians worship the devil, be- 
cause he is so naught, that he may not hurt them. But 
those men were wiser, if they understood, that the ma- 
lice of infernal spirits is not to be avoided by pleasing 
them, but by resisting them. They are too bad to be 
ever pleased by any means, but what will be utter ruin. 
■They are not stronger than the devil himself, who will 
fly if we resist him. If the best were not the most 
powerful, what would become of the world ? If God 
be stronger than the devil, he should rather be pleased 
than the devil ; for he is'able to defend you from the 
devil's displeasure : and he is mqst .able', to hurt you 
if you be despisers of iiis pQw^r.vwH>a>;jueitice will 

' '• •>> ••'>•*. 46> 

312 JErfUIT 

effect more certainly on the bad, than satan's malice 
:an do upon the good. Men think themselves wise, 
that shift for their safety by carnal and unlawful means : 
but they shall all find at last, that honesty is the best 
policy, and the favor of God the best security, a life of 
faith the most prudent life ; and that shifting for your- 
selves in unbelieving ways is the greatest folly. It is 
the design of the Papists to terrify, that none may dare 
to resist them, but may see that they have no hold of 
their lives while they are under their displeasure. But 
such as have most displeased thern have escaped best. 
Henry IV. of France, being persuaded to stand out 
against the Jesuits, answered, " Give me then security 
for my life." The security he found in his unbelief 
■was assassination. 

The Papists are fixed in their errors, and there is a 
necessity lieth on them never to change. The pope 
and a general council have already decreed that the 
pope may depose Protestant princes, and absolve their 
subjects. To give up which abominable error is to 
cease to be Papists; so that all people must necessar- 
ily despair of their amendment. 



This book is due on the date indicated below, or at the 
expiration of a definite period after the date of borrowing, 
as provided by the rules of the Library or by special ar- 
rangement with the Librarian in charge. 





C2a<l I40)MI00